Next Article in Journal
New Treatment Targets and Innovative Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Very-High-Risk Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
The Intricate Epigenetic and Transcriptional Alterations in Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas: Targeting the Crosstalk as the Oncogenic Achilles’ Heel
Previous Article in Journal
Different Effects of Valproic Acid on SLC12A2, SLC12A5 and SLC5A8 Gene Expression in Pediatric Glioblastoma Cells as an Approach to Personalised Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
EGFR Amplification Is a Phenomenon of IDH Wildtype and TERT Mutated High-Grade Glioma: An Integrated Analysis Using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and DNA Methylome Profiling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/biomedicines10050969
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Roles and Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumorigenesis

by
Peng Li
1,
Hope T. Richard
2,
Kezhou Zhu
1,
Linlin Li
1 and
Suyun Huang
1,3,4,*
1
Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
2
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
3
Institute of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
4
VCU Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(5), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10050969
Submission received: 18 March 2022 / Revised: 13 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 22 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glioma Metabolism, Epigenetics, and Microenvironment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glioblastoma is the most common and most lethal primary malignant brain tumor. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a widespread and abundant internal messenger RNA (mRNA) modification found in eukaryotes. Accumulated evidence demonstrates that m6A modification is aberrantly activated in human cancers and is critical for tumorigenesis and metastasis. m6A modification is also strongly involved in key signaling pathways and is associated with prognosis in glioblastoma. Here, we briefly outline the functions of m6A and its regulatory proteins, including m6A writers, erasers, and readers of the fate of RNA. We also summarize the latest breakthroughs in this field, describe the underlying molecular mechanisms that contribute to the tumorigenesis and progression, and highlight the inhibitors targeting the factors in m6A modification in glioblastoma. Further studies focusing on the specific pathways of m6A modification could help identify biomarkers and therapeutic targets that might prevent and treat glioblastoma.

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma (CNS World Health Organization Grade 4) is a devastating type of primary brain tumor [1], with a median survival of only 14 months, regardless of treatment. Progress has been made in understanding glioblastoma, including many genetic and immunologic profiles described in recent years [2,3]; however, the molecular mechanisms and epigenetic alterations that regulate and drive glioblastoma development remain largely elusive.
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, discovered and partially characterized in a great variety of cellular mRNAs in the 1970s [4], is the most essential and widespread internal methylation in eukaryotic mRNAs [5]. With the development and establishment of high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq/m6A-seq) [6], m6A crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing (m6A-CLIP-seq) [7], m6A individual-nucleotide-resolution crosslinking, and immunoprecipitation (miCLIP) [8], the investigation of the m6A RNA methylomes and mapping are over 18000 m6A sites in the transcripts of more than 7000 human genes have been performed [6,9]. Methylation is a process of catalytically transferring a methyl group from an active methyl donor such as S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate, which can chemically modify certain proteins or nucleic acids to form a methylated product [10]. The m6A modification has been proved to be reversible, as it involves methyltransferases (writer), demethylase (eraser), and m6A recognized RNA binding protein (reader). m6A regulates mRNA processing events such as alternative splicing, translation, and stability [11] (Figure 1). Increasing evidence shows that dysregulation of m6A modification and its corresponding proteins are implicated in the tumorigenesis and the progression of cancers, including glioblastoma [12,13] (Figure 2 and Table 1). These studies could provide potential epigenetic targets for the diagnosis and treatment of glioblastoma.

2. Writers in Glioblastoma

Installation of m6A is catalyzed by a methyltransferase complex (MTC) comprised of several proteins, known as m6A writers. The installation occurs at the pre-mRNA level during transcription and mRNA processing, and is completed when an mRNA is released from chromatin into the nucleoplasmic RNA [62]. The writers of m6A are mainly represented by a multi-subunit methyltransferase complex, which contains methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14), and Wilms tumor 1-associated protein (WTAP). Other components of the complex include RNA binding motif protein (RBM15/15B, VIRMA, synonym: KIAA1429), zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13 (ZC3H13), and Cbl proto-oncogene like 1 (CBLL1, synonym: HAKAI). METTL3 possesses methyltransferase activity, and METTL14 is catalytically inactive but serves as an RNA binding platform for METTL3. These two proteins are expressed together in the nucleus and form a stable heterodimer complex in the ratio of 1:1. Both METTL3 and METTL14 are required for m6A formation [63]. As the regulatory factor of m6A, WTAP facilitates the nuclear localization of METTL3 and METTL14. RBM15/RBM15B binds with METTL3 and participates in the regulation of m6A modification [64]. VIRMA is linked with alternative polyadenylation and mainly regulates m6A methylation of mRNA near the stop codon and 3′UTR [65]. ZC3H13, together with other cofactors, methylates three prime untranslated regions (3′UTR) [66]. CBLL1 interacts with the WTAP/ZC3H13/VIRMA complex and regulates some extents of m6A.
The expression of METTL3, significantly elevated in glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and attenuated during differentiation, is the most important m6A writer [14]. Silencing METTL3 in GSCs inhibited neurosphere formation, enhanced sensitivity to γ-irradiation, and reduced DNA repair [14]. Mechanically, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) studies identified SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2) as a bona fide substrate of METTL3 and the m6A modification of SOX2 mRNA enhanced its stability. Furthermore, METTL3 binding and m6A modification in vivo required intact METTL3/m6A sites present in the SOX2-3′UTR, resulting in the recruitment of human antigen R (HuR) to SOX2 mRNA to enhance its stability, GSCs maintenance, and dedifferentiation [14]. Interestingly, the latest research reported that METTL3 expression is positively associated with a higher grade and poorer prognosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioma but not IDH-mutant glioma. Furthermore, HuR was reported to be essential for METTL3-mediated stabilization of metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), which subsequently activated nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) in IDH-wildtype glioma [15].
Apart from directly regulating SOX2, an integrated approach of whole-transcriptome and m6A-RNA-immunoprecipitation-coupled sequencing (m6A-RIP Seq) of RNA isolated from GSCs with a non-targeting shRNA or METTL3 shRNA [16] found that there are novel RNA metabolic events that depend on METTL3 and the resultant m6A modification, which may work through the 3′UTR for regulation of RNA metabolism. METTL3 depletion dysregulates the expression of epigenetically activated genes, the RNA editing, particularly in exonic regions by altering the level of RNA editing enzymes (downregulating adenosine deaminase RNA specific (ADAR) and adenosine deaminase RNA specific B1 (ADARB1), while upregulating apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 1 (APOBEC1) and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3A (APOBEC3A)), and the splicing and stability in GSCs. Furthermore, the signaling pathways involved in GSCs maintenance and tumorigenesis, including Notch, NFκB, Wnt, c-Myc and TGF-β, are positively regulated by METTL3-mediated RNA stabilization, implying an oncogenic role for METTL3 in GSCs [16].
Additionally, it is reported that METTL3-mediated m6A modification was significantly elevated in temozolomide (TMZ)-resistant glioblastoma cells. Experimentally, METTL3 overexpression impaired the TMZ-sensitivity of glioblastoma cells, while METTL3 silencing or 3-deazaadenosine (DAA)-mediated total methylation inhibition improved the sensitivity of TMZ-resistant glioblastoma cells to TMZ in vitro and in vivo. This potentiation is likely because these two critical DNA repair genes (O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase (APNG)) were m6A-modified by METTL3 [17]. Another team illustrated that TMZ treatment induced upregulation of METTL3 and increased m6A modification. The underlying mechanism is that TMZ increased the chromatin accessibility at the METTL3 locus mediated by the EZH2-SOX4 complex [18].
Recently, it has been reported that the m6A levels in RNAs were lower in glioblastoma cells and tissues. Strikingly, the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) process were enhanced after knockdown of METTL3, which was regulated by matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP2), cadherin 1, cadherin 2 and fibronectin 1 (FN1) [19].
Shi’s team revealed an increase in m6A RNA methylation upon induced GSCs differentiation. Meanwhile, knockdown of METTL3 or METTL14 promotes human GSCs growth, self-renewal, and tumorigenesis. In contrast, overexpression of METTL3 or inhibition of the RNA demethylase fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) suppressed GSCs growth and self-renewal. Similarly, in vivo tumorigenesis experiments showed that knockdown of METTL3 and/or METTL14 significantly enhanced the growth of GSCs. In parallel, the authors found that meclofenaminc acid 2 (MA2), a selective inhibitor of FTO, increased the m6A level, diminished GSCs growth and self-renewal, and severely reduced GSCs-induced tumorigenesis. By mechanically combining m6A-seq analysis and RNA-seq in GSCs depletion of METTL3 or METTL14, they screened and verified a number of upregulated oncogenes, such as ADAM19, EPHA3, and KLF4, and downregulated tumor suppressors, including CDKN2A, BRCA2 and TP53I11. Additionally, the expression of differentiated neural cell markers (GFAP, Tuj1) was also decreased after knockdown of METTL3 or METTL14. The m6A consensus motif GGAC was identified and peak distribution analysis revealed strong enrichment of m6A peaks near the stop codon. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of genes with m6A peaks in their mRNA illustrated that m6A-methylated mRNAs are involved in critical cellular processing, such as cell growth, cell differentiation, DNA damage response, and cellular stress response [20]. Additionally, in 2021, Wang’s group found argininosuccinate synthase 1 (ASS1) was a target of METTL14-mediated m6A modification by MeRIP and RIP assay. Overexpression of METTL14 markedly elevated ASS1 mRNA m6A modification and suppressed ASS1 mRNA expression. Moreover, the authors revealed that METTL14-mediated ASS1 mRNA degradation relied on the YTH m6A RNA-binding protein 2 (YTHDF2)-dependant pathway [67].
Although originally classified as a tumor suppressor, WTAP was later found to be involved in the regulation of migration and invasion in glioblastoma [21]. Liu et al. reported that WTAP overexpression predicts poor prognosis in glioma [22], and as a crucial interactor of the methyltransferase complex it plays an oncogenic role in glioma.

3. Erasers in Glioblastoma

In 2011, FTO was discovered as the first m6A demethylase [68]. Then, another RNA demethylase, Alkb homolog 5 (ALKBH5), was identified in 2013 [69]. The findings of these studies showed that FTO and ALKBH5 belong to the alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family. Bothe enzymes remove methyl groups from m6A in a Fe (II) and α-ketoglutaric acid-dependent mode. In the demethylation process, m6A is primarily oxidized to generate N6-hydroxymethyladenosine (hm6A), which is converted into N6-formyladenosine (f6A) subsequently. Finally, f6A is changed into adenosine (A), and the demethylation is completed.
Like the writers, m6A erasers also play key roles in glioblastoma. Knockdown of FTO in human glioma cell lines or via treatment with a selective inhibitor of FTO was thought to inhibit cell proliferation and migration [23]. Furthermore, FTO knockdown decreased the expression of MYC, increased the level of MAX interactor 1 (MXI1), and inhibited the primary and mature transcripts of miR-155-5p, miR-24-3p and miR-27a-3p, respectively. However, when human glioma cell lines were treated with 200 μmol/L MA2 for 2 days, a notable decrease in both mRNA and protein of MYC was observed, but there was no difference in FTO expression. In summary, these data indicated that FTO regulated the feedback loop in glioma cells by targeting MYC transcripts [24]. On the contrary, recent research is inconsistent with previous research. Li’s group reported that FTO expression in glioblastoma was lower than in low-grade glioma and normal brain tissue. Interestingly, overexpression of FTO restrained cell growth, migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo. The potential mechanism may be that FTO regulates the m6A modification of primary microRNA-10a (pri-miR-10a) processing [25].
As early as 2017, Huang’s group uncovered a critical function for ALKBH5 and provided insight into the important roles of m6A methylation in glioblastoma. The work showed that ALKBH5 is highly expressed in GSCs and in the patients’ samples compared to normal brain tissue. Interestingly, ALKBH5 co-expressed with the typical stemness marker for glioblastoma, SOX2 and Nestin in tumor tissue. Silencing ALKBH5 suppressed the proliferation of GSCs in vitro and tumorigenesis in vivo. Furthermore, combined transcriptome and m6A-seq data indicated that the transcription factor forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) was one of the ALKBH5 targeted genes. Specifically, ALKBH5 demethylates FOXM1 nascent transcripts, causing elevated FOXM1 expression. Meanwhile, a long non-coding RNA antisense to FOXM1 (FOXM1-AS) could promote the demethylation by enhancing the interaction between ALKBH5 and FOXM1 nascent transcripts [26].
In order to explore the m6A modification of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) in the carcinogenesis of glioma, ALKBH5 was upregulated, which stimulated glioma cells to proliferate. ALKBH5 demethylated the target transcript G6PD and enhanced its mRNA stability, thereby promoting G6PD translation and activating the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) [27].
In glioblastoma, rapid cancer cell growth and poorly organized tumor vasculature result in extensive hypoxia. In response to hypoxia, multiple subtypes of immunosuppressive cells and mainly tumor-associated microglia or macrophages (TAM) infiltrate the tumors in addition to the profound adaptation of cancer cells. Wu’s team reported that ALKBH5, along with the hypoxic gene, was induced in glioblastoma models under hypoxic conditions. Hypoxia-induced ALKBH5 removed m6A modification from the lncRNA NEAT1, resulting in a steady level of its transcript and an increasing paraspeckle assembly. This process gave rise to the relocation of transcriptional repressor splicing factor proline and glutamine-rich (SFPQ) from the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) promoter to paraspeckles, leading to the overexpression of CXCL8/ interleukin 8 (IL8). Suppression of ALKBH5 in glioblastoma cells significantly decreased CXCL8/IL8 production, diminished hypoxia-induced TAM recruitment, and immunosuppression in intracranial transplanted tumors. Collectively, the authors connected hypoxia-induced epitranscriptomic alters with the immunosuppressive microenvironment promoting tumor evasion [28].
The existence of GSCs resistance to radiotherapy and TMZ are the major causes of recurrence and poor prognosis of glioblastoma. One group demonstrates that high expression of ALKBH5 increased radioresistance by regulating homologous recombination (HR) in patient-derived GSCs. They observed a decrease in invasion and survival after irradiation likely due to a defect in DNA-damage repair in ALKBH5 knockdown cells, and a diminished expression of the genes involved in HR, such as CHK1 and RAD51, as well as the persistence of gamma H2A histone family member X (γ-H2AX) staining after insulation resistance (IR) [29]. Another group found that LncRNA SOX2OT was elevated in TMZ-resistant cells and recurrent glioblastoma patient samples, and this aberration was associated with a high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. Depletion of SOX2OT inhibited cell proliferation and increased cell apoptosis thereby enhancing TMZ sensitivity. Mechanistically, ALKBH5 recruited by SOX2OT binds to SOX2 and demethylates the SOX2 transcript, leading to enhanced SOX2 expression and activating the Wnt5a/β-catenin signaling pathway [30]. Therefore, evidence is emerging that modulation of m6A RNA methylation plays an important role in the recurrence of glioblastoma.

4. Readers in Glioblastoma

4.1. YTHDF and YTHDC Families

Recognition and binding of m6A readers to their target RNAs is essential for modulating RNA fate. To date, the m6A readers discovered include YT521-B homology (YTH) domain-containing proteins, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (HNRNPS), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein (IGF2BPs) and eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 3 [70]. YTH family members include YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, YTHDC1 and YTHDC2. The YTH domain was contained at the C-terminus that harbors a binding site for m6A. YTHDF2 has been identified in the cytoplasm and nucleus, while other YTHDFs are generally located in the cytoplasm [71]. YTHDF1 and YTHDF3 promote translation in a cap-dependent manner via regulating the interaction of m6A at 3′-UTR with eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF3A and eIF3B) [72,73,74]. YTHDF2 selectively induces the degradation of m6A-modified mRNAs, lowering the abundance of its targets [75], while YTHDF3 enhances the decay and translation of RNAs by interacting with YTHDF1 and YTHDF2 [74,76]. YTHDC1 is a predominantly nuclear protein with a YTH domain and multiple other functional domains, including multiple putative nuclear localization elements and an SH2 domain. YTHDC1 appears to be the major reader of nuclear m6A to mediate RNA export and alternative splicing [77,78]. YTHDC2, a nucleocytoplasmic protein, contains a DEAD-box RNA helicase domain, raising translational activity and accelerating the degradation of its targets [79].
In 2020, Xu et al. confirmed that YTHDF1 is associated with glioma progression, and high expression of YTHDF1 predicts a poor prognosis in patients with glioma. This study identified has-mir-346 as an upstream regulator of YTHDF1 to participate in the development of glioma [31]. Later, Yarmishyn et al. reported that knockdown of YTHDF1 in human glioblastoma cell lines inhibits proliferation, sensitizes glioblastoma cells to TMZ, and attenuates cancer stem cell-like properties. Additionally, Musashi-1 (MSI1) is a posttranscriptional gene expression regulator associated with high oncogenicity in glioblastoma that positively regulates the expression of YTHDF1 [32].
YTHDF2 was first reported in association with gliomas by informatics in 2020. At that time, high YTHDF2 expression was noted to be associated with poor overall survival in low-grade glioma (LGG) and positively correlated with several immune cells markers, including prephenate dehydratase 1 (PD-1), Hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 2 (HAVCR2/TIM-3), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), as well as TAM gene markers and IDH1 in these lesions [33]. Meanwhile, Huang’s group explored the mechanism responsible for the overexpression of YTHDF2 in glioblastoma. They discovered that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation plays a role in m6A modification in glioblastoma and YTHDF2 overexpression occurred through the EGFR/SRC/ERK pathway. Phosphorylation of YTHDF2 serine39 and threonine381 by extracellular regulated MAP kinase (ERK) was found to stabilize the YTHDF2 protein, which is required for glioblastoma cell proliferation, invasion and tumorigenesis. Moreover, YTHDF2 facilitates m6A-dependent mRNA decay of L-xylulose reductase (LXRA) and HIVEP zinc finger 2 (HIVEP2), which impacts the glioma patient survival. Furthermore, YTHDF2 inhibits LXRα-dependent cholesterol homeostasis in glioblastoma cells [34]. Later, it was also confirmed that YTHDF2 accelerated UBX domain protein 1 (UBXN1) mRNA degradation via METTL3-mediated m6A, which, in turn, induced NFκB activation [35]. On the other hand, Rich’s group found that YTHDF2 stabilizes MYC and VEGFA transcripts in GSCs in an m6A-dependent manner, and IGFBP3 was identified as a downstream effector of the YTHDF2–MYC axis in GSCs. Thus, YTHDF2 links RNA epitranscriptomic modifications and GSCs growth, laying the foundation for the YTHDF2–MYC–IGFBP3 axis as a specific and novel therapeutic target in glioblastoma [36].
YTHDC1 also participates in the tumorigenesis of glioblastoma by reading the m6A marks dependent on its tryptophan 377 (W377) or W428 sites [80]. YTHDC1 deficiency inhibits sphere numbers substantially in METTL3 overexpressed U87 cells compared to the control. Overexpression of YTHDC1 W377A/W428A mutant also failed to enhance sphere formation of U87 cells, suggesting that YTFDC1 contributes to the glioblastoma phenotype dependent on its m6A-binding activity [38]. Finally, YTHDC1 inhibits cell proliferation by reducing the expression of Vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 25 (VPS25), which is highly expressed in gliomas and augments proliferation through targeting JAK-STAT signaling [39].
Although there are no reports documenting the function of YTHDF3 in glioblastoma, YTHDF3 is known to promote cancer cell interaction with brain endothelial cells and astrocyte blood–brain barrier extravasation, angiogenesis and outgrowth. Mechanistically, YTHDF3 enhances the translation of m6A-mediated transcripts for the genes associated with brain metastasis, such as ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 5 (ST6GALNAC5), gap junction protein alpha 1 (GJA1), and EGFR. Overexpression of YTHDF3 in brain metastasis is attributed to the increased gene copy number and autoregulation of YTHDF3 cap-independent translation by binding to m6A residues within its own 5′UTR [37].

4.2. HNRNPs

In addition to the putative direct m6A readers in the YTH domain, there are indirect readers such as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (HNRNPs), which include HNRNPC, HNRNPG, and HNRNPA2/B1. The binding affinity of HNRNPC for transcripts can be increased by m6A-mediated RNA structure alteration, leading to the m6A-switch effect [81]. HNRNPA2/B1 was originally identified as a nuclear m6A-binding protein that modulates microRNA biogenesis. Although HNRNPA2/B1 lacks a YTH domain, the authors of this study suggested that it could be an m6A reader [82]. RNA-HNRNPG has been reported to be regulated by an abundance of m6A sites in the transcriptome, altering the expression and alternative splicing pattern of target mRNAs [83].
There are 144 proteins that have been identified using immunoprecipitation (IP)/MS which interact with SOX2 in glioblastoma cell lines. Among the proteins identified were HNRNPC and HNRPA2/B1. This finding indicates that SOX2 associates with a heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex [84]. Furthermore, HNRNPC was shown to be highly elevated in glioblastoma cell lines and brain tissue. Silencing of HNRNPC reduced cell proliferation and enhanced etoposide-induced apoptosis. Strikingly, silencing of HNRNPC lowered mi-R-21 levels in turn increased the expression of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), suppressing AKT serine/threonine kinase (Akt) and Ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1 (p70S6K) activation and inhibiting migration and invasion in glioblastoma [40]. Similarly, high expression of HNRNPC, verified in glioblastoma by Western blot, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemical staining, was associated with malignancy and development of gliomas [85]. It was also confirmed that HNRPA2/B1 overexpressed in glioma tissue specimens is associated with advanced glioma grade and knockdown of HNRPA2/B1 leads to reduced glioblastoma cell viability, adhesion, migration, invasion, as well as chemoresistance for TMZ. HNRPA2/B1 knockdown also induced apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in glioma U251 and SHG44 cells. Molecularly, phospho-STAT3, MMP2, and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) are the targets of HNRPA2/B1 in glioma [41,42]. In addition, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) immediate early 86 protein (IE86, ie2 gene-encoded) promotes glioblastoma migration by regulating HNRPA2/B1 expression [86].

4.3. IGF2BP Family

Insulin growth factor 2 mRNA binding proteins (IGF2BPs), including IGF2BP1/2/3, also function as indirect m6A readers to inhibit the degradation of m6A-modified transcripts and facilitate translation [87].
IGF2BP1 is upregulated in human glioma tissue, which is associated with cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and cancer progression. Some non-coding RNAs, including miR-4500 [43], miR-837 [44], miR-506 [45], miR-513 [46], Lnc-THOR [47], and LINC00689 [48], promote tumorigenesis in glioma through targeting IGF2BP1.
IGF2BP2 is also overexpressed in glioblastoma. It regulates oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in primary glioblastoma sphere cultures. IGF2BP2 binds several mRNAs that encode mitochondrial respiratory chain complex subunits and interact with complex I proteins. Furthermore, depletion of IGF2BP2 in glioma spheres decreases their oxygen consumption rate through compromising complex I and complex IV activity, which results in impaired clonogenicity in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo [49]. Additionally, the long non-coding RNA, HIF1A-AS2, OIP5-AS1, and CASC9 target IGF2BP2, both directly and indirectly, to facilitate the maintenance of mesenchymal glioblastoma stem-like cells [50], to repress resistance to TMZ and proliferation via OIP5-AS1-miR-129-5p axis [51], and to accelerate aerobic glycolysis by enhancing Hexokinase-2 (HK2) mRNA stability [52]. Recently, it has been reported that serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 7 (SRSF7), an oncogenic splicing factor, promotes the proliferation and migration of glioblastoma cells dependent on the presence of the m6A methyltransferase. Furthermore, the two m6A sites of PDZ binding kinase (PBK) are regulated by SRSF7 in glioblastoma cells through recognition by IGF2BP2 [53]. IGF2BP2 also inhibits the phosphotyrosine interaction domain containing 1 (PID1) expression through the DANCR/FOXO1 axis, leading to drug resistance in glioblastoma cells and promoting glioma progression [54].
The mRNA and protein expression of IGF2BP3 is up-regulated in glioblastomas but not in lower-grade astrocytomas. IGF2BP3 is an RNA binding protein known to bind to the 5′UTR of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) mRNA, activating its translation without altering its transcript level. Gain and loss of function studies in glioblastoma cells established the role of IGF2BP3 in promoting proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, invasion, and chemoresistance. Concordantly, PI3K and MAPK, the downstream effectors of IGF-2, are activated by IGF2BP3 and essential for IGF2BP3-induced cell proliferation [55]. Functional assay confirmed IGF2BP3 as a target of miR-129-1, while targeting of IGF2BP3 by miR-129-1 decreases the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT cascade which leads to the postponement of G1-S transition in the cell cycle in glioblastoma cells [56]. Other studies illustrated that miR-654 was identified as a target of circHIPK3 while IGF2BP3 was targeted by miR-654. CircHIPK3 promoted IGF2BP3 expression via interacting with miR-654 in glioma cells [57]. IGF3BP2 participates in a positive feedback loop of the lncRNA-RMRP/ZNRF3 axis and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling to regulate progression and TMZ resistance in gliomas. It is also involved in macrophage infiltration into the tumor microenvironment (TME) via stabilizing circNEIL3 packaged into exosomes by hnRNPA2B1 [58].

4.4. eIF3 Family

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF3, a multimeric complex composed of 13 subunits (a-m), connects the 43S pre-initiation and eIF4F initiation complexes. Novel insights into the link between eIF3 and cancer have shown that eIF3 specifically recognizes mRNA structures, mRNA modifications, or the 5′cap of mRNAs [88]. A study of eIF3B in glioblastoma showed knockdown of eIF3 significantly inhibited proliferation in U87 cells, which was associated with the accumulation of G0/G1-phase cell numbers and an increased rate of apoptosis [59]. Similar to the function of eIF3B, eIF3D promotes cell growth, colony formation and migration in U251 and U87 cells [60]. Additional studies revealed that the mRNA of eIF3B, eIF3I, eIF4A1, eIF4E, and eIF4H was significantly higher in gliomas compared to non-neoplastic cortical control brain tissue (CCBT), but only eIF3I and eIF4H were significantly associated with patient outcome according to the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) dataset [60,61]. eIF3E has been found to be essential for the proliferation and survival of glioblastoma cells through the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) [89].

5. Potential Clinical Inhibitors of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma

The above description indicates that the writers, erasers, and readers in m6A modification are critically important for tumorigenesis and aggressiveness by regulating structure stability, RNA processing, translation, degradation, and nuclear export in glioblastoma. A novel perspective for individualized therapy of glioblastoma and other tumors may include targeting the regulators of m6A modification.
The functional domain of METTL3 that binds to the substrate of METTL3 was thought to be the target of designed inhibitors. Recently, METTL3 inhibitors, the competitive inhibitors binding the pocket of SAM, can be divided into two types: nucleosides (compounds) and non-nucleosides (UZH1A, UZH2 and STM2457). UZH1a was able to reduce m6A/A level at least 6 days into an mRNA fraction in a leukemia cell line but also in other cell lines (U2OS, HEK293T) [90]. The effect of METTL3 inhibitors has not been reported on glioblastoma, but we believe that it is worthy of future study.
FTO inhibitors, FTO-04, FTO-10, FTO-11, and FTO-12, reduced the size of neurospheres treated at a concentration of 30 μM. Moreover, FTO-04 can significantly impair the self-renewal of GSCs to prevent neurosphere formation without impairing the growth of human neural stem cell (hNSC) neurospheres. Importantly, treatment with FTO-04 was found to increase the levels of both m6A and m6Am modifications, with m6Am modifications showing the largest fold-change relative to DMSO control. These findings make FTO-04 a leading compound for future therapy in glioblastoma [91].
MV1035, an ALKBH5 inhibitor, can reduce U87-MG migration and invasiveness via down-regulation of CD73, which is an extrinsic protein involved in the generation of adenosine and overexpressed in glioblastoma [92]. Under the computer-aided development of active inhibitors of ALKBH5, Simona et al. identified two low micromolar compounds among the in silico-predicted compounds by using an m6A antibody-based enzymatic assay. These two compounds, 2-[(1-hydroxy-2-oxo-2-phenylethyl) sulfanyl] acetic acid and 4-[(furan-2-yl)-methyl] a-1,2-diazinane-3,6-dione, reduced cell viability from 100% down to about 40% at low micromolar concentrations [93].
Lastly, a small molecule inhibitor termed 7773 interacts with a hydrophobic surface at the boundary of IGF2BP1 KH3 and KH4 domains and inhibits binding to Kras mRNA, causing a reduction in Kras mRNA and other RNA targets. This decreases cell migration and growth in cancer cell lines (H1299, ES2, and HEK293) [94]. Kras is also upregulated in glioma samples and is involved in the ERK pathway in gliomas [95]. Therefore, IGF2BP1 inhibitors may also be promising small molecule inhibitors for glioma treatment in the future.

6. Conclusions

Increasing evidence reveals that the writers, erasers, and readers of m6A modification play an important role in the development and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma. Moreover, some of the writers, erasers, and readers in m6A modification are potential biomarkers for diagnosis and promising drug targets for therapy in these lesions. Because glioblastoma is proven to be driven by epigenetic alteration, including mRNA manipulating the expression of oncogenes, targeting m6A regulatory proteins can serve as a new approach for precisely modifying the epitranscriptome of glioblastoma and lead to a more personalized approach to glioblastoma treatment. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and chemical genetics, the studies of epitranscriptome on m6A modification have shed light on the therapy of glioblastoma. The development of inhibitors of the factors in m6A modification can control the deposition and removal of m6A marks which control RNA fate and specify the RNA to be regulated. Future efforts should be directed to the development of new inhibitors targeting the above m6A modification factors and validating their effects on glioblastoma treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and P.L.; Writing original draft preparation, P.L.; Reviewing and editing, S.H., H.T.R., K.Z., P.L. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by US NIH grants R01CA201327 and R01NS101959.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

m6AN6-methyladenosine
mRNAmessenger RNA
MeRIP-seqmethylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing
m6A-CLIP-seqm6A crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing
miCLIPm6A individual-nucleotide-resolution crosslinking and immunoprecopitation
SAMS-adenosylmethionine
MTCmethyltransferase complex
METTL3methyltransferase-like 3
METTL14methyltransferase-like 14
WTAPWilms tumor 1-associated protein
RBM15/15BRNA binding motif protein
ZC3H13zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13
CBLL1Cbl proto-oncogene like 1
GSCsglioma stem-like cells
HuRhuman antigen R
TMZTemozolomide
ADARadenosine deaminase RNA specific
ADARB1adenosine deaminase RNA specific B1
APOBEC1apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 1
APOBEC3Aapolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3A
MGMTO-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
APNGN-methylpurine DNA glycosylase
EMTepithelial to mesenchymal transition
VMvasculogenic mimicry
MMP2matrix metallopeptidase 2
MMP9matrix metallopeptidase 9
FTOfat mass and obesity-associated protein
MA2meclofenaminc acid 2
ALKBH5Alkb homolog 5
f6AN6-formyladenosine
G6PDglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
PPPpentose phosphate pathway
TAMtumor associated microglia or macrophages
PD-1prephenate dehydratase 1
HAVCR2/TIM-3Hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 2
CTLA-4cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4
SFPQsplicing factor proline and glutamine rich
CXCL8C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8
IL8interleukin 8
YTHDCYT521-B homology (YTH) domain-containing
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor
ERKextracellular regulated MAP kinase
LXRAL-xylulose reductase
HIVEP2HIVEP zinc finger 2
VPS25Vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 25
UBXN1UBX domain protein 1
ST6GALNAC5ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 5
GJA1gap junction protein alpha 1
HNRNPSheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins
PDCD4programmed cell death 4
AktAKT serine/threonine kinase
p70S6KRibosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1
RT-PCRreal time polymerase chain reaction
HK2Hexokinase-2
SRSF7serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 7
IGF2BPsinsulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding proteins
eIFeukaryotic initiation factor
CCBTcortical control brain tissue
TCGAthe Cancer Genome Atlas
HIFsHypoxia-inducible factors

References

  1. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Neuro-Oncology 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huang, B.; Zhang, H.; Gu, L.; Ye, B.; Jian, Z.; Stary, C.; Xiong, X. Advances in Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 3597613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Indraccolo, S.; Lombardi, G.; Fassan, M.; Pasqualini, L.; Giunco, S.; Marcato, R.; Gasparini, A.; Candiotto, C.; Nalio, S.; Fiduccia, P.; et al. Genetic, Epigenetic, and Immunologic Profiling of MMR-Deficient Relapsed Glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 25, 1828–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Desrosiers, R.; Friderici, K.; Rottman, F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1974, 71, 3971–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Schäfer, K.P. RNA Synthesis and Processing Reactions in a Subcellular System from Mouse L Cells. Hoppe-Seyler’s Z. Für Physiol. Chem. 1982, 363, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meyer, K.D.; Saletore, Y.; Zumbo, P.; Elemento, O.; Mason, C.E.; Jaffrey, S.R. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149, 1635–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ke, S.; Alemu, E.A.; Mertens, C.; Gantman, E.C.; Fak, J.J.; Mele, A.; Haripal, B.; Zucker-Scharff, I.; Moore, M.J.; Park, C.Y.; et al. A majority of m6A residues are in the last exons, allowing the potential for 3′ UTR regulation. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 2037–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Grozhik, A.V.; Linder, B.; Olarerin-George, A.O.; Jaffrey, S.R. Mapping m6A at Individual-Nucleotide Resolution Using Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation (miCLIP). Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1562, 55–78. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dominissini, D.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Schwartz, S.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Ungar, L.; Osenberg, S.; Cesarkas, K.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Amariglio, N.; Kupiec, M.; et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 2012, 485, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tuck, M.T. The formation of internal 6-methyladenine residues in eucaryotic messenger rna. Int. J. Biochem. 1992, 24, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zaccara, S.; Ries, R.J.; Jaffrey, S.R. Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 608–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. He, L.; Li, H.; Wu, A.; Peng, Y.; Shu, G.; Yin, G. Functions of N6-methyladenosine and its role in cancer. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhu, K.; Xie, V.; Huang, S. Epigenetic regulation of cancer stem cell and tumorigenesis. Adv. Cancer Res. 2020, 148, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Visvanathan, A.; Patil, V.; Abdulla, S.; Hoheisel, J.D.; Somasundaram, K. N6-Methyladenosine Landscape of Glioma Stem-Like Cells: METTL3 Is Essential for the Expression of Actively Transcribed Genes and Sustenance of the Oncogenic Signaling. Genes 2019, 10, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chang, Y.Z.; Chai, R.C.; Pang, B.; Chang, X.; An, S.Y.; Zhang, K.N.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.Z. METTL3 enhances the stability of MALAT1 with the assistance of HuR via m6A modification and activates NF-κB to promote the malignant progression of IDH-wildtype glioma. Cancer Lett. 2021, 511, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Visvanathan, A.; Patil, V.; Arora, A.; Hegde, A.S.; Arivazhagan, A.; Santosh, V.; Somasundaram, K. Essential role of METTL3-mediated m6A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. Oncogene 2017, 37, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, J.; Chen, G.; Dong, X.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Cheng, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Yuan, J.; Qian, Z.; et al. METTL3 Promotes the Resistance of Glioma to Temozolomide via Increasing MGMT and ANPG in a m6A Dependent Manner. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, F.; Chen, S.; Yu, J.; Gao, Z.; Sun, Z.; Yi, Y.; Long, T.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Pan, Y.; et al. Interplay of m6A and histone modifications contributes to temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tao, M.; Li, X.; He, L.; Rong, X.; Wang, H.; Pan, J.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Peng, Y. Decreased RNA m6A methylation enhances the process of the epithelial mesenchymal transition and vasculogenic mimicry in glioblastoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2022, 12, 893. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cui, Q.; Shi, H.; Ye, P.; Li, L.; Qu, Q.; Sun, G.; Sun, G.; Lu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yang, C.-G.; et al. m6A RNA Methylation Regulates the Self-Renewal and Tumorigenesis of Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 2622–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jin, D.-I.; Lee, S.W.; Han, M.-E.; Kim, H.-J.; Seo, S.-A.; Hur, G.-Y.; Jung, S.; Kim, B.-S.; Oh, S.-O. Expression and roles of Wilms’ tumor 1-associating protein in glioblastoma. Cancer Sci. 2012, 103, 2102–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xi, Z.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, J.; Liu, X.; Ma, J.; Liu, Y. WTAP Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis in Malignant Glioma Patients. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2016, 60, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, G. m6A RNA Methylation Controls Proliferation of Human Glioma Cells by Influencing Cell Apoptosis. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2019, 159, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xiao, L.; Li, X.; Mu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, P.; Xie, C.; Jiang, S. FTO Inhibition Enhances the Antitumor Effect of Temozolomide by Targeting MYC-miR-155/23a Cluster-MXI1 Feedback Circuit in Glioma. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 3945–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, S.; Zhao, S.; Qi, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, H.; Pan, Z.; Xue, H.; Jin, C.; Qiu, W.; Chen, Z.; et al. SPI1-induced downregulation of FTO promotes GBM progression by regulating pri-miR-10a processing in an m6A-dependent manner. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids 2022, 27, 699–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, S.; Zhao, B.S.; Zhou, A.; Lin, K.; Zheng, S.; Lu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Sulman, E.P.; Xie, K.; Bogler, O.; et al. m6A Demethylase ALKBH5 Maintains Tumorigenicity of Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells by Sustaining FOXM1 Expression and Cell Proliferation Program. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 591–606.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Ji, S. ALKBH5 Promotes the Proliferation of Glioma Cells via Enhancing the mRNA Stability of G6PD. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 3003–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, F.; Qin, X.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Hu, J.; Cheng, X.; Guo, D.; Cheng, F.-L.; Fang, C.; Tan, Y.; et al. ALKBH5 Facilitates Hypoxia-Induced Paraspeckle Assembly and IL8 Secretion to Generate an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 5876–5888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kowalski-Chauvel, A.; Lacore, M.G.; Arnauduc, F.; Delmas, C.; Toulas, C.; Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal, E.; Seva, C. The m6A RNA Demethylase ALKBH5 Promotes Radioresistance and Invasion Capability of Glioma Stem Cells. Cancers 2020, 13, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, B.; Zhou, J.; Wang, C.; Chi, Y.; Wei, Q.; Fu, Z.; Lian, C.; Huang, Q.; Liao, C.; Yang, Z.; et al. LncRNA SOX2OT promotes temozolomide resistance by elevating SOX2 expression via ALKBH5-mediated epigenetic regulation in glioblastoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, C.; Yuan, B.; He, T.; Ding, B.; Li, S. Prognostic values of YTHDF1 regulated negatively by mir-3436 in Glioma. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 7538–7549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yarmishyn, A.A.; Yang, Y.-P.; Lu, K.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chien, Y.; Chou, S.-J.; Tsai, P.-H.; Ma, H.-I.; Chien, C.-S.; Chen, M.-T.; et al. Musashi-1 promotes cancer stem cell properties of glioblastoma cells via upregulation of YTHDF1. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, G.; Wen, G.; Zhang, H. YTHDF2 correlates with tumor immune infiltrates in lower-grade glioma. Aging 2020, 12, 18476–18500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fang, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Shi, H.; Ye, Y.; Shi, H.; Zou, Z.; Li, P.; Guo, Q.; Ma, L.; et al. EGFR/SRC/ERK-stabilized YTHDF2 promotes cholesterol dysregulation and invasive growth of glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chai, R.C.; Chang, Y.Z.; Chang, X.; Pang, B.; An, S.Y.; Zhang, K.N.; Chang, Y.H.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.Z. YTHDF2 facilitates UBXN1 mRNA decay by recognizing METTL3-mediated m6A modification to activate NF-κB and promote the malignant progression of glioma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dixit, D.; Prager, B.C.; Gimple, R.C.; Poh, H.X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Kidwell, R.L.; Kim, L.J.Y.; Xie, Q.; et al. The RNA m6A Reader YTHDF2 Maintains Oncogene Expression and Is a Targetable Dependency in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Cancer Discov. 2020, 11, 480–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, G.; Shi, L.; Ye, Y.; Shi, H.; Zeng, L.; Tiwary, S.; Huse, J.T.; Huo, L.; Ma, L.; Ma, Y.; et al. YTHDF3 Induces the Translation of m6A-Enriched Gene Transcripts to Promote Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 857–871.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, F.; Yi, Y.; Miao, Y.; Long, W.; Long, T.; Chen, S.; Cheng, W.; Zou, C.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, X.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine Modulates Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Human Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5785–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhu, X.; Yang, H.; Zhang, M.; Wu, X.; Jiang, L.; Liu, X.; Lv, K. YTHDC1-mediated VPS25 regulates cell cycle by targeting JAK-STAT signaling in human glioma cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, Y.M.; Hwang, S.J.; Masuda, K.; Choi, K.M.; Jeong, M.R.; Nam, D.H.; Gorospe, M.; Kim, H.H. Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein C1/C2 Controls the Metastatic Potential of Glioblastoma by Regulating PDCD4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 4237–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Deng, J.; Chen, S.; Wang, F.; Zhao, H.; Xie, Z.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, P.; Zhai, X.; Cheng, Y. Effects of hnRNP A2/B1 Knockdown on Inhibition of Glioblastoma Cell Invasion, Growth and Survival. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 1132–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, L.; Wu, M.; Wang, C.; Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Qi, H.; Xu, X. β-Asarone Inhibits Invasion and EMT in Human Glioma U251 Cells by Suppressing Splicing Factor HnRNP A2/B1. Molecules 2018, 23, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Li, Z.-W.; Xue, M.; Zhu, B.-X.; Yue, C.-L.; Chen, M.; Qin, H.-H. microRNA-4500 inhibits human glioma cell progression by targeting IGF2BP1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 513, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, R.-J.; Li, J.-W.; Bao, B.-H.; Wu, H.-C.; Du, Z.-H.; Su, J.-L.; Zhang, M.-H.; Liang, H.-Q. MicroRNA-873 (MiRNA-873) Inhibits Glioblastoma Tumorigenesis and Metastasis by Suppressing the Expression of IGF2BP1. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 8938–8948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Luo, Y.; Sun, R.; Zhang, J.; Sun, T.; Liu, X.; Yang, B. miR-506 inhibits the proliferation and invasion by targeting IGF2BP1 in glioblastoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015, 7, 2007. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, P.; Zhao, P.; Li, B.; Xu, D.; Wang, K. LncRNA PCAT6 Regulated by YY1 Accelerates the Progression of Glioblastoma via miR-513/IGF2BP1. Neurochem. Res. 2020, 45, 2894–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xue, J.; Zhong, S.; Sun, B.-M.; Sun, Q.-F.; Hu, L.-Y.; Pan, S.-J. Lnc-THOR silencing inhibits human glioma cell survival by activating MAGEA6-AMPK signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhan, W.-L.; Gao, N.; Tu, G.-L.; Tang, H.; Gao, L.; Xia, Y. LncRNA LINC00689 Promotes the Tumorigenesis of Glioma via Mediation of miR-526b-3p/IGF2BP1 Axis. Neuromol. Med. 2021, 23, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Janiszewska, M.; Suvà, M.L.; Riggi, N.; Houtkooper, R.H.; Auwerx, J.; Clément-Schatlo, V.; Radovanovic, I.; Rheinbay, E.; Provero, P.; Stamenkovic, I. Imp2 controls oxidative phosphorylation and is crucial for preserving glioblastoma cancer stem cells. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 1926–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mineo, M.; Ricklefs, F.; Rooj, A.K.; Lyons, S.M.; Ivanov, P.; Ansari, K.I.; Nakano, I.; Chiocca, E.A.; Godlewski, J.; Bronisz, A. The Long Non-coding RNA HIF1A-AS2 Facilitates the Maintenance of Mesenchymal Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells in Hypoxic Niches. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 2500–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, X.; Jiang, X. Long non-coding RNA OIP5-AS1 inhibition upregulates microRNA-129-5p to repress resistance to temozolomide in glioblastoma cells via downregulating IGF2BP2. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, H.; Qin, S.; Liu, C.; Jiang, L.; Li, C.; Yang, J.; Zhang, S.; Yan, Z.; Liu, X.; Yang, J.; et al. m6A reader IGF2BP2-stabilized CASC9 accelerates glioblastoma aerobic glycolysis by enhancing HK2 mRNA stability. Cell Death Discov. 2021, 7, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cun, Y.; An, S.; Zheng, H.; Lan, J.; Chen, W.; Luo, W.; Yao, C.; Li, X.; Huang, X.; Sun, X.; et al. Specific Regulation of m6A by SRSF7 Promotes the Progression of Glioblastoma. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Han, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Xu, H.; Wang, X. IGF2BP2 Induces U251 Glioblastoma Cell Chemoresistance by Inhibiting FOXO1-Mediated PID1 Expression Through Stabilizing lncRNA DANCR. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 9, 659228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Suvasini, R.; Shruti, B.; Thota, B.; Shinde, S.V.; Friedmann-Morvinski, D.; Nawaz, Z.; Prasanna, K.V.; Thennarasu, K.; Hegde, A.S.; Arivazhagan, A.; et al. Insulin Growth Factor-2 Binding Protein 3 (IGF2BP3) Is a Glioblastoma-specific Marker That Activates Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (PI3K/MAPK) Pathways by Modulating IGF-2. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 25882–25890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kouhkan, F.; Mobarra, N.; Soufi-Zomorrod, M.; Keramati, F.; Rad, S.M.A.H.; Fathi-Roudsari, M.; Tavakoli, R.; Hajarizadeh, A.; Ziaei, S.; Lahmi, R.; et al. MicroRNA-129-1 acts as tumour suppressor and induces cell cycle arrest of GBM cancer cells through targeting IGF2BP3 and MAPK1. J. Med Genet. 2015, 53, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Jin, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, P.; Zou, Y.; Shao, T.; Wang, O. CircRNA circHIPK3 serves as a prognostic marker to promote glioma progression by regulating miR-654/IGF2BP3 signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 1570–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pan, Z.; Zhao, R.; Li, B.; Qi, Y.; Qiu, W.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, S.; Xu, H.; Li, M.; et al. EWSR1-induced circNEIL3 promotes glioma progression and exosome-mediated macrophage immunosuppressive polarization via stabilizing IGF2BP3. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liang, H.; Ding, X.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhang, C.; Xu, L. Knockdown of eukaryotic translation initiation factors 3B (EIF3B) inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in glioblastoma cells. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 33, 1057–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ren, M.; Zhou, C.; Liang, H.; Wang, X.; Xu, L. RNAi-Mediated Silencing of EIF3D Alleviates Proliferation and Migration of Glioma U251 and U87MG Cells. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 86, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chai, R.-C.; Wang, N.; Chang, Y.-Z.; Zhang, K.-N.; Li, J.-J.; Niu, J.-J.; Wu, F.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Wang, Y.-Z. Systematically profiling the expression of eIF3 subunits in glioma reveals the expression of eIF3i has prognostic value in IDH-mutant lower grade glioma. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Huang, H.; Weng, H.; Zhou, K.; Wu, T.; Zhao, B.S.; Sun, M.; Chen, Z.; Deng, X.; Xiao, G.; Auer, F.; et al. Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 36 guides m6A RNA modification co-transcriptionally. Nature 2019, 567, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, J.; Yue, Y.; Han, D.; Wang, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jia, G.; Yu, M.; Lu, Z.; Deng, X.; et al. A METTL3–METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 10, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Fang, R.P.; Ye, L.H.; Shi, H. Understanding the roles of N-6-methyladenosine writers, readers and erasers in breast cancer. Neoplasia 2021, 23, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Cao, J.; Luo, G.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, T.; Gao, M.; Shu, X.; Ma, H.; et al. VIRMA mediates preferential m6A mRNA methylation in 3′UTR and near stop codon and associates with alternative polyadenylation. Cell Discov. 2018, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Knuckles, P.; Lence, T.; Haussmann, I.U.; Jacob, D.; Kreim, N.; Carl, S.H.; Masiello, I.; Hares, T.; Villaseñor, R.; Hess, D.; et al. Zc3h13/Flacc is required for adenosine methylation by bridging the mRNA-binding factor Rbm15/Spenito to the m6A machinery component Wtap/Fl(2)d. Genes Dev. 2018, 32, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Miao, Y.-Q.; Chen, W.; Zhou, J.; Shen, Q.; Sun, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, S.-C. N(6)-adenosine-methyltransferase-14 promotes glioma tumorigenesis by repressing argininosuccinate synthase 1 expression in an m6A-dependent manner. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 1858–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jia, G.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; Yang, Y.; Yi, C.; Lindahl, T.; Pan, T.; Yang, Y.-G.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zheng, G.; Dahl, J.A.; Niu, Y.; Fedorcsak, P.; Huang, C.-M.; Li, C.J.; Vågbø, C.B.; Shi, Y.; Wang, W.-L.; Song, S.-H.; et al. ALKBH5 Is a Mammalian RNA Demethylase that Impacts RNA Metabolism and Mouse Fertility. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Meyer, K.D.; Jaffrey, S.R. Rethinking m6A Readers, Writers, and Erasers. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 33, 319–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Zhou, J.; Wan, J.; Gao, X.; Zhang, X.; Jaffrey, S.; Qian, S.-B. Dynamic m6A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature 2015, 526, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Liu, T.; Wei, Q.; Jin, J.; Luo, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, C.; Li, L.; Pi, J.; Si, Y.; et al. The m6A reader YTHDF1 promotes ovarian cancer progression via augmenting EIF3C translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 3816–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Wang, X.; Zhao, B.; Roundtree, I.A.; Lu, Z.; Han, D.; Ma, H.; Weng, X.; Chen, K.; Shi, H.; He, C. N6-methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency. Cell 2015, 161, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Shi, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, B.S.; Ma, H.; Hsu, P.J.; Liu, C.; He, C. YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N6-methyladenosine-modified RNA. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Du, H.; Zhao, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xi, H.; Liu, M.; Ma, J.; Wu, L. YTHDF2 destabilizes m6A-containing RNA through direct recruitment of the CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Li, A.; Chen, Y.-S.; Ping, X.-L.; Yang, X.; Xiao, W.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.-Y.; Zhu, Q.; Baidya, P.; Wang, X.; et al. Cytoplasmic m6A reader YTHDF3 promotes mRNA translation. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Xiao, W.; Adhikari, S.; Dahal, U.; Chen, Y.-S.; Hao, Y.-J.; Sun, B.-F.; Sun, H.-Y.; Li, A.; Ping, X.-L.; Lai, W.-Y.; et al. Nuclear m6A Reader YTHDC1 Regulates mRNA Splicing. Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Roundtree, I.A.; Luo, G.-Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, T.; Cui, Y.; Sha, J.; Huang, X.; Guerrero, L.; Xie, P.; et al. YTHDC1 mediates nuclear export of N6-methyladenosine methylated mRNAs. eLife 2017, 6, e31311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mao, Y.; Dong, L.; Liu, X.-M.; Guo, J.; Ma, H.; Shen, B.; Qian, S.-B. m6A in mRNA coding regions promotes translation via the RNA helicase-containing YTHDC2. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, K.; Roundtree, I.A.; Tempel, W.; Li, Y.; Lu, Z.; He, C.; Min, J. Structural basis for selective binding of m6A RNA by the YTHDC1 YTH domain. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 927–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, N.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; He, C.; Parisien, M.; Pan, T. N6-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA–protein interactions. Nature 2015, 518, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Alarcón, C.R.; Goodarzi, H.; Lee, H.; Liu, X.; Tavazoie, S.; Tavazoie, S.F. HNRNPA2B1 Is a Mediator of m6A-Dependent Nuclear RNA Processing Events. Cell 2015, 162, 1299–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Liu, N.; Zhou, K.I.; Parisien, M.; Dai, Q.; Diatchenko, L.; Pan, T. N 6-methyladenosine alters RNA structure to regulate binding of a low-complexity protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 6051–6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Fang, X.; Yoon, J.-G.; Li, L.; Tsai, Y.S.; Zheng, S.; Hood, L.; Goodlett, D.R.; Foltz, G.; Lin, B. Landscape of the SOX2 protein-protein interactome. Proteomics 2011, 11, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, L.-C.; Chen, S.-H.; Shen, X.-L.; Li, D.-C.; Liu, H.-Y.; Ji, Y.-L.; Li, M.; Yu, K.; Yang, H.; Chen, J.-J.; et al. m6A RNA Methylation Regulator HNRNPC Contributes to Tumorigenesis and Predicts Prognosis in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 536875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liang, S.; Yu, B.; Qian, D.; Zhao, R.; Wang, B.; Hu, M. Human cytomegalovirus ie2 affects the migration of glioblastoma by mediating the different splicing patterns of RON through hnRNP A2B1. Neuroreport 2019, 30, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Huang, H.; Weng, H.; Sun, W.; Qin, X.; Shi, H.; Wu, H.; Zhao, B.S.; Mesquita, A.; Liu, C.; Yuan, C.L.; et al. Recognition of RNA N6-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bertorello, J.; Sesen, J.; Gilhodes, J.; Evrard, S.; Courtade-Saïdi, M.; Augustus, M.; Uro-Coste, E.; Toulas, C.; Moyal, E.C.-J.; Seva, C.; et al. Translation reprogramming by eIF3 linked to glioblastoma resistance. NAR Cancer 2020, 2, zcaa020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sesen, J.; Cammas, A.; Scotland, S.J.; Elefterion, B.; Lemarié, A.; Millevoi, S.; Mathew, L.K.; Seva, C.; Toulas, C.; Moyal, E.C.J.; et al. Int6/eIF3e Is Essential for Proliferation and Survival of Human Glioblastoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2172–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Moroz-Omori, E.V.; Huang, D.; Bedi, R.K.; Cheriyamkunnel, S.J.; Bochenkova, E.; Dolbois, A.; Rzeczkowski, M.D.; Li, Y.; Wiedmer, L.; Caflisch, A. METTL3 Inhibitors for Epitranscriptomic Modulation of Cellular Processes. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 3035–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huff, S.; Tiwari, S.K.; Gonzalez, G.M.; Wang, Y.; Rana, T.M. m6A-RNA Demethylase FTO Inhibitors Impair Self-Renewal in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Malacrida, A.; Rivara, M.; Di Domizio, A.; Cislaghi, G.; Miloso, M.; Zuliani, V.; Nicolini, G. 3D proteome-wide scale screening and activity evaluation of a new ALKBH5 inhibitor in U87 glioblastoma cell line. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Selberg, S.; Seli, N.; Kankuri, E.; Karelson, M. Rational Design of Novel Anticancer Small-Molecule RNA m6A Demethylase ALKBH5 Inhibitors. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 13310–13320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wallis, N.; Oberman, F.; Shurrush, K.; Germain, N.; Greenwald, G.; Gershon, T.; Pearl, T.; Abis, G.; Singh, V.; Singh, A.; et al. Small molecule inhibitor of Igf2bp1 represses Kras and a pro-oncogenic phenotype in cancer cells. RNA Biol. 2021, 19, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Ge, P.; Ma, C. MiR-126 Regulates the ERK Pathway via Targeting KRAS to Inhibit the Glioma Cell Proliferation and Invasion. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 54, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 00969 g001 550
Figure 1. m6A modification determines RNA life fate. Here, is the cycling model of methyltransferase complex, demethylase, and m6A binding proteins. A, adenosine; m6A, N6-methyladenosine; m6Am, N6, 2′-O-dimethyladenosine; Am, 2′-O-methyladenosine; snRNA, small nuclear RNA; m7G, N7-methylguanosine; AAA (n), polyadenylation.
Figure 1. m6A modification determines RNA life fate. Here, is the cycling model of methyltransferase complex, demethylase, and m6A binding proteins. A, adenosine; m6A, N6-methyladenosine; m6Am, N6, 2′-O-dimethyladenosine; Am, 2′-O-methyladenosine; snRNA, small nuclear RNA; m7G, N7-methylguanosine; AAA (n), polyadenylation.
Biomedicines 10 00969 g001
Biomedicines 10 00969 g002 550
Figure 2. m6A regulator and the hallmarks of glioblastoma. Abnormal expression of m6A writers, erasers and readers in glioblastoma affects at least eight of the hallmarks: cell proliferation, stemness, migration and invasion, TMZ resistance, radioresistance and DNA repair, metabolism, immune infiltration, and brain metastasis.
Figure 2. m6A regulator and the hallmarks of glioblastoma. Abnormal expression of m6A writers, erasers and readers in glioblastoma affects at least eight of the hallmarks: cell proliferation, stemness, migration and invasion, TMZ resistance, radioresistance and DNA repair, metabolism, immune infiltration, and brain metastasis.
Biomedicines 10 00969 g002
Table
Table 1. List of reported functions of m6A regulatory proteins in glioblastoma.
Table 1. List of reported functions of m6A regulatory proteins in glioblastoma.
Gene NameRole in RNA ModificationRole in GlioblastomaMechanismReferences
METTL3writeroncogeneinhibiting sensitivity to γ-irradiation and enhancing DNA repair through recruitment of HuR to SOX2 mRNA.[14]
oncogeneActivating NFκB in IDH-wildtype glioma after stabilization of MALAT1[15]
oncogeneDysregulating the expression of epigenetically activated genes (the RNA editing, spicing and stability)[16]
oncogeneImpairing the TMZ-sensitivity through m6A-modified DNA repair genes (MGMT and APNG)/EZH2[17,18]
SuppressorInhibiting epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and vasculogenic mimicry[19]
Suppressorpromoting cell growth, cell differentiation, DNA damage response and cellular stress response by enhancing m6A[20]
METTL14writerSuppressorpromoting cell growth, cell differentiation, DNA damage response and cellular stress response by enhancing m6A[20]
WTAPwriteroncogeneA crucial interactor of the methyltransferase complex[21,22]
FTOeraseroncogenepromoting proliferation and migration[23]
oncogeneIncreasing cell proliferation by targeting MYC transcripts[24]
SuppressorInhibiting cell growth, migration and invasion by regulating m6A modification of primary pri-miR-10a processing[25]
ALKBH5eraseroncogeneInhibiting cell proliferation and stemness through demethylating FOXM1 nascent transcripts and increasing HuR binding[26]
oncogeneDemethylating G6PD transcript and enhancing its mRNA stability[27]
oncogeneEnhancing hypoxia-induced TAM recruitment and immunosuppression by CXCL8/IL8[28]
oncogeneIncreasing radioresistance by regulation homologous recombination[29]
oncogeneRegulating TMZ resistance by promoting SOX2 expression[30]
YTHDF1readeroncogenePromoting cell proliferation, stemness, and TMZ resistance via Musashi-1[31,32]
YTHDF2readeroncogenePositively correlating with immune cells markers, TAM markers and IDH1[33]
oncogeneInhibiting cell proliferation, invasion and tumorigenesis through EGFR/SRC/ERK[34]
oncogeneAccelerating UBXN1 mRNA degradation via METTL3-mediated m6A[35]
oncogeneLinking epitranscriptomic modification by stabilizing MYC and VEGFA transcripts[36]
YTHDF3 oncogenePromoting brain metastasis through enhancing the translation of m6A-mediated transcripts (ST6GALNAC5, GJA1 and EGFR)[37]
YTHDC1readeroncogenePromoting cell proliferation and stemness through VPS25-JAN-STAT[38,39]
HNRNPCreaderoncogenePromoting cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and inhibiting apoptosis through Akt and p70S6K activation.[40]
HNRPA2/B1readeroncogeneIncreasing cell viability, adhesion, migration, invasion, and TMZ resistance, and inhibiting apoptosis and ROS targeting STAT3, MMP-2/9[41,42]
IGF2BP1readeroncogeneTargeted by non-coding RNAs and promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [43,44,45,46,47,48]
IGF2BP2readeroncogeneMaintaining stemness and cell proliferation by regulating OXPHOS [49]
oncogeneTargeted by non-coding RNAs and increasing TMZ resistance and proliferation[50,51]
oncogeneAccelerating aerobic glycolysis by enhancing HK2 mRNA stability[52]
oncogenePromoting proliferation, and migration through recognition SRSF7[53]
oncogenePromoting drug resitance by inhibition of PID1 through DANCR/FOCO1 axis[54]
IGF2BP3readeroncogenePromoting proliferation, invasion and chemoresistance through PI3K and MAPK activation[55]
oncogeneTargeted by miR-129-1 and miR-654 to induce proliferation and TMZ resistance[56,57]
oncogeneInvolving in macrophage infiltration in TME via stabilizing circNEIL3[58]
eIF3BreaderoncogenePromoting proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis[59]
eIF3DreaderoncogenePromoting cell growth, colony formation and migration[60]
eIF3EreaderoncogenePromoting proliferation through HIFs[61]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, P.; Richard, H.T.; Zhu, K.; Li, L.; Huang, S. The Roles and Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumorigenesis. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10050969

AMA Style

Li P, Richard HT, Zhu K, Li L, Huang S. The Roles and Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumorigenesis. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(5):969. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10050969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Peng, Hope T. Richard, Kezhou Zhu, Linlin Li, and Suyun Huang. 2022. "The Roles and Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumorigenesis" Biomedicines 10, no. 5: 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10050969

APA Style

Li, P., Richard, H. T., Zhu, K., Li, L., & Huang, S. (2022). The Roles and Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumorigenesis. Biomedicines, 10(5), 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10050969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop