Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of eIF Family Genes from Brassica rapa in Response to TuMV Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Ginger and Its Sub-Components on Pain
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Enzyme Activity Behavior after Urea Nitrogen Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro and In Silico Screening of Anti-Vibrio spp., Antibiofilm, Antioxidant and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Cuminum cyminum L. Volatile Oil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Walking around the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy): An Ethnobotanical Investigation

by
Valeria Cavalloro
1,
Francesco Saverio Robustelli della Cuna
2,*,
Elena Quai
2,
Stefania Preda
2,
Francesco Bracco
1,
Emanuela Martino
1,* and
Simona Collina
2
1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Sant ’Epifanio 14, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(17), 2246; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172246
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacological and Toxicological Study of Medicinal Plants)

Abstract

:
The Trentino-South Tyrol region is a special statute region of northeastern Italy. This territory is of particular interest for its morphology, flourishing vegetation, and history, having been a meeting area among different civilizations. Hence, Trentino is characterized by an ethnic plurality and a rich ethnobotanical knowledge, even if the available information is fragmentary, widely dispersed, and often guarded in oral popular culture. To fill this gap, in the present work 200 subjects were interviewed using an ethnobotanical survey. The resulting 817 citations referred to 64 native species, used either for human or animal health or for domestic purposes. As a second step, for each plant exploited for medicinal purposes, local importance was evaluated by calculating their relative frequency of citation. Moreover, the main traditional preparations were discussed. Among them, the most cited and exploited ones are Achillea millefolium, Arnica montana, Hypericum perforatum, Malva sylvestris, Pinus mugo, and Satureja montana, for which a deeper analysis has been performed. Lastly, the ethnobotanical knowledge of the plants growing in this territory will add a piece to the mosaic of traditional medicine in Italy and may lay the foundation for a nature-aided drug discovery process.

1. Introduction

Trentino-South Tyrol region is a special statute region of northeastern Italy bordering Austria and Switzerland. It is a mountainous region where different Alps sections meet (Dolomites, Alpi Retiche, Alpi dei Tauri, and Prealpi), reaching 3905 m a.s.l. with its highest peak named Ortles. Trentino-South Tyrol, is also characterized by several valleys and it is crossed by rivers (the most important one is the Adige river) and lakes (e.g., Garda lake in the south). Due to this peculiar and varied territory, Trentino-South Tyrol is characterized by very rich biodiversity. Thus, near Garda Lake, many Mediterranean species grow, while hornbeam, beech, and maple trees prevail in the north up to an altitude of 1200–1400 m. Furthermore, spruce, larch, and birch trees prevail in higher altitudes, but give way to Alpine pastures and tundra vegetation above 2000 m. Finally, valleys are the perfect environment to harvest species like apple trees. Besides this high richness in terms of biodiversity, Trentino-South Tyrol is also a crossroads of different populations and ethnicities. Thus, being located in the northernmost part of Italy, Trentino-South Tyrol has always been characterized by an ethnic plurality, having been a meeting area among different civilizations, strongly influencing the local culture. Taken together, both these peculiar characteristics make Trentino-South Tyrol territory a very interesting hotspot of traditional knowledge, mainly belonging to the ethnobotanical field [1,2]. During the centuries, ethnobotanical knowledge has been mainly handed down orally both vertically, among generations, and horizontally, among members of the same community. In many cases, the absence of written findings and the progressive departure from traditions are causing the loss of traditional knowledge of natural remedies. This statement can be considered true for all the Italian ethnobotanical traditions and, for this reason, always more scientific papers have as final aim to rekindle attention on this topic. Consistently, starting from 1981, many ethnobotanical investigations have been carried out in different Italian areas (Table 1), with the common purpose of collecting information to achieve greater awareness of the history of a certain location. As highlighted in Table 1, none of the ethnobotanical investigations published until now has the Trentino-South Tyrol region as subject.
The present work aims to shed light on the ethnobotanical knowledge of Trentino Alto Adige. So far, the available information is fragmentary, widely dispersed, and often guarded in oral popular culture or Italian written [32,33,34]. Particularly, we selected and interviewed 200 subjects of different sex, age, and occupation to collect and analyze ethnobotanical information in the medicinal, veterinary and liquoristic fields. The knowledge of traditional uses of the plants growing in this territory will add a piece to the mosaic of traditional medicine in Italy. Moreover, the most relevant collected data may represent the starting point for a nature-aided drug discovery process, one of the most winning approaches to identify new active ingredients able to contrast human diseases [35,36,37,38].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Studied Area and Data Collection

Trentino-South Tyrol is a region with special status in northeastern Italy. It borders Austria to the north, Veneto to the east, Lombardy, and Switzerland to the west. The territory is mountainous and is characterized by numerous valleys. It hosts about 1,050,000 inhabitants with a density of 73 inhabitants per km² and has an area of 13,607 km². Trentino-South Tyrol is composed of two autonomous provinces, Trento and Bolzano. The Province of Trento or Trentino is divided into 11 sectors, corresponding to the old districts: Val di Sole, Valle di Non, Valli Giudicarie, Alto Garda and Ledro, Valle dell’Adige, Vallagarina, Alta Valsugana, Bassa Valsugana and Tesino, Valle di Fiemme, Primiero and Ladino di Fassa (Figure 1). These districts differ both in their morphology and the level of tourism.
Considering that people are the repository of knowledge and information, we paid particular attention to the selection of the informants, an essential step for performing a correct ethnobotanical investigation. Informants have been selected based on knowledge of traditional medicinal plants, and age. Overall, from June 2019 to December 2020, two hundred people have been interviewed, out of these 133 (67%) were female and 67 (32%) were male. The informants were categorized into five different age groups, as outlined in Table 2. The informants were aged from 18 to 87 years, and the average age was 53 years. In contrast with other areas [39], the majority of the informants were female, probably as a consequence of Trentino industrialization, which prompted most of the males to leave the agricultural sector, thus leaving back ethnobotanical customs. Conversely, many females have kept the job of housewives, looking after the home and children, and teaching the ethnobotanical traditions.
The recruitment of informants involved all the 11 areas of Trentino. As outlined in Table 3, data collection has been more difficult in heavily tourist areas, such as Val di Fassa, Alta Valsugana, or the Primiero, where the knowledge of the traditional uses of medicinal plants was lower, maybe because of the intense work in tourist places, which brought the inhabitants to move away from their traditions. Thus, in these areas, a maximum of 63 citations (Val di Fassa) have been collected from 12 informants. Different considerations can be made for a few tourist areas, as can be highlighted by the data related to Valle di Non and Valle di Fiemme, where a similar number of informants, 19 and 15, is associated with a very higher number of citations, 175 and 148, respectively. Informants have been interviewed following the common principle in ethnobotany, i.e., what, where, when, who, why, and how. All data have been collected, reporting the name of the plants, their medical use, parts used, methods for preparation, and collection time. Overall, 817 citations were obtained, out of these 65 were referred to native species of the Autonomous Province of Trento.

2.2. Plant Species Cited by Informants

Firstly, we performed a literature search on the 817 cited plants and classified them on their use: plants for human health (87.1%, 712), plants for preparation of liqueurs (11.5%, 94), and plants for veterinary use (1.4%, 11) (Figure 2). The cited officinal natural sources include one lichen (Cetraria islandica L.) which is now an emerging organism in the drug development field [40] and plants belonging to 31 different families, among which the most represented ones are Asteraceae (10 plants), Pinaceae (5 plants), and Lamiaceae and Rosaceae (4 plants each) families.
We particularly focused on the 56 species specifically mentioned by informants for medicinal uses and calculated relative frequency citation (0  <  RFC  <  1), useful to identify the frequency of use and the local importance of each species. The RFC index is given by the frequency of citation (FC, the number of informants mentioning the use of the species) divided by the total number of informants participating in the survey (N), without considering the use categories [41]. A full list of cited plants (scientific name, habitat, plant part used, etc.) is reported in Tables S1–S3 in the supporting information.
As shown in Table 4, Achillea millefolium L. (RFC = 0.1), Arnica montana L. (RFC = 0.47), Hypericum perforatum L. (RFC = 0.35), Malva sylvestris L. (RFC = 0.17), Pinus mugo Turra (RFC = 0.34), Satureja montana L. (RFC = 0.135), and Urtica dioica L. (RFC = 0.11) are the most exploited medicinal plants, as the high RCFs values highlighted. Conversely, the less frequently exploited biomasses were Cetraria islandica, Cornus mas, Cyclamen sp.pl., Elymus repens, Juniperus sp.pl., Lycopodium clavatum, Senna alexandrina, Solanum nigrum, and Verbascum thapsus with an RCF value of 0.005. All these plants were cited only once a time by the informants.
Traditionally prepared formulations of cited plants are employed by local people. The most common traditional preparations mentioned by the informants are herbal tea, decoction, tincture, syrup, oleolyte, and ointment. They are briefly discussed in the following paragraph.

2.3. Traditional Preparations

Informants reported different therapeutic applications of plants, depending on their route of administration. Consistently, the main preparation methods for oral administration (herbal tea and decoction) or topical administration (oleolyte and ointment) are described here below, whereas the plants most used in this preparation are reported in Table 5.
Herbal tea is an aqueous preparation extemporaneously prepared to administer orally plants for therapeutic purposes or used as a vehicle for other medicaments [42]. Briefly, the dried vegetal part is added to boiling water and left to infuse for ten minutes, keeping the container covered. At the end of the infusion, the solid is separated using a strainer of a paper filter. Another extemporaneous preparation is a decoction, commonly used to extract active compounds from barks, branches, leathery leaves, roots, and rhizomes. Extraction of active ingredients from such plant materials requires prolonged boiling times. Informants described two different decoction methods. Most of the informants put drugs and water in the container at the same time, then bring everything to a boil for a few minutes. Few informants (especially elderly people) add the drug to boiling water and let the mixture boil for several minutes. In both cases, the solid must be separated from the water by filtration, thus obtaining the decoction. The tincture is a liquid preparation obtained by maceration of fresh plant material in ethyl alcohol at 90° for at least 40 days. Some informants tend to leave the drug as soon as it is collected for a day in the shade in a warm place before the tincture preparation so that the biomass is as dry as possible. Oleolyte is a topical formulation prepared by maceration of the fresh plant materials in vegetable oil (olive, sunflower, or rice oil). Such a formulation combines the emollient properties of the oils with the therapeutic activity of the ingredients extracted from the medicinal plants [42]. The fresh plant material is placed into a jar with a lid together with the oil and left to macerate for forty days, mixing from time to time, and then the plant materials are separated from the oil by filtration. Finally, the oil enriched with active metabolites so obtained can be exploited both topically and orally (the traditional in-house packaging is pictured in Figure 3 panel A,B). From the interviews emerged that great attention must be paid to the humidity of the plant material used for preparing oleolytes. Some informants avoid collecting plant material in the morning but wait until the early afternoon, to prevent the presence of dew and therefore to limit the presence of water, others do not use the fresh plant but prefer to leave them under the sun (or in the shade in a warm place) for a day before maceration to reduce humidity. Some others, during the maceration, leave the cap of the jar slightly unscrewed and every two or three days dry the condensation that forms on the surface of the jar with paper. All the above-mentioned measures are aimed to reduce the presence of water, which could lead to microorganisms’ growth and the contamination of finished products. An example of oleolyte commonly used by local people for alleviating gout and joint pain is obtained by Rhododendron ferrugineum’s galls (or cecidia). Oleolytes may be used as such or maybe an ingredient of an ancient topical preparation called ointment.
The vernacular name of ointment is “ünt del tai”, which translation is “the grease of the cut”. Since ancient times the woodcutters collected the oleoresin (a honey-like substance) of Larix decidua, called “Largà” in the Trentino dialect, and applied it to the hands’ wounds produced during their work (Figure 3 panel C). Over the years, Largà has been used to extract wooden thorns or treat wounds with abscesses and local men exerted the ancient trade of “Largaiòl”, i.e., turpentine collector. The harvest involves carving the Larix trunk, creating a hole about 10 cm from the ground which is immediately closed with a cap. After three years (time limit by law [43]), the cap is removed and the Largà is collected in buckets.
Once harvested, Largà is traditionally prepared using:
-
1/3 oleoresin (Largà);
-
1/3 raw beeswax;
-
1/3 oleolyte of choice;
-
Essential oil or alcohol 90°
Briefly, the raw beeswax is melted till the wax is liquefied, and then Largà and the oleolyte were added. The so obtained mixture was heated for a few minutes on the stove. Once the ingredients are well-blended, essential oil or alcohol at 90° (as a preservative agent) is added. The so-obtained preparation was conserved in glass jars. Informants use ointments to improve the performance of the oleolyte, combining the therapeutic properties of the medicinal plant with those of Largà. In cases of muscle sprains or contractures, the candidates recommend the use of Arnica montana-based oleolyte for anti-inflammatory activity but, since the application of the oleolyte is uncomfortable, they prefer to use the ointment that allows having both the therapeutic properties of the two species in the same preparation. The same concept can be adapted to Hypericum perforatum-based ointment in the case of burns, erythema, or dermatitis. Another example of ointment is a particular preparation called mugolio, which is a syrup obtained by resinous pine cones of Pinus mugo. It is traditionally prepared as Mugolio (Mugo + oil) starting from the buds collected in summer, following two different methods (Figure 3 panel D). The first one involves the stratification of pine cones or buds with sugar in a jar. The recipient is then exposed to the sun for at least 40 days, till the complete dissolution of the sugar, and then the mixture is filtered. The second method foresees the filling of the jar with pine cones or buds, the addition of honey, and the subsequent maceration under sunlight for at least 40 days. This preparation is used by local people against cough and sore throat.

2.4. A Survey of the Most Used Plants

As expected, plants with the highest RCFs values (Table 4) are the plants most used for the preparation of traditional remedies. In Table 5, the most relevant plants, their traditional preparation, and their medicinal uses are reported. The most cited and used medicinal plants are Achillea millefolium, Arnica montana, Hypericum perforatum, Malva sylvestris L., Pinus mugo, and Satureja montana (entries 1, 15, 19, 24, and 33).
Over the years, several reviews regarding these plants have been published, and they can be useful to readers interested in deepening the knowledge about the above-discussed medicinal plants [44,45,46,47,48,49]. Particularly, A. millefolium and H. perforatum have been used for both oral and topical remedies. Indeed, Informants highlighted that oral and topic preparations have completely different applications as shown in Table 5 (entries 1 and 15, respectively). These different applications are strictly related to the preparation methods. Thus, herbal tea and decoction allow the extraction of water-soluble secondary metabolites. Particularly, herbal tea is characterized by mild extraction conditions (the water is added after boiling and not during boiling, so the temperatures are low). As a consequence, if, on one hand, herbal tea preserves thermolabile metabolites, on the other one this preparation allows the extraction of few metabolites due to the short extraction time and low temperature. Conversely, decoction requires higher temperature and longer extraction times, compared to herbal tea. Topic preparation (ointment) foresees the extraction of metabolites by oils (apolar solvents) and therefore different secondary metabolites are extracted.

2.5. Most Cited Plants

Achillea millefolium, also called Yarrow, belongs to the Astraceae family. It is an herbaceous, perennial, and aromatic plant with a branched and creeping rhizome and straight stem. The top of the corymbs bears several white or pink flower blooms, while the species name millefolium is due to the leaves, which are very jagged in depth. A. millefolium grows in meadows, pastures, and along the edges of paths up to 2200 m a.s.l. The importance of this plant as a medicinal remedy can be found also by analyzing its generic name. Thus Achillea derived from the Greek hero Achille, who exploited this plant to treat his companions’ wounds. A. millefolium is traditionally used in the treatment of inflammation, gastrointestinal and gynecological disorders, hepato-biliary complaints, and wound healing [44]. Generally, the aerial parts are the ones exploited to prepare the tea, decoction, or oleolyte to treat different human disorders. Recent scientific studies confirmed the A. millefolium traditional uses. Thus, the choleretic effect is mainly due to dicaffeoylquinic acids, while the spasmolytic activity was attributed to the flavonoids [50]. In detail, apigenin and luteolin (both glycosylated and not) resulted to have very interesting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, while the metabolites mainly present in the lipophilic preparations are β-pinene, sabinene, 1,8-cineole, and β-caryophyllene. The different hydro-lipophilic nature of the metabolites that are present in the phytocomplex extracted by A. millefolium may explain the different traditional preparations. Particularly, oleolyte (Table 5, #1) is able to extract lipophilic metabolites useful for treating muscle and joint pain (Figure 4), while decotion is exploited to extract apigenin, luteolin dicaffeoylquinic acids for treating urinary tract infections (Table 5, #1) [50,51,52]. No literature data supporting the use of herbal tea against menstrual pain and oligomenorrhea (Table 5, #1,) are available so far and therefore further investigations are needed.
Arnica montana is a perennial herbaceous plant of the Asteraceae family, formerly known as Compositae. It is characterized by radical rosette leaves, and an erect stem, which ends with a yellow inflorescence. In Trento Arnica is a well-known medicinal herb and grows spontaneously throughout the territory at different altitudes, even if the harvest is preferred in areas higher than 1500 m. From a biological point of view, the most interesting families of secondary metabolites produced by A. montana are sesquiterpene lactones of the pseudoguaianolide group (helenalin and its esters with short-chain fatty acids); caffeoylquinic acids (chlorogenic acid and derivatives); flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol, patuletin, and their glycosides and hispidulin); essential oil (thymol and derivatives) (Figure 5) [53]. Thymol and cymene derivatives may explain the traditional use of ointment and oleolyte (Table 5, #3), being endowed with anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory activities [54].
The secondary metabolites profile is generally influenced by endogenous and exogenous factors; in this particular medicinal herb, the endogenous ones are the age of the plant, while the exogenous ones are the altitude and therefore the radiation, the geographical area, the soil, the attack of parasites and others [55]. In 2011 Huber and collaborators highlighted that the sesquiterpene lactones significantly decrease inflammation by inhibiting the NF-kB complex, a mechanism of action that differs from that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as indomethacin and acetylsalicylic acid [56]. All the 94 citations referred to this plant are associated with pathologies involving the musculoskeletal system, such as contractures, sprains, or strains. Candidates benefit from the therapeutic properties of Arnica by extracting its active ingredients through various preparations, i.e., mother tincture called Arnica spirit, oleolyte or ointment, or Arnica flower pack. This latter case is exploited in urgency when fresh flowers are available. However, this method is rarely used because the extraction of the active ingredients is not optimal.
Hypericum perforatum, also called St. John’s wort, is a perennial herbaceous plant belonging to the Hypericaceae family. H. perforatum has a stiff and branchy stem, 30 to 50 cm high, and leaves arranged two by two against each other dotted with spots. The flowers, which bloom numerous at the apex of the branches, are bright yellow and have five petals. Flowering occurs from June to August depending on the altitude. This medicinal plant grows and develops in alpine pastures, it prefers uncultivated land, along the ditches or the edges of roads and woods up to 1600 m. The part of the plant with biological activity is represented by the flowering tops, rich in hypericin and pseudohypericin, biapigenin, hyperforin and derivatives, and cinnamic acids (Figure 6) [57]. Herbal tea (Table 5, #15), obtained by a common and traditional extraction process, is endowed with antidepressant activity. Based on literature evidence, this activity is due to a synergistic effect among hypericin hyperforin and its derivatives and some flavonols [58,59]. Moreover, most of the candidates exploit H. perforatum to treat skin pathology, preparing oleolites or ointments to be applied to injured skin (photosensitizing can be a side effect). This particular application is supported by several scientific papers, which highlighted that more lipophilic secondary metabolites like hypericin and hyperforin have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities, as well as properties concerning the stimulation of growth and tissue differentiation [60]. Finally, in the Trentino tradition, H. perforatum is used to treat pathologies involving the respiratory system, such as inflammatory states of the bronchi. Moreover, in this case, an herbal tea prepared with its flowering tops is used.
Malva sylvestris belongs to Malvaceae family and it could be an annual, biennial or perennial herbaceous plant. It has an erect or prostrate stem that can grow from 60 to 80 cm. The palminervia leaves own 5 to 7 lobes and are characterized by irregular margins. The pink flowers are gathered at the axil of the leaves and bloom from April to October, they have dark streaks and bilobed petals. The fruit is a circular polychaene. As for A. millefolium, also the importance as a medicinal plant of M. sylvestris can be found in its name. Thus, “malva” means soft in Latin, highlighting its use as an emollient. M. sylvestris can be directly eaten to have a mild laxative, liver cleansing tonic, and anti-heartburn effects. On the other hand, its pharmaceutical preparations can be used to treat gastrointestinal and urological disorders, abdominal pain, diarrhea, respiratory diseases, insect bites, burns, furuncles, and ulcerous wounds [61]. The aerial parts of the plants are the most exploited, particularly the leaves and the flowers due to their anti-inflammatory properties. In detail, their traditional use fulfills the requirement for at least 30 years of medicinal use at a specified strength and specified posology. For this reason, the European Medicinal Agency and, more, in particular, the Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) assess that flowers of M. sylvestris can be used to treat mouth irritation or throat as well as mild stomach and gut pain in patients from 12 years of age [62]. Despite no specific metabolites have been recognized as responsible for M. sylvestris biological activities, the main class of secondary metabolites which are supposed to be active are flavonoids and mucilage. Candidates benefit from the therapeutic properties of M. sylvestris by extracting its active ingredients mainly by preparing herbal teas to treat dyspepsia (Table 5, #19).
Pinus mugo, or Mountain pine, is a needle-like bush of the Pinaceae family; this evergreen shrub, also known as dwarf pine, can reach up to three meters in height and is equipped with needles curved and crescent-shaped, rigid, from 3 to 8 cm long; the mountain pine has rather superficial but very branched roots and conical ovate cones, 2 to 5 cm long. This spontaneous shrub prefers mountainous areas, it is particularly widespread in the mountains of Trentino, where it grows in a range between 1500 m and 2600 m. In folk medicine, P. mugo has been exploited in various medicinal contexts, as an antitussive, and for lung diseases, as it boasts antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, expectorant, and fluidifying properties and secretolytic and antimicrobial effects [63,64]. P. mugo was cited 78 times by 200 informants, 69 citations reported for the treatment of diseases of the respiratory system, while 9 citations referred to liqueur use. Moreover, results highlighted that two preparations are used for the extraction of the active ingredients: Mugolio (see Section 2.4) and essential oil. The essential oils are produced by the distillation of the needles and their balsamic properties are used against the cold by applying a few drops on the chest (Table 5, #24) (Figure 5 panel D). The therapeutic properties of this traditional preparation are mainly attributed to monoterpenes like α-pinene, δ-3-carene, β-pinene, β-phellandrene (Figure 7) [48]. Finally, in the liqueur field, the pinecones of P. mugo are used for the production of grappa; the pine cones are left to infuse in the distillate for at least 40 days, in warm places under the sunlight, stirring occasionally.
Satureja montana is a suffruticose perennial plant with a strong aromatic odor of the Lamiaceae family. It is characterized by woody stems at the base, erect, usually widely branched from the bottom, to form a small bush with bright green, opposite and subsessile leaves. It is native to the mountainous regions of central-southern and western Europe that inhabits rocky arid soils up to 1300 m of altitude. This plant is exploited by informants to prepare herbal tea to contrast nervous gastric pains (Table 5, #33). The use of this specific traditional preparation finds an explanation in scientific publications. Thus, a paper published in 2010 assesses that the non-volatile extracts showed the strongest antioxidant activity compared to the essential oils obtained by the same biomass. This strong activity can be attributed to the high content of phenolic compounds. In the same work, the antimicrobial activity of S. montana essential oils and ethanolic extracts is investigated. In this second case, the activity resulted mainly due to phenolics (mainly carvacrol, and thymol) and terpenes (γ-terpinene) [65]. As mentioned for A. montana, also in the case of S. montana the active secondary metabolites concentration is strongly influenced by the environment. In detail, the concentration of its major components, e.g., carvacrol, linalool, terpinene, and cymene, shows large variations based on the harvesting place and the stage of development (Figure 8) [66]. Conversely, no explanations have been found in the literature for the activity against bloating, and vomiting of the herbal tea (Table 5, #33). Further investigations are needed.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Study Area

Trentino-South Tyrol region, a special statute region of northeastern Italy. It borders to the north with Austria, to the east with Veneto, and to the west with Lombardy and Switzerland. The territory is completely mountainous and is characterized by numerous valleys. It hosts about 1,050,000 inhabitants with a density of 73 inhabitants per km2 and an area of 13,607 km2.

3.2. Ethnobotanical Survey

From June 2019 to December 2020, the ethnobotanical use of plants was documented by interviewing 200 people, both men, and women of different ages. The study was explained to every informant before they gave oral informed consent. Each of them agreed to participate voluntarily and was allowed to discontinue the interviews at any time. The questionnaire, which was used as a tool for data collection, consisted of the following questions/authorizations:
  • Informant data: Name and surname; place and date of birth; sex; education and work; source of the ethnobotanical knowledge (i.e., family, community, literature, or others).
  • Authorizations: Authorization to exploit photos to certify the harvest and preparation of the plant; consensus to use the data provided by the informant.
  • Plant information: Common (or scientific) and local name; collection place and time; traditional uses (medicinal, veterinarian, or liquoristic); part of the plant exploited and traditional preparation (infusion, food, decoction, …).
  • Biological properties: Attributed property, target pathology, side effects (if any), other information.
Finally, the plants were recognized under the guidance of local people by studying available samples or by analyzing photos and comparing them to literature information.

3.3. Quantitative Data Analysis

The local significance of plants exploited for medicinal purposes was studied given the relative frequency of citation. The RCF values were calculated as follows:
RCF = CFs/N
where CFs is the number of informants that have mentioned the use of the species and N is the total number of informants.

4. Conclusions

Trentino-South Tyrol is an Italian special statute region characterized by ethnic plurality, as testified by the fact that three languages are spoken there: Italian, German, and Ladin, a peculiar idiom whose origins are still unknown. During the decades, the different civilizations that met in this territory exploited the rich biodiversity of Trentino-South Tyrol in a different way, thus building a wide and well eradicated ethnobotanical culture. Unfortunately, all this knowledge has always been handed down orally and only a few fragmentary, incomplete, or Italian written works have been published. Consistently in the present contribution we fill this gap to rekindle attention on Trentino-South Tyrol ethnobotanical knowledge. In detail, 200 subjects were interviewed using an ethnobotanical survey. These informants were classified based on their district, bringing out that the most touristic areas have almost lost their ethnobotanical knowledge, due to the progressive removal of traditional habits. The main holders of this knowledge are women, probably as a consequence of Trentino industrialization, which prompted most males to leave ethnobotanical customs, while females continued to look after the home and children and teach the ethnobotanical traditions. The 817 citations resulting from the survey referred to 64 native species, used either for human or animal health or for domestic purposes. Moreover, based on the relative frequency citation index and the analysis of the most important traditional preparations, Achillea millefolium, Arnica montana, Hypericum perforatum, Malva sylvestris, Pinus mugo, and Satureja montana resulted to be the most exploited medicinal plants. The analysis of their traditional preparations highlighted that some of their applications were already known and the metabolites responsible for the activity identified. Conversely, some applications remain unjustified, like A. millefolium herbal tea to treat menstrual pain and oligomenorrhea or the same preparation of S. montana against bloating, and vomiting.
To sum up, Trentino-South Tyrol region, is characterized by ethnic plurality and it is a powerful source of ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal knowledge. The available information belonging to the oral culture has been herein collected, thus avoiding the risk of being forgotten and lost. Moreover, the results highlight the promising role of medicinal plants in managing different human diseases. However, to confirm their therapeutic use, a deeper investigation is needed to approve the safety and efficacy of the extracts and their bioactive compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11172246/s1, Table S1: Plants cited by the informants exploited for liquor preparation; Table S2: Plants cited by the informants exploited for veterinary purposes; Table S3: Plants cited by the informants exploited for medicinal purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S.R.d.C., E.M., and S.C.; methodology, F.S.R.d.C. and E.Q.; formal analysis, V.C. and F.B.; investigation, E.Q., F.B., and V.C.; data curation, E.Q., S.P., and F.S.R.d.C.; writing—original draft preparation, E.Q., and V.C.; writing—review and editing, F.S.R.d.C., E.M., and S.C.; visualization, V.C.; supervision, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zatelli, P.; Gabellieri, N.; Besana, A. Digitalization and Classification of Cesare Battisti’s Atlas of 1915. SPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peterlini, O. Autonomy and the Protection of Ethnic Minorities in Trentino-South Tyrol: An Overview of the History, Law and Politics; Reihe Ethnos: Wien, Austria, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballero, M.; Poli, F.; Sacchetti, G.; Loi, M.C. Ethnobotanical research in the territory of Fluminimaggiore (south-western Sardinia). Fitoterapia 2001, 72, 788–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guarrera, P.M.; Salerno, G.; Caneva, G. Folk phytotherapeutical plants from Maratea area (Basilicata, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 99, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Salerno, G.; Guarrera, P.M.; Caneva, G. Agricultural, domestic and handicraft folk uses of plants in the Tyrrhenian sector of Basilicata (Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2005, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guarrera, P.M.; Forti, G.; Marignoli, S. Ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal uses of plants in the district of Acquapendente (Latium, Central Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 96, 429–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nebel, S.; Pieroni, A.; Heinrich, M. Ta chòrta: Wild edible greens used in the Graecanic area in Calabria, Southern Italy. Appetite 2006, 47, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Natale, A.; Pollio, A. Plants species in the folk medicine of Montecorvino Rovella (inland Campania, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 109, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guarrera, P.M.; Lucchese, F.; Medori, S. Ethnophytotherapeutical research in the high Molise region (Central-Southern Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2008, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Signorini, M.A.; Piredda, M.; Bruschi, P. Plants and traditional knowledge: An ethnobotanical investigation on Monte Ortobene (Nuoro, Sardinia). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2009, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vitalini, S.; Tomè, F.; Fico, G. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in Valvestino (Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 121, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pieroni, A.; Giusti, M.E. Alpine ethnobotany in Italy: Traditional knowledge of gastronomic and medicinal plants among the Occitans of the upper Varaita valley, Piedmont. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2009, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Idolo, M.; Motti, R.; Mazzoleni, S. Ethnobotanical and phytomedicinal knowledge in a long-history protected area, the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park (Italian Apennines). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Montesano, V.; Negro, D.; Sarli, G.; De Lisi, A.; Laghetti, G.; Hammer, K. Notes about the uses of plants by one of the last healers in the Basilicata Region (South Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2012, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Leto, C.; Tuttolomondo, T.; La Bella, S.; Licata, M. Ethnobotanical study in the Madonie Regional Park (Central Sicily, Italy)—Medicinal use of wild shrub and herbaceous plant species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 146, 90–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M.; Puricelli, C.; Ciuchi, D.; Segale, A.; Fico, G. Traditional knowledge on medicinal and food plants used in Val San Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy)—An alpine ethnobotanical study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Di Sanzo, P.; De Martino, L.; Mancini, E.; De Feo, V. Medicinal and useful plants in the tradition of Rotonda, Pollino National Park, Southern Italy. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 23, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tuttolomondo, T.; Licata, M.; Leto, C.; Savo, V.; Bonsangue, G.; Letizia Gargano, M.; Venturella, G.; La Bella, S. Ethnobotanical investigation on wild medicinal plants in the Monti Sicani Regional Park (Sicily, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 153, 568–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cornara, L.; La Rocca, A.; Terrizzano, L.; Dente, F.; Mariotti, M.G. Ethnobotanical and phytomedical knowledge in the North-Western Ligurian Alps. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 155, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sansanelli, S.; Tassoni, A. Wild food plants traditionally consumed in the area of Bologna (Emilia Romagna region, Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2014, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dei Cas, L.; Pugni, F.; Fico, G. Tradition of use on medicinal species in Valfurva (Sondrio, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 163, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bellia, G.; Pieroni, A. Isolated, but transnational: The glocal nature of Waldensian ethnobotany, Western Alps, NW Italy. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fortini, P.; Di Marzio, P.; Guarrera, P.M.; Iorizzi, M. Ethnobotanical study on the medicinal plants in the Mainarde Mountains (central-southern Apennine, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 184, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vitalini, S.; Puricelli, C.; Mikerezi, I.; Iriti, M. Plants, people and traditions: Ethnobotanical survey in the Lombard Stelvio National Park and neighbouring areas (Central Alps, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 173, 435–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sansanelli, S.; Ferri, M.; Salinitro, M.; Tassoni, A. Ethnobotanical survey of wild food plants traditionally collected and consumed in the Middle Agri Valley (Basilicata region, southern Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mautone, M.; De Martino, L.; De Feo, V. Ethnobotanical research in Cava de’ Tirreni area, Southern Italy. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2019, 15, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lucchetti, L.; Zitti, S.; Taffetani, F. Ethnobotanical uses in the Ancona district (Marche region, Central Italy). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2019, 15, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prigioniero, A.; Geraci, A.; Schicchi, R.; Tartaglia, M.; Zuzolo, D.; Scarano, P.; Marziano, M.; Postiglione, A.; Sciarrillo, R.; Guarino, C. Ethnobotany of dye plants in Southern Italy, Mediterranean Basin: Floristic catalog and two centuries of analysis of traditional botanical knowledge heritage. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2020, 16, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bottoni, M.; Milani, F.; Colombo, L.; Nallio, K.; Colombo, P.S.; Giuliani, C.; Bruschi, P.; Fico, G. Using Medicinal Plants in Valmalenco (Italian Alps): From Tradition to Scientific Approaches. Molecules 2020, 25, 4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. La Rosa, A.; Cornara, L.; Saitta, A.; Salam, A.M.; Grammatico, S.; Caputo, M.; La Mantia, T.; Quave, C.L. Ethnobotany of the Aegadian Islands: Safeguarding biocultural refugia in the Mediterranean. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2021, 17, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Danna, C.; Poggio, L.; Smeriglio, A.; Mariotti, M.; Cornara, L. Ethnomedicinal and Ethnobotanical Survey in the Aosta Valley Side of the Gran Paradiso National Park (Western Alps, Italy). Plants 2022, 11, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cappelletti, E.M.; Trevisan, R.; Foletto, A.; Cattolica, P.M. Le piante utilizzate in medicina popolare in due vallate trentine: Val di Ledro e Valle dei Mocheni. Studi Trentini Di Sci. Nat. 1981, 58, 119–140. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pedrotti, G.; Bertoldi, V. Nomi dialettali delle piante indigene del Trentino e della Ladinia dolomitica. In Presi in Esame dal Punto di Vista Della Botanica Della Linguistica e Del Folklore; Monauni: Trento, Italy, 1930. [Google Scholar]
  34. Renzetti, E.; Taiani, R. Sulla Pelle Del Villano. Profili di Terapeuti e Metodi di Cura Empirica Nella Tradizione Trentina; Museo Usi Gente Trentina: Trento, Italy, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  35. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martino, E.; Della Volpe, S.; Cavalloro, V.; Amri, B.; Kaab, L.B.B.; Marrubini, G.; Rossi, D.; Collina, S. The use of a microwave-assisted solvent extraction coupled with HPLC-UV/PAD to assess the quality of Marrubium vulgare L. (white horehound) herbal raw material. Phytochem. Anal. 2019, 30, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martino, E.; Collina, S.; Rossi, D.; Bazzoni, D.; Gaggeri, R.; Bracco, F.; Azzolina, O. Influence of the extraction mode on the yield of hyperoside, vitexin and vitexin-2′′-O-rhamnoside from Crataegus monogyna Jacq. (hawthorn). Phytochem. Anal. 2008, 19, 534–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Malacrida, A.; Cavalloro, V.; Martino, E.; Costa, G.; Ambrosio, F.A.; Alcaro, S.; Rigolio, R.; Cassetti, A.; Miloso, M.; Collina, S. Anti-multiple myeloma potential of secondary metabolites from Hibiscus sabdariffa—Part 2. Molecules 2021, 26, 6596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kumar, M.; Radha; Devi, H.; Prakash, S.; Rathore, S.; Thakur, M.; Puri, S.; Pundir, A.; Bangar, S.P.; Changan, S.; et al. Ethnomedicinal Plants Used in the Health Care System: Survey of the Mid Hills of Solan District, Himachal Pradesh, India. Plants 2021, 10, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Furmanek, L.; Czarnota, P.; Seaward, M.R.D. Effects of lichen homogenates, mixtures of extracted substances and secondary metabolites on macromycetes—A critical review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 149, 559–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tardío, J.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Istituto Poligrafi co e Zecca dello Stato. Norme di Buona Preparazione, Farmacopea Ufficiale Italiana; XII ed.; Istituto Poligrafi co e Zecca dello Stato: Roma, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  43. Decree of the President of the Province 14 April 2011, n. 8-66 / Leg Regulation Concerning Forestry Provisions in Implementation of Articles 98 and 111 of the Provincial Law no. 11 Art. Available online: https://www.consiglio.provincia.tn.it/leggi-e-archivi/codice-provinciale/Pages/legge.aspx?uid=22621 (accessed on 10 July 2022).
  44. Ali, S.I.; Gopalakrishnan, B.; Venkatesalu, V. Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Achillea millefolium L.: A Review. Phytother. Res. 2017, 31, 1140–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kriplani, P.; Guarve, K.; Baghael, U.S. Arnica montana L.—A plant of healing: Review. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 69, 925–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yılmazoğlu, E.; Hasdemir, M.; Hasdemir, B. Recent Studies on Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Ethnobotanical Uses of Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae). J. Turk. Chem. Soc. Sect. A Chem. 2022, 9, 373–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sarmiento-Tomalá, G.M.; Miranda-Martínez, M.; Gutiérrez-Gaitén, Y.I.; Delgado-Hernández, R. Chemical Study, Antioxidant Capacity, and Hypoglycemic Activity of Malva pseudolavatera Webb & Berthel and Malva sylvestris L. (Malvaceae), Grown in Ecuador. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 4, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hajdari, A.; Mustafa, B.; Ahmeti, G.; Pulaj, B.; Lukas, B.; Ibraliu, A.; Stefkov, G.; Quave, C.L.; Novak, J. Essential oil composition variability among natural populations of Pinus mugo Turra in Kosovo. Springerplus 2015, 4, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marin, M.; Novaković, M.; Tešević, V.; Vučković, I.; Milojević, N.; Vuković-Gačić, B.; Marin, P.D. Antioxidative, antibacterial and antifungal activity of the essential oil of wild-growing Satureja montana L. from Dalmatia, Croatia. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012, 27, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Benedek, B.; Kopp, B. Achillea millefolium L. s.l. revisited: Recent findings confirm the traditional use. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2007, 157, 312–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. de Cássia da Silveira e Sá, R.; Andrade, L.N.; de Sousa, D.P. A review on anti-inflammatory activity of monoterpenes. Molecules 2013, 18, 1227–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Orav, A.; Kailas, T.; Ivask, K. Composition of the Essential Oil from Achillea millefolium L. from Estonia. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sugier, D.; Sugier, P.; Jakubowicz-Gil, J.; Winiarczyk, K.; Kowalski, R. Essential Oil from Arnica Montana L. Achenes: Chemical Characteristics and Anticancer Activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. de Santana, M.F.; Guimarães, A.G.; Chaves, D.O.; Silva, J.C.; Bonjardim, L.R.; de Lucca Júnior, W.; Ferro, J.N.; Barreto Ede, O.; dos Santos, F.E.; Soares, M.B.; et al. The anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory profiles of p-cymene: Evidence for the involvement of opioid system and cytokines. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 1583–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aiello, N.; Bontempo, R.; Vender, C.; Ferretti, V.; Innocenti, G.; Dall’Acqua, S. Morpho-quantitative and qualitative traits of Arnica montana L. wild accessions of Trentino, Italy. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 40, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huber, R.; Bross, F.; Schempp, C.; Gründemann, C. Arnica and stinging nettle for treating burns—A self-experiment. Complement. Ther. Med. 2011, 19, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Carrubba, A.; Lazzara, S.; Giovino, A.; Ruberto, G.; Napoli, E. Content variability of bioactive secondary metabolites in Hypericum perforatum L. Phytochem. Lett. 2021, 46, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wurglics, M.; Schubert-Zsilavecz, M. Hypericum perforatum: A “Modern” Herbal Antidepressant. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2006, 45, 449–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Caccia, S. Antidepressant-Like Components of Hypericum perforatum Extracts: An Overview of Their Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism. Curr. Drug Metab. 2005, 6, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wölfle, U.; Seelinger, G.; Schempp, C. Topical Application of St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum). Planta Med. 2013, 80, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gasparetto, J.C.; Ferreira Martins, C.A.; Hayashi, S.S.; Fleith Otuky, M.; Pontarolo, R. Ethnobotanical and scientific aspects of Malva sylvestris L.: A millennial herbal medicine. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2011, 64, 172–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Assessment Report on Achillea millefolium L. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/herbal-report/draft-assessment-report-achillea-millefolium-l-herba-revision-1_en.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2021).
  63. Venditti, A.; Serrilli, A.M.; Vittori, S.; Papa, F.; Maggi, F.; Di Cecco, M.; Ciaschetti, G.; Bruno, M.; Rosselli, S.; Bianco, A. Secondary Metabolites from Pinus mugo Turra subsp. mugo Growing in the Majella National Park (Central Apennines, Italy). Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 2091–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ciuman, R.R. Phytotherapeutic and naturopathic adjuvant therapies in otorhinolaryngology. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2012, 269, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Serrano, C.; Matos, O.; Teixeira, B.; Ramos, C.; Neng, N.; Nogueira, J.; Nunes, M.L.; Marques, A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activityof Satureja montana L. extracts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1554–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Milos, M.; Radonic, A.; Bezic, N.; Dunkic, V. Localities and seasonal variations in the chemical composition of essential oils of Satureja montana L. and S. cuneifolia Ten. Flavour. Fragr. J. 2001, 16, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study area. Image adapted from Provincia Autonoma di Trento (https://www.provincia.tn.it/, accessed on 11 July 2022).
Figure 1. Map of the study area. Image adapted from Provincia Autonoma di Trento (https://www.provincia.tn.it/, accessed on 11 July 2022).
Plants 11 02246 g001
Figure 2. (A) Percentage of citations collected during the interviews grouped for categories of use, and (B) main applications of the medicinal plants.
Figure 2. (A) Percentage of citations collected during the interviews grouped for categories of use, and (B) main applications of the medicinal plants.
Plants 11 02246 g002
Figure 3. Common “in-house” packaging of traditional preparations: oleolyte (A,B), ointment traditionally called “ünt del tai” (C), and Mugolio (D).
Figure 3. Common “in-house” packaging of traditional preparations: oleolyte (A,B), ointment traditionally called “ünt del tai” (C), and Mugolio (D).
Plants 11 02246 g003
Figure 4. Most abundant secondary metabolites produced by Achillea millefolium.
Figure 4. Most abundant secondary metabolites produced by Achillea millefolium.
Plants 11 02246 g004
Figure 5. Main secondary metabolites produced by Arnica montana.
Figure 5. Main secondary metabolites produced by Arnica montana.
Plants 11 02246 g005
Figure 6. Main secondary metabolites produced by Hypericum perforatum.
Figure 6. Main secondary metabolites produced by Hypericum perforatum.
Plants 11 02246 g006
Figure 7. Main secondary metabolites produced by Pinus mugo.
Figure 7. Main secondary metabolites produced by Pinus mugo.
Plants 11 02246 g007
Figure 8. Main secondary metabolites produced by Satureja montana.
Figure 8. Main secondary metabolites produced by Satureja montana.
Plants 11 02246 g008
Table 1. Ethnobotanical investigations carried out in different Italian areas from 1981 to 2022.
Table 1. Ethnobotanical investigations carried out in different Italian areas from 1981 to 2022.
AuthorLocationPlants (n°)Informants (n°)
Ballero et al., 2001 [3]Sardegna65105
Guarrera et al., 2005 [4]Basilicata5649
Salerno et al., 2005 [5]Basilicata6049
Guerrera et al., 2005 [6]Lazio9644
Nebel et al., 2006 [7]Calabria4854
De Natele et al., 2007 [8]Campania9556
Guarrera et al., 2008 [9]Molise7054
Signorini et al., 2009 [10]Sardegna7217
Vitalini et al., 2009 [11]Lombardia5854
Pieroni et al., 2009 [12]Piemonte8867
Idolo et al., 2010 [13]Lazio e Molise14560
Montesano et al., 2012 [14]Basilicata5211
Leto et al., 2013 [15]Sicilia174150
Vitalini et al., 2013 [16]Lombardia66100
Di Sanzo et al., 2013 [17]Basilicata78120
Tuttolomondo et al., 2014 [18]Sicilia108230
Cornara et al., 2014 [19]Liguria12052
Sansanelli et al., 2014 [20]Emilia-Romagna6639
Dei Cas et al., 2015 [21]Lombardia12692
Bellia et al., 2015 [22]Piemonte9047
Fortini et al., 2016 [23]Lazio10671
Vitalini et al., 2015 [24]Lombardia212328
Sansanelli et al., 2017 [25]Basilicata5258
Mautone et al., 2019 [26]Campania11970
Lucchetti et al., 2019 [27]Marche92120
Prigioniero et al., 2020 [28]Southern Italy524831
Bottoni et al., 2020 [29]Lombardia59137
La Rosa et al., 2021 [30]Aegadian Islands12248
Danna et al., 2022 [31]Aosta valley21768
Table 2. Distribution of the 200 subjects interviewed in Trentino-South Tyrol based on age, sex, and occupation.
Table 2. Distribution of the 200 subjects interviewed in Trentino-South Tyrol based on age, sex, and occupation.
N° Informants (%)
AgeMaleFemaleStudentWorkersRetired
<308 (12%)20 (15%)1 (1%)27 (12%)0
30–3912 (18%)17 (13%)0100 (50%)0
40–496 (9%)24 (18%)
50–5911 (16%)30 (23%)
>6030 (45%)42 (32%)030 (15%)42 (32%)
Table 3. Distribution of the 200 subjects interviewed in Trentino-South Tyrol based on the 11 districts in which the study area is divided.
Table 3. Distribution of the 200 subjects interviewed in Trentino-South Tyrol based on the 11 districts in which the study area is divided.
N° InformantsN° Citations
Valle di Sole1262
Valle di Non19175
Valli Giudicarie60116
Alto Garda e Ledro1127
Valle dell’Adige2342
Vallagarina1556
Alta Valsugana1124
Bassa Valsugana e Tesino1467
Valle di Fiemme15148
Primiero837
Ladino di Fassa1263
Tot200817
Table 4. Number of citations for plants cited in the medicinal field divided into the category of use and related frequency relative citation (RFCs).
Table 4. Number of citations for plants cited in the medicinal field divided into the category of use and related frequency relative citation (RFCs).
Respiratory
System
Integumentary SystemGastrointestinal SystemUrogenital SystemMusculoskeletal SystemNervous SystemMineralizingOthersTotalRFCs
Abies alba Mill. 3 3 60.03
Achillea millefolium L. 2 18 200.1
Arctium lappaL. 13 40.02
Arnica montana L. 94 940.47
Artemisia absinthium L. 5 50.025
Bryonia alba L. 2 20.01
Calendula officinalis L. 21 210.055
Capsella bursa-pastoris L. 21 11 a50.025
Carum carvi L. 19 190.095
Cetraria islandica L. 1 10.005
Chelidonium majus L. 13 130.065
Cornus mas L. 1 10.005
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. 3 b30.015
Cyclamen sp.pl. 1 c10.005
Elymus repens (L.) Gould 1 10.005
Equisetum arvense L. 5 3 80.04
Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. 1 16 170.085
Frangula alnus Mill. 6 60.03
Gentiana lutea L. 7 1 80.04
Hylotelephium telephium (L.) Holub 14 140.07
Hypericum perforatum L. 369 3 750.35
Juniperus sp.pl. 1 10.005
Larix sp.pl. 16 160.08
Leontopodium alpinum Cass. 4 40.02
Lycopodium clavatum L. 1 10.005
Malva sylvestris L. 11 1452 2 d340.17
Matricaria chamomilla L. 4721 1 d150.075
Melissa officinalis L. 9 3 120.06
Nepeta cataria L. 1 1 20.01
Oxalis acetosella L. 17 1 e180.09
Papaver rhoeas L. 4 3 70.035
Picea abies (L.) H.Karst 2 20.01
Pinus cembra L. 16 160.08
Pinus mugo Turra 69 690.345
Plantago lanceolata L. 2 20.01
Portulaca oleracea L. 11 3 50.025
Potentilla reptans L. 5 50.025
Pulmonaria officinalis L. 5 50.025
Rhododendron ferrugineum L. 11 110.055
Rodiola rosea L. 11 20.01
Rosa canina L.5 4 90.045
Sambucus nigra L. 10 100.05
Satureja montana L. 26 1 270.135
Senna alexandrina Mill. 1 10.005
Solanum nigrum L. 1 10.005
Solidago virgaurea L. 16 160.08
Symphytum officinale L. 15 150.075
Taraxacum F.H.Wigg sect. Taraxacum 67 130.065
Thymus sp.pl.19 190.095
Tilia sp.pl.16 2 1b190.095
Tussilago farfara L. 4 40.02
Urtica dioica L. 104 8 220.11
Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. 3 30.015
Verbascum thapsus L. 1 10.005
Viburnum lantana L. 2 d20.01
Viola odorata L. 2 20.01
Total17415612271145102212712
a = Endocrine system.b Cardiovascular system. c = Hearing system d = Visual apparatus. e = Circulatory system.
Table 5. Plants mainly used for traditional preparations and related RFC values and medicinal applications.
Table 5. Plants mainly used for traditional preparations and related RFC values and medicinal applications.
#PlantsRFCTraditional PreparationsMedicinal Uses
1Achillea millefolium0.1Herbal teaMenstrual pain and oligomenorrhea
DecoctionUrinary tract infections
OleolyteMuscle and joint pain
2Arctium lappa0.02DecoctionDiuretic
TinctureMuscle and joint pain
3Arnica montana0.47OleolyteMuscle and joint pain
OinmentMuscle sprains or contractures
4Artemisia absinthium0.025Herbal teaDyspepsia
5Bryonia alba0.01TinctureMuscle and joint pain
6Calendula officinalis0.055OleolyteSkin diseases, wounds, and burns
7Capsella bursa-pastoris0.025TinctureRheumatism
8Carum carvi0.095Herbal teaDyspepsia
9Crataegus monogyna0.015Herbal teaHypertension
10Cyclamen sp.pl.0.005OleolyteEar infection
11Equisetum arvense0.04Herbal teaUrogenital diseases
12Filipendula ulmaria0.085TinctureMuscle and joint pain
13Frangula alnus0.03Herbal teaConstipation
14Gentiana lutea0.04TinctureDyspepsia
15Hypericum perforatum0.35OleolyteSkin diseases, wounds, and burns
OinmentBurns, erythema, or dermatitis
Herbal teaRespiratory infections and depression
16Juniperus sp.pl. 0.005Herbal teaDyspepsia and urinary tract infections
17Larix decidua0.08OinmentWounds healing
18Lycopodium clavatum0.005DecoctionMuscle aches
19Malva sylvestris0.17Herbal teaDyspepsia
20Matricaria chamomilla0.075Herbal teaDyspepsia
21Melissa officinalis0.06Herbal teaInsomnia and premenstrual syndrome
22Nepeta cataria0.01Herbal teaInsomnia and premenstrual syndrome
23Papaver rhoeas0.035Herbal teaInsomnia and cough
24Pinus mugo0.345MugolioDiseases of the respiratory system
25Plantago lanceolata0.01Herbal teaCatarrh
26Portulaca oleracea0.025Herbal teaWorm infection
27Potentilla reptans0.025Herbal teaFever and diarrhea
28Pulmonaria officinalis0.025Herbal teaCough
29Rhodiola rosea0.01Herbal teaInfections of the respiratory system
30Rhododendron ferrugineum0.055Oleolytegout and joint pain
31Rosa canina0.045Herbal teaCough and sore throat
32Sambucus nigra0.05Herbal teaCold
33Satureja montana0.135Herbal teaNervous gastric pains, bloating, and vomiting
34Senna alexandrina0.005Herbal teaconstipation
35Solidago virgaurea0.08Herbal teaUrogenital diseases
36Symphytum officinale0.075OleolyteMuscle and joint pain
37Taraxacum sect. Taraxacum0.065DecoctionDiuretic
38Thymus sp.pl.0.095Herbal teaInfections of the respiratory system
39Tilia sp.pl.0.095Herbal teaCough, cold, and tachycardia
40Tussilago farfara0.02Herbal teaInfections of the respiratory system
41Vaccinium vitis-idaea0.015Herbal teaUrogenital diseases
42Verbascum thapsus0.005Herbal teaInfections of the respiratory system
43Viola odorata0.01Herbal teaCough
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cavalloro, V.; Robustelli della Cuna, F.S.; Quai, E.; Preda, S.; Bracco, F.; Martino, E.; Collina, S. Walking around the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy): An Ethnobotanical Investigation. Plants 2022, 11, 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172246

AMA Style

Cavalloro V, Robustelli della Cuna FS, Quai E, Preda S, Bracco F, Martino E, Collina S. Walking around the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy): An Ethnobotanical Investigation. Plants. 2022; 11(17):2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cavalloro, Valeria, Francesco Saverio Robustelli della Cuna, Elena Quai, Stefania Preda, Francesco Bracco, Emanuela Martino, and Simona Collina. 2022. "Walking around the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy): An Ethnobotanical Investigation" Plants 11, no. 17: 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172246

APA Style

Cavalloro, V., Robustelli della Cuna, F. S., Quai, E., Preda, S., Bracco, F., Martino, E., & Collina, S. (2022). Walking around the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy): An Ethnobotanical Investigation. Plants, 11(17), 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop