1. Introduction
In 1906, L. Fejér [
1] proved the following integral inequalities known in the literature as Fejér’s inequality:
where
is convex and
is integrable and symmetric to
. If in (
1) we consider
, we recapture the classic Hermite–Hadamard inequality [
2,
3]:
In [
4], two difference mappings
L and
P associated with Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality have been introduced as follows:
Some properties for
L and
P, refinements for Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality and some applications were raised in [
4] as well:
Theorem 1 (Theorem 1 in [
4]
).Letbe a convex mapping on the interval I and letbe fixed in.
Then, we have the following: - (i)
The mapping L is nonnegative, monotonically nondecreasing, and convex on
- (ii)
The following refinement of Hadamard’s inequality holds:for each . - (iii)
The following inequality holds:for every and each .
Theorem 2 (Theorem 2 in [
4]
).Let be a convex mapping on the interval I and let be fixed in . Then, we have the following: - (i)
The mapping P is nonnegative and monotonically nondecreasing on .
- (ii)
The following inequality holds: - (iii)
The following refinement of Hadamard’s inequality holds:for all .
The main results obtained in [
4] (Theorems 1 and 2) are based on the facts that if
is convex, then for all
with
we have (see, [
5,
6]):
and
where
is the right-derivative of f at
y.
Motivated by the above concepts, inequalities and results, we introduce two difference mappings,
and
, related to Fejér’s inequality:
In the case that , the mappings and reduce to L and P, respectively.
In this paper we obtain some properties for and that imply some refinements for Fejér’s inequality in the case that w is a nonsymmetric monotone function. Also, our results generalize Theorems 1 and 2 from Hermite–Hadamard’s type to Fejér’s type. Furthermore as applications, we find some numerical and special means type inequalities.
To obtain our respective results, we need the modified version of Theorem 5 in [
7] which includes the left and right part of Fejér’s inequality in the monotone nonsymmetric case.
Theorem 3. Let be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on . Consider with such that is a nonnegative, integrable and monotone function. Then
- (1)
If , and , then - (2)
If , and , then
The main point in Theorem 3 (1) (
), is that we have (
2) for any
with
without the need for
w to be symmetric with respect to
. Also similar properties hold for other parts of the above theorem.
Example 1. Consider and for . It is clear that f is convex and w is nonsymmetric and decreasing. If we consider , then from the fact that we obtain thatThis inequality implies thatIt follows thatSoshows that f and w satisfy (3) on , where w is not symmetric. Also, we can see that f and w satisfy (2). 2. Main Results
The first result of this section is about some properties of the mapping where the function w is nonincreasing.
Theorem 4. Let be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on . Consider with such that is a nonnegative and differentiable function with for all . Then
- (i)
The mapping is nonnegative on , if for all .
- (ii)
The mapping is convex on , if f is nondecreasing. Also is monotonically nondecreasing on .
- (iii)
The following refinement of (2) holds:for any with . - (iv)
If f is nondecreasing, then the following inequality holds:for any and each . - (v)
If , then for each we haveFurthermore when is convex on , then:
Proof. (i) We need only the inequality
for all
. This happens according to Theorem 3 (1).
(ii) Without loss of generality for
consider the following identity:
Dividing with “
” and then letting
we obtain that
Also from the convexity of
f we have
which, along with the fact that
w is nonincreasing, implies that
So from (
9) and (
10) we get
On the other hand from (
8) and Theorem 3 (1), we have
and, along with (
11), we obtain that
This implies the convexity of
.
For the fact that
L is monotonically nondecreasing, from convexity of
f on
we have
for all
and so
for any
.
(iii) Since
is monotonically nondecreasing we have
, for all
and so
which implies that
Also, by the use of Theorem 3 (1) we get
Now from (
12) and (
13), we have the result.
(iv) Since
is convex, then from the fact that
for any
and each
, we have the result.
(v) The following identity was obtained in [
8]:
for any
where
Since
w is nonincreasing, then we obtain
and
So
Now by the use of (
15) in (
14) we get
for any
. Using the change of variable
and some calculations imply that
for any
. Furthermore if
is convex on
, then from (
16) and by the use of the change of variable
we get
which implies that
for any
. □
Remark 1. (i) By the use of Theorem 3 (1), it is not hard to see that if w is nondecreasing on , then some properties of and corresponding results obtained in Theorem 4 may change. However the argument of proof is similar. The details are omitted.
(ii) Theorem 4 gives a generalization of Theorem 1, along with some new results.
The following result is including some properties of the mapping in the case that w is nondecreasing.
Theorem 5. Let be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on . Consider with such that is a nonnegative and continuous function with for all . Then
- (i)
is nonnegative, if for any .
- (ii)
If for any we have , then is nondecreasing on .
- (iii)
If , then for each we haveFurthermore when is convex on , then: - (iv)
The following inequality holds:provided that for all . - (v)
If for any we have , then the following refinement of (3) holds:for all .
Proof. (i) It follows from Theorem 3 (2).
(ii) Suppose that
. So from Theorem 3 (2) and the facts that
w is nondecreasing and
f is convex, we get
This completes the proof.
(iii) The following identity is obtained in [
8]:
for any
, where
By similar method used to prove part (v) of Theorem 4, we can obtain the results. We omitted the details here.
(iv) By Theorem 3 (1), for any
we have
and
If we add (
21) to (
22), we obtain
which is equivalent with
This implies the desired result.
(v) The left side of (
20) is a consequence of assertion (i) and the following inequality:
for all
.
Since
is nondecreasing we have
for all
, i. e.
Then we have the right side of (
20). □
Remark 2. (i) By the use of Theorem 3 (2) (w is nonincreasing on ) in the proof of Theorem 5, we can obtain some different properties for with new corresponding results. The details are omitted.
(ii) Theorem 5 gives a generalization of Theorem 2, along with some new results.
3. Applications
The following means for real numbers
are well known:
The following result holds between the two above special means:
Theorem 6. For any with and we have
In this section as applications of our results in previous section, we give some refinements for the inequalities mentioned in (
23).
Consider
with
. Define
From (
4) with some calculations we have
for all
, which implies that
Inequality (
24) gives a refinement for the right part of (
23).
In the case that
we have
In the case that
we get
for all
. In fact inequality (
25) is equivalent with the first inequality obtained in the applications section of [
4].
Now with the same assumption for
f and
w as was used to obtain (
24), by the use of (
20) we get:
for all
and
. Inequality (
26) gives a refinement for the left part of (
23). Also if we consider
, then we obtain
for all
. In a more special case, if we set
, then we get:
for all
.
Finally we encourage interested readers to use inequalities (
4)–(
7) and inequalities (
17)–(
20), for appropriate functions
f and
w to obtain some new special means types and numerical inequalities.