Next Article in Journal
Skin and Gut Microbiome in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
ES-SCLC Patients with PD-L1+ CTCs and High Percentages of CD8+PD-1+T Cells in Circulation Benefit from Front-Line Immunotherapy Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Dysregulation as an Essential Pathological Feature in Huntington’s Disease: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Significance of PD-L1 Status in Circulating Tumor Cells for Cancer Management during Immunotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hsp70—A Universal Biomarker for Predicting Therapeutic Failure in Human Female Cancers and a Target for CTC Isolation in Advanced Cancers

by
Alexia Xanthopoulos
1,
Ann-Kathrin Samt
1,
Christiane Guder
1,
Nicholas Taylor
1,
Erika Roberts
1,
Hannah Herf
1,
Verena Messner
1,
Anskar Trill
1,
Katharina Larissa Kreszentia Holzmann
1,
Marion Kiechle
2,
Vanadin Seifert-Klauss
2,
Sebastian Zschaeck
3,
Imke Schatka
4,
Robert Tauber
5,
Robert Schmidt
6,
Katrin Enste
6,
Alan Graham Pockley
7,
Dominik Lobinger
8 and
Gabriele Multhoff
1,9,*
1
Center for Translational Cancer Research TU München (TranslaTUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
2
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
3
Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
4
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
5
Department of Urology, Klinkum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
6
Krankenhaus für Naturheilweisen, 81545 Munich, Germany
7
John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK
8
Department of Thoracic Surgery, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Lehrkrankenhaus der TU München, 81925 Munich, Germany
9
Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(8), 2276; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082276
Submission received: 12 July 2023 / Revised: 2 August 2023 / Accepted: 15 August 2023 / Published: 16 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Biology of Circulating Tumor Cells 2.0)

Abstract

:
Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) is frequently overexpressed in many different tumor types. However, Hsp70 has also been shown to be selectively presented on the plasma membrane of tumor cells, but not normal cells, and this membrane form of Hsp70 (mHsp70) could be considered a universal tumor biomarker. Since viable, mHsp70-positive tumor cells actively release Hsp70 in lipid micro-vesicles, we investigated the utility of Hsp70 in circulation as a universal tumor biomarker and its potential as an early predictive marker of therapeutic failure. We have also evaluated mHsp70 as a target for the isolation and enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with different tumor entities. Circulating vesicular Hsp70 levels were measured in the peripheral blood of tumor patients with the compHsp70 ELISA. CTCs were isolated using cmHsp70.1 and EpCAM monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based bead approaches and characterized by immunohistochemistry using cytokeratin and CD45-specific antibodies. In two out of 35 patients exhibiting therapeutic failure two years after initial diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer, progressively increasing levels of circulating Hsp70 had already been observed during therapy, whereas levels in patients without subsequent recurrence remained unaltered. With regards to CTC isolation from patients with different tumors, an Hsp70 mAb-based selection system appears superior to an EpCAM mAb-based approach. Extracellular and mHsp70 can therefore serve as a predictive biomarker for therapeutic failure in early-stage tumors and as a target for the isolation of CTCs in various tumor diseases.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Comprising approximately 30% of all cancer cases, breast cancer remains the most common tumor in women, with an estimated worldwide incidence of 2.3 million cases in 2020 [1]. The local therapy of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer includes surgical removal of the tumor and potentially regional lymph nodes, in combination with adjuvant radiotherapy to prevent recurrence [2]. Depending on the age of the patient, tumor size, grading, lymph node, hormone receptor status, menopausal status, and HER2 expression, standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment can involve anti-hormone, chemo- and/or antibody-based therapies [3,4]. Despite significant progress in the development of these treatment options, the monitoring of therapeutic response in breast cancer still requires improvement. Biomarkers that can be used to better monitor the effectiveness of an individual therapy and also predict disease recurrence earlier will undoubtedly improve patient management, overall outcomes and help to reduce normal tissue toxicities.
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide and the most frequent cancer in Western countries. Despite advances in multimodal local and systemic treatment options, there is currently no cure for metastatic prostate cancer [5]. Transcriptomic analysis of plasma-derived exosomes and CTC counts appear to provide biomarkers that predict chemotherapy resistance and overall survival [5,6]. As Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) of the HSP70 and HSP90 families play crucial roles in tumorigenesis, cytoprotection, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and metastasis, inhibitors of these HSP families have been designed to render tumor cells more responsive to therapeutic interventions [7].
Herein, we assessed the utility of the major stress-inducible Hsp70 as a universal biomarker for predicting tumor responses in early-stage tumors and as a target for more efficient isolation of CTCs in advanced tumors [8]. Among all stress proteins, the 70 kDa family is the most highly conserved and best-studied group, consisting of 13 isotypes that can be distinguished by their amino acid sequence, expression levels, functions, and subcellular localization [8]. Members of the HSP70 family reside in nearly all cellular compartments, such as the nucleus, cytosol, mitochondria, and lysosomes, as well as on the plasma membrane of nucleated cancer cells [8]. In the cytosol, by supporting folding, refolding, and assembly of nascent polypeptides, HSP70s maintain protein homeostasis and thereby prevent protein aggregation, and it also assists the transport of other proteins across membranes [9]. Environmental stressors, such as nutrient [10] or ATP deprivation [11], thermal stress [12], ischemia [13], reactive oxygen species [10], and other free radicals [14], as well as physiological processes such as cell differentiation, maturation, and proliferation, induce the synthesis of the major stress-inducible Hsp70 in normal and tumor cells. Overexpression of Hsp70 in the cytosol of tumor cells promotes tumor growth and therapy resistance by activating anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective capacities [11,15]. Furthermore, it has been shown that multiple tumor types present Hsp70 on their plasma membrane [16], and an mHsp70 positive phenotype has been described for a large variety of highly aggressive tumor entities [17], including urological, lung, head, and neck tumors and tumors of the female reproductive tract such as ovarian, cervical carcinoma and breast cancers [15,18,19,20]. High levels of intracellular and mHsp70 are associated with resistance to standard therapies such as chemo- and radiotherapy and can enhance the invasive and metastatic potential [17,18,19]. It has also been shown that mHsp70 expression is a negative prognostic indicator for a number of other cancers [15].
Tumors expressing mHsp70 release extracellular lipid micro-vesicles (EVs), such as ectosomes and endosomes expressing Hsp70 on the surface [21]. The amount of vesicular Hsp70 in the blood, as measured using the compHsp70 ELISA [21], has been shown to be associated with the gross tumor volume (GTV) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [22]. Although free Hsp70 mostly originates from inflamed and dying cells, vesicular Hsp70, which is found at high concentrations in the blood of tumor patients, is actively released by viable tumor cells expressing mHsp70 [21].
As the density of mHsp70 expression is higher on metastases compared to primary tumors [23], we hypothesized that mHsp70 also is expressed on the cell surface of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) [24], which are considered precursors of metastases. Although antibody-based approaches for isolating CTCs are typically based on antibodies recognizing Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM, CD326), the fact that EpCAM (CD326) is often downregulated after Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) [25,26], likely influences the effectiveness of such approaches. In contrast, we have demonstrated that the expression of mHsp70 remains unaffected after EMT [27]. As a consequence, we developed an antibody-based bead approach using a unique monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognizes membrane-bound Hsp70 (cmHsp70.1) and demonstrated that this isolated higher numbers of CTCs from the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic cancer than an equivalent EpCAM mAb-based bead approach [27].
In our quest to develop approaches for better monitoring the effectiveness of an individual therapy and predicting disease recurrence, herein, we measured circulating levels of vesicular Hsp70 in patients with early breast cancer during the course of different therapies (radiation therapy, chemotherapy, anti-hormone therapy) and in the follow-up period up to six months. We also isolated and enumerated CTCs from the blood of patients with metastatic and non-metastatic endometrial, prostate, lung, and head and neck carcinoma using cmHsp70.1 or EpCAM mAb-based selection approaches. For the CTC isolation, patients with advanced tumor stages were chosen because of the known rarity of CTCs; typically, less than 10 CTCs/mL peripheral blood are present in the blood of patients with metastatic disease [28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Patients, and Sample Collection

This study analyzed frozen plasma samples from 35 female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (T1/T2) from a case-control-study who were treated at the Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM). Patients with secondary carcinoma, distant metastasis, previous radiation therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or prior breast cancer were excluded. All patients received breast-preserving surgery and, with the exception of two individuals, were treated with subsequent adjuvant radiation therapy. Depending on their hormone receptor status and tumor stage, patients received an adjuvant chemotherapy (FEC; 5-Fluoruracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide) and/or an anti-hormone therapy (Anastrozol, Arimidex, or Tamoxifen).
Patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were prospectively enrolled in the biomarker trial “HSP70CTC” (NCT04628806). All patients were scheduled to receive [177Lu]-PSMA radioligand therapy at the Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany. EDTA blood samples (2 × 7.5 mL) were collected from these patients at diagnosis (n = 16). Samples were also collected from a cohort of patients with endometrial carcinoma (n = 3), lung cancer (n = 19), squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN; n = 24), and from healthy individuals (n = 109). Approval for the blood sampling from patients and healthy individuals was obtained by the local Institutional Review Boards (Ethics Committee) of the Charité University Hospital, Berlin, and the Medical Faculty of Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany, respectively. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, and all participants signed an informed consent prior start of the study.

2.2. Measurement of Circulating Hsp70 Levels Using the compHSP70 ELISA [21]

Plasma was prepared from EDTA blood (S-Monovette, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) by centrifugation at 1500× g for 15 min at room temperature and aliquots (300 μL) stored at −80 °C. For the compHsp70 ELISA, 96-well MaxiSorp Nunc-Immuno plates (Thermo, Rochester, NY, USA) were incubated with the cmHsp70.2 coating mAb (1 µg/mL; multimmune GmbH (Munich, Germany)) in sodium carbonate buffer (0.1 M sodium carbonate, 0.1 M sodium hydrogen carbonate, pH 9.6; Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany)) overnight at room temperature. Plates were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Life Technologies (Darmstadt, Germany)) containing 0.05% v/v Tween-20 (Calbiochem, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and blocked with liquid plate sealer (Candor Bioscience GmbH, Wangen i. Allgäu, Germany) for 30 min to prevent non-specific protein binding. After a washing step, plasma samples (100 µL) diluted 1:5 in StabilZyme Select Stabilizer (Diarect GmbH, Freiburg i. Breisgau, Germany) were added, as was a pre-diluted Hsp70 protein standard (0–100 ng/mL) and plates were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After another washing step, plates were incubated for 30 min with biotinylated cmHsp70.1 detection mAb (multimmune GmbH, Munich, Germany; 200 ng/mL) dissolved in HRP-Protector (Candor Bioscience GmbH, Wangen i. Allgäu, Germany) and after a final washing step for another 30 min with 57 ng/mL Streptavidin (Senova GmbH, Weimar, Germany) in HRP-ProtectorTM (Candor Bioscience GmbH, Wangern i. Allgäu, Germany). Colorimetric analysis was performed after incubation with the substrate reagent (100 µL) (BioFX TMB Super Sensitive One Component HRP Microwell Substrate, Surmodics, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) for 15 min. After stopping the colorimetric analysis by adding 2N H2SO4 (50 µL) the absorbance was read at 450 nm in a Microplate Reader (VICTOR X4 Multilabel Plate Reader, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and corrected by the absorbance at 570 nm. A market-ready Hsp70-exo ELISA kit that uses identical reagents is being manufactured by DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany.

2.3. Isolation of CTCs with cmHsp70.1 and EpCAM Antibody-Coupled S-PluriSelect Beads

Isolation of CTCs was undertaken essentially as described previously [27]. Briefly, EDTA blood was incubated for 30 min with S-PluriSelect beads (PluriSelect Life Sciences, Leipzig, Germany) covalently coupled to the cmHsp70.1 (multimmune GmbH, Munich, Germany) or EpCAM (CD326, clone HEA125; Origene/Acris GmbH, Herford, Germany) mAbs under gentle rotation at room temperature. CTCs bound to the antibody-coupled beads were washed on a sterile filter with at least 20 mL wash buffer (PluriSelect Life Sciences). CTCs were detached from the beads by incubation with detachment buffer (PluriSelect Life Sciences) for 10 min and were then filtered through a sterile filter, washed in medium, and incubated overnight at 37 °C in a 48-well plate. After 24 h, CTCs were counted using a Zeiss Axiovert microscope (40× magnification) and kept in cell culture for additional counting after 5 to 7 days in cell culture.

2.4. Statistical Tests

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and the Shapiro–Wilk test showed that the Hsp70 concentrations in healthy donors and cancer patients were not normally distributed (p < 0.001 in each case). As a consequence, the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare two unrelated groups, and a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparing more than two unrelated groups. The Spearman correlation was used for calculating correlations between two metric variables.

3. Results

3.1. Hsp70 Concentrations in the Blood of Patients with Breast Cancer during Different Therapies and in the Follow-Up Period

Between 2013 and 2015, patients with localized unilateral breast cancer (n = 40) were treated in a curative intention trial. Eight years after the initial diagnosis of breast cancer, patients were contacted by a physician, and of the initial 40 patients, 35 patients agreed to provide information regarding their clinical course. Of these patients, 30 were in tumor stage T1 (a–c), and 5 in stage T2 at initial diagnosis. None of the patients had distant metastases, and all tumors were estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive (Table 1). An accepted limitation of the clinical trial was that no blood sample from before the start of therapy (surgical resection) was available from this patient cohort.
As summarized in Table 1, all patients received a breast-preserving surgery and, except for two individuals, subsequent radiotherapy with varying total doses ranging from 40 to 66 Gy according to conventional normo-fractionated or moderately hypofractionated schedules. Three patients were irradiated with 40 Gy, 27 patients with 60 Gy, and 3 patients with 66 Gy. Depending on tumor-specific characteristics, additional chemotherapy (FEC; 5-Fluoruracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide) and/or anti-hormone therapy (Anastrozol, Arimidex, or Tamoxifen) was given.
The first blood sample was taken postoperatively before the start of radiotherapy (1), then after 30 Gy (2), after the end of radiotherapy (3), six weeks after radiotherapy (4) and six months after radiotherapy (5) (Figure 1).
To investigate the potential effects of a specific therapy (radiation, chemotherapy, anti-hormone therapy) on circulating Hsp70 levels, Hsp70 was measured at the 5 indicated time-points in the recurrence-free patient cohort (n = 33) treated with or without a specific therapy. A comparison of the circulating Hsp70 levels in recurrence-free patients receiving irradiation (40, 60, 66 Gy; n = 31) or no radiation (n = 2) revealed no significant differences at any time-point (1 p = 0.910, 2 p = 0.907, 3 p = 0.763, 4 p = 1.000, 5 p = 1.000; Mann–Whitney U-test). However, as shown in Figure 2A, the Hsp70 values of patients receiving radiotherapy always remained below those without radiotherapy, although the differences failed to reach statistical significance.
A comparison of the circulating Hsp70 levels in recurrence-free patients (n = 33) receiving additional chemotherapy (n = 27) or no chemotherapy (n = 6) showed similar results (Figure 2B). The mean Hsp70 concentrations in patients without chemotherapy remained unaltered in the range between 783.2 to 802.7 ng/mL throughout the whole study period, whereas the Hsp70 concentrations in the patients who were treated with chemotherapy remained constantly below these values ranging between 301.4 and 513.3 ng/mL. However, the differences of the values at all time-points were not of statistical significance (1 p = 0.134, 2 p = 0.100, 3 p = 0.123, 4 p = 0.409, 5 p = 0.828, Mann–Whitney-U-test).
Although all patients showed a positive hormone receptor status (Estrogen receptor+, Progesterone receptor+), anti-hormone therapy was only given to 10 of the 33 patients. The Hsp70 concentrations in the recurrence-free patients with and without anti-hormone therapy were nearly identical until the end of radiotherapy (13) but dropped slightly during the anti-hormone therapy (45) (Figure 2C). However, due to the relatively low number of patients included in the study, statistical significance was not reached at any time-point (1 p = 0.512, 2 p = 0.450, 3 p = 0.488, 4 p = 0.730, 5 p = 0.860, Mann–Whitney U-test).

3.2. Hsp70 Concentrations in the Blood of Patients with Breast Cancer with and without Recurrence

Of the 35 patients with stage T1 and T2 breast cancer, 33 patients remained recurrence-free, and there was no newly diagnosed disease of other origin eight years after diagnosis. However, one patient developed an endometrial carcinoma, and another patient a contralateral breast cancer which was diagnosed two years after the first diagnosis. To study the predictive value of circulating Hsp70 levels as an early tumor biomarker, Hsp70 concentrations of the 33 recurrence-free patients at the 5 different time-points were compared to those of the patient with the endometrial carcinoma (Figure 3A) and the patient with the contralateral breast cancer recurrence (Figure 3B). As shown in Figure 3A, the Hsp70 concentrations in the blood of the patient who developed an endometrial carcinoma two years after diagnosis of the breast cancer were found to be already elevated after the breast-conserving surgery (1) and increased further during radiotherapy (2). The values remained above the 95% confidence interval of the cohort of recurrence-free patients during radiotherapy (2) as well as in the follow-up period – a time-point when no endometrial carcinoma was diagnosed. The patient was irradiated with a total dose of 66 Gy but received no chemo- or anti-hormone therapy. The finding that a newly diagnosed, additional patient with endometrial carcinoma whose tumor has spread into the lymph nodes had very high Hsp70 levels in the circulation (1171 ng/mL) suggests that the elevated circulating Hsp70 levels shown in Figure 3A might originate from the endometrial carcinoma cells.
A comparison of the Hsp70 concentrations in the blood of another breast cancer patient who was diagnosed with a contralateral breast cancer two years after the first diagnosis by classical imaging methods with those who remained recurrence-free (n = 33) revealed a progressive increase in the circulating Hsp70 values which was already apparent during radiotherapy. It is known that highly aggressive tumors not only present Hsp70 on the plasma membrane at a high cell surface density [23] but also actively release Hsp70 in extracellular micro-vesicles (EVs), levels of which can be measured in the circulation using the compHsp70 ELISA [21]. As shown in Figure 3B, the Hsp70 concentrations in the patient with recurrent breast cancer increased from 512.4 ng/mL after surgical removal of the breast cancer (1) to 759.3 ng/mL after 30 Gy irradiation (2), to 1092.7 ng/mL after the end of radiotherapy (3), to 1816.7 ng/mL six weeks (4) and to 3101.7 ng/mL six months after the end of radiotherapy (5). Compared to all other recurrence-free patients, this patient was the only one whose Hsp70 values progressively increased. The Hsp70 concentrations of this patient were above the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the recurrence-free patient cohort after the end of radiotherapy (35). With respect to these findings, we speculate that the drastically elevated Hsp70 values in the circulation of the patient with recurrent breast cancer reflect viable tumor mass (also known as minimal residual disease, MRD) at an early stage before the tumor reached a size that could be diagnosed by classical imaging methods. The patient with recurrent disease was irradiated with a total dose of 60 Gy and was receiving chemotherapy.

3.3. Hsp70 as a Target for CTC Isolation in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Metastatic Tumors

Next, we asked whether mHsp70 on tumor cells, which is a source of extracellular Hsp70 in circulation, could be used as a target for the isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Since the density of mHsp70 is higher on metastases than on primary tumors [23], and CTCs are considered precursors of metastases [24], we proposed that Hsp70 is present at high densities on the cell surface of CTCs. Most antibody-based CTC isolation systems are based on the expression of EpCAM (CD326) by CTCs [29]; however, EpCAM is often down-regulated after Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT). In contrast, we have previously shown that mHsp70 expression remains stably high on the surface of CTCs after an artificially induced EMT with TGFβ [27]. With respect to these findings, we isolated CTCs from the blood of patients with mCRPC, metastatic and non-metastatic endometrial, lung cancer, and HNSCC using comparative Hsp70 and EpCAM mAb-based bead approaches, as described previously [27]. The patient characteristics and circulating Hsp70 values in these patients are summarized in Table 2.
As shown in Figure 4 and Table 2, circulating Hsp70 levels in patients with mCRPC (mean 272.8 ± 433.7 ng/mL; **** p < 0.0001; n = 16), endometrial carcinoma (mean 524.0 ± 578.3 ng/mL; ** p < 0.01; n = 3), lung cancer (mean 161.7 ± 253.9 ng/mL; n = 19) and head and neck carcinoma (mean 196.4±300.8 ng/mL; *** p < 0.001; n = 24) were significantly higher than those in a healthy control cohort (mean 35.5 ± 41.7 ng/mL; n = 109) (Mann–Whitney test). Hsp70 levels of a patient with metastatic endometrial carcinoma (1171 ng/mL; n = 1) were drastically higher than that of patients with non-metastasized endometrial carcinoma (200.4 ng/mL; n = 2).
A comparison of the number of CTCs that were isolated from the blood of patients with metastatic prostate cancer using the cmHsp70.1 (range 2–4000; mean 803 ± 1192) and EpCAM (range 0–2560; mean 393 ± 660) mAb-based bead approaches revealed significantly higher CTC counts (* p < 0.05) when using the cmHsp70.1 mAb-based approach (Figure 5A). The values derived with the EpCAM-based bead system are comparable to those CTC counts which have been isolated from patients with prostate cancer (mean 124 ± 400) using the FDA-approved EpCAM mAb-based CELLSEARCH® system [30,31,32,33]. In a patient with metastatic endometrial carcinoma, the number of CTCs isolated with Hsp70 mAb-based and EpCAM mAb-based beads was 12,335 and 379, respectively (Figure 5B). When metastasized and non-metastasized endometrial carcinoma patients (n = 3) were compared, the number of CTCs was 4764 (range 467–12,935; mean 4764 ± 7079) vs. 399 (range 379–435; mean 399 ± 31), respectively (Figure 5B). Similar to the findings from patients with prostate carcinoma, higher CTC counts were obtained from patients with lung and head and neck cancer when using the cmHsp70.1 mAb-based bead approach. In patients with lung cancer (n = 12) the number of CTCs isolated with cmHsp70.1 mAb-coated beads was 924 (range 23–2456; mean 924 ± 876) vs. 820 (range 52–3611; mean 820 ± 1008), respectively (Figure 5C), and in patients with head and neck cancer (n = 16) the number of CTCs isolated using the cmHsp70.1 mAb-coated beads was 753 (range 0–2907; mean 753 ± 889) vs. 415 (range 0–1345; mean 415 ± 457.0), respectively (Figure 5D).
Figure 5E shows representative views of a DAPI (blue), cytokeratin (green), and CD45 (red) staining of CTCs derived from the blood of patients with metastatic prostate cancer following isolation using the cmHsp70.1 mAb-based bead approach. In both patients, CTCs were positively stained for cytokeratin (green). In one sample, the cytokeratin-positive CTC was localized in close proximity to a CD45 positively stained leukocyte (red). The nucleus of the cells was stained blue with DAPI.

4. Discussion

This study asked how radiation-, chemo-, or anti-hormone therapies affect levels of exosomal/microvesicular Hsp70 in the blood of recurrence-free patients with breast cancer in stage T1 and T2 during the therapy and in the follow-up period and whether increasing levels of exosomal Hsp70 could serve as a potential biomarker to monitor therapeutic response and/or predict subsequent therapy failure at an early time-point. Of the 35 patients studied, 33 patients remained recurrence-free 8 years after the first diagnosis of breast cancer, whereas one patient developed an endometrial carcinoma, and another patient developed a contralateral breast cancer.
The correlation between high expression of Hsp70 and clinical parameters such as diagnosis, prognosis, and response to therapy in different cancers has been shown for both intracellular [34,35,36,37,38,39] and extracellular Hsp70 levels [22,40,41,42]. As Hsp70 is overexpressed in a variety of tumors, it does not appear useful in diagnostic immunopathology for a specific tumor entity, as more specific and targeted markers to identify the lineage of cancer tissue exist [15]. Nevertheless, vesicular Hsp70 [43,44], which most likely originates from viable tumor cells and can be measured in the plasma by the compHsp70 ELISA, has great potential as a universal tumor marker in different tumor entities to make a significant contribution to the assessment of treatment response and might be useful [45,46,47].
To determine whether the plasma concentration of Hsp70 could be used as a predictor for response to a specific therapy, circulating Hsp70 values were compared in the blood of breast cancer patients with and without receiving radio-, chemo- and anti-hormone therapy. Although not statistically significant, all patients who received adjuvant radio- or chemotherapy showed consistently lower Hsp70 concentrations over the whole study period up to six months after therapy than the respective disease groups without therapy. During (time-points 4, 5) but not before or after anti-hormone therapy circulating Hsp70 values were slightly reduced in breast cancer patients.
Although patients with recurrence-free disease presented relatively constant Hsp70 values, the Hsp70 concentration of a patient who developed an endometrial carcinoma in the further course of the disease already increased while receiving radiotherapy. Since a patient with metastatic endometrial carcinoma showed very high circulating Hsp70 levels (Table 2), we speculate that the elevated Hsp70 levels originate from endometrial carcinoma cells in the breast cancer patient.
The Hsp70 values of another patient, who was diagnosed with a contralateral breast cancer two years after the first diagnosis, already showed a continuous increase of the Hsp70 levels after radiotherapy and in the follow-up period up to six months. Since the recurrent-free patients showed no increase in their circulating Hsp70 levels during the whole observation period, we speculate that the increase in circulating Hsp70 levels in the patients with recurrence or endometrial carcinoma indicates therapeutic failure. Due to the continuous increase in Hsp70 levels, which was already apparent at an early time-point (during radiotherapy, 2), the recurrence could have been detected much earlier than with the imaging-based methods that are currently used for follow-up.
Previously, it was shown that levels of exosomal Hsp70 in the circulation reflect the mHsp70 status of the tumor [21,35]. Furthermore, we have previously shown, in mouse models and patients, that metastases exhibit a higher mHsp70 density than primary tumors [23]. Although free Hsp70 originates from apoptotic tumor cells [22], a constant increase in the levels of exosomal Hsp70, therefore, appears to indicate an increase in viable tumor cells in the context of recurrence or metastases. It is well established that the time of diagnosis influences and correlates with the survival rate, not only in the context of the initial diagnosis but also in the context of identifying the development of metastases which account for a large proportion (~90%) of cancer-specific mortality [48]. After completing the primary treatment, patients should participate in a follow-up program for at least ten years. In addition to medical history and physical examination, this includes image-based diagnostics [1,2,3,4]. However, the insufficient sensitivity of conventional imaging diagnostics to detect metastases at an early stage reflects an urgent clinical need for new approaches to detect recurrence and metastases early.
The repeated determination of Hsp70 in the blood of patients with different tumors provides an additional tool that might enable earlier detection of tumor recurrence in patients without radiation exposure by radiological imaging methods. Blood sampling is a minimally invasive method that can be repeated at any time and is well tolerated by patients. Monitoring the dynamics of Hsp70 levels in the blood using the compHsp70 ELISA at diagnosis, during therapy, and in the context of follow-up examinations has the potential to make a considerable contribution to the assessment of therapeutic response and to the prediction and identification of relapse. As no larger valid studies have been conducted on individualized risk-adapted follow-up programs [3,4], larger-scale studies to test the suitability of circulating Hsp70 as a biomarker for therapy failure in breast carcinoma patients and to define cut-off values are of great importance and urgency, as are equivalent studies in other cancer settings. Since Hsp70 is overexpressed and released by many different tumor entities [17,21,22], including breast, endometrial, prostate, lung, and head and neck carcinomas, as shown in this study, circulating Hsp70 values can have prognostic values in a large variety of different tumor entities [38,39,40,45,46].
In addition to circulating Hsp70, the enumeration of CTCs plays an important role in the categorization of cancer, patient prognosis, and the prediction of metastatic spread [47,48]. However, the rarity of this cell type in the peripheral blood and the loss of EpCAM expression on CTCs after EMT limits the capacity of EpCAM mAb-based approaches to effectively isolate CTCs [47]. Herein, we demonstrated that a CTC isolation system that targets mHsp70 on tumor cells [27] is superior to an EpCAM mAb-based system since at least equal, but mostly higher numbers of CTCs could be isolated from the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received a [177Lu]-PSMA-radioligand therapy later on [49], endometrial carcinoma [50], lung and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Moreover, elevated circulating Hsp70 levels in the blood, which are most likely derived from Hsp70 that is actively released in extracellular lipid micro-vesicles from viable tumor cells [21], do not negatively affect the mHsp70-targeted CTC isolation process.

5. Conclusions

Measuring Hsp70 concentrations and CTC counts in the circulation of patients with different tumor entities using the compHsp70 ELISA and an mHsp70-targeting bead approach has the potential to make a significant contribution in the early assessment of therapy response and prognosis (enumeration of CTCs) of patients with different tumor entities. Further studies with higher patient numbers are warranted to confirm and validate the results.

6. Patents

The compHsp70 ELISA is patented by multimmune GmbH, Munich, Germany (US 11,460,472—other applications pending).

Author Contributions

Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal Analysis, A.X.; Methodology, Investigation, C.G., A.-K.S., N.T., E.R., H.H., V.M., A.T. and K.L.K.H.; Clinical Material, Data Analysis, Data Curation, M.K., V.S.-K., S.Z., I.S., R.T., R.S. and K.E.; Proof-reading, Data Curation, A.G.P.; Conceptualization, Data Curation, Writing—Review and Editing, Validation, Funding Acquisition, Project Administration, G.M. Investigation, Clinical Material, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants BMBF 02NUK064A, 02NUK064B, BMWi, ZF4320102CS7, Bayerische Forschungsstiftung BAYCELLator, Dr. med. Erwin Braun Stiftung.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee) of the Medical Faculty of the University Hospitals.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Anett Lange for editorial work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. G.M. is founder and CSO of multimmune GmbH, Munich, Germany. A.G.P. is the CEO of multimmune GmbH. The funders have no role in the design of the study, in the collection of material, analysis or interpretation of the data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Waks, A.G.; Winer, E.P. Breast cancer treatment: A review. JAMA 2019, 321, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005, 365, 1687–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goldhirsch, A.; Wood, W.C.; Coates, A.S.; Gelber, R.D.; Thurlimann, B.; Senn, H.J.; Panel, M. Strategies for subtypes—Dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: Highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011, 22, 1736–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vardaki, I.; Ozcan, S.S.; Fonseca, P.; Lin, S.H.; Logothetis, C.J.; Yachnin, J.; Ullen, A.; Panaretakis, T. Transcriptomic analysis of plasma exosomes provides molecular information of response to cabazitaxel treatment in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 2023, 83, 950–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gang, X.; Wang, G. Liquid biopsy in prostate cancer: Current status and future challenges of clinical application. Aging Male 2021, 24, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, X.; Liu, J.; Yan, X.; Disanto, M.E.; Zhang, X. Heat shock protein 70 and 90 family in prostate cancer. Life 2022, 12, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Radons, J. The human hsp70 family of chaperones: Where do we stand? Cell Stress Chaperones 2016, 21, 379–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hartl, F.U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996, 381, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lindquist, S.; Craig, E.A. The heat-shock proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988, 22, 631–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kabakov, A.E.; Gabai, V. Heat Shock Proteins and Cytoprotection: Atp-Deprived Mammalian Cells; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ritossa, F.M. A new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and dnp in drosophila. Experientia 1962, 18, 571–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Richard, V.; Kaeffer, N.; Thuillez, C. Delayed protection of the ischemic heart—From pathophysiology to therapeutic applications. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 1996, 10, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kukreja, R.C.; Kontos, M.C.; Loesser, K.E.; Batra, S.K.; Qian, Y.Z.; Gbur, C.J., Jr.; Naseem, S.A.; Jesse, R.L.; Hess, M.L. Oxidant stress increases heat shock protein 70 mrna in isolated perfused rat heart. Am. J. Physiol. 1994, 267, H2213–H2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ciocca, D.R.; Calderwood, S.K. Heat shock proteins in cancer: Diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and treatment implications. Cell Stress Chaperones 2005, 10, 86–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stangl, S.; Gehrmann, M.; Riegger, J.; Kuhs, K.; Riederer, I.; Sievert, W.; Hube, K.; Mocikat, R.; Dressel, R.; Kremmer, E.; et al. Targeting membrane heat-shock protein 70 (hsp70) on tumors by cmhsp70.1 antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Calderwood, S.K.; Khaleque, M.A.; Sawyer, D.B.; Ciocca, D.R. Heat shock proteins in cancer: Chaperones of tumorigenesis. Trends Biochem.Sci. 2006, 31, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Athanassiadou, P.; Petrakakou, E.; Sakelariou, V.; Zerva, C.; Liossi, A.; Michalas, S.; Athanassiades, P. Expression of p53, bcl-2 and heat shock protein (hsp72) in malignant and benign ovarian tumours. Eur. J Cancer Prev. 1998, 7, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Maio, A. Heat shock proteins: Facts, thoughts, and dreams. Shock 1999, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Albakova, Z.; Armeev, G.A.; Kanevskiy, L.M.; Kovalenko, E.I.; Sapozhnikov, A.M. Hsp70 multi-functionality in cancer. Cells. 2020, 9, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Werner, C.; Stangl, S.; Salvermoser, L.; Schwab, M.; Shevtsov, M.; Xanthopoulos, A.; Wang, F.; Dezfouli, A.B.; Tholke, D.; Ostheimer, C.; et al. Hsp70 in liquid biopsies-a tumor-specific biomarker for detection and response monitoring in cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gunther, S.; Ostheimer, C.; Stangl, S.; Specht, H.M.; Mozes, P.; Jesinghaus, M.; Vordermark, D.; Combs, S.E.; Peltz, F.; Jung, M.P.; et al. Correlation of hsp70 serum levels with gross tumor volume and composition of lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with squamous cell and adeno non-small cell lung cancer. Front Immunol. 2015, 6, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Botzler, C.; Schmidt, J.; Luz, A.; Jennen, L.; Issels, R.; Multhoff, G. Differential hsp70 plasma-membrane expression on primary human tumors and metastases in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 77, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Viswanath, B.; Kim, S. Influence of nanotoxicity on human health and environment: The alternative strategies. Rev. Env. Contam. Toxicol. 2017, 242, 61–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dongre, A.; Weinberg, R.A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2019, 20, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, P.; Dai, Q.; Wu, X. New insight in urological cancer therapy: From epithelial-mesenchymal transition (emt) to application of nano-biomaterials. Env. Res. 2023, 229, 115672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Breuninger, S.; Stangl, S.; Werner, C.; Sievert, W.; Lobinger, D.; Foulds, G.A.; Wagner, S.; Pickhard, A.; Piontek, G.; Kokowski, K.; et al. Membrane hsp70-a novel target for the isolation of circulating tumor cells after epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Front Oncol. 2018, 8, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Romano, G. Modalities to enumerate circulating tumor cells in the bloodstream for cancer prognosis and to monitor the response to the therapy. Drugs Today 2017, 53, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grover, P.K.; Cummins, A.G.; Price, T.J.; Roberts-Thomson, I.C.; Hardingham, J.E. Circulating tumour cells: The evolving concept and the inadequacy of their enrichment by epcam-based methodology for basic and clinical cancer research. Ann. Oncol. 2014, 25, 1506–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dirix, L.; Buys, A.; Oeyen, S.; Peeters, D.; Liegeois, V.; Prove, A.; Rondas, D.; Vervoort, L.; Marien, V.; Laere, S.V.; et al. Circulating tumor cell detection: A prospective comparison between cellsearch(r) and rarecyte(r) platforms in patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022, 193, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Konigsberg, R.; Obermayr, E.; Bises, G.; Pfeiler, G.; Gneist, M.; Wrba, F.; De Santis, M.; Zeillinger, R.; Hudec, M.; Dittrich, C. Detection of epcam positive and negative circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2011, 50, 700–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Wit, S.; Manicone, M.; Rossi, E.; Lampignano, R.; Yang, L.; Zill, B.; Rengel-Puertas, A.; Ouhlen, M.; Crespo, M.; Berghuis, A.M.S.; et al. Epcam(high) and epcam(low) circulating tumor cells in metastatic prostate and breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 35705–35716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shaffer, D.R.; Leversha, M.A.; Danila, D.C.; Lin, O.; Gonzalez-Espinoza, R.; Gu, B.; Anand, A.; Smith, K.; Maslak, P.; Doyle, G.V.; et al. Circulating tumor cell analysis in patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 2023–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Seigneuric, R.; Mjahed, H.; Gobbo, J.; Joly, A.L.; Berthenet, K.; Shirley, S.; Garrido, C. Heat shock proteins as danger signals for cancer detection. Front. Oncol. 2011, 1, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, H.W.; Lee, E.H.; Kim, S.H.; Roh, M.S.; Jung, S.B.; Choi, Y.C. Heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) expression is associated with poor prognosis in intestinal type gastric cancer. Virchows Arch. 2013, 463, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mano, R.; Zilber, S.; Di Natale, R.G.; Kedar, D.; Lifshitz, D.A.; Yossepowitch, O.; Bankiel, J.; Margel, D. Heat shock proteins 60 and 70 are associated with long-term outcome of t1-stage high-grade urothelial tumors of the bladder treated with intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin immunotherapyk. In Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 531.e9–531.e17. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tavassol, F.; Starke, O.F.; Kokemuller, H.; Wegener, G.; Muller-Tavassol, C.C.; Gellrich, N.C.; Eckardt, A. Prognostic significance of heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) in patients with oral cancer. Head Neck Oncol. 2011, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mouawad, N.; Capasso, G.; Ruggeri, E.; Martinello, L.; Severin, F.; Visentin, A.; Facco, M.; Trentin, L.; Frezzato, F. Is it still possible to think about hsp70 as a therapeutic target in onco-hematological diseases? Biomolecules 2023, 13, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Daugaard, M.; Rohde, M.; Jaattela, M. The heat shock protein 70 family: Highly homologous proteins with overlapping and distinct functions. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 3702–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Graf, L.; Barabas, L.; Madaras, B.; Garam, N.; Malati, E.; Horvath, L.; Prohaszka, Z.; Horvath, Z.; Kocsis, J. High serum hsp70 level predicts poor survival in colorectal cancer: Results obtained in an independent validation cohort. Cancer Biomark. 2018, 23, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Maio, A.; Vazquez, D. Extracellular heat shock proteins: A new location, a new function. Shock 2013, 40, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lindner, M.; Pogge Von Strandmann, E.P. The role of extracellular hsp70 in the function of tumor-associated immune cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Broquet, A.H.; Thomas, G.; Masliah, J.; Trugnan, G.; Bachelet, M. Expression of the molecular chaperone hsp70 in detergent-resistant microdomains correlates with its membrane delivery and release. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 21601–21606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lancaster, G.I.; Febbraio, M.A. Exosome-dependent trafficking of hsp70: A novel secretory pathway for cellular stress proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 23349–23355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chanteloup, G.; Cordonnier, M.; Isambert, N.; Bertaut, A.; Hervieu, A.; Hennequin, A.; Luu, M.; Zanetta, S.; Coudert, B.; Bengrine, L.; et al. Monitoring hsp70 exosomes in cancer patients’ follow up: A clinical prospective pilot study. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2020, 9, 1766192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cordonnier, M.; Chanteloup, G.; Isambert, N.; Seigneuric, R.; Fumoleau, P.; Garrido, C.; Gobbo, J. Exosomes in cancer theranostic: Diamonds in the rough. Cell Adh. Migr. 2017, 11, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alix-Panabieres, C.; Pantel, K. The circulating tumor cells: Liquid biopsy of cancer. Klin. Lab. Diagn. 2014, 4, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Patell, K.; Kurian, M.; Garcia, J.A.; Mendiratta, P.; Barata, P.C.; Jia, A.Y.; Spratt, D.E.; Brown, J.R. Lutetium-177 PSMA for the treatment of metastatic castarte resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2023, 7, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Francini, S.; Duraes, M.; Rathat, G.; Macioce, V.; Mollevi, C.; Pages, L.; Ferrer, C.; Cayrefourcq, L.; Alix-Panabieres, C. Circulating Tumor Cell Detection by Liquid Biopsy during Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Study. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Time-points 1 to 5 of blood sampling of patients with breast cancer after surgery.
Figure 1. Time-points 1 to 5 of blood sampling of patients with breast cancer after surgery.
Biomedicines 11 02276 g001
Figure 2. Hsp70 concentrations in the blood of recurrence-free patients with (n = 31) and without receiving radiotherapy (n = 2) (A), with (n = 6) and without (n = 27) receiving chemotherapy (B) and with (n = 12) and without (n = 21) receiving anti-hormone therapy (C).
Figure 2. Hsp70 concentrations in the blood of recurrence-free patients with (n = 31) and without receiving radiotherapy (n = 2) (A), with (n = 6) and without (n = 27) receiving chemotherapy (B) and with (n = 12) and without (n = 21) receiving anti-hormone therapy (C).
Biomedicines 11 02276 g002
Figure 3. Hsp70 concentrations in the blood of a patient with endometrial cancer (n = 1) (A) and a patient with contralateral recurrent breast cancer (n = 1) (B) compared to recurrence-free (n = 33) patients. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3. Hsp70 concentrations in the blood of a patient with endometrial cancer (n = 1) (A) and a patient with contralateral recurrent breast cancer (n = 1) (B) compared to recurrence-free (n = 33) patients. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Biomedicines 11 02276 g003aBiomedicines 11 02276 g003b
Figure 4. Circulating Hsp70 levels in the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers (n = 109) and patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma (mCRPC; n = 16), metastatic (n = 1), and non-metastatic (n = 2) endometrial carcinoma (n = 1), lung carcinoma (n = 19), head and neck carcinoma n = 24) before the start of any therapy as determined with the compHsp70 ELISA. Mann–Whitney test; statistical differences **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; ns not significant.
Figure 4. Circulating Hsp70 levels in the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers (n = 109) and patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma (mCRPC; n = 16), metastatic (n = 1), and non-metastatic (n = 2) endometrial carcinoma (n = 1), lung carcinoma (n = 19), head and neck carcinoma n = 24) before the start of any therapy as determined with the compHsp70 ELISA. Mann–Whitney test; statistical differences **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; ns not significant.
Biomedicines 11 02276 g004
Figure 5. Enumeration of CTCs in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (n = 16) (A), a patient with metastatic endometrial carcinoma (n = 1) and 2 patients with non-metastatic endometrial carcinoma (B), lung carcinoma (n = 12) and head and neck carcinoma (n = 16) as isolated using cmHsp70.1 and EpCAM mAb-conjugated beads (C,D). Representative photomicrographs of CTCs and a leukocyte derived from patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma following CTC isolation using cmHsp70.1 mAb-conjugated beads (E). DAPI (blue) and fluorescence-labeled antibodies directed against CD45 (red) and cytokeratin (green) identify the nucleus, leukocytes, and epithelial cells. Scale bar, 20 µm. * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Enumeration of CTCs in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (n = 16) (A), a patient with metastatic endometrial carcinoma (n = 1) and 2 patients with non-metastatic endometrial carcinoma (B), lung carcinoma (n = 12) and head and neck carcinoma (n = 16) as isolated using cmHsp70.1 and EpCAM mAb-conjugated beads (C,D). Representative photomicrographs of CTCs and a leukocyte derived from patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma following CTC isolation using cmHsp70.1 mAb-conjugated beads (E). DAPI (blue) and fluorescence-labeled antibodies directed against CD45 (red) and cytokeratin (green) identify the nucleus, leukocytes, and epithelial cells. Scale bar, 20 µm. * p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 11 02276 g005aBiomedicines 11 02276 g005b
Table 1. Patient characteristics, therapies, and clinical outcomes.
Table 1. Patient characteristics, therapies, and clinical outcomes.
Breast Cancer Patients
8 Years after Diagnosis
(n = 35)
Grade
T1 (a–c)30
T25
N030
N15
M035
G17
G226
G32
TherapyYesNo
Surgery350
Radiotherapy332
40 Gy3
60 Gy24
66 Gy6
Chemotherapy728
Anti-hormone therapy1223
Estrogen receptor+ 350
Progesterone receptor+350
Clinical status
after 8 years
Recurrence-freeContralateral recurrence/
Endometrial cancer
332
Table 2. Characteristics of patients with metastatic (n = 1) and non-metastatic (n = 2) endometrial carcinoma, metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC; n = 16) and tumor response 3 months after [177Lu]-PSMA-radioligand therapy, lung carcinoma (n = 19) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC; n = 24) and circulating Hsp70 values.
Table 2. Characteristics of patients with metastatic (n = 1) and non-metastatic (n = 2) endometrial carcinoma, metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC; n = 16) and tumor response 3 months after [177Lu]-PSMA-radioligand therapy, lung carcinoma (n = 19) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC; n = 24) and circulating Hsp70 values.
TumorNumber of PatientsHsp70 Values
(ng/mL)
Metastatic endometrial
carcinoma
11171
Non-metastatic endometrial carcinoma2200.4
Metastatic castration resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC)16272.8 ± 433.7
N01
N113
Unknown2
M1a2
M1b10
M1c4
Therapies
Pretreatments for metastatic prostate cancer
Next generation hormonal treatment16
Taxane-based chemotherapy9
Best treatment response 3 months after [177Lu]-PSMA-
radioligand therapy
PR4
SD3
PD7
Lost to follow-up2
TumorNumber of patientsHsp70 values
(ng/mL)
Lung carcinoma19161.7 ± 253.9
IA4
IB2
IIB3
IIIA3
IVA/B4
Pulmonary metastases
renal/urothelial2127.5
Carcinoid11.23
Head and neck carcinoma24196.4 ± 300.8
Oral cavity6
Oropharynx8
Hypopharynx3
Tonsil3
Thyroid1
Uvula1
Tongue2
Abbreviations: PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xanthopoulos, A.; Samt, A.-K.; Guder, C.; Taylor, N.; Roberts, E.; Herf, H.; Messner, V.; Trill, A.; Holzmann, K.L.K.; Kiechle, M.; et al. Hsp70—A Universal Biomarker for Predicting Therapeutic Failure in Human Female Cancers and a Target for CTC Isolation in Advanced Cancers. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082276

AMA Style

Xanthopoulos A, Samt A-K, Guder C, Taylor N, Roberts E, Herf H, Messner V, Trill A, Holzmann KLK, Kiechle M, et al. Hsp70—A Universal Biomarker for Predicting Therapeutic Failure in Human Female Cancers and a Target for CTC Isolation in Advanced Cancers. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(8):2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xanthopoulos, Alexia, Ann-Kathrin Samt, Christiane Guder, Nicholas Taylor, Erika Roberts, Hannah Herf, Verena Messner, Anskar Trill, Katharina Larissa Kreszentia Holzmann, Marion Kiechle, and et al. 2023. "Hsp70—A Universal Biomarker for Predicting Therapeutic Failure in Human Female Cancers and a Target for CTC Isolation in Advanced Cancers" Biomedicines 11, no. 8: 2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082276

APA Style

Xanthopoulos, A., Samt, A. -K., Guder, C., Taylor, N., Roberts, E., Herf, H., Messner, V., Trill, A., Holzmann, K. L. K., Kiechle, M., Seifert-Klauss, V., Zschaeck, S., Schatka, I., Tauber, R., Schmidt, R., Enste, K., Pockley, A. G., Lobinger, D., & Multhoff, G. (2023). Hsp70—A Universal Biomarker for Predicting Therapeutic Failure in Human Female Cancers and a Target for CTC Isolation in Advanced Cancers. Biomedicines, 11(8), 2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop