Next Article in Journal
Interleukin-10 Deficiency Impacts on TNF-Induced NFκB Regulated Responses In Vivo
Next Article in Special Issue
Small Molecules Targeting INSM1 for the Treatment of High-Risk Neuroblastoma
Previous Article in Journal
Multispecies Assessment of Anthropogenic Particle Ingestion in a Marine Protected Area
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/biology11101376
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Interplay: The Essential Role between INSM1 and N-Myc in Aggressive Neuroblastoma

by
Chiachen Chen
and
Michael S. Lan
*
Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(10), 1376; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101376
Submission received: 25 August 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biology of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a cancer that starts in certain very early forms of nerve cells of the sympathetic nervous system, most often found in an embryo or fetus. Symptoms may include bone pain, an abdominal mass, frequent urination, limping, anemia, spinal cord weakness, or bruising of the eye area. N-Myc is a key driver of high-risk NB. An elevated expression of N-Myc often predicts a poorer prognosis, in both time to tumor progression and overall survival rate. We discovered a transcription factor, insulinoma-associated-1 (INSM1), as the downstream target gene of N-Myc. INSM1 has emerged as a novel NB biomarker that plays a critical role in facilitating NB tumor cell development. Both N-Myc and INSM1 demonstrate high clinical relevance to NB. Therefore, further understanding the association of INSM1 and N-Myc functions in aggressive NB should be beneficial for future NB treatment.

Abstract

An aggressive form of neuroblastoma (NB), a malignant childhood cancer derived from granule neuron precursors and sympathoadrenal lineage, frequently comprises MYCN amplification/elevated N-Myc expression, which contributes to the development of neural crest-derived embryonal malignancy. N-Myc is an oncogenic driver in NB. Persistent N-Myc expression during the maturation of SA precursor cells can cause blockage of the apoptosis and induce abnormal proliferation, resulting in NB development. An insulinoma-associated-1 (INSM1) zinc-finger transcription factor has emerged as an NB biomarker that plays a critical role in facilitating tumor cell growth and transformation. INSM1 plays an essential role in sympathoadrenal cell differentiation. N-Myc activates endogenous INSM1 through an E2-box of the INSM1 proximal promoter, whereas INSM1 enhances N-Myc stability via RAC-α-serine/threonine protein kinase (AKT) phosphorylation in NB. The ectopic expression of INSM1 stimulates NB tumor growth in contrast to the knockdown of INSM1 that inhibits NB cell proliferation. The clinical pathological result and bioinformatics analysis show that INSM1 is a strong diagnostic and a prognostic biomarker for the evaluation of NB progression. The INSM1/N-Myc expression shows high clinical relevance in NB. Therefore, targeting the INSM1/N-Myc-associated signaling axis should be a feasible approach to identifying new drugs for the suppression of NB tumor growth.

1. Introduction

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a cancer that starts in early nerve cells (called neuroblasts) of the sympathetic nervous system, so they can be found anywhere along this system. Most NB begins in the abdomen, either in an adrenal gland or in the sympathetic nerve ganglia. The rest starts in the sympathetic ganglia near the spine, in the chest, in the neck, or in the pelvis. Human NB is the most common childhood extracranial tumor arising from the sympathetic nervous system. It is also a clinically heterogeneous disease that ranges from spontaneous regression to high-risk stage 4 disease. This type of cancer occurs most often in infants and young children. NB accounts for about 6–7% of all cancers in children as the most common cancer in babies and the third-most common cancer in children after leukemia (26%) and brain cancer (21%). Although MYCN was identified as an important genetic biomarker in high-risk NB, it was not considered “druggable” in the standard care of MYCN-amplified NB patients. However, in high-risk NB, the survival rate is about 40%, with a long-term survival rate of only 15%. A successful therapeutic strategy for high-risk NB patients is urgently needed and represents an unmet societal necessity.
Recent studies of a neuroendocrine (NE) transcription factor, Insulinoma-associated-1 (INSM1), revealed that this zinc-finger DNA-binding protein not only regulates downstream target genes but also modulates signaling pathways critical for the stability of the N-Myc oncogenic protein [1]. By screening a small molecule library using INSM1 promoter-driven luciferase assay, we were able to identify multiple inhibitors potently inhibiting INSM1 promoter activity as well as NB tumor cell growth [2]. The down regulation of INSM1 also inhibits N-Myc protein expression, which contributes to NB tumor suppression [3]. When we dissect the transcriptional regulation of INSM1 and N-Myc functional roles in NB, it is plausible to reveal potential small molecules targeting both INSM1 and N-Myc. In the current review article, we discuss the essential role of INSM1 and N-Myc interplay in aggressive NB as potential targets for NB cancer therapy.

1.1. INSM1 Is a Unique Zinc-Finger Transcription Factor

Insulinoma-associated-1 (INSM1) is a zinc-finger transcription factor that was originally identified in a human insulinoma subtraction library [4]. INSM1 is an intronless gene located in chromosome 20 p11.2, encoding a 510-amino-acid polypeptide consisting of a Snail/Gfi (SNAG) domain, two proline-rich segments, four dibasic amino acid sites, a putative nuclear localization signaling sequence (NSL), and a potential amidation signal sequence (PGKR) in the N-terminus. The C-terminal portion of INSM1 contains five zinc-finger motifs, which constitute a functional domain of a DNA-binding transcription factor. The DNA-binding consensus sequence of INSM1 was determined by a selected and amplified random oligonucleotide binding assay as 5′-TG/TC/TC/TT/AGGGGG/TCG/A-3′ [5]. Several downstream target genes’ promoters of INSM1 were subsequently identified based upon the consensus sequence on the promoter regions including neurogenic differentiation factor (NeuroD1), insulin, RE1 silencing transcription factor (REST), ripply transcription repressor 3 (Ripply3), neurogenin 3 (Ngn3), adherens junction belt-specific protein (Plekha7), and INSM1 itself [5,6,7]. SNAG domain functions as a transcription repressor by recruiting the histone deacetylase Hdac1, Hdac2, Rcor1, and histone demethylase Kdmla to modulate gene expression by chromatin modification [8,9,10]. INSM1 protein not only binds to DNA as a transcription factor but also directly binds to cellular proteins via its proline-rich domain. INSM1 is capable of binding to cyclinD1 or RACK1 directly to interfere with cell signaling and cell cycle progression [11,12].
The expression of INSM1 was detected in early human fetal brain, endocrine pancreas development, and the tumors of NE origin including insulinoma, retinoblastoma, neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, pheochromocytoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, pituitary tumor, carcinoids, and small-cell lung carcinoma [1]. The upstream region of the INSM1 promoter (2090 bps) contains several tissue-specific regulatory elements that might contribute to a distinctive expression pattern of INSM1 dominant in tumors of NE origin, as well as displays its role in neurogenesis and NE cell differentiation during embryonic development [5]. During embryonic development, the expression of INSM1 was dramatically reduced in a later stage and mostly silenced in normal adult tissues. The transient expression pattern suggests that the INSM1 gene functions as a developmentally regulated transcription factor, which transiently expresses in early NE cells and is highly reactivated in NE tumors.

1.2. The Role of INSM1 in Sympathoadrenal Cell Differentiation

The neural crest (NC) is a transient structure during early embryonic development. NC cells from the trunk area of the neural tube generate a population of multipotent embryonic cells. The sympathoadrenal (SA) cells’ lineage is a major sub-lineage of the NC cells that further differentiate into sympathetic neurons, chromaffin, and intermediate small intensely fluorescent (SIF) cells. Sympathetic neurons and chromaffin cells are derived from a common SA progenitor, which develops from NC cells that aggregated the dorsal aorta [13,14,15]. Bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) secreted from the dorsal aorta wall play a central role in the differentiation of SA progenitor cells [16,17]. The studies of chick embryo models showed that the expression of BMPs in the wall of the dorsal aorta attracts NC cells expressing BMP-receptor IA and BMP-receptor IB migrating into the dorsal aorta area [18]. BMPs induce the expression of SA precursor-specific markers. The inhibition of BMP4/7 abolished the expression of catecholaminergic and neuronal markers in NC cells that had aggregated at the dorsal aorta [19,20,21]. These data demonstrate that, at least in the chick embryo, BMPs are required in vivo for the development of SA cells. The differentiation of the SA lineage from the SA progenitor cells now aggregated in the dorsal aorta area is under the control of a common trans-regulatory network of specific transcription factors including Phox2b, Phox2a, Ascl-1, Hand2, Gata2/3, N-Myc, and INSM1 (Figure 1). All components of the SA transcriptional network have been attributed to different functions in various parts of SA cell development, including the promotion of noradrenergic, neural, and endocrine cell differentiation; the regulation of proliferation; and cell apoptosis [13].
INSM1 plays an essential role in the development of chromaffin cells [22], pituitary endocrine cells [9], pancreatic islets [7], and lung cancer cells of NE origin [23,24]. INSM1 promotes the trans-differentiation of pancreatic ductal and acinar cells into endocrine islets [25,26]. INSM1 is also required for the early differentiation of sympathetic neurons [22], sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglion [27], and olfactory neurons [28]. Insm1-null mutant mouse demonstrates that Insm1 acts as a crucial component in the network that controls the differentiation of SA lineage. The sympathetic neurons of Insm1-deficient mice appear to differentiate correctly but with a delay, and their proliferation reduced. In contrast, the terminal differentiation of chromaffin cells is significantly affected by the Insm1-null mutation. The fetal lethality of Insm1-mutant mice is caused by a catecholamine deficiency, which is the specific marker of SA lineage, supporting the importance of Insm1 in the development of SA lineage [22]. There is a wealth of phenotype similarities between Mash-1 (Ascl-1) and Insm1-deficient mice including the delay of neuronal differentiation, reduced proliferation, and impaired differentiation of chromaffin cells, suggesting that Insm1 might be the downstream target gene of Mash-1, whereas Mash-1 activates endogenous Insm1 during the differentiation of chromaffin cells [22].

1.3. Neuroblastoma—A Neural Crest Derived Embryonal Malignancy

NB arises from SA progenitor cells within the NC that differentiate into sympathetic ganglion cells and adrenal catecholamine-secreting chromaffin cells [29,30,31]. NB is a malignancy of the sympathetic nervous system where the majority are located in the abdomen along the sympathetic chain and in the adrenal gland medulla area. NB tumors occurring in the early childhood represent 6–10% of pediatric tumors. NB accounts for 12–15% of all childhood cancer death and is the most common and deadly extracranial cancer [29,32,33]. The median age at diagnosis for NB is 17–18 months and approximately 40% of the patients are younger than 1 year at diagnosis, whereas less than 5% of the patients are older than 10 years [34].
A TH-MYCN transgenic mouse model was generated using a tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-promoter-driven human MYCN cDNA [35]. The TH-MYCN transgenic model spontaneously developed NB, which is morphologically and phenotypically similar to human high-risk NB [36]. This murine NB model mirrors human NB in many aspects of tumor formation including tumor locations, spinal cord involvement, histological presentations, cellular synapses, granule formation, and gains and losses of syntenic regions of chromosomes. The TH-MYCN mouse tumor is strongly positive for the expression of Insm1 (Figure 2). NB development in this mouse model is transgene dose-dependent. The homozygous mice develop NB tumor masses faster than hemizygous, at 4.0–6.9 weeks of age vs. 5.6–19 weeks of age. One-hundred percent of homozygous TH-MYCN mice have tumor growth from six weeks of age, but only fifty percent of hemizygous mice have tumor growth. Similar results were observed in another transgenic mouse model with Cre-conditional induction of MYCN in dopamine β-hydroxylase-expressing cells termed LSL-MYCN/Dbh-iCre, where clinically relevant NB tumor development occurred in 75% of mice [37]. The transduction of primary NC cells with over-expression levels of N-Myc back into the mice resulted in NB tumor formation [3,38]. Similar results were shown in the zebrafish model; ectopic expressions of N-Myc in neural crest cells induce NB development [39]. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the over-expression of N-Myc in NC cells is sufficient for NB development and indicate that N-Myc is an important oncogenic driver in NB. Both clinical and experimental studies suggest that NB originates from the dysregulation of cellular processes during neural crest development [40,41,42].

1.4. N-Myc as an Oncogenic Driver in NB

A number of biological and genetic markers of NB have been investigated for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring the treatment effects in NB patients. The MYCN status has been proven as the most significant marker for NB. It was strongly correlated with an advanced stage of disease and poor prognosis [30]. N-Myc expression is important for the regulation of NC cell migration and expansion during normal murine sympathoadrenal development. A high level of N-Myc expression is detected in the NC cells, which migrate into the dorsal aorta area. In normal embryonic development, the expression of N-Myc is gradually decreased during the differentiation of sympathetic neurons. The dysregulation of the N-Myc onco-protein plays a strong causative role in NB that induces widespread proliferation and inhibits the SA lineage cell apoptosis [43,44,45]. The molecular mechanisms of MYCN dysregulation are mostly driven by the disruption of transcription, translation, protein stability, apoptotic resistance, and metabolic flexibility [46,47,48].
Sympathoadrenal precursors that failed to differentiate into neural or chromaffin cells might end up developing NB [49]. The over-expression of N-Myc in sympathoadrenal precursors of zebrafish models not only abolishes the differentiation of chromaffin cells but also induces the development of NB [39]. N-Myc plays a crucial transcription factor in the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Persistent N-Myc expression during the maturation of SA precursor cells can cause the blockage of apoptosis and can induce abnormal proliferation of NB [35,50].

1.5. The Interaction between INSM1 and N-Myc

Recently, the development of high-throughput technology investigating genomic DNA, RNA, and epigenetic profiles of clinical patient samples provided valuable information for analyzing the specific genes in the progression and prognosis of NB. We analyzed the correlation of the expression levels of N-Myc and INSM1 from three public NB datasets derived from GEO. MYCN amplification was identified as the first genetic biomarker of any cancer, specifically marking high-risk NB [51]. MYCN amplification is a well-confirmed prognostic factor that patients with MYCN amplification have poor prognoses and shorter overall survival time (OS). We analyzed the correlated expression level of N-Myc and MYCN amplification from three public NB datasets derived from GEO. The bioinformatics analysis indicates that patients with MYCN amplification as high-risk NB also have significantly high levels of N-Myc expression. However, INSM1 expression correlates with MYCN amplified versus non-amplified is less significant than N-Myc expression, which shows p values of 0.12, 0.017, or 0.0077, respectively (Figure 3). Furthermore, MYCN non-amplified NB tumors may have high c-Myc expression, which could still positively regulate INSM1 [46]. For the OS time analysis, the patients with a higher expression of INSM1 or N-Myc had OS times that were significantly shorter than those with lower expression levels (Figure 4, red line). Taken together, the clinical pathological result and bioinformatics analysis show that INSM1 is a strong diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for the evaluation of NB progression. The INSM1/N-Myc expression shows high clinical relevance in NB.
INSM1 can be considered an onco-fetal differentiation factor according to its elusive expression pattern in the fetal stage of NE precursors, silenced in adult normal tissues, and re-activated in tumors of NE origin. The re-expression of INSM1 in NB tumor cells contributes to the aggressive phenotype of a certain subtype of NB with enhanced N-Myc protein expression that is a well-confirmed oncogenic driver for the development of NB. Moreover, there is a feed-forward loop between INSM1 and N-Myc, N-Myc targets the INSM1 gene via direct binding to the INSM1 proximal promoter E2-box area and induces INSM1 expression. Additionally, INSM1 stabilizes the N-Myc protein via AKT phosphorylation and prevents the N-Myc protein from going into ubiquitination degradation [3,52]. The ectopic expression of INSM1 stimulates NB tumor growth in contrast to the knockdown of INSM1 that inhibits NB cell proliferation [53].

1.6. INSM1, a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker for NB

INSM1 functions as a transcription factor in NE differentiation. Recently, INSM1 has emerged in clinical practice as a sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarker in NE tumors (NETs). This novel biomarker provides pathologists a useful tool to distinguish NETs from non-NETs, and it represents a more sensitive NE marker as compared to the traditional markers, such as synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56 [54]. INSM-1 nuclear expression in cytology specimens successfully shows that it is a robust NE marker. Numerous studies confirmed that INSM1 is a reliable immune-histochemical staining for NETs with high sensitivity and specificity [55,56,57].
NB is an NET that arises from the neural crest. The immune-histochemical profile of INSM1 in a cohort of peripheral neuroblastic tumors, using both tissue microarrays and whole-slide histologic sections, shows INSM1-positive staining in 78% of peripheral neuroblastic tumors and that no INSM1 signal was detected on the non-neuroblastic tumor [58]. Additional INSM1 mRNA expression levels in a range of neurological cancers with NE features and other non-NE cancers were analyzed from the available datasets in an R2 Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform (http//r2.amc.nl, accessed on 21 February 2022, Figure 5). The result shows that INSM1 has a high specificity and expression level in NB (red bar).

1.7. Application of INSM1 in Treatment of NB

The current treatment protocol for patients with high-risk NB remains limited, and the treated patients frequently developed chemo-resistant relapse after high-intensity conventional multimodal therapy [59]. Therefore, novel treatment protocols are needed [60]. Since a high percentage of the high-risk NB patients contain MYCN amplifications, targeting the MYCN signaling pathway could be beneficial for NB therapy [61,62]. We and others have shown that N-Myc is an oncogenic factor promoting NB progression and that increased N-Myc protein stability is crucial for NB cell growth by multiple feed-forward expression loops involving N-Myc trans-activation and repression of target genes [3,63,64]. Although MYCN amplification is a well-confirmed poor prognostic factor in NB, MYCN amplification is usually considered “undruggable” in standard care for MYCN-amplified high-risk NB patients. It will be a difficult strategy to design approaches for directly targeting or modifying the amplified MYCN gene. Therefore, we aim to target a co-factor of N-Myc in aggressive NB. We have provided evidence that INSM1 can increase the N-Myc protein stability and subsequently stimulate NB cell proliferation and anti-apoptosis. Additionally, N-Myc directly binds to the INSM1 proximal promoter to activate endogenous INSM1 expression [3]. It is logical to use an INSM1 promoter-driven luciferase assay for identifying novel inhibitors that could inhibit INSM1 promoter activity [2]. We have identified several small molecules, such as 5′-iodotubercidin, plicamycin, romidepsin, panobinostat, and homoharringtonine targeting INSM1 promoter activity, which exhibited potent inhibition of INSM1 and N-Myc protein expression as well as NB tumor cell growth [2,53]. Further evaluation of novel small molecules targeting aggressive NB should provide more insights into advancing NB therapeutic options.

2. Discussion

Multiple immune-histochemical studies demonstrated that the detection of INSM1 expression is a super sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarker in NETs as compared with conventional NE markers (CGA, SYP, and CD56) [54,55]. Functional studies of INSM1 in NETs revealed that INSM1 exhibited regulatory roles in the cellular signaling axis critical for cell growth and oncogenesis including NB [3,53]. MYCN amplification plays a particularly important role in the transformation of NB, representing about one- third of NB cases that belong to high-risk groups with higher mortality. However, MYCN amplification derives from the presence of multiple copies of the MYCN gene, which poses certain difficulties while direct targeting these multi-copy genes. Therefore, it is logical to design an alternative strategy targeting other co-factors associated with MYCN gene regulation. We have identified a novel NET biomarker, INSM1, which exhibits a feed-forward loop of regulating N-Myc protein stability [3]. Both gene expression levels are clinically associated with OS time as higher expression levels of N-Myc or INSM1 present shorter OS time. The clinical relevance of INSM1 and N-Myc expression in NB suggests that either molecule could be a prominent target for the suppression of an NB tumor.
An INSM1 promoter-driven luciferase assay was developed [2]. We performed it on a small library screen using an INSM1-luciferase assay as a platform in NB. The assay result provides a high Z’ factor value suggesting its effectiveness in a chemical library screen. Several chemical compounds were identified as potent inhibitors for INSM1 and N-Myc expressions, as well as readily suppressing NB tumor cell growth. Interestingly, all of these small molecules possess a common feature of modifying INSM1 promoter regulation. Potentially, interference of the N-Myc activation of an INSM1 expression mediated through binding to the E2-box of INSM1 proximal promoter could play a role in INSM1 regulation. These small molecules comprise HDAC inhibitors, natural compounds, and cellular metabolites that significantly reduce INSM1 activity [2,53]. The HDAC inhibitors were known to have pro-differentiation and apoptotic effects on the treatment of cancer including high-risk NB [65,66,67]. Although the HDAC inhibitor showed promise in NB treatment, it usually has a limited effect as a single agent due to the induction of drug resistance. Therefore, it is plausible to add other anti-NB small molecule compounds as combinational therapy. This approach should enhance the potency of treatment effects, lower the dosage of cytotoxicity, and reduce the possibility of drug resistance. Our preliminary data show that a combination of a natural compound (homoharringtonine) and an AKT1 inhibitor (A674563) that is important for N-Myc protein stability significantly reduces the expression of INSM1, N-Myc, and NB tumor cell growth (unpublished results). Combination therapy has been a hallmark of successful cancer treatment. Our INSM1 promoter-driven luciferase screening-platform will be a valuable approach to screening additional novel small-molecules for NB cancer therapy.

Author Contributions

C.C. wrote the paper, conducted the experiments, and contributed to discussion of the paper. M.S.L. conceived the idea for the project, participated in discussion, and edited the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by R21CA218764 from National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA, and LSU Research Enhancement Program bridge grant funding to MSL.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

For chemical library drug screens, an FDA-approved oncology drug set (AOD IX) was provided by the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, USA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, C.; Notkins, A.L.; Lan, M.S. Insulinoma-Associated-1: From Neuroendocrine Tumor Marker to Cancer Therapeutics. Mol. Cancer Res. 2019, 17, 1597–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, C.; Lan, M.S. A Promoter-Driven Assay for INSM1-Associated Signaling Pathway in Neuroblastoma. Cell. Signal. 2020, 76, 109785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, C.; Breslin, M.B.; Lan, M.S. INSM1 Increases N-Myc Stability and Oncogenesis via a Positive-Feedback Loop in Neuroblastoma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 36700–36712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goto, Y.; DeSilva, M.G.; Toscani, A.; Prabhakar, B.S.; Notkins, A.L.; Lan, M.S. A Novel Human Insulinoma-Associated cDNA, IA-1, Encodes a Protein with Zinc-Finger DNA-Binding Motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 15252–15257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Breslin, M.B.; Zhu, M.; Notkins, A.L.; Lan, M.S. Neuroendocrine Differentiation Factor, IA-1, Is a Transcriptional Repressor and Contains a Specific DNA-Binding Domain: Identification of Consensus IA-1 Binding Sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 1038–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Osipovich, A.B.; Long, Q.; Manduchi, E.; Gangula, R.; Hipkens, S.B.; Schneider, J.; Okubo, T.; Stoeckert, C.J., Jr.; Takada, S.; Magnuson, M.A. Insm1 Promotes Endocrine Cell Differentiation by Modulating the Expression of a Network of Genes That Includes Neurog3 and Ripply3. Development 2014, 141, 2939–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gierl, M.S.; Karoulias, N.; Wende, H.; Strehle, M.; Birchmeier, C. The Zinc-Finger Factor Insm1 (IA-1) Is Essential for the Development of Pancreatic Beta Cells and Intestinal Endocrine Cells. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 2465–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saleque, S.; Kim, J.; Rooke, H.M.; Orkin, S.H. Epigenetic Regulation of Hematopoietic Differentiation by Gfi-1 and Gfi-1b Is Mediated by the Cofactors CoREST and LSD1. Mol. Cell 2007, 27, 562–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Welcker, J.E.; Hernandez-Miranda, L.R.; Paul, F.E.; Jia, S.; Ivanov, A.; Selbach, M.; Birchmeier, C. Insm1 Controls Development of Pituitary Endocrine Cells and Requires a SNAG Domain for Function and for Recruitment of Histone-Modifying Factors. Development 2013, 140, 4947–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grimes, H.L.; Chan, T.O.; Zweidler-Mckay, P.A.; Tong, B.; Tsichlis, P.N. The Gfi-1 Proto-Oncoprotein Contains a Novel Transcriptional Repressor Domain, SNAG, and Inhibits G1 Arrest Induced by In-Terleukin-2 Withdrawal. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 6263–6272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhang, T.; Liu, W.D.; Saunee, N.A.; Breslin, M.B.; Lan, M.S. Zinc-Finger Transcription Factor INSM1 Interrupts Cyclin D1 and CDK4 Binding and Induces Cell Cycle Arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 5574–5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, T.; Chen, C.; Breslin, M.B.; Song, K.; Lan, M.S. Extra-Nuclear Activity of INSM1 Transcription Factor Enhances Insulin Receptor Signaling Pathway and Nkx6.1 Expression Through RACK1 Interaction. Cell Signal. 2014, 26, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huber, K. The Sympathoadrenal Cell Lineage: Specification, Diversification, and New Perspectives. Dev. Biol. 2006, 298, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anderson, D.J.; Axel, R. A Bipotential Neuroendocrine Precursor Whose Choice of Cell Fate Is Determined by NGF and Glucocorticoids. Cell 1986, 47, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anderson, D.J.; Carnahan, J.F.; Michelsohn, A.; Patterson, P.H. Antibody Markers Identify a Common Progenitor to Sympathetic Neurons and Chromaffin Cells In Vivo and Reveal the Timing of Commitment to Neuronal Differentiation in the Sympathoadrenal Lineage. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11, 3507–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reissmann, E.; Ernsberger, U.; Francis-West, P.H.; Rueger, D.; Brickell, P.M.; Rohrer, H. Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7 in the Differentiation of the Adrenergic Phenotype in Developing Sympathetic Neurons. Development 1996, 122, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, N.M.; Groves, A.K.; Anderson, D.J. Alternative Neural Crest Cell Fates Are Instructively Promoted by TGFbeta Superfamily Members. Cell 1996, 85, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McPherson, C.E.; Varley, J.E.; Maxwell, G.D. Expression and Regulation of Type I BMP Receptors During Early Avian Sympathetic Ganglion Development. Dev. Biol. 2000, 221, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bilodeau, M.L.; Boulineau, T.; Greulich, J.D.; Hullinger, R.L.; Andrisani, O.M. Differential Expression of Sympathoadrenal Lineage-Determining Genes and Phenotypic Markers in Cultured Primary Neural Crest Cells. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2001, 37, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Varley, J.E.; Wehby, R.G.; Rueger, D.C.; Maxwell, G.D. Number of Adrenergic and Islet-1 Immunoreactive Cells Is Increased in Avian Trunk Neural Crest Cultures in the Presence of Human Recombinant Osteogenic Protein-1. Dev. Dyn. 1995, 203, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schneider, C.; Wicht, H.; Enderich, J.; Wegner, M.; Rohrer, H. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Are Required In Vivo for the Generation of Sympathetic Neurons. Neuron 1999, 24, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wildner, H.; Gierl, M.S.; Strehle, M.; Pla, P.; Birchmeier, C. Insm1 (IA-1) Is a Crucial Component of the Transcriptional Network That Controls Differentiation of the Sympathoadrenal Lineage. Development 2008, 135, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fujino, K.; Motooka, Y.; Hassan, W.A.; Ali Abdalla, M.O.; Sato, Y.; Kudoh, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Niimori-Kita, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Kubota, I.; et al. Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 Is a Crucial Regulator of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Lung Cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 3164–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Takagi, S.; Ishikawa, Y.; Mizutani, A.; Iwasaki, S.; Matsumoto, S.; Kamada, Y.; Nomura, T.; Nakamura, K. LSD1 Inhibitor T-3775440 Inhibits SCLC Cell Proliferation by Disrupting LSD1 Interactions with SNAG Domain Proteins INSM1 and GFI1B. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 4652–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, T.; Saunee, N.A.; Breslin, M.B.; Song, K.; Lan, M.S. Functional Role of an Islet Transcription Factor, INSM1/IA-1, on Pancreatic Acinar Cell Trans-Differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 2470–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, T.; Wang, H.W.; Saunee, N.A.; Breslin, M.B.; Lan, M.S. Insulinoma-Associated Antigen-1 Zinc-Finger Transcription Factor Promoters Pancreatic Duct Cell Trans-Differentiation. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 2030–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duggan, A.; Madathany, T.; De Castro, S.C.P.; Gerrelli, D.; Guddati, K.; Garcia-anoveros, J. Transient Expression of the Conserved Zinc Finger Gene INSM1 in Progenitors and Nascent Neurons Throughout Embryonic and Adult Neurogenesis. J. Comp. Neurol. 2008, 507, 1497–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosenbaum, J.N.; Duggan, A.; Garcia-Anoveros, J. Insm1 Promotes the Transition of Olfactory Progenitors from Apical and Proliferative to Basal, Terminally Dividing and Neu-Ronogenic. Neural Dev. 2011, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Johnsen, J.I.; Kogner, P.; Albihn, A.; Henriksson, M.A. Embryonal Neural Tumours and Cell Death. Apoptosis 2009, 14, 424–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johnsen, J.I.; Dyberg, C.; Wickstrom, M. Neuroblastoma-A Neural Crest Derived Embryonal Malignancy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. L’Abbate, A.; Macchia, G.; D’Addabbo, P.; Lonoce, A.; Tolomeo, D.; Trombetta, D.; Kok, K.; Bartenhagen, C.; Whelan, C.W.; Palumbo, O.; et al. Genomic Organization and Evolution of Double Minutes/Homogeneously Staining Regions with MYC Amplification in Human Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 9131–9145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brodeur, G.M. Neuroblastoma: Biological Insights into a Clinical Enigma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Maris, J.M.; Mosse, Y.P.; Bradfield, J.P.; Hou, C.; Monni, S.; Scott, R.H.; Asgharzadeh, S.; Attiyeh, E.F.; Diskin, S.J.; Laudenslager, M.; et al. Chromosome 6p22 Locus Associated with Clinically Aggressive Neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, J.R.; Eggert, A.; Caron, H. Neuroblastoma: Biology, Prognosis, and Treatment. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 24, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weiss, W.A.; Aldape, K.; Mohapatra, G.; Feuerstein, B.G.; Bishop, J.M. Targeted Expression of N-Myc Causes Neuroblastoma in Transgenic Mice. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 2985–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rasmuson, A.; Segerstrom, L.; Nethander, M.; Finnman, J.; Elfman, L.H.; Javanmardi, N.; Nilsson, S.; Johnsen, J.I.; Martinsson, T.; Kogner, P. Tumor Development, Growth Characteristics and Spectrum of Genetic Aberrations in the TH-MYCN Mouse Model of Neuro-Blastoma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Althoff, K.; Beckers, A.; Bell, E.; Nortmeyer, M.; Thor, T.; Sprussel, A.; Lindner, S.; De Preter, K.; Florin, A.; Heukamp, L.C.; et al. A Cre-Conditional MYCN-Driven Neuroblastoma Mouse Model as an Improved Tool for Preclinical Studies. Oncogene 2015, 34, 3357–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Olsen, R.R.; Otero, J.H.; Garcia-Lopez, J.; Wallace, K.; Finkelstein, D.; Rehg, J.E.; Yin, Z.; Wang, Y.D.; Freeman, K.W. MYCN Induces Neuroblastoma in Primary Neural Crest Cells. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5075–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuan, J.; Yankner, B.A. Apoptosis in the Nervous System. Nature 2000, 407, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kapeli, K.; Hurlin, P.J. Differential Regulation of N-Myc and C-Myc Synthesis, Degradation, and Transcriptional Activity by the Ras/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38498–38508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Maris, J.M.; Matthay, K.K. Molecular Biology of Neuroblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999, 17, 2264–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Slack, A.D.; Chen, Z.; Ludwig, A.D.; Hicks, J.; Shohet, J.M. MYCN-Directed Centrosome Amplification Requires MDM2-Mediated Suppression of p53 Activity in Neuroblastoma Cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 2448–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hansford, L.M.; Thomas, W.D.; Keating, J.M.; Burkhart, C.A.; Peaston, A.E.; Norris, M.D.; Haber, M.; Armati, P.J.; Weiss, W.A.; Marshall, G.M. Mechanisms of Embryonal Tumor Initiation: Distinct Roles for MycN Expression and MYCN Amplification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12664–12669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zimmerman, K.A.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Collum, R.G.; Smith, R.K.; Kohl, N.E.; Denis, K.A.; Nau, M.M.; Witte, O.N.; Toran-Allerand, D.; Gee, C.E.; et al. Differential Expression of Myc Family Genes During Murine Development. Nature 1986, 319, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wartiovaara, K.; Barnabe-Heider, F.; Miller, F.D.; Kaplan, D.R. N-Myc Promotes Survival and Induces S-Phase Entry of Postmitotic Sympathetic Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Otte, J.; Dyberg, C.; Pepich, A.; Johnsen, J.I. MYCN Function in Neuroblastoma Development. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 624079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, T.; Yv, B.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Yin, M.; Tang, J.; Li, Y. MYCN Protein Stability Is a Better Prognostic Indicator in Neuroblastoma. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roeschert, I.; Poon, E.; Henssen, A.G.; Garcia, H.D.; Gatti, M.; Giansanti, C.; Jamin, Y.; Ade, C.P.; Gallant, P.; Schulein-Volk, C.; et al. Combined inhibition of Aurora-A and ATR kinase results in regression of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Nat. Cancer 2021, 2, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, S.; Lee, J.S.; Guo, F.; Shin, J.; Perez-Atayde, A.R.; Kutok, J.L.; Rodig, S.J.; Neuberg, D.S.; Helman, D.; Feng, H.; et al. Activated ALK Collaborates with MYCN in Neuroblastoma Pathogenesis. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rickman, D.S.; Schulte, J.H.; Eilers, M. The Expanding World of N-MYC-Driven Tumors. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Brodeur, G.M.; Seeger, R.C.; Schwab, M.; Varmus, H.E.; Bishop, J.M. Amplification of N-Myc in Untreated Human Neuroblastomas Correlates with Advanced Disease Stage. Science 1984, 224, 1121–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.M.; Li, X.L.; Tao, Y.F.; Wu, S.Y.; Fang, F.; Xie, Y.; Liao, X.M.; Li, G.; Wu, D.; et al. MI-773, a Breaker of the MDM2/p53 Axis, Exhibits Anticancer Effects in Neuroblastoma via Downregulation of INSM1. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 22, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, C.; Breslin, M.B.; Guidry, J.J.; Lan, M.S. 5’-Iodotubercidin Represses Insulinoma-Associated-1 Expression, Decreases cAMP Levels, and Suppresses Human Neuroblastoma Cell Growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5456–5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Maleki, Z.; Nadella, A.; Nadella, M.; Patel, G.; Patel, S.; Kholova, I. INSM1, a Novel Biomarker for Detection of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Cytopathologists’ View. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rooper, L.M.; Sharma, R.; Li, Q.K.; Illei, P.; Westra, W.H. INSM1 Demonstrates Superior Performance to the individual and combined use of Synaptophysin, Chromogranin, and CD56 for Diagnosing Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Thoracic Cavity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 1561–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rosenbaum, J.N.; Guo, Z.; Baus, R.M.; Werner, H.; Rehrauer, W.M.; Lloyd, R.V. INSM1: A Novel Immunohistochemical and Molecular Marker for Neuroendocrine and Neuroepithelial Neoplasms. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2015, 144, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rindi, G.; Mete, O.; Uccella, S.; Basturk, O.; La Rosa, S.; Brosens, L.A.A.; Ezzat, S.; de Herder, W.W.; Klimstra, D.S.; Papotti, M.; et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Endocr. Pathol. 2022, 33, 115–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, H.; Krishnan, C.; Charville, G.W. INSM1 Expression in Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors and Other Embryonal Neoplasms. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2019, 22, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. DuBois, S.G.; Macy, M.E.; Henderson, T.O. High-Risk and Relapsed Neuroblastoma: Toward More Cures and Better Outcomes. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2022, 42, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Barone, G.; Anderson, J.; Pearson, A.D.; Petrie, K.; Chesler, L. New Strategies in Neuroblastoma: Therapeutic Targeting of MYCN and ALK. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 5814–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Carter, D.R.; Murray, J.; Cheung, B.B.; Gamble, L.; Koach, J.; Tsang, J.; Sutton, S.; Kalla, H.; Syed, S.; Gifford, A.J.; et al. Therapeutic Targeting of the MYC Signal by Inhibition of Histone Chaperone FACT in Neuroblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 312ra176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Koach, J.; Holien, J.K.; Massudi, H.; Carter, D.R.; Ciampa, O.C.; Herath, M.; Lim, T.; Seneviratne, J.A.; Milazzo, G.; Murray, J.E.; et al. Drugging MYCN Oncogenic Signaling through the MYCN-PA2G4 Binding Interface. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5652–5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tavana, O.; Li, D.; Dai, C.; Lopez, G.; Banerjee, D.; Kon, N.; Chen, C.; Califano, A.; Yamashiro, D.J.; Sun, H.; et al. HAUSP Deubiquitinates and Stabilizes N-Myc in Neuroblastoma. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1180–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Guo, Y.F.; Duan, J.J.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; Liu, X.Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.R.; Lv, J.; Yang, Y.J.; et al. Inhibition of the ALDH18A1-MYCN Positive Feedback Loop Attenuates MYCN-Amplified Neuroblastoma Growth. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaax8694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Witt, O.; Deubzer, H.E.; Lodrini, M.; Milde, T.; Oehme, I. Targeting Histone Deacetylases in Neuroblastoma. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Furchert, S.E.; Lanvers-Kaminsky, C.; Juurgens, H.; Jung, M.; Loidl, A.; Fruhwald, M.C. Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylases As Potential Therapeutic Tools for High-Risk Embryonal Tumors of the Nervous System of Childhood. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 120, 1787–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bolden, J.E.; Peart, M.J.; Johnstone, R.W. Anticancer Activities of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 11 01376 g001 550
Figure 1. Role of INSM1 in SA lineage differentiation. Migrating neural crest (NC) cells from neural tube (NT) aggregated and stimulated by bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) from the dorsal aorta wall for symphtho-adrenal (SA) progenitor cell differentiation. A common trans-regulatory network of specific transcription factors include Phox2b, Phox2a, Mash1 (Ascl-1), Hand2, Gata2/3, INSM1, and N-Myc, SA precursors further differentiate into sympathetic neurons and chromaffin cells, or NB tumor formation.
Figure 1. Role of INSM1 in SA lineage differentiation. Migrating neural crest (NC) cells from neural tube (NT) aggregated and stimulated by bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) from the dorsal aorta wall for symphtho-adrenal (SA) progenitor cell differentiation. A common trans-regulatory network of specific transcription factors include Phox2b, Phox2a, Mash1 (Ascl-1), Hand2, Gata2/3, INSM1, and N-Myc, SA precursors further differentiate into sympathetic neurons and chromaffin cells, or NB tumor formation.
Biology 11 01376 g001
Biology 11 01376 g002 550
Figure 2. Insm1 expression in TH-MYCN transgenic mice. Insm1 expression in the abdominal superior mesenteric ganglion (SMG) dissected from 3-week-old TH-MYCN+/− and WT mice. The boxplot shows the distribution and mean of Insm1 mRNA level with t test p = 6 × 10−12. The expression profiling data was obtained from GSE87784 dataset.
Figure 2. Insm1 expression in TH-MYCN transgenic mice. Insm1 expression in the abdominal superior mesenteric ganglion (SMG) dissected from 3-week-old TH-MYCN+/− and WT mice. The boxplot shows the distribution and mean of Insm1 mRNA level with t test p = 6 × 10−12. The expression profiling data was obtained from GSE87784 dataset.
Biology 11 01376 g002
Biology 11 01376 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlation of N-Myc/INSM1 expression with MYCN gene amplification. (A) N-Myc expression positively correlates with MYCN amplification in NE patients derived from three different public cohorts, Cangelosi (782 samples), Asgharzadeh (247 samples) and Rajbhandari (273 samples). (B) INSM1 expression significantly correlates with MYCN amplification in NB patients derived from Asgharzadeh (247 samples), and Rajbhandari (273samples) but non-significant in Cangelosi (782samples) cohort.
Figure 3. Correlation of N-Myc/INSM1 expression with MYCN gene amplification. (A) N-Myc expression positively correlates with MYCN amplification in NE patients derived from three different public cohorts, Cangelosi (782 samples), Asgharzadeh (247 samples) and Rajbhandari (273 samples). (B) INSM1 expression significantly correlates with MYCN amplification in NB patients derived from Asgharzadeh (247 samples), and Rajbhandari (273samples) but non-significant in Cangelosi (782samples) cohort.
Biology 11 01376 g003
Biology 11 01376 g004 550
Figure 4. N-Mvc and INSM1 expression consistently associated with NB overall survival (OS). A Kaplan-Meier plot shows the OS time and survival probability in NB patients. NB patients derived from Cangelosi, Asgharzadeh, and Rajbhandari cohorts were divided into high-or low-N-Myc or INSM1 expression based on the cut-point using maximally selected rank statistics (maxstat).
Figure 4. N-Mvc and INSM1 expression consistently associated with NB overall survival (OS). A Kaplan-Meier plot shows the OS time and survival probability in NB patients. NB patients derived from Cangelosi, Asgharzadeh, and Rajbhandari cohorts were divided into high-or low-N-Myc or INSM1 expression based on the cut-point using maximally selected rank statistics (maxstat).
Biology 11 01376 g004
Biology 11 01376 g005 550
Figure 5. INSM1 expression in different tumors. INSM1 expression level in various tumors was obtained from publicly available datasets in R2: Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform (http//r2.amc.nl, accessed on 21 February 2022). Analysis of INSM1 expression in neurological cancers with NE feature (red) and the other non-NE caners (blue) was across platforms with hs, u133p2, MAS5.0 data type for bioinformatics analyses.
Figure 5. INSM1 expression in different tumors. INSM1 expression level in various tumors was obtained from publicly available datasets in R2: Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform (http//r2.amc.nl, accessed on 21 February 2022). Analysis of INSM1 expression in neurological cancers with NE feature (red) and the other non-NE caners (blue) was across platforms with hs, u133p2, MAS5.0 data type for bioinformatics analyses.
Biology 11 01376 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Lan, M.S. Interplay: The Essential Role between INSM1 and N-Myc in Aggressive Neuroblastoma. Biology 2022, 11, 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101376

AMA Style

Chen C, Lan MS. Interplay: The Essential Role between INSM1 and N-Myc in Aggressive Neuroblastoma. Biology. 2022; 11(10):1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chiachen, and Michael S. Lan. 2022. "Interplay: The Essential Role between INSM1 and N-Myc in Aggressive Neuroblastoma" Biology 11, no. 10: 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101376

APA Style

Chen, C., & Lan, M. S. (2022). Interplay: The Essential Role between INSM1 and N-Myc in Aggressive Neuroblastoma. Biology, 11(10), 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop