Next Article in Journal
Makerspaces in First-Year Engineering Education
Next Article in Special Issue
Taking Universal Design Back to Its Roots: Perspectives on Accessibility and Identity in Undergraduate Mathematics
Previous Article in Journal
Problem-Oriented Project Learning as a First Year Experience: A Transformative Pedagogy for Entry Level PPL
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nature in the Eye of the Beholder: A Case Study for Cultural Humility as a Strategy to Broaden Participation in STEM
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Implementing Reflective Group Work Activities in a Large Chemistry Lab to Support Collaborative Learning

Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007
by Hannah Leopold 1,* and Ann Smith 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007
Submission received: 1 December 2019 / Revised: 23 December 2019 / Accepted: 26 December 2019 / Published: 27 December 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper is extremely important in its purpose, scope, and message.  it should be mandatory reading for general chemistry lab instructors, frankly.  I found it to be well researched, well written, clearly presented, thorough, and inviting.  It is perhaps a shame that the authors could not obtain some of the data they were hoping to use, but I would guess it was not for lack of trying.  Nevertheless, this was a pleasure to review.  Excellent scholarly work--I hope many read it and join in the restlessness.

Author Response

Thank you for your kind words regarding our manuscript and the time you dedicated to reviewing it. We hope others will join in our restlessness as well! 

 

Best, 

Hannah and Ann 

Reviewer 2 Report

I am very happy to read this paper. The paper is focusing on an issue that many universities and their labs are facing, however – I assume – in most of the cases it is not pay much attention to it.

As authors mentioned, lot of us hope and think that skills needed for a successful group work are gained in school. But we all know this I not the case.

 

I think the paper is very well written. The need for the study and the innovation is good explained and the relevant literature named. I think that the innovation is well explained and can be used from other chemistry educators. Good job! The study done is well explained and the limitations are discussed.

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript and for your kind words of support. 

 

Best, 

Hannah and Ann 

Back to TopTop