Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Species and Antibiotic Resistance—A Retrospective Analysis of Bacterial Cultures in a Pediatric Hospital
Previous Article in Journal
Carbapenem Use in the Last Days of Life: A Nationwide Korean Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Efflux Pumps by Using Staphylococcus aureus NorA Efflux Pump Inhibitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antimicrobial Resistance: Two-Component Regulatory Systems and Multidrug Efflux Pumps

by
Giuseppe Valerio De Gaetano
1,*,
Germana Lentini
1,
Agata Famà
1,
Francesco Coppolino
2 and
Concetta Beninati
1,3
1
Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical, Dental and Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
3
Scylla Biotech Srl, 98124 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(6), 965; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060965
Submission received: 5 May 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 26 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Efflux Pumps in Bacteria: What They Do and How We Can Stop Them)

Abstract

:
The number of multidrug-resistant bacteria is rapidly spreading worldwide. Among the various mechanisms determining resistance to antimicrobial agents, multidrug efflux pumps play a noteworthy role because they export extraneous and noxious substrates from the inside to the outside environment of the bacterial cell contributing to multidrug resistance (MDR) and, consequently, to the failure of anti-infective therapies. The expression of multidrug efflux pumps can be under the control of transcriptional regulators and two-component systems (TCS). TCS are a major mechanism by which microorganisms sense and reply to external and/or intramembrane stimuli by coordinating the expression of genes involved not only in pathogenic pathways but also in antibiotic resistance. In this review, we describe the influence of TCS on multidrug efflux pump expression and activity in some Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Taking into account the strict correlation between TCS and multidrug efflux pumps, the development of drugs targeting TCS, alone or together with already discovered efflux pump inhibitors, may represent a beneficial strategy to contribute to the fight against growing antibiotic resistance.

1. Introduction

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is increasingly becoming a serious problem due to the capacity of numerous bacteria to develop mechanisms of defense against antimicrobial chemotherapy [1,2,3]. From a biochemical point of view, resistance to antibiotics often consists of the inability of an antibiotic to reach the microbial targets at a satisfactory concentration to completely inhibit their biological functions. Bacteria showing resistance to single or multiple drugs are considered as “superbugs” [4,5]. Causes related to this growing phenomenon are usually associated with the ability of pathogenic bacteria to transfer genes conferring drug resistance among different bacterial species, but also with the inappropriate prescription of antimicrobial therapies in medical treatments, which provides resistant bacteria with a selective advantage [6,7]. Mechanisms of bacterial antibiotic resistance can involve (i) inactivation of the antibiotic by enzymatic modification, (ii) reduction in antibiotic affinity for its molecular bacterial targets, (iii) transfer of plasmids carrying MDR-related genes from one species to another; (iv) alterations in the permeability of the bacterial cell surface, (v) overexpression of active efflux pumps recognizing various antibiotics with different mechanisms of action, and (vi) the presence of polymorphisms or insertions in the bacterial genome at the level of DNA sequence encoding for transcriptional regulators (Figure 1) [8,9].
Efflux pumps are transporters playing important roles in bacterial pathogenesis, metabolism, and multidrug resistance by decreasing the concentrations of intracellular extraneous substances (i.e., antibiotics, disinfectants, detergents, etc.) and preventing them from reaching their biological targets [10,11,12,13]. For this reason, efflux transporters represent attractive targets for the development of new inhibitors that can help clinicians fight against MDR-linked infectious diseases. On the basis of their sequence similarity, substrate affinity, structure, and energy source, efflux transporters are mainly grouped into five superfamilies: the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) superfamily, small multidrug resistance (SMR) superfamily, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux (PACE) superfamily, major facilitator superfamily (MFS), and resistance nodulation and cell division (RND) superfamily [14,15]. While transporters of the MATE, MFS, RND, and SMR superfamilies take advantage of the motive force provided by H+ or Na+ ion gradients to obtain the energy to extrude various compounds [16,17,18,19,20], the ABC pumps function by the hydrolysis of ATP to transport their substrates across bacterial membranes [21,22]. In addition, the structural composition of efflux pumps is different among the superfamilies (Figure 2).

1.1. MATE Efflux Pumps

Members of the MATE family consist of twelve α-helical transmembrane helices (TMHs) exploiting electrochemical ion gradients to drive the efflux of cationic and polyaromatic drugs [23]. Structurally, MATE pumps have a V-shaped central cavity facing toward the extracellular space located halfway along the lipidic bilayer by maintaining an outward-open state [14]. The principal substrates recognized by MATE transporters are fluoroquinolones [19]. NorM is, for example, a MATE efflux pump that protects pathogens from the damage induced by reactive oxygen species and exports antimicrobial cationic compounds or antibiotics, as demonstrated in Neisseria gonorrhoeae [24,25,26]. NorM interaction with substrates depends on ionic and hydrogen bonds with the involvement of some conserved amino acid residues [25]. The drug-binding pocket is near the periplasmic side and does not function in an inward-open state, pointing out the importance of the conformational state of this pump [14]. Moreover, DinF (DNA damage-inducible protein F), another MATE member, confers pneumococci resistance to moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin [27].

1.2. SMR Efflux Pumps

The SMR family members are composed of four trans-membrane helices (TMHs) spanning the cytoplasmic membrane, and they function as homodimers or heterodimers [28]. While three TMHs form a substrate-binding chamber, the fourth one contributes to interactions involved in the dimerization process of the pump [28,29]. This transport system alternates between inward and outward states following conformational changes that happen in opposite orientations in the membrane [14]. The SMR pumps promote the solubilization of a broad range of drugs such as disinfecting agents, toxic lipophilic molecules, or toxic metabolites [28,29]. Genes encoding SMR proteins can be horizontally transferred through plasmids or mobile genetic elements by conferring multidrug resistance [29].

1.3. ABC Efflux Pumps

ABC transporters are composed of trans-membrane domains (TMDs) containing substrate-binding pockets and nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) that bind and hydrolyze ATP to promote substrate transport [30,31,32]. The translocation of substrates across the cell membrane is due to conformational changes happening by NBD dimerization and dissociation, a process mediated by ATP. In this way, an ABC transporter alternates an inward-open and outward-open conformation [33,34,35]. ABC transporters can be homodimeric and heterodimeric but, sometimes, they can associate with an outer membrane protein, increasing bacterial virulence and drug resistance. The tripartite complex MacAB-TolC efflux pump is, for example, a widely studied ABC-type transporter in Gram-negative bacteria [36]. This complex is composed of the inner membrane protein MacB, the periplasmic protein MacA, and the outer membrane protein TolC. While the protein MacB contains a C-terminal cytoplasmic tail and an N-terminal domain involved in the binding to ATP, the protein MacA binds to the lipopolysaccharide core and is activated by ATPase [37,38]. It has been shown that the absence of the MacAB efflux pump makes Serratia marcescens susceptible to aminoglycosides and polymyxins or that MacAB confers resistance to antibiotics in Agrobacterium tumefaciens [39,40]. Various examples of ABC transporters have been described in Gram-positive microorganisms such as LmrA in Lactococcus lactis, EfrAB in Enterococcus faecalis, or PatA/B in Streptococcus pneumoniae. LmrA recognizes and transports macrolides and lincosamides [41,42], EfrAB primarily extrudes gentamicin, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol [43], while PatA/B promotes defense against ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin [44].

1.4. PACE Efflux Pumps

PACE transporters are encoded by highly conserved genes among bacterial species and contribute to the extrusion of biocides, such as chlorhexidine [45]. The PACE family transporters share similar sizes and secondary structures with SMR transporters. The best-described PACE transporter is the Acinetobacter chrlorhexidine efflux protein I (or AceI) in Acinetobacter baumannii [46]. The structure of AceI depends on the pH and is the result of an equilibrium between a monomeric and dimeric form. Glutamic acid residue was revealed to be useful for its dimerization [47]. Moreover, AceI transcription has been shown to be augmented in the presence of increasing levels of chlorhexidine that binds to the transcriptional protein AceR, allowing bacteria to extrude chlorhexidine itself [47]. Recently, a new PACE transporter, named PA2889, has been characterized in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Similar to AceI, PA2880 transports chlorhexidine and forms dimers in a solution, regardless of pH [48].

1.5. MFS Efflux Pumps

Compared to the other transporters, those belonging to the MFS family are the most characterized and show 12–14 TMHs, organized as two main domains, each of them consisting of bundles of six helices [23]. In this family of transporters, it is possible to distinguish three subgroups: (i) uniporters that transport the substrate across the lipid bilayer without using ions; (ii) symporters that transfer the substrate and ions in the same direction; and (iii) antiporters that favor the translocation of the substrate and ions but in opposite directions [14]. Similar to ABC transporters, but under the control of the electrochemical proton gradients, the two domains of MFS pumps alternate between inward-open and outward-open conformational states during a transport cycle. MFS pumps that are associated with multidrug resistance can be further identified as Drug: H+ antiporters 1 (DHA1) and 2 (DHA2) based on the conformation of their crystal structure. Some DHA1 transporters have been, for example, characterized by their specific conformation (i.e., YajR, EmrD, and MdfA in Escherichia coli), revealing the main helices that are preferentially targeted by drugs [49,50,51]. Moreover, several studies focused on the differences, among MFS members, in terms of drug–proton exchanges [52,53,54]. While members of DHA1 (i.e., MdfA) exchange a single H+ ion with a single substrate by favoring the transport of neutral or monovalent cationic drugs, members of DHA2 transfer two H+ ions for each substrate, regardless of its charge [14]. The extrusion of hydrophilic fluoroquinolones is, for example, mediated by the pump Lde in Listeria monocytogenes and NorA in Staphylococcus aureus, while macrolides are eliminated by the pump Mef in S. pneumoniae [55,56,57]. Moreover, MFS transporters may play relevant roles in other biological processes, such as microbial pathogenesis. For example, A. baumannii uses the AbaQ MFS transporter for its motility, while S. aureus uses the Tet38 MFS efflux pump in the adherence, internalization, and trafficking processes both in epithelial cells and in phagolysosomes [58,59,60].

1.6. RND Efflux Pumps

The RND pumps are composed of an outer membrane protein (OMP), an inner membrane protein (IMP), and a periplasmic adapter protein (PAP) that mediates connections between the OMP and IMP [20]. The TMDs of the RND transporters contain an internal structural repeat that facilitates proton movement, whereas the folding of the periplasmic domain can differ among the RND homologs. The site where the drug enters is called the pore domain and consists of four subdomains (PN1, PN2, PC1, and PC2). Altogether, these subdomains form two cavities responsible for drug recognition: the proximal and distal pockets. Both pockets have specific amino acids that confer to each of them the ability to specifically bind to a particular substrate rather than another one [14,61,62,63,64]. Examples of RND efflux pumps are AcrAB-TolC in E. coli, AdeABC in A. baumannii, MexAB-OprM in P. aeruginosa, and SmeABC in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [65,66,67,68]. The RND efflux pumps are extensively involved in the elimination of huge categories of antibiotics and toxic compounds. RND transporters play, for example, an important role in mediating bacterial resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals. Furthermore, a mutation in specific amino acid residues in strategic domains of these efflux pumps may represent a mechanism to reduce or inhibit efflux pump affinity for their usual substrates, enhancing MDR [69].

2. Efflux Pump Genetic Regulation

Expression of the different efflux pumps is under the control of numerous regulatory pathways that seem to be triggered once the intracellular concentrations of toxic compounds reach high levels [70]. There are two main pathways described in terms of efflux pump genetic regulation: (i) the regulation mediated by transcriptional activators or repressors with DNA-binding motifs and (ii) the activation of two-component systems (TCS) that differently regulate gene expression. TetR is, for instance, a transcriptional regulator that controls the expression of the efflux-linked tet genes, which, in turn, confer resistance to tetracyclines, while the repressor FepR regulates the expression of the MATE efflux pump FepA, which makes L. monocytogenes resistant to fluoroquinolones [71,72]. TCS are, instead, composed of a sensor histidine protein kinase (HK) and a cognate response regulator (RR) [73,74]. The structure of an HK is composed of four domains: a sensor domain, an intracellular transduction domain, a cytoplasmic sensor domain, and a well-conserved intracellular kinase domain responsible for HK autophosphorylation and the subsequent transfer of a phosphoryl group to the RR. The sensor domains of HK can be intramembrane or placed on the cell surface and can have several structural foldings [75,76]. The structure of a RR is attributable to two main domains, indicated as the receiver domain and the effector domain. The receiver domain contains conserved aspartate residues that are commonly phosphorylated by the HK, whereas the effector domain has DNA-binding properties that are useful for its interaction with target sequences in the bacterial genome in order to regulate their expression [77,78,79]. TCS can be activated by different environmental signals, such as host receptors, antimicrobials, bivalent ions, organic solvents, pH, and oxidative stress. For several pathogens, a strict association between TCS and antibiotic resistance has been described [80,81]. In light of this, the main goal of this review is to sum up all information about the importance of TCS in regulating multidrug efflux pump expression, one of the better-identified mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. In Table 1, examples of TCS-mediated antibiotic resistance, including those mediated by mechanisms other than efflux pumps, are reported for the pathogens cited in this paper. The multifactorial roles played by TCS on MDR should be taken into consideration when developing targeted therapies against infectious diseases.

3. Gram-Negative Bacteria

3.1. Acinetobacter baumannii

Acinetobacter baumannii (phylum: Proteobacteria; class: Gammaproteobacteria; order: Pseudomonadales; family: Moraxeaceae) is a Gram-negative bacterium that is responsible for a variety of diseases such as bacteremia, meningitis, urinary tract infections, pneumonia, soft tissue, and skin infections [112]. Among the multidrug-resistant pathogens, A. baumannii behaves as an opportunistic microorganism by playing a significant role in hospital-acquired infections [113]. Epidemiological estimations revealed that carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains are isolated in a high percentage of intensive care unit patients and can cause serious infections [114,115]. Due to its ability to resist multiple antimicrobials, A. baumannii has been included among the most serious ESKAPE pathogens (E. faecium, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) [116,117,118]. As an MDR microorganism, A. baumannii has the capacity of using several mechanisms to escape antibiotic-mediated killing, including the production of modifying enzymes (e.g., β-lactamases), the alteration of membrane permeability, target modification, and the expression of multidrug efflux pumps [119,120,121].
To date, among the efflux transporter families, three RND efflux pumps have been fully described and associated with intrinsic antibiotic resistance in A. baumannii: AdeFGH, AdeIJK, and AdeABC [122,123,124,125,126]. Their expression is tightly regulated by transcriptional regulators. For example, the expression of the AdeFGH pump is controlled by the LysR-type regulator AdeL, while AdeIJK is by the TetR family transcriptional regulator AdeN [119,127]. The RND-type efflux pump AdeABC has been greatly studied in A. baumannii pathogenesis and is linked to multidrug resistance. The AdeB protein contains twelve transmembrane domains, whereas AdeC is similar to the outer membrane protein OmprM from P. aeruginosa. The AdeABC efflux pump confers resistance to various classes of antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, tigecycline, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones [128]. The genes encoding for the three elements of this efflux pump (namely adeA, adeB, and adeC) are contiguous, co-transcribed, and preceded by two genes, which encode the AdeR and AdeS (a response regulator and a histidine kinase, respectively) and are transcribed in the opposite direction [129]. The absence of AdeR and AdeS renders A. baumannii susceptible to aminoglycosides or phleomycin [129,130], while adeAB transcription is undetectable in susceptible strains. On the contrary, analyses of spontaneous gentamicin-resistant A. baumannii mutants revealed major expression of adeAB genes. Moreover, the presence of specific mutations in the sensor kinase domain and in the response regulator (Thr153→Met and Pro116→Leu, respectively) promotes constitutive resistance. These point mutations reside in important regions of the components of the AdeRS regulatory system. The Thr153→Met substitution is close to the putative amino acid residue of autophosphorylation and is seemingly involved in the inhibition of the phosphorylase activity of AdeS, whereas the Pro116→Met mutation involves the output domain of the response regulator and enhances AdeR affinity for its DNA sequence target [129]. Several observations have been performed in clinical isolates of A. baumannii, revealing how functional mutations were mainly present in the conserved domains of the AdeRS TCS and were associated with the overexpression of the AdeABC pump and the loss of antibiotic susceptibility [131,132,133,134]. Some insertional sequences in adeS have been further described in A. baumannii and associated with overexpression of the AdeABC efflux pump and decreased susceptibility to tigecycline due to constitutive activation of AdeR. By analyzing the adeR sequences of clinical tigecycline resistant A. baumannii isolates, some researchers noted the presence of point mutations in the DNA-binding domain of the response regulator of bacteria, showing a high minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tigecycline. This can be referred to as the AdeR reduced binding affinity to the intercistronic spacer, thus enabling a major expression of the efflux pump and the consequent raising of MIC values of tigecycline [135].
An RND efflux pump is typically formed by three proteins that together render the whole complex functional. Interestingly, the adeC gene is not always present in all the A. baumannii strains but, despite this, they continue to show antibiotic resistance, suggesting that the complex AdeAB can function alone. In the ATCC 17978 strain, naturally devoid of adeC, it has been shown that the deletion of adeRS determined susceptibility to a limited group of antimicrobial substances, such as chlorhexidine and pentamidine, and that resistance to these dicationic compounds was due to the AdeRS-dependent expression of adeAB in ATCC 17978 [136]. However, rather than resistance to antimicrobial substances, the overexpression of AdeABC is particularly linked to increased virulence in vivo justifying, in this way, the onset of so many single-point mutations in the AdeRS TCS. The AdeRS TCS is, indeed, involved in biofilm formation, epithelial cell killing, and the regulation of genes related to motility, DNA uptake channels, and virulence in a Galleria mellonella infection model [136,137].
In A. baumannii, the BaeSR TCS has also been found to be involved in antibiotic-resistant phenotypes and was proposed as a regulator of several efflux pumps: AdeABC, AdeIJK, and MacAB-TolC. Some authors showed that the BaeSR TCS responds to high osmotic stress and influences the susceptibility of A. baumannii to tigecycline by the regulation of adeA and adeB expression [138]. Furthermore, baeR deletion determines a reduction, in terms of expression, of AdeIJK and MacAB-TolC levels, whereas tannic acid, which shows potential properties as an antibiotic adjuvant, induces gene expression of the AdeABC, AdeIJK, and MacAB-TolC efflux pumps [139]. Despite these phenotypical characterizations, no protein DNA complexes have been observed between recombinant BaeR and adeA, adeI, and macA promoters.

3.2. Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli (phylum: Pseudomonadota; class: Gammaproteobacteria; order: Enterobacteriales; family: Enterobacteriaceae) is a significant component of the human microbiota, but it can cause intestinal or extra-intestinal infections and represents a great reservoir of resistance genes [140]. A large spectrum of virulence factors has been investigated and associated with specific E. coli phenotypes [141]. Several papers focused on the role played by TCS in multidrug efflux pump expression in E. coli. The EvgA/EvgS TCS of E. coli shows high structural similarity to the BvgA/BvgS TCS of Bordetella pertussis [142]. The N-terminal region of the sensor EvgS is localized in the periplasm, while the C-terminal one is cytoplasmic and contains the typical four domains of an HK. The EvgS protein responds to environmental stimuli through its periplasmic domain and transduces signals into the response regulator EvgA via a series of phosphorylation reactions. Mutations in the linker region of EvgS have been described and associated with constitutive activation of this TCS that induces emrKY expression, an MFS-type exporter, and confers resistance to sodium deoxycholate [143]. The linkage between emrKY and multidrug antibiotic resistance has been confirmed by using several drugs and toxic compounds, such as doxorubicin, novobiocin, crystal violet, rhodamine 6G, and others, showing that the EvgA regulator is mainly responsible for the MDR mediated by the whole TCS [144]. Afterward, the relevance of EvgA/EvgS TCS in E. coli antibiotic resistance has been confirmed and extended by revealing that the EvgA promotes the expression of another MDR RND-type efflux pump, called YhiUV, and confirming the requirement of a phosphorylated response regulator [144]. Furthermore, in the presence of a deletion in the yhiUV gene, evgA up-regulation does not determine resistance to oxacillin, cloxacillin, or nafcillin, confirming the strict correlation between drug resistance, YhiUV, and EvgA overexpression [145]. Additionally, several authors showed that the expression of different drug efflux genes is controlled by a multifaceted regulatory network that involves both phosphorylated EvgA as the leading regulator and the Mg2+-responsive PhoPQ TCS, which cooperates with the activated EvgS sensor to promote expression of the outer-membrane channel TolC [146].
In two papers, published at almost the same time, the expression of the efflux pump MdtABC has been attributed to the overexpression of the BaeR response regulator. The MdtABC is an RND-type drug efflux transporter composed of three subunits that reduce bacterial susceptibility to novobiocin and bile salt derivates. In addition, BaeR confers low-level resistance to carbenicillin, aztreonam, carumonam, cefamandole, ceftazidime, cefmetazole, cefuroxime, and cefotaxime [145]. In contrast to the organization of the genetic loci of the EvgAS TCS and emrKY, the baeSR genes are located downstream of the mdtABC genes and are not transcribed in the opposite direction [147,148].
E. coli K-12 has at least 20 MDR efflux pump genes that confer resistance, once overexpressed [149]. In this strain, several genes associated with metal-induced modifications of the membrane structure and functions have been described as regulated by the BasSR TCS. Moreover, basR mutation confers E. coli resistance to polymyxin B and sensitivity to deoxycholic acid. Deletion of basSR genes causes a loss of resistance to several antimicrobial agents (such as norfloxacin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and others) in E. coli and reduces the expression of the multidrug efflux pump emrD gene since BasR directly binds to its promoter [150].

3.3. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (phylum: Pseudomonadota; class: Gammaproteobacteria; order: Pseudomonadales; family: Pseudomonadaceae) is a Gram-negative bacillus representing one of the main causes of nosocomial infections, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and surgical, bloodstream and urinary tract infections (UTIs) [151]. It causes also high mortality in people affected by cystic fibrosis, severe burns, or cancer. P. aeruginosa has the ability to evade immune responses by producing numerous virulence factors, adhering to the host surfaces and assembling biofilms [151,152,153]. The ability to form biofilms, together with low membrane permeability and intrinsic mechanisms of resistance, makes P. aeruginosa less susceptible to antibiotics [151,154,155]. Particularly, the overexpression of multidrug efflux pumps in P. aeruginosa is associated with the ineffectiveness of anti-pseudomonal drugs. Examples of well-characterized efflux pumps in P. aeruginosa are the RND superfamily members MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN. MexAB-OprM expression is controlled by the repressor genes mexR, nalC, and nalD and is constitutively expressed in P. aeruginosa strains [156,157,158]. Mutations found in these genes are associated with MexAB-OprM overexpression and MDR in both lab and clinical isolates [159,160,161,162]. MexAB-OprM can pump several antibiotics, such as quinolones, macrolides, and chloramphenicol, and is highly expressed in carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa strains [163,164]. MexCD-OprJ is, instead, associated with resistance to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, novobiocin, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, and zwitterionic cephalosporins, and its expression is mainly regulated by the repressor nfxB [163,165,166,167,168,169,170]. MexEF-OprN expression is regulated by MexT, a LysR-like transcriptional regulator, and MexS [171,172]. Overexpression of this efflux pump arises principally following the onset of revertant mutations that activate MexT, since inactivating mexT mutations prevail in wild type P. aeruginosa strains [173]. The presence of mutations in mexS has been also observed in clinical isolates and linked to the overexpression of MexEF-OprN [174,175,176]. In the context of biofilm assembly, efflux pumps play a substantial role in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis for different reasons: (i) several molecules are transported to the extracellular environment in the course of biofilm formation; (2) specific substances are used in quorum sensing signaling pathways mediating intercellular communications; and (3) antibiotics are expelled by efflux pumps, contributing to the preservation of the microbial community [177,178,179]. The MexAB-OprM efflux pump, for example, delivers acyl-homoserine lactones (AHL) to the extracellular compartments, whereas the MexEF-OprN efflux pump promotes the outflow of 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline in P. aeruginosa quorum sensing [177,180].
The MexXY-OprM pump is known to confer resistance to the aminoglycosides, which are mainly chosen in the treatment of patients suffering from lung infections, such as cystic fibrosis [181,182]. The mexX and mexY genes are part of the same operon under the control of the repressor MexZ, while the OprM protein is encoded by another gene that belongs to mexAB-oprM, a multidrug efflux pump, as mentioned above [183,184,185]. Expression of the mexXY operon is induced by antimicrobials targeting the ribosomes or following alterations in the translational machinery [186,187,188]. The AmgRS TCS has been linked to the acquisition of aminoglycoside resistance in P. aeruginosa by mexXY overexpression as a result of gain-of-function mutations in the amgS sensor kinase gene and exposure to aminoglycosides themselves, resulting in protection from membrane damage [189]. Similar observations were made for mexAB-oprM overexpression, underlining the fact that membrane-perturbing agents, such as diamide, favor the AmgRS-dependent mexAB-oprM expression, even though this efflux pump does not seem to play a role in resistance to aminoglycosides and diamide. In light of this, the authors speculate on the possibility that aminoglycosides can induce the expression of OprM, an outer membrane protein that primarily cooperates with the MexXY pump, which, instead, contributes to aminoglycoside resistance since the oprM gene has its own promoter and can be transcribed independently from mexAB [190]. Furthermore, a comparative genomic analysis has highlighted the direct role played by the CpxRS TCS in mediating mexAB-oprM expression and the consequent multidrug resistance in the mexR-defective nalB-type P. aeruginosa strain with a phenotype detectable in clinical isolates during antibiotic therapy [191].
Strains isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis often exhibit mutations in the mexZ gene resulting in marked mexXY expression [184,192,193]. Moreover, clinical P. aeruginosa isolates overexpressing MexXY with an intact mexZ gene have sometimes been reported, suggesting additional regulatory pathways [181,193]. A genomic analysis of polymorphisms revealed the presence of a point mutation in the receiver domain of the response regulator ParR that is part of the ParRS TCS (standing for peptide-adaptive resistance regulator and sensor). The ParRS TCS has been described as a regulatory system responsible for the P. aeruginosa adaptive resistance to polycationic peptides, such as colistin, by the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) modification operon arnBCADTEF-ugd [194]. Inactivation of parS and paRS genes deletes multidrug resistance of the tested strains in the presence of colistin, and a single mutation in the first transmembrane domain of the sensor ParS confers an MDR phenotype due to an up-regulation of the mexY gene and down-regulation of the OprD porin. Even in the case of this TCS, several nucleotide substitutions in parS or in parR have been found in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates [195].
Few ABC transporters are known for P. aeruginosa. In a paper, several authors showed that the PA4456-4451 efflux pump increases bacterial resistance to tetracycline and that the PhoQP TCS negatively controls its expression in a wild type strain under low Mg2+ conditions, suggesting its role in P. aeruginosa intrinsic resistance [82].
Another efflux pump, called CzcCBA, has been associated with P. aeruginosa resistance to heavy metals such as zinc, cadmium, and cobalt [196,197]. A central role in czcCBA expression has been attributed to CzcRS (standing for cobalt/zinc/cadmum regulator and sensor) TCS, whose transcription is further enhanced upon exposure to heavy metals. The same resistance profile has been found for carbapenem-resistant strains that show a reduced quantity of the OprD protein. Interestingly, a single point mutation in the residue Val-194, in correspondence with the second transmembrane segment of the CzcS sensor, greatly contributes to a decrease in the levels of OprD expression, whereas it augments resistance to imipenem [197]. On the contrary, the overexpression of the CzcR response regulator does not determine a major resistance to heavy metals, rendering bacteria more susceptible to them because it does not up-regulate the oprD gene, suggesting that this type of regulation does not require the phosphorylation of CzcR compared to the role played by the phosphorylated CzcR in triggering the transcription of the CzcCBA [197]. In light of these evaluations, the authors remark on the possibility that both the overexpression of the CzcCBA efflux pump and the down-regulation of the OprD porin can represent defense mechanisms to avoid the increase in dangerous molecules inside the bacterial cell [197]. Furthermore, the Zinc Uptake Regulator (also known as Zur protein) has been shown to be involved in the control of intracellular zinc by the activation of CzcR. Indeed, in the presence of high quantities of Zn inside the bacterial cell, Zur dimerizes with zinc and enhances the expression of the regulator CzcR that, in turn, promotes the up-regulation of the zinc-extruding efflux pump CzcCBA [198]. CzcRS-dependent zinc induction plays a relevant role in P. aeruginosa since urine can release zinc upon contact with siliconized latex urinary catheters favoring carbepenem-resistance mediated by OprD expression [199,200]. These observations are in line with those performed with the TCS of uropathogens during the onset and progression of urinary tract infections [201].
Additionally, in P. fluorescens, the RND superfamily efflux pump EmhABS has been found to induce resistance to antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline [202,203]. Antibiotic resistance associated with the RstA/RstB TCS has been linked to increased expression of EmhABS and the MexCD-OprJ efflux pump, as demonstrated by the reduction in transcriptional levels of emhA and mexC after deletion of the rstA gene [204]. Similar to other studies performed on TCS regulation, even in this case, direct binding of the response regulator RstA to the emhA promoter was shown, underlying the role of the conserved aspartate residue 52 (D52) in the phosphorylation process since the substitution of this amino acid residue with a non-functional alanine residue increased bacterial susceptibility to numerous antibiotics such as chloramphenicol, gentamicin, kanamycin, and lomefloxacin [204]. Deletion of the sensor domain RstB did not have any effect in terms of antibiotic resistance. It seems that TCS RstA/RstB can function as a sensor for nitrosative stress, as suggested by the up-regulation of pyoverdine biosynthesis [204].

3.4. Salmonella enterica

Salmonella enterica (phylum: Pseudomonadota; class: Gammaproteobacteria; order: Enterobacteriales; family: Enterobacteriaceae) is a Gram-negative bacterium associated with foodborne disease and is the cause of Salmonellosis. It is the main cause of diarrhea, and more than 500 million humans are annually infected. After gaining access to the host, Salmonella overcomes the acid defenses of the stomach causing damage to the gastrointestinal tract [205]. For example, S. enterica behaves as an intracellular pathogen because of its capacity to enter the M cells, and it consequently crosses the epithelial barrier of the gut, causing a variety of diseases ranging from gastroenteritis to typhoid fever [206]. The host cells that are infected by Salmonella undergo cytoskeletal alterations that facilitate Salmonella internalization. This is made possible thanks to the expression of different Pathogenicity Islands (PIs) by several virulent Salmonella strains. PIs, for example, promote the production of a type of secretion system (T3SS) that mediates the injection of effector proteins inside the host cells with the effect of facilitating the invasion of epithelial cells and intracellular survival [207]. Moreover, Salmonella species invade the gallbladder, form biofilms in gallstones, and may cause irritable bowel syndrome and reinfection of the gastrointestinal tract [208,209].
Nowadays, multidrug resistance is increasingly becoming a relevant problem in the case of Salmonella species, and several clinical isolates were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones [210,211,212,213,214,215]. Ceftriaxone and azithromycin currently represent the secondary drugs of choice for treating patients suffering from typhus when fluoroquinolone-resistant strains are detected. Furthermore, although carbapenems and colistin are taken into consideration as antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates, cases of carbapenemase- and colistin-resistance phenotypes are beginning to prevail. Even for this pathogen, efflux pumps represent an important mechanism to subvert the anti-bacterial effects mediated by drugs [216]. The RND efflux pump AcrAB-TolC is, for instance, overexpressed during S. enterica exposure to antimicrobial agents through a series of transcriptional activators [217]. Moreover, in S. enterica serovar typhimurium, the MATE type efflux pump MdtK was found to be responsible for extruding drugs, such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, from the bacterial cell [218]. Among the MFS-type efflux transporters in S. enterica, the EmrAB is an important pump because it has been reported as a way to develop resistance to different antimicrobial drugs such as novobiocin, sodium deoxycholate, and nalidixic acid [219].
Several efflux pumps have been discovered in S. enterica serovar typhimurium, and each of them can confer specific antibiotic resistance. For example, the overexpression of the transporter MdsABC determines resistance to novobiocin, acriflavine, crystal violet, and other antimicrobial agents, while the up-regulation of the efflux pump emrAB genes does not render bacteria susceptible to novobiocin, nalidixic acid, or rhodamine 6G [220]. Remarkably, the overexpression of macAB drug exporter genes is induced by the PhoP-PhoQ TCS, which is known for preserving bacteria from bile salts [221]. Specifically, this TCS has been identified as a direct repressor of macAB genes since the latter are down-regulated in a phoP mutant compared to the wild type strain. Moreover, Mg2+ ions have been proposed as the main signal activating the PhoPQ TCS that, in turn, enhances the expression of macAB ABC-transporter genes [220]. Transposon mutagenesis experiments revealed the role played by the BaeRS TCS in the acquisition of S. enterica resistance to antibiotics, showing that the response regulator BaeR confers more resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins (i.e., ceftriaxone) than narrow-spectrum and expanded-spectrum drugs (i.e., cephalothim and cefamandole, respectively). Moreover, the expression of BaeR regulates the synthesis of two outer membrane proteins, named OmpW and STM3031 [222]. In another paper, it has been reported that the multidrug efflux pump mdtABC and acrD genes are positively regulated by the BaeSR TCS. The overexpression of baeR increases S. enterica serovar typhimurium resistance to several β-lactams, such as oxacillin, cloxacillin, and nafcillin, an effect that is also dependent on the expression of the TolC exporter, as demonstrated by using mutant strains for the TCS and/or the components of the efflux pumps [223]. In addition, copper and zinc have been indicated as signals capable of triggering the activation of the BaeSR TCS for the induction of mdtA and acrD gene expression, contributing to metal adaptation and resistance in S. enterica [223]. S. enterica resistance to aminoglycosides and β-lactams in both susceptible and clinical isolates has been studied in the context of CpxAR TCS activation. The absence of cpxR decreases the MICs of gentamicin, apramycin, neomycin, ceftriaxone, amikacin, ceftiofur, and cefquinome, compared to the wild type strains [224]. Moreover, complementation of a ΔcpxR S. enterica serovar typhimurium strain with a plasmid encoding for CpxR significantly reduces the expression of various porins (i.e OmpF, OmpC, OmpD, and OmpW) and up-regulates STM301 and STM1530 proteins in association with ceftriaxone [224]. A high incidence of antibiotic resistance has been further reported for S. enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates with the ACSSuT resistance profile (standing for resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline) [225,226]. The analysis of several TCS showed that the absence of PhoP and CpxR response regulators increases susceptibility to cephalosporins and quinolones by improving the expression of membrane porins (OmpC, OmpD, and OmpF) and by reducing efflux pump genes, such as acrA, macB, and mdtK [227].

3.5. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (phylum: Pseudomonadota; class: Gammaproteobacteria; order: Xanthomonadales; family: Xanthomonadaceae) is a Gram-negative opportunistic bacterium that shows high-level intrinsic resistance to several antimicrobial drugs [228]. Different RND-type efflux pumps have been identified in S. maltophilia: SmeABC, SmeDEF, SmeOP, SmeIJK, SmeVWX, and SmeYZ [229,230,231,232,233,234]. SmeDEF and SmeOP are under the control of the TetR-type transcriptional repressors, SmeT and smeRo, whereas the expression of the SmeVWX pump is regulated by a LysR-type transcription regulator [231,234,235]. Numerous antibiotics are extruded by these efflux pumps. While SmeDEF, for example, recognizes chloramphenicol, quinolone, tetracycline, and macrolides, SmeOP pumps out doxycycline, nalidixic acid, aminoglycosides and macrolides [229,234]. A sequence analysis of the genetic organization around the smeYZ genes revealed the presence of two genes encoding for an RR and HK that were named smeRy and smeSy, respectively. The deletion of the whole smeRySy TCS results in enhanced susceptibility to SmeYZ substrates and the reduction in smeYZ expression [236]. It is surprising that the inactivation of SmeRySy TCS increases the resistance to antimicrobial drugs that are not commonly recognized by the SmeYZ efflux pump but by the SmeDEF pump, whose operon is, instead, up-regulated in a strain deleted for this TCS [236]. In this case, S. maltophilia acquires resistance to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and macrolides. Furthermore, ΔsmeRy bacteria show an increased susceptibility against aminoglycosides, which are substrates of SmeYZ, but do not exhibit susceptibility against the substrates of the SmeDEF efflux pump. Altogether, these evaluations highlight that the inverse expression of both pumps may cooperate to sustain bacterial survival [236].
Cationic antimicrobial polypeptides (CAPs) are frequently used to treat MDR bacteria, and it has been shown that the PhoQP TCS plays a role played in resistance against them in S. maltophilia. Under low concentrations of Mg2+, the response regulator PhoP mediates the expression of the SmeZ efflux transporter, determining aminoglycoside resistance. Moreover, bacteria devoid of the phoP gene show a major permeability in the cell membrane compared to wild type bacteria [237]. The MacABCsm is an ABC-type efflux pump that is able to extrude macrolides, aminoglycosides, and polymyxins [238]. Upstream of the macABCsm cluster, two genes encoding for the components of the MacRS TCS are placed. In contrast to other TCS, this MacRS TCS is divergently transcribed from the macABCsm operon, suggesting its critical role in the expression of this efflux pump [238]. The MacABCsm pump is different from the MacAB homologs of other microorganisms because it has its own outer membrane channel, is intrinsically expressed, and is involved in several physiological functions, such as oxidative stress tolerance and biofilm assembly [238].

3.6. Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae (phylum: Proteobacteria; class: Gammaproteobacteria; order: Enterobacteriales; family: Enterobacteriaceae) is a Gram-negative facultative bacterium belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family. It causes severe diseases such as urinary tract infections, soft tissue infections, septicemia, and pneumonia [239]. The main reservoir for K. pneumoniae is the gastrointestinal tract, whose colonization depends on the capacity of this pathogen to interact with host surfaces, assemble biofilms, and survive against stressful responses [240,241,242]. K. pneumoniae is responsible for both nosocomial and community-acquired infections and is frequently isolated from liver abscesses [243,244,245,246]. For this microorganism, antimicrobial resistance was particularly linked to therapeutic failures of antibiotics such as quinolones, aminoglycosides, and β-lactams. Among TCS involved in sensing stressing responses, the CpxAR has been investigated in numerous bacteria, such as E. coli and S. enterica [247,248,249,250,251]. It has been demonstrated that the sensor kinase CpxA is induced by physical, chemical, and biological stresses, incorrectly folded proteins, detergents, etc. The hyper-virulent K. pneumoniae NTUH-K2044 strain has been used to investigate the role of the CpxAR in antimicrobial resistance [252]. The deletion of cpxAR in this strain resulted in sensitivity to cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and chloramphenicol and in the relative inability to express efflux pump-encoding genes, such as acrB, acrD, and eefB, highlighting the important contribution of CpxR to MDR [252]. Interestingly, the deletion of the whole TCS enhances the expression of three proteins in the outer membrane, suggesting that proteins resembling E. coli porins are involved. A DNA-protein binding assay showed that CpxR binds near the gene encoding for a homolog of E. coli OmpC, called OmpCKP (known also as kpnO) [252]. In another study, the role of the kpnO porin in MDR has been investigated in relation to its regulation by the PhoBR TCS. The deletion of phoB renders K. pneumoniae sensitive to antibiotics (i.e., ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftriazone, ertapenem, carbenicillin, and quinolones) by decreasing kpnO expression [253]. Tigecycline is currently one of the most frequently used drugs against carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Despite this, numerous carbapenem-resistant clinical strains are becoming more and more resistant to tigecycline [254,255,256]. For several microorganisms, resistance to this antimicrobial compound has been reported to be mediated by the overexpression and activity of RND transporters, such as the AcrAB-TolC efflux pumps [257]. Additionally, there are few papers focused on the correlation between antibiotic resistance and metal detoxification, suggesting that the presence of heavy metals can sometimes up-regulate resistance to antibiotics, such as β-lactams [258,259]. In K. pneumoniae, the CusSR TCS was responsive to copper and silver ions that induced the phosphorylation of the regulator CusR. This, in turn, promoted the positive regulation of CusCFBA efflux pumps, rendering bacteria resistant to the inducing ions. Based on these observations, the role of the CusSR TCS was further studied in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) strains by showing that this TCS also regulates tigecycline susceptibility [260].

4. Gram-Positive Bacteria

4.1. Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococci (phylum: Firmicutes; class: Bacilli; order: Bacillales; family: Staphylo-coccaceae) are Gram-positive bacteria and are considered commensals or opportunistic microorganisms [261]. Staphylococci are differentiated into two main groups: coagulase-negative (CoNS) and coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) on the basis of their capacity to use the coagulase enzyme to favor plasma coagulation. CoNS are considered less pathogenic than CoPS because they have fewer virulence factors, even though they have been also observed, for example, in pets, wild animals, and poultry meat, rather than humans [262,263,264,265,266]. Among CoNS, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus are mainly involved in human infections, particularly in people suffering from immune system deficiencies or with implantable medical devices, as well as in oncologic patients and newborns [267,268]. Several cases of antibiotic resistance have been reported for CoNS because they were found resistant to methicillin because of the expression of the mecC gene located on a mobile genetic element [269,270,271]. S. epidermidis is, indeed, considered an important reservoir of resistance genes and is responsible for their transfer to other staphylococci. Among CoPS, S. aureus is the main representative human pathogen responsible for a wide-ranging spectrum of frequent diseases such as superficial skin abscesses, endocarditis, toxic shock syndrome, pneumonia, meningitis, and septicemia [272,273,274]. Staphylococcal infections are becoming increasingly difficult to treat because of multidrug resistance against β-lactams, quinolones, and aminoglycosides. Furthermore, the diffusion of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains is stimulating researchers to find novel therapeutic targets and technologies [273,275]. Efflux pumps in S. aureus represent a noteworthy theme because hospital-acquired S. aureus often uses this mechanism to acquire antibiotic resistance [276,277,278]. Different from CoNS, in S. aureus, various MDR efflux pumps have been characterized and found to be chromosomal or plasmid encoded. For instance, NorA and QacA belong to the MFS multidrug efflux family. NorA, together with NorB and NorC, confers resistance to hydrophilic fluoroquinolones, biocides, dyes, and chloramphenicol, and is expressed in a wide number of MRSA strains [279,280,281,282]. A plasmid-encoded efflux pump, the QacA transporter, is able to extrude a large spectrum of cationic lipophilic antimicrobial agents, such as diamidines and biguanidines [283,284,285].
As for other pathogens, TCS play important roles in the regulation of S. aureus responses to environmental stimuli, such as antibiotics. There are several examples regarding TCS that do not necessarily affect efflux pumps or transport systems. The WalKR TCS is, for example, highly conserved in Gram-positive bacteria and is involved in cell wall synthesis by regulating the expression of several gene encodings for autolysins and peptidoglycan hydrolases. Activation of this system results in the shortening of cell wall sugar chains and a reduction in the dense network of peptidoglycan cross bonds [286,287]. By modulating these processes, bacteria can reduce or suppress the effect of antibiotics acting on cell wall synthesis, such as vancomycin, which has D-alanyl-D-alanine as the main target [288]. Vancomycin-intermediate resistance in S. aureus strains (indicated as VISA) is associated with a high frequency of walKR mutations [287]. The single point A96T mutation affects WalKR TCS function by inhibiting the phosphorylation cascade and impairing cell wall modifications. This results, in turn, in decreased bacterial sensitivity to antimicrobial drugs [289]. Moreover, the histidine kinase of the WalKR TCS is physiologically inhibited by the protein YyccHI. A higher frequency of mutations in the yyccHI gene has been found in VISA clinical strains compared to vancomycin-sensitive S. aureus [290]. A similar mechanism has been described for the AirSR TCS, whose mutations down-regulate the expression of proteins involved in cell wall synthesis, thereby increasing resistance against vancomycin [291]. In addition, the VraRS TCS positively regulates the synthesis of several proteins promoting resistance to vancomycin [292]. The LytRS TCS has, instead, a double role because on the one hand, it regulates the secretion of extracellular DNA during biofilm formation, and on the other hand, it protects S. aureus from the action of CAPs. As far as the second aspect is concerned, the LytRS TCS acts when CAPs try to destroy the integrity of the cell membrane, leading to the death of bacteria through a series of lithic events. When the bacteria cell surface is altered by CAPs, the authophoshorylation of the sensor LytS is followed by the activation of the regulator LytR that increases the expression of the irgAB gene, which inhibits, in turn, programmed cell death [293,294].
Numerous studies focused on the mechanisms used by VISA strains to augment vancomycin resistance. These include increased peptidoglycan synthesis, decreased cell wall turnover, reduced cross-linking, decreased muropetide amidation and/or penicillin-binding protein levels, and efflux pumps [295,296,297,298,299]. Bacteria protect themselves not only from synthetic antibiotics but also from bacteriocins, antimicrobial molecules that are secreted by other bacteria to predominate other species. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are usually involved in bacterial self-immunity against secreted bacteriocins, and many gene encodings for ABC transporters are close to TCS genes [300,301]. In light of this, the GraRS TCS up-regulates the expression of the VraFG ATP-transporter, improving S. aureus resistance against both vancomycin and polymyxin B. Furthermore, alterations of the GraRS TCS have been found in association with increased bacterial lysis and negative surface charge, suggesting that this TCS might be a relevant target in the therapy of clinically resistant staphylococcal infections [302]. The BraS/BraR TCS has been investigated for its role in S. aureus resistance to bacitracin and nisin. “Bra” stands for bacitracin resistance-associated, where bacitracin is an antibiotic that inhibits peptidoglycan synthesis after binding to undecaprenyl pyrophosphate (UPP), the lipid carrier responsible for the translocation of cell envelope precursors to the extracellular side of the cell membrane [303]. Despite this, Gram-positive bacteria have developed resistance to this drug [304,305,306]. In B. subtilis, a TCS similar to BraS/BraR has been found to control the expression of an ABC transporter that confers resistance to bacitracin [305,307]. Structurally, BraS belongs to the intramembrane-sensing kinase subfamily because of the presence of a short sensing domain composed of two TMHs separated by a small peptide loop. This conformation seems to be involved in the cell envelope stress that is usually generated by antibiotics. Hiron A. et al. showed that absence of the whole BraS/BraR TCS makes staphylococci highly sensitive to bacitracin, and this regulatory system controls the synthesis of the BraDE and VraDE ABC transporters, which play different roles in antibiotic resistance. Unusually, while the BraDE transporter is required for activating the phosphorylated conformational state of BraR and has no relevant role in the antibiotic resistance, VraDE is sufficient to render bacteria resistant to bacitracin and nisin [308].
Based on their amino acid composition, bacteriocins can be classified into Class I and II. Class I bacteriocins, also known as lantibiotics, are further distinguished into type A and type B subgroups [309]. Among type A lantibiotics, nisin A plays an important role. Nisin A binds to lipid II, inhibits cell wall synthesis, and produces bactericidal effects by causing pore-formation [310,311], while Nukacin ISK I acts as a bacteriostatic agent by inhibiting cell wall synthesis [312]. The role played by GraRS, BraRS, and VraSR TCS in S. aureus has been investigated by observing the effects of TCS deletions in bacterial co-culture experiments [313]. Genetic inactivation in any of the three TCS causes increased susceptibility to nisin A and/or nukacin ISK I. BraRS TCS activity is associated with resistance to nisin A and nukacin ISK-1, whereas GraRS is involved in the regulation of cell surface charge. Indeed, the inactivation of graRS genes caused an increase in the attraction of the cationic peptides nisin A and nukacin ISK-1 to the cell surface. Lastly, the inactivation of the VraSR TCS led to an increase in S. aureus susceptibility to nukacin ISK-1, rather than nisin A [313]. In addition, nukacin ISK-1 and nisin A function as activating stimuli of the BraRS TCS in terms of vraD and braA gene up-expression, whereas vraF expression, under the GraRS control, is not induced by the same antibacterial agents [313].
Fosfomycin is another bactericidal antibiotic that behaves as a phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) analog, which inhibits the protein MurA, altering the first steps in peptidoglycan biosynthesis [314,315]. Fosfomycin is useful for the treatment of numerous multidrug-resistant S. aureus-linked diseases, such as endocarditis [316]. An association between resistance to fosfomycin and the HptRS TCS has been found. This TCS is part of a novel hexose phosphate transport (HPT) system that includes the HptA protein (a putative phosphate sensor) and the UhpT protein (a hexose phosphate transporter). The authors suggest that HptA can sense extracellular phosphates and fosfomycin and activates HptRS that contribute to the expression of the UhpT protein that is not only the transporter for glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) but also fosfomycin, with the consequence that alterations involving HptA, HptRS, and/or UhpT can increase S. aureus resistance [317].

4.2. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus suis

Streptococcus pneumoniae (or pneumococcus) (phylum: Firmicutes; class: Bacilli; order: Lactobacillales; family: Staphylococcaceae) is a Gram-positive microorganism that colonizes the human nasopharynx [318]. However, it can become pathogenic and reach distant sites in the host, causing several types of infections such as otitis media, sinusitis, meningitis, community-acquired pneumonia, and septicemia [318]. The switch from a harmless commensal to a pathogen depends on pneumococcal dynamic interactions with the host, including the ability to evade immune responses [319,320,321,322,323,324]. All these pathogenic features are associated with the capacity of modulating the expression of virulence genes that are often under the control of numerous TCS [325]. The majority of TCS play important roles in pneumococcal virulence and a new one, the SirRH (standing for stress-induced response, also known as TCS01), has been recently characterized. In particular, the SirRH TCS has been shown to regulate the expression of bceAB genes that encode for an ABC transporter. Both the TCS and BceAB cooperate to provide resistance to a huge range of antimicrobial agents having, as molecular targets, the UPP or lipid II. Moreover, experimental data suggest that antimicrobial peptides can stimulate the ATPase activity of BceAB, inducing phosphorylation of the response regulator that, in turn, results in an up-regulation of bceAB genes [326]. Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus or GBS) is one of the main causes of neonatal death and clinical isolates are often associated with antibiotic resistance [327,328,329]. Numerous virulence factors facilitate host colonization, and the influx of neutrophils to GBS sites of infection, particularly, represents a fundamental step in the immune responses against this pathogen [330,331,332]. In GBS, a bceRS TCS operon has also been studied by demonstrating that antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), such as bacitracin, bind to the sensor BceS and enhance phosphorylation of the cognate regulator BceR, which results in an up-regulation of the transporter BceAB to pump out bacitracin and increase bacterial resistance, in association with an induced decrease in the negative charge of the bacterial cell membrane [73].
A comparative genomic analysis, performed in Streptococcus suis, has led several authors to find and characterize a novel bacitracin efflux pump that is under the control of the BceRS TCS [333]. Interestingly, the expression of the newly discovered SstFEG pump mediates tolerance to bacitracin independently of the BceAB transporter but is enhanced by the BceRS TCS. Furthermore, the deletion of bceAB determines the down-regulation of bceRS, which decreases SstFEG-mediated bacitracin resistance. Contrarily, the absence of sstFEG cannot regulate the BceAB and BceSR system in terms of bacitracin recognition [333]. This type of cross-activation between different TCS and efflux pumps has been also found in the genus Bacillus. In particular, it has been shown that high extracellular concentrations of bacitracin induce BceS to activate the non-cognate RR YvcP, which positively regulates the ABC transporter yvcRS operon involved in the subsequent detoxification of bacitracin [334]. Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are useful antibiotics for treating streptococcal infections and function by interacting with DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV to inhibit bacterial replication. The abuse of these antibiotics has caused increased bacterial resistance to them, mainly due to single substitutions in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRSR) of gyrase and topoisomerase IV [335,336,337]. Moreover, the overexpression of efflux pumps can also confer fluoroquinolone resistance [338,339]. In the S. suis strain BB1013, the efflux pump SatAB has been, for example, linked to fluoroquinolone resistance, and its expression is regulated by the CiaRH TCS that, once deleted, significantly reduces susceptibility to norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin by means of the overexpression of SatA and SatB [340].

4.3. Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes (phylum: Firmicutes; class: Bacilli; order: Bacillales; family: Listeriaceae) is a facultative intracellular Gram-positive pathogen that can cause infection in humans after the ingestion of contaminated foods, leading to listeriosis. L. monocytogenes can reach distal organs, such as the placenta or the brain, causing abortion or meningoencephalitis [341]. The virulence pathways of L. monocytogenes are characterized by the expression of numerous genes involved in motility, host cell invasion, and intracellular replication [342,343]. The transcriptional control of virulence in L. monocytogenes has been described for several regulators such as PrfA, σB, CodY, and VirR. While PrfA controls the expression of the pore-forming cytolysin listeriolysin (LLO) and the actin motility-inducing surface protein ActA, σB is interested in L. monocytogenes response to stress [344,345]. CodY is, instead, a transcriptional regulator the promotes the expression of PrfA and other genes when the quantity of branched-chain amino acids (BCACs) inside the host cells is low [346]. Interestingly, VirR is the response regulator of the VirRS TCS that has been studied in L. monocytogenes in terms of antibiotic resistance mediated by several systems of transport [347,348]. As described for the BceRS TCS in Bacillus subtilis, the sensor kinase VirS lacks an extracellular domain that can be able to recognize a particular ligand, but this property seems to be accomplished by an ABC transporter whose genes are usually placed close to the associated TCS genes. In this manner, the ABC transporter activates the sensor kinase, favoring the phosphorylation of the response regulator, thus forming a TCS/ABS transporter module [307,349,350]. Understanding this molecular crosstalk may be extremely useful in order to counteract antibiotic resistance even in the case of L. monocytogenes, which is becoming more nisin-resistant than other Gram-positive bacteria. It has been shown that VirR highly regulates the expression of the dltABCD operon that encodes the increase in the overall cell surface charge after incorporating D-alanine into lipoteichoic acid and controls the regulation of the protein MprF that protects L. monocytogenes from CAMP binding [351,352]. Moreover, the VirR regulates the production of an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, called AnrAB, whose role is involved in the detoxification of antimicrobial agents such as nisin, β-lactams, lantibiotics, and bacitracin [353]. A recently discovered ABC transporter, called VirAB, has been additionally associated with the VirR contribution to resistance against antimicrobial agents by showing that the deletion of virR and virAB significantly reduces the MIC of nisin, compared to the parental wild type L. monocytogenes strain. Furthermore, the VirR and AnrB proteins were found important for L. monocytogenes resistance to bacitracin, contrary to VirAB, suggesting that, under bacitracin stressing conditions, AnrAB may be involved in VirR signaling independently of the VirAB transporter. On the contrary, VirAB acts as the direct sensor of antimicrobial agents, such as nisin, potentially interacting with the VirS sensor kinase that, consequently, allows the expression of genes under the regulatory control of VirR [354]. The role played by the VirAB transporter has been further clarified in a recent paper by showing that in L. monocytogenes the VirSR TCS, in association to VirAB and AnrAB, creates a system that not only mediates nisin and bacitracin resistance, but also cephalosporins, ethidium bromide (EtBr), and benzalkonium chloride [355]. These conclusions were made after having seen that the deletion of virAB weakens the bacterial response to extracellular cefotaxim, suggesting that VirAB can modulate VirS HK activation. On the other hand, AnrAB is under the transcriptional control of VirAB and is involved in the detoxification process, even though the direction of drug transport is not completely clear. In addition, VirAB confers to L. monocytogenes kanamycin and tetracycline resistance, whereas the same feature is not detectable in VirSR and AnrAB main functions. In light of this, the VirAB-VirSR-AnrAB system mediates resistance to nisin, bacitracin, cephalosporins, EtBr, and BC by using VirAB for antimicrobial sensing and activation of VirSR and AnrAB for the transport of antimicrobials [355].

5. TCS Inhibitors: An Overview

In the last years, TCS are acquiring continuous attention because of their relevance in the various aspects of bacterial pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance [81]. The usefulness of predictive software is essential to identify, among the different species, common features, such as conserved domains of HKs and RRs, to develop new broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, given the numerous cases of TCS-induced resistance mechanisms across some Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [356,357]. The functional activities of TCS that might be targeted include (i) the inhibition of the binding properties of the sensor kinase or (ii) the response regulator, (iii) interruption of the triggering signal, and (iv) blockade of intracellular signaling or (v) HK dimerization (Figure 3) [358]. Furthermore, inhibition of the HK may be specifically enhanced based on the precise role played by TCS in physiological or pathogenic conditions since each TCS inhibitor can be used as a bacteriostatic, bactericidal, or anti-biofilm agent. An additional interesting feature is the absence of HK proteins in mammalian cells, which have other types of kinases, such as serine/threonine kinases [359]. Inhibition of the sensor kinase may be obtained, for example, by targeting the auto-phosphorylation site and/or the phosphorylation of the cognate regulator as in the case of the ATP-competitor Thienopyridine (TEP), used against some sensors in S. pneumoniae or other inhibitors used against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as S. aureus, E. faecalis, S. mutans, E. coli, and S. enterica [360,361,362,363,364]. Inhibitors of the phosphorylation state of a response regulator are, for example, Lactoferricin B, which has been tested against the BasR and CreB response regulators in E. coli [365], and an anthraquinone compound that targets the conserved phosphorylation site of the PhoP regulator [366].

6. Efflux Pumps Inhibitors: An Overview

Several efforts have been made and should be further improved to discover new molecules that can directly fight against antibiotic resistance-mediating efflux pumps (commonly known as efflux pump inhibitors, or EPIs). The possible inactivation of an efflux pump may be gained by (i) developing antibiotics that are not recognized as substrates, (ii) inhibiting the functional association of each component of the efflux pump, (iii) avoiding substrate binding to the active site of the pump, (iv) altering the source of energy responsible for pump activation and, lastly, (v) promoting the down-regulation of the efflux pump following the alteration of the genetic regulatory systems (Figure 4) [367]. Efflux pump inhibition should have the following features: (i) the inhibitor must not be an antibiotic, (ii) the inhibiting molecule should not target the efflux pump of the host, (iii) the inhibitor compound should comply with the safety indices of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) [368]. Among the inhibitors that promote the decoupling of energy and efflux processes, the synthetic inhibitor IITR08027, for example, was reported to deactivate the resistance of A. baumannii overexpressing the MATE efflux pump by making the proton gradient not functional [368]. The PAβN (Phenylala-nine-Arginine-β-Naphtylamide) is, instead, a synthetic inhibitor of the RND family pumps and has been shown to be useful in strengthening the effect of levofloxacin against P. aeruginosa overexpressing MexAB, MexCD, and MexEF pumps by reducing their capacity to directly bind to their substrates [369]. The small molecule Verapamil, instead, is effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis that up-regulates MATE pumps [370,371], while similar mechanisms of action have been seen with the molecule 1-(1-napthylmethyl)-piperazine (NMP) used together with levofloxacin against efflux pumps AcrAB and AcrEF overexpressing E. coli strains [372].
In in vitro studies performed with A. baumannii multiresistant strains showing efflux pump-mediated resistance, Riparin-B (Rip-B) was able to positively modulate norfloxacin’s effects [373]. Natural compounds have been also shown to be interesting inhibitors of the activity of efflux pumps with the aim of reducing the MIC of antimicrobial drugs [374,375]. Berberine (BBR), as a natural compound, has been, for example, proposed as an inhibitor of the MFS efflux pump MdfA in E. coli since it succeed in the significant increase in intracellular ciprofloxacin in resistant bacteria [376].

7. Conclusions and Outlook

Efflux pumps, overexpressed by resistant isolates, are continuously found and described as active ejectors of numerous antibiotics, commonly administrated in clinical practice. Efflux pump expression is under the fine genetic control of different regulatory systems; among them, TCS play a significant role. TCS are widely distributed in the microbial world and, in the future, their selective inhibition may be advantageous since they represent targets that are structurally different from those of the current antibiotics to which bacteria are not susceptible. The discovery of these new compounds and their screening have been mainly analyzed in vitro and/or in silico. For this reason, the relevance of the proposed TCS inhibitors and the new ones may be better investigated in vitro in order to carefully verify their behavior in terms of pharmacokinetic properties. Furthermore, it may be important, for example, to analyze, in antibiotic-resistant isolates with sequencing technologies, the gene encodings for HKs and RRs with the aim of creating a comprehensive antibiotic resistance database focused on TCS since the onset of point mutations in those genes may be involved in their abnormal activation associated with multidrug resistance.

Author Contributions

G.V.D.G. conceptualized and wrote the manuscript; G.L., A.F. and F.C. provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript; C.B. contributed to the final revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by the APC central fund of the University of Messina.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the APC central fund of the University of Messina.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Kristiansson, E.; Larsson, D.G.J. Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, fux053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Croft, A.C.; D’Antoni, A.V.; Terzulli, S.L. Update on the antibacterial resistance crisis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2007, 13, RA103–RA118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Baran, A.; Kwiatkowska, A.; Potocki, L. Antibiotics and Bacterial Resistance-A Short Story of an Endless Arms Race. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Morris, A.; Kellner, J.D.; Low, D.E. The superbugs: Evolution, dissemination and fitness. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998, 1, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Adegoke, A.A.; Faleye, A.C.; Singh, G.; Stenström, T.A. Antibiotic Resistant Superbugs: Assessment of the Interrelationship of Occurrence in Clinical Settings and Environmental Niches. Molecules 2016, 22, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olivares, J.; Bernardini, A.; Garcia-Leon, G.; Corona, F.; Sanchez, M.B.; Martinez, J.L. The intrinsic resistome of bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chancey, S.T.; Zähner, D.; Stephens, D.S. Acquired inducible antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive bacteria. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 959–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Munita, J.M.; Arias, C.A. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance. In Virulence Mechanisms of Bacterial Pathogens, 5th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kakoullis, L.; Papachristodoulou, E.; Chra, P.; Panos, G. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Important Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens and Novel Antibiotic Solutions. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piddock, L.J. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps—Not just for resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Masi, M.; Réfregiers, M.; Pos, K.M.; Pagès, J.M. Mechanisms of envelope permeability and antibiotic influx and efflux in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nikaido, H.; Pagès, J.M. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 340–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hernando-Amado, S.; Blanco, P.; Alcalde-Rico, M.; Corona, F.; Reales-Calderón, J.A.; Sánchez, M.B.; Martínez, J.L. Multidrug efflux pumps as main players in intrinsic and acquired resistance to antimicrobials. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 28, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Du, D.; Wang-Kan, X.; Neuberger, A.; van Veen, H.W.; Pos, K.M.; Piddock, L.J.V.; Luis, B.F. Multidrug efflux pumps: Structure, function and regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Blanco, P.; Hernando-Amado, S.; Reales-Calderon, J.A.; Corona, F.; Lira, F.; Alcalde-Rico, M.; Bernardini, A.; Sanchez, M.B.; Martinez, J.L. Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Much More Than Antibiotic Resistance Determinants. Microorganisms 2016, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, Y.C.; Hummer, G. Proton-pumping mechanism of cytochrome c oxidase: A kinetic master-equation approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1817, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tseng, T.T.; Gratwick, K.S.; Kollman, J.; Park, D.; Nies, D.H.; Goffeau, A.; Goffeau, A.; Saier, M.H., Jr. The RND permease superfamily: An ancient, ubiquitous and diverse family that includes human disease and development proteins. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 1, 107–125. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chung, Y.J.; Saier, M.H. SMR-type multidrug resistance pumps. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2001, 4, 237–245. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuroda, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Multidrug efflux transporters in the MATE family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1794, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nikaido, H. Structure and mechanism of RND-type multidrug efflux pumps. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lubelski, J.; Konings, W.N.; Driessen, A.J. Distribution and physiology of ABC-type transporters contributing to multidrug resistance in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Méndez, C.; Salas, J.A. The role of ABC transporters in antibiotic-producing organisms: Drug secretion and resistance mechanisms. Res. Microbiol. 2001, 152, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Du, D.; van Veen, H.W.; Murakami, S.; Pos, K.M.; Luisi, B.F. Structure, mechanism and cooperation of bacterial multidrug transporters. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 33, 76–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rouquette-Loughlin, C.; Dunham, S.A.; Kuhn, M.; Balthazar, J.T.; Shafer, W.M. The NorM efflux pump of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis recognizes antimicrobial cationic compounds. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 1101–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lu, M.; Symersky, J.; Radchenko, M.; Koide, A.; Guo, Y.; Nie, R.; Koide, S. Structures of a Na+-coupled, substrate-bound MATE multidrug transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 2099–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rouquette-Loughlin, C.E.; Dhulipala, V.; Reimche, J.L.; Raterman, E.; Begum, A.A.; Jerse, A.E.; Shafer, W.M. cis- and trans-Acting Factors Influence Expression of the norM-Encoded Efflux Pump of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Levels of Gonococcal Susceptibility to Substrate Antimicrobials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00821-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tocci, N.; Iannelli, F.; Bidossi, A.; Ciusa, M.L.; Decorosi, F.; Viti, C.; Pozzi, G.; Ricci, S.; Oggioni, M.R. Functional analysis of pneumococcal drug efflux pumps associates the MATE DinF transporter with quinolone susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bay, D.C.; Rommens, K.L.; Turner, R.J. Small multidrug resistance proteins: A multidrug transporter family that continues to grow. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1778, 1814–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bay, D.C.; Turner, R.J. Diversity and evolution of the small multidrug resistance protein family. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choudhury, H.G.; Tong, Z.; Mathavan, I.; Li, Y.; Iwata, S.; Zirah, S.; Rebuffat, S.; van Veen, H.W.; Beis, K. Structure of an antibacterial peptide ATP-binding cassette transporter in a novel outward occluded state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9145–9150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dawson, R.J.; Locher, K.P. Structure of a bacterial multidrug ABC transporter. Nature 2006, 443, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Verhalen, B.; Dastvan, R.; Thangapandian, S.; Peskova, Y.; Koteiche, H.A.; Nakamoto, R.K.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Mchaourab, H.S. Energy transduction and alternating access of the mammalian ABC transporter P-glycoprotein. Nature 2017, 543, 738–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Khare, D.; Oldham, M.L.; Orelle, C.; Davidson, A.L.; Chen, J. Alternating access in maltose transporter mediated by rigid-body rotations. Mol. Cell. 2009, 33, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Woo, J.S.; Zeltina, A.; Goetz, B.A.; Locher, K.P. X-ray structure of the Yersinia pestis heme transporter HmuUV. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 1310–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Korkhov, V.M.; Mireku, S.A.; Locher, K.P. Structure of AMP-PNP-bound vitamin B12 transporter BtuCD-F. Nature 2012, 490, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jo, I.; Hong, S.; Lee, M.; Song, S.; Kim, J.S.; Mitra, A.K.; Hyun, J.; Lee, K.; Ha, N.C. Stoichiometry and mechanistic implications of the MacAB-TolC tripartite efflux pump. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 494, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fitzpatrick, A.W.P.; Llabrés, S.; Neuberger, A.; Blaza, J.N.; Bai, X.C.; Okada, U.; Murakami, S.; van Veen, H.W.; Zachariae, U.; Scheres, S.H.W.; et al. Structure of the MacAB-TolC ABC-type tripartite multidrug efflux pump. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lu, S.; Zgurskaya, H.I. MacA, a periplasmic membrane fusion protein of the macrolide transporter MacAB-TolC, binds lipopolysaccharide core specifically and with high affinity. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 4865–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shirshikova, T.V.; Sierra-Bakhshi, C.G.; Kamaletdinova, L.K.; Matrosova, L.E.; Khabipova, N.N.; Evtugyn, V.G.; Khilyas, I.V.; Danilova, I.V.; Mardanova, A.M.; Sharipova, M.R.; et al. The ABC-Type Efflux Pump MacAB Is Involved in Protection of Serratia marcescens against Aminoglycoside Antibiotics, Polymyxins, and Oxidative Stress. mSphere 2021, 6, e00033-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, K.; Cao, M.; Li, C.; Huang, J.; Zheng, S.; Wang, G. Efflux proteins MacAB confer resistance to arsenite and penicillin/macrolide-type antibiotics in Agrobacterium tumefaciens 5A. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hellmich, U.A.; Mönkemeyer, L.; Velamakanni, S.; van Veen, H.W.; Glaubitz, C. Effects of nucleotide binding to LmrA: A combined MAS-NMR and solution NMR study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848, 3158–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hellmich, U.A.; Lyubenova, S.; Kaltenborn, E.; Doshi, R.; van Veen, H.W.; Prisner, T.F.; Glaubitz, C. Probing the ATP hydrolysis cycle of the ABC multidrug transporter LmrA by pulsed EPR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5857–5862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lavilla Lerma, L.; Benomar, N.; Valenzuela, A.S.; Casado Muñoz, M.e.C.; Gálvez, A.; Abriouel, H. Role of EfrAB efflux pump in biocide tolerance and antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from traditional fermented foods and the effect of EDTA as EfrAB inhibitor. Food Microbiol. 2014, 44, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Baylay, A.J.; Piddock, L.J. Clinically relevant fluoroquinolone resistance due to constitutive overexpression of the PatAB ABC transporter in Streptococcus pneumoniae is conferred by disruption of a transcriptional attenuator. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 670–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hassan, K.A.; Liu, Q.; Elbourne, L.D.H.; Ahmad, I.; Sharples, D.; Naidu, V.; Chan, C.L.; Li, L.; Harborne, S.P.D.; Pokhrel, A.; et al. Pacing across the membrane: The novel PACE family of efflux pumps is widespread in Gram-negative pathogens. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hassan, K.A.; Elbourne, L.D.; Li, L.; Gamage, H.K.; Liu, Q.; Jackson, S.M.; Sharples, D.; Kolstø, A.B.; Henderson, P.J.; Paulsen, I.T. An ace up their sleeve: A transcriptomic approach exposes the AceI efflux protein of Acinetobacter baumannii and reveals the drug efflux potential hidden in many microbial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bolla, J.R.; Howes, A.C.; Fiorentino, F.; Robinson, C.V. Assembly and regulation of the chlorhexidine-specific efflux pump AceI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 17011–17018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, J.; Hellwig, N.; Djahanschiri, B.; Khera, R.; Morgner, N.; Ebersberger, I.; Wang, J.; Michel, H. Assembly and Functional Role of PACE Transporter PA2880 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0145321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yin, Y.; He, X.; Szewczyk, P.; Nguyen, T.; Chang, G. Structure of the multidrug transporter EmrD from Escherichia coli. Science 2006, 312, 741–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Heng, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Fan, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.C. Substrate-bound structure of the E. coli multidrug resistance transporter MdfA. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 1060–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, X.; Fan, J.; Heng, J.; Liu, X.; Feng, W.; Kang, X.; Huang, B.; Liu, J.; et al. Structure of the YajR transporter suggests a transport mechanism based on the conserved motif A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14664–14669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Norimatsu, Y.; Hasegawa, K.; Shimizu, N.; Toyoshima, C. Protein-phospholipid interplay revealed with crystals of a calcium pump. Nature 2017, 545, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Martens, C.; Stein, R.A.; Masureel, M.; Roth, A.; Mishra, S.; Dawaliby, R.; Konijnenberg, A.; Sobott, F.; Govaerts, C.; Mchaourab, H.S. Lipids modulate the conformational dynamics of a secondary multidrug transporter. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schaedler, T.A.; van Veen, H.W. A flexible cation binding site in the multidrug major facilitator superfamily transporter LmrP is associated with variable proton coupling. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 3653–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jiang, X.; Zhou, L.; Gao, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, M.; Su, Y.; Li, L.; Yan, H.; et al. Expression of efflux pump gene lde in ciprofloxacin-resistant foodborne isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiol. Immunol. 2012, 56, 843–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Costa, S.S.; Viveiros, M.; Amaral, L.; Couto, I. Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Staphylococcus aureus: An Update. Open Microbiol. J. 2013, 7, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bley, C.; van der Linden, M.; Reinert, R.R. mef(A) is the predominant macrolide resistance determinant in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes in Germany. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 37, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pérez-Varela, M.; Corral, J.; Aranda, J.; Barbé, J. Roles of Efflux Pumps from Different Superfamilies in the Surface-Associated Motility and Virulence of Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02190-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Truong-Bolduc, Q.C.; Wang, Y.; Hooper, D.C. Staphylococcus aureus Tet38 Efflux Pump Structural Modeling and Roles of Essential Residues in Drug Efflux and Host Cell Internalization. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e00811-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pasqua, M.; di Patti, M.C.B.; Fanelli, G.; Utsumi, R.; Eguchi, Y.; Trirocco, R.; Prosseda, G.; Grossi, M.; Colonna, B. Host—Bacterial Pathogen Communication: The Wily Role of the Multidrug Efflux Pumps of the MFS Family. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 723274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Murakami, S.; Nakashima, R.; Yamashita, E.; Yamaguchi, A. Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature 2002, 419, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Murakami, S.; Nakashima, R.; Yamashita, E.; Matsumoto, T.; Yamaguchi, A. Crystal structures of a multidrug transporter reveal a functionally rotating mechanism. Nature 2006, 443, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Seeger, M.A.; von Ballmoos, C.; Verrey, F.; Pos, K.M. Crucial role of Asp408 in the proton translocation pathway of multidrug transporter AcrB: Evidence from site-directed mutagenesis and carbodiimide labeling. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 5801–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Eicher, T.; Seeger, M.A.; Anselmi, C.; Zhou, W.; Brandstätter, L.; Verrey, F.; Diederichs, K.; Faraldo-Gómez, J.D.; Pos, K.M. Coupling of remote alternating-access transport mechanisms for protons and substrates in the multidrug efflux pump AcrB. Elife 2014, 3, e03145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, M.; Shi, X.; Yu, Z.; Fan, G.; Serysheva, I.I.; Baker, M.L.; Luisi, B.F.; Ludtke, S.J.; Wang, Z. In situ structure of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump at subnanometer resolution. Structure 2022, 30, 107–113.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Leus, I.V.; Weeks, J.W.; Bonifay, V.; Smith, L.; Richardson, S.; Zgurskaya, H.I. Substrate Specificities and Efflux Efficiencies of RND Efflux Pumps of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200, e00049-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dreier, J.; Ruggerone, P. Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cho, H.H.; Sung, J.Y.; Kwon, K.C.; Koo, S.H. Expression of Sme efflux pumps and multilocus sequence typing in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Ann. Lab. Med. 2012, 32, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zwama, M.; Nishino, K. Ever-Adapting RND Efflux Pumps in Gram-Negative Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens: A Race against Time. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dumont, E.; Vergalli, J.; Conraux, L.; Taillier, C.; Vassort, A.; Pajovic, J.; Réfrégiers, M.; Mourez, M.; Pagès, J.M. Antibiotics and efflux: Combined spectrofluorimetry and mass spectrometry to evaluate the involvement of concentration and efflux activity in antibiotic intracellular accumulation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Deng, W.; Li, C.; Xie, J. The underling mechanism of bacterial TetR/AcrR family transcriptional repressors. Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 1608–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guérin, F.; Galimand, M.; Tuambilangana, F.; Courvalin, P.; Cattoir, V. Overexpression of the novel MATE fluoroquinolone efflux pump FepA in Listeria monocytogenes is driven by inactivation of its local repressor FepR. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yang, Y.; Luo, M.; Zhou, H.; Li, C.; Luk, A.; Zhao, G.; Fung, K.; Ip, M. Role of Two-Component System Response Regulator. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gao, R.; Stock, A.M. Biological insights from structures of two-component proteins. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stock, A.M.; Robinson, V.L.; Goudreau, P.N. Two-component signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 183–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Casino, P.; Rubio, V.; Marina, A. Structural insight into partner specificity and phosphoryl transfer in two-component signal transduction. Cell 2009, 139, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bachhawat, P.; Stock, A.M. Crystal structures of the receiver domain of the response regulator PhoP from Escherichia coli in the absence and presence of the phosphoryl analog beryllofluoride. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 5987–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Galperin, M.Y. Structural classification of bacterial response regulators: Diversity of output domains and domain combinations. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 4169–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Galperin, M.Y. Diversity of structure and function of response regulator output domains. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bhagirath, A.Y.; Li, Y.; Patidar, R.; Yerex, K.; Ma, X.; Kumar, A.; Duan, K. Two Component Regulatory Systems and Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tierney, A.R.; Rather, P.N. Roles of two-component regulatory systems in antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019, 14, 533–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, L.; Duan, K. A PhoPQ-Regulated ABC Transporter System Exports Tetracycline in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 3016–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wilton, M.; Charron-Mazenod, L.; Moore, R.; Lewenza, S. Extracellular DNA Acidifies Biofilms and Induces Aminoglycoside Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cheng, H.Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Peng, H.L. Molecular characterization of the PhoPQ-PmrD-PmrAB mediated pathway regulating polymyxin B resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43. J. Biomed. Sci. 2010, 17, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Guo, L.; Lim, K.B.; Gunn, J.S.; Bainbridge, B.; Darveau, R.P.; Hackett, M.; Miller, S.I. Regulation of lipid A modifications by Salmonella typhimurium virulence genes phoP-phoQ. Science 1997, 276, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rasamiravaka, T.; Labtani, Q.; Duez, P.; El Jaziri, M. The formation of biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A review of the natural and synthetic compounds interfering with control mechanisms. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 759348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. McPhee, J.B.; Bains, M.; Winsor, G.; Lewenza, S.; Kwasnicka, A.; Brazas, M.D.; Brinkman, F.S.; Hancock, R.E. Contribution of the PhoP-PhoQ and PmrA-PmrB two-component regulatory systems to Mg2+-induced gene regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3995–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Moskowitz, S.M.; Ernst, R.K.; Miller, S.I. PmrAB, a two-component regulatory system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that modulates resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides and addition of aminoarabinose to lipid A. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cannatelli, A.; Di Pilato, V.; Giani, T.; Arena, F.; Ambretti, S.; Gaibani, P.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Rossolini, G.M. In vivo evolution to colistin resistance by PmrB sensor kinase mutation in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae is associated with low-dosage colistin treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4399–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Beceiro, A.; Llobet, E.; Aranda, J.; Bengoechea, J.A.; Doumith, M.; Hornsey, M.; Dhanji, H.; Chart, H.; Bou, G.; Livermore, D.M.; et al. Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3370–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fernández, L.; Jenssen, H.; Bains, M.; Wiegand, I.; Gooderham, W.J.; Hancock, R.E. The two-component system CprRS senses cationic peptides and triggers adaptive resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa independently of ParRS. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 6212–6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, J.Y.; Chung, E.S.; Na, I.Y.; Kim, H.; Shin, D.; Ko, K.S. Development of colistin resistance in pmrA-, phoP-, parR- and cprR-inactivated mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 2966–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cheng, Y.H.; Lin, T.L.; Lin, Y.T.; Wang, J.T. Amino Acid Substitutions of CrrB Responsible for Resistance to Colistin through CrrC in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 3709–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gutu, A.D.; Sgambati, N.; Strasbourger, P.; Brannon, M.K.; Jacobs, M.A.; Haugen, E.; Kaul, R.K.; Johansen, H.K.; Høiby, N.; Moskowitz, S.M. Polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phoQ mutants is dependent on additional two-component regulatory systems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2204–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, Y.; Ha, U.; Zeng, L.; Jin, S. Regulation of membrane permeability by a two-component regulatory system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. de Bentzmann, S.; Giraud, C.; Bernard, C.S.; Calderon, V.; Ewald, F.; Plésiat, P.; Nguyen, C.; Grunwald, D.; Attree, I.; Jeannot, K.; et al. Unique biofilm signature, drug susceptibility and decreased virulence in Drosophila through the Pseudomonas aeruginosa two-component system PprAB. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1003052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yeung, A.T.; Bains, M.; Hancock, R.E. The sensor kinase CbrA is a global regulator that modulates metabolism, virulence, and antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Liou, M.L.; Soo, P.C.; Ling, S.R.; Kuo, H.Y.; Tang, C.Y.; Chang, K.C. The sensor kinase BfmS mediates virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2014, 47, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Russo, T.A.; Manohar, A.; Beanan, J.M.; Olson, R.; MacDonald, U.; Graham, J.; Umland, T.C. The Response Regulator BfmR Is a Potential Drug Target for Acinetobacter baumannii. mSphere 2016, 1, e00082-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zamorano, L.; Moyà, B.; Juan, C.; Mulet, X.; Blázquez, J.; Oliver, A. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa CreBC two-component system plays a major role in the response to β-lactams, fitness, biofilm growth, and global regulation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 5084–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Caille, O.; Rossier, C.; Perron, K. A copper-activated two-component system interacts with zinc and imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 4561–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Erickson, K.D.; Detweiler, C.S. The Rcs phosphorelay system is specific to enteric pathogens/commensals and activates ydeI, a gene important for persistent Salmonella infection of mice. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Farizano, J.V.; Torres, M.A.; Pescaretti, M.L.M.; Delgado, M.A. The RcsCDB regulatory system plays a crucial role in the protection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium against oxidative stress. Microbiology 2014, 160 Pt 10, 2190–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yang, S.J.; Bayer, A.S.; Mishra, N.N.; Meehl, M.; Ledala, N.; Yeaman, M.R.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Cheung, A.L. The Staphylococcus aureus two-component regulatory system, GraRS, senses and confers resistance to selected cationic antimicrobial peptides. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chen, H.; Xiong, Z.; Liu, K.; Li, S.; Wang, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. Transcriptional profiling of the two-component regulatory system VraSR in Staphylococcus aureus with low-level vancomycin resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 47, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Boyle-Vavra, S.; Yin, S.; Daum, R.S. The VraS/VraR two-component regulatory system required for oxacillin resistance in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 262, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gottschalk, S.; Bygebjerg-Hove, I.; Bonde, M.; Nielsen, P.K.; Nguyen, T.H.; Gravesen, A.; Kallipolitis, B.H. The two-component system CesRK controls the transcriptional induction of cell envelope-related genes in Listeria monocytogenes in response to cell wall-acting antibiotics. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 4772–4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kallipolitis, B.H.; Ingmer, H.; Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C.; Søgaard-Andersen, L. CesRK, a two-component signal transduction system in Listeria monocytogenes, responds to the presence of cell wall-acting antibiotics and affects beta-lactam resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 3421–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rome, K.; Borde, C.; Taher, R.; Cayron, J.; Lesterlin, C.; Gueguen, E.; De Rosny, E.; Rodrigue, A. The Two-Component System ZraPSR Is a Novel ESR that Contributes to Intrinsic Antibiotic Tolerance in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2018, 430, 4971–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Jin, J.; Liu, H.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, Y. BasS/BasR Two-Component System Affects the Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to Plantaricin BM-1 by Regulating the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle. Front Microbiol. 2022, 13, 874789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Masi, M.; Pinet, E.; Pagès, J.M. Complex Response of the CpxAR Two-Component System to β-Lactams on Antibiotic Resistance and Envelope Homeostasis in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00291-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Peleg, A.Y.; Seifert, H.; Paterson, D.L. Acinetobacter baumannii: Emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 21, 538–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lin, M.F.; Lan, C.Y. Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From bench to bedside. World J. Clin. Cases 2014, 2, 787–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Molter, G.; Seifert, H.; Mandraka, F.; Kasper, G.; Weidmann, B.; Hornei, B.; Öhler, M.; Schwimmbeck, P.; Kröschel, P.; Higgins, P.G.; et al. Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the intensive care unit: A multi-level strategic management approach. J. Hosp. Infect. 2016, 92, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Raro, O.H.F.; Gallo, S.W.; Ferreira, C.A.S.; Oliveira, S.D. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination in an intensive care unit. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2017, 50, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tommasi, R.; Brown, D.G.; Walkup, G.K.; Manchester, J.I.; Miller, A.A. ESKAPEing the labyrinth of antibacterial discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Santajit, S.; Indrawattana, N. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 2475067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. De Oliveira, D.M.P.; Forde, B.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Harris, P.N.A.; Schembri, M.A.; Beatson, S.A.; Walker, M.J. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00181-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gordon, N.C.; Wareham, D.W. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Mechanisms of virulence and resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2010, 35, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sharma, S.; Kaushik, V.; Kulshrestha, M.; Tiwari, V. Different Efflux Pump Systems in Acinetobacter baumannii and Their Role in Multidrug Resistance. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  121. Wu, H.J.; Xiao, Z.G.; Lv, X.J.; Huang, H.T.; Liao, C.; Hui, C.Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.F. Drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: From molecular mechanisms to potential therapeutics. Exp. Ther. Med. 2023, 25, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Coyne, S.; Rosenfeld, N.; Lambert, T.; Courvalin, P.; Périchon, B. Overexpression of resistance-nodulation-cell division pump AdeFGH confers multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4389–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Damier-Piolle, L.; Magnet, S.; Brémont, S.; Lambert, T.; Courvalin, P. AdeIJK, a resistance-nodulation-cell division pump effluxing multiple antibiotics in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Magnet, S.; Courvalin, P.; Lambert, T. Resistance-nodulation-cell division-type efflux pump involved in aminoglycoside resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii strain BM4454. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 3375–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Naidu, V.; Bartczak, A.; Brzoska, A.J.; Lewis, P.; Eijkelkamp, B.A.; Paulsen, I.T.; Elbourne, L.D.H.; Hassan, K.A. Evolution of RND efflux pumps in the development of a successful pathogen. Drug Resist. Updat. 2023, 66, 100911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Darby, E.M.; Bavro, V.N.; Dunn, S.; McNally, A.; Blair, J.M.A. RND pumps across the genus Acinetobacter: AdeIJK is the universal efflux pump. Microb. Genom. 2023, 9, 000964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Rosenfeld, N.; Bouchier, C.; Courvalin, P.; Périchon, B. Expression of the resistance-nodulation-cell division pump AdeIJK in Acinetobacter baumannii is regulated by AdeN, a TetR-type regulator. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2504–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wieczorek, P.; Sacha, P.; Hauschild, T.; Zórawski, M.; Krawczyk, M.; Tryniszewska, E. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii—The role of AdeABC (RND family) efflux pump in resistance to antibiotics. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2008, 46, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Marchand, I.; Damier-Piolle, L.; Courvalin, P.; Lambert, T. Expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC in Acinetobacter baumannii is regulated by the AdeRS two-component system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3298–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sun, J.R.; Chiang, Y.S.; Shang, H.S.; Perng, C.L.; Yang, Y.S.; Chiueh, T.S. Phenotype microarray analysis of the AdeRS two-component system in Acinetobacter baumannii. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 2343–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yoon, E.J.; Courvalin, P.; Grillot-Courvalin, C. RND-type efflux pumps in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii: Major role for AdeABC overexpression and AdeRS mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2989–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nowak, J.; Schneiders, T.; Seifert, H.; Higgins, P.G. The Asp20-to-Asn Substitution in the Response Regulator AdeR Leads to Enhanced Efflux Activity of AdeB in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 1085–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sun, J.R.; Jeng, W.Y.; Perng, C.L.; Yang, Y.S.; Soo, P.C.; Chiang, Y.S.; Chiueh, T.S. Single amino acid substitution Gly186Val in AdeS restores tigecycline susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1488–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Salehi, B.; Ghalavand, Z.; Yadegar, A.; Eslami, G. Characteristics and diversity of mutations in regulatory genes of resistance-nodulation-cell division efflux pumps in association with drug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2021, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Chang, T.Y.; Huang, B.J.; Sun, J.R.; Perng, C.L.; Chan, M.C.; Yu, C.P.; Chiueh, T.S. AdeR protein regulates adeABC expression by binding to a direct-repeat motif in the intercistronic spacer. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Adams, F.G.; Stroeher, U.H.; Hassan, K.A.; Marri, S.; Brown, M.H. Resistance to pentamidine is mediated by AdeAB, regulated by AdeRS, and influenced by growth conditions in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Richmond, G.E.; Evans, L.P.; Anderson, M.J.; Wand, M.E.; Bonney, L.C.; Ivens, A.; Chua, K.L.; Webber, M.A.; Sutton, J.M.; Peterson, M.L.; et al. The Acinetobacter baumannii Two-Component System AdeRS Regulates Genes Required for Multidrug Efflux, Biofilm Formation, and Virulence in a Strain-Specific Manner. mBio 2016, 7, e00430-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lin, M.F.; Lin, Y.Y.; Yeh, H.W.; Lan, C.Y. Role of the BaeSR two-component system in the regulation of Acinetobacter baumannii adeAB genes and its correlation with tigecycline susceptibility. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lin, M.F.; Lin, Y.Y.; Lan, C.Y. The Role of the Two-Component System BaeSR in Disposing Chemicals through Regulating Transporter Systems in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Rodrigues, I.A.; Ferrari, R.G.; Panzenhagen, P.; Pereira Dos Santos, A.M.; Rodrigues, G.L.; Junior, C.A.C.; Mano, S.B. The antibiotic resistome in Escherichia coli isolated from human, food, and animal sources. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxac059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Pakbin, B.; Brück, W.M.; Rossen, J.W.A. Virulence Factors of Enteric Pathogenic Escherichia coli: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Utsumi, R.; Katayama, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Horie, T.; Ikeda, M.; Igaki, S.; Utsumi, R.; Katayama, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Horie, T.; et al. Newly identified genes involved in the signal transduction of Escherichia coli K-12. Gene 1994, 140, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kato, A.; Ohnishi, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Furuta, E.; Tanabe, H.; Utsumi, R. Transcription of emrKY is regulated by the EvgA-EvgS two-component system in Escherichia coli K-12. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Nishino, K.; Yamaguchi, A. Overexpression of the response regulator evgA of the two-component signal transduction system modulates multidrug resistance conferred by multidrug resistance transporters. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 1455–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Hirakawa, H.; Nishino, K.; Yamada, J.; Hirata, T.; Yamaguchi, A. Beta-lactam resistance modulated by the overexpression of response regulators of two-component signal transduction systems in Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 52, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Eguchi, Y.; Oshima, T.; Mori, H.; Aono, R.; Yamamoto, K.; Ishihama, A.; Utsumi, R. Transcriptional regulation of drug efflux genes by EvgAS, a two-component system in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 2003, 149 Pt 10, 2819–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Nagakubo, S.; Nishino, K.; Hirata, T.; Yamaguchi, A. The putative response regulator BaeR stimulates multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli via a novel multidrug exporter system, MdtABC. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 4161–4167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Baranova, N.; Nikaido, H. The baeSR two-component regulatory system activates transcription of the yegMNOB (mdtABCD) transporter gene cluster in Escherichia coli and increases its resistance to novobiocin and deoxycholate. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 4168–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Kobayashi, A.; Hirakawa, H.; Hirata, T.; Nishino, K.; Yamaguchi, A. Growth phase-dependent expression of drug exporters in Escherichia coli and its contribution to drug tolerance. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5693–5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yu, L.; Li, W.; Xue, M.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Ni, J.; Shang, F.; Xue, T. Regulatory Role of the Two-Component System BasSR in the Expression of the EmrD Multidrug Efflux in Escherichia coli. Microb. Drug Resist. 2020, 26, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tuon, F.F.; Dantas, L.R.; Suss, P.H.; Tasca Ribeiro, V.S. Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm: A Review. Pathogens 2022, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lambert, M.L.; Suetens, C.; Savey, A.; Palomar, M.; Hiesmayr, M.; Morales, I.; Agodi, A.; Frank, U.; Mertens, K.; Schumacher, M.; et al. Clinical outcomes of health-care-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients admitted to European intensive-care units: A cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011, 11, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Reynolds, D.; Kollef, M. The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: An Update. Drugs 2021, 81, 2117–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Drenkard, E. Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microbes Infect. 2003, 5, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Akinduti, P.A.; George, O.W.; Ohore, H.U.; Ariyo, O.E.; Popoola, S.T.; Adeleye, A.I.; Akinwande, K.S.; Popoola, J.O.; Rotimi, S.O.; Olufemi, F.O.; et al. Evaluation of Efflux-Mediated Resistance and Biofilm formation in Virulent. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Poole, K.; Tetro, K.; Zhao, Q.; Neshat, S.; Heinrichs, D.E.; Bianco, N. Expression of the multidrug resistance operon mexA-mexB-oprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mexR encodes a regulator of operon expression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 2021–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Cao, L.; Srikumar, R.; Poole, K. MexAB-OprM hyperexpression in NalC-type multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Identification and characterization of the nalC gene encoding a repressor of PA3720-PA3719. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 1423–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Morita, Y.; Cao, L.; Gould, V.C.; Avison, M.B.; Poole, K. nalD encodes a second repressor of the mexAB-oprM multidrug efflux operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 8649–8654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Horna, G.; López, M.; Guerra, H.; Saénz, Y.; Ruiz, J. Interplay between MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Boutoille, D.; Corvec, S.; Caroff, N.; Giraudeau, C.; Espaze, E.; Caillon, J.; Plésiat, P.; Reynaud, A. Detection of an IS21 insertion sequence in the mexR gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa increasing beta-lactam resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 230, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ma, Z.; Xu, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Pan, X.; Liu, H.; Zhu, G.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, W.; et al. A MexR Mutation Which Confers Aztreonam Resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 659808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ahmadian, L.; Haghshenas, M.R.; Mirzaei, B.; Khalili, Y.; Goli, H.R. Role of MexAB-OprM efflux pump in the emergence of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Mazandaran province of Iran. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 2603–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Masuda, N.; Sakagawa, E.; Ohya, S.; Gotoh, N.; Tsujimoto, H.; Nishino, T. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3322–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Pan, Y.P.; Xu, Y.H.; Wang, Z.X.; Fang, Y.P.; Shen, J.L. Overexpression of MexAB-OprM efflux pump in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zahedi Bialvaei, A.; Rahbar, M.; Hamidi-Farahani, R.; Asgari, A.; Esmailkhani, A.; Mardani Dashti, Y.; Soleiman-Meigooni, S. Expression of RND efflux pumps mediated antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 153, 104789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Shigemura, K.; Osawa, K.; Kato, A.; Tokimatsu, I.; Arakawa, S.; Shirakawa, T.; Fujisawa, M. Association of overexpression of efflux pump genes with antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains clinically isolated from urinary tract infection patients. J. Antibiot. 2015, 68, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Srikumar, R.; Kon, T.; Gotoh, N.; Poole, K. Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug efflux pumps MexA-MexB-OprM and MexC-MexD-OprJ in a multidrug-sensitive Escherichia coli strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Poole, K.; Gotoh, N.; Tsujimoto, H.; Zhao, Q.; Wada, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Li, X.Z.; Nishino, T. Overexpression of the mexC-mexD-oprJ efflux operon in nfxB-type multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 1996, 21, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Gomis-Font, M.A.; Pitart, C.; Del Barrio-Tofiño, E.; Zboromyrska, Y.; Cortes-Lara, S.; Mulet, X.; Marco, F.; Vila, J.; López-Causapé, C.; Oliver, A. Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Modification of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexCD-OprJ Efflux Pump. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0008921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Jeannot, K.; Elsen, S.; Köhler, T.; Attree, I.; van Delden, C.; Plésiat, P. Resistance and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains overproducing the MexCD-OprJ efflux pump. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2455–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Köhler, T.; Epp, S.F.; Curty, L.K.; Pechère, J.C. Characterization of MexT, the regulator of the MexE-MexF-OprN multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 6300–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Sobel, M.L.; Neshat, S.; Poole, K. Mutations in PA2491 (mexS) promote MexT-dependent mexEF-oprN expression and multidrug resistance in a clinical strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 1246–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Maseda, H.; Saito, K.; Nakajima, A.; Nakae, T. Variation of the mexT gene, a regulator of the MexEF-oprN efflux pump expression in wild-type strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 192, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Fetar, H.; Gilmour, C.; Klinoski, R.; Daigle, D.M.; Dean, C.R.; Poole, K. mexEF-oprN multidrug efflux operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Regulation by the MexT activator in response to nitrosative stress and chloramphenicol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Morita, Y.; Tomida, J.; Kawamura, Y. Efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in the multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate PA7: Identification of a novel MexS variant involved in upregulation of the mexEF-oprN multidrug efflux operon. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Richardot, C.; Juarez, P.; Jeannot, K.; Patry, I.; Plésiat, P.; Llanes, C. Amino Acid Substitutions Account for Most MexS Alterations in Clinical nfxC Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 2302–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Alav, I.; Sutton, J.M.; Rahman, K.M. Role of bacterial efflux pumps in biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 2003–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Kvist, M.; Hancock, V.; Klemm, P. Inactivation of efflux pumps abolishes bacterial biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7376–7382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Dawan, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, F.; He, X.; Ahn, J. Role of Efflux Pump-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance in Quorum Sensing-Regulated Biofilm Formation by Salmonella Typhimurium. Pathogens 2022, 11, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lamarche, M.G.; Déziel, E. MexEF-OprN efflux pump exports the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS) precursor HHQ (4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline). PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sobel, M.L.; McKay, G.A.; Poole, K. Contribution of the MexXY multidrug transporter to aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 3202–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Poole, K. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Aires, J.R.; Köhler, T.; Nikaido, H.; Plésiat, P. Involvement of an active efflux system in the natural resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 2624–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Matsuo, Y.; Eda, S.; Gotoh, N.; Yoshihara, E.; Nakae, T. MexZ-mediated regulation of mexXY multidrug efflux pump expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by binding on the mexZ-mexX intergenic DNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 238, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  185. Mine, T.; Morita, Y.; Kataoka, A.; Mizushima, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Expression in Escherichia coli of a new multidrug efflux pump, MexXY, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Masuda, N.; Sakagawa, E.; Ohya, S.; Gotoh, N.; Tsujimoto, H.; Nishino, T. Contribution of the MexX-MexY-oprM efflux system to intrinsic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 2242–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Morita, Y.; Sobel, M.L.; Poole, K. Antibiotic inducibility of the MexXY multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Involvement of the antibiotic-inducible PA5471 gene product. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 1847–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Jeannot, K.; Sobel, M.L.; El Garch, F.; Poole, K.; Plésiat, P. Induction of the MexXY efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on drug-ribosome interaction. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 5341–5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Lau, C.H.; Fraud, S.; Jones, M.; Peterson, S.N.; Poole, K. Mutational activation of the AmgRS two-component system in aminoglycoside-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2243–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Fruci, M.; Poole, K. Aminoglycoside-inducible expression of the mexAB-oprM multidrug efflux operon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Involvement of the envelope stress-responsive AmgRS two-component system. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Tian, Z.X.; Yi, X.X.; Cho, A.; O’Gara, F.; Wang, Y.P. CpxR Activates MexAB-OprM Efflux Pump Expression and Enhances Antibiotic Resistance in Both Laboratory and Clinical nalB-Type Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Islam, S.; Jalal, S.; Wretlind, B. Expression of the MexXY efflux pump in amikacin-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004, 10, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Llanes, C.; Hocquet, D.; Vogne, C.; Benali-Baitich, D.; Neuwirth, C.; Plésiat, P. Clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overproducing MexAB-OprM and MexXY efflux pumps simultaneously. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1797–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Fernández, L.; Gooderham, W.J.; Bains, M.; McPhee, J.B.; Wiegand, I.; Hancock, R.E. Adaptive resistance to the "last hope" antibiotics polymyxin B and colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by the novel two-component regulatory system ParR-ParS. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3372–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Muller, C.; Plésiat, P.; Jeannot, K. A two-component regulatory system interconnects resistance to polymyxins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hassan, M.T.; van der Lelie, D.; Springael, D.; Römling, U.; Ahmed, N.; Mergeay, M. Identification of a gene cluster, czr, involved in cadmium and zinc resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 1999, 238, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Perron, K.; Caille, O.; Rossier, C.; Van Delden, C.; Dumas, J.L.; Köhler, T. CzcR-CzcS, a two-component system involved in heavy metal and carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8761–8768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Ducret, V.; Gonzalez, D.; Leoni, S.; Valentini, M.; Perron, K. A Zur-mediated transcriptional regulation of the zinc export system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. de Haan, K.E.; Woroniecka, U.D.; Boxma, H.; de Groot, C.J.; van den Hamer, C.J. Urinary zinc excretion in a patient with burns: A caveat when using bladder catheters in urine zinc studies. Burns 1990, 16, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Conejo, M.C.; García, I.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Picabea, L.; Pascual, A. Zinc eluted from siliconized latex urinary catheters decreases OprD expression, causing carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2313–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. De Gaetano, G.V.; Lentini, G.; Famà, A.; Coppolino, F.; Beninati, C. In Vivo Role of Two-Component Regulatory Systems in Models of Urinary Tract Infections. Pathogens 2023, 12, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Tian, T.; Wu, X.G.; Duan, H.M.; Zhang, L.Q. The resistance-nodulation-division efflux pump EmhABC influences the production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol in Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24. Microbiology 2010, 156 Pt 1, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Han, J.T.; Li, D.Y.; Zhang, M.Y.; Yu, X.Q.; Jia, X.X.; Xu, H.; Yan, X.; Jia, W.J.; Niu, S.; Kempher, M.L. EmhR is an indole-sensing transcriptional regulator responsible for the indole-induced antibiotic tolerance in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 2054–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Li, D.Y.; Han, J.T.; Zhang, M.Y.; Yan, X.; Zhang, N.; Ge, H.; Wang, Z.; He, Y.X. The Two-Component System RstA/RstB Regulates Expression of Multiple Efflux Pumps and Influences Anaerobic Nitrate Respiration in Pseudomonas fluorescens. mSystems 2021, 6, e0091121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Groisman, E.A.; Mouslim, C. Molecular mechanisms of Salmonella pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 13, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Jepson, M.A.; Clark, M.A. The role of M cells in Salmonella infection. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Srikanth, C.V.; Mercado-Lubo, R.; Hallstrom, K.; McCormick, B.A. Salmonella effector proteins and host-cell responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 3687–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Crawford, R.W.; Rosales-Reyes, R.; Ramírez-Aguilar, M.e.L.; Chapa-Azuela, O.; Alpuche-Aranda, C.; Gunn, J.S. Gallstones play a significant role in Salmonella spp. gallbladder colonization and carriage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4353–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Zha, L.; Garrett, S.; Sun, J. Infection in Chronic Inflammation and Gastrointestinal Cancer. Diseases 2019, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ouabdesselam, S.; Tankovic, J.; Soussy, C.J. Quinolone resistance mutations in the gyrA gene of clinical isolates of Salmonella. Microb. Drug Resist. 1996, 2, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Acheampong, G.; Owusu, M.; Owusu-Ofori, A.; Osei, I.; Sarpong, N.; Sylverken, A.; Kung, H.J.; Cho, S.T.; Kuo, C.H.; Park, S.E.; et al. Chromosomal and plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in human Salmonella enterica infection in Ghana. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Biswas, M.; Biswas, S.; Gupta, B.; Mascellino, M.T.; Rakshit, A.; Chakraborty, B. Changing Paradigms in Antibiotic Resistance in Kolkata, India. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wei, X.; Long, L.; You, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; Wang, J. Serotype distribution, trend of multidrug resistance and prevalence of β-lactamase resistance genes in human Salmonella isolates from clinical specimens in Guizhou, China. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0282254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Akshay, S.D.; Nayak, S.; Deekshit, V.K.; Rohit, A.; Maiti, B. Differential expression of outer membrane proteins and quinolone resistance determining region mutations can lead to ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella typhi. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Chiou, C.S.; Hong, Y.P.; Wang, Y.W.; Chen, B.H.; Teng, R.H.; Song, H.Y.; Liao, Y.S. Antimicrobial Resistance and Mechanisms of Azithromycin Resistance in Nontyphoidal Salmonella Isolates in Taiwan, 2017 to 2018. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0336422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Grimsey, E.M.; Weston, N.; Ricci, V.; Stone, J.W.; Piddock, L.J.V. Overexpression of RamA, Which Regulates Production of the Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pump AcrAB-TolC, Increases Mutation Rate and Influences Drug Resistance Phenotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e02460-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Nishino, K.; Nikaido, E.; Yamaguchi, A. Regulation and physiological function of multidrug efflux pumps in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1794, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Rensch, U.; Nishino, K.; Klein, G.; Kehrenberg, C. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium multidrug efflux pumps EmrAB and AcrEF support the major efflux system AcrAB in decreased susceptibility to triclosan. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 179–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Nishino, K.; Latifi, T.; Groisman, E.A. Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. van Velkinburgh, J.C.; Gunn, J.S. PhoP-PhoQ-regulated loci are required for enhanced bile resistance in Salmonella spp. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 1614–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Hu, W.S.; Li, P.C.; Cheng, C.Y. Correlation between ceftriaxone resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and expression of outer membrane proteins OmpW and Ail/OmpX-like protein, which are regulated by BaeR of a two-component system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3955–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Nishino, K.; Nikaido, E.; Yamaguchi, A. Regulation of multidrug efflux systems involved in multidrug and metal resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 9066–9075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Huang, H.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, L.; Pan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ma, C.; Hu, G. Regulation of the Two-Component Regulator CpxR on Aminoglycosides and β-lactams Resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Yu, C.Y.; Chou, S.J.; Yeh, C.M.; Chao, M.R.; Huang, K.C.; Chang, Y.F.; Chiou, C.S.; Weill, F.X.; Chiu, C.H.; Chu, C.H. Prevalence and characterization of multidrug-resistant (type ACSSuT) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains in isolates from four gosling farms and a hatchery farm. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. dos Reis, E.M.; Rodrigues, D.o.P.; de Freitas-Almeida, A.C.; Hofer, E. Prevalence of R-type ACSSuT in strains of Salmonella serovar Typhimurium DT193 isolated from human infections in Brazil. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2011, 29, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  227. Hu, M.; Huang, X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; He, S.; Zhu, J.; Liu, H.; Shi, X. Characterization of the Role of Two-Component Systems in Antibiotic Resistance Formation in Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. mSphere 2022, 7, e0038322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Brooke, J.S. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 2–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Alonso, A.; Martínez, J.L. Cloning and characterization of SmeDEF, a novel multidrug efflux pump from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3079–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Li, X.Z.; Zhang, L.; Poole, K. SmeC, an outer membrane multidrug efflux protein of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Chen, C.H.; Huang, C.C.; Chung, T.C.; Hu, R.M.; Huang, Y.W.; Yang, T.C. Contribution of resistance-nodulation-division efflux pump operon smeU1-V-W-U2-X to multidrug resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 5826–5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Gould, V.C.; Okazaki, A.; Avison, M.B. Coordinate hyperproduction of SmeZ and SmeJK efflux pumps extends drug resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 655–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Huang, Y.W.; Liou, R.S.; Lin, Y.T.; Huang, H.H.; Yang, T.C. A linkage between SmeIJK efflux pump, cell envelope integrity, and σE-mediated envelope stress response in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Lin, C.W.; Huang, Y.W.; Hu, R.M.; Yang, T.C. SmeOP-TolCSm efflux pump contributes to the multidrug resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 2405–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Sánchez, P.; Alonso, A.; Martinez, J.L. Cloning and characterization of SmeT, a repressor of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia multidrug efflux pump SmeDEF. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 3386–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Wu, C.J.; Huang, Y.W.; Lin, Y.T.; Ning, H.C.; Yang, T.C. Inactivation of SmeSyRy Two-Component Regulatory System Inversely Regulates the Expression of SmeYZ and SmeDEF Efflux Pumps in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Liu, M.C.; Tsai, Y.L.; Huang, Y.W.; Chen, H.Y.; Hsueh, P.R.; Lai, S.Y.; Chen, L.C.; Chou, Y.H.; Lin, W.Y.; Liaw, S.J. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia PhoP, a Two-Component Response Regulator, Involved in Antimicrobial Susceptibilities. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Lin, Y.T.; Huang, Y.W.; Liou, R.S.; Chang, Y.C.; Yang, T.C. MacABCsm, an ABC-type tripartite efflux pump of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia involved in drug resistance, oxidative and envelope stress tolerances and biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 3221–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Podschun, R.; Ullmann, U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 589–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Bengoechea, J.A.; Sa Pessoa, J. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection biology: Living to counteract host defences. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 43, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Joseph, L.; Merciecca, T.; Forestier, C.; Balestrino, D.; Miquel, S. From Klebsiella pneumoniae Colonization to Dissemination: An Overview of Studies Implementing Murine Models. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Guerra, M.E.S.; Destro, G.; Vieira, B.; Lima, A.S.; Ferraz, L.F.C.; Hakansson, A.P.; Darrieux, M.; Converso, T.R. Biofilms and Their Role in Disease Pathogenesis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 877995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Alcántar-Curiel, M.D.; Girón, J.A. Klebsiella pneumoniae and the pyogenic liver abscess: Implications and association of the presence of rpmA genes and expression of hypermucoviscosity. Virulence 2015, 6, 407–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Chuang, C.; Fan, W.C.; Lin, Y.T.; Wang, F.D. The emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess in non-diabetic patients and the distribution of capsular types. Gut Pathog. 2016, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Jun, J.B. Liver Abscess. Infect. Chemother. 2018, 50, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Wu, K.M.; Li, L.H.; Yan, J.J.; Tsao, N.; Liao, T.L.; Tsai, H.C.; Fung, C.P.; Chen, H.J.; Liu, Y.M.; Wang, J.T. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044, a strain causing liver abscess and meningitis. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 4492–4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Danese, P.N.; Snyder, W.B.; Cosma, C.L.; Davis, L.J.; Silhavy, T.J. The Cpx two-component signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli regulates transcription of the gene specifying the stress-inducible periplasmic protease, DegP. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Debnath, I.; Norton, J.P.; Barber, A.E.; Ott, E.M.; Dhakal, B.K.; Kulesus, R.R.; Mulvey, M.A. The Cpx stress response system potentiates the fitness and virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Humphreys, S.; Rowley, G.; Stevenson, A.; Anjum, M.F.; Woodward, M.J.; Gilbert, S.; Kormanec, J.; Roberts, M. Role of the two-component regulator CpxAR in the virulence of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 4654–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. la Cruz, M.A.D.; Pérez-Morales, D.; Palacios, I.J.; Fernández-Mora, M.; Calva, E.; Bustamante, V.H. The two-component system CpxR/A represses the expression of Salmonella virulence genes by affecting the stability of the transcriptional regulator HilD. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Li, L.; Ma, J.; Cheng, P.; Li, M.; Yu, Z.; Song, X.; Yu, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z. Roles of two-component regulatory systems in Klebsiella pneumoniae: Regulation of virulence, antibiotic resistance, and stress responses. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 272, 127374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Srinivasan, V.B.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Mondal, A.; Rajamohan, G. Role of the two component signal transduction system CpxAR in conferring cefepime and chloramphenicol resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Srinivasan, V.B.; Venkataramaiah, M.; Mondal, A.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Govil, T.; Rajamohan, G. Functional characterization of a novel outer membrane porin KpnO, regulated by PhoBR two-component system in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Pournaras, S.; Koumaki, V.; Spanakis, N.; Gennimata, V.; Tsakris, A. Current perspectives on tigecycline resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Susceptibility testing issues and mechanisms of resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 48, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Chiu, S.K.; Huang, L.Y.; Chen, H.; Tsai, Y.K.; Liou, C.H.; Lin, J.C.; Siu, L.K.; Chang, F.Y.; Yeh, K.M. Roles of ramR and tet(A) Mutations in Conferring Tigecycline Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00391-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Ye, M.; Ding, B.; Qian, H.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, J.; Huang, J.; Ou, H.; Hu, F.; Wang, M. In vivo development of tigecycline resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae owing to deletion of the ramR ribosomal binding site. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 50, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Zhang, Z.; Morgan, C.E.; Bonomo, R.A.; Yu, E.W. Cryo-EM Structures of the Klebsiella pneumoniae AcrB Multidrug Efflux Pump. mBio 2023, e0065923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Hölzel, C.S.; Müller, C.; Harms, K.S.; Mikolajewski, S.; Schäfer, S.; Schwaiger, K.; Bauer, J. Heavy metals in liquid pig manure in light of bacterial antimicrobial resistance. Environ. Res. 2012, 113, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Pal, C.; Asiani, K.; Arya, S.; Rensing, C.; Stekel, D.J.; Larsson, D.G.J.; Hobman, J.L. Metal Resistance and Its Association with Antibiotic Resistance. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2017, 70, 261–313. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  260. Chen, D.; Zhao, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Xiao, L.; He, H.; Zheng, D.; Li, X.; Yu, X.; Xu, N.; Hu, X. CusS-CusR Two-Component System Mediates Tigecycline Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Parlet, C.P.; Brown, M.M.; Horswill, A.R. Commensal Staphylococci Influence Staphylococcus aureus Skin Colonization and Disease. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Heilmann, C.; Ziebuhr, W.; Becker, K. Are coagulase-negative staphylococci virulent? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Silva, V.; Pereira, J.E.; Maltez, L.; Ferreira, E.; Manageiro, V.; Caniça, M.; Capelo, J.L.; Igrejas, G.; Poeta, P. Diversity of methicillin-resistant staphylococci among wild Lepus granatensis: First detection of mecA-MRSA in hares. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiz204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Roberts, M.C.; Garland-Lewis, G.; Trufan, S.; Meschke, S.J.; Fowler, H.; Shean, R.C.; Greninger, A.L.; Rabinowitz, P.M. Distribution of Staphylococcus species in dairy cows, workers and shared farm environments. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fny146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Lee, S.I.; Kim, S.D.; Park, J.H.; Yang, S.J. Species Distribution, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Enterotoxigenicity of Non-aureus Staphylococci in Retail Chicken Meat. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Bhargava, K.; Zhang, Y. Characterization of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) in retail meat. Food Microbiol. 2014, 42, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Michalik, M.; Samet, A.; Podbielska-Kubera, A.; Savini, V.; Międzobrodzki, J.; Kosecka-Strojek, M. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) as a significant etiological factor of laryngological infections: A review. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2020, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Noshak, M.A.; Rezaee, M.A.; Hasani, A.; Mirzaii, M. The Role of the Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) in Infective Endocarditis; A Narrative Review from 2000 to 2020. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 1140–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. MacFadyen, A.C.; Harrison, E.M.; Drigo, I.; Parkhill, J.; Holmes, M.A.; Paterson, G.K. A mecC allotype, mecC3, in the CoNS Staphylococcus caeli, encoded within a variant SCCmecC. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Loncaric, I.; Kübber-Heiss, A.; Posautz, A.; Ruppitsch, W.; Lepuschitz, S.; Schauer, B.; Feßler, A.T.; Krametter-Frötscher, R.; Harrison, E.M.; Holmes, M.A.; et al. Characterization of mecC gene-carrying coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. isolated from various animals. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 230, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Zong, Z.; Peng, C.; Lü, X. Diversity of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci clinical isolates. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Tong, S.Y.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 603–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Vestergaard, M.; Frees, D.; Ingmer, H. Antibiotic Resistance and the MRSA Problem. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Lentini, G.; Famà, A.; De Gaetano, G.V.; Galbo, R.; Coppolino, F.; Venza, M.; Teti, G.; Beninati, C. Role of Endosomal TLRs in Staphylococcus aureus Infection. J. Immunol. 2021, 207, 1448–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Ono, D.; Yamaguchi, T.; Hamada, M.; Sonoda, S.; Sato, A.; Aoki, K.; Kajiwara, C.; Kimura, S.; Fujisaki, M.; Tojo, H. Analysis of synergy between beta-lactams and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents from the standpoint of strain characteristics and binding action. J. Infect. Chemother. 2019, 25, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Costa, S.S.; Falcão, C.; Viveiros, M.; Machado, D.; Martins, M.; Melo-Cristino, J.; Amaral, L.; Couto, I. Exploring the contribution of efflux on the resistance to fluoroquinolones in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Baiomy, A.A.; Shaker, G.H.; Abbas, H.A. Sensitizing multi drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from surgical site infections to antimicrobials by efflux pump inhibitors. Afr. Health Sci. 2020, 20, 1632–1645. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  278. Chew, C.H.; Yeo, C.C.; Che Hamzah, A.M.; Al-Trad, E.I.; Jones, S.U.; Chua, K.H.; Puah, S.M. Multidrug-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Associated with Hospitalized Newborn Infants. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Neyfakh, A.A.; Borsch, C.M.; Kaatz, G.W. Fluoroquinolone resistance protein NorA of Staphylococcus aureus is a multidrug efflux transporter. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37, 128–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Handzlik, J.; Matys, A.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K. Recent Advances in Multi-Drug Resistance (MDR) Efflux Pump Inhibitors of Gram-Positive Bacteria S. aureus. Antibiotics 2013, 2, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Buonerba, F.; Lepri, S.; Goracci, L.; Schindler, B.D.; Seo, S.M.; Kaatz, G.W.; Cruciani, G. Improved Potency of Indole-Based NorA Efflux Pump Inhibitors: From Serendipity toward Rational Design and Development. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Stephen, J.; Salam, F.; Lekshmi, M.; Kumar, S.H.; Varela, M.F. The Major Facilitator Superfamily and Antimicrobial Resistance Efflux Pumps of the ESKAPEE Pathogen. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Rouch, D.A.; Cram, D.S.; DiBerardino, D.; Littlejohn, T.G.; Skurray, R.A. Efflux-mediated antiseptic resistance gene qacA from Staphylococcus aureus: Common ancestry with tetracycline- and sugar-transport proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 1990, 4, 2051–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Paulsen, I.T.; Brown, M.H.; Skurray, R.A. Characterization of the earliest known Staphylococcus aureus plasmid encoding a multidrug efflux system. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 3477–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Brown, M.H.; Skurray, R.A. Staphylococcal multidrug efflux protein QacA. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 3, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  286. Ji, Q.; Chen, P.J.; Qin, G.; Deng, X.; Hao, Z.; Wawrzak, Z.; Yeo, W.S.; Quang, J.W.; Cho, H.; Luo, G.Z. Structure and mechanism of the essential two-component signal-transduction system WalKR in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Howden, B.P.; McEvoy, C.R.; Allen, D.L.; Chua, K.; Gao, W.; Harrison, P.F.; Bell, J.; Coombs, G.; Bennett-Wood, V.; Porter, J.L.; et al. Evolution of multidrug resistance during Staphylococcus aureus infection involves mutation of the essential two component regulator WalKR. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Reynolds, P.E. Structure, biochemistry and mechanism of action of glycopeptide antibiotics. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1989, 8, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Bourret, R.B. Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Cameron, D.R.; Jiang, J.H.; Kostoulias, X.; Foxwell, D.J.; Peleg, A.Y. Vancomycin susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is mediated by YycHI activation of the WalRK essential two-component regulatory system. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Wu, S.; Lin, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lei, L. Two-component signaling pathways modulate drug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Biomed. Rep. 2020, 13, 5. [Google Scholar]
  292. Tajbakhsh, G.; Golemi-Kotra, D. The dimerization interface in VraR is essential for induction of the cell wall stress response in Staphylococcus aureus: A potential druggable target. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Patel, K.; Golemi-Kotra, D. Signaling mechanism by the Staphylococcus aureus two-component system LytSR: Role of acetyl phosphate in bypassing the cell membrane electrical potential sensor LytS. F1000Research 2015, 4, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Omardien, S.; Brul, S.; Zaat, S.A. Antimicrobial Activity of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides against Gram-Positives: Current Progress Made in Understanding the Mode of Action and the Response of Bacteria. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Hanaki, H.; Kuwahara-Arai, K.; Boyle-Vavra, S.; Daum, R.S.; Labischinski, H.; Hiramatsu, K. Activated cell-wall synthesis is associated with vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains Mu3 and Mu50. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1998, 42, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Sieradzki, K.; Tomasz, A. Gradual alterations in cell wall structure and metabolism in vancomycin-resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 7566–7570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Finan, J.E.; Archer, G.L.; Pucci, M.J.; Climo, M.W. Role of penicillin-binding protein 4 in expression of vancomycin resistance among clinical isolates of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 3070–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Cui, L.; Ma, X.; Sato, K.; Okuma, K.; Tenover, F.C.; Mamizuka, E.M.; Gemmell, C.G.; Kim, M.N.; Ploy, M.C.; El-Solh, N.; et al. Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Cui, L.; Lian, J.Q.; Neoh, H.M.; Reyes, E.; Hiramatsu, K. DNA microarray-based identification of genes associated with glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3404–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Smits, S.H.J.; Schmitt, L.; Beis, K. Self-immunity to antibacterial peptides by ABC transporters. FEBS Lett. 2020, 594, 3920–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Joseph, P.; Fichant, G.; Quentin, Y.; Denizot, F. Regulatory relationship of two-component and ABC transport systems and clustering of their genes in the Bacillus/Clostridium group, suggest a functional link between them. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 4, 503–513. [Google Scholar]
  302. Meehl, M.; Herbert, S.; Götz, F.; Cheung, A. Interaction of the GraRS two-component system with the VraFG ABC transporter to support vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 2679–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Stone, K.J.; Strominger, J.L. Mechanism of action of bacitracin: Complexation with metal ion and C 55-isoprenyl pyrophosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1971, 68, 3223–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Chalker, A.F.; Ingraham, K.A.; Lunsford, R.D.; Bryant, A.P.; Bryant, J.; Wallis, N.G.; Broskey, J.P.; Pearson, S.C.; Holmes, D.J. The bacA gene, which determines bacitracin susceptibility in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, is also required for virulence. Microbiology 2000, 146 Pt 7, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Bernard, R.; El Ghachi, M.; Mengin-Lecreulx, D.; Chippaux, M.; Denizot, F. BcrC from Bacillus subtilis acts as an undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase in bacitracin resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 28852–28857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Assoni, L.; Milani, B.; Carvalho, M.R.; Nepomuceno, L.N.; Waz, N.T.; Guerra, M.E.S.; Converso, T.R.; Darrieux, M. Resistance Mechanisms to Antimicrobial Peptides in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 593215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Ohki, R.; Giyanto Tateno, K.; Masuyama, W.; Moriya, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Ogasawara, N. The BceRS two-component regulatory system induces expression of the bacitracin transporter, BceAB, in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 49, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Hiron, A.; Falord, M.; Valle, J.; Débarbouillé, M.; Msadek, T. Bacitracin and nisin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A novel pathway involving the BraS/BraR two-component system (SA2417/SA2418) and both the BraD/BraE and VraD/VraE ABC transporters. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 81, 602–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Choi, G.H.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Todorov, S.D. Diversity of the bacteriocins, their classification and potential applications in combat of antibiotic resistant and clinically relevant pathogens. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Hyde, A.J.; Parisot, J.; McNichol, A.; Bonev, B.B. Nisin-induced changes in Bacillus morphology suggest a paradigm of antibiotic action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19896–19901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Wiedemann, I.; Breukink, E.; van Kraaij, C.; Kuipers, O.P.; Bierbaum, G.; de Kruijff, B.; Sahl, H.G. Specific binding of nisin to the peptidoglycan precursor lipid II combines pore formation and inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis for potent antibiotic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1772–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Islam, M.R.; Nishie, M.; Nagao, J.; Zendo, T.; Keller, S.; Nakayama, J.; Kohda, D.; Sahl, H.G.; Sonomoto, K. Ring A of nukacin ISK-1: A lipid II-binding motif for type-A(II) lantibiotic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3687–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Kawada-Matsuo, M.; Yoshida, Y.; Zendo, T.; Nagao, J.; Oogai, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Komatsuzawa, H. Three distinct two-component systems are involved in resistance to the class I bacteriocins, Nukacin ISK-1 and nisin A, in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Brown, E.D.; Vivas, E.I.; Walsh, C.T.; Kolter, R. MurA (MurZ), the enzyme that catalyzes the first committed step in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, is essential in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4194–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Barry, A.L.; Brown, S.D. Antibacterial spectrum of fosfomycin trometamol. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1995, 35, 228–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Miró, J.M.; Entenza, J.M.; Del Río, A.; Velasco, M.; Castañeda, X.; de la Mària, C.G.; Giddey, M.; Armero, Y.; Pericàs, J.M.; Cervera, C. High-dose daptomycin plus fosfomycin is safe and effective in treating methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4511–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Park, J.Y.; Kim, J.W.; Moon, B.Y.; Lee, J.; Fortin, Y.J.; Austin, F.W.; Yang, S.J.; Seo, K.S. Characterization of a novel two-component regulatory system, HptRS, the regulator for the hexose phosphate transport system in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 1620–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Weiser, J.N.; Ferreira, D.M.; Paton, J.C. Streptococcus pneumoniae: Transmission, colonization and invasion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Chao, Y.; Marks, L.R.; Pettigrew, M.M.; Hakansson, A.P. Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm formation and dispersion during colonization and disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Brooks, L.R.K.; Mias, G.I. Virulence and Host Immunity: Aging, Diagnostics, and Prevention. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Kohler, S.; Voß, F.; Gómez Mejia, A.; Brown, J.S.; Hammerschmidt, S. Pneumococcal lipoproteins involved in bacterial fitness, virulence, and immune evasion. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 3820–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. De Gaetano, G.V.; Coppolino, F.; Lentini, G.; Famà, A.; Cullotta, C.; Raffaele, I.; Motta, C.; Teti, G.; Speziale, P.; Pietrocola, G.; et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae binds collagens and C1q via the SSURE repeats of the PfbB adhesin. Mol. Microbiol. 2022, 117, 1479–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Famà, A.; Midiri, A.; Mancuso, G.; Biondo, C.; Lentini, G.; Galbo, R.; Giardina, M.M.; De Gaetano, G.V.; Romeo, L.; Teti, G.; et al. Nucleic Acid-Sensing Toll-Like Receptors Play a Dominant Role in Innate Immune Recognition of Pneumococci. mBio 2020, 11, e00415-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Lentini, G.; De Gaetano, G.V.; Famà, A.; Galbo, R.; Coppolino, F.; Mancuso, G.; Teti, G.; Beninati, C. Neutrophils discriminate live from dead bacteria by integrating signals initiated by Fprs and TLRs. EMBO J. 2022, 41, e109386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. Gómez-Mejia, A.; Gámez, G.; Hammerschmidt, S. Streptococcus pneumoniae two-component regulatory systems: The interplay of the pneumococcus with its environment. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 308, 722–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  326. Diagne, A.M.; Pelletier, A.; Durmort, C.; Faure, A.; Kanonenberg, K.; Freton, C.; Page, A.; Delolme, F.; Vorac, J.; Vallet, S.; et al. Identification of a two-component regulatory system involved in antimicrobial peptide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Zakerifar, M.; Kaboosi, H.; Goli, H.R.; Rahmani, Z.; Peyravii Ghadikolaii, F. Antibiotic resistance genes and molecular typing of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023, 23, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Liu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Li, J.; Ji, W.; Zhou, H.; Gong, X.; Miao, B.; Meng, S.; Duan, L.; Shi, Q.; et al. Molecular characteristics and antibiotic resistance mechanisms of clindamycin-resistant. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1138039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Dilrukshi, N.; Kottahachchi, J.; Dissanayake, T.; Fernando, N. Antibiotic Sensitivity of Group B Streptococcus from Pregnant Mothers and its Association with Resistance Genes. Med. Princ. Pract. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Lentini, G.; Famà, A.; Biondo, C.; Mohammadi, N.; Galbo, R.; Mancuso, G.; Iannello, D.; Zummo, S.; Giardina, M.; De Gaetano, G.V.; et al. Neutrophils Enhance Their Own Influx to Sites of Bacterial Infection via Endosomal TLR-Dependent Cxcl2 Production. J. Immunol. 2020, 204, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. De Gaetano, G.V.; Lentini, G.; Galbo, R.; Coppolino, F.; Famà, A.; Teti, G.; Beninati, C. Invasion and trafficking of hypervirulent group B streptococci in polarized enterocytes. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. De Gaetano, G.V.; Pietrocola, G.; Romeo, L.; Galbo, R.; Lentini, G.; Giardina, M.; Biondo, C.; Midiri, A.; Mancuso, G.; Venza, M.; et al. The Streptococcus agalactiae cell wall-anchored protein PbsP mediates adhesion to and invasion of epithelial cells by exploiting the host vitronectin/α. Mol. Microbiol. 2018, 110, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Liu, R.; Liu, G.; Yao, H.; Pan, Z. Bacitracin resistance and enhanced virulence of Streptococcus suis via a novel efflux pump. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; He, J. The two-component signal transduction system YvcPQ regulates the bacterial resistance to bacitracin in Bacillus thuringiensis. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Haenni, M.; Lupo, A.; Madec, J.Y. Antimicrobial Resistance in Streptococcus spp. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Rusch, M.; Spielmeyer, A.; Zorn, H.; Hamscher, G. Degradation and transformation of fluoroquinolones by microorganisms with special emphasis on ciprofloxacin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 6933–6948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Ostrer, L.; Khodursky, R.F.; Johnson, J.R.; Hiasa, H.; Khodursky, A. Analysis of mutational patterns in quinolone resistance-determining regions of GyrA and ParC of clinical isolates. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2019, 53, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Gill, M.J.; Brenwald, N.P.; Wise, R. Identification of an efflux pump gene, pmrA, associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Marrer, E.; Schad, K.; Satoh, A.T.; Page, M.G.; Johnson, M.M.; Piddock, L.J. Involvement of the putative ATP-dependent efflux proteins PatA and PatB in fluoroquinolone resistance of a multidrug-resistant mutant of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Yang, X.; Peng, W.; Wang, N.; Dou, B.; Yang, F.; Chen, H.; Yuan, F.; Bei, W. Role of the Two-Component System CiaRH in the Regulation of Efflux Pump SatAB and Its Correlation with Fluoroquinolone Susceptibility. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0041722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Vázquez-Boland, J.A.; Kuhn, M.; Berche, P.; Chakraborty, T.; Domínguez-Bernal, G.; Goebel, W.; González-Zorn, B.; Wehland, J.; Kreft, J. Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 584–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Freitag, N.E.; Port, G.C.; Miner, M.D. Listeria monocytogenes—From saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Toledo-Arana, A.; Dussurget, O.; Nikitas, G.; Sesto, N.; Guet-Revillet, H.; Balestrino, D.; Loh, E.; Gripenland, J.; Tiensuu, T.; Vaitkevicius, K.; et al. The Listeria transcriptional landscape from saprophytism to virulence. Nature 2009, 459, 950–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  344. Scortti, M.; Monzó, H.J.; Lacharme-Lora, L.; Lewis, D.A.; Vázquez-Boland, J.A. The PrfA virulence regulon. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1196–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Ollinger, J.; Bowen, B.; Wiedmann, M.; Boor, K.J.; Bergholz, T.M. Listeria monocytogenes sigmaB modulates PrfA-mediated virulence factor expression. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2113–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  346. Lobel, L.; Sigal, N.; Borovok, I.; Belitsky, B.R.; Sonenshein, A.L.; Herskovits, A.A. The metabolic regulator CodY links Listeria monocytogenes metabolism to virulence by directly activating the virulence regulatory gene prfA. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 95, 624–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Mandin, P.; Fsihi, H.; Dussurget, O.; Vergassola, M.; Milohanic, E.; Toledo-Arana, A.; Lasa, I.; Johansson, J.; Cossart, P. VirR, a response regulator critical for Listeria monocytogenes virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 57, 1367–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Kang, J.; Wiedmann, M.; Boor, K.J.; Bergholz, T.M. VirR-Mediated Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes against Food Antimicrobials and Cross-Protection Induced by Exposure to Organic Acid Salts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 4553–4562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Bernard, R.; Guiseppi, A.; Chippaux, M.; Foglino, M.; Denizot, F. Resistance to bacitracin in Bacillus subtilis: Unexpected requirement of the BceAB ABC transporter in the control of expression of its own structural genes. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8636–8642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  350. Dintner, S.; Heermann, R.; Fang, C.; Jung, K.; Gebhard, S. A sensory complex consisting of an ATP-binding cassette transporter and a two-component regulatory system controls bacitracin resistance in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 27899–27910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Abachin, E.; Poyart, C.; Pellegrini, E.; Milohanic, E.; Fiedler, F.; Berche, P.; Trieu-Cuot, P. Formation of D-alanyl-lipoteichoic acid is required for adhesion and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Thedieck, K.; Hain, T.; Mohamed, W.; Tindall, B.J.; Nimtz, M.; Chakraborty, T.; Wehland, J.; Jänsch, L. The MprF protein is required for lysinylation of phospholipids in listerial membranes and confers resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs) on Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 1325–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Collins, B.; Curtis, N.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. The ABC transporter AnrAB contributes to the innate resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to nisin, bacitracin, and various beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4416–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Grubaugh, D.; Regeimbal, J.M.; Ghosh, P.; Zhou, Y.; Lauer, P.; Dubensky, T.W.; Higgins, D.E. The VirAB ABC Transporter Is Required for VirR Regulation of Listeria monocytogenes Virulence and Resistance to Nisin. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00901-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Jiang, X.; Geng, Y.; Ren, S.; Yu, T.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Meng, H.; Shi, L. The VirAB-VirSR-AnrAB Multicomponent System Is Involved in Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e to Cephalosporins, Bacitracin, Nisin, Benzalkonium Chloride, and Ethidium Bromide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Dhankhar, P.; Dalal, V.; Kotra, D.G.; Kumar, P. In-silico approach to identify novel potent inhibitors against GraR of S. aureus. Front. Biosci. 2020, 25, 1337–1360. [Google Scholar]
  357. Velikova, N.; Fulle, S.; Manso, A.S.; Mechkarska, M.; Finn, P.; Conlon, J.M.; Oggioni, M.R.; Wells, J.M.; Marina, A. Putative histidine kinase inhibitors with antibacterial effect against multi-drug resistant clinical isolates identified by in vitro and in silico screens. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Hirakawa, H.; Kurushima, J.; Hashimoto, Y.; Tomita, H. Progress Overview of Bacterial Two-Component Regulatory Systems as Potential Targets for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Chen, H.; Yu, C.; Wu, H.; Li, G.; Li, C.; Hong, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; You, X. Recent Advances in Histidine Kinase-Targeted Antimicrobial Agents. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 866392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Gilmour, R.; Foster, J.E.; Sheng, Q.; McClain, J.R.; Riley, A.; Sun, P.M.; Ng, W.L.; Yan, D.; Nicas, T.I.; Henry, K.; et al. New class of competitive inhibitor of bacterial histidine kinases. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8196–8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Rasko, D.A.; Moreira, C.G.; Li, D.R.; Reading, N.C.; Ritchie, J.M.; Waldor, M.K.; Williams, N.; Taussig, R.; Wei, S.; Roth, M.; et al. Targeting QseC signaling and virulence for antibiotic development. Science 2008, 321, 1078–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  362. Curtis, M.M.; Russell, R.; Moreira, C.G.; Adebesin, A.M.; Wang, C.; Williams, N.S.; Taussig, R.; Stewart, D.; Zimmern, P.; Lu, B.; et al. QseC inhibitors as an antivirulence approach for Gram-negative pathogens. mBio 2014, 5, e02165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Boibessot, T.; Zschiedrich, C.P.; Lebeau, A.; Bénimèlis, D.; Dunyach-Rémy, C.; Lavigne, J.P.; Szurmant, H.; Benfodda, Z.; Meffre, P. The Rational Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Properties of Thiophene Derivatives That Inhibit Bacterial Histidine Kinases. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8830–8847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  364. Okada, A.; Igarashi, M.; Okajima, T.; Kinoshita, N.; Umekita, M.; Sawa, R.; Inoue, K.; Watanabe, T.; Doi, A.; Martin, A.; et al. Walkmycin B targets WalK (YycG), a histidine kinase essential for bacterial cell growth. J. Antibiot. 2010, 63, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  365. Hagiwara, D.; Yamashino, T.; Mizuno, T. A Genome-wide view of the Escherichia coli BasS-BasR two-component system implicated in iron-responses. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004, 68, 1758–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Tiwari, S.; da Costa, M.P.; Almeida, S.; Hassan, S.S.; Jamal, S.B.; Oliveira, A.; Folador, E.L.; Rocha, F.; de Abreu, V.A.; Dorella, F.; et al. C. pseudotuberculosis Phop confers virulence and may be targeted by natural compounds. Integr. Biol. 2014, 6, 1088–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Sharma, A.; Gupta, V.K.; Pathania, R. Efflux pump inhibitors for bacterial pathogens: From bench to bedside. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019, 149, 129–145. [Google Scholar]
  368. Bhattacharyya, T.; Sharma, A.; Akhter, J.; Pathania, R. The small molecule IITR08027 restores the antibacterial activity of fluoroquinolones against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by efflux inhibition. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 50, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  369. Lomovskaya, O.; Warren, M.S.; Lee, A.; Galazzo, J.; Fronko, R.; Lee, M.; Blais, J.; Cho, D.; Chamberland, S.; Renau, T.; et al. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Gupta, S.; Cohen, K.A.; Winglee, K.; Maiga, M.; Diarra, B.; Bishai, W.R. Efflux inhibition with verapamil potentiates bedaquiline in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 574–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Singh, M.; Jadaun, G.P.; Ramdas; Srivastava, K.; Chauhan, V.; Mishra, R.; Gupta, K.; Nair, S.; Chauhan, D.S.; Sharma, V.D.; et al. Effect of efflux pump inhibitors on drug susceptibility of ofloxacin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011, 133, 535–540. [Google Scholar]
  372. Bohnert, J.A.; Kern, W.V. Selected arylpiperazines are capable of reversing multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli overexpressing RND efflux pumps. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 849–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  373. Leão, P.V.S.; Ferreira, A.L.D.S.; Oliveira, F.A.A.; Mesquita, A.B.S.; Lima-Net, J.S.; Gutierrez, S.J.C.; Nogueira, C.E.S.; Cruz-Martins, N.; Arcanjo, D.D.R.; Barreto, H.M.; et al. Riparin-B as a Potential Inhibitor of AdeABC Efflux System from Acinetobacter baumannii. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2023, 2023, 1780838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Nguyen, T.H.T.; Nguyen, N.A.T.; Nguyen, H.D.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; Le, M.H.; Pham, M.Q.; Do, H.N.; Hoang, K.C.; Michalet, S.; Dijoux-Franca, M.G.; et al. Plant Secondary Metabolites on Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistant. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  375. Kumar, G.; Kiran Tudu, A. Tackling multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by natural products and their analogues acting as NorA efflux pump inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2023, 80, 117187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  376. Li, Y.; Ge, X. Role of Berberine as a Potential Efflux Pump Inhibitor against MdfA from Escherichia coli: In Vitro and In Silico Studies. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0332422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. A simplified bacterium is depicted in which various mechanisms for resistance to antimicrobial substances are highlighted. A generic antibiotic is represented as a blue ball and its fate, after having contact with the bacterium, is analyzed in six potential occasions: (1) drug inactivation by enzymes; (2) drug target modification; (3) plasmid-carrying genes conferring antibiotic resistance; (4) changes in drug permeability following cell wall and cell membrane modifications; (5) expression of efflux pumps that expel drugs outside the bacterial cell; (6) selective DNA mutations altering the bacterial genome expression.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. A simplified bacterium is depicted in which various mechanisms for resistance to antimicrobial substances are highlighted. A generic antibiotic is represented as a blue ball and its fate, after having contact with the bacterium, is analyzed in six potential occasions: (1) drug inactivation by enzymes; (2) drug target modification; (3) plasmid-carrying genes conferring antibiotic resistance; (4) changes in drug permeability following cell wall and cell membrane modifications; (5) expression of efflux pumps that expel drugs outside the bacterial cell; (6) selective DNA mutations altering the bacterial genome expression.
Antibiotics 12 00965 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representations of the main families of multidrug efflux pumps. Each transport system is depicted with a different shape and color. The source of energy needed for substrate transport is further indicated. A generic antibiotic is represented as a pill. The transporters indicated in the figure are the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family, the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family, the proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux (PACE) family, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), and the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family. The principal sites where efflux pumps may be found located in Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria are the outer membrane or the inner membrane that, in the figure, are indicated with the acronyms OM and IM, respectively.
Figure 2. Schematic representations of the main families of multidrug efflux pumps. Each transport system is depicted with a different shape and color. The source of energy needed for substrate transport is further indicated. A generic antibiotic is represented as a pill. The transporters indicated in the figure are the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family, the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family, the proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux (PACE) family, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), and the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family. The principal sites where efflux pumps may be found located in Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria are the outer membrane or the inner membrane that, in the figure, are indicated with the acronyms OM and IM, respectively.
Antibiotics 12 00965 g002
Figure 3. Representation of the potentially targetable components of a two-component system (TCS) for preventing MDR. The histidine kinase (HK) sensor senses a generic signal (dark red thunderbolt) via the signal peptide linker (SPL), which links two transmembrane (TM) domains. The other elements forming the HK are a signal transduction domain (STD), a cytoplasmic sensor domain (CSD), an ATP catalytic domain (ATP), and a dimerization histidine phosphotransfer domain (DHp). The response regulator (RR) is composed of the receiver domain (RD) and the effector domain (ED). The phosphorylation (P) of the HK is followed by the transfer of the phosphoryl-group (P) to the RD that induces the ED to bind to its target genes (row structure) and regulate their expression. The tipless arrows indicate the sites of action of the TCS inhibitors: (A) an inhibitor that can avoid TCS activation by its usual stimulus; (B) an inhibitor that can block HK dimerization; (C) an inhibitor targeting the site for ATP binding; (D) an inhibitor that can prevent the ATP from binding to the RD; (E) an inhibitor that can reduce or avoid the RR binding to antibiotic resistance-mediated genes.
Figure 3. Representation of the potentially targetable components of a two-component system (TCS) for preventing MDR. The histidine kinase (HK) sensor senses a generic signal (dark red thunderbolt) via the signal peptide linker (SPL), which links two transmembrane (TM) domains. The other elements forming the HK are a signal transduction domain (STD), a cytoplasmic sensor domain (CSD), an ATP catalytic domain (ATP), and a dimerization histidine phosphotransfer domain (DHp). The response regulator (RR) is composed of the receiver domain (RD) and the effector domain (ED). The phosphorylation (P) of the HK is followed by the transfer of the phosphoryl-group (P) to the RD that induces the ED to bind to its target genes (row structure) and regulate their expression. The tipless arrows indicate the sites of action of the TCS inhibitors: (A) an inhibitor that can avoid TCS activation by its usual stimulus; (B) an inhibitor that can block HK dimerization; (C) an inhibitor targeting the site for ATP binding; (D) an inhibitor that can prevent the ATP from binding to the RD; (E) an inhibitor that can reduce or avoid the RR binding to antibiotic resistance-mediated genes.
Antibiotics 12 00965 g003
Figure 4. Principal mechanisms for inhibiting multidrug efflux pumps. An efflux pump is schematically represented as an orange rectangle crossing the bacterial membrane. A generic antimicrobial agent is represented as a grey dot. The flux of the pump substrate is depicted as an arrow. The red cross represents the inhibition of the substrate transfer along the pump or of a constituent of the transporter or the source of energy. (Top left) Intracellular accumulation of an antimicrobial drug with a conformation different (green square) from that for which the pump is able to expel; (top right) increased presence of the drug inside the cells due to the blockage of the efflux pump assembly; (middle) inhibition of the proton force mediating the efflux pump functions; (lower left) intracellular increase in the antimicrobial drug following the selective inhibition of some of the efflux pump components that can be in the outer membrane, the inner membrane, or the cytoplasmic side; (lower right) intracellular accumulation of the antimicrobial drug following the passage of a competitive inhibitor across the efflux pump channel.
Figure 4. Principal mechanisms for inhibiting multidrug efflux pumps. An efflux pump is schematically represented as an orange rectangle crossing the bacterial membrane. A generic antimicrobial agent is represented as a grey dot. The flux of the pump substrate is depicted as an arrow. The red cross represents the inhibition of the substrate transfer along the pump or of a constituent of the transporter or the source of energy. (Top left) Intracellular accumulation of an antimicrobial drug with a conformation different (green square) from that for which the pump is able to expel; (top right) increased presence of the drug inside the cells due to the blockage of the efflux pump assembly; (middle) inhibition of the proton force mediating the efflux pump functions; (lower left) intracellular increase in the antimicrobial drug following the selective inhibition of some of the efflux pump components that can be in the outer membrane, the inner membrane, or the cytoplasmic side; (lower right) intracellular accumulation of the antimicrobial drug following the passage of a competitive inhibitor across the efflux pump channel.
Antibiotics 12 00965 g004
Table 1. Examples of antibiotic resistance mediated by TCS.
Table 1. Examples of antibiotic resistance mediated by TCS.
TCSAntibiotic Resistance MicroorganismRefs.
PhoQ/PhoP *Resistance to aminoglycosides
Resistance to cationic peptides
Modification of lipid A
P. aeruginosa; Klebsiella pneumoniae;
Salmonella enterica
[82,83,84,85]
GacS/GacAIncreased biofilm formationP. aeruginosa[86]
PmrA/PmrBResistance to cationic peptides
LPS modification
Modification of lipid A
P. aeruginosa; K. pneumoniae;
A. baumannii
[87,88,89,90]
CprS/CprRResistance to cationic peptidesP. aeruginosa[91,92]
CrrA/CrrBResistance to colistinK. pneumoniae[93]
ColS/ColRResistance to polymyxinP. aeruginosa[94]
PprA/PprBResistance to aminoglycosides P. aeruginosa[95,96]
CbrA/CbrBResistance to polymyxin, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycinP. aeruginosa[97]
BfmS/BfmRResistance to meropenem and colistinA. baumannii[98,99]
CreC/CreBResistance to β-lactamsP. aeruginosa[100]
CopS/CopRResistance to imipenem P. aeruginosa[101]
RcsBCSLPS modificationS.enterica[102,103]
GraS/GraRResistance to cationic peptidesS. aureus[104]
VraS/VraR *Resistance to vancomycyn and oxacillinS. aureus[105,106]
CesR/CesKIncreased expression of cell envelope genesL. monocytogenes[107,108]
ZraPR/ZraPSResistance to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, aminonucleosides, cyclines, and β-lactamsE. coli[109]
BasR/BasS *Resistance to class IIa bacteriocinsE. coli[110]
CpxA/CpxR *Resistance to β-lactams and aminoglycosidesE. coli[111]
* TCS are involved in efflux pump-dependent antibiotic resistance and are described in this paper.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Gaetano, G.V.; Lentini, G.; Famà, A.; Coppolino, F.; Beninati, C. Antimicrobial Resistance: Two-Component Regulatory Systems and Multidrug Efflux Pumps. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060965

AMA Style

De Gaetano GV, Lentini G, Famà A, Coppolino F, Beninati C. Antimicrobial Resistance: Two-Component Regulatory Systems and Multidrug Efflux Pumps. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(6):965. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060965

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Gaetano, Giuseppe Valerio, Germana Lentini, Agata Famà, Francesco Coppolino, and Concetta Beninati. 2023. "Antimicrobial Resistance: Two-Component Regulatory Systems and Multidrug Efflux Pumps" Antibiotics 12, no. 6: 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060965

APA Style

De Gaetano, G. V., Lentini, G., Famà, A., Coppolino, F., & Beninati, C. (2023). Antimicrobial Resistance: Two-Component Regulatory Systems and Multidrug Efflux Pumps. Antibiotics, 12(6), 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060965

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop