Next Article in Journal
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Pregnant Women and Hospital Staff Regarding Umbilical Cord Blood Banking: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Ferreira-Sánchez et al. Differences in Motor Imagery Ability between People with Parkinson’s Disease and Healthy Controls, and Its Relationship with Functionality, Independence and Quality of Life. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2898
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Factors of Pregnancy Termination Among Reproductive-Aged Women: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey

by
Md. Rabiul Islam
1,*,
Makfiratur Rahman
1,
Arifa Farzana Tanha
2,
Nusrat Hossain Sheba
3,
S. M. Raysul Haque
1,
Md. Kamran ul Baset
1,
Zenat Zebin Hossain
1,
Mohammad Abbas Gani
4 and
J. M. A. Hannan
5
1
Department of Public Health, School of Pharmacy and Public Health, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
2
Faculty of Medical Studies, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
3
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
4
Department of Pharmacy, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh
5
Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy and Public Health, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(21), 2130; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212130
Submission received: 9 September 2024 / Revised: 6 October 2024 / Accepted: 9 October 2024 / Published: 25 October 2024

Abstract

:
Background: Pregnancy termination (PT) is a major public health concern in low-and middle-income countries like Bangladesh. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors of PT using the nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey data 2017–2018. Materials and Methods: A weighted population-based sample of 8759 ever-married reproductive-aged women (15–49 years) was included in the study. The outcome variable was PT in any of the following forms: miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth. A univariate analysis for mean, frequency, and percentage and multiple logistical regression were used to determine the factors associated with PT. Results: Around 18% of the women were found to have PT. The mean age of the women in the study was 25.79 years; 65.1% lived in the rural areas, and the majority of them were Muslims. Advanced age of the women (AOR:3.49, p = 0.004), residence in the countryside (AOR:0.81, p = 0.002), higher education (AOR:0.72, p = 0.027), not being a Muslim (AOR:0.74, p = 0.010), higher socio-economic status (AOR:1.28, p = 0.027), having a job (AOR:1.15, p = 0.041), being married at the age of >22 years (AOR:0.71, p = 0.036), and using a mobile phone (AOR:1.22, p = 0.002) were significant factors of PT. This study did not find any association between PT and contraceptive use. Conclusions: Age, living region, education, religion, wealth index, working status, marital age, and mobile phone use are the determinants of PT. Interventions including these factors need to be made to reduce PT in Bangladeshi women. These findings could be helpful in undertaking further epidemiological studies to understand the actual causes of PT in various rural and urban settings among different socio-demographic groups in Bangladesh.

1. Introduction

Unintended pregnancy often leads to pregnancy termination (PT), which impacts the physical health, mental health, and socio-economic status of women [1]. The latest research estimates that between 2015 and 2019, there were 121 million unplanned pregnancies worldwide (or 64 for every 1000 women) [2], and one-third of those pregnancies are terminated by abortion, miscarriage, menstrual regulation, and stillbirth [3].
Although natural or fatal termination of pregnancy is a regular occurrence among women of childbearing age [2,4], it is never an easy decision to terminate a pregnancy, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), where patriarchal societies, restrictive abortion laws, cultural traditions, religious influences, and economic concerns may all influence women’s choices [5,6]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported a higher number of pregnancies and maternal deaths (around 90%) in these regions [7]. According to a previous study, LMICs have a higher rate of PT [Afghanistan (19.5%), India (12.0%), Pakistan (33.4%), and Nepal (20.1%)] than higher-income countries [8]. Because of strict anti-abortion laws in several South Asian countries, the unsafe abortion rate is comparatively high in South Asia [9].
Worldwide, 45% of all abortions are deemed unsafe, with 97% occurring in LMICs [7]. Between 2010 and 2014, around 55.7 million abortions were performed globally to terminate pregnancies [10], with 88% of them occurring in developing countries. Most abortions in LMICs usually take place in secret and are carried out in hazardous ways by untrained people, thereby increasing the risk of complications like hemorrhage, infection, uterus perforation, incomplete abortion, death of the mother, and morbidities [7,11,12,13].
In 2015, around 2.62 million pregnancies led to stillbirths around the world, with developed nations accounting for approximately 1.8% and developing countries accounting for the remainder [14], where Bangladesh was ranked 7th, with 83,000 stillbirths [14]. Similarly, in 2014, around 1,194,000 induced abortions [15] and 430,000 menstrual regulations occurred in Bangladesh [16]. Thus, risky PT is one of the factors that increase maternal health problems [17], mortality, and morbidity [18] and is a key public health issue in many developing nations [19] like Bangladesh.
Contemporary studies have found that several factors, notably maternal age, education, birth order [8], maternal media exposure, contraception use, women’s autonomy, birth order, parity, maternal occupation [20,21], marital status [22], and religion [23], contribute to PT. In addition, genetic factors like a child affected with a genetic disease and an abnormal fetus have also been significantly linked to PT [24,25].
In Bangladesh, the termination of life-threatening pregnancies is increasingly a major reproductive health concern [26,27,28,29]. Moreover, the country’s healthcare system faces a lot of challenges [30]. The prevalence of fatal PT has not significantly changed between 1994 and 2018 [28,29]. Bangladesh, primarily being a male-dominated [31] and Muslim society [32], inhibits female mobility and participation in decision-making processes. In particular, when it comes to family planning (i.e., spacing between pregnancies, total number of pregnancies, PT, etc.), a husband’s or partner’s decision affects the pregnancy outcome [31]. It becomes a maze of legal, religious, and moral concerns in the country [32]. When faced with an undesirable pregnancy, women typically rely on informal or traditional means of pregnancy termination, such as homeopathic and allopathic drugs, contraceptive pills, herbal remedies, roots of plants, consuming hot salt water, and so on [31]. Abortion is illegal [32] for any reason other than safeguarding a woman’s life [16] or for menstrual regulation [33]. Accessing services for PT can be challenging for women [31]. Bangladesh has a high rate of risky, unskilled service providers performing pregnancy terminations [16], which could result in mortality [18] and complexity in maternal health [17].
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) place a strong emphasis on the need to attain gender equality; enable all women and girls to have the power to make decisions about their reproductive health; ensure that everyone has access to family planning, information, and education; and incorporate comprehensive reproductive health initiatives into national policies and programs [34,35]. Given the severe effects of pregnancy termination, it is crucial to comprehend its risk factors to assist policy makers in creating focused preventative and intervention measures for lowering the rate of pregnancy termination.
Understanding regional and nation-specific variations would help healthcare professionals and stakeholders to identify possible reasons for the high prevalence of terminated pregnancies and will direct the prioritization of intervention efforts to the most at-risk countries in LMICs. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study that has exclusively examined the prevalence and factors associated with PT derived from the most recent nationally representative data of the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018 (BDHS 2017–2018).
Thus, this study intends to fill this crucial knowledge gap by carrying out a study based on BDHS 2017–2018 data to determine the prevalence and associated factors of PT in Bangladesh. This study’s findings may aid in the implementation of different initiatives to reduce the number of abortions and maternal fatalities and improve reproductive health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Study Population

The data for this study were obtained from the latest BDHS 2017–2018, which is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. It was carried out in collaboration with the Bangladesh National Institute for Population Research and Training (NIPORT) in 2017–2018, and data on the different sociodemographic, fertility, nutrition, and health status of the population were collected following a two-stage stratified cluster sampling technique. Details of the survey methodology and strategies are described in the BDHS 2017–2018 survey report [36]. Primarily, a stratified, multi-stage cluster sample from 675 enumeration areas (EAs) (425 in rural areas and 250 in urban areas) was drawn using probability proportional to the size of the EAs. Secondly, a full list of the households was constructed by using a systematic sampling technique from each EA, which was used as a sampling frame. On average, 30 households were picked from each of the EAs. A total of 20,250 households were selected for the survey, and 20,100 reproductive-aged women were interviewed (150 women did not participate in the survey).
The inclusion criteria of the sample were as follows: (a) women aged between 15 and 49 years, (b) women who had at least one pregnancy within the last five years, (c) women who fully completed the survey so that the study could prevent the loss of important data, and (d) women who gave informed consent.
On the contrary, women beyond the age of 15 to 49 years, women who were unable to give informed consent, and women who had not had at least one pregnancy within the last five years were excluded from the study.

2.2. Outcome Variable

The outcome variable of the study was PT of reproductive-aged women, which was a categorical variable. In the questionnaire of the BDHS 2017–2018, a single question inquired if they had ever experienced a miscarriage, induced abortion, or ‘menstrual regulation (MR)’ (a term used in Bangladesh to describe legal abortion by clinicians). Respondents who reported having experienced a miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth were asked whether such an event had occurred within the past five years. The outcome variable PT was dichotomized as ‘0’ and ‘1’ for no PT and PT, respectively. The analysis was restricted to PT that occurred in the last five years before the survey.

2.3. Explanatory Variables

Per the guidance of the existing literature and based on the availability of the variables, various explanatory variables were considered for the final analysis of the current study. Several factors such as age (continuous), place of residence (rural or urban, categorical), divisions (categorical), educational status (categorical), religion (categorical), wealth index (categorical), present working status (categorical), possession of a self-mobile phone (categorical), age at marriage (continuous), number of antenatal care (ANC) visits (categorical), and contraceptive use status (categorical) of the ever-married women were considered as independent variables.

2.4. Data Collection

BDHS 2017–2018 data were collected using a structured questionnaire including six types of questionnaires: (1) the household questionnaire, (2) the women’s questionnaire (completed by ever-married women age 15–49), (3) the biomarker questionnaire, (4) two verbal autopsy questionnaires to collect data on causes of death among children under age 5, (5) the community questionnaire, and (6) the fieldworker Questionnaire.
This study mainly used data collected from the household questionnaire and women’s questionnaire. The household questionnaire listed all of the usual members of and visitors to the selected households. Basic information was collected on the characteristics of each person listed, including age, sex, marital status, education, current work status, birth registration, and individual possession of a mobile phone. The women’s questionnaire collected information from ever-married women aged 15–49. Women responded to questions on background characteristics (for example, age, education, religion, and media exposure), reproductive history, use and source of family planning methods, ANC, delivery, postnatal and newborn care and breastfeeding, child immunizations, infant feeding practices and illness, marriage and sexual activities, fertility preferences, husbands’ background characteristics, and women’s work.
The questionnaires used in the survey were approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC). Both IRBs and the BMRC approved the protocols before the commencement of data collection activities.
Fieldwork for the main survey was carried out by several interviewing teams, with each team consisting of one male supervisor, one female field editor, five female interviewers, two health technicians, and one logistics staffer. Field supervisors, editors, interviewers, and health technicians filled out a two-page self-administered questionnaire on their general background characteristics. The ICF distributed and collected the questionnaires before the fieldworkers entered the field. No personal identifiers were attached to the BDHS fieldworkers’ data files. Data collection occurred in five phases, each about 4 weeks in duration. Data collection started on 24 October 2017 and was completed on 15 March 2018. The questionnaires were adapted to the local context and culture and translated into Bengali, the most commonly spoken language in Bangladesh. The questionnaires were pretested in 100 households. Based on observations in the field and suggestions made by the pretest teams, revisions were made.
Before the questionnaires were administered, informed consent was obtained from the mother. Efforts were made to maintain the privacy of respondents during interviews.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The statistical programming language R was used for data cleaning, analysis, and visualization. Both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were carried out in the study. Firstly, descriptive analyses like mean (SD), frequency, and percentage were performed for all the variables. Secondly, the chi-square (χ2) test was used to measure the association between PT and the explanatory variables. Finally, multiple logistic regression and crude and adjusted odds ratios were used to determine the factors of PT of the women in the study. In all analyses, the significance level was set at p < 0.05 (2-tailed) with a 95% confidence interval.

2.6. Ethical Consideration

This study used nationally representative BDHS 2017–2018 data, which are publicly available on the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program website: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Bangladesh_Standard-DHS_2017.cfm?flag=0 (accessed on 17 December 2021). The Office of Research Compliance Macro Institutional Review Board (Calverton, MD, USA) approved the survey, and the protocol was reviewed and approved by the National Ethics Review Committee of the Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants for the survey. Informed consent was obtained from parents/guardians of participants under 18 years of age. Since the data are secondary and thus allowed to be used for research, no additional ethical approval was needed for the authors of this study.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Profile of Women

Frequency and percentage (weighted) distributions for the demographic variables of the study participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the women was 25.79 years, and approximately half (47.1%) of them were between 15 and 24 years old, followed by 44.8% who were between 25 and 34 years old. Nearly two-thirds (65.1%) of study participants lived in the rural areas of Bangladesh. It was also found that the majority (17%) of the women were from Chittagong, the southeastern part of Bangladesh, and the lowest proportion (10.3%) were from the Khulna and Barisal (10.3%) divisions, respectively. Although almost half (47%) of the total women had completed their secondary level of education, only 16.6% had completed higher study, and 7.3% had not received any formal education in their life. The study outcome also showed that more than ninety percent (91.5%) of respondents were Muslims, and the rest (9.5%) were from other religions, such as Hinduism, Christianity, or Buddhism. Less than 50% of the total participants were from a lower economic group, whereas two-fifths of them were from an upper economic group in society.
It is evident from the study that a maximum (59.3%) of women were housewives, and only 40.7% were currently engaged in a formal job (that is, they spent at least 8 h/day at an office). The average age of marriage was found to be 16.52 years, among wich 69.7% of women were married before reaching their 18th birthday, which is considered early marriage. We also found that slightly less than 50% of women received less than four antenatal care visits during their pregnancy period, while 8.1% did not receive any ANC. Two-thirds of the total survey respondents (67.8%) used any form of family planning during their reproductive age, and 62% of women had their own mobile phone.

3.2. Prevalence of Pregnancy Termination

This study indicated that approximately 18% of the surveyed women had experienced pregnancy termination (Figure 1).
This signifies that a considerable proportion of pregnant women encountered situations that prompted such decisions.

3.3. Association of Pregnancy Termination with the Explanatory Variables

The results revealed that PT was significantly (p < 0.001) higher among older women (36.4%); urban areas (20.3%) (p < 0.001); the residents of Dhaka (20%), Khulna (21%), and Sylhet divisions (20.5%) (p < 0.001); illiterate women (20.9%) (p < 0.001); Muslims (18.3%) (p = 0.005); job holders (19.4%) (p < 0.001); and women who possess their own mobile phone (18.9%) (p = 0.003) (Table 2).
In addition, more PT occurred among upper-economic-class women (19.7%), women who married at a relatively later age (>22 years) (18.2%), and women who completed four and above ANC visits to healthcare providers (18.1%), although these factors were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05).

3.4. Determinants of Pregnancy Termination

After adjusting all the variables in the logistics regression model, the result shows the determinants of PT, which are presented in Table 3. The probability of PT is more likely to increase with the age of the respondents. The age groups of 25–34, 35–44, and 45–49 years were 1.74 (AOR:1.74, p < 0.001), 2.70 (AOR:2.70, p < 0.001) and 3.49 (AOR:3.49, p = 0.004) times more likely to lose their pregnancy than the women aged 15–24 years old. Similarly, the likelihood of PT was substantially higher among the richest women (AOR:1.28, p = 0.027) and women who lived in the Sylhet division (AOR:1.28, p = 0.036). In addition, women with jobs were 15% more likely (AOR:1.15, p = 0.041) to have PT than those who did not have a job. Likewise, women who had their own mobile phones had 1.22 times higher odds (AOR:1.22, p = 0.002) of terminating their pregnancies than their counterparts.
On the other hand, rural women were less likely to have PT (AOR:0.81, p = 0.002) than the urban women, which indicates that the urban women, remarkably, had a 19% higher chance of ending their pregnancy than the women who lived in the countryside. The study also determined that the probability of PT decreased among more educated women (AOR:0.72, p = 0.027), non- Muslims (AOR:0.74, p = 0.010), and women who were married at a later age (AOR:0.71, p = 0.036).

4. Discussion

Identifying potential factors contributing to the elevated prevalence of PT is essential for healthcare practitioners and stakeholders to prioritize interventions targeting a reduction in PT and maternal fatalities. However, we found a lack of comprehensive research on this important reproductive health issue in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study was carried out based on the BDHS 2017–2018 data to determine the prevalence and factors of PT among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh.
The results estimated that about one-fifth (18%) of the women in Bangladesh had terminated a pregnancy. Age, place of residence, level of education, religion, wealth index, working status, age at marriage, and having a personal mobile phone are the significant factors of PT in Bangladeshi women.
This study’s uniqueness lies in its exclusive examination of the prevalence and factors of PT in Bangladesh using the BDHS dataset, which is still a nationally representative latest dataset.
The prevalence of PT in Bangladesh is higher than the mean weighted prevalence (13%) of pregnancy termination in 36 other low- and middle-income countries [8]. On the contrary, Chinese women have a slightly higher prevalence of PT than Bangladeshi women [37]. Moreover, PT (in the form of miscarriage) declined significantly between 1998 and 2016 in Finland [38]. These discrepancies found in the prevalence of PT may be due to the variations in study locations, study populations, and study times.
Women’s age was determined to be one of the significant risk factors for PT, where it was observed that the chance of PT significantly increased with the age of the women. PT was found to be highly prevalent among older women compared to younger women. The findings of this study are consistent with the findings of some prior studies [39,40,41]. This positive association could be attributed to the fact that pregnancy-related complications like pre-eclampsia, ectopic pregnancy, and gestational diabetes mellitus, which may lead to miscarriages or stillbirths, increase with the age [42,43,44]. In addition, older women may already have their expected family size, resulting in them ending new pregnancies.
The current study depicted that women living in rural areas have a lower chance of PT than urban women, which is supported by some other previous studies [8,39]. Another study found similar results, stating that urban women have higher abortion rates than rural women [45]. A possible reason for this is that the women living in rural regions cannot afford to terminate their pregnancy [46,47]. On the contrary, this result is not endorsed by the study of Tamang A. et al., who found that PT was more frequent among rural women. A plausible reason for this difference is the different geographic locations, variation in the characteristics of the study population, and different times of these studies [48].
This study found geographical variation in PT in Bangladesh between administrative divisions. After adjusting covariates, this study determined a higher prevalence of PT in the Sylhet division, in the northeastern part of the country, and the Khulna division, in the southwestern part of the country. On the other hand, Chittagong, the southeastern part of the country, has the lowest probability of PT in Bangladesh. A possible explanation for this is considerable socio-economic factors, distance to facilities, and uneven distribution of public health resources in these regions.
This study’s results show that the probability of PT is significantly lower among the more educated women, which is consistent with previous studies conducted in Ethiopia [49,50] and elsewhere [51,52,53]. This could be attributed to the fact that educated women are effectively preventing unwanted pregnancies by utilizing contemporary contraceptive techniques. Moreover, less educated women are less likely to use contraceptive methods; thereby, they are more likely to have unintentional pregnancies, resulting in induced abortion. However, this study’s results contradict the findings of some other studies, which found that more educated women have a higher chance of PT than less educated women [54,55,56,57,58,59]. The differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of the study populations and study settings may be a possible explanation for such variation.
It was also observed that Muslim women were more likely to terminate a pregnancy than women of other religions like Hinduism, Christianity, and Buddhism. This is contradictory to the findings of Klutsey [60] and Ahiadeke [61], who found the prevalence of abortion was high among Christians. As most of the population of Bangladesh are Muslims, abortion is prohibited in the country [32]. However, PT can occur through various procedures like miscarriage, stillbirth, MR, etc., which may be more common among Muslim women.
Economic status has been found to be a significant contributor to PT. More affluent women have a higher likelihood of PT than the poorest women. This study finding is corroborated by previous studies conducted in Nepal, Ghana, India, and Nigeria [23,39,54,55,62,63,64]. In addition, some studies confirm that the odds of PT are higher among upper-economic-class women [51,54,56,65,66,67]. However, some studies in America and Brazil have determined that PT is higher among women in the lower socioeconomic classes. A possible reason for these mixed findings may be the ability of solvent women in Bangladesh to afford the cost of PT, although intentional abortion is illegal in the country, except for medical reasons concerning the mother [56].
There is a significant difference in PT between housewives and working women in Bangladesh. Women who have a formal job [i.e., who spent at least 8 h/day at an office] have a higher chance of PT, which aligns with the previous study of Ahinkorah et al. [40]. Another study among Ghanaian women using a DHS dataset from Ghana yielded similar results. The decision-making power of the women, prioritizing a career over having a baby, and being more aware of contraception (including MR) might be the reasons that working women terminate their pregnancy [56,68]. Some previous studies have also revealed that work itself may cause spontaneous abortion [69,70,71]. For example, a study in Nepal found that the women who are involved in agricultural activity have high stillbirth rates [72]. Therefore, this study emphasizes that pregnant women should receive sufficient support from their work environment.
The chance of termination of pregnancy reduced with the advanced age of marriage of the women. This study determined that women who were married before 18 years had a higher likelihood of ending their pregnancy. Similar findings were also observed in some other studies [59,73]. A possible explanation for this may be that early marriage may cause early pregnancy, which increases the risk of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis, and systemic infections than women who become pregnant at 20–24 years. Consequently, babies of adolescent mothers are at higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth, and severe neonatal conditions. Therefore, women who become pregnant during this adolescent period may wish to avoid risk, and they may terminate their pregnancy instead of continuing it, even if they may have a miscarriage or stillbirth [74].
PT was found to be higher among mobile phone users in Bangladeshi women. One possible explanation for this is that mobile phones, as a communication technology, can increase exposure to mass media—such as television, radio, etc.—among women, enabling them to make their own decisions by providing sufficient information [39].

4.1. Strengths and Limitations

The current study solely assessed the prevalence of PT utilizing the BDHS dataset, which remains the most recent publicly accessible data in the country. This study used a large number of samples, which enhanced the generalizability of the results at a national level.
This study has some limitations. Firstly, the study was subject to recall bias as the respondents had to recall previous events, such as their pregnancy termination history, age of marriage, contraceptive use, etc. In addition, the BDHS data do not specifically classify the type of PT. Therefore, it was difficult to classify whether PTs were spontaneous or induced. Thus, this study could not differentiate circumstances that may have led to miscarriage compared with induced termination. Moreover, this study could not identify a causal association between PT and the explanatory variables due to its cross-sectional nature. Furthermore, BDHS 2017–2018 data were used, which are not the most recent set. We had to use this dataset as it is the only available latest nationally representative dataset encompassing the variables used. Lastly, there were some other relevant explanatory variables like gender issues, violence, medical complications, and extramarital affairs that could not be considered during data collection in this study.

4.2. Message to Policy Makers

This study provides some key points to be considered by policy makers. Firstly, maternal healthcare services should be made more accessible and available, especially for older women. Secondly, the working environment should be safe for pregnant women. Women should be encouraged to have their baby early in their conjugal life.

5. Conclusions

Women of advanced age, of upper socio-economic class, who have a job, and who own a mobile phone have a higher likelihood of terminating their pregnancy. Meanwhile, PT was lower among more educated women, rural residents, non- Muslims, and women who married later in life. Public health stakeholders and policy makers should account for these factors when creating interventions to reduce PT among Bangladeshi women. These results can facilitate further epidemiological research to elucidate the underlying causes of PT across diverse rural and urban environments and among various socio-demographic cohorts in Bangladesh. Future studies should consider the distinction between spontaneous abortion, induced abortion, and stillbirths so that the actual PT scenario can be factored in.

Author Contributions

M.R.I., conceptualized, conducted the data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.R.I., M.R., A.F.T., N.H.S., M.A.G. and S.M.R.H. contributed to the editing and formatting of the manuscript. M.R.I., M.K.u.B., Z.Z.H., S.M.R.H. and J.M.A.H. revised and gave their critical input, where J.M.A.H. supervised the whole work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study used publicly available secondary data.

Informed Consent Statement

This study used the nationally representative BDHS 2017–2018 data, which are publicly available on the DHS Program website: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Bangladesh_Standard-DHS_2017.cfm?flag=0 (accessed on 17 December 2021). The Office of Research Compliance Macro Institutional Review Board (Calverton, MD, USA) approved the survey, and the protocol was reviewed and approved by the National Ethics Review Committee of the Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants for the survey. Informed consent was obtained from parents/guardians of participants under 18 years of age. Since data were secondary and allowed to be used for research, no additional ethical approval was needed for the authors of this study.

Data Availability Statement

This study used publicly available secondary data.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey program for its open data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.; Zou, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, X. Analysis of unintended pregnancy and influencing factors among married women in China. China Popul. Dev. Stud. 2023, 7, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bearak, J.; Popinchalk, A.; Ganatra, B.; Moller, A.B.; Tunçalp, Ö.; Beavin, C.; Kwok, L.; Alkema, L. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: Estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet. Glob. Health 2020, 8, e1152–e1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44529 (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  4. de Bernis, L.; Kinney, M.V.; Stones, W.; Ten Hoope-Bender, P.; Vivio, D.; Leisher, S.H.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Gülmezoglu, M.; Mathai, M.; Belizán, J.M.; et al. Stillbirths: Ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet 2016, 387, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Allotey, P.; Ravindran, T.K.S.; Sathivelu, V. Trends in Abortion Policies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2021, 42, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brookman-Amissah, E.; Moyo, J.B. Abortion law reform in sub-Saharan Africa: No turning back. Reprod. Health Matters 2004, 12, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. World Health Organization. Maternal Mortality. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  8. Ba, D.M.; Zhang, Y.; Pasha-Razzak, O.; Khunsriraksakul, C.; Maiga, M.; Chinchilli, V.M.; Ssentongo, P. Factors associated with pregnancy termination in women of childbearing age in 36 low-and middle-income countries. PLOS Glob. Public Health 2023, 3, e0001509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whittaker, A. Abortion in Asia: Local Dilemmas, Global Politics, 2nd ed.; Berghahn Books: New York, NY, USA; Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ganatra, B.; Gerdts, C.; Rossier, C.; Johnson, B.R., Jr.; Tunçalp, Ö.; Assifi, A.; Sedgh, G.; Singh, S.; Bankole, A.; Popinchalk, A.; et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–2014: Estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet 2017, 390, 2372–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kulczycki, A. The imperative to expand provision, access and use of misoprostol for post-abortion care in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 2016, 20, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gebremedhin, M.; Semahegn, A.; Usmael, T.; Tesfaye, G. Unsafe abortion and associated factors among reproductive aged women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2018, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seidu, A.-A.; Ahinkorah, B.O.; Ameyaw, E.K.; Hubert, A.; Agbemavi, W.; Armah-Ansah, E.K.; Budu, E.; Sambah, F.; Tackie, V. What has women’s reproductive health decision-making capacity and other factors got to do with pregnancy termination in sub-Saharan Africa? evidence from 27 cross-sectional surveys. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Blencowe, H.; Cousens, S.; Jassir, F.B.; Say, L.; Chou, D.; Mathers, C.; Hogan, D.; Shiekh, S.; Qureshi, Z.U.; You, D.; et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: A systematic analysis. Lancet. Glob. Health 2016, 4, e98–e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rana, J.; Sen, K.K.; Sultana, T.; Hossain, M.B.; Islam, R.M. Prevalence and determinants of menstrual regulation among ever-married women in Bangladesh: Evidence from a national survey. Reprod. Health 2019, 16, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hossain, A.; Maddow-Zimet, I.; Ingerick, M.; Bhuiyan, H.U.; Vlassoff, M.; Singh, S. Access to and Quality of Menstrual Regulation and Postabortion Care in Bangladesh: Evidence from a Survey of Health Facilities 2014; Guttmacher Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Singh, S.; Hossain, A.; Maddow-Zimet, I.; Vlassoff, M.; Bhuiyan, H.U.; Ingerick, M. The incidence of menstrual regulation procedures and abortion in Bangladesh, 2014. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 2017, 43, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, S.; Maddow-Zimet, I. Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: A review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016, 123, 1489–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Coast, E.; Norris, A.H.; Moore, A.M.; Freeman, E. Trajectories of women’s abortion-related care: A conceptual framework. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018, 200, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bago, B.J.; Hibstu, D.T.; Woldemariam, S.H. Prevalence of pregnancy termination and its associated factors among women of reproductive age group in Ethiopia using 2011 Ethiopian demography and health survey, 2016. J. Preg. Child Health 2016, 4, 359. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tsegaye, A.T.; Mengistu, M.; Shimeka, A. Prevalence of unintended pregnancy and associated factors among married women in west Belessa Woreda, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016. Reprod. Health 2018, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mulatu, T.; Cherie, A.; Negesa, L. Prevalence of unwanted pregnancy and associated factors among women in reproductive age groups at selected health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J. Women’s Health Care 2017, 6, 2167–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yogi, A.; Kc, P.; Neupane, S. Prevalence and factors associated with abortion and unsafe abortion in Nepal: A nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Amiel, A.; Tarabeih, M. Prenatal tests undertaken by Muslim women who underwent IVF treatment, secular versus religious: An Israeli study. J. Relig. Health 2023, 62, 3204–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amiel, A.; Tarabeih, M. Prenatal Testing and Pregnancy Termination Among Muslim Women Living in Israel Who Have Given Birth to a Child with a Genetic Disease. J. Relig. Health 2023, 62, 3215–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abir, T.; Agho, K.E.; Ogbo, F.A.; Stevens, G.J.; Page, A.; Hasnat, M.A.; Dibley, M.J.; Raynes-Greenow, C. Predictors of stillbirths in Bangladesh: Evidence from the 2004–2014 nation-wide household surveys. Glob. Health Action 2017, 10, 1410048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Halim, A.; Aminu, M.; Dewez, J.E.; Biswas, A.; Rahman, A.K.M.F.; van den Broek, N. Stillbirth surveillance and review in rural districts in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Das, S.; Das, J.; Mazumder, K.; Roy, P.; Begum, R.; Das, K. Trend and risk factors of fatal pregnancy termination: A long-term nationwide population-based cross-section survey in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0263467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018: Key Indicators. 2019. Available online: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR104/PR104.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  30. Islam, A.; Biswas, T. Health system in Bangladesh: Challenges and opportunities. Am. J. Public Health Res. 2014, 2, 366–374. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gipson, J.D.; Hindin, M.J. “Having another child would be a life or death situation for her”: Understanding pregnancy termination among couples in rural Bangladesh. Am. J. Public Health 2008, 98, 1827–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amin, S. Menstrual regulation in Bangladesh. In The Sociocultural and Political Aspects of Abortion; Basu, A.M., Ed.; Praeger: Westport, CT, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rahman, M.; DaVanzo, J.; Razzaque, A. Pregnancy termination in Matlab, Bangladesh: Maternal mortality risks associated with menstrual regulation and abortion. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 2014, 40, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. WHO. Sustainable Development Goal 5: Gender Equality. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/your-life-your-health/a-healthy-world/people-s-needs/SDG-3-gender-equality (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  35. United Nations. SDG Indicators: Metadata Repository. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/ (accessed on 4 May 2024).
  36. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018. 2020. Available online: https://preview.dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr344-dhs-final-reports.cfm?cssearch=685822_1 (accessed on 5 May 2024).
  37. Gao, G.P.; Zhang, R.J.; Zhang, X.J.; Jia, X.M.; Li, X.D.; Li, X.; Wang, C.C.; Tong, F.; Sun, Y.H. Prevalence and associated factors of induced abortion among rural married women: A cross-sectional survey in Anhui, China. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015, 41, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Linnakaari, R.; Helle, N.; Mentula, M.; Bloigu, A.; Gissler, M.; Heikinheimo, O.; Niinimäki, M. Trends in the incidence, rate and treatment of miscarriage—Nationwide register-study in Finland, 1998–2016. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 2120–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bright, O.A.; Abdul-Aziz, S.; Hagan Jr, J.E.; Archer, A.G.; Budu, E.; Adoboi, F.; Schack, T. Predictors of Pregnancy Termination among Young Women in Ghana: Empirical Evidence from the 2014 Demographic and Health Survey Data. Healthcare 2021, 9, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahinkorah, B.O. Socio-demographic determinants of pregnancy termination among adolescent girls and young women in selected high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dickson, K.S.; Adde, K.S.; Ahinkorah, B.O. Socio—economic determinants of abortion among women in Mozambique and Ghana: Evidence from demographic and health survey. Arch. Public Health 2018, 76, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lampinen, R.; Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K.; Kankkunen, P. A review of pregnancy in women over 35 years of age. Open Nurs. J. 2009, 3, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Correa-de-Araujo, R.; Yoon, S. Clinical outcomes in high-risk pregnancies due to advanced maternal age. J. Women’s Health 2021, 30, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frederiksen, L.E.; Ernst, A.; Brix, N.; Lauridsen, L.L.B.; Roos, L.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H.; Ekelund, C.K. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes at advanced maternal age. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 131, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Puri, M.; Singh, S.; Sundaram, A.; Hussain, R.; Tamang, A.; Crowell, M. Abortion incidence and unintended pregnancy in Nepal. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 2016, 42, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ouédraogo, R.; Sundby, J. Social determinants and access to induced abortion in Burkina Faso: From two case studies. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2014, 2014, 402456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rossier, C.; Guiella, G.; Ouédraogo, A.; Thiéba, B. Estimating clandestine abortion with the confidants method—Results from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Soc. Sci. Med. 2006, 62, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tamang, A.; Tuladhar, S.; Tamang, J.; Ganatra, B.; Dulal, B. Factors associated with choice of medical or surgical abortion among women in Nepal. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012, 118, S52–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bonnen, K.I.; Tuijje, D.N.; Rasch, V. Determinants of first and second trimester induced abortion-results from a cross-sectional study taken place 7 years after abortion law revisions in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tesfaye, G.; Hambisa, M.T.; Semahegn, A. Induced abortion and associated factors in health facilities of Guraghe zone, southern Ethiopia. J. Pregnancy 2014, 2014, 295732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hosseini, H.; Erfani, A.; Nojomi, M. Factors associated with incidence of induced abortion in Hamedan, Iran. Arch. Iran. Med. 2017, 20, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Maina, B.W.; Mutua, M.M.; Sidze, E.M. Factors associated with repeat induced abortion in Kenya. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. González-Rábago, Y.; Rodriguez-Alvarez, E.; Borrell, L.N.; Martín, U. The role of birthplace and educational attainment on induced abortion inequalities. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Adjei, G.; Enuameh, Y.; Asante, K.P.; Baiden, F.; Nettey, O.E.A.; Abubakari, S.; Mahama, E.; Gyaase, S.; Owusu-Agyei, S. Predictors of abortions in rural Ghana: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sundaram, A.; Juarez, F.; Bankole, A.; Singh, S. Factors associated with abortion-seeking and obtaining a safe abortion in Ghana. Stud. Fam. Plan. 2012, 43, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dankwah, E.; Steeves, M.; Ramsay, D.; Feng, C.; Farag, M. The relationship between sociodemographic factors and reporting having terminated a pregnancy among Ghanaian women: A population-based study. Int. Health 2018, 10, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bell, S.O.; Omoluabi, E.; OlaOlorun, F.; Shankar, M.; Moreau, C. Inequities in the incidence and safety of abortion in Nigeria. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e001814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kabiru, C.W.; Ushie, B.A.; Mutua, M.M.; Izugbara, C.O. Previous induced abortion among young women seeking abortion-related care in Kenya: A cross-sectional analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ranji, A. Induced abortion in Iran: Prevalence, reasons, and consequences. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2012, 57, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Klutsey, E.E.; Ankomah, A. Factors associated with induced abortion at selected hospitals in the Volta Region, Ghana. Int. J. Women’s Health 2014, 6, 809–816. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ahiadeke, C. Incidence of induced abortion in southern Ghana. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 2001, 27, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abortion in Ghana. 2013. Available online: https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Abortion-in-Ghana.pdf (accessed on 29 August 2024).
  63. Elul, B. Determinants of induced abortion: An analysis of individual, household and contextual factors in Rajasthan, India. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2011, 43, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sanni, Y.; Agbessi, A.; Olalekan, A.U.; Michael, E.; Ghose, B.; Ogochukwu, U.; Alzahra, H.; Vaibhav, S. Prevalence and determinants of terminated and unintended pregnancies among married women: Analysis of pooled cross-sectional surveys in Nigeria. BMJ Glob. Health 2018, 3, e000707. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chae, S.; Desai, S.; Crowell, M.; Sedgh, G.; Singh, S. Characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in selected low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Awoyemi, B.O.; Novignon, J. Demand for abortion and post abortion care in Ibadan, Nigeria. Health Econ. Rev. 2014, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kant, S.; Srivastava, R.; Rai, S.K.; Misra, P.; Charlette, L.; Pandav, C.S. Induced abortion in villages of Ballabgarh HDSS: Rates, trends, causes and determinants. Reprod. Health 2015, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Takkar, N.; Goel, P.; Saha, P.K.; Dua, D. Contraceptive practices and awareness of emergency contraception in educated working women. Indian J. Med. Sci. 2005, 59, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zeng, X.; Yan, H.; Chen, J. Study on the current status and risk factors of spontaneous abortion of women at reproductive age in rural areas of Xianyang district, Shaanxi province. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi 2007, 28, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kumar, S. Occupational, environmental and lifestyle factors associated with spontaneous abortion. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 18, 915–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zheng, D.; Li, C.; Wu, T.; Tang, K. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: A cross-sectional study of Chinese populations. Reprod. Health 2017, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ghimire, P.R.; Agho, K.E.; Renzaho, A.; Christou, A.; Nisha, M.K.; Dibley, M.; Raynes-Greenow, C. Socio-economic predictors of stillbirths in Nepal (2001–2011). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Megersa, B.S.; Ojengbede, O.A.; Deckert, A.; Fawole, O.I. Factors associated with induced abortion among women of reproductive age attending selected health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A case control study. BMC Women’s Health 2020, 20, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. World Health Organization. Adolescent Pregnancy. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy#:~:text=Adolescent%20mothers%20(aged%2010%E2%80%9319,birth%20and%20severe%20neonatal%20condition (accessed on 24 July 2024).
Figure 1. Pregnancy termination among the respondents.
Figure 1. Pregnancy termination among the respondents.
Healthcare 12 02130 g001
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 8759).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 8759).
CharacteristicsFrequency (n)Percent (%)
Age group in years
(Mean SD) years25.79 (5.68)
15–24412847.1
25–34392044.8
35–446897.9
45–49220.3
Place of residence
Urban305734.9
Rural570265.1
Divisions
Barisal90610.3
Chittagong144616.5
Dhaka130414.9
Khulna90410.3
Mymensingh102511.7
Rajshahi91210.4
Rangpur97111.1
Sylhet129114.7
Level of education
No education6427.3
Primary254829.1
Secondary411547.0
Higher145416.6
Religion
Islam801891.5
Other7418.5
Wealth quintile
Poorest192822.0
Poorer175520.0
Middle156317.8
Richer173719.8
Richest177620.3
Respondent’s current employment
Housewife519559.3
Job holder356440.7
Age at marriage in years
(Mean SD) years16.52 (2.86)
<18610369.7
18–22230526.3
>223514.0
Antenatal visits
No visits4088.1
1–3 times219043.7
≥4241448.2
Contraceptive use
No contraceptive use282232.2
Contraceptive use593767.8
Mobile phone possession
No330837.8
Yes545162.2
Table 2. Distribution of the characteristics of the women by PT.
Table 2. Distribution of the characteristics of the women by PT.
CharacteristicsPregnancy Terminationp Value *
No n (%)Yes n (%)
Age group in years
15–243587 (86.9)541 (13.1)<0.001
25–343099 (79.1)821 (20.9)
35–44488 (70.8)201 (29.2)
45–4914 (63.6)8 (36.4)
Place of residence
Urban2435 (79.7)622 (20.3)<0.001
Rural4753 (83.4)949 (16.6)
Divisions
Barisal754 (83.2)152 (16.8)<0.001
Chittagong1262 (87.3)183 (12.6)
Dhaka1043 (80.0)261 (20.0)
Khulna715 (79.1)190 (21.0)
Mymensingh852 (83.1)173 (16.9)
Rajshahi753 (82.6)159 (17.4)
Rangpur783 (80.6)188 (19.4)
Sylhet1026 (79.5)265 (20.5)
Level of education
No education508 (79.1)134 (20.9)<0.001
Primary2030 (79.7)518 (20.3)
Secondary3422 (83.2)693 (16.8)
Higher1228 (84.5)226 (15.5)
Religion
Muslim6552 (81.7)1466 (18.3)0.005
Other636 (85.8)105 (14.2)
Wealth quintile
Poorest1608 (83.4)320 (16.6)0.141
Poorer1451 (82.7)304 (17.3)
Middle1286 (82.3)277 (17.7)
Richer1417 (81.6)320 (18.4)
Richest1426 (80.3)350 (19.7)
Respondent’s current employment
Housewife4314 (83.0)881 (17.0)<0.001
Job holder2874 (80.6)690 (19.4)
Age at marriage in years
<185000 (81.9)1103 (18.1)0.835
18–221901 (82.5)404 (17.5)
>22287 (81.8)64 (18.2)
Antenatal visits
No visits346 (84.8)62 (15.2)0.073
1–3 times1843 (84.2)347 (15.8)
≥41976 (81.9)438 (18.1)
Contraceptive use
No contraceptive use2316 (82.1)506 (17.9)0.993
Contraceptive use4872 (82.1)1065 (17.9)
Mobile phone possession
No2767 (83.6)541 (16.4)0.003
Yes4421 (81.1)1030 (18.9)
* Pearson’s chi-square test was performed on the categorical variables; statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Factors associated with PT among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh.
Table 3. Factors associated with PT among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh.
FactorsCOR **CI (95%)p ValueAOR **CI (95%)p Value
Lower LimitUpper LimitLower LimitUpper Limit
Age group (years)
15–24 (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
25–341.751.561.98<0.0011.741.541.98<0.001
35–442.732.263.29<0.0012.702.203.30<0.001
45–493.791.589.070.0033.491.428.540.004
Place of residence
Urban (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Rural0.780.690.87<0.0010.810.710.920.002
Divisions
Barisal (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Chittagong0.720.570.910.0060.690.540.880.003
Dhaka1.240.991.540.0551.100.871.390.402
Khulna1.311.031.660.0251.311.031.680.027
Mymensingh1.000.791.270.9531.010.791.290.883
Rajshahi1.040.821.330.7101.050.811.340.693
Rangpur1.190.941.500.1471.230.961.560.090
Sylhet1.281.021.590.0281.281.011.610.036
Level of education
No education (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Primary0.960.781.200.7611.100.881.380.381
Secondary0.760.620.940.0120.900.711.130.382
Higher0.690.550.880.0030.720.540.960.027
Religion
Muslim (ref)1.00------1.00----
Other0.740.600.910.0050.740.590.930.010
Wealth quintile
Poorest (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Poorer0.810.680.950.0141.100.921.310.277
Middle0.850.721.010.0681.150.951.390.135
Richer0.870.731.040.1431.170.961.420.101
Richest0.920.771.080.3331.281.021.600.027
Respondent’s current employment
Housewife (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Job holder1.181.051.310.0041.151.021.390.041
Age at marriage in years
<18 (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
18–220.960.851.090.5600.880.761.010.080
>221.010.761.330.9390.710.520.970.036
Contraceptive use
No contraceptive use (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Contraceptive use0.990.881.120.9931.090.961.230.159
Mobile phone possession
No (ref)1.00---- 1.00----
Yes1.191.061.340.0031.221.071.380.002
** Multiple logistic regression was performed. (ref): Reference category. Adjusted for all the variables presented in the table. Statistically significant at p < 0.05. COR: crude odds ratio. AOR: adjusted odds ratio.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Islam, M.R.; Rahman, M.; Tanha, A.F.; Sheba, N.H.; Haque, S.M.R.; Baset, M.K.u.; Hossain, Z.Z.; Gani, M.A.; Hannan, J.M.A. Prevalence and Factors of Pregnancy Termination Among Reproductive-Aged Women: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. Healthcare 2024, 12, 2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212130

AMA Style

Islam MR, Rahman M, Tanha AF, Sheba NH, Haque SMR, Baset MKu, Hossain ZZ, Gani MA, Hannan JMA. Prevalence and Factors of Pregnancy Termination Among Reproductive-Aged Women: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. Healthcare. 2024; 12(21):2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Islam, Md. Rabiul, Makfiratur Rahman, Arifa Farzana Tanha, Nusrat Hossain Sheba, S. M. Raysul Haque, Md. Kamran ul Baset, Zenat Zebin Hossain, Mohammad Abbas Gani, and J. M. A. Hannan. 2024. "Prevalence and Factors of Pregnancy Termination Among Reproductive-Aged Women: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey" Healthcare 12, no. 21: 2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212130

APA Style

Islam, M. R., Rahman, M., Tanha, A. F., Sheba, N. H., Haque, S. M. R., Baset, M. K. u., Hossain, Z. Z., Gani, M. A., & Hannan, J. M. A. (2024). Prevalence and Factors of Pregnancy Termination Among Reproductive-Aged Women: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. Healthcare, 12(21), 2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212130

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop