Next Article in Journal
Hirsutidin Prevents Cisplatin-Evoked Renal Toxicity by Reducing Oxidative Stress/Inflammation and Restoring the Endogenous Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Level
Next Article in Special Issue
Phase Angle in Head and Neck Cancer: A Sex-Differential Analysis from Biological and Clinical Behavior to Health-Related Quality of Life
Previous Article in Journal
Exosomal MicroRNA Levels Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Which Epidemiological Characteristics Drive Decision Making in the Management of Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Radiomics in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Management: A State-of-the-Art Review †

by
Carlos M. Chiesa-Estomba
1,*,
Miguel Mayo-Yanez
2,
Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
3,
Vincent Vander-Poorten
4,
Robert P. Takes
5,
Remco de Bree
6,
Gyorgy B. Halmos
7,
Nabil F. Saba
8,
Sandra Nuyts
9 and
Alfio Ferlito
10
1
Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Biodonostia Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Deusto University, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
2
Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), 15006 A Coruña, Spain
3
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany
4
Section Head and Neck Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
5
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
6
Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
7
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
8
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
9
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
10
Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35125 Padua, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article was written by members and invitees of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group (www.IHNSG.com).
Biomedicines 2023, 11(3), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030805
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 25 February 2023 / Accepted: 4 March 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Head and Neck Tumors 2.0)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas usually present with locally advanced disease and a correspondingly poor prognosis. Currently, efforts are being made to improve tumor characterization and provide insightful information for outcome prediction. Radiomics is an emerging area of study that involves the conversion of medical images into mineable data; these data are then used to extract quantitative features based on shape, intensity, texture, and other parameters; (2) Methods: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted; (3) Results: A total of 437 manuscripts were identified. Fifteen manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. The main targets described were the evaluation of textural features to determine tumor-programmed death-ligand 1 expression; a surrogate for microvessel density and heterogeneity of perfusion; patient stratification into groups at high and low risk of progression; prediction of early recurrence, 1-year locoregional failure and survival outcome, including progression-free survival and overall survival, in patients with locally advanced HPSCC; thyroid cartilage invasion, early disease progression, recurrence, induction chemotherapy response, treatment response, and prognosis; and (4) Conclusions: our findings suggest that radiomics represents a potentially useful tool in the diagnostic workup as well as during the treatment and follow-up of patients with HPSCC. Large prospective studies are essential to validate this technology in these patients.

1. Introduction

Head and neck (H&N) cancers are the seventh most common type of malignancy worldwide [1]. Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (HPSCC) account for approximately 3% to 5% of all H&N cancers [2,3], with a higher incidence in China and Eastern Europe, due to dietary habits, and higher tobacco and alcohol consumption [4]. Patients with HPSCC usually present with loco-regionally advanced disease and a correspondingly poor prognosis, despite recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances [5,6,7].
The increased application of organ preservation protocols, including induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by definitive radiotherapy (RT) or primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), has been associated with a 5-year overall survival (OS) in well-selected patients from 38% to 51.9% [3,8]. The fact that survival outcome is comparable to that with traditional techniques, such as total laryngectomy with partial or total pharyngectomy and postoperative radiation [9], has led to a shift towards the use of organ preservation protocols, aiming to decrease functional impairment associated with surgery [3,4,5,6,7,8]. On the other hand, recurrence rates in loco-regionally advanced HPSCC after organ-preserving treatment remain high, and follow-up strategies vary between hospitals.
Currently, efforts are being made to improve tumor characterization and provide insightful information for outcome prediction based on biomarkers measured in clinical settings and technological advances in imaging that are routinely acquired as part of the diagnostic work-up for initial staging and in the follow-up process of H&N cancer patients. In this context, it is relevant to consider the use of radiomics, an emerging area of research involving the conversion of medical images into extracted data on shape, intensity, texture, and other parameters, to assess the distribution of voxel intensities, spatial information, and conduct a comparison between pixels in a region of interest (ROI) [10]. Radiomics-based approaches have the potential to allow clinicians to perform a holistic and non-invasive assessment of tumors, which could provide additional information to improve treatment and follow-up [11].
Before this approach is accepted as part of the routine clinical armamentarium, particularly for patients with such a poor prognosis as those with HPSCC, available data must be evaluated. This study aims to review the state-of-the art regarding the available literature on radiomic analysis in HPSCC.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted using keywords and following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (Figure 1) [12]. The selection criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time frame (PICOT) format [13]. This review was registered as a PROSPERO protocol (ID: 403002). The heterogeneity among studies, mainly attributable to a lack of randomization, limited our ability to statistically combine data into a formal meta-analysis.

2.1. Population and Selection Criteria

Studies (both randomized or non-randomized clinical trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies) on the use of radiomics in patients with HPSCC to estimate prognosis, outcome, or disease stage, or to analyze biological features were included. Publications were excluded if they were duplicates or studies on non-H&N or non-HPSCC cancer radiomics; animal studies; case reports, reviews, short communications, or letters; or gray literature. The different types of radiomic features described in each paper were summarized.

2.2. Intervention and Comparison

The intervention of interest was the predictive value of radiomics in HPSCC management.

2.3. Outcomes

The primary outcome measures were the efficacy of radiomics as a surrogate, non-invasive method for predicting survival outcomes before and after treatment, estimating disease stage, or analyzing biological features (e.g., aggressive growth, perineural growth, and extracapsular extension) in HPSCC patients.

2.4. Timing

The minimum median follow-up time considered to evaluate survival outcomes was 12 months after treatment.

2.5. Search Strategy

This review involved a systematic search of the electronic databases: MEDLINE via PubMed and via Ovid, Google Scholar, and Embase. We included articles published in English between January 2014 and August 2022. The search strategy was based on a combination of medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and other controlled vocabulary: “hypopharyngeal cancer” OR “head and neck cancer” OR “hypopharyngeal tumor” OR “radiomics”. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two investigators (CMCE and MMY) to exclude publications that were irrelevant or duplicates. Information extracted from each study included the main target, imaging acquisition method, radiomic feature extraction/signature building/segmentation method, and treatment strategy.

2.6. Assessment of Quality and Risk of Bias

Two authors (CMCE and MMY) evaluated the methodological quality of studies identified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence [14]. The risk of bias was assessed by assigning a score using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) [15], an extensively validated instrument for literature assessment. For non-comparative studies, 8 domains were assessed, scoring the items as 0 (not reported), 1 (reported but inadequate), or 2 (reported and adequate). The optimal score for non-comparative studies is therefore 16. For the purposes of this review, a value of 10 or below was considered to represent a high risk of bias.

3. Results

A total of 437 manuscripts were identified and screened. Fifteen manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. Of these, two studies were excluded because they did not include H&N patients, and one because it was written in Chinese (Figure 1).
Twelve studies, all of them retrospective, were subjected to qualitative analysis [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The demographic characteristics of patients from these studies are summarized in Table 1. There was a high variation in the number of HPSCC patients included in each study, ranging from 2 to 167. Excluding one study that was based on the same sample as another study, we included a total of 889 patients who underwent treatment for HPSCC. Considering the 5 studies that provided data on age, the median age was 51 years old [23,24,25,26,27]. A total of 8 studies described patients by gender, yielding 645 (94.6%) males and 37 (5.4%) females [16,18,19,20,23,24,26,27]. The imaging acquisition method was CT in five studies [18,19,21,24,26], PET/CT in three [16,22,27], and MRI in two [20,25], while dual-energy CT [17] and quantitative ultrasound (US) [23] were each considered in one study. The treatment strategies used in the included studies were surgery, IC in combination with other treatment modalities, and CRT.
The main targets described in the included studies were the evaluation of textural features as supplementary information to determine tumor-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression [16]; the role of radiomic features as a surrogate for microvessel density and heterogeneity of perfusion [17]; radiomic features leading to patient stratification into groups at high and low risk of progression [19,25]; radiomics predicting early recurrence [18] and 1-year locoregional failure and survival outcome, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced HPSCC [20]; and thyroid cartilage invasion [21], early disease progression [22], recurrence [23], induction chemotherapy response [26], treatment response [24], and prognosis [27]. The radiomic feature extraction, signature building, and segmentation methods are also described in Table 1.
Looking more in depth regarding potential applications explored in recent years, Liu et al. highlight the ability of radiomic analysis to predict response to IC in HPSCC and hypothesized that radiomic signatures could also be capable of predicting PFS. Moreover, these authors found that all patients can be divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the optimal cutoff value of a proposed radiomics signature (called radscore) [26].
Hsu et al. reported an MRI-derived radiomic signature-based prediction model for the evaluation of 1-year loco-regional control and survival in patients with HPSCC who received organ preservation therapy as a first-line treatment, and they established a tumor volume cut-off value of >35 cm3 as a predictor of poor prognosis [20]. Moreover, the authors highlight the use of radiomic analysis and functional MRI modalities, such as diffusion-weighted imaging, and their potential to provide additional information about the prognostic imaging phenotype in patients with advanced HPSCC [19], as Leithner et al. [28] and Dulhanty et al. [29] demonstrated in breast and prostate cancers, respectively. In the same vein, Chen et al. developed an MRI-based radiomic nomogram to predict overall survival in HPSCC. They demonstrated better predictive capability by implementing a nomogram that included clinical and radiomic variables rather than the use of either separately [25].
Guo et al. sought to demonstrate the capacity of CT-radiomic features in the prediction of thyroid cartilage invasion in laryngeal squamous carcinoma and HPSCC. They based their hypothesis on the low sensitivity of CT to determine thyroid cartilage invasion (49–71%), usually due to differing rates of ossification of the cartilage, and found higher gray-level non-uniformity values in patients with thyroid cartilage invasion [21]. In a different setting, Bahig et al. suggest the potential role of dual-energy CT, a technology that allows tissue characterization through material decomposition and voxel-by-voxel quantification of iodine concentration, and tumor vessel characterization in conjunction with a radiomic-based approach before RT to predict loco-regional recurrence rates in laryngeal squamous carcinoma and HPSCC [16]. Similarly, Mo et al. demonstrated the potential role of CT radiomics to predict the risk of progression in HPSCC treated with organ preservation therapy [19].
In another study, Zhong et al. demonstrated the good predictive value of PET/CT combined with radiomics and machine learning analysis to predict the early progression (1 year) in patients treated with organ preservation therapy for HPSCC [21]. Further, Chen et al. showed the value of PET/CT radiomics to determine PD-L1 expression in this subset of patients [16]. Finally, Fatima et al. reported a clinical trial to explore the feasibility of US-delta or quantitative US radiomics during the treatment with RT to predict recurrence in H&N cancer patients. Despite just two patients with HPSCC having been included in that study, the potential value of US-based radiomics should be mentioned in this analysis [23].
According to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine system, seven studies were considered to provide level three evidence and five were considered to provide level four evidence. The MINORS scores indicating the risk of bias are listed in Table 2.

4. Discussion

According to our systematic review, radiomics has the potential to support HPSCC management. Properly used, this technology has the promising potential to evaluate the characteristics of the tumor and its surrounding microenvironment, stratify patients by risk of progression, make predictions about treatment response, and improve survival estimates [16,27].
Nowadays, the UICC/AJCC TNM classification and staging system continues to be the first choice for clinical risk assessment and survival counseling [30]. Nonetheless, patients with HPSCC within the same UICC stage group have variable treatment prognoses, [30,31,32] highlighting the need for novel predictive assessment methods to improve patient stratification and propose individualized treatment plans. For this purpose, the existing clinical datasets from multiple imaging modalities routinely performed in HPSCC patients can be used in an exploratory radiomic analysis to support clinical decision-making by multidisciplinary teams.
The suffix “omics” is used to describe various sources of large volumes of data, being added to a name that characterizes the original materials for data collection. In line with this, the “radiomics” field finds its way into clinical research when large amounts of data from radiological imaging (intensity, shape, and texture) become available for analysis [33]. Specifically, texture analysis represents a set of tools to improve the characterization of tumor heterogeneity and consists in extracting texture indices from imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, and PET/CT [34]. Results from this type of analysis can be used as a surrogate biomarker to complement, facilitate, and accelerate advances towards precision medicine for cancer due to the non-invasive nature of this approach [10,35].
To translate this concept into medical or clinical research based on radiomics, the process needs to be broken down into five steps: (1) data collection; (2) ROI segmentation: delineation of the target area in the images; (3) feature selection: high-throughput extraction of lesion features; (4) feature reduction: selection of features with high reliability from the feature set for model training to improve the generalization ability of the model; and (5) establishment of a definitive model [36,37]. All these steps make it mandatory to define quality management protocols for radiomics application in H&N cancer patients, while also defining the time required per patient/exploration and the potential automatization of some parts of the process.
Moreover, there are several different useful features. First-order features describe the pattern of distribution of gray-level pixel values within a whole tumor. The maximum and kurtosis values describe the highest intensities of the whole tumor, which are related to the hemodynamic parameters of the tumor and are relevant to the prediction of the efficacy of chemotherapy [38]. The pretreatment gray-level co-occurrence matrix (glcm) informational measure of correlation 1 (Imc1) has been studied to characterize tumor aggressiveness and predict induction chemotherapy response. Higher values of this feature are possibly associated with a good response [10]. In contrast, tumors with a higher value of neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix (ngtdm) business might have a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation [39]. The gray-level non-uniformity feature has been studied to predict prognosis in patients with HPSCC, and in these cases, a lower gray-level uniformity indicates a poorer prognosis [19,40]. Similarly, lower values of glcm maximum correlation coefficient (MCC) may indicate tumors with more aggressive behavior, which can predict local failure after radiotherapy in locally advanced H&N cancers [41].
Regarding the potential information that we can obtain from the radiomics analysis about tumor growth behavior, potential treatment outcome, or the analysis of the surrounding microenvironment, we can highlight some radiomics features such as the maximum and kurtosis values useful to describe the highest intensities of the whole tumor, which are related to the hemodynamic parameters of the tumor, allowing us to predict chemotherapy efficacy [26]. The pretreatment gray-level co-occurrence matrix (glcm)_Imc1, a feature that allows us to characterize the tumor aggressiveness, also helps us to predict chemotherapeutic response, with a higher value associated with good treatment response [27]. We can also use the gray-tone-difference matrix (ngtdm)_busyness, a feature that can help us to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, with this treatment being especially useful for patients with a negative response to treatment [28]. The gray-level non-uniformity feature, which is useful for prognosis prediction, has a low uniformity among gray levels and is a predictor of worse prognosis [20,29]. Finally, the glcm_MCC is a useful feature to estimate local failure after radiation therapy treatment in H&N cancer patients [30].
Summarizing the evidence available, radiomics is a non-invasive and cost-effective technique that has great potential to expand the scope of medical imaging in HPSCC patients [35]. Its application can provide important day-to-day information regarding rapid anatomic change and tumor response during treatment. Nonetheless, some issues need to be addressed.
Radiomic features require further research into the correlation between genetic and biological imaging data. The clinical value of this tool in terms of reproducibility and variability across different settings in HPSCC needs to be established in prospective studies. Further, there is an ongoing debate about which imaging tool offers the best performance for radiomic analysis: CT, MRI, or PET/CT [42]. Nowadays, we know that contrast-enhanced CT images could provide more clear contours of tumors and important information associated with treatment response and prognosis than non-contrast CT images [40,43]. In this vein, imaging protocols and analysis must be standardized in order to be able to use the same radiomics models across different centers worldwide.
Functional organ preservation represents a relevant target of IC. In HPSCC, the larynx preservation rate is an important outcome to be measured. However, there is a lack of information in almost all the studies included; therefore, it is necessary to investigate this in future research studies. We also have evidence about the possibility to combine radiomics signatures and clinical data using clinical nomograms to improve our results [24,26].
Due to the heterogeneity of HNSCC, there is a need for collection and organization of data from samples collected at multiples hospitals. In relation to this, an international European consortium designed the BD2Decide European multicenter project to explore the potential of big data in HNSCC for clinical outcome estimation and research. The aim of this project is to summarize the characteristics of a unique large international multi-omics database for the analysis of treatment differences in a selected series of patients with locally advanced cancer treated with curative intent. In this setting, radiomics is a promising image data mining method for the prediction of therapeutic response and prognosis, and its use in HPSCC should be included in this kind of project [44].

5. Conclusions

Based on the limited reports in the literature, our findings suggest that radiomics represents a potentially useful tool in the diagnostic workup as well as during the treatment and follow-up of patients with HPSCC. Large prospective studies are essential to validate this technology in these patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.C.-E. and M.M.-Y.; methodology, C.M.C.-E.; validation, S.N.; formal analysis, O.G.-L.; investigation, N.F.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.C.-E. and G.B.H.; writing—review and editing, C.M.C.-E.; supervision, A.F., R.d.B., V.V.-P., and R.P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author via email.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Center, M.M.; Ferlay, J.; Ward, E.; Forman, D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 69–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lefebvre, J.L.; Andry, G.; Chevalier, D.; Luboinski, B.; Collette, L.; Traissac, L.; de Raucourt, D.; Langendijk, J. Laryngeal preservation with induction chemotherapy for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year results of EORTC trial 24891. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 2708–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jin, T.; Li, X.; Lei, D.; Liu, D.; Yang, Q.; Li, G.; Pan, X. Preservation of laryngeal function improves outcomes of patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 272, 1785–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Carvalho, A.L.; Nishimoto, I.N.; Califano, J.A.; Kowalski, L.P. Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: A site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 114, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, N.Y.; O’Meara, W.; Chan, K.; Della-Bianca, C.; Mechalakos, J.G.; Zhung, J.; Wolden, S.L.; Narayana, A.; Kraus, D.; Shah, J.P.; et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007, 69, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Katsoulakis, E.; Riaz, N.; Hu, M.; Morris, L.; Sherman, E.; McBride, S.; Lee, N. Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Three-dimensional or Intensity-modulated radiotherapy? A single institution’s experience. Laryngoscope 2016, 126, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lefebvre, J.; Ang, K.K. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: Key issues and recommendations—A consensus panel summary. Head Neck 2009, 31, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Panda, S.; Sakthivel, P.; Gurusamy, K.S.; Sharma, A.; Thakar, A. Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lambin, P.; Leijenaar, R.T.H.; Deist, T.M.; Peerlings, J.; de Jong, E.E.C.; van Timmeren, J.; Sanduleanu, S.; Larue, R.T.H.M.; Even, A.J.G.; Jochems, A.; et al. Radiomics: The bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 4, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Giraud, P.; Giraud, P.; Gasnier, A.; El Ayachy, R.; Kreps, S.; Foy, J.P.; Durdux, C.; Huguet, F.; Burgun, A.; Bibault, J.-E.; et al. Radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 21, e1000097. [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson, M.; Tiwari, A.; Fu, R.; Moe, E.; Buckley, D.I. A Framework to Facilitate the Use of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Design of Primary Research Studies; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2012.
  14. Howick, J.; Chalmers, I.; Glasziou, P.; Greenhalgh, T.; Heneghan, C.; Liberati, A.; Moschetti, I.; Phillips, B.; Thornton, T. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence (Introductory Document). 2011. Available online: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 (accessed on 12 May 2019).
  15. Slim, K.; Nini, E.; Forestier, D.; Kwiatkowski, F.; Panis, Y.; Chipponi, J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J. Surg. 2003, 73, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, R.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Shen, W.C.; Hsieh, T.C.; Yen, K.Y.; Chen, S.W.; Kao, C.H. Associations of Tumor PD-1 Ligands, Immunohistochemical Studies, and Textural Features in 18F-FDG PET in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bahig, H.; Lapointe, A.; Bedwani, S.; de Guise, J.; Lambert, L.; Filion, E.; Roberge, D.; Létourneau-Guillon, L.; Blais, D.; Ng, S.P.; et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for prediction of loco-regional recurrence after radiotherapy in larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019, 110, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, W.; Wei, D.; Wushouer, A.; Cao, S.; Zhao, T.; Yu, D.; Lei, D. Discovery and Validation of a CT-Based Radiomic Signature for Preoperative Prediction of Early Recurrence in Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 4340521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mo, X.; Wu, X.; Dong, D.; Guo, B.; Liang, C.; Luo, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Y.; Lian, Z.; et al. Prognostic value of the radiomics-based model in progression-free survival of hypopharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiation. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hsu, C.Y.; Lin, S.M.; Ming Tsang, N.; Juan, Y.H.; Wang, C.W.; Wang, W.C.; Kuo, S.H. Magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomic signature predicts locoregional failure after organ preservation therapy in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 25, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guo, R.; Guo, J.; Zhang, L.; Qu, X.; Dai, S.; Peng, R.; Chong, V.F.H.; Xian, J. CT-based radiomics features in the prediction of thyroid cartilage invasion from laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 2020, 20, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhong, J.; Frood, R.; Brown, P.; Nelstrop, H.; Prestwich, R.; McDermott, G.; Currie, S.; Vaidyanathan, S.; Scarsbrook, A.F. Machine learning-based FDG PET-CT radiomics for outcome prediction in larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Radiol. 2021, 76, 78.e9–78.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fatima, K.; Dasgupta, A.; DiCenzo, D.; Kolios, C.; Quiaoit, K.; Saifuddin, M.; Sandhu, M.; Bhardwaj, D.; Karam, I.; Poon, I.; et al. Ultrasound delta-radiomics during radiotherapy to predict recurrence in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2021, 28, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, X.; Sun, C.; Long, M.; Yang, Y.; Lin, P.; Xia, S.; Shen, W. Computed tomography-based radiomics signature as a pretreatment predictor of progression-free survival in locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with a different response to induction chemotherapy. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2022, 279, 3551–3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.; Lu, S.; Mao, Y.; Tan, L.; Li, G.; Gao, Y.; Tan, P.; Huang, D.; Zhang, X.; Qiu, Y.; et al. An MRI-based radiomics-clinical nomogram for the overall survival prediction in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-cohort study. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, X.; Long, M.; Sun, C.; Yang, Y.; Lin, P.; Shen, Z.; Xia, S.; Shen, W. CT-based radiomics signature analysis for evaluation of response to induction chemotherapy and progression-free survival in locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 7755–7766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nakajo, M.; Kawaji, K.; Nagano, H.; Jinguji, M.; Mukai, A.; Kawabata, H.; Tani, A.; Hirahara, D.; Yamashita, M.; Yoshiura, T. The Usefulness of Machine Learning-Based Evaluation of Clinical and Pretreatment [18F]-FDG-PET/CT Radiomic Features for Predicting Prognosis in Hypopharyngeal Cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leithner, D.; Bernard-Davila, B.; Martinez, D.F.; Horvat, J.V.; Jochelson, M.S.; Marino, M.A.; Avendano, D.; Ochoa-Albiztegui, R.E.; Sutton, E.J.; Morris, E.A.; et al. Radiomic signatures derived from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the assessment of breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2020, 22, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dulhanty, C.; Wang, L.; Cheng, M.; Gunraj, H.; Khalvati, F.; Haider, M.A.; Wong, A. Radiomics driven diffusion weighted imaging sensing strategies for zone-level prostate cancer sensing. Sensors 2020, 20, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pfister, D.G.; Spencer, S.; Adelstein, D.; Adkins, D.; Anzai, Y.; Brizel, D.M.; Maghami, E.; Mell, L.K.; Mittal, B.B.; Pinto, H.A.; et al. Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2020, 18, 873–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Machiels, J.P.; Rene Leemans, C.; Golusinski, W.; Grau, C.; Licitra, L.; Gregoire, V. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 1462–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ho, A.S.; Kim, S.; Tighiouart, M.; Gudino, C.; Mita, A.; Scher, K.S.; Laury, A.; Prasad, R.; Shiao, S.L.; Ali, N.; et al. Association of Quantitative Metastatic Lymph Node Burden with Survival in Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Scheckenbach, K. Radiomics: Big data instead of biopsies in the future? Laryngorhinootologie 2018, 97, S114–S141. [Google Scholar]
  34. Guezennec, C.; Robin, P.; Orlhac, F.; Bourhis, D.; Delcroix, O.; Gobel, Y.; Rousset, J.; Schick, U.; Salaün, P.-Y.; Abgral, R. Prognostic value of textural indices extracted from pretherapeutic 18-F FDG-PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2019, 41, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gillies, R.J.; Kinahan, P.E.; Hricak, H. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 2016, 278, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Avanzo, M.; Stancanello, J.; El Naqa, I. Beyond imaging: The promise of radiomics. Phys. Med. 2017, 38, 122–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ng, S.H.; Liao, C.T.; Lin, C.Y.; Chan, S.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; Yen, T.-C.; Chang, J.T.-C.; Ko, S.-F.; Fan, K.-H.; Wang, H.-M.; et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of survival in oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation. Eur. Radiol. 2016, 26, 4162–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shayesteh, S.; Nazari, M.; Salahshour, A.; Sandoughdaran, S.; Hajianfar, G.; Khateri, M.; Joybari, A.Y.; Jozian, F.; Feyzabad, S.H.F.; Arabi, H.; et al. Treatment response prediction using MRI-based pre-, post-, and delta-radiomic features and machine learning algorithms in colorectal cancer. Med. Phys. 2021, 48, 3691–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kayal, E.B.; Kandasamy, D.; Khare, K.; Bakhshi, S.; Sharma, R.; Mehndiratta, A. Texture analysis for chemotherapy response evaluation in osteosarcoma using MR imaging. NMR Biomed. 2021, 34, e4426. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, S.W.; Shen, W.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Chen, R.Y.; Hsieh, T.C.; Yen, K.Y.; Kao, C.H. Correlation of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET tumor textural features with gene expression in pharyngeal cancer and implications for radiotherapy-based treatment outcomes. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 44, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Devakumar, D.; Sunny, G.; Sasidharan, B.K.; Bowen, S.R.; Nadaraj, A.; Jeyseelan, L.; Mathew, M.; Irodi, A.; Isiah, R.; Pavamani, S.; et al. Framework for machine learning of CT and PET radiomics to predict local failure after radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers. J. Med. Phys. 2021, 46, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tshering Vogel, D.W.; Thoeny, H.C. Cross-sectional imaging in cancers of the head and neck: How we review and report. Cancer Imaging 2016, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Leger, S.; Zwanenburg, A.; Pilz, K.; Zschaeck, S.; Zöphel, K.; Kotzerke, J.; Schreiber, A.; Zips, D.; Krause, M.; Baumann, M.; et al. CT imaging during treatment improves radiomic models for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2019, 130, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Cavalieri, S.; De Cecco, L.; Brakenhoff, R.H.; Serafini, M.S.; Canevari, S.; Rossi, S.; Lanfranco, D.; Hoebers, F.J.P.; Wesseling, F.W.R.; Keek, S.; et al. Development of a multiomics database for personalized prognostic forecasting in head and neck cancer: The Big Data to Decide EU Project. Head Neck 2021, 43, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Prisma flowchart.
Figure 1. Prisma flowchart.
Biomedicines 11 00805 g001
Table 1. Studies investigating the role of radiomics in hypopharyngeal cancer. Abbreviations: Not described = ND; metabolic tumor volume = MTV; gray-level co-occurrence matrix = GLCM; gray-level run-length matrix = GLRLM; gray-level size zone matrix = GLSZM; and LASSO = least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Computed tomography = CT; magnetic resonance imaging = MRI, positron emission tomography = PET-CT; ultrasound = US; RT =radiotherapy; CRT = chemoradiotherapy; LR = linear regression; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; and LFS = laryngectomy-free survival.
Table 1. Studies investigating the role of radiomics in hypopharyngeal cancer. Abbreviations: Not described = ND; metabolic tumor volume = MTV; gray-level co-occurrence matrix = GLCM; gray-level run-length matrix = GLRLM; gray-level size zone matrix = GLSZM; and LASSO = least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Computed tomography = CT; magnetic resonance imaging = MRI, positron emission tomography = PET-CT; ultrasound = US; RT =radiotherapy; CRT = chemoradiotherapy; LR = linear regression; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; and LFS = laryngectomy-free survival.
StudyMain ObjectiveNumber of PatientsGender (M/F)AgeImaging Acquisition MethodRadiomic Feature Extraction/Signature Building/Segmentation MethodTreatment StrategyConclusion
Chen et al. [16] Taiwan—2017 retrospective studyAssociations of tumor PD-1 ligands, IHC studies, and textural features in 18F-FDG PET23M = 23NDPET/CTMTV;
the heterogeneity of a tumor was evaluated using its textural features;
GLCM, GLRLM,
and GLSZM.
RT or CRTp16 and Ki-67 staining percentages detected using IHC and several 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived textural features were explored. The PD-L1 expressions were positively correlated with p16 and Ki-67, whereas the textural index of correlation was a negative predictor for PD-L1 expression of ≥5%.
Bahig et al. [17] Canada—2018 retrospective studyPrediction of
loco-regional recurrence
5NDNDDual energy—CT scanKurtosis, GTVp, and GTVn; iodine concentration (in mg/mL) extracted from GTVp and GTVn structures by determining the iodine partial electron density from each voxel, using a two-material decomposition method.RTRadiomics can represent a potential surrogate of microvessel density and heterogeneity of perfusion evaluation method for outcome prediction.
Li et al. [18] China—2020
retrospective study
Preoperative prediction of early recurrence167160/7NDCTLASSO, LR;
manual VOI delineation.
SurgeryAuthors identified the noninvasive, predictive role of CT-based radiomics in the preoperative prediction of early recurrence of patients
Mo et al. [19] China—2020 retrospective studyPrediction of progression-free
survival
113106/7NDCTFeatures extracted corresponds to texture, intensity, shape, and wavelet;
LASSO.
Wavelet HHH_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized
Wavelet-LLH_firstorder_Maximum
Wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Median
Wavelet-HLH_glszm_LargeAreaEmphasis
CRTAccording to the authors, the radiomic model showed good performance in stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups of progression in hypopharyngeal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Hsu et al. [20] Taiwan—2020 retrospective studyPrediction of
locoregional failure
116111/5NDMRILASSO, skewness, and kurtosis.CRTThe authors established and validated that a non-invasive RS model provides a novel and convenient approach to predict 1-year LRF and the survival outcome, including the PFS, LFS, and OS, in patients with locally advanced HPSCC who received organ preservation treatment.
Guo et al. [21] China—2020 retrospective studyPrediction of thyroid cartilage invasion26NDNDCTLASSO
GLCM, GLRLM, and GLSZM.
Preoperative diagnosis.Models based on CT radiomic features were able to improve the accuracy of predicting thyroid cartilage invasion from LHSCC.
Zhong et al. [22] U.K.—2020 retrospective studyPrediction of early disease progression40NDNDPET-CTPET parameters selected by the ML model were metabolic tumor volume (MTV); conventional minimum standardized uptake value (SUVmin); gray-level zone length matrix (GLZLM); small-zone low gray-level emphasis (SZLGE); histogram kurtosis; and histogram energy.
CT parameters selected by the ML model were maximum CT attenuation value; GLZLM small-zone emphasis (SZE); mean CT attenuation value; GLZLM SZLGE; and GLZLM gray-level non-uniformity (GLNU).
Clinical parameters selected by the ML model were
duration of radiation treatment, nodal (N) stage, smoking, age, and sex. The parameters included in the combined model were MTV, maximum CT value, SUVmin, GLZLM SZLGE, and histogram kurtosis.
CRTFDG PET-CT determined that radiomic features are potential predictors of early disease progression in patients with locally advanced larynx and hypopharynx SCC.
Fatima et al. [23] Canada—2021 retrospective studyRecurrence prediction248/361Quantitative USIn the quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy a total of seven spectral parameters were calculated within each ROI window. These include spectral slope (SS); spectral intercept (SI) at 0 MHz; mid-band fit (MBF); average acoustic concentration (AAC); average scatterer diameter (ASD); attenuation coefficient estimate (ACE); and spacing among scatterers (SAS).
Texture analysis: GLCM, energy, homogeneity, and contrast.
RTMachine learning classifiers trained with QUS spectral and texture parameters were shown to predict recurrence for patients with HNSCC receiving RT with an accuracy of 82% at week 4 of treatment.
Liu et al. [24] China—2022 retrospective studyPretreatment
predictor of progression-free survival in locally advanced
hypopharyngeal carcinoma
112103/961CTLASSO,
Wavelet-LLH_glszm_
GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized
Gradient_glcm_Imc1
Wavelet-LLL_ngtdm_Busyness
Wavelet-LHL_firstorder_Maximum
Wavelet-LHL_firstorder_Kurtosis Wavelet-HLH_glcm_MCC
Induction QT, surgery, and RTThe authors propose a radiomics model based on pretreatment with a CT radiomics signature for the detection of induction chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chen et al. [25] China— 2022 retrospective studyOverall survival136ND58MRILASSO; Original_Shape_Maximum3DDiameter,
Original_Shape_Compactness, Original_Glrlma_Run-Length Non-Uniformity Normalized,
Wavelet_HLLc_Glrlma_Long Run Emphasis,
Wavelet_LHLd_Glcmb_Joint Entropy,
Wavelet_HLHe_Glrlma_Short Run High Gray-Level Emphasis
Surgical and non-Surgical treatmentThe radiomics-clinical nomogram and radiomics score might be non-invasive and reliable methods for the risk
stratification in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu et al. [26] China—2022 retrospective studySignature analysis for evaluation of response
to induction chemotherapy and progression-free survival
112103/961CTLASSO,
Wavelet-LLH_glszm_
GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized
Gradient_glcm_Imc1
Wavelet-LLL_ngtdm_Busyness
Wavelet-LHL_firstorder_Maximum
Wavelet-LHL_firstorder_Kurtosis Wavelet-HLH_glcm_MCC
Induction chemotherapy, surgery, and RTThe authors propose that a multiparametric CT-based radiomics model could be useful for predicting treatment response and progression-free survival in patients
with locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent induction chemotherapy.
Nakajo et al. [27] China—2022 retrospective studyDetermination of usefulness of clinical and pretreatment
18F-FDG-PET-based radiomic features for prognosis prediction in
patients with hypopharyngeal cancer
10094/671PET-CTGray-level co-occurrence matrix
entropy (GLCM_Entropy);
Gray-level run-length matrix;
run-length non-uniformity (GLRLM_RLNU).
Surgery, chemotherapy, CRT, RT. The logistic regression model constructed by UICC, T and N stages and pretreatment with [18F]-FDG-PET–based
radiomic features, GLCM_Entropy, and GLRLM_RLNU may be an important predictor of prognosis in patients with
hypopharyngeal cancer.
Table 2. Assessment of Quality and Risk of Bias. OCEBM: Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine; MINORS: Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.
Table 2. Assessment of Quality and Risk of Bias. OCEBM: Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine; MINORS: Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.
StudyOCEBMMINORS
Chen et al. [15]414
Bahig et al. [16]410
Li et al. [17]314
Mo et al. [18]314
Hsu et al. [19]312
Guo et al. [20]413
Zhong et al. [21]411
Fatima et al. [22]411
Liu et al. [23]314
Chen et al. [24]314
Liu et al. [25]314
Nakajo et al. [26]314
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiesa-Estomba, C.M.; Mayo-Yanez, M.; Guntinas-Lichius, O.; Vander-Poorten, V.; Takes, R.P.; de Bree, R.; Halmos, G.B.; Saba, N.F.; Nuyts, S.; Ferlito, A. Radiomics in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Management: A State-of-the-Art Review. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030805

AMA Style

Chiesa-Estomba CM, Mayo-Yanez M, Guntinas-Lichius O, Vander-Poorten V, Takes RP, de Bree R, Halmos GB, Saba NF, Nuyts S, Ferlito A. Radiomics in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Management: A State-of-the-Art Review. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(3):805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M., Miguel Mayo-Yanez, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Vincent Vander-Poorten, Robert P. Takes, Remco de Bree, Gyorgy B. Halmos, Nabil F. Saba, Sandra Nuyts, and Alfio Ferlito. 2023. "Radiomics in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Management: A State-of-the-Art Review" Biomedicines 11, no. 3: 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030805

APA Style

Chiesa-Estomba, C. M., Mayo-Yanez, M., Guntinas-Lichius, O., Vander-Poorten, V., Takes, R. P., de Bree, R., Halmos, G. B., Saba, N. F., Nuyts, S., & Ferlito, A. (2023). Radiomics in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Management: A State-of-the-Art Review. Biomedicines, 11(3), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop