A Survey on Resource Management for 6G Heterogeneous Networks: Current Research, Future Trends, and Challenges
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Motivation and Contributions
- This article comprehensively analyzes the current work in resource management aspects such as power allocation, user association, mode selection, and spectrum allocation.
- It highlights the most significant issues with the current resource management approaches and presents the best solution to overcome the existing problems.
- It presents future directions and research challenges that have yet to be adequately addressed.
3. Scope of This Survey
4. Resource Management in Heterogeneous Network (RM HetNet)
4.1. Power Allocation (PA)
4.1.1. Throughput
4.1.2. Energy Efficiency (EE)
4.1.3. Spectrum Efficiency (SE)
4.1.4. Open Issues and Proposed Solutions
4.2. User Association (UA)
4.2.1. Signal to Interference Noise Ratio (SINR)
4.2.2. Data Rate
4.2.3. Open Issues and Proposed Solutions
4.3. Mode Selection (MS)
4.3.1. Static
4.3.2. Dynamic
Characteristics | Issue | Methodologies | Advantages | Limitations/ Future Work | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Static | Enhance the system EE | Particle swarm optimization algorithm | Effectively increase system EE by satisfying total transmit power and load balancing | The mobility of the user needs to be considered. | [114] |
Improve EE by focusing on QoS for D2D and CU | A deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm | Outperforms the benchmark algorithms in terms of convergence properties and EE | SE needs more attention and consideration. | [115] | |
Maximize SE by utilizing a mix of full-duplex and half-duplex modes | Decentralized user scheduling and MS scheme | boost the network sum rate in comparison to the network that only uses half or full duplex | All possible transmission modes do not consider simultaneously. | [116] | |
Utilize an effective capacity to evaluate the statistical QoS of a D2D link. | A novel multiple features-based MS mechanism | MS with the best possible weights performs better than the conventional MS. | Imperfect channel state information is not considered in the proposed scenario | [126] | |
Maximize system throughput | Greedy strategy and convex optimization theory. | Significantly improve system throughput | Does not consider the interference between D2D and CU. | [127] | |
Improve SE in a cellular network. | Search plus concave–convex procedure algorithm | Illustrated the interference cancellation capabilities and channel gain with maximum SE. | EE and imperfect channel state information are not considered | [117] | |
Select between different communication modes | MS distance-based mechanism | Improved network performance and decreased network traffic load. | EE needs more attention and investigation. | [118] | |
Dynamic | Improve the network EE | A novel dynamic MS based on fuzzy clustering | The EE of downlink transmission is improved through the deployment of the D2D users. | The greater physical distance between devices leads to a user being banned. | [119] |
Selects the best mode of communication | Novel MS approach with multi-hop cellular network communications. | Maximize system throughput, EE, and network capacity | Signaling overhead is not considered. | [120] | |
Enhance the performance of cellular networks | Novel MS scheme | Confirmed the importance of the system’s dynamic performance. | The interference between the D2D and CU is not considered in the proposed scheme. | [121] | |
Identify and select the optimal mode for each device. | Context-aware MS strategy | Demonstrated the ability to adapt the MS within the cell | User association requires attention and consideration. | [122] | |
Improve the throughput of the system while simultaneously maximizing user access. | Probabilistic integrated resource allocation approach | Significantly improve system throughput and user experience, and eliminate user interference. | The equilibrium between user experience and channel utilization in the proposed approach is not considered. | [123] | |
Minimize the power consumption of the D2D devices while maximizing the total SE | Distributed AI algorithm | Outperformed its related counterparts in terms of SE and power consumption | Signaling overhead due to many relays and users is not considered. | [124] | |
Maximize the network sum rate | The deep neural network algorithm | Outperforms the Lagrange duality approach and finds an optimal solution with low complexity | Imperfect channel state information is not considered in the proposed scenario. | [125] |
4.3.3. Open Issues and Proposed Solutions
4.4. Spectrum Allocation (SA)
4.4.1. Traditional Band
4.4.2. Millimeter Wave (mmWave)
4.4.3. Tera Hertz (THz)
4.4.4. Open Issues and Proposed Solutions
5. Research Challenges and Future Directions
5.1. New Network Scenarios
5.2. Energy Harvesting
5.3. Multiple Cell Association
5.4. Resource Allocation Complexity
5.5. Spectrum Bands
5.6. Communication Security
5.7. Mobility Management
5.8. Latency Minimization
5.9. Hardware Constraints
5.10. Interference Management
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Qadir, Z.; Le, K.N.; Saeed, N.; Munawar, H.S.J.I.E. Towards 6G Internet of Things: Recent advances, use cases, and open challenges. ICT Express 2022, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, F.; Yu, F.R.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Ji, H.; Leung, V.C. Enabling massive IoT toward 6G: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 11891–11915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faizan, Q. Enhancing QOS Performance of the 5G Network by Characterizing Mm-Wave Channel and Optimizing Interference Cancellation Scheme/Faizan Qamar; University of Malaya: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bani-Bakr, A.; Dimyati, K.; Hindia, M.N.; Wong, W.R.; Izam, T.F.T.M.N. Joint successful transmission probability, delay, and energy efficiency caching optimization in fog radio access network. Electronics 2021, 10, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Liang, Y.-C.; Sun, S.; Kang, S.; Cheng, W.; Peng, M. Vision, requirements, and technology trend of 6G: How to tackle the challenges of system coverage, capacity, user data-rate and movement speed. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, S.; Chih-Lin, I.; Xie, T.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Dai, L.; Sun, Q.; Cui, C. Achieving high spectrum efficiency on high speed train for 5G new radio and beyond. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2019, 26, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, M.Z.; Hassan, R. The implementation of internet of things using test bed in the UKMnet environment. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Technol. Multimed. 2019, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Siddiqui, M.H.S.; Hindia, M.N.; Dimyati, K.; Abd Rahman, T.; Talip, M.S.A. Propagation Channel Measurement at 38 GHz for 5G mm-wave communication Network. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Selangor, Malaysia, 26–28 November 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Udeshi, D.; Qamar, F. Quality analysis of epon network for uplink and downlink design. Asian J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 56. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, R.; Qamar, F.; Hasan, M.K.; Aman, A.H.M.; Ahmed, A.S. Internet of Things and its applications: A comprehensive survey. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilwari, V.; Hindia, M.N.; Dimyati, K.; Qamar, F.; Talip, A.; Sofian, M. Contention window and residual battery aware multipath routing schemes in mobile ad-hoc networks. Int. J. Technol. 2019, 10, 1376–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dong, D.S.; Pokhrel, Y.M.; Gachhadar, A.; Qamar, F.; Amiri, I.S.; Maharjan, R.K. Resource tuned optimal random network coding for single hop multicast future 5G networks. Int. J. Electron. Telecommun. 2019, 65, 463–469. [Google Scholar]
- Dahnil, D.P.; Hassan, R. Wireless Sensor Networks: A framework for community and educational gardens. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2018, 24, 1153–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Dimyati, K.B.; Hindia, M.N.; Noordin, K.A.B.; Al-Samman, A.M. A comprehensive review on coordinated multi-point operation for LTE-A. Comput. Netw. 2017, 123, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hindia, M.N.; Qamar, F.; Abd Rahman, T.; Amiri, I.S. A stochastic geometrical approach for full-duplex MIMO relaying model of high-density network. Ad Hoc Netw. 2018, 74, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogale, T.E.; Le, L.B. Massive MIMO and mmWave for 5G wireless HetNet: Potential benefits and challenges. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2016, 11, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yau, K.-L.A.; Qadir, J.; Wu, C.; Imran, M.A.; Ling, M.H. Cognition-inspired 5G cellular networks: A review and the road ahead. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 35072–35090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polese, M.; Giordani, M.; Zugno, T.; Roy, A.; Goyal, S.; Castor, D.; Zorzi, M. Integrated access and backhaul in 5G mmWave networks: Potential and challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashem, I.A.T.; Yaqoob, I.; Anuar, N.B.; Mokhtar, S.; Gani, A.; Khan, S.U. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Inf. Syst. 2015, 47, 98–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gachhadar, A.; Hindia, M.N.; Qamar, F.; Siddiqui, M.H.S.; Noordin, K.A.; Amiri, I.S. Modified genetic algorithm based power allocation scheme for amplify-and-forward cooperative relay network. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2018, 69, 628–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noordin, K.A.B.; Hindia, M.N.; Qamar, F.; Dimyati, K. Power allocation scheme using PSO for amplify and forward cooperative relaying network. In Proceedings of the Science and Information Conference; Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2018; Volume 857, pp. 636–647. [Google Scholar]
- Hindia, M.N.; Qamar, F.; Abbas, T.; Dimyati, K.; Abu Talip, M.S.; Amiri, I.S. Interference cancelation for high-density fifth-generation relaying network using stochastic geometrical approach. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2019, 15, 1550147719855879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hassan, R.; Aman, A.H.M.; Latiff, L.A. Framework for handover process using visible light communications in 5G. In Proceedings of the 2019 Symposium on Future Telecommunication Technologies (SOFTT), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 18–19 November 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Muniyandi, R.C.; Qamar, F.; Jasim, A.N. Genetic optimized location aided routing protocol for VANET based on rectangular estimation of position. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, T.; Qamar, F.; Hindia, M.N.; Hassan, R.; Ahmed, I.; Aslam, M.I. Performance analysis of ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol for MANET. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Batu Pahat, Malaysia, 27–29 September 2020; pp. 194–199. [Google Scholar]
- Saizan, Z.; Singh, D. Cyber security awareness among social media users: Case study in German-Malaysian Institute (GMI). Asia Pac. J. Inf. Technol. Multimed 2018, 7, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mamode, M.I.S.; Fowdur, T.P. Survey of scheduling schemes in 5G mobile communication systems. J. Electr. Eng. Electron. Control Comput. Sci. 2020, 6, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
- Qamar, F.; Hindia, M.N.; Abd Rahman, T.; Hassan, R.; Dimyati, K.; Nguyen, Q.N. Propagation characterization and analysis for 5G mmWave through field experiments. CMC-Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021, 68, 2249–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khaleefa, A.S.; Hassan, R.; Ahmad, M.R.; Qamar, F.; Wen, Z.; Aman, A.H.M.; Yu, K. Performance evaluation of online machine learning models based on cyclic dynamic and feature-adaptive time series. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2021, 104, 1172–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.U.A.; Qamar, F.; Kazmi, S.H.A.; Hassan, R.; Arfeen, A.; Nguyen, Q.N. A Study on Multi-Antenna and Pertinent Technologies with AI/ML Approaches for B5G/6G Networks. Electronics 2023, 12, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yuan, X.; Xiong, Z.; Kang, J.; Wang, X.; Niyato, D. Federated learning for 6G communications: Challenges, methods, and future directions. China Commun. 2020, 17, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hewa, T.; Gür, G.; Kalla, A.; Ylianttila, M.; Bracken, A.; Liyanage, M. The role of blockchain in 6G: Challenges, opportunities and research directions. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd 6G Wireless Summit (6G SUMMIT), Levi, Finland, 17–20 March 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Hindia, M.; Qamar, F.; Majed, M.B.; Abd Rahman, T.; Amiri, I.S.J.T.S. Enabling remote-control for the power sub-stations over LTE-A networks. Telecommun. Syst. 2019, 70, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malathy, S.; Jayarajan, P.; Ojukwu, H.; Qamar, F.; Hindia, M.N.; Dimyati, K.; Noordin, K.A.; Amiri, I.S. A review on energy management issues for future 5G and beyond network. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 2691–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Hindia, M.N.; Ojukwu, H.; Hassan, R.; Dimyati, K. Robust Schemes to Enhance Energy Consumption Efficiency for Millimeter Wave-Based Microcellular Network in Congested Urban Environments. Int. J. Electron. Telecommun. 2021, 67, 417–424. [Google Scholar]
- Coskun, C.C.; Ayanoglu, E. Energy- and Spectral-Efficient Resource Allocation Algorithm for Heterogeneous Networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2017, 67, 590–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmud; Lin, Z.; Hamdi, K. On the energy efficiency of fractional frequency reuse techniques. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Istanbul, Turkey, 6–9 April 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Davaslioglu, K.; Coskun, C.C.; Ayanoglu, E. Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for Fractional Frequency Reuse in Heterogeneous Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2015, 14, 5484–5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.U.A.; Qamar, F.; Ahmed, F.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Hassan, R. Interference management in 5G and beyond network: Requirements, challenges and future directions. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 68932–68965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.U.A.; Qamar, F.; Tayyab, M.; Hindia, M.N.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Hassan, R. Mobility Management Issues and Solutions in 5G-and-Beyond Networks: A Comprehensive Review. Electronics 2022, 11, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, Z.; Xiao, M.; Ding, Z.; Lei, X.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Fan, P. 6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2019, 14, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, A.; Lopez-Aguilera, E.; Demirkol, I. Are mobility management solutions ready for 5G and beyond? Comput. Commun. 2020, 161, 50–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, Z.; Chuai, G.; Gao, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, K. A QoS-based joint user association and resource allocation scheme in ultra-dense networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2021, 2021, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gachhadar, A.; Maharjan, R.K.; Shrestha, S.; Adhikari, N.B.; Qamar, F. A 5G framework and its analysis of interference cancellation in multi-tier heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), Mauritius, Mauritius, 7–8 October 2021; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Hong, Y.; Tao, X. Analytical modeling of mode selection for moving D2D-enabled cellular networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2016, 20, 1203–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Wang, J.; Hu, R.Q.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, L. Energy-efficient resource sharing for mobile device-to-device multimedia communications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2014, 63, 2093–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnan, S.; Dhillon, H.S. Effect of user mobility on the performance of device-to-device networks with distributed caching. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2017, 6, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coll-Perales, B.; Gozálvez, J.; Friderikos, V. Context-aware opportunistic networking in multi-hop cellular networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 2016, 37, 418–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q.; Su, Z.; Guo, S. A game theoretical incentive scheme for relay selection services in mobile social networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2015, 65, 6692–6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- aldomero Coll-Perales, B.; Gozalvez, J.; Maestre, J.L. 5G and beyond: Smart devices as part of the network fabric. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Busari, S.A.; Huq, K.M.S.; Mumtaz, S.; Dai, L.; Rodriguez, J. Millimeter-wave massive MIMO communication for future wireless systems: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 20, 836–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bani-Bakr, A.; Dimyati, K.; Hindia, M.N.; Wong, W.R.; Imran, M.A. Feasibility study of 28 GHz and 38 GHz millimeter-wave technologies for fog radio access networks using multi-slope path loss model. Phys. Commun. 2021, 47, 101401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutton, G.J.; Zeng, J.; Liu, R.P.; Ni, W.; Nguyen, D.N.; Jayawickrama, B.A.; Huang, X.; Abolhasan, M.; Zhang, Z.; Dutkiewicz, E. Enabling technologies for ultra-reliable and low latency communications: From PHY and MAC layer perspectives. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2019, 21, 2488–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Hindia, M.N.; Abbas, T.; Dimyati, K.B.; Amiri, I.S. Investigation of QoS performance evaluation over 5G network for indoor environment at millimeter wave bands. Int. J. Electron. Telecommun. 2019, 65, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Z.; Du, X.; Chen, H.-H.; Ai, B.; Chen, Z.; Wu, D. Millimeter-wave propagation modeling and measurements for 5G mobile networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2019, 26, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rappaport, T.S.; Xing, Y.; MacCartney, G.R.; Molisch, A.F.; Mellios, E.; Zhang, J. Overview of millimeter wave communications for fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks—With a focus on propagation models. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 6213–6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, P.; Xiao, Y.; Xiao, M.; Li, S. 6G wireless communications: Vision and potential techniques. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rappaport, T.S.; Xing, Y.; Kanhere, O.; Ju, S.; Madanayake, A.; Mandal, S.; Alkhateeb, A.; Trichopoulos, G.C. Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 78729–78757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, I.K.; Kumar, R.; Panwar, S.S. The impact of mobile blockers on millimeter wave cellular systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2019, 37, 854–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, K.; Huang, K.; Heath, R.W. Connectivity and blockage effects in millimeter-wave air-to-everything networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2018, 8, 388–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rubio, L.; Peñarrocha, V.M.R.; Molina-García-Pardo, J.-M.; Juan-Llácer, L.; Pascual-García, J.; Reig, J.; Sanchis-Borras, C. Millimeter wave channel measurements in an intra-wagon environment. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 12427–12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Dimyati, K.; Hindia, M.N.; Noordin, K.A.; Amiri, I.S.J.I.A. A stochastically geometrical poisson point process approach for the future 5G D2D enabled cooperative cellular network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 60465–60485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazi, B.U.; Wainer, G.A. Next generation wireless cellular networks: Ultra-dense multi-tier and multi-cell cooperation perspective. Wirel. Netw. 2019, 25, 2041–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Li, J.; Guizani, M. Cooperation for spectral and energy efficiency in ultra-dense small cell networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2016, 23, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Yang, S.; Wu, S.; Wang, M.; Song, X. Coverage probability analysis for mmWave communication network with ABSF-based interference management by stochastic geometry. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 133572–133582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzubaidi, O.T.H.; Hindia, M.N.; Dimyati, K.; Noordin, K.A.; Wahab, A.N.A.; Qamar, F.; Hassan, R. Interference Challenges and Management in B5G Network Design: A Comprehensive Review. Electronics 2022, 11, 2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, N.; Kumar, K. Resource allocation trends for ultra dense networks in 5G and beyond networks: A classification and comprehensive survey. Phys. Commun. 2021, 48, 101415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manap, S.; Dimyati, K.; Hindia, M.N.; Talip, M.S.A.; Tafazolli, R. Survey of radio resource management in 5G heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 131202–131223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Gui, G.; Gacanin, H.; Adachi, F. A survey on resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks: Current research, future trends, and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 668–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, B.; Togou, M.A.; Ruffini, M.; Muntean, G.-M. A Comprehensive Survey on Radio Resource Management in 5G HetNets: Current Solutions, Future Trends and Open Issues. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 24, 2495–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Hindia, M.; Dimyati, K.; Noordin, K.A.; Amiri, I.S. Interference management issues for the future 5G network: A review. Telecommun. Syst. 2019, 71, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gures, E.; Shayea, I.; Alhammadi, A.; Ergen, M.; Mohamad, H. A comprehensive survey on mobility management in 5g heterogeneous networks: Architectures, challenges and solutions. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 195883–195913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasser, A.; Al Haj Hassan, H.; Abou Chaaya, J.; Mansour, A.; Yao, K.-C. Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio: Recent advances and future challenge. Sensors 2021, 21, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ejaz, W.; Sharma, S.K.; Saadat, S.; Naeem, M.; Anpalagan, A.; Chughtai, N.A. A comprehensive survey on resource allocation for CRAN in 5G and beyond networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2020, 160, 102638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, M.T.; Do, H.T.; Hua, H.T.; Nguyen, C.V. DRL-based intelligent resource allocation for diverse QoS in 5G and toward 6G vehicular networks: A comprehensive survey. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021, 2021, 5051328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, F.; Siddiqui, M.U.A.; Hindia, M.N.; Hassan, R.; Nguyen, Q.N. Issues, challenges, and research trends in spectrum management: A comprehensive overview and new vision for designing 6G networks. Electronics 2020, 9, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gures, E.; Shayea, I.; Ergen, M.; Azmi, M.H.; El-Saleh, A.A. Machine Learning Based Load Balancing Algorithms in Future Heterogeneous Networks: A Survey. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 37689–37717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazmi, S.H.A.; Qamar, F.; Hassan, R.; Nisar, K.; Chowdhry, B.S. Survey on Joint Paradigm of 5G and SDN Emerging Mobile Technologies: Architecture, Security, Challenges and Research Directions. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siriwardhana, Y.; Porambage, P.; Liyanage, M.; Ylianttila, M. AI and 6G security: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2021 Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit (EuCNC/6G Summit), Porto, Portugal, 8–11 June 2021; pp. 616–621. [Google Scholar]
- Shahjalal, M.; Kim, W.; Khalid, W.; Moon, S.; Khan, M.; Liu, S.; Lim, S.; Kim, E.; Yun, D.-W.; Lee, J. Enabling technologies for AI empowered 6G massive radio access networks. ICT Express 2022, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Alphones, A.; Xiong, Z.; Niyato, D.; Zhao, J.; Wu, K. Artificial-intelligence-enabled intelligent 6G networks. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohajer, A.; Sorouri, F.; Mirzaei, A.; Ziaeddini, A.; Rad, K.J.; Bavaghar, M. Energy-aware hierarchical resource management and Backhaul traffic optimization in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Syst. J. 2022, 16, 5188–5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourkabirian, A.; Anisi, M.H.; Kooshki, F. A game-based power optimization for 5G femtocell networks. Comput. Commun. 2021, 177, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-J.; Kim, J.-G. Location-Based Resource Allocation in Ultra-Dense Network with Clustering. Sensors 2021, 21, 4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, J.; Tang, Z.; Wu, C.; Ai, B.; Wang, Y. Game theory-based multi-objective optimization interference alignment algorithm for HSR 5G heterogeneous ultra-dense network. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 13371–13382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleem, U.; Jangsher, S.; Qureshi, H.K.; Hassan, S.A. Joint subcarrier and power allocation in the energy-harvesting-aided D2D communication. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 2608–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Song, X.; Dong, L.; Han, X. Power allocation for D2D aided cooperative NOMA system with imperfect CSI. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.; Yang, W.; Zhang, L. Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for NOMA-Based Heterogeneous 5G Mine Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 67437–67450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muntaha, S.T.; Hassan, S.A.; Jung, H.; Hossain, M.S. Energy efficiency and hover time optimization in UAV-based HetNets. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 22, 5103–5111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, C.-K.; Chan, K.-L.; Chien, F.-T. Energy-efficient power allocation and user association in heterogeneous networks with deep reinforcement learning. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, F.; Ye, G.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Leung, V.C. Energy-efficient joint user association and power allocation in a heterogeneous network. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 7008–7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Euttamarajah, S.; Ng, Y.H.; Tan, C.K. Energy-efficient joint power allocation and energy cooperation for hybrid-powered comp-enabled HetNet. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 29169–29175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, R.; Mishra, P.K.; Pandey, S. An energy efficient scheme by exploiting multi-hop D2D communications for 5G networks. Phys. Commun. 2022, 51, 101576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Gong, Y.; Du, X.; Guizani, M. Reinforcement Learning Power Control Algorithm Based on Graph Signal Processing for Ultra-Dense Mobile Networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2021, 8, 2694–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasser, A.; Muta, O.; Gacanin, H.; Elsabrouty, M. Non-Cooperative Game Based Power Allocation for Energy and Spectrum Efficient Downlink NOMA HetNets. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 136334–136345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ataeeshojai, M.; Elliott, R.C.; Krzymień, W.A.; Tellambura, C.; Melzer, J. Energy-efficient resource allocation in single-RF load-modulated massive MIMO HetNets. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2020, 1, 1738–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.-S.; Lin, C.-H.R.; Hu, Y.-C. Joint resource allocation, user association, and power control for 5G LTE-based heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 122654–122672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasr-Esfahani, N.; Ghahfarokhi, B.S. Power management in green FFR-based heterogeneous cellular networks. Phys. Commun. 2021, 46, 101285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, B.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, R.Q.; Wu, G.; Papathanassiou, A. Joint spectral efficiency and energy efficiency in FFR-based wireless heterogeneous networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2017, 67, 8154–8168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiong, L.; Yu, J. Deep learning based user association in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 197439–197447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khawam, K.; Lahoud, S.; El Helou, M.; Martin, S.; Feng, G. Coordinated framework for spectrum allocation and user association in 5G HetNets with mmWave. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020, 21, 1226–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, H.Z.; Ali, M.; Naeem, M.; Rashid, I.; Akhtar, A.N.; Akram, F. Joint dl/ul decouple user association in microwave and mmwave enabled beyond 5G heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 134703–134715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sana, M.; De Domenico, A.; Yu, W.; Lostanlen, Y.; Strinati, E.C. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for adaptive user association in dynamic mmWave networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 6520–6534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, N.; Fernando, X. An optimum user association algorithm in heterogeneous 5G networks using standard deviation of the load. Electronics 2020, 9, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanyal, J.; Samanta, T. Game Theoretic Approach to Enhancing D2D Communications in 5G Wireless Networks. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2021, 28, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Ruan, Y. Performance Analysis of Backhaul-Aware User Association in 5G Ultradense Heterogeneous Networks. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021, 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, M.; Zheng, G.; Chen, T.; Sun, H.; Chen, K.-C. Delay guaranteed joint user association and channel allocation for fog radio access networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 20, 3723–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, T.; Hua, J. Cluster-based energy-efficient joint user association and resource allocation for B5G ultra-dense network. Phys. Commun. 2021, 46, 101311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khodmi, A.; Rejeb, S.B.; Agoulmine, N.; Choukair, Z. A joint power allocation and user association based on non-cooperative game theory in an heterogeneous ultra-dense network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 111790–111800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamanti, M.; Fragkos, G.; Tsiropoulou, E.E.; Papavassiliou, S. Unified user association and contract-theoretic resource orchestration in noma heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2020, 1, 1485–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, A.; Lopez-Aguilera, E.; Demirkol, I. User association and resource allocation in 5G (AURA-5G): A joint optimization framework. Comput. Netw. 2021, 192, 108063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Lee, M.; Yu, G.; Li, G.Y. User association for millimeter-wave networks: A machine learning approach. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020, 68, 4162–4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hattab, G.; Cabric, D. Long-term rate-based user-centric association for downlink multi-antenna HetNets. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Kansas City, MO, USA, 20–24 May 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kuang, Z.; Li, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.; Li, C.; Liu, A. Energy efficient mode selection, base station selection and resource allocation algorithm in D2D heterogeneous networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2020, 13, 1814–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Zhu, K.; Wang, J. Energy-efficient mode selection and resource allocation for D2D-enabled heterogeneous networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 20, 1175–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forouzan, N.; Rabiei, A.M.; Vehkaperä, M.; Wichman, R. A distributed resource allocation scheme for self-backhauled full-duplex small cell networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 1461–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AbdulRahman, S.; Tout, H.; Ould-Slimane, H.; Mourad, A.; Talhi, C.; Guizani, M. A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 5476–5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.K.; Hossain, M.F. A Distance Based Communication Mode Selection Mechanism for M2M Communications over Cellular Networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 115, 2501–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Algedir, A.A.; Refai, H.H. Energy efficiency optimization and dynamic mode selection algorithms for D2D communication under HetNet in downlink reuse. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 95251–95265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas-Estañ, M.C.; Gozalvez, J. Mode selection for 5G heterogeneous and opportunistic networks. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 113511–113524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omri, A.; Hasna, M.O. A distance-based mode selection scheme for D2D-enabled networks with mobility. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2018, 17, 4326–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas-Estañ, M.C.; Gozalvez, J.; Sepulcre, M. Context-Aware Mode Selection for 5G Multi-Hop Cellular Networks. Electronics 2019, 8, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, J.; Lei, G.; Manogaran, G.; Mastorakis, G.; Mavromoustakis, C.X. D2D communication mode selection and resource optimization algorithm with optimal throughput in 5G network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 25263–25273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ioannou, I.I.; Christophorou, C.; Vassiliou, V.; Lestas, M.; Pitsillides, A. Dynamic D2D Communication in 5G/6G Using a Distributed AI Framework. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 62772–62799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ron, D.; Lee, J.-R. Learning-based joint optimization of mode selection and transmit power control for D2D communication underlaid cellular networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 198, 116725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqas Haider Shah, S.; Li, R.; Mahboob Ur Rahman, M.; Noor Mian, A.; Aman, W.; Crowcroft, J. Statistical QoS guarantees of a device-to-device link assisted by a full-duplex relay. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2021, 32, e4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, J.; Kuang, Z.; Yang, F.; Deng, X. Mode selection and resource allocation algorithm in energy-harvesting D2D heterogeneous network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 179929–179941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatti, R.; GB, A.K.; KN, S.K.; Palle, S.; Gadekallu, T.R. Optimal resource scheduling algorithm for cell boundaries users in heterogenous 5G networks. Phys. Commun. 2022, 55, 101915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S. Heterogeneous network bandwidth control scheme for the hybrid OMA-NOMA system platform. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 83414–83424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, X.; Khattak, S.; Zaib, A.; Khan, I. Energy efficient resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks using genetic algorithm. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 160510–160520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostom, M.A.; Abd El-Malek, A.H.; Abo-Zahhad, M.; Elsabrouty, M. A Two-Stage Matching Game and Repeated Auctions for Users Admission and Channels Allocation in 5G HetNets. IEEE Access 2022, 21, 9276–9292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, P.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wu, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, M. Optimal Task Offloading and Resource Allocation for C-NOMA Heterogeneous Air-Ground Integrated Power Internet of Things Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 21, 9276–9292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Yao, Z.; Tu, Y.; Chen, Y. Cooperative optimization for OFDMA resource allocation in multi-RRH millimeter-wave CRAN. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 164035–164044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, P.; Jia, J.; Chen, J. Joint optimization on both routing and resource allocation for millimeter wave cellular networks. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 93631–93642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, R.K. Licensed countrywide full-spectrum allocation: A new paradigm for millimeter-wave mobile systems in 5G/6G era. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 166612–166629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, R.K. Approaches to improve millimeter-wave spectrum utilization using indoor small cells in multi-operator environments toward 6G. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 207643–207658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, J.-H.; Lim, B.; Ko, Y.-C. Resource Allocation and System Design of Out-Band Based Integrated Access and Backhaul Network at mmWave Band. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 6503–6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.; Tang, F.; Kato, N. Federated Reinforcement Learning-Based Resource Allocation in D2D-Enabled 6G. IEEE Netw. 2022, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Poor, H.V. Optimal resource allocations for statistical QoS provisioning to support mURLLC over FBC-EH-Based 6G THz wireless nano-networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021, 39, 1544–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, T.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Han, C.; Wang, Z.; Karagiannidis, G.K. Waveform design for joint sensing and communications in millimeter-wave and low terahertz bands. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2022, 70, 7023–7039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafie, A.; Yang, N.; Alvi, S.A.; Han, C.; Durrani, S.; Jornet, J.M. Spectrum Allocation with Adaptive Sub-band Bandwidth for Terahertz Communication Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 70, 1407–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, F.; Yan, F.; Shen, F.; Xia, W.; Hu, J.; Shen, L. Spectral Efficient Resource Allocation Algorithm in Indoor Terahertz Downlink Networks. In Proceedings of the 2021 13th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Changsha, China, 20–22 October 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Mach, P.; Becvar, Z.J.I.C.S.; Tutorials. Device-to-Device Relaying: Optimization, Performance Perspectives, and Open Challenges towards 6G Networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 24, 1336–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinaldi, F.; Maattanen, H.-L.; Torsner, J.; Pizzi, S.; Andreev, S.; Iera, A.; Koucheryavy, Y.; Araniti, G. Non-terrestrial networks in 5G & beyond: A survey. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 165178–165200. [Google Scholar]
- Alraih, S.; Shayea, I.; Behjati, M.; Nordin, R.; Abdullah, N.F.; Abu-Samah, A.; Nandi, D. Revolution or evolution? Technical requirements and considerations towards 6G mobile communications. Sensors 2022, 22, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dang, S.; Amin, O.; Shihada, B.; Alouini, M.-S. What should 6G be? Nat. Electron. 2020, 3, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fan, Y.; Fu, M.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.; Liu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Yi, L.; Hu, W.; Zhuge, Q.J.I.W.C. Point-to-Multipoint Coherent Architecture with Joint Resource Allocation for B5G/6G Fronthaul. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 29, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manjunath, L.; Prabakaran, N. Smart Backhauling for 5G Heterogeneous Network with Millimeter Wave Backhaul Links to Perform Switching Off, Interference Management and Backhaul Routing. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 123, 619–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.; Yang, H.J. Recurrent Neural Network-Based User Association and Power Control in Dynamic HetNets. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 9674–9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirzaei, A. A novel approach to QoS-aware resource allocation in NOMA cellular HetNets using multi-layer optimization. Clust. Comput. 2022, 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J.; Yang, F.; Chakraborty, C.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhen, L.; Yu, K.J.F.G.C.S. Opportunistic capacity based resource allocation for 6G wireless systems with network slicing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2023, 140, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tezergil, B.; Onur, E. Wireless backhaul in 5G and beyond: Issues, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 24, 2579–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Sarieddeen, H.; Ballal, T.; Wymeersch, H.; Alouini, M.-S.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y.J.I.C.S. A tutorial on terahertz-band localization for 6G communication systems. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 24, 1780–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, S.; Vijayakumar, N.; Masilamani, A.; Nithila, E.E.; Jothi, N.; Relin Francis Raj, J.J.I.S.S. A Survey on Design Issues, Challenges, and Applications of Terahertz based 6G Communication. Intell. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 458, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
- Tripathi, S.; Sabu, N.V.; Gupta, A.K.; Dhillon, H.S. Millimeter-wave and terahertz spectrum for 6G wireless. In 6G Mobile Wireless Networks; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 83–121. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, W.U.; Javed, M.A.; Zeadally, S.; Lagunas, E.; Chatzinotas, S. Intelligent and secure radio environments for 6G vehicular aided HetNets: Key opportunities and challenges. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.02172. [Google Scholar]
- Aruna, M.; Hasan, M.K.; Islam, S.; Mohan, K.; Sharan, P.; Hassan, R. Cloud to cloud data migration using self sovereign identity for 5G and beyond. Clust. Comput. 2022, 25, 2317–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naser, S.; Bariah, L.; Muhaidat, S.; Sofotasios, P.C.; Al-Qutayri, M.; Damiani, E.; Debbah, M.J.I.W.C. Toward federated-learning-enabled visible light communication in 6G systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 29, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banafaa, M.; Shayea, I.; Din, J.; Azmi, M.H.; Alashbi, A.; Daradkeh, Y.I.; Alhammadi, A.J.A.E.J. 6G Mobile Communication Technology: Requirements, Targets, Applications, Challenges, Advantages, and Opportunities. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 64, 245–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshaibani, W.; Shayea, I.; Caglar, R.; Din, J.; Daradkeh, Y.I. Mobility Management of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Ultra–Dense Heterogeneous Networks. Sensors 2022, 22, 6013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rekha, M.; Mariappan, B. 6G and Next Gen Networks With Ultra-Dense Heterogeneous Networks: System Architecture, Performance Metrics. In Challenges and Risks Involved in Deploying 6G and NextGen Networks; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 15–31. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, L.; Chen, X.; Xu, C.; Ma, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Muntean, G.-M. A Multi-User Cost-Efficient Crowd-Assisted VR Content Delivery Solution in 5G-and-Beyond Heterogeneous Networks. In IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Rashid, M.; Khan, A.; Manjul, M. Unmanned aerial vehicles integrated HetNet for smart dense urban area. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2022, 33, e4123. [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik, A.; Vlachos, E.; Thompson, J.; Nekovee, M.; Coutts, F.J.I.S.P. Towards 6G: Spectrally efficient joint radar and communication with radio frequency selection, interference and hardware impairments. IET Signal Process. 2022, 16, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deva, P.M.; Christy, J.M.A.; Kaleeswaran, D.; Vijayarajeswari, R.; Nithya, L. Deployment, Automation. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Based Security Enforcement Techniques for 6G Communication. In Handbook of Research on Design, Deployment, Automation, Testing Strategies for 6G Mobile Core Network; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 347–364. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Cao, Q.; Huang, C.; Yuen, C.; Zhou, J. Robust Energy-Efficient Optimization for Heterogeneous Networks with Residual Hardware Impairments. In Proceedings of the ICC 2022-IEEE International Conference on Communications, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 16–20 May 2022; pp. 679–684. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, H.; Budhiraja, I.; Kumar, N.; Tekchandani, R.K. Secrecy Rate Maximization for THz-Enabled Femto Edge Users using Deep Reinforcement Learning in 6G. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2022-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), New York, NY, USA, 2–5 May 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Hakeem, S.A.A.; Hussein, H.H.; Kim, H. Vision and research directions of 6G technologies and applications. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 2022, 34, 2419–2442. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, R.; Tsiga, N.; Asif, R.J.S. Interference management with reflective in-band full-duplex NOMA for secure 6G wireless communication systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Survey | Year | Summary |
---|---|---|
[67] | 2021 |
|
[68] | 2020 |
|
[69] | 2021 |
|
[70] | 2022 |
|
[71] | 2019 |
|
[72] | 2020 |
|
[73] | 2021 |
|
[74] | 2020 |
|
[75] | 2021 |
|
[76] | 2020 |
|
[77] | 2022 |
|
This survey |
|
Characteristics | Issue | Methodologies | Advantages | Limitations/Future Work | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Throughput | Minimize the total power of HetNets as well to provide the network capacity and coverage. | Dynamic power optimization model. |
| The delay constraints of the proposed model are not considered. | [82] |
Find a user-specific optimum transmission power. | Game theoretic power control strategy. |
| Imperfect channel state information impact requires attention and consideration. | [83] | |
Mitigate the cell edge interferences. | Coordinated multi-point scenario. |
| The system energy efficiency of the proposed scheme is not considered. | [84] | |
Increase system throughput and decrease energy consumption. | Recurrent neural network-based iterative algorithm. |
| The handover effect requires attention and consideration. | [85] | |
Increase the network total sum rate. | Energy harvesting and gain-based resource allocation (EHGRA) algorithm. |
| The proposed algorithm can only be used when only one cell and one BS exist. | [86] | |
Find the optimum power of DUs. | Lagrangian dual multiplier approach and Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions. |
| UE interferences are not considered, and the network can only support a single cell. | [87] | |
Energy Efficiency (EE) | Maximize energy efficiency. | Dinkelbach method and the Lagrangian approach. |
| User association requires attention and consideration. | [88] |
Improve the capacity of indoor users. | Lagrange multipliers technique and a sub-gradient method. |
| Interferences between UAVs are not considered. | [89] | |
Optimize the downlink energy efficiency. | A novel parameterized deep Q-network (P-DQN) algorithm. |
| Considered a limited number of users and small base stations. | [90] | |
Maximize energy efficiency. | Gradients algorithm. |
| SBSs used a single band to provide users. Hence, inter-cell interference occurs. | [91] | |
Maximize energy efficiency. | Combinatorial optimization algorithm and Dickelbach algorithm. |
| User association requires attention and consideration. | [92] | |
Enhance both network performance and energy efficiency. | Binary Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. |
| Multi-cell and multi-sharing resource in the HetNet is not considered. | [93] | |
Spectrum Efficiency (SE) | Determine the optimal power allocation. | Reinforcement learning power allocation algorithm based on graph signal processing. |
| Imperfect channel state information impact requires attention and consideration. | [94] |
Maximize the weighted sum of SE and EE. | Power allocation strategy based on a non-cooperative game. |
| A limited number of users constrains the model that has been proposed. | [95] | |
Achieve a higher EE and SE. | Dinkelbach technique. |
| User mobility and imperfect CSI need to be considered. | [96] | |
Maximize SE and EE. | A Lyapunov optimization model. |
| A single band is used to provide users. Thus, inter-cell interference occurs. | [97] | |
Enhance the SE and EE and minimize the total interference. | Heuristic algorithm. |
| User association and mobility require attention and consideration. | [98] | |
Maximize both the EE and SE. | Stochastic optimization problem. |
| A high amount of signaling overhead is to be expected. | [99] |
Characteristics | Issue | Methodologies | Advantages | Limitations/ Future Work | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SINR | Associate user devices with competing MBS and SBS | Cross-entropy algorithm | Maximizes data rate and sum rate | Power control and resource allocation need to be considered. | [100] |
Associate user devices with appropriate BS. | Centralized and distributed approaches | It enhanced the performance based on different scenarios. | The network energy efficiency is not taken into consideration. | [101] | |
Associate user devices with appropriate BS. | Association schemes based on downlink uplink decoupled access | Downlink uplink decoupled access is superior in terms of UA, data rate, and SE. | EE is needed more attention and consideration. | [102] | |
User association in HetNets | A distributed method based on deep reinforcement learning | Achieved a significant sum rate when considering the dynamic traffic. | The mobility of the user within a dynamic environment is not considered. | [103] | |
Allocate users to SBS | A novel approach by employing second-order statistics of user data | Effective in reducing traffic load while also increasing data rate, average EE, and coverage. | The impact of imperfect CSI needs to be analyzed. | [104] | |
Determine optimal associations in D2D HetNet | Evolutionary Game theory | Boost the performance of the network. | A distributed Open Radio Access Network controller needs to be considered. | [105] | |
Find a more feasible user association | Developed semi-closed formulas | The coverage probability of the backhaul-aware UA scheme is outperformed. | Limited to a single MBS and single SBS scenario. | [106] | |
Data Rate | User association in fog radio access HetNet | Joint UA and channel allocation scheme. | Effectively addressed statistical delay provisioning issues in HetNet. | EE needs more attention and consideration. | [107] |
Enhance the system EE and reduce the total interference | Lagrange multiplier approach | Improved the EE and minimized the total interference | The tradeoff between EE and SE is not considered. | [108] | |
Find a more optimal user association | Non-cooperative game theory | Effective in ensuring dynamic user association, a higher total rate for all uses. | EE and frequency allocation is needed more attention and consideration. | [109] | |
Associate users with BSs in an iterative and distributed way | Reinforcement Learning based technique | The achievable data rate, power consumption, and users’ fairness. | The interference will rise with increasing the number of devices; hence the performance will degrade. | [110] | |
User association in HetNets | User association approach | Boost the network throughput and system fairness in various HetNets. | Power consumption is not considered. | [111] | |
UA in mmWave HetNet | Novel machine learning-based strategy | Capable of producing satisfactory results with a relatively small number of iterations. | The work relies on optimal UA schemes, which take time to collect. | [112] | |
User association in HetNets | User-centric association algorithm | Enhance the average user rate. | As the number of users increases, the interference becomes unacceptable. | [113] |
Characteristics | Issue | Methodologies | Advantages | Limitations/ Future Work | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional Band | Improve QoS for the cell center users and cell edge users. | Utility-based SA algorithm | Effective solutions for the real-time application of cell edge users. | A centralized SA method is presented. Hence, the burden on the BS increased. | [128] |
Improve the network SE | Cooperative bargaining solution. | Attain significant performance improvements over other existing schemes | The tradeoff between SA and the power allocation problem is not considered. | [129] | |
Improve the SE | Genetic algorithm-based EE SA scheme | Showed a tradeoff between EE and throughput | The transmitted power increased, and the EE and SE decreased. | [130] | |
Match secondary users with randomly distributed SBSs. | Many-to-one college admissions matching game | Evaluate the proposed repeated auction in comparison to the matching theory and the single auction. | The system EE of the proposed scheme is not considered | [131] | |
Enhance EE and SE | Lyapunov optimization algorithm | Achieved an outstanding overall performance with low complexity. | User mobility and imperfect CSI need to be considered. | [132] | |
Millimeter Wave (mmWave) | Maximize the sum-rate | The joint optimization problem of UA, subcarrier allocation, power control, and SA | -Perform better transmission performance in terms of the total rate and power efficiency. | Users’ fairness needs more attention and consideration. | [133] |
Optimize EE by balancing SA and route selection | Stochastic algorithm | -EE and SE are improved by optimizing resource allocation and path selection. | User mobility is not considered. | [134] | |
Allocate the entire 28 GHz mmWave spectrum to each BS | Novel licensed SA approach | Provide similar performance improvements in average capacity, SE, EE, and cost efficiency. | Load balance is not considered. | [135] | |
Enhance spectrum utilization | Static-licensed SA and flexible-licensed SA | Demonstrated that the spectrum reuse method enhanced SE and EE results. | User mobility needs to be considered. | [136] | |
Improve HetNet backhaul capacity | The centralized SA algorithm | showed that the proposed algorithm boosts HetNet performance. | EE needs more attention and consideration. | [137] | |
Terahertz (THz) | To enhance the available spectrum utilization | A decentralized resource allocation strategy based on deep reinforcement learning and federated learning | Effectively optimizes network performance in terms of power consumption and throughput. | Realistic mobility models need to be considered. | [138] |
Optimize the effective capacity in the THz band | Energy harvesting-based THz -band nano-communication systems model | Verify and assess the proposed THz band schemes over HetNets. | Network energy consumption needs more consideration and investigation. | [139] | |
Perform high data transmission | A novel multi-sub band quasi-perfect (MS-QP) sequence | Outperforms the existing methods in terms of communication and sensing performance. | Imperfect channel state information needs to be investigated. | [140] | |
Determine sub-band bandwidth, sub-band assignment, and optimum transmit power | Iterative algorithms using the successive convex approximation approach |
| The use of adaptive sub-band bandwidth is limited to situations in which the sub-bands have a relatively narrow bandwidth. | [141] | |
Optimize the SE while simultaneously fulfilling the data rate needs of users. | Long user central window principle and the bipartite graph matching approach. | Achieved greater system spectrum efficiency. | The proposed THz system is limited to a small number of users. | [142] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alhashimi, H.F.; Hindia, M.N.; Dimyati, K.; Hanafi, E.B.; Safie, N.; Qamar, F.; Azrin, K.; Nguyen, Q.N. A Survey on Resource Management for 6G Heterogeneous Networks: Current Research, Future Trends, and Challenges. Electronics 2023, 12, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030647
Alhashimi HF, Hindia MN, Dimyati K, Hanafi EB, Safie N, Qamar F, Azrin K, Nguyen QN. A Survey on Resource Management for 6G Heterogeneous Networks: Current Research, Future Trends, and Challenges. Electronics. 2023; 12(3):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030647
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlhashimi, Hayder Faeq, MHD Nour Hindia, Kaharudin Dimyati, Effariza Binti Hanafi, Nurhizam Safie, Faizan Qamar, Khairul Azrin, and Quang Ngoc Nguyen. 2023. "A Survey on Resource Management for 6G Heterogeneous Networks: Current Research, Future Trends, and Challenges" Electronics 12, no. 3: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030647
APA StyleAlhashimi, H. F., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K., Hanafi, E. B., Safie, N., Qamar, F., Azrin, K., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2023). A Survey on Resource Management for 6G Heterogeneous Networks: Current Research, Future Trends, and Challenges. Electronics, 12(3), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030647