Factors Affecting Participation in Leisure Activities in Patients after Breast Cancer Surgery
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Patients and Methods
2.2. Rehabilitation Program
2.3. Shoulder Range of Motion Test
2.4. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand
2.5. Quality of Life Assessment
2.6. Leisure Activity Participation Assessment
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Time Course of Quality of Life
3.2. Relationship between Quality of Life and Leisure Activity
3.3. Factors Affecting Participation in Leisure Activities at 3 Months after Surgery
4. Discussion
Study Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ferlay, J.; Shin, H.R.; Bray, F.; Forman, D.; Mathers, C.; Parkin, D.M. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2893–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bergmann, A.; Mendes, V.V.; de Almeida Dias, R.; do Amaral, E.; Silva, B.; da Costa Leite Ferreira, M.G.; Fabro, E.A.N. Incidence and risk factors for axillary web syndrome after breast cancer surgery. Breast. Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 131, 987–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hidding, J.T.; Beurskens, C.H.; van der Wees, P.J.; van Laarhoven, H.W.; Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W. Treatment related impairments in arm and shoulder in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Rezende, L.F.; Franco, R.L.; de Rezende, M.F.; Beletti, P.O.; Morais, S.S.; Gurgel, M.S. Two exercise schemes in postoperative breast cancer: Comparison of effects on shoulder movement and lymphatic disturbance. Tumori J. 2006, 92, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrek, J.A.; Heelan, M.C. Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema. Cancer Interdiscip. Int. J. Am. Cancer Soc. 1998, 83, 2776–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomide, L.B.; Matheus, J.P.; Candido dos Reis, F.J. Morbidity after breast cancer treatment and physiotherapeutic performance. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2007, 61, 972–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akezaki, Y.; Nakata, E.; Kikuuchi, M.; Tominaga, R.; Kurokawa, H.; Hamada, M.; Aogi, K.; Ohsumi, S.; Sugihara, S. Risk factors for early postoperative psychological problems in breast cancer patients after axillary lymph node dissection. Breast Cancer 2020, 27, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miedema, B.; Hamilton, R.; Easley, J. From invincibility to normalcy: Coping strategies of young adults during the cancer journey. Palliat. Support. Care 2007, 5, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tominaga, K.; Andow, J.; Koyama, Y.; Numao, S.; Kurokawa, E.; Ojima, M.; Nagai, M. Family environment, hobbies and habits as psychosocial predictors of survival for surgically treated patients with breast cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 28, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Heikkinen, S.; Miettinen, J.; Pukkala, E.; Koskenvuo, M.; Malila, N.; Pitkäniemi, J. Impact of major life events on breast-cancer-specific mortality: A case fatality study on 8000 breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017, 48, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Miedema, B.; Hamilton, R.; Tatemichi, S.; Thomas-MacLean, R.; Towers, A.; Hack, T.F.; Tilley, A.; Kwan, W. Predicting recreational difficulties and decreased leisure activities in women 6–12 months post breast cancer surgery. J. Cancer Surviv. 2008, 2, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudak, P.L.; Amadio, P.C.; Bombardier, C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am. J. Ind. Med. 1996, 29, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aaronson, N.K.; Ahmedzai, S.; Bergman, B.; Bullinger, M.; Cull, A.; Duez, N.J.; Filiberti, A.; Flechtner, H.; Fleishman, S.B.; de Haes, J.C.; et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujikawa, A.; Suzue, T.; Jitsunari, F.; Hirao, T. Evaluation of health-related quality of life using EQ-5D in Takamatsu, Japan. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2011, 16, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Paramanandam, V.S.; Roberts, D. Weight training is not harmful for women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema: A systematic review. J. Physiother. 2014, 60, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schmitz, K.H.; Ahmed, R.L.; Troxel, A.; Cheville, A.; Smith, R.; Lewis-Grant, L.; Bryan, C.J.; Williams-Smith, C.T.; Greene, Q.P. Weight Lifting in Women with Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 664–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Courneya, K.S.; Segal, R.J.; Mackey, J.R.; Gelmon, K.; Reid, R.D.; Friedenreich, C.M.; Ladha, A.B.; Proulx, C.; Vallance, J.K.; Lane, K.; et al. Effects of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 4396–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, R.L.; Thomas, W.; Yee, D.; Schmitz, K.H. Randomized Controlled Trial of Weight Training and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Survivors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 2765–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fantoni, S.Q.; Peugniez, C.; Duhamel, A.; Skrzypczak, J.; Frimat, P.; Leroyer, A. Factors related to return to work by women with breast cancer in northern France. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2009, 20, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, E.; Cho, J.; Shin, D.W.; Park, B.W.; Ahn, S.H.; Noh, D.Y.; Nam, S.J.; Lee, E.S.; Yun, Y.H. Impact of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment on work-related life and factors affecting them. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 116, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Hong, B.Y.; Kennedy, S.A.; Chang, Y.; Hong, C.J.; Craigie, S.; Kwon, H.Y.; Romerosa, B.; Couban, R.J.; Reid, S.; et al. Predictors of Unemployment after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 1868–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sone, T.; Nakaya, N.; Tomata, Y.; Hoshi, M.; Tsuji, I. Functional disability among partners and community activity in elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2018, 78, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Groups | Before | 1 Month | 2 Months | 3 Months |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leisure activity group (yes/no) | 29/ 8 | 27/ 10 | 34/ 3 | 37/0 |
Non-leisure activity group (yes/no) | 26/ 97 | 16/ 107 | 12/ 111 | 0/123 |
Variable | Leisure Activity Group | Non-Leisure Activity Group | p-Value between Groups | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | 3 months | p-value (a) | Before | 3 months | p-value (b) | p-value (c) | p-value (d) | |
GHS | 66.7(8–100) | 83.33 (10–100) | 0.022 | 66.7(17–100) | 66.66 (8.3–100) | 0.373 | 0.814 | 0.015 |
Functional scales, scores | ||||||||
Physical function | 100(33–100) | 93.33 (53.3–100) | 0.026 | 93.3(20–100) | 86.66 (26.7–100) | 0.038 | 0.046 | 0.578 |
Role function | 100(0–100) | 100 (33.3–100) | 0.072 | 100(0–100) | 83.33 (0–100) | 0.030 | 0.203 | 0.381 |
Emotional function | 75(0–100) | 100 (33.3–100) | p < 0.0001 | 75(17–100) | 87.495 (16.7–100) | p < 0.0001 | 0.577 | 0.019 |
Cognitive function | 100(50–100) | 100 (50–100) | 0.278 | 83.3(17–100) | 83.33 (16.7–100) | 0.742 | 0.328 | 0.069 |
Social function | 100(0–100) | 100 (33.3–100) | 0.016 | 83.3(16.7–100) | 91.665 (0–100) | 0.850 | 0.414 | 0.017 |
Symptom scales, scores | ||||||||
Fatigue | 22.2(0–100) | 22.22 (0–66.7) | 0.592 | 22.2(0–88.9) | 33.33 (0–100) | 0.146 | 0.529 | 0.400 |
Nausea/vomiting | 0(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.206 | 0(0–33.3) | 0 (0–83.3) | 0.050 | 0.778 | 0.601 |
Pain | 16.7(0–100) | 16.66 (0–66.7) | 0.594 | 16.7(0–83.3) | 16.66 (0–100) | 0.349 | 0.422 | 0.717 |
Dyspnea | 0(0–66.7) | 0 (0–100) | 0.850 | 0(0–83.4) | 0 (0–100) | 0.309 | 0.582 | 0.018 |
Insomnia/sleep | 0(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.617 | 0(0–100) | 33.33 (0–100) | 0.574 | 0.290 | 0.459 |
Appetite loss | 0(0–66.7) | 0 (0–100) | 0.670 | 0(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.686 | 0.528 | 0.916 |
Constipation | 0(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.868 | 0(0–66.7) | 0 (0–100) | 0.293 | 0.286 | 0.300 |
Diarrhea | 0(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.705 | 0(0–66.7) | 0 (0–66.7) | 0.543 | 0.086 | 0.276 |
Financial difficulties | 0(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.289 | 33.3(0–100) | 0 (0–100) | 0.002 | 0.187 | 0.178 |
Variable | Leisure Activity Group | Non-Leisure Activity Group | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years (a) | 54.4 ± 12.5 | 56.4 ± 11.4 | 0.375 |
BMI, kg/m2 (b) | 21.6(16.8–33.1) | 22.5(16.7–34.4) | 0.083 |
Work, yes/no (c) | 10/27 | 28/95 | 0.660 |
Level of lymph node dissection, level 1/level 2 and higher (c) | 33/4 | 93/30 | 0.107 |
Married, yes/no (c) | 29/8 | 104/19 | 0.453 |
Children, yes/no (c) | 26/11 | 97/26 | 0.276 |
Coresident household members, yes/no (c) | 32/5 | 110/13 | 0.567 |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, yes/no (c) | 9/28 | 38/85 | 0.539 |
Postoperative chemotherapy, yes/no (c) | 18/19 | 61/62 | 1.000 |
Postoperative hormonal therapy, yes/no (c) | 8/29 | 25/98 | 0.821 |
Postoperative radiotherapy, yes/no (c) | 11/26 | 44/79 | 0.558 |
Shoulder flexion ROM-T, degrees (b) | 160(130–175) | 155(100–180) | 0.194 |
Shoulder abduction ROM-T, degrees (b) | 160(125–175) | 155(70–180) | 0.075 |
DASH, scores (b) | 12.05(0–36.66) | 14.16(0–60) | 0.362 |
Leisure activity participation before surgery, yes/no (c) | 29/8 | 26/97 | p < 0.0001 |
Variable | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-Value |
---|---|---|
BMI | 0.894 (0.785–1.018) | 0.090 |
Shoulder abduction ROM-T | 1.017 (0.985–1.050) | 0.110 |
Leisure activity participation before surgery | 16.300 (6.198–42.869) | p < 0.0001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Akezaki, Y.; Nakata, E.; Kikuuchi, M.; Tominaga, R.; Kurokawa, H.; Okamoto, M.; Hamada, M.; Aogi, K.; Ohsumi, S.; Sugihara, S. Factors Affecting Participation in Leisure Activities in Patients after Breast Cancer Surgery. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081078
Akezaki Y, Nakata E, Kikuuchi M, Tominaga R, Kurokawa H, Okamoto M, Hamada M, Aogi K, Ohsumi S, Sugihara S. Factors Affecting Participation in Leisure Activities in Patients after Breast Cancer Surgery. Healthcare. 2021; 9(8):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081078
Chicago/Turabian StyleAkezaki, Yoshiteru, Eiji Nakata, Masato Kikuuchi, Ritsuko Tominaga, Hideaki Kurokawa, Masaki Okamoto, Makiko Hamada, Kenjiro Aogi, Shozo Ohsumi, and Shinsuke Sugihara. 2021. "Factors Affecting Participation in Leisure Activities in Patients after Breast Cancer Surgery" Healthcare 9, no. 8: 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081078
APA StyleAkezaki, Y., Nakata, E., Kikuuchi, M., Tominaga, R., Kurokawa, H., Okamoto, M., Hamada, M., Aogi, K., Ohsumi, S., & Sugihara, S. (2021). Factors Affecting Participation in Leisure Activities in Patients after Breast Cancer Surgery. Healthcare, 9(8), 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081078