1. Introduction
Let
and
be such that
. We consider the classes of functions
where
is the left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order
of
f and
is the right-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order
of
f. In this paper, we extend Dragomir–Agarwal inequality to the above classes of functions. Next, we provide an application to the special means of real numbers.
Let us mention some motivations for studying the proposed problems. Let
be a given function, where
I is a certain interval of
, and let
be such that
. If
f is convex in
I, then
Inequality (
5) is known in the literature as Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality (see [
1,
2]). Several improvements and extensions of inequality (
5) to different types of convexity were established by many authors. In this direction, we refer the reader to [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8] and the references therein. In [
9], Dragomir and Agarwal established the following interesting result, which provides an estimate between the difference between the middle and right terms in inequality (
5).
Theorem 1 (Dragomir–Agarwal inequality)
. Let be a given function, where I is a certain interval of , and let be such that . If f is differentiable in and is convex in , then The main idea for proving Theorem 1 is based on the following lemma [
9].
Lemma 1. Let be a given function, where I is a certain interval of , and let be such that . If f is differentiable in and , then In [
10], Pearce and Pečarić extended Theorem 1 to the case when
is concave. Using Lemma 1 and Jensen integral inequality, they obtained the following interesting result.
Theorem 2. Let be a given function, where I is a certain interval of , and let be such that . If f is differentiable in and is concave in , then Motivated by the above cited works, our aim in this paper is to extend Theorems 1 and 2 to the classes of functions given by (1)–(4).
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, we recall some basic concepts on fractional calculus. In
Section 3, we state and prove our main results. In
Section 4, an application to special means of real numbers is provided.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we recall some basic notions on fractional calculus. For more details, we refer the reader to [
11,
12].
First, let us fix with .
Definition 1. The left-side Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order of a function is given bywhere Γ denotes the Gamma function. Definition 2. The right-side Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order of a function is given by Lemma 2. Let and . Then,whereand Furthermore, for
and
, we set
and
Lemma 3. Let . Then,and Lemma 4. Let and . Then, Definition 3. The left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order of a function is given by Definition 4. The right-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order of a function is given by The following result is an immediate consequence of Lemma 2.
Lemma 5. Let and . Then,whereand Furthermore, for
and
, we set
and
The following result is an immediate consequence of Lemma 3.
Lemma 6. Let . Then,and The following result provides sufficient conditions for the convexity and concavity of
(see [
13]).
Lemma 7. Let and . If in , and , then is concave in . If in , and , then is convex in .
Using Lemma 7, we deduce the following criteria for the convexity and concavity of .
Lemma 8. Let and be such thatIf in and , then is concave in . If in and , then is convex in . Proof. We have just to observe that, by (7), we have
Next, using Lemma 7, the desired results follow. ☐
3. Results and Discussion
In this section, we state and prove our main results. Just before, let us fix and with .
First, we shall establish the following fractional version of Lemma 1.
Lemma 9. Let . Then, Proof. By the definition of the left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order α, we have
Using the integration by parts rule given by Lemma 4, we obtain
Next, the standard integration by parts rule yields
On the other hand, by the definition of the right-side Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order
, we have
Using the identity
we obtain
which yields
and
Using (
11), we obtain
i.e.,
Next, combining (
9), (
10) and (
12), we obtain
Finally, the change of variable
yields (
8). ☐
Remark 1. Passing to the limit as in (
8)
and using Lemmas 3 and 6, we obtain (
6).
Using a similar argument as in the proof of Lemma 9, we obtain the following fractional version of Lemma 1.
Lemma 10. Let . Then, Remark 2. Passing to the limit as in (
13)
and using Lemmas 3 and 6, we obtain (
6).
Our first main result is the following fractional version of Theorem 1.
Theorem 3. Let , where is the class of functions given by (
1)
. Then, Proof. Let
. Using Lemma 9, we obtain
On the other hand, using the convexity of
, we obtain
Using the fact that
and
we obtain
Finally, combining (
15) and (
16), we obtain (
14). ☐
Next, we discuss the case when , where is the class of functions given by (2).
Theorem 4. Let . Then, Proof. Using Lemma 10, the convexity of
and a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 3, we obtain (
17). ☐
Furthermore, we consider the case when , where is the class of functions given by (3). We obtain the following fractional version of Theorem 2.
Theorem 5. Let . Then, Proof. Using the concavity of
and Jensen integral inequality, we obtain
Using Lemma 9 and the above inequality, (
18) follows. ☐
Using a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 5, we obtain the following result concerning the case when , where is the class of functions given by (4).
Theorem 6. Let . Then, Remark 3. Let us consider the classes of functionsObserve thatTo show this, let us consider as example the functionwhereWe have . Moreover,It can be easily seen that is concave (so, nonconvex). On the other hand, we havewhich is a convex function in . Therefore, but . Hence, Theorem 3 is a real extension of Theorem 1. 4. Applications to Special Means of Real Numbers
In this section, we provide some applications to special means of real numbers. Let
The quantity
is known in the literature as the arithmetic mean of u and v. Let
The quantity can be considered as a fractional generalized ln-mean of u and v.
We have the following estimate.
Corollary 1. Let and . Then, Proof. Let
and
. Let us consider the function
Using Lemma 8, we deduce that
is convex in
, for every
. Hence,
Therefore, using Theorem 3, for all
, we obtain
Passing to the limit as
in (
21) and using Lemmas 3 and 6, we obtain (
19). ☐
Remark 4. Let us consider the case . In this case, by (ii) and (iv), we have is concave in , where f is the function given by (
20)
. Therefore, Theorem 1 cannot be applied. On the other hand, by Theorem 2, we havei.e.,Observe thatTherefore, the estimate (
19)
is sharper than (
22)
. Remark 5. Let us consider the case . In this case, is convex in , where f is the function given by (
20)
(). Therefore, by Theorem 1, we haveOn the other hand, taking in (
19)
, we obtainObserve thatTherefore, (
24)
is sharper than (
23)
.