Next Article in Journal
Potentilloside A, a New Flavonol-bis-Glucuronide from the Leaves of Potentilla chinensis, Inhibits TNF-α-Induced ROS Generation and MMP-1 Secretion
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Organophosphate-Degrading Bacteria on the Plant Biomass, Active Medicinal Components, and Soil Phosphorus Levels of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Microbiota on the Herbivory Resistance of the Giant Duckweed Are Plant Genotype-Dependent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacterial Siderophores: Classification, Biosynthesis, Perspectives of Use in Agriculture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 23
10.3390/plants11233316
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of Four Streptomyces Strains from Rhizosphere Soil to Enhance Cucumber Growth and Yield

by
Ayman F. Omar
1,2,
Adil H. A. Abdelmageed
1,3,
Ahmad Al-Turki
1,
Noha M. Abdelhameid
4,
R. Z. Sayyed
5 and
Medhat Rehan
1,6,*
1
Department of Plant Production and Protection, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2
Plant Pathology and Biotechnology Lab, EPCRS Excellence Center, Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
3
Department of Horticulture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Khartoum North 13314, Sudan
4
Desert Research Center (DRC), Soil Fertility and Microbiology Department, Cairo 11753, Egypt
5
PSGVP Mandal’s S I Patil Arts, G B Patel Science & STKVS Commerce College, Shahada 425409, India
6
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3316; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233316
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genus Streptomyces is the most abundant and essential microbes in the soil microbial community. Streptomyces are familiar and have great potential to produce a large variety of bioactive compounds. This genus considers an efficient biofertilizer based on its plant growth-promoting activities. Based on their ability to produce a wide varieties of bioactive molecules, the present study aimed to explore the potential plant growth promotion of four Streptomyces strains and their role in enhancing cucumber growth and yield under greenhouse conditions. Streptomyces sp. strain HM2, Streptomyces thinghirensis strain HM3, Streptomyces sp. strain HM8, and Streptomyces tricolor strain HM10 were chosen for the current study. Plant growth-promoting (PGP) features, i.e., indole acetic acid (IAA) production, siderophore excretion, and solubilizing phosphate, were evaluated in vitro. All four strains produced IAA, siderophore, and immobilized inorganic phosphate. Following 4 days of incubation at 30 °C, strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively). At the same time, P solubilization efficacy scored 64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6% with the same frequency. During in planta evaluation, selected Streptomyces strains combined with rock phosphate were assessed as biofertilizers on the growth and yield of cucumber plants. Under all treatments, positive and significant differences in studied traits were manifested except dry stem matter (SDM), net assimilation rate (NAR), relative growth rate (RGR), and fruit firmness (FF). Treatment T4 (rock phosphate + strain HM3) followed by T5 (rock phosphate + strain HM8) revealed the best results for plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit fresh weight per plant (FFWPP), soil P (SP) after 21 DAT, and soil P at the end of the experiment. Notably, T6 (rock phosphate + strain HM10) caused a considerable increase in leaf area (LA). Plant growth-promoting bacteria enhance plant growth and yield through phosphorus solubilizing, improve nutrient availability, produce phytohormones, and support plant growth under abiotic stress. These features are important for sustainable agriculture and reducing environmental pollution with chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

1. Introduction

The rhizosphere area is the narrow region of soil around the plant roots directly influenced by root secretions and microbial associations. The rhizosphere harbors beneficial microorganisms known as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) [1,2]. These PGPB have been known as biofertilizers in modern agriculture and as a new tool to enhance crop growth and productivity in sustainable agriculture [2]. PGPB colonizes the rhizosphere and facilitates plant growth directly by stimulating the growth or indirectly via biocontrol of the phytopathogens. The direct plant growth stimulation activity is through increased availability of nutrients, such as synthesis of phytohormones (i.e., auxin, cytokinins, gibberellins, abscisic acid) [3], bio-fixation of atmospheric nitrogen [4], production of siderophores (iron sequestration) [5], solubilization of soil minerals (i.e., phosphorus and potassium) [6,7], ACC (1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate) deaminase activity [8], and in various other ways [9,10,11,12]. The indirect mechanisms involve biocontrol of phytopathogens through antibacterial and antifungal biomolecules [13], development of resistance against phytopathogens (i.e., soil-borne disease) [14,15,16,17], and competition for nutrients [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In addition, PGPB mitigates various abiotic and oxidative stresses [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Their use reduces chemical inputs in agriculture and environmental pollution [31,32].
Actinobacteria represent a significant microbial population in the soil, particularly in the rhizosphere [33]. They are a broad group of filamentous, Gram-positive, spore-forming, aerobic bacteria that play an essential role in soil nutrient recycling and ecology [34,35,36,37]. Streptomyces genus is the most broadly studied bacteria and is a rich source of a wide variety of biologically active compounds such as antibiotics, antiparasitic, antimicrobial, and immune-suppressing [38,39,40,41]. In addition to being a biocontrol agent, Streptomyces exhibits many traits that promote plant growth by producing the phytohormone indole acetic acid (IAA), fixing the atmospheric nitrogen, and solubilizing phosphates [34,35,36,37,42].
Production of IAA and phosphate solubility by Streptomyces sp. and their effects on Arabidopsis and Brassica sp. were previously assessed. Streptomyces sp. produced moderate levels of IAA and solubilized phosphate that significantly increased Arabidopsis and Brassica sp. vegetative growth and enhanced tolerance to abiotic stress [36]. The production of IAA, extracellular enzymes, siderophores, P solubilizing ability, and antifungal and antibacterial antagonism were demonstrated in rice by three strains of Streptomyces. For example, Streptomyces fradiae NKZ-259 produced IAA up to 82.36 μg/mL in the presence of tryptophan (2 g/L) after incubation for 6 days. This production from IAA significantly increased root and shoot lengths up to 7.97 and 32.77 cm, respectively, in tomato seedlings [42].
The cucumber, Cucumis sativus L., is one of the most popular members of the cucurbitaceae family. It is a tender annual vegetable vine crop grown for its fresh fruit in salads or taken as fresh fruit desserts [43]. It is well known as a natural diuretic and thus can serve as an active drug for secreting and promoting the flow of urine. The cucumber crop is considered one of the vegetable crops stressing the soil, which needs a high percentage of chemical fertilizer to obtain good growth and high production [44]. It is one of the main greenhouse vegetable crops widely grown in Saudi Arabia. The total greenhouse area for cucumber production in 2020 was 1679.7 hectares, producing 172,036.7 tons [45,46].
Chemical fertilizers are used too often to promote soil fertility and crop yield. Therefore, organic agriculture has attracted more attention in recent years. Organic farming is becoming of interest because of the perceived health and environmental benefits of reducing the number of toxic compounds such as nitrates [47,48]. The advantage of adding bacteria to the soil is secreting phytohormones, and organic acids, which change the pH and facilitate the micro-elements such as iron, zinc, manganese, boron, copper, and phosphorous [49].
Dursun et al. [50] and Isfahani and Besharati [51] observed a significant increment in length, fresh and dry weight of roots and shoots, and yield of inoculated cucumber plants when grown in soils treated with or without chemical fertilizers in a field environment. In a follow-up study, Isfahani et al. [52] reported a significant effect of Pseudomonas sp. and PSB, such as P. putida and P. agglomerans and chemical fertilizers, on the growth and yield components of cucumber.
Several PGPB can be used for future research to improve the health and quality of vegetables grown in different production systems. The present study focused on using multipotent Streptomyces as biofertilizers, assessing their production from IAA, siderophore, and phosphate solubilization, and their possible beneficial effects on the growth and yield of cucumber crop under greenhouse application in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.

2. Results

2.1. In Vitro Evaluation of Plant Growth Promotion Features

Four Streptomyces strains (Streptomyces sp. strain HM2, Streptomyces thinghirensis strain HM3, Streptomyces sp. strain HM8, and Streptomyces tricolor strain HM10) were studied in the current investigation for their potential PGP activity. In vitro evaluation of IAA production by selected strains revealed high production from IAA after 96 h of incubation. Strain HM2 produced up to 18 µg/mL when incubated for 4 days, whereas strain HM3 displayed 22 µg/mL. Strains HM8 and HM10 were higher in their IAA production, with productivity increasing gradually and reaching 62 and 146 µg/mL, respectively, as a response to 0.2% from L-tryptophan (Figure 1).
Siderophore production was assayed on solid and liquid CAS--King’s blue agar media. The four tested strains displayed a pattern of siderophore production with an orange-yellow faint halo around the colonies on the CAS medium (Figure 2). S. tricolor HM10 secreted more siderophore with a bigger halo around colonies in a short growth time compared to other strains. When quantifying the production in broth cultures, strain HM10 excreted a high siderophore amount, reaching 64.14 psu, followed by strains HM2 and HM3 with 42.6 and 40 psu, respectively (Figure 3).
Furthermore, Streptomyces strains were tested for their ability to solubilize inorganic phosphate. The P solubilization activity was evaluated in both NBRIP-agar/broth media supplemented with tricalcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2). All designated strains exhibited P solubilization activity in the broth medium, reaching the maximum after 168 h. S. thinghirensis strain HM3 showed the maximum P solubilization with 84.4% efficiency from the beginning amount of inorganic phosphate. Moreover, S. tricolor HM10 could solubilize P with efficacy reached 81.6% after 24 h, followed by strains HM2 and HM8 with capability measured at 64.3% and 57.2%, respectively (Figure 4).
When subjected to the extracted and purified S. tricolor HM10 broth into HPLC, a reliable peak with a retention time of 12.019 min was detected in the bacterial broth. The detectable peak was comparable to this of the authentic IAA standard. The obtained peak confirmed that the HM10 strain produced IAA and subsequently belongs to PGPB (Figure 5).

2.2. Streptomyces Strains and Their Effect on Plant Growth Promotion in Cucumber Plants

2.2.1. Growth Traits

Vegetative growth traits such as plant length (cm), number of leaves per plant, Root length (cm), Leaf DM (dry matter) %, Stem DM%, and Root DM% are shown in Table 1. The assessed traits manifested a wide variation for all measured traits under treatment conditions.
Fertilization treatments T4 (rock phosphate (RP) + strain HM3) gave the highest and most significant values for plant height (198.33 cm) as well as T5 (RP + strain HM8) and T6 (RP + HM10), with their number of leaves plant−1 (26.66) and root length (44.66). Meanwhile, T2 (RP) gave the lowest significant values in plant height (124.00 cm), the number of leaves plant−1 (16.66), and root length (17.00) (Table 1).
Regarding leaf dry matter percentage, the highest value was obtained by treatment T2 (RP), and the lowest value was obtained by treatment T3 (RP + Strain HM2). Treatment T2 gave the highest value for stem dry matter percentage, while treatment T1 (NP) produced the lowest value of this trait without any significant differences between treatments. T7 treatment (RP + mixed strains) gave the highest positive and significant value of root dry matter as a percentage, whereas T3 (RP + strain HM2) recorded the lowest number in this trait.
Leaf area (cm2), net assimilation rate (g m−2·day−1), and relative growth rate (g·g−1·day−1) are located in Table 2. Treatments T6 (RP + strain HM10) and T5 (RP + strain HM8) exhibited the highest value for leaf area (323.20 and 323.00 cm2), respectively, while the treatments T1 (NP) and T2 (RP) displayed the lowest and most significant values (188.16 and 210.067 cm2) for this trait (Table 3). Concerning net assimilation rate (NAR) and relative growth rate (RGR), there are no significant differences among all treatments, recording the highest values for net assimilation rate and relative growth rate (0.008 and 0.137), respectively, for treatments T1 and T5. On the other hand, in treatments T2, T6, and T7, the net assimilation rate declined to 0.006 g cm−2·day−1, and treatments T1, T3, and T7 showed the lowest values for relative growth rate (0.117 g g−1·day−1), respectively.

2.2.2. Yield Traits Measurements

Fruit characteristics such as fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), number of fruits plant−1, fruit fresh weight (g), and fruit firmness are presented in Table 3. A significant difference between treatments was detected in all fruit yield characteristics except fruit firmness. T4 treatment recorded a considerable increase in all studied fruit characteristics except fruit firmness. Otherwise, the lowest values in all studied characteristics except fruit firmness were given by the treatment T2 under adding rock phosphate.

2.2.3. Soil and Plant Phosphorus

A combination of Streptomyces and RP fertilization significantly affected rhizospheric soil phosphorus concentrations compared with control T2 (RP only). The four tested Streptomyces strains showed different abilities to release soluble phosphate from RP (Table 4). The highly available P was noticed in T4 (RP + strain HM3), 30.76 and 26.36 mg/kg, followed by T5 (RP + strain HM8), 27.76 and 22.40 mg/kg, at 21 DAP and at harvest, respectively. In contrast, the T2 (RP) had the lowest available P concentration, 13.90 mg/kg at harvest. The maximum significant and positive plant P was observed in treatment T4 (0.91%) followed by treatment T5 (0.75%), whereas no significant differences were found between the other treatments.

2.2.4. Interrelationship among Traits

To assess the relationship between the evaluated traits, principal component analysis was achieved to categorize the related growth and yield traits together under the action of applied plant growth-promoting bacteria. The first two PCAs represented 69.84% (50.01% for PCA1 and 19.84% for PCA2) of the trait variability. Consequently, the two PCAs were utilized to draw the PC-biplot (Figure 6). A strong positive correlation was among plant content of P, relative growth rate (RGR), soil P after 21 days from planting, leaf area, root length, soil P at the end of planting, plant height, number of leaves, fresh weight of fruit, fruit number, fruit diameter, and fruit length. Furthermore, T3, T4, T5, and T6 are on the positive side of PCA1, along with most growth and yield traits.
To explore the relationship between quantified traits and applicable treatments of Streptomyces strains, heat map analysis was employed to disclose this interaction (Figure 7). The applied treatments were categorized into two groups, one group involved T1 and T2 (non-treated plants with Streptomyces strains), whereas the second group revealed two clusters. One cluster contained T4 and T5 treatments, while the second cluster implied the rest of the treatments with Streptomyces (T3, T6, and T7). Interestingly, application of Streptomyces strains along with rock phosphate (T4 and T5) exhibited positive and significant correlation with growth traits, i.e., number of leaves, plant height, leaf area, soil P at the end, soil P after 21 days from planting, root length relative growth rate, fruit fresh weight, fruit number, fruit diameter, fruit length, and hardness. Moreover, T3 followed by T6 displayed a positive correlation with most previous traits except soil P at 21 days and at the end, root length, and net assimilation rate (NAR).

3. Discussion

IAA production is considered vital for plant growth. Plant growth-promoting bacteria improve crop yield and thus reduce yield costs [11]. Streptomycetes can stimulate and enhance plant growth by producing phytohormones, solubilizing inorganic phosphate, and biosynthesis of siderophore that chelating iron from the environment and inhibit the phytopathogens [34,35,53]. As one of the soil’s most abundant microbes, four isolated Streptomyces strains from Qassim, SA, were evaluated in vitro as plant growth-promoting bacteria. The results indicated that selected Streptomyces strains produced IAA with different levels since strain HM2 recorded the least amount (18 µg/mL), whereas HM10 secreted the highest amount (146 µg/mL) after 4 days of incubation at 30 °C (Figure 1). Dimkpa et al. [54] described that Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 produces about 30 μg/mL of IAA under the sub-lethal levels of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles in a medium containing tryptophan as a precursor. Moreover, Bacillus megaterium ST2-9, isolated from soil salt samples in the delta of Vietnam, produced 33.13 mg/L of IAA after 8 days of incubation [55]. Notably, Lebrazi et al. [56] isolated Rhizobium sp. strain I69 while production from IAA reached 135 μg/mL, increasing to 166 μg/mL with optimal parameters, 36 °C incubation, 6.5 pH, 1 g/L tryptophan and 0.1 g/L NaCl. Streptomyces fradiae NKZ-259 [38] and Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16 [57] achieved the maximum production from IAA (82.363 and 80.06 μg/mL) in the presence of tryptophan. Moreover, three Streptomyces strains identified as Streptomyces kunmingenesis WC-3, Streptomyces nobilis WA-3, and Streptomyces enissocaesilis TA-3 produced 79.23, 79.5, and 69.26 μg/mL, respectively, of IAA as a response to 0.5 mg/mL of L-tryptophan [58].
Streptomyces among soil microbes is recognized with siderophores production. Microbes can bind Fe3+ from the environment by producing a siderophore and making it available for its growth, and plants can also utilize these as an iron source [5]. Regarding siderophore production, our tested four strains (HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10) disclosed siderophore production on CAS-King’s agar media by forming a clear orange halo zone around the colonies (Figure 2). Quantifying the siderophore production as psu by CAS solution reflected high production by strain HM10 exceeding 64.14 psu (Figure 3). This strain secretes three siderophore types (catechol, hydroxamate, and carboxylate) [59]. Similarly, Anwar et al. [58] isolated 98 rhizospheric actinomycetes from wheat and tomato fields. All rhizobacterial isolates recorded positive attitudes in siderophore, hydrogen cyanide, and ammonia production.
In phosphate solubilization, all four strains possess phosphate solubilization in different efficiency. S. thinghirensis HM3 released the highest amount from inorganic phosphate with an efficiency of 84.4% after 7 days of incubation (Figure 4). Six Streptomyces could solubilize phosphate after 7 days of incubation by producing clear zones around the colonies. Based on the solubilization index, Streptomyces sp. WA-1 and S. djakartensis TB-4 could solubilize 72.13 and 70.36 mg/100 mL, respectively [54]. Chouyia et al. [60] isolated and characterized Streptomyces roseocinereus and Streptomyces natalensis with a phosphate solubilization index of 1.75 and 1.63, respectively. Remarkably, Streptomyces sp. CoT10 mobilized different P resources, particularly 72.49 mg/L of FePO4, consequently improving phosphate content in soil by 15.35%, which supplied plant growth with high P and Fe acquisition [61]. On the same trend, Pantoea sp. S32 isolated from alfalfa rhizosphere, immobilized P with efficacy exceeded 18.38, 3.07, 0.16, 0.51, and 2.62% in cultured media containing CaHPO4, lecithin, rock phosphate, FePO4, and AlPO4, respectively [58]. On a closer look, phosphate-dissolving bacteria can solubilize phosphate in two ways: (1) by secreting organic acid that dissolves inorganic P compounds, and (2) by producing phosphatase enzymes that mineralize P compounds [62,63].
Various reports have demonstrated a significant increment in the vegetative growth traits when investigating the effect of organic and biofertilizers on the growth and development of different crops [23,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. In the present study, the results revealed that treatments T4 (rock phosphate (RP) + strain HM3) indicated the highest and most positive significant values for plant height, number of leaves per plant, and root length (Table 1). Furthermore, leaf dry matter and stem dry matter percentages are applied by treatment T2 (RP). Otherwise, T7 (RP + mixed strains) was recognized as the highest positive and significant value of root dry matter. The results of the present study are inconsistent with that of Eifediyi, and Remison [63], who stated that increasing the rates of inorganic fertilizers leads to increased growth in the cucumber crop.
The reason for increasing the vegetative growth traits when treated with rock phosphate or rock phosphate with biofertilizers may be attributed to increasing soil fertility and thus increasing the absorption of nutrients such as phosphorous, potassium, and others by the plant, which have a significant role in many vital processes leading to the division of cells forming meristem tissues and increase the size of cells. Moreover, other substances such as hormones, vitamins, proteins, and some amino acids such as alanine and glycine enhance the growth rate. These biofertilizers also improve the structure and porosity of the soil, which leads to a balance between moisture and aeration in the soil [75,76].
Ashraf et al. [77] disclosed that IAA application in barley revealed effective enhancement in growth and photosynthetic efficiency under normal and water deficit conditions. The significant and positive effects for leaf area and relative growth rate were detected under treatments T5 and T6. Consequently, adding IAA significantly increased the number of leaves/plant, leaf area, leaf area index, total dry matter, plant height, number of branches/plant, and crop growth rate in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) [78,79]. These increments may be due to the benefits of high IAA production by strains HM8 and HM10 (62 and 146 µg/mL).
The results of yield traits, including fruit length, fruit diameter, number of fruits plant−1, and fruit fresh weight, elucidated the significant difference between treatments in all fruit yield characteristics except fruit firmness. T4 showed the best considerable increase in all studied fruit characteristics except fruit firmness (Table 3). These data coincide with those obtained by Mahmoud et al. [80], Nair and Ngoajio [81], Isfahani and Besharati [51], Abdrabbo and Desoky [82], and Tahir et al. [83]. They demonstrated a significant increment in most fruit yield characteristics when different types of organic and biofertilizers were added separately or in combination with other crops.
Concerning the fruit firmness (Lbs. inch−2), there are no significant differences among the treatments (Table 4). Despite that, the treatments T3 and T5 performed the highest value (5.00 Lbs. inch−2). Results coming from our study are in harmony with those disclosed by Azarmi et al. [79]; Zainuddin [69]; Valdenegro et al. [84]; Kang et al. [85]; and Zapata-Sifuentes et al. [82], who depicted a significant increase in the fruit quality parameters, i.e., fruit diameter, fruit size, biomass, and yield, as well as antioxidant capacity.
Numerous Streptomyces spp. isolated from rhizosphere soils are known as superior phosphate solubilizers and plant growth promoters. The tested strains showed high phosphate solubilization and may consider P suppliers in soils rich with inorganic phosphate (Table 4). As previously documented by Jog et al., Streptomyces spp. has been reported as the best phosphate solubilizers [86] by Sadeghi et al. [87]; Jog et al. [88]; and Sreevidya et al. [89]. Plant growth-promoting bacteria help phosphorus solubilize, improve nutrient availability, control phytopathogens, produce phytohormones, biosynthesize metal chelators, and alleviate abiotic stress in plants [16,90,91,92,93,94]. These properties are considered an important practice for sustainable agriculture and good alternative practices to reduce environmental hazards with chemical fertilizers and pesticides. PGPR is safe for plants, the environment, and all living organisms. PCA is a technique that analyzes data tables with quantitative dependent variables to describe the inter-correlation between these data. Appling PCA and heatmap depicted the correlation between measured growth and yield traits under treatment of plants with different Streptomyces strains as plant growth-promoting agents (Figure 6 and Figure 7). A positive and significant correlation was observed between plant P, relative growth rate (RGR), soil P level, leaf area, root length, plant height, number of leaves, fruit fresh weight, fruit number, fruit diameter, and length when inoculating with Streptomyces. Moreover, treatments T3, T4, T5, and T6 are presented on the positive side of PCA1, along with most growth and yield traits. Sherpa et al. [95] used PCA to correlate various physicochemical parameters and the microbial community of peas (Pisum sativum L.). Firmicutes of the bulk soil revealed a positive correlation to available potassium and soil organic carbon (SOC); furthermore, proteobacteria showed a high correlation with the pH and available phosphorus.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Lab Work

4.1.1. Streptomyces Strains and Cultural Conditions

Four Streptomyces strains isolated from the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia, were chosen for the current study. Streptomyces sp. strain HM2 (accession, MN527230), Streptomyces thinghirensis strain HM3 (accession, MN527231), Streptomyces sp. strain HM8 (accession, MN527235) and Streptomyces tricolor strain HM10 (accession, MN527236) were isolated and identified as described previously by Rehan et. al. [96]. For regular growth and maintenance, Tryptic Soy Broth/agar (TSB/A), composed of (g/L) peptic digest of soybean meal 5.0, sodium chloride 5.0, agar 15.0, pH 7.5. was applied. Moreover, Glucose Soybean meal Agar (GSA), which consisted of (g/L), 10 soybean meal, 10 glucose, 1 CaCO3, 10 NaCl, and pH adjusted to 7.5, was used for spore production for 5 days at 30 °C.

4.1.2. In Vitro Evaluation of IAA, Siderophore, and Phosphate Solubilization of Streptomyces Strains

Solid and liquid King’s medium B base containing 20 g peptone, 1.5 g K2HPO4, 1.5 g O4.7H2O, 15 g agar per liter, pH 7.5 were used for siderophore and IAA detection and production. Pure bacterial colonies were inoculated in liquid King’s B medium supplemented with 0.2% L-tryptophan in an incubator shaker (200 rpm) for 4 days at 30 °C, one milliliter from cultured bacteria was withdrawn each 24 h and kept at −20 °C. Indole acetic acid (IAA) was quantified following the method of Gang et al. [97] involving the Salkowaski reagent (0.5 M FeCl3 and 35% HClO4). One volume (100 µL) from cultures supernatant (after centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 3 min) was mixed with an equal volume of Salkowaski reagent in a microplate reader, vortex gently, and incubated in a dark condition at 30 °C for 30 min. The mixture was subjected to color intensity measurement spectrophotometrically at 535 nm against an uninoculated medium and a standard curve generated by known concentration from IAA.
Siderophores detection and production were quantified by CAS assay (Chrome Azurol S) [98,99]. CAS solution was prepared by dissolving both: 72.9 mg (hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (HDTMA)) in 40 mL ddH2O, and 60.5 mg (chrome azurol S) in 50 mL dH2O, then mixed together and 10 mL from Fe3+ solution (1 mM FeCl3 in 10 mM HCl) was added. CAS solution was then autoclaved and mixed with autoclaved King’s medium with a 1:9 ratio, respectively, after cooling to 50 °C. Siderophore quantification was performed by mixing equal volumes (100 µL) from cultured supernatants and CAS reagents. This was followed by incubation at room temperature for 20 min and absorbance measured at 630 nm in a microplate reader [100]. Siderophore production was calculated as percent siderophore unit (psu) according to the method of Payne [101].
To detect phosphate solubilization, Streptomyces strains were grown in NBRIP medium containing (g/L), glucose, 10; MgCl2.6H2O, 5; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.25; KCl, 0.2; (NH4)2SO4, 0.1; Ca3(PO4)2, 5; agar 15; [102] and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Solubilized phosphate was detected by forming a clear zone in the culture plate. Liquid NBRIP medium was applied for phosphate solubilization rate by growing Streptomyces strains for 7 days with incubation shaking (30 °C and 200 rpm). Manullang and Chuang [36] described that the absorbance was measured in a microplate reader at 420 nm, and a decrease in absorption values determined phosphate solubilization.

4.1.3. Extraction, Purification, and Determination of IAA by HPLC

S. tricolor HM10, the highest IAA producer, was grown in King’s B medium supplemented with 0.2% L-tryptophan for 72 h. The fermented broth was filtered using a Whatman No.1 filter paper, and 10 mL from the filtrate was mixed with an equal volume of acidified acetonitrile (0.1% acetic acid) and shaken for 2 min. Furthermore, 4g of MgSO4 and 1 g of sodium acetate, followed by shaking for 1 min, were added, then centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min.
The supernatant was filtrated through a 0.45 µm syringe filter, then diluted 2× with water for HPLC-FLD analysis with the following condition: 1220 infinity HPLC (Agilent, USA), fluorescence light detector (FLD) (excitation 282 nm, Emission 360 nm), Column (C8, 250 mm*4.6) (5 µm particle size) (zorbax-Agilent) Gradient elution consist of: (A) water (PH of 3.8), (B) acetonitrile, 0 min (A:B) (80%:20%), 25 min (A:B) (50%:50%), 31 min (A:B)(80%:20%), 40 min (A:B) (80%:20%). The injection volume was 20 µL, and the column temperature reached 30 °C.

4.2. Greenhouse Work

4.2.1. Experimental Site and Agronomic Practices

This experiment was conducted at the experimental farm, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Al-Qassim region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (latitude 26–27 N, longitude 44–45 E, altitude 725 m above sea level) to investigate the effect of four Streptomyces strains in the presence of rock phosphate as biofertilizers on the growth and yield of cucumber vegetable crop. Soil and water samples were collected before planting at 0–30 cm depth. The properties of soil samples and other details are given in Table 5.
The recommended dose of NPK as mineral fertilizers was applied as follows: 280 kg N/ha as 600 kg urea (46% N), 465 kg K2O/ha as 930 kg potassium sulfate (48% K20), and 195 kg P2O5/ha as 672 kg rock phosphate (29% P2O5) or 1050 kg calcium superphosphate (18.5% P2O5) as control treatment. Before transplanting, all quantities of calcium superphosphate and rock phosphate were added to cucumber pots, while urea and potassium sulfate were added in four equal portions before transplanting, then after 2, 4, and 6 weeks.

4.2.2. Streptomyces Treatments under Greenhouse

The cultures were prepared by growing the four Streptomyces strains in King’s B medium with shaking for 72 h at 30 °C. The fermented broth was homogenized with a syringe, and glucose (5 g/100 mL) was added as the primary carbon source when inoculating the seedlings. At the time of seedlings transplanting, inoculum from each strain and mixture from all strains was added around the seedlings’ roots (approximately 50 mL per plant). The inoculation process was repeated again after 15 days to ensure the presence of the bacterium around the roots.
There were seven fertilization treatments, namely, normal phosphate as control (T1), rock phosphate (RP) (T2), RP + strain HM3 (T3), RP + strain HM3 (T4), RP + strain HM8 (T5), RP + strain HM10 (T6), and RP + mixture of the four strains (T7). Phosphorus treatments were added to the soil before planting at a rate of 4.8 g of normal phosphate and 7.5 g of rock phosphate pot−1 (30 cm long by 30 cm diameter filled with 20.7 kg of sandy soil).
XTREME cucumber hybrid variety was selected for the current study. The seedlings of this cultivar were purchased from the Saudi United Fertilizers Company. After one month, seedlings were transplanted to the pots in the greenhouse at 50 cm apart and 1 m wide of the ridge. The experiment design was laid out in a completely randomized block design with 12 replicates for each treatment.
Average day and night temperatures in greenhouses were 25 °C and 18 °C, as Maynard and Hochmuth [103] described as the optimum temperatures for cucumber growth.

4.2.3. Measured Traits

Morphological and Growth Traits

After 21 days of planting, three plants from each treatment were randomly selected for growth traits measurement, including; plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL), leaf dry matter (Leaf DM), stem dry matter (Stem DM), Root DM that measured after 3 days of drying at 70 °C, and the leaf area (LA) according to Cho et al. [106] and Ding et al. [107].
The relative growth rate (RGR) (g·g−1·day−1), according to Evans [70] and Hunt et al. [20], was recorded using the following equation:
RGR   = Ln   W 2 −   Ln   W 1 T 2 −   T 1 ( g · g − 1 · day − 1 )
where: Ln: logarithm of the natural base, W2: dry weight of the plant at the end of the period T2, W1: dry weight of the plant at the beginning of the period T1, and W1 and W2 are the total DW (g/plant).
Net assimilation rate (NAR) (g m−2·day−1) was calculated using the following equation according to Evans [108] and Hunt et al. [46].
NAR = W 2 − W 1 T 2 −   T 1 × Ln   LA 2 − Ln   LA LA 2 −   LA 1 ( g · m − 2 · day − 1 )
where: W2: Dry weight of the plant at the beginning of the period T2, W1: dry weight of the plant at the beginning of the period T1, LA2: leaf area of the plant at the beginning of the period T2, LA1: leaf area of the plant at the beginning of the period T1, and Ln: logarithm of the natural base.
Leaf dry matter percentage (LDM%), stem dry matter percentage (SDM), and root dry matter percentage (RDM%) were determined 21 days after seeding. At the same date, three plants per treatment were randomly chosen for P measurement. Total phosphorous and concentrations were determined in soil and the dry matter of the fourth upper leaves, according to Cottenie et al. [109].

Grain Yield and Its Related Traits

Fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit fresh weight per plant (FFWPP) at the horticultural maturity stage, and fruit firmness (FF) were recorded regularly.

Statistical Analysis and Principal Component Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed, and Duncan’s test was used to compare the means at the significant level (p ≤ 0.05) according to Khiddir et al. [110] and Webster [111]. The normality of variables was verified using the Shapiro--Wilk test before proceeding with principal component analysis (PCA), and the correlation between different variables was measured by Pearson correlation. Additionally, Bartlett’s sphericity test and Kaiser--Meyer--Olkin (KMO) were performed. The PCA and Heat Map (HM) was performed using XLSTAT software version 2019. XLSTAT software version 2019 was used to classify the data into different clusters having a common trait [112] and was executed to define plant properties versus treatment groups.

5. Conclusions

The Streptomyces genus is familiar with producing bioactive molecules that can be used in medicine, pharmacy, and agriculture. Four isolated Streptomyces strains (Streptomyces sp. strain HM2, Streptomyces thinghirensis strain HM3, Streptomyces sp. strain HM8, and Streptomyces tricolor strain HM10) were tested for their potential plant growth promotion with cucumber under greenhouse conditions. The four strains produced IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL), siderophore (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14 %SU), and immobilized inorganic phosphate (64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6%), respectively. Strain HM3, followed by strain HM8 and strain HM10, revealed the best results for plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit fresh weight per plant (FFWPP), soil P (SP) after 21 DAT, and soil P at the end of the experiment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.O., M.R., N.M.A. and A.H.A.A.; methodology, M.R., A.F.O., N.M.A. and A.H.A.A.; software, M.R. and N.M.A.; formal analysis, N.M.A.; investigation, M.R., A.F.O., N.M.A. and A.H.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.H.A.A., M.R. and N.M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.R. and R.Z.S.; supervision, A.A.-T. and R.Z.S.; project administration, A.F.O.; funding acquisition, A.A.-T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, and Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through project number (Qu-IF-1-1-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data is available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, the Ministry of Education, and Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (Qu-IF-1-1-1). The authors also thank the technical support of Qassim University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Souza, R.; Ambrosini, A.; Passaglia, L.M.P. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2015, 38, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Katsenios, N.; Andreou, V.; Sparangis, P.; Djordjevic, N.; Giannoglou, M.; Chanioti, S.; Kasimatis, C.-N.; Kakabouki, I.; Leonidakis, D.; Danalatos, N.; et al. Assessment of plant growth promoting bacteria strains on growth, yield and quality of sweet corn. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kusale, S.P.; Attar, Y.C.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Malek, R.A.; Ilyas, N.; Suriani, N.L.; Khan, N.; El Enshasy, H. Production of plant beneficial and antioxidants metabolites by Klebsiella variicola under salinity Stress. Molecules 2021, 26, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khumairah, F.H.; Setiawati, M.R.; Fitriatin, B.N.; Simarmata, T.; Alfaraj, S.; Ansari, M.J.; Enshasy, H.E.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Najafi, S. Halotolerant Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria isolated from Saline Soil Improve Nitrogen fixation and alleviate Salt Stress. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 905210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nithyapriya, S.; Lalitha, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; Dailin, D.J.; El Enshasy, H.A.; Luh, N.; Herlambang, S. Production, purification, and characterization of bacillibactin siderophore of Bacillus subtilis and its application for improvement in plant growth and oil content in sesame. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, S.; Sayyed, R.; Sonawane, M.; Trivedi, M.; Thivakaran, G. Neurospora sp SR8, a novel phosphate solubiliser from rhizosphere of soil of Sorghum in Kachh, Gujarat. Indian. J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 54, 644–649. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baba, Z.A.; Hamid, B.; Sheikh, T.A.; Alotaibi, S.; Enshasy, H.E.; Ansari, J.A.; Zuan, A.T.K.; Sayyed, R.Z. Psychrotolerant Mesorhizobium sp. Isolated from temperate and cold desert regions solubilize Potassium and produces multiple plant growth promoting metabolites. Molecules 2021, 26, 5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sagar, A.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Ramteke, P.W.; Sharma, S.; Marraiki, N.; Elgorban, A.M.; Syed, A. ACC deaminase and antioxidant enzymes producing halophilic Enterobacter sp. PR14 promotes the growth of rice and millets under salinity stress. Physiol. Mol Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1847–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khan, N.; Al, S.; Shahi, M.A.; Mustafa, A.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Curaá, J.A. Insights into the Interactions among Roots, Rhizosphere and Rhizobacteria for Improving Plant Growth and Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Cells 2021, 10, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhat, B.A.; Tariq, L.; Nissar, S.; Islam, S.T.; Islam, S.U.; Mangral, Z.; Ilyas, N.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Muthusamy, G.; Kim, W.; et al. Plant-associated rhizobacteria in plant growth and metabolism as a tool for sustainable agriculture. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; Enshasy, H.E. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Green Bioinoculants: Recent Developments, Constraints, and Prospects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hamid, B.; Zaman, M.; Farooq, S.; Fatima, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Baba, Z.A.; Sheikh, T.A.; Reddy, M.S.; Enshasy, H.E.; Gafur, A.; et al. Bacterial Plant Biostimulants: A Sustainable Way towards Improving Growth, Productivity, and Health of Crops. Sustainability 2021, 21, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zakaria, A.K.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Enshasy, H.E. Biosynthesis of Antibiotics by PGPR and Their Roles in Biocontrol of Plant Diseases. In Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management Rhizobacteria in Biotic Stress Management; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume II, pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vinay, J.U.; Naik, M.K.; Rangeshwaran, R.; Chennappa, G.; Shaikh, S.S.; Sayyed, R.Z. Detection of antimicrobial traits in fluorescent pseudomonads and molecular characterization of an antibiotic pyoluteorin. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Reshma, P.; Naik, M.K.; Aiyaz, M.; Niranjana, S.R.; Chennappa, G.; Shaikh, S.S.; Sayyed, R.Z. Induced systemic resistance by 2,4diacetylphloroglucinol positive fluorescent Pseudomonas strains against rice sheath blight. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 56, 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sagar, A.; Yadav, S.S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Sharma, S.; Ramteke, P.W. Bacillus subtilis: A Multifarious Plant Growth Promoter, Biocontrol Agent, and Bioalleviator of Abiotic Stress. In Bacilli in Agrobiotechnology. Bacilli in Climate Resilient Agriculture and Bioprospecting; Islam, M.T., Rahman, M., Pandey, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; ISBN 978-3-030-85464-5. [Google Scholar]
  17. Patel, S.; Sayyed, R.; Saraf, R. Bacterial Determinants and Plant Defense Induction: Their Role as Bio-Control Agent. In Agriculture Plant Soil Microbes; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 187–204. [Google Scholar]
  18. Khan, A.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Seifi, S. Rhizobacteria: Legendary Soil Guards in Abiotic Stress Management. In Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management Abiotic Stress Management Sayyed; Arora, N.K., Reddy, M.S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume I, pp. 27–342. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lopes, M.J.D.S.; Dias-Filho, M.B.; Gurgel, E.S.C. Successful Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes: Inoculation Methods and Abiotic Factors. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, A.; Singh, S.; Gaurav, A.K.; Srivastava, S.; Verma, J.P. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Biological Tools for the Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdelaal, K.; AlKahtani, M.; Attia, K.; Hafez, Y.; Király, L.; Künstler, A. The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Drought on Plants. Biology 2021, 10, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schillaci, M. The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in the Growth of Cereals under Abiotic Stresses; Gupta, S., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2019; p. 4. ISBN 978-1-78985-310-0. [Google Scholar]
  23. Noshin, I.; Mumtaz, K.; Akhtar, N.; Yasmin, H.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Khan, W.; El Enshasy, H.A.; Dailin, D.J.K.; Elsayed, E.A.; Ali, Z. Exopolysaccharides Producing Bacteria for the Amelioration of Drought Stress in Wheat. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kusale, S.P.; Attar, Y.C.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Enshasy, H.E.; Hanapi, Z.; Ilyas, N.; Elgorban, A.M.; Bahkali, A.H.; Marraiki, N. Inoculation of Klebsiella variicola Alleviated slat stress Salinity and Improved Growth and Nutrients in Wheat and Maize. Agronomy 2021, 8, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kapadia, C.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Enshasy, H.E.E.; Vaidya, H.; Sharma, D.; Patel, V.; Malek, R.A.; Syed, A.; Elgorban, A.M.; Ahmad, K.; et al. Halotolerant microbial consortia for sustainable mitigation of salinity stress, growth promotion, and mineral uptake in tomato plant and soil nutrient enrichment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Manasa, M.; Ravinder, P.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Srinivas, V.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Enshasy, H.E.; Yahayu, M.; Zuan, A.T.K.; Kassem, H.S.; Hameeda, B. Co-inoculation of Bacillus spp. for growth promotion and iron fortification in sorghum. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kannepalli, A.; Davranov, K.; Narimanov, A.; Enakiev, Y.; Syed, A.; Elgorban, A.M.; Bahkali, A.H.; Wirth, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Gafur, A. Co-inoculation of rhizobacteria promotes growth, yield, and nutrient contents in soybean and improves soil enzymes and nutrients under drought conditions. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Najafi, S.; Nasi, H.N.; Tuncturk, R.; Tuncturk, M.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Amirnia, R. Biofertilizer application enhances drought stress tolerance and alters the antioxidant enzymes in medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo convar. pepo var. Styriaca). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sagar, A.; Rai, S.; Ilyas, N.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Al-Turki, A.I.; Enshasy, H.E.; Simarmata, T. Halotolerant Rhizobacteria for Salinity Stress Mitigation: Diversity, Mechanism and Molecular Approaches. Sustainability 2022, 14, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ilyas, N.; Akhtar, N.; Naseem, A.; Qureshi, R.; Majeed, A.; Sayyed, R.Z. The Potential of Bacillus subtilis and Phosphorus in Improving the Growth of Wheat under chromium Stress. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 3307–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zope, V.P.; El Enshasy, H.; Sayyed, R.Z. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: An Overview in Agricultural Perspectives. In Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management Rhizobacteria in Biotic Stress Management; Sayyed, R.Z., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume II, pp. 345–362. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shaikh, S.S.; Reddy, M.S.; Sayyed, R.Z. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: An Eco-Friendly Approach for Sustainable Agro-Ecosystem Plant Soil-Microbes; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 182–201. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kalam, S.; Basu, A.; Ahmad, I.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Enshasy, H.E.; Dailin, D.J.; Suriani, N.L. Recent understanding of soil Acidobacteria and their ecological significance: A critical review. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Amaresan, N.; Kumar, K.; Naik, J.H.; Bapatla, K.G.; Mishra, R.K. Chapter 8—Streptomyces in Plant Growth Promotion: Mechanisms and Role; Singh, B.P., Gupta, V.K., Passari, A.K.B.T.-N., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 125–135. ISBN 978-0-444-63994-3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vurukonda, S.S.K.P.; Giovanardi, D.; Stefani, E. Plant Growth Promoting and Biocontrol Activity of Streptomyces spp. as Endophytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Manullang, W.; Chuang, H. Streptomyces sp. mitigates abiotic stress response and promotes plant growth. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2020, 60, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. uárez-Moreno, Z.R.; Vinchira-Villarraga, D.M.; Vergara-Morales, D.I.; Castellanos, L.; Ramos, F.A.; Guarnaccia, C.; Degrassi, G.; Venturi, V.; Moreno-Sarmiento, N. Plant-Growth Promotion and Biocontrol Properties of Three Streptomyces spp. Isolates to Control Bacterial Rice Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. de Lima Procópio, R.E.; da Silva, I.R.; Martins, M.K.; de Azevedo, J.L.; de Araújo, J.M. Antibiotics produced by Streptomyces. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 16, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Maiti, P.K.; Das, S.; Sahoo, P.; Mandal, S. Streptomyces sp SM01 isolated from Indian soil produces a novel antibiotic picolinamycin effective against multi drug resistant bacterial strains. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Manteca, Á.; Yagüe, P. Streptomyces as a Source of Antimicrobials: Novel Approaches to Activate Cryptic Secondary Metabolite Pathways; Kırmusaoğlu, S., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2019; p. 7. ISBN 978-1-78985-790-0. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pimentel-Elardo, S.M.; Kozytska, S.; Bugni, T.S.; Ireland, C.M.; Moll, H.; Hentschel, U. Anti-Parasitic Compounds from Streptomyces sp. Strains Isolated from Mediterranean Sponges. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Myo, E.M.; Ge, B.; Ma, J.; Cui, H.; Liu, B.; Shi, L.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, K. Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces fradiae NKZ-259 and its formulation to enhance plant growth. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Crane, M.; Wehner, T.C.; Naegele, R.P. Cucumber Cultivars for Container Gardening and the Value of Field Trials for Predicting Cucumber Performance in Containers. HortScience 2018, 53, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Waseem, K.; Kamran, Q.; Jilani, M. Effect of different nitrogen levels on growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Agric. Res. 2008, 46, 259–266. [Google Scholar]
  45. Agriculture, M. Statistical Yearbook; UN iLibrary: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hunt, R.; Causton, D.R.; Shipley, B.; Askew, A.P. A modern tool for classical plant growth analysis. Ann. Bot. 2002, 90, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Esitken, A.; Eken, C. Effects of mycorrhiza isolates on symbiotic germination of terrestrial orchids (Orchis palustris Jacq. and Serapias vomeracea subsp. vomeracea (Burm.f.) Briq.) in Turkey. Symbiosis 2005, 38, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao, Y.; Wang, P.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Ying, X.; Liu, S. The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat–maize cropping system. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 31, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El-Shaikh, K.A.; Mohammed, M.S. Enhancing fresh and seed yield of okra and reducing chemical phosphorus fertilizer via using VA-mycorrhizal inoculants. World J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 5, 810–818. [Google Scholar]
  50. Dursun, A.; Ekinci, M.; Dönmez, M.F. Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pakistan J. Bot. 2010, 42, 3349–3356. [Google Scholar]
  51. Isfahani, F.M.; Besharati, H. Effect of biofertilizers on yield and yield components of cucumber. J. Biol. Earth Sci. 2012, 2, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  52. Isfahani, F.M.; Isfahani, S.M.; Besharati, H.; Tarighaleslami, M. Yield and concentration of some macro and micro nutrients of cucumber as influenced by bio-fertilizers. Ann. Biol. Res. 2013, 4, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  53. de Sousa, J.A.; Olivares, F.L. Plant growth promotion by streptomycetes: Ecophysiology, mechanisms and applications. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2016, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Dimpika, D.C.; Jia, Z.; McLean, M.J.; Britt, D.W.; Zhan, J.; Anderson, A.J. Production of Indole-3-Acetic Acid via the Indole-3-Acetamide Pathway in the Plant-Beneficial Bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 Is Inhibited by ZnO Nanoparticles but Enhanced by CuO Nanoparticles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1404–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Khoi, N. Isolation and Characterization of Indole Acetic Acid Producing Halophilic Bacteria from Salt Affected Soil of Rice–Shrimp Farming System in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Agric. For. Fish. 2017, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lebrazi, S.; Fadil, M.; Chraibi, M.; Fikri-Benbrahim, K. Screening and optimization of indole-3-acetic acid production by Rhizobium sp. strain using response surface methodology. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kaur, T.; Manhas, R.K. Evaluation of ACC deaminase and indole acetic acid production by Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16 and its effect on plant growth promotion. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 102321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Anwar, S.; Ali, B.; Sajid, I. Screening of Rhizospheric Actinomycetes for Various In-vitro and In-vivo Plant Growth Promoting (PGP) Traits and for Agroactive Compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rehan, M.; Barakat, H.; Almami, I.S.; Qureshi, K.A.; Alsohim, A.S. Production and Potential Genetic Pathways of Three Different Siderophore Types in Streptomyces tricolor Strain HM10. Fermentation 2022, 8, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chouyia, F.E.; Romano, I.; Fechtali, T.; Fagnano, M.; Fiorentino, N.; Visconti, D.; Idbella, M.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O. P-Solubilizing Streptomyces roseocinereus MS1B15 With Multiple Plant Growth-Promoting Traits Enhance Barley Development and Regulate Rhizosphere Microbial Population. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cui, K.; Xu, T.; Chen, J.; Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Zhuo, R.; Peng, Y.; Tang, W.; Wang, R.; Chen, L.; et al. Siderophores, a potential phosphate solubilizer from the endophyte Streptomyces sp. CoT10, improved phosphorus mobilization for host plant growth and rhizosphere modulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 367, 133110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, Q.; Liu, S. Identification and Characterization of the Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacterium Pantoea sp. S32 in Reclamation Soil in Shanxi, China. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Eifediyi, E.K.; Remison, S.U. The effects of inorganic fertilizer on the yield of two varieties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Rep. Opin. 2010, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  64. Li, Y.; Mattson, N.S. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Source and Rate on Growth and Nutrient Leachate Profile of Greenhouse-grown Cucumber. HortTechnology Hortte 2019, 29, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kareem, M.; Almubarak, N. Effect of organic and bio fertilizers on the vegetative traits of the sugarcane plant (Saccharum officinarum L.). Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 5653–5660. [Google Scholar]
  66. AL-Taey, D.K.A.; AL-Shmary, R.F. The Impact of Bio-Organic and N, P, K Fertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Potato; Yildiz, M., Ozgen, Y., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2021; p. 3. ISBN 978-1-83969-167-6. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ye, S.; Peng, B.; Liu, T. Effects of organic fertilizers on growth characteristics and fruit quality in Pear-jujube in the Loess Plateau. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choudhary, R.C.; Bairwa, H.L.; Kumar, U.; Javed, T.; Asad, M.; Lal, K.; Mahawer, L.N.; Sharma, S.K.; Singh, P.; Hassan, M.M.; et al. Influence of organic manures on soil nutrient content, microbial population, yield and quality parameters of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0266675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zainuddin, N.; Keni, M.F.; Ibrahim, S.A.S.; Masri, M.M.M. Effect of integrated biofertilizers with chemical fertilizers on the oil palm growth and soil microbial diversity. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 102237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Moradzadeh, S.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Rahimi, A.; Pourakbar, L.; Sayyed, R.Z. Combined bio-chemical fertilizers, ameliorate agro-biochemical attributes of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bastami, A.; Amirnia, R.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Enshasy, H.E. The effect of mycorrhizal fungi and organic fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative traits of two important Satureja species. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rahimi, A.; Amirnia, R.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Enshasy, H.A.E.; Hanapi, S.Z.; Sayyed, R.Z. Effect of different biological and organic fertilizer sources on the quantitative and qualitative traits of Cephalaria syriaca. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Faridvand, S.; Amirnia, R.; Tajbakhsh, M.; El Enshasy, H.A.; Sayyed, R.Z. The effect of foliar application of magnetic water and nano, organic, and chemical fertilizers on phytochemical and yield characteristics of different landraces of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sagar, A.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Ramteke, P.W.; Ramakrishna, W.; Poczai, P.; Obaid, S.A.; Ansari, M.J. Synergistic effect of Azotobacter nigricans and NPK fertilizer on agronomic and yield traits of Maize (Zea mays L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 952212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. El Karamany, M.F.; Sadak, M.S.; Bakry, B.A. Improving quality and quantity of mungbean plant via foliar application of plant growth regulators in sandy soil conditions. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rezk, E.; Abd, N.; Robin, P.; Akkal-Corfini, N.; El-Rahman, L. Effects of Different Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Cucumber Yield and Some Soil Properties. World J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 5, 408–414. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ashraf, M.Y.; Azhar, N.; Hussain, M. Indole acetic acid (IAA) induced changes in growth, relative water contents and gas exchange attributes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown under water stress conditions. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 50, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abdrabbo, M.; Desoky, H. Enhancing Organic Production of Cucumber by using Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Compost Tea under Sandy Soil Condition. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10, 162–169. [Google Scholar]
  79. Azarmi, R.; Torabi Giglou, M.; Hajieghrari, B. The effect of sheep-manure vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative properties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in the greenhouse. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Abo-Yousef, M. Application for Hybrid Rice Technology at Egypt. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor 2018, 56, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nair, A.; Ngouajio, M. Integrating Rowcovers and Soil Amendments for Organic Cucumber Production: Implications on Crop Growth, Yield, and Microclimate. HortScience 2010, 45, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zapata-Sifuentes, G.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G.; Saenz-Mata, J.; Fortis-Hernandez, M.; Blanco-Contreras, E.; Chiquito-Contreras, R.G.; Preciado-Rangel, P. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Improve Growth and Fruit Quality of Cucumber under Greenhouse Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tahir, S.M.; Kabir, A.K.M.R.; Ibrahim, H.H.; Sufiyanu, S. Studies on the performance of organic and inorganic fertilizer on the growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Sci. World J. 2019, 14, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  84. Valdenegro, M.; Bernales, M.; Knox, M.; Vinet, R.; Caballero, E.; Ayala-Raso, A.; Kučerová, D.; Kumar, R.; Viktorová, J.; Ruml, T.; et al. Characterization of Fruit Development, Antioxidant Capacity, and Potential Vasoprotective Action of Peumo (Cryptocarya alba), a Native Fruit of Chile. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kang, S.-M.; Radhakrishnan, R.; You, Y.-H.; Khan, A.L.; Park, J.-M.; Lee, S.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Cucumber performance is improved by inoculation with plant growth-promoting microorganisms. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci. 2015, 65, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jog, R.; Nareshkumar, G.; Rajkumar, S. Plant growth promoting potential and soil enzyme production of the most abundant Streptomyces spp. from wheat rhizosphere. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sadeghi, A.; Karimi, E.; Dahaji, P.A.; Javid, M.G.; Dalvand, Y.; Askari, H. Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate of Streptomyces under saline soil conditions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jog, R.; Pandya, M.; Nareshkumar, G.; Rajkumar, S. Mechanism of phosphate solubilization and antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. isolated from wheat roots and rhizosphere and their application in improving plant growth. Microbiology 2014, 160, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sreevidya, M.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Kudapa, H.; Varshney, R.K. Exploring plant growth-promotion actinomycetes from vermicompost and rhizosphere soil for yield enhancement in chickpea. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Khan, I.; Awan, S.A.; Ikram, R.; Rizwan, M.; Akhtar, N.; Yasmin, H.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Ali, S.; Ilyas, N. 24-Epibrassinolide regulated antioxidants and osmolyte defense and endogenous hormones in two wheat varieties under drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 172, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sheikh, T.; Baba, Z.; Hamid, B.; Iqbal, S.; Yatoo, A.; Fatima, S.; Nabi, A.; Kanth, R.; Dar, K.; Hussain, N.; et al. Extracellular polymeric substances in psychrophilic cyanobacteria: A potential bioflocculant and carbon sink to mitigate cold stress. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kapadia, C.; Patel, N.; Rana, A.; Vaidya, H.; Alfarraj, A.; Ansari, M.J.; Gafur, A.; Poczai, P.; Sayyed, R.Z. Evaluation of Plant Growth Promoting and Salinity Ameliorating Potential of Halophillic Bacteria Isolated from Saline Soil. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 946217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gowtham, H.G.; Singh, S.B.; Shilpa, N.; Aiyaz, M.; Nataraj, K.; Udayashankar, A.C.; Amruthesh, K.N.; Murali, M.; Poczai, P.; Gafur, A.; et al. Insight into Recent Progress and Perspectives in Improvement of Antioxidant Machinery Upon PGPR Augmentation in Plants Under Drought Stress: A Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fazeli-Nasab, B.; Sayyed, R.Z. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Salinity Stress: A Journey into the Soil. In Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management Vol 1 Abiotic Stress Management Sayyed; Arora, N.K., Reddy, M.S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sherpa, M.T.; Bag, N.; Das, S.; Haokip, P.; Sharma, L. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from organically grown high yielding pole type native pea (Pisum sativum L.) variety Dentami of Sikkim, India. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Rehan, M.; ALSohim, A.S.; Abidou, H.; Rasheed, Z.; Abdulmonem, W.A.L. Isolation, Identification, Biocontrol Activity, and Plant Growth Promoting Capability of a Superior Streptomyces tricolor Strain HM10. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gang, S.; Sharma, S.; Saraf, M.; Buck, M.; Schumacher, J. Analysis of Indole-3-acetic Acid (IAA) Production in Klebsiellaby LC-MS/MS and the Salkowski Method. Bio.-Protocol. 2019, 9, e3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Louden, B.C.; Haarmann, D.; Lynne, A.M. Use of Blue Agar CAS Assay for Siderophore Detection. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 2011, 12, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Arora, N.K.; Verma, M. Modified microplate method for rapid and efficient estimation of siderophore produced by bacteria. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Patel, P.R.; Shaikh, S.S.; Sayyed, R.Z. Modified chrome azurol S method for detection and estimation of siderophores having affinity for metal ions other than iron. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 1, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Payne, S.M. Iron acquisition in microbial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 1993, 1, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nautiyal, C.S. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Maynard, D.N.; Hochmuth, G.J. Knott’s Handbook for Vegetable Growers; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 9781118686102. [Google Scholar]
  104. Page, A.L. Methods of soil analysis. In Part 2—Chemical and Microbiological Properties; The American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  105. Rathje. Jackson, M.L.: Soil chemical analysis. Verlag: Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1958, 498 S. DM 39.40. Z. Für Pflanz. Düngung Bodenkd. 1959, 85, 251–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Cho, Y.Y.; Oh, S.; Oh, M.M.; Son, J.E. Estimation of individual leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of hydroponically grown cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) using leaf length, width, and SPAD value. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 111, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ding, X.; Yu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, S.; He, L.; Zhou, Q.; Yu, J.; Huang, D. Changes in Leaf Length, Width, Area, and Photosynthesis of Fruit Cucumber in a Greenhouse Production System. HortScience Horts 2020, 55, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Evans, G.C. The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1972; Volume 1, ISBN 0520094328. [Google Scholar]
  109. Cottenie, A. Soil and Plant Testing as a Basis of Fertilizer Recommendations. F.A.O. Soils Bulletin. 1980. no. 38/2. p. 118. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19806734748 (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  110. Khiddir, S.M. A Statistical Approach in the Use of Parametric Systems Applied to the FAO Framework for Land Evaluation; Rijksuniversiteit Gent. Faculteit van de Wetenschappen: Ghent, Belgium, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  111. Webster, R. Quantitative and Numerical Methods in Soil Classification and Survey; Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL): Oxford, UK; Clarendon Press: London, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  112. Addinsoft XLSTAT. Statistical and Data Analysis Solution; Addinsoft XLSTAT: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 03316 g001 550
Figure 1. IAA production by four Streptomyces strains (HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10) in King’s medium B supplemented with 0.2% L-tryptophan over 4 days, each value representing the mean of three replicates. Bars not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 1. IAA production by four Streptomyces strains (HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10) in King’s medium B supplemented with 0.2% L-tryptophan over 4 days, each value representing the mean of three replicates. Bars not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Plants 11 03316 g001
Plants 11 03316 g002 550
Figure 2. Siderophore production by the four Streptomyces strains detected in CAS--King’s blue agar medium. The orange-yellow halo around colonies represents siderophore production.
Figure 2. Siderophore production by the four Streptomyces strains detected in CAS--King’s blue agar medium. The orange-yellow halo around colonies represents siderophore production.
Plants 11 03316 g002
Plants 11 03316 g003 550
Figure 3. Represents the quantified production of siderophore by the four Streptomyces strains in King’s broth medium. Bars not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Represents the quantified production of siderophore by the four Streptomyces strains in King’s broth medium. Bars not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Plants 11 03316 g003
Plants 11 03316 g004 550
Figure 4. Phosphate solubilization of inorganic phosphate by the selected four Streptomyces strains grown in NBRIP-liquid medium supplemented with 5 g/L of Ca3(PO4)2 for 7 days, each value represents the mean of three replicates. Bars not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 4. Phosphate solubilization of inorganic phosphate by the selected four Streptomyces strains grown in NBRIP-liquid medium supplemented with 5 g/L of Ca3(PO4)2 for 7 days, each value represents the mean of three replicates. Bars not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Plants 11 03316 g004
Plants 11 03316 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of produced IAA production by S. tricolor HM10 using HPLC.
Figure 5. Analysis of produced IAA production by S. tricolor HM10 using HPLC.
Plants 11 03316 g005
Plants 11 03316 g006 550
Figure 6. PC-biplot exploring the relationship between the evaluated traits under treatments of rock phosphate and Streptomyces strains as plant growth-promoting agents.
Figure 6. PC-biplot exploring the relationship between the evaluated traits under treatments of rock phosphate and Streptomyces strains as plant growth-promoting agents.
Plants 11 03316 g006
Plants 11 03316 g007 550
Figure 7. Heatmap correlation between evaluated traits and appropriate treatments from Streptomyces strains with rock phosphate.
Figure 7. Heatmap correlation between evaluated traits and appropriate treatments from Streptomyces strains with rock phosphate.
Plants 11 03316 g007
Table
Table 1. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on some vegetative growth traits of cucumber plants grown under greenhouse conditions.
Table 1. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on some vegetative growth traits of cucumber plants grown under greenhouse conditions.
TreatmentsPlant Height
(cm)		No. of Leaves Plant−1Root Length (cm)Leaf DM (%)Stem DM (%)Root DM (%)
T1133.00 c17.33 c21.33 bc13.55 b5.57 a5.84 ab
T2124.00 c16.67 c17.00 c16.11 a6.42 a6.21 ab
T3187.33 ab25.00 ab19.33 c13.08 b5.60 a5.32 b
T4198.33 a26.67 a44.67 a14.60 ab5.79 a6.67 ab
T5195.33 a26.33 a32.67 b14.01 ab6.02 a7.21 ab
T6196.33 a25.00 ab27.67 bc14.74 ab5.85 a7.34 ab
T7177.33 b22.67 b25.33 bc14.48 ab5.63 a11.10 a
Values followed by the same letter (s) within each column did not significantly differ according to the Duncan multiple comparison test at the 5% level. Each value is the average of 3 replicates. ± Values indicated to standard error (±SE). Normal phosphate (T1), rock phosphate (RP) (T2), RP + strain HM3 (T3), RP + strain HM3 (T4), RP + strain HM8 (T5), RP + strain HM10 (T6) and RP + mixture of the four strains (T7). (DM) dry matter. a,b,c: Values not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on some vegetative growth traits of cucumber plants grown under greenhouse conditions.
Table 2. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on some vegetative growth traits of cucumber plants grown under greenhouse conditions.
TreatmentsLeaf Area (LA)
(cm2)		Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) (g·cm2·day−1)Relative Growth Rate (RGR) (g·g−1·day−1)
T1188.167 c0.008 a0.117 a
T2210.067 c0.006 a0.120 a
T3307.333 ab0.007 a0.117 a
T4303.200 ab0.007 a0.120 a
T5323.000 a0.007 a0.137 a
T6323.200 a0.006 a0.127 a
T7267.933 b0.006 a0.117 a
Values followed by the same letter (s) within each column did not significantly differ according to the Duncan multiple comparison test at the 5% level. Each value is the average of 3 replicates. ± Values indicated to standard error (±SE). Normal phosphate (T1), rock phosphate (RP) (T2), RP + strain HM3 (T3), RP + strain HM3 (T4), RP + strain HM8 (T5), RP + strain HM10 (T6) and RP + mixture of the four strains (T7). a,b,c: Values not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on some fruit growth characteristics of cucumber plants grown under greenhouse conditions.
Table 3. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on some fruit growth characteristics of cucumber plants grown under greenhouse conditions.
TreatmentsFruit Length (cm)Fruit Diameter (cm)No. of Fruit per PlantFruit Fresh Weight (g)Fruit Firmness
(Lbs. Inch−2)
T111.83 ab2.10 b10.00 cd735.68 b4.92 a
T211.50 b2.10 b8.33 d512.66 c4.83 a
T313.83 ab2.80 a13.33 a810.83 ab5.00 a
T414.33 a2.83 a13.83 a920.00 a4.90 a
T513.16 ab2.75 a13.16 ab884.50 ab5.00 a
T613.16 ab2.43 ab12.66 ab782.50 ab4.83 a
T713.33 ab2.58 a11.00 bc786.00 ab4.83 a
Values followed by the same letter (s) within each column did not significantly differ according to the Duncan multiple comparison test at the 5% level. Each value is the average of 3 replicates. ± Values indicated to standard error (±SE). Normal phosphate (T1), rock phosphate (RP) (T2), RP + strain HM3 (T3), RP + strain HM3 (T4), RP + strain HM8 (T5), RP + strain HM10 (T6) and RP + mixture of the four strains (T7). a,b,c,d: Values not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on soil and plant phosphorus concentration.
Table 4. Effect of chemical, organic, and biofertilizer treatments on soil and plant phosphorus concentration.
TreatmentsSoil P (mg/kg)Plant P (%)
Before Planting21 DATAt Harvest
T12.06 c12.52 f17.92 d0.43 c
T21.16 e18.34 c13.90 g0.52 c
T35.20 a18.50 c15.02 f0.52 c
T42.48 b30.76 a26.36 a0.91 a
T51.76 cd27.76 b22.40 b0.75 b
T61.44 de17.42 d18.50 c0.55 c
T71.51 de13.75 e16.08 e0.53 c
Values followed by the same letter (s) within each column did not significantly differ according to the Duncan multiple comparison test at the 5% level. Each value is the average of 3 replicates. ± Values indicated to standard error (±SE). Normal phosphate (T1), rock phosphate (RP) (T2), RP + strain HM3 (T3), RP + strain HM3 (T4), RP + strain HM8 (T5), RP + strain HM10 (T6) and RP + mixture of the four strains (T7). FW = fresh weight and DW = Dry weight. (DAT) Days after transplanting. a,b,c,d,e,f,g: Values not sharing similar letters are significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Water used for the Study.
Table 5. Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Water used for the Study.
PropertiesValue
SoilWater
Physical properties
Sand (%)94.1-
Silt (%)3.6-
Clay (%)2.3-
TextureSand-
Chemical properties
1 pH7.847.17
2 EC (dS·m−1)0.5081.55
3 Nutrient (ppm)
Total N168-
Available P0.450-
Available K45.040.0
4 Dissolved Ions (meq·L−1)
(1) Dissolved anions (meq·L−1)
Cl−1.012.0
HCO3−1 + CO3−23.03.0
(2) Dissolved cations (meq·L−1)
Na+1.311.9
Ca++3.04.0
Mg++1.03.0
1− pH was measured in the soil suspension (soil: water) at a ratio of (1:2.5) using a pH meter type (Jenway, model 3310) according to what was mentioned in the method of Page [104]. 2− EC (dS m−1) was measured in the saturated soil paste extract using an EC-meter type (ELE, model 470) according to the method recommended in Jackson [105]. 3− Total N was determined by the Kjeldahl method; P was extracted using the Olsen method; K by 1 N NH4OAc at pH 7 Page, [104]. 4− The dissolved salts (cations + anions) were measured in the extract of saturated soil paste and determined using the EDTA solution titration method for calcium, magnesium, carbonate, and bicarbonate by titration with hydrochloric acid, and chloride by titration with silver nitrate, while, sodium was determined using a flame photometer according to the method mentioned by Jackson [105].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Omar, A.F.; Abdelmageed, A.H.A.; Al-Turki, A.; Abdelhameid, N.M.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Rehan, M. Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of Four Streptomyces Strains from Rhizosphere Soil to Enhance Cucumber Growth and Yield. Plants 2022, 11, 3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233316

AMA Style

Omar AF, Abdelmageed AHA, Al-Turki A, Abdelhameid NM, Sayyed RZ, Rehan M. Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of Four Streptomyces Strains from Rhizosphere Soil to Enhance Cucumber Growth and Yield. Plants. 2022; 11(23):3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Omar, Ayman F., Adil H. A. Abdelmageed, Ahmad Al-Turki, Noha M. Abdelhameid, R. Z. Sayyed, and Medhat Rehan. 2022. "Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of Four Streptomyces Strains from Rhizosphere Soil to Enhance Cucumber Growth and Yield" Plants 11, no. 23: 3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233316

APA Style

Omar, A. F., Abdelmageed, A. H. A., Al-Turki, A., Abdelhameid, N. M., Sayyed, R. Z., & Rehan, M. (2022). Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of Four Streptomyces Strains from Rhizosphere Soil to Enhance Cucumber Growth and Yield. Plants, 11(23), 3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233316

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop