Next Article in Journal
Metaverse Framework: A Case Study on E-Learning Environment (ELEM)
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid Framework for Lung Cancer Classification
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Electronics
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/electronics11101615
Review Report
electronics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Path Planning Strategy of Wearable Manipulators with Target Pointing End Effectors

Electronics 2022, 11(10), 1615; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11101615
by Kaifan Zou 1, Xiaorong Guan 1,*, Zhong Li 1, Huibin Li 1, Xin’an Gao 1, Meng Zhu 1, Wei Tong 1 and Xinrui Wang 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2022, 11(10), 1615; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11101615
Submission received: 17 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Design, Applications, and Control Algorithms of Emerging Topologies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "A Path Planning Strategy of Wearable Manipulators with Target Pointing End Effectors" is well written. please consider below comments and response with your answers for reviewer comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. We thank the reviewers for the time and effort that they have put into reviewing the previous version of the manuscript! The attachment is our point-by-point response to the comments raised by the reviewers. Please see the attachment. Thanks again!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors propose a freedom allocation method and a path planning strategy for wearable manipulators with a target-pointing end effector (TPEE). It good fit in the border of the journal scope.

Found shortcomings:
1. Some charts have no axes description and/or measurement dimension.
2. All abbreviations should be explained at first appearance and only at first appearance. The authors should check all abbreviations.
3. In the manuscript, I found many problems with language. I suggest that the authors should give this manuscript to an English native-speaking person for correction.  
4. Titles of chapters and subchapter seems better without abbreviations. 
5. On the reference list are many older items but only one from the last two years. Please add some high-scored references from the last two years. After it, authors should try to rebuild the state of the art and maybe the conclusion too. 

Author Response

Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. We thank the reviewers for the time and effort that they have put into reviewing the previous version of the manuscript! The attachment is our point-by-point response to the comments raised by the reviewers. Please see the attachment. Thanks again!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I proposed this manuscript is accepted for publication

Back to TopTop