Next Article in Journal
Overview of the Circadian Clock in the Hair Follicle Cycle
Next Article in Special Issue
Improvement of the Physicochemical Limitations of Rhapontigenin, a Cytotoxic Analogue of Resveratrol against Colon Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Natural Epigenetic Therapies in 3D Ovarian Cancer and Patient-Derived Tumor Explants: New Avenues in Regulating the Cancer Secretome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Treatment Options for Neuroblastoma with Polyphenols through Anti-Proliferative and Apoptotic Mechanisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/biom13071067
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Systemic Photoprotection in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

by
Mariafrancesca Hyeraci
1,2,*,
Elena Sofia Papanikolau
1,
Marta Grimaldi
3,
Francesco Ricci
1,
Sabatino Pallotta
1,
Rosanna Monetta
1,
Ylenia Aura Minafò
1,
Giovanni Di Lella
1,
Giovanna Galdo
4,
Damiano Abeni
1,
Luca Fania
1 and
Elena Dellambra
1
1
IDI-IRCCS, Dermatological Research Hospital, Via dei Monti di Creta 104, 00167 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, 35131Padua, Italy
3
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
Dermatology Unit, AORN San Giuseppe Moscati, 83100 Avellino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(7), 1067; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071067
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 30 June 2023 / Published: 2 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Potential of Phytochemicals and Their Analogs against Cancer)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), which include basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and actinic keratosis (AK), are the most common cancer diseases in the Caucasian race. If diagnosed late and improperly treated, BCC and SCC can become locally advanced and metastasize. Malignant melanoma (MM) is less frequent but more lethal than NMSC. Given the individual and social burdens of skin cancers, performing an adequate prevention is needed. Ultraviolet (UV) ray exposure is one of the main risk factors for skin cancer. Thus, the first-choice prevention strategy is represented by photoprotection that can be both topical and systemic. The latter consists of the oral administration of molecules which protect human skin against the damaging effects of UV rays, acting through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, or immunomodulator mechanisms. Although several compounds are commonly used for photoprotection, only a few molecules have demonstrated their effectiveness in clinical trials and have been included in international guidelines for NMSC prevention (i.e., nicotinamide and retinoids). Moreover, none of them have been demonstrated as able to prevent MM. Clinical and preclinical data regarding the most common compounds used for systemic photoprotection are reported in this review, with a focus on the main mechanisms involved in their photoprotective properties.

1. Introduction

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) account for approximately 20% of all malignancies and their incidence is steadily increasing [1,2]. These tumors consist of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and actinic keratosis (AK). The reported frequency of NMSCs is underestimated because they are often not recorded in national registries and their incidence is much higher than that of malignant melanoma (MM). BCC is the most frequent carcinoma in the Caucasian race and the estimated BCC/SCC ratio is about 2.5:1 in the general population [3]. Notably, this ratio is reversed in organ transplant patients [4]. In Italy, the reported incidence of NMSCs is approximately 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year, which clearly underestimates the true incidence of these tumors [4,5,6]. Both BCC and SCC, if diagnosed early and correctly treated, are completely cured in most cases; however, they can become locally advanced, and mainly SCC can metastasize, generally in proximal lymph nodes [2,7]. AKs are keratinocyte neoplasms generally occurring on photo-exposed damaged areas; if untreated, they may evolve into SCCs [2].
MM accounts for <5% of total diagnosed skin cancers, but it accounts for most deaths due to skin cancer. On average, in the United States, one person every hour dies from MM. Depending on histological and clinical features, MM can be classified in three major groups: superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), nodular melanoma (NMM), and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) [8].
Although both MM and NMSC are considered multi-factorial diseases, prolonged and unprotected natural exposure ultraviolet (UV) rays or UV lamps are recognized as the main causes of skin cancer. In fact, NMSCs usually occur on chronically exposed skin areas such as the head and neck region, and the dorsum of the hands and the trunk, generally in patients who perform outdoor work or hobbies (e.g., farmers, sailors, etc.). The risk of developing these tumors is significantly increased for people with fair skin [2,7]. Several types of MM, e.g., lentigo maligna melanoma, are recognized as related to prolonged UV photo-exposure. However, acute and chronic sun exposure is a risk factor also for superficial spreading melanoma and nodular melanoma.
Due to their high incidence, skin cancers represent a significant burden for the National Health System. Although these cancers have a high healing rate if detected early and well-treated, given their individual and collective burden it is imperative to perform adequate prevention [2,7]. Besides avoiding or reducing UV exposure, the first-line prevention strategy for MM and NMSCs is represented by photoprotection, which can be topical or systemic. Topical photoprotection consists of the use of sunscreens applied to the skin. Although fundamental, this approach presents some drawbacks, such as a short half-life, low patient compliance in the correct use of sunscreens, low systemic efficacy, and risk of contact dermatitis, even if this occurrence is very rare [9].
Systemic photoprotection consists of the oral administration of specific substances with photoprotective and anti-photocarcinogenic properties, such as nicotinamide, vitamins, minerals, polyphenols, carotenoids, and other antioxidants. These substances increase the natural protection of the body against the damaging effects of UV light and prevent carcinogenesis and photo-induced aging [9,10,11]. The photoprotectors act through many different mechanisms, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, or immunomodulator mechanisms [9,10,12]. Indeed, UV light induces DNA damage, increased oxidative stress, and immunosuppression of the skin [12,13,14]. Systemic photoprotection must be always accompanied by the topical one because of the higher efficacy of the latter.
The aim of this review is to summarize the state of the art of knowledge about systemic photoprotection focused on MM and NMSC prevention.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search

This review was prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We systematically searched peer-reviewed original articles published in English in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. No restriction in terms of time have been set retrospectively. The last search was performed on 21 December 2022. To perform the literature analysis, we combined the terms: “Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer*”, “Melanoma”, or “chemoprevention”, with the terms: “Vitamin D”, “Nicotinamide”, “Polypodium”, “Retinol”, “Retinoids”, “Carotenoids”, or “Celecoxib” using the Boolean connector “and” (i.e., (Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer*) AND (Vitamin D)). Secondly, we assessed the abstracts of all potentially pertinent articles to check if they met the eligibility criteria.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

In this review we included all the cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies concerning the use of the indicated drugs in skin cancer treatment. We also included preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies performed using the indicated drugs for the treatment of skin cells or animal models suitable for skin cancer study. The databases selected to perform this work did not report grey literature; for this reason, unpublished studies were not included in this review. The data found in conference papers or abstract books have not been reported as well, because these are usually reported later in published articles.

3. Vitamin D

Vitamin D (vit D) is a fat-soluble vitamin that exists in two natural forms: ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin D3). The main natural source of this vitamin is the synthesis of cholecalciferol in the lower layers of the epidermis through a chemical reaction dependent on UVB radiation exposure. Ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol can also be taken from some foods (e.g., fish, dairy products, and cereal products) and dietary supplements. Vit D from skin synthesis or from diet is biologically inactive and is converted into the active form by two hydroxylation steps in the liver (25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and in the kidney (1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 or 1,25-(OH)2D3). Vit D has a significant role in calcium homeostasis and regulates the calcium and phosphorous levels in the blood [15].
Preclinical studies showed that the active form of vit D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) suppressed the growth of MM and cutaneous carcinoma cells both in in vitro cultures and in animal models modulating the expression of cell cycle regulators (Figure 1) [16]. The 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 protected the keratinocytes from UV radiation-induced apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) formation [17,18]. Although experimental studies indicated that vit D may have a protective effect on skin cancer risk, epidemiological studies investigating the influence on skin cancer risk of 25(OH) vit D serum level, a biomarker of vit D status, obtained conflicting results. Most studies reported a positive association between 25(OH) vit D levels and skin cancer risk [19,20]. Vojdeman et al. enrolled 217.244 individuals with a median vit D level of 46 nmol/L (IQR 27–67 nmol/L) and they identified significant positive associations between levels of 25(OH) vit D and both MM and NMSCs [21]. In a case-control study, patients with a recent diagnosis of NMSC had significantly higher mean serum levels of 25(OH) vit D, even if most patients (65.9%) had a vit D deficiency (25(OH) vit D < 30 ng/mL). However, no association was found between histological type, time from diagnosis, or a previous skin tumor history and circulating 25(OH)D levels [22]. Some studies referred to an inverse [23,24] or no association between 25(OH) vit D levels and skin cancer risk [25,26]. Significantly reduced serum levels of 25(OH) vit D were found in stage IV MM patients as compared to those at stage I. Moreover, patients with the lowest 25(OH) vit D serum levels (<10 ng/mL) developed earlier distant metastasis, suggesting a possible role of its levels in the pathogenesis and progression of MM [27]. However, a meta-analysis of 20 studies found no association between the serum levels of 25(OH) vit D and the risk of MM or NMSC [28].
Moreover, the clinical studies concerning the associations between dietary vit D and the risk of skin cancer yielded inconsistent results [29,30]. Indeed, some studies suggested that a high intake of dietary vit D may protect against skin cancer development [24,31], whereas other studies observed no statistically significant association [32]. A randomized controlled trial involving 36.282 participants evaluated the impact of daily calcium (1000 mg) and vit D3 (400 IU) on the incidence of NMSC and MM over a 7-year period. The results of the study showed that calcium and vit D intake had no effect on the incidence of MM and NMSCs. However, in women with a clinical history of NMSC, this supplementation reduced MM risk, suggesting a potential chemopreventive role for calcium and vit D administration in this high-risk group [33]. Although rare, toxicity may occur following vit D intake. Symptoms are related to hypercalcemia and are observed after intake of excessively high doses of vit D (50,000–2,604,000 IU/day). No side effects were reported in the studies described, because vit D intake was contained within the recommended limits [34].
A recent systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies indicated that the circulating level of 25(OH) vit D was associated with higher risks of MM and NMSC. On the contrary, dietary, supplemental, and total intakes of vit D were not associated with MM and SCC risks. However, vit D intake was associated with a slightly increased BCC risk [35].
The results described here are summarized in Table 1.

4. Nicotinamide

Nicotinamide (or niacinamide, NAM) and Nicotinic acid (or niacin, NA) are two forms of vitamin B3, a water-soluble vitamin. NAM and NA represent the two main precursors of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), a key enzymatic cofactor for cellular energy [36]. However, these two molecules act on distinct metabolic pathways and have different pharmacological activities.
Intracellular NAD acts as a cofactor regulating the oxidative/reductive activity of approximately 500 enzymes involved in cellular metabolism. NAD mediates electron transfer by oscillating between its oxidized (NAD+) and reduced (NADH) states [37]. However, NAD+ also acts as a substrate for several enzymes including Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) (Figure 1). Importantly, PARP is a nuclear enzyme that is activated in response to DNA damage to promote and coordinate DNA repair processes [38].
DNA photodamage and UV-induced immune suppression have a key role in the development of MM as well as NMSC. NAM displayed photoprotective properties in vitro and in vivo as it prevented UV-induced ATP depletion (Figure 1), restoring cellular energy and enhancing DNA repair activity in keratinocytes. Moreover, NAM modulates inflammatory cytokine production. When topically or orally administered, NAM prevented the immune suppressive effects of UV radiation and modulated the skin barrier function in mouse models [10,39]. A preclinical study showed the anti-MM activity of NAM both in vitro and in vivo [40].
Patients with a history of skin cancer are more susceptible to UV-immunosuppression. Interestingly, administration of oral NAM at doses from 500 mg once daily to 500 mg twice daily for 7 days was effective in reducing UV immunosuppression in placebo-controlled studies [41]. The incidence of NMSC increased 50–80-fold and that of MM was twice more frequent in chronically immune-suppressed transplant recipients. The results of two studies in a small number of transplant patients suggest that NAM administration may contribute to a substantial decrease in the size and number of AKs compared with a placebo [42,43].
Two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trials evaluated the effects of oral NAM at doses of 500 mg twice daily and 500 mg once daily in patients with high AK predisposition. After 4 months of treatment, NAM was able to significantly reduce AK recurrence and this reduction was greater in patients treated with NAM 500 mg twice daily (35%) than in patients treated with 500 mg/day (29%) [44].
A phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of the oral intake of NAM at 1 g/day for 12 months in patients at high risk for NMSC. The study showed a 23% rate reduction of new NMSC in patients receiving NAM. However, there is no evidence of benefits after the 6-month discontinuation of NAM administration [45]. No difference in MM chemoprevention was observed with NAM administration compared to the control. However, the not eligible criteria excluded patients with a history of melanoma over the last 5 years, since the trial was designed to study the efficacy in NMSCs. Therefore, larger phase 3 studies could be performed to assess the safety and efficacy of NAM chemoprevention in patients at high MM risk.
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that NAM was associated with a significant reduction in BCCs and SCCs, and increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects (i.e., diarrhea) in high-risk skin cancer patients or organ transplant recipients [46].
Nicotinamide toxicity has been reported at doses greater than 3.5 g/day [47]. In Europe, the recommended upper limit of nicotinamide is 900 mg/day, whereas for niacin it is 54 mg/day [46].
Nicotinamide was mentioned in the NCCN Guidelines for the prevention of NMSC in high-risk patients (NCCN Guidelines for Patients Squamous Cell Skin Cancer). In detail, it is reported as an agent which may prevent recurrence and/or spreading of SCC to distant sites in high-risk patients [48].
As regards the potential effectiveness of nicotinamide in the prevention of MM, results reported in an interesting preclinical study suggested anti-melanoma activity both in vitro and in vivo even if at high doses (above 20 mM), giving the basis for further future investigations on a potential role for nicotinamide in MM management [40]. Nevertheless, no significant evidence of effectiveness of nicotinamide in prevention of MM was highlighted by any clinical study, as reported in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis [46].
The results described here are summarized in Table 1.

5. Polypodium leucotomos

Polypodium leucotomos (PL) is a tropical species of fern from South and Central America, where it has been used in traditional medicine as a therapeutic agent for psoriasis [49,50]. PL extract (PLE) obtained from the leaves of the fern has a high phenolic content (benzoates and cinnamates). Several in vitro studies were carried out to test the direct antioxidant and photoprotective effects of PLE (Figure 1) [51,52,53,54]. A group of researchers found that PLE has a protective effect on a human keratinocytes cell line (HaCaT), preventing both the cytotoxic damage and apoptosis induced by UV exposure [55], as well as inhibiting Nitric Oxide (NO) and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNFα) production and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) upregulation after UV-exposure [53].
Several studies about PLE were performed on healthy human volunteers. In 1996, Gonzalez S et al. reported a significant reduction in UV-induced erythema, compared to the control group, in individuals pre-treated with the topical application of PLE, suggesting an interesting PLE photoprotective activity [52]. Moreover, a significant reduction in CPDs (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers), sunburns, and proliferating cells, compared to the control group, was detected in specimens from persons receiving oral administrations of PLE [56]. In 2015, a clinical trial was carried out to test the efficacy of PLE for the treatment of AKs: 34 bald men with at least two AKs on the scalp were enrolled and divided into two groups. All participants underwent two sessions (one per week) of methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) photodynamic therapy (PDT), and one group also received oral supplementation with PLE one week after the PDT session. Results showed that PLE improved the effects of PDT on AKs and reduced AK recurrence [57]. Additional studies evaluated the role of PLE in specific dermatoses and/or skin conditions. Two studies showed subjective improvement in idiopathic photodermatoses after two weeks of treatment with PLE [58,59] while the use of PLE in melasma yielded mixed results [60,61].
Although the possible mechanisms of action of PLE have not yet been fully elucidated, these studies indicate that PLE may be a useful addition to photoprotection; however, to date there are no clinical trials confirming its role in chemoprevention.
The results described here are summarized in Table 1.

6. Retinol and Retinoids

Retinol and retinoids are natural forms or synthetic derivatives (i.e., acitretin, isotretinoin, etretinate) of vitamin A that exert a key role in the regulation of many important biological processes. In particular, retinoids regulate epithelial maturation, cellular differentiation and proliferation, growth arrest, and apoptosis by activating nuclear retinoid receptors (RAR or RXR), which work as ligand-dependent transcriptional factors. The interaction with the retinoid leads to the formation of a complex (RARE) between the RAR/RXR heterodimer and the ligand (Figure 1) [62].
Retinoids were used for the chemoprevention of some cancers, i.e., bladder cancer and second malignancies in the liver and in the breast, with promising results [63,64].
Retinoids were mentioned in the NCCN Guidelines for the prevention of NMSCs in patients with a high risk of developing NMSCs. In particular, oral administration of acitretin or isotretinoin is reported as a useful agent in chemoprevention of SCC in patients who develop AK easily [48]. Retinoids were evaluated in prospective studies in patients with a high risk of NMSCs, including organ transplant recipients [65,66,67,68,69,70], patients affected by xeroderma pigmentosum [71], or psoriatic patients treated with PUVA therapy (psoralen plus UV-A) [72]. The results of these studies indicated that the oral administration of acitretin [65,66,67,69], etretinate [68], or isotretinoin [71], was able to significantly reduce the incidence of new NMSCs compared to placebos in patients with high risk for multiple neoplastic lesions [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. However, the efficacy of oral retinoids in patients with a moderate risk of developing NMSCs appeared less convincing. Only one randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with ten or more previous AKs (at least one AKs in the past year) but no more than two SCCs/BCCs. Results showed a reduction in the risk of developing additional SCCs but not BCCs in patients who had taken oral retinol compared with a placebo [73]. Nevertheless, the scarce available literature is insufficient to fully understand the possible usefulness of retinoids in these patients.
It has to be recognized that side effects associated with oral retinoids may be significant. The most common adverse events reported in the literature are cheilitis, dryness and excessive peeling of the skin, and hair disorders [65]. Less frequent side effects include, among others, headache, epistaxis, hepatic and lipid changes, osteoporosis, calcification of the ligaments, and neurological disorders [66,71,74]. Notably, in a large, randomized trial that was carried out on subjects with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer, the use of isotretinoin has been related to increased mortality [75]. To limit these adverse effects, one study evaluated topical administration of treinoin 0.1% compared with a control vehicle in patients at risk of developing NMSCs. However, no significant difference among the treatment arms for the development of new invasive or in situ SCC, BCC, or AKs was observed [76].
Although several studies have provided results supporting the effectiveness of retinoids in the prevention of NMSCs, at least for high-risk patients, there is scarce evidence regarding their usefulness for MM prevention. The sole clinical trial available in the literature was carried out in 1994 by Halper et al. to evaluate the effects of the topical application of 0.1% tretinoin. The obtained results suggested a histological improvement in dysplastic nevi, potential precursors of MM [77]. Nevertheless, no further study was performed to test the effect of systemic administration of retinoids in chemoprevention of MM.
The results described here are summarized in Table 1.

7. Carotenoids

Carotenoids are molecules with antioxidant and quenching properties arising from the presence of a long-chain polyene structure and are present in all green plants. The greater the number of conjugated double bonds, the higher the quenching power of the molecule [78]. Depending on their polarity, carotenoids can be classified as carotenes (i.e., α-, β- carotene, lycopene) and xanthophylls, more polar because of the presence in the structure of hydroxy- or keto- functional groups (i.e., lutein and astaxanthin) [79].
The eligibility of carotenoids to be used in photoprotection arises from their antioxidant and quenching properties (Figure 1) and from the knowledge of their mechanisms of action: they can activate the antioxidant response element transcription system [80] and upregulate gap junctional cell–cell communication by modulating connexin gene expression [81]. The effects of carotenoids on gene expression have been explained as the result of the interaction between the metabolites of carotenoids (mainly retinoic acid) [82] with both the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoic X receptor (RXR) [83,84].
The effectiveness of carotenoids in oral photoprotection was evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, which demonstrated the photoprotective capacity of Nutrilite™ Multi Carotene, a mixture of carotenoids. In particular, the oral intake of such a mixture exerted a protective effect on human skin against both UVA and UVB radiation by increasing the minimal persistent pigmentation dose and the minimal erythemal dose [85].
Among carotenes, β-carotene showed effectiveness in systemic photoprotection in patients affected by erythropoietic protoporphyria and with higher photosensitivity in comparison to healthy individuals [86]. In 1975, the FDA approved its use in the management of photosensitivity in patients affected by erythropoietic protoporphyria. Important limits of using β-carotene for systemic photoprotection are related to its safety profile. Indeed, its administration for long treatment periods (>10 weeks) and at high doses (>12 mg/day), required the exertion of significant therapeutic effects, and had deleterious effects on high-risk patients for lung cancer [87].
As regards the potential use of β-carotene for chemoprevention of both MM and NMSC, some encouraging preclinical results were obtained. In particular, Guruvayoorappan et al., indicated the ability of β-carotene to downregulate in a MM cell line the expression of TNF-α, a tumor growth factor, and iNOS, which synthesizes Nitric Oxide, a mediator of vasodilatation [88]. Despite this in vitro study, no clinical study has reported on the significant effectiveness of carotene for prevention of NMSCs or MM [89].
Among polar carotenoids, astaxanthin is the molecule characterized by the highest antioxidant capacity. It is one of the most common among xanthophylls, and it is mainly found in crustaceans and Salmonidae. Astaxanthin has both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties as its structure contains both hydrophilic functional groups and conjugated double bonds. These chemical features provide this molecule with the ability to scavenge free oxygen radicals both from the cell surface and from the phospholipidic bilayer of the cell membrane (Figure 1) [90]. The antioxidant power of astaxanthin does not arise only from its scavenger activity, but also from its ability to modulate the expression of enzymes involved in ROS metabolism. Indeed, increased levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) were detected in irradiated cells, pre-treated with astaxanthin. Nrf2 binds the promoter regions of antioxidative enzymes as glutathione peroxidase 1, catalase, HEME oxygenase-1, and superoxide dismutase 2 [91,92].
Such observed antioxidant properties prompted researchers to further investigate the effects of astaxanthin on humans with a main focus on its eventual photoprotective effect, being the oxidative stress one of the main mechanisms involved in UV-induced skin damage [93]. In particular, the authors of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that dietary supplementation with astaxanthin enhanced the minimal erythemal dose and reduced the dryness caused by UV rays in healthy human skin [94].
Furthermore, astaxanthin was shown to act specifically on biological targets involved in tumor progression. In particular, some in vitro studies indicated that astaxanthin exerted an antiproliferative effect on tumor cell lines by regulating the expression of NF-kB, a family of transcription factors of several genes, such as growth factors and genes involved in inflammation [95] and by inhibiting key events in the JAK-2/STAT-3-signaling cascade [96]. Despite these encouraging preclinical and clinical results, no effectiveness of astaxanthin in the prevention or the management of NMSCs and MM has been actually highlighted in clinical trials.
The results described here are summarized in Table 1.

8. Celecoxib

Celecoxib is an anti-inflammatory drug approved for the temporary relief of pain and the treatment of inflammation in patients affected by osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis [97]. Its well-known mechanism of action consists of the selective inhibition of isoform 2 of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme (Figure 1). The latter catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid (Ar Ac) into unstable prostaglandins G2 (PGG2), rapidly converted into PGH2, which undergo further reactions leading to PGE2 [98]. Although these molecules are mainly involved in the inflammation process, they can stimulate cell proliferation and motility, induce angiogenesis, and inhibit immune surveillance and apoptosis [99]. Interestingly, enhanced levels of COX2 have been found in both AK [100] and SCC [101]. Many growth factors, cytokines, and oncogenes induce the increase in COX2 expression. Moreover, wildtype p53, the well-known “guardian of the genome”, negatively regulates COX2 levels. On the contrary, mutant p53 is ineffective in this regard [102,103]. Therefore, targeting COX2 could result in carcinogenesis suppression. Several preclinical studies have been carried out in experimental animals. In particular, in 2001 Neufang et al. reported that transgenic mice overexpressing the gene of human COX2 in basal keratinocytes developed epidermal hyperplasia and dysplasia [104]. Furthermore, the treatment of mice with selective COX2 inhibitors resulted in a chemopreventive effect against UV-induced skin tumors [105]. Thus, clinical studies have been carried out to investigate the potential chemopreventive role of COX2 inhibitors. In particular, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial was performed by Elmets et al. in 2010 on 240 patients considered at high risk for NMSC, to test the efficacy of celecoxib in NMSC chemoprevention. Celecoxib was able to reduce the incidence of BCC and SCC but not AK [106]. Despite such encouraging efficacy of the data, some interesting evaluations regarding its safety profile are worthy reporting. As a COX2 inhibitor, it can be responsible for the appearance of important cardiovascular side effects (i.e., increased blood pressure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death) [107]. Despite its interesting chemopreventive properties, the risk/benefit balance does not allow mention of the drug in international guidelines for NMSC prevention.
As regards the potential effectiveness of celecoxib in the prevention of MM, a preclinical in vitro study reported its capacity to reduce colony formation and cell motility in a panel of melanoma cell lines, without exerting any antiproliferative effect [108]. No clinical studies focusing on the potential role of celecoxib in management of MM have been carried out.

9. Conclusions

Several studies reported the beneficial effects of certain molecules or vitamins utilized as systemic photoprotection for NMSC; however, only a few works reported their possible role in the prevention of MM.
To date, many of these compounds are utilized as supplements to reduce UV-induced erythema (i.e., astaxantin, caroitenoids, lycopene, or polypodium extract) but none of them has demonstrated a real efficacy in clinical trial for the chemoprevention of skin cancer.
The only drugs mentioned in international guidelines for the prevention of NMSC and utilized as chemoprevention for these tumors are retinoids (i.e., acitretin and isotretinoin) and nicotinamide. Retinoids are indicated only in high-risk patients to develop NMSC (i.e., organ transplant recipients, patients with xeroderma pigmentosum, or psoriatic patients treated with PUVA therapy) but they may cause severe side effects. On the other hand, oral nicotinamide has demonstrated a chemopreventative role for NMSC in several clinical trials without inducing significant side effects.
The chemoprevention role of some supplements or drugs regarding MM is still a matter of debate because the available literature does not support any positive conclusion.
Table
Table 1. This table summarizes the uses in skin protection, the study results, and the levels of evidence for vit D, NAM, PLE, acitretin, etretinate, isotretinoin, β-carotene, astaxanthin, and celecoxib.
Table 1. This table summarizes the uses in skin protection, the study results, and the levels of evidence for vit D, NAM, PLE, acitretin, etretinate, isotretinoin, β-carotene, astaxanthin, and celecoxib.
MoleculeUseDoseOutcomeSide EffectsLevel of Evidence 1Refs.
Vit DNMSC preventionHighly variableInsufficient data for conclusive considerationsNRIB[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]
MM prevention400 IU/dayNo effectivenessIB[28]
NAMUV-induced immunosuppression prevention0.5–1.5 g/daySignificant reduction of UV-induced immunosuppressionDiarrheaIB[41]
AK preventionReduction of AKs recurrence in at-risk subjects and decrease in number and size of AKsIB[42,43,44]
NMSC preventionReduction in the rate of occurrence of new NMSCIA[46,48]
MM preventionNRNo significant effectivenessIB[46]
PLEPhotoprotection480 mg/dayReduction in UV-induced erythemaNRIB[52]
AKs480–960 mg/dayImprovement of the clearance rate of scalp AKs in patients undergoing PDTIIA[57]
Idiopathic photodermatoses480 mg/daySubjective improvementIIB[58,59]
Melasma 480–720 mg/dayContrasting resultsIB[60,61]
AcitretinNMSC prevention15–50 mg/dayReduction of NMSC incidence in high-risk patientsDryness and peeling of the skin, hair disorders, headache, epistaxis, osteoporosis, calcification of ligaments, neurological disordersIB[48,65,66,67,69]
EtretinateSkin cancer prevention20 mg/dayReduction of skin cancer incidence in high-risk patientsIB[48,68]
IsotretinoinSkin cancer prevention150 mg/dayReduction of skin cancer incidence in high-risk patientsIB[48,71]
β-carotenePhotoprotection15–180 mg/dayImproved tolerance to sun light in patients affected by erythropoietic protoporphyriaIncreased incidence of lung cancer in high-risk patientsIB[86]
AstaxanthinPhotoprotection4 mg/dayIncreased minimal erythemal dose and reduced skin dryness after UV exposureNRIB[93]
CelecoxibAK prevention200 mg twice dailyNo effectIncreased blood pressure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular deathIB[106]
NMSC preventionReduction of BCC and SCC incidenceIB[106]
1 Levels of evidence are based on guidelines in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology: level IA indicates that evidence is derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; level IB indicates that evidence is derived from at least one randomized controlled trial; level IIA indicates that evidence is derived from at least one nonrandomized trial; level IIB indicates that evidence is derived from at least one other type of experimental study; level III data include evidence from non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and case-control studies; and level IV indicates that evidence is derived from reports or expert opinions, or the clinical experience of respected authorities, or both.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H., L.F. and E.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H., L.F., E.D., D.A. and E.S.P.; writing—review and editing, M.H., L.F., E.D., D.A., E.S.P., M.G., F.R., S.P., R.M., Y.A.M., G.D.L. and G.G.; funding acquisition, L.F., D.A. and E.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was in part supported by the “Progetti Ricerca Corrente—RC3.6 and 4.3 2022” and “RF-2016-02362541” of the Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available within the article.

Acknowledgments

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xiang, F.; Lucas, R.; Hales, S.; Neale, R. Incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in relation to ambient UV radiation in white populations, 1978–2012: Empirical relationships. JAMA Dermatol. 2014, 150, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Stratigos, A.; Garbe, C.; Lebbe, C.; Malvehy, J.; del Marmol, V.; Pehamberger, H.; Peris, K.; Becker, J.C.; Zalaudek, I.; Saiag, P.; et al. Diagnosis and treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur. J. Cancer 2015, 51, 1989–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Koh, D.; Wang, H.; Lee, J.; Chia, K.S.; Lee, H.P.; Goh, C.L. Basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma of the skin: Analysis of the Singapore Cancer Registry data 1968-97. Br. J. Dermatol. 2003, 148, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rogers, H.W.; Weinstock, M.A.; Feldman, S.R.; Coldiron, B.M. Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the US Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015, 151, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fania, L.; Didona, D.; Morese, R.; Campana, I.; Coco, V.; Di Pietro, F.R.; Ricci, F.; Pallotta, S.; Candi, E.; Abeni, D.; et al. Basal cell carcinoma: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fania, L.; Didona, D.; Di Pietro, F.R.; Verkhovskaia, S.; Morese, R.; Paolino, G.; Donati, M.; Ricci, F.; Coco, V.; Ricci, F.; et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peris, K.; Alaibac, M.; Argenziano, G.; Di Stefani, A.; Fargnoli, M.C.; Frascione, P.; Gualdi, G.; Longo, C.; Moscarella, E.; Naldi, L.; et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Italian Guidelines by SIDeMaST adapted to and updating EADO/EDF/EORTC guidelines. G. Ital. Di Dermatol. E Venereol. 2018, 153, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rastrelli, M.; Tropea, S.; Rossi, C.R.; Alaibac, M. Melanoma: Epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification. In Vivo 2014, 28, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Parrado, C.; Philips, N.; Gilaberte, Y.; Juarranz, A.; González, S. Oral Photoprotection: Effective Agents and Potential Candidates. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Damian, D.L. Nicotinamide for skin cancer chemoprevention. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2017, 58, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Snaidr, V.A.; Damian, D.L.; Halliday, G.M. Nicotinamide for photoprotection and skin cancer chemoprevention: A review of efficacy and safety. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Surjana, D.; Halliday, G.M.; Damian, D.L. Role of nicotinamide in DNA damage, mutagenesis, and DNA repair. J. Nucleic Acids 2010, 2010, 157591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Marionnet, C.; Pierrard, C.; Golebiewski, C.; Bernerd, F. Diversity of biological effects induced by longwave UVA rays (UVA1) in reconstructed skin. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bernerd, F.; Marionnet, C.; Duval, C. Solar ultraviolet radiation induces biological alterations in human skin in vitro: Relevance of a well-balanced UVA/UVB protection. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2012, 78, S15–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. El-Sharkawy, A.; Malki, A. Vitamin D Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Molecules 2020, 25, 3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Spath, L.; Ulivieri, A.; Lavra, L.; Fidanza, L.; Carlesimo, M.; Giubettini, M.; Narcisi, A.; Luciani, E.; Bucci, B.; Pisani, D.; et al. Antiproliferative Effects of 1α-OH-vitD3 in Malignant Melanoma: Potential Therapeutic implications. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gupta, R.; Dixon, K.M.; Deo, S.S.; Holliday, C.J.; Slater, M.; Halliday, G.M.; Reeve, V.E.; Mason, R.S. Photoprotection by 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 is associated with an increase in p53 and a decrease in nitric oxide products. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. De Haes, P.; Garmyn, M.; Verstuyf, A.; De Clercq, P.; Vandewalle, M.; Degreef, H.; Vantieghem, K.; Bouillon, R.; Segaert, S. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and analogues protect primary human keratinocytes against UVB-induced DNA damage. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2005, 78, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liang, G.; Nan, H.; Qureshi, A.A.; Han, J. Pre-diagnostic plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in women. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Van der Pols, J.C.; Russell, A.; Bauer, U.; Neale, R.E.; Kimlin, M.G.; Green, A.C. Vitamin D status and skin cancer risk independent of time outdoors: 11-year prospective study in an Australian community. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Vojdeman, F.J.; Madsen, C.M.; Frederiksen, K.; Durup, D.; Olsen, A.; Hansen, L.; Heegaard, A.M.; Lind, B.; Tjønneland, A.; Jørgensen, H.L.; et al. Vitamin D levels and cancer incidence in 217,244 individuals from primary health care in Denmark. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Soares, A.M.; Szejnfeld, V.L.; Enokihara, M.Y.; Michalany, N.; Castro, C.H. High serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in patients with a recent diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer: A case-control study. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2018, 28, 649–653. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Tang, J.Y.; Parimi, N.; Wu, A.; Boscardin, W.J.; Shikany, J.M.; Chren, M.M.; Cummings, S.R.; Epstein, E.H., Jr.; Bauer, D.C. Inverse association between serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels and non-melanoma skin cancer in elderly men. Cancer Causes Control 2010, 21, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Vinceti, M.; Malagoli, C.; Fiorentini, C.; Longo, C.; Crespi, C.M.; Albertini, G.; Ricci, C.; Lanzoni, A.; Reggiani, M.; Virgili, A.; et al. Inverse association between dietary vitamin D and risk of cutaneous melanoma in a northern Italy population. Nutr. Cancer 2011, 63, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Asgari, M.M.; Tang, J.; Warton, M.E.; Chren, M.M.; Quesenberry, C.P., Jr.; Bikle, D.; Horst, R.L.; Orentreich, N.; Vogelman, J.H.; Friedman, G.D. Association of prediagnostic serum vitamin D levels with the development of basal cell carcinoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 1438–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Eide, M.J.; Johnson, D.A.; Jacobsen, G.R.; Krajenta, R.J.; Rao, D.S.; Lim, H.W.; Johnson, C.C. Vitamin D and nonmelanoma skin cancer in a health maintenance organization cohort. Arch. Dermatol. 2011, 147, 1379–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nürnberg, B.; Gräber, S.; Gärtner, B.; Geisel, J.; Pföhler, C.; Schadendorf, D.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J. Reduced serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in stage IV melanoma patients. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 3669–3674. [Google Scholar]
  28. Caini, S.; Boniol, M.; Tosti, G.; Magi, S.; Medri, M.; Stanganelli, I.; Palli, D.; Assedi, M.; Marmol, V.D.; Gandini, S. Vitamin D and melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer risk and prognosis: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 2649–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gandini, S.; Raimondi, S.; Gnagnarella, P.; Doré, J.F.; Maisonneuve, P.; Testori, A. Vitamin D and skin cancer: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2009, 45, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, K.; Fung, T.T.; Nan, H. An Epidemiological Review of Diet and Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2018, 27, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Millen, A.E.; Tucker, M.A.; Hartge, P.; Halpern, A.; Elder, D.E.; Guerry, D., 4th; Holly, E.A.; Sagebiel, R.W.; Potischman, N. Diet and melanoma in a case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004, 13, 1042–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hunter, D.J.; Colditz, G.A.; Stampfer, M.J.; Rosner, B.; Willett, W.C.; Speizer, F.E. Diet and risk of basal cell carcinoma of the skin in a prospective cohort of women. Ann. Epidemiol. 1992, 2, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tang, J.Y.; Fu, T.; Leblanc, E.; Manson, J.E.; Feldman, D.; Linos, E.; Vitolins, M.Z.; Zeitouni, N.C.; Larson, J.; Stefanick, M.L. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancer: Post hoc analyses of the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 3078–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Galior, K.; Grebe, S.; Singh, R. Development of Vitamin D Toxicity from Overcorrection of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Review of Case Reports. Nutrients 2018, 10, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mahamat-Saleh, Y.; Aune, D.; Schlesinger, S. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D intake, and skin cancer risk: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, Y.; Sauve, A.A. NAD+ metabolism: Bioenergetics, signaling and manipulation for therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1864, 1787–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Verdin, E. NAD+ in aging, metabolism, and neurodegeneration. Science 2015, 350, 1208–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gibson, B.A.; Kraus, W.L. New insights into the molecular and cellular functions of poly(ADP-ribose) and PARPs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fania, L.; Mazzanti, C.; Campione, E.; Candi, E.; Abeni, D.; Dellambra, E. Role of Nicotinamide in Genomic Stability and Skin Cancer Chemoprevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Scatozza, F.; Moschella, F.; D’Arcangelo, D.; Rossi, S.; Tabolacci, C.; Giampietri, C.; Proietti, E.; Facchiano, F.; Facchiano, A. Nicotinamide inhibits melanoma in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yiasemides, E.; Sivapirabu, G.; Halliday, G.M.; Park, J.; Damian, D.L. Oral nicotinamide protects against ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression in humans. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Drago, F.; Ciccarese, G.; Cogorno, L.; Calvi, C.; Marsano, L.A.; Parodi, A. Prevention of non-melanoma skin cancers with nicotinamide in transplant recipients: A case-control study. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2017, 27, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, A.C.; Martin, A.J.; Dalziell, R.A.; McKenzie, C.A.; Lowe, P.M.; Eris, J.M.; Scolyer, R.A.; Dhillon, H.M.; Vardy, J.L.; Bielski, V.A.; et al. A phase II randomized controlled trial of nicotinamide for skin cancer chemoprevention in renal transplant recipients. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 175, 1073–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Surjana, D.; Halliday, G.M.; Martin, A.J.; Moloney, F.J.; Damian, D.L. Oral nicotinamide reduces actinic keratoses in phase II double-blinded randomized controlled trials. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1497–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Chen, A.C.; Martin, A.J.; Choy, B.; Fernández-Peñas, P.; Dalziell, R.A.; McKenzie, C.A.; Scolyer, R.A.; Dhillon, H.M.; Vardy, J.L.; Kricker, A.; et al. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Mainville, L.; Smilga, A.S.; Fortin, P.R. Effect of Nicotinamide in Skin Cancer and Actinic Keratoses Chemoprophylaxis, and Adverse Effects Related to Nicotinamide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2022, 26, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. European, Food SC on. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on the Tolerable Upper Intake Levels of Nicotinic Acid and Nicotinamide (Niacin). Exch. Organ. Behav. Teach. J. 2002, 20. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmults, C.D.; Blitzblau, R.; Aasi, S.Z.; Alam, M.; Andersen, J.S.; Baumann, B.C.; Bordeaux, J.; Chen, P.L.; Chin, R.; Contreras, C.M.; et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Squamous Cell Skin Cancer, Version 1.2022. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2021, 19, 1382–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Padilla, H.C.; Héctor, L.N.; Pacheco, J.A. A new agent [hydrophilic fraction of Polypodium Leucomotos] for management of psoriasis. Int. J. Dermatol. 1974, 13, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Berman, B.; Ellis, C.; Elmets, C. Polypodium Leucotomos—An Overview of Basic Investigative Findings. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2016, 15, 224–228. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gomes, A.J.; Lunardi, C.N.; Gonzalez, S.; Tedesco, A.C. The antioxidant action of Polypodium leucotomos extract and kojic acid: Reactions with reactive oxygen species. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2001, 34, 1487–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gonzalez, S.; Pathak, M.A. Inhibition of ultraviolet-induced formation of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, erythema and skin photosensitization by Polypodium leucotomos. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 1996, 12, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jańczyk, A.; Garcia-Lopez, M.A.; Fernandez-Peñas, P.; Alonso-Lebrero, J.L.; Benedicto, I.; López-Cabrera, M.; Gonzalez, S. A Polypodium leucotomos extract inhibits solar-simulated radiation-induced TNF-alpha and iNOS expression, transcriptional activation and apoptosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2007, 16, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zattra, E.; Coleman, C.; Arad, S.; Helms, E.; Levine, D.; Bord, E.; Guillaume, A.; El-Hajahmad, M.; Zwart, E.; van Steeg, H.; et al. Polypodium leucotomos extract decreases UV-induced Cox-2 expression and inflammation, enhances DNA repair, and decreases mutagenesis in hairless mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 1952–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Alonso-Lebrero, J.L.; Dominguez-Jimenez, C.; Tejedor, R.; Brieva, A.; Pivel, J.P. Photoprotective properties of a hydrophilic extract of the fern Polypodium leucotomos on human skin cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2003, 70, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Middelkamp-Hup, M.A.; Pathak, M.A.; Parrado, C.; Goukassian, D.; Rius-Díaz, F.; Mihm, M.C.; Fitzpatrick, T.B.; González, S. Oral Polypodium leucotomos extract decreases ultraviolet-induced damage of human skin. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2004, 51, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Auriemma, M.; Di Nicola, M.; Gonzalez, S.; Piaserico, S.; Capo, A.; Amerio, P. Polypodium leucotomos supplementation in the treatment of scalp actinic keratosis: Could it improve the efficacy of photodynamic therapy? Dermatol. Surg. 2015, 41, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Caccialanza, M.; Percivalle, S.; Piccinno, R.; Brambilla, R. Photoprotective activity of oral polypodium leucotomos extract in 25 patients with idiopathic photodermatoses. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2007, 23, 46–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Caccialanza, M.; Recalcati, S.; Piccinno, R. Oral polypodium leucotomos extract photoprotective activity in 57 patients with idiopathic photodermatoses. G. Ital. Di Dermatol. E Venereol. 2011, 146, 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ahmed, A.M.; Lopez, I.; Perese, F.; Vasquez, R.; Hynan, L.S.; Chong, B.; Pandya, A.G. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of oral Polypodium leucotomos extract as an adjunct to sunscreen in the treatment of melasma. JAMA Dermatol. 2013, 149, 981–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Goh, C.L.; Chuah, S.Y.; Tien, S.; Thng, G.; Vitale, M.A.; Delgado-Rubin, A. Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Polypodium Leucotomos Extract in the Treatment of Melasma in Asian Skin: A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 2018, 11, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  62. Amann, P.M.; Eichmüller, S.B.; Schmidt, J.; Bazhin, A.V. Regulation of gene expression by retinoids. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tratnjek, L.; Jeruc, J.; Romih, R.; Zupančič, D. Vitamin A and Retinoids in Bladder Cancer Chemoprevention and Treatment: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence, Challenges and Future Prospects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Freemantle, S.J.; Spinella, M.J.; Dmitrovsky, E. Retinoids in cancer therapy and chemoprevention: Promise meets resistance. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7305–7315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. de Sévaux, R.G.L.; Smit, J.V.; de Jong, E.M.G.J.; van de Kerkhof, P.C.M.; Hoitsma, A.J. Acitretin treatment of premalignant and malignant skin disorders in renal transplant recipients: Clinical effects of a randomized trial comparing two doses of acitretin. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2003, 49, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. George, R.; Weightman, W.; Russ, G.R.; Bannister, K.M.; Mathew, T.H. Acitretin for chemoprevention of non-melanoma skin cancers in renal transplant recipients. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2002, 43, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. McKenna, D.B.; Murphy, G.M. Skin cancer chemoprophylaxis in renal transplant recipients: 5 years of experience using low-dose acitretin. Br. J. Dermatol. 1999, 140, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gibson, G.E.; O’Grady, A.; Kay, E.W.; Murphy, G.M. Low-dose retinoid therapy for chemoprophylaxis of skin cancer in renal transplant recipients. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 1998, 10, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bavinck, J.N.; Tieben, L.M.; Van der Woude, F.J.; Tegzess, A.M.; Hermans, J.; Schegget, J.T.; Vermeer, B.J. Prevention of skin cancer and reduction of keratotic skin lesions during acitretin therapy in renal transplant recipients: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Oncol. 1995, 13, 1933–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shuttleworth, D.; Marks, R.; Griffin, P.J.; Salaman, J.R. Treatment of cutaneous neoplasia with etretinate in renal transplant recipients. QJM Int. J. Med. 1988, 68, 717–725. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kraemer, K.H.; DiGiovanna, J.J.; Moshell, A.N.; Tarone, R.E.; Peck, G.L. Prevention of skin cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum with the use of oral isotretinoin. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 318, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nijsten, T.E.C.; Stern, R.S. Oral retinoid use reduces cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma risk in patients with psoriasis treated with psoralen-UVA: A nested cohort study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2003, 49, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Moon, T.E.; Levine, N.; Cartmel, B.; Bangert, J.L.; Rodney, S.; Dong, Q.; Peng, Y.M.; Alberts, D.S. Effect of retinol in preventing squamous cell skin cancer in moderate-risk subjects: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Southwest Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1997, 6, 949–956. [Google Scholar]
  74. Meyskens, F.L.; Gilmartin, E.; Alberts, D.S.; Levine, N.S.; Brooks, R.; Salmon, S.E.; Surwit, E.A. Activity of isotretinoin against squamous cell cancers and preneoplastic lesions. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1982, 66, 1315–1319. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Lippman, S.M.; Lee, J.J.; Karp, D.D.; Vokes, E.E.; Benner, S.E.; Goodman, G.E.; Khuri, F.R.; Marks, R.; Winn, R.J.; Fry, W.; et al. Randomized phase III intergroup trial of isotretinoin to prevent second primary tumors in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Weinstock, M.A.; Bingham, S.F.; Digiovanna, J.J.; Rizzo, A.E.; Marcolivio, K.; Hall, R.; Eilers, D.; Naylor, M.; Kirsner, R.; Kalivas, J.; et al. Tretinoin and the prevention of keratinocyte carcinoma (Basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin): A veterans affairs randomized chemoprevention trial. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1583–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Halpern, A.C.; Schuchter, L.M.; Elder, D.E.; Guerry, D., 4th; Elenitsas, R.; Trock, B.; Matozzo, I. Effects of topical tretinoin on dysplastic nevi. J. Clin. Oncol. 1994, 12, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stahl, W.; Sies, H. B-Carotene and other carotenoids in protection from sunlight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 1179S–1184S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Chinembiri, T.N.; Du Plessis, L.H.; Gerber, M.; Hamman, J.H.; Du Plessis, J. Review of natural compounds for potential skin cancer treatment. Molecules 2014, 19, 11679–11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ben-Dor, A.; Steiner, M.; Gheber, L.; Danilenko, M.; Dubi, N.; Linnewiel, K.; Zick, A.; Sharoni, Y.; Levy, J. Carotenoids activate the antioxidant response element transcription system. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Herraiz, L.A.; Hsieh, W.C.; Parker, R.S.; Swanson, J.E.; Bendich, A.; Roe, D.A. Effect of UV exposure and beta-carotene supplementation on delayed type hypersensitivity response in healthy older men. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1998, 17, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rühl, R.; Bub, A.; Watzl, B. Modulation of plasma all-trans retinoic acid concentrations by the consumption of carotenoid-rich vegetables. Nutrition 2008, 24, 1224–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Prakash, P.; Liu, C.; Hu, K.Q.; Krinsky, N.I.; Russell, R.M.; Wang, X.D. Beta-carotene and beta-apo-14’-carotenoic acid prevent the reduction of retinoic acid receptor beta in benzo[a]pyrene-treated normal human bronchial epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Ben-Dor, A.; Nahum, A.; Danilenko, M.; Giat, Y.; Stahl, W.; Martin, H.D.; Emmerich, T.; Noy, N.; Levy, J.; Sharoni, Y. Effects of acyclo-retinoic acid and lycopene on activation of the retinoic acid receptor and proliferation of mammary cancer cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 391, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Baswan, S.M.; Marini, A.; Klosner, A.E.; Jaenicke, T.; Leverett, J.; Murray, M.; Gellenbeck, K.W.; Krutmann, J. Orally administered mixed carotenoids protect human skin against ultraviolet A-induced skin pigmentation: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2020, 36, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Mathews-Roth, M.M.; Pathak, M.A.; Fitzpatrick, T.B.; Harber, L.C.; Kass, E.H. B-carotene as an oral photoprotective agent in erythropoietic protoporphyria. JAMA 1974, 228, 1004–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Middha, P.; Weinstein, S.J.; Männistö, S.; Albanes, D.; Mondul, A.M. β-Carotene Supplementation and Lung Cancer Incidence in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study: The Role of Tar and Nicotine. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2019, 21, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Guruvayoorappan, C.; Kuttan, G. β-Carotene down-regulates inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression and induces apoptosis by suppressing bcl-2 expression and activating caspase-3 and p53 genes in B16F-10 melanoma cells. Nutr. Res. 2007, 27, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Greenberg, E.R.; Baron, J.A.; Stukel, T.A.; Stevens, M.M.; Mandel, J.S.; Spencer, S.K.; Elias, P.M.; Lowe, N.; Nierenberg, D.W.; Bayrd, G.; et al. A clinical trial of beta carotene to prevent basal-cell and squamous-cell cancers of the skin. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Donoso, A.; González-Durán, J.; Muñoz, A.A.; González, P.A.; Agurto-Muñoz, C. Therapeutic uses of natural astaxanthin: An evidence-based review focused on human clinical trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 166, 105479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Camera, E.; Mastrofrancesco, A.; Fabbri, C.; Daubrawa, F.; Picardo, M.; Sies, H.; Stahl, W. Astaxanthin, canthaxanthin and beta-carotene differently affect UVA-induced oxidative damage and expression of oxidative stress-responsive enzymes. Exp. Dermatol. 2009, 18, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xue, X.L.; Han, X.D.; Li, Y.; Chu, X.F.; Miao, W.M.; Zhang, J.L.; Fan, S.J. Astaxanthin attenuates total body irradiation-induced hematopoietic system injury in mice via inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Nakashima, Y.; Ohta, S.; Wolf, A.M. Blue light-induced oxidative stress in live skin. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 108, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ito, N.; Seki, S.; Ueda, F. The Protective Role of Astaxanthin for UV-Induced Skin Deterioration in Healthy People-A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2018, 10, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Nagendraprabhu, P.; Sudhandiran, G. Astaxanthin inhibits tumor invasion by decreasing extracellular matrix production and induces apoptosis in experimental rat colon carcinogenesis by modulating the expressions of ERK-2, NFkB and COX-2. Investig. New Drugs 2011, 29, 207–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kowshik, J.; Baba, A.B.; Giri, H.; Deepak Reddy, G.; Dixit, M.; Nagini, S. Astaxanthin inhibits JAK/STAT-3 signaling to abrogate cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis in a hamster model of oral cancer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Krasselt, M.; Baerwald, C. Celecoxib for the treatment of musculoskeletal arthritis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019, 20, 1689–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. McAdam, B.F.; Catella-Lawson, F.; Mardini, I.A.; Kapoor, S.; Lawson, J.A.; FitzGerald, G.A. Systemic biosynthesis of prostacyclin by cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: The human pharmacology of a selective inhibitor of COX-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dannenberg, A.J.; Lippman, S.M.; Mann, J.R.; Subbaramaiah, K.; DuBois, R.N. Cyclooxygenase-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor: Pharmacologic targets for chemoprevention. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Müller-Decker, K.; Reinerth, G.; Krieg, P.; Zimmermann, R.; Heise, H.; Bayerl, C.; Marks, F.; Fürstenberger, G. Prostaglandin-H-synthase isozyme expression in normal and neoplastic human skin. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 82, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Golijanin, D.; Tan, J.Y.; Kazior, A.; Cohen, E.G.; Russo, P.; Dalbagni, G.; Auborn, K.J.; Subbaramaiah, K.; Dannenberg, A.J. Cyclooxygenase-2 and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 are overexpressed in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 1024–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Smith, W.L.; DeWitt, D.L.; Garavito, R.M. Cyclooxygenases: Structural, cellular, and molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 145–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Subbaramaiah, K.; Altorki, N.; Chung, W.J.; Mestre, J.R.; Sampat, A.; Dannenberg, A.J. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression by p53. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 10911–10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Neufang, G.; Furstenberger, G.; Heidt, M.; Marks, F.; Müller-Decker, K. Abnormal differentiation of epidermis in transgenic mice constitutively expressing cyclooxygenase-2 in skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7629–7634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Fischer, S.M.; Lo, H.H.; Gordon, G.B.; Seibert, K.; Kelloff, G.; Lubet, R.A.; Conti, C.J. Chemopreventive activity of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, and indomethacin against ultraviolet light-induced skin carcinogenesis. Mol. Carcinog. 1999, 25, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Elmets, C.A.; Viner, J.L.; Pentland, A.P.; Cantrell, W.; Lin, H.Y.; Bailey, H.; Kang, S.; Linden, K.G.; Heffernan, M.; Duvic, M.; et al. Chemoprevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer with celecoxib: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010, 102, 1835–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Grosser, T.; Ricciotti, E.; FitzGerald, G.A. The Cardiovascular Pharmacology of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 733–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kumar, D.; Rahman, H.; Tyagi, E.; Liu, T.; Li, C.; Lu, R.; Lum, D.; Holmen, S.L.; Maschek, J.A.; Cox, J.E.; et al. Aspirin Suppresses PGE2 and Activates AMP Kinase to Inhibit Melanoma Cell Motility, Pigmentation, and Selective Tumor Growth In Vivo. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 2018, 11, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 13 01067 g001 550
Figure 1. This figure details the main mechanisms involved in the chemopreventive action of the drugs included in this review. Vit D interacts with vit D receptor (VDR) leading to the formation of a complex which migrates into the nucleus, interacts with DNA, and modulates the expression of cell cycle key regulators. NAM prevents UV-induced ATP depletion and is a precursor of NAD, an enzymatic cofactor, which mediates electron transfer by oscillating between its reduced (NADH) and oxidized (NAD+) states. The latter works as a substrate for PARP, a nuclear enzyme involved in DNA repair processes. PLE, Astaxanthin (ASX), and β-carotene are antioxidant agents that neutralize ROS, leading to the restoration of molecular oxygen. Retinoids interact with retinoid receptors (RAR or RXR) in the nucleus, thus leading to the formation of RARE complex. This latter acts as transcriptional factor for genes involved in cellular differentiation, growth arrest, and apoptosis. Celecoxib is an anti-inflammatory drug, inhibitor of cyclooxygenase−2 (COX2), and a key enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins (PGE2) from arachidonic acid (Ar Ac).
Figure 1. This figure details the main mechanisms involved in the chemopreventive action of the drugs included in this review. Vit D interacts with vit D receptor (VDR) leading to the formation of a complex which migrates into the nucleus, interacts with DNA, and modulates the expression of cell cycle key regulators. NAM prevents UV-induced ATP depletion and is a precursor of NAD, an enzymatic cofactor, which mediates electron transfer by oscillating between its reduced (NADH) and oxidized (NAD+) states. The latter works as a substrate for PARP, a nuclear enzyme involved in DNA repair processes. PLE, Astaxanthin (ASX), and β-carotene are antioxidant agents that neutralize ROS, leading to the restoration of molecular oxygen. Retinoids interact with retinoid receptors (RAR or RXR) in the nucleus, thus leading to the formation of RARE complex. This latter acts as transcriptional factor for genes involved in cellular differentiation, growth arrest, and apoptosis. Celecoxib is an anti-inflammatory drug, inhibitor of cyclooxygenase−2 (COX2), and a key enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins (PGE2) from arachidonic acid (Ar Ac).
Biomolecules 13 01067 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyeraci, M.; Papanikolau, E.S.; Grimaldi, M.; Ricci, F.; Pallotta, S.; Monetta, R.; Minafò, Y.A.; Di Lella, G.; Galdo, G.; Abeni, D.; et al. Systemic Photoprotection in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071067

AMA Style

Hyeraci M, Papanikolau ES, Grimaldi M, Ricci F, Pallotta S, Monetta R, Minafò YA, Di Lella G, Galdo G, Abeni D, et al. Systemic Photoprotection in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(7):1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hyeraci, Mariafrancesca, Elena Sofia Papanikolau, Marta Grimaldi, Francesco Ricci, Sabatino Pallotta, Rosanna Monetta, Ylenia Aura Minafò, Giovanni Di Lella, Giovanna Galdo, Damiano Abeni, and et al. 2023. "Systemic Photoprotection in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer" Biomolecules 13, no. 7: 1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071067

APA Style

Hyeraci, M., Papanikolau, E. S., Grimaldi, M., Ricci, F., Pallotta, S., Monetta, R., Minafò, Y. A., Di Lella, G., Galdo, G., Abeni, D., Fania, L., & Dellambra, E. (2023). Systemic Photoprotection in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. Biomolecules, 13(7), 1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop