Next Article in Journal
Robust Position Control for an Electrical Automatic Transmission under Gear-Shifting Link Friction
Next Article in Special Issue
Interface Contact Thermal Resistance of Die Attach in High-Power Laser Diode Packages
Previous Article in Journal
The Design of a Wide-Dynamic-Range and High-Linearity RMS Power Detector for mm-Wave Applications in 65 nm CMOS
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal and Optical Analysis of Quantum-Dot-Converted White LEDs in Harsh Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Guidelines for Area Ratio between Metal Lines and Vias to Improve the Reliability of Interconnect Systems in High-Density Electronic Devices

Department of Semiconductor Engineering, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2023, 12(21), 4403; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12214403
Submission received: 5 September 2023 / Revised: 20 October 2023 / Accepted: 23 October 2023 / Published: 25 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Thermal Management of Integrated Electronic Devices)

Abstract

:
This research was conducted in the context of the semiconductor market, with a demand for high-performance and highly integrated semiconductor systems that simultaneously enhance performance and reduce chip size. Scaling down the metal line and via in back-end-of-line (BEOL) structures is essential to efficiently deliver power to scaling down devices. This study utilized the finite element method (FEM) simulation technique to model the heat and current distribution for enhancing the efficiency of scaled-down structures. Due to current flow bottlenecks, an increase in the area ratio of the via to metal line (as the via becomes relatively smaller) leads to a temperature rise due to Joule heating. This trend follows a second-degree polynomial form, and the point where the temperature doubles compared to when the area ratio is one is situated at an area ratio of three. The temperature increase caused by Joule heating ultimately leads to destruction of the via, which directly affects the reliability of the BEOL structure. These experimental results can provide guidelines for designing with reliability considerations in mind, particularly in today’s semiconductor systems where significant scaling down is required in interconnect structures. They can also be widely applied to research aimed at developing interconnect structures that enhance reliability.

1. Introduction

In the current semiconductor industry, there is a growing demand for high-performance, high-density integrated semiconductor systems as the industry advances. To meet this demand, designs and technologies that improve performance while reducing the size of semiconductor systems are necessary. However, the scaling down of individual components, such as unit transistors, has long reached the limits of the structure and fabrication processes [1,2,3]. To overcome this, packaging technologies and the development of back-end-of-line (BEOL) structures are increasingly receiving attention [4,5,6,7]. The BEOL structure consists of an area that connects individual unit transistors to form circuits and is responsible for the connection to the outside of the chip through bumps called interconnects. It is composed of metal lines and plugs called vias, as shown in Figure 1a. Vias connect the metal lines layer by layer and can have structures such as super vias, which skip several layers. Even with scaling down, these interconnects should efficiently deliver external power to individual unit transistors and their characteristics should be maintained or enhanced in terms of power delivery efficiency and reliability while ensuring stable circuit formation [8,9,10].
Since interconnects ultimately serve as pathways for current transmission, it is necessary to minimize the heat generated by Joule heating resulting from current flow [11]. However, in situations requiring scaling down, the shrinking size of vias gradually has become a cause of current flow bottlenecks within the metal line, making them susceptible to Joule heating [12,13]. Therefore, this study utilized the finite element method (FEM) technique [14,15] to model interconnects in a simplified structure and conducted simulations to analyze the extent to which Joule heating, based on the area ratio between the metal line and via, affects the reliability of the interconnect. Through this approach, this research investigated how the current flowing from the metal line to a via leads to a temperature rise in the via due to Joule heating and analyzed the influence of the area ratio between the metal line and via on the extent of temperature rise. These results can be utilized to provide guidelines for the size design of the metal line and the via in semiconductor systems that require scaling down, considering power efficiency and reliability. Furthermore, the methodology employed in this study for simulations can be applied to research aimed at discovering new structures that can enhance reliability by reducing heat generation from Joule heating in interconnect structures. This can be beneficial for proposing design guidelines for BEOL systems as well.

2. Materials and Methods

The fundamental aim of this study is to investigate the distribution of Joule heating induced by variations in the area ratio between the metal line and via. To comprehensively explore this phenomenon, this study harnesses the powerful capabilities of the Ansys simulator (https://www.ansys.com), a widely respected and extensively used software tool in the realm of engineering simulations [16,17]. The selection of this advanced simulation platform ensures the accuracy and validity of the experimental outcomes, laying a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis.
As revealed in Figure 1b, the BEOL structure is meticulously brought to life within the simulator’s virtual environment. By faithfully replicating real-world conditions, this simulation approach bridges the gap between theoretical predictions and practical scenarios, fostering a deep understanding of the system’s behavior under varying conditions. Efforts to achieve efficiency in research outcomes while retaining their relevance led to the creation of a simplified model. This model captures the essential aspects of the complex BEOL structure while streamlining its complexity. By focusing on the core attributes that significantly impact power transmission and reliability, the model preserves the fundamental characteristics that warrant investigation. This simplified representation is illustrated in Figure 1c, where the upper metal line, lower metal line, and connecting via are distilled into a visually digestible form. This model serves as the canvas on which the intricate dance of Joule heating and thermal dynamics is painted, enabling insightful interpretations and actionable conclusions.
Incorporating the concept of interconnect simplification is a strategic decision that magnifies the clarity of the study’s findings. This intricate network of components, encapsulating the upper metal line, lower metal line, and the connecting via, forms the cornerstone of modern microelectronics. The connection configuration of the metal line and via (plug) is not only used in the BEOL structure but also extends to the area between bumps and pads. Moreover, it is the same structure used in the interposer region associated with chip packaging technology, with only different names. The configuration, which involves connecting two different signal transmission layers orthogonally with plugs, serves as the fundamental structure for signal and power delivery in semiconductor systems. Therefore, the simplified structure can be expanded and applied across the entire spectrum of the semiconductor system, not limited to the BEOL area. Figure 1c provides an insightful visualization of these elements, seamlessly illustrating their roles in power transmission and signal propagation. The synergistic interaction among these components governs the overall efficiency and reliability of the system, making it imperative to dissect their individual contributions to the thermal phenomenon under investigation.
This study conducted FEM analysis using analysis tools within Ansys (Simulator). The employed analysis tools included electric and steady-state thermal, each conducted as separate projects, and they were interlinked. When configuring the size of the simulation structure, we referred to the specifications of bumps and metal lines produced at the current process level. Bumps are typically manufactured with micro bump standards, approximately 20 μm in size, while metal lines, when positioned directly above transistors, have line widths in the range of ~20 nm [18,19]. Therefore, between the transistor and the bump, there are multiple layers of metal lines with line widths ranging from 20 nm to 20 μm. The connection between the bump and metal line ultimately has the same form, where it connects the upper metal and lower metal with a plug. Among these, we used the 20 μm line width as a reference and based our research on metal lines with widths of 15 μm and 30 μm as the standard for simulation specifications. The Joule heat values obtained from electric analysis were used as inputs within the simulation to derive temperature results in the steady-state thermal analysis, considering various material properties. To delve into specifics, the simulation model incorporated Cu alloy properties (isotropic elasticity with 1.1 × 105 MPa Young’s modulus and 0.34 Poisson’s ratio, isotropic thermal conductivity with 4.01 × 108 pW/μm·°C, and isotropic electric resistivity with 16.94 MΩ·μm at 20·°C) provided by Ansys Simulation for the metal line and via. After selecting the material, we configured the Mesh conditions for precise calculations. The chosen model, which is the BEOL structure, plays a critical role in receiving power and electrically transmitting input signals. In the case of our research target, high-power components within the BEOL structure experience elevated power densities, resulting in the generation of Joule heat. Consequently, the interconnect is subjected to extreme temperatures, leading to defects and reduced reliability. To accurately analyze the vulnerabilities of this BEOL structure and temperature effects caused by Joule heat, we set up a mesh consisting of 219,000 cubic elements with a width of 0.5 μm across the entire sample model. Each mesh element undergoes individual calculations, providing us with the desired results, including current density and Joule heat experienced by the sample, based on material properties, applied currents, and sample volume. Based on approximately 200,000 meshes, the time required to extract current density, Joule heating, and temperature changes in individual mesh units in this structure is approximately 5 min, allowing for the simulation of roughly 40,000 meshes per minute. While the relative simplicity of the structure composed of metal lines and vias contributes to this efficiency, it is worth noting that if we had conducted the same analysis by creating actual samples and measuring their electrical and thermal properties, it would have taken several days. Therefore, utilizing a simulation proved to be a highly efficient approach for our research. In essence, if the current level is known, it is possible to determine the ratio of metal line width to via width based on simulation results, ensuring that it does not compromise reliability.
Once the mesh settings were completed, we configured the electrical settings for the analysis. We conducted a total of three simulations, all aimed at comparing and analyzing trends in heat distribution based on the area ratio between metal lines and vias. It is important to note that these simulations were not meant to replicate real-world conditions but, rather, to find the optimal area ratio. To achieve this, we excluded the actual melting point (~1084 °C) and boiling point (~2562 °C) of the materials used, as they were not relevant to our analysis. As depicted in Figure 2 in the paper, the applied current flows from the top metal, passes through the via, and reaches the bottom metal with the specified ground voltage (0 V). This current is calculated within each pre-defined mesh element, producing the desired results, including total current density and Joule heating values.
In this study, our primary focus was on the thermal analysis of vias, which is why the thermal analysis was conducted as the final step. The two analysis tools are interconnected, with Joule heat values from the electric analysis converted into temperature in the thermal analysis. Similar to the electric analysis, we configured the settings for the thermal analysis. In the case of convection, the entire model was set as a boundary condition to analyze the heat generated by Joule heat due to the current flowing through the metal line and via. We used the stagnant air-simplified case (5 pW/μm2·°C) provided by Ansys as the import convection data. The ambient temperature was set to 22 °C, which is room temperature. With these settings, the solution was applied to calculate the temperature, considering Joule heat values from the electric analysis, material properties of the Cu alloy, and the volume of the entire model. In this study, we identified the vulnerable areas where the metal line and via experienced extreme temperatures and used these as the temperature limits for the simulation. Therefore, we built the data for the temperature distribution trends in the model structure using only the maximum values from the simulations. (1) Comparison analysis of area ratio (1~15) between metal lines and vias for two samples with widths of 15 μm and 30 μm, respectively (applied current: 10 mA for the 15 μm width sample, 40 mA for the 30 μm width sample). (2) Comparison analysis of area ratio (1~15) within the 30 μm width sample structure under different applied currents (20 mA, 40 mA, 60 mA) from Simulation 1. (3) Comparison analysis of area ratio (1~15) for the 15 μm width sample with varying heights of the top metal (15 μm, 30 μm, 60 μm) under an applied current of 10 mA.

3. Results

In this study, as previously mentioned, an analysis was meticulously conducted through simulations to comprehensively investigate the reliability degradation resulting from heat generation due to the flow of current through vias of varying sizes. Research on the reliability of BEOL structures is relatively limited compared to FEOL and packaging studies. Even the existing research primarily focuses on material or process optimization activities, and there is a shortage of results that can provide practical guidance for the design of actual interconnect structures [20,21]. Figure 2 serves as an illustrative example of the simulation results, showcasing the impact of the via dimensions on the temperature distribution and subsequent reliability concerns.
The structural configuration was designed in such a way that current is injected into the upper metal line while being extracted from the lower metal line. This configuration allowed us to delve into the intricate details of the simulation outputs within the Ansys environment. The simulation allows for thermal analysis of structures implemented using various parameters [22]. Its outcomes encompass a spectrum of parameters, including current density, heat distribution attributed to Joule heating, and the resulting temperature changes across different spatial regions. The comprehensive nature of these results provides extensive insight into the complex interplay between various factors that influence the behavior of the interconnect structure. As shown in Figure 2a,b, the gradual modification of the via size unveils the intricate relationship between dimensions and temperature profiles across distinct regions, reinforcing the need for a nuanced approach in interconnect design to ensure optimal performance and reliability. Figure 2c provides a zoomed-in perspective, specifically focusing on the via region. This detailed view offers a deeper understanding of the temperature distribution across different mesh points, shedding light on the local variations in temperature and other critical parameters.
To investigate the reliability of the via, particularly the factors influencing the temperature rise when signals are applied, we examined how temperature varies with the area ratio between the metal line and via (ranging from 1 to 15). We conducted simulations to explore the impact of input current magnitude, the influence of input line size while maintaining current density, and the effects of input line size while keeping via current density constant. These simulations were conducted with a baseline temperature set at room temperature (22 °C). Initially, we performed a simulation to understand how the temperature variation caused by Joule heating in the via, when current flows through both the metal line and the via, is affected by scaling down. Figure 3 presents the results of this simulation. Scaling down primarily involves reducing the sizes of the via and the metal line. As the size decreases from the upper metal line to the lower metal line, the dimensions gradually diminish, including that of the connecting via. In other words, in a scaled-down system, forming a smaller via allows them to be connected to a smaller lower metal line. Therefore, it was essential to analyze the impact of the size of the via on heat generation. To do so, we examined the extent of heat generation based on the area ratio of the via in contact with the metal line.
To perform the simulation, the baseline dimensions of the metal line were set to 15 μm (width and height), and the via was gradually reduced in size in the form of a square prism, with one side of the cross-section starting at 15 μm. When the metal line and via fit perfectly without any gaps (where the width of the metal line is 15 μm and the length of one side of the via is also 15 μm), it was defined as area ratio 1. Here, we progressively reduced the size of the via while varying the area ratio (the area of the metal line relative to the cross-sectional area of the via) up to 15. This allowed us to examine the temperature changes in the via caused by the flow of current.
Figure 3a provides an in-depth analysis of how the dimensions of the metal line influence the system. In this investigation, we carefully set the width and height of the metal line at 15 μm and 30 μm, respectively, while maintaining uniform current density applied to the metal line. This allowed us to closely examine the temperature variations within the via, primarily focusing on the area ratio as our variable of interest. The graphical representation reveals a distinctive second-degree polynomial pattern. In the case of metal lines in semiconductor systems, research has shown that increasing the width can reduce stress [23]. However, for vias, such research findings do not exist. Even if we were to apply similar results, vias are more challenging to size according to the designer’s preferences because they are subject to size constraints imposed by the specifications of the upper and lower metal lines. Nevertheless, by confirming the presence of a second-degree polynomial pattern here, we can deduce that as the size ratio between the metals decreases, the temperature rise becomes progressively more severe. Therefore, it can be concluded as a preliminary observation that the specifications for vias cannot be arbitrarily reduced. At an area ratio of approximately three, we note a significant turning point where the temperature effectively doubles. This intriguing pattern suggests a critical threshold point in the relationship between the area ratio and temperature amplification within the via. Delving deeper into our findings, an intriguing insight comes to light. Even when we maintain a consistent area ratio, such as in the case of the wider metal line with dimensions of 30 μm for both width and height, we encounter elevated temperatures within the via. However, it should be noted that when the overall system specifications (metal line and via) change in conjunction with the current, the temperature rise does not exhibit a proportional relationship with the current. This observation raises an important consideration: the overall current magnitude plays a pivotal role in determining the thermal behavior of the interconnect system. In essence, our experiments underscore that the total amount of current significantly influences the system’s overall temperature, and this effect persists even when we rigorously uphold uniform current density as a constant parameter.
To more deeply explore the impact of current magnitude, we adhered to a rigorous experimental protocol. In this rigorously controlled study, we kept the dimensions of both the metal line and the via constant, maintaining a width of 15 μm and a height of 30 μm. However, we introduced a variable that held the key to unraveling the intricate relationship between the current magnitude and temperature behavior: the current magnitude itself. Incrementally, we augmented the current magnitude by three distinct levels: 20 mA, 40 mA, and 60 mA. This allowed us to adopt a more granular perspective when scrutinizing the effects of varying current magnitudes. The results, as depicted in Figure 3b, unveiled a pattern that echoed our earlier discoveries. Specifically, as the current magnitude steadily increased, we once again encountered a temperature rise conforming to a second-degree polynomial function, mirroring our prior observations.
Notably, an intriguing revelation surfaced when we examined the data closely. When the overall current was elevated to higher levels, the graph exhibited a noticeable upward shift. Furthermore, when keeping the specifications consistent, we observed that the temperature rise is proportional to the square of the overall current; in other words, it is proportional to the square of the current density within the via (when the current doubles, the temperature rise increases by a factor of four, and when the current triples, the temperature rise increases by a factor of nine). This shift was a clear indicator of the interconnect system reaching higher temperatures, even in the context of intensified Joule heating factors induced by the augmented overall current. Interestingly, this phenomenon echoed a parallel occurrence we had observed previously: a substantial doubling of temperature centered around an area ratio of approximately three. This recurrent observation underscores the potential risks associated with this specific ratio, which appear to persist across varying experimental conditions.
The recurring manifestation of this phenomenon, regardless of the conditions, underlines its robustness and its critical role in governing the thermal behavior of the system. Our systematic investigation, which thoroughly examined the interplay between current magnitude and area ratio, has provided us with comprehensive insights. Through a meticulously controlled manipulation of current variables and a rigorous analytical approach, we have consistently unveiled trends indicative of a second-degree polynomial temperature escalation. These trends, as we have come to understand, are often clustered around the area ratio of approximately three. Furthermore, it becomes increasingly evident that the effects of the current magnitude accentuate these trends, reaffirming their profound significance in shaping the overall performance and thermal behavior of the interconnect system.
We did not just aim to find the point where the temperature doubles; rather, we sought to determine a practical criterion for the occurrence of defects in interconnects using metal due to thermal stress. By combining the results of multiple papers, we found that reliability could be affected starting from around ~150 °C [24,25,26,27]. Furthermore, by refining the temperature change graph based on the area ratio (Figure 2 and Figure 3), a formula T A × I n p u t   C u r r e n t 2 V i a   w i d t h 2 + 22 can be obtained. In other words, if we take 150 °C as the reference temperature, doubling the input current would require doubling the via width to prevent any additional temperature increase. Based on the formula, when 40 mA of current flows through a 30 μm wide metal line, resulting in a temperature of 150 °C, the area ratio is approximately three (indicating a via width of 10 μm). If the current is reduced to 20 mA, halving it, we can expect the via to also be halved, allowing for scaling down to 5 μm with an area ratio of ~six, which aligns with the simulation results. Similarly, when 10 mA of current flows through a 15 μm wide metal line, reaching a temperature of 150 °C, and then the current is reduced to 20 mA (halved), we can anticipate the via being halved to 2.5 μm (with an area ratio of ~six), which is also consistent with the graph.
Upon examining the results from the previous Figure 2 and Figure 3, it became evident that, ultimately, an increase in the total current applied to the system, even with the same current density flowing through the via, leads to comparatively higher heat generation. On the basis of this insight, we speculated that, even with consistent current density in the via, reducing the overall current flowing through the system could potentially mitigate the temperature rise within the via. Therefore, we sought to find an interconnect structure that could enhance the reliability of the via based on the simulation method described earlier.
To achieve a reduction in the overall current while maintaining consistent current density within the via, one possible approach is to decrease the current density in the metal line. In other words, the input current into the metal line remains the same, but by altering certain specifications, the current flow per unit area is decreased. However, it is important to note that in semiconductor interconnect structures, the width and spacing of lines are typically determined so as to meet the specifications of the entire system. Therefore, changing the width of the lines may not be a feasible option. As a more practical alternative, we considered increasing the height of the metal line during the structure formation process through patterning and deposition techniques. This adjustment would effectively reduce the current density flowing through the metal line while keeping the metal line’s width unchanged. We proceeded with simulations while making such structural changes in this direction.
Figure 4 depicts the structure used for the mentioned simulations. Building upon a structure with a metal line width of 15 μm, we increased the height to 15 μm, 30 μm, and 60 μm, following the previous simulation approach to observe temperature changes based on the area ratio in the interconnect structure, similar to the results obtained earlier. The input current values into the interconnect structure remained consistent. As the height increased, the current density in the metal line decreased, while the current density flowing through the via remained constant.
Figure 5 presents the outcomes of the simulations conducted using the structure from Figure 4. Similar to the results of the previous simulations, all the results show a temperature increase based on the area ratio, displaying a second-degree polynomial pattern. Furthermore, there is a consistent trend of the temperature doubling around an area ratio of approximately three, compared to the initial temperature at an area ratio of one, as observed in the earlier simulations.
However, there are some notable differences in these results. As anticipated, an increase in the height of the metal line leads to a decrease in both the initial temperature and the temperature rise. This trend becomes more pronounced at heights of 30 μm and 60 μm. When the width of the metal line is maintained at 15 μm and only the height is increased from 15 μm to 30 μm, the temperature rises within the via decrease, but the absolute difference remains relatively minor, around 8 °C, despite doubling the height. However, when the height is doubled from 30 μm to 60 μm (which is four times the height of the 15 μm model), a consistent approximately two-fold reduction in temperature across various area ratios is observed. These findings highlight that increasing the height of the metal line—effectively lowering the current density within the metal line—gradually and significantly reduces the Joule heating generated within the via. Consequently, this substantially suppresses temperature rise effects.
The Joule heating responsible for the temperature rise in the via is generated by the interaction between the moving charge carriers (electrons) and the atomic ions that make up the conductor. Electrons are accelerated by the electric field, but they lose kinetic energy with each collision with ions. Conversely, the energy of ions increases through these interactions. As a result, the kinetic or vibrational energy of ions translates into heat, leading to an increase in the temperature of the conductor (via). Considering this in connection with the causes of Joule heating, even when the current density in the via is the same (i.e., the current flowing through the upper metal line connected to the via is the same), when the current density in the upper metal line is lower, it can be inferred that the acceleration of electrons is relatively reduced. The key parameters related to the energy transferred by electrons in collisions with ions include the quantity and velocity of electrons. Since the quantity of electrons is the same, the only variable that can lead to differences is velocity. Even with the same quantity of electrons, the reduced acceleration results in less energy transfer during collisions with ions, leading to a lower temperature rise as a consequence.
Furthermore, because this trend does not exhibit linearity, it has also been confirmed that increasing the thickness of the metal line to the maximum extent allowed by the process and BEOL specifications can progressively enhance the overall reliability of the entire interconnect system. This can be considered valuable standardized guidance for improving the reliability of semiconductor interconnect systems in research related to enhancing reliability.

4. Discussion

This study comprehensively explored the thermal characteristics of high-power semiconductor devices caused by current density bottlenecks, aiming to optimize the current distribution through various simulations and experiments. In the current landscape of semiconductor systems, where miniaturization and process complexity have increased, there are numerous limitations when it comes to practical evaluations due to the challenges in physical production. Consequently, research utilizing simulations has become particularly valuable, especially when leveraging physical properties, not only for research efficiency but also for the applicability of the results [28]. However, there has been limited research on the reliability of vias (plugs) within interconnect structures. Furthermore, the shrinking size of vias has led to an increasing proportion of their impact on the reliability of semiconductor systems. Therefore, this is an area that can no longer be disregarded. In the first simulation, the temperature variation of Joule heating was examined in cases where current density was equated for different sizes of interconnect structures, revealing how the temperature of the via changes. Notably, the overall current significantly influenced the temperature variation, particularly showcasing a doubling of temperature around an area ratio of approximately three. This observation was further confirmed in a second evaluation, where varying current values within the same specifications yielded consistent results, demonstrating a doubling of temperature around the same area ratio of roughly three despite slight differences in the absolute temperature values. Furthermore, we have also formulated the temperature change graph to show that the size of the via can be adjusted in proportion to the change in current for a specified reliability degradation temperature of 150 °C. Furthermore, raising the height of the metal line while maintaining the same current, which, in turn, lowered the momentarily induced current in the via, resulted in a relatively reduced temperature rise in the via. This suggested the potential for enhancing the reliability of the entire interconnect system by altering the dimensions of the metal line.
As unit transistors are made smaller for better performance and bumps need to receive signals outside the chip, there are limitations to their size reduction. In the composition of the metal line, there is a need for an appropriate size ratio to ensure the reliability of the semiconductor system while complementing the contact size of the unit transistor and reaching the bump. In other words, even if only one layer of metal line is required, it is not possible to connect directly from the contact of the unit transistor to the bump. Our research results provide a guideline for setting suitable ratios to enhance reliability when constructing multi-layer metal lines. The findings from this study, particularly the result that the temperature increased by a factor of two around an area ratio of three, provide insights for establishing design guidelines for metal lines and via dimensions in BEOL structures that demand scaling down. For instance, in the case of the via connecting the upper and lower metal lines, the design should take into consideration that, to prevent via failure due to temperature, when the area ratio is three, the temperature doubles compared to the case of an area ratio of one. Moreover, the study confirmed the viability of improving reliability by raising the height of the metal line to decrease current density and subsequently reduce the instantaneous current passing through the via, mitigating temperature rise. Beyond presenting essential design guidelines to ensure both power efficiency and reliability, the outcomes of this study offer a pathway to optimizing the existing structures for overcoming the limitations of scaling down in high-power semiconductor systems. This could serve as a method to explore potential solutions for enhancing the current design to better accommodate scaling down while maintaining adequate thermal performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.E.K. and S.K.H.; methodology, S.E.K. and S.K.H.; software, T.Y.H.; validation, S.E.K.; formal analysis, T.Y.H., J.K.P., S.E.K. and S.K.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Y.H.; writing—review and editing, J.K.P. and S.K.H.; visualization, T.Y.H.; supervision, S.K.H.; project administration, S.E.K. and S.K.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00239657).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. James, R. The Future of the High-Performance Semiconductor Industry and Design. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 20–26 February 2022; pp. 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mii, Y.J. Semiconductor Innovations, from Device to System. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits), Honolulu, HI, USA, 12–17 June 2022; pp. 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, Y.G.; McInerney, M.; Joo, Y.C.; Choi, I.S.; Kim, S.E. Copper Bonding Technology in Heterogeneous Integration. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2023, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, H.W. Recent trends in copper metallization. Electronics 2022, 11, 2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Astier, H.P.; Juvaid, M.M.; Sinha, S.; Chung, J.Y.; Srivastava, S.; Das, C.; Sudijono, J.; Gradečak, S. Scaling Down Diffusion Barriers: Performance and Thickness Dependence of TaN and Two-Dimensional-Material-Based Barrier Layers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC), San Jose, CA, USA, 27–30 June 2022; pp. 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zahedmaesh, H.; Pedreira, O.V.; Tokei, Z.; Croes, K. Electromigration limits of copper nano-interconnects. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Monterey, CA, USA, 21–25 March 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yokogawa, S.; Tsuchiya, H. Scaling Impacts on Electro migration in Narrow Single-Damascene Cu Interconnects. AIP Conf. Proc. 2004, 741, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, K.D.; Kim, J.; Jeong, T.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Patel, A.; Mai, Z.T.; Brown, L.H.; English, S.; Sawyer, D. Effect of Joule Heating on electromigration in dual-damascene copper low-k interconnects. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Monterey, CA, USA, 2–6 April 2017; pp. 6B-6.1–6B-6.5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pyun, J.W.; Baek, W.C.; Zhang, L.; Im, J.; Ho, P.S.; Smith, L.; Smith, G. Electromigration behavior of 60 nm dual damascene Cu interconnects. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 093516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tao, J.; Cheung, N.W.; Hu, C. Electromigration characteristics of copper interconnects. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 1993, 14, 249–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rothe, S.; Lienig, J. Reliability by Design: Avoiding Migration-Induced Failure in IC Interconnects. In Proceedings of the 2022 35th SBC/SBMicro/IEEE/ACM Symposium on Integrated Circuits and Systems Design (SBCCI), Porto Alegre, Brazil, 22–26 August 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Havemann, R.H.; Hutchby, J.A. High-performance interconnects: An integration overview. Proc. IEEE 2001, 89, 586–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Filipovic, L.; Selberherr, S. Microstructure and Granularity Effects in Electromigration. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2021, 9, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sabat, L.; Kundu, C.K. History of Finite Element Method: A Review. In Recent Developments in Sustainable Infrastructure, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2020; Volume 75, pp. 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vinciguerra, V.; Malgioglio, G.L.; Landi, A. Models of Bifurcation in a Semiconductor Wafer: A Comparison of the Analytical Solution vs. the ANSYS Finite Element Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2022 23rd International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), St. Julian, Malta, 25–27 April 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moran, R.L.P.; Ubando, A.T.; Gonzaga, J. Geometrical Redesigning Method of Semiconductor Packages using Finite Element Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 14th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), Boracay Island, Philippines, 1–4 December 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moran, R.L.; Arriola, E.; Lim, N.R.E.; Mercado, J.P.; Dimagiba, R.; Gonzaga, J.; Ubando, A. Eduction of IC Package Warpage through Finite Element Analysis and Direct Optimization. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), Laoag, Philippines, 29 November–1 December 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. You, H.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, S.K.; Kang, J.S. Reliability of 20μm micro bump interconnects. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 61st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 31 May–3 June 2011; pp. 608–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sungjun, I.; Srivastava, N.; Banerjee, K.; Goodson, K.E. Scaling analysis of multilevel interconnect temperatures for high-performance Ics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2005, 52, 2710–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lofrano, M.; Oprins, H.; Chang, X.; Vermeersch, B.; Pedreira, O.V.; Lesniewska, A.; Cherman, V.; Ciofi, I.; Croes, K.; Park, S.; et al. Towards accurate temperature prediction in BEOL for reliability assessment (Invited). In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Monterey, CA, USA, 26–30 March 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, J.H.; Woo, B.W.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, N.H.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, H.S.; Pae, S. Reliability Improvement with Optimized BEOL Process in Advanced DRAM. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Monterey, CA, USA, 26–30 March 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chang, X.; Oprins, H.; Lofrano, M.; Vermeersch, B.; Ciofi, I.; Pedreira, O.V.; Tokei, Z.; De Wolf, I. Thermal analysis of advanced back-end-of-line structures and the impact of design parameters. In Proceedings of the 2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm), San Diego, CA, USA, 31 May–3 June 2022; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhai, C.J.; Yao, H.W.; Marathe, A.P.; Besser, P.R.; Blish, R.C. Simulation and experiments of stress migration for Cu/low-k BEoL. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2004, 4, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shen, Y.L. Analysis of Joule heating in multilevel interconnects. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1999, 17, 2115–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prijić, Z.D.; Dimitrijev, S.S.; Stojadinović, N.D. Analysis of temperature dependence of CMOS transistors’ threshold voltage. Microelectron. Reliab. 1991, 31, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, C.L.; Lin, Y.S.; Kao, C.L.; Tarng, D.; Wang, S.B.; Hung, Y.C.; Lin, G.T.; Lin, K.L. Athermal and thermal coupling electromigration effects on the microstructure and failure mechanism in advanced fine-pitch Cu interconnects under extremely high current density. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 256, 123680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baozhen, L.I.; Sullivan, T.D.; Lee, T.C.; Badami, D. Reliability challenges for copper interconnects. Microelectron. Reliab. 2004, 44, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lofrano, M.; Wilson, C.J.; Croes, K.; Vandevelde, B. Thermo-mechanical modeling of stress-induced-voiding in BEOL Cu interconnect structures. In Proceedings of the EuroSimE 2009—10th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems, Delft, The Netherlands, 26–29 April 2009; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Back-end-of-line (BEOL) structure: (a) via and super via structure in interconnect, (b) 3-dimensional structure example of BEOL structure, and (c) simplified model structure for FEM simulation.
Figure 1. Back-end-of-line (BEOL) structure: (a) via and super via structure in interconnect, (b) 3-dimensional structure example of BEOL structure, and (c) simplified model structure for FEM simulation.
Electronics 12 04403 g001
Figure 2. Temperature measurement experiment of metal line and via based on area ratio using Ansys simulation: (a) structure with area ratio of 2, (b) area ratio of 15, and (c) close-up image of via.
Figure 2. Temperature measurement experiment of metal line and via based on area ratio using Ansys simulation: (a) structure with area ratio of 2, (b) area ratio of 15, and (c) close-up image of via.
Electronics 12 04403 g002
Figure 3. (a) Maintaining the same current density, with metal line width and heights of 15 μm and 30 μm, respectively. (b) The metal line has a width and height of 30 μm and currents of 20 mA, 40 mA, and 60 mA flow.
Figure 3. (a) Maintaining the same current density, with metal line width and heights of 15 μm and 30 μm, respectively. (b) The metal line has a width and height of 30 μm and currents of 20 mA, 40 mA, and 60 mA flow.
Electronics 12 04403 g003
Figure 4. Depicts a comparison of Joule heating distribution based on variations in the height of the upper metal line for the sample model with a width of 15 μm: (a) h: 15 μm, (b) h: 30 μm, and (c) h: 60 μm.
Figure 4. Depicts a comparison of Joule heating distribution based on variations in the height of the upper metal line for the sample model with a width of 15 μm: (a) h: 15 μm, (b) h: 30 μm, and (c) h: 60 μm.
Electronics 12 04403 g004
Figure 5. Results of the simulation where only the height was changed while keeping the metal line width constant.
Figure 5. Results of the simulation where only the height was changed while keeping the metal line width constant.
Electronics 12 04403 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, T.Y.; Kim, S.E.; Park, J.K.; Hong, S.K. Guidelines for Area Ratio between Metal Lines and Vias to Improve the Reliability of Interconnect Systems in High-Density Electronic Devices. Electronics 2023, 12, 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12214403

AMA Style

Hong TY, Kim SE, Park JK, Hong SK. Guidelines for Area Ratio between Metal Lines and Vias to Improve the Reliability of Interconnect Systems in High-Density Electronic Devices. Electronics. 2023; 12(21):4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12214403

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Tae Yeong, Sarah Eunkyung Kim, Jong Kyung Park, and Seul Ki Hong. 2023. "Guidelines for Area Ratio between Metal Lines and Vias to Improve the Reliability of Interconnect Systems in High-Density Electronic Devices" Electronics 12, no. 21: 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12214403

APA Style

Hong, T. Y., Kim, S. E., Park, J. K., & Hong, S. K. (2023). Guidelines for Area Ratio between Metal Lines and Vias to Improve the Reliability of Interconnect Systems in High-Density Electronic Devices. Electronics, 12(21), 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12214403

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop