Next Article in Journal
Assessing Reptile Conservation Status under Global Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanobiology of Adipocytes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/biology13060435
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geographical–Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important Family Amaranthaceae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Clade) Collected in 1821–2022 and Preserved in the Herbarium of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow

by
Agata Stadnicka-Futoma
1,* and
Marcin Nobis
2
1
Department of Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Environment Management and Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, ul. Zelwerowicza 8b, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(6), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060435
Submission received: 1 May 2024 / Revised: 31 May 2024 / Accepted: 11 June 2024 / Published: 13 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The digitization of herbarium collections is an important process that allows access to sometimes huge amounts of data that can be used in various natural sciences. In recent years, the collections of one of the thirty oldest herbariums in the world—the herbarium of the Jagiellonian University—have been digitized. This paper presents the resources of the economically very important Amaranthaceae family, which include 8801 herbarium sheets. They were analyzed in taxonomic, geographical, historical, and functional terms.

Abstract

Herbaria constitute a form of documentation, store and secure comparative material, as well as constitute an extra original gene bank. They are an invaluable database among others for the biological, ethnobotanical and agricultural sciences. The digitization of herbarium collections significantly facilitates access to archival materials; however, searching them is still time-consuming. Therefore, our work aims to analyze the herbarium collection of 8801 sheets for specimens representing the economically important family Amaranthaceae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae clade) deposited the oldest herbarium in Poland, the herbarium of the Jagiellonian University (KRA). These specimens have been collected from almost all the continents in dozens of countries for over 200 years. The analyses conducted, including the taxonomic coverage, geographical characteristics and origin, temporal coverage and utility importance of representative species, present the discussed resources in a more accessible way and may become a more attractive form for scientists potentially interested in more advanced research work.

1. Introduction

Herbaria, have become increasingly popular. They constitute a form of documentation, store and secure comparative material, as well as constitute an extra original gene bank. Currently, dried plant specimens are commonly used in taxonomic, phytogeographic and cytological research. On their basis, morphometric tests can be performed, which can later be used for statistical analysis (so-called numerical taxonomy) or to describe the morphology and anatomy of individual structures at the micro level. Taxonomists are often able to use digitized collections to identify and annotate specimens [1], to indicate typical specimens and to typify names of species for which the type has not been designated or is regarded as lost or destroyed. In recent years, publications including typification made based on the available online herbarium databases are becoming more and more common [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. It is worth noting that herbaria are a source of new species, collected and often set aside as unidentified species. Following Bebber et al. [11], about 70,000 species are still waiting to be described. In the era of digitization, the use of scans or photographs of herbarium specimens greatly facilitates the work as well as significantly saving time [9,12,13,14]. An important aspect is also the studies of phylogenetic relationships. Increasingly, phylogenetic analyses are based on samples collected from herbarium materials, e.g., [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], despite problems related to post-mortem DNA damage [23,24]. Herbaria also play an important role in research related to the distribution of plants. At the same time, they allow for analyzing changes in plant cover over many years and are used to establish phytogeographic patterns. Herbarium specimens can be used to analyze phytogeographic phenomena with temporal and spatial dynamics. On their basis, for example, the migration of invasive plants is studied, e.g., [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. They have similar importance in the case of rare plants, including endangered ones, but also utility plants and weeds. They therefore constitute a biodiversity database and may be indirectly helpful in its protection. Herbarium specimens allow the identification of priority places for nature conservation, e.g., [32,33]. As it turns out, herbaria can be a source of viable diasporas. In recent years, attempts have been made to use the seeds of herbarium specimens, and the success of these studies is essential in the case of endangered or even extinct species [34]. Preserved tissues can also be used for this purpose [35,36]. Based on the data contained on the labels of herbarium specimens, it is possible to reconstruct the phenology of plant species in large areas. Phenological data are, therefore, an important tool for studying the impact of climate change on living organisms [37], particularly those related to global warming [38,39,40,41,42]. Based on the collected specimens or collections, it is also possible to trace the history of botanists, e.g., in relation to the expeditions they undertook, which were previously unknown [36,43]. They are also a source of information for ethnobotanists, e.g., [44].
The herbarium of the Jagiellonian University is one of the thirty oldest herbaria in the world [43]. Currently, it contains collections of vascular plants (approx. 800,000 sheets), bryophytes (25,000 specimens), fungi and slime molds (over 70,000 specimens), lichens (approx. 100,000) and algae (approx. 5000). In addition, collections of cones and fruits numbering over 1000 specimens are deposited there. In total, there are approximately one million specimens from all over the world. In 2019, the digitization of the herbarium’s sheets began as part of the IMBIO project [45,46]. During this time, several large and numerous families of vascular plants were digitized, including one of the most useful and economically important families, Amaranthaceae.
Following the APG treatment, the family Amaranthaceae is represented by ca. 165 genera, comprising over 2050 species [47]. However, particular members of the family are taxonomically difficult and require integrative studies. It is worth admitting that only in the last decade have a dozen species within the family been described, e.g., [48,49,50,51,52,53,54].
Amaranthaceae contains many economically important crop plants, adapted to a wide range of climatic conditions due to the type of photosynthesis carried out, C4 types, but also due to their high nutrient content, e.g., [55,56,57,58,59]. For example, within the genus Chenopodium, there are many species, for instance, Ch. quinoa Willd., that contains proteins composed of amino acids that are usually missing from cereal grains (e.g., large amounts of lysine), which are considered to be richer in nutrients than cereals [60,61,62]. The genus Amaranthus is also known for containing valuable nutrients, a high protein and mineral content even compared to rice or corn grains, and an appropriate amount of exogenous amino acids (including, like the above-mentioned quinoa, lysine) [63]. Most species are also used in medicine. They have numerous medicinal properties, including anti-inflammatory, antirheumatic, diuretic, and in the case of some of them, e.g., Achyranthes aspera L., anticancer activity has been demonstrated, e.g., [64,65,66,67,68]. Many studies indicate that, for example, Atriplex lindleyi Moq. may contribute to the fight against malaria and be useful in the prevention of Candida albicans (C.-P. Robin) Berkhout and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Schröter) Migula [69]. Many species are also used in animal breeding, e.g., species of the genus Amaranthus are used in the production of animal feed [70]. Species used in the process of recultivation of contaminated areas are also of particular importance, e.g., Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Thell. (phytoremediation of solid municipal waste landfills) [71,72,73], whose properties can be used to treat soil and increase the crop area. The interest in the agricultural or pharmaceutical use of this group of plants certainly results from the fact that they are also often used for food, medical, cosmetic, textile, construction, religious and even magical purposes in various parts of the world. They are therefore a rich source of research for ethnobotanists [74,75,76,77,78]. Because the family Amaranthaceae is such an economically important group of flowering plants, in this work, we decided to analyze the species deposited in the KRA herbarium in order to make the digitized collection available to a wide audience. The main aim of our work was thus the analysis of all of the herbarium sheets with representatives of the above mentioned family, in terms of the taxonomy, the origin of the specimens and the time of their acquisition, which will significantly facilitate more advanced research work. In order to highlight the importance of the Amaranthaceae family, the literature has been reviewed. Endangered and rare species, as well as those of economic importance, were indicated.

2. Materials and Methods

The subjects of this article are specimens of species from the Amaranthaceae family (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae clade) deposited in the KRA Herbarium. During digitization, the information on the herbarium labels was recorded in the appropriate columns of the Jagiellonian University’s MUZUJ database. Moreover, especially in the case of the genus Chenopodium, the authors verified the correctness of the identification. A complete list of the specimens studied is presented in Table S1.
The families currently included in the Amaranthaceae-Chenopodiaceae clade have long been considered closely related, e.g., [79]. Kadereit et al. [80] listed several common features in terms of the morphology and anatomy, confirming the close relationship of species representing both families. Currently, representatives of both families are grouped into the family Amaranthaceae, treating Chenopodiaceae as its synonym [81,82,83]. Despite this, both Kadereit et al. [80], as well as many other researchers, e.g., [84,85,86,87,88], suggest that the concept of combining both families has no solid phylogenetic basis and only reflects the fact that they form a monophyletic group [80,84,86,89,90,91]. Therefore, they treat the families in question as the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae clade. Our work is based on a systematic division according to the applicable APG IV [83], while the nomenclature follows the Word Flora Online [92]. If names were not found in the mentioned list, the Plants of the World Online [93] platform was used. Information regarding the life forms of the analyzed plants or from publications cited in the text was also obtained from both sites.

3. Results

3.1. General Information

The total number of sheets with specimens representing the Amaranthaceae family is 8801 (Table S1). Almost 97% of them are treated in the rank of species and 6% as subspecies or variety. Slightly over 2% are identified as genera, and 0.15% are putative hybrids. The remaining 0.5% constitute specimens with illegible names, belong to the unresolved name category or are assigned to only the family. The geographical location is specified for approximately 92% of the specimens. 81% of the labels contain information on the habitat, while the remainder have no such information or the text is illegible. Generally, only a small part of the sheets provide data such as the geographical coordinates, altitude, inclination, exposure or ATPOL square number (in the case of specimens collected in Poland) [94]. Moreover, 92% of the sheets have the collector’s name and/or surname legible, while the remaining personal details are illegible or non-existent. The collection date is specified for 94% of the specimens, with full dates appearing on 86% of the specimens. In other cases, they consist of only the year, the year and the month, or are illegible. The rest are sheets without a collection date assigned.

3.2. Taxonomic Coverage

The specimens stored in the herbarium of the Jagiellonian University and representing the analyzed family belong to 346 species and constitute approximately 17% of the world’s resources [93]. The species with the most significant number of sheets (11% of resources) is Chenopodium album L., while 131 species are represented by single specimens.
Generally, species representing the Amaranthaceae-Chenopodiaceae clade belong to 83 genera (Figure 1), constituting 47% of the world’s resources [93]. The largest number of deposited specimens represent Chenopodium (3385 sheets), Atriplex (1905 sheets), and Amaranthus (1334 sheets). The remaining genera are represented by less than 100 sheets, and 53 genera are represented by only 1 sheet. Atriplex, Salsola, Chenopodium and Amaranthus are represented by the greatest numbers of species, while 41 genera are represented by only 1 species.

3.3. Life Forms

Most specimens representing the Amaranthaceae family constitute herbaceous plants (77% of annuals and 23% of perennials). Shrubs constitute 22%.

3.4. Geographical Characteristics and Origin of Specimens

The specimens representing the Amaranthaceae family deposited in the KRA herbarium come from almost all over the world (Figure 2).
The country where the individual plant was collected is specified on 8069 labels. The vast majority of specimens were collected in Europe (88.11%). The percentage of plant origin in relation to individual continents is presented in Figure 3.
Within Europe, the vast majority of specimens (almost 6000) have been collected in Poland, 306 in Ukraine, and 127 sheets in Spain, mostly from the Canary Islands. The Asian specimens representing the family Amaranthaceae mainly come from Tajikistan (103 sheets), including the only specimen of Corispermum papillosum (Kuntze) Iljin—a species with a relatively narrow range; 72 specimens come from Russia, with almost 67% collected between 1843 and 1933, while a single specimen of Atriplex gmelinii C. A. Mey. ex Bong. was collected in South Korea. The African Amarantahceae flora are represented by 143 specimens. The greatest number (47) was collected from Kenya (with 46 specimens collected by A. Starzeński in the years 1943–1956). A total of 180 specimens come from North America; however, most of them (135 sheets) were collected in the United States. Single specimens have been collected in Honduras and Jamaica, including the sole specimen of Froelichia interrupta (L.) Moq. South America is represented by 23 specimens, collected mainly in Uruguay in the years 1899–1986. A significant part of this collection represents the genera of Gomphrena, Alternanthera and Celosia. A single sheet with specimens of Iresine angustifolia Euphrasén comes from Argentina, and four specimens of other species (including the only specimens from Nitrophila occidentalis (Moq.) S. Watson, Atriplex imbricata (Moq.) D. Dietr., Atriplex atacamensis Phil. come from Chile. Two sheets of Suaeda altissima (L.) Pall. were collected in Peru by A. Junge from the same place (one in 1907 and the other in 1909).
An important part of the collection comprises rare and endemic plant species with a limited distribution range. In the KRA herbarium, they are represented by 13 species of which the majority occur in Australia (Table S2).

3.5. Temporal Coverage

Specimens of vascular plants have been collected and preserved in the KRA herbarium since approximately 1750. However, the oldest collection representing the family Amaranthaceae (complete gathering and properly labeled), Gomphrena globosa L., came from 1843 and is very well-preserved (Figure 4).
Generally, the collection can be divided into three historical periods. In the first period, which took place between 1821 and 1899, 281 specimens were collected, with the largest number of specimens (38) collected in 1876. The largest number of sheets with specimens of Amaranthaceae was collected and deposited in KRA by A. Śleńdziński (56 sheets). They come from various regions of Ukraine. Most of the plants collected by Sleńdziński can be classified as rather common species, mostly representing the genera of Atriplex, Chenopodium and Polycnemum. The most frequently collected species were Atriplex rosea L. (23 sheets) and Polycnemum arvense L. (22 sheets). A total of 4675 specimens come from the period between 1900 and 1999. The greatest number of sheets was collected by H. Trzcińska-Tacik, 689 specimens, most of them from Poland. A small part represents Czech, Slovak and Hungarian flora. A significant number was also provided by P. Szotkowski (233) from Upper Silesia, D. Fijałkowski (220) from the Lublin region, A. Śleńdziński (185) from Ukraine, A. Sendek (142) from Silesia, J. Kornaś (120) from different countries but mostly from Poland and Zambia, K. Towpasz (106) from south-eastern Poland (mainly from the foothills) and M. Wajda (106) mainly from southern Poland. The largest number of sheets contains specimens of the following species: Chenopodium album L. (462), Atriplex patula L. (405), Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC. (274), Chenopodium polyspermum L. (264) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (257). Moreover, 89 individual species sheets and a specimen of the genus Cyphocarpa come from this period. However, 3155 specimens were collected in the last and shortest period, between 2000 and 2022 (Figure 5). Most of them were collected in 2003 (699 sheets) and in 2002 (401 sheets). Over 200 sheets were collected in 2004 and each year between 2006 and 2009. The most significant numbers of specimens were collected by the following botanists: M. Nobis (373 sheets) from Poland, Tajikistan, Russia and Kyrgyzstan, as well as by M. Zarzyka-Ryszka (368 sheets), R. Piwowarczyk (252 sheets), A. Nobis (240 sheets), A. Trojecka-Brzezińska (188 sheets) and M. Bielecki (153 sheets) from Poland but from different regions. In general, 8249 labels share the collector’s name for a given plant. On 144 labels, the names are partially or completely illegible, while on the remaining labels, the names of the collectors are missing. This extensive collection of Amaranthaceae specimens is the result of almost 1000 researchers, who within over 200 years collected the plants from different regions of the world. The significant increase in the number of sheets collected after 1950 is related to the more intensive scientific activity of mainly employees (research trips) but also doctoral students (floristic studies) associated with the Jagiellonian University.

3.6. Utility Importance of Species Representing the Amaranthaceae Family

Of the 346 species representing the Amaranthaceae family in the KRA herbarium, at least 65 have been shown to be of significant economic importance. Almost 74% have healing properties for various diseases, and some even have anti-cancer properties. A total of 25 species belonging to the genera Atriplex (14) and Amaranthus (10) are used as food. In the case of the latter, the seeds are particularly important as they are treated as “pseudocereals” rich in valuable nutrients [63]. These plants also provide food for animals. Some, e.g., Aerva javanica (Burm.f.) Schult. or Arthrocnemum macrostachyum (Moric.) K.Koch can be used in phytoremediation and soil reclamation [95,96]. Alternanthera caracasana Knuth is a potential source of bioethanol for fuel production [97]. Some species, such as the representatives of the genus Dysphania R. Br., are used as moth repellent and treatment for respiratory illness, and as apotropaic and insect repellents, which are blessed during Catholic church holidays [98,99]. The list of useful species representing the family Amaranthaceae that are preserved in the herbarium of KRA is provided in Table S3.

4. Discussion

Plants play a significant role in human life. They have also been an object of interest in many fields of science, and fresh or dry parts of plants are a source of valuable and reliable data. Herbaria preserving a collection of dry plants constitute a rich resource of biological diversity. In addition to their museum, historical and scientific value, they protect comparative material and constitute a specific gene bank whose importance, together with the development of molecular technologies, is increasingly appreciated [36,100]. It seems that the most important task of herbaria is to store herbarium specimens as comparative materials for taxonomic research or studies related to the analysis of plant distribution. However, the role of herbaria is much more complex, and those mentioned above are only a few examples.
Digital collections have become an urgent necessity in today’s large-scale biodiversity research, and indeed, in recent years, an intensive digitization process has been taking place in many herbaria [101]. This makes the collections available to a wide range of recipients. Easily accessible and searchable data on herbarium specimens on the Internet have greatly increased the efficiency of research in the last decade. Time previously spent travelling to collections or waiting to borrow specimens can instead be spent on data collection [9].
Analyses such as ours, as included in this article, contribute to a more accessible presentation of herbarium resources of species representing the Amaranthaceae family, which is of great economic importance. We believe that this way of presenting them can encourage researchers to use data from the KRA herbarium for various types of scientific research, such as ethnobotanical, pharmacological, phytogeographical or taxonomical research, for instance, related to one of the species-rich, morphologically variable and taxonomically problematic genera such as Chenopodium, which we intend to address in our further research. An accessible analysis, combined with the attached list of deposited perches and online access to the herbarium sheets, which are or will soon be published in the GIBF [102], provides new research opportunities and allows researchers to save time previously spent on the revision of herbarium materials directly in the place where they are stored.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we described the whole set of 8801 herbarium specimens representing the economically important family Amaranthaceae, which were collected over 200 years and are preserved in the herbarium of the Jagiellonian University (KRA). The analyses presented here, which are related to the taxonomic coverage, geographical characteristics and origin, temporal coverage, or utility importance of species, allow for a better understanding and contribute to faster familiarization with a huge body of material, the verification of which in its raw form would require a tremendous amount of work and time. In the era of increasing possibilities of using herbarium plants, the collected resources of specimens from the discussed family may become an important source for scientific studies involving many fields of natural sciences. It is worth emphasizing that individual representatives of the family Amaranthaceae are regarded as taxonomically problematic and can cause many problems in terms of proper identification. Therefore, the data presented in both descriptive and tabular form will be useful for comparative analyses by professional scientists conducting more advanced research works as well as by students and amateur botanists dealing with plants of the family Amaranthaceae.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13060435/s1, Table S1: Database of herbarium sheets of the Amaranthaceae family deposited in the KRA herbarium; Table S2: A list of rare and endemic species representing the family Amaranthaceae and deposited in the herbarium of KRA; Table S3: List of economically useful species based on herbarium specimens of the Amaranthaceae family deposited in the KRA herbarium. References [59,60,61,62,63,65,66,67,69,70,72,73,93,95,96,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.-F. and M.N.; methodology, A.S.-F. and M.N.; validation, A.S.-F. and M.N.; formal analysis, A.S.-F.; investigation, A.S.-F.; resources, M.N.; data curation, A.S.-F. and M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.-F.; writing—review and editing, M.N.; visualization, A.S.-F.; supervision, A.S.-F. and M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding, however, M. Nobis’s research was partially funded by the Institute of Botany, the Jagiellonian University, Kraków (N18/DBS/000002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the KRA herbarium for making the collection available for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Harris, K.M.; Marsico, T.D. Digitizing specimens in a small herbarium: A viable workflow for collections working with limited resources. Appl. Plant Sci. 2017, 5, 1600125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alves-Araújo, A.; dos Santos Moraes, Q.; Nichio-Amaral, R.; Miranda, V.S. Typifications in neotropical Sapotaceae. PhytoKeys 2020, 170, 45–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boltenkov, E.V.; Güner, A. Typification of some Oncocyclus (Iris, Iridaceae) names related to the Turkish flora. Phytotaxa 2020, 468, 045–061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dalastra, C.H.; Heiden, G. Typifications of five names in Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Embrapa Clima Temperado-Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE). Phytotaxa 2020, 474, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kottekkattu, T.; Pradeep, A.K. Lectotypification and a new record of the genus Eragrostiella (Tripogoninae, Cynodonteae, Chloridoideae, Poaceae) from India. Phytotaxa 2020, 464, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, B.B.; Liu, G.N.; Hong, D.Y.; Wen, J. Typification of 23 names in Eriobotrya (Maleae, Rosaceae). PhytoKeys 2020, 139, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Naive, M.A.K.; Sanders, T. Typification of two species names in Dendrochilum (Orchidaceae, subgenus Platyclinis). Phytotaxa 2020, 470, 298–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nobis, M.; Gudkova, P.D.; Nowak, A.; Sawicki, J.; Nobis, A. A synopsis of the genus Stipa (Poaceae) in Middle Asia, including a key to species identification, an annotated checklist, and phytogeographic analyses. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2020, 105, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nobis, M.; Klichowska, E.; Wolanin, M.; Nobis, A.; Nowak, A. Typification of five plant names described based on specimens collected by Józef Warszewicz in Central and South America. PhytoKeys 2022, 192, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wolski, G.J.; Faltyn-Parzymska, A.; Proćków, J. Lectotypification of the name Stereodon nemoralis Mitt. (Plagiotheciaceae), a basionym of Plagiothecium nemorale (Mitt.) A. Jaeger. PhytoKeys 2020, 155, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bebber, D.P.; Carine, M.A.; Wood, J.R.I.; Wortley, A.H.; Harris, D.J.; Prance, G.T.; Davidse, G.; Paige, J.; Pennington, T.D.; Robson, N.K.B.; et al. Herbaria are a major frontier for species discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 22169–22171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Corney, D.P.A.; Clark, J.Y.; Tang, H.L.; Wilkin, P.; Corney, D.P.A.; Clark, J.Y.; Tang, H.L.; Wilkin, P. Automatic extraction of leaf characters from herbarium specimens. Taxon 2012, 61, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weaver, W.N.; Smith, S.A. From leaves to labels: Building modular machine learning networks for rapid herbarium specimen analysis with LeafMachine2. Appl Plant Sci. 2023, 11, e11548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Carranza-Rojas, J.; Goeau, H.; Bonnet, P.; Mata-Montero, E.; Joly, A. Going deeper in the automated identification of Herbarium specimens. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Inderbitzin, P.; Lim, S.R.; Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B.; Kohlmeyer, J.; Berbee, M.L. The phylogenetic position of Spathulospora based on DNA sequences from dried herbarium material. Mycol. Res. 2004, 108, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zuntini, A.R.; Fonseca, L.H.M.; Lohmann, L.G. Primers for phylogeny reconstruction in Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae) using herbarium samples. Appl. Plant Sci. 2013, 1, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Besnard, G.; Christin, P.A.; Malé, P.J.G.; Lhuillier, E.; Lauzeral, C.; Coissac, E.; Vorontsova, M.S. From museums to genomics: Old herbarium specimens shed light on a C3 to C4 transition. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6711–6721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Muñoz-Rodríguez, P.; Carruthers, T.; Wood, J.R.I.; Williams, B.R.M.; Weitemier, K.; Kronmiller, B.; Goodwin, Z.; Sumadijaya, A.; Anglin, N.L.; Filer, D.; et al. A taxonomic monograph of Ipomoea integrated across phylogenetic scales. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vintsek, L.; Klichowska, E.; Nowak, A.; Nobis, M. Genetic differentiation, demographic history and distribution models of high alpine endemic vicariants outline the response of species to predicted climate changes in a Central Asian biodiversity hotspot. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nobis, M.; Wróbel, S.; Klichowska, E.; Nowak, A.; Wróbel, A.; Nobis, A.; Paszko, B.; Świerszcz, S.; Chen, W.; Kauzal, P.; et al. New national and regional plant records: Contribution to the flora of the Old World countries. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2023, 92, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wróbel, A.; Klichowska, E.; Nobis, M. Hybrids as mirrors of the past: Genomic footprints reveal spatio-temporal dynamics and extinction risk of alpine extremophytes in the mountains of Central Asia. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sinaga, P.; Klichowska, E.; Nowak, A.; Nobis, M. Hybridization and introgression events in co-occurring populations of closely related grasses (Poaceae: Stipa) in high mountain steppes of Central Asia. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0298760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Staats, M.; Cuenca, A.; Richardson, J.E.; Vrielink-van Ginkel, R.; Petersen, G.; Seberg, O.; Bakker, F.T. DNA damage in plant Herbarium tissue. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McAssey, E.V.; Downs, C.; Yorkston, M.; Morden, C.; Heyduk, K. A comparison of freezer-stored DNA and herbarium tissue samples for chloroplast assembly and genome skimming. Appl. Plant Sci. 2023, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pyšek, P. Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic: Dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 1991, 26, 439–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pyšek, P.; Prach, K. Plant invasion and the role of riparian habitats: A comparison of four species alien to central Europe. J. Biogeogr. 1993, 20, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pyšek, P.; Prach, K. Invasion dynamics of Impatiens glandilufera: A century of spreading reconstructed. Biol. Conserv. 1995, 74, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lambrinos, J.G. The expansion history of a sexual and asexual species of Cortaderia in California, USA. J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mihulka, S.; Pyšek, P. Invasion history of Oenothera congeners in Europe: A comparative study of spreading rates in the last 200 years. J. Biogeogr. 2001, 28, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delisle, F.; Lavoie, C.; Jean, M.; Lachance, D. Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: Taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 1033–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ni, M. Herbarium records reveal multiple phases in the relationship between minimum residence time and invasion ranges of alien plant species. Plants People Planet 2022, 5, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hernández, H.M.; Navarro, M. A new method to estimate areas of occupancy using herbarium data. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16, 2457–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Verspagen, N.; Erkens, R.H.J. A method for making Red List assessments with herbarium data and distribution models for species-rich plant taxa: Lessons from the Neotropical genus Guatteria (Annonaceae). Plants People Planet 2023, 5, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Godefroid, S.; van de Vyver, A.; Stoffelen, P.; Robbrecht, E.; Vanderborght, T. Testing the viability of seeds from old herbarium specimens for conservation purposes. Taxon 2011, 60, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rocchetti, A.G.; Davis, C.; Caneva, G.; Bacchetta, G.; Fabrini, G.; Fenu, G.; Foggi, B.; Galasso, G.; Gargano, D.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; et al. A pragmatic and prudent consensus on the resurrection of extinct plant species using herbarium specimens. Taxon 2022, 71, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Heberling, J.M.; Prather, L.A.; Tonsor, S.J. The changing uses of Herbarium data in an era of global change: An overview using automated content analysis. BioScience 2019, 69, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lavoie, C.; Lachance, D. A new herbarium-based method for reconstructing the phenology of plant species across large areas. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Primack, D.; Imbres, C.; Primack, R.B.; Miller-Rushing, A.J.; Del Tredici, P. Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 1260–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miller-Rushing, A.J.; Primack, R.B.; Primack, D.; Mukunda, S. Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phenological changes in response to global warming. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hart, R.; Salick, J.; Ranjitkar, S.; Xu, J. Herbarium specimens show contrasting phenological responses to Himalayan climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 10615–10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rawal, D.S.; Kasel, S.; Keatley, M.R.; Nitschke, C.R. Herbarium records identify sensitivity of flowering phenology of eucalypts to climate: Implications for species response to climate change. Austral Ecol. 2014, 40, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Davis, C.C.; Willis, C.G.; Connolly, B.; Kelly, C.; Ellison, A.M. Herbarium records are reliable sources of phenological change driven by climate and provide novel insights into species’ phenological cueing mechanisms. Amer. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 1599–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Plewa, A.; Köhler, P. Pinaceae in the herbarium of the Institute of botany at the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland (KRA). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2019, 88, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Azab, A. Amaranthaceae plants of Israel and palestine: Medicinal activities and unique compounds. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2020, 9, 366–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tykarski, P. Natural data resources of Polish scientific institutions-variety, history, importance–introduction. Kosmos 2021, 70, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Knutelski, S.; Nobis, M.; Pyrcz, T.; Fiałkowski, W. Zasoby informacji o różnorodności biotycznej w kolekcjach przyrodniczych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Kosmos 2021, 70, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Christenhusz, J.M.; Byng, J.W. The number of know plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 2016, 261, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Flores-Olvera, H.; Zumaya, S.; Borsch, T. Two new species of Iresine (Amaranthaceae: Gomphrenoideae) from Mexico supported by morphological and molecular characters. Willdenowia 2016, 46, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alonso, Á.M.; Crespo, M.B.; Freitag, H. Salicornia cuscoensis (Amaranthaceae/Chenopodiaceae), a new species from Peru (South America). Phytotaxa 2017, 319, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Arya, S.; Kumar, V.S.A.; Vishnu, W.K.; Kumar, T.R. Amaranthus saradhiana (Amaranthaceae)–a new species from southern Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Phytotaxa 2019, 403, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arya, S. Alternanthera ebracteolata (Amaranthaceae), a new species from Kerala (SW-India). Phytotaxa 2021, 480, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arya, S.; Iamonico, D.; Sánchez-Del Pino, I.; Kumar, V.N.S.A. Alternanthera indica (Amaranthaceae), a new species from Kerala (India). Phytotaxa 2021, 482, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mosyakin, S.L.; Mandák, B. Chenopodium ucrainicum (Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae sensu APG), a new diploid species: A morphological description and pictorial guide. Ukr. Bot. J. 2020, 77, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chatelain, C.; Uotila, P.; Benhouhou, S.; Mombrial, F.; Mesbah, M.; Baa, S.; Benghanem, A.N. Chenopodium hoggarense (Amaranthaceae), a new species from Algeria and Chad. Willdenowia 2022, 52, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Simmonds, N.W. The grain chenopods of the tropical American highlands. Econ. Bot. 1965, 19, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Galwey, N.W.; Leakey, C.L.A.; Price, K.R.; Fenwick, G.R. Chemical composition and nutritional characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Human Nutr. Food Sci. Nutr. 1990, 42, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dincă, L.; Dincă, M.; Pantea, S.D.; Timiș-Gansac, V.; Oneț, C. Amaranthus Plant–between myth and usage. Natural Resources Sustain. Dev. 2018, 8, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bajwa, A.A.; Zulfiqar, U.; Sadia, S.; Bhowmik, P.; Chauhan, B.S. A global perspective on the biology, impact and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: Two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 5357–5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Karous, O.; Ben Haj Jilani, I.; Ghrabi-Gammar, Z. Ethnobotanical study on plant used by Semi-Nomad Descendants’ Community in Ouled Dabbeb–Southern Tunisia. Plants 2021, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schlick, G.; Bubenheim, D.L. Quinoa: Candidate crop for NASA’s controlled ecological life support systems. In Progress in New Crops; Janick, J., Ed.; ASHS Press: Arlington, VA, USA, 1996; pp. 632–640. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dini, I.; Schettino, O.; Simioli, T.; Dini, A. Studies on the constituents of Chenopodium quinoa seeds: Isolation and characterization of new triterpene saponins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Iqbal, M. An Assessment of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) potential as a grain crop on marginal lands in Pakistan. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2015, 15, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Aderibigbe, O.R.; Ezekiel, O.O.; Owolade, S.O.; Korese, J.K.; Sturm, B.; Hensel, O. Exploring the potentials of underutilized grain amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) along the value chain for food and nutrition security: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 62, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z.; Nedialkov, P.T.; Nikolov, S.D. The genus Chenopodium: Phytochemistry, ethnopharmacology and pharmacology. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2009, 3, 280–306. [Google Scholar]
  65. Donia El Raheim Mohammed, A.; Ibrahim Alqasoumi, S.; Mahmoud Radwan, A.; Burand, J.; Craker, L.E. Phytochemical screening and insecticidal activity of three plants from Chenopodiaceae family. J. Med. Plant Res. 2012, 6, 5863–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Soumia, H.; Zahia, B.; Aminata, O.E.H.K.; Hanane, B.; Zohra, B.; Yasmina, B.; Insaf, A.K.; Sara, M.; Fatma, S.; Meriem, T. Ethnobotanical study and phytochemical screening of six medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in the Northeastern Sahara of Algeria (area of Ouargla). J. Med. Plant Res. 2015, 9, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alharbi, N. Survey of plant species of medical importance to treat digestive tract diseases in Tabuk Region, Saudi Arabia. J. King Abdulaziz Univ. Sci. 2017, 29, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dobrowolska, E.; Motyka, S.; Szopa, A.; Ekiert, H. Achyranthes bidenatata (grzebyk dwuzębny)–charakterystyka botaniczna, ekologiczna, fitochemiczna oraz zastosowanie w lecznictwie. Farmacja Polska 2021, 77, 717–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. El Souda, S.S.; Matloub, A.A.; Nepveu, F.; Valentin, A.; Roques, C. Phenolic composition and prospective anti-infectious properties of Atriplex lindleyi. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2015, 5, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ganjare, A.; Raut, N. Nutritional and medicinal potential of Amaranthus spinosus. RJPP 2019, 8, 3149–3156. [Google Scholar]
  71. Eissa, M.A. Phytoextraction mechanism of Cd by Atriplex lentiformis using some mobilizing agents. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 108, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vromman, D.; Flores-Bavestrello, A.; Šlejkovec, Z.; Lapaille, S.; Teixeira-Cardoso, C.; Briceño, M.; Lutts, S. Arsenic accumulation and distribution in relation to young seedling growth in Atriplex atacamensis Phil. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 412–413, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ma, D.; He, Z.; Bai, X.; Wang, W.; Zhao, P.; Lin, P.; Zhou, H. Atriplex canescens, a valuable plant in soil rehabilitation and forage production. A review. Sci. Total Environt. 2022, 15, 150287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Qureshi, R.; Bhatti, G.R. Folklore uses of Amaranthaceae family from Nara Desert, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar]
  75. Bieski, I.G.C.; Leonti, M.; Arnason, J.T.; Ferrier, J.; Rapinski, M.; Violante, I.M.P.; Balogun, S.O.; Pereira, J.F.; de Figueiredo, R.C.; Lopes, C.R.; et al. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants by population of Valley of Juruena Region, Legal Amazon, Mato Grosso, Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 173, 383–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Saranraj, P.; Lakshmi, B.; Suganthi, K. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants from Vellore district, Tamil nadu, India. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2016, 3, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Singh, G.; Kumar, J. Studies on underutilized weeds of family Amaranthaceae used as edibles by the Munda tribe of Jharkhand, India. Ann. Plant Sci. 2019, 8, 3495–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Manzanero-Medina, G.I.; Vásquez-Dávila, M.A.; Lustre-Sánchez, H.; Pérez-Herrera, A. Ethnobotany of food plants (quelites) sold in two traditional markets of Oaxaca, Mexico. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 130, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kühn, U.; Bittrich, V.; Carolin, R.; Freitag, H.; Hedge, I.C.; Uotila, P.; Wilson, P.G. Chenopodiaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants; Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G., Bittrich, V., Eds.; Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993; Volume 2, pp: 253–281.
  80. Kadereit, G.; Borsch, T.; Weising, K.; Freitag, H. Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. J. Plant. Sci. 2003, 164, 959–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 141, 399–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Brockington, S.F.; Alexandre, R.; Ramdial, J.; Moore, M.J.; Crawley, S.; Dhingra, A.; Hilu, K.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S. Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: Revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2009, 170, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sukhorukov, A.P. The Carpology of the Chenopodiaceae with Reference to the Phylogeny, Systematics and Diagnostics of Its Representatives; Grif & Co.: Tula, Russia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hernández-Ledesma, P.; Berendsohn, W.G.; Borsch, T.; von Mering, S.; Akhani, H.; Arias, S.; Castañeda-Noa, I.; Eggli, U.; Eriksson, R.; Flores-Olvera, H.; et al. A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales. Willdenowia 2015, 45, 281–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sukhorukov, A.P.; Nilova, M.V.; Krinitsina, A.A.; Zaika, M.A.; Erst, A.S.; Shepherd, K.A. Molecular phylogenetic data and seed coat anatomy resolve the generic position of some critical Chenopodioideae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae) with reduced perianth segments. PhytoKeys 2018, 109, 103–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sukhorukov, A.P.; Liu, P.L.; Kushunina, M. Taxonomic revision of Chenopodiaceae in Himalaya and Tibet. PhytoKeys 2019, 116, 1–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Cuénoud, P.; Savolainen, V.; Chatrou, L.W.; Powell, M.; Grayer, R.J.; Chase, M.W. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 2002, 89, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Müller, K.; Borsch, T. Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data–Evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and bayesian analyses. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2005, 92, 66–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Schäferhoff, B.; Müller, K.F.; Borsch, T. Caryophyllales phylogenetics: Disentangling Phytolaccaceae and Molluginaceae and description of Microteaceae as a new isolated family. Willdenowia 2009, 39, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. WFO. The Word Flora Online. Available online: https://www.worldfloraonline.org/ (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  93. POWO. Plants of the World Online, Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  94. Zając, A. Założenia metodyczne “Atlasu rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce”. Wiadomości Botaniczne 1978, 22, 145–155. [Google Scholar]
  95. Novelly, P.; Watson, I. Successful grassland regeneration in a severely degraded catchment: A whole of government approach in north west Australia. In Climate and Land Degradation. Environmental Science and Engineering Series; Chapter, 26; Sivakumar, M.V.K., Ndiang’ui, N., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 469–484. [Google Scholar]
  96. Megharbi, A.; Kechairi, R. Ethnobotanical characterization of halophytes with medicinal virtues, Case of the Macta wetland flora: North-West Algeria. Genet. Biodivers. J. 2021, 5, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Malthesh, S.R.Y.; Achar, R.R.; Cathrine, A.A.; Vadiraj, K.T. Extraction of alcohols from non-edible agricultural weed, lignocellulouic feedstock–Alternanthera caracasana. World J. Environ. Bioscien. 2023, 12, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Oklejewicz, K.; Łuczaj, Ł. Plants blessed in churches on assumption day in the southern suburbs of Rzeszow with special reference to Dysphania schraderiana (Schult.) Mosyakin & Clemants (in polish). Etnobiologia Polska 2015, 5, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  99. Łuczaj, Ł.; Wolanin, M.; Drobnik, J.; Kujawska, M.; Dumanowski, J.; Walker, K.; Tomczyk, M. Dysphania schraderiana (Schult.) Mosyakin & Clemants-An overlooked medicinal and ritual plant used in Poland. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 284, 114755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lavoie, C. Biological collections in an ever changing world: Herbaria as tools for biogeographical and environmental studies. Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 15, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kovtonyuk, N.; Han, I.; Gatilova, E. Digital Herbarium Collections of the Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences, Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. GIBF. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  103. Thiv, M.; Thulin, M.; Kilian, N.; Linder, H.P. Eritreo–Arabian Affinities of the Socotran flora as revealed from the moolecular phylogeny of Aerva (Amaranthaceae). Syst. Bot. 2006, 31, 560–570. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25064185 (accessed on 10 October 2022). [CrossRef]
  104. Miller, A. Aerva microphylla. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T44753A10946247. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/44753/10946247 (accessed on 10 October 2023).
  105. Weakley, A.; Bucher, M.; Murdock, N. Recovery Plan for Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus); U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1996; pp. 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  106. Marcone, M.F. First report of the characterization of the threatened plant species Amaranthus pumilus (seabeach amaranth). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. NSE. Nature Serve Explorer. Available online: https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.141860/Amaranthus_pumilus (accessed on 10 March 2024).
  108. IUNC. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/199895/2617800 (accessed on 7 March 2024).
  109. Hadjiev, V. Anabasis eugeniae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/199895/2617800 (accessed on 7 March 2024).
  110. Ntore, S.; Beentje, H.J.; Fischer, E.; Kabuye, C.; Kalema, J.; Kayombo, C.; Luke, W.R.Q.; Nshutiyayesu, S. Celosia elegantissima. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/103581524/103648247 (accessed on 7 March 2024).
  111. Foziljonov, S. Theoretical analysis of the degree of scarity of representatives of the family of Chenopodiaceae in the Feragana Valley. Cent. Asian J. Med. Sci. 2021, 2, 295–299. [Google Scholar]
  112. Martínez Salas, E.; Fuentes, A.C.D.; Samain, M.-S. Celosia monosperma. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/136621713/137375989 (accessed on 7 March 2024).
  113. Raimondo, D.; von Staden, L.; Foden, W.; Victor, J.E.; Helme, N.A.; Turner, R.C.; Kamundi, D.A.; Manyama, P.A. Red List of South African Plants; Strelitzia 25; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  114. Buira, A.; Fraga i Arquimbau, P. Salsola papillosa. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/103535407/103535411 (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  115. Shafique, S.; Javaid, A.; Bajwa, R.; Shafiqe, S. Biological control of Achyranthes aspera and Xanthium strumarium in Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2007, 39, 2607–2610. [Google Scholar]
  116. Sumeet, D.; Raghvendra, D.; Kushagra, M. Achyranthes aspera Linn. (Chirchira): A magic herb in folk medicine. Ethnobot. Leafl. 2008, 12, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Varuna, K.M.; Khan, M.U.; Sharma, P.K. Review on Achyranthes aspera. J. Pharm. Pract. Res. 2010, 3, 714–717. [Google Scholar]
  118. Ozturk, M.; Mermut, A.R.; Celik, A. Urbanisation, land use, land degradation and environment. Ambio 2011, 51, 1446–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Mukherjeea, H.; Ojhaa, D.; Baga, P.; Chandelb, H.S.; Bhattacharyyad, S.; Chatterjeed, T.K.; Mukherjeed, P.K.; Chakrabortia, S.; Chattopadhyaya, D. Anti–herpes virus activities of Achyranthes aspera: An Indian ethnomedicine, and its triterpene acid. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 168, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Hasan, S. Pharmacological and medicinal uses of Achyranthes aspera. Int. J. Sci. Environ. 2014, 3, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  121. Singh, N.; Mrinal, P.S.; Gupta, V.K. A review on pharmacological aspects of Achyranthes aspera. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Chin. Med. 2019, 3, 000188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Movaliya, V.; Zaveri, M. A review on the pashanbheda plant “Aerva javanica”. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 25, 268–275. [Google Scholar]
  123. Suleiman, M.H.A. Ethnobotanical, phytochemical and biological study of Tamarix aphylla and Aerva javanica medicinal plants growing in the Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2019, 12, 1940082919869480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Soliman, M.A. Cytogenetical studies on Aerva javanica (Amaranthaceae). Fl. Medit. 2006, 16, 333–339. [Google Scholar]
  125. Rahman, A.H.M.M.; Gulshana, M.I.A. Taxonomy and medicinal uses on Amaranthaceae family of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2014, 2, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Qureshi, R.; Raza Bhatti, G. Ethnobotany of plants used by the Thari people of Nara Desert, Pakistan. Fitoterapia 2008, 79, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhao, P.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Ran, R.; Zhao, J.; Wei, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, G. Healthy values and de novo domestication of sand rice (Agriophyllum squarrosum), a comparative view against Chenopodium quinoa. Crit. Rev. Food. Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 4188–4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Qian, C.; Yin, H.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yin, C.; Luo, W.; Dong, Z.; Xia Yan, G.C.; Wang, X.-R.; Ma, X.-F. Population dynamics of Agriophyllum squarrosum, a pioneer annual plant endemic to mobile sand dunes, in response to global climate change. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Genievskaya, Y.; Abugalieva, S.; Zhubanysheva, A.; Turuspekov, Y. Morphological description and DNA barcoding study of sand rice (Agriophyllum squarrosum, Chenopodiaceae) collected in Kazakhstan. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Yin, X.; Yan, X.; Qian, C.; Zhou, S.; Fang, T.; Fan, X.; Gao, Y.; Chang, Y.; Yang, J.; Ma, X.F. Comparative transcriptome analysis to identify genes involved in terpenoid biosynthesis in Agriophyllum squarrosum, a folk medicinal herb native to Asian temperature deserts. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 15, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dhanya, V.; Ragavendran, U.; Aathira, M.; Saipriya, V.; Priya, M.S.; Palanisamy, S.; Siddhraju, P. Biochemical composition and antioxidant potential of raw and hydrothermal treated of two underutilized leafy vegetables Amaranthus dubius and Allmania nodiflora. Int. J. Food Sci. Nut. 2017, 2, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  132. Banerjee, S.; Joglekar, A.; Mishra, M. A critical review on importance of green leafy vegetables. Int. J. Appl. Sci. 2015, 2, 124–132. [Google Scholar]
  133. Canales-Martínez, M.; Hernández-Delgado, T.; Flores-Ortiz, C.; Durán-Díaz, A.; García-Bores, A.M.; Avila-Acevedo, G. Antimicrobial activity of Alternanthera caracasana. Pharm. Biol. 2005, 43, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Hwong, C.S.; Leong, K.H.; Abdul Aziz, A.; Mat Junit, S.; Mohd Noor, S.; Kong, K.W. Alternanthera sessilis: Uncovering the nutritional and medicinal values of an edible weed. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 298, 115608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. George, S.; Bhalerao, S.V.; Lidstone, E.A.; Ahmad, I.S.; Abbasi, A.; Cunningham, B.T.; Watkin, K.L. Cytotoxicity screening of Bangladeshi medicinal plant extracts on pancreatic cancer cells. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010, 17, 10–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hossain, A.I.; Faisal, M.; Rahman, S.; Jahan, R.; Rahmatullah, M. A preliminary evaluation of antihyperglycemic and analgesic activity of Alternanthera sessilis aerial parts. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014, 24, 14–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Thomas, W.; Merish, S.; Tamizhamuthu, M. Review of Alternanthera sessilis with reference to traditional siddha medicine. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Pharm. Res. 2014, 6, 249–254. [Google Scholar]
  138. Tene, V.; Malagón, O.; Finzi, P.V.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C.; Zaragoza, T. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in Loja and Zamora–Chinchipe, Ecuador. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Mosyakin, S.; Robertson, K.; Amaranthus, L. Flora of North of Mexico (Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, Part 1); Flora of North America Editorial Committee, Ed.; Oxford Universuty Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 410–435. [Google Scholar]
  140. Sarker, U.; Oba, S. Nutrients, minerals, pigments, phytochemicals, and radical scavenging activity in Amaranthus blitum leafy vegetables. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Abbasi, A.; Khan, M.; Shah, M.H.; Shah, M.; Pervez, A.; Ahmad, M. Ethnobotanical appraisal and cultural values of medicinally important wild edible vegetables of Lesser Himalayas–Pakistan. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Nedelcheva, A. An ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants in Bulgaria. Eurasian J. Biosci. 2013, 7, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Abdiniyazova, G.J.; Khojimatov, O.K. Medicinal plants of Karakalpakstan. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 6, 2113–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Shakeri, A.; Hazeri, N.; Vlizadeh, J.; Ghasemi, A.; Tavallaei, F.Z. Phytochemical screening, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Anabasis aphylla extracts. Kragujevac J. Sci. 2012, 34, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  145. Lakhdari, W.; Dehliz, A.; Acheuk, F.; M’lik, R.; Hammi, H.; Doumandji-Mitiche, B.; Gheriani, S.; Berrekbia, M.; Guermit, K.; Chergui, S. Ethnobotanical study of some plants used in traditional medicine in the region of Oued Righ (Algerian Sahara). J. Med. Plants Stud. 2016, 4, 204–211. [Google Scholar]
  146. Pei, Y.; Yang, Z.D.; Sheng, J. Chemical constituents of Anabasis salsa. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2014, 50, 957–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. DanHong, C.; Cheng, Y.; Yan, W. Seed germination characteristics of the desert subshrub Atriplex cana and its ecological significance. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2015, 24, 131–138. [Google Scholar]
  148. Soliman, G.A.; Abd El Raheim, M. Antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic and antioxidant effect of Atriplex farinosa and Atriplex nummularia in streptozotocin–induced diabetes in rats. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2015, 4, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  149. Jeong, H.; Kim, H.; Ju, E.; Kong, C.-S.; Seo, Y. Antioxidant effect of the halophyte Atriplex gmelinii. KSBB J. 2016, 31, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lefèvre, I.; Marchal, G.; Meerts, P.; Corréal, E.; Lutts, S. Chloride salinity reduces cadmium accumulation by the Mediterraneanhalophyte species Atriplex halimus L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Manousaki, E.; Kalogerakis, N. Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd by the Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus L.): Metal uptake in relation to salinity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2009, 16, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Mardi, P.; Fallah Huseini, H.; Ahvazi, M.; Tavakoli-Far, B. Effects of Atriplex hortensis hydroalcoholic extract on phenyl-hydrazine induced hemolytic anemia in rat. J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2022, 11, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ghasemi, P.; Momeni, M.; Bahmani, M. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Kurd tribe in Dehloran and Abdanan districts, Ilam province, Iran. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement Altern. Med. 2013, 10, 368–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Matloub, A.A.; Hamed, M.A.; El Souda, S.S. Chemo–protective effect on hepato–renal toxcicity and cytotoxic activity of lipoidal matter of Atriplex lindleyi Moq. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  155. Hanganu, D.; Olah, N.; Dubei, N.; Mărculescu, A. Phytochemical studies on Chenopodium bonus–henricus L. Proc. Rom. Acad. Series B 2008, 3, 287–292. [Google Scholar]
  156. Mabberley, D.J. The Plant Book; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993; p. 119. [Google Scholar]
  157. Koziok, M.J. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Comp. Anal. 1992, 5, 35–68. [Google Scholar]
  158. Yuan, C.-G.; Huo, C.; Gui, B.; Liu, P.; Zhang, C. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Chenopodium aristatum L. stem extract and their catalytic/antibacterial activities. J. Cluster Sci. 2016, 28, 1319–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Roriz, C.L.; Barros, L.; Carvalho, A.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C. Pterospartum tridentatum, Gomphrena globosa and Cymbopogon citratus. A phytochemical study focused on antioxidant compounds. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Anaswara, M.R.; Suresha, B.S.; Balasubramanian, T.; Sushma, Y.C.; Jaseela, N.M. Medical importance of Gomphrena globosa—A systematic review. Asian J. Pharm. Hea. Sci. 2022, 12, 2718–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yaseen, T.; Slathia, D.; Farooq, I. Improving floral characteristics and yield of globe amaranth (Gomphrena globosa L.) through pinching and application of bio fertilizers and its impact on soil fertility. J. Pharm. Innov. 2022, 11, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gannoun, S.; Mahfoudhi, A.; Flamini, G.; Helal, A.; Mighri, Z. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of Tunisian Salsola vermiculata L. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2016, 8, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar]
  163. Ribera, A.; Bai, Y.; Wolters, A.M.A.; van Treuren, R.; Kik, C. A review on the genetic resources, domestication and breeding history of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Euphytica 2020, 216, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 13 00435 g001
Figure 1. Number of species in the richest genera of the family Amaranthaceae in the KRA herbarium (own work).
Figure 1. Number of species in the richest genera of the family Amaranthaceae in the KRA herbarium (own work).
Biology 13 00435 g001
Biology 13 00435 g002
Figure 2. The origin of the specimens preserved in the KRA herbarium (own work based on the WMS EnviroSolution—https://www.envirosolutions.pl/ (accessed on 20 January 2024)).
Figure 2. The origin of the specimens preserved in the KRA herbarium (own work based on the WMS EnviroSolution—https://www.envirosolutions.pl/ (accessed on 20 January 2024)).
Biology 13 00435 g002
Biology 13 00435 g003
Figure 3. Percentage share of specimens representing the family Amaranthaceae collected on different continents and preserved in KRA (own work).
Figure 3. Percentage share of specimens representing the family Amaranthaceae collected on different continents and preserved in KRA (own work).
Biology 13 00435 g003
Biology 13 00435 g004
Figure 4. Gomphrena globosa L., one of the oldest specimens of the Amaranthaceae family preserved in the KRA herbarium (scan of the sheet number UJ-KRA-P-36872-N owned by the herbarium KRA).
Figure 4. Gomphrena globosa L., one of the oldest specimens of the Amaranthaceae family preserved in the KRA herbarium (scan of the sheet number UJ-KRA-P-36872-N owned by the herbarium KRA).
Biology 13 00435 g004
Biology 13 00435 g005
Figure 5. Number of sheets with specimens from the family Amaranthaceae collected in individual decades (1821–2022) and preserved in KRA (own work).
Figure 5. Number of sheets with specimens from the family Amaranthaceae collected in individual decades (1821–2022) and preserved in KRA (own work).
Biology 13 00435 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stadnicka-Futoma, A.; Nobis, M. Geographical–Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important Family Amaranthaceae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Clade) Collected in 1821–2022 and Preserved in the Herbarium of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Biology 2024, 13, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060435

AMA Style

Stadnicka-Futoma A, Nobis M. Geographical–Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important Family Amaranthaceae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Clade) Collected in 1821–2022 and Preserved in the Herbarium of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Biology. 2024; 13(6):435. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060435

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stadnicka-Futoma, Agata, and Marcin Nobis. 2024. "Geographical–Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important Family Amaranthaceae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Clade) Collected in 1821–2022 and Preserved in the Herbarium of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow" Biology 13, no. 6: 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060435

APA Style

Stadnicka-Futoma, A., & Nobis, M. (2024). Geographical–Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important Family Amaranthaceae (Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Clade) Collected in 1821–2022 and Preserved in the Herbarium of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Biology, 13(6), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060435

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop