Next Article in Journal
Whole-Genome Resequencing Identifies SNPs in Sucrose Synthase and Sugar Transporter Genes Associated with Sweetness in Coconut
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomass Productivity and Photosynthetic Activity in Ulva compressa (Chlorophyta) in Raceway Photobioreactors Under Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Salicylic, Jasmonic Acid and Ethylene in the Development of the Resistance/Susceptibility of Wheat to the SnTox1-Producing Isolate of the Pathogenic Fungus Stagonospora nodorum (Berk.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/plants13182547
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temperature Dependence and the Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Activity of Carpospores in Sub-Antarctic Red Alga Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory 1826

by
Nelso P. Navarro
1,2,3,*,
Pirjo Huovinen
3,4,
Jocelyn Jofre
1 and
Iván Gómez
3,4
1
Laboratory of Ecophysiology and Biotechnology of Algae (LEBA), Faculty of Sciences, University of Magallanes, Punta Arenas 6210427, Chile
2
Network for Extreme Environments Research—NEXER, University of Magallanes, Punta Arenas 6210427, Chile
3
FONDAP Research Center Dynamic of High Latitude Marine Ecosystems (IDEAL), Valdivia 5110566, Chile
4
Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5110566, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(18), 2547; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182547
Submission received: 2 August 2024 / Revised: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 September 2024 / Published: 11 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Algal Photosynthesis and Phytochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The short-term effects of UV radiation and low temperature on ultrastructure, photosynthetic activity (measured as the maximal photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II: Fv/Fm), chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) contents, and UV-absorbing compounds on the carpospores of Iridaea cordata from a sub-Antarctic population were investigated. Exposure to both photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and PAR + UV for 4 h caused ultrastructural modifications in all treatments. Under PAR + UV at 2 °C, a disruption of the chloroplast’s internal organization was observed. Plastoglobuli were often found in carpospores exposed to 2 °C. ‘Electron dense particles’, resembling physodes of brown algae, were detected for the first time in cells exposed to PAR and PAR + UV at 8 °C. Fv/Fm decreased following 4 h exposure at 2 °C under PAR + UV (64%) and PAR (25%). At 8 °C, Fv/Fm declined by 21% only under PAR + UV. The photosynthesis of carpospores previously treated with UV partially recovered after a 4 h exposure under dim light. UV-absorbing compounds were degraded in all radiation and temperature treatments without recovery after a 4 h dim light period. Chl-a did not change, whereas total carotenoids increased under PAR at 8 °C The study indicates that although carpospores of I. cordata exhibit photoprotective mechanisms, UV radiation strongly damages their ultrastructure and physiology, which were exacerbated under low temperatures.

1. Introduction

Once released, macroalgal propagules face a completely different physical environment than their parental reproductive structures [1,2]. Thus, propagules can be exposed to highly variable physical conditions, which could be detrimental to their development as they are more vulnerable to shifts in environmental factors compared to adult individuals [3,4,5]. However, despite the physiological machinery and regulatory processes of propagules being less developed than in adult cells, they are capable of fast acclimation to light regimes, resulting in successful recruitment [6]. Given their key importance to the establishment and fate of macroalgae populations, previous studies have examined the physiological effects of various environmental factors (especially thermal and light conditions) on propagules of macroalgae from different phylogenetic groups (e.g., [7,8,9,10]).
Considering their small size, translucent cytosol, and incipient cell wall development [11,12,13], high solar UV radiation can easily reach sensible molecules and structures inside the propagules. UV wavelengths can cause indirect and direct damage to algal cells [14]. Direct effects are mediated by UV absorption by key biomolecules such as DNA and membrane components [15], while indirect effects are mediated by the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS induction—by exposure not only to UV-B but also to elevated PAR, UV-A, and even temperature—increases the risk of photodamage [16,17]. In photosynthetic organisms, UV-A also induces the degradation of the catalytic Mn-cluster of water-oxidizing complexes as well as D1 and D2 proteins in the reaction center of PSII [18]. Both direct and indirect effects of UV radiation, even at moderate to high levels of PAR, significantly impact photosynthetic activity [8,9,19,20,21]. These effects are not limited to biochemical levels. They can also cause visible ultrastructural changes, as demonstrated in green microalgae (e.g., Micrasterias spp. [22,23]) and macroalgae (e.g., red algae Palmaria decipiens, Odonthalia dentata [24,25,26], Kappaphycus alvarezii [27], Iridaea cordata [28], and green alga Prasiola crispa [29]). The main structures affected are lipid membranes mainly in chloroplasts and mitochondria [24,25,26,27,28,30]. This damage is mediated by the overproduction of ROS, resulting in decreased functionality, especially of photosynthetic activity [26,29]. In vascular plants [31], green microalgae such as in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [32] and Coelastrella rubescens [33], thylakoids and/or whole chloroplasts damaged by UV exposure can suffer autophagy—a natural process of degradation in vacuoles. In this way, thylakoids and/or whole chloroplasts degradation can affect cells’ ability to absorb light energy, decreasing the risk of photooxidative damage under stressful conditions [31,34].
Photosynthetic organisms have evolved a suite of protective mechanisms against high solar radiation. The excessive energy in PAR and UV bands can be dissipated as heat [35,36], while ROS can be eliminated by enzymatic (e.g., catalase, superoxide–dismutase, and so on), and non-enzymatic (e.g., vitamins C and E, glutathione, carotenoids) antioxidants [37]. On the other hand, and at the ultrastructural level, the increase in thickness and density of cell walls in cortical cells of Iridaea cordata adult thalli has also been considered as a protective mechanism, with thick and dense cell walls absorbing and scattering the incident UV wavelengths [27,28,38].
UV tolerance can also be related to the presence and/or capacity to induce the formation of UV-absorbing compounds such as mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) [39,40,41,42] and carotenoids [36], which are effective UV shielding substances, even in small propagules [43]. UV-absorbing compounds can be induced at different UV and PAR wavelengths [44,45]. However, in the propagules of the red algae Mazzaella laminarioides [46] and Antarctic Iridaea cordata [9], exposure to a combination of PAR + UV promotes a decrease in UV-absorbing compounds. Depending on a sum of environmental and endogenous factors, temperature and UV radiation can act synergistically or antagonistically. For example, temperature can modify the susceptibility/tolerance to UV radiation in several polar and sub-polar red algal propagules [10,15]. Although previous studies have demonstrated that the photosynthetic activity of red algal spores from high latitudes is particularly sensitive to UV radiation and temperature changes [9,10,20], UV-induced changes in spores’ ultrastructure under different temperatures, particularly sublethal alterations that can impact cellular functionality, have been scarcely investigated [30].
In propagules, UV-induced ultrastructural alterations could have serious implications for metabolic functions, especially during germination, when UV radiation can reach and damage the chloroplast easily [7,21,47]. Thus, examining functional responses along with changes in ultrastructural features can provide new insights into the mechanistic organismal–environment interactions underlying the susceptibility of early stages of macroalgae to stressful conditions.
The intertidal red alga Iridaea cordata inhabits hard substrates in the middle–upper intertidal and tidal pools across the southern coasts of South America [48,49,50]. The phylogenetic relationship between sub-Antarctic species and Antarctic populations is under debate due to their molecular divergence [50,51,52]. Various studies carried out on the early phases of Antarctic Iridaea cordata have characterized some responses to environmental conditions [9,10]. Consequently, these populations likely have phylogenetically different lineages, and such responses cannot be generalized to the sub-Antarctic assemblages. Although less information is available for the sub-Antarctic population, some studies indicate a reproductive period from September to December coinciding with increasing solar radiation during the austral spring, which inhibits photosynthetic activity in haploid tetraspores [20]. Furthermore, these assemblages are exposed to temperature ranges between 2 and 10°C, which are clearly different from their Antarctic counterparts [20]. Additionally, the response to UV-B radiation from carpospores, young sporophytes, and adult thalli of Iridaea cordata from a sub-Antarctic population was studied [53]. In the case of carpospores, low germination and high mortality were observed under UV-B, while young and adult thalli exhibited changes in external morphology. The present study addresses the question of whether UV radiation in conjunction with low temperatures can modify the ultrastructure of carpospores of I. cordata from the sub-Antarctic region. Additionally, we examined the photosynthetic activity and bio-optical properties (Chl-a content, total carotenoids, and other UV-absorbing compounds) of carpospores exposed to UV and temperature treatment. This information could improve our knowledge of how the interaction of two key environmental factors affects the physiology of macroalgae propagules that form dominant assemblages across the Magellan region. Furthermore, it would provide valuable baseline information to project seaweed communities’ fate under global change scenarios.

2. Results

2.1. Morphological and Ultrastructural Traits of Carpospores

Iridaea cordata carpospores averaged 30 ± 1.6 μm in diameter. The spores exhibited a reddish-green color and granular consistency under a light microscope (Figure 1A). At the ultrastructural level, freshly released carpospores are surrounded by a thick cell wall (Figure 1C,D). The spores exhibited a clear nucleus with a defined nucleolus (Figure 1B). Several floridean starch grains were scattered in the cytoplasm (Figure 1B) and electron-dense particles averaging 0.7 µm in diameter were also observed (Figure 1C). Spherical vesicles with fibrillar contents and a dense core were frequently observed close to the plasma membrane (Figure 1D). These types of vesicles resembled those reported for carposporangia in the red alga Chondria tenuissima called “cored vesicle” [54] as well as in cortical cells of adult thalli of Iridaea cordata, called cell wall-producing vesicles [28]. These vesicles were fused and released their contents from the plasmalemma (Figure 1D).
Chloroplasts had a single peripheral thylakoid, while other thylakoids were unstacked and evenly spaced (Figure 1E). Spherical to elongated mitochondria, with tubulin-like cristae (Figure 1C), were observed in close association with chloroplasts (Figure 1C). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) surrounded the nucleus and was adjacent to the cytoplasmic membrane (Figure 1C,D). Numerous tubular invaginations varying in length were detected in close contact with the cellular membrane, which seems connected to the ER (Figure 1D).
After 4 h of exposure to UV and temperature treatments, the internal chloroplast structure exhibited different degrees of alteration from almost no alteration (under PAR at 8 °C: Figure 2A) to severe damage in the thylakoid membranes (e.g., dilated and disrupted thylakoids under PAR + UV at 2 °C: Figure 2D). Under PAR + UV at 8 °C and PAR at 2 °C, damage to the chloroplasts’ structure was less evident with incipient dilatations of thylakoids (Figure 2B,C). Under PAR + UV treatment at 8 °C, abundant cored vesicles (some of them fused) were observed (Figure 3A,B). Additionally, plastoglobuli were frequently observed in the chloroplast of spores under UV radiation, mainly at 2 °C (Figure 3). In this latter treatment, starch grains were less evident. Electron-dense particles were frequently observed in the cytoplasm of carpospores at 8 °C (Figure 3D).

2.2. Photochemical Responses

Fv/Fm values varied after 4 h of radiation exposure and temperature treatments (Figure 4). The two-way ANOVA showed that reduction and recovery of Fv/Fm were influenced by the significant interaction between temperature and radiation treatment (Table 1). Carpospores exposed to PAR + UV at 2 °C exhibited the lowest Fv/Fm values (65% Fv/Fm reduction relative to the control), whereas in carpospores exposed to PAR at 8 °C, the Fv/Fm declined by 10%. Considering only the temperature effect, Fv/Fm decreased by 31% in carpospores exposed at 2 °C compared to those exposed at 8 °C.
After 4 h under dim light, photosynthetic recovery was partial. The Fv/Fm of carpospores previously exposed to PAR + UV recovered from 59 to 78% (at 2 and 8 °C, respectively), while samples previously exposed to only PAR recovered from 89 to 92%.

2.3. Chlorophyll-a Content and Analysis of Absorbance Spectra

Initial Chl-a content reached 0.32 ± 0.26 µg Chl-a g−1 dry weight (DW). No significant decrease in Chl-a content was observed during the exposure (ANOVA; df = 3, F = 0.503, p = 0.687) and recovery (ANOVA: df = 3; F = 3.16; p = 0.072) period (Figure 5). To assess the presence and induction of UV-absorbing compounds and changes in pigment composition, absorbance spectra were obtained from the methanolic extract of carpospores before, during (exposure), and after (recovery) the experiments. Methanolic extracts of initial samples showed high absorbance in the UV-B and UV-A regions (peaks at 290, 305, and 320 nm), suggesting the presence of UV-absorbing compounds. Methanolic extracts of carpospores for all UV and temperature treatments were characterized by decreased absorption in the UV region of the spectrum (Figure 6B), indicating degradation of UV-absorbing compounds during the experiment (see also Figure S1: A290nm/A665nm, A305nm/A665nm, and A320nm/A665nm ratios). After 4 h under dim light, the extracts of all treatments showed that UV-absorbing compounds were not recovered (Figure 6C). The absorbance at 480 nm (indicative of carotenoids) increased only at 8 °C in both PAR and PAR + UV treatments (A480nm/A665nm ratio in Figure 6).

3. Discussions

3.1. Changes in Photosynthetic Activity and Ultrastructure

Photosynthetic activity declined in carpospores exposed to both light PAR + UV and PAR treatments. PAR exposure promotes decreased photosynthetic activity in shade-adapted algae. For example, propagules of shade-adapted polar and subpolar algae exhibit low saturation irradiance (Ek) values (see data on Ek values of Iridaea cordata propagules in Supplementary Material). Additional effects on photosynthesis (11% inhibition at 8 °C) caused by UV radiation exposure and exacerbated under low temperatures (40% inhibition) agreed well with data reported for tetraspores of this species [20]. A decrease in photosynthetic activity has been widely reported in photoautotrophs exposed to UV and PAR. Temperature, however, can exacerbate or even ameliorate their negative effects on photosynthesis. Temperature dependence caused by UV-induced photoinhibition has also been evidenced in higher plants [55] and algae [20,56,57].
A decrease in photosynthetic activity in response to high irradiance is mediated by direct absorption from important components of the photosynthetic apparatus (PSA) or the lipoperoxidation action of ROS (generated by UV and even PAR wavelength exposure). Low temperatures can promote the overproduction of ROS [17], increasing the risk of damage to PSA and consequently promoting a decline in photosynthesis. On the other hand, it has been suggested that inhibition and photochemical damage are aggravated at low temperatures because of the high sensitivity of PSII-related reactions, chlorophyll turnover, and a lower repair efficiency [58]. On the contrary, photoprotective mechanisms, e.g., D1 protein turnover, enzyme repair mechanisms, and non-photochemical quenching, are activated more efficiently at higher temperatures [59,60]. In fact, Fv/Fm values following recovery were lower in carpospores previously treated with UV radiation at 2 °C (59%) than those maintained at 8 °C (78%). In the same line, it is important to emphasize that elevated temperatures not only ameliorate the effects of UV during exposure periods but also can favor the recovery of photosynthetic activity of carpospores previously irradiated with UV.
Photosynthetic activity was lower in carpospores with severe alterations in their ultrastructure (PAR + UV at 2 °C). Under PAR at 8 °C, chloroplasts did not exhibit alteration, while PAR + UV at 2 °C caused disruption of thylakoids and complete alteration of the chloroplast’s internal organization, leading to decreased functionality [26,29]. Although not determined in this study, the ultrastructural alterations observed in I. cordata could be attributed to oxidative stress, likely mediated by the overproduction of ROS), during incubation periods [61,62,63,64,65,66]. Dilated and disrupted thylakoids are frequently observed in photoautotrophic cells exposed to high UV radiation levels. A rearrangement mechanism of membrane structures in the PSA may be responsible, similar to that observed in the autophagic process [33]. However, no evidence of autophagy was observed in the carpospores of I. cordata.
Carpospores exposed to 2 °C exhibited low photosynthetic activity, possibly because of changes in the chloroplast’s ultrastructural organization that diminish light harvesting while increasing plastoglobuli formation [67,68]. On the other hand, it has been suggested that a large number of plastoglobuli is strongly correlated with limited thylakoid development [64,68]. In fact, plastoglobuli formation (relevant for lipid synthesis) is observed when algae are subjected to stress [69,70] because the pathways to build protein-containing cell structures are suppressed [71].
The abundance of starch grains observed in spores under all radiation treatments suggests that the energy needed for spore attachment and germination is not supplied exclusively by photosynthesis. This trend could explain their accumulation during sporogenesis and their rapid mobilization at the initial stages of germination [72,73,74]. The presence of starch grains and an increase in the number of plastoglobuli inside the chloroplasts of cells exposed to PAR + UV radiation, mainly at 2 °C, are in agreement with observations in Zygnema sp. [69], Kappaphycus alvarezii [27], and Chondracanthus teedei [38]. On the other hand, the reduction in starch grains may be related to a change in the route of starch biosynthesis in the Calvin cycle, possibly by activating the degradation pathway [38].
Other ultrastructural traits such as chloroplasts in the division, ER throughout the cell, nuclear pores, and prominent nucleolus in carpospores under PAR at 8 °C could indicate intense metabolic activity in preparation for germination [75]. In the same way, tubular invaginations of the cell membrane, which were observed close to the ER. In addition, they suggest involvement in the dissemination of nutrients needed to power germination and in the transport of enzymes and cell wall compounds produced by the ER [72,74,75,76]. The presence of nuclear pores, which were less evident under UV at 2 °C, could indicate changes in the activity of the nucleus [30]. Steinhoff et al. [30] speculated that the reduced size of the nuclear pores observed in zoospores of Laminaria hyperborea when exposed to UV radiation would diminish the exchange rates of mRNA molecules and proteins between the nucleus and cytoplasm. However, whether the transcriptional process is altered by stress factors should be further examined. In all, the impact of UV radiation on nuclear division and translocation was previously reported for Macrocystis pyrifera zoospores by Huovinen et al. (2000) [7].

3.2. Photoprotective Compounds and Mechanisms

The presence of UV-absorbing compounds and carotenoids was evidenced in freshly released carpospores. The presence of UV-absorbing compounds and total carotenoids were also observed in spores of the sub-Antarctic red alga Mazzaella laminarioides [46]. Although UV-absorbing compounds were not identified in this study, the absorbance spectra could indicate MAAs, for example. The presence of two MAAs (shinorine and palythine) has been reported in spores of Antarctic species of the red alga Sarcopeltis antarctica (formerly Gigartina skottsbergii) and the cryptic species of Iridaea cordata [9,43]. However, in our study, absorbance spectra of methanolic extracts from spores exposed to PAR or PAR + UV at two temperatures minus control revealed that UV-absorbing compounds decreased and did not recover in any treatments agreeing with observations on spores of the red algae Mazzaella laminarioides [46] and the Antarctic Iridaea cordata [9]. The degradation of UV-absorbing compounds could supply nitrogen to damage repair after exposure to a high UV-B dose (e.g., via the production of antioxidant compounds: carotenoids?). The increase in A480 nm/A665 nm ratios in carpospores exposed to PAR and PAR + UV at 8 °C indicates the accumulation of carotenoids, which play a crucial photoprotective role in absorbing short PAR wavelengths and UV-A radiation [36] by quenching triplet state chlorophyll molecules [77] and scavenging singlet oxygen and other toxic oxygen species formed within the chloroplast [78,79]. Thus, the presence and synthesis of total carotenoids rather than MAAs may help protect the PSA against high PAR and UV, avoiding the risk of photooxidative damage. Interestingly, the combination of low temperatures and UV seems to inhibit carotenoid synthesis. Low concentrations of carotenoids could increase the risk of photodamage in PSA, causing a decrease in photosynthetic activity (Figure 4). However, when UV radiation was excluded during the recovery period (dim light and 8 °C), a slight increase in the A480 nm/A665 nm ratio occurred in samples previously exposed to UV and 2 °C.
On the other hand, it is important to emphasize the presence of electron-dense particles, which were frequently observed in all treatments, especially under PAR and PAR + UV at 8 °C. The appearance of these particles under transmission electron microscopy (TEM) resembles physodes, phenolic (phlorotannin)-containing structures described in brown algae [80,81]. Although the presence and significance of phlorotannins at different life stages of brown algae species have largely been recognized (reviewed by [82]), the presence of physodes in Rhodophyta has scarcely been reported. To our knowledge, the presence of structures resembling physodes has been documented in Crassiphycus birdiae (previously known as Gracilaria birdiae) under TEM [83], in Gracilaria chilensis using biochemical analysis [84], and in Trematocarpus antarcticus under violet-blue light excitation using epifluorescence microscopy [82]. Thus, phenolic compounds in Rhodophyta may be involved in photoprotection mechanisms and potentially be effective antioxidant agents, as reported for brown algae [84]. In our study, the electron-dense particles exhibited irregular shapes similar to those observed in different strains of the charophyte Zygnema [69,85]. However, in I. cordata these particles did not increase in UV-exposed carpospores as observed in Zygnema [69,85]. Temperature could influence their presence, as suggested for Gracilaria chilensis [84] and in brown algae such as Lessonia spicata, Durvillaea antarctica, and Macrocystis pyrifera [86]. In all, the type of compounds contained in these structures and their function in the spores of sub-Antarctic Rhodophyta are still unknown. However, the role they may play in photoprotection or initial adhesion is plausible, as has been documented in phenolics of brown algae [81].
Cored vesicles, also called cell wall-forming vesicles, observed in I. cordata carpospores are morphologically similar to those reported in several other red algae spores [13,72,75]. The increase in cored vesicles in carpospores treated with UV radiation at both 2 and 8 °C could imply intense polysaccharide production [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. In adult thalli, an increase in these cored vesicles has been associated with an increase in the thickness and density of the cell wall, which acts as a protective mechanism for preventing or reducing the penetration of UV through cells, e.g., by increasing absorption and scattering [27,28,38]. They also suggest that these vesicles can store material for the cell wall, e.g., mucilage necessary for the attachment process. Additionally, these particles could be crystal inclusions of N reserves (guanine), which was observed in the marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae [88].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. The Environmental Context

In the intertidal zone and during low tide, spores of Iridaea cordata experience highly variable conditions of solar irradiance. Based on the Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible models (TUV 5.3; Madronich and Flocke [89]), the estimated summer solstice solar noon irradiances at the seawater surface (with ozone layer of 300 DU) for the study site (Bahía Mansa; Magellan Strait, 53° S; 70°59′ W) are close to 1950 μmol photon m−2 s−1 for PAR, and 1.6 and 55 W m−2 for UV-B and UV-A, respectively. For the winter solstice, the corresponding levels are around 350 μmol photon m−2 s−1 for PAR, and 9 and <0.1 W m−2 for UV-A and UV-B, respectively. Based on HOBO Dataloggers (Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA) placed at 2 m depth and in a pool tide in the sector of Bahía Mansa, the mean surface water temperature varied between 5 °C in winter and 8.7 °C in summer. However, in the winter, algae may be exposed to seawater temperatures close to 3 °C, while in the pools, temperatures can be as low as 0–2 °C.

4.2. Algal Collection and Processing

Fertile fronds of cystocarpic female gametophytes were collected from Bahía Mansa in November 2017. After sampling, algae were transferred to the Laboratory of Ecophysiology and Biotechnology of Algae at the University of Magallanes (LEBA-UMAG), where they were cleaned of epiphytes and carefully washed with filtered seawater. At least twenty disc pieces (9 cm−2) punched from ten different fertile fronds were subjected to dehydration for 4 h at a room temperature of 7 ± 2 °C. After rehydration for 1 h in 150 mL of filtered (0.4 μm) seawater, the carpospores were released. Carpospores were counted using a Neubauer chamber under a stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) before being transferred to cell culture plates (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Propagules were photographed under a light microscope (Primo Star; Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) to obtain cell diameters.

4.3. Short-Term Exposure to UV Radiation

Aliquots (3 mL) from a suspension of carpospores (7.9 × 104 cells mL−1) were placed inside cell culture plates (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and immediately exposed to PAR and PAR + UV treatments for 4 h at temperatures of 2 and 8 °C using a thermoregulated incubation system (Lauda Dr. R. Wobser GMBH & CO. KG, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany). This procedure was followed by a 4 h recovery period under dim light (<4 μmol photon m−2 s−1). A temperature of 8 °C matches the average seawater surface temperature recorded in the field between spring and summer in the Magellan Strait. Additionally, carpospores were also exposed to 2 °C, a temperature reflecting the extremely low temperatures at which this species can be exposed in tidal pools during winter and even early spring. The PAR and PAR + UV treatments were established using cut-off filters (Ultraphan 295 nm to obtain PAR + UV treatment, and Ultraphan 395 nm (Digefra; Munich, Germany) to obtain PAR alone) according to Navarro et al. (2019) [20]. The experimental levels of UV-B and UV-A radiation were set at 0.26 and 1.5 W m−2, respectively. Thus, the UV-A:UV-B ratio was lower than in natural conditions. PAR (45 μmol photon m−2 s−1) remained low to avoid masking UV effects [36]. The effect of PAR and PAR + UV radiation on photosynthesis was assessed as a decrease in Fv/Fm (see below). Similarly, the effects of UV radiation at 2 °C and 8 °C on the concentration of UV-absorbing compounds and chlorophyll a (Chl-a) were assessed.

4.4. Determination of Photosynthetic Activity

Photosynthetic activity was determined as the maximal photochemical quantum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence of PSII (Fv/Fm). To accomplish this, a Water-PAM fluorometer (Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) connected to a PC with WINControl V3-36 software (Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) was used. Following a 10 min dark period, basal fluorescence (Fo) of carpospores was determined under red measuring light (approximately 0.3 μmol photons m−2 s−1), whereas maximum fluorescence (Fm) was obtained by applying a saturating white light pulse (0.6 s; 2700 µmol photons m−2 s−1). Thus, Fv/Fm was calculated as (Fm − Fo)/Fm. Fv/Fm was measured before (initial or time zero) and after 4 h exposure to UV and temperature treatment as well as after a 4 h recovery period under dim light.
The effect of radiation and temperature treatments on photochemistry was expressed as a percentage decrease between Fv/Fm of samples treated with PAR + UV or PAR at 2 and 8 °C and Fv/Fm of samples exposed to control conditions (samples maintained under <4 μmol photon m−2 s−1 at 8 °C). Additionally, the initial Fv/Fm was obtained at time zero. Similarly, the recovery was estimated in samples exposed to dim light for 4 h after exposure to PAR + UV by comparing their Fv/Fm values with those from control conditions.

4.5. Bio-Optical Traits

Before and after 4 h of PAR and PAR + UV exposure, Chl-a content and the presence and induction of UV-absorbing compounds and total carotenoids were determined. The Chl-a, carotenoids, and UV-absorbing compounds were extracted with methanol (100%) for 12 h at 4 °C in darkness. Afterward, the solution was centrifuged at 35,000× g for 10 min and analyzed using a spectrophotometer (280–750 nm, Spectroquant® Pharo 300, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). While the Chl-a content was measured using equations described in Ritchie (2008) [90], the UV-absorbing compounds, including carotenoids were determined as described by Zaytseva et al. [33] and Chekanov et al. [91]. Firstly, the absorbance spectra of treated samples were normalized using a control (A/A665nm−Acontrol/A665nm control). Thus, the differential absorbance spectra (∆D(λ)) between 250 and 500 nm were estimated. An absorbance increase (compared to the control spectrum) was considered induction, whereas the decrease was regarded as loss or degradation of UV-absorbing or carotenoid compounds. Secondly, the ratios of UV-absorbing compounds (peaks at A290nm, A305nm, and A320nm) and carotenoids (peak at A480nm) to Chl-a (peak at A665nm) were analyzed.
The dry weight was determined by filtering a known volume of carpospore suspension in a 0.22 μm glass fiber filter (Merk, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Afterward, the filter was dried to a constant mass in a stove at 50 °C. The difference in the weight of filters with dried cells and the weight of empty dried filters was used to determine the carpospore dry weight.

4.6. Transmission Electron Microscopy

After 4 h of exposure to light and temperature treatments, samples for analysis were obtained. Spore fixation in 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% paraformaldehyde in filtered seawater (0.2 μm), post-fixation in osmium–potassium ferricyanide mixture, dehydration, embedding, and infiltration followed the protocol described by Santelices et al. (1996) [92]. Cells were stained with 4% uranyl acetate and lead citrate according to Reynolds (1963) [93] and observed with a JEOL 100SX electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operated at 60 kV.

4.7. Data Analysis

Two-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of temperature and radiation treatments on carpospores’ photosynthetic activity (Fv/Fm). One-way ANOVA was used to compare the variability in Chl-a concentration and ratios of UV-absorbing compounds and carotenoids to Chl-a. Before performing ANOVA, normality was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Homoscedasticity of variance was tested using Cochran tests and visual inspection of the residuals. Post hoc comparisons of means were assessed with Tukey’s HSD test. All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistica 7 software (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

5. Conclusions

UV exposure caused decreased photosynthetic activity and altered the ultrastructure of Iridaea cordata carpospores. While low temperatures aggravated UV-induced effects on carpospores, high temperatures favored the recovery of UV-radiated carpospores. The high UV sensitivity of I. cordata carpospores at low temperatures may be caused by inefficient photoprotection and repair mechanisms operating in these cells at 2 °C. The observation of electron-dense particles resembling phenolic-containing vesicles points to a possible role in photoprotection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13182547/s1, Figure S1. Ratio of UV-absorbing compounds (peak at A290nm, A305nm, and A320nm) and carotenoids (peak at A480nm) to Chl-a (peak at A665nm) of Iridaea cordata carpospores after 4 h exposure to UV radiation and subsequent 4 h recovery in dim light. Values are means ± S.E (n = 4). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, HSD post hoc test). Table S1. Comparison of photosynthetic parameters (Ek: [μmol photon m−2 s−1], ETRmax: [μmol e− m−2 s−1], αETR [μmol e− m−2 s−1]. [μmol photon m−2 s−1]−1), the initial maximal photochemical quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) and inhibition of photosynthesis by PAR and PAR + UV radiation, and subsequent recovery in spores of Iridaea cordata from Antarctic and su b-Antarctic populations. PAR and PAR + UV inhibition was calculated after 4 h of exposure at 2 and 8 °C, with 2 °C being the control for Antarctic individuals and 8 °C for sub-Antarctic ones. Table building considering Navarro et al. (2016, 2019) [10,20], and the present study.

Author Contributions

N.P.N.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing, and funding acquisition. P.H.: conceptualization, writing—reviewing, and editing. J.J.: investigation, and data acquisition, data curation, project administration. I.G.: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, writing—reviewing, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from CONICYT-Chile: Fondecyt Iniciación N°11160520; and Centro Fondap-IDEAL 15150003 and by the 021017 Program (Universidad de Magallanes).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Verónica Flores for her technical support in TEM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Amsler, C.; Reed, D.; Neushul, M. The microclimate inhabited by macroalgal propagules. Eur. J. Phycol. 1992, 27, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zacher, K. The susceptibility of spores and propagules of Antarctic seaweeds to UV and photosynthetically active radiation—Field versus laboratory experiments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2014, 458, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Coelho, S.M.; Rijstenbil, J.W.; Brown, M.T. Impacts of anthropogenic stresses on the early development stages of seaweeds. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 2000, 7, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Véliz, K.; Edding, M.; Tala, F.; Gómez, I. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on different life cycle stages of the south Pacific kelps, Lessonia nigrescens and Lessonia trabeculata (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae). Mar. Biol. 2006, 149, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiencke, C.; Roleda, M.Y.; Gruber, A.; Clayton, M.N.; Bischof, K. Susceptibility of zoospores to UV radiation determines upper depth distribution limit of Arctic kelps: Evidence through field experiments. J. Ecol. 2006, 94, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beach, K.S.; Smith, C.M.; Michael, T.M.; Shin, H.W. Photosynthesis in reproductive unicells of Ulva fasciata and Enteromorpha flexuosa: Implications for ecological success. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1995, 125, 129–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huovinen, P.S.; Oikari, A.O.; Soimasuo, M.R.; Cherr, G.N. Impact of UV radiation on the early development of the giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) gametophytes. Photochem. Photobiol. 2000, 72, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roleda, M.Y.; Campana, G.L.; Wiencke, C.; Hanelt, D.; Quartino, M.L.; Wulff, A. Sensitivity of antarctic Urospora penicilliformis (Ulotrichales, Chlorophyta) to ultraviolet radiation is life-stage dependent. J. Phycol. 2009, 45, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zacher, K.; Roleda, M.Y.; Wulff, A.; Hanelt, D.; Wiencke, C. Responses of Antarctic Iridaea cordata (Rhodophyta) tetraspores exposed to ultraviolet radiation. Phycol. Res. 2009, 57, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Navarro, N.P.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Stress tolerance of Antarctic macroalgae in the early life stage. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2016, 89, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Avanzini, A. La ultraestructura de las esporas de Rhodophyta. Insula 1989, 19, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pueschel, C.M.; Cole, K.M. Ultrastructure of germinating carpospores of Porphyra variegata (Kjellm.) Hus (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 1985, 21, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ouriques, L.C.; Bouzon, Z.L. Ultrastructure of germinating tetraspores of Hypnea musciformis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta). Plant Biosyst. 2003, 137, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; An, L.; Wang, X. Effects of enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation on algae and cyanobacteria. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 31, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vass, I. Adverse effects of UV-B light on the structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus. In Handbook of Photosynthesis; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 931–949. [Google Scholar]
  16. Karsten, U.; Holzinger, A. Green algae in alpine biological soil crust communities: Acclimation strategies against ultraviolet radiation and dehydration. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 23, 1845–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Asada, K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant. Physiol. 2006, 141, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Verdaguer, D.; Jansen, M.A.; Llorens, L.; Morales, L.O.; Neugart, S. UV-A radiation effects on higher plants: Exploring the known unknown. Plant. Sci. 2017, 255, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roleda, M.Y.; van de Poll, W.H.; Hanelt, D.; Wiencke, C. PAR and UVBR effects on photosynthesis, viability, growth and DNA in different life stages of two coexisting Gigartinales: Implications for recruitment and zonation pattern. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 281, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Navarro, N.P.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Photosynthetic characteristics of geographically disjunct seaweeds: A case study on the early life stages of Antarctic and Subantarctic species. Prog. Oceanogr. 2019, 174, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Navarro, N.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Life history Strategies, photosynthesis, and stress tolerance in propagules of Antarctic seaweeds. In Antarctic Seaweeds: Diversity, Adaptation and Ecosystem Services; Gómez, I., Huovinen, P., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 193–215. [Google Scholar]
  22. Meindl, U.; Lütz, C. Effects of UV radiation on cell development and ultrastructure of the green alga Micrasterias. J. Photoch. Photobiol. B 1996, 36, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lütz, C.; Seidlitz, H.K.; Meindl, U. Physiological and structural changes in the chloroplast of the green alga Micrasterias denticulata induced by UV-B simulation. Plant Ecol. 1997, 128, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Poppe, F.; Hanelt, D.; Wiencke, C. Changes in ultrastructure, photosynthetic activity and pigment in the Antarctic red alga Palmaria decipiens during acclimation to UV radiation. Bot. Mar. 2002, 45, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Poppe, F.; Schmidt, R.A.; Hanelt, D.; Wiencke, C. Effects of UV radiation on the ultrastructure of several red algae. Phycol. Res. 2003, 51, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Holzinger, A.; Lütz, C.; Karsten, U.; Wiencke, C. The effect of ultraviolet radiation on ultrastructure and photosynthesis in the red macroalgae Palmaria palmata and Odonthalia dentata from Arctic waters. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmidt, E.C.; Scariot, L.A.; Rover, T.; Bouzon, Z.L. Changes in ultrastructure and histochemistry of two red macroalgae strains of Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales), as a consequence of ultraviolet B radiation exposure. Micron 2009, 40, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Navarro, N.P.; Mansilla, A.; Plastino, E.M. UVB radiation induces changes in the ultra-structure of Iridaea cordata. Micron 2010, 41, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Holzinger, A.; Karsten, U.; Lütz, C.; Wiencke, C. Ultrastructure and photosynthesis in the supralittoral green macroalga Prasiola crispa from Spitsbergen (Norway) under UV exposure. Phycologia 2006, 45, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Steinhoff, F.S.; Wiencke, C.; Müller, R.; Bischof, K. Effects of ultraviolet radiation and temperature on the ultrastructure of zoospores of the brown macroalga Laminaria hyperborean. Plant Biol. 2008, 10, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Izumi, M.; Ishida, H.; Nakamura, S.; Hidema, J. Entire photodamaged chloroplasts are transported to the central vacuole by autophagy. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pérez-Pérez, M.E.; Crespo, J.L. Autophagy in the model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Autophagy 2010, 6, 562–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zaytseva, A.; Chekanov, K.; Zaytsev, P.; Bakhareva, D.; Gorelova, O.; Kochkin, D.; Lobakova, E. Sunscreen Effect Exerted by Secondary Carotenoids and Mycosporine-like Amino Acids in the Aeroterrestrial Chlorophyte Coelastrella rubescens under High Light and UV-A Irradiation. Plants 2021, 10, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gorelova, O.; Baulina, O.; Ismagulova, T.; Kokabi, K.; Lobakova, E.; Selyakh, I.; Semenova, L.; Chivkunova, O.; Karpova, O.; Scherbakov, P.; et al. Stress-induced changes in the ultrastructure of the photosynthetic apparatus of green microalgae. Protoplasma 2019, 256, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Krause, G.H.; Weiss, E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis, the basics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 42, 313–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stroch, M.; Materova, Z.; Vrabl, D.; Karlický, V.; Sigut, L.; Nezval, J.; Spunda, V. Protective effect of UV-A radiation during acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to UV-B treatment. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bischof, K.; Gómez, I.; Molis, M.; Hanelt, D.; Karsten, U.; Lüder, U.; Roleda, M.Y.; Zacher, K.; Wiencke, C. Ultraviolet radiation shapes seaweed communities. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schmidt, E.C.; Pereira, B.; Pontes, C.L.M.; Santos, R.D.; Scherner, F.; Horta, P.A.; de Paula Martins, R.; Latini, A.; Maraschin, M.; Bouzon, Z.L. Alterations in architecture and metabolism induced by ultraviolet radiation-B in the carragenophyte Chondracanthus teedei (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales). Protoplasma 2012, 249, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hoyer, K.; Karsten, U.; Sawall, T.; Wiencke, C. Photoprotective substances in Antarctic macroalgae and their varia-tion with respect to depth distribution, different tissues and developmental stages. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001, 211, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Navarro, N.P.; Figueroa, F.L.; Korbee, N. Mycosporine-like amino acids vs carrageenan yield in Mazzaella laminarioides (Gigartinales; Rhodophyta) under high and low UV solar irradiance. Phycologia 2017, 56, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cockell, C.S.; Knowland, J. Ultraviolet radiation screening compounds. Biol. Rev. 1999, 74, 311–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Navarro, N.P.; Figueroa, F.L.; Korbee, N.; Bonomi, J.; Álvarez-Gómez, F.; de la Coba, P. MAAs from red algae to develop natural UV sunscreens. In Sunscreens: Source, Formulations, Efficacy and Recommendations; Rastogi, R., Ed.; NOVA Publisher: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  43. Roleda, M.Y.; Zacher, K.; Wulff, A.; Hanelt, D.; Wiencke, C. Susceptibility of spores of different ploidy levels from Antarctic Gigartina skottsbergii (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) to ultraviolet radiation. Phycologia 2008, 47, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kräbs, G.; Bischof, K.; Hanelt, D.; Karsten, U.; Wiencke, C. Wavelength-dependent induction of UV-absorbing mycosporine-like amino acids in the red alga Chondrus crispus under natural solar radiation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. 2002, 268, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Navarro, N.P.; Figueroa, F.L.; Korbee, N.; Mansilla, A.; Plastino, E.M. Differential responses of tetrasporophytes and gametophytes of Mazzaella laminarioides (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) under solar UV radiation. J. Phycol. 2016, 52, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Navarro, N.P.; Huovinen, P.; Jofre, J.; Gómez, I. Ultraviolet radiation stress response of haploid and diploid spores of Mazzaella laminarioides: Do bio-optical traits matter? Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wiencke, C.; Gómez, I.; Pakker, H.; Flores-Moya, A.; Altamirano, M.; Hanelt, D.; Bischof, K.; Figueroa, F.L. Impact of UV radiation on viability, photosynthetic characteristics and DNA of brown algal zoospores: Implications for depth zonation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 197, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wiencke, C.; Amsler, C.D.; Clayton, M.N. Chapter 5.1: Macroalgae. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wiencke, C.; Clayton, M.N. Antarctic Seaweeds; ARG Gantner: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2002; pp. 1–239. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hommersand, M.H.; Fredericq, S.; Freshwater, D.W.; Hughey, J. Recent developments in the systematics of the Gigartinaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) based on rbcL sequence analysis and morphological evidence. Phycol. Res. 1999, 47, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Billard, E.; Reyes, J.; Mansilla, A.; Faugeron, S.; Guillemin, M.-L. Deep genetic divergence between austral populations of the red alga Gigartina skottsbergii reveals a cryptic species endemic to the Antarctic continent. Polar Biol. 2015, 38, 2021–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ocaranza-Barrera, P.; González-Wevar, C.A.; Guillemin, M.-L.; Rosenfeld, S.; Mansilla, A. Molecular divergence between Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory de Saint-Vincent from the Antarctic Peninsula and the Magellan Region. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Navarro, N.P.; Mansilla, A.; Plastino, E.M. Iridaea cordata (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta): Responses to artificial UVB radiation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 22, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tsekos, I. The endomembrane system of differentiating carposporangia in the red alga Chondria tenuissima: Occurrence and participation in secretion of polysaccharidic and proteinaceous substances. Protoplasma 1985, 129, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Öquist, G.; Hurry, V.M.; Huner, P.A. The temperature dependence of the redox state of QA and susceptibility of photosynthesis to photoinhibition. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1993, 31, 683–689. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rautenberger, R.; Bischof, K. Impact of temperature on UV-susceptibility of two Ulva (Chlorophyta) species from Antarctic and Subantarctic regions. Polar Biol. 2006, 28, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rautenberger, R.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Effects of increased seawater temperature on UV-tolerance of Antarctic marine macroalgae. Mar. Biol. 2015, 162, 1087–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nishiyama, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Inaba, M.; Yokota, A.; Murata, N. Oxidative stress inhibits the repair of photodamage to the photosynthetic machinery. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 5587–5594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wünschmann, G.; Brand, J.J. Rapid turnover of a component required for photosynthesis explains temperatura dependence and kinetics of photoinhibition in a cyanobacterium, Synechococcus 6301. Planta 1992, 186, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Becker, S.; Graeve, M.; Bischof, K. Photosynthesis and lipid composition of the Antarctic endemic rhodophyte Palmaria decipiens: Effects of changing light and temperature levels. Polar Biol. 2010, 33, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Malanga, G.; Puntarulo, S. Oxidative stress and antioxidant content in Chlorella vulgaris after exposure to ultraviolet-B radiation. Physiol. Plant. 1995, 94, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Burritt, D.J.; Larkindale, J.; Hurd, C. Antioxidant metabolism in the intertidal red seaweed Stictosiphonia arbuscula following desiccation. Planta 2002, 215, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, T.M.; Shiu, C.T. Implications of mycosporine-like amino acid and antioxidant defenses in UV-B radiation tolerance for the algae species Pterocladiella capillacea and Gelidium amansii. Mar. Environ. Res. 2009, 27, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Müller, R.; Desel, C.; Steinhoff, F.S.; Wiencke, C.; Bischof, K. UV-radiation and elevated temperatures induce formation of reactive oxygen species in gametophytes of cold-temperate/Arctic kelps (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae). Phycol. Res. 2012, 60, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maharana, D.; Das, P.B.; Verlecar, X.N.; Pise, N.M.; Gauns, M. Oxidative stress tolerance in intertidal red seaweed Hypnea musciformis (Wulfen) in relation to environmental components. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 18741–18749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Celis-Plá, P.S.; Moenne, F.; Rodríguez-Rojas, F.; Pardo, D.; Lavergne, C.; Moenne, A.; Brown, M.T.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I.; Navarro, N.P.; et al. Antarctic intertidal macroalgae under predicted increased temperatures mediated by global climate change: Would they cope? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Senser, M.; Schötz, F.; Beck, E. Seasonal changes in structure and function of spruce chloroplasts. Planta 1975, 126, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Steinhoff, F.S. Phlorotannins as UV-Protective Substances in Early Developmental Stages of Brown Algae. Master’s Thesis, University Bremen, Bremen, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  69. Holzinger, A.; Roleda, M.Y.; Lütz, C. The vegetative arctic freshwater green alga Zygnema is insensitive to experimental UV exposure. Micron 2009, 40, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Holzinger, A.; Di Piazza, L.; Lütz, C.; Roleda, M.Y. Sporogenic and vegetative tissues of Saccharina latissima (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) exhibit distinctive sensitivity to experimentally enhanced ultraviolet radiation: Photosynthetically active radiation ratio. Phycol. Res. 2011, 59, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Oliveira, E.M.; Schmidt, E.C.; Pereira, D.T.; Bouzon, Z.L.; Ouriques, L.C. Effects of UV-B radiation on germlings of the red macroalga Nemalion helminthoides (Rhodophyta). J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. 2016, 4, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bouzon, Z.L.; Ouriques, L.C.; Oliveira, E.C. Ultrastructure of tetraspore germination in the agar-producing seaweed Gelidium floridanum (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 2005, 44, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tsekos, I. Plastid development and floridean starch grain formation during carposporogenesis in the red algae Gigartina teedii. Cryptogam. Algol. 1982, 3, 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  74. Vesk, M.; Borowitzka, M. Ultrastructure of tetrasporogenesis in the coralline alga Haliptilon cuvieri (Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 1984, 20, 501–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ouriques, L.C.; Schmidt, E.C.; Bouzon, Z.L. The mechanism of adhesion and germination in the carpospores of Porphyra spiralis var. amplifolia (Rhodophyta, Bangiales). Micron 2012, 43, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Avanzini, A.; Honsell, G. Membrane tubules in the tetraspores of a red alga. Protoplasma 1984, 119, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Siefermann-Harms, D. The light-harvesting and protective functions of carotenoids in photosynthetic membranes. Physiol. Plant. 1987, 69, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Young, A.J. The photoprotective role of carotenoids in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 1991, 83, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Edge, R.; McGarvey, D.J.; Truscott, T.G. The carotenoids as antioxidants—A review. J. Photoch. Photobiol. B 1997, 41, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Schoenwaelder, M.E.A.; Clayton, M.N. Secretion of phenolic substances into the zygote wall and cell plate in embryos of Hormosira and Acrocarpia (Fucales, Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 1998, 34, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Schoenwaelder, M.E.A. The occurrence and cellular significance of physodes in brown algae. Phycologia 2002, 41, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gómez, I.; Huovinen, P. Brown algal phlorotannins: An overview of their functional roles. In Antarctic Seaweeds: Diversity, Adaptation and Ecosystem Services; Gómez, I., Huovinen, P., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 365–388. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ayres, L.; Plastino, E.M. Effects of UV-B radiation on growth rates, pigment content and ultrastructure of red (wild type), greenish-brown and green strains of Gracilaria birdiae (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 2014, 49, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cruces, E.; Flores-Molina, M.R.; Di, M.J.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Phenolics photoprotective mechanism against combined action of UV radiation and temperature in the red alga Gracilaria chilensis? J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pichrtová, M.; Remias, D.; Lewis, L.A.; Holzinger, A. Changes in phenolic compounds and cellular ultrastructure of arctic and antarctic strains of Zygnema (Zygnematophyceae, Streptophyta) after exposure to experimentally enhanced UV to PAR ratio. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 65, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cruces, E.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Phlorotannin and antioxidant responses upon short term exposure to UV radiation and elevated temperature in three South Pacific kelps. Photochem. Photobiol. 2012, 88, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pueschel, C.M. Ultrastructure of tetrasporogenesis in Palmaria palmata (Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 1979, 15, 409–424. [Google Scholar]
  88. Mojzeš, P.; Gao, L.; Ismagulova, T.; Pilátová, J.; Moudríková, S.; Gorelova, O.; Solovchenko, A.; Nedbal, L.; Salihg, A. Guanine, a high-capacity and rapid-turnover nitrogen reserve in microalgal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 32722–32730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Madronich, S.; Flocke, S. The role of solar radiation in atmospheric chemistry. In Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Boule, P., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ritchie, R.J. Universal chlorophyll equations for estimating chlorophylls a, b, c, and d and total chlorophylls in natural assemblages of photosynthetic organisms using acetone, methanol, or ethanol solvents. Photosynth. Res. 2008, 46, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chekanov, K.; Shibzukhova, K.; Lobakova, E.; Solovchenko, A. Differential responses to UV-A stress recorded in carotenogenic microalgae Haematococcus rubicundus, Bracteacoccus aggregatus, and Deasonia sp. Plants 2022, 11, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Santelices, B.; Correa, J.; Meneses, I.; Aedo, D.; Varela, D. Sporeling coalescence and intraclonal variation in Gracilaria chilensis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 1996, 32, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Reynolds, E.S. The use of lead citrate at light pH as an electron opaquestain in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol. 1963, 17, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 02547 g001
Figure 1. Structure of Iridaea cordata carpospores. (A) Carpospores under light microscopy and their respective ultrastructural models. (B–E) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of carpospores cultivated under control conditions. (B) Carpospores exhibit homogeneously distributed vacuolar spaces, starch grains in the cytoplasm, and a condensed nucleolus. (C,D) Thick cell walls (black arrowheads) and cored vesicles releasing their contents out of the plasmalemma; additionally, tubular invaginations (white arrowheads in (D) and ER are shown close to the plasmalemma. (E) Typical internal organization of red algae chloroplasts showing a single peripheral thylakoid. CV, cored vesicles; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; EP, electron-dense particles; M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; Nu, nucleolus.
Figure 1. Structure of Iridaea cordata carpospores. (A) Carpospores under light microscopy and their respective ultrastructural models. (B–E) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of carpospores cultivated under control conditions. (B) Carpospores exhibit homogeneously distributed vacuolar spaces, starch grains in the cytoplasm, and a condensed nucleolus. (C,D) Thick cell walls (black arrowheads) and cored vesicles releasing their contents out of the plasmalemma; additionally, tubular invaginations (white arrowheads in (D) and ER are shown close to the plasmalemma. (E) Typical internal organization of red algae chloroplasts showing a single peripheral thylakoid. CV, cored vesicles; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; EP, electron-dense particles; M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; Nu, nucleolus.
Plants 13 02547 g001
Plants 13 02547 g002
Figure 2. Changes in ultrastructural organization in the chloroplast of Iridaea cordata carpospores after exposure for 4 h to PAR (A,B) and PAR + UV (C,D) treatments at two temperatures. White arrowheads in (B–D) indicate plastoglobuli.
Figure 2. Changes in ultrastructural organization in the chloroplast of Iridaea cordata carpospores after exposure for 4 h to PAR (A,B) and PAR + UV (C,D) treatments at two temperatures. White arrowheads in (B–D) indicate plastoglobuli.
Plants 13 02547 g002
Plants 13 02547 g003
Figure 3. Summary of major ultrastructural changes in carpospores of Iridaea cordata after 4 h of exposure to PAR and PAR + UV at two temperatures. (A,E) carpospores exposed to PAR at 2 °C; (B) carpospores exposed to PAR + UV at 2 °C; (C,D) carpospores exposed to PAR at 8 °C; (F) carpospores exposed to PAR + UV at 8 °C. CV, cored vesicles; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; EP, electron-dense particles; G, Golgi complex; M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; Nu, nucleolus. White arrowheads in C indicate nuclear membrane pores, while in E plastoglobuli.
Figure 3. Summary of major ultrastructural changes in carpospores of Iridaea cordata after 4 h of exposure to PAR and PAR + UV at two temperatures. (A,E) carpospores exposed to PAR at 2 °C; (B) carpospores exposed to PAR + UV at 2 °C; (C,D) carpospores exposed to PAR at 8 °C; (F) carpospores exposed to PAR + UV at 8 °C. CV, cored vesicles; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; EP, electron-dense particles; G, Golgi complex; M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; Nu, nucleolus. White arrowheads in C indicate nuclear membrane pores, while in E plastoglobuli.
Plants 13 02547 g003
Plants 13 02547 g004
Figure 4. Maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of Iridaea cordata carpospores after exposure (A,B) for 4 h to PAR and PAR + UV at two temperatures and recovery (C,D) under low white light (4 μmol photon m−2 s−1). Control was continuously maintained at 4 μmol photon m−2s−1 at 8 °C (mean ± SD, n = 6). The percentage decrease in Fv/Fm (A,B) and recovery (C,D) with respect to the control is presented within the bars. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, HSD post hoc test).
Figure 4. Maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of Iridaea cordata carpospores after exposure (A,B) for 4 h to PAR and PAR + UV at two temperatures and recovery (C,D) under low white light (4 μmol photon m−2 s−1). Control was continuously maintained at 4 μmol photon m−2s−1 at 8 °C (mean ± SD, n = 6). The percentage decrease in Fv/Fm (A,B) and recovery (C,D) with respect to the control is presented within the bars. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, HSD post hoc test).
Plants 13 02547 g004
Plants 13 02547 g005
Figure 5. Chlorophyll a content in µg Chl-a g−1 DW, the ratio of carotenoids (A480nm) to Chl-a (A665nm) in Iridaea cordata carpospores exposed for 4 h to PAR and PAR + UV treatments at 2 and 8 °C, and subsequent 4 h recovery in dim light. Control was continuously maintained at 4 μmol photon m−2 s−1 and at 8 °C. Values are means ± S.E. (n = 4). F-values and ANOVA significance are indicated. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, HSD post hoc test).
Figure 5. Chlorophyll a content in µg Chl-a g−1 DW, the ratio of carotenoids (A480nm) to Chl-a (A665nm) in Iridaea cordata carpospores exposed for 4 h to PAR and PAR + UV treatments at 2 and 8 °C, and subsequent 4 h recovery in dim light. Control was continuously maintained at 4 μmol photon m−2 s−1 and at 8 °C. Values are means ± S.E. (n = 4). F-values and ANOVA significance are indicated. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, HSD post hoc test).
Plants 13 02547 g005
Plants 13 02547 g006
Figure 6. Spectra of methanol extract of the Iridaea cordata carpospores. (A) Spectra of initial samples. (B,C) Spectra of methanol extracts (against control) of samples following 4 h exposure to UV radiation under two temperature treatments and subsequent 4 h recovery in dim light. Control was kept constant at 4 μmol photon m−2 s−1 and 8 °C. Each spectrum represents the average of four measurements.
Figure 6. Spectra of methanol extract of the Iridaea cordata carpospores. (A) Spectra of initial samples. (B,C) Spectra of methanol extracts (against control) of samples following 4 h exposure to UV radiation under two temperature treatments and subsequent 4 h recovery in dim light. Control was kept constant at 4 μmol photon m−2 s−1 and 8 °C. Each spectrum represents the average of four measurements.
Plants 13 02547 g006
Table 1. ANOVA results and significance values for the main effects and interactions of temperature and radiation treatments on the variation in photosynthetic activity (Fv/Fm) of carpospores of Iridaea cordata during exposure and recovery experiments.
Table 1. ANOVA results and significance values for the main effects and interactions of temperature and radiation treatments on the variation in photosynthetic activity (Fv/Fm) of carpospores of Iridaea cordata during exposure and recovery experiments.
dfF-Valuep-ValuedfF-Valuep-Value
Fv/Fm (4 h exposure)Fv/Fm (4 h recovery)
Radiation (A)2110<0.0012103<0.001
Temperature (B)1243<0.001175<0.001
A × B219<0.001270.001
Variation of Fv/Fm (4-h exposure)Variation of Fv/Fm (4-h recovery)
Radiation (A)120<0.001133<0.001
Temperature (B)17<0.00113<0.001
A × B12<0.00118<0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Navarro, N.P.; Huovinen, P.; Jofre, J.; Gómez, I. Temperature Dependence and the Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Activity of Carpospores in Sub-Antarctic Red Alga Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory 1826. Plants 2024, 13, 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182547

AMA Style

Navarro NP, Huovinen P, Jofre J, Gómez I. Temperature Dependence and the Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Activity of Carpospores in Sub-Antarctic Red Alga Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory 1826. Plants. 2024; 13(18):2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182547

Chicago/Turabian Style

Navarro, Nelso P., Pirjo Huovinen, Jocelyn Jofre, and Iván Gómez. 2024. "Temperature Dependence and the Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Activity of Carpospores in Sub-Antarctic Red Alga Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory 1826" Plants 13, no. 18: 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182547

APA Style

Navarro, N. P., Huovinen, P., Jofre, J., & Gómez, I. (2024). Temperature Dependence and the Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Activity of Carpospores in Sub-Antarctic Red Alga Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory 1826. Plants, 13(18), 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182547

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop