Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Effects of Selenium and Brassinosteroids on Photosynthesis and Protein Expression Patterns in Tomato Plants under Low Temperatures
Previous Article in Journal
Resolving the Puzzle of Iris maackii (Iridaceae): A Morphological Insight into Its Taxonomy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 19
10.3390/plants12193350
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) from the Soils of Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia)

by
Vyacheslav Yu. Nikulin
*,
Arthur Yu. Nikulin
*,
Andrey A. Gontcharov
,
Veronika B. Bagmet
and
Shamil R. Abdullin
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 159, 100-Letia Vladivostoka Prospect, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(19), 3350; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193350
Submission received: 27 June 2023 / Revised: 9 September 2023 / Accepted: 19 September 2023 / Published: 22 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Systematics, Taxonomy, Nomenclature and Classification)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A strain of oogamous biflagellate green alga was isolated during a study on soil algal diversity in the Russian Far East (Sakhalin Region, Iturup Island) and examined using an integrative approach. Phylogenetic analyses, based on the SSU rDNA gene, resolved the new strain as a part of the RL clade (sensu Watanabe and Nakada) within Oogamochlamydinia (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae). The strain was similar to members of the genus Oogamochlamys (parietal and massive cup-shaped chloroplasts; two apical contractile vacuoles), but was, however, distinguished from them based on the size and shape of the mature vegetative cells, the flagellar length, the presence of only one pyrenoid in both the mature vegetative cells and the zoospores, the anterior nucleus position, and the spermatozoids’ shape. Although a concept of the genus Oogamochlamys has been compromised in recent phylogenetic analysis based on the SSU rDNA sequence data and its likely affinity to anisogamous Chlamydomonas allensworthii, we described the strain from Iturup Island as Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov.

1. Introduction

Chlamydomonas-like algae (Volvocales/Chlamydomonadales, Chlorophyceae) are green flagellates that typically possess two flagella of equal length and CW flagellar apparatus orientation, a cell wall, and a single chloroplast with pyrenoid(s) [1,2]. Their morphological identification is often difficult due to the small size of the cells, the limited number of taxonomic characters, and their high polymorphism within populations or during the life cycle [3,4]. Chlamydomonadscan be found in almost every aquatic and soil habitat; however, many biodiversity assessment accounts refer only to the genera, and these data require verification. An unambiguous taxonomic affiliation of green flagellates could only be achieved with the establishment of their exact molecular phylogenetic position [5,6].
Simple morphology hides the differentiation of Chlamydomonas-like algae and represents a diverse array of lineages within the Volvocales [3,7,8,9,10]. One of these lineages is the Oogamochlamydinia clade, which comprises microalgae that are currently classified in eight genera: Lobochlamys T.Pröschold, B.Marin, U.W.Schlösser & M.Melkonian, Oogamochlamys Pröschold, B.Marin, U.W.Schlösser & Melkonian [3], Hapalochloris Nakada [11], Rhysamphichloris Nakada [12], Gymnomonas S.Watanabe & T.Nakada [13], Sarcinochlamys S.Watanabe [14], Palmellopsis Korshikov, Asterococcus Scherffel, and a number of species with uncertain taxonomic affiliations.
The genus Oogamochlamys comprises three species that were previously members of the genus Chlamydomonas: O. gigantea (O.Dill) Pröschold, B.Marin, U.W.Schlösser & Melkonian (C. gigantea, C. megalis H.W.Bischoff & Bold, and C. capensis Pocock), O. ettlii Pröschold, B.Marin, U.W.Schlösser & Melkonian (C. gigantea O.Dill), and O. zimbabwiensis (Heimke & R.C.Starr) Pröschold, B.Marin, U.W.Schlösser & Melkonian (C. zimbabwiensis Heimke & R.C.Starr). These species are characterized by chloroplast morphology (parietal, massive plastids with ridges on the surface), multiple irregularly distributed pyrenoids, and homothallic protandric oogamy [3,5]. They are mostly found in soil, although some species were also found in bottom sediments [3].
Information on the soil microalgal diversity of the Kuril Islands (Russia) is very scarce and mostly based on traditional approaches [15,16]. During a study on algae in the soils of Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia), we isolated a strain of Chlamydomonas-like green alga and studied it using an integrative approach. SSU rDNA gene sequence comparisons suggested its affinity to Oogamochlamys (Oogamochlamydinia clade). The combination of the phylogenetic and morphotaxonomic features of the strain led us to describe the alga from Iturup Island as a new species, Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov.

2. Results

2.1. Taxonomic Treatment

Oogamochlamys kurilensis V.Yu. Nikulin, Sh.R. Abdullin, V.B. Bagmet, A.Yu. Nikulin & A.A. Gontcharov, sp. nov. are shown in Figure 1A–I.
Diagnosis: the cells are ellipsoid to oviform, 6.1–17.1 × 4.5–9.5 μm; the cell wall is thin, with two flagella that are about half the cell length; the papilla broad, rounded. The chloroplast is cup-shaped, parietal, and massive; the chloroplast surface with fine ridges mostly parallel to the cell axis, with one pyrenoid in the lateral position; the eyespotis pale red, elliptic to narrowly elongate in an anterior position; two apical contractile vacuoles, nucleus in the anterior position.
Asexual reproduction by two or four zoospores, nearly spherical to oviform, with one pyrenoid, 5.7–12.4 × 4.0–8.4 μm. The sporangial wall is partially lysing before release of zoospores.
Sexual reproduction occurs via oogamy, homothallic, proterandric; 32–128 spermatozoids are formed in the gametangium; the spermatozoids are 4.0–4.5 × 3.4–4.0 μm, spherical, without a cell wall, and with two flagella nearly 1.5 times longer than the cell; the chloroplast is pale green, with a distinct eyespot, and without a pyrenoid.
The zygotes are not ornamented, are green to brownish-red, and 13.7–22.4 μm in diameter.
Habitat: soil.
Type locality: Russia, Sakhalin Region, Iturup Island (45°09′36″ N, 147°46′37.2″ E), in forest soil under the plant communities with Sasa kurilensis (Rupr.) Makino & Shibata, Quercus crispula Blume, and Acer tschonoskii Maxim.
Etymology: the species is named after the Kuril Islands.
Holotype (designated herein): exsiccatum number VLA-CA-1065; a dried biomass of a unialgal population deposited in the Herbarium, Federal Scientific Center of East Asian Terrestrial Biodiversity, Vladivostok, Russia. Gene sequence: the DNA sequence was obtained from a clonal strain of Oogamochlamys kurilensis deposited in GenBank under accession no. OM949811.
Authentic strain: Oogamochlamys kurilensis strain VCA-206 was deposited in the Culture Collection of the Laboratory of Botany, Federal Scientific Center of East Asian Terrestrial Biodiversity, Russia.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

Results of the BLAST searches revealed that the sequence of the SSU rDNA gene in our strain was highly similar to those in three accessions of Chlamydomonas sp. (98–99%) and Oogamochlamys ettlii UTEX 2218 (98.31%). When only the ITS region was compared, the similarity to the closest match, Chlamydomonas allensworthii R.C.Starr, F.Marner & Jaenicke accessions, was just above 84%.
Phylogenetic analyses of 155 SSU rDNA sequences representing major groups of the Volvocales (sensu Nakada et al. [9]) placed the new strain as a member of the Oogamochlamydinia clade that was resolved only topologically (Figure 2 and Figure S1). This lineage included the genera Asterococcus, Sarcinochlamys, Gymnomonas, Hapalochloris, Lobochlamys, Oogamochlamys, Palmellopsis, Rhysamphichloris, and numerous Chlamydomonas representatives. The overall phylogenetic resolution in the Oogamochlamydinia was weak. Four out of five genera represented by two or more accessions, Asterococcus, Sarcinochlamys, Lobochlamys, and Rhysamphichloris, attained moderate to strong support.
Our species was placed in a clade (−/0.98) that comprised representatives of the genera Oogamochlamys, Rhysamphichloris, Gymnomonas, and Hapalochloris, as well as four Chlamydomonas sp. strains. Oogamochlamys was not monophyletic and split into three species lineages: O. gigantea (100/1.00), O. zimbabwiensis (99/0.99), and O. ettlii. Oogamochlamys kurilensis was a sister (100/1.00) to a robust clade uniting Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161, NIES-2317, and NIES-2318.
To access the phylogenetic affinity of O. kurilensis with a more variable and likely informative marker, we assembled a dataset using sequences of the ITS region, and analyzed it separately and in a concatenation with the SSU rDNA data for the same strains (Figure 3). However, ITS data were only available in the GenBank for 15 out of the 50 Oogamochlamydinia accessions, which significantly limited the taxon sampling in this lineage. The topologies of the ITS and SSU+ITS rDNA trees were generally consistent with the SSU-based tree and confirmed the close relationship between O. kurilensis and Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161. Unfortunately, no ITS sequences were available for other Oogamochlamys species; therefore, these analyses could not clarify the genus concept and relationships between O. kurilensis and other species.
Since the C. allensworthii ITS sequences showed the highest similarity to that of O. kurilensis in the BLAST searches (84%), we analyzed the ITS dataset that included 15 accessions of the former species. The C. allensworthii clade was a sister (94/1.00) to a lineage comprising O. kurilensis and Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161 (Figure 4).
For the comparison of the ITS2 secondary structures between the closely related sequences, we have reconstructed the ITS2 secondary structure of O. kurilensis. Figure S2 illustrates the proposed base pairing. According to our predictions, the spacer was characterized by a typical structure with four helices and five single-stranded domains. Approximately 90% of the nucleotides were involved in the formation of the helicies in ITS2.
The comparison of the ITS2 secondary structures between O. kurilensis (Figure 5) and its closely related sequences (C. allensworthii Flamingo U66942, C. allensworthii LCH-15 AF033284, Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161, Gymnomonas nepalensis NIES-3572) showed that these algae have similar patterns of bulges and terminal loops (Figure 5). The helix I in O. kurilensis and C. allensworthii was shorter than those in other sequences, and the helix IV in O. kurilensis differed from others in terms of a longer helical part and shorter terminal loop (five pairs and five bases vs. three pairs and seven to eleven bases). We found eleven compensatory base changes (CBCs) and six hemi-compensatory base changes (hCBCs; Figure 5) in every helical domain. O. kurilensis differed from the most similar C. allensworthii in three hCBCs in the ITS2 (Helix II: U-G → U-A at positions 14–25 and C-G → U-G at positions 9–30; Helix IV: G-U → G-C, at position 2–14; Figure 5). The specific CBC and hCBC patterns in helices II and III may indicate that O. kurilensis and the American strain (CCAP 11/161) are different species of the same genus Oogamochlamys.

3. Discussion

In the present study, a novel Chlamydomonas-like biflagellated green alga, named Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov., was described from the soil of Iturup Island (Russia) based on an integrative approach. SSU rDNA sequence comparisons (Figure 2 and Figure S1) confidently placed this species in the Oogamochlamydinia clade. The gene sequence data were not conclusive in resolving the generic affiliation of the new species by placing it into a weakly supported clade that included representatives of four genera and four unnamed Chlamydomonas strains (Figure 2). Moreover, the most sampled in this clade genus Oogamochlamys was resolved paraphyletic. The non-monophyly of Oogamochlamys in our analyses contradicts earlier studies based on a limited taxon sampling [3,14] but agrees with the later, more inclusive phylogenies [9,11,12]. The lack of support for Oogamochlamys was likely due to a low (1–3%) SSU rDNA sequence divergence between its species. The absence of ITS rDNA data for representatives of the Oogamochlamys species precluded the application of this more variable marker to confirm the affinity of O. kurilensis to the genus.
Nevertheless, we can conclude that the new species is a member of the RL clade within Oogamochlamydinia [13]. This polygeneric lineage is characterized by a wide range of morphologies that were used to delineate genera and species, and we mostly rely on phenotypic features in assigning the strain from Kurils. The two wall-less genera, Hapalochloris and Gymnomonas, could be excluded from consideration because of their distinct feature [11,13]. The remaining Rhysamphichloris and Oogamochlamys are similar in terms of their presence of several pyrenoids in the cell, but somewhat differ in their chloroplast morphology, which are Amphichloris-type with anterior and posterior thickenings, and deep-cup-shaped, respectively [3,11]. The morphology of the chloroplasts described in O. kurilensis (cup-shaped, with one basally positioned pyrenoid) does not fit the diagnosis of both genera but is similar to that in the wall-less Hapalochloris and Gymnomonas.
Chloroplast morphology and the number of pyrenoids are polymorphic features, and could hardly be used to differentiate volvocalean genera. In contrast to that, the type of sexual reproduction is believed to be a good generic character for Chlamydomonas-like algae [3,5]. However, in the Oogamochlamydinia, like many other lineages, no sexual reproduction was observed in six out of the eight genera of which it is comprised. Namely, Lobochlamys was characterized by isogamous, homo- or heterothallic sexual reproduction, and Oogamochlamys by homothallic proterandric oogamy [3]. The new species shares the latter mode of sexual reproduction with other Oogamochlamys species; therefore, we assigned O. kurilensis to this genus.
It should be noted that a likely paraphyly of the Oogamochlamys clade that was resolved in recent SSU rDNA-based analyses, as well as the close relationship between oogamous O. kurilensis and anizogamous C. allensworthii suggested in the ITS rDNA data (Figure 4), questions the concept of the genus Oogamochlamys. Apparently, the unresolved relationship between four genera and additional lineages in the in the RL clade [13] require further scrutiny to define generic boundaries. If confirmed, the alliance of O. kurilensis and C. allensworthii may indicate a diversity of sexual reproduction modes in Oogamochlamys that requires a diagnosis adjustment or erection of a new genus.
Some phenotypic features of our taxon correspond to the diagnoses of other members of the genus Oogamochlamys (e.g., the shape of the papilla, and the number and distribution of contractile vacuoles in O. zimbabwiensis; the chloroplast surface with fine ridges in O. ettlii; the number of spermatozoids in the gametangium in O. gigantea; Table 1) but their combination clearly differentiates O. kurilensis. Moreover, the size of the mature vegetative cells and the flagellar length of this species are the smallest in the genus. The shape of the mature vegetative cells of O. kurilensis (oval to cylindrical–oviform) is also not typical for Oogamochlamys. The most noticeable morphological differences between the new species and the rest of the genus is the presence of a single pyrenoid in both the mature vegetative cells and the zoospores, while in most other species of Oogamochlamys, the number of pyrenoids varies from two to twenty (Table 1). It was shown that the presence of pyrenoids in Chlorogonium depends on the culture conditions (autotrophic or heterotrophic; [17]), but our strain was examined under the same autotrophic conditions as other accessions of Oogamochlamys studied by Pröschold et al. [3] and no variation in the number of pyrenoids was detected.
The composition and structure of the Oogamochlamys lineage (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4) suggest the possible presence of a number of undescribed species in the genus. These are Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161 and two highly similar strains from Japan (NIES-2317 and NIES-2318) that comprised a clade with O. kurilensis. Based on the CCAP 11/161 images (https://www.ccap.ac.uk/catalogue/strain-11-161?mfp=8-genus-name%5BChlamydomonas%5D&limit=100; accessed on 2 June 2023), we can conclude that this alga is similar to our strain in terms of the cell morphology. In addition to that, another related morpho-species, C. allensworthii, likely includes at least five biological species [5].
Oogamochlamys representatives are reported relatively unfrequently in biodiversity assessments and these records likely suggest their somewhat restricted distribution in nature. Three species have previously been recorded in southern Africa (O. gigantea and O. zimbabwiensis in South Africa and Zimbabwe; O. ettlii only in Zimbabwe). In addition, O. gigantea was found in North America (USA, California, and Texas; [3]; Table 2) as well. Until recently, no Oogamochlamys species were known from Asia, but the finding of O. zimbabwiensis (strain ZL-2012) in Korea (Figure 2) and the new species O. kurilensis in the Kuril Islands (Russia, Sakhalin Region) extends the genus distribution range. Chlamydomonas strains from Japan (NIES-2317 and NIES-2318) that likely represent yet undescribed members of the genus that are closely related to O. kurilensis were also collected in Asia. Chlamydomonas allensworthii, also showing affinity to Oogamochlamys, was found in most continents except Asia and Antarctica [18,19]. All these taxa were found in areas with temperate climate conditions and their distribution ranges in the southern and northern hemispheres are confined to approximately the same latitudes (Table 2).
The species could be tentatively divided into three ecological groups: soil inhabitants (O. ettlii, O. kurilensis, C. allensworthii), soil—benthic (O. gigantea, O. zimbabwiensis, Chlamydomonas sp. (NIES-2317, NIES-2318)), and aquatic (Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161). Thus, they occur in soil and aquatic environments but are not eurybiontic.
Most likely, the small number of sequences of Oogamochlamys indicate their rare occurrence or difficulties in cultivating and identification. Further studies on the ITS structures and ultrastructural features are required for the more complete comparison of Oogamochlamys species and related strains.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Site, Culture Conditions and Light Microscopy

Iturup is the largest island in the Kuril Island arch and belongs to the Southern Kurils. There are 20 volcanoes on Iturup Island; nine of these are active. The climate here is temperate maritime, and is formed under the influence of the currents of the Sea of Okhotsk and the Pacific Ocean, as well as being affected by monsoon activity ([20]; according to Köppen [21]—warm-summer, humid, continental climate (Dfb)). Cambisols, often with high humus content (up to 30% in the upper horizon), is the typical soil type for a major part of Iturup Island [22,23].
A soil sample was collected under the plant communities with Sasa kurilensis (Rupr.) Makino & Shibata, Quercus crispula Blume, Acer tschonoskii Maxim on Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia; 45°09′36″ N, 147°46′37.2″ E) on 3 August 2018. The sampling was carried out using standard methods [24]. A strain of flagellated green algae was isolated from this sample using the micro-pipette method [25], and was cultured in liquid nutrient medium Waris-H [26] at 20–22 °C with a photon fluence of 17.9–21.4 μmol photons·m−2s−1 in a 16:8 h light/dark cycle. The strain was maintained in the culture collection of the Laboratory of Botany in the Federal Scientific Center of East Asian Terrestrial Biodiversity, Russian Federation (strain number VCA-206).
The morphology of the vegetative and reproductive cells was examined using an Olympus BX 53 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Nomarski DIC optics and an Olympus DP27 digital camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The cultures were repeatedly examined throughout their life cycle stages, i.e., in cultures of different ages after transfer.
For the confocal laser scanning microscopy, 0.01% Triton X-100 was added to the culture of living algal cells to increase their membrane permeability. Then, the cells were fixed in FAA (3.7%: formaldehyde: 50% ethanol: 5% acetic acid) for 20 min, then rinsed twice and counterstained with DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) at a final concentration of 5 µg/mL. After another rinse of the samples, fluorescence was detected with an LSM 710 LIVE confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at the Instrumental Centre of Biotechnology and Gene Engineering of FSCEATB FEB RAS. DAPI fluorescence was detected at 410–497 nm and the autofluorescence of the chloroplasts was recorded in the additional emission channel after 600 nm using the Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC M27 objective with digital zoom. Three-dimensional files of the captured images were recorded and analyzed using ZEN microscope software.

4.2. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

For the DNA analysis, the cultures were harvested during the exponential growth phase and concentrated via centrifugation. Total genomic DNA was extracted, as described previously by Abdullin et al. [27]. For the amplification of the SSU rDNA gene and ITS region, the following primers were used: 82F (5′-GAAACTGCGAATGGCTC-3′; [28]), ITS4R (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′; [29]). PCR was performed using an Encyclo Plus PCR kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) with a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and the parameters described by Mikhailyuk et al. [30]. The PCR products were purified using an ExoSAP-IT PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and sequenced in both directions using an ABI 3500 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with a BigDye terminator v.3.1 sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), and the same primers were used for the PCR, plus SSU528F-800 (5′-CGGTAATTCCAGCTCC-3′; [31]), 920F (5′-GAAACTTAAAKGAATTG-3′; [32]), n1400R (5′-GGTAGGAGCGACGGGCGGTGTGTAC-3′; [33]), and Bd18SF1 (5′-TTTGTACACACCGCCCGTCGC-3′; [34]). Sequences were assembled with the Staden Package v.1.4 [35]. The contig sequence covering the partial SSU rDNA and the complete ITS region was deposited in GenBank under accession number OM949811.

4.3. Alignment, Secondary Structure Modeling, and Datasets

In order to clarify the phylogenetic position of the new strain, four datasets were used: (i) the SSU rDNA alignment, based on the dataset of Nakada et al. [9], including 155 taxa and 1695 bp of representatives of the Volvocales and Sphaeropleales, used as an outgroup; (ii) the concatenated dataset of 16 SSU and ITS rDNA sequences (2438 bp); (iii) the ITS rDNA dataset of 16 sequences (703 bp) of the Oogamochlamydinia clade and its sister lineage, Reinhardtinia, used as an outgroup; (iv) the ITS rDNA dataset of 31 sequences (540 bp) of the Oogamochlamydinia clade and C. allensworthii, with the Reinhardtinia used as an outgroup. The datasets were enriched by all those accessions showing an ultimate similarity to the sequences gained from our strain, as inferred from the BLAST searches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; accessed on 10 January 2023). The sequences were aligned manually in the SeaView program [36].
The Mfold web server (http://www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/rna-folding-form.php; accessed on 20 January 2023; [37]) was used with the default settings to generate the ITS2 rRNA secondary structures, which were then visualized using the program VARNA [38]. An ITS2 model was constructed based on the models of C. reinhardtii and C. allensworthii proposed by Pröschold et al. [39] and Coleman et al. [19], respectively.

4.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was carried out using PAUP 4.0b10 [40]. Bayesian inference (BI) was performed using MrBayes 3.1.2 [41]. In order to determine the most appropriate DNA substitution model for the datasets, the Akaike information criterion (AIC; [42]) was applied with jModelTest 2.1.1 [43]. The GTR + I + G, SYM + I + G and their combination (partition) models were selected as the best fits for our SSU, ITS rDNA, and concatenated datasets, respectively. The ML analysis was done using heuristic searches with a branch-swapping algorithm (tree bisection and reconnection). In the BI, two parallel MCMC runs were carried out for 5 million and 300 thousand generations, sampling every 100 generations for a total of 50,000, 3000, and 3000 samples for the SSU, ITS rDNA, and concatenated datasets, respectively. The convergence of the two chains was assessed, and the stationarity was determined according to the ‘sump’ plot, with the first 25% of samples discarded as a burn-in. The convergence of the stationary distribution was accessed using the ESS values (>200) using Tracer v.1.7.1 [44]. The robustness of the ML trees was estimated using bootstrap percentages (BP; [45]) and posterior probabilities (PP) in the BI. A BP < 50% and PP < 0.95 were not considered. The ML-based bootstrap analysis was inferred using the web service RAxML v.7.7.1 (http://embnet.vital-it.ch/raxml-bb/; accessed on 2 February 2023; [46]).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12193350/s1, Figure S1: ML phylogenetic tree of the Volvocales (model GTR + I + G) showing position of the new strain based on SSU rDNA sequence data (1695 aligned positions of 155 sequences) with expanding of collapsed clades. See Figure 2 legend for details. Figure S2: ITS2 rRNA secondary structure model for Oogamochlamys kurilensis (VLA-CA-1065, OM949811) based on Mfold predictions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, supervision, and project administration, V.Y.N. and S.R.A.; culture collection, strain setup and culturing, experiment, and microscopic analysis, V.B.B.; data analyses, S.R.A., A.Y.N. and V.Y.N.; writing—original draft preparation, V.Y.N., S.R.A. and A.Y.N.; writing—review and editing, A.A.G.; molecular and phylogenetic analyses, A.Y.N. and V.Y.N.; visualization, V.Y.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, RSF No. 21-14-00196; https://rscf.ru/en/project/21-14-00196/; accessed on 1 June 2023.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. In addition, the data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Eugenia M. Bulakh for collecting soil samples, and Tatyana Yu. Gorpenchenko (Federal Scientific Center of East Asian Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences) for her help with the confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ettl, H. Die Gattung Chlamydomonas Ehrenberg (Chlamydomonas und die nächstverwandten Gattungen II). Beih. Nova. Hedwigia. 1976, 49, 1–1122. [Google Scholar]
  2. Leliaert, F.; Smith, D.R.; Moreau, H.; Herron, M.D.; Verbruggen, H.; Delwiche, C.F.; De Clerck, O. Phylogeny and Molecular Evolution of the Green Algae. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012, 31, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pröschold, T.; Marin, B.; Schlösser, U.G.; Melkonian, M. Molecular Phylogeny and Taxonomic Revision of Chlamydomonas (Chlorophyta). I. Emendation of Chlamydomonas Ehrenberg and Chloromonas Gobi, and Description of Oogamochlamys Gen. Nov. and Lobochlamys Gen. Nov. In Memory of Hanus Ettl (19311997), Promoter of the Systematics of Thegenus. Protist 2001, 152, 265–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boldina, O.N. Hlamidomonady (Chlamydomonadaceae) Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoj oblasti: Sostoyanie izuchennosti i novye nahodki [Chlamydomonads (Chlamydomonadaceae) of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region: State of research and new findings] Novosti Sist. Nov. Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 2016, 50, 5–22. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pröschold, T.; Leliaert, F. Systematics of the green algae: Conflict of classic and modern approaches. In Unravelling the Algae: The Past, Present, and Future of Algal Systematics; Brodie, J., Lewis, J., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2007; pp. 123–153. ISBN 978-0-8493-7989-5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Manoylov, K.M. Taxonomic identification of algae (morphological and molecular): Species concepts, methodologies, and their implications for ecological bioassessment. J. Phycol. 2014, 50, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buchheim, M.A.; Lemieux, C.; Otis, C.; Gutell, R.R.; Chapman, R.L.; Turmel, M. Phylogeny of the Chlamydomonadales (Chlorophyceae) a comparison of ribosomal RNA gene sequences from the nucleus and the chloroplast. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1996, 5, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nozaki, H.; Misumi, O.; Kuroiwa, T. Phylogeny of the quadriflagellate Volvocales (Chlorophyceae) based on chloroplast multigene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakada, T.; Misawa, K.; Nozaki, H. Molecular Systematics of Volvocales (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta) Based on Exhaustive 18S RRNA Phylogenetic Analyses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fučíková, K.; Lewis, P.O.; Neupane, S.; Karol, K.G.; Lewis, L.A. Order, Please! Uncertainty in the Ordinal-Level Classification of Chlorophyceae. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakada, T.; Tomita, M. Morphology and Phylogeny of a New Wall-Less Freshwater Volvocalean Flagellate, Hapalochloris Nozakii Gen. et Sp. Nov. (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 2017, 53, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nakada, T.; Tomita, M.; Wu, J.-T.; Nozaki, H. Taxonomic Revision of Chlamydomonas Subg. Amphichloris (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae), with Resurrection of the Genus Dangeardinia and Descriptions of Ixipapillifera Gen. Nov. and Rhysamphichloris Gen. Nov. J. Phycol. 2016, 52, 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Watanabe, S.; Nakada, T. Gymnomonas nepalensis gen. et sp. nov. for the naked flagellate strain ‘Nepal’, formerly identified as Dunaliella lateralis (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae). Phycol. Res. 2018, 66, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Watanabe, S.; Mitsui, K.; Nakayama, T.; Inouye, I. Phylogenetic Relationships and Taxonomy of Sarcinoid Green Algae: Chlorosarcinopsis, Desmotetra, Sarcinochlamys Gen. Nov., Neochlorosarcina, and Chlorosphaeropsis (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta)1. J. Phycol. 2006, 42, 679–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shtina, E.A.; Andreyeva, V.M.; Kuzyakina, T.I. Zaseleniye vodoroslyami vulkanicheskikh substratov [Algae settlement of volcanic substrates]. Bot. Zhurnal 1992, 8, 33–42. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Ilchibaeva, K.V.; Kunsbaeva, D.F.; Allaguvatova, R.Z.; Fazlutdinova, A.I.; Polokhin, O.V.; Sibirina, L.A.; Gontcharov, A.A.; Singh, P.; Gaysina, L.A. Preliminary data about algae and cyanobacteria of volcanic soils on Kuril islands. Theor. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 4, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nozaki, H.; Ohta, N.; Morita, E.; Watanabe, M.M. Toward a natural system of species in Chlorogonium (Volvocales, Chlorophyta): A combined analysis of morphological and rbcL gene sequence data. J. Phycol. 1998, 34, 1024–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Starr, R.C.; Marner, F.J.; Jaenicke, L. Chemoattraction of Male Gametes by a Pheromone Produced by Female Gametes of Chlamydomonas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Coleman, A.W.; Jaenicke, L.; Starr, R.C. Genetics and sexual behavior of the pheromone producer Chlamydomonas allensworthii (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 2001, 37, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alisov, B.P. Klimaticheskie Oblasti i Rajony` SSSR [Climatic Regions and Provinces of the USSR]; Geografgiz: Moscow, Russia, 1947; 212p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  21. Köppen, W. Das geographische System der Klimate. In Handbuch der Klimatologie Bd. 1: Teil C; Köppen, W., Geiger, R., Eds.; Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin, Germany, 1936; pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kostenkov, N.M.; Oznobikhin, V.I. Pochvenno-geograficheskoye rayonirovanie Kuril’skikh ostrovov [Soil-geographical zoning of the Kuril Islands]. Vestnik SVNTS DVO RAN 2011, 1, 77–83. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  23. Polokhin, O.V.; Sibirina, L.A. Pochvenniy i rastitel’nyy pokrov ostrova Iturup (Kuril’skiye ostrova) [Soil and Vegetation Cover of Iturup Island (Kuril Islands)]. Sovr. Probl. Nauki. i Obr. 2014, 5, 618. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuzyakhmetov, G.G.; Dubovik, I.E. Metody Izucheniya Pochvennyh Vodorosley [Methods for Studying Soil Algae]; Izdatelstvo RIO BashGU: Ufa, Russia, 2001. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  25. Andersen, R.A. Algal Culturing Techniques; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2005; ISBN 0-12-088426-7. [Google Scholar]
  26. McFadden, G.I.; Melkonian, M. Use of Hepes buffer for microalgal culture media and fixation for electron microscopy. Phycologia 1986, 25, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abdullin, S.R.; Nikulin, A.Y.; Bagmet, V.B.; Nikulin, V.Y.; Gontcharov, A.A. New cyanobacterium Aliterella vladivostokensis sp. nov. (Aliterellaceae, Chroococcidiopsidales), isolated from temperate monsoon climate zone (Vladivostok, Russia). Phytotaxa 2021, 527, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. López-García, P.; Philippe, H.; Gail, F.; Moreira, D. Autochthonous eukaryotic diversity in hydrothermal sediment and experimental microcolonizers at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols—A Guide to Methods and Application; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mikhailyuk, T.; Lukešová, A.; Glaser, K.; Holzinger, A.; Obwegeser, S.; Nyporko, S.; Friedl, T.; Karsten, U. New Taxa of Streptophyte Algae (Streptophyta) from Terrestrial Habitats Revealed Using an Integrative Approach. Protist 2018, 169, 406–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hoef-Emden, K.; Melkonian, M. Revision of the Genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): A Combination of Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Provides Insights into a Long-Hidden Dimorphism. Protist 2003, 154, 371–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Marin, B.; Klingberg, M.; Melkonian, M. Phylogenetic Relationships among the Cryptophyta: Analyses of nuclear-encoded SSU rRNA sequences support the monophyly of extant plastid-containing lineages. Protist 1998, 149, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marin, B.; Palm, A.; Klingberg, M.; Melkonian, M. Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of plastid-containing euglenophytes based on SSU rDNA sequence comparisons and synapomorphic signatures in the SSU rRNA secondary structure. Protist 2003, 154, 99–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goka, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Une, Y.; Kuroki, T.; Suzuki, K.; Nakahara, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Inaba, S.; Mizutani, T.; Hyatt, A.D. Amphibian chytridiomycosis in Japan: Distribution, haplotypes and possible route of entry into Japan. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 4757–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bonfield, J.K.; Smith, K.F.; Staden, R. A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 4992–4999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Galtier, N.; Gouy, M.; Gautier, C. SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: Two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Bioinformatics 1996, 12, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3406–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Darty, K.; Denise, A.; Ponty, Y. VARNA: Interactive drawing and editing of the RNA secondary structure. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1974–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pröschold, T.; Darienko, T.; Krienitz, L.; Coleman, A.W. Chlamydomonas schloesseri sp. nov. (Chlamydophyceae, Chlorophyta) revealed by morphology, autolysin cross experiments, and multiple gene analyses. Phytotaxa 2018, 362, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Akaike, H. A New look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 1974, 19, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. JModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kozlov, A.M.; Darriba, D.; Flouri, T.; Morel, B.; Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4453–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 03350 g001
Figure 1. Light micrographs of general morphology (A,D–I), confocal reconstruction of chloroplast morphology (B), and confocal optical section of the nucleus (C) with a bright-field image-merged fluorescence channel in a Oogamochlamys kurilensis, cell with a nucleus stained with DAPI; (A–C) vegetative cell; (D) zoosporangium; (E) gametangium; (F) spermatozoid; (G) spermatozoid attached to a vegetative cell; (H) zygote; (I) mature zygote. Scale bars: A, D, E, F, G, H, I = 10 µm; B, C = 5 µm.
Figure 1. Light micrographs of general morphology (A,D–I), confocal reconstruction of chloroplast morphology (B), and confocal optical section of the nucleus (C) with a bright-field image-merged fluorescence channel in a Oogamochlamys kurilensis, cell with a nucleus stained with DAPI; (A–C) vegetative cell; (D) zoosporangium; (E) gametangium; (F) spermatozoid; (G) spermatozoid attached to a vegetative cell; (H) zygote; (I) mature zygote. Scale bars: A, D, E, F, G, H, I = 10 µm; B, C = 5 µm.
Plants 12 03350 g001
Plants 12 03350 g002
Figure 2. ML phylogenetic tree of the Volvocales (model GTR + I + G) showing the position of the new strain based on the SSU rDNA sequence data (155 sequences, 1695 aligned positions). Some clades are collapsed. Supports [(BP) > 50% and (PP) > 0.95: ML/BI] are provided above/below the branches. The new strain and branches with 100% BP and 1.00 PP are shown in boldface. The major clade designations follow Nakada et al. [9].
Figure 2. ML phylogenetic tree of the Volvocales (model GTR + I + G) showing the position of the new strain based on the SSU rDNA sequence data (155 sequences, 1695 aligned positions). Some clades are collapsed. Supports [(BP) > 50% and (PP) > 0.95: ML/BI] are provided above/below the branches. The new strain and branches with 100% BP and 1.00 PP are shown in boldface. The major clade designations follow Nakada et al. [9].
Plants 12 03350 g002
Plants 12 03350 g003
Figure 3. Tanglegram (ML) representing the position of the new strain based on the ITS rDNA sequence data (703 aligned positions of 16 sequences) and the SSU+ITS rDNA dataset (2438 aligned positions). See Figure 2 legend for details.
Figure 3. Tanglegram (ML) representing the position of the new strain based on the ITS rDNA sequence data (703 aligned positions of 16 sequences) and the SSU+ITS rDNA dataset (2438 aligned positions). See Figure 2 legend for details.
Plants 12 03350 g003
Plants 12 03350 g004
Figure 4. ML phylogenetic tree (GTR + I + G model) based on ITS rDNA sequence data (540 aligned positions of 31 sequences) showing the close relationship between O. kurilensis and C. allensworthii. See Figure 2 legend for details.
Figure 4. ML phylogenetic tree (GTR + I + G model) based on ITS rDNA sequence data (540 aligned positions of 31 sequences) showing the close relationship between O. kurilensis and C. allensworthii. See Figure 2 legend for details.
Plants 12 03350 g004
Plants 12 03350 g005
Figure 5. ITS2 secondary structure models for the new and related strains based on Mfold predictions. (C. allensworthii Flamingo U66942, C. allensworthii LCH-15 AF033284, O. kurilensis VLA-CA-1065 OM949811, Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161 FR865555, Gymnomonas nepalensis NIES-3572 LC268992). Compensatory (CBCs) and hemi-compensatory base changes (hCBCs) are shown in red and green colors, respectively. Identical bases are highlighted with a thick grey line. Homologous base pairs of helix III are indicated by dashed lines.
Figure 5. ITS2 secondary structure models for the new and related strains based on Mfold predictions. (C. allensworthii Flamingo U66942, C. allensworthii LCH-15 AF033284, O. kurilensis VLA-CA-1065 OM949811, Chlamydomonas sp. CCAP 11/161 FR865555, Gymnomonas nepalensis NIES-3572 LC268992). Compensatory (CBCs) and hemi-compensatory base changes (hCBCs) are shown in red and green colors, respectively. Identical bases are highlighted with a thick grey line. Homologous base pairs of helix III are indicated by dashed lines.
Plants 12 03350 g005
Table 1. Comparison of features characterized Oogamochlamys genus members, including C. allensworthii and the new species, O. kurilensis.
Table 1. Comparison of features characterized Oogamochlamys genus members, including C. allensworthii and the new species, O. kurilensis.
CharacterO. giganteaO. ettliiO. zimbabwiensisO. kurilensis sp. nov.C. allensworthii
Mature vegetative cells
shapebroadly rounded–cylindrical–oviformoval–cylindrical–oviform ellipsoidal to almost spherical
size, μm30–50 × 25–3516–27 × 18–2215–22 × 15–206.1–17.1 × 4.5–9.515 × 11
Cell wallthin
Cell wall papillasmall, roundedbroad, rounded, two
humped or absent		broad, roundedabsent
Flagellar lengthabout as long as the cellabout half of the cellabout as long as the cell
Chloroplast shapecup-shaped parietal, massive, surface with coarse ridgescup-shaped, parietal, massive, surface with fine ridgescup-shaped, parietal, massive, surface with very fine ridgescup-shaped, parietal, massive, surface with fine ridgescup-shaped
Pyrenoids10–16 (–20)3–82–611–3
shapediscontinuous, matrix multipartitend
Eyespot colorpale rednd
shapeelliptic to narrowly elongatedelliptic to narrowly elongated or punctiformelliptic to narrowly elongatedelliptic
position in the chloroplastanterior
Contractile vacuoles2 apical + many (>20), distributed over the whole cell surface2 apical2 apical4 apical
Nucleus positioncentral or slightly anterioranteriornd
Zoospores 4 (2–8)2–42–8
shapenearly sphericalnearly spherical–oviformnd
pyrenoids4–83–62–41nd
size, μm10–1510–125.7–12.4 × 4.0–8.4nd
Sexual reproductionoogamy, homothallic, proterandricanisogamy
Spermatozoids32–64 (rarely 128) 1632–128nd
shapeteardrop-shaped, without cell wall, with two flagella nearly 1.5 times as long as the cell, with two apical contractile vacuoles, chloroplast reduced, pale green, with a distinct eyespot, without pyrenoidround-shaped, without cell wall, with two flagella nearly 1.5 times as long as the cell, chloroplast reduced, pale green, with a distinct eyespot, without pyrenoidteardrop-shaped
size, μm6–10 × 4–64–6 × 3–54.0–4.5 × 3.4–4.06 × 4 and larger
Zygoteornamented with regular, flat-stopped
projections, green to brownish-red		not ornamented, greennot ornamented, green to brownish-red, diameter 13.7–22.4 μmwith a broad, hyaline wall at first, with crenulations forming on the surface later
References[3]This study[18]
Notes: nd—no data.
Table 2. Comparison of climate conditions and habitats of members and potential representatives of the Oogamochlamys genus.
Table 2. Comparison of climate conditions and habitats of members and potential representatives of the Oogamochlamys genus.
SpeciesGeographyClimate Conditions (Köppen 1936)HabitatStrain
O. giganteaAfrica (South Africa) Warm—summer, Mediterranean (Csb) soilSAG 44.91
Africa (Zimbabwe)nd soilSAG 22.98
North America (USA, California)Warm—summer, Mediterranean (Csb) pond soilSAG 21.72
North America (USA, Texas)humid subtropical (Cfa)soilSAG 9.84
O. zimbabwiensisAfrica (South Africa)Warm—summer, Mediterranean (Csb) soilSAG 45.91
Africa (Zimbabwe)nd soilUTEX LB 2214
Africa (Zimbabwe)nd soilSAG 2316
Oogamochlamys sp. (putative, O. zimbabwiensis)Asia (Republic of Korea)Humid, continental (Dwa)bottom sedimentZL-2012
O. ettliiAfrica (Zimbabwe)ndsoilUTEX 2218
O. kurilensisAsia (Russia, Sakhalin Region, Iturup Island)Warm—summer, humid, continental (Dfb)soilVCA-206
Chlamydomonas sp.Asia (Japan, Saitama)Humid, subtropical (Cfa)freshwater (paddy soil)NIES-2317, NIES-2318
Chlamydomonas sp.North America (USA, Minnesota)Warm—summer, humid, continental (Dfb)freshwaterCCAP 11/161
C. allensworthiiNorth America (USA, California)warm—summer, Mediterranean (Csb) soilLCH-15, LCN-9, LCA-74
North America (USA, Texas)Humid, subtropical (Cfa)nd21A, 266
Europe (Germany, Koln) temperate—oceanic (Cfb)ndFlamingo
North America (USA, Nebraska)Humid, continental (Dfa)ndisolate 1 (Neb)
North America (USA, Texas)Hot, semi-arid (BSh)soilisolate 2 (Cat)
Africa (South Africa)Hot, semi-arid (BSh)ndisolate 3 (Krueger)
Australia (Lismore) Humid, subtropical (Cfa)ndisolate 4 (88-10)
South America (Chile, Lago Cisne) subpolar variety of the oceanic (Cfc)ndisolate 5 (Chile)
Oceania (USA, Hawaii)Hot, semi-arid (BSh)ndisolate 6 (Hon2), isolate 7 (Hon9)
North America (USA, California)warm—summer, Mediterranean (Csb) soilUTEX 2718
North America (USA, Texas)Hot, semi-arid (BSh)soilUTEX 2719
Notes: nd—no data.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikulin, V.Y.; Nikulin, A.Y.; Gontcharov, A.A.; Bagmet, V.B.; Abdullin, S.R. Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) from the Soils of Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia). Plants 2023, 12, 3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193350

AMA Style

Nikulin VY, Nikulin AY, Gontcharov AA, Bagmet VB, Abdullin SR. Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) from the Soils of Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia). Plants. 2023; 12(19):3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikulin, Vyacheslav Yu., Arthur Yu. Nikulin, Andrey A. Gontcharov, Veronika B. Bagmet, and Shamil R. Abdullin. 2023. "Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) from the Soils of Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia)" Plants 12, no. 19: 3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193350

APA Style

Nikulin, V. Y., Nikulin, A. Y., Gontcharov, A. A., Bagmet, V. B., & Abdullin, S. R. (2023). Oogamochlamys kurilensis sp. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) from the Soils of Iturup Island (Sakhalin Region, Russia). Plants, 12(19), 3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop