Next Article in Journal
Treatment of Brain Metastases: The Synergy of Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Chronic Hepatitis B Relapse Rates after Cessation of Tenofovir Alafenamide and Entecavir Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Recovery Care versus Traditional Care after Surgery in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/biomedicines10092210
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hepatitis B x (HBx) as a Component of a Functional Cure for Chronic Hepatitis B

by
Mark A. Feitelson
1,*,
Alla Arzumanyan
1,
Ira Spector
2 and
Arvin Medhat
3
1
Room 409 Biolife Building, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N. 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
2
SFA Therapeutics, Jenkintown, PA 19046, USA
3
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Islamic Azad University Tehran North Branch, Tehran 1975933411, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(9), 2210; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092210
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hepatitis B Virus Infection: From Cell Entry to Carcinogenesis. Understanding Viral Replication, Cell Pathogenesis, Disease and Treatments)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Patients who are carriers of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) are at high risk of chronic liver disease (CLD) which proceeds from hepatitis, to fibrosis, cirrhosis and to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The hepatitis B-encoded X antigen, HBx, promotes virus gene expression and replication, protects infected hepatocytes from immunological destruction, and promotes the development of CLD and HCC. For virus replication, HBx regulates covalently closed circular (ccc) HBV DNA transcription, while for CLD, HBx triggers cellular oxidative stress, in part, by triggering mitochondrial damage that stimulates innate immunity. Constitutive activation of NF-κB by HBx transcriptionally activates pro-inflammatory genes, resulting in hepatocellular destruction, regeneration, and increased integration of the HBx gene into the host genome. NF-κB is also hepatoprotective, which sustains the survival of infected cells. Multiple therapeutic approaches include direct-acting anti-viral compounds and immune-stimulating drugs, but functional cures were not achieved, in part, because none were yet devised to target HBx. In addition, many patients with cirrhosis or HCC have little or no virus replication, but continue to express HBx from integrated templates, suggesting that HBx contributes to the pathogenesis of CLD. Blocking HBx activity will, therefore, impact multiple aspects of the host–virus relationship that are relevant to achieving a functional cure.

1. Introduction

HBV is still a major etiologic agent of CLD and HCC despite the availability of an efficacious vaccine and the virtual elimination of HBV from the worldwide blood supply [1]. The reason for this includes a global vaccine coverage of only about 37%; there are still an estimated 260 million carriers and nearly 900,000 HBV-related deaths annually [2]. This unmet medical need was addressed, in part, by the development and clinical application of a variety of nucleoside analogs which suppress virus replication, but these are not curative [3].
HBV is not a lytic virus [4], meaning that liver cell destruction results from the development and persistence of immune responses against virus-infected cells; it is, therefore, generally accepted that the pathogenesis of CLD is immune-mediated. While recent research focused upon the complete eradication of HBV by direct-acting anti-viral drugs, there is also evidence that chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with anti-viral immune responses and autoimmune manifestations, suggesting that stimulation of pro-inflammatory immune responses against the virus may also potentiate auto-reactivity arising from the lysis of virus-infected hepatocytes [5]. Continued development of immune modulating compounds against HBV is, therefore, also important [5].
The HBV genome is a relaxed circular molecule in virus particles that has four open reading frames (ORF) (Figure 1A). The S gene encodes a family of hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg) polypeptides that are on the envelope of the mature virus. The C gene encodes the core protein, which polymerizes into a nucleocapsid having icosahedral symmetry, and which packages the virus genome. The P region encodes the polymerase of the virus. The DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity converts the partially double-stranded virus genome into a fully double-stranded molecule (by filling in the dotted line in Figure 1A). This relaxed double-stranded molecule, which has a nick at a unique position in each strand adjacent to the direct repeat (DR) sequences, is ligated and appears in the nucleus as supercoiled DNA in the form of a mini-chromosome (Figure 1B). The ccc HBV DNA mini-chromosome is then transcribed into several RNAs, including a pre-genomic RNA, the latter of which is packaged with the virus polymerase into core particles within the cytoplasm. This pre-genomic RNA is then reverse transcribed into minus-strand DNA, followed by RNase degradation of the pre-genomic RNA, and partial plus-strand synthesis prior to budding (Figure 1B).
The fourth ORF, the X region (Figure 1A), encodes the hepatitis B x antigen, HBx, which has pleiotropic properties that support virus gene expression and replication, increase the resistance of infected hepatocytes to immune-mediated lysis, and contribute importantly to the development of HCC [6] (Figure 2). HBx is a trans-regulatory protein that impacts virus and host gene expression by binding to other proteins. In the cytoplasm, HBx constitutively activates a number of signal transduction pathways that are pro-inflammatory and pro-carcinogenic [7,8]. In the nucleus, HBx binds to and alters the activity of transcriptional complexes. It also effects the expression and activity of epigenetic regulators of gene expression, such as histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases [8]. These properties of HBx have important biological implications. For example, HBx-mediated alterations in the patterns of host-cell gene expression may contribute to CLD by stimulating the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, and the destruction of hepatocytes over time may also trigger auto-reactivity. HBx promotes virus replication by activating virus transcription from ccc HBV DNA in the nuclei of infected cells, and this in turn promotes the persistence of virus antigens that serve as targets for anti-virus specific immune responses. Thus, HBx plays a central role in virus replication and CLD (Figure 2).
While the clearance of ccc HBV DNA was sought as a goal to permanently eradicate the virus, this is difficult to achieve. This is due to the persistent expression of HBx from ccc HBV DNA and from integrated HBV DNA templates. With each bout of CLD, fragments of the HBV genome become integrated into various sites within the host genome. Prior to becoming a covalently closed circular molecule, HBV DNA exists as a relaxed circle (Figure 1). The X ORF is just upstream from the nick in the long strand of the HBV genome and integrates within replication forks of cellular DNA during liver cell regeneration following a bout of hepatitis. Many of these integrated templates express functional HBx [9] which supports virus gene expression and replication [6] (Figure 2). Thus, a sterilizing cure may be difficult to achieve. Accordingly, investigations have set out to achieve a functional cure, which is characterized by clearance of the HBsAg from blood, reduction of HBV DNA levels in blood to undetectable levels, and resolution of CLD [10]. Since the S gene also becomes integrated into the host chromatin, it is likely that HBsAg will persist in the blood even when ccc HBV DNA is completely eliminated [11].
The potential importance of HBx to the pathogenesis of CLD and development of HCC is underscored by the existence of HBx transgenic mice. In these models, persistently high levels of HBx expression are associated with the development of HCC without accompanying virus replication [12,13]. The importance of CLD which progresses from hepatitis to fibrosis, cirrhosis and finally HCC is supported by epidemiological observations that only carriers with CLD are at high risk for HCC, while carriers without liver disease rarely develop HCC [14]. It was subsequently shown that carriers with CLD have integrated templates that make HBx [15]. In this context, the central role of HBx to virus replication, resistance of infected hepatocytes to immune-mediated elimination, and to the development of HCC (Figure 2), suggest that interventions against HBx will bring this infection closer to a functional cure.
Biomedicines 10 02210 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Structure of the HBV genome as it exists in the virus particle. The open reading frames encoding the HBsAg polypeptides (gene S and preS), nucleocapsid (gene C), polymerase (region P) and HBx (region X) are shown. The genome has two direct repeat (DR) sequences: DR1 is adjacent to the nick in the long strand of DNA at the end of region X, which is the site on the HBV genome which integrates into host DNA. The short strand is of different lengths in individual virus particles. When the endogenous DNA polymerase inside virus particles fully lengthens this strand (so that the dotted line becomes solid), the DR2 is adjacent to the nick in the short strand [16]. (B) When HBV infects a hepatocyte, the partially double-stranded virus DNA becomes fully double-stranded, and then appears in the nuclei of cells as a minichromosome where ccc HBV DNA complexes with host DNA-binding proteins. The minichromosome then acts as a template for the production of all the virus-encoded mRNAs, including the pre-genomic RNA. The latter migrates into the cytoplasm and takes up residence with the virus polymerase in nucleocapsid particles, where it is reverse transcribed into partially double-stranded virus DNA, which then acquires an envelope containing HBsAg polypeptides as it buds from the cell [17]. Abbreviations: ccc—covalently closed circular, DR—direct repeat, HBV—hepatitis B virus, HBsAg—hepatitis B surface antigen, NTCP—sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (the cell-encoded receptor for HBV).
Figure 1. (A) Structure of the HBV genome as it exists in the virus particle. The open reading frames encoding the HBsAg polypeptides (gene S and preS), nucleocapsid (gene C), polymerase (region P) and HBx (region X) are shown. The genome has two direct repeat (DR) sequences: DR1 is adjacent to the nick in the long strand of DNA at the end of region X, which is the site on the HBV genome which integrates into host DNA. The short strand is of different lengths in individual virus particles. When the endogenous DNA polymerase inside virus particles fully lengthens this strand (so that the dotted line becomes solid), the DR2 is adjacent to the nick in the short strand [16]. (B) When HBV infects a hepatocyte, the partially double-stranded virus DNA becomes fully double-stranded, and then appears in the nuclei of cells as a minichromosome where ccc HBV DNA complexes with host DNA-binding proteins. The minichromosome then acts as a template for the production of all the virus-encoded mRNAs, including the pre-genomic RNA. The latter migrates into the cytoplasm and takes up residence with the virus polymerase in nucleocapsid particles, where it is reverse transcribed into partially double-stranded virus DNA, which then acquires an envelope containing HBsAg polypeptides as it buds from the cell [17]. Abbreviations: ccc—covalently closed circular, DR—direct repeat, HBV—hepatitis B virus, HBsAg—hepatitis B surface antigen, NTCP—sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (the cell-encoded receptor for HBV).
Biomedicines 10 02210 g001
Biomedicines 10 02210 g002 550
Figure 2. HBx contributes to virus gene expression and replication, which promotes both virus persistence and the pathogenesis of HCC. Details are provided within the text. Abbreviations: HBx—hepatitis B x antigen, CLD—chronic liver disease, HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2. HBx contributes to virus gene expression and replication, which promotes both virus persistence and the pathogenesis of HCC. Details are provided within the text. Abbreviations: HBx—hepatitis B x antigen, CLD—chronic liver disease, HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma.
Biomedicines 10 02210 g002

2. HBV Treatments and Their Limitations in Achieving a Functional Cure (Table 1)

Persistent virus replication among HBV carriers with CLD increases the risk of HCC, while inhibition of virus replication is often associated with diminished or resolution of CLD [4]. Based on these observations, efforts over the years aimed at the development of anti-viral compounds that target virus replication. In the years following the discovery of HBV, injectable interferon (IFN) (e.g., Intron A from Merck, New York, NY, USA) was developed for treatment, but antiviral efficacy was observed in a minority of patients [18], and the high doses used were accompanied with serious adverse effects, which limited their applicability [19]. Intron A was replaced by pegylated IFN (Pegasis from Genetech, San Francisco, CA, USA) which had the advantage of a longer half-life and milder adverse effects, but a cure was achieved in only 3–11% of patients [19,20].
Table
Table 1. Therapeutic Approaches Aiming to Cure HBV Infection [20].
Table 1. Therapeutic Approaches Aiming to Cure HBV Infection [20].
Drug *Mechanism of Action
Intron A, PegasysImmunostimulation with interferons
Epivir, Hepsera, Baraclude, Tyzeka, Viread,
Vemlidy, Levovir, Besivo		Nucleoside analogs that inhibit the HBV
polymerase
VIR-2218, RG6346, JNJ-3989, AB-729Inhibitory RNAs blocking HBV gene expression
Vebicorvir, Morphothiadin, JNJ 56136379, EDP-514, R07049389, QL-007, ABI-H3733, ZM-H1506R,
ALG-000184, B-836, VNRX-9945		Inhibitors that disrupt nucleocapsids or prevent normal nucleocapsid formation
NASVAC, GS-4774, HepTcell, VBI-2601, VVX001,
VTP-300, CVI-HBV-002, AIC 649, HB-110,
JNJ 64300535, CARG-201		Therapeutic vaccines to target immunological resolution of the carrier state
Selgantolimod, RG7854Toll-like receptor agonists to stimulate innate immunity
Lenvervimab, Vir-3434Monoclonal antibodies against HBV antigens
ASX22, GS 4224PD-L1 inhibitors to overcome T cell exhaustion
Bulevirtide, Hepcludex, hzVSFInhibitors of virus entry into susceptible cells
* interferons and nucleoside analogs have been FDA approved and are in the clinic while the other approaches are in human clinical trials.
Nucleoside analogs were then developed as oral medications that targeted the virus polymerase as DNA-chain terminators (Table 1). Nucleoside analogs were efficacious in quickly reducing virus titers in the blood and ameliorating CLD with few adverse effects [19,20]. The first nucleoside analog approved for treatment was lamivudine (Epivir from GSK, Brentford, UK), which reduced both virus titer and ameliorated CLD while under treatment, but resistance developed in up to 30% of treated patients per year [21,22], limiting its effectiveness. Based on the success of lamivudine, many companies pursued similar compounds. Accordingly, adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera from Gilead, Foster City, CA, USA) was developed to treat patients who became lamivudine resistant, but resistance to adefovir appeared in 20–29% of patients after 5 years of therapy [23,24]. Subsequent compounds in widespread use today include entecavir (Baraclude from BMS, Milan, IL, USA) and tenofovir (Viread from Gilead) [19]. Other direct-acting virus-polymerase inhibitors were also approved for use (Table 1). Although highly effective, virus and disease relapse occurred following the termination of treatment, and none of them was curative [25]. Most patients under treatment remained HBsAg positive, and continuing therapy long term ran the risk of toxicity, resistance, and mounting cost [19]. In addition, there were cross-resistant mutations in the virus polymerase shared by lamivudine and entecavir, so that the probability of developing entecavir-resistant variants was reportedly more than 50% among patients with disease refractory to lamivudine [19]. Combination therapy with pegylated IFN and tenofovir yielded results that were slightly better than either alone, while combinations including tenofovir and entecavir showed no additional virus suppression or disease suppression than either alone [19].
Chronic HBV infection is associated with a weak induction of innate immunity which is mediated through toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling [26]. Appropriate stimulation of innate immunity is important for corresponding adaptive immune responses that clear a virus. Among HBV carriers, induction of innate immunity, and corresponding reduction in HBV levels in the blood were observed with pegylated IFN and entecavir treatment [19]. TLR agonists (Table 1, [20]) reduced HBV DNA levels in the blood of HBV transgenic mice by activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling and elevated expression of IFN and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [26], suggesting the viability of this approach. There is increasing evidence that HBV proteins inhibit innate signaling [26]. For example, HBsAg, HBx, and the virus polymerase inhibit signaling pathways that stimulate IFN expression [26,27]. Thus, therapeutic approaches that target HBx activity would likely attenuate the inhibition of innate signaling, thereby promoting immune clearance of HBV. ccc HBV DNA, which is the template for pre-genomic RNA and other virus transcripts, exists in the form of a minichromosome in the nuclei of infected cells (Figure 1B) [17,28]. In addition, HBV replication occurs within cytoplasmic nucleocapsid particles [28,29]. In both cases, virus nucleic acids are sequestered and do not bind to innate immune sensors. HBx promotes ccc HBV DNA transcription via epigenetic modulation of histone acetylation, demethylation, and inhibition of ccc HBV DNA transcriptional repression [30], which is needed for the translation of virus proteins and formation of cytoplasmic replication complexes. Thus, blocking HBx would further permit recovery of innate and adaptive immunity against virus-infected cells, thereby contributing to a functional cure.
Small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that block the expression of one or more HBV genes are under development [31] (Table 1), but it is not clear whether they could be delivered to all infected cells, at sufficient concentrations, and for a sustained period of time, to be therapeutically useful. It is too early to know whether they could augment nucleoside analogs or other therapeutic approaches. There is also the question as to whether siRNAs could block expression of integrated HBV sequences, which often encode HBx and sometimes preS/HBs-containing sequences. However, high levels of HBsAg in the blood are thought to promote immune tolerance, while siRNA inhibition of HBsAg secretion may have both anti-viral effects (reduced HBV DNA in the blood) and attenuation of immunological tolerance [32]. Recently, several siRNAs (e.g., RG6346 from Roche, Basel, Switzerland) reduced the levels of HBsAg in blood, and in some cases, viral titer. The hope is that this approach will be applicable to future combination therapies [2].
Small compounds and monoclonal antibodies that block the entry of HBV into susceptible cells provide another potential option [33] (Table 1). For example, Bulevirtide (myrcludex B) is a lipopeptide spanning a portion of the pre-S1 domain of HBsAg. Although it binds the virus receptor on susceptible cells, which results in the reduction in serum HBV DNA, HBsAg levels were not altered [2]. Neutralizing-HBV monoclonal antibodies demonstrated in vivo prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy in animal models, and decreased HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in infected humans [33]. However, following a bout of hepatitis, virus-infected cells undergo regeneration, promoting the intrahepatic spread of the virus without dependence on the production of extracellular virus, suggesting that monoclonal antibodies will have limited utility.
Gene editing aims to disable (through mutation) or remove HBV sequences by targeting both ccc HBV DNA and integrated virus sequences. Most of the work to date used the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which in multiple studies successfully targeted degradation of ccc HBV DNA [34,35,36]. Hepatotropic viruses, such as adenoviral and adeno-associated viruses, were used as vectors for CRISPR/Cas9, but it is not clear whether this could result in targeting all infected cells. Of course, the expectation is that significant reductions in HBsAg and ccc HBV DNA by gene editing will promote the generation of immune responses that will clear the remaining virus. However, if HBx continues to support virus gene expression and replication, it may still be difficult to achieve a functional cure. Multiple applications of CRISPR/Cas9 could also select for mutations that are resistant to cleavage, especially among integrated virus templates that often encode HBx and HBsAg polypeptides. Off-target cleavage is also a potential limitation, although the use of guide RNAs to conserved-virus sequences simultaneously targeting multiple virus genes may improve the efficacy of this approach [37]. Moreover, double-stranded DNA breaks resulting from gene editing may promote HBV DNA integration, which potentially would increase the risk of hepatocarcinogenesis [38].
Over a dozen companies are developing capsid inhibitors [33] (Table 1). Since HBV replication occurs within nucleocapsid particles [29], inhibition of nucleocapsid assembly or disruption of preformed nucleocapsids will interrupt virus replication [33]. This may contribute to the development of potent direct-acting anti-viral combination therapies. In a preclinical mouse model supporting HBV replication, combination therapy using a capsid inhibitor and nucleoside-analog-suppressed virus to a greater extent (>4 logs reduction) than either treatment alone (2.5–3 logs reduction). Virus rebound was observed following the end of treatment [39], suggesting that even combination therapy did not clear ccc HBV DNA. Combination therapy in patients with pegylated IFN also suppressed virus replication more than either monotherapy [40], but HBsAg levels were unaffected, suggesting that even when the pool of ccc HBV DNA is suppressed, the current technology is far from achieving a functional cure. Targeting multiple virus antigens was successful in controlling human immunodeficiency virus infection, and in curing hepatitis C [41]. Unlike hepatitis C, however, portions of the HBV genome become integrated into multiple sites within the host chromatin, and this probably contributes to the ongoing production of HBsAg. In addition, the production of HBx from many of these templates protects cells against immune-mediated clearance, thereby promoting virus persistence and CLD [42] (Figure 1B and Figure 2).
Many companies are also pursuing therapeutic vaccines designed to target and eliminate virus-infected cells and reduce the risk of CLD progression to cirrhosis and HCC (Table 1). Most of the therapeutic vaccines target HBsAg because clearance of HBsAg during infection is associated with the clearance of virus replication and termination of the carrier state. However, the liver is normally an immunotolerant environment to limit reactivity against gastrointestinal antigens [43]. This immunotolerance may be the reason that HBsAg is not often cleared during natural infection and following therapeutic immunization. Once the carrier state is established, roughly 70% of patients remain asymptomatic, and among those with CLD, very few are capable of clearing the virus from the liver and undergoing seroconversion from HBsAg to anti-HBs. Instead, many patients with CLD develop cellular immune responses which cause liver damage but do not effectively clear the virus-infected cells. With this in mind, several companies are developing checkpoint inhibitors that will permit reactivation of exhausted T cells and subsequent greater antiviral efficacy. However, targeting PD-1, CTLA-4, or other individual receptors with the aim of ameliorating T-cell exhaustion may fall short because there are many other receptors on T cells that could potentially maintain the exhaustion phenotype [44].
Virus replication, by itself, does not drive pathogenesis, since HBV is a non-cytopathic virus [4]. Thus, the majority of carriers with very high levels of HBV replication show no evidence of liver damage. Consequently, strong, specific immune responses against multiple virus antigens, and also perhaps host antigens, are likely to drive pathogenesis independent of virus replication. As described below, HBx is likely to be a viable therapeutic target because it supports virus replication, increases the resistance of infected cells to immune elimination, and promotes the development of fibrosis and HCC [42] (Figure 2). Existing and developing therapies target virus-infected cells, but not all virus-infected cells replicate the virus. HBx is critical for driving pathogenesis of CLD and HCC. Thus, targeting virus replication and immune stimulation without also targeting HBx will probably not achieve a functional cure.

3. Role of HBx in the Immunopathogenesis of CLD and HCC

As outlined above, the pathogenesis of acute and chronic HBV infection is immune mediated [4]. For example, the contribution of cell-mediated and cytokine-based immunity to the pathogenesis of acute HBV infection in chimpanzees was demonstrated by the depletion of either CD8+ or CD4+ T cells during early acute infection, which prevented viral clearance and the onset of liver disease [45]. The contribution of cell-mediated immunity to CLD was shown in HBV transgenic Severe Combined Immunodeficient mice adoptively transferred with splenocytes from immunocompetent syngeneic mice [46]. In this model, adoptive transfer gave rise to chronic hepatitis and partial clearance of virus antigens from sera, as well as virus DNA replicative forms, virus RNA, and virus antigens from the liver [46]. Among chimpanzees acutely infected with HBV, the cytolytic activity of CD8+ T cells was suppressed by the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, resulting in diminished T-cell activity that caused liver damage without virus clearance [47]. Interestingly, acute infection of chimpanzees with HBV and acute infection of woodchucks with a hepatitis B-like virus showed apparent cytokine-mediated virus clearance which occurred prior to the onset of a cell-mediated cytolytic response [48,49]. In these cases, acute hepatitis appeared only after most of the virus was cleared from the liver and serum. However, closer examination of chimpanzees and people revealed the persistence of low level ccc HBV DNA following acute, resolving infection [48,50,51,52], suggesting that HBV could assume an occult infection [53] despite strong, timely immune responses. Neutralizing anti-HBs appear only after the virus is cleared from most hepatocytes [48,54], suggesting that these antibodies protect against re-emergence of the virus after recovery. This outcome calls into question whether the various approaches discussed above, aimed at bolstering anti-virus immunity, will be sufficient to achieve a functional or sterilizing cure.
The immune-mediated pathogenesis of CLD and HCC is associated with ongoing HBV replication, as indicated by the persistence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) [55,56], which is a surrogate marker of virus replication. However, CLD provides an oxidative environment that activates HBx, which in turn supports virus replication [57]. HBx alters patterns of host gene expression resulting in the upregulation of neoantigens that trigger additional immune responses during CLD. HBx is also a target for both humoral and cellular immune responses [58,59]. Moreover, HBx transgenic mice are capable of triggering CLD which progresses to HCC in the absence of virus replication [60]. Constitutive high levels of intrahepatic HBx expression were also shown to develop HCC even in the absence of CLD [13]. This suggests that CLD promotes the integration of HBx-encoding HBV DNA (Figure 2), and sustained high levels of HBx could act as a complete carcinogen [61]. Thus, HBx promotes the development of cancer hallmarks [62]. None of these HBx transgenic mice developed HCC on a background of cirrhosis. In natural human infections, HCC often appears on a background of cirrhosis but may also appear in carriers without cirrhosis [63]. Although this suggests that high levels of intrahepatic HBx expression contribute to HCC, viral load, and HBV genotypes, integration events near or within cellular oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, and mutations in multiple virus genes may also contribute [55]. Thus, while HBsAg and HBeAg may be useful surrogate markers that signal increased risk for HCC, the persistent, elevated expression of intrahepatic HBx should be considered a target for achieving a functional cure.

3.1. HBx and Mitochondria

In addition to the oxidative stress triggered by immune responses against virus-infected cells, HBx also stimulates oxidative stress from its association with mitochondria [64] (Figure 3). Oxidative stress damages mitochondrial DNA, and subsequent alterations in cellular bioenergetics cause hepatocellular damage and the release of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs), which promote inflammation associated with CLD (Figure 2). Cytosolic mitochondrial DNA triggers inflammation via recognition by endosomal-associated TLR-9, and by activation of the inflammasome and IFN pathways [65]. Mitochondria-associated HBx [54] causes depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential, promotes the redistribution of calcium ion (Ca2+) to the cytosol, and stimulates the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI), resulting in apoptosis [66,67]. HBx also strongly activates NF-κB [67,68], which is hepatoprotective, in part, by being anti-apoptotic [69]. Thus, many HBx-expressing hepatocytes are protected during bouts of CLD, thereby maintaining cells that support chronic infection. Constitutive activation of NF-κB also results in the upregulated expression of multiple inflammatory genes. The latter promotes a persistent oxidative environment that increases HBx expression and activity, which in turn, stimulates HBV gene expression and replication (Figure 3). HBx activation of phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and β-catenin is also hepatoprotective because these block immune mediated cytotoxicity of virus-infected hepatocytes by Fas and by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) [70]. Elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ also (i) induces oxidative stress [71] that subsequently activates Pyk2 and src kinases which support HBV replication, and (ii) elevates Ras, Raf and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signaling, which contribute to cell growth and hepatocarcinogenesis [57]. HBx-elevated ROI activate pro-inflammatory signaling through NF-κB, and some of the pro-inflammatory cytokines activate STAT3, which then transcriptionally regulates cell growth and differentiation [57]. In addition, mitochondria-associated HBx binds to Mitochondrial Antiviral Signaling Protein (MAVS), which is a part of the Retinoic acid-Inducible Gene 1 (RIG-1) pathway that activates type 1 IFN and the expression of other pro-inflammatory genes mediating innate immunity [72]. In summary, HBx within mitochondria enhances HBV replication, helps to confer resistance of infected cells to apoptosis through hepatoprotection despite activating inflammation, and blunts innate immune responses required for mediating virus clearance. Mitochondria-associated HBx also triggers mitophagy [73]. Mitophagy could also promote chronic inflammation, continued virus replication, and progression to HCC (Figure 3). These features suggest that blocking HBx activity will impact multiple aspects of the host–virus relationship that are relevant to achieving a functional cure.

3.2. HBx and Fibrogenesis

HBx also contributes to the pathogenesis of CLD by promoting fibrogenesis, which is a well-established risk factor for HCC [75] (Figure 1). The likelihood of developing fibrogenesis correlates with the extent of HBV integration since many integrated templates encode HBx. HBx activates liver stellate cells in vitro to produce Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) which is pro-fibrogenic and pro-carcinogenic [62] via differential phosphorylation of the TGFβ-signaling molecule smad3 [76]. Hepatic stellate cells treated with conditioned medium from HBx-positive hepatocytes showed increased expression of TGFβ and other markers associated with fibrogenesis, such as collagen 1, alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF), and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) [77,78]. This paracrine effect also triggered stellate cell proliferation [77,78]. Further work showed that HBx potentiates TGFβ signaling [79]. HBx suppresses the expression of the natural TGFβ inhibitor, alpha-2 macroglobulin (α2M), by (i) activation of NF-κB, which in turn blocks the expression of the α2M gene normally activated by STAT3, and/or (ii) by the HBx activation of PI3K, which then suppresses α2M expression [70]. Activation of TGFβ signaling and additional markers associated with fibrosis was seen by proteomics analysis of HBx transgenic mice that developed mild fibrosis [80]. For example, HBx transcriptionally promotes the expression of fibronectin via activation of NF-κB and via inhibition of p53, the latter normally suppressing the fibronectin promoter [70,81]. HBx may also contribute to extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling by stimulating PI3K signaling that elevates expression of the adhesion protein, LIM, and SH3 protein 1 (LASP-1), resulting in increased cellular proliferation and migration [82]. HBx also interacts with Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α) which contributes to liver fibrosis by promoting the rearrangement of the normal ECM [83]. In addition, elevated levels of HBx and HIF-1α activate Notch signaling [84,85] which is associated with the development of fibrosis in many organs, including the liver [86]. Interestingly, HBx activation of the Yes oncogene-associated protein, YAP (in HIPPO signaling), also contributes to fibrosis by activation of Notch signaling via upregulated expression of the Notch ligand, Jagged 1 [87]. Independent work showed that HBx upregulated the expression of Jagged in HCC [88]. Given that HBx promotes the development of fibrosis by multiple mechanisms, therapeutic intervention aimed at HBx would likely change the pathogenesis of chronic infection which would contribute centrally to the resolution of CLD and a functional cure.

4. HBx and cccHBV DNA as Targets for a Functional Cure

A fundamental function of HBx is to support virus gene expression and replication [6,74]. HBx protein was present in the serum of patients replicating HBV [89]. In longitudinal studies, clearance of the virus was accompanied by the loss of HBx in the blood and the appearance of anti-HBx [90]. These events closely followed seroconversion of HBeAg to anti-HBe [90]. Other studies showed increased frequency of both HBx in liver and anti-HBx in serum among patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC compared with patients with hepatitis [58,91]. Independent work showed that HBx trans-activated the X (HBx) and C (core) gene promoters both in vivo and in vitro [57,92,93,94], thereby supporting HBV replication. Mutational abrogation of woodchuck hepatitis x antigen (WHx) in the related woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) model failed to develop the carrier state and CLD upon experimental infection [95,96], showing that the X antigen was essential for supporting WHV replication in the establishment and persistence of the carrier state. HBx was also shown to be central to supporting HBV replication in cell culture [93] and in HBV transgenic mice [92]. Naturally occurring HBx-deletion variants in human serum samples were also found in patients with mild hepatitis who were HBsAg negative [97], again suggesting that HBx supported HBV replication. HBx-specific siRNAs inhibited virus replication in vitro and in vivo [98]. HBx-specific T-cell epitopes were also identified in vitro and in vivo [99,100], but their role in virus replication and the pathogenesis of CLD are still open questions.
More recently, the role of HBx in virus replication was clarified. ccc HBV DNA exists as a minichromosome in the nuclei of infected cells [101]. During virus replication, HBx is also localized in the nucleus where it is associated with transcriptional complexes supporting expression of ccc HBV DNA and host genes that mediate hallmarks of cancer (e.g., activation of signaling pathways mediated by ras, src, myc, PI3K, NF-κB, and histone deacetylases) [62,102]. As mentioned above, HBx contributes to virus replication, in part by elevating the levels of Ca2+ to activate Pyk2/Src and Focal Activated Kinase (FAK) pathways [103]. HBx-mediated Ca2+ signaling also facilitates viral core assembly and pre-genomic RNA (pgRNA) production [103], both of which are required for virus replication (Figure 1). It is proposed that when HBx expression is high enough in infected cells, it results in the stimulation of cell growth. However, among differentiated hepatocytes, the more HBx stimulates cell growth, the more likely the cellular response will be G1 arrest or apoptosis. The latter was shown in HBx transgenic mice after partial hepatectomy [104,105], suggesting that the outcome of HBx expression in hepatocytes, in part, depends upon the state of cellular differentiation. In this context, quiescent hepatocytes optimally support virus replication, so there appears to be a balance between the levels and intracellular localization of HBx and its biological effects upon infected cells and virus replication. In cell nuclei, HBx is associated with the HBV minichromosome, where it epigenetically modulates ccc HBV DNA transcription, in part, by inhibiting the activities of several histone deacetylases [106]. HBx also binds to and inactivates Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) [107] and facilitates the degradation of the methyltransferase WD Repeat Domain 77 protein (WDR77), both of which negatively regulate HBV replication [108]. HBx also facilities the proteasomal degradation of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complex, SMC5/6, which attenuates the transcription of ccc HBV DNA [109]. Targeting HBx expression and function in regulating ccc HBV DNA transcription will, therefore, be an important component in achieving a functional cure.

5. HBx Integration

Viral integration appears to be linked to immune-mediated CLD, characterized by the destruction of virus-infected cells and regeneration, which is accompanied by oxidative stress and damage to hepatocellular DNA (Figure 1). Oxidative stress gives rise to double-stranded DNA breaks, which provides opportunities for increased HBV DNA integration [110,111]. The most commonly integrated viral sequences are at the end of the HBV genome, which encodes HBx, and sometimes also includes upstream HBsAg and preS sequences [112]. The more severe the CLD, the more integration events occur throughout the host genome [113], resulting over time in the cytoplasmic accumulation of HBx [114,115,116]. HBx alters multiple-signal-transduction pathways in the cytoplasm (e.g., NF-κB, [117]) that promote resistance of hepatocytes to immunological damage, persistent survival and growth, resistance to apoptosis, and contribute to the appearance of other hallmarks of cancer [62]. This provides positive feedback that amplifies HBx expression and function and helps to explain observations that progressive CLD among HBV carriers is a major risk factor for the development of HCC [14]. Thus, the stimulation of HBx by oxidative stress during CLD suggests that antioxidants could have therapeutic value [118]. This hypothesis was supported by results in HBx transgenic mice that developed CLD and HCC treated with short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [12]. SCFAs are known to reduce oxidative stress by epigenetically shifting Th1 (pro-inflammatory) to Th2 (anti-inflammatory) cytokines and by promoting the differentiation of naïve T cells into the T regulatory cells [119]. SCFAs downregulate the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN, interleukin-17 and TNFα, by blocking NF-κB signaling, while upregulating the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-10. SCFAs mediate these changes by binding to cognate receptors and stimulating signaling pathways that modify cellular transcriptional patterns, suggesting that SCFAs may have a therapeutic application in delaying or preventing the pathogenesis of CLD and development of HCC [12]. Independent observations also suggested that the attenuation of T-cell-mediated CLD will reduce the risk of CLD progression to HCC [4]. Targeting HBx with SCFAs reduced HBx expression and activity by attenuating inflammation and oxidative stress [120]. This would be expected to have an anti-viral effect and also reduce HBx activity to epigenetically alter the patterns of host gene expression, thereby permitting restoration of a more normal cellular phenotype [120,121]. This correlates with the decreased frequency of dysplasia and HCC in SCFA-treated HBx transgenic mice compared with those treated with placebo [12]. In this context, even the anti-inflammatory properties of low-dose aspirin significantly reduced the risk of liver disease-related mortality and the development of HCC [122], suggesting that the attenuation of CLD is an important element of a functional cure.
Integrated virus templates do not produce replication competent transcripts, but do make proteins that promote T-cell exhaustion and HCC [111]. HBx made from the transcription of integrated virus DNA [111] promotes cell survival and growth, thereby permitting the continued synthesis of HBsAg, even among patients who have low levels of virus replication [123]. High concentrations of HBsAg in the blood, whether HBsAg mRNA is encoded by ccc HBV DNA or from integrated templates, may contribute to high zone T-cell tolerance and virus persistence. PreS/S polypeptides encoded from integrated templates accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), resulting in ER stress and elevation of ROI, which further promotes DNA damage. The latter provides additional opportunities for HBV DNA integration and continued HBx expression during CLD [113], which further protects infected cells, thereby promoting production of HBsAg [57,93]. These findings suggest that targeting HBsAg will have limited effectiveness because more is always being made from integrated templates containing the HBs gene. If so, then targeting HBx and lowering oxidative stress will also contribute to the reduced expression and clearance of HBsAg made from integrated templates, thereby contributing to a functional cure. Targeting HBx expression/activity will help to re-establish homeostasis among hepatocytes and within the immune system, thereby reducing the risk for the appearance of fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC.
HBV integration is also associated with the clonal expansion of hepatocytes in the infected liver, even between bouts of CLD [15,124]. While cis-acting mechanisms related to HBx integration probably contribute to enhanced survival and growth among tumor nodules in some patients, the trans-activation function of HBx from many of these integrated templates may be more common. Either way, the risk of developing HCC remains elevated in HBsAg-negative HBV patients and those with occult infections [125,126] (Figure 1), again suggesting that HBx drives pathogenesis even in the absence of HBV replication. This indicates that even when the markers associated with a functional cure (HBsAg and HBV DNA in the blood) are not detectable, a functional cure is not established and CLD may still progress to HCC.

6. Conclusions

The utilization of HBsAg and ccc HBV DNA as markers for a functional cure is based on observations that acute, resolving hepatitis B results in the clearance of these markers and that a small percentage of patients who clear HBsAg also have a reduced risk of the progression of CLD to cirrhosis and HCC [10]. The fact that HBx supports virus gene expression and replication [6,74] suggests that inhibition of HBx will contribute to decreased levels of ccc HBV DNA, thereby contributing to a functional cure. Since (i) HBx activity is promoted in CLD by oxidative stress [64], (ii) integration and intrahepatic accumulation of HBx directly correlate with the progression of CLD [114,115], and (iii) HBx constitutively activates pro-inflammatory molecules, such as NF-κB [67,68], it can be inferred that amelioration of CLD will also attenuate HBx expression and activity, thereby contributing to a functional cure.
Functional cures were achieved in 20–80% of patients with low baseline HBsAg and HBV DNA titers in the blood, who were treated with a combination therapy consisting of pegylated IFN and a nucleoside analog [127]. In these cases, significant reductions in virus titers may help restore innate and virus-specific immune responses in chronic hepatitis B patients [128]. However, patients with high levels of HBV DNA in the blood, who are mostly HBeAg positive, do not achieve a functional cure at high rates when similarly treated, and may relapse after treatment is terminated [127]. Capsid inhibitors, siRNAs, CRISPR/Cas9, and other approaches mentioned above, are still under development and whether singly, or in combination, any of these will contribute to a functional cure remains to be demonstrated. However, none of these approaches take into consideration HBx and its potential contribution to a functional cure. Moreover, none of the clinical trials, completed or underway, specifically targeted HBx, and the point of this review is to suggest that this be done.
In acute, resolving hepatitis B, where little integration occurs, and strong, multi-specific, anti-viral immune responses are present, elements for virus clearance are operative. If CLD is mild, not much integration will occur, which may favor seroconversion in a small proportion of patients. In both cases, hepatocellular destruction and turnover are limited, providing fewer opportunities for integration and HBx expression to occur and persist. However, when CLD progresses to fibrosis and cirrhosis, elevated levels of intrahepatic HBx accumulate [113], which promotes the persistence of virus replication, protects cells from immune-mediated elimination, and mediates the appearance of hallmarks of cancer [61,62]. This may contribute to why it is difficult to achieve a functional cure [129]. HBx also impacts upon protein ubiquitination, proteasome-mediated degradation [130], and apoptosis and anti-viral responses. In addition, many of the properties of HBx are epigenetically mediated [131]. This includes the ability of HBx to recruit and upregulate selected host histone acetyltransferases (which promote activation of ccc HBV DNA transcription) and DNA methyltransferases (which methylate host DNA and contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis) [38], suggesting that targeting epigenetic functions of HBx by SCFAs [12] (or other compounds) could have therapeutic potential. Thus, therapeutic inhibition of HBx expression and function, in combination with one or more of the approaches above, should contribute to a functional cure prior to the development of cirrhosis and HCC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation: M.A.F.; writing—review and editing: A.M.; reading and revision of the submitted manuscript after initial peer review: A.A. and I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Biology and College of Science (16072613120) and Technology at Temple University and SFA Therapeutics, Inc.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

M.A.F. is the Chief Scientific Officer at SFA Therapeutics, which is developing microbiome-derived therapeutics for chronic inflammatory diseases. A.A. is the Chief Development Officer at SFA Therapeutics. I.S. is CEO of SFA Therapeutics and is providing publication fees. A.M. is a graduate student on a Ph.D. program.

Abbreviations

α2Malpha 2 macroglobulin
αSMAalpha-smooth muscle actin
Ca2+calcium ions
ccc HBV DNAcovalently closed circular hepatitis B virus DNA
CLDchronic liver disease
CHBchronic hepatitis B
CTGFconnective-tissue growth factor
DAMPsdamage-associated molecular patterns
DRdirect repeats
ECMextracellular matrix
ERendoplasmic reticulum
FAKfocal activated kinase
HBeAghepatitis B e antigen
HBsAghepatitis B surface antigen
HBVhepatitis B virus
HBxhepatitis B x antigen
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HIF-1αhypoxia inducible factor 1α
IFNinterferon
LASP-1LIM and SH3 domain protein 1
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
MAVSmitochondrial antiviral signaling protein, matrix metalloproteinase-2
NF-κBnuclear factor kappa B
NTCPSodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide
ORFopen reading frame
pgRNApre-genomic RNA
PI3Kphosphoinositol 3-kinase
PRMT1protein arginine methyltransferase
Pyk2proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2
RIG-1retinoic acid-inducible gene 1
ROIreactive oxygen intermediates
SCFAsshort-chain fatty acids
Smcstructural maintenance of chromosomes
TGFβtransforming growth factor β
TLRtoll-like receptor
TNFαtumor necrosis factor alpha
siRNAssmall interfering RNAs
WDR77WD repeat domain 77 protein
WHVwoodchuck hepatitis virus

References

  1. Harputluoglu, M.; Carr, B.I. Hepatitis B Before and After Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2021, 52, 1206–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Soriano, V.; Barreiro, P.; Cachay, E.; Kottilil, S.; Fernandez-Montero, J.V.; de Mendoza, C. Advances in hepatitis B therapeutics. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, 2049936120965027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chien, R.N.; Liaw, Y.F. Current Trend in Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B. Viruses 2022, 14, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Iannacone, M.; Guidotti, L.G. Immunobiology and pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus infection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cacoub, P.; Terrier, B. Hepatitis B-related autoimmune manifestations. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2009, 35, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Feitelson, M.A.; Bonamassa, B.; Arzumanyan, A. The roles of hepatitis B virus-encoded X protein in virus replication and the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2014, 18, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Diao, J.; Garces, R.; Richardson, C.D. X protein of hepatitis B virus modulates cytokine and growth factor related signal transduction pathways during the course of viral infections and hepatocarcinogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001, 12, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, S.; Koh, S.S.; Lee, C.G. Hepatitis B Virus X Protein and Hepatocarcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wollersheim, M.; Debelka, U.; Hofschneider, P.H. A transactivating function encoded in the hepatitis B virus X gene is conserved in the integrated state. Oncogene 1988, 3, 545–552. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moini, M.; Fung, S. HBsAg Loss as a Treatment Endpoint for Chronic HBV Infection: HBV Cure. Viruses 2022, 14, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Meier, M.A.; Calabrese, D.; Suslov, A.; Terracciano, L.M.; Heim, M.H.; Wieland, S. Ubiquitous expression of HBsAg from integrated HBV DNA in patients with low viral load. J. Hepatol. 2021, 75, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. McBrearty, N.; Arzumanyan, A.; Bichenkov, E.; Merali, S.; Merali, C.; Feitelson, M. Short chain fatty acids delay the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in HBx transgenic mice. Neoplasia 2021, 23, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ueda, H.; Ullrich, S.J.; Gangemi, J.D.; Kappel, C.A.; Ngo, L.; Feitelson, M.A.; Jay, G. Functional inactivation but not structural mutation of p53 causes liver cancer. Nat. Genet. 1995, 9, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beasley, R.P.; Hwang, L.Y.; Lin, C.C.; Chien, C.S. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B virus. A prospective study of 22707 men in Taiwan. Lancet 1981, 2, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mason, W.S.; Jilbert, A.R.; Litwin, S. Hepatitis B Virus DNA Integration and Clonal Expansion of Hepatocytes in the Chronically Infected Liver. Viruses 2021, 13, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feitelson, M.A.; Larkin, J.D. New Animal Models of Hepatitis B and C. ILAR J. 2001, 42, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mani, S.K.K.; Andrisani, O. Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Cancer Stem Cells. Genes 2018, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kwon, H.; Lok, A. Hepatitis B therapy. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 8, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tang, L.S.Y.; Covert, E.; Wilson, E.; Kottilil, S. Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: A Review. JAMA 2018, 319, 1802–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Available online: https://www.hepb.org/treatment-and-management/drug-watch/ (accessed on 16 August 2022).
  21. Dienstag, J.L.; Schiff, E.R.; Wright, T.L.; Perrillo, R.P.; Hann, H.W.; Goodman, Z.; Crowther, L.; Condreay, L.D.; Woessner, M.; Rubin, M.; et al. Lamivudine as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis B in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chan, H.L.; Wang, H.; Niu, J.; Chim, A.M.; Sung, J.J. Two-year lamivudine treatment for hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Antivir. Ther. 2007, 12, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marcellin, P.; Chang, T.T.; Lim, S.G.; Sievert, W.; Tong, M.; Arterburn, S.; Borroto-Esoda, K.; Frederick, D.; Rousseau, F. Long-term efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2008, 48, 750–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hadziyannis, S.J.; Tassopoulos, N.C.; Heathcote, E.J.; Chang, T.T.; Kitis, G.; Rizzetto, M.; Marcellin, P.; Lim, S.G.; Goodman, Z.; Ma, J.; et al. Adefovir Dipivoxil 438 Study Group. Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B for up to 5 years. Gastroenterology 2006, 131, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Q.; Cai, D.C.; Hu, P.; Ren, H. Low-level viremia in nucleoside analog-treated chronic hepatitis B patients. Chin. Med. J. 2021, 134, 2810–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kayesh, M.E.H.; Kohara, M.; Tsukiyama-Kohara, K. Toll-Like Receptor Response to Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Potential of TLR Agonists as Immunomodulators for Treating Chronic Hepatitis B: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jiang, J.; Tang, H. Mechanism of inhibiting type I interferon induction by hepatitis B virus X protein. Protein Cell 2010, 1, 1106–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seeger, C.; Mason, W.S. Molecular biology of hepatitis B virus infection. Virology 2015, 479–480, 672–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, L.; PLoss, A. Mechanism of Hepatitis B Virus cccDNA Formation. Viruses 2021, 13, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, L.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, S.; Cheng, J.; Chang, J.; Guo, J.T. The current status and future directions of hepatitis B antiviral drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hui, R.W.; Mak, L.Y.; Seto, W.K.; Yuen, M.F. RNA interference as a novel treatment strategy for chronic hepatitis B infection. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2022, in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fanning, G.C.; Zoulim, F.; Hou, J.; Bertoletti, A. Therapeutic strategies for hepatitis B virus infection: Towards a cure. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 827–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, H.; Ko, C.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, M. Current Progress in the Development of Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Assembly Modulators: Chemical Structure, Mode-of-Action and Efficacy. Molecules 2021, 26, 7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moyo, B.; Bloom, K.; Scott, T.; Ely, A.; Arbuthnot, P. Advances with using CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene editing to treat infections with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. Virus Res. 2018, 244, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kostyushev, D.; Brezgin, S.; Kostyusheva, A.; Zarifyan, D.; Goptar, I.; Chulanov, V. Orthologous CRISPR/Cas9 systems for specific and efficient degradation of covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 1779–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schiwon, M.; Ehrke-Schulz, E.; Oswald, A.; Bergmann, T.; Michler, T.; Protzer, U.; Ehrhardt, A. One-Vector System for Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 against Hepatitis B Virus cccDNA Utilizing High-Capacity Adenoviral Vectors. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 12, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lee, C. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Antiviral Strategy: Current Status and the Potential Challenge. Molecules 2019, 24, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Prescott, N.A.; Bram, Y.; Schwartz, R.E.; David, Y. Targeting Hepatitis B Virus Covalently Closed Circular DNA and Hepatitis B Virus X Protein: Recent Advances and New Approaches. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 1657–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hurwitz, S.J.; McBrearty, N.; Arzumanyan, A.; Bichenkov, E.; Tao, S.; Bassit, L.; Chen, Z.; Kohler, J.J.; Amblard, F.; Feitelson, M.A.; et al. Studies on the Efficacy, Potential Cardiotoxicity and Monkey Pharmacokinetics of GLP-26 as a Potent Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Assembly Modulator. Viruses 2021, 13, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuen, M.F.; Gane, E.J.; Kim, D.J.; Weilert, F.; Yuen Chan, H.L.; Lalezari, J.; Hwang, S.G.; Nguyen, T.; Flores, O.; Hartman, G.; et al. Antiviral Activity, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Capsid Assembly Modulator NVR 3-778 in Patients with Chronic HBV Infection. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1392–1403.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shyr, Z.A.; Cheng, Y.S.; Lo, D.C.; Zheng, W. Drug combination therapy for emerging viral diseases. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 2367–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Medhat, A.; Arzumanyan, A.; Feitelson, M.A. Hepatitis B x antigen (HBx) is an important therapeutic target in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2021, 12, 2421–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jenne, C.N.; Kubes, P. Immune surveillance by the liver. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 996–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kraehenbuehl, L.; Weng, C.H.; Eghbali, S.; Wolchok, J.D.; Merghoub, T. Enhancing immunotherapy in cancer by targeting emerging immunomodulatory pathways. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 19, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Thimme, R.; Wieland, S.; Steiger, C.; Ghrayeb, J.; Reimann, K.A.; Purcell, R.H.; Chisari, F.V. CD8(+) T cells mediate viral clearance and disease pathogenesis during acute hepatitis B virus infection. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Larkin, J.; Clayton, M.; Sun, B.; Perchonock, C.E.; Morgan, J.L.; Siracusa, L.D.; Michaels, F.H.; Feitelson, M.A. Hepatitis B virus transgenic mouse model of chronic liver disease. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fioravanti, J.; Di Lucia, P.; Magini, D.; Moalli, F.; Boni, C.; Benechet, A.P.; Fumagalli, V.; Inverso, D.; Vecchi, A.; Fiocchi, A.; et al. Effector CD8+ T cell-derived interleukin-10 enhances acute liver immunopathology. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wieland, S.F.; Spangenberg, H.C.; Thimme, R.; Purcell, R.H.; Chisari, F.V. Expansion and contraction of the hepatitis B virus transcriptional template in infected chimpanzees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2129–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mason, W.S.; Litwin, S.; Xu, C.; Jilbert, A.R. Hepatocyte turnover in transient and chronic hepadnavirus infections. J. Viral Hepat. 2007, 14, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Murray, J.M.; Wieland, S.F.; Purcell, R.H.; Chisari, F.V. Dynamics of hepatitis B virus clearance in chimpanzees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17780–17785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yuki, N.; Nagaoka, T.; Yamashiro, M.; Mochizuki, K.; Kaneko, A.; Yamamoto, K.; Omura, M.; Hikiji, K.; Kato, M. Long-term histologic and virologic outcomes of acute self-limited hepatitis B. Hepatology 2003, 37, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rehermann, B.; Ferrari, C.; Pasquinelli, C.; Chisari, F.V. The hepatitis B virus persists for decades after patients’ recovery from acute viral hepatitis despite active maintenance of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 1104–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Raimondo, G.; Caccamo, G.; Filomia, R.; Pollicino, T. Occult HBV infection. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guidotti, L.G.; Rochford, R.; Chung, J.; Shapiro, M.; Purcell, R.; Chisari, F.V. Viral clearance without destruction of infected cells during acute HBV infection. Science 1999, 284, 825–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Datfar, T.; Doulberis, M.; Papaefthymiou, A.; Hines, I.N.; Manzini, G. Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: State of the Art. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, H.I.; Lu, S.N.; Liaw, Y.F.; You, S.L.; Sun, C.A.; Wang, L.Y.; Hsiao, C.K.; Chen, P.J.; Chen, D.S.; Chen, C.J.; et al. Hepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Slagle, B.L.; Bouchard, M.J. Hepatitis B Virus X and Regulation of Viral Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a021402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, H.; Wu, L.Y.; Zhang, S.; Qiu, L.Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.Z.; Shan, C.L.; Ye, L.H.; Zhang, X.D. Anti-hepatitis B virus X protein in sera is one of the markers of development of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer mediated by HBV. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2009, 2009, 289068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chun, E.; Lee, J.; Cheong, H.S.; Lee, K.Y. Tumor eradication by hepatitis B virus X antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in xenografted nude mice. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, D.Y.; Moon, H.B.; Son, J.K.; Jeong, S.; Yu, S.L.; Yoon, H.; Han, Y.M.; Lee, C.S.; Park, J.S.; Lee, C.H.; et al. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in transgenic mice expressing the hepatitis B virus X-protein. J. Hepatol. 1999, 31, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mesri, E.A.; Feitelson, M.A.; Munger, K. Human viral oncogenesis: A cancer hallmarks analysis. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 15, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sivasudhan, E.; Blake, N.; Lu, Z.; Meng, J.; Rong, R. Hepatitis B Viral Protein HBx and the Molecular Mechanisms Modulating the Hallmarks of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review. Cells 2022, 11, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Corrigendum to “EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Clippinger, A.J.; Bouchard, M.J. Hepatitis B virus HBx protein localizes to mitochondria in primary rat hepatocytes and modulates mitochondrial membrane potential. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 6798–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Hu, Q.; Wu, J.; Wang, G.; Hong, Z.; Ren, J.; Lab for Trauma and Surgical Infections. Mitochondrial DNA in liver inflammation and oxidative stress. Life Sci. 2019, 236, 116464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bouchard, M.J.; Wang, L.H.; Schneider, R.J. Calcium signaling by HBx protein in hepatitis B virus DNA replication. Science 2001, 294, 2376–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Waris, G.; Huh, K.W.; Siddiqui, A. Mitochondrially associated hepatitis B virus X protein constitutively activates transcription factors STAT-3 and NF-kappa B via oxidative stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 7721–7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hong, A.; Han, D.D.; Wright, C.J.; Burch, T.; Piper, J.; Osiowy, C.; Gao, C.; Chiang, S.; Magill, T.; Dick, K.; et al. The interaction between hepatitis B virus X protein and AIB1 oncogene is required for the activation of NFκB signal transduction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 423, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, B.; Karin, M. NF-kappaB signaling, liver disease and hepatoprotective agents. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6228–6244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Feitelson, M.A.; Reis, H.M.; Tufan, N.L.; Sun, B.; Pan, J.; Lian, Z. Putative roles of hepatitis B x antigen in the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease. Cancer Lett. 2009, 286, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chen, J.; Siddiqui, A. Hepatitis B virus X protein stimulates the mitochondrial translocation of Raf-1 via oxidative stress. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 6757–6760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wei, C.; Ni, C.; Song, T.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Jia, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Guan, K.; Xu, Y.; et al. The hepatitis B virus X protein disrupts innate immunity by downregulating mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, S.J.; Khan, M.; Quan, J.; Till, A.; Subramani, S.; Siddiqui, A. Hepatitis B virus disrupts mitochondrial dynamics: Induces fission and mitophagy to attenuate apoptosis. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lucifora, J.; Arzberger, S.; Durantel, D.; Belloni, L.; Strubin, M.; Levrero, M.; Zoulim, F.; Hantz, O.; Protzer, U. Hepatitis B virus X protein is essential to initiate and maintain virus replication after infection. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dewidar, B.; Meyer, C.; Dooley, S.; Meindl-Beinker, A.N. TGF-β in Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Fibrogenesis-Updated 2019. Cells 2019, 8, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Murata, M.; Matsuzaki, K.; Yoshida, K.; Sekimoto, G.; Tahashi, Y.; Mori, S.; Uemura, Y.; Sakaida, N.; Fujisawa, J.; Seki, T.; et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein shifts human hepatic transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling from tumor suppression to oncogenesis in early chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2009, 49, 1203–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Martín-Vílchez, S.; Sanz-Cameno, P.; Rodríguez-Muñoz, Y.; Majano, P.L.; Molina-Jiménez, F.; López-Cabrera, M.; Moreno-Otero, R.; Lara-Pezzi, E. The hepatitis B virus X protein induces paracrine activation of human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1872–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Guo, G.H.; Tan, D.M.; Zhu, P.A.; Liu, F. Hepatitis B virus X protein promotes proliferation and upregulates TGF-beta1 and CTGF in human hepatic stellate cell line, LX-2. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2009, 8, 59–64, PMID: 19208517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Lee, D.K.; Park, S.H.; Yi, Y.; Choi, S.G.; Lee, C.; Parks, W.T.; Cho, H.; de Caestecker, M.P.; Shaul, Y.; Roberts, A.B.; et al. The hepatitis B virus encoded oncoprotein pX amplifies TGF-beta family signaling through direct interaction with Smad4: Potential mechanism of hepatitis B virus-induced liver fibrosis. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yang, M.H.; Chen, M.; Mo, H.H.; Tsai, W.C.; Chang, Y.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chen, K.C.; Wu, H.Y.; Yuan, C.H.; Lee, C.H.; et al. Utilizing Experimental Mouse Model to Identify Effectors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induced by HBx Antigen. Cancers 2020, 12, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Norton, P.A.; Reis, H.M.; Prince, S.; Larkin, J.; Pan, J.; Liu, J.; Gong, Q.; Zhu, M.; Feitelson, M.A. Activation of fibronectin gene expression by hepatitis B virus x antigen. J. Viral Hepat. 2004, 11, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Grunewald, T.G.; Kammerer, U.; Winkler, C.; Schindler, D.; Sickmann, A.; Honig, A.; Butt, E. Overexpression of LASP-1 mediates migration and proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells and influences zyxin localisation. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 96, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Katrinli, S.; Ozdil, K.; Sahin, A.; Ozturk, O.; Kir, G.; Baykal, A.T.; Akgun, E.; Sarac, O.S.; Sokmen, M.; Doğanay, H.L.; et al. Proteomic profiling of HBV infected liver biopsies with different fibrotic stages. Proteome Sci. 2017, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kongkavitoon, P.; Tangkijvanich, P.; Hirankarn, N.; Palaga, T. Hepatitis B Virus HBx Activates Notch Signaling via Delta-Like 4/Notch1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yang, S.L.; Ren, Q.G.; Zhang, T.; Pan, X.; Wen, L.; Hu, J.L.; Yu, C.; He, Q.J. Hepatitis B virus X protein and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α stimulate Notch gene expression in liver cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 37, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hu, B.; Phan, S.H. Notch in fibrosis and as a target of anti-fibrotic therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 108, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tschaharganeh, D.F.; Chen, X.; Latzko, P.; Malz, M.; Gaida, M.M.; Felix, K.; Ladu, S.; Singer, S.; Pinna, F.; Gretz, N.; et al. Yes-associated protein up-regulates Jagged-1 and activates the Notch pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2013, 144, 1530–1542.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Gao, J.; Chen, C.; Hong, L.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; Song, J.; Shao, X.; Zhang, J.; Han, H.; Liu, J.; et al. Expression of Jagged1 and its association with hepatitis B virus X protein in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 356, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Feitelson, M.A.; Clayton, M.M. X antigen polypeptides in the sera of hepatitis B virus-infected patients. Virology 1990, 177, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Horiike, N.; Blumberg, B.S.; Feitelson, M.A. Characteristics of hepatitis B X antigen, antibodies to X antigen, and antibodies to the viral polymerase during hepatitis B virus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 1991, 164, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hwang, G.Y.; Lin, C.Y.; Huang, L.M.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, J.C.; Hsu, C.T.; Yang, S.S.; Wu, C.C. Detection of the hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) antigen and anti-HBx antibodies in cases of human hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5598–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xu, Z.; Yen, T.S.; Wu, L.; Madden, C.R.; Tan, W.; Slagle, B.L.; Ou, J.H. Enhancement of hepatitis B virus replication by its X protein in transgenic mice. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 2579–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Tang, H.; Delgermaa, L.; Huang, F.; Oishi, N.; Liu, L.; He, F.; Zhao, L.; Murakami, S. The transcriptional transactivation function of HBx protein is important for its augmentation role in hepatitis B virus replication. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5548–5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Keasler, V.V.; Hodgson, A.J.; Madden, C.R.; Slagle, B.L. Enhancement of hepatitis B virus replication by the regulatory X protein in vitro and in vivo. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 2656–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Chen, H.S.; Kaneko, S.; Girones, R.; Anderson, R.W.; Hornbuckle, W.E.; Tennant, B.C.; Cote, P.J.; Gerin, J.L.; Purcell, R.H.; Miller, R.H. The woodchuck hepatitis virus X gene is important for establishment of virus infection in woodchucks. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 1218–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Dandri, M.; Schirmacher, P.; Rogler, C.E. Woodchuck hepatitis virus X protein is present in chronically infected woodchuck liver and woodchuck hepatocellular carcinomas which are permissive for viral replication. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 5246–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Feitelson, M.A.; Duan, L.X.; Guo, J.; Sun, B.; Woo, J.; Steensma, K.; Horiike, N.; Blumberg, B.S. X region deletion variants of hepatitis B virus in surface antigen-negative infections and non-A, non-B hepatitis. J. Infect. Dis. 1995, 172, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Carmona, S.; Ely, A.; Crowther, C.; Moolla, N.; Salazar, F.H.; Marion, P.L.; Ferry, N.; Weinberg, M.S.; Arbuthnot, P. Effective inhibition of HBV replication in vivo by anti-HBx short hairpin RNAs. Mol. Ther. 2006, 13, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Malmassari, S.; Lone, Y.C.; Zhang, M.; Transy, C.; Michel, M.L. In vivo hierarchy of immunodominant and subdominant HLA-A*0201-restricted T-cell epitopes of HBx antigen of hepatitis B virus. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Chung, M.K.; Yoon, H.; Min, S.S.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, T.G.; Lim, J.S.; Kim, C.M.; Park, S.N. Induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes with peptides in vitro: Identification of candidate T-cell epitopes in hepatitis B virus X antigen. J. Immunother. 1999, 22, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G. Research progress in hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA. Cancer Biol. Med. 2021, 19, 415–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ma, J.; Sun, T.; Park, S.; Shen, G.; Liu, J. The role of hepatitis B virus X protein is related to its differential intracellular localization. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2011, 43, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Kong, F.; Zhang, F.; Liu, X.; Qin, S.; Yang, X.; Kong, D.; Pan, X.; You, H.; Zheng, K.; Tang, R. Calcium signaling in hepatitis B virus infection and its potential as a therapeutic target. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 19, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Park, E.S.; Park, Y.K.; Shin, C.Y.; Park, S.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Lim, K.H.; Kwon, S.Y.; Kim, K.P.; Yang, S.I.; et al. Hepatitis B virus inhibits liver regeneration via epigenetic regulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Hepatology 2013, 58, 762–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tralhao, J.G.; Roudier, J.; Morosan, S.; Giannini, C.; Tu, H.; Goulenok, C.; Carnot, F.; Zavala, F.; Joulin, V.; Kremsdorf, D.; et al. Paracrine in vivo inhibitory effects of hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) on liver cell proliferation: An alternative mechanism of HBx-related pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6991–6996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Belloni, L.; Pollicino, T.; De Nicola, F.; Guerrieri, F.; Raffa, G.; Fanciulli, M.; Raimondo, G.; Levrero, M. Nuclear HBx binds the HBV minichromosome and modifies the epigenetic regulation of cccDNA function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19975–19979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Benhenda, S.; Ducroux, A.; Rivière, L.; Sobhian, B.; Ward, M.D.; Dion, S.; Hantz, O.; Protzer, U.; Michel, M.L.; Benkirane, M.; et al. Methyltransferase PRMT1 is a binding partner of HBx and a negative regulator of hepatitis B virus transcription. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4360–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yuan, H.; Zhao, L.; Yuan, Y.; Yun, H.; Zheng, W.; Geng, Y.; Yang, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, X. HBx represses WDR77 to enhance HBV replication by DDB1-mediated WDR77 degradation in the liver. Theranostics 2021, 11, 8362–8378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Decorsière, A.; Mueller, H.; van Breugel, P.C.; Abdul, F.; Gerossier, L.; Beran, R.K.; Livingston, C.M.; Niu, C.; Fletcher, S.P.; Hantz, O.; et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein identifies the Smc5/6 complex as a host restriction factor. Nature 2016, 531, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Yang, W.; Summers, J. Integration of hepadnavirus DNA in infected liver: Evidence for a linear precursor. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 9710–9717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pollicino, T.; Caminiti, G. HBV-Integration Studies in the Clinic: Role in the Natural History of Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tu, T.; Budzinska, M.A.; Shackel, N.A.; Urban, S. HBV DNA Integration: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Viruses 2017, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Arzumanyan, A.; Reis, H.M.; Feitelson, M.A. Pathogenic mechanisms in HBV- and HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, W.L.; London, W.T.; Lega, L.; Feitelson, M.A. HBxAg in the liver from carrier patients with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Hepatology 1991, 14, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wang, W.L.; London, W.T.; Feitelson, M.A. Hepatitis B x antigen in hepatitis B virus carrier patients with liver cancer. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 4971–4977. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Martin-Vilchez, S.; Lara-Pezzi, E.; Trapero-Marugán, M.; Moreno-Otero, R.; Sanz-Cameno, P. The molecular and pathophysiological implications of hepatitis B X antigen in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Rev. Med. Virol. 2011, 21, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Guo, S.P.; Wang, W.L.; Zhai, Y.Q.; Zhao, Y.L. Expression of nuclear factor-kappa B in hepatocellular carcinoma and its relation with the X protein of hepatitis B virus. World J. Gastroenterol. 2001, 7, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Meyer, M.; Caselmann, W.H.; Schlüter, V.; Schreck, R.; Hofschneider, P.H.; Baeuerle, P.A. Hepatitis B virus transactivator MHBst: Activation of NF-kappa B, selective inhibition by antioxidants and integral membrane localization. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 2991–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kim, C.H.; Park, J.; Kim, M. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain Fatty acids, T cells, and inflammation. Immune Netw. 2014, 14, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yang, L.; Zou, T.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, M.; Du, F.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Shen, J. Hepatitis B virus X protein mediated epigenetic alterations in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol. Int. 2022, in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Pant, K.; Mishra, A.K.; Pradhan, S.M.; Nayak, B.; Das, P.; Shalimar, D.; Saraya, A.; Venugopal, S.K. Butyrate inhibits HBV replication and HBV-induced hepatoma cell proliferation via modulating SIRT-1/Ac-p53 regulatory axis. Mol. Carcinog. 2019, 58, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Simon, T.G.; Duberg, A.S.; Aleman, S.; Chung, R.T.; Chan, A.T.; Ludvigsson, J.F. Association of Aspirin with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver-Related Mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wooddell, C.I.; Yuen, M.F.; Chan, H.L.; Gish, R.G.; Locarnini, S.A.; Chavez, D.; Ferrari, C.; Given, B.D.; Hamilton, J.; Kanner, S.B.; et al. RNAi-based treatment of chronically infected patients and chimpanzees reveals that integrated hepatitis B virus DNA is a source of HBsAg. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaan0241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Mason, W.S.; Gill, U.S.; Litwin, S.; Zhou, Y.; Peri, S.; Pop, O.; Hong, M.L.; Naik, S.; Quaglia, A.; Bertoletti, A.; et al. HBV DNA Integration and Clonal Hepatocyte Expansion in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Considered Immune Tolerant. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 986–998.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ikeda, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Someya, T.; Saitoh, S.; Hosaka, T.; Akuta, N.; Suzuki, F.; Suzuki, Y.; Arase, Y.; Kumada, H. Occult hepatitis B virus infection increases hepatocellular carcinogenesis by eight times in patients with non-B, non-C liver cirrhosis: A cohort study. J. Viral Hepat. 2009, 16, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Paterlini, P.; Driss, F.; Nalpas, B.; Pisi, E.; Franco, D.; Berthelot, P.; Bréchot, C. Persistence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viral genomes in primary liver cancers from HBsAg-negative patients: A study of a low-endemic area. Hepatology 1993, 17, 20–29, PMID: 8380790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Mo, Z.; Gan, W.; Zhao, Q.; Yin, Y.; Gao, Z. Functional cure of chronic hepatitis B: Efforts and prospects. Liver Res. 2020, 4, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Thimme, R.; Dandri, M. Dissecting the divergent effects of interferon-alpha on immune cells: Time to rethink combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B? J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Singh, P.; Kairuz, D.; Arbuthnot, P.; Bloom, K. Silencing hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA: The potential of an epigenetic therapy approach. World J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 27, 3182–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Minor, M.M.; Slagle, B.L. Hepatitis B virus HBx protein interactions with the ubiquitin proteasome system. Viruses 2014, 6, 4683–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Tian, Y.; Yang, W.; Song, J.; Wu, Y.; Ni, B. Hepatitis B virus X protein-induced aberrant epigenetic modifications contributing to human hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 2810–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomedicines 10 02210 g003 550
Figure 3. Selected mechanisms whereby HBx contributes to CLD. This includes association of HBx with mitochondria, resulting in mitochondrial damage, mitophagy, and the stimulation of innate immunity through activation of mitochondria-associated MAVS/RIG1. HBx also stimulates virus gene expression and replication [6,74], and promotes systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in the infected cell (which stimulates HBx activity), but at the same time protects hepatocytes from immune-mediated damage via constitutive activation of NF-κB. Hepatocellular regeneration associated with CLD provides opportunities for HBx–ORF integration events, which results in the accumulation of intrahepatic HBx and progression of CLD to HCC. Abbreviations: Ca2+—calcium ions, CLD—chronic liver disease, DAMPS—damage-associated molecular patterns, HBx—hepatitis B x antigen, HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma, MAPK—mitogen-activated protein kinase, MAVS—mitochondrial anti-viral signaling protein, NF-κB—nuclear factor kappa B, ORF—open reading frame, Pyk2—proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2, RIG1—retinoic acid-inducible gene I, ROI—reactive oxygen intermediates.
Figure 3. Selected mechanisms whereby HBx contributes to CLD. This includes association of HBx with mitochondria, resulting in mitochondrial damage, mitophagy, and the stimulation of innate immunity through activation of mitochondria-associated MAVS/RIG1. HBx also stimulates virus gene expression and replication [6,74], and promotes systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in the infected cell (which stimulates HBx activity), but at the same time protects hepatocytes from immune-mediated damage via constitutive activation of NF-κB. Hepatocellular regeneration associated with CLD provides opportunities for HBx–ORF integration events, which results in the accumulation of intrahepatic HBx and progression of CLD to HCC. Abbreviations: Ca2+—calcium ions, CLD—chronic liver disease, DAMPS—damage-associated molecular patterns, HBx—hepatitis B x antigen, HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma, MAPK—mitogen-activated protein kinase, MAVS—mitochondrial anti-viral signaling protein, NF-κB—nuclear factor kappa B, ORF—open reading frame, Pyk2—proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2, RIG1—retinoic acid-inducible gene I, ROI—reactive oxygen intermediates.
Biomedicines 10 02210 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feitelson, M.A.; Arzumanyan, A.; Spector, I.; Medhat, A. Hepatitis B x (HBx) as a Component of a Functional Cure for Chronic Hepatitis B. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092210

AMA Style

Feitelson MA, Arzumanyan A, Spector I, Medhat A. Hepatitis B x (HBx) as a Component of a Functional Cure for Chronic Hepatitis B. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9):2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feitelson, Mark A., Alla Arzumanyan, Ira Spector, and Arvin Medhat. 2022. "Hepatitis B x (HBx) as a Component of a Functional Cure for Chronic Hepatitis B" Biomedicines 10, no. 9: 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092210

APA Style

Feitelson, M. A., Arzumanyan, A., Spector, I., & Medhat, A. (2022). Hepatitis B x (HBx) as a Component of a Functional Cure for Chronic Hepatitis B. Biomedicines, 10(9), 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop