Development of an Extended Reality-Based Collaborative Platform for Engineering Education: Operator 5.0
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Contribution of Paper
1.2. Manuscript Organization
2. Literature Review
2.1. Review Methodology
“(TITLE-ABS-KEY (metaverse AND education) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (industry 5.0) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (operator) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (immersive AND learning)) AND (LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “ENGI”) OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “COMP”))”
2.2. Training through Immersive Learning with Extended Reality under the Framework of Teaching Factory
2.3. Blockchain and XR Technologies Integration in Education and Industrial Metaverse
2.4. Operator 5.0
2.5. XR for Peolple with Disabilities
3. Design and Development
3.1. Requirements
3.2. System Architecture
4. Platform Implementation
5. In Vitro Test
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
7.1. Concluding Remarks
7.2. Future Work
7.3. Validation Methodology
- User engagement is among the most influential factors, since it corresponds to the level of interest, involvement, and satisfaction of users with the platform. The suggested weight for user engagement is 30%.
- Task performance is linked directly to the effectiveness and efficiency of users in carrying out tasks using the digital platform. The suggested weight for task performance is 25%.
- Knowledge gain evaluates the extent to which users acquire new knowledge or new skills through the platform. The suggested weight for knowledge gain is 20%.
- User experience encompasses the overall satisfaction, ease of use, and enjoyment derived from using the virtual reality application. Recognizing its impact on user acceptance and continued usage, the suggested weight for user experience is 15%.
- The overall impact captures the broader implications and the benefits of the virtual reality application in terms of improved maintenance processes, cost savings, and efficiency gains. It serves as an overarching KPI that reflects the application’s ability to deliver value. Assigning a weight of 10% to overall impact acknowledges its significance in driving organizational outcomes.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
function personalizedTraining(): if checkInternetConnection(): initialize XR environment detectDeviceType() load user preferences and training data if userRegistered(): user = login() else: user = register() if user is not None: initialize training model and performance metrics selectTrainingScenario() trainingCompleted = False while user is engaged and not trainingCompleted: personalizedContent = generatePersonalizedContent(user) presentContent(personalizedContent) userInteracting = True while userInteracting: userAction = getUserAction() updateXRScene(userAction) evaluatePerformance(userAction) if trainingCriteriaMet(): trainingCompleted = True break if userInterruptsTraining(): userInteracting = False break updateTrainingModel() finalizeTraining() saveUserProfile(user) startMultiplayerSession() else: handleLoginFailure() else: handleNoInternetConnection() function checkInternetConnection(): if internetAvailable(): return True else: return False function handleNoInternetConnection(): displayErrorMessage("No internet connection available. Please check your network settings and try again.") function uploadFileViaFTP(filename, server): # FTP upload logic # ... function uploadTextToNoSQLDatabase(text, database): # NoSQL database upload logic # ... function downloadFileViaFTP(filename, server): # FTP download logic # ... function retrieveDataFromNoSQLDatabase(query, database): # NoSQL database retrieval logic # ... |
References
- Huang, S.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Zheng, P.; Mourtzis, D.; Wang, L. Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 64, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- nVIDIA. What Is Extended Reality? Available online: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2022/05/20/what-is-extended-reality/ (accessed on 8 June 2023).
- Shen, Y.; Ong, S.K.; Nee, A.Y. Augmented reality for collaborative product design and development. Des. Stud. 2010, 31, 118–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D.; Siatras, V.; Angelopoulos, J. Real-Time Remote Maintenance Support Based on Augmented Reality (AR). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitris, M. Design and Operation of Production Networks for Mass Personalization in the Era of Cloud Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 1–393. [Google Scholar]
- Romanengo, C.; Raffo, A.; Qie, Y.; Anwer, N.; Falcidieno, B. Fit4CAD: A point cloud benchmark for fitting simple geometric primitives in CAD objects. Comput. Graph. 2022, 102, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chryssolouris, G. Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Romero, D.; Stahre, J. Towards the resilient operator 5.0: The future of work in smart resilient manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 2021, 104, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephenson, N. Snow Crash: A Novel; Spectra: Boulder, CO, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Mystakidis, S. Metaverse. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Su, Z.; Zhang, N.; Xing, R.; Liu, D.; Luan, T.H.; Shen, X. A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 25, 319–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D. Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: State of the art and new trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1927–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motyl, B.; Baronio, G.; Uberti, S.; Speranza, D.; Filippi, S. How will change the future engineers’ skills in the Industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavrikios, D.; Georgoulias, K.; Chryssolouris, G. The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 23, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chryssolouris, G.; Mavrikios, D.; Rentzos, L. The teaching factory: A manufacturing education paradigm. Procedia CIRP 2016, 57, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussin, A.A. Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 2018, 6, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Pérez, L.I.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peraković, D.; Periša, M.; Zorić, P. Challenges and Issues of ICT in Industry 4.0. In Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II. DSMIE 2019; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, M.; Kimata, T.; Sugiura, K.; Zettsu, K. Quality-of-experience (QoE) in emerging mobile social networks. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2014, 97, 2606–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slalmi, A.; Chaibi, H.; Chehri, A.; Saadane, R.; Jeon, G.; Hakem, N. On the Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications for Tactile Internet in 5G Era. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 176, 3853–3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aijaz, A.; Simsek, M.; Dohler, M.; Fettweis, G. Shaping 5G for the Tactile Internet; Xiang, W., Zheng, K., Shen, X., Eds.; 5G Mobile Communications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, P.E.; Ghosh, A.; Penders, J.; Reed, H. Towards human technology symbiosis in the haptic mode. In Proceedings of the II International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design, Macau, China, 17–18 March 2013; pp. 307–312. [Google Scholar]
- Freina, L.; Ott, M. A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Elearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania, 23–24 April 2015; Volume 1, pp. 133–141. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan, A.; Jones, D. Perceptions of service user and carer involvement in healthcare education and impact on students’ knowledge and practice: A literature review. Med. Teach. 2009, 31, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pohl, H.; Mottelson, A. Hafnia Hands: A Multi-Skin Hand Texture Resource for Virtual Reality Research. Front. Virtual Real. 2021, 3, 719506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rother, A.; Spiliopoulou, M. Virtual Reality for Medical Annotation Tasks—A Systematic Review. Front. Virtual Real. 2022, 70, 717383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergsnev, K.; Laws, L.S. Personalizing Virtual Reality for the Research and Treatment of Fear-Related Disorders: A Mini Review. Front. Virtual Real. 2022, 3, 834004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhdanov, A.D.; Bogdanov, N.N.; Potemin, I.S.; Galaktionov, V.A.; Sorokin, M.I. Discomfort of Visual Perception in Virtual and Mixed Reality Systems. Program. Comput. Softw. 2019, 45, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katifori, A.; Lougiakis, C.; Roussou, M. Exploring the Effect of Personality Traits in VR Interaction: The Emergent Role of Perspective-Taking in Task Performance. Front. Virtual Real. 2022, 3, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palma, L.M.; Vigil, M.A.G.; Pereira, F.L.; Martina, J.E. Blockchain and smart contracts for higher education registry in Brazil. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 2019, 29, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutfiani, N.; Apriani, D.; Nabila, E.A.; Juniar, H.L. Academic Certificate Fraud Detection System Framework Using Blockchain Technology. Blockchain Front. Technol. 2022, 1, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsobhi, H.A.; Alakhtar, R.A.; Ubaid, A.; Hussain, O.K.; Hussain, F.K. Blockchain-based micro-credentialing system in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Knowl. Based Syst. 2023, 265, 110238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edastama, P.; Purnama, S.; Widayanti, R.; Meria, L.; Rivelino, D. The potential blockchain technology in higher education learning innovations in era 4.0. Blockchain Front. Technol. 2021, 1, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raimundo, R.; Rosário, A. Blockchain system in the higher education. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2021, 11, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broo, D.G.; Kaynak, O.; Sait, S.M. Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 25, 100311. [Google Scholar]
- Zambiasi, L.P.; Rabelo, R.J.; Zambiasi, S.P.; Lizot, R. Supporting Resilient Operator 5.0: An Augmented Softbot Approach. Advances in Pro-duction Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 664. [Google Scholar]
- Gladysz, B.; Tran, T.; Romero, D.; van Erp, T.; Abonyi, J.; Ruppert, T. Current development on the Operator 4.0 and transition towards the Operator 5.0: A systematic literature review in light of Industry 5.0. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023, 70, 160–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inagaki, T. Adaptive Automation: Sharing and Trading of Control. In Chapter 8—Handbook of Cognitive Task Design; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL USA, 2003; pp. 147–169. [Google Scholar]
- Bradshaw, J.M.; Feltovich, P.J.; Jung, H.; Kulkarni, S.; Taysom, W.; Uszok, A. Dimensions of Adjustable Autonomy and Mixed-Initiative Interaction. In Agents and Computational Autonomy; Nickles, M., Ed.; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; Volume 2969, pp. 17–39. [Google Scholar]
- Mourtzis, D.; Siatras, V.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N. An augmented reality collaborative product design cloud-based platform in the context of learning factory. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 45, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryant, L.; Brunner, M.; Hemsley, B. A review of virtual reality technologies in the field of communication disability: Implications for practice and research. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2020, 15, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maran, P.L.; Daniëls, R.; Slegers, K. The Use of Extended Reality (XR) for People with Moderate to Severe Intellectual Disabilities (ID): A Scoping Review. Technol. Disabil. 2022, 34, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, P.N.; Foreman, N.; Stanton, D. Virtual reality, disability and rehabilitation. Disabil. Rehabil. 1997, 19, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dammacco, L.; Carli, R.; Lazazzera, V.; Fiorentino, M.; Dotoli, M. Designing complex manufacturing systems by virtual reality: A novel approach and its application to the virtual commissioning of a production line. Comput. Ind. 2022, 143, 103761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Yoon, K.; Kim, M.; Yoo, J.; Lee, B.; Song, I.; Woo, J. Building Korean DMZ Metaverse Using a Web-Based Metaverse Platform. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bors, B. Leaderboards. In Game Backend Development: With Microsoft Azure and PlayFab; Apress: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2023; pp. 199–232. [Google Scholar]
- XML for the Uninitiated, Microsoft. Available online: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/xml-for-the-uninitiated-a87d234d-4c2e-4409-9cbc-45e4eb857d44 (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Unity 3D. Available online: https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/UNet.html (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Bharambe, A.R.; Pang, J.; Seshan, S. Colyseus: A Distributed Architecture for Online Multiplayer Games. In Proceedings of the NSDI, San Jose, CA, USA, 8–10 May 2006; Volume 6, p. 12. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2017; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Guo, X.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y. The Development of Extended Reality in Education: Inspiration from the Research Literature. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hafiz, F.A.; Wajid, R.; Raihan, U.R.; Abdulaziz, A.; Zahid, A.; Junaid, Q. Leveraging 6G, extended reality, and IoT big data analytics for healthcare: A review. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2023, 48, 100558. [Google Scholar]
- Dadario, N.B.; Quinoa, T.; Khatri, D.; Boockvar, J.; Langer, D.; D’Amico, R.S. Examining the benefits of extended reality in neurosurgery: A systematic review. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2021, 94, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cárdenas-Robledo, L.A.; Hernández-Uribe, Ó.; Reta, C.; Cantoral-Ceballos, J.A. Extended reality applications in industry 4.0.—A systematic literature review. Telemat. Inform. 2022, 73, 101863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiou, E.; Balafoutis, A.T.; Fountas, S. Applications of extended reality (XR) in agriculture, livestock farming, and aquaculture: A review. Smart Agric. Technol. 2023, 3, 100105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applications of MR Technologies in Personalized Education | Technology | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Laboratory experiments as well as remote studies using Virtual Reality (VR) have been conducted, focusing on aligning the representation of hands in VR with the skin tone of the participants. | VR | [25] |
Medical tasks with a focus on annotation. | VR | [26] |
The current advancements in customizing virtual reality (VR) technology for the examination and therapy of fear-related disorders. | VR | [27] |
A review was conducted on methodologies for creating virtual prototypes of visual optical systems that have the potential to be utilized in the development of Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and Mixed Reality (MR) devices. | VR, AR, MR | [28] |
Study of how individual attributes influence user engagement in virtual reality settings. | VR | [29] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J. Development of an Extended Reality-Based Collaborative Platform for Engineering Education: Operator 5.0. Electronics 2023, 12, 3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173663
Mourtzis D, Angelopoulos J. Development of an Extended Reality-Based Collaborative Platform for Engineering Education: Operator 5.0. Electronics. 2023; 12(17):3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173663
Chicago/Turabian StyleMourtzis, Dimitris, and John Angelopoulos. 2023. "Development of an Extended Reality-Based Collaborative Platform for Engineering Education: Operator 5.0" Electronics 12, no. 17: 3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173663
APA StyleMourtzis, D., & Angelopoulos, J. (2023). Development of an Extended Reality-Based Collaborative Platform for Engineering Education: Operator 5.0. Electronics, 12(17), 3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173663