A Novel ON-State Resistance Modeling Technique for MOSFET Power Switches

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (New Reviewer)

My comments are in the attached document!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report (New Reviewer)

Please check my full report in the provided attachment

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report (New Reviewer)

 

I have noticed significant improvement in this new version of paper, However there are Minor issues to be satisfied.

 

1.         Check abstract length requirement (it seems bit long). Also, in abstract do not cite brands of products to make it concise and more general.

2.         Please revise; this keyword insignificant and too long:

Personal Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit and Phases (PSpice) Allegro simulator

3.          Correct here: In [9], the authors make: ® Stefanskyi et al. [9] made a ……..

4.         Same correction for: In [1], the authors propose;     In [10]; In [11] etc….. please change this citation method in the paper is not appropriate

5.         Make sure that all parameters and constants are defined for example what w in eqt(3-4) means ; otherwise you should provide a list of symbols.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. An explanation is needed why the graphs in fig. 5-7, etc. have this or that behavior (exponential, linear); the analytical model described in paragraph 4 does not allow explaining the nature of the dependencies.

2. It is advisable to display regression dependencies (linear, exponential) on graphs and determine the regression parameters, for example, by the least squares method.

3. Dependence in fig. 7 has a noticeable non-linear character, in contrast to what is written in the text.

 

In the opinion of the reviewer, the work is of practical interest, but the mathematical justification is rather weak. It may be advisable to submit the material of the article in its current form to one of the radio engineering or physical journals.

Reviewer 2 Report

The main contributions of this work should be clarified for more details that can help the reader through this paper. 

The presents of the plots seem a bit tight. Some plots are likely the lines. Thus, presentations based on values and tables may be appropriate ones. 

The conclusion may be reconsidered for a bit revised to emphasize the results regarding the contributions themselves. 

Reviewer 3 Report

The "Abstract" section can be made much more impressive by highlighting your contributions. The contribution of the study should be explained simply and clearly.

The "Introduction" section can be made much more impressive by highlighting your contributions.

The importance of the design carried out in this manuscript can be explained better than other important studies published in this field. I recommend the authors to review other recently developed works and compare your work with state of the art techniques.

The performance of the proposed method should be better analyzed, commented and visualized in the experimental section.

What makes the proposed method suitable for this unique task? What new development to the proposed method have the authors added (compared to the existing approaches)? These points should be clarified.

Discussion" section should be added in a more highlighting, argumentative way. The author should analysis the reason why the tested results is achieved.