Next Article in Journal
Identification of One Major QTL and a Novel Gene OsIAA17q5 Associated with Tiller Number in Rice Using QTL Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant, Cytotoxic, and Rheological Properties of Canola Oil Extract of Usnea barbata (L.) Weber ex F.H. Wigg from Călimani Mountains, Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Thiophenes—Naturally Occurring Plant Metabolites: Biological Activities and In Silico Evaluation of Their Potential as Cathepsin D Inhibitors
Previous Article in Special Issue
UPLC-PDA-MS/MS Profiling and Healing Activity of Polyphenol-Rich Fraction of Alhagi maurorum against Oral Ulcer in Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/plants11040540
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Pimenta dioica L. Essential Oil and Its Major Compound (Eugenol) against Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria

by
Ayshah Aysh ALrashidi
1,
Emira Noumi
1,2,*,
Mejdi Snoussi
1,3 and
Vincenzo De Feo
4
1
Department of Biology, University of Ha’il, College of Science, P.O. Box 2440, Ha’il 81451, Saudi Arabia
2
Laboratory of Bioresources: Integrative Biology and Valorization (LR14-ES06), Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, University of Monastir, Avenue Tahar Haddad, BP 74, Monastir 5000, Tunisia
3
Laboratory of Genetic, Biodiversity and Valorization of Bioressources, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, University of Monastir, Avenue Tahar Haddad, BP 74, Monastir 5000, Tunisia
4
Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, 84084 Salerno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(4), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040540
Submission received: 12 January 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2022 / Accepted: 14 February 2022 / Published: 17 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyphenols in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Pimenta dioica essential oil and its main compound (eugenol) were tested for their antibacterial potency against eight Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria implicated in food intoxication. This essential oil and its main component were evaluated for their ability in inhibiting Quorum sensing (QS)-dependent mechanisms such as motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, production of violacein by Chromobacterium violaceum and biofilm formation on stainless steel and glass surfaces. Our results demonstrated that P. dioica essential oil and eugenol were active against all tested strains with a maximum of inhibition against Listeria monocytogenes CECT 933 (26.66 ± 0.57 mm). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of the tested essential oil and eugenol was about 0.048 mg/mL for all strains. The obtained results demonstrated that 4CMI eugenol inhibited foodborne strains biofilm formation on the glass strips by 73.79% and by 75.90% on polystyrene. Moreover, 0.048 mg/mL (MIC) of P. dioica essential oil inhibited the violacein production by 69.30%. At 100 µg/mL, P. dioica oil and eugenol affected the motility of PAO1 by 42.00% and 29.17%, respectively. Low concentrations of P. dioica essential oil are active against the quorum sensing phenomena and biofilm potency. Thus, this essential oil could be further investigated for new molecules useful for the treatment of toxi-alimentary infections.

1. Introduction

Foodborne pathogenic bacteria are responsible of many human alimentary intoxications. The obvious examples of pathogenic bacteria are Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio vulnificus, Shigella flexneri, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. These bacteria are recognized for their high ability to adhere to surfaces and epithelial cells. Food preparations are based on the use of species responsible for their aromatic properties and antimicrobial potency.
The diet based on the consumption of contaminated food with bacteria causes a big problem to public health. Several bacteria accounted for many cases of death [1]. The use of plants (spices) and natural products (herbs), which can be added during the food conception may reduce the risk of contamination with these pathogens by inhibiting their activities and food damage [2,3,4].
Essential oils are widely used for antimicrobial, anti-parasitical, insecticidal and other medicinal activities. Additionally, they are used as flavour in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and food industries [5,6].
The Pimenta genus is a group of trees native throughout the Caribbean region, is recognized by its anticancer, antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties [7].
Eugenol, as an additive in alimentary industry, was the main constituent identified in P. dioica essential oil [3], which was recognized for its antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities [8,9].
Volatile oils are obtained by the process of distillation of plant parts. There are widely used for antimicrobial, antiparasitical, insecticidal and other medicinal activities. Additionally, they are used as flavours in the cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and food industries [5].
The eugenol present in Pimenta leaf essential oil [8], which was recognized for many activities, especially antioxidant, bactericidal and virucidal properties [9,10]. Ali et al. [11], Faria et al. [12] and many other scientists have demonstrated the inhibitory activities of P. dioica and eugenol against many pathogenic microorganisms such as S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa [13,14,15].
Several virulence factors such as adhesion and resistance to antibiotics were largely studied by scientists in order to search for a new method of therapy [16]. The formation of biofilm in bacteria strains is regulated by the mechanism of QS [16,17]. The capacity to form biofilms is considered as a QS-based factors, such as swarming, production of exopolysaccharides and inhibition of violacein production [16].
The purpose of the present study was to determine the chemical composition of P. dioica essential oil and to study its activity, as well as its main compound, eugenol, against several foodborne pathogenic bacteria. The anti-QS activity of P. dioica EO was tested using Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. In addition, we reported the antibiofilm potency of different concentrations of P. dioica essential oil and its main component eugenol.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Composition of P. dioica Essential Oil

The chemical composition of P. dioica essential oil is summarized in Table 1. Thirty components with different percentage were identified using HP5 capillary column according to their elution time. P. dioica essential oil was rich in eugenol (48.67%), β-pinene (18.52%) and 2-Propenylphenol (7.61%). Other relevant components were linalool (3.68%) and limonene (3.55%). The structures of the major compounds are represented in Figure 1.

2.2. Antibacterial Activity of P. dioica Essential Oil and Eugenol

The results demonstrated that P. dioica essential oil and eugenol were active against all tested strains with a maximum inhibition against L. monocytogenes CECT 933 (21.66 mm with P. dioica and 21.33 mm for eugenol). Eugenol was more active against S. flexeneri CECT 4804.
P. aeruginosa PAO1 showed a resistance to P. dioica and eugenol with inhibition zone diameters of 8.00 mm and 7.66 mm, respectively (Table 2).
Low concentrations of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol inhibited the growth of all foodborne pathogenic tested strains. In fact, the MIC value of the tested essential oil was 0.048 mg/mL for all strains. The same concentration (0.048 mg/mL) for the eugenol was able to reduce the growth of all bacterial strains. The MBC values of the tested essential oil were about 1.562 to 12.5 mg/mL and 3.125–12.5 mg/mL (eugenol) are needed to completely inhibit the growth of the Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains tested (Table 2).

2.3. Adhesive Properties and Biofilm Formation on Abiotic Materials

Among the isolated strains, five out of eight (62.50%) were slime producing characterized by the black colonies and red with black center, and the remaining strains (P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis and S. enterica) were non-slime producing characterized by red bordeaux colonies (Figure 2, Table 3).
The study of biofilm formation on glass tubes showed that S. flexeneri and L. monocytogenes were strongly adherent (a, noted +++), and 50% of the tested strains were moderately adherent (b, noted ++) to this material (Figure 3).
The most used materials in culinary preparations (polystyrene, glass, stainless steel and polyvinylchloride) were chosen during this work. The staining assay with 1% crystal violet (CV) showed that all foodborne pathogenic strains form a biofilm (0.1 < OD < 1 or OD570 > 1) on the selected materials with different degrees depending on the strain and the surface (Figure 4).
All Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains were high biofilm producers on glass with a maximum of adhesion for B. subtilis (OD = 2.65). S. aureus ATCC 6538 was the highest biofilm producer on polystyrene (OD > 1). S. flexneri CECT 4804 showed the lowest values of OD on the four tested materials (Table 3).

2.4. Anti-Biofilm Activity of P. dioica and Eugenol on Polystyrene and Glass Surfaces

The study of the anti-biofilm properties of P. dioica and eugenol was carried out on the S. aureus ATCC 6538 strain according to its high potency of biofilm formation.
P. dioica showed an anti-biofilm ability of the S. aureus strain on glass and polystyrene about 55% and 58%, respectively, at the lowest tested concentration (MIC = 0.048 mg/mL) (Table 4). This effect was stronger when we tested the anti-biofilm effect of eugenol against the same strain showing an inhibition about 73.00% on polystyrene. In fact, low concentrations (0.048, 0.096 and 0.192 mg/mL) of this compound demonstrated an important reduction of the biofilm formation on both tested surfaces.
The main compound, eugenol, was more active on sessile S. aureus ATCC 6538 isolate adherent into polystyrene and glass than the essential oil. The effect of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on biofilm formed on polystyrene and glass was not variable depending on the concentration and tested material. A 4 × MIC concentration of P. dioica EO inhibited the S. aureus biofilm formed on glass and polystyrene with percentages of (64.41 ± 1.4%) and (70.25 ± 1.19%), respectively. All these results are summarized in Table 4.

2.5. Violacein Inhibition Assay in C. violaceum

In qualitative analysis, P. dioica essential oil inhibited the production of violacein in C. violaceum ATCC 12472 with a percentage of inhibition more than 50% (71.30 ± 1.5%) at MIC value even at a low concentration (MIC/4) (Table 5).
However, violacein production was inhibited only to an extent of 48.29 ± 0.9% when we tested the eugenol (Table 5, Figure 5).

2.6. Anti-Swarming Assay

During this essay, we examined the anti-QS potential of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on swarming motility in PAO1 strain. The results indicated that P. dioica essential oil and its main compound inhibited the swarming of PAO1 to different extents and at the selected doses (50, 75 and 100 µg/mL). Moreover, 100 µg/mL were able to inhibit swarming about 42.00% and 29.00% for P. dioica oil and eugenol, respectively (Table 6).

3. Discussion

P. dioica has been used as an important spice for its culinary and medicinal uses [18]. This plant was used to reduce muscle pain, help digestion and stomach gases [19,20]. In Cuba, this species can be cooked or ingested to treat stomach pain and colds [21]. The leaves of Pimenta are used to reduce arthritis, fever and stress and in India [22].
Many compounds have been isolated from this plant such as tannins, glycosides, phenylpropanoids and essential oils [23].
Many constituents found in P. dioica berries and leaves such as galloylglucosides phenylpropanoids [24], tannins and flavonoids [25] showed several properties (antibacterial, analgesic hypotensive and anti-neuralgic). Considering the phytochemical composition and low cost of Pimenta berries, this spice may be used in the food preparation [26] (Table 7).
Eugenol represents the main compound of the oil (48.67%). Our results are similar to previous literature [24]. These researchers identified 22 compounds in Pimenta oils. The eugenol was the main component of both oils with 71.40% in leaves and 65.90% in fruits [27].
Our study showed that the tested P. dioica essential oil was rich in eugenol (48.67%), β-pinene (18.52%) and (1E)-Phenol-2-propenyl (7.61%). Other relevant components were linalool (3.68%) and limonene (3.55%) (Table 7).
The essential oil of P. dioica fruits from Jamaica was composed of eugenol essentially (68–78%) [33]. In addition, the volatile oil from P. dioica fruits originating from Mexico was rich in eugenol (90%) and α-terpineol (2%) [34]. The same result was obtained in Guatemalan fruits [35].
P. dioica has been described for several years for its biological uses. Our results demonstrated that its essential oil and eugenol were active against all tested foodborne pathogenic strains. The essential oil of P. dioica berries inhibited L. monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas putida, E. coli and S. aureus [36]. The essential oil of the same plant extracted from its leaves demonstrated a strong antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus species [13].
The antimicrobial activity of P. dioica fruits and leaves extracts and essential oil has been proved. P. dioica leaf extracts presented significant antimicrobial properties against many genera of bacteria and fungi such as Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Salmonella typhimurium, Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger and Penicillium sp. [37,38,39].
Mérida-Reyes et al. [27] tested the antibacterial activity of the essential oil of leaves of P. dioica against B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. enterica and E. coli. Their results showed that this oil is very active against B. subtlis and E. coli was the more resistant strain. The activity of the oil against bacteria depends on the synthesis of the cell wall interfering in the formation of the peptidoglycan molecule [40]. Some authors related to this antibacterial activity to the presence of eugenol and (E)-caryophyllene since these two compounds were currently found in P. dioica oil [40,41]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that eugenol is active on the cytoplasmic membrane [30].
It has been demonstrated that eugenol can reduce the production of pyocyanin and biofilm formation in E. coli and S. aureus [42].
Using the CRA test, 62.50% were slime-producing, characterized by a black colonies and red with black centers. Pigmented colonies were considered as slime-producing strains, whereas unpigmented colonies were classified as non-slime-producing strains [43].
Many works have proved the anti-biofilm potency of monoterpenoids on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria during the biofilm development [44].
Eugenol is largely used as a flavoring agent in the food industry due to its biological properties such as anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and antioxidant. This compound is used against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It is demonstrated that eugenol presents strong inhibition against several anaerobic bacteria (Streptococcus mutans and Prevotella intermedia), Listeria monocytogenes and Candida albicans. Several essential oils are active against bacterial biofilm development such as clove and pimento berry oil [45]. This compound inhibits QS of P. aeruginosa [46]. Some studies reported that thymol and carvacrol were responsible for the anti-QS activity [47].
Burt (2004) [48] demonstrated that essential oils containing phenolic compounds such as eugenol thymol or carvacrol have the strongest antimicrobial activity. Gram-negative bacteria are known to be more resistant to volatile oils than the Gram-positive bacteria [48]. The same scientists proved that monoterpenes (limonene and α-pinene) inhibited biofilm formation more than terpene alcohols such as linalool and terpinene-4-ol. The most foodborne pathogenic bacteria such as the Pseudomonas produce biofilms [49]. The family Lamiaceae is considered as important aromatic plants with constituents having anti-QS properties to combat different food pathogenic microorganisms [50]. Other studies demonstrated that single constituents of essential oils such as eugenol, linalool, γ-terpinene and limonene exhibited anti-QS effects [51].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains

The antibacterial effect of the volatile oil of P. dioica and its main component the eugenol was tested against eight food-borne pathogenic bacteria including four Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Bacillus subtilis CIP 5265, Vibrio vulnificus CECT 529, Listeria monocytogenes CECT 933) and four Gram-negative bacterial strains (Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, Salmonella enterica CECT 443, Shigella flexeneri CECT 4804) were procured from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) USA and Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT).

4.2. Chemical Characterization of the Essential Oil

P. dioica essential oil was purchased from Huile & Sens (Crestet, France) on 27 November 2014 (Product number B750N06). This oil was extracted from the dried unripe fruits by hydrodistillation technique. The main compound (eugenol) was purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l. Milan, Italy). The essential oil was analyzed by gas chromatography–flame ionization detector (GC–FID) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) [52,53,54,55] and mass spectra on both columns with those of authentic compounds available in our laboratories by means NIST 02 and Wiley 275 libraries [56].

4.3. Antimicrobial Activities

4.3.1. Disk-Diffusion Assay

Antimicrobial activity testing was performed according to the protocol described by Noumi et al. [57]. Bacterial strains were enriched on a tube containing 9 mL of Mueller–Hinton (MH) broth then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The inoculums were streaked onto Mueller–Hinton agar plates using a sterile swab. Tetracycline was used in this study as positive control. The antibiotic susceptibility was determined by using the Kirby–Bauer method and Mueller–Hinton agar plates.

4.3.2. Microdilution Method for the Determination of the MIC and MBC

The MIC and the MBC values were determined for all bacteria as described by Hajlaoui et al. [58]. The inoculums of the bacterial strains were prepared from an overnight broth cultures (37 °C) and suspensions and were adjusted to OD600 (107 CFU/mL). The essential oil dissolved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) with a high concentration about 50 mg/mL. Serial two-fold dilutions of the stock solution of the essential oil were prepared in 96-wells plate containing 95 µL of Mueller–Hinton broth for bacteria. In fact, 100 µL aliquot from the stock solution (50 mg/mL) was added to the first well containing 95 µL of the correspondent broth. Then, a serial two-fold dilutions was prepared by transferring 100 µL from the first well into the 10 consecutive wells. The last well containing 195 µL of Mueller–Hinton broth without essential oil and 5 µL of the inoculum on each strain was used as the negative control. Finally, 5µL of the inoculum of each microorganism was added to the wells with a final volume about 200 µL in each well. We have used the scheme proposed for essential oils by Aligiannis et al. [52]: strong activity (0.05 < MIC < 0.5 mg/mL), moderate activity (0.6 < MIC < 1.5 mg/mL) and weak activity (MIC > 1.5 mg/mL).

4.4. Biofilm Formation Ability of Tested Isolates

4.4.1. Phenotypic Characterization of Bacteria-Producing Slime

Detection of slime producing strains was carried out by culturing the isolates on Congo Red Agar (CRA) plates as previously described by Touati et al. [53]. The plates were prepared by mixing 36 g of saccharose (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) with 0.8 g of Congo red in 1 L of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, black colonies and colonies red with a black center were considered as positive slime producers [53].

4.4.2. Test Tube Method

Slime production on glass tubes was determined using the Safranin staining as described for coagulase negative staphylococci by incubating bacterial culture into a glace test tube containing 10 mL of LB broth supplemented with 8% of glucose [54]. Slime production was interpreted as negative, weak (1+), moderate (2+) or strong (3+).

4.4.3. Biofilm Formation in 96-well Polystyrene Plates and Glass

Biofilm production by foodborne pathogenic bacterial strains grown in BHI (Bio-Rad, France) was assessed using crystal violet staining assay [55]. Biofilm formation was interpreted as highly positive (OD570 ≥ 1), low grade positive (0.1 ≤ OD570 < 1) or negative (OD570 < 0.1).
For biofilm formation on glass, the strips (1.5 cm2) were disinfected by dipping in 70% alcohol for 30 min and was held with sterile distilled water. Biofilm quantification was made with crystal violet 1% staining. Moreover, 125 µL of each well were transferred on 96-well microtiter plate and the OD at 570 nm was measured [16].

4.5. Determination of Anti-Biofilm Activity on Polystyrene and Glass

MIC, 2 × MIC and 4 × MIC of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol were tested for their anti-Staphylococcus biofilm formation. Only S. aureus ATCC 6538 strain was selected for this test. The crystal violet staining was employed to test the effects on biofilm formation. One hundred µL of fresh bacterial suspension was added to each well. Growth control, media control and blank control were included. The biofilm formation was evaluated using the crystal violet staining method as described previously [16,57].

4.6. Violacein Inhibition Assay

Various concentrations of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol (MIC = 10 mg/mL until MIC/32 = 0.3125 mg/mL) were added to 10 µL of C. violaceum ATCC 12472 and incubated at 30 °C for 18 h for the qualitative screening of violacein inhibition [57,59].

4.7. Swarming Assay

P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain were point inoculated on plates (1% peptone, 0.5% Na Cl, 0.5% agar and 0.5% D-glucose) with various concentrations of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol (50, 75 and 100 µg/mL) [59,60].

4.8. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were conducted in triplicate and average values were calculated using the SPSS 16.0 statistics package for Windows. The differences in mean were calculated using the Duncan’s multiple-range tests for means with 95% confidence limit (p ≤ 0.05). Values were expressed as means ± standard deviations.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we reported the isolation of eugenol (48.76%) and β-pinene (18.52%) as the main phytocompounds in P. dioica essential oil. Shigella, Vibrio, Listeria, Bacillus, Salmonella, Escherichia, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus foodborne pathogenic bacteria were highly sensitive to the tested oil with mean diameter of growth inhibition zone ranging from (8.00 ± 0.01) mm to (26.66 ± 0.57) mm. Low concentrations of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol were necessary to inhibit the growth of all tested microorganisms. While concentrations as low as 12.5 mg/mL for Pimenta essential oil and 3.125 mg/mL for eugenol are needed to kill the tested strains. Additionally, P. dioica essential oil and eugenol were able to inhibit the biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces (Polystyrene and glass) by almost all tested foodborne strains. Moreover, the tested essential oil and eugenol were able to regulate the production of some virulence related properties controlled by the quorum sensing mechanism in C. violaceum and P. aeruginosa PAO1 starter strains. Hence, these findings highlighted the potential use of this essential oil as a potential candidate for food preservation, biofilm prevention and bacterial cell to cell communication inhibitor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.A. and E.N.; methodology, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; software, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; validation, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; formal analysis, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; investigation, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; resources, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; data curation, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.A., E.N. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, A.A.A., E.N., M.S. and V.D.F.; visualization, V.D.F.; supervision, M.S., and V.D.F.; project administration, A.A.A. and E.N.; funding acquisition, A.A.A. and E.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by Scientific Research Deanship at University of Ha’il-Saudi Arabia through project number BA-2114.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by Scientific Research Deanship at University of Ha’il-Saudi Arabia through project number BA-2114.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Todd, E.C.D. Preliminary estimates of costs of foodborne disease in Canada and costs to reduce Salmonellosis. J. Food Prot. 1989, 52, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burt, S.A.; Reinders, R.D. Antimicrobial activity selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Seaforth, C.; Tikasingh, T.; Gupta, M.; Robertson, D. St. Rose, G.A. Study for the Development of a Handbook of Selected Caribbean Herbs for Industry; Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA): Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mollova, S.; Fidan, H.; Antonova, D.; Bozhilov, D.; Stanev, S.; Kostova, I.; Stoyanova, A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don subspecies essential oils. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2020, 44, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paula, J.; Reis, J.; Ferreira, L.; Menezes, A.; Paula, J. Pimenta genus: Botanical aspects, chemical composition and pharmacological potential. Rev. Bras. Pl. Med. 2010, 12, 363–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Alitonou, G.A.; Noudogbessi, J.; Sessou, P.; Tonouhewa, A.; Avlessi, F.; Menut, C. Chemical composition and biological activities of essential oils of Pimenta racemosa (Mill) JW Moore from Benin. Int. J. Biosci. 2012, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  9. Meneses, R.; Ocazionez, R.; Torres, F.; Stashenko, E. Essentials oils from seven aromatic plants grown in Colombia: Chemical composition, cytotoxicity and in vitro virucidal effect on the dengue virus. Int. J. Essent. Oil Ther. 2009, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sessou, P.; Farougou, S.; Ahounou, S.; Hounnankpon, Y.; Azokpota, P.; Youssao, I. Comparative study of antifungal activities of six selected essential oils against fungal isolates from cheese wagashi in Benin. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ali, S.M.; Khan, A.A.; Ahmed, I.; Musaddiq, M.; Ahmed, K.S.; Polasa, H.; Rao, L.V.; Habibullah, C.M.; Sechi, L.A.; Ahmed, N. Antimicrobial activities of eugenol and cinnamaldehyde against the human pathogen Heliobacter pylori. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2005, 4, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Faria, T.J.; Ferreira, R.S.; Yassumoto, L.; Souza, J.R.P.; Ishikawa, N.K.; Barbosa, A.M. Antifungal Activity of Essential Oil Isolated from Ocimum gratissimum L. (eugenol chemotype) against Phytopathogenic Fungi. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn. 2006, 49, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rao, S.K.; Iyengar, M.A.; Rao, G. Anti-microbial activity of the essential oil of the leaves of Pimenta dioica, Linn (Family: Myrtaceae). Indian Drugs 2001, 38, 458–461. [Google Scholar]
  14. Marzouk, M.S.A.; Moharram, F.A.; Mohamed, M.A.; Gamal-Eldeen, A.M.; Aboutabl, E.A. Anticancer and Antioxidant Tannins from Pimenta dioica Leaves. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung C 2007, 62, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oussalah, M.; Caillet, S.; Lacroix, L.S.M. Inhibitory effects of selected plant essential oils on the growth of four pathogenic bacteria: E coli 0157: H7, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2007, 18, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. da Silva Meira, Q.G.; de Medeiros Barbosa, I.; Alves Aguiar Athayde, A.J.; de Siqueira-Júnior, J.P.; de Souza, E.L. Influence of temperature and surface kind on biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food-contact surfaces and sensitivity to sanitizers. Food Control 2012, 25, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Packiavathy, I.A.S.V.; Agilandeswari, P.; Musthafa, K.S.; Karutha Pandian, S.; Veera Ravi, A. Antibiofilm and quorum sensing inhibitory potential of Cuminum cyminum and its secondary metabolite methyl eugenol against Gram negative bacterial pathogens. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kamble Vilas, A.; Patil, S.D. Spice derived essential oils: Effective antifungal and possible therapeutic agents. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 2008, 14, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. NIIR Board of Consultants and Engineers. The Complete Book on Spices and Condiments (with Cultivation, Processing and Uses), 2nd ed.; Asia Pacific Business Press Inc.: New Delhi, India, 2008; pp. 37–38. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakatani, N. Antioxidative and antimicrobial constituents of herbs and spices. In Spices, Herbs and Edible Fungi, 1st ed.; Charalambous, G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 251–271. [Google Scholar]
  21. Volpato, G.; Godínez, D.; Beyra, A.; Barreto, A. Uses of medicinal plants by Haitian immigrants and their descendants in the Province of Camagüey, Cuba. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2012, 13, 1900–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nayak, Y.; Abhilash, D.; Vijaynarayana, K.; Fernandes, J. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity of Pimenta dioica leaves extract. J. Cell Tissue Res. 2008, 8, 1571–1576. [Google Scholar]
  23. Priya, S.R.; Sheth, N.; Jayaveera, K.N. An important spice, Pimenta dioica (Linn.) Merill: A Review. Int. Curr. Pharm. J. 2012, 1, 221–225. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kikuzaki, H.; Hara, S.; Kawai, Y.; Nakatani, N. Antioxidative phenylpropanoids from berries of Pimenta dioica. Phytochemistry 1999, 52, 1307–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Stoilova, I.; Krastanov, A.; Stoyanova, A.; Schmidt, E. Spice plants: Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of Pimenta Lindl. essential oils, part 1: Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr. leaf oil from Jamaica. Nutr. Vienna 2007, 31, 55. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tenne, P.C.R.K.; Karunaratne, M.M.S.C. Phytochemical profile and bioactivity of essential oil from Pimenta dioica leaves on cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): A farmer friendly solution for postharvest pest management. Open Agric. 2018, 3, 301–309. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mérida-Reyes, M.S.; Muñoz-Wug, M.A.; Oliva-Hernández, B.E.; Gaitán-Fernández, I.C.; Reis Simas, D.L.; Ribeiro da Silva, A.J.; Pérez-Sabino, J.F. Composition and Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oil from Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr. from Guatemala. Medicines 2020, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pino, J.A.; Bello, A.; Urquiola, A. The leaf oil of Pimenta adenoclada (Urb.) Burret from Cuba. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2002, 14, 400–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tucker, A.O.; Maciarello, M.J.; Landrum, L.R. Volatile leaf oils of Caribbean Myrtaceae. II. Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr. of Jamaica. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1991, 3, 195–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. García-Fajardo, J.; Martínez-Sosa, M.; Estarrón-Espinosa, M.; Vilarem, G.; Gaset, A.; de Santos, J.M. Comparative study of the oil and supercritical CO2 extract of Mexican pimento (Pimenta dioica Merrill). J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marongiu, B.; Piras, A.; Porcedda, S.; Casu, R.; Pierucci, P. Comparative analysis of supercritical CO2 extract and oil of Pimenta dioica leaves. J. Essent. Oil 2005, 17, 530–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Monteiro, O.S.; Souza, A.G.; Soledade, L.E.B.; Queiroz, N.; Souza, A.L.; Mouchrek Filho, V.E.; Vasconcelos, A.F.F. Chemical evaluation and thermal analysis of the essential oil from the fruits of the vegetable species Pimenta dioica Lindl. J. Therm. Anal. Calori 2011, 106, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Padmakumari, K.P.; Sasidharan, I.; Sreekumar, M.M. Composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil of pimento (Pimenta dioica (L) Merr.) from Jamaica. Nat. Prod. Res. 2011, 25, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lorenzo-Leal, A.C.; Palou, E.; López-Malo, A.; Bach, H. Antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and anti-inflammatory activities of Pimenta dioica and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1639726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sabino, F.P.; Reyes, M.M.; Taracena, E.; Oliva, B.; Wug, M.M.; Martínez, J.V.; Simas, D.L.R.; Silva, A.J.R. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Pimenta dioica (L.) Merrill from Guatemala. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2015, 8, 75. [Google Scholar]
  36. Oussualah, M.; Caillet, S.; Saucier, L.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial effects of selected plant essential oils on the growth of Pseudomonas putida strain isolated from meat. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Asha, M.M.; Chaithra, M.; Yashoda, K.; Vivek, M.N.; Prashith Kekuda, T.R. Antibacterial activity of leaf and bark extracts of Pimenta dioica (Linn.) Merill against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 2, 3207–3215. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lowe, H.I.C.; Daley, D.K.; Lindo, J.; Davis, C.; Rainford, L.; Hartley, S.-A.; Watson, C.; Chambers, C.; Reynolds-Campbell, G.; Foster, S.R.; et al. The antibacterial and antifungal analysis of crude extracts from leaves and bark of Pimenta species found in Jamaica. J. Med. Plant Res. 2017, 11, 591–595. [Google Scholar]
  39. Boyd, F.A.H.; Benkeblia, N. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity of crude extracts of Pimenta dioica L. (Merr.). In Proceedings of the III International Conference on Postharvest and Quality Management of Horticultural Products of Interest for Tropical Regions, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 1–5 July 2013; Volume 1047, pp. 199–205. [Google Scholar]
  40. Park, I.-K.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.-G.; Shin, S.-C. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi), Allspice (Pimenta dioica) and Litsea (Litsea cubeba) essential oils against pine Wood Nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). J. Nematol. 2007, 39, 275–279. [Google Scholar]
  41. Narayanankutty, A.; Kuttithodi, A.M.; Alfarhan, A.; Rajagopal, R.; Barcelo, D. Chemical composition, insecticidal and mosquito larvicidal activities of Allspice (Pimenta dioica) essential oil. Molecules 2021, 26, 6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mak, K.-K.; Kamal, M.B.; Ayuba, S.B.; Sakirolla, R.; Kang, Y.-B.; Mohandas, K.; Balijepalli, M.K.; Ahmad, S.H.; Pichika, M.R. A comprehensive review on eugenol’s antimicrobial properties and industry applications: A transformation from ethnomedicine to industry. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2019, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sechi, L.A.; Deriu, A.; Falchi, M.P.; Fadda, G.; Zanetti, S. Distribution of virulence genes in Aeromonas spp. isolated from Sardinian waters and from patients with diarrhoea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Okoh, S.O.; Iweriegbor, B.C.; Okoh, O.O.; Nwodo, U.U.; Okoh, A.I. Bactericidal and antioxidant properties of essential oils from the fruits Dennettia tripetala G. Baker. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Anusriha, S.; Ponnarmadha, S. A review on anti-biofilm inhibitor from plant essential oils. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2020, 11, 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  46. Borges, A.; Serra, S.; Cristina, A.A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Salgado, A.; Simões, M. Evaluation of the effects of selected phytochemicals on quorum sensing inhibition and in vitro cytotoxicity. Biofouling 2014, 30, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cervantes-Ceballos, L.; Caballero-Gallardo, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Repellent and anti-quorum sensing activity of six aromatic plants occurring in Colombia. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1753–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kerekes, E.B.; Deák, É.; Takó, M.; Tserennadmid, R.; Petkovits, T.; Vágvölgyi, C. Anti-biofilm forming and anti-quorum sensing activity of selected essential oils and their main components on food-related micro-organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 115, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ippolito, C.; Elshafie, H.S.; Caputo, L.; De Feo, V. Anti-quorum Sensing and Antimicrobial Effect of Mediterranean Plant Essential Oils Against Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, e2619. [Google Scholar]
  51. Al-Haidari, R.A.; Shaaban, M.I.; Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Mohamed, G.A. Anti-quorum sensing activity of some medicinal plants. Afr. J. Tradit. Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 13, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  52. Aligiannis, N.; Kalpotzakis, E.; Mitaku, S.; Chinou, I.B. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of two Origanum species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 40, 4168–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Touati, A.; Achour, W.; Abbassi, M.S.; Ben Hassen, A. Detection of ica genes and slime production in a collection of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients. Pathol. Biol. 2007, 55, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Christensen, G.D.; Simpson, W.A.; Bisno, A.L.; Beachey, E.H. Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect. Immun. 1982, 37, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Mack, D.; Bartscht, K.; Fischer, C.; Rohde, H.; de Grahl, C.; Dobinsky, S. Genetic and biochemical analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm accumulation. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 336, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. McLafferty, F.W. Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data, with NIST Spectral Data CD Rom, 7th ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  57. Noumi, E.; Merghni, A.; Alreshidi, M.M.; Haddad, O.; Akmada, G.; De Martino, L.; Mastouri, M.; Ceylan, O.; Snoussi, M.; Al-sieni, A.; et al. Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: Models for Evaluating Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity of Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil and Its Main Component Terpinen-4-ol. Molecules 2018, 23, 2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Hajlaoui, H.; Mighri, H.; Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Trabelsi, N.; Ksouri, R.; Bakhrouf, A. Chemical composition and biological activities of Tunisian Cuminum cyminum L. essential oil, a high effectiveness against Vibrio spp. strains. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 2186–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Snoussi, M.; Noumi, E.; Punchappady-Devasya, R.; Trabelsi, N.; Kanekar, S.; Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Flamini, G.; De Feo, V.; Al-Sieni, A. Antioxidant properties and anti-quorum sensing potential of Carum copticum essential oil and phenolics against Chromobacterium violaceum. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2824–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Alreshidi, M.M.; Rekha, P.D.; Saptami, K.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Souza, L.F.; Msaada, K.; Mancini, E.; et al. Chemical and biological evaluation of essential oils from cardamom species. Molecules 2018, 23, 2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 11 00540 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the main compounds identified in P. dioica essential oil by GC-MS technique: (a) eugenol, (b) β-pinene, (c) 2-Propenylphenol, (d) linalool and (e) limonene.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the main compounds identified in P. dioica essential oil by GC-MS technique: (a) eugenol, (b) β-pinene, (c) 2-Propenylphenol, (d) linalool and (e) limonene.
Plants 11 00540 g001
Plants 11 00540 g002 550
Figure 2. Different morphotypes of foodborne pathogenic strains cultivated on CRA: (a) negative morphotype, (b) and (c): positive morphotype.
Figure 2. Different morphotypes of foodborne pathogenic strains cultivated on CRA: (a) negative morphotype, (b) and (c): positive morphotype.
Plants 11 00540 g002
Plants 11 00540 g003 550
Figure 3. Adhesive properties on glass tube using safranin staining: (a) Strong adhesion (+++); (b) Moderate adhesion (++); (c) Low adhesion (+).
Figure 3. Adhesive properties on glass tube using safranin staining: (a) Strong adhesion (+++); (b) Moderate adhesion (++); (c) Low adhesion (+).
Plants 11 00540 g003
Plants 11 00540 g004 550
Figure 4. Adhesion of the selected strains to different materials (Polyvinyl chloride PVC, glass and stainless steel).
Figure 4. Adhesion of the selected strains to different materials (Polyvinyl chloride PVC, glass and stainless steel).
Plants 11 00540 g004
Plants 11 00540 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of different MIC values of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on violacein inhibition (qualitative method with C. violaceum ATCC 12472).
Figure 5. Effects of different MIC values of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on violacein inhibition (qualitative method with C. violaceum ATCC 12472).
Plants 11 00540 g005
Table
Table 1. GC-MS results showing the chemical composition of P. dioica essential oil.
Table 1. GC-MS results showing the chemical composition of P. dioica essential oil.
N.CompoundKi aKi b% c
1α-thujene9169300.05
2α-Pinene9249390.42
31-Octen-3-ol9709791.42
43-Octanone9779830.42
5β-Pinene98397918.52
63-Octanol9869910.47
7δ-2-carene99210020.52
8δ-3-carene100410110.21
9ρ-Cymene101210240.84
10Limonene101710293.55
11(Z)-β-Ocimene103810370.49
12γ-Terpinene104810590.06
13Benzyl Formate107710760.18
14Linalool109110963.68
15Isopulegol (neoiso)116711710.61
16α-terpineol118011880.17
17Methyl chavicol118711960.47
182-Propenylphenol124712677.61
195-Indanol133613410.12
20Eugenol1356135948.67
21α-copaene136713760.29
22α-gurjunene140914090.93
23α-muurolene144314540.26
249-epi-(E) Caryophyllene146614660.26
25Germacrene D148514850.10
26γ-amorphene149714950.21
27γ-patchoulene150315020.17
28δ-amorphene151315120.74
29γ–eudesmol163116310.18
30α-muurolol164416460.16
a Kovats retention index determined relatively to the tR of a series of n-alkanes (C10–C35) on HP-5 MS column. b Kovats retention index determined relatively to the tR of a series of n-alkanes (C10–C35) on HP Innowax. c t = trace (<0.1%).
Table
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol against several foodborne pathogenic bacteria.
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol against several foodborne pathogenic bacteria.
StrainsP. dioica EOEugenol
IZ
(mm ± SD)		MIC
(mg/mL)		MBC
(mg/mL)		IZ
(mm ± SD)		MIC
(mg/mL)		MBC
(mg/mL)
Listeria monocytogenes CECT 93326.66 ± 0.57 a0.04812.521.33 ± 0.57 A0.0483.125
Vibrio vulnificus CECT 52919.00 ± 0.01 d0.04812.517.66 ± 0.57 B0.04812.5
Shigella flexeneri CECT 480417.00 ± 0.01 e0.0483.12518.66 ± 0.57 B0.04812.5
Bacillus subtilis CIP 526522.33 ± 0.57 c0.04812.56.00 ± 0.01 E0.0483.125
Salmonella enterica CECT 44324.33 ± 0.57 b0.0483.12522.00 ± 0.01 A0.0483.125
Escherichia coli ATCC 3521816.67 ± 0.57 e0.0483.12514.33 ± 0.81 C0.0483.125
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO18.00 ± 0.01 f0.04812.57.66 ± 0.57 D0.04812.5
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 653817.00 ± 1.00 e0.0481.56218.00 ± 1.00 B0.0483.125
IZ: Inhibition zone; MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration; MBC: Minimal bactericidal concentration; SD: Standard deviation. The letters (a–f) and (A–E) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Slime production, qualitative and quantitative adhesive properties of selected strains on glass and polystyrene.
Table 3. Slime production, qualitative and quantitative adhesive properties of selected strains on glass and polystyrene.
StrainsAdhesion to GlassSlime Production on CRAAdhesion to Polystyrene
ColourS+/S−OD570 ± SDProduction of Biofilm
S. aureus ATCC 6538++BlackS+1.36 ± 0.20High productrice
P. aeruginosa PAO1++Red bordeauxS−0.42 ± 0.26Low productrice
E. coli ATCC 35218++Redwith black centerS+0.17 ± 0.03Low productrice
S. flexeneri CECT 4804+++Redwith black centerS+0.10 ± 0.01Low productrice
B. subtilis CIP 5265+Red bordeauxS−0.12 ± 0.01Low productrice
V. vulnificus CECT 529++Redwith black centerS+0.13 ± 0.02Low productrice
S. enterica CECT 443+Red bordeauxS−0.15 ± 0.01Low productrice
L. monocytogenes CECT 933+++Red with black centerS+0.19 ± 0.07Low productrice
OD: Optical density; SD: Standard deviation; +: low adhesion; ++: moderate adhesion; +++: High adhesion; S+: Slime producer; S−: Non slime producer.
Table
Table 4. Effect of MIC, 2MIC and 4MIC of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on S. aureus ATCC 6538 biofilm formed on polystyrene and glass.
Table 4. Effect of MIC, 2MIC and 4MIC of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on S. aureus ATCC 6538 biofilm formed on polystyrene and glass.
Essential Oil/
Main Compound		Percentage of Inhibition of S. aureus ATCC 6538 Biofilm Formed on
PolystyreneGlass
MIC2xMIC4xMICMIC2xMIC4xMIC
P. dioica55.05 ± 3.23 b60.66 ± 1.01 a64.41± 1.4 a58.01 ± 1.62 c63.01 ± 0.53 b70.25 ± 1.19 a
Eugenol73.25 ± 2.68 A75.31 ± 2.02 A75.90 ± 1.76 A67.25 ± 0.68 B72.75 ± 0.92 A73.79 ± 1.47 A
MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration; MIC of P. dioica = 0.048 mg/mL; MIC of eugenol = 0.048 mg/mL. The letters (a–c) and (A, B) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Percentage of violacein inhibition using C. violaceum ATCC 12472 strain.
Table 5. Percentage of violacein inhibition using C. violaceum ATCC 12472 strain.
Concentration% of Violacein Inhibition
P. dioicaEugenol
MIC71.30 ± 1.5 a48.29 ± 0.9 a
MIC/267.87 ± 1.7 b37. 78 ± 1.8 b
MIC/455.74 ± 0.71 c33.91 ± 1.1 c
MIC/838.25 ± 1.8 d0 ± 1.5 d
MIC/1632.34 ± 1.3 e6.65 ± 0.7 e
MIC/3217.65 ± 0.7 f3.41 ± 1.1 f
The letters (a–f) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 6. Effect of 50, 75 and 100 µg/mL of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on swarming motility of PAO1.
Table 6. Effect of 50, 75 and 100 µg/mL of P. dioica essential oil and eugenol on swarming motility of PAO1.
ComponentConcentration
50 µg/mL75 µg/mL100 µg/mL
P. dioica17 ± 0 c25 ± 0 b42 ± 0 a
Eugenol20.83 ± 1.17 B29.17 ± 0.17 A29.17 ± 0.17 A
The letters (a–c) and (A, B) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 7. Chemical composition of essential oils of the genus Pimenta function of origin and plant organ.
Table 7. Chemical composition of essential oils of the genus Pimenta function of origin and plant organ.
Plant Species (Origin)OrganExtraction MethodMain CompoundsReference
P. adenoclada (Cuba)LeavesHydrodistillationCaryophyllene oxide (15.4), α-muurolol (9.4), humulene epoxide II (7.6), trans-sabinol (5.6), β-pinene (5.3) [28]
P. dioica (Jamaica)LeavesSteam distillationEugenol (66.38–79.24), β-caryophyllene (0.97–7.10) [29]
P. dioica (México)BerriesSteam distillationMethyl-eugenol (48.3), myrcene (17.7), eugenol (17.3), β-caryophyllene (6.2) [30]
P. dioica (Australia)LeavesSupercritical CO2Eugenol (77.9), β-caryophyllene (5.1), squalene (4.1) [31]
P. dioica (Brazil)FruitsHydrodistillationEugenol (76.98), β-pinene (6.52), limonene (4.09) [32]
P. dioicaFruitsHydrodistillationEugenol (48.67%), β-pinene (18.52%), (1E)-Phenol-2-propenyl (7.61%)This study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

ALrashidi, A.A.; Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Feo, V.D. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Pimenta dioica L. Essential Oil and Its Major Compound (Eugenol) against Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Plants 2022, 11, 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040540

AMA Style

ALrashidi AA, Noumi E, Snoussi M, Feo VD. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Pimenta dioica L. Essential Oil and Its Major Compound (Eugenol) against Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Plants. 2022; 11(4):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040540

Chicago/Turabian Style

ALrashidi, Ayshah Aysh, Emira Noumi, Mejdi Snoussi, and Vincenzo De Feo. 2022. "Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Pimenta dioica L. Essential Oil and Its Major Compound (Eugenol) against Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria" Plants 11, no. 4: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040540

APA Style

ALrashidi, A. A., Noumi, E., Snoussi, M., & Feo, V. D. (2022). Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Pimenta dioica L. Essential Oil and Its Major Compound (Eugenol) against Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Plants, 11(4), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop