Next Article in Journal
On the η1(1855), π1(1400) and π1(1600) as Dynamically Generated States and Their SU(3) Partners
Next Article in Special Issue
Pauli Exclusion Classical Potential for Intermediate-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions
Previous Article in Journal
Diagram of High-Energy Nuclear Collisions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting Angular Momentum Conservation in Transport Simulations of Intermediate-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Beam Energy Dependence of the Linear and Mode-Coupled Flow Harmonics Using the a Multi-Phase Transport Model

Department of Chemistry, State University of New York, New York, NY 11794, USA
Universe 2023, 9(2), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020107
Submission received: 12 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 18 February 2023

Abstract

:
In the framework of the A Multi-Phase Transport (AMPT) model, the multi-particle azimuthal cumulant method is used to calculate the linear and mode-coupled contributions to the quadrangular flow harmonic ( v 4 ) and the mode-coupled response coefficient as functions of centrality in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV. This study indicates that the linear and mode-coupled contributions to v 4 are sensitive to beam energy change. Nevertheless, the correlations between different-order flow symmetry planes and the mode-coupled response coefficients show weak beam energy dependence. In addition, the presented results suggest that the experimental measurements that span a broad range of beam energies can be an additional constraint for the theoretical model calculations.

1. Introduction

Experimental investigations of heavy-ion collisions demonstrate the formation of Quantum Chromodynamic (QCD) matter called Quark–Gluon Plasma (QGP) at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1,2,3]. One of the primary purposes of previous and present experimental studies of heavy-ion collisions is to understand the QGP transport properties, such as shear viscosity divided by entropy density, η / s [4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
In recent years, experimental measurements of anisotropic flow resumed being a beneficial route to the extraction of η / s [5,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. In addition, anisotropic flow gives the viscous hydrodynamic response to the initial-state energy density anisotropy described by complex eccentricity vectors E n [24,25,26,27,28].
E n ε n e i n Φ n d x d y r n e i n φ E ( r , φ ) d x d y r n E ( r , φ ) , ( n > 1 ) ,
x = r cos φ ,
y = r sin φ ,
where ε n and Φ n are the magnitude and the angle of the nth-order eccentricity vector, φ is the spatial azimuthal angle and E ( r , φ ) is the initial anisotropic energy density profile [27,29,30].
The anisotropic flow can be given by the Fourier expansion of the azimuthal anisotropy of particles emitted relative to the collision symmetry planes [31].
E d 3 N d 3 p = 1 2 π d 2 N p T d p T d y 1 + i = 1 2 v n cos n ϕ ψ m ,
where v n stands for the n t h flow coefficient, y is the rapidity, ϕ represents the particle azimuthal angle, p T gives the transverse momentum and ψ m is the m t h -order symmetry plane. Flow harmonics v n (n = 1, 2 and 3) are called directed, elliptic and triangular flow, respectively.
Prior and current studies of v 2 and v 3 suggest that to a reasonable degree, they are linearly related to the medium response [28,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
v n = κ n ε n ,
where κ n (for n = 2 and 3) encodes the importance of QGP η / s [42,43]. Higher-order flow harmonic v 4 [19,34,38,42,44,45,46,47] exhibits a linear response to same-order eccentricity as well as a mode-coupled response to lower-order eccentricity ε 2 [21,29,30,48].
V 4 = v 4 e i 4 ψ 4 = κ 4 ε 4 e 4 i Φ 4 + κ 4 ε 2 2 e 4 i Φ 2 = V 4 Linear + χ 4 , 22 V 4 MC ,
where κ 4 represents the mixed effect of the medium properties and the coupling between lower- and higher-order eccentricity harmonics. V 4 Linear , V 4 MC and χ 4 , 22 are the linear and the mode-coupled contributions to V 4 and the mode-coupled response coefficients, respectively.
The mode-coupled response to V 4 represents additional constraints for initial-stage dynamics and η / s extraction [29,32,33,37,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Therefore, ongoing work suggests that leveraging comprehensive measurements of v 4 Linear and v 4 MC could provide additional constraints to differentiate between various initial-state models [9,10,32,55]. In addition, these measurements could pin down the η / s dependence on temperature (T) and baryon chemical potential ( μ B ).
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the AMPT model and the analysis technique employed in this work. Section 3 conveys the results of this work. The summary is presented in Section 4.

2. Method

AMPT [56] model (version ampt-v2.26t9b)-simulated events were used in the present investigation of Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV. The used AMPT model has both string-melting mechanism and hadronic cascade turned on. The AMPT model has been widely employed to investigate relativistic heavy-ion collision physics [56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. In the AMPT model with string melting on, the HIJING model is used for hadron creation. These hadrons are then transformed into their valence quarks and anti-quarks. In addition, their time and space evolution is evaluated with the ZPC parton cascade model [66].
The AMPT has four essential components: (i) the HIJING model [67,68] in the initial parton production stage, (ii) the parton scattering stage and (iii) hadronization through coalescence, followed by (iv) a hadronic interaction stage [69]. In the stage of parton scattering, the parton scattering cross-section is given as
σ p p = 9 π α s 2 2 μ 2 ,
where μ = 4.6 gives the partonic matter screening mass and α s = 0.47 represents the QCD coupling constant. Parameters μ and α s generally give the expansion dynamics of A–A collision systems [66,70,71,72]. In the current work, σ p p was fixed to 1.5 mb.
In the current work, the centrality intervals were obtained by cutting on the charged particle multiplicity in midrapidity. Then, the AMPT-simulated events were analyzed using the multi-particle cumulant method [49,73,74,75] using particles with pseudorapidities | η | < 1 and with transverse momentum 0.2 < p T < 2.0 GeV/ c .
The multi-particle cumulant technique was here used for correlation analysis. The framework of the multi-particle cumulant using one and many sub-events is described in Refs. [49,73,74,75]. Here, I used two-, three- and four-particle correlations in this work by applying the two-sub-event cumulant technique [74]. The two sub-events A and B with | Δ η | > 0.7 (i.e., η A > 0.35 and η B < 0.35 ) were used. Using the two-sub-event method helps reduce non-flow correlations [76]. Two-, three- and four-particle correlations are given using the two-sub-event cumulant method [74] as
v n Inclusive = v n = cos ( n ( φ 1 A φ 2 B ) ) 1 / 2 ,
C n + m , n m = cos ( ( n + m ) φ 1 A n φ 2 B m φ 3 B ) ,
v n 2 v m 2 = cos ( n φ 1 A + m φ 2 A n φ 3 B m φ 4 B ) ,
where represents the average over all particles and all events, and φ i is the i t h particle azimuthal angle.
Using Equations (8)–(10), the mode-coupled response to v n + m is [30,77]
v n + m MC = C n + m , n m v n 2 v m 2 , v n + m cos ( ( n + m ) Ψ n + m n Ψ n m Ψ m ) .
Moreover, the linear response to v n + m is
v n + m Linear = ( v n + m Inclusive ) 2 ( v n + m MC ) 2 .
The ratio of the mode-coupled response to inclusive v n + m gives the correlations between different-order flow symmetry planes.
ρ n + m , n m = v n + m MC v n + m Inclusive , cos ( ( n + m ) Ψ n + m n Ψ n m Ψ m ) .
The mode-coupled response coefficient gives the coupling to the higher-order anisotropic flow harmonics and is given as
χ n + m , n m = v n + m MC v n 2 v m 2 .

3. Results and Discussion

Extracting the linear and the mode-coupled (i.e., non-linear) contributions to v 4 depends on two- and four-particle correlations. Therefore, it is instructive to investigate the model’s potential to simulate the experimental measurements of two- and four-particle flow harmonics [78,79]. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show a comparison of the centrality dependence of v n { 2 } and v 2 { 4 } in Au–Au collisions at 200 (a), 39 (b), 27 (c) and 19.6 (d) GeV according to the AMPT model. The AMPT calculations exhibited sensitivity to beam energy change and harmonic order n. They also indicated similar patterns to the data reported by the STAR experiment [78,79] (solid points). The data model comparisons suggest that the AMPT model contains the proper ingredient to describe the experimental data.
The centrality dependence of the three-particle correlators, C 4 , 22 (panel (a)) and C 5 , 23 (panel (b)), are shown in Figure 3 for Au+Au collisions at 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV according to the AMPT model. My results demonstrate that C 4 , 22 and C 5 , 23 depend on beam energy. These dependencies indicate that C 4 , 22 and C 5 , 23 are susceptible to the change in viscous attenuation according to the AMPT model (i.e., p T and charged particle multiplicity) and initial-state eccentricity. My results reflect the capability of the three-particle correlators to constrain the interplay between the final- and initial-state effects in the AMPT model. The AMPT calculations qualitatively reproduced the trend observed in the experimental data [10]. However, the AMPT model overestimated C 4 , 22 for centrality larger than 30% and C 5 , 23 for mid-central (10–50%) region values.
Figure 4 shows the centrality and beam energy dependence of inclusive (a), mode-coupled and linear v 4 in Au+Au collisions according to the AMPT model. My results indicate that the linear contribution is the dominant contribution to inclusive v 4 in central collisions at all presented energies. In addition, v 4 L i n e a r showed weak centrality dependence. In addition, the difference between linear and mode-coupled v 4 in central collisions is derived from the difference in ε 4 and ε 2 , respectively. The presented results show that inclusive, linear and mode-coupled v 4 are sensitive to beam energy variation. The AMPT results are in qualitative agreement with the experimental measurements from the STAR experiment in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200 GeV [10,80].
Mode-coupling response coefficient χ 4 , 22 , which gives the coupling strength between lower and higher flow harmonics, is presented in Figure 5a as a function of centrality for Au+Au at 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV. The χ 4 , 22 calculations indicated weak centrality and beam energy dependence, which implies that (i) χ 4 , 22 is dominated by initial-state eccentricity couplings and (ii) mode-coupled v 4 centrality and energy dependence arise from lower-order flow harmonics. Figure 5b illustrates the centrality and energy dependence of the correlation between flow symmetry planes, ρ 4 , 22 , in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV according to the AMPT model. The AMPT calculations of ρ 4 , 22 indicated stronger event plane correlations in peripheral collisions at all presented energies. Nevertheless, ρ 4 , 22 magnitudes were shown to be independent of beam energies. Such observation implies that initial-state eccentricity direction correlations dominate the correlation between flow symmetry planes. In addition, these calculations are in agreement with the STAR experiment measurements in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200 GeV [10,80].

4. Conclusions

I have presented comprehensive AMPT model calculations to evaluate the beam energy dependence of the linear and mode-coupling contributions to v 4 , χ 4 , 22 and ρ 4 , 22 . The AMPT calculations indicate similar patterns and values to the experimental measurements of v n { 2 } and v 2 { 4 } . The AMPT calculations of mode-coupled v 4 indicate strong centrality dependence; however, they show weak centrality dependence for linear v 4 . In addition, three-particle correlations and v 4 show strong beam energy dependence. In contrast, χ 4 , 22 and ρ 4 , 22 show magnitudes and trends that are weakly dependent on beam energy. The AMPT model calculations suggest that initial-state effects might be the dominant factors behind the correlations of event plane angles and the non-linear response coefficients.

Funding

This research was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics (DOE NP) under contract DE-FG02-87ER40331.A008.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shuryak, E.V. Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Production of Leptons, Photons and Psions. Phys. Lett. B 1978, 78, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shuryak, E.V. Quantum Chromodynamics and the Theory of Superdense Matter. Phys. Rep. 1980, 61, 71–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Muller, B.; Schukraft, J.; Wyslouch, B. First Results from Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2012, 62, 361–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Shuryak, E. Why does the quark gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid? Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2004, 53, 273–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Romatschke, P.; Romatschke, U. Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 172301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Luzum, M.; Romatschke, P. Conformal Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics: Applications to RHIC results at s N N = 200-GeV. Phys. Rev. 2008, C78, 034915. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bozek, P. Bulk and shear viscosities of matter created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2010, 81, 034909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Acharya, S. et al. [ALICE Collaboration] Investigations of Anisotropic Flow Using Multiparticle Azimuthal Correlations in pp, p-Pb, Xe-Xe, and Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 142301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Acharya, S. et al. [ALICE Collaboration] Higher harmonic non-linear flow modes of charged hadrons in Pb-Pb collisions at s N N = 5.02 TeV. JHEP 2020, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adam, J. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Investigation of the linear and mode-coupled flow harmonics in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Lett. 2020, B809, 135728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heinz, U.W.; Kolb, P.F. Early thermalization at RHIC. Nucl. Phys. 2002, A702, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hirano, T.; Heinz, U.W.; Kharzeev, D.; Lacey, R.; Nara, Y. Hadronic dissipative effects on elliptic flow in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Lett. 2006, B636, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Huovinen, P.; Kolb, P.F.; Heinz, U.W.; Ruuskanen, P.V.; Voloshin, S.A. Radial and elliptic flow at RHIC: Further predictions. Phys. Lett. 2001, B503, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hirano, T.; Tsuda, K. Collective flow and two pion correlations from a relativistic hydrodynamic model with early chemical freeze out. Phys. Rev. 2002, C66, 054905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Luzum, M. Flow fluctuations and long-range correlations: Elliptic flow and beyond. J. Phys. 2011, G38, 124026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Song, H.; Bass, S.A.; Heinz, U.; Hirano, T.; Shen, C. 200 A GeV Au+Au collisions serve a nearly perfect quark-gluon liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 192301, Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 139904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Qian, J.; Heinz, U.W.; Liu, J. Mode-coupling effects in anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 2016, C93, 064901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Magdy, N. Beam energy dependence of the anisotropic flow coefficients vn. PoS 2018, CPOD2017, 005. [Google Scholar]
  19. Magdy, N. Viscous Damping of Anisotropic Flow in 7.7 − 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 779, 012060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schenke, B.; Jeon, S.; Gale, C. Anisotropic flow in s = 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC. Phys. Lett. 2011, B702, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Teaney, D.; Yan, L. Non linearities in the harmonic spectrum of heavy ion collisions with ideal and viscous hydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. 2012, C86, 044908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gardim, F.G.; Grassi, F.; Luzum, M.; Ollitrault, J.Y. Anisotropic flow in event-by-event ideal hydrodynamic simulations of s N N = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 202302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lacey, R.A.; Reynolds, D.; Taranenko, A.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Alexander, J.M.; Liu, F.H.; Gu, Y.; Mwai, A. Acoustic scaling of anisotropic flow in shape-engineered events: Implications for extraction of the specific shear viscosity of the quark gluon plasma. J. Phys. 2016, G43, 10LT01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Alver, B.H.; Gombeaud, C.; Luzum, M.; Ollitrault, J.Y. Triangular flow in hydrodynamics and transport theory. Phys. Rev. 2010, C82, 034913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Petersen, H.; Qin, G.Y.; Bass, S.A.; Muller, B. Triangular flow in event-by-event ideal hydrodynamics in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200 A GeV. Phys. Rev. 2010, C82, 041901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lacey, R.A.; Wei, R.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Taranenko, A. Initial eccentricity fluctuations and their relation to higher-order flow harmonics. Phys. Rev. 2011, C83, 044902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Teaney, D.; Yan, L. Triangularity and Dipole Asymmetry in Heavy Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. 2011, C83, 064904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Qiu, Z.; Heinz, U.W. Event-by-event shape and flow fluctuations of relativistic heavy-ion collision fireballs. Phys. Rev. 2011, C84, 024911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bhalerao, R.S.; Ollitrault, J.Y.; Pal, S. Characterizing flow fluctuations with moments. Phys. Lett. 2015, B742, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, L.; Ollitrault, J.Y. ν4,ν5,ν6,ν7: Nonlinear hydrodynamic response versus LHC data. Phys. Lett. 2015, B744, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Poskanzer, A.M.; Voloshin, S.A. Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. 1998, C58, 1671–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Adam, J. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Correlation Measurements Between Flow Harmonics in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Lett. 2018, B783, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adam, J. et al. [ALICE collaboration] Correlated event-by-event fluctuations of flow harmonics in Pb-Pb collisions at s N N = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 182301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Adamczyk, L. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Harmonic decomposition of three-particle azimuthal correlations at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. 2018, C98, 034918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Adare, A. et al. [PHENIX Collaboration] Measurements of Higher-Order Flow Harmonics in Au+Au Collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 252301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Aad, G. et al. [ATLAS Collaboration] Measurement of event-plane correlations in s N N = 2.76 TeV lead-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. 2014, C90, 024905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Aguilar-Saavedra, J.A. et al. [ATLAS Collaboration] Measurement of the correlation between flow harmonics of different order in lead-lead collisions at s N N = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. 2015, C92, 034903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Magdy, N. Collision system and beam energy dependence of anisotropic flow fluctuations. Nucl. Phys. 2019, A982, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alver, B.; Back, B.B.; Baker, M.; Ballintijn, M.; Barton, D.S.; Betts, R.R.; Bindel, R.; Busza, W.; Chetluru, V.; Garcia, E.; et al. Importance of correlations and fluctuations on the initial source eccentricity in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. 2008, C77, 014906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alver, B. et al. [PHOBOS Collaboration] Non-flow correlations and elliptic flow fluctuations in gold-gold collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. 2010, C81, 034915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ollitrault, J.Y.; Poskanzer, A.M.; Voloshin, S.A. Effect of flow fluctuations and nonflow on elliptic flow methods. Phys. Rev. 2009, C80, 014904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Adam, J. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Azimuthal Harmonics in Small and Large Collision Systems at RHIC Top Energies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 172301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Heinz, U.; Snellings, R. Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2013, 63, 123–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Magdy, N. Beam-energy dependence of the azimuthal anisotropic flow from RHIC. arXiv 2019, arXiv:nucl-ex/1909.09640. [Google Scholar]
  45. Adamczyk, L. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Azimuthal anisotropy in Cu+Au collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. 2018, C98, 014915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Alver, B.; Roland, G. Collision geometry fluctuations and triangular flow in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 2010, C81, 054905, Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 2010, 82, 039903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chatrchyan, S.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Eroe, J.; Fabjan, C.; Friedl, M.; et al. Measurement of higher-order harmonic azimuthal anisotropy in PbPb collisions at s N N = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. 2014, C89, 044906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gardim, F.G.; Grassi, F.; Luzum, M.; Ollitrault, J.Y. Mapping the hydrodynamic response to the initial geometry in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 85, 024908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bilandzic, A.; Christensen, C.H.; Gulbrandsen, K.; Hansen, A.; Zhou, Y. Generic framework for anisotropic flow analyses with multiparticle azimuthal correlations. Phys. Rev. 2014, C89, 064904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, Y. Review of anisotropic flow correlations in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 2016, 9365637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Qiu, Z.; Heinz, U. Hydrodynamic event-plane correlations in Pb+Pb collisions at s = 2.76 ATeV. Phys. Lett. 2012, B717, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Teaney, D.; Yan, L. Event-plane correlations and hydrodynamic simulations of heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 2014, C90, 024902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Niemi, H.; Eskola, K.J.; Paatelainen, R. Event-by-event fluctuations in a perturbative QCD + saturation + hydrodynamics model: Determining QCD matter shear viscosity in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 2016, C93, 024907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhou, Y.; Xiao, K.; Feng, Z.; Liu, F.; Snellings, R. Anisotropic distributions in a multiphase transport model. Phys. Rev. 2016, C93, 034909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sirunyan, A.M. et al. [CMS Collaboration] Mixed higher-order anisotropic flow and nonlinear response coefficients of charged particles in PbPb collisions at s N N = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, Z.W.; Ko, C.M.; Li, B.A.; Zhang, B.; Pal, S. A Multi-phase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 2005, C72, 064901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ma, G.L.; Lin, Z.W. Predictions for s N N = 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb Collisions from a Multi-Phase Transport Model. Phys. Rev. 2016, C93, 054911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ma, G.L. Decomposition of the jet fragmentation function in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 2013, C88, 021902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ma, G.L. Medium modifications of jet shapes in Pb+Pb collisions at s N N = 2.76 TeV within a multiphase transport model. Phys. Rev. 2014, C89, 024902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bzdak, A.; Ma, G.L. Elliptic and triangular flow in p+Pb and peripheral Pb+Pb collisions from parton scatterings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 252301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Nie, M.W.; Huo, P.; Jia, J.; Ma, G.L. Multiparticle azimuthal cumulants in p+Pb collisions from a multiphase transport model. Phys. Rev. 2018, C98, 034903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Magdy, N.; Nie, M.W.; Huang, L.; Ma, G.L.; Lacey, R.A. An extended R Ψ m ( 2 ) S2) correlator for detecting and characterizing the Chiral Magnetic Wave. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 811, 135986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Magdy, N. Characterizing the initial and final state effects of relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2022, 107, 024905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Magdy, N. Measuring differential flow angle fluctuations in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C 2022, 106, 044911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Magdy, N. Impact of nuclear deformation on collective flow observables in relativistic U+U collisions. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.05332. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, B. ZPC 1.0.1: A Parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1998, 109, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, X.N.; Gyulassy, M. HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions. Phys. Rev. 1991, D44, 3501–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gyulassy, M.; Wang, X.N. HIJING 1.0: A Monte Carlo program for parton and particle production in high-energy hadronic and nuclear collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1994, 83, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Li, B.A.; Ko, C.M. Formation of superdense hadronic matter in high-energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. 1995, C52, 2037–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Xu, J.; Ko, C.M. Pb-Pb collisions at s N N = 2.76 TeV in a multiphase transport model. Phys. Rev. C 2011, 83, 034904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nasim, M. Systematic study of symmetric cumulants at s N N = 200 GeV in Au+Au collision using transport approach. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 95, 034905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Solanki, D.; Sorensen, P.; Basu, S.; Raniwala, R.; Nayak, T.K. Beam energy dependence of Elliptic and Triangular flow with the AMPT model. Phys. Lett. B 2013, 720, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Bilandzic, A.; Snellings, R.; Voloshin, S. Flow analysis with cumulants: Direct calculations. Phys. Rev. 2011, C83, 044913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Jia, J.; Zhou, M.; Trzupek, A. Revealing long-range multiparticle collectivity in small collision systems via subevent cumulants. Phys. Rev. 2017, C96, 034906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Gajdošová, K. Investigations of anisotropic collectivity using multi-particle correlations in pp, p–Pb and Pb–Pb collisions. Nucl. Phys. 2017, A967, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Magdy, N.; Evdokimov, O.; Lacey, R.A. A method to test the coupling strength of the linear and nonlinear contributions to higher-order flow harmonics via Event Shape Engineering. J. Phys. G 2020, 48, 025101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bhalerao, R.S.; Ollitrault, J.Y.; Pal, S. Event-plane correlators. Phys. Rev. 2013, C88, 024909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Adams, J. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au collisions at s N N = 200-GeV. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 72, 014904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Adamczyk, L. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Beam Energy Dependence of the Third Harmonic of Azimuthal Correlations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 112302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Aboona, B.E. et al. [STAR Collaboration] Beam energy dependence of the linear and mode-coupled flow harmonics in Au+Au collisions. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 137755, 0370–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of the experimental and simulated centrality and beam energy dependence of v n { 2 } in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV (panel (a)), 39 GeV (panel (b)), 27 GeV (panel (c)) and 19.6 GeV (panel (d)). The solid points represent the experimental data reported by the STAR collaboration [78,79].
Figure 1. Comparison of the experimental and simulated centrality and beam energy dependence of v n { 2 } in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV (panel (a)), 39 GeV (panel (b)), 27 GeV (panel (c)) and 19.6 GeV (panel (d)). The solid points represent the experimental data reported by the STAR collaboration [78,79].
Universe 09 00107 g001
Figure 2. Centrality dependence of v 2 { k } in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV (panel (a)), 39 GeV (panel (b)), 27 GeV (panel (c)) and 19.6 GeV (panel (d)). The solid points represent the experimental data reported by the STAR collaboration [78,79].
Figure 2. Centrality dependence of v 2 { k } in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV (panel (a)), 39 GeV (panel (b)), 27 GeV (panel (c)) and 19.6 GeV (panel (d)). The solid points represent the experimental data reported by the STAR collaboration [78,79].
Universe 09 00107 g002
Figure 3. Centrality and beam energy dependence of three-particle correlators C 4 , 22 panel (a) and C 5 , 23 panel (b) in Au+Au collisions according to the AMPT model. The points represent the experimental measurements at 200 GeV [10].
Figure 3. Centrality and beam energy dependence of three-particle correlators C 4 , 22 panel (a) and C 5 , 23 panel (b) in Au+Au collisions according to the AMPT model. The points represent the experimental measurements at 200 GeV [10].
Universe 09 00107 g003
Figure 4. Centrality and beam energy dependence of inclusive, non-linear and linear v 4 panels (ac) obtained with the two-sub-event cumulant method in Au–Au collisions at 200 GeV according to the AMPT model. The points represent the experimental measurements at 200 GeV [10].
Figure 4. Centrality and beam energy dependence of inclusive, non-linear and linear v 4 panels (ac) obtained with the two-sub-event cumulant method in Au–Au collisions at 200 GeV according to the AMPT model. The points represent the experimental measurements at 200 GeV [10].
Universe 09 00107 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of χ 4 , 22 panel (a) and ρ 4 , 22 panel (b) in Au–Au collisions at 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV as functions of centrality obtained with the AMPT model. The points represent the experimental measurements at 200 GeV [10].
Figure 5. Comparison of χ 4 , 22 panel (a) and ρ 4 , 22 panel (b) in Au–Au collisions at 200, 39, 27 and 19.6 GeV as functions of centrality obtained with the AMPT model. The points represent the experimental measurements at 200 GeV [10].
Universe 09 00107 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magdy, N. Beam Energy Dependence of the Linear and Mode-Coupled Flow Harmonics Using the a Multi-Phase Transport Model. Universe 2023, 9, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020107

AMA Style

Magdy N. Beam Energy Dependence of the Linear and Mode-Coupled Flow Harmonics Using the a Multi-Phase Transport Model. Universe. 2023; 9(2):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magdy, Niseem. 2023. "Beam Energy Dependence of the Linear and Mode-Coupled Flow Harmonics Using the a Multi-Phase Transport Model" Universe 9, no. 2: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020107

APA Style

Magdy, N. (2023). Beam Energy Dependence of the Linear and Mode-Coupled Flow Harmonics Using the a Multi-Phase Transport Model. Universe, 9(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020107

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop