Next Article in Journal
Platelet and HIV Interactions and Their Contribution to Non-AIDS Comorbidities
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning Technology for EEG-Forecast of the Blood–Brain Barrier Leakage and the Activation of the Brain’s Drainage System during Isoflurane Anesthesia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/biom13111606
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Dual Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Joint Osteoarthritis: Their Global and Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Molecule-Based Pathogenic and Therapeutic Effects

by
Zhi Li
1,
Ruiye Bi
2,* and
Songsong Zhu
2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
2
Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(11), 1606; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111606
Submission received: 13 September 2023 / Revised: 20 October 2023 / Accepted: 24 October 2023 / Published: 2 November 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
OA is the most common joint disease that affects approximately 7% of the global population. Current treatment methods mainly relieve its symptoms with limited repairing effect on joint destructions, which ultimately contributes to the high morbidity rate of OA. Stem cell treatment is a potential regenerative medical therapy for joint repair in OA, but the uncertainty in differentiation direction and immunogenicity limits its clinical usage. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), the by-products secreted by stem cells, show similar efficacy levels but have safer regenerative repair effect without potential adverse outcomes, and have recently drawn attention from the broader research community. A series of research works and reviews have been performed in the last decade, providing references for the application of various exogenous therapeutic sEVs for treating OA. However, the clinical potential of target intervention involving endogenous pathogenic sEVs in the treatment of OA is still under-explored and under-discussed. In this review, and for the first time, we emphasize the dual role of sEVs in OA and explain the effects of sEVs on various joint tissues from both the pathogenic and therapeutic aspects. Our aim is to provide a reference for future research in the field.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease that is highly related to age and mechanical factors. As a chronic degenerative disease, it mainly damages the articular cartilage and destroys the entire joint articular surface [1]. Progressive softening, abrasion and thinning of the articular cartilage induce typical lesions, and the main symptoms of OA include joint pain, stiffness and swelling [2]. This disease occurs in almost all joints, especially in the weight-bearing joints such as the hip, knee and spine. According to the WHO Global Burden of Disease Study, the lifetime risk of morbidity associated with hip OA is approximately 25%, which increases to 45% for knee OA [2].
Due to the high morbidity rate, the life quality of OA patients is seriously affected, and it imposes a heavy economic burden on families and society [3,4,5]. There are reports that the direct economic losses caused by OA each year account for 1–2.5% of the GDP in Canada and America [2,4], while the indirect losses due to the reduction in social production activities affected by the health status of patients are difficult to assess. In addition, the incidence of OA is highly correlated with age, and in countries with increasingly aging populations, these losses will increase year by year [5,6].
However, due to the lack of understanding of the pathogenesis of OA, there is no ideal therapeutic approach to cure or relieve this disease. Currently, the treatment of early OA includes the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pain relievers, as well as nonpharmacological treatments such as exercise, weight loss and physical therapy [1,7]. However, these methods can only produce temporary relief and fail to repair damaged articular cartilage, and they also present with problems such as poor long-term treatment effect and uncertain safety. For advanced patients with severe dysfunction, surgical intervention is required such as total joint replacement, but complications such as infection and implant loosening may occur, which result in poor functional recovery and eventual disability [1,8].
Almost all cells can secrete extracellular vesicles, and those with a diameter of <100 nm or <200 nm are named small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) [9]. These vesicles have a phospholipid bilayer structure with special surface molecules, and contain different cargoes such as nucleic acids, proteins and metabolites [9,10]. They can cross the cytoplasmic membrane, the blood–brain barrier and the gastrointestinal tract, and can be taken up by recipient cells, thus playing an important role in cellular communication [11].
sEV-based therapy is considered a potential treatment strategy for OA. It has attracted wide attention with the key role of sEVs in stem cell therapy being revealed in recent years [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Compared to stem cell treatments, treatments with sEVs show similar efficacy [25] while providing safer therapeutic effect without potential adverse outcomes, such as uncertain differentiation direction and immunogenicity [3]. On the one hand, sEVs not only have therapeutic functions but also pathogenic roles. For example, Gao [26] et al. found that sEVs in the synovial fluid (SF) of OA patients inhibited the proliferation of chondrocytes. On the other hand, sEVs can be endogenous or exogenous, derived from various cells, and used alone or in combination with tissue engineering, and the mechanism becomes gradually clearer with the effect of different specific molecular mechanisms being revealed. The miRNAs (microRNAs), lncRNAs (long non-coding RNAs) and circRNAs (circular RNAs) carried by sEVs produce effect via activating or inhibiting various signaling pathways.
This review summarizes previous research results and classifies them from the perspective of the effects of sEVs on the pathogenesis and treatment of OA. The aim of this review is to provide a reference for further research.

2. Origin of sEV Therapy: Stem Cell Therapy for Osteoarthritis

The damage and death of chondrocytes is one of the key lesions in OA [1], which suggests a potential therapeutic strategy for OA. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) at the lesion cartilage is considered the most traditional cellular therapy for OA [27]. It has the advantages of a high success rate and good safety, and the problem of residency rate and dedifferentiation can also be improved through the combined application of various cell scaffolds [28]. However, its efficacy is ultimately limited by the insufficient numbers of autologous chondrocytes available. Inducing stem cell differentiation into chondrocytes to fill the lesion cartilage in vivo is a possible solution because stem cells are more accessible. Intra-articular injection or surgical implantation of MSCs derived from different tissue sources, such as bone marrow, adipose and umbilical cord, has been reported to have regenerative repair effects on OA knees [29,30,31,32]. In temporomandibular joint (TMJ) OA, it has also been reported that the defect is repaired after intra-articular injection of MSCs [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Moreover, compared to BMSCs, tooth-derived stem cells may display a higher affinity for regenerating craniofacial tissues because they share the same embryological origins and similar gene expression patterns [35,41,42].
Although stem cell therapy has experienced further progress, compared to ACI, some new problems have arisen, mainly due to the strong tumorigenic potential and immunogenicity of stem cells [43]. Investigators have found that the regenerative effects of stem cell therapy are partly due to the paracrine effects of stem cells, in addition to their chondrogenic differentiation. Specifically, stem cells in the body can secrete information substances, which do not enter the blood circulation but affect their adjacent cells through diffusion. These information substances include growth factors, nitric oxide and hormones. They regulate downstream gene expression in cells, which implies higher safety, predictability and controllability for the final effects. These advantages have attracted the attention of researchers. With a deeper insight obtained from further research, some investigators have even emphasized that the role played by the paracrine effects in OA is actually greater than previously believed, though more evidence is needed. sEVs, as the main bearers of the paracrine effects, have received increasing attention in this field.

3. Effects of sEVs on Articular Tissues in OA

During the OA process, sEVs exhibit either a pathogenic or therapeutic effect. Pathogenic sEVs cause or promote lesions and are commonly derived from adjacent pathological tissues of the joint. Therapeutic sEVs have an opposite effect, and they are commonly derived from healthy tissues throughout the body or are injected after extraction to work in the body [44,45,46]. At the same time, the main regions that are affected in the synovial joint include chondrocytes, the cartilage matrix, the subchondral bone and the synovium, which can produce different effects under the action of the same sEVs.
Hereafter, sEVs that meet at least one of the following criteria are classified as therapeutic sEVs: a) they have been found to exert therapeutic effects on OA in in vivo experiments, such as cartilage regeneration and pain relief, and b) they have been found to have at least one significant anti-OA effect in in vitro experiments, including promoting chondrocyte proliferation and migration, or inhibiting their apoptosis; promoting cartilage matrix secretion or inhibiting their degradation; promoting synovial inflammation resolution; and promoting subchondral bone recovery. sEVs with the opposite effects are classified as pathogenic sEVs [47].

3.1. Pathogenic sEVs in OA

3.1.1. Effects of Pathogenic sEVS on Chondrocytes

Chondrocytes are the main damaged objects in OA, and their affected biological behaviors include proliferation, hypertrophy, apoptosis, senescence, differentiation, migration, inflammatory response and metabolism. SEVs that affect the progress of OA play a pathogenic role in OA chondrocytes, and these sEVs are derived from (a) synovial fibroblasts (SFBs) in synovium [26,48,49,50,51]; (b) osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the subchondral bone [52,53]; and (c) vascular endothelial cells in nearby vessels [54].
Gao [26] et al. reported increased inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in sEVs derived from the synovial fluid (SF) of patients during OA progress, leading to the inhibition of chondrocyte proliferation. Further studies [48,49,50] revealed that pathogenic sEVs in the SF were derived partly from SFBs with OA-like lesions. In addition to inhibiting chondrocyte proliferation, these SFB-sEVs were found to inhibit migration, induce apoptosis and promote the inflammatory response of chondrocytes, according to the studies by Zhou [48] et al. and Kato [51] et al.
At the same time, Wu [52] et al. and Dai [53] et al. separately showed that osteoblast-derived sEVs and osteoclast-derived sEVs from the subchondral bone could promote hypertrophy and catabolism of articular chondrocytes in OA. Yang [54] et al. found that sEVs from vascular endothelial cells reduced the resistance of chondrocytes to oxidative stress by inhibiting autophagy and p21 expression, thereby inducing chondrocyte apoptosis.

3.1.2. Effects of Pathogenic sEVS on Cartilage Extracellular Matrix

The cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex network composed of various macromolecules secreted by chondrocytes [1]. The expression levels of catabolic markers, such as MMP13, ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS5, in chondrocytes are positively correlated with the degree of ECM destruction, while the expressions of anabolic markers, such as COL2A1 and ACAN, have a negative correlation with intensified ECM destruction.
sEVs derived from OA hCCs, SFBs and osteoblasts play a pathogenic role in the cartilage ECM. Guo [55], Zhu [56], Lai [57] and Meng [58] et al. found that hCC-sEVs in OA aggravate the up-regulation of MMP13 and down-regulation of ACAN in chondrocytes, ultimately causing cartilage ECM degradation. sEVs derived from OA SFBs have been shown to promote the degradation of OA cartilage ECM by sequestering miR-142-5p and upregulating RUNX2 [59]. In the study by Wu [52] et al., sEVs derived from the osteoblasts from the sclerotic subchondral bone of OA patients triggered catabolic gene expression in chondrocytes.
In addition, some sEVs derived from healthy cells have been shown to pro-degrade cartilage ECM as a side effect. There are several investigations that demonstrate that normal hS-MSCs [13] and human urine-derived stem cells (hUSCs) [60] further reduce cartilage ECM secretion in OA chondrocytes.

3.1.3. Effects of Pathogenic sEVS on Synovial Tissue

The synovium is a thin and smooth layer of loose connective tissue located in the inner layer of the joint capsule. Its inflammation is one of the typical lesions in OA, whose severity degree is determined by the types and levels of cytokines. And these cytokines are secreted by SFBs and synovial macrophages.
According to the existing findings, the destruction of synovial tissue by OA sEVs is mainly through internally enriched pro-inflammatory factors, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, TNF-α and NF-κB. However, sEVs derived from OA hCCs are currently the only reported pathogenic sEVs. Ni [61] et al. found that the production of mature IL-1β in macrophages is enhanced by sEVs and subsequently exerts a pro-OA effect, which involves the inhibition of macrophage autophagy.

3.2. Therapeutic sEVs in OA

3.2.1. Effects of Therapeutic sEVS on Chondrocytes

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to secrete therapeutic sEVs to maintain the function of chondrocytes in OA joints. Wang [62] et al. and Liu [14,63] et al. found that normal murine bone marrow MSC-sEVs (BMSCs-sEVs) and human bone marrow MSC-sEVs could enhance the proliferation of chondrocytes in OA [64]; meanwhile, hBMSC-sEVs inhibited chondrocyte hypertrophy. The ability to inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis in OA was also observed in sEVs derived from BMSCs [13,18,33,35,36,37,38,39,40], human umbilical cord MSCs [65] (hUC-MSCs), dental pulp stem cells [18] (DPSCs), human synovial MSCs [17,66] (hS-MSCs) and infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP)-MSCs [21]. And sEVs derived from BMSCs [19], UC-MSCs [67,68] and hypoxia-cultured human adipose-derived stem cells [69] have been reported to be able to restore aging chondrocytes. In terms of inflammatory response, BMSCs-sEVs [15] and DPSCs [70] could inhibit the production of inflammatory factors, such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α. In addition, the promotion of chondrogenic differentiation driven by MSCs-sEVs has been reported by Zeng Li [71] and Guping Mao [12] et al.
Chondrocyte-derived sEVs(hCC-sEVs) also play a protective role for cartilage in OA. Li [71] et al. and Ma [72] et al. used hCC-sEVs to treat human bone marrow MSCs (hBMSCs) and hUC-MSCs, respectively. Both studies found that the transcriptional activities of chondrogenesis, such as ACAN, COL2A1 and SOX9 expression levels, were significantly increased.
In addition to being used alone, sEVs can also be applied to a lesion area in combination with gels [73] or tissue engineering constructs [74]. Apart from improving the drug retention rate, sEVs can also provide differentiation signals when used in conjunction with tissue engineering constructs. hBMSC-sEVs and hCCs-sEVs have been reported to provide chondrogenic signals for rabbit chondrogenic progenitor cell constructs. Compared to hBMSC-sEVs, the cartilage tissue induced by hCCs-sEVs has a lower degree of cell hypertrophy and almost no vascularization, which is more consistent with physiological cartilage [74].

3.2.2. Effects of Therapeutic sEVS on Cartilage Extracellular Matrix (ECM)

Current research evidence shows that therapeutic sEVs in the cartilage ECM are mainly derived from various MSCs. Among several EVs which are reported to have the effect of promoting cartilage ECM deposition, BMSCs-sEVs are the most studied at present [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82], whose effect can be enhanced by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) [83,84] and parathyroid hormone (PTH) pretreatment [85]. In addition, sEVs derived from human embryonic MSCs (hE-MSCs) [21,86], human adipose MSCs(hA-MSCs) [87], PDLSCs (periodontal ligament-derived stem cells) [88] and monocyte-derived cells [89] have been shown to affect the expression of related genes that are involved in COL2A1, ACAN, MMP13, ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS5, thereby promoting the deposition of cartilage ECM.

3.2.3. Effects of Therapeutic sEVS on Subchondral Bone

The subchondral bone maintains the morphology of the joint, supplies nutrition to the cartilage, and bears the joint load. Current studies have mainly focused on the effect of therapeutic sEVs on subchondral bone metabolism during OA. Generally speaking, sEVs are able to restore abnormal bone index such as bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume) (BV/TV) and trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp.), as well as increasing osteoblast number and decreasing osteoclast number.
In a rat knee OA model, Zhang [21] et al. and Jin [19,90] et al. observed that intra-articular injection of hE-MSCs-sEVs or hBMSCs-sEVs significantly restored the BV/TV and Tn.Sp, which was accompanied by a significant increase in osteoblast number and decrease in osteoclast number. In addition to the restoration of subchondral bone structure, therapeutic sEVs can regulate the growth of nerves and blood vessels in the subchondral bone to provide relief of joint pain [91]. Li [92] and Wang [93] et al. observed that, in the lumbar facet joints and knee joints of mice, BMSCs-sEVs significantly alleviated pain by inhibiting abnormal CGRP-positive nerve invasion and abnormal H-type blood vessel formation, respectively, in OA subchondral bone remodeling. Li [92] et al. further revealed that this effect may be mediated through the RANKL-RANK-TRAF6 signaling pathway in the subchondral bone. Considering that the RANKL/RANK system plays an important role in bone remodeling, further exploration in this direction is of great significance for revealing the mechanism of subchondral bone remodeling in OA.

3.2.4. Effects of Therapeutic sEVS on Synovial Tissue

Regarding SFBs, sEVs derived from normal human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) and hBMSCs can down-regulate the expression of IL-6, NF-κB and TNF-α, as well as up-regulate the expression of IL-10 in OA-hSFBs, ultimately improving synovial inflammation [94,95,96].
Regarding synovial macrophages, it has been shown that rat BMSCs-sEVs can promote the transformation of macrophages from M1 to M2 type, thereby promoting the secretion of IL-10 but inhibiting IL-1β and TNF-α via synovial macrophages [62,97]. In addition, co-culturing sEV-treated M2-polarized macrophages with chondrocytes also helps maintain the cartilage characteristics of chondrocytes and inhibit their hypertrophy and senescence [97,98] (Figure 1).

4. Direct Bearers of Sev Effects on OA: Non-coding Regulatory RNA Molecule

The species of the cell source, the different cell types and the physiological/pathological condition of cells merely indirectly determine the function of sEVs; it is the sEV cargoes that really exert a direct determining effect and are the direct bearers of the effects of sEVs in OA.
sEV cargoes mainly include three types of non-coding regulatory RNA molecules: (a) microRNAs, (b) long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and (c) circular RNAs (circRNAs). Each specific cargo could have specific effects (Figure 2).

4.1. MicroRNAs (miRNAs)

Mechanically, miRNAs bind to the 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR) of target mRNAs to inhibit their translation, and then negatively regulate the expressions of substream proteins, such as mTOR, NF-κB and WNT5A, leading to the promotion or inhibition of OA [99]. As the most abundant sEV cargoes, miRNAs are generally considered to have the most important role in sEV effects. Thus, there has been a large number of research studies investigating their roles and mechanisms in the OA process (Table 1.).
The NF-κB signaling pathway is one of the signaling pathways activated in OA. It regulates the production of many inflammatory mediators and cytokines, and participates in many events such as chondrocyte apoptosis and catabolism, synovial inflammation and chondrogenic differentiation. This pathway has long been regarded as a potential target for OA treatment [100]. Studies examining the treatment of OA with sEVs have revealed that the NF-κB signaling pathway may be involved in the anti-OA effect of sEVs. Related studies have reported that it is mainly the different miRNAs carried by sEVs that ultimately cause the NF-κB signaling pathway to be inhibited. In chondrocytes, both miR-129-5p and miR-93-5p have been reported to increase cell viability and inhibit apoptosis, immune response and catabolism through the HMGB1/TLRs4/NF-κB axis [17,58]; miR-326 exerts similar effects through the HDAC3/STAT1/NF-κB axis [101]. The inhibition of chondrocyte apoptosis by sEV miR-143 has also been reported to be related to the inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway [102]. Several studies have shown that sEV-mediated inhibition of the NF-κB pathway may be achieved by inhibiting IκBα degradation [81,83,96]. Usually, IκBα combines with NF-κB to form an intracytoplasmic complex, thereby preventing NF-κB from entering the nucleus to play its role. In the OA state, through the mediation of intrinsic membrane receptors, some extracellular signaling substances can activate an enzyme called IkB kinase (IKK). Then, IKK phosphorylates IκBα protein, which leads to the ubiquitination of the latter, causing IκBα to detach from NF-κB, and, eventually, IκBα is degraded by proteasome [100]. hBMSCs-sEVs have been reported to target DDX20 by delivering miR-361-5p, thereby causing an attenuation of IκBα degradation and inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in human chondrocytes [81]. However, a single application of SD rat BMSCs-sEVs was reported to not cause changes in NF-κB signal intensity in rat chondrocytes, although it still exerted an OA inhibitory effect. Interestingly, when combined with LIPUS, inhibition of IκBα degradation was observed in chondrocytes, and the therapeutic effect of BMSCs-sEVs in SD rats with OA was enhanced [83]. In human synovial fibroblasts, sEV miR-147b, miR-145, and miR-221 were reported to inhibit the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [94,96]. And the latter two miRNAs were also reported to exert anti-OA effects by promoting the conversion of synovial macrophages from M1 to M2 phenotype and stimulating the chondrogenic differentiation of periosteal cells [94].
Table 1. MicroRNAs of mechanistic importance in OA.
Table 1. MicroRNAs of mechanistic importance in OA.
MicroRNAOrigin of sEVMechanismEffectsSpeciesRef.
miR-9-5prat BM-MSCsNegatively regulates SDC1Reduces inflammation in OA cartilage (decreases IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, NO, MDA, iNOS, COX2, SOD, OCN, MMP13, COMP, AKP)rat[15]
miR-92a-3phuman BM-MSCsNegatively regulates WNT5AIncreases cell proliferation and matrix secretion in OA cartilage (increases ACAN, COL2A1, COL9A1, COMP, SOX9; decreases COL10A1, RUNX2, MMP13)human[12]
miR-95-5phuman BM-MSCsNegatively regulates HDAC2/8Increases cartilage development and cartilage matrix expression in MSCs and chondrocytes (increases ACAN, COL2A1, COL9A1, COMP; decreases COL10A1, MMP13)human[79]
miR-100-5phuman UC-MSCsNegatively regulates NOS4Reduces ROS production and apoptosis in OA chondrocyteshuman[65]
miR-100-5phuman IPFP-MSCsNegatively regulates mTORIncreases autophagy and reduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytes; increases secretion in OA ECM (increases COL2; decreases MMP13, ADAMTS5)human[21]
miR-100-5phuman exfoliated deciduous teeth-SCsNegatively regulates mTORReduces inflammation in OA chondrocytes (decreases MMP1, MMP9, MMP13, ADAMTS5)human[70]
miR-124MSCsNegatively regulates ROCK1, which actives TLR9Reduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytesmouse[102]
miR-125a-5phuman BM-MSCsNegatively regulates E2F2Increases migration in OA chondrocytes and increases secretion in OA ECM (increases COL2, ACAN, SOX9; decreases MMP13)human/mouse[75]
miR-126-3prat SFBs Increases migration and proliferation, reduces apoptosis and inflammation in OA chondrocytes (decreases IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α); reduces formation of osteophytes and degeneration in cartilagerat[48]
miR-127-3prat BM-MSCsNegatively regulates CDH11, which actives Wnt/β-catenin pathwayIncreases cell viability and DNA synthesis activity, and reduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytes (increases COL2; decreases MMP13)rat[103]
miR-129-5phuman S-MSCsNegatively regulates HMGB1, which up-regulates TLR4 and then actives NF-κB signaling pathwayReduces inflammatory response and apoptosis in OA chondrocytes (increases COL2; decreases COX2, iNOS, MMP13)human[17]
miR-135brat MSCsNegatively regulates Sp1Increases viability and proliferation in OA chondrocytesrat[64]
miR-135brat BM-MSCsNegatively regulates MAPK6Increases M2 polarization in synovial macrophages; increases repair of OA cartilage (increases ACAN, SOX9); reduces inflammatory factors (IL-1β, PGE2, COX-2, COX-1, NO) in OA serumrat[62]
miR-136-5phuman BM-MSCsNegatively regulates ELF3Increases migration in chondrocytes; reduces degeneration in cartilage (increases COL2, ACAN, SOX9; decreases MMP13)human/mouse[76]
miR-140-5phuman DPSCs/human USCsNegatively regulates VEGFAIncreases proliferation, migration, and reduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytes; increases secretion in OA ECM (increases COL2, ACAN, SOX9)human/rat[18,60]
miR-140-5phuman S-MSCsNegatively regulates RalAIncreases secretion in OA ECM (increases SOX9, ACAN, and COL2)human/rat[13]
miR-143MSCsNegatively regulates ROCK1, which actives NF-κB signaling pathwayReduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytesmouse[102]
miR-145human ADSCsinhibits the NF-κB signaling pathway; actives Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayIncreases chondrogenesis (increases SOX9 in periosteal cells) and collagen deposits in OA cartilagehuman[94]
miR-147bhuman BM-MSCsinhibits the degradation of IκBα, then inhibits the NF-κB signaling pathwayReduces inflammation in OA synovial cells (increases SOCS3, SOCS6; decreases IL-1β, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1)human[96]
miR-155-5phuman S-MSCsNegatively regulates Runx2Increases proliferation, migration, ECM secretion (increases COL2, SOX9) and reduced apoptosis in OA chondrocyteshuman/mouse[66]
miR-206mouseNegatively regulates ELF3Increases proliferation, differentiation and reduces apoptosis in OA osteoblasts (increases OCN, BMP2, ALP and calcium deposition level; decreases pro-inflammatory mediators)mouse[90]
miR-210-5phuman subchondral bone osteoblastMay involve PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathwayIncreases hypertrophic, degradative gene expression, and changes cellular aerobic respiration in OA chondrocytes (increases ADAMTS5, COL10, RUNX2, MMP13; decreases SOX9, ACAN, COL2)human[52]
miR-214-3prat SFBs Increases proliferation, and reduces apoptosis, inflammation (decreases TNF-α, IL-1β) in OA chondrocytes; reduces degeneration of OA cartilage and synovium; reduces osteophytes formation and maintains the subchondral bone structure in OArat[49]
miR-221human ADSCsinhibits the NF-κB signaling pathway; actives Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayIncreases viability and proliferation of periosteal cellshuman[94]
miR-320cS-MSCsNegatively regulates ADAM19, which up-regulates β-catenin, MYC and then actives Wnt signaling pathwayIncreases proliferation, migration and reduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytes; increases secretion in OA ECM (increases COL2A1, ACAN)rat[104,105]
miR-320chuman BM-MSCs Increases proliferation in OA chondrocytes; increases secretion in OA ECM (increases SOX9; decreases MMP13)human[80]
miR-326rat BM-MSCsNegatively regulates HDAC3, which negatively regulates STAT1 and then actives NF-κB signaling pathwayIncreases proliferation, migration, the expression of chondrogenic specific genes (COL2A1, SOX9, Agg, and Prg4), and reduce inflammation(IL-6, TNF-α), pyroptosis (decreases NLRP3, ASC, GSDMD, Caspase-1, IL-1β, IL-18) in OA chondrocytesrat[101]
miR-361-5phuman BM-MSCsNegatively regulates DDX20, which actives NF-κB signaling pathwayReduces inflammation (decreases IL-18, IL-6, TNF-α) and degradation (decreases iNOS, MMP3, MMP13) in OA cartilagerat[81]
miR-let-7a-5pmouse osteoclastNegatively regulates Smad2Increases hypertrophic gene expression in OA chondrocytes (increases COL10A1, RUNX2, MMP13)mouse[53]

4.2. Long Non-Coding RNAs (lncRNAs)

lncRNAs act as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to separate miRNAs from target mRNAs [106]. Although there are many reports on the effects of lncRNAs on chondrocytes, there are only a few studies on sEV lncRNAs [107] (Table 2).

4.3. Circular RNAs (CircRNAs)

CircRNAs belong to a special class of non-coding RNA molecules with a closed-loop structure. They are the same ceRNAs as lncRNAs and act as miRNA sponges with numerous miRNA binding sites. By interacting with OA-associated miRNAs, circRNAs play an important regulatory role in OA [108] (Table 3).

5. Limitation and Future Direction

5.1. Limitations in the Mechanism Research for OA Diagnosis and Treatment

Osteoarthritis can be divided into different disease stages, and the changes in sEVs in each stage are different. Moreover, among sEVs secreted by different cells, their changes in the same stage are also different. For diagnostic applications of sEVs, further research is still required to supplement current data, especially data on the early stage of OA. The data that have been reported thus far all focus on the progressive stage, and are not enough to provide a reference for establishing the criteria for early diagnosis of OA. Fortunately, the advancement in high-throughput detection technologies has made it easier to collect these data, but the participation of more investigators is needed.
Regarding treatment, the search for MSC subpopulations capable of producing more sEVs is an important issue to be solved in the clinical application of sEVs. Bone marrow, umbilical cord, antler and ginger have all shown to be potentially ideal sources. In addition, the artificial modification of MSCs is another feasible approach. The earliest attempt to continuously obtain sEVs by immortalizing MSCs was carried out by Chen et al. [110]. However, these immortalized cells, which accept lentiviral transfection of the MYC gene, largely lose their multilineage differentiation. Fortunately, the sEVs secreted by them are still effective in the treatment of myocardial infarction and OA, and are secreted in significantly higher amounts than in normal cells [24]. Currently, more immortalization protocols for MSCs have been validated, and some can still preserve good multiple differentiated potentiality, such as SV40LT and hTERT [111], but the quantity and functional changes of the sEVs secreted by these cells lack further reports. As genetic engineering technology matures, it becomes possible to directly regulate genes involved in sEV production.
In fact, in recent years, it has been reported that the amount of sEV miRNAs is not sufficient to cause an effect on target cells [112,113]. This disputes the hypothesis in previous studies that the observed regulatory effects are caused by sEVs delivering miRNAs into target cells. On the one hand, this suggests that sEV cargoes may not play a direct role, and there may be more hidden steps between miRNAs and mRNAs. On the other hand, it also suggests that what actually functions may not be sEV miRNAs, or even any sEV components [114]. This consideration stems from the shortcomings of current technology of sEV isolation and extraction. The final obtained sEV sample is actually a mixture, and it is still unclear whether unknown components or the interactions of different components affect the final effect [115,116,117]. In addition, the transfection technology used in sEV research can overexpress specific miRNAs that are several orders of magnitude above physiological levels [118], which is reported to exert functions that sEVs do not have under physiological conditions [119].

5.2. Limitations in sEV Isolation Technology

Current sEV extraction methods cannot guarantee yield and purity simultaneously. In terms of diagnosis, whether sEVs isolated and used for detection reflect the real situation in an organism remains to be determined. The influence of sEV depletion during extraction and the presence of certain impurities, which are hard to remove, on subsequent analysis are unclear [115,116,117]. Regarding treatment, even though the most common therapeutic sEVs are currently derived from MSCs, a kind of cells that secrete more sEVs than other cells, their production still fails to meet clinical needs. And the effects of impurities are unknown. Perhaps, developing and improving assays for pooled samples is a promising way for improving the current status.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, R.B. and S.Z.; supervision, R.B. and S.Z.; funding acquisition, R.B. and S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) No. 82071139 (to S.Z.), 82270999 (to R.B.); Key R&D Program of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology No. 23ZDYF2130 (to S.Z.); and ‘From Zero to One’ Innovative Research Program of Sichuan University No. 2022SCUH0022 (to R.B.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arden, N.; Blanco, F.; Cooper, C.; Guermazi, A.; Hayashi, D.; Hunter, D.; Javaid, M.K.; Rannou, F.; Roemer, F.; Reginster, J.Y. Atlas of Osteoarthritis M.; Springer Healthcare Ltd.: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Martel-Pelletier, J.; Barr, A.J.; Cicuttini, F.M.; Conaghan, P.G.; Cooper, C.; Goldring, M.B.; Goldring, S.R.; Jones, G.; Teichtahl, A.J.; Pelletier, J.P. Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mancuso, P.; Raman, S.; Glynn, A.; Barry, F.; Murphy, J.M. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Osteoarthritis: The Critical Role of the Cell Secretome. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ruiz Iban, M.A.; Benavides, J.; Forero, J.P.; Bittelman, S.; Martinez, R.; Mite, M.A.; Diaz Heredia, J.; Ulloa, S.; Lizárraga Ferrand, M.M. Use of strong opioids for chronic pain in osteoarthritis: An insight into the Latin American reality. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 11, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. The Institute of Joint Surgery; Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Association; Osteoarthritis Study Group of the Orthopedic Physician Branch of the Chinese Physician Association; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases (Xiangya Hospital). Guideline fors diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis in China (2021 edition). Chin. J. Orthop. 2021, 41, 24. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong, J.W.; Noh, J.H.; Kim, D.J. The prevalence of and demographic factors associated with radiographic knee osteoarthritis in Korean adults aged ≥ 50 years: The 2010–2013 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mianehsaz, E.; Mirzaei, H.R.; Mahjoubin-Tehran, M.; Rezaee, A.; Sahebnasagh, R.; Pourhanifeh, M.H.; Mirzaei, H.; Hamblin, M.R. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: A new therapeutic approach to osteoarthritis? Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bao, C.; He, C. The role and therapeutic potential of MSC-derived exosomes in osteoarthritis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2021, 710, 109002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lobb, R.J.; Becker, M.; Wen, S.W.; Wong, C.S.; Wiegmans, A.P.; Leimgruber, A.; Möller, A. Optimized exosome isolation protocol for cell culture supernatant and human plasma. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 27031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Bi, J.; Huang, J.; Tang, Y.; Du, S.; Li, P. Exosome: A Review of Its Classification, Isolation Techniques, Storage, Diagnostic and Targeted Therapy Applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 6917–6934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mao, G.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Chang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Liao, W.; Kang, Y. Exosomes derived from miR-92a-3p-overexpressing human mesenchymal stem cells enhance chondrogenesis and suppress cartilage degradation via targeting WNT5A. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tao, S.C.; Yuan, T.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yin, W.J.; Guo, S.C.; Zhang, C.Q. Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model. Theranostics 2017, 7, 180–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, Y.; Zou, R.; Wang, Z.; Wen, C.; Zhang, F.; Lin, F. Exosomal KLF3-AS1 from hMSCs promoted cartilage repair and chondrocyte proliferation in osteoarthritis. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 3629–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jin, Z.; Ren, J.; Qi, S. Exosomal miR-9-5p secreted by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates osteoarthritis by inhibiting syndecan-1. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 381, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; He, S.H.; Liang, X.; Zhang, X.X.; Li, S.S.; Li, T.F. ATF4-modified serum exosomes derived from osteoarthritic mice inhibit osteoarthritis by inducing autophagy. IUBMB Life 2021, 73, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qiu, M.; Liu, D.; Fu, Q. MiR-129-5p shuttled by human synovial mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes relieves IL-1β induced osteoarthritis via targeting HMGB1. Life Sci. 2021, 269, 118987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, T.; Wu, N.; Wang, L.; Zhang, R.; Pan, R.; Chen, Y.F. Inhibition of chondrocyte apoptosis in a rat model of osteoarthritis by exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human dental pulp stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2021, 47, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhu, H.; Dong, C.; Ji, J.; Liu, Y.; Deng, A.; Gu, Z. Therapeutic effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes on osteoarthritis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 9281–9294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, S.; Tian, G.; Yang, Z.; Gao, X.; Wang, F.; Li, J.; Tian, Z.; Huang, B.; Wei, F.; Sang, X. Enhancement of acellular cartilage matrix scaffold by Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes to promote osteochondral regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 2711–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, J.; Kuang, L.; Chen, C.; Yang, J.; Zeng, W.N.; Li, T.; Chen, H.; Huang, S.; Fu, Z.; Li, J.; et al. miR-100-5p-abundant exosomes derived from infrapatellar fat pad MSCs protect articular cartilage and ameliorate gait abnormalities via inhibition of mTOR in osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 2019, 206, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, S.; Chu, W.C.; Lai, R.C.; Lim, S.K.; Hui, J.H.; Toh, W.S. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 2135–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Niu, X.; Hu, B.; Li, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ding, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. Comparison of exosomes secreted by induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells and synovial membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, S.; Chuah, S.J.; Lai, R.C.; Hui, J.H.P.; Lim, S.K.; Toh, W.S. MSC exosomes mediate cartilage repair by enhancing proliferation, attenuating apoptosis and modulating immune reactivity. Biomaterials 2018, 156, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cosenza, S.; Toupet, K.; Maumus, M.; Luz-Crawford, P.; Blanc-Brude, O.; Jorgensen, C.; Noël, D. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes are more immunosuppressive than microparticles in inflammatory arthritis. Theranostics 2018, 8, 1399–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gao, K.; Zhu, W.; Li, H.; Ma, D.; Liu, W.; Yu, W.; Wang, L.; Cao, Y.; Jiang, Y. Association between cytokines and exosomes in synovial fluid of individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Mod. Rheumatol. 2020, 30, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nam, Y.; Rim, Y.A.; Lee, J.; Ju, J.H. Current Therapeutic Strategies for Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Regeneration. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2018, 8490489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Caron, M.M.; Emans, P.J.; Coolsen, M.M.; Voss, L.; Surtel, D.A.; Cremers, A.; van Rhijn, L.W.; Welting, T.J. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: Comparison of 2D and 3D cultures. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2012, 20, 1170–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, Y.S.; Kwon, O.R.; Choi, Y.J.; Suh, D.S.; Heo, D.B.; Koh, Y.G. Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis of the Injection Versus Implantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis. Am. J. Sports Med. 2015, 43, 2738–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wakitani, S.; Okabe, T.; Horibe, S.; Mitsuoka, T.; Saito, M.; Koyama, T.; Nawata, M.; Tensho, K.; Kato, H.; Uematsu, K.; et al. Safety of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for cartilage repair in 41 patients with 45 joints followed for up to 11 years and 5 months. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011, 5, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wong, K.L.; Lee, K.B.; Tai, B.C.; Law, P.; Lee, E.H.; Hui, J.H. Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 2013, 29, 2020–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Orozco, L.; Munar, A.; Soler, R.; Alberca, M.; Soler, F.; Huguet, M.; Sentís, J.; Sánchez, A.; García-Sancho, J. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with autologous mesenchymal stem cells: Two-year follow-up results. Transplantation 2014, 97, e66–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ahtiainen, K.; Mauno, J.; Ellä, V.; Hagström, J.; Lindqvist, C.; Miettinen, S.; Ylikomi, T.; Kellomäki, M.; Seppänen, R. Autologous adipose stem cells and polylactide discs in the replacement of the rabbit temporomandibular joint disc. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10, 20130287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mäenpää, K.; Ellä, V.; Mauno, J.; Kellomäki, M.; Suuronen, R.; Ylikomi, T.; Miettinen, S. Use of adipose stem cells and polylactide discs for tissue engineering of the temporomandibular joint disc. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tatullo, M.; Marrelli, M.; Shakesheff, K.M.; White, L.J. Dental pulp stem cells: Function, isolation and applications in regenerative medicine. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015, 9, 1205–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, J.; Liao, W.; Su, K.; Jia, J.; Qin, L.; Liu, W.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ou, F.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid Attenuates Interleukin-1β-Induced Interleukin-6 Upregulation by Inhibiting the Microtubule Affinity-Regulating Kinase 4/Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway in Synovium-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Temporomandibular Joint. Inflammation 2020, 43, 1246–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, W.; Sun, Y.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, Z. IL-1β impedes the chondrogenic differentiation of synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells in the human temporomandibular joint. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, Y.; Umebayashi, M.; Abdallah, M.N.; Dong, G.; Roskies, M.G.; Zhao, Y.F.; Murshed, M.; Zhang, Z.; Tran, S.D. Combination of polyetherketoneketone scaffold and human mesenchymal stem cells from temporomandibular joint synovial fluid enhances bone regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, Y.P.; Zheng, Y.H.; Liu, W.J.; Zheng, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.G. Synovium fragment-derived cells exhibit characteristics similar to those of dissociated multipotent cells in synovial fluid of the temporomandibular joint. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Koyama, N.; Okubo, Y.; Nakao, K.; Osawa, K.; Fujimura, K.; Bessho, K. Pluripotency of mesenchymal cells derived from synovial fluid in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder. Life Sci. 2011, 89, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, J.; Guo, F.; Mi, J.; Zhang, Z. Periodontal ligament mesenchymal stromal cells increase proliferation and glycosaminoglycans formation of temporomandibular joint derived fibrochondrocytes. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 410167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ogasawara, N.; Kano, F.; Hashimoto, N.; Mori, H.; Liu, Y.; Xia, L.; Sakamaki, T.; Hibi, H.; Iwamoto, T.; Tanaka, E.; et al. Factors secreted from dental pulp stem cells show multifaceted benefits for treating experimental temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020, 28, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. De Almeida, P.E.; Ransohoff, J.D.; Nahid, A.; Wu, J.C. Immunogenicity of pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives. Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kalluri, R.; Lebleu, V.S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 2020, 367, eaau6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Murao, A.; Brenner, M.; Aziz, M.; Wang, P. Exosomes in Sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Z.; Huang, Z.; Bai, L. Cell Interplay in Osteoarthritis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 720477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, H.; Huang, Y.; Yang, L. Research progress in the use of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022, 80, 101684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhou, Y.; Ming, J.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Deng, M.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, S. Exosomes derived from miR-126-3p-overexpressing synovial fibroblasts suppress chondrocyte inflammation and cartilage degradation in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Cell Death Discov. 2021, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lai, C.; Liao, B.; Peng, S.; Fang, P.; Bao, N.; Zhang, L. Synovial fibroblast-miR-214-3p-derived exosomes inhibit inflammation and degeneration of cartilage tissues of osteoarthritis rats. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2022, 478, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tan, F.; Wang, D.; Yuan, Z. The Fibroblast-Like Synoviocyte Derived Exosomal Long Non-coding RNA H19 Alleviates Osteoarthritis Progression Through the miR-106b-5p/TIMP2 Axis. Inflammation 2020, 43, 1498–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kato, T.; Miyaki, S.; Ishitobi, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakasa, T.; Lotz, M.K.; Ochi, M. Exosomes from IL-1β stimulated synovial fibroblasts induce osteoarthritic changes in articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, R163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, X.; Crawford, R.; Xiao, Y.; Mao, X.; Prasadam, I. Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Release Exosomes That Promote Cartilage Degeneration. J. Cells 2021, 10, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dai, J.; Dong, R.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Gong, X.; Bai, Y.; Kang, F.; Liang, M.; Zeng, F.; Hou, Z.; et al. Osteoclast-derived exosomal let-7a-5p targets Smad2 to promote the hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2020, 319, C21–C33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, R.Z.; Zheng, H.L.; Xu, W.N.; Zheng, X.F.; Li, B.; Jiang, L.S.; Jiang, S.D. Vascular endothelial cell-secreted exosomes facilitate osteoarthritis pathogenesis by promoting chondrocyte apoptosis. Aging 2021, 13, 4647–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Guo, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhao, F.; Liu, M.; Wang, F.; Kang, M.; He, W.; Lv, Z. Exosomal circ-BRWD1 contributes to osteoarthritis development through the modulation of miR-1277/TRAF6 axis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhu, C.; Shen, K.; Zhou, W.; Wu, H.; Lu, Y. Exosome-mediated circ_0001846 participates in IL-1β-induced chondrocyte cell damage by miR-149-5p-dependent regulation of WNT5B. Clin. Immunol. 2021, 232, 108856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lai, X.; Song, Y.; Tian, J. CircCDK14 ameliorates interleukin-1β-induced chondrocyte damage by the miR-1183/KLF5 pathway in osteoarthritis. Autoimmunity 2022, 55, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meng, Y.; Qiu, S.; Sun, L.; Zuo, J. Knockdown of exosome-mediated lnc-PVT1 alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoarthritis progression by mediating the HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB pathway via miR-93-5p. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 5313–5325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zeng, G.; Deng, G.; Xiao, S.; Li, F. Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes-derived Exosomal PCGEM1 Accelerates IL-1β-induced Apoptosis and Cartilage Matrix Degradation by miR-142-5p/RUNX2 in Chondrocytes. Immunol. Investig. 2022, 51, 1284–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Si, H.B.; Tang, L.; Xie, H.Q.; Shen, B. Exosomes Derived From Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells Overexpressing miR-140-5p Alleviate Knee Osteoarthritis Through Downregulation of VEGFA in a Rat Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 2022, 50, 1088–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ni, Z.; Kuang, L.; Chen, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, B.; Ouyang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhou, S.; Chen, L.; Su, N.; et al. The exosome-like vesicles from osteoarthritic chondrocyte enhanced mature IL-1β production of macrophages and aggravated synovitis in osteoarthritis. Cell death & disease 2019, 10, 522. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, R.; Xu, B. TGF-β1-modified MSC-derived exosomal miR-135b attenuates cartilage injury via promoting M2 synovial macrophage polarization by targeting MAPK6. Cell Tissue Res. 2021, 384, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, Y.; Lin, L.; Zou, R.; Wen, C.; Wang, Z.; Lin, F. MSC-derived exosomes promote proliferation and inhibit apoptosis of chondrocytes via lncRNA-KLF3-AS1/miR-206/GIT1 axis in osteoarthritis. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 2411–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, R.; Xu, B.; Xu, H. TGF-β1 promoted chondrocyte proliferation by regulating Sp1 through MSC-exosomes derived miR-135b. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 2756–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Li, L.; Fu, P. Exosomes from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells inhibit ROS production and cell apoptosis in human articular chondrocytes via the miR-100-5p/NOX4 axis. Cell Biol. Int. 2021, 45, 2096–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Z.; Yan, K.; Ge, G.; Zhang, D.; Bai, J.; Guo, X.; Zhou, J.; Xu, T.; Xu, M.; Long, X.; et al. Exosomes derived from miR-155-5p-overexpressing synovial mesenchymal stem cells prevent osteoarthritis via enhancing proliferation and migration, attenuating apoptosis, and modulating extracellular matrix secretion in chondrocytes. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2021, 37, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cao, H.; Chen, M.; Cui, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Deng, S.; Yuan, T.; Fan, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X. Cell-Free Osteoarthritis Treatment with Sustained-Release of Chondrocyte-Targeting Exosomes from Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Rejuvenate Aging Chondrocytes. ACS nano 2023, 17, 13358–13376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yan, L.; Liu, G.; Wu, X. The umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal lncRNA H19 improves osteochondral activity through miR-29b-3p/FoxO3 axis. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chang, L.H.; Wu, S.C.; Chen, C.H.; Chen, J.W.; Huang, W.C.; Wu, C.W.; Lin, Y.S.; Chen, Y.J.; Chang, J.K.; Ho, M.L. Exosomes Derived from Hypoxia-Cultured Human Adipose Stem Cells Alleviate Articular Chondrocyte Inflammaging and Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Luo, P.; Jiang, C.; Ji, P.; Wang, M.; Xu, J. Exosomes of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth as an anti-inflammatory agent in temporomandibular joint chondrocytes via miR-100-5p/mTOR J. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, S.; Zheng, Z.; Bian, Y.; Feng, B.; Weng, X. Chondrocytes-derived exosomal miR-8485 regulated the Wnt/β-catenin pathways to promote chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 523, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ma, K.; Zhu, B.; Wang, Z.; Cai, P.; He, M.; Ye, D.; Yan, G.; Zheng, L.; Yang, L.; Zhao, J. Articular chondrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles promote cartilage differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells by activation of autophagy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 18, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Qian, D.; Gao, P.; Qin, T.; Jiang, T.; Yi, J.; Xu, T.; Huang, Y.; et al. Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma administration in site mediate cartilage protection in subtalar osteoarthritis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chen, Y.; Xue, K.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, K. Exosomes derived from mature chondrocytes facilitate subcutaneous stable ectopic chondrogenesis of cartilage progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xia, Q.; Wang, Q.; Lin, F.; Wang, J. miR-125a-5p-abundant exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells suppress chondrocyte degeneration via targeting E2F2 in traumatic osteoarthritis. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 11225–11238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, X.; Shi, Y.; Xue, P.; Ma, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-136-5p inhibits chondrocyte degeneration in traumatic osteoarthritis by targeting ELF3. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. He, L.; He, T.; Xing, J.; Zhou, Q.; Fan, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Wu, D.; Tian, Z.; Liu, B.; et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect cartilage damage and relieve knee osteoarthritis pain in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cosenza, S.; Ruiz, M.; Toupet, K.; Jorgensen, C.; Noël, D. Mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes and microparticles protect cartilage and bone from degradation in osteoarthritis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mao, G.; Hu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, P.; Zhao, X.; Lin, R.; Liao, W.; Kang, Y. Exosomal miR-95-5p regulates chondrogenesis and cartilage degradation via histone deacetylase 2/8. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 5354–5366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sun, H.; Hu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Lun, J.; Liao, W.; Zhang, Z. Expression of exosomal microRNAs during chondrogenic differentiation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Z.; Tao, H.; Bai, J.; Ge, G.; Li, W.; Zhang, W.; Hao, Y.; Yang, X.; et al. Human bone mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomal miRNA-361-5p alleviates osteoarthritis by downregulating DDX20 and inactivating the NF-κB signaling pathway. Bioorganic Chem. 2021, 113, 104978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mao, G.; Xu, Y.; Long, D.; Sun, H.; Li, H.; Xin, R.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Yang, Z.; Kang, Y. Exosome-transported circRNA_0001236 enhances chondrogenesis and suppress cartilage degradation via the miR-3677-3p/Sox9 axis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Liao, Q.; Li, B.J.; Li, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zeng, H.; Liu, J.M.; Yuan, L.X.; Liu, G. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound promotes osteoarthritic cartilage regeneration by BMSC-derived exosomes via modulating the NF-κB signaling pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 97, 107824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Xia, P.; Wang, Q.; Song, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Lin, Q.; Cheng, K.; Chen, A.; Li, X. Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Enhances the Efficacy of Bone Marrow-Derived MSCs in Osteoarthritis Cartilage Repair by Regulating Autophagy-Mediated Exosome Release. Cartilage 2022, 13, 19476035221093060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shao, L.T.; Luo, L.; Qiu, J.H.; Deng, D.Y.B. PTH (1-34) enhances the therapeutic effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines expression on OA chondrocyte repair in vitro. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2022, 24, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, Y.; Yu, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, F.; Dai, J.; Wu, B.; Zhou, J.; Heng, B.C.; Zou, X.H.; Ouyang, H.; et al. Exosomes from embryonic mesenchymal stem cells alleviate osteoarthritis through balancing synthesis and degradation of cartilage extracellular matrix. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tofiño-Vian, M.; Guillén, M.I.; Pérez Del Caz, M.D.; Silvestre, A.; Alcaraz, M.J. Microvesicles from Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a New Protective Strategy in Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 47, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Huang, C.Y.; Vesvoranan, O.; Yin, X.; Montoya, A.; Londono, V.; Sawatari, Y.; Garcia-Godoy, F. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Conditioned Medium of Periodontal Ligament-Derived Stem Cells on Chondrocytes, Synoviocytes, and Meniscus Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2021, 30, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Huang, M.; Cheng, W.; Shan, H.; Gao, X.; Zhang, M.; Sheng, L.; Dai, J.; et al. LncRNA MM2P-induced, exosome-mediated transfer of Sox9 from monocyte-derived cells modulates primary chondrocytes. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhan, J.; Yan, Z.; Chen, D.; Xue, X.; Pan, X. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-206 promotes osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in osteoarthritis by reducing Elf3. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 7734–7745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yang, Q.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zou, H.; Lai, C.; Xiang, G.; Wang, G.; Luo, L.; Shi, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. LncRNA H19 secreted by umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells through microRNA-29a-3p/FOS axis for central sensitization of pain in advanced osteoarthritis. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar]
  92. Li, J.; Ding, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Yu, H.; Liu, A.; Miao, J.; Chen, S.; Wu, T.; et al. BMSCs-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Pain Via Abrogation of Aberrant Nerve Invasion in Subchondral Bone in Lumbar Facet Joint Osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Res. Off. Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2020, 38, 670–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, R.; Xu, B. TGFβ1-modified MSC-derived exosome attenuates osteoarthritis by inhibiting PDGF-BB secretion and H-type vessel activity in the subchondral bone. Acta Histochem. 2022, 124, 151933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, C.; Chen, J.Y.; Peng, W.M.; Yuan, B.; Bi, Q.; Xu, Y.J. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells promote chondrogenesis and suppress inflammation by upregulating miR-145 and miR-221. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 1881–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jin, Z.; Ren, J.; Qi, S. Human bone mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes overexpressing microRNA-26a-5p alleviate osteoarthritis via down-regulation of PTGS2. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 78, 105946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kim, M.; Shin, D.I.; Choi, B.H.; Min, B.H. Exosomes from IL-1β-Primed Mesenchymal Stem Cells Inhibited IL-1β- and TNF-α-Mediated Inflammatory Responses in Osteoarthritic SW982 Cells. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2021, 18, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhang, J.; Rong, Y.; Luo, C.; Cui, W. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes prevent osteoarthritis by regulating synovial macrophage polarization. Aging 2020, 12, 25138–25152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liang, C.; Wu, S.; Xia, G.; Huang, J.; Wen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Cao, X. Engineered M2a macrophages for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Front. Immunol. FRONT IMMUNOL 2022, 13, 1054938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Foo, J.B.; Looi, Q.H.; How, C.W.; Lee, S.H.; Al-Masawa, M.E.; Chong, P.P.; Law, J.X. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes and MicroRNAs in Cartilage Regeneration: Biogenesis, Efficacy, miRNA Enrichment and Delivery. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yao, Q.; Wu, X.; Tao, C.; Gong, W.; Chen, M.; Qu, M.; Zhong, Y.; He, T.; Chen, S.; Xiao, G. Osteoarthritis: Pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Xu, H.; Xu, B. BMSC-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Osteoarthritis by Inhibiting Pyroptosis of Cartilage via Delivering miR-326 Targeting HDAC3 and STAT1//NF-κB p65 to Chondrocytes. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 9972805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Qiu, B.; Xu, X.; Yi, P.; Hao, Y. Curcumin reinforces MSC-derived exosomes in attenuating osteoarthritis via modulating the miR-124/NF-kB and miR-143/ROCK1/TLR9 signalling pathways. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 10855–10865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dong, J.; Li, L.; Fang, X.; Zang, M. Exosome-Encapsulated microRNA-127-3p Released from Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviates Osteoarthritis Through Regulating CDH11-Mediated Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. J. Pain Res. 2021, 14, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kong, R.; Gao, J.; Zhang, J.; Ji, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, D. Synovial mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-320c enhances chondrogenesis by targeting ADAM19. Future Med. Chem. 2022, 14, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kong, R.; Zhang, J.; Ji, L.; Yu, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhao, D. Synovial mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-320c facilitates cartilage damage repair by targeting ADAM19-dependent Wnt signalling in osteoarthritis rats. Inflammopharmacology 2023, 31, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bridges, M.C.; Daulagala, A.C.; Kourtidis, A. LNCcation: lncRNA localization and function. J. Cell Biol. 2021, 220, e202009045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Xie, F.; Liu, Y.L.; Chen, X.Y.; Li, Q.; Zhong, J.; Dai, B.Y.; Shao, X.F.; Wu, G.B. Role of MicroRNA, LncRNA, and Exosomes in the Progression of Osteoarthritis: A Review of Recent Literature. Orthop. Surg. 2020, 12, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ali, S.A.; Peffers, M.J.; Ormseth, M.J.; Jurisica, I.; Kapoor, M. The non-coding RNA interactome in joint health and disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2021, 17, 692–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liu, Z.; Cao, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Yan, T.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, S. Knockdown of circ-PRKCH alleviates IL-1β-treated chondrocyte cell phenotypic changes through modulating miR-502-5p/ADAMTS5 axis. Autoimmunity 2022, 55, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, T.S.; Arslan, F.; Yin, Y.; Tan, S.S.; Lai, R.C.; Choo, A.B.; Padmanabhan, J.; Lee, C.N.; de Kleijn, D.P.; Lim, S.K. Enabling a robust scalable manufacturing process for therapeutic exosomes through oncogenic immortalization of human ESC-derived MSCs. J. Transl. Med. 2011, 9, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Piñeiro-Ramil, M.; Castro-Viñuelas, R.; Sanjurjo-Rodríguez, C.; Rodríguez-Fernández, S.; Hermida-Gómez, T.; Blanco-García, F.J.; Fuentes-Boquete, I.; Díaz-Prado, S. Immortalizing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Aged Donors While Keeping Their Essential Features. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 5726947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Albanese, M.; Chen, Y.A.; Hüls, C.; Gärtner, K.; Tagawa, T.; Mejias-Perez, E.; Keppler, O.T.; Göbel, C.; Zeidler, R.; Shein, M.; et al. MicroRNAs are minor constituents of extracellular vesicles that are rarely delivered to target cells. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Chevillet, J.R.; Kang, Q.; Ruf, I.K.; Briggs, H.A.; Vojtech, L.N.; Hughes, S.M.; Cheng, H.H.; Arroyo, J.D.; Meredith, E.K.; Gallichotte, E.N.; et al. Quantitative and stoichiometric analysis of the microRNA content of exosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 14888–14893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Roefs, M.T.; Bauzá-Martinez, J.; van de Wakker, S.I.; Qin, J.; Olijve, W.T.; Tuinte, R.; Rozeboom, M.; Snijders Blok, C.; Mol, E.A.; Wu, W.; et al. Cardiac progenitor cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote angiogenesis through both associated- and co-isolated proteins. Commun. Biol. 2023, 6, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Yin, B.; Ni, J.; Witherel, C.E.; Yang, M.; Burdick, J.A.; Wen, C.; Wong, S.H.D. Harnessing Tissue-derived Extracellular Vesicles for Osteoarthritis Theranostics. Theranostics 2022, 12, 207–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Simonsen, J.B. What Are We Looking At? Extracellular Vesicles, Lipoproteins, or Both? Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 920–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vickers, K.C.; Palmisano, B.T.; Shoucri, B.M.; Shamburek, R.D.; Remaley, A.T. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Witwer, K.W.; Halushka, M.K. Toward the promise of microRNAs - Enhancing reproducibility and rigor in microRNA research. RNA Biol. 2016, 13, 1103–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mayya, V.K.; Duchaine, T.F. On the availability of microRNA-induced silencing complexes, saturation of microRNA-binding sites and stoichiometry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 7556–7565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 13 01606 g001
Figure 1. Pathogenic sEVs and therapeutic sEVs in OA. In OA joints, osteoblasts (①), osteoclasts (②), vascular endothelial cells (③), synovial fibroblasts and macrophages (④) secrete (black arrow) sEVs (red) that act on the cartilage and produce pathogenic effects (red arrow). Healthy human chondrocytes, MSCs and rat MSCs (⑤) can secrete sEVs (green) that act on the cartilage, synovium and subchondral bone and produce therapeutic effects (green arrow).
Figure 1. Pathogenic sEVs and therapeutic sEVs in OA. In OA joints, osteoblasts (①), osteoclasts (②), vascular endothelial cells (③), synovial fibroblasts and macrophages (④) secrete (black arrow) sEVs (red) that act on the cartilage and produce pathogenic effects (red arrow). Healthy human chondrocytes, MSCs and rat MSCs (⑤) can secrete sEVs (green) that act on the cartilage, synovium and subchondral bone and produce therapeutic effects (green arrow).
Biomolecules 13 01606 g001
Biomolecules 13 01606 g002
Figure 2. Mechanism of sEVs cargoes.
Figure 2. Mechanism of sEVs cargoes.
Biomolecules 13 01606 g002
Table 2. LncRNAs of mechanistic importance in OA.
Table 2. LncRNAs of mechanistic importance in OA.
LncRNAOrigin of sEVMechanismEffectsSpeciesRef.
KLF3-AS1human MSCsSponges miR- 206, which negatively regulates GIT1Increases proliferation and reduces apoptosis, hypertrophy (decreases MMP13, Runx2) in OA chondrocytes, and increases secretion in OA ECM (increases COL2A1, ACAN)mouse[63]
PCGEM1human SFBsSponges miR-142-5p, which negatively regulates RUNX2Increases apoptosis in OA chondrocytes; increases degradation in OA ECM (increases MMP13; decreases ACAN, COL2A1)human[59]
PVT1human CCsSponges miR-93-5p, which negatively regulates HMGB1 and then negatively regulates TLR4 to inhibit NF-κB signaling pathwayIncreases apoptosis (increases Bax and cleaved caspase-3; decreases Bcl-2), inflammation responses (increases IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) and reduces viability in OA chondrocytes; increases collagen degradation in OA ECM(increases MMP13; decreases ACAN)human[58]
MEG-3human BM-MSCsMay involve miR-206/GIT1, miR-92a-3p/Wnt5a, miR-93/TGFBR2, miR-16/SMAD7 axisReduces senescence and apoptosis in OA chondrocytesrat[19]
H19human UC-MSCsSponges miR-29a-3p, which negatively regulates FOSReduces pain and central sensitization in advanced OArat[91]
human UC-MSCsSponges miR-29a-3p, which negatively regulates FOXO3Increases migration and reduces senescence and apoptosis in OA chondrocytes; increases secretion in OA ECM (increases COL2A1, ACAN)human/rat[68]
rat SFBsSponges miR-106b-5p, which negatively regulates TIMP2Increases proliferation and migration in OA chondrocytes; reduces degeneration in OA cartilage (increases COL2A1, ACAN; decreases MMP13, ADAMTS5)human[50]
Table 3. CircRNAs of mechanistic importance in OA.
Table 3. CircRNAs of mechanistic importance in OA.
CircRNAOrigin of sEVMechanismEffectsSpeciesRef.
circ_0001236human BM-MSCsSponges miR-3677-3p, which
negatively regulates Sox9		Regulates degradation and repair in OA ECM (increases COL2A1 and SOX9; decreases MMP13)mouse[82]
circ_0001846human CCsSponges miR-149-5p, which
negatively regulates WNT5B		Reduces cell viability, invasion and migration, and increases apoptosis, inflammatory cytokines production in OA chondrocytes; and increases degradation in ECMhuman[56]
circBRWD1human CCsSponges miR-1277, which
negatively regulates TRAF6		Reduces cell viability and proliferation and increases apoptosis (increases Bax; decreases CyclinD1), inflammation (increases IL-6, IL-8) and ECM degradation (increases MMP13; decreases ACAN) in OA chondrocyteshuman[55]
circCDK14human CCsSponges miR-1183, which
negatively regulates KLF5		Increases proliferation, and reduces apoptosis in OA chondrocytes; reduces degradation in OA ECMhuman[57]
circPRKCHhuman CCsSponges miR-502-5p, which
negatively regulates ADAMTS5		Reduces proliferation, migration, and increases apoptosis, inflammatory response to promote phenotypic changes in OA chondrocyteshuman[109]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Bi, R.; Zhu, S. The Dual Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Joint Osteoarthritis: Their Global and Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Molecule-Based Pathogenic and Therapeutic Effects. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111606

AMA Style

Li Z, Bi R, Zhu S. The Dual Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Joint Osteoarthritis: Their Global and Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Molecule-Based Pathogenic and Therapeutic Effects. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(11):1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhi, Ruiye Bi, and Songsong Zhu. 2023. "The Dual Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Joint Osteoarthritis: Their Global and Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Molecule-Based Pathogenic and Therapeutic Effects" Biomolecules 13, no. 11: 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111606

APA Style

Li, Z., Bi, R., & Zhu, S. (2023). The Dual Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Joint Osteoarthritis: Their Global and Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Molecule-Based Pathogenic and Therapeutic Effects. Biomolecules, 13(11), 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop