Measurement and Interpretation of the Effect of Electrical Sliding Speed on Contact Characteristics of On-Load Tap Changers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Literature Survey and Gaps
1.2. Summary of Contributions
- A practical friction and wear testing platform was established for simulating the OLTC’s contact couples’ movement with different speeds in air and insulting oil environments.
- Micro-morphology analysis was also performed using SEM, revealing the wear characteristics of the contact surface of the OLTC.
- The element analysis using EDS and XPS proposes possible mechanisms of the friction and wear behavior of OLTC contact couples at different sliding speeds.
2. Experimental Setup
2.1. Friction and Wear Testing Platform
2.2. Testing Scenarios and Procedures
3. Experimental Results and Discussion
3.1. Contact Resistance
3.1.1. Fluctuations of Contact Resistance over Time
3.1.2. Variations of Contact Resistance at Different Sliding Speeds
3.2. Micro-Morphology Analysis of Contact Surface
3.3. Element Analysis of Contact Surface
3.3.1. Element Analysis of the Contact Surface in Air
3.3.2. Element Analysis of the Contact Surface in Insulating Oil
4. Degradation Mechanism of Contact Couple
4.1. Micro-Morphology Analysis
4.1.1. Influence of Force on Micro-Morphology
- Adhesion effect between the static and moving contacts. In the process of electrical sliding, a large amount of energy will be transmitted through the contact surface, which means the current generates a large amount of Joule heat. Such current will produce an electromagnetic force that promotes adhesion between the contact surfaces. This adhesion may exist in both air and insulating oil medium.
- Meniscus force between the insulating oil (liquid) and the contact couple (solid) [17]. Due to the presence of the insulating oil between the static and moving contacts, meniscus force will be generated. Since the insulating oil also has a specific capillary effect, this will, in turn, further enhance the meniscus force. The meniscus force along the normal direction of the contact surface plays a dominant role in determining the degradation of the contact surface [18].
- Adhesion effect of the insulating oil itself. Since the kinematic viscosity of the insulating oil in the experiment is 9.395 (at 40 °C), which is much higher than that of air, an adhesive force will be formed along the tangential direction of the contact surface during the sliding, which will eventually increase the tangential force. With the increase in sliding speed, the movement of the moving contact in the insulating oil will also be subject to liquid resistance.
- Meniscus force induced by the electric field. It has been reported that the electric field would enhance the generation of meniscus force in the water [19]. Therefore, it is assumed that the electric field will induce meniscus force in the insulating oil.
- Gravity force and thermal buoyancy. During the sliding process, the temperature of the contact surface increases, and such an increase becomes more prominent when the sliding speed is higher [20]. Therefore, thermal buoyancy may have a specific impact on the contact surface, requiring further investigation.
- Arc force. The last force influencing the contact surface is the arc force which is generated during the electrical sliding. Specifically, the arc flow will increase at high sliding speeds, which leads to increased arc pressure applied on the contact surface [21]. It is assumed that the force acts in the direction of contact separation. The arcing activity under oil is higher than that under air because oil’s insulating capability is higher than air. Compared with air, the meniscus force generated by the insulating oil is much more vital. Therefore, the following section mainly focuses on the force analysis of the contact surface in the insulating oil, which is shown in Figure 9. Table 5 shows the explanation of the terms in Figure 9 and the meaning of some parameters in the following formula.
4.1.2. Influence of Arcing on the Micro-Morphology
4.2. Analysis of Surface Compound Formation Mechanisms
4.2.1. Formation of Copper Oxide in Air
4.2.2. Formation of Cuprous Sulfide in Insulating Oil
4.3. Macroscopic Contact Resistance Variation
4.3.1. Macroscopic Contact Resistance Variation in Air
4.3.2. Macroscopic Contact Resistance Variation in Insulating Oil
5. Conclusions
- When the sliding speed increases from 24 mm/s to 119 mm/s, the average contact resistance in air and insulating oil medium increases by 39.67% and 36.83%, respectively. After 120 min of sliding, the initial contact resistance is 0.2 Ω, and the final average contact resistance is 0.276 Ω and 0.267 Ω, respectively. Compared with air, the contact resistance in insulating oil shows more significant fluctuation at high sliding speed and reaches 0.3 Ω at 119 mm/s.
- There are critical velocities in air and insulating oil, and different wear mechanisms appear before and after the critical velocities. The critical velocity in air is about 119 mm/s, and that in insulating oil is about 95 mm/s. Below this speed, mechanical wear plays a significant role in the deterioration of the contact surface. When the velocity exceeds this threshold, arc ablation and chemical oxidation are the main reasons for the deterioration of the contact surface.
- At different sliding speeds, tribological oxidation and electrochemical oxidation lead to the formation of the copper oxide film on the contact surface in the air. In the insulating oil, copper sulfide or cuprous sulfide appears on the contact surface. The oxide film increases the contact resistance, especially at high sliding speeds. The arcing also accelerates the generation of copper sulfide or cuprous sulfide on the contact surface, which increases the contact resistance at high sliding speeds. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the proper sliding speed of the contact couple in an OLTC to minimize mechanical wear and chemical oxidation in real-life operating conditions.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Allard, L.; Lorin, P.; Foata, M. Vibro-acoustic diagnostic: Contributing to an optimized on-load tap changer (OLTC) maintenance strategy. Water Energy Int. 2011, 68, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- CIGRE Brochure. Transformer reliability survey. CIGRE Task Force 2015, 642, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Xu, J.; Wu, P.; Shi, Q.; Wu, Y. On load tap changer fault diagnosis method based on drive motor current and vibration signal. High Volt. Appar. 2022, 58, 202–210. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, J.; Wang, F.; Zheng, Y. Mechanical condition monitoring of on- load tap changer based on recurrence quantification analysis. High Volt. Appar. 2019, 55, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.; Kang, X.; Zhang, L. Friction maps and wear maps of Ag/MoS2/WS2 nanocomposite with different sliding speed and normal force. Tribol. Int. 2021, 164, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namus, R.; Nutter, J.; Qi, J. Sliding speed influence on the tribo-corrosion behaviour of Ti6Al4V alloy in simulated body fluid. Tribol. Int. 2021, 3, 107023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Song, C.; Zhang, Y. Current-carrying contact character and wear behavior of an elastic ring at different rolling speeds. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 131, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, J. Sliding electrical contact behavior of AuAgCu brush on Au plating. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 3029–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noguchi, S. Turn-to-Turn Contact Resistance Measurement of No-Insulation REBCO Pancake Coil: External Field Dependence. IEEE trans. Appl. Supercond. 2021, 31, 4602105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukuyama, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Kondo, T. Study of Contact Resistance in Connectors with Physical Simulation Using Nanofabrication. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2017, 66, 1248–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.; Gao, W.; Zhao, D. Method to improve the repeatability of dynamic contact resistance measurement test results for high-voltage circuit breakers. IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2019, 13, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, S.; Vikram, G.; Bobji, M.; Mohan, S. Table top experimental setup for electrical contact resistance measurement during indentation. Measurement 2019, 152, 107286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popov, V.L. Principles and Applications of Contact Mechanics and Tribology, 2nd ed.; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Sun, L.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, S. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of CuO-Cu2O/GO nanocomposites for the photocatalytic degradation of organic dye and tetracycline pollutants. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 6420–6427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Song, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effect of rotating speed on rolling current carrying friction damage of pure copper in water environment. Tribol 2021, 41, 365–372. [Google Scholar]
- Heide, P.V. X-ray Photoelectron Spectrosco; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Birleanu, C.; Pustan, M.; Rusu, F.; Dudescu, C.; Muller, R.; Baracu, A. Relative humidity effect on pull-off forces in MEMS flexible structures measured by AFM. In 2017 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Zamora, R.; Sanchez, C.; Freire, F. Influence of capillary condensation of water in nanoscale friction. Phys. Status Solidi 2010, 201, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Jing, W.; Liang, X.; Liu, Y. Adhesion force measurement of electrical insulating materials by atomic force microscopy. In Proceedings of the 2012 Power Engineering and Automation Conference, Wuhan, China, 18–20 September 2012; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, G.; Xu, P.; Wei, W. Modeling and analysis of magnetic fluid in descending arc under load conditions. High Volt. Eng. 2019, 45, 3916–3923. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Gao, G. Thermal ablation process of electrical contact materials under arc action. High Volt. Eng. 2019, 45, 2276–2283. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, Y.; Jacobs, T.; Jiang, Y. A multi-bond model of single-asperity tribochemical wear at the nano-scale. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2017, 9, 35333–35340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhayal, Y.; Chandel, C.; Gupta, K. The influence of hydroxyl volatile organic compounds on the oxidation of aqueous sulfur dioxide by oxygen. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 7805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, H.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q. Study on Sulfide distribution in the operating oil of power transformers and its effect on the oil quality. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Gao, S.; Deng, B. Corrosion mechanisms for electrical fields leading to the acceleration of copper sulfide deposition on insulation windings. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 9124–9134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajek, J.; Bennstam, G.; Dahlund, M. Quality of oil makes the difference, ABB discovers the solution to transformer breakdown. ABB Rev. 2004, 3, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
Parameters | Set Value | Actual Value |
---|---|---|
Normal load Fn (N) | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Sliding speed v (mm/s) | 25/50/75/100/125 | 24/50/76/95/119 |
Diameter d (mm) | 20 | 20 |
Sliding time t (min) | 120 | 120 |
Electrical voltage U (kV) | 2 | 2 |
Sliding distance D (mm) | 200 | 200 |
Insulating Dielectrics | Sliding Speed (mm/s) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 50 | 76 | 95 | 119 | |
Air | Scratches, abrasive wear and slight arc erosion | Scratches, grooves, and arc erosion | Erosion pits, abrasive wear | Adhesive wear, micro-cracks and delamination wear | Arc erosion |
Oil | Erosion pit and delamination wear | Arc erosion and adhesive wear | Abrasive wear and delamination wear | Scratches, delamination wear and large erosion pits | Adhesive wear and delamination wear |
Element | O1s | S2p | C1s | Cu2p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Atom/% | 6.32 | 1.53 | 90.25 | 1.89 |
Element | Cu2p | O1s | S2p | C1s |
---|---|---|---|---|
Atom/% | 3.32 | 4.87 | 3.06 | 88.75 |
Parameters | Meaning |
---|---|
θ | Angle between insulating oil and copper contact surface |
φ | The half-angle of the contact area |
Fad | Adhesive force: A type of molecular force that represents the adhesion between the insulating oil and the contact surface, including the adhesion force caused by the meniscus force and the sliding speed |
Fm | Adhesive force dominated by the meniscus force |
Fv⊥ | Adhesive force dominated by the sliding speed |
R | The radius of the moving contact tip |
γ1 | The surface energy of the insulating oil medium; surface energy is a measure of the breaking of chemical bonds between molecules when creating the surface of a substance |
μ | The dynamic viscosity coefficient |
v | Sliding speed |
dv/dx | The velocity gradient |
K1 | Constant determined by different liquids |
Ff | Resistance against the direction of motion |
Speed (mm/s) | Breakdown Voltage Amplitude (V) | Average Breakdown Voltage (V) | Arc Discharge Energy (J) | Arc Discharge Energy Amplitude (J) | Breakdown Frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 0.579 | 0.055 | 0.088 | 0.366 | 281 |
50 | 0.512 | 0.032 | 0.034 | 0.346 | 171 |
76 | 0.584 | 0.026 | 0.204 | 0.388 | 63 |
95 | 3.620 | 0.016 | 0.015 | 0.372 | 49 |
119 | 1.181 | 0.075 | 0.013 | 0.381 | 98 |
Speed (mm/s) | Breakdown Voltage Amplitude (V) | Average Breakdown Voltage (V) | Arc Discharge Energy (J) | Arc Discharge Energy Amplitude (J) | Breakdown Frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 4.137 | 0.051 | 0.004 | 0.300 | 120 |
50 | 3.200 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.230 | 29 |
76 | 3.926 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.305 | 46 |
95 | 3.185 | 0.097 | 0.002 | 0.205 | 25 |
119 | 0.940 | 0.059 | 0.003 | 0.240 | 82 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, X.; Li, S.; Cui, Y.; Kang, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; Dong, H. Measurement and Interpretation of the Effect of Electrical Sliding Speed on Contact Characteristics of On-Load Tap Changers. Coatings 2022, 12, 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101436
Yang X, Li S, Cui Y, Kang Y, Li Z, Li H, Dong H. Measurement and Interpretation of the Effect of Electrical Sliding Speed on Contact Characteristics of On-Load Tap Changers. Coatings. 2022; 12(10):1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101436
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Xingzu, Shuaibing Li, Yi Cui, Yongqiang Kang, Zongying Li, Hongwei Li, and Haiying Dong. 2022. "Measurement and Interpretation of the Effect of Electrical Sliding Speed on Contact Characteristics of On-Load Tap Changers" Coatings 12, no. 10: 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101436
APA StyleYang, X., Li, S., Cui, Y., Kang, Y., Li, Z., Li, H., & Dong, H. (2022). Measurement and Interpretation of the Effect of Electrical Sliding Speed on Contact Characteristics of On-Load Tap Changers. Coatings, 12(10), 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101436