1. Introduction
The little we know about ovothiol (OSH) or π-
N-methyl-5-thiohistidine alludes to a potential “wonder molecule” [
1,
2]. Although it was discovered in the 1980s [
2,
3], its history needs to be traced back to 1930 when Otto Warburg, as a visiting scientist in Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn in Naples, before his Nobel Prize award in Medicine in 1931, described the oxidative burst occurring in sea urchin oocytes upon fertilization. Sperm fusion in sea urchins results in an explosive production of extracellular H
2O
2 for the generation of the fertilization envelope [
4]. An accompanying increase in the intracellular concentration of H
2O
2 needs to be counteracted by antioxidant mechanisms. It was also in Naples that 50 years later, OSH would be discovered in the oocytes of the sea urchin
Paracentrotus lividus, hence the name [
2,
3]. OSH was proposed to have a physiological role in protecting the urchin
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus eggs from H
2O
2 toxicity [
5,
6]. OSH would function as a non-enzymatic scavenger of H
2O
2, the resulting oxidized OSH disulphide being reduced back by glutathione (GSH) [
2]. OSH has since been described in ovaries, oocytes and biological fluids of different marine invertebrates, but also in proteobacteria, cyanobacteria and in some fungi and protists, including protozoa and algae [
1,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. Three different isoforms have been described, depending on their level of methylation: ovothiol A (OSH-A) and ovothiols B and C (OSH-B and -C), which are the mono- and di-methylated forms of OSH-A, respectively [
2,
9].
OSHs exhibit quite special chemical properties because of the reactivity of the functional thiol, in relation to its positioning into the imidazole system, conferring stronger reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity compared to other thiols, with reactivity also against hydroperoxides and peroxynitrites [
2]. This thiol group, characterized by a remarkable acidity, is attached to position 5 of the imidazole ring, providing a pK
a much lower (pK
a = 1.4) than cysteine (pK
a = 8.4), GSH (pK
a = 8.7), trypanothione (pK
a = 7.4) and coenzyme A (pK
a = 9.8). This unique property has led to the belief that OSH-A may be a particularly efficient peroxide scavenger [
1,
2,
5,
6]. On the other hand, the disulphide of OSH-A is less stable than the disulphide of GSH. Unlike most thiols, OSHs are rapidly oxidized by H
2O
2, in a reaction at least twice as fast as that with GSH. The oxidation is followed by a reaction with another molecule of reduced OSH to form a disulphide [
2]. Therefore, it seems that the more reactive OSH-A and the more reductive GSH could cooperate to protect the organism from H
2O
2-induced damage [
1,
2,
6]. Due to its chemical properties as a ROS scavenger and its potential therapeutic applications in humans, the interest in OSH-A has grown lately. For example, OSH-A was shown to reduce cell proliferation and increase autophagy in the Hep-G2 human liver carcinoma cell line [
10]. In the same way, it has been shown to inhibit collagen deposition and reduce liver fibrosis, thus displaying a hepatoprotective capacity [
11].
OSH-A has been shown to have a role during development, protecting sea urchins from environmental factors along early development in seawater [
9]. In the pathogenic protozoa
Leishmania donovani and in the non-human infective protist
Crithidia fasciculate, OSH-A has been suggested to participate in the protection of parasites from oxidative stress produced by macrophages during infection [
8]. The unmethylated histidine derivative of OSH-A, 5-thiolhistidine, was reported as part of the mixture that forms adrenochrome, the iron (III)-containing pigment in the branchial heart of
Octopus vulgaris [
7]. Moreover, the metabolite L-ovothiol A disulphide could act as a male pheromone during mating in the marine polychaete
Platynereis dumerilii [
12], and as a redox regulator in chloroplasts in the microalga
Dunaliella salina, where OSH-A disulphide inactivates ATPase by a disulphide exchange reaction [
13].
The first step of the OSH-A biosynthetic pathway involves the conjugation of cysteine and histidine accompanied by the net transfer of the cysteine sulfur atom into the C
5–H bond in the histidine side chain, resulting in the formation of a 5-L-histidyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide conjugate [
14]. The aforementioned reaction is catalyzed by an iron (II)-dependent sulfoxide synthase, termed A synthase (OvoA). The second cleavage step is catalyzed by a lyase (OvoB) that generates a thiohistidine. Then, OvoA again catalyzes the third step, methylating the imidazole ring to produce OSH-A [
1,
2,
9,
14].
Recent studies have reported the characterization of
ovoA gene sequence and OvoA protein primary structure in several species of marine invertebrates [
9,
15]. Similar to ergothioneine synthase (EgtB), the other known sulfoxide synthase that contributes to the biosynthesis of the biothiol compound ergothioneine, OvoA shows a conserved N-terminal DNA damage-inducible (DinB) superfamily domain characterized by a four-helix bundle at the N-terminal region. This domain contains a putative iron-binding motif (HX3HXE) and is involved in the SOS response [
9]. The DinB domain is followed by a domain structurally related to that of copper-dependent formyl glycine-generating enzymes (FGE-sulfatase), which performs the conversion of cysteine residues. Unlike EgtB, OvoA contains an additional S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase (SAM-transferase) domain at the C-terminal region [
9,
15]. This domain is related with various functions such as transmethylation and trans-sulfuration. It could also take part in the methylation of OSH to generate its different forms [
2,
9,
15].
ovoA is highly conserved in marine metazoans, both in protostomes and in deuterostomes [
9,
15]. There have been independent events that resulted in the loss of the
ovoA gene in various groups, notably in nematodes and arthropods, and in the ancestor of teleost fish and tetrapods [
9,
15]. In Hydrozoa and Rotifera Bdelloidea, the gene has been obtained through lateral gene transfer after previous gene reduction events [
15].
The promoter region of the sea urchin
ovoA gene contains metal, stress and oxyradical response elements that regulate its transcription under stress conditions [
9]. It is this capacity to respond to environmental variables which confers metazoans’ adaptability under stress, and that constitute interesting study processes for environmental toxicologists. For instance, toxins and heavy metals dispersed in seawater can induce oxidative stress and the resulting ROS and the metals themselves may activate transcription factors to regulate
ovoA transcription.
Marine mussels are exceptionally well adapted to live in coastal marine habitats, where they are exposed to fluctuating environmental conditions and elevated levels of natural and anthropogenic pollutants. For these reasons, they possess an antioxidant system that plays a key role in their remarkable capacity for acclimation [
16,
17,
18]. In this study, the mussel (
Mytilus galloprovincialis) was studied due to its relevant position as a pollution sentinel species in estuaries and coastal waters, where it is used in pollution monitoring programs. Mussels are filter-feeders, which results in the accumulation of high levels of contaminants in their tissues, sometimes well over concentrations found in the water column [
17]. In health assessment, mussels are used to measure biological endpoints that could provide information about the level of exposure to pollutants, or the effects of such exposures [
17,
18,
19,
20]. In this sense, there are different programs using oxidative stress responses to evaluate toxicological effects of different anthropic activities, accidental spills [
17,
20,
21] or the effects of climate change [
22].
ovoA orthologs have been sequenced in different molluscs: the pacific oyster (
Cassostrea gigas), the Californian sea hare (
Aplysia californica), the yesso scallop (
Mizuhopecten yessoensis) and the air-breathing freshwater snail (
Biomphalaria glabrata) [
15]. Consequently, the aim of the present study was to sequence the still unknown coding sequence of the
ovoA gene in
Mytillus galloprovincialis based on the previous data. Furthermore, the patterns of
ovoA transcription and OSH-A accumulation were analyzed in the male and female mussels collected in two different estuaries with different pollution burdens, Plentzia and Arriluze, along a whole gametogenic cycle. In marine organisms, such as mussels, several metals interact with molecules containing sulfhydryl groups as OSH, the classical metal scavenger being metallothioneins [
19]. In this context, we further studied the transcriptional regulation of
ovoA under acute laboratory exposure to copper, a known pro-oxidant. This was completed with a non-target metabolomics study (Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry) to distinguish mantle tissues along gametogenesis in different estuaries, together with a targeted analysis of OSHs and GSH in order to quantify their levels in those tissues.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling of Mussels along Their Gametogenic Cycle
Thirty mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) were collected monthly at low tide from August 2017 to March 2018 in two localities of the Basque Country (Spain). One of the sampling points was in Arriluze (43°20′20.53″ N–3°0′46.15″ W), a putatively polluted site in the Nerbioi estuary, and the second one in Plentzia (43°24′32.35″ N–2°56′50.32″ W) in the Butroe estuary. Genetic material was collected and utilized according to Access and Benefit Sharing Legislation in place in Spain and under the Internationally Recognized Certificate of Compliance (ABSCH-IRCC-ES-248276-2).
Mussels were dissected in the laboratory shortly after collection. The mantle within each valve was separated using one half for histological studies by fixation in 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (10% NBF) for 24 h. The other half of the mantle was immediately frozen at −80 °C after embedding in RNAlater.
2.2. Exposure of Mussels to Copper under Laboratory Conditions
One hundred mussels (M. galloprovincialis) were collected at the end of April in Plentzia at the Butroe estuary (43°24′32.35″ N–2°56′50.32″ W). All the mussels were acclimatized for 1 week to laboratory conditions in continuously aerated seawater at 18 °C and a photoperiod of 12 h/12 h. The seawater was decanted, filtered through 0.2 µm filters and treated by UV light. After acclimatization, 50 mussels were taken as control organisms and placed in aquaria with clean seawater. A further 50 mussels were placed in 25 L aquaria and exposed to copper (II) oxide (CuO) at a final concentration of 10 μg/L. Samplings from control and Cu-treated mussels were performed at 3 and 7 days of exposure. At each time-point, mantle, digestive gland, gills and foot were dissected for molecular analyses from 25 mussels in the control and Cu exposure groups. Tissues were immediately frozen at −80 °C after embedding in RNAlater. Mantles were also collected for histological analysis and fixed in 10% NBF.
2.3. Histological Processing and Microscopic Analysis of Gonads
After 24 h fixation, mantle samples were transferred to 70% ethanol and then processed for paraffin embedding following an automated program in a Leica AS300S tissue processor. Paraffin blocks were cut at a thickness of 5 μm using a Leitz 1512 microtome (Leica, Vienna, Austria). Sections were then automatically stained with hematoxylin/eosin using a Leica AutostainerXL (Leica) to finally mount the slides with DPX (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for microscopic visualization. Sex and developmental stage of each animal was identified within any of the six gamete developmental stages (1 = resting, 6 = spawning) described by Seed [
23]. Histological analysis revealed no lesions nor any meaningful infestation or disease.
2.4. Cloning of the Ovothiol Synthase Coding Domain Sequence
The sequence of Purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) ovothiol synthase, (XM_784225.4) was used to search for ortholog sequences in the GenBank database through BLASTn analysis. The hits corresponding to the species phylogenetically more related to mussels were selected for primer design: pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas, JH818685), sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus, KT900888), California sea-hare (Aplysia californica, XM_005099513), yesso scallop (Mizuhopecten yessoensis, XM_021501961) and the air-breathing freshwater snail (Biomphalaria glabrata, XM_013228453). Then, Clustal Omega was used for multiple sequence alignment and selection of homologous sequence fragments with the highest degree of sequence conservation across species. This information was used to design degenerate primers (FW 5′-3′ ATGTTTGARACDGGWGTKGATGAAATG and RV 5′-3′ CCATAYTCATTGTCCADCC) using Eurofins genomics.
2.5. PCR and Electrophoresis
The amplification was performed using a commercial Taq DNA Polymerase recombinant Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 35 cycles in a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), using, as a template, cDNA coming for a pool of mussel ovaries that was previously synthesized in the framework of another project and stored at −80 °C. The thermocycler was programmed with the following steps: 94 °C for 2 min, denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C (Tm) for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 8 s and finally, 72 °C for 8 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels (1.5%).
When the resulting amplicon was observed to be unique and displaying the expected molecular weight (411 bp), it was sent for sequencing to the Bank of DNA Service of the University of the Basque Country (SGIker sequencing service of UPV/EHU), using both the forward and reverse primers.
2.6. Study of the OvoA Transcription Patterns in Mussel Gonads
2.6.1. RNA Extraction
After histologically assigning sex and gametogenic stage to each sampled mussel, six individuals per sex and gametogenic stage from Plentzia and from Arriluze were chosen in order to carry out qPCR analyses. In the Cu exposure experiment, six individuals per sex and per experimental group were selected for extraction of RNA from all tissues. 50–100 mg from each tissue was mechanically and individually homogenized in 1 mL of TriZol® Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using a Precellys 24 homogenizer system (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) with 1.0 zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec, Bartlesville, OK, USA). RNA extraction was performed following TriZol® Reagent manufacturer’s instructions. RNA yield of each sample was quantified by measuring their absorbance at 260/298 nm and 260/230 nm in a Biophotometer (Eppenorf, Hamburg, Germany). Additionally, RNA quality was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis using the Lab-on-a-Chip kit in an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, according to the manufacturer’s instructions and their Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kits Assay Protocol (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
2.6.2. cDNA Synthesis and Concentration Measurement
First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the Affinity Script Multiple Temperature cDNA Synthesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). cDNA was prepared using 1.2 μg of target total RNA in a total volume of 20 μL. Single-stranded cDNA concentrations were quantified using the QuantiT™ OliGreen® Kit (Life Technologies™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. All measurements were done in triplicates in a black 96-well plate (Corning Incorporated, Corning, New York, NY, USA). Fluorescence in each sample was measured in a Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Biotek, Winoosky, VT, USA) at standard fluorescein excitation and emission wavelengths of 480 nm and 520 nm, respectively.
2.6.3. qRT-PCR Analysis of OvoA Transcription Levels in Mussel Tissues
qPCR amplifications were performed using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Rox) (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Specific primes were FW (5′-3′) GTCCATGGTGGGGAC and RV (5′-3′) AACTCGGATCATTGG, which resulted in an amplicon of 179 bp. First, serial dilutions of a pooled mix of cDNA of all the samples was amplified to determine the best cDNA and primer concentrations. cDNA dilution of 1:20 and primer concentration of 6.25 pmol were determined as the best suited based on cycle threshold (Ct) values (20 < 30) and the non-appearance of primer dimers in the dissociation curve. Three replicas of each sample were amplified on 96-well reaction plates using the 7300 Real-Time PCR System thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) in a total volume of 20 μL, with 2 μL of diluted cDNA. The amplification protocol was programmed to follow an initial denaturation and activation step at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and a primer annealing temperature of 58 °C. Amplification reaction was followed by a dissociation stage (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min and again 95 °C for 15 s), where a single peak confirmed the specificity of the selected primer set and the absence of primer dimers.
Efficiency of amplification (E
amp = 1.522 in the Cu experiment and 1.94 in the gametogenic cycle analysis) was estimated by calculating a standard curve, after amplification of serial dilutions of a cDNA pool and applying the following equation:
All gene transcription results were normalized with the amount of cDNA charged in the qPCR according to Rojo-Bartolomé et al. [
24] using an adapted ΔCT formula (
RQ) with efficiency correction (
E).
In the sex comparison of gametogenic stages, the reference group was the average of indeterminate gonads per sampling site. In the Cu exposure experiment, the reference group was the day 3 control group and, finally, when comparing transcription in different mussel tissues, the average of all values was used as a reference.
2.7. Metabolome Analysis
2.7.1. Sample Preparation for Metabolome Analysis
Mantle samples of six mussels in stage 2 (early gametogenesis) and 5 (ripe gonad previous to spawning) were selected in each site and, additionally, individuals at stage 4 (late gametogenesis) from Plentzia were also processed. In the copper experiment, mantle of six individuals in control and exposure groups were selected, additionally including samples of other tissues (foot, gill, and digestive gland). Mussel samples were wet-weighted and placed in polypropylene cryotubes with 1.4 zirconium oxide beads (Precellys, Bertin Technologies). Prior to the extraction, the samples were spiked with deuterated L-Methionine to provide a final concentration in vial of 5 ng µL−1 as an internal standard for quantification. Samples were homogenized in a Cryolys cooling system coupled to a Precellys 24 refrigerated homogenizer system (Bertin Technologies) at 4 °C.
The extraction consisted in the addition of solvents and homogenization in three steps: (i) 400 µL of MeOH and 100 µL of distilled water were added and homogenized during 2 cycles of 50 s at 6400 rpm, (ii) 100 µL of MeOH, 100 µL of distilled water and 200 µL of chloroform were added and vortexed, following the same homogenization cycles and finally, (iii) 300 µL of chloroform and 200 µL of distilled water were added and vortexed, followed by the homogenization cycles again. Then, samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min. The upper polar phase was recovered on chromatography vials. In order to assure the highest recovery of the polar compounds, a second wash of the non-polar phase was performed by adding to the remaining chloroform the same polar phase as done previously (500 µL of MeOH and 400 µL of distilled water), in one single step. It was vortexed and homogenized likewise, centrifuged, and the upper polar phase was pooled with the first one and kept frozen until analytical analysis.
2.7.2. Analytical Method
Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry using a Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) coupled to a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (LC-qOrbitrap MS), equipped with a heated electrospray ionization source (HESI, Thermo Scientific, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Samples were processed in two different analysis runs so the results could be better compared among experimental groups, the first one including all analyzed mussel mantle samples and the second one including different mussel tissues and P. lividius ovaries as controls for the targeted analysis and quantification of OSH levels. Analytes were separated onto a Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography (HILIC) column Acquity UPLC Ethylene Bridged Hybrid (BEH) Amide (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm, provided by Waters). Mobile phases used were (A) water as aqueous phase (5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid) and (B) acetonitrile as organic phase: (5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid). All solvents were of liquid chromatography technical grade (PanReac AppliChem, Castellar del Vallès, Spain). The flow gradient consisted in 5 min of constant B flux at 3%, followed by a constant increase rate until 95% B after 5 min, kept constant for 2 more minutes. Initial conditions were recovered after 4 min.
Molecular and fragment ions were identified with high-resolution Full Scan confirmation mode (FullMS-ddMS2) on positive polarity. Resolution was kept at 70,000 in MS and 17,500 for the dd-MS2. Scan range went from m/z 70 to 1000 with an automatic gain control (AGC) target of 1e6 and an auto maximum injection time (IT) in the Full MS. Fragmentation in the MS2 was achieved with a normalized stepped collision energy ((N) CE) of 10, 35 and 75 eV, with a first mass fixed at 50 m/z and an Automatic Gained Control (AGC) target of 4 e4 and an auto maximum IT, with a tolerance of 5 ppm.
2.7.3. Targeted Metabolite Analysis
The confirmation list included 5 target compounds and the internal standard, as well as the 3 target OSHs and their oxidized forms (
Supplementary Table S1). Standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), dissolved in H
2O:methanol (75:25) and stock solutions were kept at −20 ˚C. Working solutions were freshly prepared in methanol.
Quantification was performed following the internal standard method using the spiked labeled methionine and a standards calibration curve between 0.5 and 50 ppm using Xcalibur software (Thermo Scientific). As we did not have an OSH standard, all OSH forms were quantified using an ergothioneine standard calibration curve. Method recoveries of the target analytes were checked with 10 replicates of spiked water following the same procedure as the samples included within the same batches, providing recoveries ranging from 98% for cysteine and 166% for reduced glutathione. Results are provided in µg per mg of wet material.
Table S1 in the supplementary information includes full details on chemical characterization.
2.8. Statistical Analysis and Data Analysis
All statistical analyses for transcription level data were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 24.0 for Windows, IBM Spain, Santa Hortensia, Spain). All data were tested to analyze whether they followed a normal distribution. As data did not show a normal distribution, non-parametric analyses such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test was employed coupled with Dunn’s test. Significance was established at p < 0.05. The Pearson correlation test was applied to determine the correlation between OSH-A and GSH levels in the mantle samples from Arriluze and Plentzia (p < 0.05).
The LC-qOrbitrap data was treated by Compound Discoverer 2.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for the non-target mode of analysis. Briefly, following a standard untargeted metabolomic workflow with statistical analysis, the program performed a set of tasks such as retention time alignment, detection of compounds, predict compositions and molecular formula assignment, among others, to identify compounds (features) present. Finally, the features were compared with internal MS
n libraries (mzCloud) and external ones (polar endogenous metabolites from Mass Bank, ChemSpider, etc.), as well as external mass lists, resulting in a list of potential candidates to fulfil features identification, including matching scores for the candidates. Concurrently, basic and advanced statistical treatments (trend analysis, data filtering, principal component analysis, etc.) were used to select the most significant compounds based on the scoring results and the discrimination capacity among the biological groups (Arriluze versus Plentzia, sex or maturity stage). Based on this selection, the data was treated with the web application Metaboanalyst 4.0 (
http://www.metaboanalyst.ca) to explore further statistical procedures (e.g., analysis of variance (ANOVA) or partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)) and pathway enrichment analysis. The latter analysis was also carried out with the Mbrole 2.0 web application (
http://csbg.cnb.csic.es/mbrole2/).