Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Salt Stress on the Morphological and Some Biochemical Characteristics of Solanum lycopersicum L. Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Braiding Fruits and Flowers as a Wish of Prosperity and Victory over Death in the Carved Festoons of Ancient Rome
Previous Article in Journal
Infraspecific Variation in Silene Seed Tubercles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/plants13101417
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological Characterization of Fossil Vitis L. Seeds from the Gelasian of Italy by Seed Image Analysis

by
Mariano Ucchesu
1,
Edoardo Martinetto
2,
Marco Sarigu
3,*,
Martino Orrù
3,
Michela Bornancin
2 and
Gianluigi Bacchetta
3
1
Institute of Evolution Sciences of Montpellier (ISEM) UMR 5554, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France
2
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Torino, Italy
3
Centro Conservazione Biodiversità (CCB), Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente (DISVA), Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Viale Sant’Ignazio da Laconi, 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(10), 1417; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101417
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 9 May 2024 / Accepted: 17 May 2024 / Published: 20 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The discovery of well-preserved fossil Vitis L. seeds from the Gelasian stage in Italy has provided a unique opportunity to investigate the systematics of fossilized Vitis species. Through seed image analyses and elliptical Fourier transforms of fossil Vitis seeds from the sites Buronzo−Gifflenga and Castelletto Cervo II, we pointed out a strong relationship to the group of extant Eurasian Vitis species. However, classification analyses highlighted challenges in accurately assigning the fossil grape seeds to specific modern species. Morphological comparisons with modern Vitis species revealed striking similarities between the fossil seeds and V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris, as well as several other wild species from Asia. This close morphological resemblance suggests the existence of a population of V. vinifera sensu lato in Northen Italy during the Gelasian. These findings contributed to our understanding of the evolution and the complex interplay between ancient and modern Vitis species.

1. Introduction

The Vitaceae family consists of approximately 14 genera and 900 taxa distributed in different areas of the world, including Asia, Africa, Australia, and some Pacific islands, with a few genera located in temperate regions [1].
The genus Vitis L. comprises approximately 60 species, with at least 14 species and three named hybrid taxa native to North America and Caribbean region, one species complex in Europe (including the domesticated grape V. vinifera subsp. vinifera, and the wild V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris), and 37 species in China [2,3,4]. Phylogenetic analyses have confirmed the monophyletic nature of Vitis, consisting of two subgenera: subgenus Muscadinia Planch. (two species), found primarily in the southeastern United States, the West Indies, and Mexico, and subgenus Vitis, which encompasses the majority of species with a wide distribution across the Northern Hemisphere [2,3,4].
Phylogenetic studies conducted by Liu et al. [3] allowed us to reconstruct the origin of the genus Vitis. According to the results of this study, that used five plastid and two nuclear markers, it has been highlighted that the Ampelocissus-Vitis clade is composed of five main lineages, within which Vitis included two subgenera, each as a monophyletic group. In the same work, it is stated that Vitis originated in North America at approximately 39.4 Ma and subsequently migrated to Eurasia in the late Eocene (37.3 Ma), while, according to the study by Wan et al. [2], the divergence of the two subgenera Euvitis Planch. and Muscadinia Planch. took place approximately 18 Ma and was followed by the spreading and differentiation of the species, which became more evident during the tectonic and climatic changes of the Quaternary Period (starting from 1.3 Ma).
During the Pleistocene cold intervals, the populations of grapevine were isolated, producing consequential genetic diversification through allotropic speciation [5], as Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi (hereafter, V. vinifera sylvestris) was found to be a sister to all Asian species and to be one of the many oldest living Eurasian species [6]. Even if seeds very similar to those of V. vinifera sylvestris are known before the major Pleistocene glaciations, it does not seem to be correct to apply the name of this subspecies to such fossils. In the case of sound evidence of a close relation to the living taxon, a possibility would be to name them V. vinifera sensu lato.
In interglacial periods, important redistributional phenomena occurred repeatedly, as did the isolation of plants in areas prone to adverse conditions (shelter), which has been fundamental to the evolution of the species [7,8]. The Caucasus, the Iberian Peninsula, Italy and Sardinia could have played a key role in protecting the genetic diversity of V. vinifera sylvestris and thus allowing the quick colonization of Central and Northern Europe during the postglacial period, when those places were subject to the range expansion of this taxon [9]. Climatic refugia [10] and vectors such as men, birds, foxes, bears, and turtles played key roles in the recolonization of a wide range of habitats and surfaces in the Mediterranean Basin and a limited number of places in Central Europe [9,11,12].
Vitis seeds exhibit specific morphological characteristics and small morphological modifications often reflect infrafamilial relationships that could be used to determine evolutionary and phytogeographic divergence [13]. The morphological characteristics of seeds in the genus Vitis, such as the dorsal chalaza and a pair of depressions called ventral infolds, have been systematically studied [13,14,15,16,17].
A particularly critical set of fossil seeds of Vitis, which occurs abundantly in the Neogene of Europe, was indicated as similar to the extant V. vinifera sylvestris [18,19,20]. Kirchheimer [21], based on morphological characteristics, identified as “Vitis cf. silvestris Gmelin” the fossil Vitis seeds from several European localities, e.g., the Upper Pliocene layers of Reuver in Limburg (The Netherlands), the Pliocene lignite-bearing deposits of the Wetterau (Hesse, Germany), and the Pliocene layers of Kroscienko (Neumarkt, Poland). Later, the same author [18] proposed, in a much more unclear treatment without illustrations, a new fossil-species name, V. parasylvestris Kirchh., for fossil seeds similar to the extant V. vinifera sylvestris. In a separate popular publication [22], the same author figured two fossil seeds only from the ventral side but failed to indicate the name V. parasylvestris. However, in his comprehensive book [19], he considered that these two seeds were the types and that the species name was validly published and should be applied to all of the Neogene records of seeds similar to those of V. vinifera sylvestris. Such an approach was later criticized by Mai and Walther [23] and Geissert et al. [20]. These authors accepted the fossil-species V. parasylvestris but pointed out that this name should only be applied to a limited number of Neogene fossils, those in which “the chalaza and the dorsal side are very different [in comparison to V. vinifera sylvestris], but also the prolongation of the basis and the ventral invaginations are otherwise” [23]. Fossil seeds which referred to the extant taxon “V. sylvestris” occur in the Upper Miocene, according to Mai and Walther [23], only in Eastern Europe. Conversely, in the Pliocene and Early Pleistocene, they are widely distributed in all European territory and occur above the present northern limit of V. vinifera sylvestris in the Holsteinian and Eemian intergacials.
Overall, the differential characters of V. parasylvestris and “V. sylvestris” were never described with an acceptable precision, and, in those fossil assemblages that provided hundreds of seeds, the two types are mixed and linked by intermediate forms (e.g., in the Mio-Pliocene “Saugbaggerflora”) [20]. Indeed, further studies on specimen-rich fossil assemblages of seeds similar to those of V. vinifera sylvestris would be needed.
Recently, different studies conducted by the seed image analysis technique confirmed the importance of identifying both modern and archaeological grape seeds [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] and we deemed it useful to carry out a seed image analysis on non-archaeological fossil assemblages that consisted approximately of one hundred specimens. In the Italian fossil seed collections, this requirement was only fulfilled by Early Pleistocene seed assemblages from the Cervo River section, in NW Italy. Approximately 1 km south of Castelletto Cervo, in the province of Biella (Italy), the erosion caused by the Cervo River exposed sandy–silty sediments of palaeobotanical interest [37,38]. Within this stratigraphic succession, 242 seeds of the genus Vitis were recovered.
Using a seed image analysis, the aims of this study were to characterize fossil Vitis seeds and to explore the morphological relationships between fossil seeds and modern wild species of the genus Vitis originating from North America, Europe, and Asia. The objectives of the study also extend to questions about the evolutionary and phytogeographic divergences of the genus Vitis.

2. Palaeontological Background of the Study Area

The studied assemblages of fossil Vitis seeds were recovered from two plant-bearing beds of the Cervo River section (Figure 1), cropping out near the villages of Castelletto Cervo and Gifflenga, even if the second locality was named [39] after the largest neighbouring village of Buronzo, and will be referred to here as Buronzo-Gifflenga. In both sites, the sediments are mainly composed of paralic sands, muds, and brown coals with mummified plant remains. The animal fossils are represented only by casts of the autochthonous claim Cerastoderma Poli sp., which is abundant in a single layer and probably lived in a brackish environment. Plant macrofossils include trunks, small stumps, fern rhizomes, and leaf compressions. Mummified fruits and seeds are abundant in a few layers, and the largest specimens can be easily collected on the outcrop surface: fruits of Juglans bergomensis (Bals.-Criv.) A. Massal., and seeds of Euryale Salisb. sp., Magnolia cor R.Ludw., and Quercus L. sp., documented by cupules. A particular layer with Trapa L. sp. fruits is so rich in such remains that it has been named the “Trapa layer” [40]. In the carpological assemblages gathered from the two Vitis-bearing layers («Castelletto Cervo II flora» and «Buronzo-Gifflenga flora»: Figure 1), the “HUTEA” elements [41], which characterize the Pliocene assemblages in northern Italy, are completely lacking. However, several species with exotic affinities are still present: Euryale nodulosa C.Reid & E.Reid, Liriodendron geminatum Kirchheim., Magnolia cor, Juglans bergomensis, Phellodendron elegans C.Reid & E.Reid, and Symplocos cf. paucicostata (C.Reid & E.Reid) Mai & Martinetto.
The Cervo River section, among the Italian stratigraphic sections, is one of the richest in carpological fossil remains and one of the few that provides several stratigraphically superposed assemblages. These have been the object of either preliminary taxonomic analyses [39,40,42,43] or more accurate systematic treatments [37,38]. The lower part of this ca. 220 m-thick succession is dated to the Zanclean based on marine palaeontological records [44], whereas its upper part has no dating elements, apart from the palaeoflora data. The sediments are not suitable for a continuous pollen record because of the long intervals made up of oxidized gravel and sand deposits; thus, only short fine-grained portions of the upper part of the succession have been analyzed by palynologists [45]. The age of the succession, based only on palaeobotanical records, suggested a long-term coverage [39], at least late Zanclean–Gelasian (ca. 4 to 2 Ma), if not late Zanclean–Calabrian (ca. 4 to 1 Ma).
The abundant plant macrofossil assemblages studied thus far in the Cervo River section are widely scattered from top to bottom and plotted within different climatic phases [39]. The floral character of the five lower assemblages is rather homogeneous and shows a typical Zanclean–early Piacenzian composition [46]. Floras from overlaying layers of the Cervo River section (Terzoglio III-Castelletto Cervo I) point to a Piacenzian age according to the biochronological criteria described in Martinetto et al. [38,46]. The upper 50 metres of the Cervo River succession are separated by older layers by a large fault, which introduces a wide, but not precisely quantifiable, gap in the stratigraphic succession. The fault separates two blocks of sediments rich in plant fossils, which are considerably different in the upthrown block (Castelletto Cervo I flora) versus the downthrown block (Castelletto Cervo II and Buronzo−Gifflenga floras).
Plant assemblages of the downthrown block contain some relevant taxa that may be considered as biochronological indicators. In particular, the occurrence of Actinidia, Azolla tegeliensis, Menispermum, and Pseudolarix in the Castelletto Cervo II flora would suggest a Gelasian rather than Calabrian age, and the late Gelasian age (ca. 1.9 Ma) of the younger Buronzo−Gifflenga flora is suggested by the co-occurrence of Azolla tegeliensis and Azolla filiculoides [47]. A thick red palaeosol between the two layers can be associated with a consistent time gap, so that the Buronzo−Gifflenga flora should be at least a few hundred thousand years younger than the Castelletto Cervo II flora (within the time interval of 2.5–1.9 Ma).

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of Fossil Vitis Seeds

To compare the fossil assemblages of the Buronzo–Gifflenga flora and the Castelletto Cervo II flora, a PCA was performed using 24 coefficients (Figure 2). The PC1–PC2 (41.4% of the total variance) biplot showed no clear difference between the two fossil grape seed assemblages: Both were distributed in the centre of the plot (Figure 2).

3.2. Comparison of Fossil Seeds with the Modern Vitis Species

Based on the previous PCA results, both fossil grape seeds were considered a single group and were compared by LDA to two groups of modern Vitis species; one included Eurasian species, while the other included all North American accessions (Table S1).
In the LDA analysis, the fossil grape seeds, considered as an unknown group, were assigned to the group of Eurasian Vitis species, for which 94.3% of the species were correctly classified and only 5.7% were attributed to North American Vitis species (Table 1, Figure 3).
To determine which modern Eurasian Vitis species exhibited a close relationship with the fossil grape seeds, an additional LDA analysis was conducted. The fossil grape seeds were compared with the modern Vitis species from Eurasia considered as individual accessions. The LDA results showed a high similarity to those of V. vinifera sylvestris (41.4%), while the remaining fossil grape seeds were assigned to V. amurensis (11.4%), V. heyneana (11.4%), V. ficifolia (20.0%), and V. romanetii (14.3%) (Table 2, Figure 4).
Finally, to achieve a more accurate classification of fossil grape seeds, a further LDA was conducted, focusing only on the Eurasian species exhibiting a close morphometric correlation with the fossil grape seeds identified in the previous LDA (Table 2). In this case, the LDA revealed that the fossil grape seeds were correctly classified as V. ficifolia with a percentage of 32.9% and V. vinifera sylvestris with a percentage of 32.9%. Furthermore, a portion of the fossil grape seeds was classified as V. amurensis (22.9%), with only a minor portion assigned to V. heyneana and V. romanetii (5.7%) (Table 3, Figure 5).
Subsequently, considering a probability threshold of p ≥ 0.90 for the distribution of fossil seeds in the previous LDA classification, the analysis showed that 37.1% of the fossil seeds were not allocated to any of the five species. However, 25.7% of the fossil seeds were assigned to V. vinifera sylvestris, and 15.7% and 14.3% to V. ficifolia and V. amurensis, respectively. Only 5.7% and 1.4% of the fossil seeds were assigned to V. heyneana and V. romanetii, respectively (Figure 6).
Based on the previous results obtained from the discriminant analysis where grape fossils were mostly assigned to V. vinifera sylvestris, we conducted a further discriminant analysis by comparing the fossil grape seeds with two groups of V. vinifera sylvestris populations from the Western and Eastern ecotype. The first group belonged to the ecotype present in Western Europe (Italy, France, and Spain), while the second group belonged to the ecotype present in Western Asia (Georgia). The LDA results showed a high similarity to the Western ecotype (78.6%), while the remaining fossil grape seeds (21.4%) were assigned to Eastern ecotype (Table 4, Figure 7).

4. Discussion

Fossil seeds belonging to the Vitaceae family are well-represented throughout the European Tertiary, suggesting that there was a widespread distribution of the mother plants [13,19]. Additionally, the occurrence of many separate taxa (e.g., three genera and six fossil-species reported by Czaja [48], particularly in the Miocene [19] suggests a consistent diversification during the Palaeogene. Molecular dating places the origin of Vitis in the Palaeogene, suggesting that the common ancestor of Vitis originated in North America [2]. This hypothesis seems to be supported by the findings of fossil Vitis seeds in the Eocene deposits of Northwestern America, while no evidence comes from Southeast Asian before the Pliocene [2,49]. However, sound evidence for the presence of Vitis in Europe is also provided by Eocene fossil seeds of V. messelensis [50].
The patterns of morphological variation exhibited by seeds of the Vitaceae family may be correlated with intrafamilial relationships; thus, fossil Vitis seeds can be useful in addressing questions about evolutionary and phytogeographic divergences [2].
Since Vitaceae seeds are characterized the presence of both the paired ventral infolds and the dorsal chalaza that are not found in seeds of other families, their identification is quite reliable. While the family-level identification is facilitated by the characteristics just described, assigning them to specific genera or species is rather challenging. Moreover, additional limitations for the exact identification of fossil seeds are due to the limited availability of materials and the poor preservation of fossil remains, which do not retain all seed characteristics [13].
Recent studies, that have employed a morphometric seed image analysis, proved to be effective in distinguishing wild grapes from domestic ones in both modern and archaeological seeds [31,33,34,35,36,51,52]. The same methodology was extended beyond mere species identification, aiming to differentiate groups of domestic grape varieties or specific wild grape populations [24,25,26,28,30,31,33,34,35,36,53,54,55,56].
In this study, we applied a seed image analysis and elliptical Fourier transforms to non-archaeological fossil Vitis seeds, comparing them with a comprehensive database that included species of Vitis from North American and Eurasian origins.
The discovery of well-preserved fossil Vitis seeds in the Buronzo−Gifflenga and Castelletto Cervo II floras of NW Italy, of probable Gelasian age, allowed us to explore, for the first time, the systematics of non-archaeological fossils.
The morphometric comparison of both accessions of fossil grape seeds found in the Buronzo−Gifflenga and Castelletto Cervo II floras revealed that they belong to the same Vitis species. These materials came from two different stratigraphic layers: the seeds from Castelletto Cervo II were found at the base of the succession assigned to the lower part of the Gelasian stage, dating approximately around 2.5–2.2 million years ago, and those from Buronzo−Gifflenga were found in the upper Gelasian layers, with an approximate date of about 2.1–1.9 million years ago. Our analyses showed that the morphology of these fossil seeds remained unchanged for a relevant time, possibly approaching half a million years.
The comparative analysis between the Italian fossil Vitis seeds and the modern materials that had been grouped as Eurasian and North American accessions allowed us to classify the fossil Vitis seeds in the Eurasian species groups. Indeed, according to the results obtained by Wan et al. [2], the divergence between Eurasian and American wild grape species would have occurred approximately 11.2 million years ago, and our findings are in agreement with such a hypothesis, showing that the morphology of the Italian fossil Vitis seeds does not match with the wild Vitis species native to North America. Moreover, a recent genetic analysis established the biogeographic disjunctions of the subgenus Vitis between North America and Eurasia [3].
A further comparative analysis of individual accessions of 11 wild grape species from Eurasia showed that the morphology of fossil Vitis seeds was highly similar to modern V. vinifera sylvestris and four other wild species from Asia (V. ficifolia, V. amurensis, V. heyneana, and V. romanetii). However, when compared with the fossil grape seeds of only these five species, the fossil Vitis seeds appear to be morphologically very similar to V. vinifera sylvestris, and to two Asian wild grape species (V. amurensis and V. ficifolia). Upon further analysis, where we considered a classification probability threshold of p ≥ 0.90, LDA showed that a high percentage of the fossil Vitis seeds were assigned to the V. vinifera sylvestris. The same analysis also showed that a high percentage of specimens was not assigned to any of the modern Vitis species. This could be related to the distortion in the morphology of the fossil seeds, which prevented an accurate classification of the samples.
However, our study confirms the presence of the genus Vitis with morphological characteristics attributable to the extant V. vinifera sylvestris in the Italian Gelasian deposit. Based on the results obtained from our study, it is plausible to consider that the fossil Vitis seeds found in the Gelasian layers of northern Italy may have belonged to the lineage of the present Eurasian wild grapevine and, in particular, with the current populations’ ecotype present in Western Europe.
However, we cannot assert with absolute certainty that they belonged to Vitis vinifera L. subsp. sylvestris, since this subspecies could be the result of a bottleneck effect due to various population geographic isolation processes that occurred over the last 400,000 years [57]. The study of Zecca et al. [6] demonstrated that the diversification of wild grapes is a continuous and complex process that has involved both the Neogene and the Quaternary periods, encompassing both geographical and climatic forces.
Therefore, we deem it appropriate to classify these fossil seeds as Vitis vinifera L. sensu lato. The above-cited identification of various fossil grape seeds apparently similar to those of modern European wild grape, in the European Pliocene (see Introduction), suggests that our Gelasian specimens may not represent the oldest fossil record of V. vinifera sensu lato in Europe.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Modern Grape Seed Accessions

A total of 536 modern grape seeds were obtained from 17 Vitis species; 11 taxa from Asia and Europe (hereafter Eurasian) and 6 species from North America were used as reference materials for comparison with fossil seeds (Table S1, Figure 8). Modern materials were obtained from the collection of Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution de Montpellier (ISEM), University of Montpellier, (France), Sardinian Germplasm Bank (BG-SAR) of the University of Cagliari (Italy), Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University of Boston (Massachusetts, USA), Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) of Quedlinburg (Germany), and from Nat’l Clonal Germplasm Rep—Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes (NCGR) of Davis (California, IL, USA).

5.2. Fossil Grape Seed Accessions

The fossil seeds analyzed in this study display central chalaza positioned on the dorsal surface, a clearly visible chalaza-apex groove, and short linear ventral infolds, all of which closely align with the characteristics of the genus Vitis [13,14].
The fossil diaspores of Vitis consisted of 202 seeds found in the section that yielded the Buronzo−Gifflenga flora and 40 seeds found in the section that yielded the Castelletto Cervo II flora (Figure 1). Each set of seeds was extracted by a single sediment sample collected from a definite layer. These samples were processed with 5% hydrogen peroxide to improve sediment disaggregation and determine a partial floatation of the fossil seeds. After the reaction was complete, the floating fraction was sieved separately from the sunken material (for a final mesh size of 0.3 mm). Finally, fruits, seeds, and related organs were picked from the residue of both fractions. The sediment volume of the samples analyzed approached 20 dm3.
To minimize classification errors, we selected fossil specimens that showed completely intact morphology (presence of beak, and absence of deformation or breakage). In total, 70 well-preserved fossil Vitis seeds were utilized (Figure 9).

5.3. Morphometric Analysis

Digital images of dorsal views of modern and fossil grape seeds were acquired using a flatbed scanner (Epson Perfection V600 photo, Suwa, Japan), with a digital resolution of 600 dpi for a scanning area not exceeding 1024 × 1024 pixels [58]. All the images were converted to black silhouettes using the software package ImageJ v. 1.54 (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij (accessed on 30 March 2024), and outline analyses were performed using elliptical Fourier transforms (EFTs) following the method described in Terral et al. [53]. This method allows us to describe the geometry of the seed boundary and converts the outline of an object into shape descriptors (Fourier coefficients = EFDs) [59]. The EFT transforms (x; y) co-ordinates of the outline into “Fourier coefficients”, which are then treated as multivariate variables. Initially, 360 equidistant points were sampled along the curvilinear abscissa. Subsequently, the outlines underwent normalization for size, rotation, position, and the first point. Consistent with previous studies [60], the first six harmonics were employed to describe each view, resulting in 24 coefficients (four coefficients per harmonic, for one view) useful for discriminating between Vitis species. This decision, based on six harmonics, strikes a balance between accurately describing shape (capturing more than 95% of the total harmonic power) and minimizing measurement errors, which tend to increase with harmonic rank [60]. The outline analyses were conducted using ImageJ.

5.4. Statistical Analysis

To investigate the overall morphological variation of fossil seeds under study, principal component analysis (PCA) was first applied. After, focusing on uncorrelated PCA scores, stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was applied using leave-one-out cross-validation. This approach is commonly used to classify/identify unknown groups characterized by quantitative and qualitative variables [61], finding the combination of predictor variables with the aim of minimizing the within-class distance and maximizing the between-class distance simultaneously, thus achieving maximum class discrimination [62]. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software v. 20.0 (Statistical Package for Social Science) (SPSS, Inc., for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA).

6. Conclusions

This research represents the first study in which seed image analyses and elliptical Fourier transforms were applied for the characterization of fossil Vitis seeds.
Morphological comparisons with modern Vitis species unveiled remarkable resemblances between the fossil seeds and V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris, alongside several other wild species from Asia. This close morphological similarity implies the presence of a population of V. vinifera sensu lato in Northern Italy during the Gelasian period. In this work, we have demonstrated the potential of seed image analysis to be successfully applied to fossil plant materials and proved how this methodology has been able to clarify information regarding the identification of fossil Vitis seeds.
The validity of this methodology is closely related to two important factors that must be taken into consideration when we want to characterize fossil materials: The first is the quantity of the materials; since the results are obtained on a statistical basis, it is essential to be in possession of a sufficiently large number of both fossil and modern materials. The second aspect is the quality of the material, which must not show excessive morphological deformations that could produce inaccurate parameters that could affect the results.
We hope that this work may stimulate further research in this field and contribute to understanding the evolutionary and phytogeographic divergences for Vitis and other fossil taxa.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13101417/s1, Table S1: Modern Vitis species seeds utilized in the study. The botanical nomenclature follows World Flora Online (WFO) https://wfoplantlist.org/ (accessed on 30 March 2024).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.U., E.M., M.S., M.O. and G.B.; methodology, M.U., E.M., M.S., M.O. and G.B.; plant material collection, M.U., E.M., M.S., M.O. and G.B.; morphometric analysis and statistical analysis, M.U., M.S. and G.B.; validation, M.U., E.M., M.S., M.B. and G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.U., E.M., M.S. and G.B.; writing—review and editing, M.U., E.M., M.S., M.O., M.B. and G.B.; visualization, M.U., E.M., M.S., M.O., M.B. and G.B.; supervision, G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work of M. Ucchesu received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement (No 101019563—VITALY).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Kathryn Richardson and Michael Dosmann from Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) of Quedlinburg (Germany), Nat’l Clonal Germplasm Rep—Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes (NCGR) of Davis (California, USA), Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution de Montpellier (ISEM), University of Montpellier, (France), and David Maghradze from National Wine Agency of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia for providing access to the collections of modern wild Vitis seeds used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Soejima, A.; Wen, J. Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on three chloroplast markers. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wan, Y.; Schwaninger, H.R.; Baldo, A.M.; Labate, J.A.; Zhong, G.Y.; Simon, C.J. A phylogenetic analysis of the grape genus (Vitis L.) reveals broad reticulation and concurrent diversification during Neogene and Quaternary climate change. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, X.Q.; Ickert-Bond, S.M.; Nie, Z.L.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, L.Q.; Wen, J. Phylogeny of the Ampelocissus–Vitis clade in Vitaceae supports the New World origin of the grape genus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 95, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. This, T.; Lacombe, T.; Thomas, M.R. Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends Genet. 2006, 22, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Willis, K.J.; Niklas, K.J. The role of Quaternary environmental change in plant macroevolution: The exception or the rule? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2004, 359, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zecca, G.; Abbott, J.R.; Sun, W.B.; Spada, A.; Sala, F.; Grassi, F. The timing and the mode of evolution of wild grapes (Vitis). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 62, 736–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bennett, K.D. Milankovitch cycles and their effects on species in ecological and evolutionary time. Paleobiology 1990, 16, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bennett, K.D. Evolution and Ecology: The Pace of Life, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. Grassi, F.; De Mattia, F.; Zecca, G.; Sala, F.; Labbra, M. Historical isolation and Quaternary range expansion of divergent lineages in wild grapevine. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 95, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Médail, F.; Diadema, K. Glacial refugia influence plant diversity patterns in the Mediterranean Basin. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grassi, F.; Labra, M.; Imazio, S.; Ocete Rubio, R.; Failla, O.; Scienza, A.; Sala, F. Phylogeographical structure and conservation genetics of wild grapevine. Conserv. Genet. 2006, 7, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mabberley, D.J. Mabberley’s Plant-Book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classifications and Uses, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, I.; Manchester, S.R. Seed morphology of modern and fossil Ampelocissus (Vitaceae) and implications for phytogeography. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 1534–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tiffney, B.H.; Barghoorn, E.S. Fruits and seeds of the Brandon Lignite. I. Vitaceae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 1976, 22, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jacquat, C.; Martinoli, D. Vitis vinifera L.: Wild or cultivated? Study of the grape pips found at Petra, Jordan; 150 B.C.–A.D. 40. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 1999, 8, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rivera, D.; Miralles, B.; Obón, C.; Carreño, E.; Palazón, J.A. Multivariate analysis of Vitis subgenus Vitis seed morphology. Vitis 2007, 46, 158–167. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong, F.; Karsai, I.; Liu, Y.-S. Vitis seeds (Vitaceae) from the late Neogene Gray Fossil Site, northeastern Tennessee USA. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2010, 162, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kirchheimer, F. Weitere mitteilungen über fossile Rebengewächse. Wein Rebe 1940, 22, 280–291. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirchheimer, F. Die Laubgewächse der Braunkohlenzeit; Veb Wilhelm Knapp Verlag: Halle, Germany, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  20. Geissert, F.; Gregor, H.J.; Mai, D.H. Die “Saugbaggerflora” eine Frücht- und amenflora aus dem Grenzbereich Miozän–Pliozän von Sessenheim im Elsass (Frankreich). Doc. Nat. 1990, 57, 1–208. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kirchheimer, F. Beiträge zur nåheren Kenntnis der Vitaceen-Samenformen tertiären Alters. Planta 1938, 28, 582–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kirchheimer, F. Bemerkenswerte Funde del’ Mastixioideen-Flora. Braunkohle 1941, 40, 610–617. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mai, D.H.; Walther, H. Die pliozänen Floren von Thüringen, Deutsche Demokratische Republik. Quartärpaläontologie 1988, 7, 55–297. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bonhomme, V.; Terral, J.F.; Zech-Matterne, V.; Ivorra, S.; Lacombe, T.; Deborde, G.; Kuchler, P.; Limier, B.; Pastor, T.; Rollet, P.; et al. Seed morphology uncovers 1500 years of vine agrobiodiversity before the advent of the Champagne wine. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pagnoux, C.; Bouby, L.; Ivorra, S.; Petit, C.; Valamoti, S.M.; Pastor, T.; Picq, S.; Terral, J.F. Inferring the Agrobiodiversity of Vitis vinifera L. (Grapevine) in Ancient Greece by Comparative Shape Analysis of Archaeological and Modern Seeds. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2015, 24, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pagnoux, C.; Bouby, L.; Valamoti, S.M.; Bonhomme, V.; Ivorra, S.; Gkatzogia, E.; Karathanou, A.; Kotsachristou, D.; Kroll, H.; Terral, J.F. Local Domestication or Diffusion? Insights into Viticulture in Greece from Neolithic to Archaic Times, using Geometric Morphometric Analyses of Archaeological Grape Seeds. J. Arch. Sci. 2021, 125, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bouby, L.; Figueiral, I.; Bouchette, A.; Rovira, N.; Ivorra, S.; Lacombe, T.; Pastor, T.; Picq, S.; Marinval, P.; Terral, J.F. Bioarchaeological Insights into the Process of Domestication of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) during Roman Times in Southern France. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bouby, L.; Wales, N.; Jalabadze, M.; Rusishvili, N.; Bonhomme, V.; Ramos-Madrigal, J.; Evin, A.; Ivorra, S.; Lacombe, T.; Pagnoux, C.; et al. Tracking the history of grapevine cultivation in Georgia by combining geometric morphometrics and ancient DNA. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 2021, 30, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bonhomme, V.; Allen, S.E.; Pagnoux, C.; Valamoti, S.M.; Ivorra, S.; Bouby, L. Early viticulture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Greece: Looking for the best traditional morphometric method to distinguish wild and domestic grape pips. In Cooking with Plants in Prehistoric Europe and Beyond; Sidestone Press: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  30. Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Venora, G.; Bacchetta, G. Computer vision as a method complementary to molecular analysis: Grapevine cultivar seeds case study. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2012, 335, 602–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Lovicu, G.; Venora, G.; Bacchetta, G. Morphological characterisation of Vitis vinifera L. seeds by image analysis and comparison with archaeological remains. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2013, 22, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Venora, G.; Bacchetta, G. Seed morpho-colorimetric analysis by computer vision: A helpful tool to identify grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2015, 21, 508–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ucchesu, M.; Orrù, M.; Grillo, O.; Venora, G.; Usai, A.; Serreli, P.F.; Bacchetta, G. Earliest evidence of a primitive cultivar of Vitis vinifera L. during the Bronze Age in Sardinia (Italy). Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2015, 24, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ucchesu, M.; Orrù, M.; Venora, G.; Paglietti, G.; Ardu, A.; Bacchetta, G. Predictive method for correct identification of archaeological charred grape seeds: Support for advances in knowledge of grape domestication process. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ucchesu, M.; Ivorra, S.; Pastor, T.; Bouby, L. Comparison of image acquisition techniques and morphometric methods to distinguish between Vitis vinifera subspecies and cultivars. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ucchesu, M.; Orrù, M.; Sau, S.; Sarigu, M.; D’Hallewin, G.; Ucchesu, M.; Sau, S.; Orrù, M.; Sarigu, M. Gli archeosemi raccontano: L’uva e il vino della Sardegna nuragica. In Sa Massaria Ecologia Storica dei sistemi di Lavoro Contadino in Sardegna; Serreli, G., Melis, R.T., French, C., Sulas, F., Eds.; ISEM-Istituto di Storia dell’Europa Mediterranea: Cagliari, Italy, 2017; pp. 371–384. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cavallo, P.; Martinetto, E. Flore carpologiche del Pliocene di Castelletto Cervo (Biella). Boll. Mus. Regionale. Sci. Nat. 2001, 18, 277–343. [Google Scholar]
  38. Martinetto, E.; Monegato, G.; Irace, A.; Vaiani, S.C.; Vassio, E. Pliocene and Early Pleistocene carpological records of terrestrial plants from the southern border of the Po Plain (northern Italy). Rev. Palaeobot. Palyno. 2015, 218, 148–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Martinetto, E. Studies on some exotic elements of the Pliocene floras of Italy. Palaeontogr. Abt. B 2001, 259, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martinetto, E.; Festa, C. Frutti e semi fossili del Biellese. DocBi 2013, 2013, 169–188. [Google Scholar]
  41. Martinetto, E.; Momohara, A.; Bizzarri, R.; Baldanza, A.; Delfino, M.; Esu, D.; Sardella, R. Late persistence and deterministic extinction of humid thermophilous plant taxa of East Asian affinity (HUTEA) in southern Europe. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2017, 467, 211–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Martinetto, E. Significato Cronologico e Paleoambientale dei Macrofossili Vegetali Nell’inquadramento Stratigrafico del “Villafranchiano” di Alcuni Settori del Piemonte (Italia NW). Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ferrero, E.; Merlino, B.; Provera, A.; Martinetto, E. Associazione a molluschi marini e vegetali terrestri del Pliocene di Castellengo (Biella, Italia NW). Rend. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 2005, 2, 87–108. [Google Scholar]
  44. Aimone, S.; Ferrero Mortara, E. Malacofaune plioceniche di Cossato e Candelo (Biellese, Italia NW). Boll. Mus. Regionale. Sci. Nat. 1983, 1, 276–328. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zanni, M.; Ravazzi, C. Description and differentiation of Pseudolarix amabilis pollen. Palaeoecological implications and new identification key to fresh bisaccate pollen. Rev. Palaeobot. Palyno. 2007, 145, 35–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martinetto, E.; Tema, E.; Irace, A.; Violanti, D.; Ciuto, M.; Zanella, E. High-diversity European palaeoflora favoured by early Pliocene warmth: New chronological constraints from the Ca′ Viettone section, NW Italy. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2018, 496, 248–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Urban, B. Stratigraphische Begriffe für das Quartär des Periglazialraums in Deutschland. J. Quat. Sci. 2007, 56, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Czaja, A. Paleocarpological investigations of the taphocoenoses of the Lower- and Middle Miocene from the opencast mine Berzdorf/Upper Lusatica (Saxony). Palaeontogr. Abt. B 2003, 265, 1–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, I.J.U. History of Vitaceae Inferred from Morphology-Based Phylogeny and the Fossil Record of Seeds; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  50. Collinson, M.E.; Manchester, S.R.; Wilde, V. Fossil fruits and seeds of the Middle Eocene Messel biota, Germany. Abh. Senckenberg Gesell. Naturforsch. 2012, 570, 1–251. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sarigu, M.; Sabato, D.; Ucchesu, M.; Loi, M.C.; Bosi, G.; Grillo, O.; Barros Torres, S.; Bacchetta, G. Discovering Plum, Watermelon and Grape Cultivars Founded in a Middle Age Site of Sassari (Sardinia, Italy) through a Computer Image Analysis Approach. Plants 2022, 11, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Coradeschi, G.; Ucchesu, M.; Dias, E.; Cunha, J.; Baleiras-Couto, M.M.; Ângelo, M.; Alegria Ribeiro, C.; Barrocas Dias, C.; Bacchetta, G. A glimpse into the viticulture of Roman Lusitania: Morphometric analysis of charred grape pips from Torre dos Namorados, Portugal. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2023, 32, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Terral, J.; Tabard, E.; Bouby, L.; Ivorra, S.; Pastor, T.; Figueiral, I.; Picq, S.; Chevance, J.B.; Jung, C.; Fabre, L.; et al. Evolution and history of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) under domestication: New morphometric perspectives to understand seed domestication syndrome and reveal origins of ancient European cultivars. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Martín-Gómez, J.J.; Rodríguez-Lorenzo, J.L.; Gutiérrez del Pozo, D.; Cabello Sáez de Santamaría, F.; Muñoz-Organero, G.; Tocino, Á.; Cervantes, E. Seed Morphological analysis in Species of Vitis and Relatives. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Martín-Gómez, J.J.; Gutiérrez del Pozo, D.; Ucchesu, M.; Bacchetta, G.; Cabello Sáenz de Santamaría, F.; Tocino, Á.; Cervantes, E. Seed morphology in the Vitaceae based on geometric models. Agronomy 2020, 10, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cervantes, E.; Martín-Gómez, J.J.; Gutiérrez del Pozo, D.; Tocino, Á. Seed geometry in the Vitaceae. Plants 2021, 10, 1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dong, Y.; Duan, S.; Xia, Q.; Liang, Z.; Dong, X.; Margaryan, K.; Musayev, M.; Goryslavets, S.; Zdunić, G.; Bert, P.F.; et al. Dual domestications and origin of traits in grapevine evolution. Science 2023, 379, 892–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bacchetta, G.; Grillo, O.; Mattana, E.; Venora, G. Morphocolorimetric characterization by image analysis to identify diaspores of wild plant species. Flora 2008, 203, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kuhl, F.P.; Giardina, C.R. Elliptic fourier features of a closed contour. Comput. Graph. Image Process 1982, 18, 236–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bonhomme, V.; Ivorra, S.; Lacombe, T.; Evin, A.; Figueiral, I.; Maghradze, D.; Marchal, C.; Pagnoux, C.; Pastor, T.; Pomarèdes, H.; et al. Pip Shape Echoes Grapevine Domestication History. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sugiyama, M. Dimensionality Reduction of Multimodal Labeled Data by Local Fisher Discriminant Analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007, 8, 1027–1061. [Google Scholar]
  62. Holden, J.E.; Finch, W.H.; Kelley, K. A Comparison of two-group Classification Methods. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2011, 71, 870–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 01417 g001
Figure 1. Composite stratigraphic log of the sedimentary succession cropping out along the Cervo River. The strata gently slope toward southeast, and, therefore, the oldest deposits (Zanclean) are located in the northwestern part of the valley (Candelo−Cossato), whereas the youngest (Gelasian and/or Calabrian) to the southeast (Castelletto Cervo II and Buronzo−Gifflenga, incl. Vitis layers). Modified from Martinetto and Festa [40]. m, muds; s, sands; g, gravels; GA5 and BU2: labels of the two fossiliferous beds with Vitis seed assemblages.
Figure 1. Composite stratigraphic log of the sedimentary succession cropping out along the Cervo River. The strata gently slope toward southeast, and, therefore, the oldest deposits (Zanclean) are located in the northwestern part of the valley (Candelo−Cossato), whereas the youngest (Gelasian and/or Calabrian) to the southeast (Castelletto Cervo II and Buronzo−Gifflenga, incl. Vitis layers). Modified from Martinetto and Festa [40]. m, muds; s, sands; g, gravels; GA5 and BU2: labels of the two fossiliferous beds with Vitis seed assemblages.
Plants 13 01417 g001
Plants 13 01417 g002
Figure 2. Results of principal component analysis using the 24 coefficients of 60 fossil grape seeds from the Buronzo–Gifflenga flora and 10 fossil Vitis seeds from Castelletto Cervo II flora.
Figure 2. Results of principal component analysis using the 24 coefficients of 60 fossil grape seeds from the Buronzo–Gifflenga flora and 10 fossil Vitis seeds from Castelletto Cervo II flora.
Plants 13 01417 g002
Plants 13 01417 g003
Figure 3. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered an unknown group among the two groups of Vitis species.
Figure 3. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered an unknown group among the two groups of Vitis species.
Plants 13 01417 g003
Plants 13 01417 g004
Figure 4. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered to be an unknown group in the 11 accessions of Eurasian Vitis species.
Figure 4. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered to be an unknown group in the 11 accessions of Eurasian Vitis species.
Plants 13 01417 g004
Plants 13 01417 g005
Figure 5. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered unknown group in the five accessions of Eurasian Vitis species.
Figure 5. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered unknown group in the five accessions of Eurasian Vitis species.
Plants 13 01417 g005
Plants 13 01417 g006
Figure 6. LDA percentage distribution (p ≥ 0.9) of fossil grape seeds according to the allocation to the five Eurasian Vitis species.
Figure 6. LDA percentage distribution (p ≥ 0.9) of fossil grape seeds according to the allocation to the five Eurasian Vitis species.
Plants 13 01417 g006
Plants 13 01417 g007
Figure 7. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered an unknown group among the two ecotype groups of V. vinifera sylvestris. Western ecotype: Spain, France, and Italy; Eastern ecotype: Georgia.
Figure 7. LDA graphical representation of the allocation of fossil grape seeds considered an unknown group among the two ecotype groups of V. vinifera sylvestris. Western ecotype: Spain, France, and Italy; Eastern ecotype: Georgia.
Plants 13 01417 g007
Plants 13 01417 g008
Figure 8. Geographic distribution of Vitis species used in this study and location of the Cervo River section.
Figure 8. Geographic distribution of Vitis species used in this study and location of the Cervo River section.
Plants 13 01417 g008
Plants 13 01417 g009
Figure 9. Representative image of some fossil Vitis seeds from Buronzo-Gifflenga flora used in this work ((a) = dorsal; and (b) = ventral).
Figure 9. Representative image of some fossil Vitis seeds from Buronzo-Gifflenga flora used in this work ((a) = dorsal; and (b) = ventral).
Plants 13 01417 g009
Table 1. Correct classification percentage between the fossil seeds, considered the unknown group, and the two Vitis species group.
Table 1. Correct classification percentage between the fossil seeds, considered the unknown group, and the two Vitis species group.
Eurasian VitisNorth American VitisTotal
Eurasian Vitis77.722.3100
North American Vitis12.287.8100
Fossil grapes94.35.7100
79.7% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.
Table 2. Correct classification percentage between the fossil seeds, considered an unknown group, and the 11 Vitis species from Eurasia.
Table 2. Correct classification percentage between the fossil seeds, considered an unknown group, and the 11 Vitis species from Eurasia.
V. thunbergiiV. yenshanensisV. amurensisV. heyneanaV. betulifoliaV. ficifoliaV. vinifera sylvestrisV. piasezkiiV. viniferaV. romanetiiV. coignetiaeTotal
V. thunbergii803.3-----106.7- 100
V. yenshanensis-83.33.3----10--3.3100
V. amurensis--90-3.3-----6.7100
V. heyneana---100------ 100
V. betulifolia----96.7- --3.3 100
V. ficifolia---6.7-93.3---- 100
V. vinifera sylvestris6.7---3.31080--- 100
V. piasezkii103.33.3----76.63.33.3 100
V. vinifera10------3.386.7- 100
V. romanetii-3.4--6.93.4--3.482.8 100
V. coignetiae-7.13.6-------89.3100
Fossil grape--11.411.41.42041.4--14.3-100
81.3% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.
Table 3. Correct classification percentages between the fossil seeds, considered an unknown group, and the five Vitis species from Eurasia.
Table 3. Correct classification percentages between the fossil seeds, considered an unknown group, and the five Vitis species from Eurasia.
V. amurensisV. heyneanaV. ficifoliaV. vinifera sylvestrisV. romanetiiTotal
V. amurensis93.3---6.7100
V. heyneana-93.36.7--100
V. ficifolia--100--100
V. vinifera sylvestris-3.36.790-100
V. romanetii3.4--3.493.1100
Fossil grapes22.95.732.932.95.7100
91.3% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.
Table 4. Correct classification percentage between the fossil seeds, considered the unknown group, and the two ecotype groups of V. vinifera sylvestris.
Table 4. Correct classification percentage between the fossil seeds, considered the unknown group, and the two ecotype groups of V. vinifera sylvestris.
Western V. vinifera sylvestrisEastern V. vinifera sylvestrisTotal
Western V. vinifera sylvestris81.118.9100
Eastern V. vinifera sylvestris18.981.1100
Fossil grapes78.621.4100
81.0% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ucchesu, M.; Martinetto, E.; Sarigu, M.; Orrù, M.; Bornancin, M.; Bacchetta, G. Morphological Characterization of Fossil Vitis L. Seeds from the Gelasian of Italy by Seed Image Analysis. Plants 2024, 13, 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101417

AMA Style

Ucchesu M, Martinetto E, Sarigu M, Orrù M, Bornancin M, Bacchetta G. Morphological Characterization of Fossil Vitis L. Seeds from the Gelasian of Italy by Seed Image Analysis. Plants. 2024; 13(10):1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ucchesu, Mariano, Edoardo Martinetto, Marco Sarigu, Martino Orrù, Michela Bornancin, and Gianluigi Bacchetta. 2024. "Morphological Characterization of Fossil Vitis L. Seeds from the Gelasian of Italy by Seed Image Analysis" Plants 13, no. 10: 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101417

APA Style

Ucchesu, M., Martinetto, E., Sarigu, M., Orrù, M., Bornancin, M., & Bacchetta, G. (2024). Morphological Characterization of Fossil Vitis L. Seeds from the Gelasian of Italy by Seed Image Analysis. Plants, 13(10), 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop