Next Article in Journal
Production of Primordial Black Holes in Improved E-Models of Inflation
Next Article in Special Issue
Pyroxene and Hydroxyl Signatures in Vesta Newly Calibrated Data from Dawn Mission
Previous Article in Journal
Electromagnetic Waves in Cosmological Spacetime
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solar Sail Trajectories to Earth’s Trojan Asteroids
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Formation of a Rubble Pile Asteroid: Insights from the Asteroid Ryugu

Universe 2023, 9(6), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9060293
by Tsutomu Ota *, Christian Potiszil, Katsura Kobayashi, Ryoji Tanaka, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Tak Kunihiro, Chie Sakaguchi, Masahiro Yamanaka and Eizo Nakamura
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Universe 2023, 9(6), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9060293
Submission received: 19 May 2023 / Revised: 9 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Missions to Small Bodies: Results and Future Activities)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript presents a short review on rubble pile asteroid formation focused on Ryugu. The text is very well presented and covers a significant scope of references.

I believe it brings some contribution in this topic to the community.

 

Author Response

We sincerely appreciate the reviewer’s careful reading our manuscript and providing the comments to improve the paper. As there was no specific comment for revi- sion from Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2, we have modified the manuscript with considering each of the comments from Reviewer 3.

Reviewer 2 Report

I would first say that I am working on the area of asteroid exploring dynamical problems. So the evolution of asteroids/comets is related background of my research. This is also indicate that I am not very good at this scientific topic. Even though by going through the manuscript, I enjoyed reading this review paper. A new hypothesis was proposed regarding the rubble-pile asteroid based on the obversations of Ryugu. I would recommend its publication as a nice conceptual study. No specific comments.

Author Response

We sincerely appreciate the reviewer’s careful reading our manuscript and providing the comments to improve the paper. As there was no specific comment for revi- sion from Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2, we have modified the manuscript with considering each of the comments from Reviewer 3.

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

   I had a chance to give a look at the revised version of this manuscript. I appreciate that I am reviewing a very good paper with valuable results and am happy to see that the authors made an effort to accommodate all my previous comments. In my opinion, the paper in the current version is improved enough to become acceptable for publishing.

Back to TopTop