Next Article in Journal
Prediction of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Atmospheric Plasma-Sprayed 8YSZ Thermal Barrier Coatings Using Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical and Tribological Behaviors of Hot-Pressed SiC/SiCw-Y2O3 Ceramics with Different Y2O3 Contents
Previous Article in Journal
Growth of Zn1−xNixO Thin Films and Their Structural, Optical and Magneto-Optical Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Microstructures and Properties of B-Bearing High-Speed Alloy Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interfacial Microstructure and Shear Behavior of the Copper/Q235 Steel/Copper Block Fabricated by Explosive Welding

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China
2
School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(3), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030600
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 11 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Ceramic and Alloy Coatings)

Abstract

:
A copper/Q235 steel/copper composite block with excellent bonding interfaces was prepared by explosive welding which was a promising technique to fabricate laminates. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the interfaces were investigated via the tensile-shear test, optical microscope (OM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD). The results showed that the shear strength of the upper-interface and lower-interfaces of the welded copper/steel are higher than ~235 MPa and ~222 MPa, respectively. The specimens failed fully within the copper and not at the bonding interface. It was attributed to: (1) no cavities and cracks at the interface; (2) the interface formed a metallurgical bonding including numerous ultra-fine grains (UFGs) which can significantly improve the plastic deformation coordination at the interface and inhibit the generation of micro-cracks.

1. Introduction

Copper-steel composite laminates combine the excellent electrical/thermal conductivity of pure copper with the high strength and corrosion resistance of steel, and have a wide application in many fields, such as nuclear island cooling systems, vacuum chamber heat exchange systems, copper electrolytic refining equipment [1,2,3]. Good metallurgical bonding of copper and steel has been challenging due to the large melting point difference and low mutual solubility. Traditional copper/steel composite laminate preparation methods mainly include accumulative rolling [4], diffusion welding [5], magnetron sputtering [6], and casting [7]. Compared with the processes mentioned above, explosive welding is an effective process to weld two or more dissimilar laminates, when there are distinct differences in metal properties such as melting point, strength and so on [8]. Explosive welding is a metallurgical process that uses the shock wave generated by the explosion of explosives to subject the metal to a high-speed impact and bond it in a short period of time. Of course, there are many factors that can affect the quality of welding, such as the falling speed of the flyer plate, static angle, bending angle, burst speed of the explosive, the thickness and nature of the flyer plate and substrate [9,10].
The bonding interface has a decisive influence on the mechanical properties of the welded composites. This is because failure often occurs near the weld interface. The development of industry also places higher desire on explosive welding: (1) revealing failure mechanisms of composite materials at the welded interface; (2) improving the bonding strength of welded composite materials.
Presently, most studies on explosive welding are focused on the wave morphology, bonding strength, and microstructure at the interface of two welded dissimilar metals [10,11,12]. The bonding interface of explosive welding is often wavy, and the periodic fluctuation of shear stress is considered to be an important factor [13]. Gao et al. [14] investigated the effect of stand-off distance on the bonding strength and microstructure of Al/Ni sheets, and found that with the increasing of stand-off distance, the welded interface becomes more undulating, showing in turn straight, wavy and continuously melted. Zhou et al. [8] employed tensile shear test with in-situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) to investigate the interfacial bonding properties of the Q235/TA2 composite plate and micro-cracks generation and propagation in the welded interface. The results suggested that failure of the interface is the combination of the cavities, micro-cracks, and brittle intermetallic compounds. Under the tensile-shear condition, micro-cracks develop at the welded interface, associate, and subsequently develop along the interface wave direction. In order to increase the interfacial bonding of explosive welding, friction stir processing (FSP) was used as a means of optimization [11]. The FSP not only reduces defects at the interface, but introduces the formation of nano-grains during stirring, which significantly improves the bonding strength of the interface. Ismail et al. [15] found that the addition of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) between two plates increases the resistance of the solder joint to the blast wave. Based on the above studies, it can obviously be found that many efforts were devoted to exploit the interfacial microstructures and improve the interface bonding strength for the explosive welded composite with two kinds of dissimilar metals. In general, relatively little effort has been devoted to fabricate multi-layered composites via explosive welding, especially for a widely used copper-steel composite, while the microstructure and properties of the weld interfaces are worth exploring.
In this work, a three-layered copper/Q235 steel/copper block was fabricated by an explosive welding technique. The interfacial microstructure and shear behavior of the copper/Q235 steel/copper block were clearly explored and revealed.

2. Experimental

Ordinary carbon structural steel plates (Q235, C-0.125, Si-0.072, Mn-0.145, P-0.017, S-0.015, Fe-balance in wt.%) and pure copper (Fe-0.003, Si-0.028, S-0.004, Cu-balance in wt.%) plates were selected. All plates had the same dimensions in 110 × 110 × 3 mm3. The commonly used parallel type preparation was employed to prepare copper/Q235 steel/copper composite as schematically revealed in Figure 1a above and all explosions took place in a sand pool. An ammonium nitrate fuel oil (ANFO) mixture having a density of 0.90 g/cm3 was selected as the explosive material. The explosive material with a detonation velocity of 2200 m/s and a thickness of 65 mm was placed on a Cu plate. The stand-off distance was 6 mm. Under the action of the explosion, the flyer plate near the detonation point was accelerated to collide with the lower plate at an angle and forming a welded interface, as shown in Figure 1a below. After explosive welding, the thicknesses of the three plates from top to bottom were ~2.65 mm (copper), ~2.9 mm (Q235 steel) and ~2.9 mm (copper), respectively, two interfaces were referred to as upper-interface and lower-interface.
The mechanical properties and microstructure of explosion welded composites tend to differ along the direction of explosive wave propagation, especially the position near and far from the detonation point. Therefore, the samples used in this experiment were strictly cut from the same position of the composite. All mechanical tests and microstructure observations were performed on samples cut in the direction perpendicular to explosion direction from laminates.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out on a Bruker AXS D8 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The 2θ angle was selected from 40° to 100° and the scanning speed was 6° min−1. Electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis was performed on a field emission SEM (Quant 250FEG, FEI, America) equipped with a fully automatic Oxford Instruments Aztec2.0 EBSD system (Channel 5 Software, Oxford Instruments, England, Oxford). The scanning step size and accelerate voltage were 1.5 μm and 20 kV, respectively. The fracture surfaces of specimens were also investigated by this equipment.
The tensile-shear tests on the explosion-welded upper-interface and lower-interface were performed using an AGS-X100KN electronic universal tester (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a movement speed of 1 mm/min. Tensile-shear specimens with a thickness of 1 mm were cut as parallel to the bonding interface from the explosively welded copper and Q235 steel plates by wire-electrode cutting and processed according to the standard of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM A265-03), as shown in Figure 1b,c. The specimens were notched with a width of 1 mm at two edges. It should be noticed that in this study, the form of the interface close to the explosive layer varies more significantly with the upper copper plate than with the interface far from the explosive layer. Both shear strength of the upper-interface and lower-interface of the bonding composites were considered in this work. During tensile-shear tests, the load was continuously applied to the specimen until failure fully occurred.

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 2a,b, the metallographic results of the initial microstructure indicate that pure copper has equiaxed grains with a mean size of ~17 μm, and Q235 steel (mean grain size of ~14 μm) is composed of a homogeneous mixture of ~90% ferrite (white part in Figure 2b) and ~10% pearlite (black part in Figure 2b). It is well known that pearlite is a mechanical mixture of alternating lamellar ferrite and Fe3C [16,17]. According to the XRD results (Figure 2c), there is no other types of tissue in the matrix of both pure copper and Q235 steel. It should be noted that by comparing the PDF card (PDF#06-0696), the four diffraction peaks in the figure corresponded to the (110), (200), (211) and (220) diffraction peaks of the ferrite. This is mainly because the Fe3C in the matrix was too small, so there was no obvious diffraction peak. The XRD results for the ND (normal direction of rolling) plane of the copper plate are shown in Figure 2c (marked in red). Compared with the XRD spectra of standard annealed copper (PDF#65-9743), it can be found that the (110) and (100) diffraction peaks at the ND plane have an increased percentage of intensity. This is attributed to the fact that copper sheets in the rolled state usually have a strong brass texture ({110}<112>) which indicates that the {110} crystalline plane parallel to the ND plane and the <112> crystal direction parallel to the RD (rolling direction). After annealing treatment, although the grains recrystallize and become equiaxed, part of the crystallographic orientation of grains is inherited [18].
Figure 3a shows the metallographic results of the welded sandwich copper/Q235 steel/copper composites which indicates that the bonding interfaces have high quality joining without defects in forms of pores and micro-cracks. As with other other explosively dissimilar welded joints [2,19,20], upper-interface and lower-interface both have wavy morphology. When the explosion energy is certain, with the increase in stand-off distance, straight, wavy and continuously melted interface will be obtained in order [14]. The flyer plate is in an accelerated state before it touches the substrate, thus, when the stand-off distance is larger, the kinetic energy of the flyer plate will be transformed into heat energy near the interface [3,11,14]. Such sinusoidal shape of the interfaces can hinder the propagation of cracks and increase the strength of the welded dissimilar layers [20,21]. The upper-interface is more undulating than the lower-interface, and the measured average wavelength and amplitude of the upper-interface waves are 290 ± 20 μm and 75 ± 5 μm, respectively, those of the lower-interface are 231 ± 18 μm and 41 ± 3 μm. It may be due to the fact that the upper-interface has higher energy. In addition, there is a small amount of penetration at the upper interface, and it can be found from the energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDX) results (marked by black arrows in Figure 3b). This phenomenon suggests that the vortex is a melted zone. This could be attributed to the following reasons. Despite the fact that the copper has a very high value of heat conductivity, there was not enough time for the heat generated by the collision to be transferred to other position with lower temperatures at the moment of the explosion. The rapidly increasing temperature resulted in part of the copper and Q235 steel in the bonding interface to melt. The melting points of copper and steel are 1083 °C and 1500 °C, respectively. As a result, a number of the most severely deformed copper microstructures melted in the first place, and more liquid copper was mixed with the soften or even molten iron, which can be evidenced by the fact that copper occupies more volume fraction in the vortex region. Then, under the action of the shock wave, the molten copper and steel mixed together and flowed with the wave crest, and finally converge to the vortex region where the pressure in front of the wave is lowest [1,16,19]. Greenberg et al. [22,23] found the same phenomenon in aluminium–tantalum and copper–titanium explosive welding interfaces, vortex zones are formed near the cusps and valleys. Due to the low impact energy, we did not find a similar vortex zone at the lower-interface, as shown in Figure 3c.
For further understanding, the upper-interface and lower-interface are analyzed by EBSD, as shown in Figure 4. Figure 4a,b displays the microstructures of two interfaces. Inverse pole figure (IPF) indicates that the grains away from the interface in copper and steel are equiaxed, and the grain size is consistent with the metallographic statistics. However, the grains of steel have a certain selective orientation with <100> and <111> oriented parallel to the direction of the wave crest line. This could be the inheritance of the initial microstructure, considering the strain gradient distribution at the interface due to the explosion [12]. Two typical areas are selected and enlarged in Figure 4c,d, respectively. The upper-interface and lower-interface are composed of ultra-fine grains (UFGs) with thicknesses of ~80 μm and ~50 μm (the area marked by the yellow dotted line). The average grain size of UFG in domains of upper-interface and lower-interface are ~3.6 μm and ~4.8 μm. Different from conventional welding techniques, the copper/Q235 steel interface obtained via explosive welding without the appearance of coarse grains with poor-strength which are often the site of cracks sprouting and eventually severely degrade the mechanical properties of the welded interface. The formation of UFGs can be ascribed to the high temperature generated during the impact at the bonding interface and subsequent rapid cooling. The distribution of grain boundaries in Figure 4e,f suggests that the UFGs mainly contain high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs), while the density of low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) is higher beyond the interface and decreases with increasing distance. Which is consistent with the decrease in hardness gradient along the weld interface reported in Liu et al. [12] and Zhou et al. [8]. Because high dislocation density and reduced grain size often lead to high hardness [24,25].
To investigate the interfacial bonding strength of the copper/Q235 steel/copper explosive composite, the tensile-shear test was employed, and the load-displacement curves are shown in Figure 5. It can be found that the trend of the tensile-shear curve of the upper-interface is basically the same as that of the lower-interface. Shear strength ( τ ) is commonly used to measure the ability of a material to resist shear sliding, which is defined as τ = F m a x / S , where F m a x and S are the maximum load and bonding surface area between the two notches [8]. The corresponding shear strengths of the upper-interface and lower-interfaces are higher than ~235 MPa and ~222 MPa, respectively. However, the energy consumed by the upper-interface and lower-interfaces is also almost equal during the tensile shear test because the area enclosed by the tensile-shear curve and the displacement axis is proportional to the energy consumed by the specimen during the deformation process [26,27].
Interestingly, the welded interfaces in the present work exhibited a different fracture behavior during tensile shear testing than in other literature [8,14]. Usually, failure of the welded interface occurs along the direction of the interface wave. This is due to the presence of defects such as cavities, cracks and brittle intermetallic at the interface zone. The discontinuities and stress concentration points can weaken the interface shear resistance [8]. However, during the experiment in this work, all fracture occurs on the copper side, the interface of the welded joint maintains the shape before the shear test (Figure 5). Fracture on the copper side indicates that the tensile-shear test is failed. In addition, the plastic deformation on the copper side resulted in much more slip traces and surface relief than the steel side which indicates that the plastic deformation during the tensile-shear test occurred mainly on the copper side. The reason for this phenomenon is that pure copper has a low strength. In other words, the shear strength of the upper-interface and lower-interface is much higher than 220 MPa. No obvious micro-cracks and fragmented brittle intermetallic compounds were found at the fracture (Figure 6a–d). From Figure 6c,d, it can be found that the plastic deformation on the copper side mainly occurs away from the interface, which is due to the fact that the UFGs can increase the coordination of plastic deformation in the local area and inhibit the generation of micro-cracks [26,27]. Thus, the explosive welding interface obtained in this work is excellent. This can also be judged from the fracture morphology of the fractured samples, where a large number of dimples indicate that ductile fracture occurred, and the size of the dimples is comparable to the grain size counted by EBSD, as shown in Figure 6e,f. Good quality of interfacial bonding will reduce the tendency of interfacial delamination in subsequent plastic processing [2].

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the microstructures and properties of the interface for a copper/Q235 steel/copper composite plate prepared by explosive welding are studied. The interface between copper and Q235 steel presents a typical wavy structure with an amplitude ranging between 40 and 75 μm and a wavelength from 230 to 290 μm. The shear strength of the upper-interface and lower-interfaces of the welded copper/Q235 steel are higher than ~235 MPa and ~222 MPa, respectively. The specimens failed fully within the copper and not at the bonding interface, which is due to three factors: (1) no cavities and cracks at the interface; (2) the interface forms a metallurgical bonding including numerous UFGs, which can significantly improve the plastic deformation coordination at the interface and inhibit the generation of micro-cracks. Explosive welding can avoid the reduction of mechanical properties of welded joints due to defects such as coarse grains and cracks at the bonding interface. This research provides the experimental basis for sample preparation, microstructure observation and performance testing of the interface between two or more dissimilar metals. Furthermore, the simulation of interface microstructure and properties also has very important guiding significance for the bonding of two or more dissimilar metals. In addition, small-sized copper/Q235 steel/copper composite plates with excellent bonding interface were obtained in this study, and the preparation and deformation processes of large-sized composites suitable for engineering applications are yet to be investigated. They are the future directions of this work.

Author Contributions

J.L.: Investigation, writing–original draft, funding acquisition. Z.X.: investigation. Y.Z.: resources, funding acquisition. W.J.: investigation, resources. W.Q.: formal analysis, funding acquisition, writing–review & editing. Q.M.: formal analysis, software, writing–review & editing. Y.W.: investigation, funding acquisition. B.W.: formal analysis, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number 52101030, 42202343, Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province grant number 2208085QE125, the Scientific Research Foundation of Anhui Polytechnic University grant number HX202211007, Xjky2022024, Xjky2022032, the Open Research Found of Anhui Key Laboratory of High-performance Non-ferrous Metal Materials grant number YSJS-2023-01 and Major Research Development Program of Wuhu grant number 2022yf61.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Jiao, K.X.; Zhang, J.L.; Liu, J. Comparisons of the microstructures and micro-mechanical properties of copper/steel explosive-bonded wave interfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 756, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gladkovsky, S.V.; Kuteneva, S.V.; Sergeev, S.N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of sandwich copper/steel composites produced by explosive welding. Mater. Charact. 2019, 154, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, H.; Jiao, K.X.; Zhang, J.L.; Liu, J. Experimental and numerical investigations of interface characteristics of copper/steel composite prepared by explosive welding. Mater. Des. 2018, 154, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, H.; Xiong, S.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wang, C.; Xu, N. Influence of cold rolling parameters on bonding of copper/steel clad plate. J. Plast. Eng. 2021, 28, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sebastian, S.; Suyamburajan, V. Microstructural analysis of diffusion bonding on copper stainless steel. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 37, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Danes, C.A.; Dumitriu, C.; Vizireanu, S.; Bita, B.; Nicola, I.M.; Dinescu, G.; Pirvu, C. Influence of carbon nanowalls interlayer on copper deposition. Coatings 2021, 11, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, H.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ma, T.; Li, Y. Study on the bonding mechanism of copper-low carbon steel for casting compounding process. Metals 2021, 11, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, Q.; Liu, R.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, P.; Zhu, L. Microstructure characterization and tensile shear failure mechanism of the bonding interface of explosively welded titanium-steel composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2021, 820, 141559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sui, G.; Li, J.; Sun, F.; Ma, B.; Li, H. 3D finite element simulation of explosive welding of three-layer plates. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2011, 54, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, M.; Chen, D.; Zhou, H.; Xu, J.; Ma, H.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, B.; Tian, J. Experimental and numerical investigation of microstructure and evolution of TiNi Alloy/Q235 steel interfaces prepared by explosive welding. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 5803–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.; Lu, X.; Cheng, C.; Li, B.; Ma, Z. Improve the quality of 1060Al/Q235 explosive composite plate by friction stir processing. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, L.; Jia, Y.F.; Xuan, F.Z. Gradient effect in the waved interfacial layer of 304L/533B bimetallic plates induced by explosive welding. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 704, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abe, A. Numerical simulation of the plastic flow field near the bonding surface of explosive welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1999, 85, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, X.; Ma, Y.; Jin, K.; Wang, H.; Tao, J.; Fan, M. Effect of stand-off distance on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni/Al/Ni laminates prepared by explosive bonding. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2017, 26, 4235–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ismail, N.; Jalar, A.; Bakar, M.A.; Safee, N.S.; Yusoff, W.Y.W.; Ismail, A. Microstructural evolution and micromechanical properties of SAC305/CNT/CU solder joint under blast wave condition. Solder. Surf. Mount Technol. 2020, 33, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Xue, W.; Chen, Y.; Yu, W.; Xiao, K. Microstructure and grain boundary corrosion mechanism of pearlitic material. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2021, 31, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, F.; Mao, X.; Bao, S.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, S.; Deng, Z.; He, M.; Huang, F.; Qu, X. Microstructure evolution and its effects on the mechanical behavior of cold drawn pearlite steel wires for bridge cables. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2022, 37, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Doherty, R.D.; Hughes, D.A.; Humphreys, F.J.; Jonas, J.J.; Jensen, D.J.; Kassner, M.E.; King, W.E.; Mcnelley, T.R.; Mcqueen, H.J.; Rollett, A.D. Current issues in recrystallization: A review. Mater. Today 1998, 1, 14–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pouraliakbar, H.; Khalaj, G.; Jandaghi, M.R.; Fadaei, A.; Ghareh-Shiran, M.K.; Shim, S.H.; Hong, S.I. Three-layered SS321/AA1050/AA5083 explosive welds: Effect of PWHT on the interface evolution and its mechanical strength. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2020, 188, 104216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Durgutlu, A.; Gülenç, B.; Findik, F. Examination of copper/stainless steel joints formed by explosive welding. Mater. Des. 2005, 26, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Findik, F. Recent developments in explosive welding. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 1081–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Greenberg, B.A.; Ivanov, M.A.; Kuzmin, S.V.; Lysak, V.I.; Besshaposhnikov, Y.P.; Pushkin, M.S.; Inozemtsev, A.V.; Patselov, A.M. Microstructures upon explosion welding and processes which prevent joining of materials. Lett. Mater. 2018, 8, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grinberg, B.A.; Pushkin, M.S.; Patselov, A.M.; Inozemtsev, A.V.; Ivanov, M.A.; Slautin, O.V.; Besshaposhnikov, Y.P. The structure of molten zones in explosion welding (aluminium–tantalum, copper–titanium). Weld. Inter. 2017, 31, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y. Breaking material property trade-offs via macrodesign of microstructure. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 3191–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y. Enhanced electrical conductivity and mechanical properties in thermally stable fine-grained copper wire. Commun. Mater. 2021, 2, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, J.; Cao, Y.; Gao, B.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y. Superior strength and ductility of 316L stainless steel with heterogeneous lamella structure. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 10442–10456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.; Fang, C.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wang, S.; Mao, Q.; Li, Y. Deformation mechanisms of 304L stainless steel with heterogeneous lamella structure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 742, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for explosive bonding process (a) and double notched tensile-shear specimen (b); the tensile-shear specimens (c).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for explosive bonding process (a) and double notched tensile-shear specimen (b); the tensile-shear specimens (c).
Coatings 13 00600 g001
Figure 2. Optical microscope images of pure copper (a) and Q235 steel (b) in the initial state, X-ray diffraction analysis on the copper and steel plates (c).
Figure 2. Optical microscope images of pure copper (a) and Q235 steel (b) in the initial state, X-ray diffraction analysis on the copper and steel plates (c).
Coatings 13 00600 g002
Figure 3. Optical microscope images (a) of the wave crest structure in copper/steel explosive bonding interface (b,c) are upper-interface and lower-interface, respectively. The insets in (b,c) are energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDX) maps and color codes.
Figure 3. Optical microscope images (a) of the wave crest structure in copper/steel explosive bonding interface (b,c) are upper-interface and lower-interface, respectively. The insets in (b,c) are energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDX) maps and color codes.
Coatings 13 00600 g003
Figure 4. Inverse pole figures (ad), grain boundaries (GBs) maps (e,f) of the wave crest structure in copper/Q235 steel explosive welding interface. (a,c,e) and (b,d,f) are upper-interface and lower-interface, respectively. The inset in (c) is color coded. For GB maps, black and cyan lines represent high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) > 15° and low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) between 2° and 15°, respectively.
Figure 4. Inverse pole figures (ad), grain boundaries (GBs) maps (e,f) of the wave crest structure in copper/Q235 steel explosive welding interface. (a,c,e) and (b,d,f) are upper-interface and lower-interface, respectively. The inset in (c) is color coded. For GB maps, black and cyan lines represent high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) > 15° and low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) between 2° and 15°, respectively.
Coatings 13 00600 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the obtained load-displacement curves by tensile-shear tests for upper-face sample and lower-face sample, and the inset is the image of corresponding specimens after the tensile-shear test.
Figure 5. Comparison of the obtained load-displacement curves by tensile-shear tests for upper-face sample and lower-face sample, and the inset is the image of corresponding specimens after the tensile-shear test.
Coatings 13 00600 g005
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) morphology of fractured tensile-shear specimens: (ad) side view, (e,f) top view. The upper row and bottom row are upper-face and lower-face, respectively.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) morphology of fractured tensile-shear specimens: (ad) side view, (e,f) top view. The upper row and bottom row are upper-face and lower-face, respectively.
Coatings 13 00600 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, W.; Qin, W.; Mao, Q.; Wei, Y.; Wang, B. Interfacial Microstructure and Shear Behavior of the Copper/Q235 Steel/Copper Block Fabricated by Explosive Welding. Coatings 2023, 13, 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030600

AMA Style

Li J, Xu Z, Zhao Y, Jiang W, Qin W, Mao Q, Wei Y, Wang B. Interfacial Microstructure and Shear Behavior of the Copper/Q235 Steel/Copper Block Fabricated by Explosive Welding. Coatings. 2023; 13(3):600. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jiansheng, Zuyuan Xu, Yu Zhao, Wei Jiang, Wenbo Qin, Qingzhong Mao, Yong Wei, and Banglun Wang. 2023. "Interfacial Microstructure and Shear Behavior of the Copper/Q235 Steel/Copper Block Fabricated by Explosive Welding" Coatings 13, no. 3: 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030600

APA Style

Li, J., Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Jiang, W., Qin, W., Mao, Q., Wei, Y., & Wang, B. (2023). Interfacial Microstructure and Shear Behavior of the Copper/Q235 Steel/Copper Block Fabricated by Explosive Welding. Coatings, 13(3), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop