Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: Mechanical Properties of Advanced Multifunctional Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Uniformity of Wafer-Scale 4H-SiC Epitaxial Layers Grown under Various Epitaxial Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Internal Relaxation of Biaxial Strain on Structural and Electronic Properties of In0.5Al0.5N Thin Film

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
2
Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Metamaterials and Micro-Device, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
3
Institute of Sciences, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan 467036, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(5), 598; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050598
Submission received: 20 February 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Inorganic Thin Film Materials)

Abstract

:
Ternary wurtzite In0.5Al0.5N films and coatings are promising candidates for microelectronic or optoelectronic devices due to their excellent physical and chemical properties. However, as a universal and non-negligible phenomenon, in-plane strain and its effects on the structure and properties of In0.5Al0.5N still need systematic research. In particular, the deformation mechanism of In0.5Al0.5N under biaxial strain is not clearly understood currently. To reveal the role of the internal relaxation effect in lattice deformation, the lattice variation, thermal stability, and the electronic properties of ternary wurtzite compound In0.5Al0.5N under different biaxial strains are systematically investigated, using first-principles calculations based on density functional theory. The results indicate that, compared with the classic elastic deformation mechanism with constrained atomic coordinates, atom relaxation results in a much smaller Poisson ratio. Moreover, the plastic relaxation In0.5Al0.5N phase, generated by free atom relaxation, exhibits higher thermal stability than the elastic relaxation phase, so it is the most likely phase in reality when biaxial strain is imposed. Meanwhile, the biaxial strain has a remarkable influence on the electronic structure of In0.5Al0.5N films, where a non-linear variety of energy band gaps can be seen between the valance band and conduction band.

1. Introduction

Boron group elements and their nitrides, such as AlGaN and InGaN, have been extensively used in UV lasers, light-emitting diodes or high-electron-mobility transistors, and other fields [1,2,3], owing to their excellent physical and chemical properties, such as wide bandgap, superior luminous and quantum efficiency, as well as extraordinary resistance from high temperature, acid, alkali, and radiation. The wurtzite (WZ) compound InxAl1−xN, as a promising representative of these materials, has attracted extensive attention in recent years within the field because of its unique performance. For example, the adjustable bandgap with a wide range (0.7~6.2 eV) allows for the realization of emission and detection from ultraviolet to infrared in the wavelength range. Moreover, the refractive index makes it a suitable candidate for microelectronic or optoelectronic devices [4,5,6].
On the other hand, InAlN ternary alloy, instead of a conventional AlGaN barrier layer, is the best way to solve the problems caused by the strain of the barrier layer. In lattice-matched InAlN/GaN heterostructures, the InAlN barrier layer is in a strain-free state, which effectively eliminates the strain-related inverse piezoelectric effect and reliability problems. In fact, depending on the change of In composition, InAlN can form lattice-matched heterostructures of different channel materials, such as InAlN/AlGaN, InAlN/GaN and InAlN/InGaN, respectively, to meet different application requirements. Therefore, InAlN alloy materials bring more choices and degrees of freedom to the design of nitride-based heterostructures and devices, provide opportunities for the further improvement of device performance, greatly expand the research scope, solve the device problems based on conventional AlGaN and InGaN ternary alloys, and can realize many theoretical predictions and expand the application space of nitride devices.
Compared with AlGaN, InGaN, or other Boron group element nitrides, it is more complex and challenging to obtain high-quality epitaxial thin films for InxAl1−xN, which is mainly due to the difference between two basic binary nitrides, i.e., AlN and InN. Specifically, the growth of AlN requires a high temperature and low Ⅲ-Ⅴ element ratio, while low temperature and high Ⅲ-Ⅴ ratio are needed for the growth of InN [7]. In addition, the lattice constant mismatch of AlN and InN in a and c are 12.3% and 13.5%, respectively, thereafter introducing tremendous strain in epitaxial InxAl1−xN film. The biaxial strain is also quite universal in these thin films, and it is essential to determine the physical properties of such materials. Until now, considerable efforts have been made to address this issue, for example, introducing an AlN intermediate layer at the InxAl1−xN/GaN interface [8]. However, the mechanism between biaxial strain and physical properties is not clear for InxAl1−xN thin films so far, especially WZ InxAl1−xN. Fortunately, our previous study showed that internal relaxation plays a crucial role in the deformation of crystalline materials under biaxial strain [9]. In this study, the effects of strain on the geometry structure, stability, electronic structure, and other physical properties of this nitride are systematically investigated by applying the in-plane strains on WZ In0.5Al0.5N within the framework of the first-principles analyzing method.

2. Modeling and Computational Details

The equilibrium phase of AlN and InN is a wurtzite-type structure at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The experimental values for a and c of the crystallographic cells are 3.112 Å (3.548 Å) and 4.982 Å (5.760 Å), respectively [10,11]. It has been proved that AlN and InN could form continuous compounds in the whole compositional range with the formula InxAl1−xN, deviating slightly from Vegard’s rule [12]. In this study, the cell of In0.5Al0.5N was set up by replacing half of the Al atoms in the cell model, as it can be reasonably chosen as a typical representative of InxAl1−xN compounds.
In this work, the CASTEP coded package was employed for computation and analysis of the structural, mechanical, stability, and electronic properties of In0.5Al0.5N based on a plane wave basis, set within the density functional theory framework [13,14]. The lattice structure and atomic configuration of the initial In0.5Al0.5N cell were optimized through a ground state energy calculation, using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof function within the generalized gradient approximations (GGA) to describe the electron–electron exchange and correlation effects [15]. The ultrasoft pseudopotentials method was employed, in which the atomic core, as well as the near-core electrons, were treated as Coulomb cores, and the valance electrons are N (2s22p3), Al (3s23p1), and In (5s25p1), respectively [16]. During the computation, the cut-off energy and Brillouin zone k-point mesh of 1020 eV, 11 × 11 × 6, 1090 eV, 12 × 12 × 6, and 1190 eV, 11 × 11 × 6 were used for the AlN, InN, and In0.5Al0.5N, respectively. It has been examined and proved to be reason enough for the convergence of the computation. The deviation in parameters from the experimental one is lower than 5%, so the whole calculation is reasonably reliable. The method used in this work to apply biaxial strain has been reported previously. Compared with the classic elastic deformation model with fixed atomic coordinates, the effects of internal relaxation on the structure and other physical properties of In0.5Al0.5N are investigated in detail in this research. After the structural computation, the B3LYP hybrid function [17] was employed to compute the band structures and density of states. The cut-off energy and K-point meshes were 450 eV and 3 × 3 × 6, respectively. The obtained lattice parameters and elastic constants for these three nitrides are summarized in Table 1. The lattice parameters obtained in this work are in considerable agreement with the previously reported experimental and theoretical values [18]. The evident deviations between the results in this work and the experimental and theoretical values reported in the literature originate from the settings of the exchange-correlation functional in the calculations.
GGA functionals in this work are believed to provide a better overall description of the electronic subsystem than the classic local exchange-correlation functionals, which tend to overbind atoms, so that the bond lengths and the cell volume are usually underestimated by a few percent, and the bulk modulus is correspondingly overestimated. GGA corrects this error but may underbind instead, leading to slightly long bond lengths and deviations in the elastic constants. On the other hand, despite standard Kohn–Sham approaches, the Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof (HSE) screened exchange hybrid functionals scheme offers a high degree of accuracy in lattice parameters and bulk moduli, for a wide range of semiconductors, but with an additional cost.

3. Results and Discussion

It is well recognized that the Poisson phenomenon is the effect that a solid-state tends to transfer the lattice deformation to other directions. Through this effect, the solid-state system will reduce the strain energy and make the lattice more stable. Figure 1 shows the out-of-plane strain εzz as a function of in-plane strain εxx of In0.5Al0.5N, where the out-of-plane strain εzz decreases linearly with the increase in in-plane strain εxx. The slope of the L2 line is the Poisson ratio (−0.5228), which can be obtained using the equation ν = −2C13/C33 for this WZ type of symmetry, where ν denotes the Poisson ratio, and C13 and C33 are elastic constants (Table 1). It is worth noting that the slope of L1 is much smaller than that of L2, illustrating that internal relaxation reduces out-of-plane train and, thus, Poisson ratio. This phenomenon has also been verified experimentally for other WZ compounds [23], and the results of this work are reliable.
The cohesive energy (Ecoh) of a solid refers to the energy required to separate the constituent atoms apart from each other to form an assembly of neutral free atoms [24], which can be used to evaluate of thermal stability of crystal materials. Figure 2 shows the Ecoh of In0.5Al0.5N versus different deformations of biaxial strain. The same parabolic-type relationship can be found for the deformed phases, with and without internal relaxation. It is evident that under the same biaxial strain, the cohesive energy after internal relaxation is more negative than the elastically deformed phase, indicating higher thermal stability of In0.5Al0.5N after internal relaxation than that caused by classic elastic deformation without internal relaxation, so it is the most likely phase in reality when biaxial strain is imposed. The same phenomenon can also be found in WZ ZnO [9]; although there is still work to do yet, these results indicate that the WZ-type compounds after internal relaxation are the most likely phases.
The electronic properties of a material primarily depend on the type of elements that make up the material and the topology of these elements. The latter determines its electronic structure by defining the overall distribution of various fields, such as electric charge (electric field) in the material. The atomic relaxation of In0.5Al0.5N involves adjusting atomic position, which inevitably affects its electronic structure. Figure 3 presents the results of the most stable phase (i.e., after freely atomic relaxation) under biaxial strain.
From Figure 3, we can see that the band gap (Eg) of In0.5Al0.5N under no in-plane strain is 2.55 eV, which is in good accordance with the experimental results of optical absorption [25], verifying the reliability of our calculation method. Moreover, we noticed that the band-gap values vary evidently with the applied strains. Specifically, the values of band gap Eg monotonically narrow under compressive strain, while the band gap Eg first widens and then narrows under tensile strain. It is noteworthy that the Eg exhibits the highest value of 2.65 eV, at a tensile strain of around 1%, indicating that the band gap Eg of solid states, such as WZ-type compounds, can be modulated by applying in-plane strain.
To shed light on the mechanism of biaxial strain on the electronic structures, we carried out the calculations of energy-band structure and electronic density of states (DOS), as depicted in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. Many works have confirmed that the equilibrium state of In0.5Al0.5N exhibits typical direct band-gap semiconductor characteristics, with valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) appearing at the Γ point of the Brillouin zone. We first focus our attention on the energy band structure. The results show that the main outline of the band structure of In0.5Al0.5N is very close to those of InN and AlN, with a relatively smooth VBM, mainly composed of N2p orbitals [26]. The bottom of the conduction band (CB) primarily consists of s orbital electrons, with a free-electron-like distribution, which leads to the lower effective mass of the charge carrier at the bottom of the conduction band (electron) than that at the top of the valence band (hole, VB). That is to say, the mobility of electron charge is higher than that of the hole in In0.5Al0.5N, thus, resulting in an n-type semiconductor at normal conditions.
The band structure changes significantly with the application of the biaxial strain. Concerning CB, an apparent monotonic decrease can be seen for CBM under compressive strain, while CBM rises first and then decreases under tensile strain, leading to a maximum band gap between VBM and CBM, occurring at a tension strain of 1%. Furthermore, the locations of bands in VB also vary with the biaxial strain. As reported by Yang [27], the VBM consists of the near degenerate heavy hole (HH) and crystal-field-split hole (CH) bands. As can be seen from Figure 4, the HH band of WZ In0.5Al0.5N is consistently above CH, regardless of biaxial strain, which is different from Yang’s research on other II-V and III-V WZ semiconductors, such as GaN and CdSe, where the CH band shifts upward and becomes the VBM under tensile strain. On the other hand, the positions of HH and CH and the gaps have changed remarkably, especially in our study, as the HH bands become non-degenerate.
Beyond that, the biaxial strain also shows an apparent influence on the density of states. As revealed in Figure 5, the variety of VB is quite simple, where the peaks from every species move downward to the lower energy region under compressive strain and upward to the higher energy region under tensile strain. In contrast, a relatively complicated change can be identified for CB in Figure 4 and Figure 5, in which the peak positions firstly undergo an upward shifting in the tiny tensile strain region (≤1%) and then rapidly move downward, as the tensile strain continues to increase, although the peaks of CB show similar trends to that of the valence band in the compressive strain region. Moreover, the magnitude of effects of biaxial strain on the valence band and conduction band is different. In general, the shift range of the peak in the conduction band is more significant than that of the valence band. It is believed that the change in electronic structure will cause a variety of related optical behavior, which will be investigated in further work.
The above theoretical results have a particular significance for the preparation and practical application of optoelectronic devices based on AlxIn1−xN materials. For example, they can be used to assist in formulating the preparation process and parameters to shift the electronic structure of AlxIn1−xN, to realize accurate regulation of device characteristics. They can also be used to evaluate the influence of temperature and its changes, matrix materials, and other practical factors on the performance of the AlxIn1−xN-based device, to determine the best service conditions for specific performance requirements.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the influence of biaxial strain on the structure, thermal stability, as well as electronic properties, of wurtzite-type In0.5Al0.5N was investigated based on the first-principles computations. Compared with the classical linear elastic deformation mechanism with fixed atomic coordinates, the internal relaxation, involving free atom and lattice adjustment, will lead to plastic relaxation, along with a similar linear dependence in the out-of-plane strain on the in-plane strain, although the Poisson ratio of the plastic relaxation phase is much smaller than that of its elastic relaxation counterpart under the same biaxial strain. In addition, the change in the cohesive energy of this compound after plastic relaxation, under the same strain, is also smaller than that of the elastic-deformed one, indicating that the internal relaxation will improve the thermal stability of In0.5Al0.5N, relative to elastic relaxation under biaxial strain. The electronic structure of wurtzite In0.5Al0.5N is also significantly affected and modulated by internal relaxation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Q.; Writing—original draft, G.Z.; Writing—review & editing, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 51502179. And Hebei Natural Science Foundation, Grant No. E2020210076.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arifin, P.; Sutanto, H.; Subagio, A. Plasma-Assisted MOCVD Growth of Non-Polar GaN and AlGaN on Si(111) Substrates Utilizing GaN-AlN Buffer Layer. Coatings 2022, 12, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, H.; Tang, B.; Wan, H.; Sun, H.; Zhou, S.; Dai, J.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.; Guo, L.J. Boosted ultraviolet electroluminescence of InGaN/AlGaN quantum structures grown on high-index contrast patterned sapphire with silica array. Nano Energy 2020, 69, 104427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khan, M.A.K.; Alim, M.A.; Gaquiere, C. 2DEG transport properties over temperature for AlGaN/GaN HEMT and AlGaN/InGaN/GaN pHEMT. Microelectron. Eng. 2021, 238, 111508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Song, W.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, W.; Wang, L. Influence of growth parameters on microstructures and electrical properties of InxAl1−xN thin films using sputtering. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 885, 160977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, Y.; Peng, W.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wei, J.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y. Substrate temperature induced physical property variation of InxAl1−xN alloys prepared on Al2O3 by magnetron sputtering. Vacuum 2020, 179, 109512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Taylor, E.; Smith, M.D.; Sadler, T.C.; Lorenz, K.; Li, H.N.; Alves, E.; Parbrook, P.J.; Martin, R.W. Structural and optical properties of Ga auto-incorporated InAlN epilayers. J. Cryst. Growth 2014, 408, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gonschorek, M.; Carlin, J.F.; Feltin, E.; Py, M.A.; Grandjean, N.; Darakchieva, V.; Monemar, B.; Lorenz, M.; Ramm, G. Two-dimensional electron gas density in Al1−x InxN/AlN/GaN heterostructures (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.23). J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 93714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Xie, J.; Ni, X.; Wu, M.; Leach, J.H.; Özgür, Ü.; Morkoç, H. High electron mobility in nearly lattice-matched AlInN∕AlN∕GaN heterostructure field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 132116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Guoqiang, Q.; Guanglei, Z.; Dongchun, L.; Shimin, L. Lattice and internal relaxation of ZnO thin film under in-plane strain. Thin Solid Film. 2010, 519, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paszkowicz, W.; Černý, R.; Krukowski, S. Rietveld refinement for indium nitride in the 105–295 K range. Powder Diffr. 2012, 18, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Angerer, H.; Brunner, D.; Freudenberg, F.; Ambacher, O.; Stutzmann, M.; Höpler, R.; Metzger, T.; Born, E.; Dollinger, G.; Bergmaier, A.; et al. Determination of the Al mole fraction and the band gap bowing of epitaxial AlxGa1−xN films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 71, 1504–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sapa, L.; Bożek, B.; Danielewski, M. Remarks on Parabolicity in a One-Dimensional Interdiffusion Model with the Vegard Rule. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2021, 45, 2135–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fan, Q.; Li, C.; Yang, R.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Yun, S. Stability, mechanical, anisotropic and electronic properties of oP8 carbon: A superhard carbon allotrope in orthorhombic phase. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 294, 121894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kilic, M.E.; Lee, K.-R. First-Principles Study of Fluorinated Tetrahexcarbon: Stable Configurations, Thermal, Mechanical, and Electronic Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 8225–8235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Perdew, J.P.; Wang, Y. Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244–13249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vanderbilt, D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 7892–7895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Toma, M.; Kuvek, T.; Vrček, V. Ionization Energy and Reduction Potential in Ferrocene Derivatives: Comparison of Hybrid and Pure DFT Functionals. J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 8029–8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Darakchieva, V.; Xie, M.Y.; Tasnádi, F.; Abrikosov, I.A.; Hultman, L.; Monemar, B.; Kamimura, J.; Kishino, K. Lattice parameters, deviations from Vegard’s rule, and E2 phonons in InAlN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 261908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Polian, A.; Grimsditch, M.; Grzegory, I. Elastic constants of gallium nitride. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 3343–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caro, M.A.; Schulz, S.; O’Reilly, E.P. Hybrid functional study of the elastic and structural properties of wurtzite and zinc-blende group-III nitrides. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 14117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Serrano, J.; Bosak, A.; Krisch, M.; Manjón, F.J.; Romero, A.H.; Garro, N.; Wang, X.; Yoshikawa, A.; Kuball, M. InN Thin Film Lattice Dynamics by Grazing Incidence Inelastic X-Ray Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 205501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Łepkowski, S.P.; Gorczyca, I. Elastic properties of InGaN and InAlN from first-principles calculations. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1566, 83–84. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ashrafi, A.B.M.A.; Binh, N.T.; Zhang, B.P.; Segawa, Y. Strain relaxation and its effect in exciton resonance energies of epitaxial ZnO layers grown on 6H-SiC substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 2814–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmed, H.; Hashim, A. Geometry Optimization, Optical and Electronic Characteristics of Novel PVA/PEO/SiC Structure for Electronics Applications. Silicon 2021, 13, 2639–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alam, S.N.; Zubialevich, V.Z.; Ghafary, B.; Parbrook, P.J. Bandgap and refractive index estimates of InAlN and related nitrides across their full composition ranges. Nature 2020, 10, 16205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xie, M. Structural and elastic properties of InN and InAlN with different surface orientations and doping. Ph.D. Thesis, Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping, Sweden, 2012; p. 79. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang, S.; Prendergast, D.; Neaton, J.B. Nonlinear variations in the electronic structure of II–VI and III–V wurtzite semiconductors with biaxial strain. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 152108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Deviations of out−of−plane strain εzz of In0.5Al0.5N after different deformations of biaxial strain.
Figure 1. Deviations of out−of−plane strain εzz of In0.5Al0.5N after different deformations of biaxial strain.
Coatings 12 00598 g001
Figure 2. Cohesive energy Ecoh of In0.5Al0.5N after different deformations of biaxial strain.
Figure 2. Cohesive energy Ecoh of In0.5Al0.5N after different deformations of biaxial strain.
Coatings 12 00598 g002
Figure 3. Energy band gaps Eg of In0.5Al0.5N under different biaxial strains.
Figure 3. Energy band gaps Eg of In0.5Al0.5N under different biaxial strains.
Coatings 12 00598 g003
Figure 4. Band structures of WZ In0.5Al0.5N at (a) equilibrium, (b) biaxial compressive strain of −5%, (c) biaxial tensile strain of 1%, and (d) biaxial tensile strain of 5% in (0001) plane after free relaxation.
Figure 4. Band structures of WZ In0.5Al0.5N at (a) equilibrium, (b) biaxial compressive strain of −5%, (c) biaxial tensile strain of 1%, and (d) biaxial tensile strain of 5% in (0001) plane after free relaxation.
Coatings 12 00598 g004
Figure 5. Partial density of states of freely relaxed In0.5Al0.5N under different biaxial strains for (A) N2s, (B) N2p, (C) In5s, (D) In5p, (E) Al3s, (F) Al3p electrons.
Figure 5. Partial density of states of freely relaxed In0.5Al0.5N under different biaxial strains for (A) N2s, (B) N2p, (C) In5s, (D) In5p, (E) Al3s, (F) Al3p electrons.
Coatings 12 00598 g005
Table 1. Lattice parameters and elastic constants of AlN, InN, and In0.5Al0.5N.
Table 1. Lattice parameters and elastic constants of AlN, InN, and In0.5Al0.5N.
NameMethoda = bcC11/GPaC12/GPaC13/GPaC33/GPaC44/GPa
AlNExperimental [19]3.1124.982396137108373116
This work3.1265.002428.893.264.1418.3125.0
HSE [20]3.1034.970410.2142.4110.1385.0122.9
InNExperimental [21]3.5485.76022510910826555
This work3.5935.835246.067.645.7264.859.6
HSE [20]3.5425.711233.8110.091238.355.4
In0.5Al0.5NThis work3.3485.527256.589.384.1321.069.2
Others3.35 [18]5.37 [18]293 [22]128.3 [22]105.3 [22]298.25 [22]73.75 [22]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, G.; Qin, G.; Zhang, F. Effects of Internal Relaxation of Biaxial Strain on Structural and Electronic Properties of In0.5Al0.5N Thin Film. Coatings 2022, 12, 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050598

AMA Style

Zhang G, Qin G, Zhang F. Effects of Internal Relaxation of Biaxial Strain on Structural and Electronic Properties of In0.5Al0.5N Thin Film. Coatings. 2022; 12(5):598. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Guanglei, Guoqiang Qin, and Feipeng Zhang. 2022. "Effects of Internal Relaxation of Biaxial Strain on Structural and Electronic Properties of In0.5Al0.5N Thin Film" Coatings 12, no. 5: 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050598

APA Style

Zhang, G., Qin, G., & Zhang, F. (2022). Effects of Internal Relaxation of Biaxial Strain on Structural and Electronic Properties of In0.5Al0.5N Thin Film. Coatings, 12(5), 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050598

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop