Next Article in Journal
A Hybrid Attention Network for Malware Detection Based on Multi-Feature Aligned and Fusion
Next Article in Special Issue
New Miniature Narrow Band Microstrip Diplexer for Recent Wireless Communications
Previous Article in Journal
MVPN: A Defense Architecture against VPN Traffic Hijacking Based on MTD
Previous Article in Special Issue
An H-Plane Groove Gap Waveguide Magic-T for X-Band Applications
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

A Novel Self-Adaptive Rectifier with High Efficiency and Wide Input Power Range

Electronics 2023, 12(3), 712; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030712
by Shimiao Lai, Zihao Zhang, Zhijun Liu, Ge Wang, Yongjie Zhou, Huacheng Zhu and Yang Yang *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Electronics 2023, 12(3), 712; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030712
Submission received: 5 January 2023 / Revised: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced RF, Microwave, and Millimeter-Wave Circuits and Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The proposed design can switch between these two branches by the feedback network according to its output voltage level. The rectifier has been simulated, fabricated and tested. The measured conversion efficiency exceeds 50% over the input power range from 5 to 29 dBm, with a total dynamic range of 24 dB. The conversion efficiency of over 60% is from 10 dBm to 28 dBm. The maximum efficiency is 75.2% at 26 dBm. In contrast, I have some concerns about it. 

1 A lot of work has been done in the literature; how is your work different from others? Please make a review table to elaborate on your contribution. 

2. What is the range of energy transfer circuits, and how is this useful in various domains, e.g. wireless power mobile edge cloud? I am referencing one interesting paper, "Partial Offloading in Energy Harvested Mobile Edge Computing: A Direct Search Approach" please check and add some discussion in the literature regarding this aspect in the revised version. 

3. The mentioned results are insufficient to claim the proposed scheme's effectiveness. Please compare your results with others also. 

4. There are a lot of typos and grammatical errors in the paper. Please check carefully and avoid the revised version. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present "A Novel Self-adaptive Rectifier with High Efficiency and Wide Input Power Range". The topic is interesting, but the contribution is not clear. According to Table 1 there are topologies with  similar efficiency for wide power range and in some cases with a better efficiency in very low power, Refs 24, 26 and 29. Moreover the references need to be updated with current references, for example, we can easily find published papers in this journal with similar research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors propose design and fabrication a rectifier consists of an ITIN and a feedback network with the result of higher range and efficiency compared to several related works. Several comments to increase the writing quality:

1) 2.45GHz -> 2.45 GHz ; put a space to make it consistent similar to other units

2) Provide minimum 5 key words

3) line 19, rf signal to dc current for power -> write rf dan dc with uppercase RF and DC. Also write the full form when the acronyms appear for the first time

4) line 53, is shown in fig. 1 -> is shown in Fig. 1 ; check others and revise all

5) line 66, in fig. 3 (a) and (b). ->  in Figs. 3(a) and (b). ; check others and revise all

6) change the images with vector based to achieve highest quality in PDF

7) punctuate the equations with comma or period

8) line 80, shift the sentence to the left margin to avoid making new paragraph. Check also line 84 and others and revise all

9) revise the size of ( ) in the equations (1) and (3)

10) form one paragraph with minimum 3 sentences

11) shift line 139 to the next page

12) font size lines 145 – 148 are not consistent due to smaller than others

Author Response

Thank you so much for your comments. We have checked the figures, typo and grammatical errors according to the above comments. The manuscript has been revised thoroughly.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks for the comments. The paper is accepted in its current form.

But still, there are a lot of grammatical error, 

Please read the Paper carefully to avoid any typos.

 

Author Response

Thanks for the comments. We have checked our grammatical errors and typos carefully. The manuscript has been revised thoroughly.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors improved the paper. The contribution is more clear and the references were updated. In my opinion it can be accepted in its current form. But careful proofreading is required in order to avoid grammatical errors and typos.

Author Response

Thanks for the comments. We have checked our grammatical errors and typos carefully. The manuscript has been revised thoroughly.

Back to TopTop