Next Article in Journal
Two-Pion Bose–Einstein Correlations in Au+Au Collisions at sNN = 3 GeV in the STAR Experiment
Next Article in Special Issue
Supernova Remnants in Gamma Rays
Previous Article in Journal
The Changes in Multiscale Solar Wind Fluctuations on the Path from the Sun to Earth
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Very-High-Energy Gamma-Ray View of the Transient Sky
 
 
universe-logo
Article Menu

Article Menu

Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Future Perspectives for Gamma-ray Burst Detection from Space

by
Enrico Bozzo
1,*,†,
Lorenzo Amati
2,
Wayne Baumgartner
3,
Tzu-Ching Chang
4,
Bertrand Cordier
5,
Nicolas De Angelis
6,7,
Akihiro Doi
8,
Marco Feroci
7,
Cynthia Froning
9,
Jessica Gaskin
3,
Adam Goldstein
10,
Diego Götz
5,
Jon E. Grove
11,
Sylvain Guiriec
12,13,
Margarita Hernanz
14,15,
C. Michelle Hui
3,
Peter Jenke
16,
Daniel Kocevski
3,
Merlin Kole
6,
Chryssa Kouveliotou
12,
Thomas Maccarone
17,
Mark L. McConnell
18,19,
Hideo Matsuhara
8,
Paul O’Brien
20,
Nicolas Produit
1,
Paul S. Ray
11,
Peter Roming
9,
Andrea Santangelo
21,
Michael Seiffert
4,
Hui Sun
22,
Alexander van der Horst
12,
Peter Veres
16,
Jianyan Wei
22,
Nicholas White
12,
Colleen Wilson-Hodge
3,
Daisuke Yonetoku
8,23,
Weimin Yuan
22,24 and
Shuang-Nan Zhang
24,25
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Astronomy, University of Geneva, Chemin d’Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
2
INAF-OAS Bologna, via P. Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, Italy
3
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812, USA
4
Jet Propulsion Lab, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
5
IRFU/Département d’Astrophysique, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
6
DPNC, University of Geneva, quai Ernest-Ansermet 24, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
7
INAF-IAPS Roma, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Rome, Italy
8
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan
9
Southwest Research Institute Space Science and Engineering Division, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
10
Science and Technology Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA
11
Space Science Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA
12
Department of Physics, George Washington University, Corcoran Hall, 725 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA
13
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
14
Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC), Carrer de can Magrans, s/n, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
15
Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Barcelona, Spain
16
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA
17
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Texas Tech University Box 41051, Lubbock, TX 79409-1051, USA
18
Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
19
Department of Earth, Oceans, and Space, Southwest Research Institute, Durham, NH 03824, USA
20
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
21
Institut für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, Eberhard Karls, Universität, Sand 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
22
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
23
College of Science and Engineering, School of Mathematics and Physics, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan
24
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
25
Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Most authors provided inputs on behalf of a larger collaboration.
Universe 2024, 10(4), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10040187
Submission received: 13 February 2024 / Revised: 11 April 2024 / Accepted: 17 April 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Gamma Ray Astrophysics and Future Perspectives)

Abstract

:
Since their first discovery in the late 1960s, gamma-ray bursts have attracted an exponentially growing interest from the international community due to their central role in the most highly debated open questions of the modern research of astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics. These range from the intimate nuclear composition of high-density material within the core of ultra-dense neuron stars, to stellar evolution via the collapse of massive stars, the production and propagation of gravitational waves, as well as the exploration of the early universe by unveiling the first stars and galaxies (assessing also their evolution and cosmic re-ionization). GRBs in the past ∼50 years have stimulated the development of cutting-edge technological instruments for observations of high-energy celestial sources from space, leading to the launch and successful operations of many different scientific missions (several of them still in data-taking mode currently). In this review, we provide a brief description of the GRB-dedicated missions from space being designed and developed for the future. The list of these projects, not meant to be exhaustive, shall serve as a reference to interested readers to understand what is likely to come next to lead the further development of GRB research and the associated phenomenology.

1. Introduction

About 57 years have already gone by since the first discovery of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in 1967. This occurred genuinely by chance, while the U.S. Vela military satellites were looking for evidence of nuclear bomb testing in space following the 1963 partial test-ban treaty (which prohibited testing in the atmosphere, outer space, and underwater). The existence of GRBs was later revealed to the scientific community, stimulating a fast-growing excitement for this fortunate discovery [1]. A number of experiments were quickly developed and launched into space, mainly by the Soviet Union and the United States, to boost the detection of similar events and understand their true nature. The inevitable requirement of space-based instrumentation to catch the unpredictable short and bright flash of high-energy radiation from these events largely contributed to boosting the international race in the development of cutting-edge technological detectors with exponentially increasing sensitivity, as well as the provision of more and more advanced platforms to ensure their most proficient operations (see, e.g., [2] for recent historical reviews on GRBs).
A major leap forward in GRB research was first provided by the Konus-WIND satellite [3,4] and the BATSE experiment on-board CGRO [5,6], which allowed the determination of the dichotomy into short and long GRBs, established the isotropic distribution of the events in the sky, and led to the first characterization of their non-thermal emission (see, e.g., [7] and the references therein). Subsequently, the Italian–Dutch Beppo-SAX satellite, launched in 1996, unveiled the cosmological nature of these events by identifying for the first time the GRB X-ray afterglows and providing arcsec-accurate localizations of their host galaxies [8] (enabling also multi-wavelength observations with ground-based observatories). This was possible thanks to an on-board powerful suite of instruments covering a large energy-band (2–700 keV) and providing simultaneously a high sensitivity to faint sources via dedicated pointed observations and monitoring of a large fraction of the sky at once via large field-of-view (FoV) instruments [9] (achieving up to 20 × 20 deg with full imaging and good localization capabilities of typically a few arcminutes).
The size of the GRB community and its efforts to probe and understand the physics of these uniquely powerful cosmological explosions have been growing ever since. GRBs are also widely recognized to have a key role in many of the most debated aspects of research in astronomy and astrophysics. These range from the problems of fundamental physics, such as the equation of state of supra-density matter, to stellar evolution, via the collapse of massive stars and the production of both kilonovae and supernovae, to jet formation and dissipation, to the generation and propagation of gravitational waves, up to the quest for key cosmological parameters (see, e.g., [10,11] and the references therein). In the most recent years, GRBs have also gained renewed interest as key sources in the field of multi-messenger astrophysics due to their association with kilonovae and gravitational wave (GW) sources (see, e.g., [12,13,14], the well-known cases of GRB 170817A, GRB 211211A, and GRB 230307A, and the references therein).
Following the decommissioning of Beppo-SAX in 2002, a number of successful missions have provided dramatic advancements in the fields related to GRBs. Among these, AGILE [15], Astro-SAT [16], Fermi [17], INTEGRAL [18], and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory [19] are still operational and work in synergy also with ground-based multi-wavelength observatories to boost the detection and characterization of bright impulsive cosmological events (in addition to transients of different kinds). While an appraisal of the most relevant achievements of these missions can be found in recent reviews, the aim of the current paper is to provide interested readers an overview of the world-wide efforts from different teams to develop the GRB instruments of the future. These are expected to lead the scientific community toward the next leaps forward in the understanding of GRBs and associated phenomena. Different missions are presented in alphabetical order in the following sections. The list is not meant to be exhaustive, and given the heavily dynamic and fast-evolving nature of GRB research, it is likely (and desirable) that additional relevant missions set to provide important contributions to GRB research are being developed by other teams.

2. Einstein Probe

2.1. Mission Overview

The Einstein Probe (https://ep.bao.ac.cn) (EP) is a mission designed to monitor the sky in the soft X-ray band. It will perform systematic surveys and the characterization of high-energy transients and the monitoring of variable objects at unprecedented sensitivity and monitoring cadences. It has a large instantaneous FoV (3600 sq. deg.), which is achieved by using the established technology of novel lobster-eye micro-pore optics (MPOs). The EP also carries a conventional X-ray-focusing telescope with a larger effective area to perform follow-up observations and precise localization of newly discovered transients. Public transient alerts will be issued rapidly to trigger multi-wavelength follow-up observations from the world-wide community.
The primary science objectives of the EP mission are as follows: (1) Discover and characterize cosmic X-ray transients, particularly faint, distant, and rare X-ray transients, in large numbers. (2) Discover and characterize X-ray outbursts from otherwise normally dormant black holes. (3) Search for X-ray sources associated with gravitational wave events and precisely locate them. The EP is an international mission led by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) in collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA), the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (MPE) in Germany, and the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) in France. The mission was successfully launched on 9 January 2024 with a nominal lifetime of 3 years (5 years as a goal).

2.2. Instrument Design

The EP carries a wide-field X-ray telescope (WXT) with a large instantaneous FoV, which adopts a novel lobster-eye MPO technology. Complementary to this wide-field instrument is a follow-up X-ray telescope (FXT) with a large effective area and a narrow FoV. Figure 1 shows the configuration of the EP payload:
  • Wide-field X-ray telescope (WXT): There are 12 almost identical WXT modules, each with an FoV of ∼300 sq. deg. Each WXT module includes a lobster-eye MPO mirror assembly with a focal length of 375 mm, a focal plane detector array, and an electronics unit. The mirror assembly of each module comprises 36 MPOs mounted on a supporting alloy frame. An MPO is made of a thin plate with millions of square micro-pores perpendicular to the surface, slumped into a spherical shape. Incoming X-rays at a grazing-incidence angle are reflected off the walls of the pores and are brought onto a focal sphere with a radius of half the curvature of the optic. It produces true imaging with a characteristic cruciform point-spread function. The detector array of each module is composed of four black-illuminated CMOS sensors, each 6 cm by 6 cm in size and 4 k by 4 k pixels. An aluminum layer of a 200 nm thickness is coated on the surface to block incident optical and UV light. The nominal detection bandpass of the WXT is 0.5–4 keV.
  • Follow-up X-ray telescope (FXT): The FXT is a set of two telescopes of the Wolter-I optics, which have almost the same design and are co-aligned. The design of the mirror assembly is similar to that of the eROSITA telescopes, which has a focal length of 1.6 m. The focal plane detectors are built from pn-CCDs, and a set of thin and thick filters of aluminum layers are mounted on a filter wheel.

2.3. Expected Performance

The angular resolution of the WXT is about 5 arcmin (FWHM) for the central focal spot, and the effective area is in the range of 2–3 cm 2 . The grasp parameter of the WXT is shown in Figure 2. In a 1000 s exposure, a sensitivity of approximately (2–3) × 10 11 ergss 1 cm 2 in the 0.5–4 keV band can be achieved at the 5- σ level. Such sensitivity and spatial resolution improve by one order of magnitude or more upon the previous and current wide-field X-ray monitors.
Operating in the 0.3–10 keV energy range, the FXT has a narrow field of view (60 arcmin in diameter) and an effective area of about 300 cm2 at 1 keV (for one unit). The spatial resolution (PSF) is about 23 arcsec in half-power diameter (HPD), which gives a source localization precision of 5–15 arcsec (90% c.l.) depending on the source intensity. The FXT is responsible for the quick follow-up observations (within 5 min) of the triggered sources from the WXT, and will also observe other targets of interest as target of opportunity (ToO) observations.
Once a transient is detected with the WXT, the spacecraft will slew to point the FXT to the target for quick follow-up observations. Meanwhile, the alert information of the transient will be down-linked quickly to the ground segment and made public to trigger follow-up observations. Quick command up-link for time-critical ToO observations is also possible.
With the unprecedented capability of the WXT and FXT, the EP is expected to characterize the cosmic high-energy transients over wide time scales and at high cadences, revealing new insights into a diverse set of systems including dormant black holes, neutron stars, supernova shock breakouts, active galactic nuclei, X-ray binaries, gamma-ray bursts, stellar coronal activity, and electromagnetic-wave sources and gravitational-wave events. In particular, EP will provide valuable data for the prompt emission of GRBs in the soft X-ray band, which has not been common in previous GRB detections. Meanwhile, EP will also monitor the variability of several types of X-ray sources in large samples all over the sky.

3. eXTP

3.1. Mission Overview

The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission (https://www.isdc.unige.ch/extp/) (eXTP) is designed to study mainly the state of matter under extreme conditions of density, gravity, and magnetic field [21]. The core science objectives of the mission are focused on the determination of the equation of state of matter at supra-nuclear density and the study of the dynamics of accretion/ejection flows under the influence of strong gravitational fields. Thanks to an extensive suite of innovative instruments, the eXTP is designed also to be a general observatory for astrophysics, providing broad capabilities in the X-ray domain (0.5–50 keV) to conduct timing, spectral, and polarimetric observations of a wide variety of galactic and extra-galactic sources. Although the mission is not focusing on GRB science, the availability of a large FoV and sensitive instrument, the WFM (see below), makes the eXTP an important contributor to the possible detection and study of these events in the future.
The eXTP is planned to be the next flagship-class mission led by China, and it is currently in an advanced design phase, where virtually all payload elements have reached a relatively mature technology and could be ready for implementation (see Figure 3). The mission is being studied by a large collaboration including a wide scientific community in China and many European member states. At present, a launch of opportunity has still to be identified, and the programmatics are being cleared in order to possibly bring the eXTP into space in 2028–2029.

3.2. Instrument Design

The eXTP scientific payload consists of four main instruments: the spectroscopic-focusing array (SFA), the large-area detector (LAD), the polarimetry-focusing array (PFA), and the wide-field monitor (WFM). The SFA comprises nine identical Wolter-I grazing-incidence X-ray telescopes and is mainly used for spectral and timing observations of celestial sources in the energy range of 0.5–10 keV. In its current design, the SFA total effective area is 7400 cm2 (at 2 keV) and the instrument FoV is circular with a diameter of 12 arcmin. The instrument achieves an energy resolution of 180 eV at 6 keV and a timing resolution of 10 μ s in the whole operational energy band. The LAD is designed to perform photon-by-photon observations of X-ray sources in the 2–30 keV energy range. The LAD is exploiting the technology of innovative large-area Silicon Drift Detectors [22] (SDDs), to provide an unprecedented large effective area, reaching 3.4 m2 at 8 keV. The instrument is not designed for imaging purposes, and the FoV is limited to 1 deg using micro-channel collimator plates [23] to simultaneously reduce source confusion and background. The LAD achieves an energy resolution of 260 eV at 6 keV and a timing resolution of 10 μ s in the whole operating energy range. A similar instrument is also planned on-board the STROBE-X mission (see Section 10). The WFM exploits the same SDD technology coupled with coded masks to provide a coverage of about 5.5 sr of the sky at any time in the energy range of 2–50 keV. The instrument is capable of localizing X-ray sources within an accuracy of <1 arcmin and performing timing (spectral) investigations on these objects with a time (energy) resolution of 10 μ s (<300 eV at 6 keV). The WFM is equipped with an automatic alert system to promptly broadcast to the ground (within a few tens of seconds at the most) the onset time and position of bright impulsive events detected on-board, including GRBs. A similar instrument is also planned on-board the STROBE-X mission (see Section 10). The PFA provides polarimetric capabilities in the energy range of 2–8 keV, exploiting X-ray optics optimized for polarimetric observations and a similar detector technology compared to that currently flying on the IXPE mission (the so-called gas pixel detectors (GPDs); see, e.g., [24] and the references therein).

3.3. Expected Performance

Given the capabilities of the eXTP/WFM (see Figure 4), a detection rate of about 100 GRB/year has been estimated. The WFM will be able to measure with good accuracy the spectral shape of the detected events and follow the hard to soft evolution of the prompt emission in the 2–50 keV band, where different GRB models are known to make different predictions [25,26]. This could provide information on the composition and magnetization of the emitting plasma, the geometry of the emission, and the structure of the jet and surrounding material. The combination of sensitivity and soft energy coverage of the WFM provides the opportunity to detect a few high redshift (z > 6) GRBs per year and many of the so-far elusive absorption features in tens of medium bright GRBs, probing (among others) the surroundings of GRB progenitors (see [27,28]). The WFM is also expected to detect up to 40 X-ray flashes each year (see [29]).

4. Gamow

4.1. Mission Overview

The Gamow Explorer mission [31] is optimized to: (1) probe the high-redshift universe (z > 6) when the first stars were born, galaxies formed, and Hydrogen was re-ionized and (2) enable multi-messenger astrophysics (MMA) by rapidly identifying electro-magnetic (EM) counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GRBs have been detected out to z∼9 (see, e.g., [32,33] and the references therein), and their afterglows are bright beacons lasting a few days, which can be used to observe the spectral fingerprints of the host galaxy and intergalactic medium. Gamow is designed to detect and rapidly identify high-redshift events. Rapid follow-up spectroscopy with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and >6 m ground-based telescopes provide NIR R 2500 spectra to determine the IGM neutral fraction versus redshift using the damping wing of the Lyman- α absorption line (see Figure 5 from [34]).
GRB afterglows are particularly advantageous for this measurement versus, e.g., using QSOs. GRBs have a featureless power-law spectrum, ideal for fitting the Ly- α absorption profile, are hosted by low-mass galaxies directly tracing the typical ionization state of the IGM, and can be seen out to redshifts of 20, whereas the abundance of QSOs drops steeply with redshift. The same spectra will be used to determine metallicities from absorption lines to trace the early chemical enrichment and measure the escape fraction of ionizing photons that escape the galaxies to ionize atoms in the IGM. The co-moving GRB rate generally follows the star-formation rate (SFR). At higher redshifts, the GRB rate exceeds the SFR derived by other means. The greatly improved measurements of the high-redshift GRB rate by Gamow will provide crucial information to probe potential changes of the initial mass function of massive stars and the star-formation rate at high redshift and constrain GRB progenitors and their properties (e.g., luminosity distributions, progenitor binary fractions, etc.) in the high-redshift universe [33].

4.2. Instrument Design

The lobster-eye X-ray telescope (LEXT) with a wide FoV of ∼1350 sq deg detects GRBs and locates them with arcminute precision. The LEXT utilizes an array of slumped micro-pore optics (MPOs) with 40 μ m square pores and a focal length of 30 cm [36]. The focal plane uses heritage MIT-Lincoln Labs CCDs. The required performance is to detect at least 20 z > 6-long GRBs over a 2.5-year prime mission. A rapidly slewing spacecraft autonomously points the photo-z infra-red telescope (PIRT) within 100 s to identify high-redshift (z > 6) GRBs. The photo-z technique takes advantage of the Hydrogen Lyman- σ absorption, which creates a sharp blue-ward drop out. A 30 cm aluminum RC telescope passively cooled to 200 K feeds a dichroic prism beam splitter to place five images onto a single H2RG detector covering the 0.6 to 2.5 μ m band [37]. The FoV is 10 arcmin square. This design provides the required 15 μ Jy (21 mag AB) 5- σ sensitivity in a single 500 s exposure (see [38]). The high redshift science objectives require rapid follow-up observations to provide NIR medium-resolution spectroscopy (R∼3000) to measure the profile of the Ly- σ absorption line and metal absorption lines from the host galaxy. To obtain a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio in a reasonable observing time requires 6 m class or greater telescopes. Ground-based telescopes begin observations within an hour and JWST and the ELT within 2–3 days (Kann et al., 2024, to be submitted). An L2 orbit provides >95% observing efficiency with pointing optimized for these follow-up observatories. A low-bandwidth continuous S-band connection provides real-time alerts to the ground.

4.3. Expected Performance

Gamow’s capabilities are also optimized for the identification of EM counterparts to binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star black hole (NSBH) mergers detected by the A+ generation of GW detectors. Within <200 s of a GW alert, the real-time low-bandwidth link uploads commands to re-point the LEXT at the GW uncertainty region so as to detect and locate to 3 arcmin precision the accompanying short GRB afterglow (Figure 6). Figure 2 from White et al. [31] shows that the measurement predictions are based on the extrapolation of Swift short GRB afterglow detections to the LEXT pass-band and 600 Mpc source distances (the horizon of the LVK A+ GW detectors). Approximately 80% of Swift short GRBs have X-ray afterglow detections. This demonstrates that they will be detectable by Gamow at BNS-appropriate distances. If a transient X-ray source is detected, an autonomous PIRT pointing will refine the position to 1 arcsec precision and use simultaneous five-band photometry to follow the early phase of the merger. The X-ray and optical–NIR multi-band and multi-wavelength capabilities combined with an agile spacecraft will enable a broad swath of time domain astronomy science, very similar to Swift [39]. While waiting for GRBs and GW events, we envision that Gamow will undertake a community-driven comprehensive time domain astronomy program. The Gamow Explorer was proposed in the 2021 NASA MIDEX call. While it was not successful, there are considerations to re-propose for future NASA opportunities.

5. HiZ-GUNDAM

5.1. Mission Overview

The high-z gamma-ray bursts for unraveling the dark ages mission (HiZ-GUNDAM) (https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/missions/spacecraft/future/hiz-gundam.html) is a future satellite mission, a competitive medium-class mission at ISAS/JAXA, designed to advance time domain astronomy through the observation of high-energy transient phenomena [43]. Two scientific goals are defined: (1) the exploration of the early universe with high-redshift gamma-ray bursts and (2) a contribution to multi-messenger astronomy. These scientific objectives require observational capabilities to detect high-energy transients and to carry out automatic/rapid follow-ups in the near-infrared band. This section provides the description of the current specifications and designs of the satellite and mission payloads, but it is important to note that they are subject to change in subsequent studies and developments.

5.2. Instrument Design

HiZ-GUNDAM has two types of mission payloads: the wide-field X-ray monitor (WFXM) and the near-infrared telescope (NIRT). These payloads are optimized and minimized to achieve the scientific goals [44,45,46,47,48]. We show a schematic view in Figure 7 and basic specification of the WFXM and NIRT in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
The wide-field X-ray monitors (WFXMs) consist of lobster-eye optic arrays and focal imaging sensors (pnCCDs). They are designed to detect high-energy transients within a wide field of view of >0.5 steradian in the 0.5–4 keV energy range. The current design of a single module of the WFXM includes a lobster-eye optic array of 3 × 3 with a 300 mm focal length and a pnCCD with a pixel size of approximately 100 μ m on a 55 × 55 mm2 format at the focus. Multiple modules are installed aboard the spacecraft to monitor the wide FoV.
The near-infrared telescope (NIRT) has an aperture size of 30 cm in diameter and simultaneously observes at five wavelength bands between 0.5 and 2.5 μ m using a dichroic mirror and Kösters. The NIR telescope is cooled to <200 K by radiative cooling to maintain the best sensitivity up to the 2.5 μ m band. The mirrors and structure of the NIRT are primarily made of aluminum alloy to ensure imaging performance remains consistent even if the temperature of the telescope changes in orbit, i.e., an athermal configuration.

5.3. Expected Performance

In Figure 8, we show schematic views of the HiZ-GUNDAM satellite. The size of the satellite bus is about 1 m3, except for the solar paddles and mission payloads. For orbital placement, we have chosen a Sun-synchronous polar orbit along the twilight line. This choice is based on the favorable thermal conditions for the NIRT, which is cooled down to <200 K. However, X-ray observation may face disturbances from both the South Atlantic Anomaly and aurora belt at the high-latitude polar region. The nominal operation of HiZ-GUNDAM follows the sequence outlined below:
  • Set the satellite attitude to a solar separation angle of 120 degrees and a forward movement of 50 degrees.
  • Maintain the inertial pointing direction for approximately 560 s, during which HiZ-GUNDAM monitors X-ray transients.
  • After the monitoring time, the satellite slews to the same attitude configuration as described in (1), but with a different pointing direction to prevent thermal radiation from the Earth exposing the NIRT.
This nominal sequence is repeated, and the observation of eight different fields of view is performed in every orbit. The satellite continuously monitors the X-ray sky, except during the maneuver. This optimized sequence facilitates follow-up observations with the NIR telescope. HiZ-GUNDAM can execute this operation for 97% of the GRBs discovered by itself, ensuring more than 10 min of follow-up time in each case.

6. LEAP

6.1. Mission Overview

The LargE Area burst Polarimeter (https://sti.usra.edu/in-the-news/leap-mission-study/ (LEAP) is a mission that was proposed in 2021 to NASA’s Astrophysics Mission of Opportunity Program. The LEAP instrument is a wide-FoV Compton polarimeter that measures GRB polarization over the energy range from 50 keV to 1 MeV and performs GRB spectroscopy from 20 keV to 5 MeV. If approved (a final decision on the selection is expected during the first quarter of 2024), it will be deployed as an external payload on the International Space Station (ISS) in 2027 for a three-year mission [49,50]. The LEAP science investigation is based on the ability to distinguish between three classes of GRB models [51]. The baseline science investigation requires the observation of 65 GRBs with a minimum detectable polarization (MDP) of 30% or better. Evidence of polarized γ -ray emission in GRBs (>100 keV) has been accumulated in recent years, but the limited sensitivity of these measurements does not yet yield a clear picture of the underlying physics [52,53,54]. A sensitive and systematic study of GRB polarization, such as the one that will be provided by LEAP, is needed to remedy this situation.

6.2. Detector Design

The LEAP payload (Figure 9) consists of an array of seven independent polarimeter modules, each with a 12 × 12 array of optically isolated high-Z and low-Z scintillation detectors read out by individual PMTs. Each polarimeter module includes 84 plastic scintillator elements, 58 CsI(Tl) scintillator elements, and two Co 60 calibration sources. Each calibration source consists of a small plastic scintillator doped with Co 60 , which permits electronic tagging of each decay via the coincident β particle. As a Compton polarimeter, scatter events recorded by the scintillator array within each module are used to measure polarization. Within each module, the arrangement of plastic and CsI(Tl) scintillation detectors is designed to optimize the polarization response. The dominant type of scatter event is one involving only two detector elements, in which incident photons scatter from a low-Z plastic detector element into a high-Z CsI(Tl) element. The distribution of azimuthal scatter angles for these events provides a polarization signature. The total effective area for polarimetry is ∼1000 cm2 at energies above 100 keV. Since the total energy deposit is a sum of the energy deposits in all triggered elements, spectroscopic information is provided by all types of events of any multiplicity (both single events and scatter events). To characterize the GRB parameters, spectroscopic measurements (20–5000 keV) are obtained using all event types (both multiple and single events), with a total effective area that reaches >3000 cm2 between 50 and 500 keV.
To accurately reconstruct the source spectrum and polarization, LEAP self-sufficiently determines the source direction using single events from all 420 CsI(Tl) elements, whose relative response provides the source localization. Localization errors of < 5 ° (1 σ ) are obtained at a rate of about 40 per year. This is sufficiently precise to enable rapid follow-up by many ground-based instruments using the rapid burst response messages that will be generated and distributed (in real time) by LEAP.

6.3. Expected Performance

As a wide-FoV instrument, LEAP maintains some level of polarization sensitivity out to at least 75° off-axis, providing an effective FoV of ∼1.5 π sr. Minimal obstructions from the ISS within the FoV maximize sky exposure and minimize photon absorption and scattering effects. However, scattered flux from ISS structures (such as solar panels) must always be considered in the analysis of both the spectrum and the polarization. Response simulations spanning a range in energy, spectral shape, and incidence direction have been used in estimates of instrument performance. Figure 10 shows, for a three-year mission, the number of expected GRBs as a function of MDP. These estimates show that LEAP will attain its requirement of 65 GRBs with <30% MDP, with a significant margin.

7. MoonBEAM

7.1. Mission Overview

The Moon Burst Energetics All-sky Monitor (MoonBEAM) is a proposed gamma-ray mission to observe the entire sky instantaneously for relativistic astrophysical explosions from a cislunar orbit. It is designed to explore the behavior of matter and energy under extreme conditions by observing the prompt emission from GRBs, identifying the conditions capable of launching transient relativistic jets and the origins of high-energy radiation from the relativistic outflows. MoonBEAM provides the essential continuous all-sky gamma-ray observations for time domain and multi-messenger astrophysics by reporting on any prompt emission of a GRB and by providing the critical first alerts to the community for contemporaneous and follow-up observations.

7.2. Detector Design

MoonBEAM achieves instantaneous, all-sky coverage by positioning six gamma-ray detector assemblies at the corners of the spacecraft to minimize blockage (see Figure 11), and by deploying the observatory in an Earth–Moon Lagrange Point 3 cislunar orbit instead of low-Earth orbit (LEO) to reduce the particle background from radiation belts, atmospheric interactions, and planetary occultation from 30% to < < 1% of the sky.
Each detector assembly consists of a NaI(Tl)/CsI(Na) phoswich scintillator coupled to flat-panel photomultiplier tubes. The phoswich design allows for both localization improvement and increased effective area for spectroscopy. It is sensitive to 10–5000 keV photons, with an energy resolution better than 12% at 662 keV.

7.3. Expected Performance

MoonBEAM is expected to detect more than 1000 GRBs over 30 months of operation, with an intrinsic localization capability similar to that of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. In the absence of a detection, MoonBEAM provides unprecedented sensitive gamma-ray upper limits for any externally detected transients such as mergers seen in gravitational waves and supernovae detected in optical wavelengths, estimated to be in the order of thousands over the operation time of MoonBEAM. Figure 12 shows the 1-second limiting flux sensitivity of MoonBEAM across the entire sky.
The wide-field, sensitive, and continuous gamma-ray coverage is necessary to advance our current understanding of astrophysical jet formation, structure, and evolution. MoonBEAM achieves sensitivity improvement over current missions in LEO because of the combined advantage of its cislunar orbit and instrument design. It will join the Interplanetary Gamma-ray Burst Timing Network [55] as one of the few missions outside of LEO with gamma-ray sensitivity and the only one outside of LEO with the capability of on-board transient localization.

8. POLAR-2

8.1. Mission Overview

POLAR-2 (https://www.unige.ch/dpnc/polar-2 is a dedicated GRB polarimeter foreseen to be launched in 2027 towards the China Space Station (CSS). The detector is being developed by an international collaboration consisting of teams from Switzerland, Poland, Germany, and China. The project is currently ready for the production of the flight model after a prototype was successfully tested for physics performance and space qualification in 2023. POLAR-2 is a successor of the POLAR mission, which detected 55 GRBs between October 2016 and April 2017 and performed polarization measurements in the energy range of 50–500 keV of 14 of these [56], as well as of the Crab pulsar [57].
Although the measurement results of POLAR are the most constraining GRB polarization measurements to date, they are only able to constrain the polarization degree to be below ≈40%. Therefore, the results remain consistent with the majority of the existing theoretical predictions [58]. This, along with the hint of an evolution of the polarization with time observed in two of the GRBs [56], indicates the need for a significantly more sensitive detector. For this purpose, the POLAR-2 detector was initiated in 2017, followed by an approval for launch towards the CSS, through a United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs call in 2019.

8.2. Detector Design

Compared to its predecessor, the POLAR-2 detector will be a factor of four larger in size, thereby employing a total of 6400 plastic scintillator bars. These scintillators are read out in groups of 64, using segmented SiPM arrays connected to their own front-end electronics, as indicated in Figure 13. As the GRB photons enter the detector, they can undergo Compton scattering in the detector array, followed by photo-absorption in a second scintillator. Their azimuthal scattering angle can be constrained using the relative position of the two scintillators in which the photon interacted. As the photons will scatter preferentially perpendicular to their initial polarization, this measurement allows determining the polarization of the incoming photon flux.
While the increase in detector area provides an increase in effective area bu a factor of four compared to POLAR, further improvements to its design allow for additional improvements in its sensitivity. In particular, the switch from the PMTs as used in POLAR to SiPMs results in a significant increase in sensitivity at lower energies.

8.3. Expected Performance

Thanks to all the design improvements, POLAR-2 is approximately an order of magnitude more sensitive compared to POLAR, as indicated in Figure 14. As a result, POLAR-2 will be able to perform constraining polarization measurements for GRBs with fluences as low as 10 6 erg cm−2, while measurements able to constrain the polarization degree below 10% will be possible for about 10–15 GRBs per year.
The POLAR-2 detector will also contribute to transient alerts thanks to its large effective area, which exceeds 2000 cm 2 . This large effective area, combined with continuous observations of half the sky and almost continuous communication to the ground will allow POLAR-2 to send alerts within one minute from the onset of about one GRB every 2 days. As the instrument furthermore has access to a GPU on-board the CSS, studies are currently ongoing on how to optimize GRB spectral and location information within such alerts [60].

9. StarBurst

9.1. Mission Overview

The StarBurst Multimessenger Pioneer is a highly sensitive and wide-field gamma-ray monitor designed to detect the prompt emission of gamma-ray bursts. StarBurst is designed as a SmallSat to be deployed to LEO as a secondary payload using the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Secondary Payload Adapter (ESPA) Grande interface for a nominal 1-year mission starting in 2027 to coincide with LIGO’s scheduled fifth observing run. StarBurst will utilize NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (https://www.nasa.gov/mission/tracking-and-data-relay-satellites/ (TDRS) system to report possible electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave mergers with low latency via the GCN system. StarBurst is among the first of NASA’s new Pioneer-class missions, intended to perform compelling astrophysics science at a lower cost than missions in the Explorers Program. The Pioneer program provides opportunities for early-to-mid-career researchers to propose innovative experiments and lead space or suborbital science investigations for the first time.

9.2. Instrument Design

StarBurst relies heavily on the heritage of the GBM, Glowbug, and BurstCube instruments, consisting of an array of 12 NaI(TI) scintillator detectors that utilize new, low-mass, and low-voltage SiPMs to cover an energy range from 30 keV to 2 MeV. The StarBurst detectors are arranged to form a half cube, with two detectors mounted side-by-side to form four sides of the cube and four detectors comprising the top, as shown in Figure 15. This configuration maximizes the available active surface area of the instrument given the volume constraints imposed on ESPA-Grande Rideshare Payloads and provides coverage of the entire unocculted sky. Each of the individual StarBurst detectors consists of a 24 cm × 24 cm × 1.6 cm NaI(TI) scintillator read out by an array of SiPMs and enclosed in a housing with a thin (1 mm) aluminum window transparent down to 30 keV and a beryllium-copper back shield to provide strong attenuation below 200 keV. The scintillation light is read out by a 2 × 38 linear array of 6 mm × 6 mm J-Series SiPMs from ON Semiconductor (formerly SensL) optically coupled through an elastomeric silicone optical pad to a single edge of the NaI(Tl) crystal. Edge readout of the NaI(TI) exploits the planar geometry of the crystal to pipe scintillation light to the SiPM array. Each of the detectors has a dedicated bias voltage supply and Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA) for independent operation. The MCA is a Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) Bridgeport Instruments slimMorpho with an on-board 20 MHz oscillator and flash ADC.

9.3. Expected Performance

The scientific performance of the StarBurst instrument was assessed through Monte Carlo simulations using Geometry and Tracking 4 (GEANT4) ([61]). The peak StarBurst effective area between 50 and 300 keV, averaged over azimuth, is roughly 3000 cm2, or roughly 500% that of the GBM (Figure 16. This provides an estimated detection efficiency of > 90 % for a 64 ms peak flux (photons cm−2 s−1) of 0.9 for SGRBs (<2 s) and a 1024 ms peak flux of 0.25 for long GRBs (>2 s). Because StarBurst will have a similar field of view and duty cycle as the GBM, it is estimated that StarBurst will detect 158 SGRBs per year, compared to the 40 and 8.6 SGRBs detected by the GBM and Swift, respectively. StarBurst is estimated to achieve a localization uncertainty within 8° (1 σ ) for an SGRB with a 1 photon cm−2 s−1 64 ms peak flux. For SGRBs with a 64 ms peak flux comparable to GRB 170817, or about 3 photons cm−2 s−1, StarBurst is expected to achieve a localization uncertainty of < 3 ° (1 σ ). Employing the technique developed in Howell et al. [62], along with the StarBurst detection efficiency and the projected A+ (LHVKI) BNS detection efficiency, provides an estimate joint GW–SGRB detection rate of roughly seven joint GW–SGRB detections per year.

10. STROBE-X

10.1. Mission Overview

The Spectroscopic Time-Resolving Observatory for Broadband Energy X-rays (https://strobe-x.org/) (STROBE-X) is a mission proposed to the NASA call for an X-ray probe-class ($1B PI-managed cost cap) mission responding to the recommendations of the 2020 Astrophysics Decadal Survey (Astro2020; see Figure 17). It has a broad range of science goals with a focus on time domain and transient events in the era of multi-wavelength and multi-messenger astronomy. It combines a huge collecting area, high throughput on bright sources, broad energy coverage, and excellent spectral and temporal resolution in a single facility. With its wide field of view, agile spacecraft, and low-latency communications, it would be a critical component of the NASA Time Domain and Multi-Messenger (TDAMM) program.

10.2. Instrument Design

STROBE-X carries three instruments. The Low-Energy Modular Array (LEMA) covers the soft or low-energy band (0.2–12 keV) with an array of lightweight optics (3 m focal length) that concentrate incident photons onto small solid-state detectors with a CCD-level (85–175 eV) energy resolution, a 100 ns time resolution, and low background rates. This technology has been fully developed for NICER and will be scaled up to take advantage of the longer focal length of LEMA, which provides a factor of 8.5 improvement in effective area over NICER with over 1.6 m2. The High-Energy Modular Array (HEMA) covers the harder or higher energy band (2–30 keV or beyond), with modules of Si drift detectors and micro-pore collimators originally developed for the European LOFT and eXTP mission concepts. HEMA provides a factor of 5.5 improvement in effective area (3.4 m2) and ∼3 in spectral resolution (200–300 eV) over the RXTE/PCA. The Wide-Field Monitor (WFM) comprises a set of coded-aperture cameras operating in the 2–50 keV band, which have a combined instantaneous field of view of 1/3 of the sky, with arcmin localization capability. It will act as a trigger for pointed observations of X-ray transients and will also provide high duty-cycle, high time-resolution, and high spectral-resolution monitoring of the dynamic X-ray sky. The WFM will have 15-times the sensitivity of the RXTE All-Sky Monitor, enabling multi-wavelength and multi-messenger investigations with a large instantaneous field of view, down to a new, order-of-magnitude lower flux regime. On-board processing will detect bursts in real time and provide notifications to the ground, as well as triggering autonomous slews to get the pointed instrument on source in a few minutes.
Figure 17. Rendering of the STROBE-X spacecraft, showing the 3 science instruments. LEMA and HEMA are co-aligned narrow FoV instruments, while the WFM has an instantaneous FoV of 1/3 of the sky.
Figure 17. Rendering of the STROBE-X spacecraft, showing the 3 science instruments. LEMA and HEMA are co-aligned narrow FoV instruments, while the WFM has an instantaneous FoV of 1/3 of the sky.
Universe 10 00187 g017

10.3. Expected Performance

STROBE-X will make major advances in several areas of GRB and multi-messenger astronomy (Figure 18). The WFM will detect and localize >5 short GRBs per year and distribute the position accurate to 2 arcmin, brightness, and timing to the ground in <5 min. In some cases, it will measure the redshift directly from the X-ray data (from the location of absorption edges in their spectra). STROBE-X will study the plateau emission of both short and long GRBs and provide unique diagnostics of whether the emission comes from millisecond magnetars or structured jets, revealing the nature of the central engines.
STROBE-X will also be triggered by ground-based GW detections and get the pointed instruments on source within <11.5 min, given access to early afterglows with the tremendous collecting area and CCD-quality spectral resolution of LEMA.
The large grasp and softer response than many GRB missions will give STROBE-X access to unusual GRB phenomena that have not been well studied so far, including X-ray flashes (XRFs) and ultra-long GRBs (ULGRBs). Detecting and localizing >10 XRFs per year will increase the samples of these sources and break the degeneracies in the models for the source mechanisms.

11. SVOM

11.1. Mission Overview

The Space-based Variable astronomical Object Monitor (SVOM) mission is dedicated to gamma-ray burst studies and, in general, to time domain astrophysics, including multi-messenger science. It is optimized to detect and follow-up all types of GRBs, but particularly tailored for high-redshift GRBs thanks to its low-energy triggering threshold of around 4 keV. One of the main goals of SVOM is to produce a complete catalog of GRBs, including their redshift measurements. For this purpose, SVOM will follow an anti-solar pointing strategy and will avoid the galactic plane, in order to facilitate the observations from ground-based observatories and robotic telescopes. That is why SVOM is composed of a space segment, as well as a few ground-based dedicated follow-up facilities. SVOM alerts will be promptly transmitted to the ground through a dedicated network of VHF antennas and through the Chinese Beidou inter-satellite communications link. The goal is for ground observers to receive SVOM alerts less than 30 s after the GRB is detected on board. The SVOM satellite will be launched from China around mid-2024 with an LM 2-C rocket and injected in a low-Earth orbit (h∼600 km) with an inclination of about 30°. It will carry four co-aligned instruments. Two instruments (ECLAIRs and GRM) are sensitive in the hard X-/soft gamma-ray energy range and have a wide FoV, in order to monitor vast regions of the sky and detect gamma-ray transients. Two narrow FoV instruments (MXT and VT) will be used to follow-up and characterize the afterglow emission. The SVOM-integrated payload is shown in Figure 19.

11.2. Instrument Design

ECLAIRs is a coded-mask telescope, composed of a 54 × 54 cm2 pseudo-random coded mask made of a Ti-Ta-Ti sandwich (10/0.6/10 mm) placed 45.8 cm above a pixelated detection plane made of 80 × 80 CdTe crystals (4 × 4 × 1 mm3). Its FoV is about 2 sr (89° × 89°) wide. ECLAIRs is sensitive in the 4 keV–150 keV energy range, and it comprises on-board software to detect and localize (to better than 13 arcmin) in near-real time the GRBs that appear in its FoV. Once a new transient is detected, ECLAIRs issues an alert and requests the platform to slew so that the error box can be observed by the narrow-field instruments.
ECLAIRs is complemented by the Gamma-ray Monitor (GRM), a set of three 1.5 cm thick NaI scintillators of 16 cm in diameter, each one offset by 120° with respect to each other and with a combined FoV of ∼2.6 sr. The GRM has poor localization capabilities, but it extends the SVOM spectral range up to about 5 MeV and increases the probability of the simultaneous detection of short GRBs and GW alerts.
The Microchannel X-ray Telescope is a light (<42 kg) and compact (focal length of ∼1.15 m) X-ray-focusing telescope; its sensitivity below 1 mCrab makes it the ideal instrument to detect, identify, and localize down to the arcmin level X-ray afterglows of the SVOM GRBs. Its optical design is based on a “lobster-eye” grazing-incidence X-ray optics, inspired by the vision of some crustacean decapods. It is composed of 25 square MPO plates of 40 mm each arranged in a 5 × 5 configuration. Although lobster-eye optics were originally developed for large-FoV telescopes (several tens of square degrees), the MXT optical design is optimized for a (relatively) small FoV of 58 × 58 arcmin2. The “lobster-eye” technique results in a peculiar point-spread function (PSF), made by a central peak and two cross-arms. The MXT optics is coupled with a focal plane based on a pnCCD sensor, cooled at −65°, sensitive in the 0.2–10 keV energy band. The MXT will localize GRB afterglows to better than the arcminute for the majority of them.
The Visible Telescope (VT) is a Ritchey–Chretien telescope with a 40 cm diameter primary mirror. Its field of view is 26 × 26 arcmin2 wide, adapted to cover the ECLAIRs error box in most of the cases. It has two channels, a blue one (400–650 nm) and a red one (650–1000 nm), and a sensitivity limit of M V = 22.5 in 300 s, allowing the detection ∼80% of the ECLAIRs GRBs. The main characteristics of the SVOM space segment are summarized in Table 3.
The SVOM mission is also provided with a number of dedicated telescopes on the ground. In particular, here, we mention the following:
  • The Ground-Based Wide-Angle Cameras (GWACs), a set of 36 optical cameras with a combined FoV of 5400 deg2, located in Ali (China), whose goal is to catch the prompt optical emission for the ECLAIRs GRBs;
  • The Chinese Ground Follow-up Telescope (C-GFT), a robotic 1 m class telescope, with a 21 × 21 arcmin2 FoV, located in Xinglog (China) and sensitive in the 400-950 nm wavelength range;
  • The French Ground Follow-up Telescope (F-GFT, Colibri), a robotic 1 m class telescope, with a 26 × 26 arc min2 FoV, located in San Pedro Martir (Mexico) and with multi-band photometry capabilities over the 400–1700 nm wavelength range.
Other robotic telescopes will be part of the SVOM follow-up system, but they will not be fully dedicated to SVOM.

11.3. Expected Performance

The understanding of the GRB physics requires observations in the largest spectral domain and in the largest temporal interval, from the possible precursor up to the transition between the prompt and afterglow emissions. Simultaneous observation of the prompt GRB event in the gamma-ray, X-ray, and visible bands, combined with narrow field observations of the afterglow in the X-ray, visible, and near-infrared bands immediately after the beginning of the event will enable a better understanding of the mechanisms at work in such events. New measurements (gravitational wave, gamma-ray polarization, neutrinos) may also become possible in the future, and their impact on the physical understanding of the GRB phenomenon will be maximized if these measurements are made for bursts whose “standard” properties, including the distance, are well measured. The SVOM mission is well adapted to these objectives. Compared to previous missions, it offers simultaneously (i) the capacity to trigger on all types of GRBs (especially on X-ray-rich and ultra-long ones); (ii) an excellent efficiency of the follow-up and the redshift measurement; (iii) a good spectral coverage of the prompt emission by ECLAIRs+GRM, allowing a detailed modeling (for a significant fraction of SVOM GRBs, the GWAC will provide, in addition, a measurement or an upper limit on the prompt optical emission); and (iv) a good temporal and spectral coverage of the prompt and afterglow emission thanks to the MXT, VT, and GFTs.
Concerning multi-messenger astrophysics, SVOM with its ground and space instruments will offer a large and complementary follow-up capability through ToOs. The GWAC with its 5000 sq. deg. coverage can start the observation from the alert reception. The GFTs with their small FoV will confirm GWAC candidates and will be able to perform follow-up for well-localized events. To activate the satellite instruments, we will rely on a specific ToO program to send the observation program using S-band stations. This program guarantees less than 12 h between the alert and the start of space observations (less can be expected for most cases) and can be activated around 20-times per year. From space, the MXT and its 1 sq. deg. FoV will have the possibility to cover a larger sky portion using a specific tiling procedure.

12. THESEUS

12.1. Mission Overview

The Transient High-Energy Sky and Early Universe Surveyor (https://www.isdc.unige.ch/theseus/) (THESEUS) mission concept aims to fully exploit GRBs for investigating the early universe, around the epoch of re-ionization, and substantially advancing multi-messenger astrophysics (see Figure 20). THESEUS is planned to also simultaneously increase the discovery space of high-energy transient phenomena and allow tests of fundamental physics. The core science goals of THESEUS are summarized as follows:
  • Investigating the first billion years of the universe through high-redshift GRBs, thus shedding light on the main open issues in modern cosmology, like (i) the population of primordial low-mass and -luminosity galaxies; (ii) the drivers and evolution of cosmic re-ionization; and (iii) the star-formation rate (SFR) and metallicity evolution up to the “cosmic dawn” and across Pop-III stars.
  • Providing a substantial advancement of multi-messenger and time domain astrophysics by enabling the identification, accurate localization, and study of (i) electromagnetic counterparts to sources of gravitational waves and neutrinos, which will be routinely detected in the mid-2030s by the second- and third-generation gravitational wave (GW) interferometers and future neutrino detectors and (ii) all kinds of GRBs and most classes of other X-/gamma-ray transient sources.
The achievement of these scientific objectives will be possible by a mission concept including: (a) a set of innovative wide-field monitors with an unprecedented combination of a broad energy range, sensitivity, FoV, and localization accuracy and (b) an on-board autonomous fast follow-up in the optical/NIR band, arcsec location, and redshift measurement of detected GRB/transients.
THESEUS has been selected twice by the European Space Agency (ESA) for a phase A study (in 2018 and 2022), aiming at demonstrating its technological and programmatic feasibility within the boundaries of a medium-sized mission. THESEUS is currently undergoing its second phase A study, with a further selection step expected in 2026 and eventually a launch planned in 2037. Nominal scientific operations are being planned for four years, but the lack of on-board consumables makes it feasible for the mission to extend operations in space well beyond the nominal lifetime.

12.2. Instruments’ Design

Three instruments are planned on-board THESEUS. The Soft X-ray Imager (SXI) uses lobster-eye wide-field (∼0.5 sr) focusing optics to increase the mission’s sensitivity to fast transients in the 0.3–5 keV energy band. The use of such optics provides uniform sensitivity across a very large field of view while maintaining arcminute localization accuracy. The X- and Gamma-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XGIS) is a GRB and transient monitor providing an unprecedented combination of an exceptionally wide energy band (2 keV–10 MeV), imaging capabilities, and location accuracy. The latter achieves <15 arcmin up to 150 keV over an FoV of 2 π . The instrument is also characterized by an energy resolution of a few hundred eV at energies <30 keV and a time resolution of a few μ s over the whole energy band. Finally, the Infra-Red Telescope (IRT) is mainly conceived to detect, identify, and measure the redshift of GRB afterglows detected by the SXI and the XGIS, especially those at high redshifts ( z > 6 ). The IRT is a 70 cm Korsch telescope, optimized for an off-axis line of sight (LoS) of 0.884 deg. The optical design will implement two separated FoVs, one for photometry with a minimal size of 15 × 15 arcmin (potentially extendable to 17 × 20 arcmin) and one for spectroscopy of 2 × 2 arcmin. On the photometric field of view, the IRT will be able to acquire images using five different filters (I, Z, Y, J, and H) and, on the spectroscopic field of view, will provide moderate resolution (R∼400) slit-less spectroscopy in the 0.8–1.6 μ m range.

12.3. Expected Performance

THESEUS has two main core science objectives: the characterization of the physics of the high-redshift universe and the electromagnetic characterization of gravitational wave transients (above all, the neutron star binary mergers). Long and short GRBs will be exploited for this scope. The first objective is instrumental to the understanding of the emergence of the first structures in the universe, including the mass function of the high-redshift galaxies and the metal enrichment in the early stages of the universe (at the epoch of the re-ionization). The second objective has transformational potential, building upon the first-ever gravitational wave multi-messenger detection thus far, i.e., GW170817. THESEUS’s observations and discoveries in this field are expected to unveil the nature of ultra-dense matter, pin down the physics of relativistic jets, and help us understand the nucleosynthesis of heavy elements (in turn, probing fundamental aspects of general relativity and cosmology). We show in Figure 21 the total number of GRBs expected to be detected during the nominal lifetime of the mission (corresponding to 3.45 yrs of scientific operations) compared to the total number of GRBs discovered from 2005 up to 2020. The transformational capabilities of THESEUS in these respects can well be appreciated from this figure.

13. Conclusions

In this paper, we provided an overview of a number of missions, either close to beginning scientific operations or being planned for the coming/far future, that are expected to dramatically widen our capability of detecting and characterizing bright impulsive transient events of astrophysical interest, such as (but not limited to) GRBs. The list of missions is not meant to be exhaustive, especially in view of the recent fast-growing interest of the international community in the fields of time domain and multi-messenger astrophysics, which is driving many parallel developments in several countries around the globe. The missions presented here have been or are being conceived based on largely overlapping science objectives, which have, as main celestial targets, transient and fast variable sources (down to time scales as short as fractions of a second). Catching and studying these objects typically requires the simultaneous availability of large-FoV X-/ γ -ray instruments efficiently (i.e., with high duty cycles) monitoring the high-energy sky and either narrower field instruments providing higher sensitivity measurements in complementary energy domains (from space, as well as from the ground) or advanced detector technologies paving the way to poorly explored regions of the relevant parameter space (e.g., high-energy polarimetry, simultaneous energy–time-resolved spectroscopy, etc.). Given the largely different programmatic states of all summarized missions and the dynamic evolution of the design of at least those missions that are still in the early design and programmatic stage, providing an exhaustive comparison of their performance capabilities in different scientific fields is hardly achievable with sufficient confidence and, thus, beyond the scope of the present paper.
At the time of writing, the EP is the first of the described mission to come on-line, as the launch was successfully executed on 2024 January 9 and information on the first results is expected to be publicly available soon. SVOM is planned to be the second in line, with a launch planned for June 2024. As described in the previous sections, both missions are likely to boost the number of GRBs, as well as other high-energy transients, to be discovered, characterized, and possibly followed-up in different energy domains during the next (at least) ∼5 years. The lifetime of both the EP and SVOM will significantly overlap with the scientific runs of the current generation of GW detectors, such as LIGO and VIRGO, possibly providing the discovery of electromagnetic counterparts of merging binary systems. A similar conclusion applies to the case of StarBurst, the launch of which is currently planned in 2027, and the 1-year expected duration of science operations shall match the LIGO’s scheduled so-called fifth observing run. In 2027, also the installation of POLAR-2 onto the CSS is being planned, and this should bring to the community a much deeper insight into the polarization properties of GRBs, extending the outcomes of previous investigations in this domain from its predecessor, POLAR. Less certain, at present, is the path to the beginning of operations for a few more missions presented, the eXTP, Gamow, HiZ-GUNDAM, LEAP, and MoonBEAM. The advanced design state of all these missions could possibly bring them to space between the late 2020s and the early 2030s, making them largely complementary and uniquely valuable for discoveries in the field of time domain and multi-messenger astrophysics to the EP, SVOM, and StarBurst. STROBE-X and THESEUS are being planned for scientific operations no earlier than the mid- to late-2030s. STROBE-X is competing with several other candidate missions in both the X-ray and IR domain within the NASA 2023 Probe mission call (https://explorers.larc.nasa.gov/2023APPROBE/, while THESEUS is competing against two further candidate missions for a launch opportunity in ∼2037 within the context of the ESA’s seventh call for medium-sized missions (https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Final_three_for_ESA_s_next_medium_science_mission). Although the possible launch dates of STROBE-X and THESEUS are projected relatively far in the future, their timeline could interestingly match the planned observational runs from the third generation of GW detectors, such as the Einstein Telescope (ET) (see, e.g., [63,64] and the references therein) and the Cosmic Explorer (CE) (see, e.g., [65] and the references therein). The enhanced sensitivity of these instruments would greatly increase the number of possibly detected electromagnetic counterparts of GW sources, reaching up to a few tens per year, as reported, e.g., in the case of THESEUS [66].

Author Contributions

E.B. coordinated the overall work; W.Y. and H.S. provided information on the Einstein Probe; E.B., S.-N.Z., M.F., M.H. and A.S. provided information on the eXTP; N.W., S.G., T.-C.C., M.S., W.B., C.K. and A.v.d.H. provided information on Gamow; D.Y., A.D. and H.M. provided information on HiZ-GUNDAM; M.L.M., J.G., C.W.-H. and P.V. provided information on LEAP; C.M.H., C.W.-H., A.G. and P.J. provided information on MoonBEAM; M.K., N.P. and N.D.A. provided information on POLAR-2; D.K. and J.E.G. provided information on StarBurst; P.R., C.F., P.S.R. and T.M. provided information on STROBE-X; D.G., B.C. and J.W. provided information on SVOM; E.B., L.A., D.G., P.O. and A.S. provided information on THESEUS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

L.A. acknowledges support from the Italian Ministry of University and Research through grant PRIN MIUR 2020-2020KB33TP METE and the INAF grant program 2022.

Data Availability Statement

This paper contains information about different missions either being planned for the future or starting nominal operations soon. Further details on all missions considered can be found on the corresponding websites (if applicable) or in complementary material in the literature.

Acknowledgments

We thank all referees for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Klebesadel, R.W.; Strong, I.B.; Olson, R.A. Observations of Gamma-ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin. ApJL 1973, 182, L85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vigliano, A.; Longo, F. Gamma-ray Bursts: 50 Years and Counting! Universe 2024, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aptekar, R.L.; Frederiks, D.D.; Golenetskii, S.V.; Ilynskii, V.N.; Mazets, E.P.; Panov, V.N.; Sokolova, Z.J.; Terekhov, M.M.; Sheshin, L.O.; Cline, T.L.; et al. Konus-W Gamma-ray Burst Experiment for the GGS Wind Spacecraft. SSRv 1995, 71, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tsvetkova, A.; Frederiks, D.; Svinkin, D.; Aptekar, R.; Cline, T.L.; Golenetskii, S.; Hurley, K.; Lysenko, A.; Ridnaia, A.; Ulanov, M. The Konus-Wind Catalog of Gamma-ray Bursts with Known Redshifts. II. Waiting-Mode Bursts Simultaneously Detected by Swift/BAT. ApJ 2021, 908, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Harmon, B.A.; Fishman, G.J.; Wilson, C.A.; Paciesas, W.S.; Zhang, S.N.; Finger, M.H.; Koshut, T.M.; McCollough, M.L.; Robinson, C.R.; Rubin, B.C. The Burst and Transient Source Experiment Earth Occultation Technique. ApJS 2002, 138, 149–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Band, D.; Matteson, J.; Ford, L.; Schaefer, B.; Palmer, D.; Teegarden, B.; Cline, T.; Briggs, M.; Paciesas, W.; Pendleton, G.; et al. BATSE Observations of Gamma-ray Burst Spectra. I. Spectral Diversity. ApJ 1993, 413, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaneko, Y.; Preece, R.D.; Briggs, M.S.; Paciesas, W.S.; Meegan, C.A.; Band, D.L. The Complete Spectral Catalog of Bright BATSE Gamma-ray Bursts. ApJS 2006, 166, 298–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frontera, F.; Guidorzi, C.; Montanari, E.; Rossi, F.; Costa, E.; Feroci, M.; Calura, F.; Rapisarda, M.; Amati, L.; Carturan, D.; et al. The Gamma-ray Burst Catalog Obtained with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Aboard BeppoSAX. ApJS 2009, 180, 192–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boella, G.; Butler, R.C.; Perola, G.C.; Piro, L.; Scarsi, L.; Bleeker, J.A.M. BeppoSAX, the wide band mission for X-ray astronomy. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1997, 122, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Demianski, M.; Piedipalumbo, E.; Sawant, D.; Amati, L. Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts. I. The Hubble diagram through the calibrated Ep,I-Eiso correlation. A&A 2017, 598, A112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdalla, E.; Abellán, G.F.; Aboubrahim, A.; Agnello, A.; Akarsu, Ö.; Akrami, Y.; Alestas, G.; Aloni, D.; Amendola, L.; Anchordoqui, L.A.; et al. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. J. High Energy Astrophys. 2022, 34, 49–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abbott, B.P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V.B.; et al. Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. ApJL 2017, 848, L13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Troja, E.; Fryer, C.L.; O’Connor, B.; Ryan, G.; Dichiara, S.; Kumar, A.; Ito, N.; Gupta, R.; Wollaeger, R.T.; Norris, J.P.; et al. A nearby long gamma-ray burst from a merger of compact objects. Nature 2022, 612, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dichiara, S.; Tsang, D.; Troja, E.; Neill, D.; Norris, J.P.; Yang, Y.H. A Luminous Precursor in the Extremely Bright GRB 230307A. ApJL 2023, 954, L29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tavani, M.; Barbiellini, G.; Argan, A.; Boffelli, F.; Bulgarelli, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cattaneo, P.W.; Chen, A.W.; Cocco, V.; Costa, E.; et al. The AGILE Mission. A&A 2009, 502, 995–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, K.P.; Tandon, S.N.; Agrawal, P.C.; Antia, H.M.; Manchanda, R.K.; Yadav, J.S.; Seetha, S.; Ramadevi, M.C.; Rao, A.R.; Bhattacharya, D.; et al. ASTROSAT mission. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma ray, Montréal, QC, Canada, 29 July 2014; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Series. Takahashi, T., den Herder, J.W.A., Bautz, M., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2014; Volume 9144, p. 91441S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Atwood, W.B.; Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.; Althouse, W.; Anderson, B.; Axelsson, M.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Band, D.L.; Barbiellini, G.; et al. The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission. ApJ 2009, 697, 1071–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Winkler, C. INTEGRAL: Overview and Mission Concept. ApJS 1994, 92, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gehrels, N.; Chincarini, G.; Giommi, P.; Mason, K.O.; Nousek, J.A.; Wells, A.A.; White, N.E.; Barthelmy, S.D.; Burrows, D.N.; Cominsky, L.R.; et al. The Swift Gamma-ray Burst Mission. ApJ 2004, 611, 1005–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuan, W.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.; Ling, Z. The Einstein Probe Mission. In Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics; Springer: Singapore, 2022; p. 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santangelo, A.; Zhang, S.N.; Feroci, M.; Hernanz, M.; Lu, F.; Xu, Y. The Enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry Mission: eXTP. In Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics; Bambi, C., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; p. 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rachevski, A.; Zampa, G.; Zampa, N.; Campana, R.; Evangelista, Y.; Giacomini, G.; Picciotto, A.; Bellutti, P.; Feroci, M.; Labanti, C.; et al. Large-area linear Silicon Drift Detector design for X-ray experiments. J. Instrum. 2014, 9, P07014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mineo, T.; Fraser, G.W.; Martindale, A.; Feldman, C.; Campana, R.; Cusumano, G.; Feroci, M. Effects of capillary reflection in the performance of the collimator of the Large Area Detector on board LOFT. Exp. Astron. 2014, 37, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Soffitta, P.; Baldini, L.; Baumgartner, W.; Bellazzini, R.; Bongiorno, S.D.; Bucciantini, N.; Costa, E.; Dovčiak, M.; Ehlert, S.; Kaaret, P.E.; et al. The Imaging X-ray polarimetry explorer (IXPE) at last! In Proceedings of the UV, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIII, San Diego, CA, USA, 5 October 2023; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. Siegmund, O.H., Hoadley, K., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2023; Volume 12678, p. 1267803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, B.; Mészáros, P. Gamma-ray Burst Beaming: A Universal Configuration with a Standard Energy Reservoir? ApJ 2002, 571, 876–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ghirlanda, G.; Nava, L.; Ghisellini, G.; Firmani, C. Confirming the γ-ray burst spectral-energy correlations in the era of multiple time breaks. A&A 2007, 466, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amati, L.; Frontera, F.; Vietri, M.; in’t Zand, J.J.M.; Soffitta, P.; Costa, E.; Del Sordo, S.; Pian, E.; Piro, L.; Antonelli, L.A.; et al. Discovery of a Transient Absorption Edge in the X-ray Spectrum of GRB 990705. Science 2000, 290, 953–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gehrels, N.; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Fox, D.B. Gamma-ray Bursts in the Swift Era. Ann. Rev. A&A 2009, 47, 567–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pélangeon, A.; Atteia, J.L.; Nakagawa, Y.E.; Hurley, K.; Yoshida, A.; Vanderspek, R.; Suzuki, M.; Kawai, N.; Pizzichini, G.; Boër, M.; et al. Intrinsic properties of a complete sample of HETE-2 gamma-ray bursts. A measure of the GRB rate in the Local Universe. A&A 2008, 491, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. in’t Zand, J.J.M.; Bozzo, E.; Qu, J.; Li, X.D.; Amati, L.; Chen, Y.; Donnarumma, I.; Doroshenko, V.; Drake, S.A.; Hernanz, M.; et al. Observatory science with eXTP. Sci. China Physics, Mech. Astron. 2019, 62, 29506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. White, N.E.; Bauer, F.E.; Baumgartner, W.; Bautz, M.; Berger, E.; Cenko, B.; Chang, T.C.; Falcone, A.; Fausey, H.; Feldman, C.; et al. The Gamow Explorer: A Gamma-ray Burst Observatory to study the high redshift universe and enable multi-messenger astrophysics. In Proceedings of the UV, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXII, San Diego, CA, USA, 24 August 2021; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. Siegmund, O.H., Ed.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 11821, p. 1182109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Salvaterra, R. High redshift Gamma-ray Bursts. J. High Energy Astrophys. 2015, 7, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fryer, C.L.; Lien, A.Y.; Fruchter, A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Hartmann, D.; Salvaterra, R.; Upton Sanderbeck, P.R.; Johnson, J.L. Properties of High-redshift Gamma-ray Bursts. ApJ 2022, 929, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lidz, A.; Chang, T.C.; Mas-Ribas, L.; Sun, G. Future Constraints on the Reionization History and the Ionizing Sources from Gamma-ray Burst Afterglows. ApJ 2021, 917, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ota, K.; Iye, M.; Kashikawa, N.; Konno, A.; Nakata, F.; Totani, T.; Kobayashi, M.A.R.; Fudamoto, Y.; Seko, A.; Toshikawa, J.; et al. A New Constraint on Reionization from the Evolution of the Lyα Luminosity Function at z ∼6–7 Probed by a Deep Census ofz = 7.0 Lyα-Emitter Candidates to 0.3 L. Astrophys. J. 2017, 844, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feldman, C.; O’Brien, P.; White, N.; Baumgartner, W.; Thomas, N.; Lodge, A.; Bautz, M.; Hinrichsen, E. LEXT: A lobster eye optic for Gamow. In Proceedings of the Optics for EUV, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Astronomy X, San Diego, CA, USA, 23 August 2021; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. O’Dell, S.L., Gaskin, J.A., Pareschi, G., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 11822, p. 118221D. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seiffert, M.; Balady, A.; Chang, T.C.; Dyer, R.; Fausey, H.; Guiriec, S.; Hart, M.; Morris, R.O.; Rodriguez, J.I.; Roming, P.; et al. The Photo-z Infrared Telescope (PIRT)—A space instrument for rapid follow up of high-redshift gamma-ray bursts and electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave events. In Proceedings of the UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts X, San Diego, CA, USA, 20 August 2021; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. Barto, A.A., Breckinridge, J.B., Stahl, H.P., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 11819, p. 1181906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fausey, H.M.; van der Horst, A.J.; White, N.E.; Seiffert, M.; Willems, P.; Young, E.T.; Kann, D.A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Salvaterra, R.; Tanvir, N.R.; et al. Photometric redshift estimation for gamma-ray bursts from the early Universe. MNRAS 2023, 526, 4599–4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gehrels, N.; Cannizzo, J.K. How Swift is redefining time domain astronomy. J. High Energy Astrophys. 2015, 7, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chan, M.L.; Messenger, C.; Heng, I.S.; Hendry, M. Binary neutron star mergers and third generation detectors: Localization and early warning. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 123014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nitz, A.H.; Canton, T.D. Pre-merger Localization of Compact-binary Mergers with Third-generation Observatories. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 917, L27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Banerjee, B.; Oganesyan, G.; Branchesi, M.; Dupletsa, U.; Aharonian, F.; Brighenti, F.; Goncharov, B.; Harms, J.; Mapelli, M.; Ronchini, S.; et al. Pre-merger alert to detect prompt emission in very-high-energy gamma-rays from binary neutron star mergers: Einstein Telescope and Cherenkov Telescope Array synergy. A&A 2023, 678, A126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yonetoku, D.; Mihara, T.; Doi, A.; Sakamoto, T.; Tsumura, K.; Ioka, K.; Amaya, Y.; Arimoto, M.; Enoto, T.; Fujii, T.; et al. High-redshift gamma-ray burst for unraveling the Dark Ages Mission: HiZ-GUNDAM. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma ray, San Diego, CA, USA, 20 August 2021; den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 11444, p. 114442Z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.; Sakamoto, T.; Serino, M.; Yonetoku, D.; Sawano, T.; Mitsuish, I.; Mihara, T. X-ray performance and simulation study of lobster eye optics. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma ray, Online, 13 December 2020; den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 11444, p. 114447C. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ogino, N.; Arimoto, M.; Sawano, T.; Yonetoku, D.; Goto, H.; Hyeongsoon, W.; Hiraga, J.; Sakamoto, T.; Sei, K.; Yatsu, Y. Development of a fast readout system of a CMOS image sensor for the time-domain astronomy. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma ray, Online, 13 December 2020; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 11444, p. 114445L. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sawano, T.; Yonetoku, D.; Arimoto, M.; Li, J.; Mihara, T.; Ogino, N.; Sakamoto, T.; Serino, M. A detection algorithm for faint sources based on 1-d projection for a lobster-eye X-ray imaging system. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma ray, Online, 13 December 2020; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 11444, p. 114445K. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Goto, H.; Yonetoku, D.; Ogino, N.; Takahashi, S.; Sato, T.; Mukai, K.; Arimoto, M.; Sawano, T.; Mihara, T.; Sakamoto, T.; et al. Development of a method for aligning lobster eye optics onboard HiZ-GUNDAM with visible light and shape measurements. In Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Montréal, QC, Canada, 31 August 2022; den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE): Bellingham, DC, USA, 2022; Volume 12181, p. 121815J. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tsumura, K.; Yonetoku, D.; Kawabata, K.; Matsuura, S.; Noda, H.; Urata, Y.; Niino, Y.; Sano, K.; Ohashi, A.; Doi, A.; et al. Development of an optical and near-infrared telescope onboard the HiZ-GUNDAM mission. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, Infrared, and MillimeterWave, online, 13 December 2020; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. Lystrup, M., Perrin, M.D., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 11443, p. 114430R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McConnell, M.L.; Baring, M.; Bloser, P.F.; Briggs, M.; Ertley, C.; Fletcher, G.; Gaskin, J.; Gelmis, K.; Goldstein, A.; Grove, J.E.; et al. The LargE Area burst Polarimeter (LEAP)—A NASA mission of opportunity for the ISS. In Proceedings of the UV, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXII, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–5 August 2021; p. 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oñate-Melecio, K.; Ertley, C.; McConnell, M.L.; Legere, J.; Bloser, P.F.; Briggs, M.; Gaskin, J.; Goldstein, A.; Grove, J.E.; Hui, M.; et al. Evaluation of a prototype detector for the LargE Area burst Polarimeter (LEAP). In Proceedings of the UV, X-ray, and Gamma-ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXII, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–5 August 2021; p. 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Toma, K.; Sakamoto, T.; Zhang, B.; Hill, J.E.; McConnell, M.L.; Bloser, P.F.; Yamazaki, R.; Ioka, K.; Nakamura, T. Statistical Properties of Gamma-ray Burst Polarization. Astrophys. J. 2009, 698, 1042–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McConnell, M.L. High energy polarimetry of prompt GRB emission. New Astron. Rev. 2017, 76, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tatischeff, V.; McConnell, M.L.; Laurent, P. Astronomical Polarisation from the Infrared to Gamma Rays; Astrophysics and Space Science Library: Toledo, Spain, 2019; pp. 109–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chattopadhyay, T. Hard X-ray polarimetry—An overview of the method, science drivers, and recent findings. J. Astrophys. Astron. 2021, 42, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hurley, K.; Pal’shin, V.D.; Aptekar, R.L.; Golenetskii, S.V.; Frederiks, D.D.; Mazets, E.P.; Svinkin, D.S.; Briggs, M.S.; Connaughton, V.; Meegan, C.; et al. The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic Gamma-ray Bursts. ApJS 2013, 207, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kole, M.; De Angelis, N.; Berlato, F.; Burgess, J.M.; Gauvin, N.; Greiner, J.; Hajdas, W.; Li, H.C.; Li, Z.H.; Pollo, A.; et al. The POLAR gamma-ray burst polarization catalog. A&A 2020, 644, A124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, H. Gamma-ray Polarimetry of the Crab Pulsar Observed by POLAR. In Proceedings of the 44th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Online, 16–24 July 2022; Volume 44, p. 1847. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gill, R.; Kole, M.; Granot, J. GRB Polarization: A Unique Probe of GRB Physics. Galaxies 2021, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De Angelis, N. Development of the Next Generation Space-Based Compton Polarimeter and Energy Resolved Polarization Analysis of Gamma-ray Bursts Prompt Emission. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kole, M.; Koziol, G.; Droz, D. HAGRID–High Accuracy GRB Rapid Inference with Deep learning. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2309.01493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.; Apostolakis, J.; Araujo, H.; Arce, P.; Asai, M.; Axen, D.; Banerjee, S.; Barrand, G.; et al. Geant4—A simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 506, 250–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Howell, E.J.; Ackley, K.; Rowlinson, A.; Coward, D. Joint gravitational wave-gamma-ray burst detection rates in the aftermath of GW170817. MNRAS 2019, 485, 1435–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Punturo, M.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Allen, B.; Andersson, N.; Arun, K.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.; Beker, M.; et al. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quantum Gravity 2010, 27, 194002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Maggiore, M.; Broeck, C.V.D.; Bartolo, N.; Belgacem, E.; Bertacca, D.; Bizouard, M.A.; Branchesi, M.; Clesse, S.; Foffa, S.; García-Bellido, J.; et al. Science case for the Einstein telescope. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 2020, 050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reitze, D.; Adhikari, R.X.; Ballmer, S.; Barish, B.; Barsotti, L.; Billingsley, G.; Brown, D.A.; Chen, Y.; Coyne, D.; Eisenstein, R.; et al. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1907.04833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stratta, G.; Amati, L.; Branchesi, M.; Ciolfi, R.; Tanvir, N.; Bozzo, E.; Götz, D.; O’Brien, P.; Santangelo, A. Breakthrough Multi-Messenger Astrophysics with the THESEUS Space Mission. Galaxies 2022, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preliminary configuration of the EP payloads’ alignment, with twelve WXT modules surrounding two FXTs.
Figure 1. Preliminary configuration of the EP payloads’ alignment, with twelve WXT modules surrounding two FXTs.
Universe 10 00187 g001
Figure 2. Representative grasp (effective area times FoV) of the WXT as a function of photon energy (black). As a comparison, the grasp parameters of several X-ray-focusing telescopes are overplotted. Adapted from Figure 10 in [20].
Figure 2. Representative grasp (effective area times FoV) of the WXT as a function of photon energy (black). As a comparison, the grasp parameters of several X-ray-focusing telescopes are overplotted. Adapted from Figure 10 in [20].
Universe 10 00187 g002
Figure 3. An artist impression of the eXTP satellite. In the image, we show the 13 nested shell optics of the SFA (9 telescopes) and PFA (4 telescopes), as well as the 6 cameras with coded masks composing the WFM. The LAD is placed on deployable panels equipped with solar shades. There are a total of 40 modules composing the LAD, and each module hosts 16 SDDs.
Figure 3. An artist impression of the eXTP satellite. In the image, we show the 13 nested shell optics of the SFA (9 telescopes) and PFA (4 telescopes), as well as the 6 cameras with coded masks composing the WFM. The LAD is placed on deployable panels equipped with solar shades. There are a total of 40 modules composing the LAD, and each module hosts 16 SDDs.
Universe 10 00187 g003
Figure 4. The large FoV of the eXTP/WFM (red line) overlapped on a background map of the high-energy sky, which has been provided as a courtesy by the MAXI team (T. Mihara, RIKEN, JAXA). The red line corresponds to the total FoV covered by the WFM in the configuration used for the eXTP, as illustrated by in’t Zand et al. [30].
Figure 4. The large FoV of the eXTP/WFM (red line) overlapped on a background map of the high-energy sky, which has been provided as a courtesy by the MAXI team (T. Mihara, RIKEN, JAXA). The red line corresponds to the total FoV covered by the WFM in the configuration used for the eXTP, as illustrated by in’t Zand et al. [30].
Universe 10 00187 g004
Figure 5. Recent measurements of the neutral fraction <XHI> versus redshift, z, by various techniques, including GRBs (green; see [35]). The forecast Gamow results are shown as red [34]. The Fisher matrix forecast assumes 26 GRBs at z > 5. We assume follow-up spectra with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 20 at the continuum per R = 3000 resolution element and assume accurate host redshift determinations via metal absorption lines. The results illustrate that Gamow can map the re-ionization history in detail from z∼6 to 14. Predicted re-ionization curves (blue and dashed red lines) illustrate the degree of variance between theoretical models compared to the Fisher forecasting.
Figure 5. Recent measurements of the neutral fraction <XHI> versus redshift, z, by various techniques, including GRBs (green; see [35]). The forecast Gamow results are shown as red [34]. The Fisher matrix forecast assumes 26 GRBs at z > 5. We assume follow-up spectra with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 20 at the continuum per R = 3000 resolution element and assume accurate host redshift determinations via metal absorption lines. The results illustrate that Gamow can map the re-ionization history in detail from z∼6 to 14. Predicted re-ionization curves (blue and dashed red lines) illustrate the degree of variance between theoretical models compared to the Fisher forecasting.
Universe 10 00187 g005
Figure 6. The ability of the Gamow LEXT to detect the afterglows of on-axis BNS and NSBH mergers. X-ray luminosity (left axis) and X-ray flux at 600 Mpc (right axis) for Swift short GRBs at known redshift. The black line is the LEXT sensitivity starting at 0 s (base-line). In practice, it will frequently be earlier than this (short-slew) and, sometimes, before the BNS merger (pre-alert; figure from [31]; see Chan et al. [40], Nitz and Canton [41], Banerjee et al. [42]).
Figure 6. The ability of the Gamow LEXT to detect the afterglows of on-axis BNS and NSBH mergers. X-ray luminosity (left axis) and X-ray flux at 600 Mpc (right axis) for Swift short GRBs at known redshift. The black line is the LEXT sensitivity starting at 0 s (base-line). In practice, it will frequently be earlier than this (short-slew) and, sometimes, before the BNS merger (pre-alert; figure from [31]; see Chan et al. [40], Nitz and Canton [41], Banerjee et al. [42]).
Universe 10 00187 g006
Figure 7. A schematic view of the HiZ-GUNDAM WFXM (top) (copyright MEISEI ELECTRIC Co., LTD.). Schematic views of the HiZ-GUNDAM NIRT (middle and bottom).
Figure 7. A schematic view of the HiZ-GUNDAM WFXM (top) (copyright MEISEI ELECTRIC Co., LTD.). Schematic views of the HiZ-GUNDAM NIRT (middle and bottom).
Universe 10 00187 g007
Figure 8. Schematic view of the HiZ-GUNDAM satellite.
Figure 8. Schematic view of the HiZ-GUNDAM satellite.
Universe 10 00187 g008
Figure 9. The LEAP payload includes seven independent polarimeter modules. When mounted on the outside of the ISS, the array of modules points toward the local zenith and scans the sky for GRBs.
Figure 9. The LEAP payload includes seven independent polarimeter modules. When mounted on the outside of the ISS, the array of modules points toward the local zenith and scans the sky for GRBs.
Universe 10 00187 g009
Figure 10. The number of GRBs measured with a polarization degree > 30 % versus the number of GRBs with an MDP < 30 % provides a convenient way to distinguish between different model classes. For the case shown here, 65 GRB measurements are required to distinguish the three model classes. LEAP will be able to measure a total of 135 GRBs with MDP < 30 % (and 23 GRBs with MDP < 10 % ) during its baseline 32 months of science operations.
Figure 10. The number of GRBs measured with a polarization degree > 30 % versus the number of GRBs with an MDP < 30 % provides a convenient way to distinguish between different model classes. For the case shown here, 65 GRB measurements are required to distinguish the three model classes. LEAP will be able to measure a total of 135 GRBs with MDP < 30 % (and 23 GRBs with MDP < 10 % ) during its baseline 32 months of science operations.
Universe 10 00187 g010
Figure 11. Six scintillating detectors positioned for an instantaneous all-sky field of view, no slewing required. Coupled with a cislunar orbit, MoonBEAM provides an unprecedented all-sky sensitivity that cannot be achieved in low-Earth orbit.
Figure 11. Six scintillating detectors positioned for an instantaneous all-sky field of view, no slewing required. Coupled with a cislunar orbit, MoonBEAM provides an unprecedented all-sky sensitivity that cannot be achieved in low-Earth orbit.
Universe 10 00187 g011
Figure 12. MoonBEAM’s 1-second limiting flux sensitivity across the entire sky in any instant, providing the continuous sensitivity needed to study astrophysical jet formation and emissions.
Figure 12. MoonBEAM’s 1-second limiting flux sensitivity across the entire sky in any instant, providing the continuous sensitivity needed to study astrophysical jet formation and emissions.
Universe 10 00187 g012
Figure 13. An exploded view of one of the 100 POLAR-2 detector modules that make up the instrument. The detector measures the polarization of the incoming photons when these undergo Compton scattering in the segmented scintillator array. The scintillators are read out by a temperature-controlled Silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) array connected to its own front-end electronics. Taken with permission from [59].
Figure 13. An exploded view of one of the 100 POLAR-2 detector modules that make up the instrument. The detector measures the polarization of the incoming photons when these undergo Compton scattering in the segmented scintillator array. The scintillators are read out by a temperature-controlled Silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) array connected to its own front-end electronics. Taken with permission from [59].
Universe 10 00187 g013
Figure 14. The MDP (99%) for 1 s GRBs as a function of GRB fluence for the POLAR and POLAR-2 instruments. In addition, the sensitivity of the GAP, the first dedicated gamma-ray polarimeter, is indicated. For reference, the fluence of the very weak GRB 170817A is indicated with a dotted line.
Figure 14. The MDP (99%) for 1 s GRBs as a function of GRB fluence for the POLAR and POLAR-2 instruments. In addition, the sensitivity of the GAP, the first dedicated gamma-ray polarimeter, is indicated. For reference, the fluence of the very weak GRB 170817A is indicated with a dotted line.
Universe 10 00187 g014
Figure 15. The StarBurst instrument (left). The integrated StarBurst observatory shown mounted to an ESPA-Grande ring (right).
Figure 15. The StarBurst instrument (left). The integrated StarBurst observatory shown mounted to an ESPA-Grande ring (right).
Universe 10 00187 g015
Figure 16. The StarBurst effective area averaged over azimuth, as a function of the angle from the instrument boresight (left). The StarBurst effective area as a function of energy (right).
Figure 16. The StarBurst effective area averaged over azimuth, as a function of the angle from the instrument boresight (left). The StarBurst effective area as a function of energy (right).
Universe 10 00187 g016
Figure 18. The expected cumulative on-board detection rate of canonical gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and X-ray flashes (XRFs) by the STROBE-X/WFM as estimated by folding observed GRB and XRF spectra through the WFM responses and accounting for the effective field-of-view of the WFM. It will detect ∼100 long-duration GRBs, ∼7 short-duration GRBs, and ∼12 XRFs on-board per year. The onboard detection rate of long GRBs exceeds that of Swift/BAT, while the short GRB detection rate is comparable. A unique capability is the down-link of event data to the ground for the WFM, enabling sub-threshold searches to double the number of short GRB detections (purple shading). The detection rate of XRFs exceeds that of previous instruments and is a particular science focus for the WFM. The blue shading shows the region of the signal-to-noise ratio, where high-fidelity spectroscopy can be performed in the prompt X-ray for these sources.
Figure 18. The expected cumulative on-board detection rate of canonical gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and X-ray flashes (XRFs) by the STROBE-X/WFM as estimated by folding observed GRB and XRF spectra through the WFM responses and accounting for the effective field-of-view of the WFM. It will detect ∼100 long-duration GRBs, ∼7 short-duration GRBs, and ∼12 XRFs on-board per year. The onboard detection rate of long GRBs exceeds that of Swift/BAT, while the short GRB detection rate is comparable. A unique capability is the down-link of event data to the ground for the WFM, enabling sub-threshold searches to double the number of short GRB detections (purple shading). The detection rate of XRFs exceeds that of previous instruments and is a particular science focus for the WFM. The blue shading shows the region of the signal-to-noise ratio, where high-fidelity spectroscopy can be performed in the prompt X-ray for these sources.
Universe 10 00187 g018
Figure 19. The fully integrated SVOM payload.
Figure 19. The fully integrated SVOM payload.
Universe 10 00187 g019
Figure 20. Examples of THESEUS’s capabilities for multi-messenger and time domain astrophysics.
Figure 20. Examples of THESEUS’s capabilities for multi-messenger and time domain astrophysics.
Universe 10 00187 g020
Figure 21. (Left) Distribution of long GRBs with redshift determination in the peak isotropic luminosity versus redshift plane now (yellow points and hatched histogram) and after the nominal operation life of THESEUS (purple points and full histogram). (Right) A different version of the left-side figure where the GRBs discovered by THESEUS and those detected up to 2020 are displayed in a cone representing the cosmic evolution.
Figure 21. (Left) Distribution of long GRBs with redshift determination in the peak isotropic luminosity versus redshift plane now (yellow points and hatched histogram) and after the nominal operation life of THESEUS (purple points and full histogram). (Right) A different version of the left-side figure where the GRBs discovered by THESEUS and those detected up to 2020 are displayed in a cone representing the cosmic evolution.
Universe 10 00187 g021
Table 1. HiZ-GUNDAM wide-field X-ray monitor.
Table 1. HiZ-GUNDAM wide-field X-ray monitor.
ItemSpecification
OpticsLobster-Eye
Focal Length300 mm
Focal DetectorpnCCD
Size of Focal Detector 55 × 55 mm2
Energy Band0.5–4.0 keV
Field of View>0.5 str (in total)
Sensitivity (100 s) 10 10 erg cm−2 s−1
Localization Accuracy∼3 arcmin
Time Resolution∼0.1 s
Table 2. HiZ-GUNDAM near-infrared telescope.
Table 2. HiZ-GUNDAM near-infrared telescope.
ItemSpecification
Telescope TypeOffset/Athermal
Aperture Size30 cm
Telescope Temp.<200 K
Focal DetectorHyViSi (Optical)
HgCdTe (NIR)
Field of View 15 × 15 arcmin2
BandSensitivity (2 min × 5)
0.5–0.9  μ m21.4 mag (AB)
0.9–1.3  μ m21.3 mag (AB)
1.3–1.7  μ m21.4 mag (AB)
1.7–2.1  μ m20.8 mag (AB)
2.1–2.5  μ m20.7 mag (AB)
Table 3. Summary of the characteristics of the SVOM space instruments.
Table 3. Summary of the characteristics of the SVOM space instruments.
ECLAIRsGRMMXTVT
Energy/Wavelength4–150 keV15–5000 keV0.1–10 keV650–1000 nm
Field of View2 sr2.6 sr (combined)58′× 58′26′× 26′
Localization Accuracy<12′<20°<2′<1′′
Expected GRBs Year−160905040
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bozzo, E.; Amati, L.; Baumgartner, W.; Chang, T.-C.; Cordier, B.; De Angelis, N.; Doi, A.; Feroci, M.; Froning, C.; Gaskin, J.; et al. Future Perspectives for Gamma-ray Burst Detection from Space. Universe 2024, 10, 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10040187

AMA Style

Bozzo E, Amati L, Baumgartner W, Chang T-C, Cordier B, De Angelis N, Doi A, Feroci M, Froning C, Gaskin J, et al. Future Perspectives for Gamma-ray Burst Detection from Space. Universe. 2024; 10(4):187. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10040187

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bozzo, Enrico, Lorenzo Amati, Wayne Baumgartner, Tzu-Ching Chang, Bertrand Cordier, Nicolas De Angelis, Akihiro Doi, Marco Feroci, Cynthia Froning, Jessica Gaskin, and et al. 2024. "Future Perspectives for Gamma-ray Burst Detection from Space" Universe 10, no. 4: 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10040187

APA Style

Bozzo, E., Amati, L., Baumgartner, W., Chang, T. -C., Cordier, B., De Angelis, N., Doi, A., Feroci, M., Froning, C., Gaskin, J., Goldstein, A., Götz, D., Grove, J. E., Guiriec, S., Hernanz, M., Hui, C. M., Jenke, P., Kocevski, D., Kole, M., ... Zhang, S. -N. (2024). Future Perspectives for Gamma-ray Burst Detection from Space. Universe, 10(4), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10040187

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop