Next Article in Journal
Multi-Response Optimization of Surface Grinding Process Parameters of AISI 4140 Alloy Steel Using Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Function under Dry and Wet Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation Test of NO Degradation by Nano-TiO2 Coatings on Road Pavements under Natural Light
Previous Article in Journal
Structural and Electrical Properties of Atomic Layer Deposited PtRu Bimetallic Alloy Thin Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lab-Controlled Experimental Evaluation of Heat-Reflective Coatings by Increasing Surface Albedo for Cool Pavements in Urban Areas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study of Black Cotton Soil Stabilization with Natural Lime and Pozzolans in Pavement Subgrade Construction

by
Zihong Yin
1,
Raymond Leiren Lekalpure
1,* and
Kevin Maraka Ndiema
1,2
1
School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Eldoret, Eldoret 30100, Kenya
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010103
Submission received: 5 December 2021 / Revised: 6 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Materials for Building and Pavement Coatings)

Abstract

:
This study explores the engineering characteristics of Black cotton soil (BCS) stabilized with natural lime, volcanic ash (VA), and their mixtures. Based on the available literature, the stabilization of VA-BCS is limited. Laboratory tests conducted on stabilized BCS include the Atterbeg limits, the proctor test, the swell percent test, and the California bearing ratio (CBR). The results showed that adding VA and lime greatly improves the engineering characteristics of BCS. BCS stabilized with a mixture of VA and lime showed superior results. Adding 3% lime with 20% VA increased natural CBR values 10.76 times, reduced plasticity by 29%, and reduced swell percent by 88%. Stabilized BCS with 3% lime + 20% VA meets the minimum swell, plasticity, and strength requirements; thus, it can be used as an alternative to cutting and filling.

1. Introduction

The construction of new railways, highways and rural roads has rapidly developed in Kenya [1,2]. This development has led to heavy construction of infrastructure projects, which has increasingly faced engineering difficulties due to black cotton soil [3]. Expansive soils form a significant percentage of soils in Kenya [4]. The depth of BCS in Kenya ranges from 0.2 to 0.3 m [5]. BCS is characterized by high swell potential, low shear, low bearing capacity, and excessive compression and dispersion [6]. Clay minerals including chlorite, vermiculite, illite and montmorillonites were found to be abundant in BCS [7]. The high content of clays minerals is the cause of high expansion in BCS [8]. BCS forms deep cracks in dry seasons and expands in wet seasons; these changes, shrinking and swelling, cause road deformation [9]. Therefore, untreated BCS does not meet the material requirements for the placement of subgrade soil and must be cut and filled with suitable material. Various methods of dealing with BCS in Kenya include excavation and replacement with suitable material, stabilization with Portland cement, confining BCS under improved subgrade by using a 300 mm capping layer or entire re-alignment of the proposed road corridor to avoid BCS areas [5]. However, substantial use of these methods dramatically increases construction budgets. Thus, it is vital to find a readily available local replacement material to deal with BCS.
Mixing the materials with inherent binder properties with unstable soils to increase the engineering characteristics of such soils is referred to as soil stabilization. Stabilization greatly reduces the plasticity and swelling potential of BCS, which improves its strength and durability [10,11,12]. Admixtures with, e.g., Portland cement, rice husk ash, hydrated lime and cement kiln dust have been utilized as stabilizers [13,14,15,16]. Other methods include the use of bagasse ash [17]. Al-Mukhtar et al. [18,19] studied lime–soil reactions for both short and long term durations, and Al-Rawas [19] researched the effects of lime and artificial pozzolana on black cotton soil by use of Atterberg limits, swell potential, swell pressure, CBR and unconfined compression tests (UCS). They found that lime and artificial pozzolana greatly improve the engineering characteristics of BCS. F Sitepu et al. [20] investigated the engineering characteristics of VA stabilized BCS by means of the Atterberg limit, CBR and UCS and found that VA increased UCS and CBR, and decreased the liquid limit (LL) and plasticity index (PI), but not significantly. A combination of lime and VA presented a better improvement. Karatai et al. [3] studied the influence of rice husk ash in the treatment of BCS and found that the addition of 20% rice husk ash with 2% lime increases BCS CBR by 800%, decreases soil plasticity by 90% and decreases free swell by 70%. However, rice husk ash is limited only to rice-growing areas.
Volcanic ash (VA), which forms due to volcanic activity, is abundantly found in Kenya [21]. It is rich in minerals, volcanic fragments and rocks and can be used to stabilize BCS. The pozzolanic properties of VA enables it to bind with BCS clay particles and reduce clay swelling. Thus, VA-stabilized BCS decreases the expansive potential and the PI, and increases durability and strength [22]. The utilization of VA as a BCS stabilization agent is limited in Kenya. Zhang et al. [7] studied a combination of VA and BCS for use in the production of hollow clay bricks and found that the bricks exhibit an excellent compressive strength of more than 60 Mpa. This paper was written to establish the viability of the use of VA found in Kenya to stabilize BCS. The effects of natural pozzolana and natural lime on the plasticity, swell and strength of stabilized BCS were investigated.

2. Materials

The materials used in these experiments included Black Cotton Soils, Volcanic Ash soils and Natural lime.

2.1. Black Cotton Soils (BCS)

The BCS used in this study was obtained at Km 20 + 080 along Kapsokwony-Kopsiro-Namwela road, 20 Km from Kimilili town in Western Kenya. Figure 1 presents a sample of BCS used in this study. Chemical and engineering properties, in terms of Atterberg limits based on BS 1377: Part 2:1990 [23], are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. With a CBR value of 1.7, a liquid and plastic limit of 70.7 and 35.7, respectively, and a plasticity index of 35, the obtained soil is classified as black cotton soil according to the Ministry of Public Works Kenya: Road material design manual [5]. Figure 2 illustrates the particle size distribution curve of the obtained BCS.
From the particle size distribution curve:
C μ = D 60 D 10 = 32.79
C C = D 30 2 D 60 D 10 = 0.65
D 60 = 0.1004
D 30 = 0.0142
D 10 = 0.0031
With coefficient of uniformity > 15 and coefficient of curvature < 0.5. The sampled BCS used in this study can be classified as Gap graded according to the BS EN ISO 14688-2:2018 classification, based on particle size distribution [24].

2.2. Volcanic Ash

The natural volcanic ash (VA) sample used in this study was obtained at the floor of the Great Rift Valley near Ewaso Kendong town situated between Mt. Suswa and Mt. Longonot, 65 km Northwest of Nairobi. The sample was scooped 0.2 m below the topsoil. Figure 3 shows VA sample used in this study. The VA’s chemical properties are shown in Table 2.

2.3. Hydrated Lime

Hydrated lime was procured from a local store near the laboratory.

3. Methods

3.1. Combination Scheme and Sample Preparation

Volcanic ash (VA) and black cotton soil (BCS) were air-dried and grounded to pass through 0.75 and 0.5 mm sieving openings. Both VA and BCS were oven-dried for 24 h at 105 °C temperature. The samples were then weighed and thoroughly mixed with different lime, VA and BCS combination dosages, after which they were ready for testing. The design scheme for BCS stabilization is presented in Table 3.

3.2. Engineering Properties Measurements

The engineering characteristics of black cotton soil stabilized with volcanic ash and lime were assessed in this study, including a determination of the Atterberg limits, in addition to the swell potential proctor test and CBR.

3.3. Assessment of Plasticity

The plastic limit (PL) was measured per British Standard 1377-Part 2:1990 [23]. Samples of BCS and BCS with various mixtures passing through a 0.425 mm sieve were air-dried, mixed thoroughly with distilled water, and soaked for 24 h. PL is the moisture content at which a molded soil sample loop breaks when its diameter nears around 3 mm.
The liquid limit (LL) is defined as the water content that changes soil from plastic state to liquid state. The Casagrande apparatus was used to determine LL as per the British Standard 1377-Part 2:1990 [23]. Samples were prepared by passing through a 0.425 mm sieve, oven-dried, mixed thoroughly with distilled water and soaked for 24 h. The soil water content at which 25 blows caused 13 mm closure of the groove at the top of the cub was used as the soil LL.
The plasticity index is the difference of the liquid limit and the plastic limit:
P l a s t i c i t y   I n d e x   ( P I ) = L L P L

3.4. Assessment of Soil Compaction Characteristics

A proctor test was conducted to determine the maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC) as per AASHTO T180:2011 [25]. Black cotton soil (BCS) and BCS specimens with various additives were thoroughly mixed and stored for 24 h. A compaction test was performed for all 15 specimens to determine the MDD and OMC.

3.5. Assessment of Soil Bearing Strength

The California bearing ratio (CBR) was measured per the American Standard ASSHTO: T193:2003 [26]. Specimens were prepared at the OMC and MDD and stored for 24 h. Samples were compacted into three layers of CBR molds. A 2.5 kg rammer was used to apply 30 blows in every layer. After soaking for 7 days, a penetration test was conducted with a 1935 mm2 area plunger at a 1.27 mm/min penetration rate. Values corresponding to 2.5 mm penetration were computed and recorded as the sample’s CBR values.

3.6. Assessment of Swelling Soil Characteristics

Swell percent was determined using the same CBR apparatus as per ASSHTO: T193:2003 [26]. Figure 4 shows the soaked specimen fitted with a CBR swell tripod. The initial gauge reading was recorded as (R1) mm; the final gauge reading was recorded as (R2) mm after 7 days of soaking. The swell percent was calculated as follows:
S w e l l = ( R 1 R 2 ) 116.4 × 100 %
where 116.4 mm is the height of the specimen.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Effects of Volcanic Ash and Hydrated Lime on Plasticity

Table 4 presents the LL and PL of natural and stabilized Black cotton soil. The LL of BCS with the addition of 25% Volcanic Ash decreased by 6.9% from 70.7% to 65.8%. LL of BCS mixed with lime also showed a steady decrease in LL; the use of 4% lime-stabilized BCS reduced the LL from 70.7% to 64.3%. BCS samples mixed with 4% lime + 15% VA presented the largest decrease in the LL value from 70.7% to 53.9%, a 38% reduction.
According to Figure 5a,b, for all the studied materials, a steady decrease in the plasticity index was observed. This is attributed to the pozzolana properties of both lime and VA. Pozzolans react with expansive soils to form compounds with cementitious characteristics; this leads to steady a reduction in the plasticity of BCS.
Figure 5b presents the effect of lime, VA and their mixtures on the plasticity index of natural BCS. BCS mixed with 4% lime, 25% VA, and a mixture of 4% lime + 20% VA decreased the plasticity index from 35% to 21%, 26% and 21%, respectively. According to the Ministry of Public Works Kenya: Road material design manual [5], the plasticity index of subgrade layer material should not exceed 50%. The sampled BCS used in this study satisfies the code plasticity index requirement but does not meet the swell and CBR requirements. BCS stabilized with 3% lime + 20% VA reduced the PI by 1.2 times, to 24.9%.

4.2. Effects of Stabilizers on Compaction Characteristics

Figure 6 presents the influence of lime and volcanic ash (VA) on the optimum moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density (MDD) of black cotton soil (BCS). As observed in Figure 6a, the addition of lime caused a gradual decrease in the MDD and a nearly linear increase in the OMC. Similar behavior was observed by other researchers [3,21]. The immediate decrease in MDD due to the addition of lime can result from particles’ aggregation caused by lime. These particles occupy larger spaces and affect soil grading; further drops in density with the addition of lime can be attributed to the replacement of soil particles with lime particles of comparatively low specific value.
In Figure 6b, the MDD increased while the OMC decreased with the addition of volcanic Ash (VA) from 0% to 25%. Hossain et al. [22] similarly observed the same behavior. According to their explanation, an increase in MDD with the gradual addition of VA is attributed to VA’s lower affinity for water. Increased MDD is an indication of improved soil strength characteristics.

4.3. Effects of Volcanic Ash and Hydrated Lime on the California Bearing Ratio and Expansion Ratio

The CBR and expansion ratio of treated black cotton soil after 7 days of soaking are presented in Figure 7. The lime-stabilized BCS CBR values increased with the increasing of the lime content from 1% to 4%. The CBR values increased from 1.7% to 19%. The expansion ratio of lime-stabilized BCS decreased from 4% to 0.4%, with 4% lime. This behavior is attributed to cation and pozzolanic reactions between BCS and lime.
The CBR values of the Volcanic Ash (VA)-stabilized soils increased from 1.7% to 7% with 25% VA. According to the Ministry of Public Works Kenya: Road material design manual, a minimum of 8% CBR is required for the class 2 (S2) subgrade. Subgrade class S2 has a CBR range of (5–10) with a medium of 7.5. The code recommends that subgrade soils with this range of CBR be further treated with cement. Table 5 presents the subgrade soil classification in Kenya. Thus, BCS stabilized with VA alone is not sufficient to lay a subgrade. The expansion ratio decreased 2.7-fold from 4% to 1.5% with the Addition of 25% VA.
The lime and VA mix stabilizer showed a significant increase in CBR values. The CBR values increased from 1.7% to 25% with the addition of composite stabilizer 4% lime + 20% VA. Expansion was reduced from 4% to 0.3% with the addition of 4% lime + 20% VA.
Table 5 shows the CBR requirement of subgrade material in Kenya. According to Figure 7c, BCS stabilized with 3% lime + 20% VA with a 20% CBR ratio satisfies the requirement and can be used as a subgrade material for subgrade class S2 (CBR range (5–10)) to S5 (CBR range (15–30)).

5. Conclusions

Atterberg limits, compaction, CBR and swell percent tests were used in this study to investigate the engineering characteristics of black cotton soils stabilized with volcanic ash and lime as stabilizing agents. The following conclusions were drawn:
  • BCS stabilized with 3% lime + 20% VA exhibited enhanced mechanical properties such as an increase in the CBR and MDD, which indicated an increase in strength.
  • The addition of 3% lime + 20% VA increased the BCS CBR values significantly, by 10.76 folds, reduced the swell potential by 88%, and reduced the plasticity index by 29%, thus meeting the standard requirement for Class S2 and above pavement subgrade materials according to Kenya’s national road design manual.
  • This study found that both lime and VA significantly reduced the plasticity of BCS.
  • This study found that volcanic ash sourced in Kenya mixed with lime in a 3% lime + 20% VA combination can be used as an effective BCS stabilizer.
In line with the above conclusions, the authors recommend the use of lime and volcanic ash in a 3% lime + 20% VA combination to address the problem of black cotton soil in areas where volcanic ash is available as an alternative to cutting and filling or an over reliance on Portland cement, in order to reduce road infrastructure construction budgets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.L.L.; Supervision, Z.Y.; Writing—original draft, R.L.L. and K.M.N.; Writing—review & editing, Z.Y. and K.M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key research and Development Project of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0802203).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Michael Rono, Moses Ogire, Kapsokwony-Namwela & Malinda Road Project for allowing us to conduct some experiments at the Project Laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding this submission.

References

  1. Briceño-garmendia, C.M.; Shkaratan, M. Kenya’ s Infrastructure: A Continental Perspective; AASHTO: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Njoro, W.M. Impact of Infrastructure Development on Economic Competitiveness in Kenya; Semantic Scholar: Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Karatai, T.R.; Kaluli, J.W.; Kabubo, C.; Thiong’O, G. Soil Stabilization Using Rice Husk Ash and Natural Lime as an Alternative to Cutting and Filling in Road Construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04016127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kanyanjua, S.M.; Keter, J.K.; Okalebo, R.J.; Verchot, L. Identifying potassium-deficient soils in Kenya by mapping and analysis of selected sites. Soil Sci. 2006, 171, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ministry of Public Works Kenya. Part III—Materials & Pavement Design.pdf; Ministry of Public Works Kenya: Nairobi, Kenya, 1999.
  6. Rao, S.; Thyagaraj, T. Swell-compression behaviour of compacted clays under chemical gradients. Can. Geotech. J. 2007, 44, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, P.; Huang, J.; Shen, Z.; Wang, X.; Luo, F.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Miao, S. Fired hollow clay bricks manufactured from black cotton soils and natural pozzolans in Kenya. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 141, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miao, S.; Shi, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, P.; Shen, Z.; Nian, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P. Applied Clay Science Mineral abundances quanti fi cation to reveal the swelling property of the black cotton soil in Kenya. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 161, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tripathy, S.; Rao, K.S.; Fredlund, D.G. Water content—Void ratio swell—Shrink paths of compacted expansive soils. Can. Geotech. J. 2002, 959, 938–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.-F.; Shen, S.-L.; Yin, Z.-Y.; Xu, Y.-S. Rapid field evaluation of the strength of cement-stabilized clayey soil. Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 2014, 74, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aldaood, A.; Bouasker, M.; Al-Mukhtar, M. Effect of long-term soaking and leaching on the behaviour of lime-stabilised gypseous soil. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2015, 16, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yazdandoust, F.; Yasrobi, S.S. Applied Clay Science Effect of cyclic wetting and drying on swelling behavior of polymer-stabilized expansive clays. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al-Mukhtar, M.; Lasledj, A.; Alcover, J.-F. Applied Clay Science Behaviour and mineralogy changes in lime-treated expansive soil at 20 °C. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Babu, G.L.S.; Vasudevan, A.K.; Sayida, M.K. Use of Coir Fibers for Improving the Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils. J. Nat. Fibers 2008, 5, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Murty, V.R.; Praveen, G.V. Use of Chemically Stabilized Soil as Cushion Material below Light Weight Structures Founded on Expansive Soils. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2008, 20, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nawalany, G.; Sokołowski, P. Building—Soil Thermal Interaction: A Case Study. Energies 2019, 12, 2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dang, L.C.; Khabbaz, H.; Ni, B.-J. Transportation Geotechnics Improving engineering characteristics of expansive soils using industry waste as a sustainable application for reuse of bagasse ash. Transp. Geotech. 2021, 31, 100637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al-Mukhtar, M.; Lasledj, A.; Alcover, J.-F. Applied Clay Science Behaviour and mineralogy changes in lime-treated expansive soil at 50 °C. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Rawas, A.A.; Hago, A.W.; Al-Sarmi, H. Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj (artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman. Build. Environ. 2005, 40, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sitepu, F.; Harianto, T.; Ridwan, R.; Marfuah, N. Behaviour of Mixed Expansive Soil and Additive Minerals as Subgrade Layer. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 841, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mizota, C.; Domon, Y.; Yoshida, N. Oxygen isotope composition of natural phosphates from volcanic ash soils of the Great Rift Valley of Africa and east Java, Indonesia. Geoderma 1992, 53, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hossain, K.; Mol, L. Some engineering properties of stabilized clayey soils incorporating natural pozzolans and industrial wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3495–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. BS 1377-9:1990; Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes—Part 2: Classification Tests. British Standard Institutions: London, UK, 2020.
  24. BS EN ISO 14688-1:2018; BSI Standards Publication Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Identification and Classification of Soil. British Standards Institutions: London, UK, 2018; Volume 2, pp. pp. 4–6.
  25. AASHTO. AASHTO-T99-T180 Moisture-Density Relations of Soils; AASHTO: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Volume 310, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  26. Documents, R. The California Bearing Ratio; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003; Volume 99, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. BCS material sample.
Figure 1. BCS material sample.
Coatings 12 00103 g001
Figure 2. Natural BCS particle size distribution curve.
Figure 2. Natural BCS particle size distribution curve.
Coatings 12 00103 g002
Figure 3. Volcanic ash material sample.
Figure 3. Volcanic ash material sample.
Coatings 12 00103 g003
Figure 4. CBR swell tripod for measuring swell.
Figure 4. CBR swell tripod for measuring swell.
Coatings 12 00103 g004
Figure 5. Effects of (a) lime and VA and (b) Lime–VA combined stabilizer on the plasticity of BCS.
Figure 5. Effects of (a) lime and VA and (b) Lime–VA combined stabilizer on the plasticity of BCS.
Coatings 12 00103 g005
Figure 6. Effects of (a) lime and (b) VA on OMC and MDD of black cotton soil.
Figure 6. Effects of (a) lime and (b) VA on OMC and MDD of black cotton soil.
Coatings 12 00103 g006
Figure 7. Effects of (a) lime, (b) volcanic ash and (c) a combination of volcanic ash on CBR and the swell percent value of BCS.
Figure 7. Effects of (a) lime, (b) volcanic ash and (c) a combination of volcanic ash on CBR and the swell percent value of BCS.
Coatings 12 00103 g007
Table 1. Engineering properties of BCS.
Table 1. Engineering properties of BCS.
PropertiesTest Values
LL (%)70.7
PL (%)35.7
PI (%)35
MDD (g/m3)1449
OMC (%)34
CBR (%)1.7
Linear Shrinkage Limit (%)16.4
Free Swell Index (%)3
Plastic Modulus (%)1680
Grading% passing sieve size 0.425 mm48
Table 2. Volcanic ash and black cotton soil chemical properties.
Table 2. Volcanic ash and black cotton soil chemical properties.
PropertiesVolcanic Ash (VA)Black Cotton Soil (BCS)
CaO10.261.68
Fe2O312.249.22
MgO11.420.97
K2O1.291.03
SO30.08-
MnO0.170.26
AL2O313.4617.04
Na2O2.660.69
P2O20.490.02
TiO22.630.91
SiO243.5450.28
Loss on ignition0.4618.02
Table 3. The design scheme for BCS stabilization.
Table 3. The design scheme for BCS stabilization.
No.Volcanic Ash (%)Hydrated Lime (%)Mix Ratio
VA:L
Total Stabilizer Content (%)Notes
1--0:0-Neat BCS
2-10:11-
3-20:22-
4-30:33Lime and BCS
5-40:44-
610-10:010-
715-15:015VA with BCS
820-20:020-
925-25:025-
1015115:116-
1120120:121VA, lime and BCS
121535:118-
1320320:323-
1415415:419-
152045:124-
Table 4. Liquid and plastic limits of neat BCS and with stabilizer.
Table 4. Liquid and plastic limits of neat BCS and with stabilizer.
Sample No.SamplesLiquid Limit (%)Plastic Limit (%)
1Neat BCS70.735.7
Lime (%)
2171.337.9
3269.242
4365.842.8
5464.343
Volcanic ash (%)
61075.442
71565.635.6
8206535
92565.840
Mix stabilizer
1015% VA + 1% L64.432.9
1120% VA + 1% L69.539.7
1215% VA + 3% L58.232
1320% VA + 3% L56.932
1415% VA + 4% L53.933.9
1520% VA + 4% L56.935.6
Table 5. Subgrade soil classification in Kenya [5].
Table 5. Subgrade soil classification in Kenya [5].
Subgrade ClassCBR Range (%)Median
S12–53.5
S25–107.5
S37–1310
S410–1814
S515–3022.5
S6>30-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, Z.; Lekalpure, R.L.; Ndiema, K.M. Experimental Study of Black Cotton Soil Stabilization with Natural Lime and Pozzolans in Pavement Subgrade Construction. Coatings 2022, 12, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010103

AMA Style

Yin Z, Lekalpure RL, Ndiema KM. Experimental Study of Black Cotton Soil Stabilization with Natural Lime and Pozzolans in Pavement Subgrade Construction. Coatings. 2022; 12(1):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Zihong, Raymond Leiren Lekalpure, and Kevin Maraka Ndiema. 2022. "Experimental Study of Black Cotton Soil Stabilization with Natural Lime and Pozzolans in Pavement Subgrade Construction" Coatings 12, no. 1: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010103

APA Style

Yin, Z., Lekalpure, R. L., & Ndiema, K. M. (2022). Experimental Study of Black Cotton Soil Stabilization with Natural Lime and Pozzolans in Pavement Subgrade Construction. Coatings, 12(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop