Next Article in Journal
Atomic Data for Plasma Spectroscopy: The CHIANTI Database, Improvements and Challenges
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of a Collisional Radiative Model for Laser-Produced Plasmas
Previous Article in Journal
Spectroscopic Measurement of Hydrogen Atom Density in a Plasma Produced with 28 GHz ECH in QUEST
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of the FEL Fluctuations on the 2s2p Li+ Auto-Ionization Lineshape
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Photoionization of Astrophysically Relevant Atomic Ions at PIPE

1
I. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16, 35392 Giessen, Germany
2
Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Leihgesterner Weg 217, 35392 Giessen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atoms 2020, 8(3), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms8030045
Submission received: 20 July 2020 / Revised: 12 August 2020 / Accepted: 14 August 2020 / Published: 18 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interaction of Ionizing Photons with Atomic and Molecular Ions)

Abstract

:
We review recent work on the photoionization of atomic ions of astrophysical interest that has been carried out at the photon-ion merged-beams setup PIPE, a permanently installed end station at the XUV beamline P04 of the PETRA III synchrotron radiation source operated by DESY in Hamburg, Germany. Our results on single and multiple L-shell photoionization of Fe + , Fe 2 + , and Fe 3 + ions, and on single and multiple K-shell photoionization of C , C + , C 4 + , Ne + , and Si 2 + ions are discussed in astrophysical contexts. Moreover, these experimental results bear witness of the fact that the implementation of the photon-ion merged-beams method at one of the world’s brightest synchrotron light sources has led to a breakthrough for the experimental study of atomic inner-shell photoionization processes with ions.

1. Introduction

Much of the baryonic matter in the Universe is in a plasma state. The interpretation of the astronomical observations of cosmic plasmas requires a quantitative understanding of the quantum processes that lead to the emission or absorption of photons and that govern the charge balance of atoms and ions in a plasma. The photoionization and photoabsorption of atomic ions are important in connection with radiation transport, e.g., in stars [1] or kilonovae [2] and whenever a cosmic plasma is within the line of sight between the observer and a radiation source such as, e.g., a star, an X-ray binary, or an active galactic nucleus. Absorption spectra that were recorded by X-ray telescopes contain spectral signatures of the atomic ions contained in the plasma [3]. The most prominent features are due to the cosmically most abundant elements. Next to hydrogen and helium these are C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, and Fe [4]. The astrophysically motivated atomic-data needs concerning these and other elements from the Periodic Table have been highlighted repeatedly (see, e.g., [5,6,7,8,9,10]).
Here, we briefly review recent progress in experimental photoionization that has been accomplished while using interacting photon and ion beams at one of the world’s brightest third generation synchrotron light sources. We present experimental cross sections for L-shell photoionization of Fe + , Fe 2 + , and Fe 3 + ions, and for K-shell photoionization of C , C + , C 4 + , Ne + , and Si 2 + ions. In addition, we discuss the relevance of our results for the modeling of astrophysical plasmas.

2. Experimental Technique

The photoionization of ions by a single photon requires photon energies that exceed the ionization potential of the ion to be investigated. For stable atomic ions, these range from 10 eV for Ba + to 132 keV for U 91 + [11]. Thus, photon energies from the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) to the hard X-ray bands are needed for investigating photoionization of ions across the entire periodic table. Powerful laboratory sources for these types of radiation are hot plasmas and synchrotron light sources, which both have been used for photoabsorption and photoionization studies with atomic ions. The dual laser plasma (DLP) technique [12] uses a laser-generated hot plasma as a back-lighter for absorption measurements with ions in a second laser-generated plasma. In contrast to the broad spectral distribution of the radiation from a hot plasma, synchrotron radiation has a much narrower photon-energy bandwidth and it is freely tunable over large energy ranges. Moreover, modern third generation synchrotron light sources provide a high photon flux, which is a prime necessity for experiments with dilute targets, such as ions, whose mutual electrostatic repulsion entails low particle densities. The density of ionic targets can be increased in ion traps, where the ion cloud can be compressed by external fields and its density can be increased by applying cooling techniques. Nevertheless, the signal rates from such arrangements are usually still rather low and, therefore, photoionization of trapped atomic ions has been performed in only a few cases [13,14,15,16,17,18], so far.
The photon-ion merged-beams technique [19,20,21] makes up for the diluteness of the ionic target by providing a large spatial overlap between the photon beam and the ion beam. Corresponding experimental setups were installed at several synchrotron light sources [19,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The most recent development is the use of a XUV laser for a photon-ion merged-beams experiment in a heavy-ion storage ring [29,30]. Figure 1 sketches the photon-ion merged-beams setup PIPE [27], which is permanently installed at the variable polarization XUV beam line P04 [31] of the PETRA III synchrotron light source operated by DESY in Hamburg, Germany. Different types of ion sources can be mounted, such that a large variety of ion beams can be produced. In the past years, experiments at PIPE have been performed with positive and negative atomic ions, small molecular ions, and endohedral fullerene ions [32]. After extraction from the ion source, which is operated on a potential of typically 6 kV, the ions are separated in the analyzing magnet according to their mass-to-charge ratio. Subsequently, the selected ion beam is brought to a coaxial overlap with the photon-beam by adjusting the electrostatic ion-optical elements of the ion beam line accordingly. The length of the overlap region is 1.7 m. The demerging magnet separates the more highly charged product ions from the primary ions. The demerging-magnet field strength is adjusted, such that one selected product-ion charge state is directed onto a single-particle detector that counts the product ions, which hit the detector with keV energies, with practically 100% efficiency. The combination of a large interaction volume, a record-high photon flux (more than 10 12 s 1 at 0.01% bandwidth across the entire 250–3000 eV P04 energy range), and a highly efficient and largely background-free product-detection scheme provides a world-unique sensitivity for photon-interaction studies with ionized matter in the gas phase.
An asset of the merged-beam technique, which is particularly important for applications in astrophysics, is its capability to provide absolute photoionization cross sections. To this end, the photon flux, ϕ ph , at PIPE is monitored with a calibrated photodiode and the primary ion current, I ion , is measured with a large Faraday cup that is located inside the demerging-magnet vacuum chamber (Figure 1). From these experimental quantities and the measured product-ion count rate, R, the absolute cross section can be calculated as
σ = R q e v ion η I ion ϕ ph F L ,
where q e and v ion are the charge and the velocity of the primary ion and η is the detection efficiency (usually η = 1.0 ). The factor F L quantifies the mutual spatial overlap of the ion beam and the photon beam (see [27] for details). It is determined by beam-profile measurements using slit scanners that probe the beam overlap at three different locations along the photon-ion interaction region. Figure 2 shows beam profiles that are measured at its center. This procedure results in a systematic uncertainty of the absolute cross-section scale of typically 15% at a confidence level of 90% [27].
The systematic uncertainty of the P04 photon-energy scale is typically ±30–200 meV after a calibration to absorption features in gases has been applied. As discussed in considerable detail in [33], the remaining uncertainty is primarily due to the uncertainties of the calibration standards that are currently available in the soft X-ray range. Considering the ppm accuracies that can be obtained at hard X-ray beamlines with crystal monochromators, this situation for soft X-rays seems unsatisfying and calls for better calibration standards. As proposed in [34] (see also below), few-electron ions could serve this purpose since the theoretical uncertainties of photoionization-resonance positions for such fundamental atomic systems are on the meV level if state-of-the-art atomic theory is applied (see, e.g., [34,35,36]).

3. L-Shell Ionization of Low-Charged Iron Ions

A particular astrophysical data need was addressed in a sequence of measurements with the low-charged iron ions Fe + [37], Fe 2 + [38], and Fe 3 + [39]. These ions and neutral iron atoms form the gaseous iron fraction in the interstellar medium [40]. Another fraction of iron is chemically bound to interstellar dust grains. This fraction is an important parameter for tracing the evolution of the stellar mass distribution and, more generally, of the chemical evolution of the universe [41]. The abundance of iron in the interstellar medium can be inferred from astronomical X-ray observations of Fe L-shell features, and high-resolution data from X-ray satellites can be used to discriminate between the gaseous and solid forms of iron in the interstellar medium [42]. This requires laboratory data for L-shell absorption by solid iron compounds and by iron in the gas-phase. The available data for solids have been compiled in [43] and 2 p absorption of neutral iron vapour was experimentally studied in [44,45]. However, data for L-shell photoionization of low-charged iron ions have not been available prior to our recent measurements at PIPE, except for relative cross sections for single and double photoionization of Fe + [18]. Further work on L-shell photoionization was only carried out for the higher charge states Fe 6 + –Fe 10 + [46] and Fe 14 + [17]. In addition, a number of merged beams experiments have been performed on valence shell photoionization of Fe + [47], Fe 4 + [48], Fe 2 + –Fe 6 + [49], and of Fe 3 + , Fe 5 + , and Fe 7 + [50].
Most of these previous studies only considered single ionization and in some cases also double ionization. At PIPE, cross sections could be measured for m-fold photoionization of Fe + , Fe 2 + , and Fe 3 + with m ranging from 1 to 5 and, in the case of Fe + [37], even to 6. As an example, Figure 3 displays cross sections for up to five-fold ionization of Fe 3 + [39]. The cross-section scale spans several orders of magnitude ranging from several Mb to below one kb. Such low cross sections can only be accessed because of the high photon flux from the PETRA III synchrotron and because of the high selectivity and practically background-free detection of the product ions in the PIPE setup. All of the cross sections displayed in Figure 3 show the same resonance features, which are associated with the excitation of a 2 p or a 2 s electron to a higher n l subshell. The two most prominent ones in the energy range 700–730 eV are due to 2 p 3 d excitations. The separation of the two peaks corresponds to the 2 p 3 / 2 2 p 1 / 2 spin-orbit splitting amounting to about 15 eV. The resonances in the range 740–760 eV are dominated by 2 p 4 d excitations according to atomic structure calculations that were carried out in support of the Fe 3 + experiment [39]. At energies below ∼770 eV, double ionization is the dominant channel. That energy corresponds to the threshold for direct 2 p ionization. The theoretical value for the threshold energy is 766.9 eV [51]. In contrast to 2 p excitation, which occurs below this threshold and results in net double ionization, the 2 p ionization process increases the ion charge state by one and, consequently, net triple ionization is the dominant ionization channel once direct ionization becomes energetically possible.
The charge state distribution that results from inner-shell ionization is rather broad as compared to valence ionization, as can bee seen from Figure 3. This is due to the multitude of deexcitation pathways that open up, once a L-shell hole is created. The deexcitation cascade involves radiative and autoionization transitions. The theoretical calculation of these cascades and the resulting product charge-state fractions is of considerable complexity. Already almost three decades ago, such calculations were performed for astrophysically relevant ions, including iron, by Kaastra and Mewe [52], who had to make simplifications to keep the computations tractable. Modern computers allow one to follow cascades in more detail and to include also many-electron processes such as autoionization accompanied by shake processes. This approach, which was taken in our supporting calculations for Fe + –Fe 3 + [37,38,39], reproduced the experimental findings better than the earlier work of Kaastra and Mewe, but still leaves room for improvement. We just mention here that cascade calculations addressing L-shell ionization of Fe 2 + were also carried out by Kučas et al. [53,54]. Their results are compared with our measured product charge-state fraction in [38].
Because all significant ionization processes have been measured, one can very well approximate the Fe 3 + absorption cross section by the sum of all cross sections for m-fold ionization with 1 m 5 . In Figure 4 (left panels), the experimental absorption cross section for Fe + –Fe 3 + [37,38,39] are compared with the widely used theoretical results of Verner et al. [51]. Their calculations comprised only direct ionization processes and, therefore, do not reproduce the resonance features that are associated with 2 p (and 2 s ) excitation, which dominate the absorption cross sections below the 2 p threshold and which are important for inferring iron abundances from astronomical X-ray absorption spectra. The resonance structures are significantly different for the different charge states, such that a discrimination between these in the astronomical observations is feasible. As can be seen from the right panels of Figure 4, this is also true for the higher iron charge states. The displayed ionization cross sections for Fe 6 + –Fe 10 + [46] were measured at the MAIA setup [28] at SOLEIL. They exhibit rather large statistical uncertainties as compared to the data from PIPE. This is due to the lower photon flux at SOLEIL when compared to PETRA III and also due to the fact that it is more difficult to obtain intense ion beams for more highly charged ions.

4. K-Shell Ionization of Light Ions

Deep inner-shell photoionization of atomic ions has been reviewed five years ago by Müller [55]. This earlier review covers a large part of the data that were measured prior to the start of the experimental program at PIPE in 2013. Table 1 provides a comprehensive compilation of merged-beams studies on K-shell ionization of positive and negative atomic ions, which cover a time span of two decades. In the present review, we concentrate on the recent results from PIPE for Ne + , C , C + , C 4 + , and Si 2 + ions.

4.1. K-Shell Photoionization of Ne +

X-ray emission and absorption lines of singly charged neon are frequently encountered in the spectra recorded by X-ray observatories. They originate from a variety of cosmic objects, such as stellar coronae, X-ray binaries, supernova remnants, the interstellar medium, galaxies, and active galactic nuclei (see, e.g., [87]). Figure 5 shows experimental cross sections for single, double, and triple ionization of Ne + ions [33] that contain prominent resonance lines associated with the excitation of a 1 s electron to a higher n p subshell. As discussed above already for iron, here the absorption cross section can also be well approximated by the cross-section sum over the different final ion charge states. In Figure 5d, the experimental absorption cross section thus derived is compared to state-of-the-art theoretical results of Gorzcyca et al. [42,88,89] and Witthoeft et al. [90]. At energies above 900 eV, i.e., at energies well above the threshold for direct K-shell ionization, where the cross section in the displayed energy range is essentially flat, all of the results agree excellently with one another. However, there are significant discrepancies concerning the photoionization resonances.
As detailed in [33], accurate resonance positions, resonance widths, and resonance strengths could be retrieved from the measured absolute cross sections. Even more detailed information on Auger transition rates and fluorescence yields could be obtained, in particular, for the 1 s 2 s 2 2 p 6 2 S 1 / 2 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 5 2 P 1 / 2 , 3 / 2 K α transitions. The theoretical resonance positions differ from the experimental ones by much more than the ±0.2 eV uncertainty of the experimental energy scale, as can be seen in Figure 5d,e. Moreover, there are also discrepancies concerning resonance widths and fine-structure splittings not only between experiment and theory but also between both state-of-the-art theoretical calculations. This is most probably due to different computational approximations of the two different approaches, e.g., by choosing different, naturally limited sets of basis states in close-coupling calculations whose convergence is not always obvious. Clearly, experimental benchmarking is vitally needed for the accurate location of resonance lines and, thus, for their unambiguous identification in absorption and emission spectra from astronomical observations. One should also be aware of the fact that accurate line strengths are required for inferring elemental abundances from astrophysical line spectra. At the current level of theoretical accuracy, these quantities apparently also need to be checked against laboratory results.

4.2. K-Shell Photoionization of Carbon Ions: C , C + , C 4 +

Carbon is the fourth most abundant element in the Solar system [4]. High charge states of carbon such as C 4 + occur in many of the cosmic objects mentioned in the introduction. In our vicinity, C 4 + is found in the solar wind, where its abundance has been shown to significantly depend on photoionization by the solar EUV and X-ray radiation [91]. Lower-charged carbon, in particular C + , plays a decisive role in the interstellar chemistry [92]. In fact, most of the molecules that have been detected in the interstellar medium to date are organic [93]. Some of these carbon containing molecules are negatively charged [94]. However, the atomic ion C has not been detected in any cosmic object. Potentially, this could be due to a lack of corresponding atomic data, since the K-shell absorption cross section has become available for a wide range of photon energies only recently [67] (see below). As can be seen from Table 1, merged-beams experiments on K-shell ionization of carbon ions were carried out at the ALS and at PETRA III (PIPE) covering the charge states −1, 1, 2, 3, and 4. In addition to this work on carbon K-shell ionization of atomic ions, there are also related studies with the carbon containing molecules CH + [95], La 3 N@C 80 + [96], and Sc 3 N@C 80 + [97], which are not discussed here.
Figure 6 showcases some of the highlights obtained from photon-ion merged beams experiments with atomic carbon ions at PIPE. The displayed absorption and ionization cross sections for C , C + , and C 4 + are distinctly different from one another. This allows one to discriminate between these ions in astronomical X-ray absorption spectra. The spectra of the positive ions are dominated by photoionization resonances of primary ions being initially in the ground level or in a long-lived excited metastable level. The C + ion beam contained a 9:1 mixture of ions in the 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 2 P ground term and in the metastable 1 s 2 2 s 2 p 2 4 P term [70]. The C 4 + beam was a mixture of C 4 + ( 1 s 2 1 S 0 ) and C 4 + ( 1 s 2 s 3 P 1 ) ions with the metastable fraction amounting to 0.105 [34]. In the C beam, all ions were initially in the 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 3 4 S ground term. Unfortunately, there is no general method for determining the fraction of metastable ions in an ion beam (for special cases see, e.g., [98,99,100]). For C + , the ion-beam composition was inferred from a detailed comparison between measured and calculated absorption cross sections. This approach is somewhat dissatisfying since it relies on the accuracy of the theoretical methods, which is generally difficult to assess. In exceptional cases, one can relate the experimental photoionization cross sections to experimental cross sections for the time inverse process of photorecombination by employing the principle of detailed balance [63,72,101]. This method could be applied to C 4 + while using the measured absolute cross section for photorecombination of C 5 + ions from a storage-ring experiment [102].
Figure 6a displays the C absorption cross section. Only two relatively weak resonance features can be discerned. Generally, negative ions support less resonances than positive ions because the potential that binds the extra electron in a negative ion is comparatively shallow. Nevertheless, a number of hitherto mostly unknown resonances were discovered in the C photoionization cross sections measured at PIPE, as can been seen in Figure 6a,b. From a fundamental point of view, investigations of negative ions are interesting because their structure and dynamics is governed by strong correlation effects [103]. The 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 3 4 S 1 s 2 s 2 2 p 4 4 P resonance at about 282 eV (Figure 6a) was already experimentally studied earlier by Walter et al. [66]. These authors found that it can be well described by an asymmetric Breit–Wigner line shape, which, in addition to the resonance itself, accounts for the K-shell ionization threshold that occurs just 0.1 eV below the resonance energy. The broader resonance peaking at ∼287 eV (Figure 6a) is outside the experimental energy range of the earlier work. It has been tentatively assigned to 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 3 4 S 1 s 2 s 2 2 p 2 3 p 4 P excitations [67]. The weak resonances at higher energies that are only visible in the experimental cross section for net triple ionization (Figure 6b) could not be unambiguously assigned. They exhibit asymmetric Fano line shapes that are caused by quantum mechanical interference of the resonance channel with direct 1 s + 2 s double ionization, which sets in at about 310 eV [67]. We just mention here that also double core-hole creation by direct 1 s + 1 s ionization was observed in the five-fold ionization channel of the C experiment.
Additionally, for C + and C 4 + , the most prominent resonances in the cross sections displayed in Figure 6c–f are associated with 1 s n p excitations with n 2 . The resonance structure is more complicated for C + than for C 4 + because of the larger number of open subshells and the correspondingly larger number of fine-structure levels of the excited C + ( 1 s 2 s 2 2 p n p ) and C + ( 1 s 2 s 2 p 2 n p ) configurations as compared to the C 4 + ( 2 s n p ) configurations. The latter are exclusively excited from the metastable C 4 + ( 1 s 2 s 3 P 1 ) ions. Their excitation from the C 4 + ( 1 s 2 1 S 0 ) ground level would be very much less efficient, since this requires the simultaneous rearrangement of both electrons and the required photon energy would be almost 300 eV higher.
The careful evaluation of the measured data allows for one to extract a considerable amount of detail concerning resonance parameters and deexcitation pathways. For example, the measurement of the strengths and widths of the C + ( 1 s 2 s 2 2 p 2 ) resonances in the single, double and threefold ionization channels provided unambiguous evidence and quantitative results for the elusive triple-Auger process, which is a manifestation of a genuine four-particle interaction [69,70]. The widths (and asymmetry parameters) of narrow resonances can be extracted from high-resolution measurements by fitting (Fano-)Voigt line profiles [104] to the measured data (Figure 6b,d,f). Moreover, high photon-energy resolving powers E / Δ E facilitate the separation of individual fine-structure components, as shown in Figure 6f for the C 4 + ( 2 s 2 p 3 P ) resonance, where E / Δ E = 25,800 was reached [34]. This result is unique, since the fine-structure of resonance terms associated with deep inner-shell excitations has not yet been resolved in any other photoionization experiment with ions.
The original paper on the photoionization of C 4 + [34] also comprises state-of-the-art theoretical calculations using relativistic many-body perturbation theory (RMBPT) [105] with quantum electrodynamical (QED) additions [106]. An in-depth discussion of these calculations is beyond the scope of the present review, but we want to point out that the C 4 + photoionization resonances were calculated with an exceptionally high accuracy at an estimated uncertainty of the resonance energies of less than ±1 meV. At present, such an accuracy can only be achieved for few-electron ions where the description of electron-electron–interaction effects is well under control. At the given level of theoretical uncertainty of resonance energies for He-like ions, these resonances can be potentially used to establish new photon-energy calibration standards that are up to two orders of magnitude more accurate than what is currently available in the soft X-ray range, as is discussed in detail in [33,34]. Like many other technical applications, the field of X-ray astronomy will certainly greatly benefit from such a development.

4.3. K-Shell Ionization of Silicon Ions

K-shell photoabsorption by silicon is used to trace its abundance in the interstellar medium, where it is, to a large part, contained in dust particles [107]. Only a small fraction of the interstellar silicon is expected to be in the gas-phase. Recently, it has been suggested that gas phase absorption data for silicon ions are required for an accurate modelling of the astronomically observed Si K-edge absorption features [108]. This has motivated theoretical work on the photoabsorption of silicon atoms and ions [90,109,110,111]. At PIPE, we have recently measured cross sections for single and multiple photoionization of low-charged Si + , Si 2 + , ans Si 3 + ions. Figure 7 shows preliminary results for the K-shell photoionization of Si 2 + ([Ne] 3 s 2 1 S 0 ) [86]. The experimental cross section, which has not yet been put on an absolute scale, has strong resonance contributions associated with 1 s 3 p and 1 s 4 p excitations. A more careful, currently ongoing analysis will reveal whether there are also smaller contributions from excitations to higher shells. The cross-section rise at energies above 1860 eV is caused by direct 1 s ionization. The theoretically predicted threshold energy for this process is 1852 eV [51], which is in reasonable accord with the experimental finding when considering the fact that a photon-energy calibration has still to be applied to the experimental energy scale. It should be pointed out that PIPE is currently the only photon-ion merged-beams setup where photon energies beyond 1000 eV available.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

It is fair to state that the implementation of the photon-ion merged-beams technique at a world-leading synchrotron beamline has led to a breakthrough for experimental inner-shell ionization studies with ions. The high sensitivity of the PIPE setup allows one to measure cross sections on a sub-kilobarn level and, thus, to gain insight in multiple ionization processes in unprecedented detail. This facilitates the observation of rare multi-electron processes, such as, e.g., the triple-Auger process. At present, the merged-beams method is the only experimental approach that can independently provide absolute cross sections, which is of particular value for the application of atomic cross-section data in astrophysics. A draw-back is that the ion beams are often mixtures of ground-level and excited metastable ions and that there is no general method to quantitatively determine the ion-beam composition. In special cases, these can be inferred, e.g., by applying the principle of detailed balance to comparisons with experimental cross sections for photorecombination, which is the time inverse process of photoionization. In general, the use of state-prepared ion beams is desirable. Photoionization experiments with state-prepared ions in traps have been demonstrated, but the associated particle losses seem discouraging. Moreover, trap-based methods cannot generally provide absolute cross sections. Another route towards state preparation is taken at ion storage rings, where photon-ion merged-beams experiments with portable XUV light sources based on high-harmonic generation are currently being devised. In the foreseeable future, synchrotron based photon-ion merged-beams setups will continue to deliver the bulk of experimental data on the photoionization of ions [112].

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed to the writing of the text. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant numbers 05K10RG1, 05K16RG1, 05K19RG3) and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, grant numbers Mu1068/22-1, Schi378/12-1).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to their collaborators for their contributions to the work at PIPE reviewed here, who are, in alphabetical order, Sadia Bari, Dietrich Bernhardt, Alexander Borovik, Ticia Buhr, Jonas Hellhund, Pierre-Michel Hillenbrand, Kristof Holste, David Kilcoyne, Stephan Klumpp, Michael Martins, Alexander Perry-Sassmannshausen, Ron Phaneuf, Simon Reinwardt, Sandor Ricz, Daniel Savin, Jörn Seltmann, Kaja Schubert, Florian Trinter, Jens Viefhaus, and Patrick Wilhelm. We also thank Randolf Beerwerth, Stephan Fritzsche, Paul Indelicato, Eva Lindroth, and Sebastian Stock for their theory contributions to our joint work, and the staff of the PETRA III beamline P04 for their excellent support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pain, J.C.; Gilleron, F.; Comet, M. Detailed opacity calculations for astrophysical applications. Atoms 2017, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tanaka, M.; Kato, D.; Gaigalas, G.; Kawaguchi, K. Systematic Opacity Calculations for Kilonovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 496, 1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Paerels, F.B.S.; Kahn, S.M. High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy with Chandra and XMM-Newton. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2003, 41, 291–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Asplund, M.; Grevesse, N.; Sauval, A.J.; Scott, P. The chemical composition of the Sun. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 481–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ferland, G.J. Quantitative spectroscopy of astronomical plasmas. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2003, 41, 517–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kallman, T.R.; Palmeri, P. Atomic data for X-ray astrophysics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007, 79, 79–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Savin, D.W.; Brickhouse, N.S.; Cowan, J.J.; Drake, R.P.; Federman, S.R.; Ferland, G.J.; Frank, A.; Gudipati, M.S.; Haxton, W.C.; Herbst, E.; et al. The impact of recent advances in laboratory astrophysics on our understanding of the Cosmos. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2012, 75, 036901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Smith, R.K.; Brickhouse, N.S. Atomic Data Needs for Understanding X-ray Astrophysical Plasmas. Adv. Atomic Mol. Opt. Phys. 2014, 63, 271–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lynas-Gray, A.E.; Basu, S.; Bautista, M.A.; Colgan, J.; Mendoza, C.; Tennyson, J.; Trampedach, R.; Turck-Chièze, S. Current State of Astrophysical Opacities: A White Paper. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Astrophysical Opacities, Kalamazoo, MI, USA, 1–4 August 2017; Volume 515, p. 115. [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith, R.; Hahn, M.; Raymond, J.; Kallman, T.; Ballance, C.P.; Polito, V.; Zanna, G.D.; Gu, L.; Hell, N.; Cumbee, R.; et al. Roadmap on cosmic EUV and X-ray spectroscopy. J. Phys. B 2020, 53, 092001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kramida, A.; Ralchenko, Y.; Reader, J.; Team, N.A. NIST Atomic Spectra Database; Version 5.7.1, Technical Report; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2019. Available online: http://physics.nist.gov/asd (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  12. Kennedy, E.T.; Costello, J.T.; Mosnier, J.P.; van Kampen, P. VUV/EUV ionising radiation and atoms and ions: Dual laser plasma investigations. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2004, 70, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kravis, S.D.; Church, D.A.; Johnson, B.M.; Meron, M.; Jones, K.W.; Levin, J.; Sellin, I.A.; Azuma, Y.; Mansour, N.B.; Berry, H.G.; et al. Inner-shell photoionization of stored positive ions using synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 2956–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Thissen, R.; Bizau, J.M.; Blancard, C.; Coreno, M.; Dehon, C.; Franceschi, P.; Giuliani, A.; Lemaire, J.; Nicolas, C. Photoionization cross section of Xe+ ion in the pure 5p5 2P3/2 ground level. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 223001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bizau, J.M.; Blancard, C.; Coreno, M.; Cubaynes, D.; Dehon, C.; Hassan, N.E.; Folkmann, F.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Giuliani, A.; Lemaire, J.; et al. Photoionization study of Kr+ and Xe+ ions with the combined use of a merged-beam set-up and an ion trap. J. Phys. B 2011, 44, 055205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Simon, M.C.; Crespo López-Urrutia, J.R.; Beilmann, C.; Schwarz, M.; Harman, Z.; Epp, S.W.; Schmitt, B.L.; Baumann, T.M.; Behar, E.; Bernitt, S.; et al. Resonant and near-threshold photoionization cross sections of Fe14+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 183001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Simon, M.C.; Schwarz, M.; Epp, S.W.; Beilmann, C.; Schmitt, B.L.; Harman, Z.; Baumann, T.M.; Mokler, P.H.; Bernitt, S.; Ginzel, R.; et al. Photoionization of N3+ and Ar8+ in an electron beam ion trap by synchrotron radiation. J. Phys. B 2010, 43, 065003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hirsch, K.; Zamudio-Bayer, V.; Ameseder, F.; Langenberg, A.; Rittmann, J.; Vogel, M.; Möller, T.; Issendorff, B.; Lau, J.T. 2p X-ray absorption of free transition-metal cations across the 3d transition elements: Calcium through copper. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85, 062501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lyon, I.C.; Peart, B.; West, J.B.; Dolder, K. Measurements of absolute cross sections for the photoionisation of Ba+ ions. J. Phys. B 1986, 19, 4137–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kjeldsen, H. Photoionization cross sections of atomic ions from merged-beam experiments. J. Phys. B 2006, 39, R325–R377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schippers, S.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Müller, A. Photoionization of ions with synchrotron radiation: From ions in space to atoms in cages. Contemp. Phys. 2016, 57, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Richter, M.; Wuilleumier, F.J.; Obert, J.; Putaux, J.C.; Morgan, T.J.; Källne, E.; Sorensen, S.; Damany, A. First observation of photoelectron spectra emitted in the photoionization of a singly charged-ion beam with synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 576–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oura, M.; Kravis, S.; Koizumi, T.; Itoh, Y.; Kojima, T.M.; Sano, M.; Sekioka, T.; Kimura, M.; Okuno, K.; Awaya, Y. Experimental setups for photoionization of multiply charged ions by synchrotron radiation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 1994, 86, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kjeldsen, H.; Folkmann, F.; Knudsen, H.; Rasmussen, M.S.; West, J.B.; Andersen, T. Absolute photoionization cross cection of K+ ions from the 3p to the 3s threshold. J. Phys. B 1999, 32, 4457–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yamaoka, H.; Oura, M.; Kawatsura, K.; Hayaishi, T.; Sekioka, T.; Agui, A.; Yoshigoe, A.; Koike, F. Photoionization of singly and doubly charged neon ions following inner-shell excitation. Phys. Rev. A 2001, 65, 012709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Covington, A.M.; Aguilar, A.; Covington, I.R.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Hinojosa, G.; Shirley, C.A.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Álvarez, I.; Cisneros, C.; Dominguez-Lopez, I.; et al. Photoionization of Ne+ using synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 062710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schippers, S.; Ricz, S.; Buhr, T.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Hellhund, J.; Holste, K.; Huber, K.; Schäfer, H.J.; Schury, D.; Klumpp, S.; et al. Absolute cross sections for photoionization of Xeq+ ions (1 ≤ q ≤ 5) at the 3d ionization threshold. J. Phys. B 2014, 47, 115602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Eassan, N.E.; Shorman, M.M.A.; Bouisset, E.; Guigand, J.; Moustier, O.; Marié, A.; Nadal, E.; et al. A merged-beam setup at SOLEIL dedicated to photoelectron- photoion coincidence studies on ionic species. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2016, 210, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lestinsky, M.; Andrianov, V.; Aurand, B.; Bagnoud, V.; Bernhardt, D.; Beyer, H.; Bishop, S.; Blaum, K.; Bleile, A.; Borovik, A.; et al. Physics book: CRYRING@ESR. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2016, 225, 797–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Borovik, A.; Weber, G.; Hilbert, V.; Lin, H.; Pfäfflein, P.; Zhu, B.; Hahn, C.; Lestinsky, M.; Schippers, S.; Stöhlker, T.; et al. Development of a detector to register low-energy, charge-changed ions from ionization experiments at CRYRING@ESR. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1412, 242003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Viefhaus, J.; Scholz, F.; Deinert, S.; Glaser, L.; Ilchen, M.; Seltmann, J.; Walter, P.; Siewert, F. The variable polarization XUV beamline P04 at PETRA III: Optics, mechanics and their performance. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2013, 710, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Schippers, S.; Buhr, T.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Holste, K.; Perry-Sassmannshausen, A.; Mertens, K.; Reinwardt, S.; Martins, M.; Klumpp, S.; Schubert, K.; et al. The photon-ion merged-beams experiment PIPE at PETRA III—The first five years. X-ray Spectrom. 2020, 49, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Müller, A.; Bernhardt, D.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Buhr, T.; Hellhund, J.; Holste, K.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Klumpp, S.; Martins, M.; Ricz, S.; et al. Photoionization of Ne atoms and Ne+ ions near the K edge: Precision spectroscopy and absolute cross sections. Astrophys. J. 2017, 836, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Müller, A.; Lindroth, E.; Bari, S.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Hillenbrand, P.M.; Holste, K.; Indelicato, P.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Klumpp, S.; Martins, M.; et al. Photoionization of metastable heliumlike C4+(1s2s3S1) ions: Precision study of intermediate doubly excited states. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 033416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yerokhin, V.A.; Surzhykov, A.; Müller, A. Relativistic configuration-interaction calculations of the energy levels of the 1s22l and 1s 2l 2l’ states in lithiumlike ions: Carbon through chlorine. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 042505, Erratum in 2017, 96, 069901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Machado, J.; Bian, G.; Paul, N.; Trassinelli, M.; Amaro, P.; Guerra, M.; Szabo, C.I.; Gumberidze, A.; Isac, J.M.; Santos, J.P.; et al. Reference-free measurements of the 1s2 2s 2p 2Po1/2,3/2 → 1s2 2s 2S1/2 and 1s 2s 2p 4P5/2 → 1s2 2s 2S1/2 transition energies and widths in lithiumlike sulfur and argon ions. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 101, 062505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schippers, S.; Martins, M.; Beerwerth, R.; Bari, S.; Holste, K.; Schubert, K.; Viefhaus, J.; Savin, D.W.; Fritzsche, S.; Müller, A. Near L-edge single and multiple photoionization of singly charged iron ions. Astrophys. J. 2017, 849, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Schippers, S.; Beerwerth, R.; Bari, S.; Buhr, T.; Holste, K.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Perry-Sassmannshausen, A.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Reinwardt, S.; Savin, D.W.; et al. Near L-edge single and multiple photoionization of doubly charged iron ions. In preparation.
  39. Beerwerth, R.; Buhr, T.; Perry-Sassmannshausen, A.; Stock, S.O.; Bari, S.; Holste, K.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Reinwardt, S.; Ricz, S.; Savin, D.W.; et al. Near L-edge single and multiple photoionization of triply charged iron ions. Astrophys. J. 2019, 887, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jensen, A.G.; Snow, T.P. New insights on interstellar gas-phase iron. Astrophys. J. 2007, 669, 378–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jenkins, E.B. A unified representation of gas-phase element depletions in the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 2009, 700, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Juett, A.M.; Schulz, N.S.; Chakrabarty, D.; Gorczyca, T.W. High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy of the interstellar medium. II. neon and iron absorption edges. Astrophys. J. 2006, 648, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Miedema, P.S.; de Groot, F.M.F. The iron L edges:Fe 2p X-ray absorption and electron energy loss spectroscopy. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2013, 187, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Richter, T.; Godehusen, K.; Martins, M.; Wolff, T.; Zimmermann, P. Interplay of intra-atomic and interatomic effects: An investigation of the 2p core level spectra of atomic Fe and molecular FeCl2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 023002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Martins, M.; Godehusen, K.; Richter, T.; Wernet, P.; Zimmermann, P. Open shells and multi-electron interactions: Core level photoionization of the 3d metal atoms. J. Phys. B 2006, 39, R79–R125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Blancard, C.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Bizau, J.M. Absolute photoionization cross section for Fe6+ to Fe10+ ions in the photon energy region of the 2p-3d resonance lines. Astrophys. J. 2018, 853, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kjeldsen, H.; Kristensen, B.; Folkmann, F.; Andersen, T. Measurements of the absolute photoionization cross section of Fe+ ions from 15.8 to 180 eV. J. Phys. B 2002, 35, 3655–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bizau, J.M.; Blancard, C.; Cubaynes, D.; Folkmann, F.; Kilbane, D.; Faussurier, G.; Luna, H.; Lemaire, J.L.; Blieck, J.; Wuilleumier, F.J. Experimental and theoretical studies of the photoionization cross section of Fe4+. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73, 020707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El Hassan, N.; Bizau, J.M.; Blancard, C.; Cosse, P.; Cubaynes, D.; Faussurier, G.; Folkmann, F. Photoionization cross sections of iron isonuclear sequence ions: Fe2+ to Fe6+. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79, 033415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gharaibeh, M.F.; Aguilar, A.; Covington, A.M.; Emmons, E.D.; Scully, S.W.J.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Müller, A.; Bozek, J.D.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Schlachter, A.S.; et al. Photoionization measurements for the iron isonuclear sequence Fe3+, Fe5+, and Fe7+. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83, 043412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Verner, D.A.; Yakovlev, D.G.; Band, I.M.; Trzhaskovskaya, M.B. Subshell photoionization cross sections and ionization energies of atoms and ions from He to Zn. Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 1993, 55, 233–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kaastra, J.S.; Mewe, R. X-ray emission from thin plasmas. I - Multiple Auger ionisation and fluorescence processes for Be to Zn. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1993, 97, 443–482. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kučas, S.; Drabužinskis, P.; Kynienė, A.; Masys, Š.; Jonauskas, V. Evolution of radiative and Auger cascades following 2s vacancy creation in Fe2+. J. Phys. B 2019, 52, 225001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kučas, S.; Drabužinskis, P.; Jonauskas, V. Radiative and Auger cascade following 2p vacancy creation in Fe2+. Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 2020, 101357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Müller, A. Precision studies of deep-inner-shell photoabsorption by atomic ions. Phys. Scr. 2015, 90, 054004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Andersen, P.; Andersen, T.; Folkmann, F.; Ivanov, V.K.; Kjeldsen, H.; West, J.B. Absolute cross sections for the photoionization of 4d electrons in Xe+ and Xe2+ ions. J. Phys. B 2001, 34, 2009–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Berrah, N.; Bozek, J.D.; Turri, G.; Akerman, G.; Rude, B.; Zhou, H.L.; Manson, S.T. K-shell photodetachment of He: Experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 093001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bilodeau, R.C.; Bozek, J.D.; Aguilar, A.; Ackerman, G.D.; Turri, G.; Berrah, N. Photoexcitation of He hollow-ion resonances: Observation of the 2s 2p2 4P state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 193001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kjeldsen, H.; Andersen, P.; Folkmann, F.; Kristensen, B.; Andersen, T. Inner-shell photodetachment of Li. J. Phys. B 2001, 34, L353–L357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Berrah, N.; Bozek, J.D.; Wills, A.A.; Turri, G.; Zhou, H.L.; Manson, S.T.; Akerman, G.; Rude, B.; Gibson, N.D.; Walter, C.W.; et al. K-shell photodetachment of Li: Experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 253002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Scully, S.W.J.; Álvarez, I.; Cisneros, C.; Emmons, E.D.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Leitner, D.; Lubell, M.S.; Müller, A.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Püttner, R.; et al. Doubly excited resonances in the photoionization spectrum of Li+: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2006, 39, 3957–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Berrah, N.; Bilodeau, R.C.; Dumitriu, I.; Bozek, J.D.; Gibson, N.D.; Walter, C.W.; Ackerman, G.D.; Zatsarinny, O.; Gorczyca, T.W. Shape resonances in the absolute K-shell photodetachment of B. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 76, 032713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Müller, A.; Schippers, S.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Scully, S.W.J.; Aguilar, A.; Cisneros, C.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Schlachter, A.S.; McLaughlin, B.M. K -shell photoionization of Be-like boron (B+) ions: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2014, 47, 135201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Müller, A.; Schippers, S.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Scully, S.W.J.; Aguilar, A.; Cisneros, C.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Schlachter, A.S.; McLaughlin, B.M. K-shell photoionization of ground-state Li-like boron ions [B2+]: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2010, 43, 135602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Gibson, N.D.; Walter, C.W.; Zatsarinny, O.; Gorczyca, T.W.; Ackerman, G.D.; Bozek, J.D.; Martins, M.; McLaughlin, B.M.; Berrah, N. K-shell photodetachment from C: Experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. A 2003, 67, 030703(R). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Walter, C.W.; Gibson, N.D.; Bilodeau, R.C.; Berrah, N.; Bozek, J.D.; Ackerman, G.D.; Aguilar, A. Shape resonance in K-shell photodetachment from C. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73, 062702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Perry-Sassmannshausen, A.; Buhr, T.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Martins, M.; Reinwardt, S.; Ricz, S.; Stock, S.O.; Trinter, F.; Müller, A.; Fritzsche, S.; et al. Multiple photodetachment of carbon anions via single and double core-hole creation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 083203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Schlachter, A.S.; Sant’Anna, M.M.; Covington, A.M.; Aguilar, A.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Emmons, E.D.; Scully, S.W.J.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Hinojosa, G.; Álvarez, I.; et al. Lifetime of a K-shell vacancy in atomic carbon created by 1s → 2p photoexcitation of C+. J. Phys. B 2004, 37, L103–L109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Müller, A.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Buhr, T.; Hellhund, J.; Holste, K.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Klumpp, S.; Martins, M.; Ricz, S.; Viefhaus, J.; et al. Observation of a four-electron Auger process in near-K-edge photoionization of singly charged carbon ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 013002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Müller, A.; Borovik, A.; Buhr, T.; Hellhund, J.; Holste, K.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Klumpp, S.; Martins, M.; Ricz, S.; Viefhaus, J.; et al. Near-K-edge single, double, and triple photoionization of C+ ions. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 013409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Scully, S.W.J.; Aguilar, A.; Emmons, E.D.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Halka, M.; Leitner, D.; Levin, J.C.; Lubell, M.S.; Püttner, R.; Schlachter, A.S.; et al. K-shell photoionization of Be-like carbon ions: Experiment and theory for C2+. J. Phys. B 2005, 38, 1967–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Müller, A.; Schippers, S.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Scully, S.W.J.; Aguilar, A.; Covington, A.M.; Álvarez, I.; Cisneros, C.; Emmons, E.D.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; et al. K-shell photoionization of li-like carbon ions [C3+]: Experiment, theory and comparison with time-reversed photorecombination. J. Phys. B 2009, 42, 235602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gharaibeh, M.F.; Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; El Hassan, N.; Al Shorman, M.M.; Miron, C.; Nicolas, C.; Robert, E.; Blancard, C.; et al. K-shell photoionization of singly ionized atomic nitrogen: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2011, 44, 175208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bari, S.; Inhester, L.; Schubert, K.; Mertens, K.; Schunck, J.O.; Dörner, S.; Deinert, S.; Schwob, L.; Schippers, S.; Müller, A.; et al. Inner-shell X-ray absorption spectra of the cationic series NH+y (y = 0–3). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 16505–16514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. McLaughlin, B.M.; Mosnier, J.P.; Kennedy, E.T.; Sokell, E.; Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Carniato, S. K-shell Photoionization of the N+, NH+ and NH+2 ions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1412, 142007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gharaibeh, M.; El Hassan, N.; Shorman, M.A.; Bizau, J.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Sakho, I.; Blancard, C.; McLaughlin, B. K-shell photoionization of B-like atomic nitrogen ions: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2014, 47, 065201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Al Shorman, M.M.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; El Hassan, N.; Miron, C.; Nicolas, C.; Robert, E.; Sakho, I.; et al. K-shell photoionization of Be-like and Li-like ions of atomic nitrogen: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2013, 46, 195701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gibson, N.D.; Bilodeau, R.C.; Walter, C.W.; Hanstorp, D.; Aguilar, A.; Berrah, N.; Matyas, D.J.; Li, Y.G.; Alton, R.M.; Lou, S.E. K-shell photodetachment from O. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2012, 388, 022102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Schippers, S.; Beerwerth, R.; Abrok, L.; Bari, S.; Buhr, T.; Martins, M.; Ricz, S.; Viefhaus, J.; Fritzsche, S.; Müller, A. Prominent role of multielectron processes in K-shell double and triple photodetachment of oxygen anions. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 94, 041401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Kawatsura, K.; Yamaoka, H.; Oura, M.; Hayaishi, T.; Sekioka, T.; Agui, A.; Yoshigoe, A.; Koike, F. The 1s − 2p resonance photoionization measurement of O+ ions in comparison with an isoelectronic species Ne3+. J. Phys. B 2002, 35, 4147–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Al Shorman, M.M.; Gharaibeh, M.F.; Ababneh, I.Q.; Blancard, C.; McLaughlin, B.M. K-shell photoionization of O+ and O2+ ions: Experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. A 2015, 92, 023401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. McLaughlin, B.; Bizau, J.; Cubaynes, D.; Shorman, M.A.; Guilbaud, S.; Sakho, I.; Blancard, C.; Gharaibeh, M. K-shell photoionization of B-like oxygen (O3+) ions: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. B 2014, 47, 115201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. McLaughlin, B.M.; Bizau, J.M.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Douix, S.; Shorman, M.M.A.; Ghazaly, M.O.A.E.; Sakho, I.; Gharaibeh, M.F. K-shell photoionization of O4+ and O5+ ions: Experiment and theory. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 465, 4690–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Müller, A.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Bari, S.; Buhr, T.; Holste, K.; Martins, M.; Perry-Sassmannshausen, A.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Reinwardt, S.; Ricz, S.; et al. Near-K-edge double and triple detachment of the F negative ion: Observation of direct two-electron ejection by a single photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 133202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Oura, M.; Yamaoka, H.; Kawatsura, K.; Kimata, J.; Hayaishi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Koizumi, T.; Sekioka, T.; Terasawa, M.; Itoh, Y.; et al. Photoionization of Ne3+ ions in the region of the 1s2p autoionizing resonance. Phys. Rev. A 2001, 63, 014704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Buhr, T.; Stock, S.O.; Perry-Sassmannshausen, A.; Reinwardt, S.; Martins, M.; Ricz, S.; Müller, A.; Fritzsche, S.; Schippers, S. Photoionization of low-charged silicon ions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1412, 152024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liao, J.Y.; Zhang, S.N.; Yao, Y. Wavelength measurements of K transitions of oxygen, neon, and magnesium with X-ray absorption lines. Astrophys. J. 2013, 774, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Gorczyca, T.W. Auger decay of the photoexcited 1s−1np Rydberg series in neon. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 61, 024702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gatuzz, E.; Garcia, J.; Kallman, T.R.; Mendoza, C.; Gorczyca, T.W. ISMabs: A comprehensive X-ray absorption model for the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 2015, 800, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Witthoeft, M.C.; Bautista, M.A.; Mendoza, C.; Kallman, T.R.; Palmeri, P.; Quinet, P. K-shell photoionization and photoabsorption of Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 182, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Landi, E.; Lepri, S.T. Photoionization in the Solar wind. Astrophys. J. 2015, 812, L28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Larsson, M.; Geppert, W.D.; Nyman, G. Ion chemistry in space. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2012, 75, 066901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tielens, A.G.G.M. The molecular universe. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2013, 85, 1021–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Millar, T.J.; Walsh, C.; Field, T.A. Negative ions in space. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1765–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Mosnier, J.P.; Kennedy, E.T.; van Kampen, P.; Cubaynes, D.; Guilbaud, S.; Sisourat, N.; Puglisi, A.; Carniato, S.; Bizau, J.M. Inner-shell photoexcitations as probes of the molecular ions CH+, OH+, and SiH+: Measurements and theory. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 93, 061401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hellhund, J.; Borovik, A., Jr.; Holste, K.; Klumpp, S.; Martins, M.; Ricz, S.; Schippers, S.; Müller, A. Photoionization and photofragmentation of multiply charged Lu3N@C80 ions. Phys. Rev. A 2015, 92, 013413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Müller, A.; Martins, M.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Hellhund, J.; Borovik, A.; Holste, K.; Bari, S.; Buhr, T.; Klumpp, S.; et al. Photoionization and photofragmentation of singly charged positive and negative Sc3N@C80 endohedral fullerene ions. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 99, 063401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Voulot, D.; Gillen, D.R.; Thompson, W.R.; Gilbody, H.B.; McCullough, R.W.; Errea, L.; Macias, A.; Mendez, L.; Riera, A. First studies of state-selective electron capture in collisions of state-prepared ions with atomic hydrogen; the case of C2+–H(1s). J. Phys. B 2000, 33, L187–L192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Covington, A.M.; Aguilar, A.; Covington, I.R.; Gharaibeh, M.; Shirley, C.A.; Phaneuf, R.A.; Álvarez, I.; Cisneros, C.; Hinojosa, G.; Bozek, J.D.; et al. Photoionization of metastable O+ ions: Experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 243002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Benis, E.P.; Madesis, I.; Laoutaris, A.; Nanos, S.; Zouros, T.J.M. Mixed-state ionic beams: An effective tool for collision dynamics investigations. Atoms 2018, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Schippers, S.; Müller, A.; Ricz, S.; Bannister, M.E.; Dunn, G.H.; Bozek, J.D.; Schlachter, A.S.; Hinojosa, G.; Cisneros, C.; Aguilar, A.; et al. Experimental link of photoionization of Sc2+ to photorecombination of Sc3+: An application of detailed balance in a unique atomic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 193002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wolf, A.; Berger, J.; Bock, M.; Habs, D.; Hochadel, B.; Kilgus, G.; Neureither, G.; Schramm, U.; Schwalm, D.; Szmola, E.; et al. Experiments with highly-charged ions in the storage ring TSR. Z. Phys. D 1991, 21, S69–S75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Andersen, T. Atomic negative ions: Structure, dynamics and collisions. Phys. Rep. 2004, 394, 157–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Schippers, S. Analytical expression for the convolution of a Fano line profile with a gaussian. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2018, 219, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Lindroth, E.; Argenti, L. Atomic resonance states and their role in charge-changing processes. Adv. Quantum Chem. 2012, 63, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Indelicato, P.; Gorveix, O.; Desclaux, J.P. Multiconfigurational Dirac-Fock studies of two-electron ions. II. Radiative corrections and comparison with experiment. J. Phys. B 1987, 20, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zeegers, S.T.; Costantini, E.; Rogantini, D.; de Vries, C.P.; Mutschke, H.; Mohr, P.; de Groot, F.; Tielens, A.G.G.M. Dust absorption and scattering in the silicon K-edge. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 627, A16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Schulz, N.S.; Corrales, L.; Canizares, C.R. Si K edge structure and variability in Galactic X-ray binaries. Astrophys. J. 2016, 827, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Witthoeft, M.C.; García, J.; Kallman, T.R.; Bautista, M.A.; Mendoza, C.; Palmeri, P.; Quinet, P. K-shell photoionization of Na-like to Cl-like ions of Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2011, 1992, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kučas, S.; Karazija, R.; Momkauskaitė, A. Cascades after K-vacancy production in atoms and ions of light elements. Astrophys. J. 2012, 750, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hasoglu, M.F.; Gorczyca, T.W. X-Ray Absorption by Interstellar Atomic Gases near the K Edges of C, O, Ne, Mg, and Si and the L Edge of Fe. ASP Conf. Ser. 2018, 515, 275. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ueda, K.; Sokell, E.; Schippers, S.; Aumayr, F.; Sadeghpour, H.; Burgdörfer, J.; Lemell, C.; Tong, X.M.; Pfeifer, T.; Calegari, F.; et al. Roadmap on photonic, electronic and atomic collision physics: I. Light–matter interaction. J. Phys. B 2019, 52, 171001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sketch of the photon-ion merged-beams setup PIPE (Photon-Ion spectrometer at PETRA III). Ion-optical elements, such as focusing lenses, beam deflectors, collimating slits and Faraday cup are drawn in red color. This figure is a differently labeled version of Figure 2 from [33] (reproduced by permission of the AAS).
Figure 1. Sketch of the photon-ion merged-beams setup PIPE (Photon-Ion spectrometer at PETRA III). Ion-optical elements, such as focusing lenses, beam deflectors, collimating slits and Faraday cup are drawn in red color. This figure is a differently labeled version of Figure 2 from [33] (reproduced by permission of the AAS).
Atoms 08 00045 g001
Figure 2. Measured horizontal (a) and vertical (b) beam profiles at the center of the interaction region [33] (reproduced by permission of the AAS). The red full and blue dashed curves represent the ion-beam (Ne + ) and photon-beam profiles, respectively.
Figure 2. Measured horizontal (a) and vertical (b) beam profiles at the center of the interaction region [33] (reproduced by permission of the AAS). The red full and blue dashed curves represent the ion-beam (Ne + ) and photon-beam profiles, respectively.
Atoms 08 00045 g002
Figure 3. Experimental cross sections (1 Mb = 10 18 cm 2 ) for m-fold ionization of Fe 3 + ions in the energy range 690–920 eV that contains the thresholds for 2 p and 2 s ionization [39]. The observed resonance structures are associated with the excitation of a 2 p or a 2 s electron to a higher atomic subshell and subsequent autoionization.
Figure 3. Experimental cross sections (1 Mb = 10 18 cm 2 ) for m-fold ionization of Fe 3 + ions in the energy range 690–920 eV that contains the thresholds for 2 p and 2 s ionization [39]. The observed resonance structures are associated with the excitation of a 2 p or a 2 s electron to a higher atomic subshell and subsequent autoionization.
Atoms 08 00045 g003
Figure 4. Left panels: Experimental cross sections (symbols) from PIPE for photoabsorption of Fe + [37], Fe 2 + [38], and Fe 3 + [39]. The uncertainty of the experimental energy scale amounts ±0.2 eV. The light-shaded full curves are theoretical cross sections provided by Verner et al. [51]. The steps in the theoretical cross sections occur at the computed thresholds for direct ionization of a 2 p or a 2 s electron. The photoionization resonances that dominate the experimental spectra below the 2 p thresholds were not considered in the theoretical calculations. Right panels: Experimental cross sections for single ionization of Fe 6 + –Fe 10 + ions measured at SOLEIL [46] (reproduced by permission of the AAS).
Figure 4. Left panels: Experimental cross sections (symbols) from PIPE for photoabsorption of Fe + [37], Fe 2 + [38], and Fe 3 + [39]. The uncertainty of the experimental energy scale amounts ±0.2 eV. The light-shaded full curves are theoretical cross sections provided by Verner et al. [51]. The steps in the theoretical cross sections occur at the computed thresholds for direct ionization of a 2 p or a 2 s electron. The photoionization resonances that dominate the experimental spectra below the 2 p thresholds were not considered in the theoretical calculations. Right panels: Experimental cross sections for single ionization of Fe 6 + –Fe 10 + ions measured at SOLEIL [46] (reproduced by permission of the AAS).
Atoms 08 00045 g004
Figure 5. Cross sections for (a) single ionization, (b) double ionization, and (c) triple ionization of Ne + ions [33] measured with a photon energy bandwidth of 500 meV. The experimental cross section in panel (d) is the sum of the cross sections displayed in panels (ac). It represents the Ne + absorption cross section, which is compared with the theoretical cross sections of Gorczyca et al. [42,88,89] and Witthoeft et al. [90]. Panel (e) presents a comparison between the theoretical results with a high-resolution measurement (113 meV photon-energy bandwidth) of the cross section for double ionization (multiplied by a factor of 2) over a narrower energy range. For the comparisons, the theoretical cross sections were convolved with gaussians with full-widths-at-half-maximum of 500 meV in panel (d) and 113 meV in panel (e).
Figure 5. Cross sections for (a) single ionization, (b) double ionization, and (c) triple ionization of Ne + ions [33] measured with a photon energy bandwidth of 500 meV. The experimental cross section in panel (d) is the sum of the cross sections displayed in panels (ac). It represents the Ne + absorption cross section, which is compared with the theoretical cross sections of Gorczyca et al. [42,88,89] and Witthoeft et al. [90]. Panel (e) presents a comparison between the theoretical results with a high-resolution measurement (113 meV photon-energy bandwidth) of the cross section for double ionization (multiplied by a factor of 2) over a narrower energy range. For the comparisons, the theoretical cross sections were convolved with gaussians with full-widths-at-half-maximum of 500 meV in panel (d) and 113 meV in panel (e).
Atoms 08 00045 g005
Figure 6. Experimental cross sections for photoabsorption and (multiple) photoionization of C [67] {panels (a,b)}, C + [70] {panels (c,d)}, and C 4 + [34] {panels (e,f)}. The C + and C 4 + ion beams were mixtures of ground-level and excited metastable ions (see text). For each measurement the experimental photon-energy bandwidth Δ E is specified. The left panels provide overviews, the right panels feature cross-section details that were measured partly with significantly smaller photon-energy bandwidths. For a better display of the data in panel (b), a smooth cross section was subtracted that represented the direct ionization of a 1 s electron (see [67] for details). The full black lines in panels (b,d,f) result from resonance fits to the experimental data. The uncertainty of the experimental photon-energy scale is ±200 meV for C , ±30 meV for C + , and (depending on photon energy) ±40 meV up to ±50 meV for C 4 + .
Figure 6. Experimental cross sections for photoabsorption and (multiple) photoionization of C [67] {panels (a,b)}, C + [70] {panels (c,d)}, and C 4 + [34] {panels (e,f)}. The C + and C 4 + ion beams were mixtures of ground-level and excited metastable ions (see text). For each measurement the experimental photon-energy bandwidth Δ E is specified. The left panels provide overviews, the right panels feature cross-section details that were measured partly with significantly smaller photon-energy bandwidths. For a better display of the data in panel (b), a smooth cross section was subtracted that represented the direct ionization of a 1 s electron (see [67] for details). The full black lines in panels (b,d,f) result from resonance fits to the experimental data. The uncertainty of the experimental photon-energy scale is ±200 meV for C , ±30 meV for C + , and (depending on photon energy) ±40 meV up to ±50 meV for C 4 + .
Atoms 08 00045 g006
Figure 7. Experimental cross section for K-shell triple ionization of Si 2 + . These preliminary data from [86] are not on an absolute cross section scale, and the photon energy scale has not been calibrated, yet.
Figure 7. Experimental cross section for K-shell triple ionization of Si 2 + . These preliminary data from [86] are not on an absolute cross section scale, and the photon energy scale has not been calibrated, yet.
Atoms 08 00045 g007
Table 1. List of published experimental cross sections for K-shell photoionization of atomic ions with atomic numbers Z 2 from photon-ion merged-beams experiments at the synchrotron light sources ALS (Berkeley, CA, USA), ASTRID (Aarhus, Denmark), PETRA III (Hamburg, Germany), SOLEIL (Saint-Aubin, France), and SPring-8 (Hyogo, Japan). Columns 3 and 5 provide the experimental photon-energy range and the year of publication, respectively.
Table 1. List of published experimental cross sections for K-shell photoionization of atomic ions with atomic numbers Z 2 from photon-ion merged-beams experiments at the synchrotron light sources ALS (Berkeley, CA, USA), ASTRID (Aarhus, Denmark), PETRA III (Hamburg, Germany), SOLEIL (Saint-Aubin, France), and SPring-8 (Hyogo, Japan). Columns 3 and 5 provide the experimental photon-energy range and the year of publication, respectively.
ZIonEnergy Range (eV)Light SourceYearReference
2He + 80–140ASTRID2001[56]
2He 38–44ALS2002[57]
2He 43–44ALS2004[58]
3Li 56–70ASTRID2001[59]
3Li 56–66ALS2001[60]
3Li + 149–181ALS2006[61]
5B 187–196ALS2007[62]
5B + 193–210ALS2014[63]
5B 2 + 195–235ALS2010[64]
6C 280–285ALS2003[65]
6C 281–282ALS2006[66]
6C 282–1000PETRA III2020[67]
6C + 287–290ALS2004[68]
6C + 286–326PETRA III2015[69]
6C + 286–326PETRA III2018[70]
6C 2 + 292–323ALS2005[71]
6C 3 + 300–338ALS2009[72]
6C 4 + 358–439PETRA III2018[34]
7N + 399–406SOLEIL2011[73]
7N + 390–435PETRA III2019[74]
7N + 415–440SOLEIL2020[75]
7N 2 + 404–442SOLEIL2014[76]
7N 3 + 412–414SOLEIL2013[77]
7N 4 + 421–460SOLEIL2013[77]
8O 526–536ALS2012[78]
8O 524–543PETRA III2016[79]
8O + 525–540SPRING-82002[80]
8O + 526–620SOLEIL2015[81]
8O 2 + 526–620SOLEIL2015[81]
8O 3 + 540–600SOLEIL2014[82]
8O 4 + 550–670SOLEIL2017[83]
8O 5 + 561–570SOLEIL2017[83]
9F 660–1000PETRA III2018[84]
10Ne + 841–858SPRING-82001[25]
10Ne + 840–925PETRA III2017[33]
10Ne 2 + 850–863SPRING-82001[25]
10Ne 3 + 853–873SPRING-82001[85]
14Si 2 + 1830–1880PETRA III2020[86]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schippers, S.; Müller, A. Photoionization of Astrophysically Relevant Atomic Ions at PIPE. Atoms 2020, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms8030045

AMA Style

Schippers S, Müller A. Photoionization of Astrophysically Relevant Atomic Ions at PIPE. Atoms. 2020; 8(3):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms8030045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schippers, Stefan, and Alfred Müller. 2020. "Photoionization of Astrophysically Relevant Atomic Ions at PIPE" Atoms 8, no. 3: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms8030045

APA Style

Schippers, S., & Müller, A. (2020). Photoionization of Astrophysically Relevant Atomic Ions at PIPE. Atoms, 8(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms8030045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop