Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Regulatory Mechanism of Color Diversity in Rhododendron pulchrum Sweet (Ericaceae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Seasonal Hydration Status of Common Bryophyte Species in Azorean Native Vegetation
Previous Article in Journal
MBD3 Regulates Male Germ Cell Division and Sperm Fertility in Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Copper Requirements of the Metallophyte Liverworts Cephaloziella nicholsonii Douin and C. massalongoi (Spruce) Müll.Frib
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bryophyte Diversity and Distribution Patterns along Elevation Gradients of the Mount Etna (Sicily), the Highest Active Volcano in Europea

Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via A. Longo 19, 95125 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(14), 2655; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142655
Submission received: 26 June 2023 / Revised: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 8 July 2023 / Published: 15 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Responses and Adaptations of Bryophytes to a Changing World)

Abstract

:
Mt Etna in Sicily hosts a bryophyte floristic richness of 306 taxa, corresponding to 259 mosses, 43 liverworts, and 4 hornworts. Species richness shows a hump-shaped relationship with the elevation, with a peak at 1200–1700 m a.s.l. Chorotype patterns clearly change along an altitudinal gradient, from the Mediterranean, located at 0–300 m a.s.l., to Arctic-montane and boreo-Arctic montane at 1800–2700 m a.s.l., showing a correlation with the bioclimatic belts identified for the Mt Etna. In regard to the life form pattern, the turf species are the most represented in each elevation gradient, except at 2300–2700 m a.s.l. where the tuft species are prevalent. The life strategy pattern shows the colonists as the prevailing species, featured by an increasing trend up to 2200 m of elevation; above this limit, they are exceeded by the perennial stayers. Furthermore, taking into consideration the red-listed species (at the European and/or Italian level), as well as the species of phytogeographical interest, it was possible to identify the high bryophyte conservation priority areas; these areas are located in thermo-Mediterranean and oro-Mediterranean bioclimatic belts, the latter corresponding to the oldest substrates of the volcano where some of the most interesting bryophyte glacial relicts find refuge.

1. Introduction

Bryophytes are the most diverse group of land plants after the flowering plants. They are significant contributors to diversity in many temperate ecosystems and play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning [1]. Bryophytes are poikilohydric and lack roots and, in most cases, an outer waxy cuticle; they take up water and nutrients directly through their surface [2]. Unlike tracheophytes, they are particularly sensitive to the microclimate, mainly moisture, because they lack control over water loss which they compensate for with different strategies, using physiological mechanisms [3] and colony architecture [4] to increase desiccation tolerance. They are more sensitive to environmental changes because of their simple anatomy (absence of roots and an efficient vascular system) and because they absorb water and nutrients from their entire surface; therefore, global warming and climate change have significant impacts on them. One of the effects on bryophytes is the alteration of their distribution patterns [5], with shift to higher elevations or latitudes in search of suitable habitats. As they have a high sensitivity to climatic conditions, widespread distribution, and are found from the tropics to the polar regions, from sea level to above the tree line, they have been advanced as useful organisms to be used in latitudinal and altitudinal studies [6]. In particular, elevation gradients are among the most suitable model templates for testing species diversity distribution–climate relationships, reflecting the adaptive traits or life strategies of species found at different elevations. In mountain areas, the elevation gradient causes changes in moisture, temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation. Thus, the knowledge of richness, abundance, and distribution of species and their assemblage along the altitudinal gradients provide us with data to study the relationships between species diversity and climate change [7,8,9] and improve conservation strategies [10]. The many studies to date have focused on relatively few taxonomic groups, in particular vascular plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates [11]. Research on bryophyte diversity along elevation gradients is mainly focused on large mountains in various parts of the world, including tropical zones, Alps, and central Apennines [8,11,12,13,14,15]., while the Mediterranean islands have received no attention.
Sicily, the largest Mediterranean island, is considered one of the main biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean region [16,17,18,19], with about 3250 native and naturalized taxa of vascular plants [20] and 600 bryophytes (117 liverworts, 4 hornworts, and 479 mosses) [21]. Mt Etna, as a geologically recent volcano (Late Quaternary), located in eastern Sicily, is very interesting for the study of plant colonization processes and speciation mechanisms, both of which are favored by its important altitudinal development (highest peak at 3328 m a.s.l.), geographic isolation (i.e., insular mountain system causing a “double insularity”), geo-lithological isolation, and the incessant volcanic activity leading to a continuous creation of new, bare land. This high Mediterranean mountain hosts a set of phytogeographically interesting bryophytes (artic-montane, boreo-Arctic montane, and boreal-montane species) that find on the Mt Etna their southernmost distribution limit.

2. Results

Based on the collected data, the bryophyte flora of Mt Etna accounts for 306 taxa (259 mosses, 43 liverworts, and 4 hornworts), together belonging to 56 families. The most represented are Pottiaceae (71 taxa, 23.2%), Brachytheciaceae (28 taxa, 9.2%), Grimmiaceae (26 taxa, 8.5%), Bryaceae (17 taxa, 5.6%), and Mniaceae (15 taxa, 4.9%). The life form spectrum of the bryophyte flora indicates prevalence of turf species (40.7%), followed by mat (21.8%), cushion (11.3%), tuft (10.5%), and weft (8.0%) (Figure 1). The life strategy spectrum shows the higher incidence of colonist (42.2%) and perennial stayer (31.3%) species (Figure 2).

2.1. Elevational Gradient of Species Richness

Overall, with increasing elevation, the area for each altitudinal belt declines almost constantly (Figure 3). The bryophyte richness distribution, in relation to the belt area expressed in percentage (Figure 4), shows a parabolic, unimodal (hump-shaped) relationship with the elevation, showing a peak of richness at 1200–1700 m a.s.l.; then, from 1700 to 2700 m a.s.l., a growing reduction in species richness occurs.

2.2. Cluster Analysis

Floristic similarity across the different elevational gradients was examined using hierarchical cluster analysis (Figure 5). All flora species are joined in clusters corresponding to the mountain ranges in which they occur.
The results of the cluster analysis show two main, well separated, and not correlated floristic groups: one with species richness on gradients of low and medium elevation to 1600 a.s.l. (cluster A), and the other at high elevations, to 2700 m (Cluster B). Cluster A is subdivided in two groups of clusters (A1 and A2), the first one comprising the bryophytes of the belts 0–1000 m a.s.l., and the second one the bryophytes of 1000–1600 m a.s.l. In particular, cluster A1 comprises the clusters A11 (species occurring at 0–300 m a.s.l.) and A12 (species occurring at 400-,1000 m a.s.l.). Cluster B includes only the cluster B1, subdivided into B11 (species occurring at 1700–2200 m a.s.l.) and B12 (species occurring at 2300–2700 m a.s.l.). The highest similarity is shown by the species of the cluster B12, represented by a few species, occurring in a few refuge stations.

2.3. Life form Distribution Patterns

Life form distribution patterns along the altitudinal gradient of the whole Etnean flora are shown in Figure 6 as percentage of each life form category per altitudinal interval related to the area of each altitudinal belt. Turf species (including turf protonemal and turf scattered) are the dominant life form, accounting for 40.7% of the whole bryoflora; they tend to increase up to 1900 m a.s.l., the latter representing their peak, and then they rapidly decrease up to 2700 m a.s.l. Cushion species, very scarcely present up to 700 m a.s.l., increase up to 2100 m a.s.l. and then abruptly decrease up to 2300 m a.s.l. Mat species show a good presence at 100–300 m a.s.l. and at 1200–2000 m a.s.l., then decrease. Dendroid and fan species, mostly represented on the Mt Etna by epiphytes, mainly occur between 1200 m and 1800 m a.s.l. Tuft species, scarcely occurring at 0–900 m a.s.l., show an increasing trend, and dominate at 2300–2700 m a.s.l.
Overall, the lower elevations (<500 m) are characterized by an abundance of turf species and exclusive presence of solitary thalloid (especially Riccia spp.) and solitary creeping species (Fossombronia spp.); moreover, a lot of mat thalloid species occur too. The elevations from 600 m to 1200 m a.s.l. are characterized by a dominance of weft species; turfs and mats are represented with lower percentages. Above 1300 m a.s.l., turf, cushions, and mats are dominating.

2.4. Life Strategy Distribution Patterns

Colonist species, amounting to 42.2% of the total, are the dominant life form and tend to increase up to 2000 m a.s.l., and then they decrease (Figure 7). Perennial stayer species, accounting for an average of 31.3%, behave similarly to colonist taxa, also peaking at 2000 m a.s.l.. The long-lived shuttle strategy, accounting for 8.2%, show an increasing trend up to 2400 m a.s.l. Short-lived shuttle species (6.1%) gradually decrease with increasing elevation up to 700 m a.s.l., increasing up to 1200 m a.s.l. and then decreasing again up to 1600 m a.s.l. Annual shuttle species (11.9%), mostly concentrated at 100–300 m a.s.l., decrease at a constant rate up to 1600 m a.s.l. The fugitive category is represented only by the moss species Funaria hygrometrica Hedw. occurring at 100–1000 m a.s.l.
Overall, colonist and perennial species are the most representative life strategies in almost all elevation ranges, with colonists prevailing from 1700 m a.s.l. and representing the only life strategy, together with the long-lived shuttle one, from 2300 m to 2700 m a.s.l.. At low elevations, up to 300 m a.s.l., in addition to colonists, the annual shuttle strategy prevails, mostly represented by liverworts and hornworts with a Mediterranean distribution.

2.5. Chorotype Distribution Patterns

Chorotype distribution patterns along the altitudinal gradient are shown in Figure 8. At low elevations, up to 300 m a.s.l., Mediterranean species distinctly prevail with a peak at 100 m a.s.l., then rapidly decrease up to 800 m a.s.l. The Southern temperate species mostly occur up to 700 m a.s.l., with a peak at 100 m a.s.l., decreasing up to 1400 m a.s.l. Wide temperate species are fairly equally distributed from 300 m a.s.l to 1600 m a.s.l., with low-altitude peaks at 100–200 m a.s.l. and high-altitude peaks at 1000–1200 m a.s.l. Temperate species increase up to 1200 m a.s.l., the latter representing the highest peak, and then rapidly decrease up to 2000 m a.s.l. Mediterranean montane species appear at 700 m a.s.l, with a peak at 1500 m a.s.l., and decrease up to 1700 m a.s.l. Boreo-temperate and wide boreal species are scarcely present at 300–1000 m a.s.l., then increase up to 2000 m a.s.l, with a peak at 1600 m a.s.l. Boreo-temperate, scarcely occurring up to 1100 m a.s.l., increase up to 1600 m and then decrease up to 2000 m a.s.l. The wide boreal species behave similarly to the boreo-temperate taxa, with a peak at 1700 m a.s.l. The boreal montane species, scarcely occurring at 800–1000 m a.s.l., increase up to 2000 m a.s.l. and then rapidly decrease up to 2200 m a.s.l. Finally, boreo-Arctic montane and Arctic-montane occur at 1700–2500 m a.s.l. with a peak at 2000–2100 m a.s.l.
To investigate the correlation between the chorotypes of the Etnean bryophytes and the bioclimatic belts, a CCA ordination was performed. As shown in Figure 9, the thermo-Mediterranean belt, in the altitudinal gradient 0–500 m a.s.l., hosts Mediterranean and southern temperate species. In the meso-Mediterraneanbioclimatic belt, at 600–1000 m a.s.l., the temperate and wide-temperate species are found, and in the supra-Mediterranean bioclimatic belt, at 1000–1600 m a.s.l., the Mediterranean montane, boreo-temperate, and wide boreal species occur. Finally, in the oro-Mediterranean (1600–2400 m a.s.l.) and crioro-Mediterranean (above 2500 m a.s.l.) bioclimatic belts, only boreo-Arctic montane and Arctic montane species occur.

3. Discussion

3.1. Degree of Species Richness

Distribution of species richness along elevational gradients, related to the area of each altitudinal belt, shows a hump-shaped relationship with elevation. This pattern recorded on Mt Etna is in accordance with other studies on bryophytes along elevational gradients on several islands, such as La Réunion [12], La Palma (Canary Islands) [13], Pico Island (Azores Islands) [14], and in the continental transects in Colombia [12]. Along the 27 altitudinal intervals of the elevation transect on Mt Etna, many species of bryophytes can be observed. However, the maximum richness was achieved at the middle of the gradient, where the greater concentration of beech woods and deciduous oak woods with Quercus congesta C.Presl or Quercus cerris L. provide more suitable habitats for bryophyte colonization. In these sites, favorable climatic conditions, mostly related to water availability (precipitation and relative humidity due the presence of woods), are decisive for the effective colonization of bryophytes. The increasingly harsher ecological conditions, with less potential area for growth, toward greater elevations leads to decreasing species richness. Overall, the area available for plant colonization, on a high active volcano such as Mt Etna, is not constant due to the sudden fallout of lava flows or tephra falls that may suddenly cover huge surfaces or due to catastrophic natural events that may reduce the available area because of huge collapses, as it occurred 15,000 years ago on Mt Etna. In addition, such variations may mainly affect areas at high elevations and, subsequently, cause variations in total plant species richness and degree of isolation. Despite this, Mt Etna hosts a rich bryophyte flora corresponding to more than a half of the Sicilian flora [21].

3.2. Species of Conservation Interest

Our study revealed important data regarding the distribution pattern and preferential habitats of some rare bryophytes [22] included in the Italian and European Red Book. Overall, on the Mt Etna, 26 species are considered threatened or near threatened at the European and/or Italian level (Table 1), corresponding for 8.5% of the whole Etnean flora. Four species are categorized as Endangered (EN) in Europe, six as Vulnerable (VU), and six as Near Threatened (NT); one additional species is classified as Data Deficient (DD). An additional five species, considered Least Concern (LC) at the European level, are classified as Vulnerable in Italy and other five species as Near Threatened. Although the species under NT and DD classifications are not strictly considered threatened, as the term is applied by the IUCN, these categories indicate that these species deserve special attention; in particular, they can fall under a threat category when more information is acquired (DD), or if their habitats change drastically (NT) [23].
Moreover, a set of phytogeographycally interesting species should be considered too. They are species occurring in Sicily, only on Mt Etna, and rare in Italy. They mostly occur at 1700–2100 m a.s.l., and only one species reaches 2700 m a.s.l. Moreover, for some species, the Mt Etna finding stations represent the only ones confirmed in Italy.
Overall, the areas with high concentrations of species of conservation interest correspond to two different bioclimatic belts: the thermo-Mediterranean (0–400 m a.s.l.) and the supra- and oro-Mediterranean (2400–2700 m a.s.l.). The first belt hosts a group of threatened Mediterranean bryophytes that are very rare in Italy, such as Anthoceros agrestis Paton, Exormotheca pustulosa Mitt., Riccia warstorfii Limpr. ex Warnst., Ephemerum serratum (Hedw.) Hampe, Ephemerum crassinervium (Schwägr.) Hampe subsp. rutheanum (Schimp.) Holyoak, and Funariella curviseta (Schwägr.) Sérgio, etc.
In correspondence with the supra-Mediterranean and oro-Mediterranean bioclimatic belts, the areas with the highest values of rare species are characterized by mesophilous forests dominated by Fagus sylvatica, usually occurring between 1600 m and 2000 m a.s.l., referring to the Directive 92/43/EEC priority Habitat 9210* “Apennine beech forests with Taxus and Ilex” or by pine woodlands dominated by Pinus nigra subsp. calabrica and Juniperus hemisphaerica, between 1400 and 1600 m a.s.l., referred to the priority Habitat 9530* “sub-Mediterranean pine forests with endemic black pines”. Other extremely important habitats for the conservation of bryophytes are natural caves, referred to by the Habitat 8320 as “fields of lava and natural excavations”, and to the orophilous pulvinate shrubby with Astragalus siculus Biv. or Juniperus hemisphaerica Presl., referred to by the Habitat 4090 as “endemic oro-Mediterranean heaths with gorse”. Moreover, the oro-Mediterranean belt corresponds to one of the most active areas of the volcano for the fallout of volcanic ash and partly for volcanic eruptions, the belt corresponding to the oldest substrates of the volcano. In a remarkable variety of natural rocky habitats, here some of the most interesting species find refuge, such as Brachytheciastrum collinum (Schleich. ex Müll.Hal.) Ignatov & Huttunen, Grimmia fuscolutea Hook., G. alpestris (F.Weber & D.Mohr) Schleich., G. donniana Sm., G. torquata Drumm., Mielichhoferia elongata (Hoppe & Hornsch. ex Hook.) Hornsch., M. mielichhoferiana (Funck) Loeske, and Schistidium flaccidum (De Not.) Ochyra. At present, they are the most interesting glacial relicts of the Sicilian bryophyte flora.

3.3. Life form Distribution Patterns

Life form is an ecological concept embracing structural characters, the aggregation of individuals, and their relationships with environmental demands [24,25]. They are expressions of morphological adaptations to special ecological niches and reflect habitats, being especially related to moisture conditions [26].
Overall, the bryophyte flora of Mt Etna is characterized by the preponderance of turf species, and lower occurrence of the weft and cushion, although cushion species become important in the high mountain ranges. Along the altitudinal transects of Mt Etna, mat thalloid, solitary creeping, and solitary thalloid are characteristic of lowland areas, wefts, dendroid, and fans are typical of montane habitats, whereas higher elevations are rich in cushion, turf, and mats. Moreover, the occurrence of tuft species is quite high at 1900–2700 m a.s.l., mostly represented by cryophytes of montane and high montane areas.
As a general trend, mat-, weft-, tail-, or fan-forming bryophytes prefer shady and humid sites (e.g., forest habitats), whereas cushion- and turf-forming bryophytes (mostly acrocarpous mosses) increase in sun-exposed, xeric sites underlying drought stress [25]; cushions are particularly effective at storing water and are characteristic of habitats with occasional desiccation [27]. Overall, turf and cushion, suitable for reduction of water loss and protection against strong irradiation (drought stress), represent the more competitive life forms at high elevations, because the species with this life form can survive to unsuitable climatic and edaphic conditions like snow cover, strong insolation, and strong winds as occurring on Mt Etna at high elevations. Many tuft-forming bryophytes are cryophytes of montane and high montane areas.

3.4. Life Strategy Distribution Patterns

The life strategy system is based on characters such as life span (avoidance vs. tolerance strategy of the gametophyte), breeding system, main reproductive effort (sexual vs. asexual reproduction), and dispersal strategies [numerous small spores (<25 µm) providing chance dispersal vs. few large spores (>25 µm), indicating decreasing long-range dispersal and achory] [28]. Life strategies reflect the ecological site conditions [25] and can be envisaged as a system of co-evolved adaptive traits [29]. On the Mt Etna, colonist and perennial species prevail in almost all elevational ranges. In particular, colonist species (characterized by a rather short life cycle and a high sexual or asexual reproductive effort) are considered as pioneers colonizing harsh environments, where they usually reach very high percentages, such as rocky surfaces, e.g., [30,31,32,33]. On the Mt Etna, many moss species occur on lava surfaces, showing this typical life strategy. The perennial stayer life strategy, characterized by a long life cycle and low reproductive effort, is frequent in late successional stages or long lasting sites under roughly constant environmental conditions, e.g., [33]; many pleurocarpous mosses follow this life strategy. On the Mt Etna, these species are mostly concentrated at 1200–2000 m a.s.l. in humid forests, such as beech woods. Shuttle species are typical of unstable habitats, often underlying anthropogenic disturbance (annual and short-lived shuttle species). The annual shuttle species can be observed in numerous marchantioids of seasonally dry sites, xeric protosoils, amongst rock boulders and exfoliating knobs, underlying disturbance, e.g., [34]; on the Mt Etna, these species, together with short-lived shuttle taxa, are mostly present at low elevations where anthropogenic influence is higher. Long-lived shuttle species require more stable environments where the end of habitat is predictable; many corticolous bryophytes show this life strategy on the mountain areas of Mt Etna. In agreement with Lloret & González-Mancebo [35], who analyzed elevation patterns of life strategy categories in the bryophytes in the Canary Islands, perennial stayers and long-lived shuttle species become established in the upper localities, while many annual shuttle species and colonists become established in the lowest localities. Colonists also occupy the harsh summit in the highest islands.

3.5. Chorotype Distribution Patterns

Overall, at low elevations (0–500 m a.s.l.), the Mediterranean species clearly prevail, followed by the southern temperate taxa, present to a lesser extent; also, a small number of wide temperate and temperate species occur. Instead, at medium elevations the temperate species prevail up to 1200 m a.s.l., together with boreo-temperate species up to 1700 m; in the same altitudinal interval (700–1700 m a.s.l.), the Mediterranean montane species appear. Above 1700 m a.s.l., the boreal montane, boreo-Arctic montane, and Arctic montane species prevail; only the boreo-Arctic montane and Arctic montane reach 2700 m a.s.l., beyond which no bryophytes were found.

3.6. Cluster Analysis

Overall, it is possible to identify a correlation between the clusters and the bioclimatic belts of the Mt Etna. In particular, cluster A11 includes species of the thermo-Mediterranean belt, with a clear dominance of Mediterranean mosses and liverworts, as well as occurrence of a group of southern temperate and temperate species. Cluster A12 comprises the species of the meso-Mediterranean belt, where the highest presence of southern temperate, temperate, and wide temperate species is found; here, the Mediterranean species disappear. Clusters A11 and A12 share the occurrence of some southern temperate and temperate species with wider altitude ranges. Cluster A2 includes the species of the supra-Mediterranean belt, characterized by the presence of wide boreal, boreo-temperate, and some boreal montane species, nearly absent in the lower altitudinal belts; moreover, a group of wide temperate and temperate species are also present. Occurrence of these last species render cluster A2 somewhat similar to the previous A12 and A11. Cluster B11 includes species of the oro-Mediterranean belt, where the Arctic montane and boreo-Arctic montane species are located, together with boreal montane and wide boreal species; only some boreo-temperate species are still found, while the wide temperate and temperate ones have vanished. Cluster B12 comprises species of the cryoro-Mediterranean belt; these are only a few boreo-Arctic montane species that reach the record altitude of 2700 m a.s.l. The presence of these species approaches the last two clusters (B11 and B12).

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Study Area

Mount Etna is a large stratovolcano of basaltic nature. Its height varies over time due to its eruptions which cause it to rise or fall. It is a polygenic basaltic volcano covering a surface of 1178 km2 from the sea level, along the eastern coast of Sicily; it reaches an altitude of 3328 m a.s.l., being the highest active volcano in Europe and one of the world’s most active volcanoes. At the same time, it represents the highest mountain in Sicily and the highest mountain in Italy south of the Alps. It is characterized by an almost continuous eruptive activity from its summit craters and fairly frequent lava flows from lateral fissures. Its origin is quite recent (late Quaternary), having formed 500 ka ago along a diverging zone in the framework of the Africa–Europe plate convergence [36], with eruptions occurring beneath the sea off the ancient coastline of Sicily. Four main eruptive phases can be recognized, comprising different volcanic successions in which the eruptions occurred with a similar eruptive style in the same geodynamic setting [37,38]. During each phase, several volcanic centers formed, and remnants of these are still recognizable in the field [38]. In particular, after an earlier phase of scattered and discontinuous volcanic activity occurring about 500 ka and 330 ka ago, the volcanism in the Mt Etna region was concentrated along the Ionian Sea coast between 220 and 121 ka ago [38,39]. According to [40], about 80% of the volcanic products were erupted only in the past 110 ka due to the stabilization of the magma source and, 15,000 years ago, the younger volcanics mantled most of the previous edifice (88% of the area) with a widespread cover of lava flow fields and pyroclastic deposits [41]. This, joined to a general process of tectonic uplifting, sometimes broken by the subsidence related to flank sliding of this volcanic edifice, contributes to our understanding of the present structure of the Etna volcano but also to the highlighting of relevant constraints and evolutionary chances for the plants colonizing this mountain in which soils are rejuvenated quite frequently, especially at higher elevations, not only with lava flows, but above all with the fall of volcanic ash and tephra.
As far as the climate is concerned, according to the bioclimatic classification proposed by Rivas-Martinez [42] and Rivas-Martinez et al. [43], Mt Etna is characterized by a Mediterranean pluviseasonal oceanic bioclimate, very diversified in relation to the altitude and exposure. Thermotypes range from the low thermo-Mediterranean to the lower cryo-Mediterranean, while ombrotypes range from the semiarid to the upper hyperhumid [44]. In Sicily, the lower cryo-Mediterranean and upper oro-Mediterranean belts exclusively occur on Mt Etna.

4.2. Floristic Data Sources

This research is based on a complete checklist of the Etnean bryophyte flora resulting from literature data, integrated with several field observations conducted in the last three decades all around the volcano by the first author of the paper. Currently, an updated published bryophyte flora of Mt Etna does not exist and, therefore, it was necessary to draw up a preliminary control list and provide accurate distribution data in order to be able to establish the altitudinal range for each taxon. All reports regarding Mt Etna were considered. The first important contribution was from Strobl [45], with the reports of about fifty bryophytes. Some papers concern some restricted Etna territories [46,47,48,49,50]. Other sporadic information can be found in larger studies on the bryoflora of Sicily and Italy [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. Finally, a number of more recent published floristic and phytosociological contributions were considered [33,34,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]. More than 700 phytosociological published relevés were examined. As far as the floristic reports and phytosociological relevés are concerned, without any explicit altitudinal indication but only the locality (i.e., toponym), elevation was determined by consulting topographic maps at 1:25,000 or 1:50,000 provided by the I.G.M. (Istituto Geografico Militare_Military Geographic Institute). Combining these data, also checking the taxonomic and nomenclatural correspondences, it was possible to establish a reliable distribution and altitudinal range for each species.
Mt Etna (0–3357 m), according to Trigas, Panitsa, and Tsiftasis [85] and Sciandrello et al. [86], was divided into 33 belts 100 m wide and the bryophyte diversity of each altitudinal belt was calculated as the total number of species per interval. All species were considered to have a continuous distribution between their minimum and maximum elevation limits. The area of each altitudinal belt was calculated using digital elevation models in ArcGIS 10.3 (3D Analyst).
For each species chorotypes, ecological indices, life forms, and life strategy were considered. The chorotypes follow Hill et al. [87], according to the classification of Hill and Preston [88], where the species are assigned to biome categories corresponding to the biomes in which they are found. The classification is as follows: Arctic-montane (with main distribution in tundra or above tree-line in temperate mountains), boreo-Arctic montane (in tundra and coniferous forest zones), wide-boreal (from temperate zone to tundra), boreal-montane (main distribution in coniferous forest zone), boreo-temperate (in conifer and broadleaf zones), wide temperate (from Mediterranean region to coniferous forest zone), temperate (in broadleaf forest zone), southern-temperate (in the Mediterranean region and broadleaf forest zones), Mediterranean (in the Mediterranean region).
Life forms were defined according to Hill et al. [87], and life strategies according to Dierβen [89]. The Ellenberg indicator values (moisture, light, soil acidity) were obtained from Hill et al. [87].
Simple scatter plots were used to show the life forms, life strategies, and corotypes along the elevational gradient of Mt Etna. Simple regression analyses were used to correlate total bryophyte flora to log-area of each elevational interval, both as number of species for each altitudinal interval and as distribution of the floristic richness in relation to the real surface of each belt expressed as a percentage. Regression analyses and generalized linear models were performed using the statistical package Past Version 2.17. A multivariate analysis (Linkage method: Ward’s, Distance measure: Correlation) and ordination (CCA) were used to establish spatial patterns about the bioclimatic belts and corotypes. Cluster analysis and ordination of the dataset were performed using PC-ORD 6 software [90].
In order to identify areas with high bryophyte conservation priority, occurrence on the Mt Etna of species considered threatened or near threatened at the European and/or Italian level [23,91], as well the occurrence of rare and very rare species (in Italy and/or in Sicily, or occurring in Sicily only on the Mt Etna) was considered.
The nomenclature of the species and taxonomy follow Hodgetts et al. [92].

5. Conclusions

Species distribution models are widely utilized in conservation biogeography due to their ability to estimate potential range shifts for species and communities in response to climate change. Moreover, they have been successfully used to study the distribution of bryophytes in a variety of ecosystems, including identifying areas of high conservation value [93,94]. Consequently, they represent a valuable tool for informing and guiding conservation management planning.
Our contribution wanted to go one step further by using quantitative data on the spatial distribution of the bryophyte species along the altitudinal gradient and highlight areas with a high concentration of species of conservation interest. In particular, the peculiar hump-shaped pattern of floristic richness at medium elevations (1200–1700 m a.s.l.) was highlighted corresponding to the greater concentration of beech and deciduous oak woods that provide more suitable habitats for bryophyte establishment; here, the boreo-temperate species showing turf and mat life forms and colonist and perennial stayer life strategies are prevalent.
The results of the analysis on the species of conservation interest (red-listed and/or phytogeographically interesting) emphasize the fact that the high plant conservation priority areas are located in the oro-Mediterranean (1800–2400 ms.l.m.) bioclimatic belt, where the oldest substrates of the volcano (110–15 ka), which functioned as refuge areas for high-latitude species (Arctic montane, boreo-Arctic montane, and boreal montane), is found; moreover, it should be noted that in the thermo-Mediterranean belt, some red-listed liverworts are found and, therefore, this should also be taken into consideration for conservation actions. The worthy bryophyte diversity of the Mt Etna discussed in this paper confirmed the floristic value of this volcano, as already highlighted by Sciandrello et al. [85] for the vascular flora.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P.; methodology, M.P. and S.S.; investigation, M.P.; data curation, M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P.; writing—review and editing, M.P. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the research programme (PIA.CE.RI. 2020–2022 Line 2 cod. 22722132149) funded by the University of Catania and Line 3 Starting Grant Progetto HAB-VEG cod. 22722132172) funded by the University of Catania.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kolari, P.; Pumpanen, J.; Kulmala, L.; Ilvesniemi, H.; Nikinmaa, E.; Grönholm, T.; Hari, P. Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 221, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gignac, L.D. Bryophytes as indicators of climate change. Bryologist 2001, 104, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Proctor, M.C.F.; Tuba, Z. Poikilohydry and homoihydry: Antithesis or spectrum of possibilities? New Phytol. 2002, 156, 327–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Spitale, D. Switch between competition and facilitation within a seasonal scale at colony level in bryophytes. Oecologia 2009, 160, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zanatta, F.; Engler, R.; Collart, F.; Broennimann, O.; Mateo, R.G.; Papp, B.; Muñoz, J.; Baurain, D.; Guisan, A.; Vanderpoorten, A. Bryophytes are predicted to lag behind future climate change despite their high dispersal capacities. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Andrew, N.; Rodgerson, L.; Dunlop, M. Variation in invertebrate-bryophyte community structure at different spatial scales along altitudinal gradients. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 731–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McCain, C.M.; Grytnes, J.-A. Elevational gradients in species richness. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nascimbene, J.; Spitale, D. Patterns of beta-diversity along elevational gradients inform epiphyte conservation in alpine forests under a climate change scenario. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 216, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mejia, A.; Castro, V.; Peralta, D.F.; Moncada, B. Altitudinal zonation of mosses in west of the Sierra Nevada of Cocuy, Boyacá, Colombia. Hoehnea 2020, 47, e162020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Socolar, J.B.; Gilroy, J.J.; Kunin, W.E.; Edwards, D.P. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016, 31, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Becker-Scarpitta, A.; Auberson-Lavoie, D.; Aussenac, R.; Vellend, M. Different temporal trends in vascular plant and bryophyte communities along elevational gradients over four decades. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e9102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ah-Peng, C.; Wilding, N.; Kluge, J.; Descamps-Julien, B.; Bardat, J.; Chuah-Petiot, M.; Strasberg, D.; Hedderson, T.A.J. Bryophyte diversity and range size distribution along two altitudinal gradients: Continent vs. Island. Acta Oecol. 2012, 42, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hernández-Hernández, R.; Kluge, J.; Ah-Peng, C.; González-Mancebo, J.M. Natural and human-impacted diversity of bryophytes along an elevational gradient on an oceanic island (La Palma, Canarias). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Coelho, M.C.M.; Gabriel, R.; Hespanhol, H.; Borges, P.A.V.; Ah-Peng, C. Bryophyte diversity along an elevational gradient on Pico Island (Azores, Portugal). Diversity 2021, 13, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Di Nuzzo, L.; Vallese, C.; Benesperi, R.; Giordani, P.; Chiarucci, A.; Di Cecco, V.; Di Martino, L.; Di Musciano, M.; Gheza, G.; Lelli, C.; et al. Contrasting multitaxon responses to climate change in Mediterranean mountains. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Médail, F.; Quézel, P. Hot-spots analysis for conservation of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1997, 84, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Médail, F.; Quézel, P. Biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting global conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 1999, 13, 1510–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Kents, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Médail, F.; Diadema, K. Glacial refugia influence plant diversity patterns in the Mediterranean Basin. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raimondo, F.M.; Domina, G.; Spadaro, V. Checklist of the vascular flora of Sicily. Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 2010, 21, 189–252. [Google Scholar]
  21. Aleffi, M.; Tacchi, R.; Poponessi, S. New checklist of the bryophytes of Italy. Cryptogam. Bryol. 2020, 41, 147–195. [Google Scholar]
  22. Henriques, D.; Borges, P.A.V.; Ah-Peng, C.; Gabriel, R. Mosses and liverworts show contrasting elevational distribution patterns in an oceanic island (Terceira, Azores): The influence of climate and space. J. Bryol. 2016, 38, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Puglisi, M.; Campisi, P.; Aleffi, M.; Bonini, I.; Cogoni, A.; Dia, M.G.; Miserere, L.; Privitera, M.; Tiburtini, M.; Poponessi, S. Red-list of Italian bryophytes. 1. Liverworts and hornworts. Plant Biosyst. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kürschner, H.; Stech, M.; Sim-Sim, M.; Fontinha, S.; Frey, W. Life form and life strategy analyses of the epiphytic bryophyte communities of Madeira’s laurel and ericaceous forests. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 2007, 127, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kürschner, H.; Frey, W. Life strategies in bryophytes—A first example for the evolution of functional types. Nova Hedwig. 2013, 96, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frahm, J.-P. Ecology of bryophytes along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients in Chile. Studies in austral temperate rain forest bryophytes 16. Trop. Bryol. 2002, 21, 67–79. [Google Scholar]
  27. Frahm, J.-P.; Pócs, T.; O’Shea, B.; Koponen, T.; Piippo, S.; Enroth, J.; Rao, P.; Fang, Y.-M. Manual of Tropical Bryology. Bryophyt. Divers. Evol. 2003, 23, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kürschner, H. Life strategies and adaptations in bryophytes from the near and Middle East. Turk. J. Bot. 2004, 28, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
  29. During, H.J. Life strategies of bryophytes: A preliminary review. Lindbergia 1979, 5, 2–18. [Google Scholar]
  30. Puglisi, M.; Kürschner, H.; Privitera, M. Saxicolous bryophyte communities of mountain areas of Greece—Phytosociology, ecology, life forms and life strategies. Nova Hedwig. 2013, 97, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Puglisi, M.; Kürschner, H.; Privitera, M. The Schistidio atrofusci-Grimmietum pulvinatae, a new association of the class Grimmietea anodontis on the Mediterranean mountains. Nova Hedwig. 2015, 100, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Puglisi, M.; Kürschner, H.; Privitera, M. The mountain and high-mountain bryophyte vegetation of the Pollino National Park (Southern Italy): Syntaxonomy and ecology. Nova Hedwig. 2016, 103, 385–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Puglisi, M.; Campisi, P.; Dia, M.G.; Privitera, M.; Spampinato, G. Bryophytes as ecological indicators in the beech woods of Sicily. Nova Hedwig. 2019, 108, 339–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Puglisi, M.; Privitera, M.; Minissale, P.; Costa, R. Diversity and ecology of the bryophytes in the cave environment: A study on the volcanic and karstic caves of Sicily. Plant Biosyst. 2019, 153, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lloret, F.; González-Mancebo, J.M. Altitudinal distribution patterns of bryophytes in the Canary Islands and vulnerability to climate change. Flora 2011, 206, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barreca, G.; Branca, S.; Corsaro, R.A.; Scarfì, L.; Cannavò, F.; Alois, M.; Monaco, C.; Faccenna, C. Slab Detachment, Mantle Flow, and Crustal Collision in Eastern Sicily (Southern Italy): Implications on Mount Etna Volcanism. Tectonics 2020, 39, e2020TC006188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Branca, S.; Coltelli, M.; De Beni, E.; Wijbrans, J. Geological evolution of Mount Etna volcano (Italy) from earliest products until the first central volcanism (between 500 and 100 ka ago) inferred from geochronological and stratigraphic data. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2008, 97, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Branca, S.; Coltelli, M.; Groppelli, G. Geological evolution of a complex basaltic stratovolcano: Mount Etna, Italy. Ital. J. Geosci. 2011, 130, 306–317. [Google Scholar]
  39. De Beni, E.; Branca, S.; Coltelli, M.; Groppelli, G.; Wijbrans, J. 39Ar/40Ar isotopic dating of Etna volcanic succession. Ital. J. Geosci. 2011, 130, 292–305. [Google Scholar]
  40. Branca, S.; Ferrara, V. The morphostructural setting of Mount Etna sedimentary basement (Italy): Implications for the geometry and volume of the volcano and its flank instability. Tectonophysics 2013, 586, 46–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barreca, G.; Branca, S.; Monaco, C. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Mount Etna Volcano: Volume Assessment, Trend of Eruption Rates, and Geodynamic Significance. Tectonics 2018, 37, 842–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rivas Martínez, S. Bases para una nueva clasificacion bioclimatica de la tierra. Folia Bot. Matritensis 1993, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rivas-Martinez, S. Bioclimatic Map of Europe: Bioclimates, Scale 1:16 Mill; Cartographic service; University of Léon: Léon, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bazan, G.; Marino, P.; Guarino, R.; Domina, G.; Schicchi, R. Bioclimatology and vegetation series in Sicily: A geostatistical approach. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2015, 52, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Strobl, P.G. Flora des Aetna. Osterr. Bot. Z. 1880, 38, 24, 26, 58–60, 95–96, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zodda, G. Briofite sicule. IV. Malpighia 1911, 24, 258–277. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lo Giudice, R.; Privitera, M. La flora muscinale della Valle S. Giacomo (Etna). Rev. Bryol. Lichénol. 1979, 45, 453–466. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lo Giudice, R.; Privitera, M. Contributo alla conoscenza della brioflora cavernicola dell’Etna. Arch. Bot. Biogeogr. Ital. 1981, 57, 171–192. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lo Giudice, R.; Privitera, M. Sulla brioflora di alcune grotte etnee (Grotta Forcato, Grotta delle Palombe, Grotta dei ladri). Arch. Bot. Biogeogr. Ital. 1983, 59, 137–157. [Google Scholar]
  50. Privitera, M.; Lo Giudice, R. La florula muscinale della lecceta di Monte Minardo (Etna). Webbia 1979, 33, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Philippi, R.A. Über die Vegetation am Ätna. Flora 1832, 7, 727–764. [Google Scholar]
  52. De Notaris, G. Syllabus Muscorum in Italiae et Insulis Circumstantibus; Ex Typographia Canfari: Torino, Italy, 1838; pp. 1–331. [Google Scholar]
  53. De Notaris, G. Musci Italici. Particula. I. Trichostomacei. Gen. Tortula; Ex Typographia Surdorum: Genova, Italy, 1862; pp. 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  54. De Notaris, G. Epilogo Della Briologia Italiana; Co’ Tipi del R.I. de’ sordo-muti: Genova, Italy, 1869; pp. 1–781. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lojacono Pojero, M. Primo elenco briologico di Sicilia. Nat. Sicil. 1883–1884, 3, 62–66, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  56. Massalongo, C. Repertorio della Epaticologia Italica. Annu. R. Ist. Bot. Roma 1886, 2, 87–155. [Google Scholar]
  57. Brizi, U. Notizie. Addenda ad floram Italicam. Note di Briologia Italiana. Malpighia 1890, 4, 262–282, 350–362. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bottini, A. Appunti di Briologia Italiana. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 1890, 22, 259–266. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bottini, A. Sulla Briologia delle isole italiane. Webbia 1907, 2, 345–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zodda, G. Notizie sull’erbario del Prof. Alfio Fichera. Atti Rend. Accad. Dafnica Sci. Lett. Arti Acireale 1906, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zodda, G. Le Brofite del Messinese. II. Ann. Bot. 1907, 6, 237–269. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zodda, G. Le Briofite del Messinese. III. Ann. Bot. 1908, 7, 449–487. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zodda, G. Briofite sicule. III. Malpighia 1908, 22, 506–521. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zodda, G. Sulla Marchantia circumscissa di Bivona. Boll. Orto Bot. R. Univ. Napoli 1909, 2, 251–253. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zodda, G. Le Briofite del Messinese. IV. Ann. Bot. 1913, 11, 253–280. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zodda, G. Hepaticae. In Flora Italica Cryptogama; Soc. Bot. Ital., Rocca S.: Casciano, Italy, 1934. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zodda, G. Schedule Briologiche. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 1958, 65, 860–861. [Google Scholar]
  68. Barsali, E. Epatiche di Sicilia, Isole Eolie e Pelagie. Bull. Natur. 1908, 28, 14–17, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  69. Roth, G. Neuere und noch weniger bekannte Europäische Laubmoose. Hedwigia 1913, 53, 124–133. [Google Scholar]
  70. Nicholson, W.E. Bryological notes from Sicily. Rev. Bryol. Lichénol. 1921, 48, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  71. Müller, K. Die Lebermoose. In Rabenhorst’s L., Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland, Osterreich Und Scheweiz; Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft: Leipzig, Germany, 1920; Volume 6, pp. 481–640. [Google Scholar]
  72. Reimers, H. Beiträge zur Moosflora von Italien. Willdenowia 1956, 1, 533–562. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lübenau, R.; Lübenau, K. Ein Beitrag zur Moosflora der Äolischen Inseln Lipari, Vulcano und Stromboli. Naturwiss. Mitt. Kempten-Allg. 1968, 13, 82–97. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lübenau, R.; Lübenau, K. Ein Beitrag zur Moosflora der Äolischen Inseln Lipari, Vulcano und Stromboli. Herzogia 1970, 2, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lo Giudice, R. Studio fitosociologico sulla briovegetazione epifitica della Sicilia. Arch. Bot. Ital. 1991, 67, 76–98. [Google Scholar]
  76. Privitera, M.; Puglisi, M. La vegetazione briofitica dell’Etna (Sicilia, Italia). Braun-Blanquetia 1996, 19, 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  77. Privitera, M.; Puglisi, M. Noteworty orophilous mosses from Mount Etna (Sicily). Bocconea 1997, 5, 905–911. [Google Scholar]
  78. Privitera, M.; Puglisi, M. Some interesting records for the Italian moss flora. Cryptogam. Bryol. 2002, 23, 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  79. Puglisi, M. New interesting records to the moss flora of Sicily (Italy). Cryptogam. Bryol. 2009, 30, 395–398. [Google Scholar]
  80. Puglisi, M.; Privitera, M. A synopsis of the Italian bryophyte vegetation. Cryptogam. Bryol. 2012, 33, 357–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Puglisi, M.; Privitera, M. New moss records for the Mediterranean islands. Cryptogam. Bryol. 2018, 39, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Puglisi, M.; Privitera, M. New and noteworthy records of mosses from Italian national and regional Parks. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 604–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Puglisi, M.; Minissale, P.; Sciandrello, S.; Privitera, M. The bryophyte vegetation of the Mediterranean temporary ponds in Italy. Plant Sociol. 2015, 52, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  84. Puglisi, M.; Kürschner, H.; Privitera, M. Phytosociology and life syndromes of bryophyte communities from Sicilian caves, a clear example of relationship between bryophytes and environment. Plant Sociol. 2018, 55, 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  85. Trigas, P.; Panitsa, M.; Tsiftasis, S. Elevational gradient of vascular plant species richness and endemism in Crete—The effect of post-isolation mountain uplift on a continental island system. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sciandrello, S.; Minissale, P.; Giusso del Galdo, G. Vascular plant species diversity of Mt. Etna (Sicily): Endemicity, insularity and spatial patterns along the altitudinal gradient of the highest active volcano in Europe. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hill, M.O.; Preston, C.D.; Bosanquet, S.D.S.; Roy, D.B. BRYOATT Attributes of British and Irish Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts; Centre for Ecology and Hydrology: Huntingdon, UK, 2007; pp. 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  88. Hill, M.O.; Preston, C.D. The geographical relationship of British and Irish bryophytes. J. Bryol. 1998, 20, 127–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dierssen, K. Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. Bryophyt. Biblioth. 2001, 56, 1–289. [Google Scholar]
  90. McCune, B.; Mefford, M.J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 6; MjM Software PC-ORD: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 2011; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  91. Hodgetts, N.G.; Cálix, M.; Englefield, E.; Fettes, N.; García Criado, M.; Patin, L.; Nieto, A.; Bergamini, A.; Bisang, I.; Baisheva, E.; et al. A Miniature world in Decline: European Red List of Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts; International Union for Conservation of Nature: Gland, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hodgetts, N.G.; Söderström, L.; Blockeel, T.L.; Caspari, S.; Ignatov, M.S.; Konstantinova, N.A.; Lockhart, N.; Papp, B.; Schröck, C.; Sim-Sim, M.; et al. An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus. J. Bryol. 2020, 42, 1–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Heikkinen, R.K.; Luoto, M.; Araújo, M.B.; Virkkala, R.; Thuiller, W.; Sykes, M.T. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2006, 30, 751–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Číhal, L. Bryophytes in a Changing World: Understanding Distribution Patterns, Risks, and Conservation. Diversity 2023, 15, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Life form spectrum of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora.
Figure 1. Life form spectrum of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora.
Plants 12 02655 g001
Figure 2. Life strategy spectrum of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora.
Figure 2. Life strategy spectrum of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora.
Plants 12 02655 g002
Figure 3. Elevational gradient of each belt on Mt Etna.
Figure 3. Elevational gradient of each belt on Mt Etna.
Plants 12 02655 g003
Figure 4. Elevation gradient of Mt Etna bryophyte species richness.
Figure 4. Elevation gradient of Mt Etna bryophyte species richness.
Plants 12 02655 g004
Figure 5. Cluster analysis of the Mt Etna bryophytes in relation to the altitudinal range.
Figure 5. Cluster analysis of the Mt Etna bryophytes in relation to the altitudinal range.
Plants 12 02655 g005
Figure 6. Life forms of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora in relation to elevation.
Figure 6. Life forms of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora in relation to elevation.
Plants 12 02655 g006
Figure 7. Life strategy of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora in relation to elevation.
Figure 7. Life strategy of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora in relation to elevation.
Plants 12 02655 g007
Figure 8. Chorotypes of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora in relation to elevation.
Figure 8. Chorotypes of the Mt Etna bryophyte flora in relation to elevation.
Plants 12 02655 g008
Figure 9. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA). Total variance (inertia) in the species data: 5.75; Eigenvalues: axis 1 = 0.86; axis 2 = 0.73, Variance in species data % of variance explained 14.9 (axis 1), 12.8 (axis 2), Cumulative % explained 14.9 (axis 1) and 27.7 (axis 2).
Figure 9. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA). Total variance (inertia) in the species data: 5.75; Eigenvalues: axis 1 = 0.86; axis 2 = 0.73, Variance in species data % of variance explained 14.9 (axis 1), 12.8 (axis 2), Cumulative % explained 14.9 (axis 1) and 27.7 (axis 2).
Plants 12 02655 g009
Table 1. Bryophytes of conservation interest on the Mt Etna. * Priority Habitat.
Table 1. Bryophytes of conservation interest on the Mt Etna. * Priority Habitat.
TaxonRed-List EuropeRed-List ItalyPhytogeographical InterestDistribution on the Etna
SitesAltitude Range (m a.s.l.)Habitat (Directive 92/43/EEC)
Amphidium mougeotii (Schimp.) Schimp.LCLCOccurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Grotta dei Faggi; Grotta delle Palombe; Mts Silvestri; Mts Calcarazzi; Mt Baracca; Mt Pomiciaro; Grotta dei Lamponi; Grotta dei Ladri; Grotta di Casa del Vescovo; Grotta di Cassone; Grotta del Coniglio; Rifugio Citelli; Mt Palestra; Contrada Germaniera; Grotta Intraleo; Grotta Corruccio.1400–21008320, 4090
Anthoceros agrestis PatonNTNTRare in Italy.Aci Castello; Piano delle Immacolatelle; Catani; Capo Mulini; Grotta Immacolatella IV. 0–3008320
Aschisma carniolicum (F.Weber & D.Mohr) Lindb.ENVURare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Capo Mulini. 0–100-
Aulacomnium androgynum (Hedw.) Schwägr.LCNERare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Contrada Giarrita; M. Rinatu.1000–17009210 *
Brachytheciastrum collinum (Schleich. ex Müll.Hal.) Ignatov & HuttunenLCVURare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mt Palestra; Mt Maletto; Grotta dei Lamponi; Contrada Germaniera; Grotta del Gelo.1700–22008320, 9530 *
Callicladium imponens (Hedw.) Hedenäs, Schlesak & D.QuandtNTNERare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Valle S. Giacomo.700–8008320
Clevea spathysii (Lindenb.) Müll.Frib.NTDDVery rare in Italy.Acireale; Aci Trezza.0–100-
Coscinodon cribrosus (Hedw.) SpruceLCLCOccurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Grotta Cassone; Mts Silvestri; Mt Palestra; Rifugio Citelli; Mt Baracca; I Dammusi; Valle del Tripodo; Casa del Vescovo; Etna botanical garden "Nuova Gussonea"; Mt Baracca; Mt Pomiciaro; rifugio di M.te Maletto; Grotta dei Tre Livelli; Contrada Giarrita; Grotta di Casa del Vescovo; Mt Arcimis; a nord di Rifugio Sapienza.1400–21008320, 4090, 9210 *, 9530 *
Cynodontium bruntonii (Sm.) Bruch & Schimp.LCNEOccurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mt Spagnolo; I Dammusi.1000–16009210
Entosthodon muhlenbergii (Turner) FifeNTNTRare in Italy.Valle S. Giacomo; Mt Minardo.700–9009210, 9340
Ephemerum serratum (Hedw.) HampeLCVURare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Piano delle Immacolatelle; Grotta Immacolatella IV.300–400 8320
Exormotheca pustulosa Mitt.NTCRThe Etna locality is the only one confirmed in Italy.Aci Castello.0–100-
Fossombronia caespitiformis (Raddi) De Not. ex Rabenh. subsp. multispira (Schiffn.) J.R.Bray & CargillLCNTRare in Italy.S. Maria La Stella; Capo Mulini.0–1003170 *
Fossombronia wondraczekii (Corda) Dumort. ex Lindb.LCNTRare in Italy.Aci Castello; Grotta Cantarella.0–3008320
Funariella curviseta (Schwägr.) SérgioVUVU?Rare in Italy.Aci Castello; Acireale0–100-
Grimmia alpestris (F.Weber & D.Mohr) Schleich.LCNTRare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Etna botanical garden "Nuova Gussonea".2100–22009530 *
Grimmia crinita Brid.VUVURare in Italy.Etna botanical garden "Nuova Gussonea". 9530 *
Grimmia decipiens (Schultz) Lindb.LCNERare in Italy.Grotta Forcato; Grotta delle Palombe; Ingresso Demanio forestale; Mt Spagnolo; Contrada Tabbutazzo; Contrada Timpazza; Mt Intraleo; Mt Minardo; Fornazzo; Mt Maletto; Mt Guardiola.1300–15008320, 9210 *, 9340
Grimmia donniana Sm.LCNERare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mt Spagnolo; I Dammusi; Etna botanical garden "Nuova Gussonea"; Mt Minardo; Ingresso Demanio forestale; Mt Maletto; Mt Pomiciaro; strada forestale tra Mt Maletto e Mt Spagnolo.1800–22008320, 9210, 9530
Grimmia fuscolutea Hook.VUENVery rare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mts Silvestri. 2000–22008320, 4090
Grimmia elatior Bruch ex Bals.-Criv. & De Not.LCNERare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Contrada Tabbutazzo; Ingresso Demanio forestale; Mt Minardo; Mts Silvestri.1700–19008320, 4090
Grimmia torquata Drumm.LCVURare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Grotta delle Palombe.1800–19008320
Hydrogonium bolleanum (Müll.Hal.) A.JaegerDDVURare in Italy.Fiume Fiumefreddo.0–1003280
Hymenoloma crispulum (Hedw.) OchyraLCLCOccurring in Sicily only on the Etna.I Dammusi.1900–21009210 *
Isopterygiopsis pulchella (Hedw.) Z.Iwats.LCLCOccurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Grotta delle Palombe.1700–20008320
Mielichhoferia elongata (Hoppe & Hornsch. ex Hook.) Hornsch.VUVURare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mts Silvestri. 1900–20004090
Mielichhoferia mielichhoferiana (Funck) Loeske NTVURare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mt Frumento; Mts Silvestri.1900–21004090
Physcomitrium eurystomum Sendtn. subsp. eurystomumVUCRThe only recent report for Italy.Botanical garden of Catania.0–100-
Pohlia proligera (Kindb.) Lindb. ex Broth.LCNTRare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Grotta dei Lamponi; Mts Silvestri.1800–19008320, 4090
Pohlia wahlenbergii (F.Weber & D.Mohr)A.L.Andrews var. calcarea (Warnst.) E.F.Warb.LCNTRare in Italy.Aci Castello.0–100-
Ptychostomum cernuum (Hedw.) Hornsch.ENENThe Etna locality is the only one confirmed in Italy.Grotta del Santo.1200–13008320
Pyramidula tetragona (Brid.) Brid.ENNEVery rare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Aci Castello.0–100-
Rhabdoweisia fugax (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp.LCNERare in Italy.Grotta delle Palombe.1700–18008320
Schistidium flaccidum (De Not.) OchyraVUNTRare in Italy; occurring in Sicily only on the Etna.Mt Minardo; Ingresso Demanio forestale; Casa del Vescovo.1700–18009340, 9530 *, 8320
Timmia bavarica Hessl.LCLCRare in Italy.Grotta dei Lamponi.1700–18008320
Tortula bolanderi (Lesq. & James) M.HoweENENVery rare in Italy.Grotta Forcato.600–7008320
Tortula hoppeana (Schultz) OchyraLCVURare in Italy.Mts Silvestri; nord di Rifugio Sapienza.2000–25004090
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Puglisi, M.; Sciandrello, S. Bryophyte Diversity and Distribution Patterns along Elevation Gradients of the Mount Etna (Sicily), the Highest Active Volcano in Europea. Plants 2023, 12, 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142655

AMA Style

Puglisi M, Sciandrello S. Bryophyte Diversity and Distribution Patterns along Elevation Gradients of the Mount Etna (Sicily), the Highest Active Volcano in Europea. Plants. 2023; 12(14):2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Puglisi, Marta, and Saverio Sciandrello. 2023. "Bryophyte Diversity and Distribution Patterns along Elevation Gradients of the Mount Etna (Sicily), the Highest Active Volcano in Europea" Plants 12, no. 14: 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142655

APA Style

Puglisi, M., & Sciandrello, S. (2023). Bryophyte Diversity and Distribution Patterns along Elevation Gradients of the Mount Etna (Sicily), the Highest Active Volcano in Europea. Plants, 12(14), 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142655

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop