Next Article in Journal
Ouabain Reverts CUS-Induced Disruption of the HPA Axis and Avoids Long-Term Spatial Memory Deficits
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Health in Elderly People, a Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies

by
Luca Filippi
1,* and
Agostino Chiaravalloti
2,3
1
Nuclear Medicine Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
2
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy
3
IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(4), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041176
Submission received: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 6 April 2023 / Published: 14 April 2023
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, affecting a million people worldwide with a particularly high burden in countries with a low human development index [1]. Although population screening by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has favorably impacted PCa mortality, this approach still remains controversial due to its high sensitivity but relatively low specificity. Therefore, there is an unmet need for effective laboratory and imaging biomarkers in all phases of PCa’s natural history, from diagnosis up until its ultimate switch into the more aggressive and androgen-independent form (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer/mCRPCa).
Hence, the Special Issue “Prostate Cancer: from Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies” was conceived as an opportunity to disseminate the current research on this cutting-edge topic, with a particular emphasis on recently implemented metabolic and molecular imaging probes in the field. For example, Urso et al. investigated the impact of positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) using 18F-choline, a surrogate biomarker of cell membrane biosynthesis, on the initial clinical management of PCa patients according to a multidisciplinary approach [2]. The enrolled patients were split into three distinct groups based on the type of imaging they received: A) conventional radiological imaging (MRI or CT); B) conventional imaging plus 18F-choline PET/CT; C) only 18F-choline PET/CT. The authors found that 18F-choline PET/CT was more frequently employed in patients with higher Gleason or International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) scores; in addition, the authors found that the execution of 18F-choline PET/CT influenced the clinical decisions in 14.3% of patients in group B and correlated with a longer time interval before relapse. Of note, metabolically active tumor burden at initial staging (i.e., total lesion choline kinase activity/TLCKA) and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) were able to discriminate patients who experienced tumor recurrence from those who did not relapse.
PET/CT using anti-1-amino-3-[18F]-flurocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-FACBC) has been introduced into clinical practice for the imaging of PCa patients showing biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical treatment (radiation therapy/surgery). However, the diagnostic performance of 18F-FACBC PET/CT in subjects with low or very low PSA values and the eventual impact of this imaging modality on clinical management have yet to be fully elucidated. In a bicentric retrospective study by Filippi et al., a cohort of 81 PCa patients with BCR after radical therapy underwent 18F-FACBC PET/CT [3]. The detection rate in the whole cohort was 76.9% and, when stratified by PSA values, diagnostic performance of 18F-FACBC remained relevant for low and very low levels (i.e., 0.58–0.99 and 0.2–0.57 ng/mL, respectively). The most frequent sites of relapse were in prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes, easily identified thanks to the lack of 18F-FACBC physiological accumulation within the bladder. Notably, PET/CT significantly influenced patients’ management in almost half of the cases (40.7%), leading to a major change in the planned treatment (e.g., from androgen deprivation therapy into targeted radiation therapy) in 30 subjects.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has recently emerged as a promising target for the approaches to PCa based on the synergism between diagnosis and therapy, also known as “theranostics”. The recently published pro-PSMA trial has shown the superiority of PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11 over the conventional cross-sectional imaging (CT) and bone scan for the staging of high-risk PCa [4]. However, the role of PSMA PET/CT in low-risk PCa patients still remains to be addressed. From this perspective, Maserumule and coworkers investigated the potential of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in black South African (BSA) and white South African (WSA) men with ISUP grade 1 (Gleason 3 + 3) and 2 (Gleason 3 + 4) PCa at initial staging [5]. The authors found a correlation between PSA levels and primary tumor and whole-body PSMA-tumor volume (PSMA-TV), with higher values in BSA than in WSA males. Of note, evidence of seminal vesicle invasion at PSMA examination and black ethnicity predicted metastases.
Among the papers included in the Special Issue, two were focused on the radioligand therapy (RLT) with PSMA ligands. Although PSMA RLT with radionuclides emitting beta or alpha particles has been gaining an ever-increasing interest among the scientific community, some issues still remain to be addressed [6]. In particular, although the detection of PSMA-avid lesions on PSMA PET is an essential prerequisite to be enrolled, not all the patients respond to RLT. In this regard, the retrospective study carried out by van der Sar et al. could outline the identikit of the “ideal patient” for PSMA RLT [7]. In the 32 mCRPCa patients submitted to baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before RLT with 177Lu-PSMA-617, the authors investigated the prognostic value of baseline PET-derived parameters on imaging response assessed by PSMA-PET after two cycles. In the lesion-level analysis, a correlation was found between SUVpeak/max and response, regardless of the anatomical location of the metastatic site (lymph node, viscera or bone). In the patient-level analysis, SUVpeak value of the most avid metastasis was associated with PET response. Therefore, the lesions’ baseline SUV values, reflecting intralesional PSMA availability, are a potential prognostic factor for RLT outcome. Another relevant topic, in the perspective of the widespread implementation of PSMA RLT, is represented by our increased understanding of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the various PSMA ligands. In this regard, van der Gaag and colleagues provided a comprehensive overview of the existing scientific literature concerning this cutting-edge topic, shedding light on the synergism between concomitant therapeutic regimens (e.g., androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors/ARSI) and PSMA RLT, thanks to ARSI-induced up-regulation of PSMA expression on PCa cell membranes [8]. In addition, other relevant issues, such as PSMA dosing, the optimal interval-time between the various cycles and the more frequent adverse events associated with RLT, are covered.
In conclusion, the articles published in this Special Issue provides a snapshot of the state of the art concerning the employment of metabolic and molecular imaging probes in the different phases of PCa’s natural history, with a particular attention to the potential of each radiopharmaceutical to achieve a patient-tailored therapeutic approach.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, R. The Burden of Prostate Cancer Is Associated with Human Development Index: Evidence from 87 Countries, 1990–2016. EPMA J. 2019, 10, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Urso, L.; Rocca, G.C.; Borgia, F.; Lancia, F.; Malorgio, A.; Gagliano, M.; Zanetto, M.; Uccelli, L.; Cittanti, C.; Ippolito, C.; et al. The Role of [18F]F-Choline PET/CT in the Initial Management and Outcome Prediction of Prostate Cancer: A Real-World Experience from a Multidisciplinary Approach. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Filippi, L.; Bagni, O.; Crisafulli, C.; Cerio, I.; Brunotti, G.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Schillaci, O.; Dore, F. Detection Rate and Clinical Impact of PET/CT with 18F-FACBC in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Bicentric Study. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hofman, M.S.; Lawrentschuk, N.; Francis, R.J.; Tang, C.; Vela, I.; Thomas, P.; Rutherford, N.; Martin, J.M.; Frydenberg, M.; Shakher, R.; et al. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-CT in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer before Curative-Intent Surgery or Radiotherapy (ProPSMA): A Prospective, Randomised, Multicentre Study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1208–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Maserumule, L.C.; Mokoala, K.M.G.; van de Wiele, C.; Popoola, G.; Hlongwa, K.N.; Ndlovu, H.; Maes, A.; Vorster, M.; Sathekge, M.M. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Initial Staging in Black and White South African Males with ISUP Grade Group 1 and 2 Prostate Adenocarcinoma. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Filippi, L.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Schillaci, O.; Bagni, O. The Potential of PSMA-Targeted Alpha Therapy in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer. Ther. 2020, 20, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. van der Sar, E.C.A.; Kühr, A.J.S.; Ebbers, S.C.; Henderson, A.M.; de Keizer, B.; Lam, M.G.E.H.; Braat, A.J.A.T. Baseline Imaging Derived Predictive Factors of Response Following [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy in Salvage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Lesion- and Patient-Based Analysis. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. van der Gaag, S.; Bartelink, I.H.; Vis, A.N.; Burchell, G.L.; Oprea-Lager, D.E.; Hendrikse, H. Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Filippi, L.; Chiaravalloti, A. Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041176

AMA Style

Filippi L, Chiaravalloti A. Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(4):1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Filippi, Luca, and Agostino Chiaravalloti. 2023. "Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies" Biomedicines 11, no. 4: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041176

APA Style

Filippi, L., & Chiaravalloti, A. (2023). Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies. Biomedicines, 11(4), 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop