Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Antidepressant Prescription in Adolescents Newly Diagnosed with Depression in Germany
Previous Article in Journal
The Associations between Depressive Symptoms and Self-Rated Health in Relation to Sense of Coherence among Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of Three Executive Function Batteries in a Preschool-Aged Sample
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Contribution of Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition to Reading Comprehension Among Japanese Adolescents

1
Attention Lab, School of Education, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 67017, Israel
2
Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 67017, Israel
3
SHO-zemi Labs, Shonan Seminar Co., Ltd., Tokyo 150-6222, Japan
4
Independent Researcher, Towson, MD 21204, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2024, 11(10), 1245; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101245
Submission received: 29 August 2024 / Revised: 10 October 2024 / Accepted: 12 October 2024 / Published: 16 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive and Linguistic Development in Children and Adolescents)

Abstract

:
Background: Previous studies demonstrated the influential role of sustained attention in the reading comprehension of alphabetic writing systems. However, there is limited understanding of how these cognitive functions contribute to reading comprehension in non-alphabetic systems, such as Japanese. This study seeks to explore this gap, focusing on how sustained attention and response inhibition function in a writing system where some of the characters represent meanings rather than sounds, introducing another layer of difficulty in the complex process of reading; Methods: Seventy-five Japanese 9th grade students performed a task to assess sustained attention and response inhibition. The cognitive test was carried out using tablets to enable feasible parallel group administration while maintaining high comparability with ecological classroom settings. Reading comprehension was measured using an exam that the participants took as part of their educational routine; Results: Our results indicate that both sustained attention and response inhibition significantly contributed to the reading comprehension of Japanese 9th grade students; Conclusions: These results replicate and expand previous studies documenting the contribution of sustained attention on the reading comprehension of alphabetic writing systems to a non-alphabetic system. Moreover, our findings unravel another important cognitive factor, namely response inhibition in reading comprehension. We suggest that response inhibition may play a crucial role in reading non-alphabetic writing systems that pose high cognitive demands, such as Japanese.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Reading comprehension is a complex skill fundamental to academic and professional success. The impact of good or poor reading comprehension on learning extends beyond a specific discipline, age group, or culture [1]. The inter-individual differences in reading comprehension proficiency among readers are immense in any given language. Achieving reading comprehension depends on the integration and synchronization of various reading skills, as well as cognitive functions such as word-reading accuracy, word-reading fluency, verbal working memory, and attention, to name a few [2,3,4,5].
Many previous studies based on the Simple View of Reading (SVR) model have focused on individual differences and investigated various language and cognitive abilities that underlie reading comprehension. The SVR model, widely used in reading research, emphasizes the importance of word recognition and language comprehension [6,7,8,9]. According to this model, language-related skills such as phonological awareness and processing, word and sentence decoding speed, vocabulary and syntactic knowledge, and language comprehension are key factors in explaining reading comprehension [10,11,12,13].
Another approach that extends beyond the SVR is the active view of reading, emphasizing the reader’s active engagement in the reading process, and the role of executive functions in reading comprehension [8,9]. Within this framework, previous studies have investigated the input of basic domain-general cognitive factors, such as sustained attention, inhibitory control, and working memory, to reading comprehension [5,10,14]. The current study focuses on investigating the contribution of individual differences in sustained attention and response inhibition to reading comprehension among Japanese adolescents.
Sustained attention, the ability to allocate attention to a prolonged task over time [15], has been associated with reading comprehension in native readers in several languages, such as English, Spanish, and Hebrew [2,5,16]. Stern and Shalev [5] found significant differences in reading comprehension efficiency (among other reading abilities) between adolescent Hebrew readers with either a high, average, or low ability to sustain attention over time. Those with a high ability to sustain attention were better in answering comprehension questions correctly and reading faster than individuals with an average or low ability to sustain attention. In adolescent English readers, Arrington [2] found that good levels of sustained attention facilitate successful reading comprehension by regulating working memory contents while reading. In a study conducted in Mexico with Spanish readers, Silva-Pereyra and colleagues [16] found that elementary school students with poor reading comprehension skills showed a poor ability to sustain attention, compared to those with an adequate grade-level reading ability. However, response inhibition, the ability to withhold a dominant pre-potent response [17], was not found to be consistently predictive of reading comprehension in these languages [5,18,19].
On the other hand, among young Chinese readers, response inhibition has been found to predict reading comprehension in several studies [18,20]. In a cross-cultural study comparing young Chinese and English readers in Canada, response inhibition was found to be predictive of reading comprehension among Chinese readers, but not in English readers [18]. While English, Spanish, and Hebrew use an alphabetic writing system with a relatively small number of characters, the Chinese writing system is logographic and contains thousands of characters [21]. Researchers have previously argued that Chinese readers must often suppress the phonological and semantic activation of similar-looking characters while reading because some Chinese characters may be visually confusing [19,20]. However, it is not clear from the existing data whether response inhibition remains relevant for logographic reading with older children or adults, or whether response inhibition is only relevant during the early stages of learning.
In the current study, we investigated the involvement of two domain-general basic cognitive components in the reading comprehension of another non-alphabetic writing system—Japanese. The Japanese writing system is unique because it combines three scripts: one logographic system—Kanji (originating from Chinese characters), and two forms of syllabic scripts: KanaHiragana and Katakana. These three scripts are interwoven in Japanese texts, and are used to write different classes of words [14]. Japanese readers must master the three scripts, switching between the orthographic systems while reading texts, and interestingly attain a much faster average reading speed, even in comparison to Chinese [22]. It should be noted that while most previous studies that documented the impact of inhibitory control on Chinese reading comprehension were conducted with preschool and young elementary school children [18,20,23], the participants in the present study were adolescents who are naturally much more experienced with reading and are frequently exposed to academic activities that involve processing complex texts.
Research on gender differences in sustained attention has shown mixed findings. In some studies, males demonstrated faster reaction times and fewer lapses of attention, but they also exhibited more false starts (i.e., responding prior to the target onset) compared to females, suggesting greater impulsivity [24]. Conversely, in tasks such as the Mesulam Continuous Performance Test (M-CPT), females were found to commit fewer errors, indicating better attentional control [25]. However, other studies, such as those using the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), found minimal gender differences [26], suggesting variability in results based on the specific task used. Research on gender differences in response inhibition has yielded mixed results as well. Some studies found no significant differences between males and females in inhibitory control [27,28]. Additionally, some studies report a tendency for females to respond faster but with more errors compared to males [29], while others have found that women exhibited slower response inhibition [30].

1.2. The Current Study

The aim of the current study was to examine the contribution of two basic domain-general cognitive components, sustained attention and response inhibition, to reading comprehension among adolescent Japanese readers. Based on previous studies that have demonstrated that sustained attention predicted reading comprehension competency among English, Spanish, and Hebrew readers, and assuming that sustained attention is by definition required in reading texts independent of the writing system type, we hypothesized that good sustained attention would contribute to the proficiency of reading comprehension of Japanese adolescents. Furthermore, since Japanese texts combine syllabic and logographic writing systems, we hypothesized that response inhibition (i.e., the ability to withhold a pre-potent response) would also play a unique role in Japanese adolescent readers’ reading comprehension proficiency. In addition, we sought to explore potential gender differences in these cognitive components, as previous research has shown mixed results.
Additionally, we aimed to collect data in a naturalistic classroom setting to reflect the ecological environment in which students typically engage with reading tasks. The use of tablet-based cognitive tasks facilitated the parallel administration of the cognitive assessment in groups, while maintaining ecological validity similar to real-life classroom conditions [31]. This manuscript not only expands the research on reading comprehension by investigating cognitive factors in the context of Japanese, a non-alphabetic language system, but also employs a tablet-based version of a standard cognitive assessment task, allowing us to examine sustained attention and response inhibition in a context that is more reflective of typical educational settings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Seventy-five 9th grade Japanese students (thirty-six females) participated in this study. Two participants were discarded from the analysis due to high error rates (see outliers and data analysis below), leaving a final sample of seventy-three participants (Mean age = 14.76 years, SD = 0.3). A boxplot of the participants’ age is presented in Figure 1. All participants were students in 2 out of 10 classes in a four-day intensive summer study camp, organized by a private secondary school, in August 2017. The participants were enrolled in a private after-school tuition program specifically designed to prepare students for entry into top-tier high schools. The participants were classified as being at ISCED Level 2, according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), which corresponds to lower secondary education [32]. As far as we know, none of the participants diagnosed with specific learning disabilities or with attention deficit hyperactivity. No assessment for ADHD symptoms or vision impairments was conducted.

2.2. Assessment Tools

Sustained attention and response inhibition. The Conjunctive Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) [15] was administered using an OpenSesame version 3.1.7 Android Python 2.7 package on 10.1-inch display AndroidTM tablets. Each participant performed the CCPT individually on a separate tablet device. The size of each stimulus ranged from 1.2 to 1.8 cm in height, and from 1.2 to 1.9 cm in width. There were 16 possible stimuli resulting from the factorial combinations of a square, circle, triangle, or star appearing in red, blue, green, or yellow (see Figure 2). Each stimulus was presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) and was separated from the next by an interval of 1000, 1500, 2000, or 2500 ms. The various stimulus types and inter-stimulus intervals were randomly intermixed. The target stimulus (i.e., red square) appeared in 30% of the trials, whereas in 17.5% of the trials, a differently-colored square appeared, and in 17.5% of the trials, a red non-square geometric shape appeared. In the remaining 35% of the trials, a non-target shape that shared neither identity nor color with the target appeared. The task consisted of a single block of 320 trials, preceded by 15 practice trials. The task duration was approximately 12 min. Sustained attention and response inhibition were assessed using four measures: means and standard deviations of reaction times of hits (M-RT and SD-RT, respectively), omission errors rate, assessing sustained attention, and commission errors rate, assessing response inhibition. Omission errors refer to the rate of missed targets, and are calculated by dividing the number of omission errors by the total number of targets. Commission errors, on the other hand, refer to the identification of a non-target stimulus as a target, and are calculated by dividing the number of commission errors by the total number of non-targets. Small values of SD-RT and a low omission errors rate reflect a better ability to sustain attention over time. Small values of commission errors reflect a good ability to inhibit responses to non-targets. The split-half reliability coefficient for M-RT is 0.98 and for SD-RT is 0.83, and the test-retest reliability coefficients for M-RT is 0.76 and for SD-RT is 0.62.
Reading Comprehension. The Japanese test consisted of 5 problem sets spanning 14 pages and lasted 50 min. It was designed to assess the reading fluency expected of 9th grade students preparing for entrance exams, where proficiency in Kanji and Kana is presumed. All three writing systems are integrated throughout the entire test, including both the questions and the reading materials. The first set was comprised of questions on the understanding of specific particles (auxiliary verbs), and a Haiku (short poem) (20% of the total score). The second set was comprised of questions on classical Japanese reading comprehension of about 700 characters (16% of the total score). The next two problem sets were comprised of long reading comprehension texts in modern Japanese, both of which were over 2 pages long with approximately 3600 to 4000 characters (24% and 30% of the total score, respectively). The final set consisted of questions on graphs and dialogue texts that required students to interpret the content (10% of the total score). The test’s scale ranged from 0 to 100, and the scores of the participants in this study ranged from 42 to 94.

2.3. Procedure

The study protocol was approved by an IRB committee. Parents were informed a minimum of two weeks prior to data collection, and students were asked for their assent prior to testing.
Data collection. The administration of the CCPT took place during a four-day residential summer tutoring program held at Kuwarubi Hotel, a lakeside resort near Mount Fuji, southwest of Tokyo. This intensive summer program was conducted in August 2017. The CCPT was administered using tablets during the first day of the summer camp, in two different classrooms, to all students simultaneously. Participants were instructed to respond as quickly and as accurately as possible as soon as the target stimulus appeared, and to withhold their responses to all other non-target stimuli. Responses were carried out by touching a dark-grey rectangle, located at the dominant hand side of the screen, using the thumb of their dominant hand. A click sound followed each touch in the dark-grey area.
To assess their reading comprehension, we used the July 2017 Japanese mock exam, which was administered before the summer camp. The Japanese test scores were provided later by the schools’ managers, as part of standard educational practice.

2.4. Outliers and Data Analysis

Two participants were excluded from data analyses due to very high rate of omission errors in the CCPT task (>15%). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS for Windows version 25 (SPSS Inc., Panasonic, New York, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) were calculated for the CCPT measures (M-RT, SD-RT, omission errors rate, and commission errors rate) and for the Japanese reading comprehension scores. Forward multiple-regression analysis was used to determine if sustained attention and response inhibition (as measured by the CCPT) can significantly predict the reading comprehension of Japanese adolescent students. The Japanese reading comprehension score was used as the dependent variable, and the four CCPT measures were entered as predictors. The significance threshold for the regression analysis was set at p < 0.05. Independent sample t-tests were used to examine gender differences in reading comprehension and the RT-based measures of sustained attention (M-RT and SD-RT). The t-tests were two-tailed, with significance set at p < 0.05. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d. Additionally, for measures that did not meet normality assumptions (i.e., commission errors rate and omission errors rate), the Mann-Whitney U test was applied. As with the t-tests, the Mann-Whitney U tests were two-tailed, and significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The results of the reading comprehension exam and the various measures from the Conjunctive Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) used to assess sustained attention and response inhibition are presented in Table 1. Descriptive statistics include means, standard deviations, medians, interquartile ranges, skewness, and kurtosis values.
To examine whether sustained attention and/or response inhibition (as measured by the CCPT) significantly predicts Japanese reading comprehension scores, we first conducted a Pearson correlation analysis to assess the relationships between the study variables (see Table 2 for the results). As can be seen from Table 2, reading comprehension significantly correlated with three out of the four CCPT measures: −0.337 with omission errors rate, −0.333 with commission errors rate, and −0.275 with SD-RT. Notably, there was no significant correlation between the omission errors rate and the commission errors rate (r = 0.165, p > 0.05). This indicates that these two types of errors reflect distinct aspects of performance: lapses of attention and response inhibition failures, respectively.
Following this, we performed a forward multiple regression analysis, with the Japanese reading comprehension score as the dependent variable and the four CCPT measures as predictors. The regression analysis is summarized in Table 3.
As shown in Table 3, omission errors and commission errors were found to be significant predictors, explaining 19.3% of the variance (R2 = 0.193; significance of F change: F(1,70) = 6.865, p = 0.011). That is, both sustained attention and response inhibition significantly contribute to reading comprehension among Japanese adolescents. The RT-based measures of sustained attention (M-RT and SD-RT) were excluded in the forward regression model, and were found to be insignificant predictors of reading comprehension (An exploratory Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was conducted on all the study’s variables, including the sub-section scores of the Reading Comprehension test. This additional analysis revealed patterns consistent with those observed in the regression analysis above, which included the overall Reading Comprehension score).
Finally, we tested whether there were any gender differences in our sample on reading comprehension, sustained attention, and response inhibition (see Table 4 and Figure 3). There was no age difference between girls and boys (girls: n = 36, mean age = 14.8, SD = 0.30; boys: n = 37, mean age = 14.7, SD = 0.29). We carried out a series of independent sample t-tests to compare the performance of boys and girls in the reading comprehension test score, and the RT-based measures of sustained attention (M-RT and SD-RT in the CCPT), which all turned out insignificant (all p values > 0.05, two-tailed). The gender differences in commission errors and omission errors were examined by the Mann-Whitney U test. A significant difference was found between boys and girls in the commission errors rate (median = 4% vs. median = 1.8%, respectively; Mann-Whitney U = 392.5, p < 0.005, two-tailed) but not in the omission errors rate (Mann-Whitney U = 570, n.s).

4. Discussion

In this study, we aimed to replicate previous studies that found sustained attention contributes to reading comprehension in alphabetic writing systems, and expand these findings to a non-alphabetic writing system. Our findings not only confirm the significant role of sustained attention in reading comprehension among adolescent Japanese readers, but also introduce a novel dimension by demonstrating the relevance of response inhibition in this context. Our focus on sustained attention and response inhibition aligns with the active view of the reading model, emphasizing the reader’s active engagement in the reading process, and the crucial role of domain-general cognitive mechanisms in reading comprehension in a non-alphabetic writing system, such as Japanese.
Reading comprehension is a vital proficiency, essential for every learner in literate cultures throughout their entire lifespan [1]. In addition to the various phonological skills, word decoding, and linguistic skills that are necessary to the process of extracting meaning out of written texts [2,3,4,5], several domain-general cognitive factors may impact the efficiency of reading comprehension [5,10,14]. While phonology, decoding, and linguistic knowledge were studied in numerous previous studies, and found to be substantial in different writing systems and languages [10,13], the specific impact of domain-general factors such as sustained attention and/or response inhibition on reading comprehension in different script systems, languages, and cultures was scarcely explored. While the majority of previously aforementioned studies investigated reading comprehension in alphabetic script languages [2,5,16], the Japanese writing system is a unique and highly complex non-alphabetic system that combines three types of scripts simultaneously: a logographic and two syllabic scripts. As a result, Japanese readers must acquire high decoding and linguistic skills to master these different scripts. Moreover, they must switch between orthographic systems when reading texts, and process a large number of characters while refraining from identifying and encoding letter and word errors, which may increase the demand for inhibitory control [14,22].
In this field study, we found that sustained attention was a significant predictor of reading comprehension. This finding replicates previous studies conducted among English, Spanish, and Hebrew readers [2,5,16]. Our results lend further support to the claim that the involvement of sustained attention in reading comprehension is universal and indifferent to the type of orthography in different languages. Interestingly, response inhibition equally and uniquely contributes to the prediction of reading comprehension along with sustained attention in adolescent Japanese readers. In a previous study that used the same neuropsychological task to assess sustained attention and response inhibition (CCPT), response inhibition did not predict reading comprehension among adolescent Hebrew readers [5]. We suggest that response inhibition might be another domain-general cognitive mechanism that plays an important role in reading comprehension in writing systems that pose high cognitive demands, such as Japanese, which requires mastering three scripts including logographic decoding. Further studies are warranted to examine this hypothesis. Interestingly, gender differences emerged specifically in the rate of commission errors, with males showing a significantly higher rate compared to females.
Another contribution of the present study is the age of the participants. While most previous studies that documented the impact of inhibitory control on Chinese reading comprehension were conducted with preschool and young elementary school children [18,20,23], the participants in the present study were adolescents who cope with advanced texts and are required to use reading comprehension skills intensively daily. Our results show that inhibitory control plays an important role in reading comprehension in non-alphabetic writing systems, not only in the early stages of reading acquisition, but also among fluent readers. Notably, the CCPT employed in the present study utilizes simple geometric shapes to assess sustained attention and response inhibition, refraining purposely from using letter-like stimuli. Reading comprehension on the other hand, involves various domain-specific functions, such as letter recognition, word recognition, vocabulary, and many other language skills. Moreover, reading comprehension in Japanese poses high cognitive demands, particularly with the integration of the logographic Kanji system. Hence, this study emphasizes the significant role of basic domain-general cognitive mechanisms, such as sustained attention and response inhibition in reading comprehension in adolescents who use non-alphabetical writing systems. This raises the question of whether cognitive training that addresses attention and inhibitory control [5] can improve reading comprehension.
In the present study, we employed a new tablet version of the CCPT to enable fast and economical group administration in an ecological setting. In all previous studies that have used the CCPT, the task was administered using either desktop or laptop computers [33,34,35,36]. While no direct comparison can be made between the present study and the previous studies, the successful replication of a main finding from the original study on Hebrew readers by Stern and Shalev [5], which used desktop computers and a single rather than group administration, suggests the validity of the sustained attention assessment remained adequate. Despite noisy conditions, the CCPT maintained its psychometric properties in group assessments in the field, and perhaps other similar tasks could be administered feasibly in the future context of large-scale field studies.
Although gender comparisons were not the focus of this study, we tested whether there were differences between boys and girls in reading comprehension, sustained attention, and response inhibition. While no gender differences were obtained in reading comprehension and sustained attention, a significant difference was recorded in response inhibition: boys executed more commission errors than girls, indicating a poorer ability to inhibit pre-potent responses. A similar gender effect was reported in a study that compared young children with and without ADHD using the same task [36]. Yet, this gender difference was not consistent across studies [37,38]. Future research is required to investigate whether gender differences exist in response inhibition, and whether they are linked to cultural biases.
Finally, several limitations should be noted. First, reading comprehension was assessed using a single score taken from a mock exam that participants completed as part of their studies and testing routine. A more detailed assessment of reading comprehension, as well as reading accuracy and fluency, would improve the sensitivity of the reading comprehension assessment. Moreover, future studies may explore the nuances of Kanji-Kana comprehension differences in younger children [39]. Second, since the present study was a field study, the time dedicated to cognitive assessment was limited. Furthermore, the CCPT was administered in the evening of the first day of the summer, after a long and intense day of classes, conditions that may have reduced the reliability of the cognitive measures. Hence, it might be the case that the documented effects are an underestimation of the real effects. Nevertheless, our findings support the approach that basic domain-general cognitive mechanisms contribute to learning efficiency, and that these could be assessed in field studies. Taken together, the present findings point to the important roles of sustained attention and response inhibition in the reading comprehension of adolescent learners. To improve reading comprehension, in light of the present study results, simple adaptations and developments of teaching methods aiming at decreasing sustained attention and/or response inhibition demands should be evaluated. For instance, dividing the studied texts into short units, and embedding various quizzes and short activities, will decrease sustained attention demands and may increase students’ engagement during learning; delaying the response to a question after text-reading by introducing an intermediate stage where students will have to circle the correct answer in the text before responding. Such adjustments could be beneficial for many students.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S., Y.A.O. and D.C.; methodology, L.S., Y.A.O. and D.C.; software, L.S., Y.A.O. and D.C.; validation, I.L.T., S.F.-I. and D.C.; formal analysis, I.L.T., S.F.-I. and Y.D.; resources, L.S. and Y.A.O.; data curation, I.L.T. and S.F.-I.; writing—original draft preparation, I.L.T., S.F.-I. and Y.D.; writing—review and editing, L.S. and I.L.T.; supervision, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by Integ Review IRB, located in Austin, Texas, United States. The research was conducted in accordance with local legislation and institutional requirements.

Informed Consent Statement

The study protocol was approved by an IRB committee. Parents were informed at least two weeks prior to data collection, and students provided assent before testing. The IRB waived the requirement for written informed consent as parents had already consented to the data collection and research activities outlined in this study through the “Agreement Concerning the Handling of Personal Information”.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: OSF—https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CPZFM. Accessed on 8 August 2022.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Sam Kondo for his valuable assistance in encoding the data of the Japanese exam.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yoshi A. Okamoto was employed by Shonan Seminar Co., Ltd. The company did not influence the research questions, methodology, or findings presented in this paper. The research was conducted independently, and no financial or material incentives were provided by Shonan Seminar Co., Ltd. that could have affected the integrity or outcomes of the study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schleicher, A. Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework for Assessment; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrington, C.N.; Kulesz, P.A.; Francis, D.J.; Fletcher, J.M.; Barnes, M.A. The Contribution of Attentional Control and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension and Decoding. Sci. Stud. Read. 2014, 18, 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kibby, M.Y.; Lee, S.E.; Dyer, S.M. Reading Performance Is Predicted by More than Phonological Processing. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shaywitz, S.E.; Shaywitz, B.A. Paying Attention to Reading: The Neurobiology of Reading and Dyslexia. Dev. Psychopathol. 2008, 20, 1329–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stern, P.; Shalev, L. The Role of Sustained Attention and Display Medium in Reading Comprehension among Adolescents with ADHD and without It. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2013, 34, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cole, A.M.; Chan, E.S.M.; Gaye, F.; Spiegel, J.A.; Soto, E.F.; Kofler, M.J. Evaluating the Simple View of Reading for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J. Educ. Psychol. 2023, 115, 700–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, Y.S.G. Why the Simple View of Reading Is Not Simplistic: Unpacking Component Skills of Reading Using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER). Sci. Stud. Read. 2017, 21, 310–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cartwright, K.B.; Lee, S.A.; Taboada Barber, A.; DeWyngaert, L.U.; Lane, A.B.; Singleton, T. Contributions of Executive Function and Cognitive Intrinsic Motivation to University Students’ Reading Comprehension. Read. Res. Q. 2020, 55, 345–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duke, N.K.; Cartwright, K.B. The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Read. Res. Q. 2021, 56, S25–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McVay, J.C.; Kane, M.J. Why Does Working Memory Capacity Predict Variation in Reading Comprehension? On the Influence of Mind Wandering and Executive Attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141, 302–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Melby-Lervåg, M.; Lervåg, A. Cross-Linguistic Transfer of Oral Language, Decoding, Phonological Awareness and Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlational Evidence. J. Res. Read. 2011, 34, 114–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schmitt, N.; Jiang, X.; Grabe, W. The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension. Mod. Lang. J. 2011, 95, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van Gelderen, A.; Schoonen, R.; De Glopper, K.; Hulstijn, J.; Simis, A.; Snellings, P.; Stevenson, M. Linguistic Knowledge, Processing Speed, and Metacognitive Knowledge in First- and Second-Language Reading Comprehension: A Componential Analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 2004, 96, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uno, A.; Wydell, T.N.; Haruhara, N.; Kaneko, M.; Shinya, N. Relationship between Reading/Writing Skills and Cognitive Abilities among Japanese Primary-School Children: Normal Readers versus Poor Readers (Dyslexics). Read. Writ. 2009, 22, 755–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shalev, L.; Ben-simon, A.; Mevorach, C.; Cohen, Y.; Tsal, Y. Conjunctive Continuous Performance Task (CCPT)—A Pure Measure of Sustained Attention. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49, 2584–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Silva-Pereyra, J.; Bernal, J.; Rodríguez-Camacho, M.; Yáñez, G.; Prieto-Corona, B.; Luviano, L.; Hernández, M.; Marosi, E.; Guerrero, V.; Rodríguez, H. Poor Reading Skills May Involve a Failure to Focus Attention. Neuroreport 2010, 21, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Friedman, N.P.; Miyake, A. The Relations among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Variable Analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2004, 133, 101–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Georgiou, G.K.; Wei, W.; Inoue, T.; Das, J.P.; Deng, C. Cultural Influences on the Relation between Executive Functions and Academic Achievement. Read. Writ. 2020, 33, 991–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Lin, D.; Li, H.; Yeung, S.S.; Wong, T.T.Y. The Unique Role of Executive Function Skills in Predicting Hong Kong Kindergarteners’ Reading Comprehension. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2018, 88, 628–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chung, K.K.H.; McBride-Chang, C. Executive Functioning Skills Uniquely Predict Chinese Word Reading. J. Educ. Psychol. 2011, 103, 909–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, P.; Sha, T.; Li, B. The Deficit Profile of Working Memory, Inhibition, and Updating in Chinese Children with Reading Difficulties. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2013, 25, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trauzettel-Klosinski, S.; Dietz, K.; IReST Study Group. Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 5452–5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lan, X.; Legare, C.H.; Ponitz, C.C.; Li, S.; Morrison, F.J. Investigating the Links between the Subcomponents of Executive Function and Academic Achievement: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Chinese and American Preschoolers. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2011, 108, 677–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Efrat, B.; Orna, T. Sex Differences in the Sustained Attention of Elementary School Children. BMC Psychol. 2022, 10, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sussman, J.; Tasso, A.F. The Mesulam Continuous Performance Test (M-CPT): Age-Related and Gender Differences in the Sustained Attention of Elementary School Children. New School Psychol. Bull. 2013, 10, 1. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan, R.C.K. A Further Study on the Sustained Attention Response to Task (SART): The Effect of Age, Gender and Education. Brain Inj. 2001, 15, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kertzman, S.; Fluhr, A.; Vainder, M.; Weizman, A.; Dannon, P.N. The Role of Gender in Association between Inhibition Capacities and Risky Decision Making. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2018, 11, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gaillard, A.; Fehring, D.J.; Rossell, S.L. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioural Sex Differences in Executive Control. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021, 53, 519–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rosenberg-Kima, R.B.; Sadeh, A. Attention, Response Inhibition, and Face-Information Processing in Children: The Role of Task Characteristics, Age, and Gender. Child Neuropsychol. 2010, 16, 388–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eriksson, L.J.K.; Sundin, Ö.; Jansson, B. Exploring Response Inhibition, the Behavioral Inhibition System and Possible Sex Differences in Athletes and Non-Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shamir, T. Is It Possible to Assess Sustained Attention Using a Tablet? Convergent Validity of a New Tablet Version of the Conjunctive Continuous Performance Task (CCPT). Master’s Thesis, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Schneider, S.L. The International Standard Classification of Education 2011; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2013; Volume 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ben-Yehudah, G.; Brann, A. Pay Attention to Digital Text: The Impact of the Media on Text Comprehension and Self-Monitoring in Higher-Education Students with ADHD. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2019, 89, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Segal, D.; Mashal, N.; Shalev, L. Semantic Conflicts Are Resolved Differently by Adults with and without ADHD. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 47, 416–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shalev, L.; Kolodny, T.; Shalev, N.; Mevorach, C. Attention Functioning among Adolescents with Multiple Learning, Attentional, Behavioral, and Emotional Difficulties. J. Learn. Disabil. 2016, 49, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tsal, Y.; Shalev, L.; Mevorach, C. The Diversity of Attention Deficits in ADHD: The Prevalence of Four Cognitive Factors in ADHD versus Controls. J. Learn. Disabil. 2005, 38, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Evans, K.L.; Hampson, E. Sex Differences on Prefrontally-Dependent Cognitive Tasks. Brain Cogn. 2015, 93, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mansouri, F.A.; Fehring, D.J.; Gaillard, A.; Jaberzadeh, S.; Parkington, H. Sex Dependency of Inhibitory Control Functions. Biol. Sex Differ. 2016, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Steinberg, D.D.; Oka, N. Learning to Read Kanji is Easier than Learning Individual Kana. Jpn. J. Psychol. 1978, 49, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Boxplot of participants’ age in years.
Figure 1. Boxplot of participants’ age in years.
Children 11 01245 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the CCPT that was used to assess sustained attention and response inhibition.
Figure 2. Schematic of the CCPT that was used to assess sustained attention and response inhibition.
Children 11 01245 g002
Figure 3. Raincloud plots comparison between genders: (a) CCPT—M-RT (ms); (b) CCPT—SD-RT (ms); (c) CCPT—Omission errors (rate); (d) CCPT—Commission errors (rate); (e) Reading comprehension score.
Figure 3. Raincloud plots comparison between genders: (a) CCPT—M-RT (ms); (b) CCPT—SD-RT (ms); (c) CCPT—Omission errors (rate); (d) CCPT—Commission errors (rate); (e) Reading comprehension score.
Children 11 01245 g003
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and normality measures of the reading comprehension score and the Conjunctive Continuous Performance Task (CCPT) measures.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and normality measures of the reading comprehension score and the Conjunctive Continuous Performance Task (CCPT) measures.
MeasureMeanSDMedianIQRSkewnessKurtosis
Reading Comprehension Score65.511.3766160.49−0.23
CCPT—M-RT (ms)4003940057.10.18−0.72
CCPT—SD-RT (ms)80227725.01.272.05
CCPT—Omission errors (rate)0.0130.0210.010.0212.235.00
CCPT—Commission errors (rate)0.0440.0520.0270.042.768.50
Note. CCPT, Conjunctive Continuous Performance Test; SD, Standard Deviation; RT, Reaction Time; ms, millisecond.
Table 2. Pearson correlations between each of the variables in the study.
Table 2. Pearson correlations between each of the variables in the study.
Variable1.2.3.4.5.
1. Reading Comprehension Score
2. CCPT—Omission errors rate−0.337 **
3. CCPT—Commission errors rate−0.333 **0.165
4. CCPT—M-RT−0.1180.159−0.278 *
4. CCPT—SD-RT−0.275 *0.428 ***0.1090.34 **
Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. Regression analysis summary. Dependent variable is the Japanese score.
Table 3. Regression analysis summary. Dependent variable is the Japanese score.
BStd. ErrorBetatp-Value
Constant67.9271.499 45.325<0.001
Omission errors−182.48160.560−0.337−3.0130.004
R20.113
Constant70.2891.699 41.366<0.001
Omission errors−158.99558.890−0.293−2.70.009
Commission errors−62.44623.834−0.285−2.620.011
R20.193
Table 4. Comparison between boys and girls in reading comprehension, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
Table 4. Comparison between boys and girls in reading comprehension, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
VariableBoys
(n = 37)
Girls
(n = 36)
t(71)pCohen’s d
MeanSDMeanSD
Reading Comprehension Score63.4610.9067.5611.571.570.1240.36
CCPT—M-RT (ms)39638404400.8560.3950.2
CCPT—SD-RT (ms)832376181.3560.1790.318
VariableBoys
(n = 37)
Girls
(n = 36)
U(Z)p
MedianMedian
CCPT—Omission Errors (rate)0.0140.007570 (1.138)0.255
CCPT—Commission Errors (rate)0.040.018392.5 (3.025)0.002
Note. CCPT, Conjunctive Continuous Performance Test; SD, Standard Deviation; RT, Reaction Time; ms, millisecond.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trinczer, I.L.; Dankner, Y.; Frances-Israeli, S.; Okamoto, Y.A.; Clark, D.; Shalev, L. The Contribution of Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition to Reading Comprehension Among Japanese Adolescents. Children 2024, 11, 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101245

AMA Style

Trinczer IL, Dankner Y, Frances-Israeli S, Okamoto YA, Clark D, Shalev L. The Contribution of Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition to Reading Comprehension Among Japanese Adolescents. Children. 2024; 11(10):1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trinczer, Inbar Lucia, Yarden Dankner, Shira Frances-Israeli, Yoshi A. Okamoto, Dav Clark, and Lilach Shalev. 2024. "The Contribution of Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition to Reading Comprehension Among Japanese Adolescents" Children 11, no. 10: 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101245

APA Style

Trinczer, I. L., Dankner, Y., Frances-Israeli, S., Okamoto, Y. A., Clark, D., & Shalev, L. (2024). The Contribution of Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition to Reading Comprehension Among Japanese Adolescents. Children, 11(10), 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop