Reduction of Online Fraudulent Activities in Freelancing Sites Using Blockchain and Biometric
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology and Development of System Design
2.1. Methodology
2.2. System Design and Development
2.2.1. Transaction Processing Architecture of the Proposed System
- ✓
- In the first phase of the transaction, systems users initialize the transaction with some necessary parameters for transaction identification, including Chain Code ID, Timestamp, and transaction payload.
- ✓
- In the next phase, a verification signature is generated by approving nodes in the network to ensure the authenticity of the user, i.e., whether they are authorized to perform transactions in the system.
- ✓
- After the signature verification of the user, the user is allowed to propose several parameters specified in the system, such as the identity of the user, signature of the user, and channel identity. Channel identity is referred to as an address of private blockchain between two or more users involved in the project, and they can share the ledger privately with other users of the system.
- ✓
- After broadcasting the required information in the system, the validity is confirmed by time status, i.e., assigned or not assigned, before engaging the professionals with that broadcasted job.
- ✓
- After the confirmation of validity, the user is allowed to participate in it. After the necessary documentation, such as deal, time, and agreements, the transaction becomes part of the blockchain and smart contracts are executed when conditions are met successfully as stated in the agreement form.
2.2.2. Work Process of System
2.2.3. Layered Architecture of the System
2.2.4. Database Design
2.2.5. Prototype Design
Prototype Design
Job Posting and Bid Placing on Job
Job Submission after Completion
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. User Registration and Login
3.2. Users Dashboard and Profile
3.2.1. Seller Dashboard
3.2.2. Buyer Dashboard
3.3. Job Posting
3.4. Approving the Placed Bids on Jobs
3.5. Agreement on the Contract Form
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix B
References
- Rehman, Z.; Usman, M.; Abrar, M.F.; Ullah, N. Freelancing as an Alternative Market for Software Professionals in Pakistan. VFAST Trans. Softw. Eng. 2021, 9, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
- McKeown, T.; Pichault, F. Independent Professionals as Talent: Evidence from Individual Views of Working as a Contractor. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 60, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, B.; Manohar, R.M.S.N.; Vamsi, R.R.; Teja, G.E.S. Online Freelancing Website. Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2021, 7, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, A.; Varshney, L.R.; Vishwanath, S. Work Capacity of Regulated Freelance Platforms: Fundamental Limits and Decentralized Schemes. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017, 25, 3641–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandhi, M.; Shah, P.; Solanki, D.; Shah, M. IRJET—Decentralized Freelancing System—Trust and Transparency. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2019, 6, 2092–2097. [Google Scholar]
- Mondon-Navazo, M.; Murgia, A.; Borghi, P.; Mezihorak, P. In Search of Alternatives for Individualised Workers: A Comparative Study of Freelance Organisations. Organization 2021, 28, 13505084211041709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popiel, P. “Boundaryless” in the Creative Economy: Assessing Freelancing on Upwork. Crit. Stud. Media Commun. 2017, 34, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baitenizov, D.T.; Dubina, I.N.; Campbell, D.F.J.; Carayannis, E.G.; Azatbek, T.A. Freelance as a Creative Mode of Self-Employment in a New Economy (a Literature Review). J. Knowl. Econ. 2019, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haq, N.U.; Raja, A.A.; Nosheen, S.; Sajjad, M.F. Determinants of Client Satisfaction in Web Development Projects from Freelance Marketplaces. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2018, 11, 583–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, R.R. Blockchain Based Decentralized Freelancing Application; California State University: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland, W.; Jarrahi, M.H.; Dunn, M.; Nelson, S.B. Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing. Work Employ. Soc. 2020, 34, 457–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallam, B.; Gore, M.M. Boomerang: Blockchain-Based Freelance Paradigm on Hyperledger. In Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Kanpur, India, 6–8 July 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cachon, G.P.; Dizdarer, T.; Tsoukalas, G. Decentralized or Centralized Control of Online Service Platforms: Who Should Set Prices? SSRN Electron. J. 2021, 1, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, C.S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System; Whitepaper: Sydney, Australia, 2008; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Dannen, C. Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryznar, M. How to Regulate Bitcoin Futures; Columbia Law School. Blue Sky Blog: Jerome Greene Hall, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
- Nofer, M.; Gomber, P.; Hinz, O.; Schiereck, D. Blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtschaft, Z.B.W.L. Digitales Archiv. Mater. Test. 1999, 41, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monrat, A.A.; Schelén, O.; Andersson, K. A Survey of Blockchain from the Perspectives of Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 117134–117151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sankar, L.S.; Vidyapeetham, A.V.; Sindhu, M.; Vidyapeetham, A.V.; Sethumadhavan, M.; Vidyapeetham, A.V.; Protocol, C.; Slice, Q. A Global Road Map for Ceramic Materials and Technologies: Forecasting the Future of Ceramics. In Proceedings of the International Ceramic Federation—2nd International Congress on Ceramics, ICC 2008, Final Programme, Verona, Italy, 29 June–4 July 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Yaqoob, I.; Salah, K.; Jayaraman, R.; Al-Hammadi, Y. Blockchain for Healthcare Data Management: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Recommendations. Neural Comput. Appl. 2021, 1, 123456789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Wu, K.; Xu, J.J. How Will Blockchain Technology Impact Auditing and Accounting: Permissionless versus Permissioned Blockchain. Curr. Issues Audit. 2019, 13, A19–A29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guustaaf, E.; Rahardja, U.; Aini, Q.; Maharani, H.W. Blockchain-Based Education Project. Aptisi Trans. Manag. 2021, 5, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aristidou, C.; Marcou, E. Blockchain Standards and Government Applications. J. ICT Stand. 2019, 7, 287–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marchesi, L.; Marchesi, M.; Destefanis, G.; Barabino, G.; Tigano, D. Design Patterns for Gas Optimization in Ethereum. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE), London, ON, Canada, 18 February 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Walia, N.K. Cryptography Algorithms: A Review. Int. J. Eng. Dev. Res. 2014, 2, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Xia, X.; Lo, D.; Grundy, J.; Luo, X.; Chen, T. Defining Smart Contract Defects on Ethereum. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2020, 48, 327–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michailidis, M.P. Blockchain Technology: The Emerging Human Resources Challenge. Preprints 2021, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinna, A.; Ibba, S. A Blockchain-Based Decentralized System for Proper Handling of Temporary Employment Contracts; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Levy, A. A Decentralized Fundraising and Freelancing Network. Whitepaper Revision 1.00-Draft for Community Review 2017; pp. 1–31. Available online: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IsraTo/fundraiser/master/whitepaper/IsraTo.whitepaper.en.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2022).
- Lim, J.; Na, K.; Kim, S.; Lim, J.; Na, K.; Kim, S. A Study on Information Technology Freelancer Matching with Exploiting Blockchain in Gig Economy. WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 2021, 18, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- António, R.; Quelhas, M.; António, R.; Quelhas, M.; António, R.; Quelhas, M. Secure and Connect Smart-Contracts to the Outside World. 2021, p. 1. Available online: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/handle/10316/98240 (accessed on 27 February 2022).
- Delgado-Mohatar, O.; Fierrez, J.; Tolosana, R.; Vera-Rodriguez, R. Blockchain Meets Biometrics: Concepts, Application to Template Protection, and Trends. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.09262. [Google Scholar]
- Valenta, M.; Sandner, P. Comparison of Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric and Corda; The Frankfurt School Blockchain Center: Frankfurt, Germany, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Brandenburger, M.; Cachin, C.; Kapitza, R.; Sorniotti, A. Blockchain and Trusted Computing: Problems, Pitfalls, and a Solution for Hyperledger Fabric. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1805.08541. [Google Scholar]
- Guerreiro, S.; Silva, D.; Rosado, T.; Vasconcelos, A.; Correia, M.; Sousa, P. Decentralized Business Process Control Using Blockchain An Experience Report from Two Applications: Food Supply Chain and Car Registration. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. 2020, 15, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, K.; Grenning, J.; Martin, R.C.; Beedle, M.; Highsmith, J.; Mellor, S.; van Bennekum, A.; Hunt, A.; Schwaber, K.; Cockburn, A.; et al. Manifesto for Agile Software Development; Agile Alliance: Corryton, TN, USA, 2001; pp. 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- de Rossi, L.M.; Salviotti, G.; Abbatemarco, N. Towards a Comprehensive Blockchain Architecture Continuum. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Grand Wailea, HI, USA, 8–11 January 2019; pp. 4605–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muzammal, M.; Qu, Q.; Nasrulin, B. Renovating Blockchain with Distributed Databases: An Open Source System. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 90, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agile Methodology Phases | Tools and Technology | Timespan (Days) |
---|---|---|
Brainstorm |
| 60 |
System Design |
| 60 |
System Development |
| 120 |
Quality Assurance |
| 15 |
Launching |
| 5 |
Documentation/dissertation writing |
| 60 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Batool, A.; Byun, Y. Reduction of Online Fraudulent Activities in Freelancing Sites Using Blockchain and Biometric. Electronics 2022, 11, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050789
Batool A, Byun Y. Reduction of Online Fraudulent Activities in Freelancing Sites Using Blockchain and Biometric. Electronics. 2022; 11(5):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050789
Chicago/Turabian StyleBatool, Amreen, and Yungcheol Byun. 2022. "Reduction of Online Fraudulent Activities in Freelancing Sites Using Blockchain and Biometric" Electronics 11, no. 5: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050789
APA StyleBatool, A., & Byun, Y. (2022). Reduction of Online Fraudulent Activities in Freelancing Sites Using Blockchain and Biometric. Electronics, 11(5), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050789