Next Article in Journal
A New Three-Step Class of Iterative Methods for Solving Nonlinear Systems
Previous Article in Journal
The Enhancement of Academic Performance in Online Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Alsaedi, A., et al. Existence and Stability Results for a Fractional Order Differential Equation with Non-Conjugate Riemann–Stieltjes Integro-Multipoint Boundary Conditions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 249

1
Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM)-Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2019, 7(12), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121220
Submission received: 21 November 2019 / Accepted: 29 November 2019 / Published: 10 December 2019
In [1], the authors wish to make the following corrections.
1 .
Throughout the original paper, the co-efficient of g 3 ( t ) (see (5), (21), (28), proof of Theorem 6) is
a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) f ^ ( u ) d u d A ( s ) .
It should be
i = 1 n 2 α i a η i ( η i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) f ^ ( s ) d s + a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) f ^ ( u ) d u d A ( s ) .
2
In (15) of the original paper, it was
I 3 = a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) f ^ ( u ) d u d A ( s ) .
It should be
I 3 = i = 1 n 2 α i a η i ( η i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) f ^ ( s ) d s + a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) f ^ ( u ) d u d A ( s ) .
3 .
Throughout the original paper, the coefficient of g 3 ¯ (for instance, see (19), proofs of Theorems 2, 4, 6, and 7) is a b ( s a ) q Γ ( q + 1 ) d A ( s ) . It should be
i = 1 n 2 | α i | ( η i a ) q Γ ( q + 1 ) + a b ( s a ) q Γ ( q + 1 ) d A ( s ) .
The coefficient of | ( g 3 ( t 2 ) g 3 ( t 1 ) ) | Γ ( q + 1 ) in the proof of Theorem 2 is a b a s ( s a ) q d A ( s ) . It should be
i = 1 n 2 | α i | ( η i a ) q + a b ( s a ) q d A ( s ) .
4 .
Throughout the original paper, the co-efficient of | g 3 ( t ) | (see proofs of Theorems 2, 4, 6, and 7) and | g 3 ( t 2 ) g 3 ( t 1 ) | in the proof Theorem 2 is
a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d A ( s ) .
It should be
i = 1 n 2 | α i | a η i ( η i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d A ( s ) .
5 .
In the proofs of Theorems 6 and 7, the coefficient of | g 3 ( t ) | is
a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) | f ( u , x ( u ) ) f ( u , y ( u ) ) | d u d A ( s ) .
It should be
[ i = 1 n 2 | α i | a η i ( η i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) | f ( s , x ( s ) ) f ( s , y ( s ) ) | d s + a b a s ( s u ) q 1 Γ ( q ) | f ( u , x ( u ) ) f ( u , y ( u ) ) | d u d A ( s ) ] .
6 .
In Example 2, Λ 0 . 243646 , ξ Λ 0 . 097458 < 1 in the original paper. These values should be Λ 0 . 261226 , ξ Λ 0 . 104490 < 1 .
7 .
In Example 3 of the original paper, Λ 0 . 272140 , Λ ( b a ) q Γ ( q + 1 ) 0 . 204166 and δ < 14 . 693960 . The corrected values of these parameters are Λ 0 . 326742 , Λ ( b a ) q Γ ( q + 1 ) 0 . 258768 and δ < 11 . 5 .
8 .
In Example 4, δ < 11 . 023738 in the original paper. It should be δ < 9 . 1 .
9 .
In Example 5, L Λ 0 . 102053 . It should be L Λ 0 . 097959 .
10 .
In the Conclusions, the coefficient of g 3 ¯ is ( b a ) q + 1 Γ ( q + 2 ) . It should be
i = 1 n 2 | α i | ( η i a ) q Γ ( q + 1 ) + ( b a ) q + 1 Γ ( q + 2 ) .
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.

References

  1. Ahmad, B.; Alruwaily, Y.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K. Existence and Stability Results for a Fractional Order Differential Equation with Non-Conjugate Riemann-Stieltjes Integro-Multipoint Boundary Conditions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmad, B.; Alruwaily, Y.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K. Correction: Alsaedi, A., et al. Existence and Stability Results for a Fractional Order Differential Equation with Non-Conjugate Riemann–Stieltjes Integro-Multipoint Boundary Conditions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 249. Mathematics 2019, 7, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121220

AMA Style

Ahmad B, Alruwaily Y, Alsaedi A, Ntouyas SK. Correction: Alsaedi, A., et al. Existence and Stability Results for a Fractional Order Differential Equation with Non-Conjugate Riemann–Stieltjes Integro-Multipoint Boundary Conditions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 249. Mathematics. 2019; 7(12):1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmad, Bashir, Ymnah Alruwaily, Ahmed Alsaedi, and Sotiris K. Ntouyas. 2019. "Correction: Alsaedi, A., et al. Existence and Stability Results for a Fractional Order Differential Equation with Non-Conjugate Riemann–Stieltjes Integro-Multipoint Boundary Conditions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 249" Mathematics 7, no. 12: 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121220

APA Style

Ahmad, B., Alruwaily, Y., Alsaedi, A., & Ntouyas, S. K. (2019). Correction: Alsaedi, A., et al. Existence and Stability Results for a Fractional Order Differential Equation with Non-Conjugate Riemann–Stieltjes Integro-Multipoint Boundary Conditions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 249. Mathematics, 7(12), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121220

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop