Next Article in Journal
On AP–Henstock–Kurzweil Integrals and Non-Atomic Radon Measure
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Optimal Investment Strategies with Exchange Rate Risk and Default Risk
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Practicality of the Analytical Solutions for all Third- and Fourth-Degree Algebraic Equations with Real Coefficients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Hybrid Numbers with Gaussian Leonardo Coefficients

Department of Mathematics, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, 06900 Ankara, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2023, 11(6), 1551; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061551
Submission received: 8 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematics and Its Applications in Science and Engineering II)

Abstract

:
We consider the Gaussian Leonardo numbers and investigate some of their amazing characteristic properties, including their generating function, the associated Binet formula and Cassini identity, and their matrix representation. Then, we define the hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers and obtain some of their particular properties. Furthermore, we define n n Hessenberg matrices whose permanents yield the Leonardo and Gaussian Leonardo sequences.

1. Introduction

The Leonardo numbers [1] are defined by the following recurrence relation:
L e n = L e n 1 + L e n 2 + 1 ; n 2
where L e n denotes the nth Leonardo number and L e 0 = 1 , L e 1 = 1 . It is known that they can be represented via the Fibonacci numbers, as shown below:
L e n = 2 F n + 1 1
where F n is the nth Fibonacci number, defined by the following recurrence for n 2 :
F n = F n 1 + F n 2 .
Although the Leonardo numbers have been recently defined, one can find a vast amount of papers about them in the literature. For example, in [2], the authors obtain new identities of the Leonardo numbers and give relationships among the Fibonacci, Lucas, and Leonardo numbers. Moreover, they give some matrix representations. In [3], the authors define the incomplete Leonardo numbers and obtain some properties. The authors give a generalization of the Leonardo numbers in [4]. In [5], the authors define the generalized Leonardo numbers and provide some properties of these numbers. Additionally, they give matrix representations and define the incomplete generalized Leonardo numbers. In [6], the authors present some properties of octonion numbers of the Leonardo sequence.
Recently, there has been a huge amount of interest in hybrid numbers, which can be considered a generalization of complex numbers and are composed of a combination of complex ( i 2 = 1 ) , hyperbolic ( h 2 = 1 ) , and dual numbers ( ε 2 = 0 ) . The set of hybrid numbers (for details, see [7]) are defined below:
K = a + b i + c ε + d h : a , b , c , d R , i 2 = 1 , ε 2 = 0 , h 2 = 1 , i h = h i = ε + i .
Here, we want to draw your attention to the fact that the product of any two hybrid numbers is achieved by exploiting Table 1:
Recently, many researchers have been interested in the hybrid numbers with some well-known number sequence coefficients. For more details, please see [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] and the references therein.
The determinant and the permanent of an n × n matrix A = ( a i j ) may be given by
det ( A ) = σ S n sgn ( σ ) i = 1 n a i σ ( i ) ,
and
per ( A ) = σ S n i = 1 n a i σ ( i )
respectively. Here, S n represents the symmetric group of the degree n. Note that if one omits the sign pattern in the definition of the determinant, we obtain the permanent of A.
In the literature, there are many researchers who are interested in determinant and permanent computations. For more details, please look at references [24,25,26,27,28]. The authors of [24] have defined an excellent method for computing matrix permanents, which is called the contraction method. In other words, it is defined as follows:
Let A = ( a i j ) be an m × n matrix with row vectors r 1 , r 2 , , r m . We say A is contractible on column k if that column contains exactly two nonzero elements, say a i k 0 , a j k 0 , and i j . Then, the ( m 1 ) × ( n 1 ) matrix, A i j : k , is obtained from A replacing the ith row with a j k r i + a i k r j and deleting the jth row, and the kth column is called the contraction of A on column k relative to rows i and j. If A is contractible on row k with a k i 0 , a k j 0 , and i j , then the matrix A k : i j = [ A i j : k T ] T is called the contraction of A on row k relative to columns i and j. We know that if A is an integer matrix, and B is a contraction of A, then
per A = per B .
Inspired by these recent papers, we introduce a new hybrid number system with the Gaussian Leonardo coefficients. In the following section, we define the Gaussian Leonardo hybrid numbers and obtain some of their particular properties. In the next section, we define n × n Hessenberg matrices whose permanents are the Leonardo and Gaussian Leonardo numbers. Finally, we give a Maple 13 source code to verify the permanent computation (Appendix A).

2. The Gaussian Leonardo Sequence

Definition 1.
The Gaussian Leonardo numbers are defined as shown below:
G L n = L e n + L e n 1 i ; n 1
where G L n denotes the nth Gaussian Leonardo number, and L e n denotes the nth Leonardo number. Clearly, it can be written as follows:
G L n = L e n + L e n 1 i = 2 L e n 1 L e n 3 + 2 L e n 2 L e n 4 i ,
and
G L n 1 = 2 L e n 1 + L e n 3 i ,
G L n 2 = 2 L e n 2 + L e n 4 i .
In other words, the Gaussian Leonardo sequence can be rewritten by the following recurrence, n 3 :
G L n = 2 G L n 1 G L n 3
where G L 0 = 1 i , G L 1 = 1 + i , G L 2 = 3 + i , and G L 3 = 5 + 3 i .
Some values of the Gaussian Leonardo numbers are given in Table 2.
Theorem 1.
(Generating function) The generating function for the Gaussian Leonardo numbers is given by
g ( x ) = n = 0 G L n x n = 1 i + 1 + 3 i x + 1 i x 2 1 2 x + x 3 .
Proof. 
Taking into account the definition of the generating function and the Gaussian Leonardo numbers, we can write the following equalities:
g ( x ) = G L 0 + G L 1 x + G L 2 x 2 + . . . + G L n x n + . . .
2 x g ( x ) = 2 G L 0 x + 2 G L 1 x 2 + 2 G L 2 x 3 + . . . + 2 G L n 1 x n + . . . x 3 g ( x ) = G L 0 x 3 G L 1 x 4 G L 2 x 5 + . . . G L n 3 x n + . . . .
Then,
( 1 2 x + x 3 ) g ( x ) = G L 0 + G L 1 2 G L 0 x + G L 2 2 G L 1 x 2 + G L 3 2 G L 2 + G L 0 x 3 . . . + G L n 2 G L n 1 + G L n 3 x n + . . .
and, therefore,
g ( x ) = G L 0 + G L 1 2 G L 0 x + G L 2 2 G L 1 x 2 1 2 x + x 3 = 1 i + 1 + 3 i x + 1 i x 2 1 2 x + x 3 .
So, the proof is completed.    □
Theorem 2.
(Binet formula) For n 0 , the Binet formula for the Gaussian Leonardo numbers is
G L n = T ( α n β n α β ) + 2 β n + K
where T = 1 + 2 i + 5 , K = 1 i , α = 1 + 5 2 , and β = 1 5 2 .
Proof. 
By exploiting the generating function and the definition of the Gaussian Leonardo numbers, and, as a result,
g ( x ) = 1 i + 1 + 3 i x + 1 i x 2 1 2 x + x 3 = A x + B ( 1 x x 2 ) + C ( 1 x ) = D ( 1 α x ) + E ( 1 β x ) + C 1 x
where A = 2 i , B = 2 , C = 1 i , D = 1 + 2 i + 5 5 , E = 5 1 2 i 5 ,
α = 1 + 5 2 and β = 1 5 2 .
This can be rewritten as
1 i + 1 + 3 i x + 1 i x 2 1 2 x + x 3 = D ( 1 α x ) + E ( 1 β x ) + C 1 x = n = 0 D α n x n + n = 0 E β n x n + n = 0 C x n = n = 0 D α n + E β n + C x n
where
g ( x ) = n = 0 D α n + E β n + C x n
i.e.,
G L n = T ( α n β n α β ) + 2 β n + K
where T = 1 + 2 i + 5 a n d K = 1 i . So, the proof is completed.    □
Note that by using the Binet formula for the Fibonacci numbers and the relation G L n = ( 2 F n + 1 1 ) + ( 2 F n 1 ) i , we obtain another statement for the Binet formula.
Example 1.
For n = 3 ,
G L 3 = T ( α 3 β 3 α β ) + 2 β 3 + K = ( 1 + 2 i + 5 ) ( α 2 + α β + β 2 ) + 2 β 3 1 i = 5 + 3 i .
Theorem 3.
(Cassini identity) For n > 0 , the following identity holds
G L n 1 G L n + 1 G L n 2 = 3 + i 5 8 n 2 i 8 α n 2 α + 2 i + 8 β n 4 3 i + 2 i 5 + 2 1 + 2 n 5 + 5 i 2 n + 2 + i + i 5 2 α n .
Proof. 
According to the Binet formula and by applying a pile of operations, we have:
G L n 1 G L n + 1 G L n 2 = ( 1 + 2 i + 5 ) 1 + 5 2 n 1 1 5 2 n 1 1 + 5 2 1 5 2 + 2 1 5 2 n 1 + ( 1 i ) ( 1 + 2 i + 5 ) 1 + 5 2 n + 1 1 5 2 n + 1 1 + 5 2 1 5 2 + 2 1 5 2 n + 1 + ( 1 i ) ( 1 + 2 i + 5 ) 1 + 5 2 n 1 5 2 n 1 + 5 2 1 5 2 + 2 1 5 2 n + ( 1 i ) 2 = 3 + i 5 8 n 2 i 4 1 + 5 n 1 + 2 i + 5 + 4 4 5 n 4 3 i + 2 i 5 + 2 1 + 2 n 5 + 5 i 2 n + 2 + i + i 5 1 + 5 n .
So, the proof is completed.    □
Note that by using the relation G L n = ( 2 F n + 1 1 ) + ( 2 F n 1 ) i , the Binet formula for F n , and exploiting the algebraic manipulations on the recurrence relation for the Fibonacci numbers, one can find the Cassini identity, as shown below:
G L n 1 G L n + 1 G L n 2 = ( 8 ( 1 ) n 1 4 F n + 6 F n 1 ) + ( 4 ( 1 ) n 2 F n 1 ) i .

3. Matrix Representation of the Gaussian Leonardo Sequence

In this section, we give the matrix representation of the Leonardo numbers. Note that, in [2], the authors give a matrix representation of the Leonardo numbers; this matrix can also be expressed by the sums of the Fibonacci numbers. Let us consider the matrices given below:
A = 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
and
B = G L 2 G L 1 G L 0 .
Then, it is easy to see that the following equation holds:
G L 3 G L 2 G L 1 = 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 G L 2 G L 1 G L 0
and, by induction, we say:
G L n + 2 G L n + 1 G L n = 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 n G L 2 G L 1 G L 0 .
Moreover, the following amazing property also holds:
G L 2 n + 2 G L 2 n + 1 G L 2 n = 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 n G L n + 2 G L n + 1 G L n .
Theorem 4.
For n 1 ,
A n = F n + 4 F n + 2 F n + 3 F n + 3 F n + 1 F n + 2 F n + 2 F n F n + 1
where F 1 = 1 , F 2 = 0 , and F k = i = 0 k 3 F i = F k 1 1 ( k 3 ), and F k is the kth Fibonacci number.
Proof. 
By exploiting the well-known property for the Fibonacci sums
i = 1 n F i = F n + 2 1 ,
we have, for k 3 ,
F k = i = 0 k 3 F i = F k 1 1 .
Then, by using the Mathematical Induction Method, it is easy to see that this is verified for n = 1 . Then, suppose that the following equation is true:
A n = F n + 4 F n + 2 F n + 3 F n + 3 F n + 1 F n + 2 F n + 2 F n F n + 1 = F n + 3 1 F n + 1 + 1 F n + 2 + 1 F n + 2 1 F n + 1 F n + 1 + 1 F n + 1 1 F n 1 + 1 F n + 1 .
Then,
A n + 1 = A n A = F n + 4 F n + 2 F n + 3 F n + 3 F n + 1 F n + 2 F n + 2 F n F n + 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 = F n + 5 F n + 3 F n + 4 F n + 4 F n + 2 F n + 3 F n + 3 F n + 1 F n + 2
which shows that it holds for n + 1 .    □
Proposition 1.
d e t ( A n ) = ( 1 ) n .          
Proof. 
By Theorem 4 and its proof:
A n = F n + 4 F n + 2 F n + 3 F n + 3 F n + 1 F n + 2 F n + 2 F n F n + 1 = F n + 3 1 F n + 1 + 1 F n + 2 + 1 F n + 2 1 F n + 1 F n + 1 + 1 F n + 1 1 F n 1 + 1 F n + 1 .
Applying the suitable elementary row operations, one obtains the determinant, as shown below:
d e t ( A n ) = d e t 1 1 1 F n F n 2 F n 1 F n + 1 1 F n 1 + 1 F n + 1 = F n 1 2 F n F n 2 = ( 1 ) n
where the last equality follows from the Cassini identity for the Fibonacci numbers.    □

4. On Hybrid Numbers with Gaussian Leonardo Coefficients

The main goal of this section is to define hybrid numbers with the Gaussian Leonardo coefficients and to present some amazing results involving them.
Definition 2.
Let us define hybrid numbers with the Gaussian Leonardo coefficients, as shown below:
H G L n = G L n + G L n + 1 i + G L n + 2 ε + G L n + 3 h ; n 0
where H G L n denotes the nth hybrid Gaussian Leonardo number.
By using the definition of the G L n , we can write:
H G L n = G L n + G L n + 1 i + G L n + 2 ε + G L n + 3 h = 2 G L n 1 G L n 3 + 2 G L n G L n 2 i + 2 G L n + 1 G L n 1 ε + 2 G L n + 2 G L n h
and
H G L n 1 = G L n 1 + G L n i + G L n + 1 ε + G L n + 2 h ,
H G L n 2 = G L n 2 + G L n 1 i + G L n ε + G L n + 1 h .
In other words, the hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers can be rewritten by the following recurrence, n 3 :
H G L n = 2 H G L n 1 H G L n 3
with the initial conditions H G L 0 = 1 + 3 i + 6 ε + 4 h , H G L 1 = 3 + 9 i + 10 ε + 6 h , and H G L 2 = 5 + 15 i + 18 ε + 10 h .
Some values of H G L n are given in Table 3.
In order to find the generating function for the hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers, we have to write the sequence as a power series in which each term of the sequence corresponds to the coefficients of the series. For more details, please see [20].
Theorem 5.
(Generating function) The generating function for the hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers is given by
g ( x ) = n = 0 H G L n x n = 1 + 3 i + 6 ε + 4 h + 1 + 3 i 2 ε 2 h x + ( 1 3 i 2 ε 2 h ) x 2 1 2 x + x 3 .
Proof. 
The generating function of H G L n with a formal power series is
g ( x ) = H G L 0 + H G L 1 x + H G L 2 x 2 + . . . + H G L n x n + . . .
and
2 x g ( x ) = 2 H G L 0 x + 2 H G L 1 x 2 + 2 H G L 2 x 3 + . . . + 2 H G L n 1 x n + . . . x 3 g ( x ) = H G L 0 x 3 H G L 1 x 4 H G L 2 x 5 + . . . H G L n 3 x n + . . .
From here,
( 1 2 x + x 3 ) g ( x ) = H G L 0 + H G L 1 2 H G L 0 x + H G L 2 2 H G L 1 x 2 + H G L 3 2 H G L 2 + H G L 0 x 3 . . . + H G L n 2 H G L n 1 + H G L n 3 x n + . . .
and, as a result,
g ( x ) = H G L 0 + H G L 1 2 H G L 0 ) x   +   ( H G L 2 2 H G L 1 x 2 1 2 x + x 3 = 1 + 3 i + 6 ε + 4 h + 1 + 3 i 2 ε 2 h x + ( 1 3 i 2 ε 2 h ) x 2 1 2 x + x 3 .
So, the proof is completed.    □
Theorem 6.
(Binet formula) For n 0 ,
H G L n = X ( α n + β n ) + Y ( α n β n ) 5 + ( 1 3 i 2 ε )
where X = 5 ( 1 + 3 i + 4 ε + 2 h ) , Y = 3 + 9 i + 8 ε + 4 h .
Proof. 
By exploiting the generating function and the definition of the hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers, we have
g ( x ) = H G L 0 + H G L 1 2 H G L 0 ) x + ( H G L 2 2 H G L 1 x 2 1 2 x + x 3 = A x + B ( 1 x x 2 ) + C ( 1 x )
where A = 2 + 6 i + 4 ε + 2 h , B = 2 + 6 i + 8 ε + 4 h , and C = 1 3 i 2 ε . Then, we write
A x + B ( 1 x x 2 ) = E ( 1 x α ) + F ( 1 x β )
where
E = 3 + 9 i + 8 ε + 4 h + 5 1 + 3 i + 4 ε + 2 h 5
and
F = 1 + 3 i + 4 ε + 2 h 5 3 + 9 i + 8 ε + 4 h 5 .
This can be rewritten as
g ( x ) = 1 + 3 i + 6 ε + 4 h + 1 + 3 i 2 ε 2 h x + ( 1 3 i 2 ε 2 h ) x 2 1 2 x + x 3 = 3 + 9 i + 8 ε + 4 h + 5 1 + 3 i + 4 ε + 2 h 5 ( 1 x α ) + 1 + 3 i + 4 ε + 2 h 5 3 + 9 i + 8 ε + 4 h 5 ( 1 x β ) + 1 3 i 2 ε ( 1 x ) = n = 0 E α n x n + n = 0 F β n x n + n = 0 C x n = n = 0 E α n + F β n + C x n
i.e.,
H G L n = X ( α n + β n ) + Y ( α n β n ) 5 + ( 1 3 i 2 ε ) .
So, the proof is completed.    □
Example 2.
For n = 2 ,
H G L 2 = X ( α 2 + β 2 ) + Y ( α 2 β 2 ) 5 + ( 1 3 i 2 ε ) = 3 X + Y 5 5 + 1 3 i 2 ε = 5 + 15 i + 18 ε + 10 h .

5. On Permanents of Hessenberg Matrices Yielding the Leonardo and Gaussian Leonardo Sequences

In this section, we define one type of Hessenberg matrix family and compute its permanent by using the contraction method. Furthermore, we provide a Maple 13 source code to calculate the permanent using the contraction method (Appendix A).
Let P n = [ p i j ] be an n × n Hessenberg matrix with p 11 = p 12 = p 13 = 1 ,   p m m = 2 ,   p m , m 1 = 1 , and p t , t + 2 = 1 for m = 2 , 3 , , n and t = 2 , 3 , , n 2 . Clearly:
P n = 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 .
Then, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.
Let P n be a matrix as in (2). Then,
p e r P n = L e n 1 .
Proof. 
From the definition of the matrix P n , this can be contracted on the first column. Let us denote the kth contraction of P n by P n ( k ) . Namely,
P n ( 1 ) = 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2
and by continuing with this process with ( n 3 ) steps, we obtain for 2 k n 3 ;
P n ( k ) = L e k L e k 2 L e k 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2
and the ( n 2 ) th step is given below:
P n ( n 2 ) = L e n 2 L e n 4 1 2 .
Then, we have
p e r P n = p e r P n ( n 2 ) = 2 L e n 2 L e n 4 = L e n 1 .
   □
Let K n = [ k i j ] be an n × n Hessenberg matrix with k 11 = k 12 = k 13 = 1 , k m , m = 2 , k n n = 2 + i ,   k m , m 1 = 1 , and k t , t + 2 = 1 for m = 2 , 3 , 4 , , n 1 and t = 2 , 3 , 4 , , n 2 . Clearly:
K n = 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 + i .
Then, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 8.
Let K n be a matrix as in (5). Then
p e r K n = G L n 1 .
Proof. 
The matrix K n can be contracted on column 1, and, by following the same steps as in the previous theorem, we obtain the following matrix for 1 r n 3 ;
K n ( r ) = L e k L e k 2 L e k 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 + i
and the ( n 2 ) th step is given below:
K n ( n 2 ) = L e n 2 L e n 4 1 2 + i .
Then, we have
p e r K n = p e r K n ( n 2 ) = ( 2 + i ) L e n 2 L e n 4 = G L n 1 .
   □

6. Conclusions

In this study, we initially present the Gaussian Leonardo numbers. Then, we investigate some of their amazing characteristic properties, such as the Binet formula, generating function, Cassini identity, etc. Furthermore, we give some matrix representations. In the following section, we define the hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers and obtain some particular properties for them. Additionally, we define n × n Hessenberg matrices whose permanents are the Leonardo and Gaussian Leonardo numbers. Finally, we give a Maple 13 source code to verify the permanent computation (Appendix A).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Y. and N.K.; methodology, F.Y.; software, N.K.; validation, F.Y. and N.K.; formal analysis, F.Y.; investigation, F.Y.; resources, N.K.; data curation, F.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, N.K.; writing—review and editing, N.K.; visualization, F.Y.; supervision, F.Y.; project administration, F.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Using the following Maple 13 source code, it is possible to obtain the matrix and the steps of the contraction method.
restart:
with(LinearAlgebra):
permanent:=proc(n)
local i,j,k,c,C;
c:=(i,j)->piecewise(i=1 and j=1, 1, i=1 and j=2, 1, i=1
and j=3, 1, i=j,2,i=j-2,-1,
i=j+1, -1, 0);
C:=Matrix(n,n,c):
for k from 0 to n-3 do
print(k,C):
for j from 2 to n-k do
C[1,j]:=C[2,1]C[1,j]+C[1,1]C[2,j]:
od:
C:=DeleteRow(DeleteColumn(Matrix(n-k,n-k,C),1),2):
od:
print(k, eval(C)):
end proc:with(LinearAlgebra):
permanent(n);

References

  1. Catarino, P.; Borges, A. On Leonardo numbers. Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 2019, 89, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alp, Y.; Koçer, E.G. Some Properties of Leonardo Numbers. Konuralp J. Math. 2021, 9, 183–189. [Google Scholar]
  3. Catarino, P.; Borges, A. A Note on Incomplete Leonardo Numbers. Integers 2020, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shannon, A.G. A Note On Generalized Leonardo Numbers. Notes Number Theory Discret. Math. 2019, 25, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kuhapatanakul, K.; Chobsorn, J. On The Generalized Leonardo Numbers. Integers 2022, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vieira, R.; Mangueira, M.; Catarino, P. The Generalization of Gaussians and Leonardo’s Octonions. Ann. Math. Silesianae 2023, 37, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ozdemir, M. Introduction to Hybrid Numbers. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2018, 28, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Szynal-Liana, A.; Wloch, I. The Fibonacci hybrid numbers. Util. Math. 2019, 110, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Szynal-Liana, A.; Wloch, I. On Jacosthal and Jacosthal-Lucas hybrid numbers. Ann. Math. Sil. 2019, 33, 276–283. [Google Scholar]
  10. Szynal-Liana, A.; Wloch, I. On Pell and Pell-Lucas hybrid numbers. Commentat. Math. 2018, 58, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  11. Szynal-Liana, A. The Horadam hybrid numbers. Discuss. Math. Gen. Algebra Appl. 2018, 38, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Catarino, P. On k-Pell hybrid numbers. J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 2019, 22, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ozkan, E.; Uysal, M. Mersenne-Lucas Hybrid Numbers. Math. Montisnigri 2021, 52, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taşcı, D.; Sevgi, E. Some Properties between Mersenne, Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal-Lucas Hybrid Numbers. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 146, 110862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soykan, Y.; Taşdemir, E. Generalized Tetranacci Hybrid Numbers. Ann. Math. Silesianae 2021, 35, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alp, Y.; Kocer, E.G. Hybrid Leonardo numbers. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 150, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Isbilir, Z.; Gurses, N. Pentanacci and Pentanacci-Lucas hybrid numbers. J. Discret. Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kocer, E.G.; Alsan, H. Generalized Hybrid Fibonacci and Lucas p-numbers. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2022, 53, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kızılates, C. A new generalization of Fibonacci hybrid and Lucas hybrid numbers. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 130, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Srivastava, H.M.; Manocha, H.L.A. Treatise on Generating Functions; Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood Limited): Chichester, UK; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NJ, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  21. Uysal, M.; Ozkan, E. Padovan Hybrid Quaternions and Some Properties. J. Sci. Arts 2022, 22, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Szynal-Liana, A.; Włoch, I. On generalized Leonardo hybrid numbers. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 150, 111128. [Google Scholar]
  23. Akbiyik, M.; Alo, J. On Third-Order Bronze Fibonacci Numbers. Mathematics 2021, 9, 2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brualdi, R.A.; Gibson, P.M. Convex polyhedra of doubly stochastic matrices I: Applications of the permanent function. J. Combin. Theory A 1977, 22, 194–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. da Fonseca, C.M. An identity between the determinant and the permanent of Hessenberg type-matrices. Czechoslovak Math. J. 2011, 61, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yılmaz, F.; Bozkurt, D. Hessenberg matrices and the Pell and Perrin numbers. J. Number Theory 2011, 131, 1390–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yılmaz, F.; Bozkurt, D. On the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, their sums and permanents of one type of Hessenberg matrices. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2014, 43, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sogabe, T.; Yılmaz, F. A note on a fast breakdown-free algorithm for computing the determinants and the permanents of k-tridiagonal matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 270, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Multiplication table.
Table 1. Multiplication table.
.1i ε h
11i ε h
ii 1 1 h ε + i
ε ε h + 1 0 ε
h h ε i ε 1
Table 2. Gaussian Leonardo numbers.
Table 2. Gaussian Leonardo numbers.
n01234567
G L n 1 i 1 + i 3 + i 5 + 3 i 9 + 5 i 15 + 9 i 25 + 15 i 41 + 25 i
Table 3. Some hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers.
Table 3. Some hybrid Gaussian Leonardo numbers.
n012345
H G L n 1 + 3 i + 6 ε + 4 h 3 + 9 i + 10 ε + 6 h 5 + 15 i + 18 ε + 10 h 9 + 27 i + 30 ε + 16 h 15 + 45 i + 50 ε + 26 h 25 + 75 i + 82 ε + 42 h
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kara, N.; Yilmaz, F. On Hybrid Numbers with Gaussian Leonardo Coefficients. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061551

AMA Style

Kara N, Yilmaz F. On Hybrid Numbers with Gaussian Leonardo Coefficients. Mathematics. 2023; 11(6):1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kara, Nagihan, and Fatih Yilmaz. 2023. "On Hybrid Numbers with Gaussian Leonardo Coefficients" Mathematics 11, no. 6: 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061551

APA Style

Kara, N., & Yilmaz, F. (2023). On Hybrid Numbers with Gaussian Leonardo Coefficients. Mathematics, 11(6), 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061551

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop