The Architecture of Mass Customization-Social Internet of Things System: Current Research Profile
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Analysis
3. The MC-SIOT System Architecture
3.1. The Organizational Architecture of the MC–SIOT System
3.2. The Technical Architecture of MC–SIOT System
4. Main Technological Applications
4.1. Human-to-Human: Semantic Analysis
4.2. Human-to-Thing: Knowledge Graph
4.3. Thing-to-Thing: Deep Learning
5. Key Problems
5.1. Data Management
- In terms of data collection, with the increasing application of intelligent equipment in manufacturing enterprises, manufacturing enterprises can obtain large amounts of data from intelligent devices and, thus, get rich data sets [129,130,131]; however, in the process of massive data collection, the following problems arise:
- (1)
- In terms of integrity, as the intelligent manufacturing enterprise has many parts operating at the same time, its production equipment and control system need to run for a long time; that is to say, data will be generated at every moment and collected through the terminal for a long time. In the process of data acquisition over such a long period of time [132], it is very important to avoid missing important information, such as the important data relating to customer design or the fault data of production equipment. Therefore, ensuring normal operations is inseparable from the integrity of the data. In order to effectively detect whether the data are complete, it is necessary to label the data generated by all data sources.
- (2)
- Ensuring data quality is an essential process [133,134]. Due to the different scenarios faced by the different departments of the MC–SIOT system in a manufacturing enterprise, the collected data cannot be of a unified specification and type, and the associated amounts of data are huge. It is difficult to ensure that the collected data are of high quality; that is, the collected data inevitably will contain invalid data (i.e., noise). Therefore, to ensure the quality of data, it is necessary to clean the data to ensure their integrity [135]. This can remove the noise contained in the data.
- Data transmission usually refers to the process of transferring data from one place to another. Intelligent manufacturing enterprises produce a large amount of data, which are transmitted between devices through the wireless network [136,137]. This can effectively solve cross-organizational problems. Therefore, data transmission between manufacturing enterprises through large-scale wireless networks has become the norm. However, this involves the following problems:
- (1)
- The reliability of a large-scale data network is very important for industrial production; however, packet loss is often inevitable in data transmission, which is one of the main reasons for errors in the process of data transmission. How to resolve the problem of packet loss and determining which data have been lost has been the focus of many studies. On one hand, a real-time data stream can be transmitted to the designated device within a specified time by coordinating the network [138], which can effectively reduce the packet loss rate in the process of data transmission [139]. This solution requires clearly understanding what data are transmitted (i.e., data annotation), in order to arrange the transmission channel for them. On the other hand, in case of an emergency, the transmitted data can be backed up and cached in a data buffer to avoid packet loss [140]. This solution also requires data annotation, in order to find the corresponding backup in the buffer immediately after the packet is lost.
- (2)
- In terms of accuracy, the transmission system can connect the front and back terminals of the equipment to realize signal transmission. However, in the process of transmission, interference is very common, which causes the receiver to obtain the wrong information. Therefore, it is necessary to reasonably analyze whether there are interference factors during data transmission [141]. Particularly, one must ensure the functionality of transmitting and receiving information in a noisy environment [142]. When an error occurs, the system needs to effectively detect and correct the error; that is, it needs to accurately judge what the correct original code is, in order to ensure accurate data transmission. However, to judge the original code correctly, it is also necessary to label the original data.
- Regarding data querying, the large amounts of data generated by manufacturing enterprises need to be stored, where the storage objects include the temporary files generated in the process of data flow or the information to be searched in the process. With the exponential growth of big data flows, data querying has also become more challenging [143]. The following problems are considered important:
- (1)
- In current storage systems, there is high data redundancy. Repeated data input into the storage system occupies a significant amount of disk memory space. Therefore, duplicate data should be eliminated, in order to reduce the impact of meaningless data on storage [144], which is also convenient for data queries.
- (2)
- In terms of timeliness, the system often takes a long time to obtain accurate query results [145]. Untimely information will be greatly reduced in usefulness, or may even have no value; that is, in some delay-sensitive applications, if it takes too long to answer a query, the query result(s) may become useless. Therefore, it is very important to satisfy the queries of users in a timely manner [146,147].
5.2. Knowledge Discovery
- In terms of knowledge extraction, there is an increasing demand for transforming raw data into knowledge, which is of great significance for decision making, optimization, and analysis [149,150,151]. Tang et al. [152] have proposed a method to acquire knowledge from documents, which can process documents with high complexity. However, the acquisition of expert knowledge is often a complex process involving a variety of activities [153]. Due to the diversity of domain experts, they often have different experiences and knowledge; that is, the information they can provide often has many types. Additionally, there are integrity and accuracy problems [154]. On the other hand, as knowledge has the characteristics of separation and dispersion, when employees transfer from one post to another, the problem of explicit and tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing cannot be ignored [155].
- Knowledge representation refers to the association of knowledge factors and knowledge objects. It is convenient for people to recognize and understand knowledge. To date, many knowledge representation methods have been developed, including fuzzy rules [156,157]; however, most of them are static and cannot be adjusted dynamically. Liu et al. [158] have proposed an adaptive fuzzy model, which can reflect the different experiences of experts and realize knowledge reasoning dynamically. Jong et al. [159] have proposed temporal knowledge representation and reasoning technology. Considering heterogeneous data, Kargin et al. [160] have proposed an intelligent rule engine model which realized the cognitive functions of data generalization and abstraction, while Ebrahimipour et al. [161] have proposed a knowledge representation method based on ontology. This method can address the problems related to noise data, data arrangement, and ambiguous technical vocabulary in text maintenance records.
- Knowledge updating means that a system can continuously learn new knowledge from new samples, while retaining most of the previously learned knowledge, which is similar to how human learning works. At present, with the emergence of incremental industrial big data, traditional static learning methods struggle to obtain incremental features effectively [162]. Therefore, incremental learning has become a new research hotspot. Incremental learning can make full use of the historical training results, such that the system can learn independently to adjust the relevant set value [163]. This reduces the need for manual interventions and adjusts key model parameters based on historical experience [164]. Additionally, incremental learning enables the system to perceive the surrounding environment [165] and take appropriate actions against the changes in the process [166]. By learning experience in the environment, it can improve its overall performance in unknown scenes [167]. This even makes the machine run automatically in cases of communication delay and unexpected system stoppage [168]. In addition to serving the normal operations of a system in various complex environments, incremental learning can also reduce the configuration time and expense, as configuration normally requires professional knowledge.
5.3. Human–Computer Interaction
- In terms of intelligence, the system should have the function of capturing information or learning new knowledge for users. By distinguishing the levels of understanding of users, it can establish a harmonious relationship or sense of harmony, ensuring the comfort and participation of users. Xia et al. [172] have connected emotional design with interactive design, allowing the interactive design to shift from machine-based design to human-oriented design, in order to realize the unity of humans and objects. Erol et al. [173] expected that agents will recognize human emotional states to promote the natural connection between humans and robots. In addition, robots have been widely used in the industrial field. They usually perform complex tasks along with other robots and humans, promoting efficiency and accuracy while ensuring the safety of workers. Additionally, systems can combine semi-autonomous robots, edge computing, and cloud services to realize the automation of complex tasks [174].
- In terms of efficiency, an HCI system can reduce the workload of human supervisors [175]. For example, Doering et al. [176] have proposed an imitation learning technology which learns the interactive behavior of social robots from natural HCI data. However, it only requires the designer to input minimal information. Liu et al. [177] found that the design of a HCI detection scheme is conducive to the system management, in terms of microdata and macro-control. This not only reduces the labor cost and improves the calculation speed, but also lays a solid foundation for the development of future technology. Furthermore, computer-aided design based on HCI technology can enhance the efficiency of industrial production [178]. Feng et al. [179] have introduced an HCI interface design method based on context awareness. It is very important to improve the efficiency of the system by improving the user’s performance and satisfaction. Quintas et al. [180] have enhanced the interaction function by integrating a context and interaction information model into a decision model. This decision model acts as a supervisory process to control the interaction, allowing for more natural and effective interactions between human and artificial agents.
- Reliability in HCI is very important for industrial production. Herrera et al. [181] have proposed a new fuzzy logic method. By integrating social rules into walking events, this method can overcome many common interference situations and adapt to different interference events over time. Xu et al. [182] have designed a machine-oriented proximity estimation algorithm to simplify data connection, ensure data connection accuracy, and reduce the time complexity. Bowyer et al. [183] have designed an n-dimensional dissipative control strategy which can reduce the task error, thus enabling human–machine interactions to occur safely and effectively.
- Availability is an important factor that must be considered when evaluating the operation of a system. By making the interaction process between users and devices simpler and easier, the system should become more available [184,185]. Additionally, availability is an important factor for users to achieve effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction within a specific environment [186,187]. Considering availability issues in the design of management applications can affect the user experiences of staff. Hu et al. [188] believed that the user should be central in the interactive design, in order to achieve a user-centered, reassuring, and user-satisfactory human–computer interface. Meng et al. [189] believed that user-centered design is the best way to create a usable human–computer interface, which can support operator tasks. To improve the usability of the HCI interface, Zeng et al. [190] have developed a comprehensive evaluation hierarchy of software and hardware interfaces, a corresponding comprehensive evaluation carrier, and a decision pattern.
6. The MC–SIOT System as a Complex System
6.1. Qualitative Analysis
- The MC–SIOT system has a multi-layered structure; each level reflects its upper-level components. For example, as shown in Figure 7, the first level node represents an MC–SIOT system, composed of the sales department (red), R&D department (blue), and manufacturing workshop (green). The nodes of the second level represent the ISs of the sales department, R&D department, and manufacturing workshop. In the third level, each node represents a sub-department; for example, the sales department is sub-divided into multiple stores, the R&D department includes multiple product R&D teams, and the manufacturing workshop includes multiple production lines. Sub-ISs exist in each ISs of the second level, and so on. This multi-level structure is the foundation of the MC–SIOT system.
- The evolutionary strategy involves adapting to the external environment by adjusting the system’s structure and components. For example, the MC–SIOT system can improve its IT infrastructure, business processes, management methods, and so on, according to a plan, in order to meet the needs of the enterprise market.
- The interactions of departments at the same level demonstrate the nature of the coordination. For example, the coordination and cooperation between ISs of different departments form a pull effect to promote the development of the MC–SIOT system.
- Self-similarity refers to the repetitious structure of the MC–SIOT system and its components; for example, the MC–SIOT system contains multiple ISs of different departments, where the IS of each department comprises multiple modules. The self-similar structure is gradually formed in the process of evolution.
- Self-organization refers to the spontaneous formation of new structures or behaviors through the adjustment of system components. When the enterprise plans to produce new products, the MC–SIOT system will automatically transfer the tasks to each department. After these departments receive their tasks, they will adjust their statuses voluntarily to complete the assigned tasks; for example, the sales department should find customer groups, the R&D department may complete a product design demonstration, and the manufacturing workshop must ensure the timely production and delivery of products.
- The MC–SIOT system is composed of multiple ISs, and there is a cooperative relationship between them. These ISs are based on a variety of architectures and achieve corresponding goals through different departments. Different departments are faced with different scenarios. The data are not only collected in a multi-source manner, but different devices in physical space or cyberspace are also used as the infrastructure.
- The MC–SIOT system constantly exchanges resources and information with the surrounding environment; for example, the MC–SIOT system provides data related to products or services to consumers, while absorbing product innovation and workshop management experiences in the external environment. Due to its openness, the MC–SIOT system can be continuously upgraded.
6.2. Quantitative Analysis
- (1)
- The state transition function
- (2)
- Relationship between system units.
- (1)
- If , then if M is in the state q, the character a is read, the state is changed to p, and then the character prior of a will be read. At this time, .
- (2)
- When , then q in M changes to p after reading a, and the next character is then read.
- (3)
- When , the state of M changes to p after reading a, but the character is read again the next time.
- (3)
- Servo constraint function
7. Discussion
7.1. Research Findings
7.2. Limitations
7.3. Future Directions
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mo, H.; Wagle, N.; Zuba, M. Cyber-physical systems. XRDS: Crossroads ACM Mag. Stud. 2014, 20, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gershenfeld, N.; Krikorian, R.; Cohen, D. The Internet of Things. Sci. Am. 2004, 291, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Apte, C. Data mining: An industrial research perspective. IEEE Comput. Sci. 1997, 4, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.; Feld, T.; Hoffmann, M. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; Yang, J.; Wang, K. Industry 4.0: A way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Adv. Manuf. 2017, 5, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, T.; Chen, C.; Cheng, F.; Yang, H. Automatic Virtual Metrology and Target Value Adjustment for Mass Customization. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2017, 2, 546–553. [Google Scholar]
- Dyk, D.; Pretorius, L. A system dynamics approach to quality improvement programs in a heavy engineering manufacturing environment: A case study. In Proceedings of the PICMET 2012: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29 July–2 August 2012; pp. 3287–3296. [Google Scholar]
- El Hadj Khalaf, R.; Agard, B.; Penz, B. Module selection and supply chain optimization for customized product families using redundancy and standardization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2011, 8, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, S. From “future perfect”: Mass customizing. Strategy Leadersh. 2013, 17, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silveira, G.; Fogliatto, F.; Fendyur, A. Demographics of mass customization: A global study of manufacturing plants. Production 2016, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mindas, M.; Bednar, S. Mass Customization in the Context of Industry 4.0: Implications of Variety-induced Complexity. In Advanced Industrial Engineering: Industry 4.0; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Chapter 2. [Google Scholar]
- Iarovyi, S.; Lastra, J.; Haber, R.; Toro, R. From artificial cognitive systems and open architectures to cognitive manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Cambridge, UK, 1 October 2015; pp. 1225–1232. [Google Scholar]
- Da Cunha, C.; Agard, B.; Kusiak, A. Design for Cost: Module-Based Mass Customization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2007, 4, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michael, N. Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition: B. Joseph Pine II; Harvard Business School Press: Brighton, MA, USA, 1993; p. 142. [Google Scholar]
- Partanen, J.; Haapasalo, H. Fast production for order fulfillment: Implementing mass customization in electronics industry. International Journal of Production Economics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 90, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, R.; Petersen, T.; Storch, R. Asynchronous stochastic learning curve effects in engineering-to-order customisation processes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47, 1309–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mike, B. Innovation in the Food Industry: Personalised Nutrition and Mass Customisation. Innovation 2008, 10, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Barlow, J.; Childerhouse, P.; Gann, D.; Hong-Minh, S.; Naim, M.; Ozaki, R. Choice and delivery in housebuilding: Lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders. Build. Res. Inf. 2003, 31, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wan, J.; Huang, L.; Zhu, J. Smart e-commerce systems: Current status and research challenges. Electron. Mark. 2017, 29, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Aal, M.; Selim, S. Risk-averse multi-product selective newsvendor problem with different market entry scenarios under CVaR criterion. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2017, 103, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, P. Assessment of pre and post-disaster supply chain resilience based on network structural parameters with CVaR as a risk measure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 227, 107655. [Google Scholar]
- Gang, W.; Gunasekaran, A.; Ngai, E.; Papadopoulos, T. Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain Investigations for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 176, 98–110. [Google Scholar]
- Larrea, G.; Gregory, A. Informing timeshare exchange services on the drivers of customer-driven co-production. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 91, 102645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Chang, H.; Forrest, Y.; Yang, B. Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china’s manufacturing sectors. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 158, 120142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iera, A.; Morabito, G.; Atzori, L. The Social Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E), Tempe, AZ, USA, 9–13 March 2015; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Nemeschansky, B.; Heidt, T.; Kim, P. Customer-driven menu analysis (CDMA): Capturing customer voice in menu management. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 91, 102417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitti, M.; Girau, R.; Atzori, L. Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Thing. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2014, 26, 1253–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, D. Graph-based service recommendation in Social Internet of Things. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2021, 17, 1477–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, J.; Choi, W.; Choi, S. Trust information network in social Internet of things using trust-aware recommender systems. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2020, 16, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, L.; Dou, Z.; Hu, Y.; Huang, R. Textual Analysis for Online Reviews: A Polymerization Topic Sentiment Model. IEEE Access 2019, 99, 91940–91945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cascini, G.; Russo, D. Computer-aided analysis of patents and search for TRIZ contradictions. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2007, 4, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Sun, Y.; Dou, Z. Chaotic neural network model for SMISs reliability prediction based on interdependent network SMISs reliability prediction by chaotic neural network. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2020, 37, 717–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepasgozar, S.; Karimi, R.; Farahzadi, L.; Moezzi, F.; Shirowzhan, S.; Ebrahimzadeh, S.M.; Hui, F.; Aye, L. A Systematic Content Review of Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things Applications in Smart Home. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzahrani, S. Development of IoT mining machine for Twitter sentiment analysis: Mining in the cloud and results on the mirror. In Proceedings of the 2018 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 25–26 February 2018; pp. 86–95. [Google Scholar]
- Htet, H.; Khaing, S.; Yi, Y. Tweets Sentiment Analysis for Healthcare on Big Data Processing and IoT Architecture Using Maximum Entropy Classifier. Big Data Anal. Deep. Learn. Appl. 2018, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Psomakelis, E.; Aisopos, F.; Litke, A.; Tserpes, K.; Kardara, M.; Campo, P. Big IoT and social networking data for smart cities: Algorithmic improvements on Big Data Analysis in the context of RADICAL city applications. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1607.00509. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Du, F.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Y.; He, J.; Zhu, T.; Sun, C. A crowdsourcing-based topic model for service matchmaking in Internet of Things. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 87, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bermudez-Edo, M.; Elsaleh, T.; Barnaghi, P.; Taylor, K. IoT-Lite: A Lightweight Semantic Model for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conferences on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress, Toulouse, France, 18–21 July 2016; pp. 90–97. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Ping, L.; Deng, D. Device-Oriented Automatic Semantic Annotation in IoT. J. Sens. 2017, 2017, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xie, C.; Yu, B.; Zeng, Z.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Q. Multi-Layer Internet of Things Middleware based on Knowledge Graph. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 2635–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Berbís, M.; Amescua-Seco, A. SEDIT: Semantic Digital Twin Based on Industrial IoT Data Management and Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the Technologies and Innovation, 5th International Conference, CITI, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 2–5 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Khokhlov, I.; Reznik, L. Knowledge Graph in Data Quality Evaluation for IoT applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 6th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), New Orleans, LA, USA, 3 November 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.; Cao, Z.; Tanveer, M.; Pandey, H.; Wang, C. A Semantic Collaboration Method Based on Uniform Knowledge Graph. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 4473–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, W.; Yin, L.; Wang, C.; Liu, F.; Ni, Z. Medical Knowledge Graph in Chinese Using Deep Semantic Mobile Computation Based on IoT and WoT. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021, 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Karim, F.; Naameh, O.; Lytra, I.; Mader, C.; Vidal, M.; Auer, S. Semantic Enrichment of IoT Stream Data On-demand. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 31 January–2 February 2018; pp. 33–40. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, J.; Jiang, X.; Wang, S.; Jiang, K.; Yu, X. SVM-BiLSTM: A Fault Detection Method for the Gas Station IoT System Based on Deep Learning. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 203712–203723. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, R.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, S.; Yang, Y.; Yang, W. Fault point detection of IOT using multi-spectral image fusion based on deep learning. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 2019, 64, 102600.1–102600.8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benkedjouh, T.; Zerhouni, N.; Rechak, S. Deep Learning for Fault Diagnosis based on short-time Fourier transform. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Smart Communications in Network Technologies (SaCoNeT), El Oued, Algeria, 27–31 October 2018; pp. 288–293. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; He, Y.; Du, B.; Yuan, L.; Li, B.; Jiang, S. Transformer fault diagnosis method using IoT based monitoring system and ensemble machine learning. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 108, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Fu, Z.; Yang, Z. Wind power generation fault diagnosis based on deep learning model in internet of things (IoT) with clusters. Clust. Comput. 2018, 22, 14013–14025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Wu, J. MOPS: Providing Content-Based Service in Disruption-Tolerant Networks. In Proceedings of the 2009 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 22–26 June 2009; pp. 526–533. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, J.; Chun, S.; Jin, X. Enabling smart objects discovery via constructing hypergraphs of heterogeneous IoT interactions. J. Inf. Sci. Princ. Pract. 2018, 44, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, B.; Min, G.; Kouvatsos, D.; Ilyas, M. An Adaptive Content Sharing Protocol for P2P Mobile Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, Perth, Australia, 20–23 April 2010; pp. 413–418. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, T.; Luo, D.; Xia, F.; Deonauth, N.; Si, W.; Tolba, A. A greedy model with small world for improving the robustness of heterogeneous Internet of Things. Comput. Netw. 2016, 101, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, D.; Choi, J.; Jung, J.; Kang, K.; Bae, C. SDIF: Social device interaction framework for encounter and play in smart home service. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2016, 62, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Kim, K.; Kwon, J. A Pervasive Interconnection Technique for Efficient Information Sharing in Social IoT Environment. Int. J. Smart Home 2016, 10, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turcu, C.; Turcu, C. The Social Internet of Things and the RFID-based robots. In Proceedings of the 2012 IV International Congress on Ultra-Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems, St. Petersburg, Russia, 3–5 October 2012; pp. 77–83. [Google Scholar]
- Agostinho, C.; Ducq, Y.; Zacharewicz, G.; Sarraipa, J.; Lampathaki, F. Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Comput. Ind. 2016, 79, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, P.; Sun, Y.; Li, W. Service-oriented manufacturing information system: Concept, architecture and focus of future research. In Proceedings of the 2015 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Guangzhou, China, 22–24 June 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, N.; Li, Y.; Wu, S. Effective Pattern Discovery for Text Mining. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2012, 24, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kostyra, D.; Reiner, J.; Natter, M.; Klapper, D. Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2016, 33, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anh, Q.; Nagai, Y.; Le, M. Extracting Customer Reviews from Online Shopping and Its Perspective on Product Design. Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 2019, 06, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, S.; Wei, C.; Dong, M. Crowd intelligence: Analyzing online product reviews for preference measurement. Inf. Manag. 2016, 53, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.; Stylianou, A.; Zheng, Y. Sources and Impacts of Social Influence from Online Anonymous User Reviews. Inf. Manag. 2017, 55, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nan, H.; Ling, L.; Jie, J. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2008, 9, 201–214. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, W.; Gu, B.; Whinston, A. Do online reviews matter?–An empirical investigation of panel data. Decis. Support Syst. 2008, 45, 1007–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, F.; Li, B.; Chong, Y.; Yannopoulou, N.; Liu, M. Understanding and predicting what influence online product sales? A neural network approach. Prod. Plan. Control. 2017, 28, 964–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandrin, E.; Trentin, A.; Grosso, C.; Forza, C. Enhancing the consumer-perceived benefits of a mass-customized product through its online sales configurator: An empirical examination. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 1295–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, K.; So, K.; Wang, W. Joint effects of management responses and online reviews on hotel financial performance: A data-analytics approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 62, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Dou, Z.; Hu, Y.; Huang, R. Online Sales Prediction: An Analysis with Dependency SCOR-Topic Sentiment Model. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 79791–79797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, Z.; Hu, Y.; Peng, C.; Huang, L.; Xiao, H. Predicting Sales Performance Based on Polarity Sentiments of Online Reviews and Manifold Dynamics Method. In Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), Nanjing, China, 10–12 November 2018; pp. 1138–1145. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, G.; Yan, W.; Xu, X. An analysis of the sales and consumer preferences of e-cigarettes based on text mining of online reviews. In Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), Shanghai, China, 19–21 November 2016; pp. 1045–1049. [Google Scholar]
- Archak, N.; Ghose, A.; Ipeirotis, P. Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 2011, 57, 1485–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chong, A.; Li, B.; Ngai, E.; Chang, E.; Lee, F. Predicting online product sales via online reviews, sentiments, and promotion strategies. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2016, 36, 358–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, N.; Koh, N.; Reddy, S. Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales. Decis. Support Syst. 2014, 57, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, D.; Bond, S.; Han, Z. Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews. Mis. Quarterly 2013, 38, 539–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Bose, I. Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business. Decis. Support Syst. 2017, 96, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Sun, H.; Park, J. The role of entropy of review text sentiments on online WOM and movie box office sales. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2017, 22, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, S.; Pinch, T. Six degrees of reputation: The use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 2006, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, M.; Dorner, V.; Schryen, G.; Benlian, A. A configuration-based recommender system for supporting e-commerce decisions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 259, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kermany, N.; Alizadeh, S. A hybrid multi-criteria recommender system using ontology and neuro-fuzzy techniques. Electron. Commer. Res. 2017, 21, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bendle, T.; Wang, X. Uncovering the message from the mess of big data. Bus. Horiz. 2016, 59, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, A.; Wu, F. Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: Antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2016, 44, 516–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhargava, M.; Hipple, E. The Sources of Innovation. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 2007, 31, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rautela, S.; Sharma, S.; Virani, S. Influence of customer participation in new product development: The moderating role of social media. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2020. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishikawa, H.; Schreier, M.; Ogawa, S. User-generated versus designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji. Int. J. Res. Marketing. 2013, 30, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogawa, S.; Piller, F. Reducing the Risks ofNew Product Development. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2006, 47, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
- Vargo, S.; Lusch, R. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2008, 36, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahl, D.; Fuchs, C.; Schreier, M. Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account. Manag. Sci. 2015, 61, 1978–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Erevelles, S.; Fukawa, N.; Swayne, L. Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tietz, R.; Morrison, P.D.; Luthje, C.; Herstatt, C. The process of user-innovation: A case study in a consumer goods setting. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2005, 2, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulheim, H.; Cimiano, P. Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semant. Web. 2017, 8, 489–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rassenfosse, G.; Bruno, V. A Policy Insight into the R&D-Patent Relationship. Res. Policy 2009, 38, 779–792. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, W.; Lai, C.; Chen, P. International R&D Funding and Patent Collateral in an R&D-Growth Model. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2016, 51, 545–561. [Google Scholar]
- Ernst, H.; Leptien, C.; Vitt, J. Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2000, 47, 184–199. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.; Xie, G. Industry Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2009, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Varadarajan, R.; Yadav, M.; Shankar, V. First-Mover Advantage in the Internet-Enabled Market Environment. In Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 157–185. [Google Scholar]
- Conley, J.; Bican, P.; Ernst, H. Value Articulation: A Framework for the Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2013, 55, 102–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ceccagnoli, M.; Rothaermel, F. Appropriability Strategies to Capture Value from Innovation. Technol. Innov. Gener. Econ. Results 2016, 26, 3–31. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, W.; Goto, A.; Nagata, A.; Nelson, R.; Walsh, J. R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Res. Policy 2002, 31, 1349–1367. [Google Scholar]
- Acs, Z.; Anselin, L.; Varga, A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res. Policy 2002, 31, 1069–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginarte, J.; Park, W. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Res. Policy 1997, 26, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W. Can intellectual property rights protection and governmental R&D investment promote Chinese enterprises’ R&D investment? Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2017, 15, 551–559. [Google Scholar]
- Penin, J. Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look. Res. Policy 2005, 34, 641–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ernst, H. Patent information for strategic technology management. World Pat. Inf. 2003, 25, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, Z.; Wu, B.; Sun, Y.; Wang, T. The Competitiveness of Manufacturing and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of G20 Participating Countries. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griliches, Z. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. In R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence; NBER: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998; pp. 287–343. [Google Scholar]
- Manu, F.; Sriram, V. Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 35, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, C.; Li, Z. Analysis of patent management effects on technological innovation performance. Balt. J. Manag. 2013, 8, 286–305. [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-Vega, H.; Tell, F.; Vanhaverbeke, W. Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation. Res. Policy 2016, 45, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yayavaram, S.; Chen, W. Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity. Strateg. Manag. J. 2015, 36, 377–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, X.; Zhang, G.; Ma, S. Deep Learning. Int. J. Semant. Comput. 2016, 10, 417–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ding, Y.; Ma, L.; Ma, J.; Suo, M.; Tao, L.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, C. Intelligent fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using deep Q-network based health state classification: A deep reinforcement learning approach. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 42, 100977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, K.; Li, X. An adaptive deep transfer learning method for bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement 2019, 151, 107227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Yuan, X.; Yang, C.; Gui, W. A novel deep learning based fault diagnosis approach for chemical process with extended deep belief network. ISA Trans. 2020, 96, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, P.; Deng, C.; Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Compound Fault Diagnosis of Gearboxes via Multi-label Convolutional Neural Network and Wavelet Transform. Comput. Ind. 2019, 113, 103132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Nepal, S.; Chen, J. A Time Efficient Approach for Detecting Errors in Big Sensor Data on Cloud. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2015, 26, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, J. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating System Design & Implementation, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–8 December 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Lindell, Y.; Riva, B. Cut-and-Choose Yao-Based Secure Computation in the Online/Offline and Batch Settings. In Proceedings of the International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 17–21 August 2014; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 476–494. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, A.; Shankar, R.; Chou, D.; Hary, A.; Thakur, L. A big data MapReduce framework for fault diagnosis in cloud-based manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 7060–7073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wan, J.; Tang, S.; Li, D.; Wang, S.; Liu, C. A Manufacturing Big Data Solution for Active Preventive Maintenance. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 13, 2039–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekooij, M.; Wiggers, M.; Meerbergen, V.; Falk, H.; Marwedel, P. Efficient Buffer Capacity and Scheduler Setting Computation for Soft Real-Time Stream Processing Applications. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Software & Compilers for Embedded Systems, Nice, France, 20 April 2007; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Huo, Z.; Mukherjee, M.; Shu, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, Z. Cloud-based Data-intensive Framework towards fault diagnosis in large-scale petrochemical plants. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Paphos, Cyprus, 5–9 September 2016; pp. 1080–1085. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wan, J.; Liu, X.; Song, Z. Industrial Big Data for Fault Diagnosis: Taxonomy, Review, and Applications. IEEE Access 2017, 13, 2039–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinton, G.; Salakhutdinov, R. Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks. Science 2016, 313, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Qi, Y.; Wei, Y.; Shen, C.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, Z. Hierarchical diagnosis network based on sparse deep neural networks and its application in bearing fault diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 2017 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Harbin), Harbin, China, 9–12 July 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Tamilselvan, P.; Wang, P. Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 2013, 115, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Lei, Y.; Jing, L.; Xin, Z.; Na, L. Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2016, 72–73, 303–315. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Ren, S. Data-driven sustainable intelligent manufacturing based on demand response for energy-intensive industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 123155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lade, P.; Ghosh, R.; Srinivasan, S. Manufacturing Analytics and Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2017, 32, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basanta-Val, P. An Efficient Industrial Big-Data Engine. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 14, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Li, G.; Li, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y. A Continuous Data Acquisition System Based on CompactPCI for EAST Tokamak. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2010, 57, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlovic, I.; Miklavcic, D. Web-Based Electronic Data Collection System to Support Electrochemotherapy Clinical Trial. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2007, 11, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bender, A.; Ward, J.; Worrall, S.; Moreyra, M.; Konrad, S.; Masson, F.; Nebot, E. A Flexible System Architecture for Acquisition and Storage of Naturalistic Driving Data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2016, 17, 1748–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Ke, H.; Zheng, X.; Wang, K.; Liu, A. Big Data Cleaning Based on Mobile Edge Computing in Industrial Sensor-Cloud. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2019, 16, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wei, W.; Deng, Q.; Liu, W.; Song, H. An Energy-Efficient Skyline Query for Massively Multidimensional Sensing Data. Sensors 2016, 16, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Li, X.; Li, D.; Wan, J.; Vasilakos, A.; Lai, C.; Wang, S. A review of industrial wireless networks in the context of Industry 4.0. Wirel. Netw. 2017, 23, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Tan, S.; Zhu, Y.; Li, M. Deterministic Scheduling with Optimization of Average Transmission Delays in Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 18852–18862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, X.; Kong, F.; Kong, L.; Wang, H.; Xia, C. A Hierarchical Data Transmission Framework for Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2017, 13, 2019–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dong, G.; Yan, C.; Wei, C.; Guo, D. Integrated system of industrial data acquisition and monitor with CDMA 1x technology. In Proceedings of the 2008 2nd International Conference on Anti-counterfeiting, Security and Identification, Guiyang, China, 20–23 August 2008; pp. 424–427. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Cheng, H.; Liu, M.; Xu, D. Analysis, Design, and Implementation of a Wireless Power and Data Transmission System Using Capacitive Coupling and Double-Sided LCC Compensation Topology. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 55, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, K.; Yun, H.; Kim, N. Robust Data Hiding for MCLT Based Acoustic Data Transmission. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2010, 17, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Garg, S.; Kaur, K.; Batra, S.; Kumar, N.; Choo, K. Fuzzy-Folded Bloom Filter-as-a-Service for Big Data Storage in the Cloud. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2019, 15, 2338–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, M.; Hong, J.; Wu, S.; Lei, T. Leveraging Data Deduplication to Improve the Performance of Primary Storage Systems in the Cloud. IEEE Trans. Comput. 2016, 65, 1775–1788. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, Q.; Xu, Z.; Liang, W.; Yu, S.; Guo, S.; Zomaya, A. Efficient Data Placement and Replication for QoS-Aware Approximate Query Evaluation of Big Data Analytics. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2019, 30, 2677–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benghanem, M.; Maafi, A. Data acquisition system for photovoltaic systems performance monitoring. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1998, 47, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.; Kim, I.; Lee, K. The Architectural Design of Storage System for Power Data Management. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), Bangkok, Thailand, 17–20 January 2018; pp. 736–738. [Google Scholar]
- Tomar, D.; Agarwal, S. A survey on Data Mining approaches for healthcare. Int. J. Bio-Sci. Bio-Technol. 2013, 5, 241–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.; Ali, R.; Khan, W.; Han, S.; Bang, J.; Hur, T.; Kim, D.; Lee, S.; Kang, B. A Data-Driven Knowledge Acquisition System: An End-to-End Knowledge Engineering Process for Generating Production Rules. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 15587–15607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, W.; Qian, W.; Xie, Y. Knowledge Acquisition Approach based on Incremental Objects from Data with Missing Values. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 54863–54878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, D.; Tsang, E. Fuzzy knowledge representation and reasoning using Petri nets. Expert Syst. Appl. 1994, 7, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Hong, M. Modified Fractal Signature (MFS): A New Approach to Document Analysis for Automatic Knowledge Acquisition. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1997, 9, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaines, B.; Shaw, M. Eliciting Knowledge and Transferring It Effectively to a Knowledge-Based System. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2002, 5, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Liu, L.; Lin, Q.; Liu, N. Knowledge Acquisition and Representation Using Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning and Dynamic Adaptive Fuzzy Petri Nets. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2013, 43, 1059–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W. Framework of Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing in Multiple Projects for Contractors. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, Wuhan, China, 21–22 December 2008; pp. 172–176. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Ke, J.; Chang, J. Knowledge representation using fuzzy Petri nets. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1990, 2, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Looney, C. Fuzzy Petri nets for rule-based decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1988, 18, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Lin, Q.; Mao, L.; Zhang, Z. Dynamic Adaptive Fuzzy Petri Nets for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2013, 43, 1399–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jong, W.; Shiau, Y.; Horng, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, S. Temporal knowledge representation and reasoning techniques using time Petri nets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 1999, 29, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kargin, A.; Petrenko, T. Knowledge Representation in Smart Rules Engine. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communications Technologies (AICT), Lviv, Ukraine, 2–6 July 2019; pp. 231–236. [Google Scholar]
- Ebrahimipour, V.; Yacout, S. Ontology-Based Schema to Support Maintenance Knowledge Representation with a Case Study of a Pneumatic Valve. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2015, 45, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Chen, Z.; Yang, L.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Deen, M. An Incremental Deep Convolutional Computation Model for Feature Learning on Industrial Big Data. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2019, 15, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, X.; Wang, X. Incremental learning of dynamic fuzzy neural networks for accurate system modeling. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2009, 160, 972–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filev, D.; Chinnam, R.; Tseng, F.; Baruah, P. An Industrial Strength Novelty Detection Framework for Autonomous Equipment Monitoring and Diagnostics. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2010, 6, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, K.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.; Jang, C.; Sunwoo, M. Development of Autonomous Car—Part I: Distributed System Architecture and Development Process. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2014, 61, 7131–7140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripkovic, S.; Delic, M. Knowledge databases in control systems. In Proceedings of the IECON’99, 25th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, San Jose, CA, USA, 29 November–3 December 1999; pp. 642–645. [Google Scholar]
- Doroodgar, B.; Liu, Y.; Nejat, G. A Learning-Based Semi-Autonomous Controller for Robotic Exploration of Unknown Disaster Scenes While Searching for Victims. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2017, 44, 2719–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Sanchez-Tamayo, N.; Gonzalez, G.; Agarwal, M.; Wachs, J. Transferring Dexterous Surgical Skill Knowledge between Robots for Semi-autonomous Teleoperation. In Proceedings of the 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New Delhi, India, 14–18 October 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Qasim, I.; Anwar, M.; Azam, F.; Tufail, H.; Zafar, M. A Model-driven Mobile HMI Framework (MMHF) for Industrial Control Systems. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 10827–10846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, T.; Shin, D. Formalizing Human-Machine Interactions for Adaptive Automation in Smart Manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Hum. -Mach. Syst. 2019, 49, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meschtscherjakov, A.; Tscheligi, M.; Szostak, D.; Krome, S.; Pfleging, B.; Ratan, R.; Politis, I.; Baltodano, S.; Miller, D.; Ju, W. HCI and Autonomous Vehicles: Contextual Experience Informs Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 3542–3549. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, L.; Zhu, J.; Zhe, Y. Kcansee engineering applied in Human-Computer Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design, Wenzhou, China, 26–29 November 2009; pp. 1287–1290. [Google Scholar]
- Erol, B.; Majumdar, A.; Benavidez, P.; Rad, P.; Choo, K.; Jamshidi, M. Toward Artificial Emotional Intelligence for Cooperative Social Human-Machine Interaction. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2020, 7, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filho, R.; Huang, C.; Yu, B.; Venkataramana, R.; El-Messidi, A.; Sharber, D.; Westerheide, J.; Alkadi, N. Semi-Autonomous Industrial Robotic Inspection: Remote Methane Detection in Oilfield. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–7 July 2018; pp. 17–24. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafa, S.; Mustapha, A.; Shamsudin, A.; Ahmad, A.; Gunasekaran, S. A Real-Time Autonomous Flight Navigation Trajectory Assessment for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), Putrajaya, Malaysia, 27 August 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Doering, M.; Glas, D.; Ishiguro, H. Modeling Interaction Structure for Robot Imitation Learning of Human Social Behavior. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 2019, 49, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, L. Design and Implementation of Human-Computer Interaction Adjustment in Nuclear Power Monitoring System. Microprocess Microsyst. 2021, 104096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.; Jian, Z.; Zheng, L.; Nan, L. The Application of Human-Computer Interaction Idea in Computer Aided Industrial Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computer Network, Electronic and Automation (ICCNEA), Xi’an, China, 23–25 September 2017; pp. 160–164. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, L.; Yin, Q.; Wang, L.; Xue, Q. Human-computer interaction analysis of turret based on context-aware. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Hong Kong, China, 10–13 December 2012; pp. 1253–1256. [Google Scholar]
- Quintas, J.; Menezes, P.; Dias, J. Information Model and Architecture Specification for Context Awareness Interaction Decision Support in Cyber-Physical Human–Machine Systems. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 2016, 47, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrera, D.; Roberti, F.; Toibero, M.; Carelli, R. Human-Robot Interaction: Legible behavior rules in passing and crossing events. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 2016, 14, 2644–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Wang, R.; Yue, X.; Liu, T.; Chen, C.; Fang, S. FaceME: Face-to-Machine Proximity Estimation Based on RSSI Difference for Mobile Industrial Human Machine Interaction. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 3547–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowyer, S.; Rodriguez y Baena, F. Dissipative Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2015, 31, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albuainain, H.; Almelihi, S.; Alkhaidi, S.; Alzahrani, R.; Alqahtani, A. Human Computer Interaction Study on Fujifilm Instax Mini 8 Camera Using Evaluation Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1–3 May 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Milanovic, N.; Malek, M. Service-Oriented Operating System: A Key Element in Improving Service Availability. In Service Availability, 4th International Service Availability Symposium, ISAS 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; p. 4526. [Google Scholar]
- Stadje, W. Availability of an operating system during a given time interval: A dynamic programming approach. Nav. Res. Log. 1996, 43, 589–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broek, E. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Comput. Rev. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, M.; Peng, B.; Zhang, N. The research of human-machine interactions unity on IOS and android smartphone platform. In Proceedings of the 2014 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education, Vancouver, Canada, 22–24 August 2014; pp. 640–643. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, L.; Wei, J.; Xi, Z.; Bolton, M. A Formal Machine–Learning Approach to Generating Human–Machine Interfaces from Task Models. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 2017, 47, 822–833. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, Q.; Duan, Q.; Jiang, B. Integrated Evaluation of Hardware and Software Interfaces for Automotive Human–Machine Interaction. IET Cyber-Phys. Syst. Theory Appl. 2019, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benbya, H.; Mckelvey, B. Using Coevolutionary and Complexity Theories to Improve IS Alignment: A Multi-Level Approach. J. Inf. Technol. 2006, 21, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merali, Y.; Papadopoulos, T.; Nadkarni, T. Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2012, 21, 125–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weichhart, G.; Molina, A.; Chen, D.; Whitman, L.; Vernadat, F. Challenges and current developments for Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Enterprise Systems. Comput. Ind. 2016, 79, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pintus, A.; Carboni, D.; Piras, A. Paraimpu: A platform for a social web of things. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France, 16–20 April 2012; pp. 401–404. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, T.; Mashal, I.; Alsaryrah, O.; Chang, C.; Hsu, T.; Li, P.; Kuo, W. MUL-SWoT: A Social Web of Things Platform for Internet of Things Application Development. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), Taipei, Taiwan, 1–3 September 2014; pp. 296–299. [Google Scholar]
- Azad, M.; Bag, S.; Hao, F.; Shalaginov, A. Decentralized Self-Enforcing Trust Management System for Social Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 2690–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Data Management | Knowledge Discovery | Human Computer Interaction | |
---|---|---|---|
Semantics analysis | √ | √ | √ |
Knowledge graph | √ | √ | √ |
Deep learning | √ | √ | √ |
Data management | Key problems | 1. Integrity; 2. Quality; 3. Reliability; 4. Accuracy; 5. Redundancy; 6. Timeliness |
Challenges | To solve the problem of incomplete data annotation and heterogeneous data noise, how to ensure the anti-noise and realize perception of data | |
Future directions | 1. Transfer learning: This technology can annotate and effectively manage the data, including removing noise, avoiding packet loss, and fast searching aspects.2. Digital twin: This technology can simulate and simulate the operations of the system in the virtual space and exchange information with the real world. Improve the reliability of system operation data. | |
Knowledge discovery | Key problems | 1. Knowledge extraction; 2. Knowledge representation; 3. Knowledge updating |
Challenges | To solve the problem of information characteristics in complex environment; how to carry out online knowledge updating of differentiated knowledge. | |
Future directions | 1. Incremental learning: This technology is constantly learning new things from new scenarios in the complex manufacturing environment. 2. Reinforcement learning: This technique can be used to learn strategies to achieve specific goals during interaction, ensuring the robustness of the system. | |
HCI | Key problems | 1. Intelligence; 2. Efficiency; 3. Reliability; 4. Availability |
Challenges | To solve the problem of industrial scene understanding, human–computer interface, and how to realize collaborative evolution and decision control interaction through task collaboration. | |
Future directions | The Multi-agent co-operative: This technology can help the system to realize the scientific and efficient interaction of each body. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dou, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, T.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Y. The Architecture of Mass Customization-Social Internet of Things System: Current Research Profile. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100653
Dou Z, Sun Y, Wu Z, Wang T, Fan S, Zhang Y. The Architecture of Mass Customization-Social Internet of Things System: Current Research Profile. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021; 10(10):653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100653
Chicago/Turabian StyleDou, Zixin, Yanming Sun, Zhidong Wu, Tao Wang, Shiqi Fan, and Yuxuan Zhang. 2021. "The Architecture of Mass Customization-Social Internet of Things System: Current Research Profile" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10, no. 10: 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100653
APA StyleDou, Z., Sun, Y., Wu, Z., Wang, T., Fan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The Architecture of Mass Customization-Social Internet of Things System: Current Research Profile. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(10), 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100653