1. Introduction
Compounds with a nanolaminated crystal structure may exhibit unique chemical and physical properties. One example is the so-called MAX phases with the chemical composition M
n+1AX
n (n = 1–3) where M usually is an early transition metal, A is typically an element in group 13–14 and X is C or N. From a structural point of view, the MAX phases can be described as MX slabs separated by a layer of A atoms. The M-A bonds are weaker than the M-X bonds leading to a nanolaminated structure with unique mechanical properties [
1]. By removing the A atoms using chemical etching with e.g., HF, it is also possible to produce 2D materials called MXenes with potential applications in e.g., batteries [
2]. The MAX phases are easily deposited as thin films with magnetron sputtering but as a general rule a fairly high deposition temperature is required to obtain high quality films [
3].
Recently, there has been an increased interest in ternary layered borides. One example is MoAlB, which exhibits an orthorhombic structure of MoB slabs separated by double Al layers. This ternary boride has mechanical properties similar to the MAX phases, which also can be attributed to the nanolaminated structure with weaker Mo-Al bonds between the MoB slabs [
4]. Furthermore, the presence of Al in the structure gives excellent high-temperature oxidation properties due the formation of a protecting Al
2O
3 scale. Alameda et al. have also demonstrated a possibility to produce 2D MoB structures [
5]. They showed that a treatment in NaOH can lead to a topochemical removal of Al forming a small amount of 2D MoB called MBenes. Magnetron sputtering of MoAlB has recently been demonstrated by Achenbach et al. using a combinatorial approach with MoB and Al targets [
6]. Additionally, in this case a rather high deposition temperature of 700 °C was used in order to obtain well-defined films.
Another group of borides displaying a structural anisotropy is M
2AlB
2 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe). They crystallise in an orthorhombic structure closely related to MoAlB but with MB slabs separated by a single atomic layer of Al (
Figure 1a). Ab initio calculations have shown that the M
2AlB
2 phases also can be described as a nanolaminated structure of MB slabs with strong M-B bonds and weaker M-Al bonds [
7]. In analogy with the MAX phases they have been described by some authors as MAB phases [
8] and a recent review describes their properties in this respect in [
9].
The M
2AlB
2 phases have interesting magnetic and mechanical properties. Fe
2AlB
2, for example, is ferromagnetic with a Curie temperature close to room temperature. This phase has been suggested as a potential material for magnetic refrigeration due to its magnetocaloric properties [
10]. In contrast, Mn
2AlB
2 is antiferromagnetic, while solid-solutions mixing Mn and Fe on the metal sites give a disordered ferrimagnetic phase [
11]. In the Cr-Al-B system, three phases in the series (CrB
2)
nCrAl with n = 1, 2, 3 have been synthesised [
8]. The boron network in Cr
2AlB
2, and in the other M
2AlB
2 phases, forms single zigzag chains with each B atom coordinated to six Cr atoms in a triangular prism as in CrB. On the other hand, double and triple chains of boron atoms in graphite-like layers are formed in Cr
3AlB
4 and Cr
4AlB
6, respectively, as observed in Cr
3B
4 and Cr
2B
3. A large increase in hardness was also reported as the boron content increased from Cr
2AlB
2 to Cr
3AlB
4. Furthermore, the similarities to MAX phases suggest that they have the potential to exhibit special deformation behaviour with kink bands observed in many MAX compounds. Initial deformation studies show indeed a delamination behaviour during deformation but not as pronounced as for e.g., Ti
3AlC
2 [
7]. Further studies, however, are required to clarify the deformation behaviour of the M
2AlB
2 phases.
The M2AlB2 phases are easily synthesised as bulk materials by solid-state sintering or arc-melting followed by an annealing step, in both cases with an excess of Al. Hitherto, however, no studies on the deposition of these compounds as thin films have been published. The similarities to MAX phases and MoAlB suggest that a rather high deposition temperature is required but the complex structure and difficulties associated with the thin film deposition of metal boride compounds are challenging. The aim of this study is to deposit single-phase Cr2AlB2 films and to identify important process parameters to obtain well-defined films. Establishment of such parameters could also facilitate the deposition of dense films of magnetocaloric Fe2AlB2, with potential applications in microscale refrigeration and other MAB phases.
2. Materials and Methods
Initial attempts to deposit Cr2AlB2 films with conventional magnetron sputtering from Al, Cr and B targets at different process parameters were unsuccessful. A combinatorial approach was therefore used with three magnetrons and a non-rotating substrate. On a large substrate this will, in a single experiment, generate a film with a compositional gradient enabling a rapid screening of the parameter space. All films were deposited in an ultra-high vacuum chamber with the magnetrons symmetrically spaced at 39° with respect to the sample surface normal. The target to substrate distance was 17.5 cm at the focus point. The lowest base pressure that could be achieved at room temperature was 8 × 10−9 Pa after sputtering a titanium target for 3 h. The targets used in the depositions were a composite target of aluminum and boron, bonded with indium to a copper backing plate (SCM, assayed composition AlB2 with 99.9% purity), and Al and Cr targets (Lesker, >99.95% purity) with 3′ diameter. The substrates used were 3′ Si (100) wafers and 10 × 10 mm2 MgO (100) or Al2O3 (001) that had been ultrasonically cleaned in both ethanol and isopropanol for 10 min. The substrates were heated at 600 °C for 30 min prior to depositions and a seed layer of Cr of about 5–10 nm was deposited on the single crystal substrates while rotating the substrate holder at the deposition temperature. Depositions were made using 6 N grade Ar as a sputtering gas at a pressure of 0.27 Pa. No bias was applied to the substrate which was kept floating. In order to avoid arcing, the composite Al-B target was sputtered using an RF power supply (AE RFX-600, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., Denver, CO, USA) with a matching network at 170 W. The low deposition rate obtained from this target was a limiting factor and the Cr target was sputtered using a pulsed DC power supply (AE Pinnacle Plus 5 kW) at the lowest possible power (15 W) required to maintain a stable plasma at 250 kHz with a 1.6 μs pulse factor. The Al-B and Cr targets were mounted on magnetrons opposite each other to obtain a compositional gradient and an Al target was mounted at 90° from this axis and sputtered using a DC power supply (AE MDX-500, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., Denver, CO, USA) at 15 W in power regulation. The deposition time for the films prepared at 680 °C was 6 h.
The phase composition of the films grown on MgO substrates was investigated with X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 diffractometer with CuKα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). Film thicknesses were obtained from analysis of X-ray reflectivity (XRR) data collected using a Phillips MRD X’Pert diffractometer with CuKα radiation. Microscopy studies were carried out with a Zeiss LEO-1550 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an AZtec energy dispersive X-ray detector for spectroscopy analysis (EDS) at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. The chemical composition was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Physical Systems Quantum-2000 spectrometer (Physical Electronics, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) with Al Kα radiation. Depth profile analyses were performed on a spot of 200 μm after pre-sputtering for 10 min using a 1 kV Ar
+ ion beam. Prior to the sputtering, the peak position of the C 1s peak was centered at 284.8 eV and no surface charge neutralisation was used. The sensitivity factors used for Al and Cr were those included in the MultiPak v9.0 software database [
12], while the sensitivity factor for B was corrected for matrix effects using spectra collected on a CrB
2 thin film.
Cross-section samples of the films deposited on MgO for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis were prepared with a focused ion beam and scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM, FEI Strata DB-235, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The samples were transferred to a Cu lift-out grid and thinned to electron transparency applying a final polishing step using 5 kV Ga ions. TEM analysis was carried out on a probe corrected FEI Titan Themis equipped with the SuperX system for EDS analysis (FEI Europe B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The acquired EDS elemental maps were recorded and quantified with Esprit 1.9 from Bruker using the theoretical k-factors provided by the software. Electron diffraction studies were carried out in nano-beam (NBD) mode with a lateral resolution of ca 2.5 nm. The electron diffraction patterns were evaluated with the CrystBox software suite [
13].
3. Results
In an initial series of experiments, attempts were made to deposit single-phase AlB2 at 430 °C on Si substrates from the Al-B target to identify suitable deposition conditions for the ternary Cr2AlB2 phase. XPS analysis showed an Al/B ratio of 0.2 instead of the expected 0.5 ratio of AlB2. This could be partly due to a lower Al content in the Al-B target than the assayed value. Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that a significant loss of Al can occur from the growing film at higher temperatures. An additional Al target was therefore used in all other depositions. The deposition rate obtained from the Al-B target with the RF power supply at 170 W was 0.5 nm/min. The sputtering rate of the Al target at 15 W was determined to 0.75 nm/min and co-sputtering with the Al target increased the Al/B ratio to 0.67 at a position on the compositional gradient close to the Al target and 0.46 close to the Al-B target. Thus, a stoichiometry with elemental boron and aluminium close to AlB2 is expected at a position between the Al and Al-B targets. Co-sputtering of the Al, Al-B and Cr targets was done using the same settings on the Al and Al-B targets previously determined to give an Al/B ratio close to 0.5 as described above. The sputtering rate from the Cr target was reduced by using a pulsed DC source at a low power (15 W) which resulted in a growth rate of 1.3 nm/min.
Using the sputtering parameters described above, a compositional gradient film was deposited on a Si wafer at 430 °C. The film shows a darker region close to the Al-B target and a completely metallic luster close to the Cr target (
Figure 2a). XPS analyses were carried out at three different positions labelled A, B and C in
Figure 2a, which are the extreme points of the wafer giving Al rich, Cr deficient and Al deficient compositions respectively. The position closest to the Cr target was found to have a high Cr content and was not considered further. The compositions obtained at these positions are given in
Figure 2c and marked in the ternary Cr-Al-B phase diagram in
Figure 2b.
X-ray diffraction patterns at different positions on the film deposited at 430 °C were X-ray amorphous except for in the Al rich part of the film where peaks from Al and Cr
4Al
13Si
4 were observed. The formation of chromium silicides would be expected at higher temperatures [
14] but it is likely that this ternary phase is more stable at these conditions. This suggests a reaction with the Si substrate and therefore subsequent experiments were carried out on MgO and Al
2O
3 substrates placed at positions A, B and C as shown in
Figure 2a. To increase the crystallinity of the films, deposition experiments were carried out at 550 °C. XRD showed the formation of Al and CrB
2 but no indication of a ternary phase. The deposition temperature was therefore increased to 680 °C, above the melting point of Al (660 °C), and depositions were made on both MgO and Al
2O
3 substrates. At this temperature, the formation of Cr
2AlB
2 was observed only on MgO substrates and the diffraction patterns of three films deposited on MgO substrates at positions A, B and C are shown in
Figure 3.
The diffraction pattern from the film deposited at position C shows only reflections from the Cr
2AlB
2 phase (
Figure 3c). As indicated in
Figure 2b, position C is indeed close to stoichiometric Cr
2AlB
2. Sharp diffraction peaks with high intensity originate from (00
l) reflections. Due to the reflection conditions in the
Cmmm space group with
c >
a, the (
h00) reflection with
h = 2
n is indicated but has a weak intensity. This suggests that the Cr
2AlB
2 film grows with a strong [00l] preferred orientation in this sample. The diffraction pattern obtained from the film deposited at position A shows sharp (00
l) reflections but also strong (0
k0) peaks from the ternary Cr
2AlB
2 phase suggesting a [0
k0] texture in addition to the [
00l] orientation. A weak (200) peak of Cr is also observed in this diffraction pattern. Cell parameters for the Cr
2AlB
2 phase deposited at position A were determined from a diffraction pattern using grazing incidence XRD (not shown) to be
a = 2.9371(1) Å,
b = 11.0913(4) Å and
c = 2.9597(1) Å. These are in good agreement with the experimental data obtained from bulk samples [
8]. An XPS analysis of this film was carried out to confirm the chemical composition. The oxygen content of the film was very high (18 at.%). This can be explained by the chimney-like morphology of the grains (described below), which exposes a large surface area of the film to air. After removal from the deposition chamber, the exposed surface will oxidise giving a very thin surface oxide. This oxide can only partly be removed from a rough surface with Ar
+ ion beam sputtering. Therefore, the main source of oxygen in this case is the post-oxidation of the sample after being exposed to air. From the areas of the Cr 2p
3/2, B 1s and Al 2s peaks, the chemical composition of sample A is determined to be Cr
0.38Al
0.26B
0.36 (excluding oxygen), i.e., with the correct Cr/B ratio but a higher Al content than in Cr
2AlB
2. This is expected since this film is deposited closer to the Al target.
The diffraction pattern from the film deposited at position B, closer to the Al-B target, showed a more complex phase composition. The observed diffraction peaks were assigned to pure Al and hexagonal CrB
2, from their respective (200) and (100) reflections, Cr
2AlB
2 and a weak peak from another ternary phase, Cr
3AlB
4. The latter is a thermodynamically stable phase present in the published phase diagrams [
15] and marked in
Figure 2b. The fact that we have four phases present suggests that the films are deposited at non-equilibrium conditions. The composition obtained by XPS in this sample (excluding oxygen) is determined to be Cr
0.36Al
0.18B
0.46. In this case, a lower oxygen content after sputtering (8 at.%) was obtained. The lower oxygen content in this film can be explained by the smoother surface morphology shown in
Figure 4. In summary, the XPS and XRD analyses show that the compositions and phases at positions A, B and C are found within the triangle defined by Cr
2AlB
2, CrB
2 and Al shown in
Figure 2b.
Figure 4 shows SEM top view images from the films deposited at positions A, B and C. The two positions A and C, which according to XRD only consist of Cr
2AlB
2, exhibit a columnar microstructure with chimney-like outgrowths (
Figure 4a,c). The grains at position A (closer to the Al target) do not show coalescence but are significantly smaller than at position C. In contrast, the film at position B exhibits a completely different morphology. The inset in
Figure 4b shows cuboid grains with a small number of whisker-like outgrowths.
The films deposited at positions A and B were studied in more detail with TEM. Combining the EDS and image information for sample A, four different structural features can be distinguished in
Figure 5a. At the interface to the MgO substrate, a thin layer (≈18 nm) of pure Al is formed, which is interrupted by smaller patches of pure Cr (the boron signal in this area is noise). This Al layer is probably too thin to be detected in the X-ray diffraction pattern in
Figure 3a. Then, two features with the same composition but with two different growth modes are observed. The first growth mode is a rougher area composed of an arrangement of flat, plate-like grains and the second a columnar structure with crystals up to 500 nm in length perpendicular to the substrate. These chimney-like outgrowths are also seen in the inset in
Figure 4a. The fourth feature is material between the columns that show an increased Al and lower Cr and B content.
For sample B, three different features can be distinguished (
Figure 5b). The first feature is grains of pure Al. The second are grains containing Al, Cr and B with similar concentration as in sample A. Grains that contain no Al and show a high B to Cr ratio are also observed. Quantification with EDS is not very accurate, especially for materials containing light elements such as boron. To identify the phases, the films were probed using NBD and atomically resolved STEM.
Figure 6 shows high-angle annular dark field images (HAADF) and NBD patterns from sample A. All zone axis patterns can be indexed with the Cr
2AlB
2 structure and are aligned with the [100] MgO substrate orientation. For the plate-like grains close to the substrate, the [101] zone axis is observed (
Figure 6d) and the b-direction is perpendicular to the surface, meaning that the CrB slabs are oriented parallel to the substrate interface (the orientation in
Figure 1a). The atomic arrangement is shown in the atomically resolved HAADF STEM image in
Figure 6b. For the chimney-like grains, two different Cr
2AlB
2 orientations aligned with the [100] MgO substrate orientation are detected: the [014] and [3–10] zone axes, shown in
Figure 6e,f respectively. The atomic model of the [014] orientation is overlaid with the HAADF STEM image in
Figure 6c with the a-axis oriented perpendicular to the surface. For the [3–10] orientation, the c-axis is aligned perpendicular to the surface (the orientation shown in
Figure 1b). This texture is also observed by the strong (001) reflection in the X-ray diffraction pattern of sample A.
For sample B, the three chemically different grains were probed with NBD and HAADF STEM to identify the structures present. The small Cr
3AlB
4 impurity that was identified in the X-ray diffractogram was not found in this TEM analysis. However, it is likely that this phase would form at the interface between Cr
2AlB
2 and CrB
2 grains. All zone axis patterns are aligned with the [110] orientation of the MgO substrate.
Figure 7a shows the bright field STEM overview with the positions where the NBD patterns and high resolution HAADF STEM images, as depicted in
Figure 7b–d and
Figure 7e–g, respectively, were recorded. The NBD pattern recorded at spot 1 is indexed with the Cr
2AlB
2 structure in [001] orientation with the b-axis perpendicular to the surface, which is verified by the STEM HAADF image in
Figure 7e. The NBD patterns taken at spots 2 and 3 identify the grains as CrB
2 with the [001] orientation and Al with the [110] orientation, respectively. The formation of Cr
2AlB
2, CrB
2 and Al grains is also confirmed by the EDS maps in
Figure 5b and their orientation relationship can be determined from the electron diffraction patterns. Thus, the Cr
2AlB
2 (200), the CrB
2 (1–20) and the Al (−220) reflections marked in
Figure 7b–d coincide. These correspond to aligned lattices with spacings of 1.4315, 1.4860 and 1.4686 Å in the ideal structures, respectively. The main orientation is given by the MgO substrate with the coinciding (−220) reflection (
d = 1.4889 Å), leading to an apparent epitaxial growth and a small lattice mismatch of <4%.
A high resolution XPS analysis was carried out for sample A. The B 1s spectrum in
Figure 8a can be fitted with two peaks centered at 187.8 and 188.4 eV with FWHM of 1.0 eV that can be attributed to B-B and B-metal peaks respectively [
16]. No indication of oxidised boron species at higher bonding energies was observed. In
Figure 8b, the Cr 2p spectrum shows a single Cr 2p
3/2 peak at 574.2 eV with a FWHM of 1.1 eV and the Cr 2p
1/2 peakat 583.5 eV (E = 9.3 eV) that can be assigned to Cr-B bonds although no chemical shift is observed between the metallic and boride bonds [
17]. Thus, to account for the measured oxygen content of 18 at.%, the absence of oxide peaks in the B and Cr spectra suggests the presence of oxidised Al. The Al 2p spectrum overlaps with the Cr 3s peak and displays an asymmetric peak at high binding energies. The analysis included a peak centered at 72.7 eV attributed to metallic Al and a peak at 73.9 eV that can be assigned to Al
2O
3, with their area ratio determined to be 15/85. The peak at higher binding energies in
Figure 8c can be assigned to Cr 3s [
18]. A similar shape for the Al 2p + Cr 3s peak has been observed in the related Cr
2AlC compound where an oxygen content of 20 at.% was reported [
19]. The Al 2s spectrum in
Figure 8d was fitted with a peak for the Al-Al bonds centered at 117.8 eV and peak centered at 120.1 eV attributed to Al-O bonds. The fraction of metallic Al is approximately 0.17, i.e., in agreement with the value obtained from the Al 2p spectrum. Similar oxide contributions to the Al spectra have been determined from the analysis of bulk Cr
2AlB
2 samples [
20].
4. Discussion
The results in
Figure 3,
Figure 4,
Figure 5,
Figure 6 and
Figure 7 suggest a complex growth behaviour strongly dependent on the composition. XPS analyses show that the composite Al-B target used in this study is slightly sub-stoichiometric with respect to Al. An additional source of Al is therefore required to obtain the correct Al content for the deposition of Cr
2AlB
2. Crystalline films of the ternary phase are only observed at high temperatures (above the melting point of pure Al) and it is reasonable to assume that a loss of Al due to a higher vapour pressure continuously occurs during the growth process. A similar observation has been made for the deposition of V
2AlC films from elemental targets [
21]. Moreover, the synthesis of bulk MoAlB and M
2AlB
2 by different methods also requires excess Al due to the formation of Al-rich secondary phases [
9]. Thin films of MoAlB have recently been deposited using combinatorial magnetron sputtering of MoB and Al targets on Al
2O
3 wafers at 700 °C [
6]. Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction patterns showed the formation of MoAlB polycrystalline films with AlB
2 as a second phase in Al-rich coatings. Moreover, a different texture was observed in the close to stoichiometric coating, which was partly attributed to changes in the chemical composition.
A loss of Al can explain the growth behaviour in positions A and C. As shown in the ternary phase diagram in
Figure 2, position C has a composition close to Cr
2AlB
2 and the single-phase ternary film observed in the X-ray diffraction pattern is therefore in good agreement with thermodynamics. In a solid-state reaction, the formation of the ternary phase can be described as a topotactic reaction with the intercalation of Al between CrB layers [
22]. However, during vapour deposition, Cr
2AlB
2 can expose two types of surfaces towards the vapour phase depending on the growth direction of the grains. The surface in the [010] direction has CrB slabs separated by layers of Al (
Figure 1a). It is likely that such Al monolayers at 680 °C (above the melting point of Al) have high evaporation rates making it less favourable to grow grains with this texture. In contrast, grains with the [100] and [001] orientation expose the Al layers on the sides perpendicular to the growth direction (
Figure 1b). It is conceivable to assume that the evaporation rate of Al from the (100) and (001) surface, where the Al is embedded between the CrB slabs, is lower than from the (010) surface. At position C, this should favour the formation of elongated and chimney-like grains with the [100]/[001] texture observed in
Figure 4c. In sample A, the Al content is higher. In agreement with the XRD results in
Figure 3a and the TEM results in
Figure 5 and
Figure 6, this would enable the formation of Cr
2AlB
2 grains with a [010] texture exposing Al layers to the vapour. In addition, according to the phase diagram in
Figure 2, sample A is now on the tie line between Al and Cr
2AlB
2. The additional Al can probably be found in the amorphous features, rich in Al, between the columns seen in
Figure 5a. Both types of grains would be easily oxidised after exposure to air and account for the measured oxygen content in XPS analyses. A thin layer of Al is also formed at the film/substrate interface in sample A. It is unclear if this layer is formed at the initial stages of growth or is precipitated at a later stage from a more Al-rich film.
At position B, the boron content is higher and the composition will then move into the Cr
2AlB
2- CrB
2-Al triangle as shown in
Figure 2b. Interestingly, the XRD analysis in
Figure 3 shows the simultaneous growth of the four phases in the marked Cr
2AlB
2-CrB
2-Al triangle. As only three phases can be in equilibrium in a ternary system, the triangle does not illustrate the equilibrium conditions for sample B, where at 800 °C a three-phase region exists between Al, Cr
2AlB
2 and Cr
3AlB
4 [
15]. In this sample, the different phases are present as rather large grains at different parts of the film that grow with a close lattice matching of distinct crystallographic orientations coherent with the (100) plane of the MgO substrate.
Lastly, it is important to emphasise that the deposition conditions applied in this study have been obtained using a combinatorial approach. The use of elemental targets in the deposition of multi-element thin films requires the tuning of several parameters and a large number of experiments as only one composition is deposited on a rotating substrate in each experiment. The combinatorial sputtering approach is an established method for the rapid preparation of compositional gradients on a stationary substrate for the analysis of different properties on a continuous gradient. However, the advantage of obtaining a large compositional gradient has some drawbacks. Possible shadowing effects can be caused by the deposition at an oblique angle on a stationary substrate. Also, the measured composition will be an average and on a larger scale, the thickness of the film will vary across the gradient and influence the physical properties at different points, which limit the use of gradient films in practical applications.