Next Article in Journal
“Atoms” Special Issue (Electron Scattering from Atoms, Ions and Molecules)
Next Article in Special Issue
Charge-State Distributions after Beta Decay of 6He to Form 6Li+
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Plasma Emission Experiments and ‘Dips’
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implications of W-Boson Mass Anomaly for Atomic Parity Violation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deep Laser Cooling of Thulium Atoms to Sub-µK Temperatures in Magneto-Optical Trap

1
The Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
2
Russian Quantum Center, Moscow 121205, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atoms 2023, 11(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11020030
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 5 February 2023

Abstract

:
Deep laser cooling of atoms, ions, and molecules facilitates the study of fundamental physics as well as applied research. In this work, we report on the narrow-line laser cooling of thulium atoms at the wavelength of 506.2 nm with the natural linewidth of 7.8 kHz , which widens the limits of atomic cloud parameters control. Temperatures of about 400 nK , phase-space density of up to 3.5 × 10 4 and 2 × 10 6 number of trapped atoms were achieved. We have also demonstrated formation of double cloud structure in an optical lattice by adjusting parameters of the 506.2 nm magneto-optical trap. These results can be used to improve experiments with BEC, atomic interferometers, and optical clocks.

1. Introduction

In modern atomic physics, laser cooling of atoms, ions, and molecules is an essential technique for producing cold and dense clouds of particles. Such ensembles are the subject of study in many fields, including few- and many-body physics [1,2], absolute and differential quantum gravimetry [3,4,5], quantum simulations [2], Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) [6,7,8,9,10], and optical lattice clocks [11,12].
Bose–Einstein condensation requires the atomic de Brogile wavelength to be compared with atom–atom distance. The main aim of laser cooling techniques in such experiments is to achieve a better starting point for evaporative cooling. Laser cooling techniques typically allows to reach the temperatures of about (∼ 1 μ K ) with the typical phase-space density (PSD) of 10 4 [13,14,15,16,17], while the PSD of 2.612 is required to achieve BEC [6]. A further increase in PSD is achieved with evaporative cooling which reduces the number of particles.
Another application of laser-cooled ensembles is the optical lattice clocks. The state-of-the-art level of relative frequency uncertainty of lattice optical clocks is on a scale of 10 18 [11]. In such experiments, cold atoms are trapped in optical lattices at the magic wavelengths to reduce the lattice-induced frequency shifts of the clock transition, but high-order polarizabilities lead these frequency shifts to be dependent on vibrational states of atoms in the potential [18]. High temperature means that more vibrational states are occupied, leading to undesirable frequency shifts and to decoherence of the clock transition excitation [19,20]. It is desirable that a significant number of atoms should be in the lowest vibrational state, which usually corresponds to temperatures of the order of (∼ 1 μ K ).
Thulium atoms are proven to be a convenient platform for optical clocks [21], quantum simulators, and experiments with BEC [10,22]. The clock transition in thulium has low sensitivity to most environmental frequency shifts while others can be eliminated by the interrogation protocol [23]. In the case of quantum simulators and BEC experiments, thulium atoms are promising due to large number of Fano–Feshbach resonances and relatively high magnetic moment of the ground state ( μ = 4 μ B ) [24].
All current experiments with cold atomic thulium are performed with the single stable bosonic isotope thulium-169. The experimental procedure starts with two-stage laser cooling which typically produces several millions of atoms at a temperature of ∼ 20 μ K . In experiments with BEC, this results in PSD of ∼ 2 × 10 5 after the second stage cooling [10]. In optical clock experiments, such temperature leads to mean vibrational number n vib 8 , which corresponds to the relative frequency shift at the 10 16 level and hard-to-control uncertainty [25].
Thus, a deeper cooling of thulium atoms is preferable to solve both of these problems. The minimal temperature T D attainable with Doppler cooling is related to the linewidth of cooling transition γ according to the relationship T D = h γ / ( 2 k B ) , where h—the Planck constant, and k B —the Boltzmann constant. The first transition used for laser cooling of Tm atoms is the transition at the wavelength of 410.6 nm (“blue”, 1st stage magneto-optical trap, MOT, Figure 1a) with the natural linewidth of 10 MHz . While Doppler limit for this transition equals 240 μ K , it is possible to work in a sub-Doppler regime with temperatures as low as 25 μ K . However, the atomic cloud in this case becomes larger with lower number of atoms. The second laser cooling transition has the wavelength of 530.7 nm (“green”, 2nd stage MOT, Figure 1a) and the linewidth of 350 kHz . The recapture efficiency from the first stage MOT is close to 100%, and the Doppler limit equals 10 μ K .
In this work, we present a detailed experimental analysis of not yet studied transition | 4 f 13 ( 2 F o ) 6 s 2 , F = 4 | 4 f 13 ( 2 F 7 / 2 o ) 6 s 6 p ( 3 P 2 o ) , F = 5 for deep cooling of thulium atoms, at the wavelength of λ = 506.2 nm with the linewidth of γ = 7.8 kHz . The Doppler limit for this transition is T D = 200 nK which is lower than the recoil limit for this transition T rec = h 2 / ( 2 m λ 2 k B ) = 220 nK , where m—atomic mass of thulium.
In Section 2 we describe our experimental results: the efficient recapture of atoms from the 1st and the 2nd into the 3rd-stage MOT (Section 2.1), the optimization of the narrow line cooling process (Section 2.2), the confirmation of the low temperature of MOT with the Doppler broadening of the clock transition spectroscopy (Section 2.3), the effect of the intermediate 2nd-stage MOT (Section 2.4), and the possibility to form double-structured clouds in an optical lattice (Section 2.5). Finally, we draw the conclusions in Section 3.

2. Results

2.1. Loading of Broadband MOT

As a starting point, we cool and trap thulium atoms using two-stage MOT (see Figure 1b). The Zeeman slower and the first-stage MOT work on the strong transition at a wavelength of 410.6 nm with the natural linewidth of 10 MHz . This transition is also used for the probe radiation. The second-stage MOT works on 530.7 nm transition with natural linewidth of 350 kHz . The transfer efficiency of atoms from the 1st to 2nd stage MOT is near 100 % , and the final temperature of atoms is about 20 μ K . More details can be found in [26,27].
In this work, we follow a common approach of working with narrow-line magneto-optical trap [15,28,29], when in the beginning of narrow-line cooling the cooling radiation frequency is modulated to broaden its spectrum and increase the velocity capturing range. Note that the laser itself is stabilized to an ultrastable cavity (see Appendix A). We use triangle-shaped frequency modulation for convenience, as it was readily available for our direct digital synthesizers (DDS), based on AD9910 chip. The spectrum of triangle-shaped modulated signal differs only slightly from the spectrum of a more commonly used harmonic frequency modulation.
We determined modulation parameters that work well for our setup: amplitude of 100 kHz 13 γ and frequency of about 10 kHz . The center frequency of the modulated radiation is typically red-detuned further from the line center than the frequency of the narrow-line cooling stage radiation (see Figure 1b). Note that there is a wide range of acceptable modulation parameters which may depend on magnetic fields and the atomic cloud geometry and temperature.
In our case, since we start with much lower temperature of atoms (∼ 20 μ K vs. 0.5–3 mK in [14,28,30]), the 50 ms -long broadband cooling results in stable trapping of ≈ 100 % atoms from the 2nd stage MOT and 1.5 μ K temperature of the atoms. We use it as a starting point for investigation of single-frequency MOT performance.

2.2. Optimal MOT Parameters

The key parameters of atomic cloud after laser cooling are its temperature, size, number of atoms, and density (or phase-space density). We measured all of them for different gradients of anti-Helmholtz magnetic field, cooling radiation intensity (in units of saturation parameter s = I / I sat , where I sat 8 μ W / cm 2 ), and frequency detuning from resonance δ ν in units of natural linewidth γ . We varied optical power from s = 14 ( P min = 100 μ W , the minimum optical power we could see MOT with) to s = 89 ( P max 635 μ W , increasing the optical power further would not lead to increasing the number of atoms or decreasing the temperature). The detuning was varied from 8 γ ( 60 kHz , closer to the resonance we lost a significant amount of atoms) to 14 γ ( 110 kHz , further from the resonance the horizontal cloud size becomes too big and complicates the temperature measurements). For the discussion on the line center position, see Appendix A. The magnetic field gradient was varied from 0.2 G / cm to 0.6 G / cm ( 20 mA to 60 mA for the current in coils).
The pulses timing sequence we used for this experiment is presented in Figure 1b. The duration of 2nd-stage cooling was fixed to 30 ms . The delay time between narrow-line cooling and the probe pulse was varied between 0–30 ms for the time-of-flight measurement. We calibrated our CMOS-camera in advance to get the number of atoms as well as the horizontal and vertical cloud dimensions from the images. The cloud size dependance on the time-of-flight was used to deduce the temperature, and the cloud size before the release of atoms with their number and temperature was used for the PSD calculation.
The results are shown in Figure 2. We show atomic temperatures in the horizontal and vertical directions (measured by time-of-flight technique), fraction of recaputered atoms N / N 0 , and phase-space density after 100 ms of single-frequency MOT.
Firstly, one can see that minimum temperature is achieved at low intensities and small detunings. However, in this parameter space the number of trapped atoms is less than 20 % , and the PSD is below 10 4 . The fraction of trapped atoms can be significantly increased almost up to 100 % by increasing intensity, detuning, and magnetic field gradient. The explanation is that the velocity capturing range is increasing. Maximum PSD of 3.5 × 10 4 is achieved at s = 51 , b = 0.6 G / cm , and δ ν = 10 γ and corresponds to a compromise between the cloud temperature ( T ver = 0.8 μ K , T hor = 1.2 μ K ) and the number of atoms ( N = 1.3 × 10 6 or N / N 0 = 64 % ), and is shifted to low detunings which makes the atomic cloud more compact. This is a significant order of magnitude increase in PSD compared to the previously reported values for 530.7 nm MOT [10].

2.3. Temperature Measurement with Clock Transition Spectroscopy

The standard method for temperature measurements in this kind of experiment is time-of-flight method [31]. In order to measure low temperatures, it is preferable to allow for a long time-of-flight of about 20–30 ms which corresponds to a free-fall distance of 2–4 mm. The field of view of our camera was about 6 mm . To keep the intensity of the probe beam constant along this distance, we used vertical probe beam.
Note that for narrow-line Doppler cooling, we often get a typical bowl-shape of the cloud, with horizontal dimensions being significantly larger than vertical. In this case we see that laser cooling works more efficiently in the vertical direction than in horizontal plane, and the resulting temperature is inhomogeneous which can be seen in the first two columns in Figure 2.
The cloud temperature in the vertical direction is of particular interest to us because of our experiments with optical lattice clock. In such experiments, the clock transition spectroscopy is often performed with an optical lattice aligned vertically. As mentioned previously in Section 1, lowering the vertical temperature of the cloud would reduce the mean longitudinal vibrational sublevel population:
n z ¯ = n z = 0 n z max n z exp ( h ν z n z / k B T ver ) n z = 0 n z max exp ( h ν z n z / k B T ver )
In this equation, n z max is the maximum vibrational number in the potential which is defined by the potential depth, ν z is the longitudinal frequency of the optical lattice.
In our experiments, we operate the optical lattice at a wavelength of 1063.9 nm which is close to the magic wavelength which we will use in clock spectroscopy experiments [21,25]. The typical vibrational frequency ν z = 40 kHz and maximum vibrational number n z max = 15 . With lowering the temperature of atoms from 20 μ K which we achieved in our previous works, to about 1 μ K achieved in this work, the mean longitudinal vibrational sublevel population changes from n ¯ z 4.4 to n ¯ z 0.2 , which is a great starting point for further experiments. Note that further decreasing of mean vibrational number could be achieved via optical lattice sifting (for more information about this method and typical optical lattice parameters in our experiments, see [25]).
In order to independently measure low temperatures that we get in the vertical direction, we used clock line spectroscopy in a free space which we were able to do due to the experiments with optical clocks. After the capturing of atoms into the 3rd MOT (as in Figure 1b), we wait about 20 ms for the magnetic fields to turn off. During that time, only 506.2 nm -molasses work to restrain atomic cloud from expanding. After that, a 1 ms -long clock pulse excites atoms along the vertical direction, and we detect the remaining atoms with the probe pulse and a CMOS-camera. The result of this experiment is presented in Figure 3a. The full width at half maximum of this line equals Δ ν clock = 13.7 ( 1.2 ) kHz . In Figure 3b, we can see the result of the time-of-flight experiment, giving T = 0.69 ( 6 ) μ K . This temperature corresponds to Δ ν D = 12 ( 1 ) kHz Doppler broadening of the clock transition linewidth. The similarity of the measured linewidth Δ ν clock and the Doppler broadening Δ ν D assures correct measurements of the temperature of the atoms above and smallness of other residual broadenings, e.g., due to the Zeeman effect.

2.4. Effect of the 2nd-Stage MOT on Recapture Efficiency

While the recapturing efficiency of the broadband MOT 506.2 nm from the 2nd-stage MOT is nearly 100%, we get only ∼ 15 % when loading it directly from the 1st-stage MOT. In order to understand what impacts this efficiency, we performed the following experiment. We kept only 410.6 nm and 506.2 nm during the 1st-stage MOT (in the experiments described above radiation at 530.7 nm was also present) and varied duration of the 2nd-stage MOT (see Figure 1b). For each 2nd-stage MOT duration τ the number of atoms recaptured in broadband 506.2 nm MOT is measured (Figure 4). Beside this, we also measured the cloud size and the temperature of atoms after the 2nd-stage MOT.
All the parameters have similar characteristic time dependence. Comparing τ = 0 (only the 1st-stage MOT) and τ > 20 ms (steady regime with 2nd-stage MOT), the initial cloud size decreases by a factor of 2 and the initial temperature decreases by a factor of 5. Since we observed almost 7-fold improvement of the number of captured atoms, we conclude that probably both these factors affect the capture efficiency, while the temperature seems to be the dominant one.
It is worth noting that with some optimization of the 1st-stage MOT, we could achieve 30 % recapture efficiency directly to the broadband 506.2 nm MOT, with the downside of reduced initial number of atoms.

2.5. Two Atomic Clouds Producing

Narrow-line cooling can also be used in applications that require spatial control of the atomic cloud. Some recent works [32,33] show great interest in space resolved spectroscopy between separated regions of the atomic cloud or between different clouds in the same vacuum chamber. During the multistage cooling described above, one can alter the position of the atomic cloud by varying frequency detuning or magnetic field gradient, and thus control the process of recapturing atoms in the optical lattice creating multiple clouds.
In order to achieve two non-intersecting atomic clouds we keep optical lattice and frequency-broadened 506.2 nm radiation on throughout the experiment.
First, atomic cloud is formed by ∼ 50 ms -long second stage MOT (see left image on Figure 5). Since atoms are already relatively cold ( T 20 μ K ), ∼ 10 % becomes captured in the optical lattice at the 2nd-stage MOT cloud position. After that, 530.7 nm radiation turns off, and anti-Helmholtz magnetic field switches to the 3rd stage cooling regime. Atoms, which are not trapped into the optical lattice, move to the new position determined by the parameters of the 506.2 nm MOT, as shown in the middle image of Figure 5. One can see that a small number of atoms is captured into the optical lattice in between positions of the 2nd and 3rd MOTs since the atomic cloud was shifting slowly down. Finally, we switch off 506.2 nm MOT, and after non-trapped atoms fly away, we obtain two separated clouds in the optical lattice (right image in Figure 5).
Parameters of the frequency-broadened 3rd stage MOT were adjusted so that the resulting atomic clouds contain an equal number of atoms (about 7% of the initial number of trapped atoms in each cloud) and are spaced several cloud diameters apart (Figure 5). The main characteristics of resulting atomic clouds are mostly determined by the optical lattice. Note that here the optical lattice was formed by a single reflecting mirror, unlike some of our previous works with enhancement cavity [21,25]. Final lifetimes and temperatures of clouds are similar, which enables space-resolved spectroscopy in two non-intersecting atomic clouds and is of interest for future works in this direction.

3. Discussion

The overall result of this work is extensive experimental analysis of different regimes of a narrow line MOT on 506.2 nm transition in thulium. We have shown that we can achieve temperature of the atomic cloud as low as 0.4 μ K . When aiming for the highest phase-space density, we were able to reach PSD = 3.5 × 10 4 at T = 0.8 μ K when starting with N = 2 × 10 6 atoms in the 1st-stage MOT. This value is similar to those reported in other experiments with narrow-line MOTs [14,15,16,17]. Implementation of this technique to experiments with thulium with N = 30 × 10 6 [10] or 13 × 10 6 [34] atoms in the initial MOT, would result in PSD 3 × 10 3 . This value is 2 orders of magnitude larger than the initial PSD in [10], that should significantly speed up and increase efficiency of the following evaporative cooling.
The best performance of the narrow-line MOT is achieved using two preliminary stages of laser cooling on 410.6 nm and 530.7 nm transitions. Meanwhile, we have demonstrated up to 30% efficiency of the narrow-line MOT loading directly from the 1st-stage MOT, which operates on strong 410.6 nm transition. This is similar to some experiments with narrow-line MOTs [14,35], while less than in other works [28], depending on atomic species. Hereby, one can choose between simplicity of the laser setup (i.e., the use of only 2 lasers at 410.6 nm and 506.2 nm) and performance, when using 3 stages of laser cooling.
Demonstrated deep laser cooling below 1 μ K would significantly improve optical lattice clocks since mostly the ground motional state should be occupied at such temperature and typical depth of optical lattice. For thulium atoms in the motional ground state we expect clock transition frequency shift from the optical lattice to be at the 10 17 level with uncertainty at 10 18 , including contribution from the higher-order polarizabilities.
Large sensitivity of 506.2 nm MOT to the parameters of the experiment (like magnetic field gradient, power, and frequency of the cooling beams) can be used to achieve various advantages dependent on the task. One particular example is the use of sensitive 3rd MOT for creating double-structured atomic cloud. By adjusting cooling parameters, it is possible to get two clouds separated by 1 mm in the same optical lattice. Working with two separate but spatially close clouds, it is possible to eliminate a number of inconvenient frequency shifts and noise sources [32,33].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G. and N.K.; data curation, D.T. and A.G.; formal analysis, D.P. and D.T.; funding acquisition, A.G. and N.K.; investigation, D.P., D.T., D.M., M.Y. and A.G.; methodology, D.P., D.T. and D.M.; project administration, K.K. and N.K.; resources, D.K., V.S. and K.K.; software, D.T. and A.G.; supervision, V.S. and N.K.; validation, D.P., D.T., D.M. and A.G.; visualization, D.P. and D.T.; writing—original draft, D.P. and D.T.; writing—review and editing, D.M., A.G. and N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation grant number 21-72-10108.

Data Availability Statement

The associated experimental data will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MOTMagneto-optical trap
BECBose-Einstein condensate
PSDphase-space density
AOMacousto-optic modulator
ULEultra-low expansion glass

Appendix A. Laser Frequency Stabilization and Calibration

As a source of laser radiation at a wavelength of λ = 506.2 nm , we use Toptica Dl pro laser which provides up to 15 mW optical power with a linewidth less than 100 kHz . The laser frequency is locked to one of the eigenmode of an utrastable cavity made of ultra-low expansion (ULE) glass. The temperature of ULE cavity was set near its zero thermal expansion point at T = 26.8 C . The cavity finesse is 47,500 and transmission is 37 % in resonance. We stabilized the frequency of the laser to the ULE cavity mode, nearest to the previously investigated transition frequency [36].
In order to be able to operate with the frequency detuning of the 506.2 nm laser relative to the exact resonance as well as to compensate the long-term frequency drift of the reference ULE cavity, we perform transition resonance determination at least once a day. For this, we record absorption spectrum of the cooling 506.2 nm radiation in cloud of thulium atoms, which is formed by the 2nd-stage MOT at 530.7 nm .
After loading of atoms into the MOT, we switched off all the magnetic fields and waited for 30 ms with only 530.7 nm molasses working to prevent the expansion of the atomic cloud during that time. Then we excited atoms with a 506.2 nm MOT beams and determined the probability of excitation with a probe 410.6 nm beam and a CMOS-camera. Scanning the detuning of the 506.2 nm laser, we obtained the spectrum (one of the measurements is shown in Figure A1).
We attribute the double-peak structure to Zeeman shift for different magnetic sublevels of thulium. The magnetic field inside the vacuum chamber might be inhomogeneous, and because of large atomic cloud in this experiment, different atoms might be in different magnetic field, and possibly on different magnetic sublevels. Taking into account g-factors of the ground and excited states for the 506.2 nm transition [37], this structure can be explained by ≈ 10 mG residual magnetic field difference on a scale of atomic cloud diameter ∼ 0.5 mm . The double-peak structure is consistent, and is smoothed out with power broadening of the 506.2 nm transition. We choose average frequency between the two peaks as an origin on the frequency scale because of the symmetry of the experiment. This corresponds also to the line center of the power-broadened spectrum.
From day-to-day calibration we observe linear cavity drift of ≈ 30 kHz / day . On a typical timescale of our experiment of ∼ 4 h , this results in ≈ 5 kHz frequency shift which is on the order of the transition natural linewidth ( γ = 7.8 kHz ). As we typically work at the frequency detuning of 10 γ , the laser frequency drift does not affect the experiments. We note, that in the future we plan to automatically compensate this drift with an acousto-optic modulator in front of the reference cavity.
Figure A1. Typical 506.2 nm cooling transition absorption spectrum in free space depending on the AOM frequency ν detuned from ν 0 = 200.985 MHz . Dashed line shows the results of two Gaussian fit. The half-sum of their center frequencies was chosen as an origin on the frequency scale in further experiments.
Figure A1. Typical 506.2 nm cooling transition absorption spectrum in free space depending on the AOM frequency ν detuned from ν 0 = 200.985 MHz . Dashed line shows the results of two Gaussian fit. The half-sum of their center frequencies was chosen as an origin on the frequency scale in further experiments.
Atoms 11 00030 g0a1

References

  1. Blume, D. Few-body physics with ultracold atomic and molecular systems in traps. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2012, 75, 046401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bloch, I.; Dalibard, J.; Nascimbene, S. Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Janvier, C.; Ménoret, V.; Desruelle, B.; Merlet, S.; Landragin, A.; dos Santos, F.P. Compact differential gravimeter at the quantum projection-noise limit. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 022801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ménoret, V.; Vermeulen, P.; Le Moigne, N.; Bonvalot, S.; Bouyer, P.; Landragin, A.; Desruelle, B. Gravity measurements below 10-9g with a transportable absolute quantum gravimeter. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Del Aguila, R.P.; Mazzoni, T.; Hu, L.; Salvi, L.; Tino, G.M.; Poli, N. Bragg gravity-gradiometer using the 1S0-3P1 intercombination transition of 88Sr. New J. Phys. 2018, 20, 043002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ketterle, W.; Andrews, M.; Davis, K.; Durfee, D.; Kurn, D.; Mewes, M.O.; Van Druten, N. Bose–Einstein condensation of ultracold atomic gases. Phys. Scr. 1996, 1996, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Warner, C.; Lam, A.Z.; Bigagli, N.; Liu, H.C.; Stevenson, I.; Will, S. Overlapping Bose-Einstein condensates of Na 23 and Cs 133. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 104, 033302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miyazawa, Y.; Inoue, R.; Matsui, H.; Nomura, G.; Kozuma, M. Bose-Einstein condensation of europium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 223401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schreck, F.; Druten, K.v. Laser cooling for quantum gases. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davletov, E.; Tsyganok, V.; Khlebnikov, V.; Pershin, D.; Shaykin, D.; Akimov, A. Machine learning for achieving Bose-Einstein condensation of thulium atoms. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 102, 011302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ludlow, A.D.; Boyd, M.M.; Ye, J.; Peik, E.; Schmidt, P.O. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015, 87, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Collaboration, Boulder Atomic Clock Optical Network BACON. Frequency ratio measurements at 18-digit accuracy using an optical clock network. Nature 2021, 591, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Griesmaier, A.; Werner, J.; Hensler, S.; Stuhler, J.; Pfau, T. Bose-Einstein condensation of chromium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 160401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lu, M.; Burdick, N.Q.; Youn, S.H.; Lev, B.L. Strongly dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate of dysprosium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 190401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kraft, S.; Vogt, F.; Appel, O.; Riehle, F.; Sterr, U. Bose-Einstein condensation of alkaline earth atoms: Ca 40. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 130401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aikawa, K.; Frisch, A.; Mark, M.; Baier, S.; Rietzler, A.; Grimm, R.; Ferlaino, F. Bose-Einstein condensation of erbium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 210401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stellmer, S.; Tey, M.K.; Huang, B.; Grimm, R.; Schreck, F. Bose-Einstein condensation of strontium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 200401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ushijima, I.; Takamoto, M.; Katori, H. Operational Magic Intensity for Sr Optical Lattice Clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Blatt, S.; Thomsen, J.W.; Campbell, G.K.; Ludlow, A.D.; Swallows, M.D.; Martin, M.J.; Boyd, M.M.; Ye, J. Rabi Spectroscopy and Excitation Inhomogeneity in a 1D Optical Lattice Clock. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80, 052703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fedorova, E.S.; Tregubov, D.O.; Golovizin, A.A.; Mishin, D.A.; Provorchenko, D.I.; Khabarova, K.Y.; Sorokin, V.N.; Kolachevsky, N.N. Rabi spectroscopy of the clock transition in thulium atoms in a one-dimensional optical lattice. Quantum Electron. 2020, 50, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Golovizin, A.; Fedorova, E.; Tregubov, D.; Sukachev, D.; Khabarova, K.; Sorokin, V.; Kolachevsky, N. Inner-shell clock transition in atomic thulium with a small blackbody radiation shift. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khlebnikov, V.A.; Pershin, D.A.; Tsyganok, V.V.; Davletov, E.T.; Cojocaru, I.S. Random to chaotic temperature transition in low-field Fano-Feshbach resonances of cold thulium atoms. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1902.00201. [Google Scholar]
  23. Golovizin, A.A.; Tregubov, D.O.; Fedorova, E.S.; Mishin, D.A.; Provorchenko, D.I.; Khabarova, K.Y.; Sorokin, V.N.; Kolachevsky, N.N. Simultaneous bicolor interrogation in thulium optical clock providing very low systematic frequency shifts. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khlebnikov, V.; Tsyganok, V.; Pershin, D.; Davletov, E.; Kuznetsova, E.; Akimov, A. Characterizing the temperature dependence of Fano-Feshbach resonances of ultracold polarized thulium. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 023306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mishin, D.A.; Provorchenko, D.I.; Tregubov, D.O.; Golovizin, A.A.; Khabarova, K.Y.; Sorokin, V.N.; Kolachevsky, N.N. Effect of optical lattice field on characteristics of a clock transition in thulium atoms. Quantum Electron. 2022, 52, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sukachev, D.D.; Kalganova, E.S.; Sokolov, A.V.; Fedorov, S.A.; Vishnyakova, G.A.; Akimov, A.V.; Kolachevsky, N.N.; Sorokin, V.N. Secondary laser cooling and capturing of thulium atoms in traps. Quantum Electron. 2014, 44, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kalganova, E.; Prudnikov, O.; Vishnyakova, G.; Golovizin, A.; Tregubov, D.; Sukachev, D.; Khabarova, K.; Sorokin, V.; Kolachevsky, N. Two-temperature momentum distribution in a thulium magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 033418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Katori, H.; Ido, T.; Isoya, Y.; Kuwata-Gonokami, M. Magneto-optical trapping and cooling of strontium atoms down to the photon recoil temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yamaguchi, A.; Safronova, M.; Gibble, K.; Katori, H. Narrow-line cooling and determination of the magic wavelength of Cd. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 113201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maier, T.; Kadau, H.; Schmitt, M.; Griesmaier, A.; Pfau, T. Narrow-line magneto-optical trap for dysprosium atoms. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 3138–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lett, P.D.; Watts, R.N.; Westbrook, C.I.; Phillips, W.D.; Gould, P.L.; Metcalf, H.J. Observation of atoms laser cooled below the Doppler limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 61, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bothwell, T.; Kennedy, C.J.; Aeppli, A.; Kedar, D.; Robinson, J.M.; Oelker, E.; Staron, A.; Ye, J. Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample. Nature 2022, 602, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zheng, X.; Dolde, J.; Lochab, V.; Merriman, B.N.; Li, H.; Kolkowitz, S. Differential clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock. Nature 2022, 602, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Golovizin, A.; Tregubov, D.; Mishin, D.; Provorchenko, D.; Kolachevsky, N. Compact magneto-optical trap of thulium atoms for a transportable optical clock. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 36734–36744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Degenhardt, C.; Stoehr, H.; Lisdat, C.; Wilpers, G.; Schnatz, H.; Lipphardt, B. Calcium optical frequency standard with ultracold atoms: Approaching 10-15 relative uncertainty. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72, 062111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Provorchenko, D.I.; Tregubov, D.O.; Mishin, D.A.; Golovizin, A.A.; Fedorova, E.S.; Khabarova, K.Y.; Sorokin, V.N.; Kolachevsky, N.N. Investigation of the transition at a wavelength of 506 nm, intended for deep cooling of thulium atoms. Quantum Electron. 2021, 51, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martin, W.; Zalubas, R.; Hagan, L. Atomic Energy Levels—The Rare Earth Elements.(The Spectra of Lanthanum, Cerium, Praseodymium, Neodymium, Promethium, Samarium, Europium, Gadolinium, Terbium, Dysprosium, Holmium, Erbium, Thulium, Ytterbium, and Lutetium); [66 Atoms and Ions]; Technical Report; Department of Chemistry, Manchester College of Science and Technology (UK): Manchester, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) The diagram of levels and transitions in Tm that we used in this work. For the 1st-stage cooling and the probe beam we use the radiation at the wavelength of 410.6 nm . For the 2nd-stage cooling— 530.7 nm , and the 3rd-stage cooling— 506.2 nm , the transition that we study in this work. The radiation at 1063.9 nm used to form the optical lattice and the clock transition at 1.14 μ m used to confirm the low temperatures, achieved in experiment. (b) The typical pulse sequence and its timings used in our experiments. The diagram shows the order of laser cooling pulses and the magnetic field changes with time. For 3rd stage cooling pulse the frequency and the intensity of cooling radiation showed independently.
Figure 1. (a) The diagram of levels and transitions in Tm that we used in this work. For the 1st-stage cooling and the probe beam we use the radiation at the wavelength of 410.6 nm . For the 2nd-stage cooling— 530.7 nm , and the 3rd-stage cooling— 506.2 nm , the transition that we study in this work. The radiation at 1063.9 nm used to form the optical lattice and the clock transition at 1.14 μ m used to confirm the low temperatures, achieved in experiment. (b) The typical pulse sequence and its timings used in our experiments. The diagram shows the order of laser cooling pulses and the magnetic field changes with time. For 3rd stage cooling pulse the frequency and the intensity of cooling radiation showed independently.
Atoms 11 00030 g001
Figure 2. Results of MOT optimization process for several input parameters: magnetic field gradient (b, y-axis), frequency detuning ( δ ν , x-axis), and total intensity of 506.2 nm MOT beams in the units of saturation parameter (s, rows). Four columns represent four key parameters: two temperatures of atomic cloud ( T hor along the horizontal plane and T ver along the vertical direction), phase-space density ( P S D ), and relative number of atoms ( N / N 0 , where N 0 = 2 × 10 6 —the number of atoms in MOT after first stage cooling). Bowl-shaped cloud in the region of high detunings and low magnetic field gradient complicates temperature measurement in the horizontal plane. This area gives unreliable results for the horizontal temperature and is marked by the white lines crossing this area.
Figure 2. Results of MOT optimization process for several input parameters: magnetic field gradient (b, y-axis), frequency detuning ( δ ν , x-axis), and total intensity of 506.2 nm MOT beams in the units of saturation parameter (s, rows). Four columns represent four key parameters: two temperatures of atomic cloud ( T hor along the horizontal plane and T ver along the vertical direction), phase-space density ( P S D ), and relative number of atoms ( N / N 0 , where N 0 = 2 × 10 6 —the number of atoms in MOT after first stage cooling). Bowl-shaped cloud in the region of high detunings and low magnetic field gradient complicates temperature measurement in the horizontal plane. This area gives unreliable results for the horizontal temperature and is marked by the white lines crossing this area.
Atoms 11 00030 g002
Figure 3. (a) Clock line spectroscopy in free-space using vertical clock laser beam: relative number of atoms remained after clock transition excitation depending on clock frequency detuning from resonance. (b) Atomic cloud vertical size (radius at 1 / e level) during the time-of-flight experiment. The temperature T ver = 0.69 ( 6 ) μ K explains 12 kHz of the linewidth which is consistent with clock line spectroscopy.
Figure 3. (a) Clock line spectroscopy in free-space using vertical clock laser beam: relative number of atoms remained after clock transition excitation depending on clock frequency detuning from resonance. (b) Atomic cloud vertical size (radius at 1 / e level) during the time-of-flight experiment. The temperature T ver = 0.69 ( 6 ) μ K explains 12 kHz of the linewidth which is consistent with clock line spectroscopy.
Atoms 11 00030 g003
Figure 4. Number of atoms recaptured in broad 506.2 nm MOT. Insets: temperature and cloud radius vs. 2nd-stage MOT cooling duration. Dashed lines represent the exponential function fitting, with the characteristic time of the recapturing process being ≈ 5 ms .
Figure 4. Number of atoms recaptured in broad 506.2 nm MOT. Insets: temperature and cloud radius vs. 2nd-stage MOT cooling duration. Dashed lines represent the exponential function fitting, with the characteristic time of the recapturing process being ≈ 5 ms .
Atoms 11 00030 g004
Figure 5. Double cloud structure. Three stages of experiment are shown from left to right: 2nd-stage MOT, intermediate process of recapturing into 3rd-stage MOT, two clouds in optical lattice without any MOT radiation and magnetic fields.
Figure 5. Double cloud structure. Three stages of experiment are shown from left to right: 2nd-stage MOT, intermediate process of recapturing into 3rd-stage MOT, two clouds in optical lattice without any MOT radiation and magnetic fields.
Atoms 11 00030 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Provorchenko, D.; Tregubov, D.; Mishin, D.; Yaushev, M.; Kryuchkov, D.; Sorokin, V.; Khabarova, K.; Golovizin, A.; Kolachevsky, N. Deep Laser Cooling of Thulium Atoms to Sub-µK Temperatures in Magneto-Optical Trap. Atoms 2023, 11, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11020030

AMA Style

Provorchenko D, Tregubov D, Mishin D, Yaushev M, Kryuchkov D, Sorokin V, Khabarova K, Golovizin A, Kolachevsky N. Deep Laser Cooling of Thulium Atoms to Sub-µK Temperatures in Magneto-Optical Trap. Atoms. 2023; 11(2):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11020030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Provorchenko, Daniil, Dmitry Tregubov, Denis Mishin, Mikhail Yaushev, Denis Kryuchkov, Vadim Sorokin, Ksenia Khabarova, Artem Golovizin, and Nikolay Kolachevsky. 2023. "Deep Laser Cooling of Thulium Atoms to Sub-µK Temperatures in Magneto-Optical Trap" Atoms 11, no. 2: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11020030

APA Style

Provorchenko, D., Tregubov, D., Mishin, D., Yaushev, M., Kryuchkov, D., Sorokin, V., Khabarova, K., Golovizin, A., & Kolachevsky, N. (2023). Deep Laser Cooling of Thulium Atoms to Sub-µK Temperatures in Magneto-Optical Trap. Atoms, 11(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11020030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop