Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Bioactive Compounds and Biological Activities of Five Rose Hip Species Grown in Sicily
Next Article in Special Issue
Device Structure, Light Source Height, and Sunset Time Affect the Light-Trap Catching of Tea Leafhoppers
Previous Article in Journal
Nomenclature and Typification of the Jasione L. (Campanulaceae) Groups from the Eastern Mediterranean Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Institutional Context of Pest Management Science in the Global South
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/plants13010052
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prior Infection by Colletotrichum spinaciae Lowers the Susceptibility to Infection by Powdery Mildew in Common Vetch

by
Faxi Li
1,†,
Rui Zhu
1,†,
Feng Gao
2,* and
Tingyu Duan
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Gansu Vocational College of Agriculture, Lanzhou 730020, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2024, 13(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010052
Submission received: 27 November 2023 / Revised: 20 December 2023 / Accepted: 20 December 2023 / Published: 22 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anthracnose (Colletotrichum spinaciae) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) are important diseases of common vetch (Vicia sativa) and often co-occur in the same plant. Here, we evaluate how C. spinaciae infection affects susceptibility to E. pisi, using sterilized and non-sterilized field soil to test the effect of resident soil microorganisms on the plant’s immune response. Plants infected with C. spinaciae (C+) exhibited a respective 41.77~44.16% and 72.37~75.27% lower incidence and severity of powdery mildew than uninfected (C−) plants. Moreover, the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance were higher in the C− plants than in the C+ plants prior to infection with powdery mildew. These differences were not recorded following powdery mildew infection. Additionally, the activities of superoxide dismutase, polyphenol oxidase, and catalase were higher in the C+ plants than in the C− plants. The resident soil microbiota did not affect the plant responses to both pathogens. By uncovering the mechanistic basis of plant immune response, our study informs integrated disease management in a globally important forage crop.

1. Introduction

Common vetch (Vicia sativa) is a member of the Leguminosae family. It originated from southern Europe and western Asia and is widely cultivated throughout the world [1]. Common vetch is an excellent forage crop that is highly resistant to drought, tolerant to salt, and highly effective at fixing nitrogen. Moreover, it grows quickly and can improve the productivity of pastures when mixed with other forage grasses [2]. Common vetch is a green manure crop that is commonly used in rotation and intercropping production, such as intercropping with fruit trees [3]. Moreover, the plants have been planted to prevent soil erosion [4].
Plant diseases significantly affect agricultural production both directly and indirectly and lead to losses of approximately $40 billion per year worldwide [5]. Common vetch is susceptible to diseases and pathogens, including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Approximately 24 fungal diseases, four bacterial diseases, five viral diseases, and 24 nematodes, including southern root-knot nematodes, have been detected in common vetch [6,7]. However, anthracnose is one of the most common diseases of common vetch. The pathogens that cause anthracnose in this plant include Colletotrichum vicia [8], C. villosum [9], C. sativum [10], C. viciae-sativae [11], C. acutatum [12], C. lentis [13], and C. spinaciae [14]. Colletotrichum species are hemibiotrophic plant pathogenic fungi that feed on live plant tissues in the early stage of infection and dead cells in the plant residues after plant death [15,16]. Anthracnose can cause severe yield losses. For example, it can decrease the plant biomass by 26.90~40.00%, decrease the numbers of effective nodules by 42.25%, and increase the content of jasmonic acid (JA) by 70.34% under greenhouse conditions [17]. Moreover, anthracnose reduces the content of chlorophyll a and b and inhibits the PSII photochemical activity [18]. Colletotrichum spinaciae was detected in Xiahe, Gansu Province, China, in 2019, and it caused a significant reduction in yield from 2019 to 2021. Anthracnose can reduce the shoots and seed yield of common vetch by more than 25.8% and 32.5%, respectively, under field conditions [19].
Powdery mildew is a common fungal disease that affects many plant species, including the Erysiphe pisi infection of common vetch. This disease decreases the ability to conduct photosynthesis, which results in severe yield losses [20,21,22]. Erysiphe pisi is a type of biotrophic parasitic pathogenic fungus that coexists with the host and does not cause its death [16,20,23]. Powdery mildew usually affects the photosynthesis of plants, which leads to yield losses. For example, powdery mildew can cause approximately 20% yield losses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) [24]. Powdery mildew can significantly reduce the net photosynthesis and evapotranspiration compared to in leaves that are not infected. Furthermore, the net photosynthesis can be practically interrupted when the infected area is more than 75% of a young leaf [25]. The induction in activities of enzymes related to defense, such as phenylalanine ammonia lyase, polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and peroxidase (POD), can decrease the natural incidence of powdery mildew infection by 37.2% [26].
Multiple stresses, such as abiotic ones, diseases, and insect pests, simultaneously affect crops in the agricultural system. Moreover, many studies have assessed the interaction between abiotic stress and disease. Most cases have shown that abiotic stress aggravates diseases. For example, salt and water stresses aggravate the susceptibility of faba bean (Vicia faba) to phytopathogenic fungi [27]. Moreover, banana (Musa nana) and grapevine (Vitis vinifera) are more vulnerable to diseases and infections under water stress [28,29]. Furthermore, some studies have analyzed the interactions between pathogens and insects and found that insect pests may positively or negatively affect the prevalence of diseases [19]. In some cases, a pathogenic infection can induce a plant immune response, which renders the plant resistant to the invasion of other pathogens. For example, infection with Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) reduces the exposure of a second insect-vectored pathogen (Erwinia tracheiphila) and the establishment of powdery mildew on Cucurbita pepo [30]. Additionally, infection with Blumeria graminis can elicit immune responses in wheat (Triticum aestivum), such as the expression of defense genes (PAL, PR1, PR2, PR3, PEROX, and NADPHOX), the content of total phenolics, and the activity of related antioxidant enzymes, thus suppressing the development of the English grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) [31]. Scientists have defined these pre-infection interactions as “ecological interference,” which indicates that a primary infection can reduce the rate of contact and development of secondary infections [32]. The previous infection in plant cells can trigger signaling cascades whose functions are implemented through the signaling molecules JA and salicylic acid (SA). The elicited immune system can provide broad-spectrum immunity against subsequent pathogen attacks [33]. However, the interaction between phytopathogenic fungi on forage crops is unclear.
Microbes in the rhizosphere can protect plants against abiotic and biotic stresses. This microbial resource has increasing importance for crop production and a reduction in fertilizer and pesticide inputs [34]. The protection of plants against diseases is one of the most intensively studied microbiome functions and became well known from the discovery of disease-suppressive soils [35]. For example, infection by the foliar downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis promotes the growth of specific microbiota in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana, which indirectly affects the pathogen. These rhizosphere microbial community changes include an enrichment of three beneficial bacteria (Xanthomonas, Stenotrophomonas, and Microbacterium) that help plants to resist subsequent invasion by pathogens [36].
Anthracnose and powdery mildew are common diseases of common vetch that significantly affect the growth and production of this species in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in China. Infection with anthracnose usually begins in July, while powdery mildew occurs in September in this plateau. The two diseases simultaneously occur in middle and late September in the fields of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the synergistic effect of the two diseases on common vetch and assess whether anthracnose affects subsequent infection by powdery mildew. This study was designed to simulate a field anthracnose infection followed by that of powdery mildew to test the effects of anthracnose caused by C. spinaciae on a subsequent powdery mildew infection. We established different soil microbial treatments through the sterilization and non-sterilization of field soil with common vetch growth and determined the effects of the resident soil microorganisms in the field on the response of common vetch to anthracnose and powdery mildew. We proposed the following hypotheses: (1) The synergistic occurrence of anthracnose and powdery mildew severely damages common vetch, and anthracnose renders common vetch non-susceptible to powdery mildew, and (2) the resident field soil microorganisms have a positive effect on the resistance of common vetch to anthracnose and powdery mildew.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants and Pathogens

Vicia sativa “Lanjian No. 2” was obtained from Lanzhou University (Lanzhou, China). This is the primary common vetch cultivar that is recommended by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China and widely planted in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. The anthracnose pathogen was isolated from infected leaves of common vetch in Xiahe County, Gansu Province. The pathogen was isolated from the diseased common vetch in the field and identified as C. spinaciae using morphological, molecular biological, and pathogenicity determination [14]. Powdery mildew occurs naturally in the individual plant pathology greenhouse.
Experimental design. The study was divided into two stages to simulate the mixed infection of anthracnose (occurring annually from July to September) and powdery mildew (occurring annually from August to October) in the greenhouse.
Stage 1: Stage 1 was designed to establish the anthracnose pathogen C. spinaciae-infected (C+) and uninfected (C−) plants for stage 2. In this step, common vetch was either infected or uninfected with C. spinaciae (30 pots for each treatment). The incidence and disease index (DI) of anthracnose were assessed to determine the successful colonization of C. spinaciae on the leaves of common vetch plants.
Stage 2: A fully crossed two-factor experiment was designed, which included C. spinaciae (two levels) × soil (two levels) = four treatments, each with 10 replicate pots. The disease incidence and DI of powdery mildew and the physiological and biochemical indices of common vetch were determined after the spontaneous occurrence of powdery mildew.

2.2. Growth Medium

The common vetch was cultivated in two soils, including field soil (FS) with common vetch, taken from the trial field in Xiahe County, and sterilized field soil (SFS) to establish growth media with resident field soil microorganisms and exclude resident field soil microorganisms, respectively. The soil mixtures were prepared by mixing 25% soil with 75% sand, which was then passed through a 2 mm sieve. The SFS and sands were sterilized using autoclaving twice at 121 °C for 1 h for 3 d and then dried in an oven at 110 °C for 36 h. The pots measured 14 cm (bottom diameter) by 22 cm (height) by 17 cm (top diameter) and contained 2.5 kg of soil.

2.3. Experiment Establishment, Management, and Harvest

Stage 1. The seeds of “Lanjian No. 2” were surface-sterilized for 10 min using 10% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and then washed three times with sterilized distilled water. The treated seeds were placed in sterile Petri dishes that contained sterile filter paper at the bottom and incubated at 25 °C for 48 h to germinate. A total of 12 germinated seeds were planted in each pot and thinned to eight seedlings of a similar size 1 week after emergence for further experiments.
The Colletotrichum spinaciae was grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The conidia of the pathogen were harvested in sterilized water from 30-day-old cultures that had been incubated at 25 °C. The pathogen was inoculated 30 d after planting (DAP) using a spore suspension of C. spinaciae that contained approximately 1.0 × 106 conidia per mL. The numbers of spores in the solution were determined using a direct microscopic counting procedure known as a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber (XB-K-25, Shiya Science and Technology Company, Guangzhou, China). There were 30 pots each of C. spinaciae-infected (C+) and C. spinaciae-uninfected (C−) plants. A suspension (20 mL) was sprayed onto the C+ plant (per pot), and the same volume of sterilized water was used for the C− plants. All the plants were covered with a black plastic bag for 48 h, so they would be moist [37]. The incidence and DI of anthracnose were measured and counted three times at 35, 40, and 45 DAP to determine the success of inoculation.
The severity of anthracnose disease was classified into six different levels based on the percentage area of diseased lesions on the individual leaves: Level 0, no symptoms; Level 1, ≤10%; Level 2, 10.1–25.0%; Level 3, 25.1–50.0%; Level 4, 50.1–75.0%; and Level 5, 75.1–100%. The following equation was used to calculate the DI:
DI = ∑ ( n × l ) N × L × 100
where l, L, n, and N represent the level of severity, the highest severity level, the number of leaves for each severity level, and the total number of leaves, respectively.
Stage 2. Powdery mildew naturally infected all the plants at 46 DAP. The incidence and DI of powdery mildew were then measured three times at 46, 51, and 56 DAP. The number of total plants per pot and those diseased with powdery mildew were counted to calculate the incidence by dividing the number of diseased plants by the total number of plants. Moreover, all the leaves were counted to assess the DI of powdery mildew. The classification and methods of calculating disease severity were the same as those described in stage 1 for anthracnose, we used the percentage area of powdery mildew instead of diseased lesions on the individual leaves.
The photosynthetic indicators, including the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and concentration of intercellular carbon dioxide, were determined every 8 d from 40 DAP onward (40, 48, and 56 DAP). A GFS-3000 portable photosynthetic measuring system (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) was used to measure the photosynthetic indicators.
The plants in each treatment were mixed and sampled randomly before harvest. There were four replicates, and each had more than 2 g of fresh leaves. These fresh leaf samples were used to measure the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT). Approximately 0.1 g of fresh leaf sample was required for each enzyme assay as described by Li et al. [38]. Coomassie brilliant blue and uranine fluorescence were used to observe the powdery mildew mycelia as described by Wang et al. [39].
The aboveground parts of the plants in every pot were obtained at 60 DAP using scissors close to the soil and separated into different envelopes, dried, and weighed. The fresh weight of each pot was determined immediately, and the dry weight was determined after drying to a constant weight.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± SE. SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze all the data. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the treatment effects on the incidence, DI, photosynthetic indices, and biomass production with 10 replicates, except for the defense enzyme activities, which had four replicates. Independent-sample t-tests were used to determine significant differences between the C+ and C− plants in all the parameters and defined at the 95% confidence level. A Spearman’s correlation heatmap was plotted using Origin 2022 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Plant Fresh Weight and Dry Weight

The fresh and dry weights did not differ significantly between the C− and C+ plants (p > 0.05) (Figure 1). The fresh weight was lower in the SFS than in the FS (relative decrease of 18.50%) (p < 0.05) (Figure 1a). In contrast, the dry weight was not significantly different across all the treatments (p > 0.05) (Figure 1b), which indicated that the soil microorganisms had a positive effect on the absorption of water by common vetch.

3.2. Disease Incidence and Disease Index

The Colletotrichum spinaciae-uninfected plants (C−) did not have anthracnose symptoms, while the C+ plants showed typical symptoms 5 d after inoculation with the pathogen. The disease incidence of common vetch anthracnose increased daily and reached 86.25~92.50% (Figure 2a). The DI showed a pattern similar to that of the disease incidence and reached 28.98~31.08 (Figure 2b). The DI and disease incidence did not differ significantly among the different soil treatments (p > 0.05).
Powdery mildew occurred at 46 DAP. The incidence of powdery mildew increased over time. Moreover, the incidence was significantly higher in the C− plants (92.08~98.33%) than in the C+ plants (24.17%~55.83%) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3a). However, the incidence of powdery mildew did not differ significantly among the different soils under the same treatment (p > 0.05). The DI of powdery mildew was lower in the C+ plants (1.81~8.09) than in the C− plants (12.85~31.84) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3b). The soil treatment had no impact on the DI of powdery mildew in both the C+ and C− plants (p > 0.05).

3.3. Photosynthetic and Physiological Indices

The net photosynthetic rate was higher in the C− plants than in the C+ plants by 156.06%~359.30% at 40 DAP (before powdery mildew occurrence) (p < 0.05). However, the net photosynthetic rate was lower in the C− plants than in the C+ plants by 6.93~18.01% at 56 DAP (after powdery mildew infection for 10 d) (p > 0.05). The effect of powdery mildew alone was similar to the combined effect of anthracnose and powdery mildew infections (Figure 4a).
Anthracnose and powdery mildew significantly affected the plant transpiration rate. For example, the transpiration rate was significantly lower in the C+ plants than in the C− plants (relative difference: 87.18~293.43%) at 40 DAP (p < 0.05) (Figure 4b).
Anthracnose and powdery mildew significantly affected the plant stomatal conductance. The stomatal conductance was significantly higher in the C− plants than in the C+ plants by 90.63%~312.63% at 40 DAP (p < 0.05). The average stomatal conductance was slightly higher in the C− plants than in the C+ plants by only 3.01% after powdery mildew infection for 10 d (p > 0.05) (Figure 5a).
Anthracnose and powdery mildew did not significantly affect the intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration of common vetch. The C− and C+ plants had different intercellular CO2 concentrations on 40 DAP and 56 DAP (relative decrease; 12.49% and 12.94%, respectively). In contrast, the intercellular CO2 concentration did not differ significantly across the treatments (p > 0.05) (Figure 5b).

3.4. Enzyme Activities Related to Plant Defense

The enzymes related to defense in the C+ and C− plants were determined after powdery mildew infection. The activities of SOD, PPO, and CAT were higher in the C+ than in the C− plants (relative increase; 147.88–148.21%, 182.50–196.25%, and 98.81–264.91%, respectively) (p < 0.05) (Figure 6a,b,d). The activity of POD increased significantly in the C+ plants compared with the C− plants in the FS (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the SFS (p > 0.05) (Figure 6c). The values of the activities of SOD, PPO, and CAT were higher in the SFS than in the FS, which indicated that soil microorganisms had a negative impact on the activities of the plant defense enzymes (p < 0.05).

3.5. Correlation Analysis between the Level of Infection and the Photosynthetic Index, Biomass, and Defense Enzymes

There was a significant positive correlation between the disease incidence and DI for both anthracnose and powdery mildew (p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the disease incidence and DI of anthracnose and powdery mildew (p > 0.05). The disease incidence and DI of powdery mildew significantly positively correlated with the dry weight (p < 0.05) and significantly negatively correlated with the activities of POD, PPO, CAT, and SOD (p < 0.05). In addition, the disease incidence of powdery mildew significantly positively correlated with the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (ICDC) (p < 0.05) (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

The interactions between synergistic diseases, such as anthracnose and powdery mildew, can lead to unexpected dynamics in plant microbial multi-pathogen systems. In this study, the response of common vetch infected with C. spinacia to the natural development of powdery mildew was analyzed using a greenhouse experiment. The plants infected with C. spinacia were less likely to be infected with powdery mildew. Moreover, the plants that were first infected with C. spinacia had a lower severity of powdery mildew symptoms, with a higher activity of defense-related enzymes (SOD, PPO, POD, and CAT) involved in induced systemic resistance by anthracnose. Our research confirmed the pre-infection interactions of the anthracnose pathogen to be “ecological interference,” which reduced the contact rate and development to secondary infection by powdery mildew. In addition, the damage caused by powdery mildew infection alone and that caused by the combined infection with anthracnose and powdery mildew were not significantly different.
The photosynthetic indices were lower in the C+ plants than in the C− plants before powdery mildew infection, which indicated that anthracnose decreases the photosynthesis of common vetch. Anthracnose may affect photosynthesis by reducing the contents of chlorophyll a and b and inhibiting the PSII photochemical activity [18]. Castro et al. found that the Colletotrichum sp. decreases light capture and the assimilation of CO2 in the mesophyll, thus decreasing the photosynthetic performance [40]. Additionally, lower gaseous exchanges in anthracnose-infected plants could be owing to the reduction in leaf pigments, thus decreasing photosynthesis [41].
The photosynthetic indices of the C+ and C− plants were approached gradually after powdery mildew infection, indicating that powdery mildew suppresses the photosynthesis of common vetch. Watanabe et al. found that severe infection with powdery mildew significantly reduced the photosynthetic activity of the sprouts [42]. Powdery mildew reduces photosynthesis by reducing the green leaf area through its visual lesions and influencing the gas exchange of the remaining green leaf tissues [43]. Herein, there were interactions between powdery mildew and anthracnose in common vetch, which could also be affected by multiple fungal pathogens. However, Lopes and Berger (2001) showed no interaction between rust and anthracnose [44], which indicates the diversity of plant responses to infection with multiple pathogens.
The disease incidence and DI of powdery mildew differed significantly between the C+ and C− plants, which indicated a significant interaction between the two diseases mediated by common vetch under greenhouse conditions. The C+ plants infected with pathogens were less susceptible to powdery mildew than the C− plants, which indicates that common vetch is more tolerant to powdery mildew after C. spinaciae infection. Similarly, Harth et al. found that the infection of powdery mildew decreased in Cucurbita pepo after inoculation with Zucchini yellow mosaic virus [30]. However, the soil did not induce significant variation in the development of powdery mildew. Moreover, the leaves of common vetch that had been pre-infected with anthracnose had substantially fewer powdery mildew mycelia, possibly owing to the necrotic reactions of the plant hypersensitive response. Pre-infection with C. spinaciae causes the death of plant tissue, which reduces the sites of pathogen infection and the absorption of carbon from plants [45], which was similar to the microscopic observations (Figures S1 and S2).
Plant diseases can cause serious losses in yield. For example, anthracnose causes serious losses in the yield of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) [46], Chinese goldthread (Coptis chinensis) [37], alfalfa (Medicago sativa) [47], plum (Pyrus spp.) [48], qing qian liu (Cyclocarya paliurus) [49], and other crops in China. Similarly, powdery mildew reduces the production of Euonymus japonicas [50] and wheat [51] spiny bitter gourd (Momordica cochinchinensis) [52], and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) [53]. Notably, powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe pisi, Erysiphe trifolii, and Erysiphe baeumleri can cause 25–50% yield losses [54]. A previous study found that infection with anthracnose can significantly decrease the growth and biomass of common vetch [37]. Herein, the biomass of the aboveground fresh and dry weights was not significantly different between the C+ and C− plants after infection with powdery mildew, which confirmed the strong interaction between anthracnose and powdery mildew. The infection of powdery mildew on common vetch is reduced by anthracnose infection. Generally, the leaf abrasions caused by inoculation can provide an easier avenue for the fungus to invade the plants [30]. However, powdery mildew ingress seemed to be greatly reduced after anthracnose had already caused damage to common vetch in our study. The two diseases caused the same damage as anthracnose alone, which suggested that anthracnose could use some mechanism to prevent powdery mildew invasion. Our hypothesis was partially upheld.
Plant defense enzymes strongly respond to pathogens [55]. The damage to the plant leaves caused by pathogens leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [56], which play a key role in plant defense. The accumulation of ROS can damage the plant tissue [57]. Plants produce antioxidative enzymes, such as SOD, CAT, POD, and PPO, to maintain the homeostasis of ROS by scavenging redundant ROS [58]. In this study, the activities of enzymes related to defense were significantly higher in the C+ plants than in the C− plants. Moreover, infection with anthracnose upregulated the defense genes and produced several enzymes related to defense [37,59,60,61,62].
Anthracnose induced a strong defense response and increased the activities of enzymes related to defense, thus inhibiting the growth of powdery mildew. This explains why powdery mildew was more severe in the C− plants than in the C+ plants. Agents derived from plants induce resistance to powdery mildew by activating the biochemical defense of the treated leaves, such as by increasing the activities of PPO and POD [63]. This was further supported by an analysis based on the Spearman’s correlation matrix of the activities of the plant defense enzymes and the severity of powdery mildew. Chitosan and potassium reduced the severity of powdery mildew and increased the activities of PPO, POD, chitinase, and β-1,3-glucanase in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) plants [64]. This mechanism related to plant defense enzymes has been used to develop resistance to plant powdery mildew. For example, an extract of the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum significantly regulated the activity of defense-related enzymes, such as CAT, POD, and PPO, to induce the active defense of squash (Cucurbita moschata) [65], strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) [23], and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) against powdery mildew [66].
The defense response in the C+ plants induced by anthracnose may also lead to the production of some secondary metabolites related to defense, such as phenolics and flavonoids [26]. These metabolites and enzymes related to defense can improve the resistance to powdery mildew. Moreover, this has been confirmed at the physiological, biochemical, and genetic levels. Moreover, the levels of expression of the genes related to hormone signaling, POD, and cell wall degradation under powdery mildew infection are higher in the resistant varieties than in the susceptible varieties [67].
The resident soil microbiota did not affect the occurrence of anthracnose and the subsequent natural development of powdery mildew. Equally, our hypothesis that common vetch grown with resident soil microorganisms would have less severe disease was not supported. The plants grown in unsterilized soil had higher fresh weights and lower activities of plant defense enzymes, which suggested that the soil microorganisms had a positive effect on the absorption of water by plants and plant defense to diseases. Recent research has pinpointed the concept that enhanced nutrient uptake, improved root architecture, and protection of the host against biotic and abiotic stress are key functions of the soil microbiome [68]. Further research is required to clarify the microbial mechanism in complex plant–fungal pathogen interactions.
In conclusion, this study showed that anthracnose infection can establish “ecological interference”, thus reducing the contact rate and development of powdery mildew infection. The defense response and increase in the activities of defense-related enzymes, including SOD, PPO, POD, and CAT, induced by anthracnose infection can thus improve the plant immune response to powdery mildew. The physiological and biochemical changes confirmed the interactive effect between anthracnose and powdery mildew in common vetch. The resident soil microbiota from the growth of common vetch in the field had no significant impact on the severity of plant disease, but they increased the activities of the enzymes related to plant defense and showed a potential function to improve plant disease resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13010052/s1, Figure S1: Morphological structures of powdery mildew observed by commassie brilliant blue staining. a: mycelium structure of C− plant leaf; b: mycelium symptoms of C+ plant leaf; Figure S2: Morphological structures of powdery mildew observed by uranine fluorescence staining. a: mycelium structure of C− plant leaf; b: mycelium symptoms of C+ plant leaf.

Author Contributions

Writing of original draft: F.L. and R.Z.; investigation: F.L.; graph and statistics: F.L., R.Z. and F.G.; funding acquisition and revising of manuscript: T.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the China Modern Agriculture Research System (CARS-22 Green Manure).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Nan, Z.B.; Abd El-Moneim, A.M.; Larbi, A.; Nie, B. Productivity of vetches (Vicia spp.) under alpine grassland conditions in China. Trop. Grassl. 2006, 40, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beyaz, R. Impact of gamma irradiation pretreatment on the growth of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) seedlings grown under salt and drought stress. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2020, 2, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dong, R.; Shen, S.H.; Jahufer, M.Z.Z.; Dong, D.K.; Luo, D.; Zhou, Q.; Chai, X.T.; Luo, K.; Nan, Z.B.; Wang, Y.R.; et al. Effect of genotype and environment on agronomical characters of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2019, 66, 1587–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharaiha, R.K.; Ziadat, F.M. Alternative cropping systems to control soil erosion in the arid to semi-arid areas of Jordan. Arid. Land Res. Manag. 2008, 22, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ab Rahman, S.F.S.; Singh, E.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Schenk, P.M. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sci. 2018, 267, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, S.; Li, Y.Z. Research advances on fungal diseases of Vicia sativa. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2016, 25, 203–214. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Q.; Ma, L.X.; Duan, T.Y.; Nan, Z.B. Research progress on non-fungal diseases of Vicia sativa. Pratacult. Sci. 2019, 36, 1578–1590. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dearness, J. New and noteworthy fungi-IV. Mycologia 1926, 18, 236–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weimer, J.L. A new species of Colletotrichum on vetch. Phytopathology 1945, 35, 12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Horn, N.L. Acomparative study of two species of Colletotrichum on Vetch. Phytopathology 1952, 42, 670–674. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sawada, K. Descriptive catalogue of Taiwan (Formosan) fungi. Agric. Taiwan. Univ. 1959, 8, 268. [Google Scholar]
  12. Reed, P.J.; Dickens, J.S.W.; O’neill, T.M. Occurrence of anthracnose (Colletotrichum acutatum) on ornamental lupin in the United Kingdom. Plant Pathol. 1996, 45, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, S.; Li, Y.Z. First report of common vetch anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lentis in China. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Q.; Duan, T.Y.; Nan, Z.B. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum spinaciae on Vicia sativa in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2138–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, W. Sexual Genetic Characteristics of Colletotrichum structicola. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Williams, M.; Herman, M. Fighting for Their Lives: Plants and Pathogens. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding, T.T.; Wang, X.Y.; Nie, B.; Zhang, W.Z.; Duan, T.Y. Effect of anthracnose on the growth, physiology, and biochemistry in Vicia sativa. Pratacult. Sci. 2019, 36, 2569–2579. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, H.; Tang, M.J.; Guo, H.W.; Zhang, G.Z.; Gu, Q.; Yuan, Y.W.; Sheng, L.; Zhou, H.K.; Liu, Z. Photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll fluorescence in anthracnose infected tea plants. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2020, 24, 531–537. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Y.D.; Nan, Z.B.; Matthew, C.; Wang, Y.J.; Duan, T.Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus changes alfalfa (Medicago sativa) metabolites in response to leaf spot (Phoma medicaginis) infection, with subsequent effects on pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) behavior. New Phytol. 2023, 239, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Glawe, D.A. The powdery mildews: A review of the world’s most familiar (yet poorly known) plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2008, 46, 27–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dreiseitl, A. A novel way to identify specific powdery mildew resistance genes in hybrid barley cultivars. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Merry, A.; Barry, K. Mechanisms of powdery mildew resistance of wheat—A review of molecular breeding. Plant Pathol. 2020, 69, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liang, P. Powdery Mildew Adapts to a Specialized In Vivo Nutritional Lifestyle through the Contraction of Carbohydrate Metabolism Pathways and Diversification of Effector Molecules. Ph.D. Thesis, Hainan University, Haikou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pearce, W.L.; VanSanford, D.A.; Hershman, D.E. Partial resistance to powdery mildew in soft red winter wheat. Plant Dis. 1996, 80, 1359–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pap, P.; Stojnic, S.; Nikolic, N.; Orlovic, S.; Markovic, M.; Vasic, V.; Stevanov, M. Impact of Erysiphe alphitoides (Griffon & Maubl.) U. Braun & S. Takam. on leaf physiological parameters in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) saplings. Balt. For. 2014, 20, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bajpai, S.; Shukla, P.S.; Asiedu, S.; Pruski, K.; Prithiviraj, B. A biostimulant preparation of brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum suppresses powdery mildew of strawberry. Plant Pathol. J. 2019, 35, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Haddoudi, I.; Mhadhbi, H.; Gargouri, M.; Barhoumi, F.; Romdhane, S.B.; Mrabet, M. Occurrence of fungal diseases in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under salt and drought stress. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 159, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ochola, D.; Ocimati, W.; Tinzaara, W.; Blomme, G.; Karamura, E.B. Effects of water stress on the development of banana Xanthomonas wilt disease. Plant Pathol. 2015, 64, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guilpart, N.; Roux, S.; Gary, C.; Metay, A. The trade-off between grape yield and grapevine susceptibility to powdery mildew and grey mould depends on inter-annual variations in water stress. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 234, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harth, J.E.; Ferrari, M.J.; Tooker, J.F.; Stephenson, A.G. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus infection limits establishment and severity of powdery mildew in wild populations of Cucurbita pepo. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, Z.W.; Liu, F.H.; Tan, X.L.; Zhang, Z.F.; Zhu, J.Y.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, T.X. Infection of powdery mildew reduces the fitness of grain aphids (Sitobion avenae) through restricted nutrition and induced defense response in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rohani, P.; Green, C.J.; Mantilla-Beniers, N.B.; Grenfell, B.T. Ecological interference between fatal diseases. Nature 2003, 422, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jones, J.D.G.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Carrion, V.J.; Cordovez, V.; Tyc, O.; Etalo, D.W.; de Bruijn, I.; de Jager, V.C.L.; Medema, M.H.; Eberl, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Involvement of Burkholderiaceae and sulfurous volatiles in disease-suppressive soils. ISME J. 2018, 12, 2307–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Raaijmakers, J.M.; Mazzola, M. Soil immune responses soil microbiomes may be harnessed for plant health. Science 2016, 352, 1392–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Berendsen, R.L.; Vismans, G.; Yu, K.; Song, Y.; de Jonge, R.; Burgman, W.P.; Burmolle, M.; Herschend, J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1496–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ding, H.X.; Cheng, H.H.; Li, J.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Peng, L.J. First report of Colletotrichum boninense causing anthracnose on goldthread (Coptis chinensis) in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1538–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, H.S.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, S.J.; Zhang, W.H. Principle and Techniques of Botanic, Chemical and Physiological Experiments, 1st ed.; Senior Education Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, P.; Luan, F.S.; Chen, K.N.; Dou, B.Q. Comparison of staining effects of four staining techniques for observation of Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Mycosystema 2008, 27, 673–678. [Google Scholar]
  40. Castro, G.L.S.; Silva Junior, D.D.; Bueno, A.C.S.O.; Silva, G.B. Anthracnose in acai palm leaves reduces leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2017, 42, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lobato, A.K.S.; Goncalves-Vidigal, M.C.; Vidigal Filho, P.S.; Andrade, C.A.B.; Kvitschal, M.V.; Bonato, C.M. Relationships between leaf pigments and photosynthesis in common bean plants infected by anthracnose. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2010, 38, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Watanabe, M.; Kitaoka, S.; Eguchi, N.; Watanabe, Y.; Satomura, T.; Takagi, K.; Satoh, F.; Koike, T. Photosynthetic traits and growth of Quercus mongolica var. crispula sprouts attacked by powdery mildew under free-air CO2 enrichment. Eur. J. For. Res. 2014, 133, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moriondo, M.; Orlandini, S.; Giuntoli, A.; Bindi, M. The effect of downy and powdery mildew on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaf gas exchange. J. Phytopathol. 2005, 153, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lopes, D.B.; Berger, R.D. The effects of rust and anthracnose on the photosynthetic competence of diseased bean leaves. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pitsili, E.; Phukan, U.J.; Coll, N.S. Cell death in plant immunity. CSH Perspect. Biol. 2020, 12, a036483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cong, Y.L.; Hou, J.; Liu, L.P.; Liu, Z.Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, X.M.; Hu, T.J.; Liu, F.; Yu, Y. First report of anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum truncatum on the velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hu, J.L.; Zheng, M.Z.; Dang, S.Z.; Shi, M.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.Z. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LYZ69 against anthracnose of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Phytopathology 2021, 111, 1338–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, Y.; Jiang, T.; Xu, H.; Xu, G.; Qian, G.; Liu, F. Characterization of Lysobacter spp. strains and their potential use as biocontrol agents against pear anthracnose. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zheng, X.R.; Zhang, M.J.; Shang, X.L.; Fang, S.Z.; Chen, F.M. Etiology of Cyclocarya paliurus anthracnose in Jiangsu Province, China. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 613499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, J.G.; Chi, M.Y.; Sun, X.M.; Qian, H.W.; Liang, W.X.; Zhou, X.F. First report of powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe alphitoides on Euonymus japonicas and its natural teleomorph stage in China. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, L.; Yang, B.Y.; Li, S.; Guo, A.H. Disease-weather relationships for wheat powdery mildew under climate change in China. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 155, 1239–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chai, A.L.; Guo, W.T.; Kang, H.J.; Wu, C.L.; Li, B.J. First report of powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera xanthii on Momordica cochinchinensis in China. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pei, D.L.; Zhang, Q.C.; Guo, Y.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Yu, Z. First report of powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera fusca on Helianthus tuberosus in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fondevilla, S.; Rubiales, D. Powdery mildew control in pea. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, B.H.; Guo, W.L.; Yang, H.L.; Li, Q.F.; Zhou, J.G.; Li, X.Z. Photosynthetic properties and biochemical metabolism of Cucurbita moschatagenotypes following infection with powdery mildew. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 102, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Behr, M.; Humbeck, K.; Hause, G.; Deising, H.B.; Wirsel, S.G.R. The hemibiotroph Colletotrichum graminicola locally induces photosynthetically active green islands but globally accelerates senescence on aging maize leaves. Mol. Plant Microbe 2010, 23, 879–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Scandalios, J.G. Oxidative stress: Molecular perception and transduction of signals triggering antioxidant gene defenses. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2005, 38, 995–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, H.; Ullah, F.; Zhou, D.X.; Yi, M.; Zhao, Y. Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Padder, B.A.; Kamfwa, K.; Awale, H.E.; Kelly, J.D. Transcriptome profiling of the Phaseolus vulgaris—Colletotrichum lindemuthianum pathosystem. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Utsumi, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Kurotani, A.; Yoshida, T.; Mochida, K.; Matsui, A.; Ishitani, M.; Sraphet, S.; Whankaew, S.; Asvarak, T.; et al. Cassava (Manihot esculenta) transcriptome analysis in response to infection by the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides using an oligonucleotide-DNA microarray. J. Plant Res. 2016, 129, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mishra, R.; Nanda, S.; Rout, E.; Chand, S.K.; Mohanty, J.N.; Joshi, R.K. Differential expression of defense-related genes in chilli pepper infected with anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 97, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Diniz, I.; Azinheira, H.; Figueiredo, A.; Gichuru, E.; Oliveira, H.; Guerra-Guimaraes, L.; Silva, M.C. Fungal penetration associated with recognition, signaling and defence-related genes and peroxidase activity during the resistance response of coffee to Colletotrichum kahawae. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 105, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Moharam, M.H.A. Induction of defence-related biochemical changes in okra leaves to powdery mildew disease by several plant-derived agents. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2013, 46, 1667–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Soliman, M.H.; El-Mohamedy, R.S.R. Induction of defense-related physiological and antioxidant enzyme response against powdery mildew disease in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) plant by using chitosan and potassium salts. Mycobiology 2017, 45, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hafez, Y.M.; El-Nagar, A.S.; Elzaawely, A.A.; Kamel, S.; Maswada, H.F. Biological control of Podosphaera xanthii the causal agent of squash powdery mildew disease by upregulation of defense-related enzymes. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2018, 28, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sarhan, E.A.D.; Abd-Elsyed, M.H.F.; Ebrahiem, A.M.Y. Biological control of cucumber powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii) (Castagne) under greenhouse conditions. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2020, 30, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, P.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, S. Comparative transcriptomic analyses of powdery mildew resistant and susceptible cultivated cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) varieties to identify the genes involved in the resistance to Sphaerotheca fuliginea infection. Peer J. 2020, 8, e8250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; de Jonge, R.; Berendsen, R.L. The Soil-Borne Legacy. Cell 2018, 172, 1178–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 00052 g001
Figure 1. Fresh (a) and dry (b) weight of common vetch—uninfected (C−) vs. infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate a significant difference between the FS and SFS at the p < 0.05 level. ns means there is no significant difference between FS and SFS.
Figure 1. Fresh (a) and dry (b) weight of common vetch—uninfected (C−) vs. infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate a significant difference between the FS and SFS at the p < 0.05 level. ns means there is no significant difference between FS and SFS.
Plants 13 00052 g001
Plants 13 00052 g002
Figure 2. Anthracnose incidence (a) and disease index (b) of common vetch grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS).
Figure 2. Anthracnose incidence (a) and disease index (b) of common vetch grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS).
Plants 13 00052 g002
Plants 13 00052 g003
Figure 3. Powdery mildew incidence (a) and disease index (b) in common vetch uninfected (C−) and infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). * significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae at the p < 0.05 level on the same date.
Figure 3. Powdery mildew incidence (a) and disease index (b) in common vetch uninfected (C−) and infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). * significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae at the p < 0.05 level on the same date.
Plants 13 00052 g003
Plants 13 00052 g004
Figure 4. Net photosynthetic rate (a) and transpiration rate (b) in common vetch uninfected (C−) and infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). * significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae at the p < 0.05 level on the same date.
Figure 4. Net photosynthetic rate (a) and transpiration rate (b) in common vetch uninfected (C−) and infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). * significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae at the p < 0.05 level on the same date.
Plants 13 00052 g004
Plants 13 00052 g005
Figure 5. Stomatal conductance (a) and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (b) in common vetch infected and uninfected with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). * significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae at the p < 0.05 level on the same date. The soil treatment had no impact on the photosynthetic and physiological indices of common vetch when exposed to anthracnose and powdery mildew (p > 0.05).
Figure 5. Stomatal conductance (a) and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (b) in common vetch infected and uninfected with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). * significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae at the p < 0.05 level on the same date. The soil treatment had no impact on the photosynthetic and physiological indices of common vetch when exposed to anthracnose and powdery mildew (p > 0.05).
Plants 13 00052 g005
Plants 13 00052 g006
Figure 6. Defense-related enzyme activities of SOD (a), PPO (b), POD (c), and CAT (d) in common vetch plants uninfected (C−) vs infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). Different lowercase letter above the bars indicates a significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS) at the p < 0.05 level. CAT, catalase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Figure 6. Defense-related enzyme activities of SOD (a), PPO (b), POD (c), and CAT (d) in common vetch plants uninfected (C−) vs infected (C+) with Colletotrichum spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS). Different lowercase letter above the bars indicates a significant difference between common vetch infected and uninfected with C. spinaciae grown in field soil (FS) and sterilized field soil (SFS) at the p < 0.05 level. CAT, catalase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Plants 13 00052 g006
Plants 13 00052 g007
Figure 7. Heatmap based on the Spearman’s correlation matrix of the biomass of fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), and the activities of POD, PPO, CAT, and SOD at harvest. The profiles before harvest include the photosynthetic index of net photosynthetic rate (NPR) and stomatal conductance (SC), transpiration rate (TR) and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (ICDC), the anthracnose incidence (AI) and anthracnose disease index (ADI), and the powdery mildew incidence (PMI) and powdery mildew disease index (PMDI). CAT, catalase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase. * statistical difference the two variables that correspond to the small grid at the level of 0.05 (0.01 < p ≤ 0.05). ** statistically significant difference at the level of 0.01 (0.001 < p ≤ 0.01). *** extremely significant statistical difference at the level of 0.001 (0.0001 < p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 7. Heatmap based on the Spearman’s correlation matrix of the biomass of fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), and the activities of POD, PPO, CAT, and SOD at harvest. The profiles before harvest include the photosynthetic index of net photosynthetic rate (NPR) and stomatal conductance (SC), transpiration rate (TR) and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (ICDC), the anthracnose incidence (AI) and anthracnose disease index (ADI), and the powdery mildew incidence (PMI) and powdery mildew disease index (PMDI). CAT, catalase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase. * statistical difference the two variables that correspond to the small grid at the level of 0.05 (0.01 < p ≤ 0.05). ** statistically significant difference at the level of 0.01 (0.001 < p ≤ 0.01). *** extremely significant statistical difference at the level of 0.001 (0.0001 < p ≤ 0.001).
Plants 13 00052 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, F.; Zhu, R.; Gao, F.; Duan, T. Prior Infection by Colletotrichum spinaciae Lowers the Susceptibility to Infection by Powdery Mildew in Common Vetch. Plants 2024, 13, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010052

AMA Style

Li F, Zhu R, Gao F, Duan T. Prior Infection by Colletotrichum spinaciae Lowers the Susceptibility to Infection by Powdery Mildew in Common Vetch. Plants. 2024; 13(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Faxi, Rui Zhu, Feng Gao, and Tingyu Duan. 2024. "Prior Infection by Colletotrichum spinaciae Lowers the Susceptibility to Infection by Powdery Mildew in Common Vetch" Plants 13, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010052

APA Style

Li, F., Zhu, R., Gao, F., & Duan, T. (2024). Prior Infection by Colletotrichum spinaciae Lowers the Susceptibility to Infection by Powdery Mildew in Common Vetch. Plants, 13(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop