Next Article in Journal
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Induced by Feeding Medium-Chain Fatty Acids Upregulates Cholesterol and Lipid Homeostatic Genes in Skeletal Muscle of Neonatal Pigs
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Premature Birth on the Development of Pulmonary Diseases: Focus on the Microbiome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stable Isotope Tracing Analysis in Cancer Research: Advancements and Challenges in Identifying Dysregulated Cancer Metabolism and Treatment Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Challenges of Spatially Resolved Metabolism in Cancer Research

Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology and Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 789 S. Limestone St., Lexington, KY 40536, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2024, 14(7), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14070383
Submission received: 26 May 2024 / Revised: 28 June 2024 / Accepted: 7 July 2024 / Published: 11 July 2024

Abstract

:
Stable isotope-resolved metabolomics comprises a critical set of technologies that can be applied to a wide variety of systems, from isolated cells to whole organisms, to define metabolic pathway usage and responses to perturbations such as drugs or mutations, as well as providing the basis for flux analysis. As the diversity of stable isotope-enriched compounds is very high, and with newer approaches to multiplexing, the coverage of metabolism is now very extensive. However, as the complexity of the model increases, including more kinds of interacting cell types and interorgan communication, the analytical complexity also increases. Further, as studies move further into spatially resolved biology, new technical problems have to be overcome owing to the small number of analytes present in the confines of a single cell or cell compartment. Here, we review the overall goals and solutions made possible by stable isotope tracing and their applications to models of increasing complexity. Finally, we discuss progress and outstanding difficulties in high-resolution spatially resolved tracer-based metabolic studies.

1. Introduction

1.1. Metabolism and Metabolomics

Metabolomics is generally described as the analytical study of the complement of metabolites in an organism or biological system (the metabolome), and its response to perturbations, whether intrinsic (e.g., as a result of a mutation) or extrinsic (e.g., changes in nutrient supply or other environmental factors). The identification and quantification of these molecules lie firmly in the realm of analytical chemistry. The interpretation of the analytes that are identified in terms of metabolites, as well as the underlying biochemical mechanism of their synthesis, utilization, and regulation, is the realm of metabolism.
To illustrate the distinction, all live cells take in compounds, mainly via specific membrane-bound transporters, and many are converted to other compounds by the catalytic activity of enzymes. Such compounds are part of metabolism, which comprises a network of enzymes that either capture free energy of oxidation (catabolism) or use the captured energy to drive energy-consuming reactions that build complex molecules from simpler precursors (anabolism). Metabolism also includes detoxification mechanisms involving oxidations and conjugations that are enzyme-dependent. Generally, metabolism is concerned with how these conversions are coordinated, which, in addition to identifying and quantifying the compounds that are metabolites, also requires analysis of compartmentation, protein expression, and enzyme activity via allosteric or post-translational modification. In this sense, macromolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, complex carbohydrates, and lipids must be considered as metabolites (anabolites) as they are the products of long sequences of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. In contrast, metabolomics is, in large measure, the analytical effort of identifying and quantifying (usually) so-called small molecules, which may or may not be metabolites. There are other compounds, often small molecules, that are metabolites, but which are less commonly analyzed by metabolomics, but are clearly critical to cell function. These include oxygen, O2.−, H2O2, CO2, H2O, NO, and NH4+, none of which is organic, and all of them are both created and consumed in cells in enzyme-catalyzed reactions.
Humans rely on nutrition for many compounds in addition to those used for oxidation or anabolic purposes, including vitamins and essential amino and fatty acids, but these exogenous metabolites may be metabolized by the host. Similarly, xenobiotics may be (and often are) metabolized by the host; a wide range of enzyme activities are expressed for detoxifying foreign substances. There is also a symbiotic relationship between the host and the microbiome, which in some cases relies on the microbes to carry out one or more steps in a synthetic pathways, e.g., bile acids [1].
Even compounds that are metabolites may in fact be produced by chemical synthesis and are present in the environment. For example, lactate is the end product of lactic fermentation, and results from the reduction of pyruvate. Both enantiomers are produced biologically, though mammals produce mainly L-lactate. D-lactate can be produced by bacteria, and also from methylglyoxal [2]; these enantiomers have quite different biological properties, but are rarely differentiated by analytic tools [3]. Furthermore, lactic acid is often present in deionized water used for cell culture and is a common descaling agent that can contaminate samples. To distinguish the origin of “lactate” and determining whether it is an intrinsic or extrinsic metabolite is not always straightforward. Similarly, glutamate is in many contexts a metabolite that is involved in a large number of biochemical processes, but is also widely present in foodstuffs in the form of chemically synthesized MSG as well as a natural product. Further, especially in biofluids, compounds present at very low levels might be important potent bioactive species or just general chemical noise arising from multiple substances from air and water, pollutants, etc. Also, in the context of biofluids which distribute and disperse a very wide range of compounds by virtue of being in contact with a large surface area of cells, some fraction of which is constantly dying, a certain level of metabolites from these cells will be present in blood and urine. An abundant metabolite at 1 mM intracellular concentration in a cell volume of approx. 1 pL is 1 fmol. The content of 5 million dying cells disgorged into 5 L of blood (typical human blood volume) corresponds to a concentration of 1 nM, a level routinely measured by mass spectrometry. However, the steady-state level would be lower owing to depuration and reuptake by other cells.
The use of stable isotope tracers can certainly help with the assignment of the term “metabolite” and distinguish them from accidentally ingested adventitious compounds, which typically will not be isotopically enriched.
The critical points about enzymes are that they are catalysts (i.e., they accelerate reactions equally in both directions, but do not influence equilibrium distributions), but by virtue of high specificity, can influence flux through different branches of the metabolic network. Enzyme activity depends not only on intrinsic catalytic power but also on expression level, substrate availability, location (compartmentation), concentration of non-covalent modulators (allosteric or active site), and activity of post-translational modification enzymes (phosphorylation, glycosylation, succinate, myristylation, etc.). This is all part of the metabolic network. Many enzymes have different isoforms, which may be differentially expressed among tissues or compartments, and which may have different catalytic powers and mechanisms of activity modulation. For example, the enzyme PFK1 catalyzes the phosphorylation of fructose-6-P (F6P) to fructose 1,6 bisphosphate coupled to the conversion of ATP to ADP. This enzyme exists as three isoforms in mammals, the muscle, liver, and platelet isoforms [4], and mainly resides in the cytoplasm, though it is also found in the nucleus [5,6]. PFK1 is also allosterically inhibited by ATP (i.e., there is a separate ATP binding site), but is allosterically activated by AMP. It may also be inhibited by high concentrations of citrate and PEP. Potentially the most potent allosteric activator of PFK1 is fructose 2,6 bisphosphate, which is synthesized from F6P via the activity of one of the four isoforms of the unrelated bienzyme complexes of PFFKB [7]. These enzymes contain both PFK2 activity and the specific F2,6 phosphatase activity, and the relative levels of these competing functions depend on both isoforms and the level of phosphorylation by PFKB kinase [7,8]. Furthermore, PFK1 may undergo O-GlcNAcylation, especially under hypoxia, which decreases PFK1 activity [9].
PFK1 occupies a crossroad that determines relative flux into glycolysis versus the oxidative branch (NADPH generating and Rib-5-P) of the pentose phosphate pathway (Figure 1), and is strongly linked to metabolic energy levels (ATP) via glycolysis, as well as the provision of precursors for lipid synthesis (via DHAP), glycosylation (via F6P and the hexosamine pathway), and serine/glycogen production (via 3-phosphoglycerate).
Mapping metabolic pathways within complex networks is best achieved using tracers, which is typically achieved using stable isotope-enriched precursors with mass spectrometry and NMR as the isotope-sensitive analytical tools [10,11,12,13,14], though it is also possible to use vibrational spectroscopy under certain circumstances [15,16]. NMR identifies molecules and isotopomers of a subset of abundant metabolites, and quantification of individual isotopomers can be achieved using a variety of NMR methods including selection by isotope editing [12,17]. Mass spectrometry methods generally have a higher metabolic coverage and, combined with chromatography and fragmentation, can identify and quantify a large number of compounds and their isotopologues (number of heavy atoms incorporated). With Tandem MS, it is possible to determine which metabolic subunits contain the exogenously supplied label, for example, in the ribose and nucleobase subunits of nucleotides and dinucleotides [18,19] and intact complex lipids [20]. With ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry (>20,000 at m/z = 200, [10,21]), it is possible to discriminate the incorporation of a single 13C, a single 15N, or a single 2H atom (all nominally +1 amu) into a product, allowing multiplexed tracing to be carried out [19,21]. For mass spectrometry detection, the natural abundance must also be taken into account, as for large molecules, the m + 1 ion can be quite substantial. Standard methods are available for this kind of correction for both single isotopes [22] and multiple isotopes [23].
Although time courses of metabolite concentrations (or amounts) can provide valuable kinetic information, especially about nutrient uptake rates and excretion [24,25,26], the determination of metabolic fluxes more generally requires a metabolic model that can be parametrized, for either dynamic (time-dependent) or isotopic steady-state conditions [19,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Stable isotope tracing is a powerful means to determine the metabolic network activity in the system of interest, but generally, is not flux per se [30].

1.2. Models and Complexity

Although it is possible to apply tracer methodologies to whole organisms, including human subjects [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], the complexity and limited experimental control can limit the amount of mechanistic information that can be recovered [40,41,42,43]. For this reason, various model systems that can be manipulated are needed. Different experimental models vary in their complexity from cells in 2D culture, 3D spheroids and organoids, excised tissues, perfused organs to whole mouse models, with or without xenografts, or genetically engineered animals [43]. Even organotypic tissue cultures, while allowing extensive control of experimental variables, by virtue of their heterogeneity in cell types and interactions, are highly complex, and some level of spatial resolution is needed [44].
In this article, we discuss progress in isotope tracing methodologies for pathway analysis, the pitfalls in modeling systems of increasing complexity [43], and the challenges in applying these approaches at single cell resolution in live tissue [15], which is becoming increasingly urgent as other omics technologies are able to measure RNA and protein expression at the subcellular level expression [45,46,47,48,49]. We will illustrate principles mainly from the perspective of cancer metabolism, immune cell metabolism, and the tumor microenvironment. Because the field is very large and is rapidly developing, we can only provide representative examples, but we have cited other reviews wherever possible.

2. Pathway Mapping via Tracers

Actual pathway mapping is complex and relies on identification and quantification of many metabolites and their specific isotope distributions, which can be mapped onto known pathways using standard biochemical pathways relevant to the organism and tissue type of interest found in various databases [50,51,52,53,54], and is substantially aided by expression data, especially of proteins [55]. In the following, we review stable isotope tracing of several intersecting metabolic pathways.

2.1. Tracers for Metabolism

If metabolic pathways were completely independent of one another, pathway mapping and utilization would be simple, and measuring the end product as a function of time would determine the pathway utilization. In practice, metabolic pathways are components of a complex intersecting network (Figure 1). For example, the conversion of glucose to pyruvate (glycolysis) has numerous branch points where carbon is removed from the pathway (i.e., at G6P, F6P, DHAP, 3PGA, pyruvate). Indeed, the end product pyruvate has numerous fates: lactate (via lactate hydrogenase), alanine (via glutamate pyruvate transaminase), AcCoA (via pyruvate dehydrogenase), and oxalacetate (via pyruvate carboxylase). Thus, glucose uptake and glycolysis are intimately connected to glycogen metabolism, the pentose phosphate pathway to generate ribose-5-phosphate and (in the oxidative branch) NADPH, the hexosamine pathway, glycerol and complex lipid biosynthesis, serine and 1-carbon metabolism, the Krebs cycle, anaplerosis, and both pyrimidine and glutathione biosynthesis. Glucose is not the only carbohydrate that can feed these pathways; other common dietary carbohydrates such as fructose and galactose can be utilized. Galactose via the Leloir pathway has been reported to be important in glioblastoma multiforme [56] and hepatocellular carcinoma [57], and fructose is associated with liver and lipid metabolism [58,59,60]. However, compared with glucose utilization, their contributions to cancer metabolism have not been studied in great detail [61].
Acetyl CoA produced by oxidation of pyruvate (PDH) may enter the Krebs cycle and label intermediates two carbon atoms at a time (Figure 2). Acetyl CoA may also be exported as citrate from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm, where ATP citrate lyase converts the cytoplasmic citrate to AcCoA + OAA. The AcCoA produced may then be used for fatty acid (FA) biosynthesis. The OAA may be reduced by cytoplasmic MDH and participate in the redox shuttle mechanism for re-oxidizing cytoplasmic NADH to NAD+. The shuttle mechanism is essential for oxidizing cytoplasmic NADH that is not re-oxidized in the LDH-catalyzed reaction. Figure 2 shows how Krebs cycle intermediates are labeled from [U-13C]-glucose via both PDH and PC reactions. Careful quantitative analysis of isotopologues of malate, citrate, and glutamate can determine the relative input from PC and PDH [34,62]. [13C1,2]-glucose labeling has also been used for analyzing the PC versus PDH input to the Krebs cycle [63,64].
Parsing the substrate participation from glucose and amino acids such as glutamine requires tracers [66]. There are numerous commercially available forms of stable isotope-enriched precursors that can be chosen according to the experimental question being addressed. For example, several 13C isotopomers of glucose are available, including [U-13C]-glucose, 13C-1, 13C-2, 13C1-,2, and 13C-3,4 as well as deuterated forms, e.g., 2H7 and 2H6,6 glucose. Similarly, [U-13C], [U-13C,15N]-, 15N2, 13C1 or 13C5 Gln can be used to probe different aspects of Gln metabolism. Other amino acids labeled with 13C, 15N, or 2H can also be obtained, as can 13C or 2H FA and 13C fructose. Many other enriched compounds are commercially available for specific questions. Table 1 summarizes the parts of metabolic networks that these tracers probe.
For example, [U-13C]-glucose is valuable for tracing central carbohydrate metabolism. Because of the abundant glucose transporters, most cells readily absorb glucose, which is immediately phosphorylated to G6P, and trapped. The fate of the G6P then depends on many conditions and is the precursor to glycogen synthesis (via UDP-glucose) and the pentose phosphate pathway or is committed to glycolysis (Figure 1). Most of the intermediates of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway can be identified and quantified by IC-FTMS [17,18,98].

2.2. Glycolysis and Lactic Fermentation

G6P is oxidized by NAD+ to pyruvate in glycolysis, generating NADH and ATP. The pools of the intermediates are typically rapidly replaced (minutes) with uniformly 13C labeled versions at high fractional enrichment. In cancer cells in culture, the levels of free glucose and G6P are typically low, indicating that, at the concentrations of exogenous glucose typically supplied (5–25 mM), uptake and phosphorylation (Glut + HK activity) are relatively low compared with the activity of downstream steps (PFK through PK). Indeed, in cancer cells and tissues, the flux control coefficients for glycolysis are usually highest for Glut and HK, rather than the often described “rate limiting steps” of PFK1 and PK activities [99,100,101,102,103], which may be more important in normal tissue. This is likely to be exacerbated in solid tumors that are poorly vascularized and where nutrient delivery is compromised (see below). PFKB4 produces fructose-2,6 bisphosphate, a potent activator of PFK1, and decreases its glycolytic flux control coefficient, and this may also be important for net flux control in glycolysis [101] versus diversion to other pathways (cf. Figure 1). Note that cell culture media are typically highly unphysiological. Even in serum, the glucose concentration is 4–6 mM (and considerably lower in poorly vascularized tissue), and amino acid concentrations greatly exceed those of serum. More recently, media formulations that match those of human serum are being made available [104], which can significantly impact the biochemical behavior of cultured cells [104,105,106].
Pyruvate, the end product of glycolysis, has numerous fates. In cancer cells, much of the glycolytically generated pyruvate is converted to lactate via LDH and excreted along with a glycolytically produced proton, regenerating NAD+ to allow glycolysis to continue, and also helping maintain a near-neutral intracellular pH [107]. This lactic fermentation can account for most of the glucose consumed by the cell [71,85,108]. However, some pyruvate may be transported into and oxidized by the mitochondria via the Krebs cycle, which also requires functional respiration. Mitochondrial pyruvate may also be carboxylated to OAA by PC, an anaplerotic reaction that is important in some cancers such as that of the lung [34,37,62]. Cytoplasmic pyruvate may also be transaminated to alanine (by ALT), some of which is excreted [62], and some enters protein synthesis or simply buffers the free pyruvate.
As Figure 1 shows, not all of the exogenous glucose that is consumed completes glycolysis, and in addition, glycogen hydrolysis may also contribute to carbon flow through the glycolytic pathway. Significant amounts of glucose carbon may be consumed in any of several branch points of glycolysis. G6P can be oxidized to ribose-5-P +CO2 in the oxidative branch, generating 2 moles of NADPH. The resulting pentose phosphate is a precursor for nucleotide biosynthesis, which is very important in dividing cells, but may also be returned to glycolysis through the reversible steps of the non-oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). In red blood corpuscles, this is the major fate of glucose-derived pentose phosphate carbon [109]. The labeling patterns of the PPP can become highly complex via the transaldolase (TA) and transketolase (TK) reactions, and the relative importance of the oxidative and non-oxidative pathways cannot be easily discriminated using13C6 glucose. 13C1,2 or 13C1,6 glucose, however, can discriminate, because C-1 of glucose is lost in the PPPox but is retained in the non-oxidative branch [110]. IC-FTMS can determine most of the PPP intermediates, and NMR is particularly useful for isotopomer analysis of the ribose in newly synthesized nucleotides [110] and, ultimately, in RNA [111].
Although the PPP may account for only a few percent of glucose consumption, other branches from glycolysis may also divert carbon from pyruvate production. Fructose-6-phosphate (F6P) is the precursor to UDP-GlcNAc synthesis, which is used for specific protein glycosylation, both O- and N-linked. In dividing cells, where the total protein content is doubled in each cell division, de novo glycosylation must occur, which may account for a significant amount of consumed glucose [112], though specific determinations using tracers have not been widely reported.
Dividing cells also make complex lipids which are dominated by glycerophospholipids and triglycerides. The glycerol backbone derives mainly from glucose via DHAP, as is readily shown in lipid analyses by NMR and MS of cells treated with [U-13C]-glucose. Typically, the glycerol backbone is triply labeled when 13C6 glucose is the source, with very little scrambling. Exogenous glycerol may also end up in complex lipids [110,113]. The fatty acyl chains are synthesized from AcCoA, deriving from citrate. Depending on the cell type and growth conditions, a significant portion of the fatty acyl chain carbon may also be derived from glucose, with contributions from glutamine and exogenous free fatty acids [59,88,110,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121].
A fourth significant branch point in glycolysis occurs at 3-phosphoglycerate. PHGDH catalyzes the oxidation of 3PGA as the entry point into the synthesis of serine and then glycine [19,122,123,124,125]. Both amino acids may also be taken up from the medium. Serine and glycine are used for protein synthesis, but also for phospholipid synthesis (cf. phosphatidyl serine and sphingolipids), purine biosynthesis, and 1-carbon metabolism (glycine). The relative importance of the uptake of exogenous amino acids versus synthesis from glucose is highly cell- and condition-dependent and requires multiple tracers to determine the fate of different atoms into products.
Therefore, the amount of glucose carbon consumed will generally be higher than the amount of glucose-derived pyruvate produced. The actual fraction of glucose consumed that enters these anabolic pathways is variable and requires careful quantification (see above).
As pyruvate is also generated from other reactions (e.g., via malic enzyme) and has multiple fates, steady-state levels of either pyruvate or the commonly proposed surrogate lactate, even using 13C glucose and monitoring 13C lactate, can only provide an upper and lower limit to the total glycolysis. However, a useful parameter is to determine how much 13C glucose was consumed per cell and how much of that glucose was converted to 13C lactate or 13C Ala and excreted into the medium at a certain time (Equation (1)).
F(t) = 0.5*Δ [Lac(t)]/Δ[Glc(t)]
For example, in a 2D cell culture using a 10 cm plate, the medium volume would be 8 mL, and for 1 million epithelial cells of volume 2 pL, the cell volume would be 2 μL (volume ratio = 4000:1), of which approx. 30% is biomass (<0.5 pg/cell). For an initial cell number of 1 million, after one doubling time, the amount of new cellular biomass would be of the order 50 ng. At most, 50% of this biomass could be glucose-derived (protein is the most abundant component of cellular biomass, and nearly half of the amino acids are essential, i.e., cannot be made from glucose [126,127]). This amounts to <1.5 nmol of glucose being incorporated into new cellular biomass. For a medium glucose concentration of 10 mM, the amount of glucose initially present in the medium = 80 μmol; even a small consumption over a single cell doubling (ca. 24 h) very greatly exceeds the amount of biomass produced. In fact, cancer cells typically consume glucose at a high rate, easily 40 μmol over a period of one cell doubling from 1 million cells. Therefore, most of the glucose that is consumed does not enter biomass, but is either oxidized to CO2 and lost, converted to excreted metabolites such as lactate, alanine, glutamate, and acetate [82], or produces extracellular matrix including collagens, other proteins, and possibly polymeric carbohydrates [128,129,130,131]. In fact, all of these metabolic processes occur, to different extents, according to cell types and growth conditions [71,85,122,132]. Lactate production and excretion is often a major end product of glucose metabolism in proliferating cells [133], though in tumors, it can also be a fuel [35], but does not always account for the majority of the glucose consumed. Ala, acetate, and Glu are biologically significant excretion products, but usually account for much less carbon than lactate. CO2 production is potentially a major end product of glucose oxidation, primarily via mitochondrial oxidative decarboxylation, but there are few studies of the mass balance between glucose consumption and CO2 production, not least because cell culture is usually carried out in media containing 12–25 mM bicarbonate and a 5% CO2 atmosphere (and at 20% oxygen), which might serve to suppress oxidation in favor of fixation (cf. mitochondrial reductive carboxylation [71,118,119,120,121]). More realistic tissue conditions may have alternative explanations [134]. Although it is often assumed that fibroblasts provide the extracellular matrix (implying a rather large amount of metabolism devoted to producing the polymeric materials, not only in terms of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, but also the metabolic energy to drive anabolism), other cells, including cancers, produce ECM components, especially collagens [129]. Matrix protein deposition in 2D or 3D culture can potentially interfere with metabolite normalizations if total protein is used, depending on the method of cell harvesting. Moreover, the metabolic requirements of matrix deposition in tissue or cell culture have not been quantitatively evaluated.

Glycolytic Rate

The glycolytic rate, or flux, is the rate at which glucose is oxidized to pyruvate. As alluded to above, the measurement of this flux is not straightforward. As glycolysis produces protons, the rate of extracellular acidification (ECAR) is proportional to the glycolytic flux [135]. However, the degree of acidification as measured by proton activity (pH) depends on buffer capacity, as well as any other proton-producing reactions [136]. More recently, deuterium NMR has been used to estimate glycolytic flux in vivo, using deuterated glucose and measuring the deuterium released via glycolysis into water [75,135,136,137].

2.3. Gluconeogenesis

Gluconeogenesis is the production of glucose from precursors downstream of pyruvate in the metabolic network, and requires four alternative enzyme-catalyzed reactions to those of glycolysis, namely PC and PEPCK, which catalyze the conversion of pyruvate to PEP via OAA; F1,6 bisphosphatase, which converts FBP to F6P; and G6P phosphatase, which concerts G6P to glucose, which can be readily exported from the cell via glucose transporters. Usually, the full gluconeogenic pathway is active in the liver and kidneys [138], which helps maintain systemic glucose homeostasis by converting (mainly) lactate and alanine to glucose, though other glucogenic amino acids can also be used, at the cost of metabolic energy [138,139,140,141,142,143]. However, in the tumor microenvironment, glucose is often highly depleted, leading to low concentrations [144,145,146], which contributes to the flux control at the transporter level (see above). As glycolysis provides several anabolic precursors required for cell proliferation (see above), low glucose availability can impact a cell’s survival and ability to divide [147,148]. Further, cancer cells can express PC [34,149] and PEPCK (PCK) [150,151] and suppress FBPase [152] and also take up lactate as fuel [35,62,153]. Thus, lactate, Ala, and other glucogenic amino acids can provide carbon for the anabolic precursors which require bypassing the PK-catalyzed step to trioses like 3PGA (serine/glycine/1-C pathway needed for purine biosynthesis) and G3P (lipid biosynthesis) as well as the PPP (F6P + GAP), HBP (F6P), and if FBPase is active, also G6P for the oxidative branch of the PPP (Figure 1).

2.4. Redox Metabolism

The redox couples NAD+/NADH, NADP+/NAPH, and FAD/FADH2 differ depending on the cellular compartment and reflect the different catabolic and anabolic needs in these compartments [154]. Thus, the free [NAD+] to [NADH] ratio is very high in the cytoplasm of most cells [155], and significantly lower in the mitochondrial matrix [156]. In contrast, the NADP+ to NADPH ratio is <<1 in the cytoplasm [157], and higher inside mitochondria [158,159]. The ratios also depend on conditions of substrate availability and oxygenation [160]. As indicated above, a high cytoplasmic NAD+/NADH ratio is needed to maintain a high glycolytic flux, whereas a high cytoplasmic NADPH/NADP+ ratio is needed to maintain fatty acid synthesis and the reduction of ribonucleotides for DNA synthesis in S-phase, as well as to combat oxidative stress via glutathione reductase [158,161]. An important set of experiments using stable isotope tracers with deuterated substrates was used to show the activity dehydrogenases as they accepted a deuteron onto NADP+ to form NADPD [159,162]. In these experiments, the substrates were 3 or 4-2H glucose to measure NADPH production from the oxidative PPP, or 2,3,3,4,4-2H-glutamine and 2,3,3-2H-aspartate, which implicated activity of GDH and malic enzyme, and 2,3,3-2H-serine, which implicated the activity of serine hydroxymethyltransferases (SHMTs) and methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenases. Discrimination between cytosolic and mitochondrial isoforms, however, has to conformed by knockout experiments. In principle, the same approach could be used for flavin proteins using, for example, deuterated succinate (provided as dimethylsuccinate, for example), or other specific dehydrogenases where the deuterated substrate can be introduced into cells.
Compartmented metabolism may also be deconvoluted using a combination of tracers with specific modeling [19,163]. It is also possible to parse compartmented metabolism by isolating organelles from cells, such as mitochondria [164] and nuclei [6].
The GSH/GSSG ratio is also a redox couple, and although the two forms are in continuous exchange, GSH also can modify proteins and is diluted by cell division, necessitating continuous synthesis to maintain homeostasis. GSH is a tripeptide of Gly, Glu, and Cys, so its synthesis necessitates the uptake and/or synthesis of these three amino acids. Notably, Glu is the transamination product of 2OG (Figure 2 and Figure 3), Cystine is antiported with Glu via the Xc system [165], and Gly is produced from serine. The synthesis of GSH is therefore closely linked to central, amino acid, and redox metabolism, and its synthesis and turnover are fundamental to cell survival and proliferation. Tracer methodology that can measure several pathways simultaneously is therefore needed to determine GSH/GSSG homeostasis.

2.4.1. Reductive Carboxylation of 2OG

2OG has several fates in cells (Figure 3), both as a TCA cycle intermediate and as a co-substrate for 2OG-dependent dioxygenases [166]. In mitochondria, 2OG is produced by the reversible activity of the unrelated NADP+-dependent IDH2 and NAD+-dependent IDH3. It is also produced by successive deamidation by glutaminase and amidotransferases to glutamate followed by transamination with partner amino acids or oxidative deamination via GDH activity (NAD(P)-dependent). 2OG may also be produced in the cytoplasm by the activity of IDH1 [167] (Figure 3).
The IDH-catalyzed reaction is described by
Isocitrate + NAD(P)+ ⇔ 2OG + NAD(P)H + CO2
The equilibrium constant for this reaction is ca. 1 M [168], and the preferred substrate for carboxylation is dissolved CO2 rather than bicarbonate [169]. The net direction of flux is determined by the actual concentrations of the substrates and products, such that if
[2OG][NAD(P)H][CO2]/[isocitrate][NAD(P)+] > Keq
then the net reaction is toward isocitrate synthesis, i.e., reductive carboxylation.
Reductive carboxylation from Gln-derived 2OG via IDH1 or IDH2 has been observed in brown adipose tissue [170] and in cancer cells under deep hypoxia or with defective mitochondria [71,88,108,118,120]. Defining reductive carboxylation unambiguously requires a careful choice of which tracers to use and which products to measure (Table 1), preferably coupled with manipulation of critical enzyme activities [108,171].
Under deep hypoxia, or where mitochondria have a diminished ability to respire, the NADPH/NADP+ level tends to rise. Furthermore, in standard cell culture, the concentrations of CO2 and bicarbonate are also very high, all of which favor reductive carboxylation. Indeed, as the reaction is reversible, tracers such as 13C from Gln will exchange even if the net flux is toward decarboxylation [134], which should be accounted for in all tracer experiments.
The disequilibrium ratio of 2OG to isocitrate depends on reactions that consume or produce these compounds and the NADP+/NADPH redox ratio. Critically, whether mitochondrial or cytoplasmic, aconitase equilibrates isocitrate with citrate, and then ATP-dependent citrate lyase converts the citrate to AcCoA and OAA, driven by the hydrolysis of ATP. Subsequent consumption of AcCoA to make FA is further driven by NADPH oxidation and ATP hydrolysis (Figure 3); overall, this can be a highly favorable process, but the fluxes depend on the actual enzyme activities and the various metabolite concentration ratios, which depend heavily on the growth conditions. Nevertheless, hypoxia and/or defective mitochondria seem to be favored in cultured cancer cells, where de novo FA synthesis under normoxia is typically low [88,110,116] and may compete with exogenous FA uptake [95,97,172], especially in vivo [173,174].
Interestingly, the reaction catalyzed by malic enzyme has an equilibrium constant of ≈30 M−1 for [malate][NADP+]/[pyruvate][NADPH][CO2] [175], indicating a reversible reaction that will be associated with a significant exchange flux. The net flux is likely to be poised [175], as well as being linked to CO2 hydration and thus carbonic hydratase activity, which should be taken into consideration in tracer experiments [168].
2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) (Figure 3) is a naturally occurring metabolite that occurs in both enantiomeric forms, normally from the reaction catalyzed by D and L-2OG dehydrogenases [176,177,178], which if absent or inactive cause 2HG acidurias [179]. 2HG is normally present at low levels but may increase enormously when there are specific mutations in the genes encoding IDH1 or IDH2, and which are associated with several cancers including gliomas [167,180], leukemias [181,182], and renal cell carcinomas [183]. 2HG is a potent inhibitor of 2OG-dependent dioxygenases [184,185], and therefore may have a range of downstream biochemical effects [184]. The variant IDH enzymes use NADPH to reduce 2OG to 2HG, typically producing the D enantiomer [3,186] and potentially skewing the NADP+:NADPH ratio [187]. Other enzymes including MDH, LDH, and PHGDH may produce alternative enantiomers [185,188]. As the two enantiomers may have different biological effects, the determination of the enantiomeric purity can become important. As neither MS nor NMR can directly discriminate enantiomers, it is necessary either to use a chiral column or to convert the enantiomers to distinguishable diastereomers using a chiral derivatizing agent [3,188,189], or via a chiral shift reagent [190]. There are other metabolites that exist biologically as enantiomeric pairs, which are almost always analyzed in total. Although protein amino acids are almost always the L form, D amino acids are produced naturally and have quite different biological effects to the L form [185]. Mammalian cells produce almost exclusively L-lactate, though some D-lactate may be produced by the methylglyoxal pathway especially under conditions of high glycolytic flux [191], but some bacteria produce the D enantiomer [192]. As a 2-hydroxy carboxylic acid, D- and L-lactate can also be discriminated by the same chiral derivatization of 2HG [3].

2.4.2. Dinucleotide Metabolism

NAD(P)+ and their reduced forms are critical to central redox metabolism, and the total amount of these dinucleotides is strongly regulated. Dividing cells and cells that have active ADP ribosylation must maintain their overall NAD+ levels. NAD+ synthesis uses either the de novo pathway or salvage pathways [193]. The latter can only maintain levels, whereas in proliferating cells, net NAD+ synthesis is required. NAD+ is synthesized from ATP and nicotinamide riboside. De novo synthesis of ATP utilizes the PPP and purine pathways as described in Section 2.5.2. Nicotinamide riboside is synthesized from nicotinamide and PRPP (from the pentose phosphate pathway) by the agency of Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) or in the de novo kynurenine pathway from tryptophan from quinolinate via quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase (QPRT) [194]. The nicotinamide derives either from exogenous sources (niacin, or vitamin B3), from NAD+ turnover via ADP ribosylation, or from de novo synthesis from tryptophan via the kynurenine pathway [194,195]. Nicotinamide itself can also be methylated to 1Me-Nicotinamide, which may be either retained by the cell and impact SAM levels and thence 1-carbon metabolism [196,197,198] or excreted as an immune suppressive product [199,200]. The kynurenine pathway is particularly expressed in the liver, which can supply systemic nicotinamide under conditions of vitamin B3 deficiency [91]. However, other tissues also express the enzymes, as well as, notably, in some cancers [90], where one of the early products, kynurenine, is an immune suppressor in the TME [201].
Tryptophan metabolism through the kynurenine pathway can be traced in individual cells or in animal models using stable isotope tracing. Fan et al. [90] used 15N2 tryptophan to determine the pathway in human macrophages, and Liu et al. [91] used 2H4 NAM or [U-13C] tryptophan to follow the uptake and metabolism of these precursors into NAD in breast cancer cells and mice. As expected, in the cells, exogenous NAM accounts for most of the newly synthesized NAD+. In mice, [U-13C] tryptophan was converted to NAD+ primarily in the liver with some kidney labeling, but only low levels in other tissues, which showed much higher levels of 2H-labeled NAM and NAD+.

2.5. Macromolecule Metabolism

Macromolecules are anabolites synthesized from small metabolite subunits with the expenditure of metabolic energy. Proteins comprise the most abundant class of macromolecules in cells. For an average protein concentration of 20%, w/volume, the concentration of peptides is 1.8–2 M, or ca. 2–4 pmol/cell. One cell doubling therefore requires a large amount of amino acids, either taken up from the exterior or synthesized de novo, and each peptide bond uses ca. 5 ATP equivalents [202,203]. Protein synthesis is the most energy-expensive process in the cell. Further, protein degradation via the proteasome also uses ATP hydrolysis. Approximately half of the protein amino acids are essential and therefore must be transported from outside, whereas the other amino acids can be synthesized from other metabolites or may also be transported from outside the cell. Some amino acids are energetically neutral to synthesis (e.g., Ala from Pyr and Glu by transamination), whereas others also cost metabolic energy (e.g., glutamine and asparagine synthesis). Although the NMR and X-ray crystallography communities have long used metabolic incorporation of stable isotopes into proteins, this is aimed at high or defined levels of incorporation for structural and dynamic analysis of purified proteins [204,205,206,207]. To assess protein synthesis and turnover, the traditional method uses radioisotope labels, such as 35S-Methionine in pulse chase experiments, which have numerous disadvantages [208].

2.5.1. Protein Analysis

Determining protein synthesis and/or degradation requires tracers. Making links to central and amino acid metabolism needs amino acid analysis that is tracer-sensitive. Although there are many methods for protein analysis, they are often not compatible with isotope enrichment.
The traditional method of protein hydrolysis using 6 N HCl is time-consuming and destroys several amino acids (e.g., tryptophan, methionine) or converts them to other amino acids (Gln -> Glu, Asn -> Asp) [209], resulting in loss of information. Although a cocktail of proteases can also hydrolyze proteins under mild conditions [210], this is slow and may contaminate the sample with unlabeled amino acids. Alternatively, rapid acid hydrolysis using focused microwaves achieves complete conversion in only 10 min, with retention of the labile amino acids [21,211]. The subsequently derivatized amino acids with ethyl chloroformate could be analyzed completely by direct-infusion ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry on cell and tissue samples simultaneously treated with multiple tracers [21]. Under these conditions, only non-essential amino acids are labeled in mammals, though with careful choice of the labeling scheme, it is possible to discriminate between de novo synthesis versus uptake of exogenous amino acids that are incorporated into proteins. For essential amino acids, of course, these can be provided as 13C- or 15N- or 2H-enriched compounds, and then their uptake and incorporation into protein can be measured [92,212]. The protein pool may be a major sink of exogenous glucose where non-essential amino acid production is significant.

2.5.2. Nucleic Acid Analysis

Analogous to protein synthesis, nucleic acid synthesis can be determined by tracing the pathway from de novo nucleotide synthesis into the end products RNA and DNA. The nucleotide pathways are conveniently probed using a combination of 13C and 15N sources, predominantly glucose and glutamine. Glucose via G6P or F6P usually provides the carbon for the ribose subunit via the PPP, leading to PRPP (Figure 4).
Nucleobase synthesis then flows through two separate pathways: purines via the pathway that builds directly onto PRPP using glycine, bicarbonate, methylene tetrahydrofolate (carbon), and Gln and Asp (nitrogen), and pyrimidines via the pyrimidine pathway using bicarbonate and aspartate, followed by condensation of Uracil with PRPP [213]. These pathways can be determined by NMR and mass spectrometry and, with appropriate use of different tracers, distinguish which sources contribute most [19,111,214]. Determining the incorporation of labeled nucleotides into polymeric nucleic acids can be achieved by digestion to mononucleotides, followed by NMR or MS analysis [111].
These procedures can help determine the relative importance of de novo synthesis versus salvage pathways. When provided with high levels of glucose in standard media, cells in culture usually turn over the nucleotide pool using primarily exogenous glucose for ribose production via the PPP [98,215]. Under the same conditions, exogenous Gln generally provides more carbon than glucose to pyrimidine biosynthesis [111], and the total carbon labels for the pyrimidine rings and ribose are comparable [111]. In contrast, although de novo purine nucleotide synthesis is substantial in rapidly dividing cancer cells in culture, the amount of glucose-derived carbon found in the purine rings is considerably lower than either the Gln-derived nitrogen or the glucose-derived carbon in the ribose rings [19,65,110,216]. This suggests that, at least in these cases, exogenous serine and/or glycine (and thence the 1-carbon pools) effectively competes for glucose-derived Ser/Gly carbon [19], and the salvage pathways via recovery of bases from nucleotide catabolism contribute relatively little, unlike other tissues [217]. In other systems, however, the salvage pathways may dominate [213,216,217,218]. Only multiple labeling approaches can really assess the sources of C and N for the de novo pathways versus the salvage pathways.

2.5.3. Glycogen Turnover

Glycogen is primarily a polymer of glucose, though some other sugars such as glucosamine can be found in certain circumstances [219]. Glycogen may act as a storage reservoir of glucose and is typically abundant in the liver, skeletal muscle, kidneys, and brain [6,219,220,221,222], but is also found in other organs including tumors [223,224]. It can be analyzed by digestion to glucose, either enzymatically [219] or by acid hydrolysis with focused microwaves, or intact by NMR [224].
Glycogen is synthesized by successive addition of activated glucose (via UDP-glucose), mainly in α-1,4 linkages, with occasional (ca. 10 residues) α-1,6 linkages, giving the highly branched and relatively compact structure of glycogen. The activation of glucose for synthesis is a net consumer of metabolic energy (UDP is converted to UTP by phosphorylation with ATP). Glycogen is successively broken down by phosphorolysis, i.e., using inorganic phosphate to produce Glucose-1-phosphate (catalyzed by one of the tissue-specific glycogen phosphorylase isoenzymes). This product can then enter glycolysis after isomerization to G6P (Figure 4). As glycogen-derived G6P does not consume an ATP (unlike the hexokinase reaction), the net ATP yield of glycogenolysis plus glycolysis is three ATP/glucose [225]; the glycogen storage prepays one of the ATP-consuming steps. Clearly, the metabolism of glycogen can be very important in the energy homeostasis of cells under different conditions.
As the net synthesis of glycogen utilizes UDP-glucose, the supporting pathway includes the conversion of glucose or glucose-phosphate to G1P and thence to UDP-glucose. G6P is thus a critical hub for glycogen synthesis and degradation, as well as glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway. All of the relevant intermediates can be measured in detail using 13C tracers such as [U-13C]-glucose or 13C5 Gln as all of the intermediates can be quantified by MS + NMR, as well as the pyrimidine synthesis pathway [224].
Much of metabolism and metabolomics is concerned with measuring or tracing “small” molecules, operationally defined at Mr < 1000–1500. As discussed here, quantitatively, it is the anabolites that account for most CHONPS supplied to the cells or tissue. Yet tracer balances are rarely if ever recorded, unlike the older classical radiotracer studies [226], as stable isotope incorporation into macromolecules is challenging. Even estimates of glucose conversion to lactate can be difficult to reconcile with proliferation [108]. However, tracer atoms entering different components of these major sinks can be very informative about the overall nutrient utilization for cell proliferation, for example.

3. Complex Metabolic Models

3.1. Two-Dimensional Cultures

Although two-dimensional (2D) cell culture has many advantages in terms of experimental control of conditions and the ability to manipulate gene and protein expression in the entire population, even if realistic growth media and oxygenation levels are used, the cells are not homogeneous, and their morphologies are usually quite different from that in the tissue of origin. It is well known that transcriptional profiles, and, perhaps even more so, metabolic activity, is very sensitive to these conditions [106,227], such that cells grown in 2D culture do not closely resemble the behavior in more complex systems [19,86,228]. Notably, 2D cultures rather poorly predict responses to drugs, for example [43,229,230,231]. Nevertheless, these models are still widely used as they have the most options for experimental control of conditions, genetic manipulations, and comparative simplicity for modeling purposes. For these reasons, 2D cell cultures are widely used for SIRM studies [17,21,101,187,232].
Although genetic manipulations by CRISPR/Cas9 [233,234], siRNA, shRNA [235,236], and antisense oligonucleotides [237,238,239] are fully compatible with 2D cultures, more complex systems are less amenable to these kinds of manipulations.

3.2. Three-Dimensional Spheroids/Organoid Cultures

Given the many limitations of 2D cell cultures, increasing effort is being placed in 3D cultures and organoids [240,241], which have been available for many years [231,240,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250].
There are numerous ways to promote 3D culture formation with various supporting matrices [44,244,247], induced aggregation by magnetic fields after uptake of magnetic nanocrystals [250], in hanging drops [250], or growth on very-low-retention surface wells [248,251]. Matrigel and similar support matrices have several disadvantages for metabolic studies, not least the variable composition of Matrigel and difficulty in digestion to release the spheroids rapidly [44]. Magnetic particles are optically opaque, so the spheroids cannot be monitored or stained for microscopy/IF [245]. Interestingly, at least some human cancer cells produce their own ECM when cultured as spheroids [228], which is presumably more relevant than the variable ECM extracted from mouse sarcoma [252].
As the spheroids are relatively small, and can be easily grown in standard plates, there is complete control over the medium composition including the addition of inhibitors and tracers, as for 2D culture. Depending on the cell type, it may be possible to create spheroids from multiple cell types, further mimicking the natural environment [253], which, in tissues, comprises multiple cell types (see below). In addition, to discriminate between the effects of direct cell–cell interactions and those via diffusible compounds released from one cell type, the co-culture can be compared with a culture in which two cell types are separated by a membrane that allows free diffusion of small molecules but not exchange of cells. As with 2D cell culture, subsampling of the medium is possible to determine uptake rates of particular nutrients and excretion of metabolites by analyzing the media at timed intervals.
For cells that can divide (i.e., have not reached the Hayflick limit or become senescent [254]), genetic manipulation of the cells can be readily carried out in the 2D state, which are selected and induced to form spheroids, which of course may differ morphologically from the parent cell and/or have altered metabolic requirements.
In order to induce stable spheroid culture, it is normal to use media that promote stemness, which include various growth factors and sometimes very high concentrations of compounds such as nicotinamide [255]. In this sense, the control over the medium is not as free as for 2D cell culture, and has to considered in the design phase.
Seahorse analysis on spheroids grown from colorectal or pancreatic cancer cell lines in the absence of matrices behaved quite differently from the 2D cultures, associated with changes in the balance between lactic fermentation and coupled mitochondrial respiration, correlating with altered expression of the monocarboxylate transporter and the mitochondrial protein translocase TOMM20 [256].
Sato et al. [257] used metabolomics to study spheroids formed from OVTOKO (ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma) and SiHa (cervical squamous cell carcinoma) cell lines, in comparison with the profiles obtained in 2D culture. PCA analysis showed separation between 2D and 3D cell cultures and especially increased levels of Ser and Gln, as well as adenylates.
Similarly, our group compared 2D and 3D cultures of A549 (NSCLC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PANC1) cells using magnetic beads, with SIRM analysis with [U-13C]-glucose [245]. Although the extent of 13C incorporation into metabolites of glycolysis, the Krebs cycle, the pentose phosphate pathway, and purine/pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis was largely comparable between 2D and 3D culture systems for both cell lines, the 3D cultures showed reduced capacity for de novo synthesis of pyrimidine and sugar nucleotides. More strikingly, selenite induced much less perturbation of these pathways in the spheroids relative to the 2D counterparts in both cell lines, which is consistent with the corresponding lesser effects on morphology and growth, and shows an impact of culture on response to toxic agents. SIRM analysis of mixed cell spheroids (co-cultures) also show metabolic differences compared with the pure cell versions or 2D cultures, which has implications for immune responses in terms of the tumor microenvironment [44]. To date, there have been few studies of drug response analyses in spheroids using tracer-based metabolic readouts.

3.3. Organotypic Cultures

The next level of complexity above organoid cultures is tissue slices. Thin sections of tissue can be incubated in controlled media, enabling the influence of nutrient supply or inhibitors to be determined using tracers as for 3D culture [228,258]. The tissues can be freshly resected from patients or from cryopreserved tissues and incubated for long periods (e.g., one month, depending on the organ of origin) [259]. The advantage of these organotypic cultures is that they represent individual subjects, the cells have not been cultured over several generations under unphysiological conditions (which changes the expression profile [260,261,262]), and they retain all of the original cell types and tissue architecture, without being connected to the circulatory system as in vivo studies (see below) [44,263]. As such, they recapitulate the biochemistry and response to drugs more accurately than other models [55,264]. Further, compared with mouse xenografts, this model often has non-cancerous tissue from the same organ available that can be used as a matched control. In the mouse xenograft model, the control tissue is of mouse origin, not human, and is thus not paired.
Warburg [133] first demonstrated accelerated lactic fermentation in the presence of oxygen using thin tumor tissue slices placed on moist filter paper. He showed that the slice thickness needed to be ca. 0.5 mm to avoid significant diffusion limitation [133]. Most tissues are not exposed to air on one side. Two-sided diffusion is commensurate with minimizing diffusion barriers even at 0.7 mm, provided that the tissue is bathed in a medium that also moves with respect to the tissue, which also dilutes waste products [264]. Much thinner slices can be very fragile, and the relative proportion of damaged to undamaged cells increases as slice thickness is decreased.
Keeping track of the slices within a tumor actually provides limited spatial resolution through the tissue (i.e., in one dimension) as each slice can be independently analyzed. Thin tissue slices are also commensurate with (immune)histochemical staining and microscopy (Figure 5), as well as transcriptomic analyses either at regional levels [44] or at essentially single-cell resolution [265,266]. As the tissue slices retain all of the original cell types, metabolic readout of the entire slice represents an average, such that contributions from different cell types or the impact of interactions between cells can be difficult to disentangle. Spatially resolved transcriptomics and protein analyses can help deconvolute this layer of complexity [265,266]. In addition, the metabolic phenotypes of individual cells derived from the tissue, and knowledge of cell-specific metabolism, can also be used to assess cell-dependent metabolic phenotypes and response to drugs or altered conditions [44,98].
Although generally less efficient than in 2D cell cultures, methods for manipulating gene expression by selective uptake of siRNA or shRNAs [267] are being developed which can complement studies on small-molecule inhibitors. Using Accell RNA, Ruigrok et al. [268] reported successful transfection of 250–350 μm thick mouse lung and kidney tissue slices [268]. Further, mRNA delivery using mRNA-based antiviral approaches [269] might be developed to produce any protein of interest in target cells.
Such organotypic tissue cultures have been used for metabolic studies and assessing the tissue microenvironment and heterogeneity in several systems, including lung cancers [90,98], liver, kidney [268,270,271], brain [272], breast [259], and prostate cancer [273].

3.4. Organ Cultures

Perfused organ cultures such as the Langendorrf perfused heart [274,275,276], kidney [277], liver [278,279,280], everted intestine [281], and skeletal muscle [282] have long been used in physiological studies. These models have the advantage of representing the entire organ in its full functional complexity while being able to control the supply of labeled nutrients and the removal of waste products. Generally, the biochemistry of the cells is better maintained in these systems (for example, hepatocytes are notoriously difficult to culture [232,283]). Usually, such studies are carried out with organs excised from experimental animal models.
Organ cultures are amenable to MRI/MRS (see below), which gives an organ-level overview of energy metabolism when using 31P NMR and central metabolism when using 13C-enriched substrates. However, it is difficult to separate out the metabolic contributions from different cell types and, generally, after completion of the physiological experiments, the tissue can be extracted and subjected to high-resolution NMR and mass spectrometry to analyze otherwise poorly resolved or invisible metabolites due to immobilization or low abundance. The circulating medium can also be temporally subsampled to assess nutrient uptake and waste product release as for cell culture (see above), allowing a direct connection to the relevant physiological state(s).

3.5. Animal Models

In vivo studies in animal models have the advantage of a live organism, with all the disadvantages of the mixed cell and tissue types, plus the added complexity of intertissue communication via the humoral system, which can complicate metabolic analysis.
Tracer administration is usually systemic, which means that the isotopically enriched precursor reaches every tissue in the organism, which each have different uptake and metabolic rates. The different cells and tissues will then produce variable sets of labeled metabolites, some of which are released into the blood [284] and can be absorbed by distant organs. It is thus important to measure the isotopologue distributions in multiple organs and the blood to assess origins and exchange processes [285]. This becomes increasingly severe the longer the duration of labeling and can make achievement of an isotopic steady state difficult [91,286].
Tracer administration is an additional consideration, as there are numerous ethical and biological constraints that must be addressed. The main routes of isotopically enriched precursors are oral, either by oral gavage [95] or inclusion in water or feed [286]; by bolus injection directly into a vein [42,284] or intraperitoneally [38]; via continuous infusion into a vein [84]; or through implantation of an osmotic pump [285,287]. With the exception of ad libitum diet, all of these methods require animal handling with restraints or surgery and possibly with anesthesia, which impact metabolic rates either directly or indirectly.
Bolus injection via a vein introduces the desired tracer that is distributed systemically very rapidly [284] and thence to tissues, which have their own characteristic uptake and metabolic rates. The time course of humoral distribution and overall metabolism can be easily assessed by sampling blood and measuring the amount of labeled precursor present, as well as how much has been converted to metabolites that are excreted back into the blood. For example, using [U-13C]-glucose, we found that the optimal time to harvest organs was about 15 min post injection, when the lactate enrichment was at a maximum. In practice, we used three injections spaced at 15 min intervals to increase the degree of labeling of central metabolites. However, with a bolus injection, many of the more slowly turning-over pools (nucleotides, fats, proteins) were not highly labeled. By injecting glucose into the blood, much of it is actually metabolized to lactate by the red cells, which accounts for >40% of the blood volume. Furthermore, with a bolus injection, an isotopic steady state cannot be achieved, making modeling more involved.
Oral gavage is an alternative when absorption through the gut is desired and may lead to labeling of the gut microbiome [288]. Gavage can be stressful to the animal, and as it is also a bolus method, the time course of isotope distribution is complex and does not reach an isotopic steady state. Nevertheless, high levels of enrichment can be obtained in certain organs such as brain and liver [289].
For much longer labeling periods (e.g., >6 h), dietary administration of enriched precursors may be more appropriate. Ad libitum feeding has the advantage of no added stress to the animal or requires anesthesia, but is complicated by animal feeding behavior and shows a complicated time dependence. A liquid diet that is formulated for either glucose or Gln tracer administration is a convenient way to label slowly turning-over metabolite pools in rodents. The commercially available diets are adjusted to maintain the original levels of carbohydrate and nitrogen. For mice, which eat mainly nocturnally, 18 h of feeding during the dark cycle is sufficient to observe label incorporation into slowly changing macromolecular metabolic pools including RNA, complex lipids, and proteins [286].
Implanted osmotic pumps are widely used for drug delivery in animal models [287] and offer an additional means for continuous infusion that can supply labeled precursors at a defined rate over an extended time period (e.g., 24 h), and after recovery from surgery, they do not rely on ad libitum feeding [285]. In an early application, Xu et al. [285] used a subcutaneous minipump to infuse fasted mice with 13C6-glucose, 13C3 lactate, or 13C-2 lactate over 24 h. Isotopologue distribution analysis of blood plasma enabled hepatic glucose production (HGP) and glucose carbon recycling lactate and glycerol turnover at the whole organism level, using a physiological organ model. Very-long-term constant infusion may not mimic natural physiology, and implantation, depending on the site, may introduce adverse effects if a major organ is also catheterized [290].
As animals need constant access to water, labeling precursors can be incorporated into their water supply [291], including deuterated water. This route has been widely used for administering drugs and heavy water [292] as well as in humans as the glucose tolerance test and 13C imaging spectroscopy [293]. Although animal studies can be complex, the experimental design should seek to maximize information retrieval relevant to the questions being posed, rather than for the convenience of the researchers.

3.6. Human Subjects

Major differences between small animal models and human subjects are size, additional ethical and legal regulations [294], and far greater intrinsic variance due to both genetic and environmental considerations. The size difference (20 g mouse versus 70+ kg human) means a very different metabolic rate (approx. seven-fold) that needs to be accounted for, as well as the quantity of labeled precursors that is needed to achieve a measurable amount of labeling. The routes and methods of administration, however, are the same as for other mammals, with similar considerations for experimental design in the context of the question(s) to be answered [55,295].
For example, bolus injection of 13C6 glucose into human subjects requires around 10 g of pure, sterile glucose, with blood sampling and tissue collection within 2–3 h of injection. This approach showed the activity of pyruvate carboxylase, which was overexpressed in NSCLC tissue [34,37], which also indicated that PFK1 activity was not rate-limiting for glycolysis in the tumors. Hensley et al. [62] demonstrated the metabolic heterogeneity in NSCLC by continuous infusion of 3C6 glucose, and that lactate can act as a nutrient in some regions of the mass. These studies also demonstrated that accelerated lactic fermentation was present in the tumors compared to the adjacent matched non-cancerous lung tissue (an example of the Warburg effect in situ). Similarly, 13C6 glucose infusion into very young children bearing neuroblastomas showed substantial tumor mitochondrial activity of both PDH and PC, as well as high lactate labeling and production of catecholamines [41].
Brain metabolism has been extensively studied using glucose infusion by 13C MRS, which showed activity of the Krebs cycle, and by modeling the interaction between neurons and glia (Gln cycle) [67,296].
Heavy water infusions have been used to characterize protein turnover [297] that required daily does over a 2-week period and frequently for lipid metabolism in human subjects [298,299,300].
These studies further demonstrate the overall safety of stable isotope administration, as well as the ability to map specific metabolic activities in target tissues.

4. Spatially Resolved Metabolism and Models

Spatial resolution can be at the organ level, sub-organ tissue level, single-cell level, or, ultimately, at the subcellular level [15,44,301,302,303,304,305,306]. The biological question at hand largely determines the spatial resolution needed, though technological issues will always limit what is possible. Spatially resolved analyses can be achieved by dissection, for example, intact organs even down to small groups of cells (cf. laser microdissection [307]); see above. More generally, however, spatially resolved studies involve imaging.

4.1. Amount versus Volume. Sensitivity: Imaging In Situ versus Dissociation

As the spatial resolution increases, the target size decreases quadratically for thin tissue slices or decreases cubically in volume. This means that the sensitivity of the detection may become limiting at very high resolution. The tradeoffs are therefore among target size (volume), concentration of analytes, acquisition time, and depth of metabolic coverage. Point-by-point rastering is the slowest modality, and imaging time is determined by the number of points sampled and the dwell time at each pixel. High resolution with adequate sampling over a wide field can therefore be very time-consuming (hours per sample).
Human cells range in volume from <0.5 pL to 1–2 pL (epithelial cells) to 5 pL (liver cells). A diploid nucleus occupies ca. 20–25% of the total volume [308], and mitochondria may occupy 10–30% of the total volume depending on the cell type and state [309], so that the cytoplasmic volume may be of the order 50% of the total volume.
Table 2 shows the amounts of metabolite present at different concentrations, for a sampling of a large group of cells (109) down to individual cells. For a large number of cells, even low-abundance metabolites present at nM concentrations would be detectable and quantifiable by mass spectrometry, whereas at the single-cell level, even a 10 μM concentration becomes challenging (amole range), especially with complex biological samples where background chemical noise will contribute significantly to the overall signal. For subcellular probing, the challenge is even greater. This ultimately limits the metabolic coverage attainable with even the most sensitive detection system.
There are important metabolites present at high concentrations (>100 μM) in cells, including ATP, NAD+, GSH, most amino acids, and some organic acids, but many are present at much lower steady-state concentrations, and signaling molecules are typically sub nM.

4.2. Intracellular versus Extracellular Pools

The extracellular space is filled with a wide variety of macromolecules and small metabolites that form a complex microenvironment called the extracellular matrix (ECM). This space also contains the underlying solution that is isotonic with cells and is fundamentally similar to plasma. A wide range of metabolites are present in this interstitial fluid [145,310], which cells may exploit as a source of nutrients via various mechanisms [145,146,152,153,172,311,312]. With point-by-point imaging techniques, the spot size may include extracellular as well as intracellular metabolites, thus smearing the true biochemical and spatial resolution. Nevertheless, spatial resolution even at the meso scale is very important for tissue analysis, owing to the high degrees of cellular and structural heterogeneity, especially under pathological conditions. Figure 5 shows a stained section of slices of NSCLC and non-cancerous lung that shows the extreme variation in positional distribution of different cell types, which likely interact both via direct contact and via diffusible metabolites.

4.3. Metabolic Imaging by MRI/MRS

NMR in MRI/MRS has long been used for anatomical and metabolic imaging [76,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320], which, because of the low energies involved, are compatible with live organism studies utilizing stable isotope tracers such as 13C, 2H, and 31P (which is 100% naturally abundant). With modern imaging spectrometers, large-scale (wide-field) anatomical imaging is possible relatively quickly as the image is generated as a planar slice [321], multiple slices can be recorded simultaneously with an array of detector coils (parallel imaging) [322], and the depth of field is commensurate with whole-body imaging and spectroscopy.
The spatial resolution of MRS is typically low (at best several mm3) owing to the low intrinsic sensitivity of NMR (rule of thumb requires 1 nmol for high-resolution spectroscopy and considerably more for imaging-based spectroscopy). Again related to the intrinsic sensitivity of NMR detection, coupled with moderate spectral resolution, the metabolite coverage is relatively low in MRS, limited to a few (key) abundant metabolites [76,320,323]. Nevertheless, using a variety of stable isotope-based studies of patients and organisms has provided gold-standard information about metabolism in live tissue in situ in the brain [67,75,77,84,324,325] and liver [326], among others [327]. More recent developments in dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) have greatly increased the sensitivity at the cost of low metabolic coverage, and short half-life of the hyperpolarized spins [78,79,80,81,328,329]. However, as the measurements are made in vivo, critical dynamic information can be obtained about central metabolic pathways related to pathologies [80,329,330]. Advances in detection efficiency, such as indirect detection of 13C by the attached proton [331,332], and advanced data reduction techniques [320] should permit large gains in sensitivity in SIRM studies in vivo that benefit from signal averaging and much longer acquisition periods than is possible with DNP, at the cost of decreased temporal resolution.

4.4. Confocal Microscopy

The spatial resolution of confocal fluorescence microscopy can be very high (<1 μm), with typically low metabolic coverage owing to the poor spectral resolution of fluorescence and the need for specific probes which can be complicated by uptake kinetics in tissues. However, optical methods also have low penetration depth, so are usually limited to thin sections. With optical tissue clearing, greater depth can be achieved, albeit only in vitro [333]. The imaging time using point-by-point microscopy can be lengthy, so very good environmental control is needed for live tissue imaging. The imaging times can be reduced using spinning disk confocal microscopy (essentially linear detection) or maximally using light sheet microscopy with CCD camera detection (planar imaging) [334,335].
In general, the metabolic coverage by fluorescence confocal imaging is limited to a few intrinsically fluorescent species (e.g., flavins, NAD(P)H, fluorescent sensors such as TMRE [336,337]) or to fluorescently tagged precursors such as NBDG glucose [336,337] and BODIPY-labeled fatty acids [338]. An increasing number of fluorescence-labeled metabolites are becoming available, which should substantially enhance the metabolic coverage of optical microscopy [339,340,341].
Redox ratios can be monitored at subcellular resolution using fluorescent sensors, which have to be introduced into cells [342]. As the proteins can be tagged, they can be made to localize to different compartments [343], showing different redox ratios in the cytoplasm versus the mitochondria in live cells, for example [344]. The biosensors probe the free (i.e., unbound) metabolites, and if both oxidized and reduced forms of NAD(P):NAD(P)H can be measured, the true redox ratio can be determined, in principle in real time and compartmentally localized. For example, although the total dinucleotide concentration is of the order 0.5 mM in mammalian cells, the concentrations and redox ratios differ significantly different between the cytoplasm and the mitochondria. Further, the free concentrations are much lower than the total amounts, owing to binding to the large number of dehydrogenases present [15]. This also leads to NAD+/NADH and NADPH/NADP+ ratios quite different from the ratios of the total concentrations. The cytoplasmic ratio of free NAD+ to NADH is 500–1500 [155,344] compared with <10 in mitochondria [345]. In contrast, the free NADPH/NADP+ ratios are in the range of 20–80 (cytoplasm) and ca. two-fold higher in mitochondria [343].
The advantage of optical confocal microscopy is the excellent spatial resolution and compatibility with live cell analysis, but its low metabolic coverage and insensitivity to isotopic substitution is a significant limitation. In principle, confocal vibrational spectroscopy can combine the spatial resolution advantages of optical methods, with much greater chemical diversity, as well as being sensitive to isotopic substitution. Replacing C-H with C-D causes a large change in vibrational frequency [346], and 13C/15N substitutions also give rise to detectable isotope shifts [347] and could be used to follow biochemical transformations, including NAD(P)H changes. Both Raman spectroscopy and infrared (e.g., via photothermal excitation) have been used to determine a wide range of metabolites in cells and thin tissue sections at subcellular resolution [346,347,348,349,350].

4.5. Single-Cell Analysis by MS

The high intrinsic sensitivity of mass spectrometry makes detection of sub fmol levels of metabolites possible, and therefore enables metabolomics of common relatively abundant metabolites in individual cells [15,306,351,352,353] or even organelles within cells [306]. While tissue dissociation into individual cells loses the biologically important spatial information, this can be retained by ablating individual cells using MALDI-based mass spectrometry imaging [354,355,356] or DESI-MS [357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364], or groups of cells isolated by laser capture microdissection coupled to MS detection [362,363].
Abundant metabolites can be mapped, including lipids [362,364,365], glycogen [366], and glycosylation of proteins [219,367]. Most of these studies have been at the level of groups of cells and steady-state levels, limited by spot/beam size, matrix, and sensitivity [365,366,367,368] (see above). MALDI requires adding a matrix to the tissue surface, which introduces unwanted ions and may interfere with biochemistry. As thin slices are needed, imaging time to obtain depth can be very long, even at modest x-y spatial resolution. DESI does not require a matrix or a vacuum as it uses a stream of charged molecules for desorption [368,369,370,371]. Typically, MALDI spot sizes are around 30–50 μm, though smaller sizes have been reported. Similarly, DESI may work at an effective resolution of 50 μm, though newer developments are increasing resolution to the 10–20 μm level, which is essentially the single-cell level. A variant of DESI-MS called AFADESI (air-flow-assisted desorption electrospray ionization) showed good coverage in brain chemistry [357]. Nano-DESI is a development that improves the sampling from tissues using continuous flow, which can be interfaced to a variety of separation modes prior to MS with resolutions down to 12 um [372,373]. Applications of MALDI and DESI-based imaging to several cancers has been reviewed, showing the use of a small number of assigned ions to discriminate between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue [357].
Carson et al. [374] used DESI-MS to map lipid turnover in a mouse brain following feeding 8% deuterated water over a period up to 40 d, at a (pixel) resolution of 75 × 150 μm, by which time the deuteration had still not reached a steady state (but was well represented with simple kinetic curves), showing that certain large pools of metabolites very slowly turn over compared to intermediates of central metabolism. The time-dependent maps showed distinct differences in specific lipid distributions in various parts of the brain. More recently, 13C labeling has been incorporated to provide information about intracellular metabolites at the tissue level [304,358]. SIRM approaches have been applied to brain tissue slices with detailed spatial resolution showing increased glucose metabolism via glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway [375]. Hu et al. proposed an algorithm for single-cell spatial resolution in tissues with protein markers of the cells to enhance cell metabolite assignment [376].
MALDI and DESI MS imaging have been combined with 13C glucose labeling of gliomas in mice, using a liquid diet [286] to administer the tracer over 24 h. Thin tissue slices of the brain were imaged at a resolution of 50 μm, and the isotopologue distributions in several abundant metabolites of central metabolism were determined, including estimating fatty acid synthesis rates (flux). The estimates of pool sizes from MALDI and DESI, however, were shown to be inconsistent, which indicates that caution is needed when comparing metabolite abundances across multiple images [374].
As Table 2 indicates, single cells contain sub attomole amounts of metabolites present at sub μM concentrations. Individual mitochondria have a volume of ca. 1 fL, so even at a concentration of 1 mM, the amount of a metabolite is 1 amole. At such trace levels, not only is detection by mass spectrometry difficult, even assuming essentially 100% ionization efficiency, but contamination from background species becomes increasingly problematic, and more controls of blanks have to be recorded. Tracers may help overcome contamination as only active metabolites can become labeled, provided there are no trace contaminating organisms also present.

4.6. Future Directions

Although high-resolution imaging modalities with subcellular resolution are currently possible, the metabolic coverage of optical detection is very limited, restricting studies to very well-posed metabolic questions. Such studies can be carried out in live cells or thin tissue slices, thus providing both spatial and temporal readouts of the biochemistry. However, fluorescent probes are insensitive to isotopic substitution by metabolic processes, also limiting the biochemical depth of studies. Optical methods also have penetration depth issues, and although tissue clarification goes a long way in circumventing that limitation, it probably interferes with the actual metabolic profile and may not be fully compatible with in vivo analyses. The metabolic coverage will, however, continue to increase as more probes of metabolic processes become available.
Vibrational spectroscopy imaging has a much greater metabolic coverage, at the expense of very complicated spectra which can make deconvolution problematic. Simplifications can be achieved using SERS [377] and in some cases resonance Raman enhancements [378]. Furthermore, vibrational spectroscopy is sensitive to isotopic substitution and compatible with live cell imaging. Again, however, the penetration depth is problematic for organ-level metabolic analyses. The low sensitivity of Raman, for example, also requires very long acquisition times for a modest field of view and is therefore not compatible with broad-range temporally resolved metabolism.
Mass spectrometry has by far the widest metabolic coverage and is sensitive to isotopic substitution, though for macromolecules, this can lead to such a large number of isotopologues that the spectra become uninterpretable. MS imaging also has very low depth penetration and is not generally compatible with live tissue or organs, though in principle, DESI could be compatible with live tissue. A promising development using MS, however, is intraoperative surgical analysis of tumors, using pyrolysis–MS in real time; the so-called iKnife has been shown to be able to distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue with good accuracy and thus may help guide marginal resections [379,380].
Nevertheless, the achievement of subcellular spatial resolution of a substantial number of metabolites continues to need development. The simultaneous use of stable isotope labeling exacerbates the sensitivity problem, as well as spectral overlap, as many more species are produced. Lipids, for example, may have a very large number of isotopologues that all have to be quantified to determine fractional enrichment [20]. Furthermore, the act of tissue preparation (slicing, mounting, etc.) may produce smearing artefacts by physical forces and/or by diffusion. Although diffusion is slow, small molecules may diffuse hundreds of μm in an hour in unfixed tissue without a cryostage [381].
The very large quantities of data that are generated by omics require powerful and sophisticated software, especially where different omics data streams (i.e., transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) are to be integrated. Given the increasing power of machine learning/AI tools, this would likely be a rich area for the application of such tools [369,382,383].

5. Conclusions

There are no methods that can currently meet the need to obtain deep metabolic coverage with high (subcellular) spatial resolution in live tissue or organisms. This necessitates workarounds that are geared to answering specific questions. However, the spatial (and temporal) resolution and metabolic coverage needed depend on the problem posed, and often modest (regional) spatial resolution or highly targeted metabolite determination can suffice. Further, considerable progress is being made in metabolic imaging of tissue slices ex vivo with stable isotope tracers, and as both sample handling and analytical technologies advance, more metabolic depth should be achieved at the desired spatial resolution, enabling detailed metabolic network dynamics to be extracted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.W.-M.F., A.N.L. and R.M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N.L.; writing—review and editing, T.W.-M.F., A.N.L. and R.M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Metabolism Shared Resources of P30CA177558 (to B.M. Evers), NIGMS COBRE 5P20GM121327 (to B.P. Zhou), and the Edith D. Gardner Endowed Chair funds (to T.W.-M. Fan).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Collins, S.L.; Stine, J.G.; Bisanz, J.E.; Okafor, C.D.; Patterson, A.D. Bile acids and the gut microbiota: Metabolic interactions and impacts on disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Honek, J.F. Glyoxalase biochemistry. Biomol. Concepts 2015, 6, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lin, P.H.; Crooks, D.R.; Linehan, W.M.; Fan, T.W.M.; Lane, A.N. Resolving Enantiomers of 2-Hydroxy Acids by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 12286–12291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fernandes, P.M.; Kinkead, J.; McNae, I.; Michels, P.A.; Walkinshaw, M.D. Biochemical and transcript level differences between the three human phosphofructokinases show optimisation of each isoform for specific metabolic niches. Biochem. J. 2020, 477, 4425–4441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gao, X.; Qin, S.; Wu, Y.; Chu, C.; Jiang, B.; Johnson, R.H.; Kuang, D.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Mehta, A.; et al. Nuclear PFKP promotes CXCR4-dependent infiltration by T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e143119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, R.C.; Dukhande, V.V.; Zhou, Z.; Young, L.E.A.; Emanuelle, S.; Brainson, C.F.; Gentry, M.S. Nuclear Glycogenolysis Modulates Histone Acetylation in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 903–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yalcin, A.; Telang, S.; Clem, B.; Chesney, J. Regulation of glucose metabolism by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatases in cancer. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2009, 86, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chesney, J.; Clark, J.; Klarer, A.C.; Imbert-Fernandez, Y.; Lane, A.N.; Telang, S. Fructose-2,6-Bisphosphate synthesis by 6-Phosphofructo-2-Kinase/Fructose-2,6-Bisphosphatase 4 (PFKFB4) is required for the glycolytic response to hypoxia and tumor growth. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 6670–6686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yi, W.; Clark, P.M.; Mason, D.E.; Keenan, M.C.; Hill, C.; Goddard, W.A.; Peters, E.C.; Driggers, E.M.; Hsieh-Wilson, L. Phosphofructokinase 1 glycosylation regulates cell growth and metabolism. Science 2012, 337, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Lorkiewicz, P.K.; Moseley, H.N.B.; Lane, A.N. Stable Isotope Labeled Tracers for Metabolic Pathway Elucidation by GC-MS and FT-MS. In Mass Spectrometry Methods in Metabolomics; Raftery, D., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 1198, pp. 147–167. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bruntz, R.C.; Higashi, R.M.; Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M. Exploring Cancer Metabolism using Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics (SIRM). J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 11601–11609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fan, T.W.-M.; Lane, A.N. Applications of NMR to Systems Biochemistry. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 2016, 92, 18–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lin, P.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Lane, A.N. NMR-based isotope editing, chemoselection and isotopomer distribution analysis in stable isotope resolved metabolomics. Methods 2022, 206, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, G.-F.; Sadhukhan, S.; Tochtrop, G.P.; Brunengraber, H. Metabolomics, Pathway Regulation, and Pathway Discovery. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 23631–23635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ali, A.; Davidson, S.; Fraenkel, E.; Gilmore, I.; Hankemeier, T.; Kirwan, J.A.; Lane, A.N.; Lanekoff, I.; Larion, M.; McCall, L.I.; et al. Single cell metabolism: Current and future trends. Metabolomics 2022, 18, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Matthäus, C.; Krafft, C.; Dietzek, B.; Brehm, B.R.; Lorkowski, S.; Popp, J. Noninvasive Imaging of Intracellular Lipid Metabolism in Macrophages by Raman Microscopy in Combination with Stable Isotopic Labeling. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 8549–8556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, Q.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M. Ion Chromatography-Ultra High-resolution MS1/MS2 Method for Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics (SIRM) Reconstruction of Metabolic Networks. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 2749–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sun, Q.; Fan, T.W.M.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M. Applications of chromatography-ultra high-resolution MS for stable isotope-resolved metabolomics (SIRM) reconstruction of metabolic networks. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 123, 115676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fan, T.W.M.; Bruntz, R.C.; Yang, Y.; Song, H.; Chernyavskaya, Y.; Deng, P.; Zhang, Y.; Shah, P.P.; Beverly, L.J.; Qi, Z.; et al. De novo synthesis of serine and glycine fuels purine nucleotide biosynthesis in human lung cancer tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 13464–13477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Xie, X.; Moseley, H.N.; Higashi, R.M. Stable isotope analysis of lipid biosynthesis by high resolution mass spectrometry and NMR. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 651, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yang, Y.; Fan, W.W.-M.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M. Chloroformate Derivatization for Tracing the Fate of Amino Acids in Cells by Multiple Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics (mSIRM). Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 976, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Carreer, W.J.; Flight, R.M.; Moseley, H.N. A Computational Framework for High-Throughput Isotopic Natural Abundance Correction of Omics-Level Ultra-High Resolution FT-MS Datasets. Metabolites 2013, 3, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, L.; Kim, D.; Liu, X.; Myers, C.R.; Locasale, J.W. Estimating Relative Changes of Metabolic Fluxes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ben Yahia, B.; Malphettes, L.; Heinzle, E. Macroscopic modeling of mammalian cell growth and metabolism. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7009–7024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, Y.; McConnell, B.O.; Gayatri Dhara, V.; Naik, H.M.; Li, C.-T.; Antoniewicz, M.R.; Betenbaugh, M.J. An unconventional uptake rate objective function approach enhances applicability of genome-scale models for mammalian cells. NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl. 2019, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Selivanov, V.A.; Marin, S.; Tarragó-Celada, J.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M.; de Ataur, P.; Cascante, M. Software Supporting a Workflow of Quantitative Dynamic Flux Maps Estimation in Central Metabolism from SIRM Experimental Data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2088, 271–298. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, X.; Su, Y.; Lane, A.N.; Stromberg, A.J.; Fan, T.W.M.; Wang, C. Bayesian kinetic modeling for tracer-based metabolomic data. BMC Bioinform. 2023, 24, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alves, T.C.; Pongratz, R.L.; Zhao, X.; Yarborough, O.; Sereda, S.; Shirihai, O.; Cline, G.W.; Mason, G.; Kibbey, R.G. Integrated, step-wise, mass-isotopomeric flux analysis of the TCA cycle. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Alger, J.R.; Sherry, A.D.; Malloy, C.R. tcaSIM: A Simulation Program for Optimal Design of 13C Tracer Experiments for Analysis of Metabolic Flux by NMR and Mass Spectroscopy. Curr. Metabolomics 2018, 6, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Buescher, J.M.; Antoniewicz, M.R.; Boros, L.G.; Burgess, S.C.; Brunengraber, H.; Clish, C.B.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Feron, O.; Frezza, C.; Ghesquiere, B.; et al. A roadmap for interpreting 13C metabolite labeling patterns from cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 34, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Murphy, T.A.; Dang, C.V.; Young, J.D. Isotopically nonstationary 13C flux analysis of Myc-induced metabolic reprogramming in B-cells. Metab. Eng. 2013, 15, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wiechert, W.; Noh, K. Isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analysis: Complex yet highly informative. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zamboni, N.; Fendt, S.-M.; Rühl, M.; Sauer, U. 13C-based metabolic flux analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 878–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sellers, K.; Fox, M.P.; Bousamra, M., 2nd; Slone, S.P.; Higashi, R.M.; Miller, D.M.; Wang, Y.; Yan, J.; Yuneva, M.O.; Deshpande, R.; et al. Pyruvate carboxylase is critical for non-small-cell lung cancer proliferation. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Faubert, B.; Li, K.Y.; Cai, L.; Hensley, C.T.; Kim, J.; Zacharias, L.G.; Yang, C.; Do, Q.N.; Doucette, S.; Burguete, D.; et al. Lactate Metabolism in Human Lung Tumors. Cell 2017, 171, 358–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Maher, E.A.; Marin-Valencia, I.; Bachoo, R.M.; Mashimo, T.; Raisanen, J.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Jindal, A.; Jeffrey, F.M.; Choi, C.H.; Madden, C.; et al. Metabolism of U-13C glucose in human brain tumors in vivo. NMR Biomed. 2012, 25, 1234–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fan, T.W.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M.; Farag, M.A.; Gao, H.; Bousamra, M.; Miller, D.M. Altered Regulation of Metabolic Pathways in Human Lung Cancer Discerned by 13C Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics (SIRM)). Mol. Cancer 2009, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, S.; Zhou, D.; Yao, Z.; Satapati, S.; Chen, Y.; Daurio, N.A.; Petrov, A.; Shen, X.; Metzger, D.; Yin, W.; et al. Quantifying rates of glucose production in vivo following an intraperitoneal tracer bolus. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 311, E911–E921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kelleher, J.K. Probing metabolic pathways with isotopic tracers: Insights from mammalian metabolic physiology. Metab. Eng. 2004, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kim, I.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Wolfe, R.R. Tracing metabolic flux in vivo: Basic model structures of tracer methodology. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022, 54, 1311–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Johnston, K.; Pachnis, P.; Tasdogan, A.; Faubert, B.; Zacharias, L.G.; Hieu Sy Vu, H.S.; Rodgers-Augustyniak, L.; AJohnson, A.; Huang, F.; Ricciardo, S.; et al. Isotope tracing reveals glycolysis and oxidative metabolism in childhood tumors of multiple histologies. Med 2021, 2, 395–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lane, A.N.; Yan, J.; Fan, T.W.-M. 13C Tracer Studies of Metabolism in Mouse Tumor Xenografts. Bio-Protocol 2015, 5, e1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M. Preclinical models for interrogating drug action in human cancers using Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics (SIRM). Metabolomics 2016, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fan, T.W.M.; Higashi, R.M.; Chernayavskaya, Y.; Lane, A.N. Resolving Metabolic Heterogeneity in Experimental Models of the Tumor Microenvironment from a Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics Perspective. Metabolites 2020, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Close, H.J.; Stead, L.F.; Nsengimana, J.; Reilly, K.A.; Droop, A.; Wurdak, H.; Mathew, R.K.; Corns, R.; Newton-Bishop, J.; Melcher, A.A.; et al. Expression profiling of single cells and patient cohorts identifies multiple immunosuppressive pathways and an altered NK cell phenotype in glioblastoma. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2019, 200, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Alfoldi, R.; Balog, J.A.; Farago, N.; Halmai, M.; Kotogany, E.; Neuperger, P.; Nagy, L.I.; Feher, L.Z.; Szebeni, G.J.; Puskas, L.G. Single Cell Mass Cytometry of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Reveals Complexity of In Vivo and Three-Dimensional Models over the Petri-Dish. Cells 2019, 8, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nguyen, Q.H.; Pervolarakis, N.; Blake, K.; Ma, D.; Davis, R.T.; James, N.; Phung, A.T.; Willey, E.; Kumar, R.; Jabart, E.; et al. Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Taylor, M.J.; Lukowski, J.K.; Anderton, C.R. Spatially Resolved Mass Spectrometry at the Single Cell: Recent Innovations in Proteomics and Metabolomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2021, 32, 872–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mund, A.; Brunner, A.-D.; Mann, M. Unbiased spatial proteomics with single-cell resolution in tissues. Molec. Cell 2022, 82, 2335–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wishart, D.S.; Guo, A.; Oler, E.; Wang, F.; Anjum, A.; Peters, H.; Dizon, R.; Sayeeda, Z.; Tian, S.; Lee, B.L.; et al. HMDB 5.0: The Human Metabolome Database for 2022. Nucl. Acids. Res 2022, 50, D622–D631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Romero, P.; Wagg, J.; Green, M.L.; Kaiser, D.; Krummenacker, M.; Karp, P.D. Computational prediction of human metabolic pathways from the complete human genome. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, R2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Karp, P.D.; Midford, P.E.; Billington, R.; Kothari, A.; Krummenacker, M.; Latendresse, M.; Ong, W.K.; Subhraveti, P.; Caspi, R.; Fulcher, C.; et al. Pathway Tools version 23.0 update: Software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. Brief. Bioinform. 2021, 22, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M. Data, information, knowledge and principle: Back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D199–D205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fan, T.W.-M.; Higashi, R.M.; Lane, A.N. Metabolic Reprogramming in Human Cancer Patients and Patient-Derived Models. CSH Perspect. Med. 2024, in press.
  56. Sharpe, M.A.; Ijare, O.B.; Baskin, D.S.; Baskin, A.M.; Baskin, B.N.; Pichumani, K. The Leloir Cycle in Glioblastoma: Galactose Scavenging and Metabolic Remodeling. Cancers 2021, 13, 1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tang, M.; Etokidem, E.; Lai, K. The Leloir Pathway of Galactose Metabolism—A Novel Therapeutic Target for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. AnticancerRes. 2016, 36, 6265–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bu, P.; Chen, K.-Y.; Xiang, K.; Johnson, C.; Crown, S.B.; Rakhilin, N.; Ai, Y.; Wang, L.; Xi, R.; Astapova, I.; et al. Aldolase B-Mediated Fructose Metabolism Drives Metabolic Reprogramming of Colon Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Silva, J.C.P.; Marques, C.; Martins, F.O.; Viegas, I.; Tavares, L.; Macedo, M.P.; Jones, J.G. Determining contributions of exogenous glucose and fructose to de novo fatty acid and glycerol synthesis in liver and adipose tissue. Metab. Eng. 2019, 56, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hannou, S.A.; Haslam, D.E.; McKeown, N.M.; Herman, M.A. Fructose metabolism and metabolic disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Krause, N.; Wegner, A. Fructose Metabolism in Cancer. Cells 2020, 9, 2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hensley, C.T.; Faubert, B.; Yuan, Q.; Lev-Cohain, N.; Jin, E.; Kim, J.; Jiang, L.; Ko, B.; Skelton, R.; Loudat, L.; et al. Metabolic Heterogeneity in Human Lung Tumors. Cell 2016, 164, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Boros, L.G.; Bassilian, S.; Lim, S.; Lee, W.-N.P. Genistein Inhibits Nonoxidative Ribose Synthesis in MIA Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells: A New Mechanism of Controlling Tumor Growth. Pancreas 2001, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Madhu, V.; Boneski, P.K.; Silagi, E.; Qiu, Y.; Kurland, I.; Guntur, A.R.; Shapiro, I.M.; Risbud, M.V. Hypoxic Regulation of Mitochondrial Metabolism and Mitophagy in Nucleus Pulposus Cells Is Dependent on HIF-1α–BNIP3 Axis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2020, 35, 1504–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M. NMR-based Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics in systems biochemistry. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2017, 628, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fan, T.W.M.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M. The promise of metabolomics in cancer molecular therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2004, 6, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Cheshkov, S.; Dimitrov, I.E.; Jakkamsetti, V.; Good, L.; Kelly, D.; Rajasekaran, K.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Pascual, J.M.; Sherry, A.D.; Malloy, C.R. Oxidation of U-C-13 glucose in the human brain at 7T under steady state conditions. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017, 78, 2065–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mendes, A.C.; Caldeira, M.M.; Silva, C.; Burgess, S.C.; Merritt, M.E.; Gomes, F.; Barosa, C.; Delgado, T.C.; Franco, F.; Monteiro, P.; et al. Hepatic UDP-glucose C-13 isotopomers from [U-C-13]glucose: A simple analysis by C-13 NMR of urinary menthol glucuronide. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006, 56, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Martin, M.; Portais, J.-C.; Labouesse, J.; Canioni, P.; Merle, M. [1-13C]Glucose metabolism in rat cerebellar granule cells and astrocytes in primary culture: Evaluation of flux parameters by 13C- and 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 217, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Delgado, T.C.; Castro, M.M.; Geraldes, C.F.; Jones, J.G. Quantitation of erythrocyte pentose pathway flux with [2-(13)]Glucose and H-1 NMR analysis of the lactate methyl signal. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004, 51, 1283–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yang, Y.; Lane, A.N.; Ricketts, C.J.; Carole Sourbier, C.; Wei, M.-H.; Shuch, B.; Pike, L.; Wu, M.; Rouault, T.A.; Boros, L.G.; et al. Metabolic Reprogramming for Producing Energy and Reducing Power in Fumarate Hydratase Null Cells from Hereditary Leiomyomatosis Renal Cell Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lee, W.-N.P.; Boros, L.G.; Puigjaner, J.; Bassilian, S.; Lim, S.; Cascante, M. Mass isotopomer study of the nonoxidative pathways of the pentose cycle with [1,2-13C2]glucose. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 274, E843–E851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Miccheli, A.; Tomassini, A.; Puccetti, C.; Valerio, M.; Peluso, G.; Tuccillo, F.; Calvani, M.; Manetti, C.; Conti, F. Metabolic profiling by C-13-NMR spectroscopy: [1,2-C-13(2)] glucose reveals a heterogeneous metabolism in human leukemia T cells. Biochimie 2006, 88, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jin, E.S.; Jones, J.G.; Burgess, S.C.; Merritt, M.E.; Sherry, A.D.; Malloy, C.R. Comparison of [3,4-C-13(2)]glucose to [6,6-H-2(2)]glucose as a tracer for glucose turnover by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005, 53, 1479–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Mahar, R.; Zeng, H.; Giacalone, A.; Ragavan, M.; Mareci, T.H.; Merritt, M.E. Deuterated water imaging of the rat brain following metabolism of [2H7]glucose. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021, 85, 3049–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kreis, F.; Wright, A.J.; Hesse, F.; Fala, M.; Hu, D.-E.; Brindle, K.M. Measuring Tumor Glycolytic Flux In Vivo by Using Fast Deuterium MRI. Radiology 2019, 294, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Boumezbeur, F.; Petersen, K.F.; Cline, G.W.; Mason, G.F.; Behar, K.L.; Shulman, G.I.; Rothman, D.L. The Contribution of Blood Lactate to Brain Energy Metabolism in Humans Measured by Dynamic C-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 13983–13991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wilson, D.M.; Keshari, K.R.; Larson, P.E.Z.; Chen, A.P.; Hu, S.; Van Criekinge, M.; Bok, R.; Nelson, S.J.; Macdonald, J.M.; Vigneron, D.B.; et al. Multi-compound polarization by DNP allows simultaneous assessment of multiple enzymatic activities in vivo. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 205, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Keshari, K.R.; Sriram, R.; Koelsch, B.L.; Van Criekinge, M.; Wilson, D.M.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Wang, Z.J. Hyperpolarized C-13-Pyruvate Magnetic Resonance Reveals Rapid Lactate Export in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kennedy, B.W.C.; Kettunen, M.I.; Hu, D.E.; Brindle, K.M. Probing Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity in Tumors by Measuring Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange in Hyperpolarized L-1-C-13,U-H-2 Lactate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4969–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Moreno, K.X.; Satapati, S.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Burgess, S.C.; Malloy, C.R.; Merritt, M.E. Real-time Detection of Hepatic Gluconeogenic and Glycogenolytic States Using Hyperpolarized 2-C-13 Dihydroxyacetone. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 35859–35867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Schug, Z.T.; Vande Voorde, J.; Gottlieb, E. The metabolic fate of acetate in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Malloy, C.R.; Maher, E.; Marin-Valenica, I.; Mickey, B.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Sherry, A.D. Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Analysis of Metabolc Pathways. In Methodologies for Metabolomics: Experimental Strategies and Techniques; Lutz, N., Sweedler, J.V., Weevers, R.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 415–445. [Google Scholar]
  84. Patel, A.B.; De Graaf, R.A.; Rothman, D.L.; Behar, K.L.; Mason, G.F. Evaluation of cerebral acetate transport and metabolic rates in the rat brain in vivo using H-1-C-13-NMR. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 1200–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Le, A.; Lane, A.N.; Hamaker, M.; Bose, S.; Gouw, A.; Barbi, J.; Tsukamoto, T.; Rojas, C.J.; Slusher, B.S.; Zhang, H.; et al. Glucose-independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation and survival in B cells. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M. Metabolic reprogramming in tumors: Contributions of the tumor microenvironment. Genes Dis. 2019, 7, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yuneva, M.O.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Allen, T.D.; Higashi, R.M.; Ferraris, D.V.; Tsukamoto, T.; Matés, J.M.; Alonso, F.J.; Wang, C.; Seo, Y.; et al. The Metabolic Profile of Tumors Depends on Both the Responsible Genetic Lesion and Tissue Type. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Metallo, C.M.; Gameiro, P.A.; Bell, E.L.; Mattaini, K.R.; Yang, J.; Hiller, K.; Jewell, C.M.; Johnson, Z.R.; Irvine, D.J.; Guarente, L.; et al. Reductive glutamine metabolism by IDH1 mediates lipogenesis under hypoxia. Nature 2011, 481, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Darmaun, D.; Matthews, D.E.; Bier, D.M. Glutamine and glutamate kinetics in humans. Endocrinol. Metab. 1986, 251, E117–E126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Fan, T.W.M.; Daneshmandi, S.; Cassel, T.A.; Uddin, M.B.; Sledziona, J.; Thompson, P.T.; Lin, P.H.; Higashi, R.M.; Lane, A.N. Polarization and β-Glucan Reprogram Immunomodulatory Metabolism in Human Macrophages and Ex Vivo in Human Lung Cancer Tissues. J. Immunol. 2022, 209, 1674–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Liu, L.; Su, X.; Quinn, W.J., III; Hui, S.; Krukenberg, K.; Frederick, D.W.; Redpath, P.; Zhan, L.; Chellappa, K.; White, E.; et al. Quantitative Analysis of NAD Synthesis-Breakdown Fluxes. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Neinast, M.D.; Jang, C.; Hui, S.; Murashige, D.S.; Chu, Q.; Morscher, R.J.; Li, X.; Zhan, L.; White, E.; Anthony, T.G.; et al. Quantitative Analysis of the Whole-Body Metabolic Fate of Branched-Chain Amino Acids. Cell Metab. 2019, 29, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Thelwall, P.E.; Simpson, N.E.; Rabbani, Z.N.; Clark, M.D.; Pourdeyhimi, R.; Macdonald, J.M.; Blackband, S.J.; Gamcsik, M.P. In vivo MR studies of glycine and glutathione metabolism in a rat mammary tumor. NMR Biomed. 2012, 25, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yang, J.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Brandon, J.A.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M. Rapid analysis of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and Sadenosylhomocysteine (SAH) isotopologues in stable isotope-resolved metabolomics (SIRM) using direct infusion nanoelectrospray ultrahigh-resolution Fourier transform mass spectrometry (DI-nESI UHRFTMS). Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1181, 338873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Li, J.; Song, J.; Zaytseva, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.; Rychahou, P.; Jiang, K.; Starr, M.E.; Kim, J.T.; Harris, J.W.; Yiannikouris, F.B.; et al. An obligatory role for neurotensin in high fat diet-induced obesity. Nature 2016, 533, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ventura, F.V.; Costa, C.G.; Struys, E.A.; Ruiter, J.; Allers, P.; Ijlst, L.; de Almeida, T.; Duran, M.; Jakobs, C.; Wanders, R.J.A. Quantitative acylcarnitine profiling in fibroblasts using [U-C-13] palmitic acid: An improved tool for the diagnosis of fatty acid oxidation defects. Clin. Chim. Acta 1999, 281, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lin, P.; Sledziona, J.; Akkaya-Colak, K.B.; Mihaylova, M.M.; Lane, A.N. Determination of fatty acid uptake and desaturase activity in mammalian cells by NMR-based stable isotope tracing. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1313, 342511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fan, T.W.M.; Higashi, R.M.; Song, H.; Daneshmandi, S.; Mahan, A.L.; Purdom, M.S.; Bocklage, T.J.; Pittman, T.A.; He, D.H.; Wang, C.; et al. Innate immune activation by checkpoint inhibition in human patient-derived lung cancer tissues. eLife 2021, 10, e69578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Marin-Hernandez, A.; Rodriguez-Enriquez, S.; Vital-Gonzalez, P.A.; Flores-Rodriguez, F.L.; Macias-Silva, M.; Sosa-Garrocho, M.; Moreno-Sanchez, R. Determining and understanding the control of glycolysis in fast-growth tumor cells-Flux control by an over-expressed but strongly product-inhibited hexokinase. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 1975–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Marín-Hernández, A.; Gallardo-Pérez, J.C.; Rodríguez-Enríquez, S.; Encalada, R.; Moreno-Sánchez, R.; Saavedra, E. Modeling cancer glycolysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1807, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Tanner, L.B.; Goglia, A.G.; Wei, M.H.; Sehgal, T.; Parsons, L.R.; Park, J.O.; White, E.; Toettcher, J.E.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Four key steps control glycolytic flux in mammalian cells. Cell Syst. 2018, 7, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Werle, M.; Jahn, L.; Kreuzer, J.; Hofele, J.; Elsasser, A.; Ackermann, C.; Katus, H.A.; Vogt, A.M. Metabolic control analysis of the Warburg-effect in proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biomed. Sci. 2005, 12, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Marin-Hernandez, A.; Saavedra, E. Metabolic control analysis as a strategy to identify therapeutic targets, the case of cancer glycolysis. Biosystems 2023, 231, 104986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ackermann, T.; Tardito, S. Cell Culture Medium Formulation and Its Implications in Cancer Metabolism. Trends Cancer. 2019, 5, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Selenius, L.A.; Lundgren, M.W.; Jawad, R.; Danielsson, O.; Björnstedt, M. The Cell Culture Medium Affects Growth, Phenotype Expression and the Response to Selenium Cytotoxicity in A549 and HepG2 Cells. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Chihanga, T.; Hausmann, S.M.; Ni, S.; Kennedy, M.A. Influence of media selection on NMR based metabolic profiling of human cell lines. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Higashi, R.M. Metabolic acidosis and the importance of balanced equations. Metabolomics 2009, 5, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wise, D.R.; Ward, P.S.; Shay, J.E.S.; Cross, J.R.; Gruber, J.J.; Sachdev, U.M.; Platt, J.M.; DeMatteo, R.G.; Simon, M.C.; Thompson, C.B. Hypoxia promotes isocitrate dehydrogenasedependent carboxylation of α-ketoglutarate to citrate to support cell growth and viability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19611–19616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. D’Alessandro, A.D.; Anastasiadi, A.K.; Tzounakas, V.L.; Nemkov, T.; Reisz, J.A.; Kriebardis, A.G.; Zimring, J.C.; Spitalnik, S.L.; Busch, M.P. Red Blood Cell Metabolism In Vivo and In Vitro. Metabolites 2023, 13, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lane, A.N.; Tan, J.; Wang, Y.; Yan, J.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M. Probing the metabolic phenotype of breast cancer cells by multiple tracer Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics. Metab. Eng. 2017, 43, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Fan, T.W.-M.; Tan, J.L.; McKinney, M.M.; Lane, A.N. Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics Analysis of Ribonucleotide and RNA Metabolism in Human Lung Cancer Cells. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. del Val, I.; Polizzi, K.; Kontoravdi, C. A theoretical estimate for nucleotide sugar demand towards Chinese Hamster Ovary cellular glycosylation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Qi, J.; Lang, W.; Geisler, J.G.; Wang, P.; Petrounia, I.; Mai, S.; Smith, C.; Askari, H.; Struble, G.T.; Williams, R.; et al. The use of stable isotope-labeled glycerol and oleic acid to differentiate the hepatic functions of DGAT1 and -2. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 1106–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Koundouros, N.; Poulogiannis, G. Reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism in cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 122, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Morrish, F.; Noonan, J.; Perez-Olsen, C.; Gafken, P.R.; Fitzgibbon, M.; Kelleher, J.; VanGilst, M.; Hockenbery, D. Myc-dependent Mitochondrial Generation of Acetyl-CoA Contributes to Fatty Acid Biosynthesis and Histone Acetylation during Cell Cycle Entry. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 36267–36274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lin, P.; Dai, L.; Crooks, D.R.; Neckers, L.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Lane, A.N. NMR methods of determining lipid turnover via stable isotope resolved metabolomics. Metabolites 2021, 11, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Higashi, R.; Lane, A.; Yang, T.; Xie, Z.; Fan, T. Isotopomer Lipid Metabolomics in Cancer Cells by 2D-NMR and FTICR-MS Reveals Detailed Lipid Metabolism. In Proceedings of the Metabolomics Society 4th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 2–6 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  118. Mullen, A.R.; Wheaton, W.W.; Jin, E.S.; Chen, P.-H.; Sullivan, L.B.; Cheng, T.; Yang, Y.; Linehan, W.M.; Chandel, N.S.; DeBerardinis, R.J. Reductive carboxylation supports growth in tumour cells with defective mitochondria. Nature 2011, 481, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Yoo, H.; Antoniewicz, M.R.; Stephanopoulos, G.; Kelleher, J.K. Quantifying reductive carboxylation flux of glutamine to lipid in a brown adipocyte cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 20621–20627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jiang, L.; Shestov, A.A.; Swain, P.; Yang, C.; Parker, S.J.; Wang, Q.A.; Terada, L.S.; Adams, N.D.; McCabe, M.T.; Pietrak, B.; et al. Reductive carboxylation supports redox homeostasis during anchorage-independent growth. Nature 2016, 532, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Fendt, S.-M.; Bell, E.L.; Keibler, M.A.; Olenchock, B.A.; Mayers, J.R.; Wasylenko, T.M.; Vokes, N.I.; Guarente, L.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Stephanopoulos, G. Reductive glutamine metabolism is a function of the alpha-ketoglutarate to citrate ratio in cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Locasale, J.W. Serine, glycine and one-carbon units: Cancer metabolism in full circle. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 572–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Vazquez, A.; Markert, E.K.; Oltvai, Z.N. Serine Biosynthesis with One Carbon Catabolism and the Glycine Cleavage System Represents a Novel Pathway for ATP Generation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Possemato, R.; Marks, K.M.; Shaul, Y.D.; Pacold, M.E.; Kim, D.; Birsoy, K.; Sethumadhavan, S.; Woo, H.-K.; Jang, H.G.; Jha, A.K.; et al. Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer. Nature 2011, 476, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Reina-Campos, M.; Diaz-Meco, M.T.; Moscat, J. The complexity of the serine glycine one-carbon pathway in cancer. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 219, e201907022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Young, V.R. Adult Amino Acid Requirements: The Case for a Major Revision in Current Recommendations. J. Nutr. 1994, 124, 1517S–1523S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Dolfi, S.C.; Chan, L.L.-Y.; Qiu, J.; Tedeschi, P.M.; Bertino, J.R.; Hirshfield, K.M.; Oltvai, Z.N.; Vazquez, A. The metabolic demands of cancer cells are coupled to their size and protein synthesis rates. Cancer Metab. 2013, 1, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bosman, F.T.; Stamenkovic, I. Functional structure and composition of the extracellular matrix. J. Pathol. 2003, 200, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Xiong, G.; Xu, R. Function of cancer cell-derived extracellular matrix in tumor progression. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2016, 2, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kular, J.K.; Basu, S.; Sharma, R.I. The extracellular matrix: Structure, composition, age-related differences, tools for analysis and applications for tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. 2014, 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Karamanos, N.K.; Theocharis, A.D.; Piperigkou, Z.; Manou, D.; Passi, A.; Skandalis, S.S.; Vynios, D.H.; Orian-Rousseau, V.; Ricard-Blum, S.; Schmelzer, C.E.H.; et al. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 6850–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. DeBerardinis, R.J.; Sayed, N.; Ditsworth, D.; Thompson, C.B. Brick by brick: Metabolism and tumor cell growth. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008, 18, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Warburg, O. Versuche an überlebendem Carcinomgewebe (Methoden). Biochem. Zeitschr. 1923, 142, 317–333. [Google Scholar]
  134. Fan, J.; Kamphorst, J.J.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; Shlomi, T. Fatty Acid Labeling from Glutamine in Hypoxia Can Be Explained by Isotope Exchange without Net Reductive Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Flux. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 31363–31369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Wu, M.; Neilson, A.; Swift, A.L.; Moran, R.; Tamagnine, J.; Parslow, D.; Armistead, S.; Lemire, K.; Orrell, J.; Teich, J.; et al. Multiparameter metabolic analysis reveals a close link between attenuated mitochondrial bioenergetic function and enhanced glycolysis dependency in human tumor cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2007, 292, C125–C136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. TeSlaa, T.; Teitell, M.A. Techniques to Monitor Glycolysis. Meths. Enzymol. 2014, 542, 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  137. Mahar, R.; Donabedian, P.L.; Merritt, M.E. HDO production from [2H7]glucose Quantitatively Identifies Warburg Metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Previs, S.F.; Brunengraber, D.Z.; Brunengraber, H. Is There Glucose Production Outside of the Liver and Kidney? Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2009, 29, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Yang, L.; Kombu, R.S.; Kasumov, T.; Zhu, S.-H.; Cendrowski, A.V.; David, F.; Anderson, V.E.; Kelleher, J.K.; Brunengraber, H. Metabolomic and mass isotopomer analysis of liver gluconeogenesis and citric acid cycle-I. Interrelation between gluconeogenesis and cataplerosis; Formation of methoxamates from aminooxyacetate and ketoacids. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 21978–21987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Leithner, K.; Hrzenjak, A.; Olschewski, H. Gluconeogenesis in cancer: Door wide open. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Mayes, P.D.; Bender, D.A. Gluconeogenesis and Control of the Blood Glucose. In Harper’s Illustrated Biocemistry, 26th ed.; Murray, R.K., Granner, D.K., Mayes, P.A., Rodwell, V.W., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  142. Yang, L.; Kasumov, T.; Kombu, R.S.; Zhu, S.-H.; Cendrowski, A.V.; David, F.; Anderson, V.E.; Kelleher, J.K.; Brunengraber, H. Metabolomic and mass isotopomer analysis of liver gluconeogenesis and citric acid cycle-II. Heterogeneity of metabolite labeling pattern. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 21988–21996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sherry, A.D.; Jeffrey, F.M.H.; Malloy, C.R. Analytical solutions for C-13 isotopomer analysis of complex metabolic conditions: Substrate oxidation, multiple pyruvate cycles, and gluconeogenesis. Metab. Eng. 2004, 6, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Hu, X.; Chao, M.; Wu, H. Central role of lactate and proton in cancer cell resistance to glucose deprivation and its clinical translation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 16047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Gullino, P.M.; Clark, S.H.; Grantham, F.H. The Interstial Fluid of Solid Tumors. Cancer Res. 1964, 24, 780–797. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  146. Schroeder, T.; Yuan, H.; Viglianti, B.L.; Peltz, C.; Asopa, S.; Vujaskovic, Z.; Dewhirst, M.W. Spatial Heterogeneity and Oxygen Dependence of Glucose Consumption in R3230Ac and Fibrosarcomas of the Fischer 344 Rat. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5163–5171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Leprivier, G.; Rotblat, B. How does mTOR sense glucose starvation? AMPK is the usual suspect. Cell Death Discov. 2020, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Grasmann, G.; Smolle, E.; Olschewski, H.; Leithner, K. Gluconeogenesis in cancer cells-repurposing of a starvation-induced metabolic pathway? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2019, 1872, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Fan, T.-M.; Lane, A.; Farag, M.; Arumugam, V.; Higashi, R.; Bousamra, M.; Miller, D. Human Lung Cancers Have Altered Anaplerotic (“Replenishing”) Pathways Discerned By 13C-Isotopomer-Based Metabolomics. In Proceedings of the 16th Triennial Conference for the International Society of Magnetic Resonance, Kenting, Taiwan, 14–19 October 2007. [Google Scholar]
  150. Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Hou, S. Glycolytic Reprogramming through PCK2 Regulates Tumor Initiation of Prostate Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 83602–83618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Leithner, K.; Hrzenjak, A.; Troetzmueller, M.; Moustafa, T.; Koefeler, H.C.; Wohlkoenig, C.; Stacher, E.; Lindenmann, J.; Harris, A.L.; Olschewski, A.; et al. PCK2 activation mediates an adaptive response to glucose depletion in lung cancer. Oncogene 2015, 34, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Dong, C.; Yuan, T.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Miriyala, S.; Lin, Y.; Yao, J.; Shi, J.; Lorkiewicz, P.K.; et al. Loss of FBP1 by Snail-mediated Repression Provides Metabolic Advantages in Basal-like Breast Cancer. Cancer Cell 2013, 23, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Sonveaux, P.; Végran, F.; Schroeder, T.; Wergin, M.C.; Verrax, J.; Rabbani, Z.N.; De Saedeleer, C.J.; Kennedy, K.M.; Diepart, C.; Jordan, B.F.; et al. Targeting lactate-fueled respiration selectively kills hypoxic tumor cells in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 3930–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Walker, M.A.; Tian, R. NAD(H) in mitochondrial energy transduction: Implications for health and disease. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2018, 3, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Christensen, C.E.; Karlsson, M.; Winther, J.R.; Jensen, P.R.; Lerche, M.H. Non-invasive In-cell Determination of Free Cytosolic NAD(+)/NADH Ratios Using Hyperpolarized Glucose Show Large Variations in Metabolic Phenotypes. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 2344–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Stein, L.R.; Imai, S.-i. The dynamic regulation of NAD metabolism in mitochondria. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Zhang, J.; ten Pierick, A.; van Rossum, H.M.; Seifar, R.M.; Ras, C.; Daran, J.-M.; Heijnen, J.J.; Wahl, S.A. Determination of the Cytosolic NADPH/NADP Ratio in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Shikimate Dehydrogenase as Sensor Reaction. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Lewis, C.A.; Parker, S.J.; Fiske, B.P.; McCloskey, D.; Gui, D.Y.; Green, C.R.; Vokes, N.I.; Feist, A.M.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Metallo, C.M. Tracing Compartmentalized NADPH Metabolism in the Cytosol and Mitochondria of Mammalian Cells. Mol. Cell 2014, 55, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Lukina, M.M.; Shimolina, L.E.; Kiselev, N.M.; Zagainov, V.E.; Komarov, D.V.; Zagaynova, E.V.; Shirmanova, M.V. Interrogation of tumor metabolism in tissue samples ex vivo using fluorescence lifetime imaging of NAD(P)H. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2020, 8, 014002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hu, Q.; Wu, D.; Walker, M.; Wang, P.; Tian, R.; Wang, W. Genetically encoded biosensors for evaluating NAD+/NADH ratio in cytosolicand mitochondrial compartments. Cell Rep. Methods 2021, 1, 100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Jeon, S.-M.; Chandel, N.S.; Hay, N. AMPK regulates NADPH homeostasis to promote tumour cell survival during energy stress. Nature 2012, 485, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Fan, J.; Ye, J.B.; Kamphorst, J.J.; Shlomi, T.; Thompson, C.B.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Quantitative flux analysis reveals folate-dependent NADPH production. Nature 2014, 510, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Stern, A.; Fokra, M.; Sarvin, B.; Alrahem, A.A.; Lee, W.D.; Aizenshtein, E.; Sarvin, N.; Shlomi, T. Inferring mitochondrial and cytosolic metabolism by coupling isotope tracing and deconvolution. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Chen, W.W.; Freinkman, E.; Wang, T.; Birsoy, K.; Sabatini, D.M. Absolute Quantification of Matrix Metabolites Reveals the Dynamics of Mitochondrial Metabolism. Cell 2016, 166, 1324–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Lo, M.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Gout, P.W. The xc- Cystine/Glutamate Antiporter: A Potential Target for Therapy of Cancer and Other Diseases. J. Cell Physiol. 2008, 215, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Losman, J.; Koivunen, P.; Kaelin, W.G. 2-Oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 710–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Dang, L.; White, D.W.; Gross, S.; Bennett, B.D.; Bittinger, M.A.; Driggers, E.M.; Fantin, V.R.; Jang, H.G.; Jin, S.; Keenan, M.C.; et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 2009, 462, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Londesborough, J.; Dalziel, K. Equilibrium Constant Of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Reaction. Biochem. J. 1968, 110, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Dalziel, K.; Londesborough, J. Mechanisms of Reductive Carboxylation Reactions-Carbon Dioxide or Bicarbonate as Substrate of Nicotinamide-Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate-Linked Isocitrate Dehydrogenase and Malic Enzyme. Biochem. J. 1968, 110, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Yoo, H.; Stephanopoulos, G.; Kelleher, J.K. Quantifying carbon sources for de novo lipogenesis in wild-type and IRS-1 knockout brown adipocytes. J. Lipid Res. 2004, 45, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Grassian, A.R.; Parker, S.J.; Davidson, S.M.; Divakaruni, A.S.; Green, C.R.; Zhang, X.M.; Slocum, K.L.; Pu, M.Y.; Lin, F.; Vickers, C.; et al. IDH1 Mutations Alter Citric Acid Cycle Metabolism and Increase Dependence on Oxidative Mitochondrial Metabolism. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 3317–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Kamphorst, J.J.; Cross, J.R.; Fan, J.; de Stanchina, E.; Mathew, R.; White, E.P.; Thompson, C.B.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Hypoxic and Ras-transformed cells support growth by scavenging unsaturated fatty acids from lysophospholipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8882–8887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Swierczynski, J.; Hebanowska, A.; Sledzinski, T. Role of abnormal lipid metabolism in development, progression, diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 2279–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Magkos, F.; Mittendorfer, B. Stable isotope-labeled tracers for the investigation of fatty acid and triglyceride metabolism in humans in vivo. Clin. Lipidol. 2009, 4, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Sundqvist, K.E.; Heikkilä, J.; Hassinen, I.E.; Hiltunen, J.K. Role of NADP+ (corrected)-linked malic enzymes as regulators of the pool size of tricarboxylic acid-cycle intermediates in the perfused rat heart. Biochem. J. 1987, 243, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Rzem, R.; Vincent, M.F.; Van Schaftingen, E.; Veiga-da-Cunha, M. L-2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria, a defect of metabolite repair. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2007, 30, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Struys, E.A.; Salomons, G.S.; Achouri, Y.; Van Schaftingen, E.; Grosso, S.; Craigen, W.J.; Verhoeven, N.M.; Jakobs, C. Mutations in the D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase gene cause D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 76, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Achouri, Y.; NoëL, G.; Vertommen, D.; Rider, M.H.; Veiga-Da-Cunha, M.; van Schaftingen, E. Identification of a dehydrogenase acting on D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Biochem. J. 2004, 381, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Kranendijk, M.; Struys, E.A.; Salomons, G.S.; Van der Knaap, M.S.; Jakobs, C. Progress in understanding 2-hydroxyglutaric acidurias. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2012, 35, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Choi, C.; Ganji, S.K.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Rakheja, D.; Kovacs, Z.; Yang, X.L.; Mashimo, T.; Raisanen, J.M.; Marin-Valencia, I.; et al. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in subjects with IDH-mutated gliomas. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ward, P.S.; Patel, J.; Wise, D.R.; Abdel-Wahab, O.; Bennett, B.D.; Coller, H.A.; Cross, J.R.; Fantin, V.R.; Hedvat, C.V.; Perl, A.E.; et al. The Common Feature of Leukemia-Associated IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations Is a Neomorphic Enzyme Activity Converting alpha-Ketoglutarate to 2-Hydroxyglutarate. Cancer Cell 2010, 17, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Gross, S.; Cairns, R.A.; Minden, M.D.; Driggers, E.M.; Bittinger, M.A.; Jang, H.G.; Sasaki, M.; Jin, S.; Schenkein, D.P.; Su, S.M.; et al. Cancer-associated metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulates in acute myelogenous leukemia with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Merino, M.J.; Ricketts, C.J.; Moreno, V.; Yang, Y.; Fan, T.W.; Lane, A.N.; Meltzer, P.S.; Vocke, C.D.; Crooks, D.R.; Linehan, W.M. Multifocal renal cell carcinomas with somatic IDH2 mutation: Report of a previously undescribed neoplasm. Am. J. Surg. Path. 2021, 45, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Xu, W.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Kim, S.; Ito, S.; Yang, C.; Wang, P.; Xiao, M.T.; et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Tyrakis, P.A.; Palazon, A.; Macias, D.; Lee, K.L.; Phan, A.T.; Velica, P.; You, J.; Chia, G.S.; Sim, J.; Doedens, A.; et al. S-2-hydroxyglutarate regulates CD8(+) T-lymphocyte fate. Nature 2016, 540, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Intlekofer, A.M.; Dematteo, R.G.; Venneti, S.; Finley, L.W.S.; Lu, C.; Judkins, A.R.; Rustenburg, A.S.; Grinaway, P.B.; Chodera, J.D.; Cross, J.R.; et al. Hypoxia Induces Production of L-2-Hydroxyglutarate. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Gelman, S.J.; Naser, F.; Mahieu, N.G.; McKenzie, L.D.; Dunn, G.P.; Chheda, M.G.; Patti, G.J. Consumption of NADPH for 2-HG Synthesis Increases Pentose Phosphate Pathway Flux and Sensitizes Cells to Oxidative Stress. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Oldham, W.M.; Clish, C.B.; Yang, Y.; Loscalzo, J. Hypoxia-Mediated Increases in L-2-hydroxyglutarate Coordinate the Metabolic Response to Reductive Stress. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Oldham, W.M.; Loscalzo, J. Quantification of 2-Hydroxyglutarate Enantiomers by Liquid Chromatography-mass Spectrometry. Bio-Protocol 2016, 6, e1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Suh, H.E.; Geraldes, C.F.G.C.; Chirayil, S.; Faubert, B.; Ayala, R.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Sherry, A.D. Detection of glucose-derived D- and L-lactate in cancer cells by the use of a chiral NMR shift reagent. Cancer Metab. 2021, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Morgenstern, J.; Campos, M.P.; Nawroth, P.; Fleming, T. The Glyoxalase System—New Insights into an Ancient Metabolism. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Pohanka, M. D-Lactic Acid as a Metabolite: Toxicology, Diagnosis, and Detection. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 419034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Yang, Y.; Sauve, A.A. NAD(+) metabolism: Bioenergetics, signaling and manipulation for therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1864, 1787–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Dutta, T.; Kapoor, N.; Mathew, M.; Chakraborty, S.S.; Ward, N.P.; Prieto-Farigua, N.; Falzone, A.; DeLany, J.P.; Smith, S.R.; Coen, P.M.; et al. Source of nicotinamide governs its metabolic fate in cultured cells, mice, and humans. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Groth, B.; Venkatakrishnan, P.; Lin, S.-J. NAD+ Metabolism, Metabolic Stress, and Infection. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 686412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Wang, W.; Yang, C.; Wang, T.; Deng, H. Complex roles of nicotinamide N-methyltransferase in cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Yoda, M.; Mizuno, R.; Izumi, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Bamba, T.; Kawaoka, S. Nicotinamide-N-methyltransferase regulates lipid metabolism via SAM and 1-methylnicotinamide in the AML12 hepatocyte cell line. J. Biochem. 2023, 174, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Huang, Q.; Chen, H.; Yin, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Yang, F.; Li, J.; Mu, T.; Li, J.; Zhao, J.; et al. Multi-omics analysis reveals NNMT as a master metabolic regulator of metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2024, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Sidor, K.; Jeznach, A.; Hoser, G.; Skirecki, T. 1-Methylnicotinamide (1-MNA) inhibits the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in human macrophages. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 121, 110445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Kilgour, M.K.; MacPherson, S.; Zacharias, L.G.; Ellis, A.E.; Sheldon, R.D.; Liu, E.Y.; Keyes, S.; Pauly, B.; Carleton, G.; Allard, B.; et al. 1-Methylnicotinamide is an immune regulatory metabolite in human ovarian cancer. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabe1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Seo, S.-K.; Kwon, B. Immune regulation through tryptophan metabolism. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023, 55, 1371–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Princiotta, M.F.; Finzi, D.; Qian, S.B.; Gibbs, J.; Schuchmann, S.; Buttgereit, F.; Bennink, J.R.; Yewdell, J.W. Quantitating protein synthesis, degradation, and endogenous antigen processing. Immunity 2003, 18, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Marchingo, J.M.; Cantrell, D.A. Protein synthesis, degradation, and energy metabolism in T cell immunity. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2022, 19, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Wuthrich, K. The way to NMR structures of proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2001, 8, 923–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Fushman, D.; Tjandra, N.; Cowburn, D. An approach to direct determination of protein dynamics from N-15 NMR relaxation at multiple fields, independent of variable N-15 chemical shift anisotropy and chemical exchange contributions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8577–8582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Clore, G.M.; Gronenborn, A.M. NMR structure determination of proteins and protein complexes larger than 20 kDa. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Barbato, G.; Ikura, M.; Kay, L.E.; Pastor, R.W.; Bax, A. Backbone Dynamics of Calmodulin Studied by N-15 Relaxation Using Inverse Detected 2-Dimensional Nmr-Spectroscopy-the Central Helix Is Flexible. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 5269–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Hu, V.W.; Heikka, D.S. Radiolabeling revisited: Metabolic labeling with 35S-methionine inhibits cell cylce progression, proliferation and survival. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Tsugita, A.; Scheffler, J.-J. A Rapid Method for Acid Hydrolysis of Protein with a Mixture of Trifluoroacetic Acid and Hydrochloric Acid. Eur. J. Biochem. 1982, 124, 585–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Hill, R.L.; Schmidt, W.R. The complete enzymic hydrolysis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1962, 237, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Engelhart, W. Microwave hydrolysis of peptides and proteins for amino acid analysis. Am. Biotechnol. Lab. 1990, 8, 30+32+34. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  212. Hattori, A.; Tsunoda, M.; Konuma, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Nagy, T.; Glushka, J.; Tayyari, F.; McSkimming, D.; Kannan, N.; Tojo, A.; et al. Cancer progression by reprogrammed BCAA metabolism in myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2017, 545, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M. Regulation of mammalian nucleotide metabolism and biosynthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 2466–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Wang, T.; Gnanaprakasam, J.N.R.; Chen, X.; Kang, S.; Xu, X.; Sun, H.; Liu, L.; Rodgers, H.; Miller, E.; Cassel, T.A.; et al. Inosine is an alternative carbon source for CD8+-T-cell function under glucose restriction. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Frederiks, W.M.; Vizan, P.; Bosch, K.S.; Vreeling-Sindelarova, H.; Boren, J.; Cascante, M. Elevated activity of the oxidative and non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in (pre)neoplastic lesions in rat liver. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2008, 89, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Lin, P.; Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M. NMR-based stable isotope tracing of cancer metabolism. Methods Molec. Biol. 2024, in press.
  217. Gessner, P.; Lum, J.; Frenguelli, B.G. The mammalian purine salvage pathway as an exploitable route for cerebral bioenergetic support after brain injury. Neuropharmacology 2023, 224, 109370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Walter, M.; Herr, P. Re-Discovery of Pyrimidine Salvage as Target in Cancer Therapy. Cells 2022, 11, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Sun, R.C.; Young, L.E.A.; Bruntz, R.C.; Markussen, K.H.; Zhou, Z.Q.; Conroy, L.R.; Hawkinson, T.R.; Clarke, H.A.; Stanback, A.E.; Macedo, J.K.A.; et al. Brain glycogen serves as a critical glucosamine cache required for protein glycosylation. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Hicks, J.; Wartchow, E.; Mierau, G. Glycogen storage diseases: A brief review and update on clinical features, genetic abnormalities, pathologic features, and treatment. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 2011, 35, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Rousset, M.; Paris, H.; Chevalier, G.; Terrain, B.; Murat, J.C.; Zweibaum, A. Growth-related enzymatic control of glycogen metabolism in cultured human tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1984, 44, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  222. Rousset, M.; Zweibaum, A.; Fogh, J. Presence of Glycogen and Growth-related Variations in 58 Cultured Human Tumor Cell Lines of Various Tissue Origins. Cancer Res. 1981, 41, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  223. Zois, C.E.; Favaro, E.; Harris, A.L. Glycogen metabolism in cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 92, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Scott, T.L.; Zhu, J.; Cassel, T.A.; Vicente-Munoz, S.; Lin, P.H.; Higashi, R.M.; Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.M. A Micro-Scale Analytical Method for Determining Glycogen Turnover by NMR and FTMS. Metabolites 2022, 12, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Ipata, P.L.; Balestri, F. Glycogen as a fuel: Metabolic interaction between glycogen and ATP catabolism in oxygen-independent muscle contraction. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Beumer, J.H.; Beijnen, J.H.; Schellens, J.H.M. Mass balance studies, with a focus on anticancer drugs. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2006, 45, 33–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Golikov, M.V.; Valuev-Elliston, V.T.; Smirnova, O.A.; Ivanov, A.V. Physiological Media in Studies of Cell Metabolism. Mol. Biol. 2022, 56, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Fan, T.W.-M.; Islam, J.; Higashi, R.M.; Lin, P.; Brainson, C.; Lane, A.N. Matrix-dependent metabolic reprogramming modulated by EZH2. J. Biol. Chem. 2024, 300, 105485. [Google Scholar]
  229. Souza, A.G.; Silva, I.B.B.; Campos-Fernández, E.; Barcelos, L.S.; Souza, J.B.; Marangoni, K.; Goulart, L.R.; Alonso-Goulart, V. Comparative Assay of 2D and 3D Cell Culture Models: Proliferation, Gene Expression and Anticancer Drug Response. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Foglizzo, V.; Cocco, E.; Marchiò, S. Advanced Cellular Models for Preclinical Drug Testing: From 2D Cultures to Organ-on-a-Chip Technology. Cancers 2022, 14, 3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Imamura, Y.; Mukohara, T.; Shimono, Y.; Funakoshi, Y.; Chayahara, N.; Toyoda, M.; Kiyota, N.; Takao, S.; Kono, S.; Nakatsura, T.; et al. Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Winnike, J.H.; Pediaditakis, P.; Wolak, J.E.; McClelland, R.W.; Watkins, P.B.; Macdonald, J.M. Stable isotope resolved metabolomics of primary human hepatocytes reveals a stressed phenotype. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Kleinstiver, B.P.; Sousa, A.A.; Walton, R.T.; Tak, Y.E.; Hsu, J.Y.; Clement, K.; Welch, M.M.; Horng, J.E.; Malagon-Lopez, J.; Scarfo, I.; et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a variants with increased activities and improved targeting ranges for gene, epigenetic and base editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Walton, R.T.; Christie, K.A.; Whittaker, M.N.; Kleinstiver, B.P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science 2020, 368, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Siolas, D.; Lerner, C.; Burchard, J.; Ge, W.; Linsley, P.S.; Paddison, P.J.; Hannon, G.J.; Cleary, M.A. Synthetic shRNAs as potent RNAi triggers. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Summerton, J.E. Morpholino, siRNA, and S-DNA compared: Impact of structure and mechanism of action on off-target effects and sequence specificity. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Heasman, J. Morpholino oligos: Making sense of antisense? Dev. Biol. 2002, 243, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Aboul-Fadl, T. Antisense oligonucleotides: The state of the art. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 2193–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Scoles, D.R.; Minikel, E.V.; Pulst, S.M. Antisense oligonucleotides. A primer. Neurol. Genet. 2019, 5, e323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. van Gorsel, M.; Elia, I.; Fendt, S.-M. 13C Tracer Analysis and Metabolomics in 3D Cultured Cancer Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1862, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  241. Shah, A.T.; Heaster, T.M.; Skala, M.C. Metabolic Imaging of Head and Neck Cancer Organoids. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Lee, G.Y.; Kenny, P.A.; Lee, E.H.; Bissell, M.J. Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Sant, S.; Johnston, P. The production of 3D tumor spheroids for cancer drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2017, 23, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Kozyra, M.; Johansson, I.; Nordling, A.; Ullah, S.; Lauschke, V.M.; Ingelman-Sundberg, M. Human hepatic 3D spheroids as a model for steatosis and insulin resistance. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Fan, T.W.M.; El-Amouri, S.S.; Macedo, J.K.A.; Wang, Q.J.; Song, H.; Cassel, T.; Lane, A.N. Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics Shows Metabolic Resistance to Anti-Cancer Selenite in 3D Spheroids versus 2D Cell Cultures. Metabolites 2018, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Fan, T.W.-M.; El-Amouri, S.S.; Macedo, J.K.A.; Wang, Q.J.; Cassel, T.A.; Lane, A.N. Mapping Metabolic Networks in 3D Spheroids Using Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Metabolomics, Online, 20–27 November 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Russell, S.; Wojtkowiak, J.; Neilson, A.; Gillies, R.J. Metabolic Profiling of healthy and cancerous tissues in 2D and 3D. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Nath, S.; Devi, G.R. Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: Focus on tumor spheroid model. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 163, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Augustine, T.N.; Dix-Peek, T.; Duarte, R.; Candy, G.P. Establishment of a heterotypic 3D culture system toevaluate the interaction of TREG lymphocytes and NK cells with breast cancer. J. Immunol. Methods 2015, 426, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Eder, T.; Eder, I.E. 3D Hanging Drop Culture to Establish Prostate Cancer Organoids. In 3D Cell Culture: Methods and Protocols; Koledova, Z., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 1612, pp. 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  251. Maritan, S.M.; Lian, E.Y.; Mulligan, L.M. An Efficient and Flexible Cell Aggregation Method for 3D Spheroid Production. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 121, 55544. [Google Scholar]
  252. Aisenbrey, E.A.; Murphy, W.L. Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Takebe, T.; Wells, J.M. Organoids by design. Science 2019, 364, 956–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Shay, J.W.; Wright, W.E. Hayflick, his limit, and cellular ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Meng, Y.; Ren, Z.; Xu, F.; Zhou, X.; Song, C.; Wang, V.Y.-A.; Liu, W.; Lu, L.; Thomson, J.A.; Chen, G. Nicotinamide Promotes Cell Survival and Differentiation as Kinase Inhibitor in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 11, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Tidwell, T.R.; Røsland, G.V.; Tronstad, K.J.; Søreide, K.; Hagland, H.R. Metabolic flux analysis of 3D spheroids reveals significant differences in glucose metabolism from matched 2D cultures of colorectal cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Metab. 2022, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Sato, M.; Kawana, K.; Adachi, K.; Fujimoto, A.; Yoshida, M.; Nakamura, H.; Nishida, H.; Inoue, T.; Taguchi, A.; Takahashi, J.; et al. Spheroid cancer stem cells display reprogrammed metabolism and obtain energy by actively running the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 33297–33305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Matsui, T.; Shinozawa, T. Human Organoids for Predictive Toxicology Research and Drug Development. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 767621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Yan, J.; Lima Goncalves, C.F.; Korfhage, M.O.; Hasan, M.Z.; Fan, T.W.M.; Wang, X.; Zhu, C. Portable optical spectroscopic assay for non-destructive measurement of key metabolic parameters on in vitro cancer cells and organotypic fresh tumor slices. Biomed. Opt. Express 2023, 14, 4065–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Januszyk, M.; Rennert, R.C.; Sorkin, M.; Maan, Z.N.; Wong, L.K.; Whittam, A.J.; Whitmore, A.; Duscher, D.; Gurtner, G.C. Evaluating the Effect of Cell Culture on Gene Expression in Primary Tissue Samples Using Microfluidic-Based Single Cell Transcriptional Analysis. Microarrays 2015, 4, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Nilsson, L.M.; Castresana-Aguirre, M.; Scott, L.; Brismar, H. RNA-seq reveals altered gene expression levels in proximal tubular cell cultures compared to renal cortex but not during early glucotoxicity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Zschenker, O.; Streichert, T.; Hehlgans, S.; Cordes, N. Genome-Wide Gene Expression Analysis in Cancer Cells Reveals 3D Growth to Affect ECM and Processes Associated with Cell Adhesion but Not DNA Repair. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. deGraaf, I.A.M.; Olinga, P.; deJager, M.H.; Merema, M.T.; deKanter, R.; van de Kerkhof, E.G.; Groothuis, G.M.M. Preparation and incubation of precision-cut liver and intestinal slices for application in drug metabolism and toxicity studies. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1540–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Fan, T.W.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M. Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics Studies in Ex Vivo Tissue Slices. Bio Protoc. 2016, 6, e1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Marx, V. Method of the Year: Spatially resolved transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Duan, H.; Cheng, T.; Cheng, H. Spatially resolved transcriptomics: Advances and applications. Blood Sci. 2022, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Chastagnier, L.; Marquette, C.; Petiot, E. In situ transient transfection of 3D cell cultures and tissues, a promising tool for tissue engineering and gene therapy. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 68, 108211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Ruigrok, M.J.R.; Maggan, N.; Willaert, D.; Frijlink, H.W.; Melgert, B.N.; Olinga, P.; Hinrichs, W.L. siRNA-Mediated RNA Interference in Precision-Cut Tissue Slices Prepared from Mouse Lung and Kidney. AAPS J. 2017, 19, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Hou, X.; Zaks, T.; Langer, R.; Dong, Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 1078–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. De Kanter, R.; Olinga, P.; De Jager, M.H.; Merema, M.T.; Meijer, D.K.; Groothius, G.M. Organ slices as an in vitro test system for drug metabolism in human liver, lung and kidney. Toxicol. In Vitro 1999, 13, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Okegawa, T.; Morimoto, M.; Nishizawa, S.; Kitazawa, S.; Honda, K.; Araki, H.; Tamura, T.; Ando, A.; Satomi, Y.; Nutahara, K.; et al. Intratumor Heterogeneity in Primary Kidney Cancer Revealed by Metabolic Profiling of Multiple Spatially Separated Samples within Tumors. eBioMedicine 2017, 19, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Gonzalez-Riano, C.; Tapia-González, S.; Perea, G.; González-Arias, C.; DeFelipe, J.; Barbas, C. Metabolic Changes in Brain Slices over Time: A Multiplatform Metabolomics Approach. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 3224–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Keshari, K.R.; Sriram, R.; Van Criekinge, M.; Wilson, D.M.; Wang, Z.J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Peehl, D.M.; Kurhanewicz, J. Metabolic Reprogramming and Validation of Hyperpolarized C-13 Lactate as a Prostate Cancer Biomarker Using a Human Prostate Tissue Slice Culture Bioreactor. Prostate 2013, 73, 1171–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Burgess, S.C.; Babcock, E.E.; Jeffrey, F.M.H.; Sherry, A.D.; Malloy, C.R. NMR indirect detection of glutamate to measure citric acid cycle flux in the isolated perfused mouse heart. FEBS Lett. 2001, 505, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Anousis, N.; Carvalho, R.A.; Zhao, P.Y.; Malloy, C.R.; Sherry, A.D. Compartmentation of glycolysis and glycogenolysis in the perfused rat heart. NMR Biomed. 2004, 17, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Li, Q.; Deng, S.; Ibarra, R.A.; Anderson, V.E.; Brunengraber, H.; Zhang, G.F. Multiple mass isotopomer tracing of acetyl-CoA metabolism in langendorff-perfused rat hearts: Channeling of acetyl-CoA from pyruvate dehydrogenase to carnitine acetyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 8121–8132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Scaduto, R.C.; Davis, E.J. Serine synthesis by an isolated perfused rat kidney preparation. Biochem. J. 1985, 230, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Miller, C.O.; Cao, J.; Chekmenev, E.Y.; Damon, B.M.; Cherrington, A.D.; Gore, J.C.; Heinicke, K.; Dimitrov, I.E.; Romain, N.; Cheshkov, S.; et al. Noninvasive measurements of glycogen in perfused mouse livers using chemical exchange saturation transfer NMR and comparison to (13)C NMR spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 5824–5830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. Bergans, N.; Dresselaers, T.; Vanhamme, L.; Van Hecke, P.; Van Huffel, S.; Vanstapel, F. Quantification of the glycogen 13C-1 NMR signal during glycogen synthesis in perfused rat liver. NMR Biomed. 2003, 16, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Lowenstein, J.M.; Brunengraber, H.; Wadke, M. Measurement of rates of lipogenesis with deuterated and tritiated water. Methods Enzymol. 1975, 35, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  281. Park, Y.-C.; Kim, J.-B.; Heo, Y.; Park, D.-C.; Lee, I.-S.; Chung, H.-W.; Han, J.-H.; Chung, W.-G.; Vendeland, S.C.; Whanger, P.D. Metabolism of subtoxic level of selenite by double-perfused small intestine in rats. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2004, 98, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Preedy, V.R.; Pain, V.M.; Garlick, P.J. The metabolic state of muscle in the isolated perfused rat hemicorpus in relation to rates of protein synthesis. Biochem. J. 1984, 218, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Vorrink, S.U.; Ullah, S.; Schmidt, S.F.; Nandania, J.T.; Velagapudi, V.; Beck, O.; Ingelman-Sundberg, M.; Lauschke, V.M. Endogenous and xenobiotic metabolic stability of primary human hepatocytes in long-term 3D spheroid cultures revealed by a combination of targeted and untargeted metabolomics. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 2696–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Fan, T.W.-M.; Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M.; Yan, J. Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics of Lung Cancer in a SCID Mouse Model. Metabolomics 2011, 7, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Xu, J.; Xiao, G.; Trujillo, C.; Chang, V.; Blanco, L.; Joseph, S.B.; Bassilian, S.; Saad, M.F.; Tontonoz, P.; Lee, W.N.P.; et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor (PPAR) Influences Substrate Utilization for Hepatic Glucose Production. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 50237–50244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Sun, R.C.; Fan, T.W.M.; Deng, P.; Higashi, R.M.; Lane, A.N.; Le, A.-T.; Scott, T.L.; Sun, Q.; Warmoes, M.O.; Yang, Y. Noninvasive liquid diet delivery of stable isotopes into mouse models for deep metabolic network tracing. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Almoshari, Y. Osmotic Pump Drug Delivery Systems—A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Deng, P.; Valentino, T.; Flythe, M.D.; Moseley, H.N.B.; Leachman, J.R.; Morris, A.J.; Hennig, B. Untargeted Stable Isotope Probing of the Gut Microbiota Metabolome Using 13C-Labeled Dietary Fibers. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 2904–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Williams, H.C.; Piron, M.A.; Nation, G.K.; Walsh, A.E.; Young, L.E.A.; Sun, R.C.; Johnson, L.A. Oral Gavage Delivery of Stable Isotope Tracer for In Vivo Metabolomics. Metabolites 2020, 10, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Koch, A.L.; Rusnak, M.; Peachee, K.; Akira Isaac, A.; McCart, E.A.; Rittase, W.B.; Olsen, C.H.; Day, R.M.; Symes, A.J. Comparison of the effects of osmotic pump implantation with subcutaneous injection for administration of drugs after total body irradiation in mice. Lab. Anim. 2021, 55, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Bongers, K.S.; McDonald, R.A.; Winner, K.M.; Falkowski, N.R.; Brown, C.A.; Baker, J.M.; Hinkle, K.J.; Fergle, D.J.; Dickson, R.P. Antibiotics cause metabolic changes in mice primarily through microbiome modulation rather than behavioral changes. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Kostyukevich, Y.; Stekolshikova, E.; Levashova, A.; Kovalenko, A.; Vishnevskaya, A.; Bashilov, A.; Kireev, A.; Tupertsev, B.; Rumiantseva, L.; Khaitovich, P.; et al. Untargeted Lipidomics after D2O Administration Reveals the Turnover Rate of Individual Lipids in Various Organs of Living Organisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Mason, G.F.; Petersen, K.F.; de Graaf, R.A.; Kanamatsu, T.; Otsuki, T.; Rothman, D.L. A comparison of C-13 NMR measurements of the rates of glutamine synthesis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle during oral and intravenous administration of 1-C-13 glucose. Brain Res. Protoc. 2002, 10, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Bousamra II, M.; Higashi, R.M.; Yan, J.; Miller, D.M. Clinical Applications of Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics (SIRM) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Omics 2011, 15, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Bartman, C.R.; Faubert, B.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; DeBerardinis, R.J. Metabolic pathway analysis using stable isotopes in patients with cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2023, 23, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Mason, G.F.; Petersen, K.F.; de Graaf, R.A.; Shulman, G.I.; Rothman, D.L. Measurements of the anaplerotic rate in the human cerebral cortex using C-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and [1-C-13] and [2-C-13] glucose. J. Neurochem. 2007, 100, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Wang, D.; Liem, D.A.; Lau, E.; Ng, D.C.; Bleakley, B.J.; Cadeiras, M.; Deng, M.C.; Lam, M.P.; Ping, P. Characterization of human plasma proteome dynamics using deuterium oxide. PROTEOMICS–Clin. Appl. 2014, 8, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Turner, S.M.; Murphy, E.J.; Neese, R.A.; Antelo, F.; Thomas, T.; Agarwal, A.; Go, C.; Hellerstein, M.K. Measurement of TG synthesis and turnover in vivo by (2HO)-O-2 incorporation into the glycerol moiety and application of MIDA. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 285, E790–E803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Strawford, A.; Antelo, F.; Christiansen, M.; Hellerstein, M.K. Adipose tissue triglyceride turnover, de novo lipogenesis, and cell proliferation in humans measured with 2H2O. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 286, E577–E588. [Google Scholar]
  300. Ter Horst, K.W.; Vatner, D.F.; Zhang, D.; Cline, G.W.; Ackermans, M.T.; Nederveen, A.J.; Verheij, J.; Demirkiran, A.; van Wagensveld, B.A.; Dallinga-Thie, G.M.; et al. Hepatic Insulin Resistance Is NotPathway Selective in HumansWith Nonalcoholic Fatty LiverDisease. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Ciurli, A.; Liebl, M.; Derks, R.J.E.; Neefjes, J.J.C.; Giera, M. Spatially resolved sampling for untargeted metabolomics: A new tool for salivomics. iScience 2021, 24, 102768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Bergman, H.-M.; Lanekoff, I. Profiling and quantifying endogenous molecules in single cells using nano-DESI MS. Analyst 2017, 142, 3639–3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Lanekoff, I.; Sharma, V.V.; Marques, C. Single-cell metabolomics: Where are we and where are we going? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 75, 102693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Wang, L.; Xing, X.; Zeng, X.; Jackson, S.R.; TeSlaa, T.; Yang, L.; McReynolds, M.; Li, X.; Wolff, J.; Rabinowitz, J.R.; et al. Spatially resolved stable-isotope tracing reveals regional metabolic activity. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 223–230. [Google Scholar]
  305. Neumann, E.K.; Comi, T.J.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Sweedler, J.V. Lipid Heterogeneity between Astrocytes and Neurons Revealed by Single-Cell MALDI-MS Combined with Immunocytochemical Classification. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5910–5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Castro, D.C.; Xie, Y.R.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Romanova, E.V.; Sweedler, J.V. Image-guided MALDI mass spectrometry for high-throughput single-organelle characterization. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 1233–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Miura, K.; Bowman, E.D.; Simon, R.; Peng, A.C.; Robles, A.I.; Jones, R.T.; Katagiri, T.; He, P.; Mizukami, H.; Charboneau, L.; et al. Laser capture microdissection and microarray expression analysis of lung adenocarcinoma reveals tobacco smoking- and prognosis-related molecular profiles. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3244–3250. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  308. Wu, Y.; Pegoraro, A.F.; Weitz, D.A.; Janmey, P.; Sun, S.X. The correlation between cell and nucleus size is explained by an eukaryotic cell growth model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022, 18, e1009400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Khraiwesh, H.; López-Domínguez, J.A.; Lopez-Lluch, G.; Navas, P.; Cabo, R.; Ramsey, J.; Villalba, J.M.; González-Reyes, J. Alterations of Ultrastructural and Fission/Fusion Markers in Hepatocyte Mitochondria from Mice Following Calorie Restriction with Different Dietary Fats. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013, 68, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Wagner, M.; Wiig, H. Tumor Interstitial Fluid Formation, Characterization, and Clinical Implications. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Kamphorst, J.J.; Nofal, M.; Commisso, C.; Hackett, S.R.; Lu, W.Y.; Grabocka, E.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Miller, G.; Drebin, J.A.; Bar-Sagi, D.; et al. Human Pancreatic Cancer Tumors Are Nutrient Poor and Tumor Cells Actively Scavenge Extracellular Protein. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Commisso, C.; Davidson, S.M.; Soydaner-Azeloglu, R.G.; Parker, S.J.; Kamphorst, J.J.; Hackett, S.; Grabocka, E.; Nofal, M.; Drebin, J.A.; Thompson, C.B.; et al. Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells. Nature 2013, 497, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Atherton, H.J.; Schroeder, M.A.; Dodd, M.S.; Heather, L.C.; Carter, E.E.; Cochlin, L.E.; Nagel, S.; Sibson, N.R.; Radda, G.K.; Clarke, K.; et al. Validation of the in vivo assessment of pyruvate dehydrogenase activity using hyperpolarised C-13 MRS. NMR Biomed. 2011, 24, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Haddadin, I.S.; McIntosh, A.; Meisamy, S.; Corum, C.; Styczynski Snyder, A.L.; Powell, N.J.; Nelson, M.T.; Yee, D.; Garwood, M.; Bolan, P.J. Metabolite quantification and high-field MRS in breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2009, 22, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Peet, A.C.; McConville, C.; Wilson, M.; Levine, B.A.; Reed, M.; Dyer, S.A.; Edwards, E.C.; Strachan, M.C.; McMullan, D.J.; Wilkes, T.M.; et al. H-1 MRS identifies specific metabolite profiles associated with MYCN-amplified and non-amplified tumour subtypes of neuroblastoma cell lines. NMR Biomed. 2007, 20, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Lane, D.; Soong, R.; Bermel, W.; Ning, P.; Majumdar, R.D.; Tabatabaei-Anaraki, M.; Heumann, H.; Gundy, M.; Boenisch, H.; Mobarhan, Y.L.; et al. Selective Amino Acid-Only in Vivo NMR: A Powerful Tool to Follow Stress Processes. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 9017–9028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Gadian, D.G. In vivo NMR. In Supramolecular Structure and Function; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986; pp. 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  318. Evanochko, W.T.; Ng, T.C.; Glickson, J.D. Application of in vivo NMR spectroscopy to cancer. Magn. Reson. Med. 1984, 1, 508–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J.J.; Hwangbo, L.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, N.K.; Nam, K.J.; Choo, K.S.; Kang, T.; Park, H.; Son, Y.; et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: Association between intratumoral heterogeneity and recurrence risk. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Kishimoto, S.; Brendert, J.R.; Crooks, D.R.; Matsumoto, S.; Seki, T.; Oshima, N.; Merkle, H.; Lin, P.; Reed, G.; Chen, A.P.; et al. Imaging of glucose metabolism by 13C-MRI distinguishes pancreatic cancer subtypes in mice. eLife 2019, 8, e46312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Stehling, M.K.; Turner, R.; Mansfield, P. Echo-Planar Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Fraction of a Second. Science 1991, 254, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  322. Beauferris, Y.; Teuwen, J.; Karkalousos, D.; Moriakov, N.; Caan, M.; Yiasemis, G.; Rodrigues, L.; Lopes, A.; Pedrini, H.; Rittner, L.; et al. Multi-Coil MRI Reconstruction Challenge-Assessing Brain MRI Reconstruction Models and Their Generalizability to Varying Coil Configurations. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 919186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Leach, M.O.; Verrill, M.; Glaholm, J.; Smith, T.A.D.; Collins, D.J.; Payne, G.S.; Sharp, J.C.; Ronen, S.M.; McCready, V.R.; Powles, T.J.; et al. Measurements of human breast cancer using magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A review of clinical measurements and a report of localized 31P measurements of response to treatment. NMR Biomed. 1998, 11, 314–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Mason, G.F.; Rothman, D.L. Basic principles of metabolic modeling of NMR C-13 isotopic turnover to determine rates of brain metabolism in vivo. Metab. Eng. 2004, 6, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. de Graaf, R.A.; Brown, P.B.; Mason, G.F.; Rothman, D.L.; Behar, K.L. Detection of 1,6-C-13(2) -glucose metabolism in rat brain by in vivo H-1 C-13 -NMR spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003, 49, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  326. Walton, M.E.; Ebert, D.; Haller, R.G. Octanoate oxidation measured by C-13-NMR spectroscopy in rat skeletal muscle, heart, and liver. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 1908–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Penet, M.-F.; Bhujwalla, Z.M.; Glunde, K. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Investigating the Cancer Metabolome in Preclinical Model Systems. In Methodologies for Metabolomics; Lutz, N.W., Jonathan, V.S., Wevers, R.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 335–376. [Google Scholar]
  328. Golman, K.; Petersson, J.S.; Magnusson, P.; Johansson, E.; Akeson, P.; Chai, C.M.; Hansson, G.; Mansson, S. Cardiac metabolism measured noninvasively by hyperpolarized C-13 MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 59, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Ehrhardt, M.J.; Gallagher, F.A.; McLean, M.A.; Schönlieb, C.-B. Enhancing the spatial resolution of hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI of human brain metabolism using structure guidance. Magn. Reson. Med. 2022, 87, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Nelson, S.J.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Larson, P.E.Z.; Harzstark, A.L.; Ferrone, M.; van Criekinge, M.; Chang, J.W.; Bok, R.; Park, I.; et al. Metabolic Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Hyperpolarized 1-C-13 Pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 198ra108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  331. Watanabe, H.; Umeda, M.; Ishihara, Y.; Okamoto, K.; Oshio, K.; Kanamatsu, T.; Tsukada, Y. Human brain glucose metabolism mapping using multislice 2D H-1-C-13 correlation HSQC spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 43, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Lane, D.; Skinner, T.E.; Gershenzon, N.I.; Bermel, W.; Soong, R.; Majumdar, R.D.; Mobarhan, Y.L.; Schmidt, S.; Heumann, H.; Monette, M.; et al. Assessing the potential of quantitative 2D HSQC NMR in C-13 enriched living organisms. J. Biomol. Nmr 2019, 73, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Richardson, D.S.; Guan, W.; Matsumoto, K.; Pan, C.; Chung, K.; Ertürk, A.; Ueda, H.R.; Lichtman, J.W. Tissue Clearing. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Morizet, J.; Chow, D.; Wijesinghe, P.; Schartner, E.; Dwapanyin, G.; Dubost, N.; Bruce, G.D.; Anckaert, E.; Dunning, K.; Dholakia, K. UVA Hyperspectral Light-Sheet Microscopy for Volumetric Metabolic Imaging: Application to Preimplantation Embryo Development. ACS Photonics 2023, 10, 4177–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Patel, K.B.; Liang, W.; Casper, M.J.; Voleti, V.; Li, W.; Yagielski, A.J.; Zhao, H.T.; Perez Campos, C.; Lee, G.S.; Liu, J.M.; et al. High-speed light-sheet microscopy for the in-situ acquisition of volumetric histological images of living tissue. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 6, 569–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Perry, S.W.; Norman, J.P.; Barbieri, J.; Brown, E.B.; Gelbard, H.A. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: A practical usage guide. Biotechniques 2011, 50, 98–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Zhu, C.G.; Martinez, A.F.; Martin, H.L.; Li, M.; Crouch, B.T.; Carlson, D.A.; Haystead, T.A.J.; Ramanujam, N. Near-simultaneous intravital microscopy of glucose uptake and mitochondrial membrane potential, key endpoints that reflect major metabolic axes in cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Khan, D.; Ara, T.; Munjal, A.; Mishra, S.; Sundaresan, N.R. Microscopy-Based Assessment of Fatty Acid Uptake and Lipid Accumulation in Cultured Cells. Cells. Curr. Protoc. 2022, 2, e626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  339. Hong, S.; Pawel, G.T.; Pei, R. Recent progress in developing fluorescent probes for imaging cell metabolites. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 16, 044108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  340. Benson, S.; Fernandez, A.; Barth, N.D.; de Moliner, F.; Horrocks, M.H.; Herrington, C.S.; Abad, J.L.; Delgado, A.; Kelly, L.; Chang, Z.; et al. SCOTfluors: Small, Conjugatable, Orthogonal, and Tunable Fluorophores for In Vivo Imaging of Cell Metabolism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6911–6915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  341. Tsuchiya, M.; Tachibana, N.; Nagao, K.; Tamura, T.; Hamachi, I. Organelle-selective click labeling coupled with flow cytometry allows pooled CRISPR screening of genes involved in phosphatidylcholine metabolism. Cell Metab. 2023, 35, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Edmondson, R.; Broglie, J.J.; Adcock, A.F.; Yang, L. Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems and Their Applications in Drug Discovery and Cell-Based Biosensors. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2014, 12, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Sallin, O.; Reymond, L.; Gondrand, C.; Raith, F.; Koch, B.; Johnsson, K. Semisynthetic biosensors for mapping cellular concentrations of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides. eLife 2018, 7, e32638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  344. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y. Real-time and high-throughput analysis of mitochondrial metabolic states in living cells using genetically encoded NAD+/NADH sensors. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 100, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Williamson, D.H.; Lund, P.; Krebs, H.A. The redox state of free nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of rat liver. Biochem. J. 1967, 103, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  346. Xu, J.; Zhu, D.; Ibrahim, A.D.; Allen, C.C.R.; Gibson, C.M.; Fowler, P.W.; Song, Y.; Huang, W.E. Raman Deuterium Isotope Probing Reveals Microbial Metabolism at the Single-Cell Level. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 13305–13312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Lima, C.; Muhamadali, H.; Goodacre, R. Simultaneous Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy of Stable Isotope Labelled Escherichia col. Sensors 2022, 22, 3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Kato, R.; Yano, T.; Minamikawa, T.; Tanaka, T. High-sensitivity hyperspectral vibrational imaging of heart tissues by mid-infrared photothermal microscopy. Anal. Sci. 2022, 38, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Lita, A.; Kuzmin, A.N.; Pliss, A.; Baev, A.; Rzhevskii, A.; Gilbert, M.R.; Larion, M.; Prasad, P.N. Toward Single-Organelle Lipidomics in Live Cells. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 11380–11387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  350. Lita, A.; Pliss, A.; Kuzmin, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Zhang, L.; Dowdy, T.; Burks, C.; de Val, N.; Celiku, O.; Ruiz-Rodado, V.; et al. IDH1 mutations induce organelle defects via dysregulated phospholipids. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  351. Neumann, E.K.; Ellis, J.F.; Triplett, A.E.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Sweedler, J.V. Lipid Analysis of 30 000 Individual Rodent Cerebellar Cells Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 7871–7878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  352. Nemes, P.; Knolhoff, A.M.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Sweedler, J.V. Single-Cell Metabolomics: Changes in the Metabolome of Freshly Isolated and Cultured Neurons. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2012, 3, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Gilmore, I.S.; Heiles, S.; Pieterse, C.L. Metabolic Imaging at the Single-Cell Scale: Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 12, 201–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Yuan, Z.Y.; Zhou, Q.M.; Cai, L.S.; Pan, L.; Sun, W.L.; Qumu, S.W.; Yu, S.; Feng, J.X.; Zhao, H.S.; Zheng, Y.C.; et al. SEAM is a spatial single nuclear metabolomics method for dissecting tissue microenvironment. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Dueñas, M.E.; Lee, Y.J. Single-Cell Metabolomics by Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1280, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  356. Neumann, E.K.; Migas, L.G.; Allen, J.L.; Caprioli, R.M.; Van de Plas, R.; Spraggins, J.M. MALDI Tims-Tof Spatial Metabolomics of the Human Kidney using MAL-DI Trapped Ion Mobility Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2020, 19, 13084–13091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  357. He, M.J.; Pu, W.J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Tang, D.E.; Dai, Y. Comparing DESI-MSI and MALDI-MSI Mediated Spatial Metabolomics and Their Applications in Cancer Studies. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 891018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  358. Kreuzaler, P.; Inglese, P.; Ghanate, A.; Gjelaj, E.; Wu, V.C.; Panina, Y.; Mendez-Lucas, A.; MacLachlan, C.; Patani, N.; Hubert, C.B.; et al. Vitamin B5 supports MYC oncogenic metabolism and tumor progression in breast cancer. Nat. Metab. 2023, 5, 1870–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  359. Schwaiger-Haber, M.; Stancliffe, E.; Anbukumar, D.S.; Sells, B.; Yi, J.; Cho, K.; Adkins-Travis, K.; Chheda, M.G.; Shriver, L.P.; Patti, G.J. Using mass spectrometry imaging to map fluxes quantitatively in the tumor ecosystem. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  360. Rončević, A.; Koruga, N.; Soldo Koruga, A.; Debeljak, Ž.; Rončević, R.; Turk, T.; Kretić, D.; Rotim, T.; Krivdić Dupan, Z.; Troha, D.; et al. MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry of High-Grade Gliomas: A Review of Recent Progress and Future Perspective. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 838–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  361. Morato, N.M.; Cooks, R.G. Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: 20 Years. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 2526–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  362. Varga-Zsiros, V.; Migh, E.; Marton, A.; Kóta, Z.; Vizler, C.; Tiszlavicz, L.; Horváth, P.; Török, Z.; Vígh, L.; Balogh, G.; et al. Development of a Laser Microdissection-Coupled Quantitative Shotgun Lipidomic Method to Uncover Spatial Heterogeneity. Cells 2023, 12, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  363. Shen, S.C.; Li, J.; Huo, S.A.; Ma, M.; Zhu, X.Y.; Rasam, S.; Duan, X.T.; Qu, M.; Titus, M.A.; Qu, J. Parallel, High-Quality Proteomic and Targeted Metabolomic Quantification Using Laser Capture Microdissected Tissues. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 8711–8718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  364. Wang, Z.; Cao, M.; Lam, S.M.; Shui, G. Embracing lipidomics at single-cell resolution: Promises and pitfalls. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 160, 116973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Fields, L.; Shi, X.; Huang, P.; Lu, H.; Schneider, A.J.; Tang, X.; Puglielli, L.; Welham, N.V.; et al. Single-cell lipidomics enabled by dual-polarity ionization and ion mobility-mass spectrometry imaging. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Young, L.E.A.; Conroy, L.R.; Clarke, H.A.; Hawkinson, T.R.; Bolton, K.E.; Sanders, W.C.; Chang, J.E.; Webb, M.B.; Alilain, W.J.; Vander Kooi, C.W.; et al. In situ mass spectrometry imaging reveals heterogeneous glycogen stores in human normal and cancerous tissues. Embo Mol. Med. 2022, 14, e16029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Grgic, A.; Krestensen, K.K.; Heeren, R.M.A. Optimized protocol for MALDI MSI of N-glycans using an on-tissue digestion in fresh frozen tissue sections. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. He, J.; Sun, C.; Li, T.; Luo, Z.; Huang, L.; Song, X.; Li, X.; Abliz, Z. A Sensitive and Wide Coverage Ambient Mass Spectrometry Imaging Method for Functional Metabolites Based Molecular Histology. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  369. Alexandrov, T. Spatial Metabolomics and Imaging Mass Spectrometry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2020, 3, 61–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  370. Santos, A.A.; Delgado, T.C.; Marques, V.; Ramirez-Moncayo, C.; Alonso, C.; Vidal-Puig, A.; Hall, Z.; Martínez-Chantar, M.L.; Rodrigues, C.M.P. Spatial metabolomics and its application in the liver. Hepatology 2024, 79, 1158–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  371. Lanekoff, I.; Thomas, M.; Carson, J.P.; Smith, J.N.; Timchalk, C.; Laskin, J. Imaging nicotine in rat brain tissue by use of nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  372. Laskin, J.; Lanekoff, I. Ambient Mass Spectrometry Imaging Using Direct Liquid Extraction Techniques. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 52–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  373. Jiang, L.-X.; Hernly, E.; Hu, H.; Hilger, R.T.; Neuweger, H.; Yang, M.; Laskin, J.J. Nanospray Desorption Electrospray Ionization (Nano-DESI) Mass Spectrometry Imaging with High Ion Mobility Resolution. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2023, 34, 1798–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Carson, R.H.; Lewis, C.R.; Erickson, M.N.; Zagieboylo, A.P.; Naylor, C.; Li, K.W.; Farnsworth, P.B.; Price, J.C. Imaging regiospecific lipid turnover in mouse brain with desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 2017, 58, 1884–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  375. Miller, A.; York, E.M.; Stopka, S.A.; Martínez-François, J.R.; Hossain, M.H.; Baquer, G.; Regan, M.S.; Agar, N.Y.R.; Yellen, G. Spatially resolved metabolomics and isotope tracing reveal dynamic metabolic responses of dentate granule neurons with acute stimulation. Nat. Metab. 2023, 5, 1820–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  376. Hu, T.; Allam, M.; Cai, S.; Henderson, W.; Yueh, B.; Garipcan, A.; Ievlev, A.V.; Afkarian, M.; Beyaz, S.; Coskun, A.F. Single-cell spatial metabolomics with cell-type specific protein profiling for tissue systems biology. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  377. Han, X.X.; Rodriguez, R.S.; Haynes, C.L.; Ozaki, Y.; Zhao, B. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Kuzmin, A.; Pliss, A.; Lim, C.; Heo, J.; Kim, S.; Rzhevskii, A.; Gu, B.; Yong, K.-T.; Wen, S.; Prasad, P.N. Resonance Raman Probes for Organelle-Specific Labeling in Live Cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Tzafetas, M.; Mitra, A.; Paraskevaidi, M.; Bodai, Z.; Kalliala, I.; Bowden, S.; Lathouras, K.; Rosini, F.; Szasz, M.; Savage, A.; et al. The intelligent knife (iKnife) and its intraoperative diagnostic advantage for the treatment of cervical disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 7338–7346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  380. Marcus, D.; Phelps, D.L.; Savage, A.; Balog, J.; Kudo, H.; Dina, R.; Bodai, Z.; Rosini, F.; Ip, J.; Amgheib, A.; et al. Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer Using the Surgical Intelligent Knife (iKnife)-A Prospective Pilot Study of Diagnostic Accuracy. Cancers 2022, 14, 5892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  381. Kreft, M.; Lukšič, M.; Zorec, T.M.; Prebil, M.; Zorec, R. Diffusion of D-glucose measured in the cytosol of a single astrocyte. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 1483–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  382. Gao, F.; Huang, K.; Xing, Y. Artificial Intelligence in Omics. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2022, 20, 811–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  383. Ahmed, Z.; Wan, S.; Zhang, F. Artificial intelligence for omics data analysis. BMC Methods 2024, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Glycolysis as a source of anabolic intermediates. PFK1 occupies a crossroad that determines relative flux into glycolysis versus the oxidative branch (NADPH generating and Rib-5-P) of the pentose phosphate pathway. Double-headed arrows represent reversible reactions, catalyzed by the same enzyme; two arrows represent reactions catalyzed by different enzymes. Glycolytic anabolic precursors are in blue; anabolic products are in red; enzyme names are in green. G6P: glucose-6-phosphate; F6P: fructose-6-phosphate; F1,6BP: fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; GAP: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DHAP: dihydroxyacetone phosphate; 1,3bisPG: 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; 2PGA: 2-phosphogycerate; PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr: pyruvate; OAA: oxaloacetate; AcCoA: acetyl CoA; Lac: lactate; Ru5P: ribose-5-phosphate; GSH: reduced glutathione; HK: hexokinase; G6Pase: glucose-6-phosphatase; PGI: phosphoglucose isomerase; PFK1: phosphofructokinase 1; FBPase: fructose 1,6bisphosphatase; ALD: aldolase; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PGK: phosphoglycerate kinase; PGM: phosphoglycerate mutase; ENO: enolase; PK: pyruvate kinase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; PC: pyruvate carboxylase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; SHMT: serine hydroxymethyl transferase; GOT: glutamate oxaloacetate aminotransferase.
Figure 1. Glycolysis as a source of anabolic intermediates. PFK1 occupies a crossroad that determines relative flux into glycolysis versus the oxidative branch (NADPH generating and Rib-5-P) of the pentose phosphate pathway. Double-headed arrows represent reversible reactions, catalyzed by the same enzyme; two arrows represent reactions catalyzed by different enzymes. Glycolytic anabolic precursors are in blue; anabolic products are in red; enzyme names are in green. G6P: glucose-6-phosphate; F6P: fructose-6-phosphate; F1,6BP: fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; GAP: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DHAP: dihydroxyacetone phosphate; 1,3bisPG: 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; 2PGA: 2-phosphogycerate; PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr: pyruvate; OAA: oxaloacetate; AcCoA: acetyl CoA; Lac: lactate; Ru5P: ribose-5-phosphate; GSH: reduced glutathione; HK: hexokinase; G6Pase: glucose-6-phosphatase; PGI: phosphoglucose isomerase; PFK1: phosphofructokinase 1; FBPase: fructose 1,6bisphosphatase; ALD: aldolase; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PGK: phosphoglycerate kinase; PGM: phosphoglycerate mutase; ENO: enolase; PK: pyruvate kinase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; PC: pyruvate carboxylase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; SHMT: serine hydroxymethyl transferase; GOT: glutamate oxaloacetate aminotransferase.
Metabolites 14 00383 g001
Figure 2. Isotopomer evolution in the Krebs Cycle. Acetyl CoA produced by oxidation of [U-13C]-glucose-derived pyruvate (PDH) may enter the Krebs cycle and label intermediates 2 carbon atoms at a time. Acetyl CoA may also be exported from the mitochondria as citrate, when ATP citrate lyase converts the cytoplasmic citrate to OAA + AcCoA, which is used for fatty acid synthesis and acetylation reactions. Anaplerosis from Gln via glutaminase and transaminases and/or from pyruvate carboxylation also contributes carbon to the TCA cycle intermediates, leading to complex isotopomer patterns as increasing numbers of cycles are traversed. (A) 13C6 glucose plus unlabeled Gln. Black dots are 12C. 13C6 glucose (red dots) produces 13C3 pyruvate which can enter the Krebs cycle either via PDH as a 2-carbon unit via acetyl CoA or a 3-carbon unit via PCB (green dots), which give rise to different isotopomers of Krebs cycle intermediates and anabolic products such as uracil and its precursor Asp, which are distinguishable by NMR as 13C-1,2 and 13C-3,4 Asp via PDH in the forward direction, and 13C1,2,3 Asp via PCB. (B) 13C5,15N2 Gln plus unlabeled glucose. Open black circles are 12C. Red dots are 13C atoms from Gln; blue dots are the amino and amido nitrogen atoms of Gln. The anaplerotic input of fully labeled Gln produces the fully labeled Krebs cycle intermediates starting from 2OG via glutaminase and GDH or aminotransferases. Fully labeled OAA from Gln condenses with glucose-derived AcCoA to produce quadruple-labeled citrate, which becomes triply labeled 2OG via the Krebs cycle and doubly labeled succinate. AST will transaminate OAA with Glu, transferring the amino nitrogen to Asp. Unlabeled glucose produces the partially labeled 2OG and subsequent metabolites with scrambling at the succinate-to-fumarate step. The isotopomers produced evolve in further cycles and differ with other inputs to the cycle. Detailed isotopomer analysis is needed to disentangle the effects such as with TCAsim [29]. LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; PCB: pyruvate carboxylase; GLS: glutaminase; GDH: glutamate dehydrogenase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase (also glutamate-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, GOT). From Figure 2 of Lane and Fan (2017) [65].
Figure 2. Isotopomer evolution in the Krebs Cycle. Acetyl CoA produced by oxidation of [U-13C]-glucose-derived pyruvate (PDH) may enter the Krebs cycle and label intermediates 2 carbon atoms at a time. Acetyl CoA may also be exported from the mitochondria as citrate, when ATP citrate lyase converts the cytoplasmic citrate to OAA + AcCoA, which is used for fatty acid synthesis and acetylation reactions. Anaplerosis from Gln via glutaminase and transaminases and/or from pyruvate carboxylation also contributes carbon to the TCA cycle intermediates, leading to complex isotopomer patterns as increasing numbers of cycles are traversed. (A) 13C6 glucose plus unlabeled Gln. Black dots are 12C. 13C6 glucose (red dots) produces 13C3 pyruvate which can enter the Krebs cycle either via PDH as a 2-carbon unit via acetyl CoA or a 3-carbon unit via PCB (green dots), which give rise to different isotopomers of Krebs cycle intermediates and anabolic products such as uracil and its precursor Asp, which are distinguishable by NMR as 13C-1,2 and 13C-3,4 Asp via PDH in the forward direction, and 13C1,2,3 Asp via PCB. (B) 13C5,15N2 Gln plus unlabeled glucose. Open black circles are 12C. Red dots are 13C atoms from Gln; blue dots are the amino and amido nitrogen atoms of Gln. The anaplerotic input of fully labeled Gln produces the fully labeled Krebs cycle intermediates starting from 2OG via glutaminase and GDH or aminotransferases. Fully labeled OAA from Gln condenses with glucose-derived AcCoA to produce quadruple-labeled citrate, which becomes triply labeled 2OG via the Krebs cycle and doubly labeled succinate. AST will transaminate OAA with Glu, transferring the amino nitrogen to Asp. Unlabeled glucose produces the partially labeled 2OG and subsequent metabolites with scrambling at the succinate-to-fumarate step. The isotopomers produced evolve in further cycles and differ with other inputs to the cycle. Detailed isotopomer analysis is needed to disentangle the effects such as with TCAsim [29]. LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; PCB: pyruvate carboxylase; GLS: glutaminase; GDH: glutamate dehydrogenase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase (also glutamate-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, GOT). From Figure 2 of Lane and Fan (2017) [65].
Metabolites 14 00383 g002
Figure 3. 2OG is a hub metabolite with several fates in both the mitochondria and the cytoplasm. Mitochondrial 2OG may derive from IDH activity in the TCA (Aco + IDH2,3), which is reversible depending on substrate and redox ratios; interconversion to 2HG via specific dehydrogenases or variant IDH2; transamination of Glu via GOT2, from Gln via glutaminase; and oxidization to citrate and then OAA via the TCA. In the cytoplasm, citrate is cleaved to OAA + AcCoA, which itself has numerous fates including fatty acid synthesis; OAA may transaminate with Glu (via GOT1) producing 2OG, which is a co-substrate for 2OG-dependent dioxygenase (Diox). Enzymes in blue: Glnase glutaminase; GDH: glutamate dehydrogenase; GOT2: glutamate OAA transaminase 2; IDH2: NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase; IDH3: NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle; Aco: aconitase; ACLY: ATP-dependent citrate lyase; FASN: fatty acid synthase; GOT1: glutamate OAA transaminase 1; Diox: 2OG-dependent dioxygenase (numerous).
Figure 3. 2OG is a hub metabolite with several fates in both the mitochondria and the cytoplasm. Mitochondrial 2OG may derive from IDH activity in the TCA (Aco + IDH2,3), which is reversible depending on substrate and redox ratios; interconversion to 2HG via specific dehydrogenases or variant IDH2; transamination of Glu via GOT2, from Gln via glutaminase; and oxidization to citrate and then OAA via the TCA. In the cytoplasm, citrate is cleaved to OAA + AcCoA, which itself has numerous fates including fatty acid synthesis; OAA may transaminate with Glu (via GOT1) producing 2OG, which is a co-substrate for 2OG-dependent dioxygenase (Diox). Enzymes in blue: Glnase glutaminase; GDH: glutamate dehydrogenase; GOT2: glutamate OAA transaminase 2; IDH2: NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase; IDH3: NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle; Aco: aconitase; ACLY: ATP-dependent citrate lyase; FASN: fatty acid synthase; GOT1: glutamate OAA transaminase 1; Diox: 2OG-dependent dioxygenase (numerous).
Metabolites 14 00383 g003
Figure 4. G6P/G1P is a node for glycolysis, glycogen metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) has several fates in glycolysis (Glyc), glycogen synthesis, and ribose synthesis via the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). UDPGlc = uridinediphosphoglucose; R5P = ribose-5-phosphate; nt = nucleotide. Enzymes in blue: PYG: glycogen phosphorylase; GYS: glycogen synthase; UGP: UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; PGM: phosphoglucomutase.
Figure 4. G6P/G1P is a node for glycolysis, glycogen metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) has several fates in glycolysis (Glyc), glycogen synthesis, and ribose synthesis via the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). UDPGlc = uridinediphosphoglucose; R5P = ribose-5-phosphate; nt = nucleotide. Enzymes in blue: PYG: glycogen phosphorylase; GYS: glycogen synthase; UGP: UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; PGM: phosphoglucomutase.
Metabolites 14 00383 g004
Figure 5. Tissue heterogeneity in lung cancer tissue. This slice (10 μm thickness) was stained for cancer (panCK, green), CD8- (T cells, red), and CD68- (macrophages, yellow) expressing cells and DAPI (localizing nuclei, blue). Different regions (circled) were analyzed by transcriptomics, whole slices by SIRM using 2H Glucose + 13C,15N Gln and analyzed by NMR and ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry. The circled regions of interest (100 μm diameter, numbered 1–6) were further analyzed for the protein expression level of 58 different markers of cancer and immune cell functional states using oligonucleotide-barcoded antibodies using the NanoString Digital Spatial Profiling system. From Figure 4C of Fan et al. [44] under creative commons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (accessed on 1 May 2024).
Figure 5. Tissue heterogeneity in lung cancer tissue. This slice (10 μm thickness) was stained for cancer (panCK, green), CD8- (T cells, red), and CD68- (macrophages, yellow) expressing cells and DAPI (localizing nuclei, blue). Different regions (circled) were analyzed by transcriptomics, whole slices by SIRM using 2H Glucose + 13C,15N Gln and analyzed by NMR and ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry. The circled regions of interest (100 μm diameter, numbered 1–6) were further analyzed for the protein expression level of 58 different markers of cancer and immune cell functional states using oligonucleotide-barcoded antibodies using the NanoString Digital Spatial Profiling system. From Figure 4C of Fan et al. [44] under creative commons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (accessed on 1 May 2024).
Metabolites 14 00383 g005
Table 1. Common stable isotope-enriched precursors.
Table 1. Common stable isotope-enriched precursors.
CompoundIsotopomerMetabolic PathwaysRefs
Glucose13C6Glycolysis, glycogen synthesis, Krebs cycle, HBP
Lipid synthesis
[36,67,68]
[20]
13C-1Glycolysis[69]
13C-2 [70]
13C-1,2Pentose phosphate pathway;[71,72,73]
PC/PDH[63,64]
13C-3,4Pentose phosphate pathway[74]
2H7 [75]
2H-6,6 [74,76]
Fructose13C6Fructose metabolism[60]
Lactate13C3Lactate utilization, gluconeogenesis[35,77]
Pyruvate13C-1LDH activity (via DNP)[78,79,80]
13C-2DNP-LDH, Krebs cycle activity[81]
Acetate13C2Krebs cycle[82,83,84]
Glutamine13C5Glutaminolysis, Krebs cycle, protein synthesis,
gluconeogenesis
[85]
13C515N2Glutaminolysis, Krebs cycle, transamination,
amidotransferase, gluconeogenesis, nucleobase synthesis
[18,85,86,87]
13C-1; 13C-5Reductive carboxylation[88]
15N-2, 15N-5Amino and amido transferase activity[89]
Tryptophan15N2, [U-13C]Protein, kynurenine/nicotinamide[90,91]
V,I,L13C,15NBranched chain amino acid metabolism[92]
Glycine13C2Protein, purines, 1-C metabolism[19,93]
Serine2H3Phospholipids, protein, 1-C metabolism[19]
Methionineε-13C1-carbon metabolism via S-Adenosylmethionine[94]
Palmitate
Oleate
13C16
13C18
Fatty acid uptake and metabolism[95,96,97]
Water2H2OLipid synthesis[59]
Table 2. Relationship between volume, concentration, and quantity.
Table 2. Relationship between volume, concentration, and quantity.
No. CellsTotal Cell Volume a
nL
N Mole @
1 mM b
N Mole @
10 μM b
N Mole @
0.1 μM b
N Mole @
0.001 μM b
1E92E62E-62E-82E-102E-12
1E620002E-92E-112E-132E-14
1E322E-132E-142E-162E-18
10.0022E-152E-172E-192E-21
a assuming 2 pL/cell; b averaged over the entire cell volume.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lane, A.N.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M. Challenges of Spatially Resolved Metabolism in Cancer Research. Metabolites 2024, 14, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14070383

AMA Style

Lane AN, Higashi RM, Fan TW-M. Challenges of Spatially Resolved Metabolism in Cancer Research. Metabolites. 2024; 14(7):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14070383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lane, Andrew N., Richard M. Higashi, and Teresa W-M. Fan. 2024. "Challenges of Spatially Resolved Metabolism in Cancer Research" Metabolites 14, no. 7: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14070383

APA Style

Lane, A. N., Higashi, R. M., & Fan, T. W. -M. (2024). Challenges of Spatially Resolved Metabolism in Cancer Research. Metabolites, 14(7), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14070383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop