Next Article in Journal
The Role of Oxidative Stress and Therapeutic Potential of Antioxidants in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibody Based Delivery of Toxins and Other Active Molecules for Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering the Role of Pyrvinium Pamoate in the Generation of Integrated Stress Response and Modulation of Mitochondrial Function in Myeloid Leukemia Cells through Transcriptome Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antibody-Based Immunotoxins for Colorectal Cancer Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/biomedicines9121870
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Validity of Anti-PSMA ScFvD2B as a Theranostic Tool: A Narrative-Focused Review

by
Barbara Frigerio
1,
Elena Luison
1,
Alessandro Desideri
2,
Federico Iacovelli
2,
Chiara Camisaschi
1,
Ettore C. Seregni
3,
Silvana Canevari
4,† and
Mariangela Figini
1,*,†
1
Biomarkers Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technical Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Laboratory of Structural Biology, Department of Biology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
3
Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
4
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equally contributing last Author.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(12), 1870; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121870
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Revised: 3 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Based Delivery of Toxins and Other Active Molecules for Cancer Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer among men, and its diagnosis and adequate staging are fundamental. Among the biomarkers identified in recent years for PCa management, prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA), physiologically expressed at a low level on healthy prostate and in other normal tissues and highly overexpressed in PCa, represents a reliable marker ideal for imaging and therapy. The development of anti-PSMA antibodies, such as D2B, demonstrated slow clearance of intact antibodies compared with fragments resulting in low tumor-to-blood ratios; however, the modular structural and functional nature of antibodies allowed the generation of smaller fragments, such as scFvs. In this review of the anti-PSMA antibody fragment scFvD2B, we combined further characterization of its biomolecular and tissue cross-reactivity characteristics with a comprehensive summary of what has already been performed in preclinical models to evaluate imaging and therapeutic activities. A molecular dynamics study was performed, and ScFvD2B occupied a limited conformational space, characterized by low-energy conformational basins, confirming the high stability of the protein structure. In the cross-reactivity study, the weak/absent immunoreactivity in non-tumor tissues was comparable to the PSMA expression reported in the literature. Biodistribution studies and therapeutic treatments were conducted in different animal models obtained by subcutaneous or locoregional injection of PSMA-positive-versus-negative xenografts. The maximum tumor uptake was observed for 123I(SPECT), 124I(PET), and optical imaging, which avoids kidney accumulation (compared with radiometals) and leads to an optimal tumor-to-kidney and tumor-to-background ratios. Regarding its possible use in therapy, experimental data suggested a strong and specific antitumor activity, in vitro and in vivo, obtained using CAR-T or NK-92/CAR cells expressing scFvD2B. Based on presented/reviewed data, we consider that scFvD2B, due to its versatility and robustness, seems to: (i) overcome some problems observed in other studied scFvs, very often relatively unstable and prone to form aggregates; (ii) have sufficient tumor-to-background ratios for targeting and imaging PSMA-expressing cancer; (iii) significantly redirect immune killing cells to PSMA-positive tumors when inserted in second-generation CAR-T or NK-92/CAR cells. These data suggest that our product can be considered the right reagent to fill the gap that still exists in PCa diagnosis and treatment.

1. Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer among men, with an estimated 191,930 new cases and 33,330 deaths in 2020 in the United States [1]. Currently, PCa treatment depends on the stage of the disease at initial diagnosis; thus, diagnosis of PCa and adequate staging are fundamental for clinical and patient care, and imaging plays a central role.
Conventional imaging techniques such as bone scintigraphy, computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance are current backbones in diagnostic medicine; these techniques are largely restricted to providing anatomical and physiological information. To optimize the management of PCa patients, positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with emerging radiopharmaceuticals and fluorescence may provide accurate staging of primary disease, the restaging of tumor recurrence, and detection of metastatic disease. PET/CT allows direct visualization of tumor-dependent metabolism or target expression combined with morphological information, potentially allowing for detecting and localizing small lesions with an elevated metabolic rate or high target expression. Different PET radiotracers have been used to evaluate PCa, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), which has limited sensitivity due to low 18F-FDG-uptake in most PCa tumors, and 11C- or 18F-choline, but their accuracy is limited for initial staging and localization of tumor lesions in early biochemical recurrence [2,3,4,5].
Targeted therapies for cancer are aimed at maximizing tumor kill and minimizing toxicity, and their development requires, on one side, the identification of good targets and, on the other, site-selective targeting molecules. On the target side, in the last twenty years, many efforts have been aimed at identifying proteins present in cancer cells but not in normal cells or that are more abundant in cancer cells, where they exert a role in proliferation. Along with PSA, several new biomarkers have been identified in recent years for PCa, and they include cell surface proteins, glycoproteins, receptors, enzymes, and peptides [6].
Among biomarkers used for PCa managing, PSMA represents a valuable TAA (tumor-associated antigen) for PCa theranostics. PSMA is a rapid internalized and not-secreted receptor with folate hydrolase and carboxypeptidase activities. PSMA is a type II membrane glycoprotein (100–120 kDa) with an intracellular domain (amino acids 1–18), a transmembrane domain (amino acids 19–43), and an extracellular domain (amino acids 44–750) [7]. PSMA is physiologically expressed at a low level on healthy prostate and in other tissues, including, e.g., kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, brain, salivary glands, breast, kidney, and ovary [8,9]. In some of these organs, upon cancerization, PSMA expression significantly increases; in addition, a middle–high PSMA expression is recorded in other cancers rising from PSMA negative normal tissues such as lung and pancreas, and melanoma. PSMA levels increase up to 1000-fold on about 90% of primary and metastatic PCa cells including bone and lymph node metastases [8,9,10]. Most importantly, there is a strong correlation of PSMA expression with high tumor-grade and stage as well as metastatic and hormone-refractory disease [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Due to these properties, PSMA constitutes a reliable molecular marker for PCa and other PSMA-expressing tumors ideal for imaging and therapy. These data are summarized in Figure 1 [12,13,14,15,16,17].
On the side of selective targeting molecules, most of them are small molecules or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The latter represents one of the best examples of ‘intelligent’ bullets that arrive directly at the target with high target selectivity. Many mAbs are being tested or studied, and about thirty of them have already completed the experimental phase and have been introduced in the clinic [18]. In addition, the mAb molecular structure is easily manageable, revolutionizing the treatment of an ever-increasing number of cancers since they could be exploited as effective anticancer therapies using platforms such as antibody–drug conjugates, small-molecule drug conjugates, radioimmunoconjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells [19,20].

2. PSMA-Targeted Diagnosis/Therapy with Monoclonal Antibodies

The first commercialized anti-PSMA antibody was 7E11, which, as radioconjugate 111In-capromab-pendetide (ProstaScint) [21], was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1996. However, ProstaScint binds to an intracellular epitope of PSMA and was therefore not capable of visualizing viable PCa cells, leading to poor clinical performance [22]. This limitation was partially overcome by the development of another anti-PSMA antibody, J591, that binds extracellular epitopes of PSMA, and was largely used in preclinical and clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00195039; NCT02410577). Other mAbs directed to PSMA extracellular epitopes, as well as their conjugates, are being evaluated in a variety of experimental and preclinical models [23,24,25], but only IgGD2B [26], similarly to J591 [27], has been extensively characterized, demonstrating low tumor-to-blood ratios that can occur owing to relatively slow clearance of intact antibodies compared with fragments [28]. Different groups analyzed IgGD2B tumor-targeting capacity (Table 1, refs. [28,29,30,31,32] and compared it with those of F(Ab)2 and FAb fragments [28].

3. ScFvD2B Characterization and Development

Since the licensing of the first monoclonal antibody in 1986, antibodies have become the larger class of biopharmaceuticals [18]. However, the long circulatory half-life (3–4 days) typical of whole antibodies, as well as low tumor penetrability, the long delay between injection and imaging, and nonspecific accumulation associated with inflammation [33,34,35], limits their use in clinical practice. Utilizing engineered antibody fragments may address these challenges, as size reduction and removal of Fc function decrease serum half-life [28].
The modular structural and functional nature of Ab allowed the generation of smaller fragments, such as scFvs. These Ab fragments over a conventional Ab have several advantages (faster clearance from the circulation and shorter time for maximum tumor uptake) and some limitations (relative instability, low affinity [36], and absence of effector functions). The main history, format, and production methods are excellently summarized in a recent review [37]. IgGD2B antibody produced by conventional hybridoma technology was reshaped to scFv format, as described in Frigerio et al., 2013 [26]. ScFvD2B as its parental IgGD2B carries a V segment of the VK1 family (12/13 subgroup) and the VH belonging to the VH3 family.
ScFvD2B was initially produced in a prokaryotic system and later, in the roadmap for characterization of a clinical-grade reagent [38], in a GLP eukaryotic system. Our biochemical data indicate that scFvD2B did not aggregate, and not more than 5–8% dimers are present.
The binding specificity of our scFvD2B against PSMA was verified on different cell lines expressing or not expressing PSMA and showed good and specific binding to the cell lines expressing the antigen, whereas the non-related cell lines were negative. To enforce our data and add further characterization of scFvD2B in this current review, we also report some new and unpublished data.
Since stability is a very important characteristic for a bioreagent, to further identify the scFvD2B physical property, a molecular dynamics simulation study was performed, as depicted in Figure 2. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) values, describing the deviation of the Cα atoms from the initial model as a function of time, indicate high stability of the protein structure. The largest flexibility was localized on the linker peptide connecting the heavy (VH) and light chains (VL). ScFvD2B model sampled a limited conformational space, characterized by low-energy basins, confirming its high stability.
These data suggest that our product shows to overcome some problems often observed in other studied scFvs, such as a relatively large instability [41] and a propensity to form aggregates [42,43]. Aggregation strongly can limit in vivo applications of protein therapeutics, including MAbs, since they may reduce the MAb efficacy and heavily contribute to immunogenicity.
His and Myc tag were also removed from ScFvD2B for a useful clinical-grade reagent with no change in biodistribution and targeting properties (data not shown).
In the perspective of clinical application, scFvD2B was evaluated by tissue cross-reactivity studies to assess possible reactions with non-target organs and tissues in humans. The study was carried out in accordance with the ‘Points to Consider in the Manufacture and Testing of Monoclonal Antibody Products for Human Use’ (1997) issued by the Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research of the FDA, the ‘Guideline on Development, Production, Characterization and Specifications for Monoclonal Antibodies and Related Products’ (2008) issued by the EMEA/EMA and the EMA ICH S6 (R1) ‘Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals’ (2011) and subsequent addendum (2012). Specific binding of scFvD2B was weakly seen in epithelium of the prostate, breast, and pituitary, in the endothelium of the ovary and endometrium, and diffusely throughout myelinated regions of the cerebellum, cerebral cortex, spinal cord, colon, stomach, and peripheral nerve. These results are consistent with PSMA expression reported with anti-PSMA entire antibodies (see Figure 1). The weak binding to these non-tumor tissues is consistent with its expression and function since PSMA is responsible for folate transport and absorption in several tissues justifying its distribution. A similar immunohistochemical reactivity pattern on human frozen tissues was obtained with the anti-PSMA whole antibodies 7E11 and J591 without unacceptable side effects in prostate cancer patients.

4. ScfvD2B as a Diagnostic Agent

ScfvD2B can be exploited as an imaging diagnostic agent after conjugation with a label; chemical conjugation is a critical step in attaching isotopes to an antibody fragment. Radionuclide conjugation can be directly performed to the antibody fragment at certain amino acids or, for radiometals, indirectly performed through a chelating moiety, such as NOTA or DOTA. Labeling should proceed quickly, with high efficiency, and the immunoconjugate should be stable under in vivo conditions. Both direct conjugations may lead to the incorporation of the radionuclide at random sites on the antibody fragment, potentially impacting immunoreactivity if the antigen-binding site is modified and affecting biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of the probe. In fact, several studies [26,28] have demonstrated that many factors, such as the labeling chemistry, could influence the targeting and pharmacokinetics of an antibody fragment [44,45].
When proteins labeled with a radiometal bind to a rapid internalizing antigen such as PSMA, the label will be trapped in the lysosomes, leading to increased accumulation of activity over time. On the other hand, directly iodinated proteins will be rapidly catabolized and expelled from cells, reducing the kidney background noise. The rate of internalization is an intrinsic characteristic of the receptor and, upon binding with IgGD2B or its scFv, PSMA rapidly internalizes [26]; efficient receptor-mediated endocytosis should be considered as part of a therapeutic strategy through the use of engineered antibody conjugates. In addition to nuclear imaging, the use of antibodies and/or antibody fragments is increasingly being explored in the field of biomedical optical imaging, which mainly includes fluorescence or bioluminescence-based imaging probes. Optical imaging modalities have emerged as a preferable alternative over radioisotope-based imaging and have become increasingly popular for intraoperative staging to enable cellular resolution imaging of tumor margins during surgical resection. The main advantages are the high sensitivity, specificity, low cost, more practical fluorochrome design and conjugation method, portability of imaging instruments, and absence of ionizing radiations [46]. In near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) optical imaging, cells are labeled with dyes or proteins that emit light of a limited spectrum when excited by different wavelengths of light.
ScFvD2B was conjugated with 111In and 177Lu, upon cross-ligation with NOTA and DOTA, respectively, and directly with the radio-iodinated isotopes 123I, 124I, and 131I and the fluorescent probe X770. The possibility to expose scFvD2B to harsh conditions, such as low pH during radiolabeling, is an important screening parameter for the selection of reagents suitable for diagnostic and therapeutic applications that require chemical manipulations without loss of specificity and functionality.
Biodistribution studies were conducted in different animal models obtained by subcutaneous or locoregional injection of PSMA-positive or PSMA-negative cell lines. In each model, tumor growth was monitored over time, and when the tumors reached an appropriate volume (200–400 mm3), non-tumor-bearing mice or mice bearing tumors in one or both flanks were injected via the tail vein with scFvD2B labeled. Despite scFvD2B’s rapid clearance from the blood, its strength of binding to PSMA was proved to be sufficient to have a rapid localization in target tissues. The maximum tumor uptake was observed for 123I (SPECT), 124I (PET), and optical imaging, which avoids kidney accumulation (compared with radiometals) and leads to an optimal tumor-to-kidney and tumor-to-background ratios.
The results of biodistribution obtained with the scFvD2B immunoconjugated with 111In, 131I, 123I, 124I, 177Lu, and X770 were summarized in Figure 3 [46,47,48,49,50].
In particular, the ability of X770-scFvD2B to detect prostate cancer was monitored by fluorescent reflectance imaging (FRI) and by fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT), and the accumulation of the labeled scFvD2B with respect to the labeled control scFv increased 10-fold at 72 h and 20-fold at 96 h.

5. ScFv as a Therapeutic Agent

Adoptive immunotherapy appears to be a promising strategy to control the advanced stages of cancer by specific targeting, in particular through chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy or, more recently, CAR-NK [51,52,53]. The high curative potential against hematologic malignancies afforded by CAR T cells supports the large number of current clinical trials (nine directed against PSMA: 8 as CAR-T and 1 as CAR-NK) (www.Clinicaltrials.gov at 9 December 2021). Despite the advancements of CAR-T technology in the treatment of hematological malignancies, solid tumors still represent a challenge. To overcome current limits with CAR-T therapy, other cellular effectors than T lymphocytes are under study as possible candidates for CAR-engineered cancer immunotherapy. Nonetheless, CAR-T cell treatment is associated with heavy adverse events in a significant number of patients, and, additionally, the logistics and costs of such an approach pose significant challenges for making it available to a large number of potentially suitable recipients. A novel approach involves the NK-92 cell line, which mediates strong cytotoxic responses against various tumor cells but has no effect on nonmalignant healthy counterparts. Due to its versatility, scFvD2B was proposed as a therapeutic agent as second-generation CAR-T [54] or NK-92/CAR- to redirect immune killing cells on PSMA-positive tumors.
Zuccolotto et al. [55] demonstrated a strong and specific antitumor activity with scFvD2B CAR T, both in vitro and in vivo; in particular, they demonstrated that CAR-expressing lentiviral vectors efficiently transduced short-term activated PBMC, which, in turn, were readily stimulated to produce cytokines and to exert a relevant cytotoxic activity by engagement with PSMA+ prostate tumor cells. Upon in vivo transfer in tumor-bearing mice, CAR-transduced T cells were capable of completely eradicating disseminated neoplasia in more than 60% of treated NOD/SCID animals. Montagner et al. [56] demonstrated that the genetically modified NK-92/CAR cells acquired the ability to specifically and effectively lyse PSMA-expressing PCa cells, in contrast to parental NK/92 cells. Furthermore, the adoptive transfer of gene-modified NK-92 cells reduced tumor growth in different PCa mouse tumor models and significantly enhanced survival. Antitumor activities of both CAR-T and NK/92 CAR are shown in Figure 4 [55,56].
The robust ex vivo expansion of NK-92 cells to high numbers, the potent antitumor activity, the immediate availability as a fully defined and characterized cell product with reduced costs, and the lack of risks of manufacturing failures make this cell line an ideal platform for the development of off-the-shelf therapeutics CAR-engineered variants to target other solid tumors.
The therapeutic potential of scFvD2B, due to its advantageous properties and versatilities, could be exploited to redirect cytotoxic drugs such as immunotoxins [57] (currently under evaluation).

6. Conclusions

Based on the presented/reviewed data, we consider that the scFvD2B, due to its versatility and robustness, seems to: (i) overcome some problems observed with other scFvs, very often relatively unstable and prone to form aggregates; (ii) have sufficient tumor-to-background ratios for targeting and imaging PSMA-expressing cancer; (iii) significantly redirect immune killing cells to PSMA-positive tumors when inserted in second-generation CAR-T or NK-92/CAR cells. These data suggest that our product can be considered the right reagent to fill the gap in PCa diagnosis and treatment.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: B.F., M.F. and S.C.; Financial support: M.F.; Collection and assembly of data: B.F., C.C. and E.L.; Experimental data generation: A.D. and F.I.; Data analysis and interpretation: B.F., E.L., A.D., F.I., C.C., E.C.S., S.C. and M.F.; Manuscript writing: B.F., M.F. and S.C.; Final approval of manuscript: All authors; Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Grant No. RF-2016-02363661 to M.F.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere gratitude and acknowledgment to Antonio Florita for his precious help in the Reference section creation with the Bibliography Software Package Zotero.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding agencies had no role in study design and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, nor in writing this paper or the decision to submit it for publication.

Abbreviations

CAR TChimeric Antigen Receptor T cell.
CTcomputed tomography.
DOTA1:4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid.
18F-FDG18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
FMTfluorescence molecular tomography.
FRIfluorescent reflectance imaging.
GAMDGaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.
GLPgood laboratory practice.
Mabmonoclonal antibody.
NIRFnear-infrared fluorescence.
NOTA2-(p-isothiocyanato benzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid.
NKnatural killer.
PcaProstate Cancer.
PCAPrincipal component analysis.
PETpositron emission tomography.
PSMAprostate-specific membrane antigen.
RMSDroot mean square deviation.
RMSFroot mean square fluctuation.
scFvsingle-chain fragment variable.
SPECTsingle-photon emission computed tomography.
TAAtumor-associated antigen.
VHheavy chain.
VLlight chains.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kitajima, K.; Murphy, R.C.; Nathan, M.A. Choline PET/CT for Imaging Prostate Cancer: An Update. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2013, 27, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Umbehr, M.H.; Müntener, M.; Hany, T.; Sulser, T.; Bachmann, L.M. The Role of 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Urol. 2013, 64, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Krause, B.J.; Souvatzoglou, M.; Treiber, U. Imaging of Prostate Cancer with PET/CT and Radioactively Labeled Choline Derivates. Urol. Oncol. 2013, 31, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bauman, G.; Belhocine, T.; Kovacs, M.; Ward, A.; Beheshti, M.; Rachinsky, I. 18F-Fluorocholine for Prostate Cancer Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012, 15, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ross, J.S.; Sheehan, C.E.; Fisher, H.A.G.; Kaufman, R.P.J.; Kaur, P.; Gray, K.; Webb, I.; Gray, G.S.; Mosher, R.; Kallakury, B.V.S. Correlation of Primary Tumor Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression with Disease Recurrence in Prostate Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 6357–6362. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghosh, A.; Heston, W.D.W. Tumor Target Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) and Its Regulation in Prostate Cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 91, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawakami, M.; Nakayama, J. Enhanced Expression of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Gene in Prostate Cancer as Revealed by in Situ Hybridization. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 2321–2324. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mhawech-Fauceglia, P.; Zhang, S.; Terracciano, L.; Sauter, G.; Chadhuri, A.; Herrmann, F.R.; Penetrante, R. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Protein Expression in Normal and Neoplastic Tissues and Its Sensitivity and Specificity in Prostate Adenocarcinoma: An Immunohistochemical Study Using Mutiple Tumour Tissue Microarray Technique. Histopathology 2007, 50, 472–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raff, A.B.; Gray, A.; Kast, W.M. Prostate Stem Cell Antigen: A Prospective Therapeutic and Diagnostic Target. Cancer Lett. 2009, 277, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Perico, M.E.; Grasso, S.; Brunelli, M.; Martignoni, G.; Munari, E.; Moiso, E.; Fracasso, G.; Cestari, T.; Naim, H.Y.; Bronte, V.; et al. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Assembles a Macromolecular Complex Regulating Growth and Survival of Prostate Cancer Cells “in Vitro” and Correlating with Progression “in Vivo”. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 74189–74202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kinoshita, Y.; Kuratsukuri, K.; Landas, S.; Imaida, K.; Rovito, P.M.J.; Wang, C.Y.; Haas, G.P. Expression of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Normal and Malignant Human Tissues. World J. Surg. 2006, 30, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kasoha, M.; Unger, C.; Solomayer, E.-F.; Bohle, R.M.; Zaharia, C.; Khreich, F.; Wagenpfeil, S.; Juhasz-Böss, I. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Expression in Breast Cancer and Its Metastases. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2017, 34, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salas Fragomeni, R.A.; Amir, T.; Sheikhbahaei, S.; Harvey, S.C.; Javadi, M.S.; Solnes, L.B.; Kiess, A.P.; Allaf, M.E.; Pomper, M.G.; Gorin, M.A.; et al. Imaging of Nonprostate Cancers Using PSMA-Targeted Radiotracers: Rationale, Current State of the Field, and a Call to Arms. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Nimmagadda, S.; Pullambhatla, M.; Chen, Y.; Parsana, P.; Lisok, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Mease, R.; Rowe, S.P.; Lupold, S.; Pienta, K.J.; et al. Low-Level Endogenous PSMA Expression in Nonprostatic Tumor Xenografts Is Sufficient for In Vivo Tumor Targeting and Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chang, S.S.; Reuter, V.E.; Heston, W.D.; Bander, N.H.; Grauer, L.S.; Gaudin, P.B. Five Different Anti-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Antibodies Confirm PSMA Expression in Tumor-Associated Neovasculature. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 3192–3198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Silver, D.A.; Pellicer, I.; Fair, W.R.; Heston, W.D.; Cordon-Cardo, C. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Normal and Malignant Human Tissues. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mullard, A. FDA Approves 100th Monoclonal Antibody Product. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vezina, H.E.; Cotreau, M.; Han, T.H.; Gupta, M. Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Cancer Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 57, S11–S25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diamantis, N.; Banerji, U. Antibody-Drug Conjugates--an Emerging Class of Cancer Treatment. Br. J. Cancer 2016, 114, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rosenthal, S.A.; Haseman, M.K.; Polascik, T.J. Utility of Capromab Pendetide (ProstaScint) Imaging in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Tech. Urol. 2001, 7, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Wilkinson, S.; Chodak, G. The Role of 111indium-Capromab Pendetide Imaging for Assessing Biochemical Failure after Radical Prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2004, 172, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nováková, Z.; Foss, C.A.; Copeland, B.T.; Morath, V.; Baranová, P.; Havlínová, B.; Skerra, A.; Pomper, M.G.; Barinka, C. Novel Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing Human Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) as Research and Theranostic Tools. Prostate 2017, 77, 749–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moffett, S.; Mélançon, D.; DeCrescenzo, G.; St-Pierre, C.; Deschénes, F.; Saragovi, H.U.; Gold, P.; Cuello, A.C. Preparation and Characterization of New Anti-PSMA Monoclonal Antibodies with Potential Clinical Use. Hybridoma 2007, 26, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, C.T.; Guo, X.; Bařinka, C.; Lupold, S.E.; Pomper, M.G.; Gabrielson, K.; Raman, V.; Artemov, D.; Hapuarachchige, S. Development of 5D3-DM1: A Novel Anti-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Antibody-Drug Conjugate for PSMA-Positive Prostate Cancer Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 17, 3392–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frigerio, B.; Fracasso, G.; Luison, E.; Cingarlini, S.; Mortarino, M.; Coliva, A.; Seregni, E.; Bombardieri, E.; Zuccolotto, G.; Rosato, A.; et al. A Single-Chain Fragment against Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen as a Tool to Build Theranostic Reagents for Prostate Cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 2223–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roumeguère, T.; Aoun, F.; Albisinni, S.; Mjaess, G. Antibodies Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positive Prostate Cancer: From Diagnostic Imaging to Theranostics. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2021, 33, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lütje, S.; van Rij, C.M.; Franssen, G.M.; Fracasso, G.; Helfrich, W.; Eek, A.; Oyen, W.J.; Colombatti, M.; Boerman, O.C. Targeting Human Prostate Cancer with 111In-Labeled D2B IgG, F(Ab’)2 and Fab Fragments in Nude Mice with PSMA-Expressing Xenografts. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2015, 10, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lütje, S.; Rijpkema, M.; Franssen, G.M.; Fracasso, G.; Helfrich, W.; Eek, A.; Oyen, W.J.; Colombatti, M.; Boerman, O.C. Dual-Modality Image-Guided Surgery of Prostate Cancer with a Radiolabeled Fluorescent Anti-PSMA Monoclonal Antibody. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lütje, S.; Heskamp, S.; Franssen, G.M.; Frielink, C.; Kip, A.; Hekman, M.; Fracasso, G.; Colombatti, M.; Herrmann, K.; Boerman, O.C.; et al. Development and Characterization of a Theranostic Multimodal Anti-PSMA Targeting Agent for Imaging, Surgical Guidance, and Targeted Photodynamic Therapy of PSMA-Expressing Tumors. Theranostics 2019, 9, 2924–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lucío, M.I.; Opri, R.; Pinto, M.; Scarsi, A.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Meneghetti, M.; Fracasso, G.; Prato, M.; Vázquez, E.; Herrero, M.A. Targeted Killing of Prostate Cancer Cells Using Antibody-Drug Conjugated Carbon Nanohorns. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 8821–8832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Czerwińska, M.; Fracasso, G.; Pruszyński, M.; Bilewicz, A.; Kruszewski, M.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Lankoff, A. Design and Evaluation of (223)Ra-Labeled and Anti-PSMA Targeted NaA Nanozeolites for Prostate Cancer Therapy—Part I. Materials 2020, 13, 3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, H.; Rajasekaran, A.K.; Moy, P.; Xia, Y.; Kim, S.; Navarro, V.; Rahmati, R.; Bander, N.H. Constitutive and Antibody-Induced Internalization of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 4055–4060. [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith-Jones, P.M.; Vallabhajosula, S.; Navarro, V.; Bastidas, D.; Goldsmith, S.J.; Bander, N.H. Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies Specific to the Extracellular Domain of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Preclinical Studies in Nude Mice Bearing LNCaP Human Prostate Tumor. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2003, 44, 610–617. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lütje, S.; Boerman, O.C.; van Rij, C.M.; Sedelaar, M.; Helfrich, W.; Oyen, W.J.G.; Mulders, P.F.A. Prospects in Radionuclide Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2012, 72, 1262–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rudnick, S.I.; Lou, J.; Shaller, C.C.; Tang, Y.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.P.; Weiner, L.M.; Marks, J.D.; Adams, G.P. Influence of Affinity and Antigen Internalization on the Uptake and Penetration of Anti-HER2 Antibodies in Solid Tumors. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 2250–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bates, A.; Power, C.A. David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments. Antibodies 2019, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dijkers, E.C.F.; Kosterink, J.G.W.; Rademaker, A.P.; Perk, L.R.; van Dongen, G.A.M.S.; Bart, J.; de Jong, J.R.; de Vries, E.G.E.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N. Development and Characterization of Clinical-Grade 89Zr-Trastuzumab for HER2/Neu ImmunoPET Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Vasiliauskaité-Brooks, I.; Sounier, R.; Rochaix, P.; Bellot, G.; Fortier, M.; Hoh, F.; De Colibus, L.; Bechara, C.; Saied, E.M.; Arenz, C.; et al. Structural Insights into Adiponectin Receptors Suggest Ceramidase Activity. Nature 2017, 544, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Miao, Y.; Feher, V.A.; McCammon, J.A. Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics: Unconstrained Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3584–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, L.S.; Liu, A.P.; Yang, J.H.; Dong, Y.Q.; Li, L.W.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.C.; Liu, J. Construction, Expression and Characterization of the Engineered Antibody against Tumor Surface Antigen, P185(c-ErbB-2). Cell Res. 2003, 13, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Arndt, K.M.; Müller, K.M.; Plückthun, A. Factors Influencing the Dimer to Monomer Transition of an Antibody Single-Chain Fv Fragment. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 12918–12926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Röthlisberger, D.; Honegger, A.; Plückthun, A. Domain Interactions in the Fab Fragment: A Comparative Evaluation of the Single-Chain Fv and Fab Format Engineered with Variable Domains of Different Stability. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 347, 773–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garousi, J.; Orlova, A.; Frejd, F.Y.; Tolmachev, V. Imaging Using Radiolabelled Targeted Proteins: Radioimmunodetection and Beyond. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 2020, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tsai, W.-T.K.; Wu, A.M. Aligning Physics and Physiology: Engineering Antibodies for Radionuclide Delivery. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2018, 61, 693–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mazzocco, C.; Fracasso, G.; Germain-Genevois, C.; Dugot-Senant, N.; Figini, M.; Colombatti, M.; Grenier, N.; Couillaud, F. In Vivo Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using an Anti-PSMA ScFv Fragment as a Probe. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Frigerio, B.; Benigni, F.; Luison, E.; Seregni, E.; Pascali, C.; Fracasso, G.; Morlino, S.; Valdagni, R.; Mezzanzanica, D.; Canevari, S.; et al. Effect of Radiochemical Modification on Biodistribution of ScFvD2B Antibody Fragment Recognising Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen. Immunol. Lett. 2015, 168, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Frigerio, B.; Franssen, G.; Luison, E.; Satta, A.; Seregni, E.; Colombatti, M.; Fracasso, G.; Valdagni, R.; Mezzanzanica, D.; Boerman, O.; et al. Full Preclinical Validation of The123I-Labeled Anti-PSMA Antibody Fragment ScFvD2B for Prostate Cancer Imaging. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 10919–10930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Frigerio, B.; Morlino, S.; Luison, E.; Seregni, E.; Lorenzoni, A.; Satta, A.; Valdagni, R.; Bogni, A.; Chiesa, C.; Mira, M.; et al. Anti-PSMA (124)I-ScFvD2B as a New Immuno-PET Tool for Prostate Cancer: Preclinical Proof of Principle. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. CR 2019, 38, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carpanese, D.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Ocampo-Garcia, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Salvarese, N.; Figini, M.; Fracasso, G.; De Nardo, L.; Bolzati, C.; Rosato, A.; et al. Development of (177)Lu-ScFvD2B as a Potential Immunotheranostic Agent for Tumors Overexpressing the Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ullah, K.; Addai Peprah, F.; Yu, F.; Shi, H. The Application of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen in CART-cell Therapy for Treatment of Prostate Carcinoma (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 3136–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wang, D.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lu, G.; Liu, B. IL-23 and PSMA-Targeted Duo-CAR T Cells in Prostate Cancer Eradication in a Preclinical Model. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zuccolotto, G.; Penna, A.; Fracasso, G.; Montagner, I.M.; Carpanese, D.; Tosi, A.; Rosato, A. PSMA-Specific Car-Engineered T Cells for Prostate Cancer: CD28 outperforms combined CD28-41BB “Super-Stimulation”. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 708073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Satta, A.; Mezzanzanica, D.; Turatti, F.; Canevari, S.; Figini, M. Redirection of T-Cell Effector Functions for Cancer Therapy: Bispecific Antibodies and Chimeric Antigen Receptors. Future Oncol. Lond. Engl. 2013, 9, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zuccolotto, G.; Fracasso, G.; Merlo, A.; Montagner, I.M.; Rondina, M.; Bobisse, S.; Figini, M.; Cingarlini, S.; Colombatti, M.; Zanovello, P.; et al. PSMA-Specific CAR-Engineered T Cells Eradicate Disseminated Prostate Cancer in Preclinical Models. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Montagner, I.M.; Penna, A.; Fracasso, G.; Carpanese, D.; Dalla Pietà, A.; Barbieri, V.; Zuccolotto, G.; Rosato, A. Anti-PSMA CAR-Engineered NK-92 Cells: An Off-the-Shelf Cell Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Cells 2020, 9, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bruell, D.; Bruns, C.J.; Yezhelyev, M.; Huhn, M.; Müller, J.; Ischenko, I.; Fischer, R.; Finnern, R.; Jauch, K.-W.; Barth, S. Recombinant Anti-EGFR Immunotoxin 425(ScFv)-ETA’ Demonstrates Anti-Tumor Activity against Disseminated Human Pancreatic Cancer in Nude Mice. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2005, 15, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 09 01870 g001 550
Figure 1. PSMA expression occurs in a range of solid tumors; the percentages of expression in tumor (red) and nonmalignant tissues (blue) have been derived from the literature using different detection techniques, numbers of specimens, and thresholds for determining expression [12,13,14,15,16,17].
Figure 1. PSMA expression occurs in a range of solid tumors; the percentages of expression in tumor (red) and nonmalignant tissues (blue) have been derived from the literature using different detection techniques, numbers of specimens, and thresholds for determining expression [12,13,14,15,16,17].
Biomedicines 09 01870 g001
Biomedicines 09 01870 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) ScFvD2B molecular model, built using the crystal structure of the single-chain variable fragment recognizing the human adiponectin receptor 2 (PDB ID: 5LX9, 2.4 Å resolution) from Mus musculus as a template [39]. The two sequences’ alignment shows a 60% identity. (B) Time-dependent root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the ScFvD2B model calculated for a 100 ns Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics (GAMD) simulation [40]. (C) The root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) values, describing the time-averaged deviation of the Cα atoms position, confirms the stability and the low fluctuation of the ScFvD2B structure. (D) Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis, coupled to the projection of the first two main motions to the reweighting of the GaMD simulation, recovering the original free energy profiles of the antibody fragment. The conformational space sampled by the single chain is directly proportional to the number of points plotted on the graph, whereas the color, ranging from blue to red, indicates the energy associated with the sampled conformations.
Figure 2. (A) ScFvD2B molecular model, built using the crystal structure of the single-chain variable fragment recognizing the human adiponectin receptor 2 (PDB ID: 5LX9, 2.4 Å resolution) from Mus musculus as a template [39]. The two sequences’ alignment shows a 60% identity. (B) Time-dependent root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the ScFvD2B model calculated for a 100 ns Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics (GAMD) simulation [40]. (C) The root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) values, describing the time-averaged deviation of the Cα atoms position, confirms the stability and the low fluctuation of the ScFvD2B structure. (D) Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis, coupled to the projection of the first two main motions to the reweighting of the GaMD simulation, recovering the original free energy profiles of the antibody fragment. The conformational space sampled by the single chain is directly proportional to the number of points plotted on the graph, whereas the color, ranging from blue to red, indicates the energy associated with the sampled conformations.
Biomedicines 09 01870 g002
Biomedicines 09 01870 g003 550
Figure 3. Summary of biodistribution and localization data with scFvD2B conjugates in PCa mice models.
Figure 3. Summary of biodistribution and localization data with scFvD2B conjugates in PCa mice models.
Biomedicines 09 01870 g003
Biomedicines 09 01870 g004 550
Figure 4. Antitumor activities over time of both scfvD2B CART (left panel) and NK/92 CAR (right panel), expressed as % of mice survival.
Figure 4. Antitumor activities over time of both scfvD2B CART (left panel) and NK/92 CAR (right panel), expressed as % of mice survival.
Biomedicines 09 01870 g004
Table
Table 1. IgGD2B applications in PCa preclinical models [28,29,30,31,32].
Table 1. IgGD2B applications in PCa preclinical models [28,29,30,31,32].
PurposeImagingImaging/TherapyTherapyTherapy
Compound name111In-IgGD2B111In-DTPA-D2B-IRDye700DXD2B–cisplatin–CNH conjugate223RaA-silane-PEG-D2B
IgGD2B manipulationConjugation with ITC-DTPA and 111In radiolabelingConjugation with IRDye700DX and DTPA and 111In radiolabelingConjugation with CNH and cisplatin in a prodrug form Conjugation with
NaA zeolite nanocarrier
and 223Ra radiolabeling
Model systemIn vivo xenografts
(PSMA+ vs. PSMA−		In vivo xenografts
(PSMA+ vs. PSMA−)		In vitro cell lines
(PSMA+ vs. PSMA−)		In vitro cell lines
(PSMA+ vs. PSMA−)
ResultsXenografts clearly visualized in SPECT/CT with specific differentiation of PSMA+ imaging at 168 h post-injectionXenografts clearly visualized using µSPECT/CT.
PSMA-tPDT efficiently inhibit growth of PSMA-expressing tumors and prolong median survival		Selective binding, uptake, and killing of PSMA+ activities are enhanced when the nanosystems are shielded with BSASelective binding, uptake, and killing of PSMA+
Main ConclusionsIntact IgGD2B can be used when high concentrations of the antibody in the tumor are requiredNear-infrared imaging can be used to guide surgical removal.
PSMA-targeted photodynamic therapy (tPDT) can act on tumor remnants not removable surgically		This new system allows the variation of the quantity of drug or antibody attached to the nanostructure to play with the killing efficacy223RaA-silane-PEG-D2B might be a promising agent for the targeted treatment of human PCa
Reference[28,29][30][31][32]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frigerio, B.; Luison, E.; Desideri, A.; Iacovelli, F.; Camisaschi, C.; Seregni, E.C.; Canevari, S.; Figini, M. Validity of Anti-PSMA ScFvD2B as a Theranostic Tool: A Narrative-Focused Review. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121870

AMA Style

Frigerio B, Luison E, Desideri A, Iacovelli F, Camisaschi C, Seregni EC, Canevari S, Figini M. Validity of Anti-PSMA ScFvD2B as a Theranostic Tool: A Narrative-Focused Review. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(12):1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frigerio, Barbara, Elena Luison, Alessandro Desideri, Federico Iacovelli, Chiara Camisaschi, Ettore C. Seregni, Silvana Canevari, and Mariangela Figini. 2021. "Validity of Anti-PSMA ScFvD2B as a Theranostic Tool: A Narrative-Focused Review" Biomedicines 9, no. 12: 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121870

APA Style

Frigerio, B., Luison, E., Desideri, A., Iacovelli, F., Camisaschi, C., Seregni, E. C., Canevari, S., & Figini, M. (2021). Validity of Anti-PSMA ScFvD2B as a Theranostic Tool: A Narrative-Focused Review. Biomedicines, 9(12), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121870

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop