1. Introduction
The notion that atopy and allergy can be inhibited by infection was initially introduced by Strachan in 1989 [
1]. His classical study found that first-born children showed a higher frequency of allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis than their siblings, likely due to the lower possibility of the former being exposed to common infections. Since then, many epidemiological and experimental studies have provided evidence supporting the hygiene hypothesis that is extended to explain the increases in other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [
2,
3,
4]. Many microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, are found to be inhibitory for allergic responses in experimental models and clinical settings [
5,
6,
7,
8]. Our previous research found that chlamydial and mycobacterial infections can inhibit antigen-specific allergic responses induced by OVA and ragweed sensitization and challenge in mice [
5,
9]. Although significant progress has been made in this area, the underlying mechanisms by which infections modulate allergic diseases remain elusive.
Asthma is an airway inflammatory disorder characterized by hyperresponsiveness, local inflammation, structure remodeling, mucus hypersecretion, angiogenesis, smooth muscle hypertrophy, and sub-basement membrane fibrosis. OVA is a commonly used model allergen to stimulate an allergic reaction in animal experiments. The features of OVA-induced airway acute allergic responses include eosinophils infiltration, mucus hypersecretion, and increased Th2 cytokines, as well as OVA-specific IgE in the serum and lung. Our previous studies have demonstrated that chlamydial and mycobacterial infections can switch the allergen-specific CD4+ T cells from Th2- to Th1-like cells in the OVA and ragweed sensitization and challenge models [
5,
9]. In particular, we found that Cm-infected mice showed significantly increased IFNγ production by OVA-specific T cells after OVA sensitization and challenge [
5]. We also found that these infections can enhance regulatory T cell (Treg) responses [
10]. The alterations in T cell responses are associated with the inhibition of allergic reactions. Furthermore, we found that the changes in T cell responses are largely reflected by the alteration of dendritic cell (DC) function [
11]. In addition, we found that chlamydial-infection-induced NK cells play an important role in the infection-mediated inhibition of allergic responses induced by OVA [
12]. The results suggest that multiple types of immune cells are involved in the process of infection-mediated inhibition of allergies.
Traditionally, the function of B cells is considered to contribute to adaptive immunity by secreting antibodies and working as antigen-presenting cells (APCs). IgE antibody production by B cells in allergy is a critical component of the pathological process. However, recent studies suggested that B cells can also produce cytokines, such as IL-10, IL-17, and IFNγ, contributing to the modulation of immune responses [
13]. In particular, IL-10-producing B cells were found to function like regulatory cells, earning them the name regulatory B cells (Breg) [
14]. In addition, IL-10-producing B cells were found to contribute to host defense against infections. For example, in primary Coxiella
burnetii infection, B cells defend against infection by secreting high levels of IL-10 [
15]. According to the differential secretion of IFNγ or IL-4, B cells may be subgrouped into two populations which may subsequently regulate naïve CD4+ T cells differentiating to Th1 or Th2 cells [
16]. Although the studies on cytokine-producing B cells are still limited, the available data thus far suggest that, in addition to their role in the production of antibodies, B cells may play other roles in the process between the interaction of infection and allergy.
To more specifically address the mechanism underlying infection-mediated regulation of allergy, we used an adoptive transfer strategy to test the influence of B cells activated by Cm infection on allergic reactions in a mouse model of asthma-like lung inflammation. We found that B cells isolated from chlamydia-infected mice could inhibit OVA-induced asthma-like inflammatory responses. The inhibitory function of Cm-B cells is associated with their IFNγ production. Further study using simultaneous IFNγ-blocking antibodies confirmed the contribution of IFNγ produced by Cm-B cells in the inhibition process. The finding suggests that IFNγ-producing B cells play a significant role in the infection-mediated inhibition of allergic reactions and imply that this type of B cell may be involved in a broader spectrum of immune regulation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mice
Male C57BL/6 mice were used for the study at 6–8 weeks of age; approximately 100 mice were sacrificed for the research. The mice were bred and maintained at a pathogen-free animal care facility at the University of Manitoba, Canada. All experiments were performed following the guidelines issued by the Canadian Council of Animal Care. The Animal Ethical Committee of the University of Manitoba approved the animal protocol (No. 15-008).
2.2. Organism
Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) organisms (Nigg strain) were cultured, purified, and quantified, as reported in our previous study (5). In brief, Cm was cultured in HeLa-229 cells using RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, and 25 mg/mL gentamycin. The elementary bodies (EBs) were purified and collected by discontinuous density gradient centrifugation. EB infectivity was measured by infecting Hela-229 and immunostaining chlamydial inclusions. The purified EBs were suspended in sucrose–phosphate–glutamic acid buffer and stored at −80 °C. The same batch of purified EBs was used throughout this study.
2.3. Chlamydia Infection and B Cell Isolation
Naïve mice were intranasally (i.n.) inoculated with 1 × 10
3 inclusion-forming units (IFU) of Cm EBs. Ten days post-infection, the spleens of naïve mice and Cm-infected mice were aseptically removed, and B cells were isolated using MACS (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) B220 beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, spleen single-cell suspension was prepared in PBS with 0.5% BSA. MACS B220 beads were used for the positive selection of B220+ cells using the columns. Purified B cells were used for adoptive transfer through the tail vein or i.n. routes. As specified in the experiments, the transfer of B cells was performed with or without an anti-IFNγ antibody (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) or isotype control IgG antibody (BD Pharmingen). The purity of the isolated B cells was 95% to 99%, based on flow cytometry analysis of B220+ cells (
Supplementary Figure S1A). Intracellular cytokine analysis showed that B220+ cells were virtually the sole cell population that produced IFNγ (
Supplementary Figure S1B). Considering that B220+ cells may contain cells other than B cells, we stained the splenic B220
+ cell with CD19, CD11c, and NK1.1 antibodies and found that over 97% of the cells were CD19+ B cells (
Supplementary Figure S1C).
2.4. Allergen Sensitization/Challenge and Cell Adoptive Transfer
Mice were initially sensitized intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 2 μg of OVA and 2 mg Al(OH)
3 adjuvant in 100 μL HBSS. On day 14 post-sensitization, mice were challenged intranasally with 50 μg OVA in 40 μL HBSS (
Supplementary Figure S2A). For adoptive transfer experiments, 2 h before sensitization and challenge, B cells (2 × 10
6 cells/mouse) isolated from naïve or Cm-infected mice were injected through the tail vein. The other steps were the same as in the routine OVA challenge/sensitized model (
Supplementary Figure S2B). For antibody-blocking experiments, mice were sensitized i.p. with 2 μg OVA and 2 mg Al(OH)
3 in 40 μL HBSS. At 14 days post-sensitization, mice were intranasally administered naïve B cells or Cm-B cells (1 × 10
6 cells/mouse) with or without anti-IFNγ antibody (10 μg) or isotype control IgG antibody (10 μg) in 40 μL HBSS. Two hours later, mice were challenged intranasally with OVA (50 μg/mouse) in 40 μL HBSS (
Supplementary Figure S2C). All mice were euthanized 5 days later and analyzed for allergic inflammation and immune responses.
2.5. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluids and Leukocyte Differentials
The main trachea of a mouse was cannulated, followed by a wash of the lung with 1 mL of PBS two times to collect bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids. Cells in the BAL fluids were counted and prepared for smears using a Cytospin machine (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The slides were air-dried and then stained with Hema-3 Stain kit (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA), which contained a cell fixative and eosin Y stain. The number of eosinophils, monocytes/macrophages (mon/Mφ), and lymphocytes per 200 cells were counted and differentiated based on cellular morphology and staining characteristics. Cells in the BAL were also analyzed by flow cytometry (Canto II, BD) for eosinophils with fluorescence-conjugated mAbs.
2.6. Preparation of Lung and Spleen Single-Cell Suspensions
Lung and spleen single-cell suspensions were prepared for flow cytometry analysis. The lungs were collected from mice and digested with 2 mg/mL collagenase XI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in RPMI 1640 for 1 h at 37 °C; 20% EDTA was then added at 5 min before the digestion ended. Then, red blood cells were lysed using ACK lysis buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA) and the cell suspensions were filtered. All the cells were washed and resuspended with FACS buffer (PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ containing 2% FBS and 0.09% NaN3). The spleens were ground using a 70 μm cell strainer for spleen cells, then lysed with ACK buffer, followed by centrifugation and resuspension with PBS buffer.
2.7. Analysis of Lung Pathology
The lung tissues of mice were collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Tissue sections were stained with H&E (hematoxylin and eosin) for histology. Periodic-acid Schiff (PAS) Staining Kit (Sigma Aldrich) was used for bronchial mucus and goblet cell testing, and the staining slides were examined and quantified for a histologic mucus index (HMI) [
9].
2.8. Cell Culture and Cytokine Analysis
Mice were euthanized on day 5 post-OVA challenge and examined for cytokine production by both lung and spleen cells. The lung and spleen single-cell suspensions were prepared aseptically. They were cultured at a relative concentration of 7.5 × 106 cells/mL (spleen) and 5.0 × 106 cells/mL (lung) with OVA (0.4 mg/mL) in the complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 25μg/mL gentamycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Culture supernatants were harvested at 72 h for the measurement of cytokines by ELISA.
2.9. Immunoglobulin Determination in Blood Serum
ELISA was used for analyzing total and OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 Abs in the serum. Sera were determined for OVA-specific IgG1 Abs using biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG1 Abs (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL, USA). For determination of total and OVA-specific IgE, sera were first incubated with a 50% slurry of GammaBind G Sepharose (GE Healthcare Life Science, Piscataway, NJ, USA) to remove most of the serum IgG and then were measured for OVA-specific IgE Abs using an ELISA kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Total IgG1 and IgE were measured by ELISA with purified and biotinylated antibodies (Southern Biotechnology Associates).
2.10. Flow Cytometry Analysis
For cell surface molecule staining, cells were blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 Abs (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 min followed by surface molecule staining using anti-CD45-PerCp (BD Pharmingen), anti-Siglec-F-PE (eBioscience), anti-CD11c-FITC (eBioscience), and Fixable Viability Dye-eFlour 506 mAbs (eBioscience). After incubating on ice in the dark for 40 min, the cells were washed and resuspended with a fix buffer (eBioscience) for flow cytometry analysis. For intracellular cytokine staining, lung and spleen single-cell suspensions were cultured at concentrations of 5 × 10
6 cells/mL and 7.5 × 10
6 cells/mL, respectively, in the complete RPMI 1640 medium with Brefeldin A Solution (eBioscience), which includes PMA, ionomycin, and BFA, for 5 hrs. After incubation, cells were collected and blocked with anti-CD16/32 Abs for 20 min and stained with anti-B220-FITC (BD Pharmingen), anti-CD3e-PE-Cy7 (eBioscience), and Fixable Viability Dye-eFlour 506 mAbs (eBioscience) for 40 min. Cells were then fixed and washed in permeabilization buffer and stained with anti-IFNγ-APC, IL-10-APC, or IL-4-APC (eBioscience), or with isotype control Abs, for 40 min. Cells were washed twice with permeabilization buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry, which was based on the gating strategy shown in
Figure S3.
2.11. Statistical Analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using Student t-tests, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (GraphPad Prism 5 software); p < 0.05 was considered significant. All the experiments were repeated three or more times. In each repeating experiment, every group included 3–4 mice.
4. Discussion
This study extended our research on the mechanism of Cm-infection-mediated inhibition of asthma-like reactions by examining the role of B cells in this process. Using an adoptive transfer approach, we showed that B cells from infected mice have the capacity to dramatically inhibit allergic reactions. Specifically, adoptive transfer of B cells isolated from Cm-infected mice significantly inhibited airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction, reduced Th2 cytokines production, and allergic asthma-related total and allergen-specific antibody responses. More interestingly, we found that the B cells from Cm-infected mice produce IFNγ, which is likely the key mechanism for the modulatory effect of these cells on allergic reactions. The results suggest that IFNγ-producing B cells may play a critical role in the modulating effect of infections on allergic responses.
Aside from its classical role in antibody production, the immunoregulatory function of B cells has been gradually appreciated in recent years. Among the multiple potential mechanisms involving the effect of B cells in immune modulation, the role of regulatory B cells, which produce a large amount of IL-10, is most widely recognized. Indeed, IL-10-producing Breg cells (B10) have been shown to play an important role in the inhibition of autoimmune diseases and inflammations. For example, with the loss of B10 cells, older Tim-1-mutant mice were found to develop spontaneous autoimmune responses associated with hyperactive T cell expansion [
17]. Similarly, during a viral brain infection, B10 cells could directly modulate T lymphocyte and microglial cell responses as well as promote CD4
+ Foxp3
+ T regulatory cell proliferation to control neuroinflammation [
18]. The inhibitory role of Breg cells in allergic diseases has also been reported. In a cockroach-allergen-induced airway inflammation model, the deficiency of regulatory B cells in mice led to increased allergic airway inflammation with a higher level of Th2 cytokines [
19]. In the house-dust-mite-induced murine asthma model, a CD9
+ Breg cell subset was identified as the major inhibitor of the asthmatic responses [
20]. Moreover, Amu et al. found that regulatory B cells from helminth-infected mice could reverse established airway inflammation via inducing regulatory T cells [
21]. Therefore, our initial exploration was also more focused on identifying IL-10-producing Breg cells induced by Cm infection. However, after extensive exploration, we found that the role of classical Breg appeared not significant in this model because the intracellular cytokine staining of Cm-B cells and the culture of spleen cells from infected mice did not show a meaningful increase in IL-10 production. Instead, we found a close association between the inhibitory effect of Cm-B cells and their IFNγ production. Indeed, we found that among the cytokines related to immune modulation in allergic reactions, IFNγ is the only cytokine showing a significant increase in production by the B cells isolated from Cm-infected mice (
Figure 4). More importantly, we found that the simultaneous neutralization of IFNγ at the time of Cm-B cell adoptive transfer virtually abolished the modulating effect of these cells on allergic reactions. The data, together with the previous reports on the modulating role of B cells, suggest that, depending on the type of infection or disease, B cells may play their regulatory role through different cytokine signaling pathways. In particular, in infections of intracellular bacteria which often bias a Th1-like response, such as chlamydia, B cells may more likely modulate immune responses through IFNγ, rather than IL-10 production. Notably, this is not the first report that shows the role of IFNγ-producing B cells in immune-related diseases [
22,
23,
24,
25,
26].
It is reported that IFNγ-producing B cells contributed to the pathogenesis of proteoglycan-induced arthritis (PGIA) [
24,
27]. In addition, treatment of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) with agonistic anti-CD40 antibody reduced IFNγ production by B cells, leading to improvement of the disease [
26]. Notably, all these reports showed a pathogenic role of IFNγ-producing B cells. However, in our model, IFNγ-producing B cells showed a protective role in allergy and asthma. However, considering that the IFNγ-producing B cells only occupy of small portion of the transferred B cells, we think that the IFNγ production of B cells is more likely a mechanism for these B cells to modulate other cells that are related to the development and promotion of allergic reactions. In other words, IFNγ likely needs to be delivered to the right cells in the right niche, possibly through cell–cell interactions. The details of the potential cell–cell interaction and the manner of cytokine delivery by B cells and consequent signaling pathways in this process is subject to future study. On the other hand, the protective role of IFNγ-producing B cells by promoting Th1 cells in infectious diseases has been well documented [
28,
29,
30]. Therefore, the opposite role played by B cells observed in this and previous studies [
24,
26,
27] is likely due to the nature of the corresponding diseases, i.e., Th2-related asthma and Th1-related autoimmune diseases.
It might be of concern that we used B220 as a major marker for identifying B cells in the study, because B220 also reportedly expresses on non-B cells, such as NK and dendritic cells (DCs). To ensure that the observation in this study is a reflection of B cell function, we analyzed the percentage of different types of cells, including B cells, NK cells, and DCs, in the B220+ population based on their CD19, CD11c, and NK1.1 markers. The results showed that more than 97% of the B220+ cells are CD19+ cells, i.e., B cells. Moreover, the minimal population of NK1.1+ cells and CD11c+ B220+ cells showed no significant changes in Cm-infected mice in comparison with naïve mice (
Supplementary Figure S1A). In the adoptive transfer experiments, a clear inhibition of OVA-induced asthma-like responses was found even with the transfer of B220+ cells with nearly 99% purity. The results strongly suggest a significant role of B cells in inhibitory function. More importantly, our intracellular cytokine staining of the purified cells showed that the minimally contaminated B220− cells virtually had no IFNγ production (
Supplementary Figure S1B). It could be of concern that the transferred B cells from infected mice might carry live Cm, which infects the recipient mice, thus modulating T cell responses because the infection is not fully clear at day 10. However, we tested and did not see live Cm in the isolated splenic B cells. This is likely because Cm mainly infects local (lung) epithelial cells and macrophages. Another potential concern is the possible contamination of cells other than B cells in the transferred B cell preparation, because some T cells, DCs, and NK cells reportedly also express B220. In particular, because IFNγ-producing Th1 cells have been shown to inhibit allergic reactions, the involvement of the contaminated cell in the process needs to be addressed. Therefore, we carefully analyzed the purity of the B cell preparation and the capacity of the contaminated non-B cells for IFNγ production. As shown in
Supplementary Figure S1, the purity of the B cell preparation was over 97% (
Supplementary Figure S1A), and the CD3
+ cell produced a negligible amount of IFNγ, which is unlikely to impact the effect of B cell transfer for the inhibition of allergic response (
Supplementary Figure S1B). Moreover, very few non-B cells were found in the isolated B220+ cells (
Supplementary Figure S1C). Taken together, we feel confident that the observed inhibitory effect of the adoptive transfer of B cells on allergic reactions in the study is mainly due to the modulatory role of the IFNγ-producing B cells.