1. Introduction
We are motivated by the following famous Iyengar inequality (1938), [
1].
Theorem 1. Let f be a differentiable function on and . Then We need
Definition 1 ([
2])
. Let , , the ceiling of the number. Here (absolutely continuous functions) and strictly increasing. We assume that . We define the left generalized g-fractional derivative of f of order α as follows:If , by [3], pp. 360–361, we have that . When , thenthe usual left Caputo fractional derivative. We mention the following g-left fractional generalized Taylor’s formula:
Theorem 2 ([
2])
. Let g be a strictly increasing function and . We assume that , i.e., where , . Also we assume that . ThenCalling the remainder of (7), we find that We need
Definition 2 ([
2])
. Here and is strictly increasing. We assume that , where , . We define the right generalized g-fractional derivative of f of order α as follows:all If , by [3], p. 378, we find that . When , thenthe usual right Caputo fractional derivative. We mention the g-right generalized fractional Taylor’s formula:
Theorem 3 ([
2])
. Let g be a strictly increasing function and . We assume that , where , . Also we assume that . ThenCalling the remainder in (13), we find that We mention the following g-right generalized modified Taylor’s formula:
Theorem 4 ([
2])
. Suppose that , for , fulfill: where , , and where . Thenwhere , any We mention the following g-left generalized modified Taylor’s formula:
Theorem 5 ([
2])
. Suppose that , for , fulfill: , where , , and where . Thenwhere , any Next we present generalized fractional Iyengar type inequalities.
2. Main Results
We present the following Caputo type generalized g-fractional Iyengar type inequality:
Theorem 6. Let g be a strictly increasing function and . We assume that , where , . We also assume that (clearly here it is ). Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (21) is minimized, and we have: (iii) if , for we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds (v) if , for from (24) we obtain (vi) when , , (25) turns to (vii) when , inequality (26) is again valid without any boundary conditions. Proof. We have by (
7) that
∀
Also by (
13) we obtain
∀
By (
27) we derive (by [
4], p. 107)
and by (
28) we obtain
∀
That is
and
∀
Equivalently, we have
and
∀
Let any
, then by integration against
g over
and
, respectively, we obtain
and
Adding (
37) and (
38), we obtain
∀
Consequently we derive:
∀
We have that
giving
and
, that is
the only critical number of
. We have that
, and
, which is the minimum of
over
Consequently the right hand side of (
40) is minimized when
, with value
Assuming
, for
, then we obtain that
which is a sharp inequality.
When
, then (
40) becomes
Next let , and , that is ,
Hence it holds
We notice
and (for
)
By (
40) we have
If
,
then (
46) becomes
When
and
, then (
47) becomes
Let , then .
In that case, without any boundary conditions, we derive from (
48) again that
We have proved theorem in all possible cases. □
Next we give modified g-fractional Iyengar type inequalities:
Theorem 7. Let g be a strictly increasing function and , and . Let , and , for . We assume that and . Also let , for , they fulfill and Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (50) is minimized, and we have: (iii) assuming , for we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds (v) if , for from (53) we obtain:for (vi) when , , (54) becomes Proof. We have by (
19) that
∀
Also by (
16) we find
∀
Clearly here it is
By (
56) we derive (by [
4], p. 107)
and by (
57) we obtain
∀
That is
and
∀
Equivalently, we have
and
∀
Let any
, then by integration against
g over
and
, respectively, we obtain
and
Adding (
67) and (
68), we obtain
∀
Consequently, we derive:
∀
Let us consider
∀
We have that
giving
and
, that is
the only critical number of
. We have that
and
which is the minimum of
over
.
Consequently, the right hand side of (
70) is minimized when
, for some
, with value
Assuming
,
, then we obtain that
which is a sharp inequality.
When
, then (
70) becomes
Next let , and , that is
Hence it holds
We notice
and (for
)
for
.
By (
70) we have
If
,
, then (
76) becomes
When
and
, then (
77) becomes
We have proved theorem in all possible cases. □
We give variants of last theorems:
Theorem 8. All as in Theorem 6 with . If , we assume that . Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (79) is minimized, and we find: (iii) if , for we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds that (v) if , for from (82) we obtain (vi) when , , (83) turns to Proof. From (
27) we have
∀
Similarly, from (
28) we obtain
∀
We have proved that
and
∀
The rest of the proof is as in Theorem 6. □
It follows
Theorem 9. All as in Theorem 7, with . Call Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (91) is minimized, and we find: (iii) assuming , we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds that (v) if , from (94) we find:for (vi) when and , (95) becomes Proof. By (
56) we obtain
∀
Similarly, from (
57) we derive
∀
We have proved that
and
∀
The rest of the proof is as in Theorem 7. □
Next follow variants of Theorems 6 and 7.
Theorem 10. All as in Theorem 6 with , and . If , we assume that . Set Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (102) is minimized, and we have: (iii) if , for we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds (v) if , for from (105) we obtain (vi) when , , (106) turns to Proof. From (
27) we find
(by [
5], p. 439)
(by [
6])
Similarly, from (
28) we obtain
(by [
5], p. 439)
(by [
6])
We have proved that
and
∀
The rest of the proof is as in Theorem 6. □
We continue with
Theorem 11. All as in Theorem 7, with , and . Set Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (115) is minimized, and we have: (iii) assuming , we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds that (v) if , from (118) we obtain: (vi) when , , (119) turns to Proof. By (
56) we find
(by [
5])
(by [
6])
Similarly, from (
57) we derive
(by [
5])
(by [
6])
We have proved that
and
∀
The rest of the proof is as in Theorem 7. □
Applications follow:
Proposition 1. We assume that , where , . We also assume that , . Set Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (128) is minimized, and we find: (iii) if , for we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds (v) if , for from (131) we obtain (vi) when , , (132) turns to (vii) when , inequality (133) is again valid without any boundary conditions. Proof. By Theorem 6, for
We continue with
Proposition 2. Here , where . Let , and , for . We assume that and . Also let , for , they fulfill and . Set Then
(ii) at , the right hand side of (135) is minimized, and we have: (iii) assuming , , we obtainwhich is a sharp inequality, (iv) more generally, for , it holds (v) if , , from (138) we find:for (vi) if and , (139) becomes Proof. By Theorem 7, for □
We could give many other interesting applications that are based in our other theorems, due to lack of space we skip this task.