Next Article in Journal
Coupled Excitation Strategy for Crack Initiation at the Adhesive Interface of Large-Sized Ultra-Thin Chips
Previous Article in Journal
Study on a Second-Order Adaptive Sliding-Mode Observer Control Algorithm for the Sensorless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heavy Metals Exacerbate the Effect of Temperature on the Growth of Chlorella sp.: Implications on Algal Blooms and Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Coupled UV−Peroxydisulfate System: Efficiency, Stability and Mechanism

School of Environment and Municipal Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(6), 1638; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061638
Submission received: 9 April 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 26 May 2023

Abstract

:
Magnetic CuFe2O4 powder obtained by sol−gel method and coupled photocatalysis was used to activate peroxydisulfate for tetracycline (TC) removal. A scanning electron microscope, X−ray diffraction Raman spectroscopy and FT−TR were used to characterize the catalysts. The degradation efficiency and stability of TC were highest under neutral conditions. The TC degradation rate reached 91.1% within 90 min. The removal rate of total organic carbon reaches 39.6% under optimal conditions. The unique electron transfer property of CuFe2O4 was utilized to achieve the synergistic effect of photocatalysis and persulfate oxidation. The main oxidizing substances involved in the decomposition were sulfate radicals and hydroxyl radicals, and the removal rate of over 84% could be maintained after five cycles of experiments.

1. Introduction

As a kind of drug to prevent and treat bacterial diseases, antibiotics are used in a wide range of industries such as the medical industry, pharmaceutical industry and breeding industry [1]. Conventional wastewater treatment plants are unable to effectively treat antibiotics entering water bodies. Moreover, due to the long residence time of antibiotics and the low rate of microbial degradation in water, resulting in large amounts of antibiotic residues accumulating in natural water bodies [2]. This may increase the probability of the antibiotic resistance gene appearing, thus posing a threat to ecosystems. Tetracycline (TC) is widely used in veterinary medicine and aquaculture. The production and use of TC is the second largest antibiotic in global [3]. It plays a significant role in environmental protection and human health to explore an efficient and low−cost technology to remove TC from water bodies.
Advanced oxidation technology of sulfate radical (SO4•−) has attracted widespread interest [4]. Persulfate advanced oxidation method has been shown to be a very effective strategy for antibiotic degradation [5,6]. The persulfate itself is a strong oxidant (E0 = 2.01 V) [7]. The activation can generate SO4•− with higher potential. The rapid decomposition and final mineralization of organic matter can be achieved through SO4•−. Compared with Fenton advanced oxidation technology which generates hydroxyl radical (•OH), the advanced oxidation technology based on persulfate has the following characteristics: the redox potential of SO4•− standard (E0 = 2.5–3.1 V) is higher than that of •OH (E0 = 1.9–2.7 V). The oxidation principle is also similar to that of •OH, but with a longer stabilization time. Additionally, it has a wider pH applicability range. Advanced oxidation of persulfate is more environmentally friendly than other degradation methods because it does not produce large amounts of waste material, nor does it consume a great deal of energy [8].
In recent years, CuFe2O4 magnetic materials have attracted great interest as an anon−homogeneous catalyst applied to advanced oxidation process systems (AOPs). Li et al. [9] prepared Cu/CuFe2O4 composites using the solvothermal method. It was observed that both SO4•− and •OH are the main activation products, indicating that CuFe2O4 could activate persulfate. Xu et al. [10] have found that the peroxymonosulfate (PMS) can produce free radicals to remove bisphenol A in aqueous solutions with CuFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles, and the removal rate of BPA reached 92.3% within 60 min. Furthermore, CuFe2O4 can be used as a photocatalyst. Jing et al. [11] studied the separate porous tetragonal− CuFe2O4 nanotubes coupled with photocatalytic degradation of acid fuchsin, indicating that CuFe2O4 has good photocatalytic activity and durability. The photocatalytic and persulfate oxidation system also has an abundance of highly reactive oxide species. Persulfate can generate SO4•− and •OH by capturing photo−generated electrons. Thus, using UV activated persulfate can achieve highly efficient removal of pollutants [12].
In this study, the combination of ultraviolet light (UV) and peroxodisulfate (PDS) was investigated for the removal of TC. The magnetically separable nano copper ferrite was prepared by sol−gel method and their structural features were characterized. The CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system was constructed to degrade TC and the total organic carbon (TOC) was investigated. The effect of pH on the degradation performance and the reusability of CuFe2O4 were investigated. Additionally, the active species in the system were obtained by quenching experiments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

The water used in the experiment was deionized water. The other reagents were analytical reagents.

2.2. Synthesis of CuFe2O4

Magnetic nanometer copper ferrite was prepared by the sol−gel method [13]. Firstly, adding Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (Shanghai Maclean Biochemical Technology Co., Shanghai, China), Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Tianjin Komio Chemical Reagent Co., Tianjin, China) and citric acid (Tianjin Fengchuan Sliding Chemical Reagent Technology Co., Tianjin, China) in the molar ratio of 1:2:3 to deionized water and stir well, and stirred until dissolved. The pH of the mixed solution was then adjusted to 7 with ammonia (Yantai Shuangshuang Chemical Co., Yantai, Shandong, China). Secondly, the solution was transferred to a water bath at 70 °C with continuous stirring until the water evaporated to form a dark green gel. The gel was dried for 7 h at 130 °C. Finally, the obtained dry gel was calcined at 200 °C, 300 °C, 400 °C, 500 °C and 600 °C for 2 h to afford the catalyst.

2.3. Analysis Methods

The scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM−6700F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the microscopic morphology and structure of catalytic materials. The X−ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of CuFe2O4 was carried out on Dmax 2500 V Advance diffractometer (Bruker Co, Billerica, MA, USA) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) at a scanning rate of 5°/min with 2θ ranging between 10° and 80°. Raman spectrometer (HORIBA HR Evolution, HORIBA Co., Kyoto, Japan) with a laser wavelength of 532 nm was used in the range of 200–1200 cm−1. The different functional groups and lattice vibrations of prepared systems were monitored by Fourier−transform infrared. (FT−IR, Is50FT−IR, American Thermal Power Company, Boston, MA, USA). The absorbance of TC solution was analyzed by UV−VIS spectrometer (N5000, Shanghai Youke Co., Shanghai, China) at a wavelength of 357 nm. To determine the removal rate of total organic carbon by TOC analyzer (Trace Elemental Instruments, XPERT, Delft, The Netherlands) was used. The pHzpc of CuFe2O4 material was determined by intermittent equilibrium technique.

2.4. TC Degradation Experiments

The 0.02 g of CuFe2O4 was weighed into a beaker. Then, add 100 mL of TC solution with a concentration of 20 mg/L to the beaker. The solution was put into a dark box and stirred magnetically for 30 min. After that, 0.7 mM of PDS was added under continuous stirring and UV light (Royal Dutch Philips, λ = 254 nm) source was turned on. The light source is located above the beaker and the distance to the beaker is 15 cm. Samples were acquired when the reaction time was 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min, respectively. The TC solution concentration was determined by UV−VIS spectrometer after filtration with 0.45 μm filter membrane.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of CuFe2O4

The SEM analysis of CuFe2O4 calcined at 300 °C was carried out, and the results are shown in Figure 1. It is seen that the particles are on the nanometer scale. There are many particles on the surface of the material with uniform particle size dispersion, and these raised particles are CuFe2O4 crystals.
Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of CuFe2O4 at different calcination temperatures. The diffraction peaks of CuFe2O4−300 at 2θ = 30.17°, 35.54°, 37.18°, 43.20°, 53.60°, 57.14° and 62.74° corresponding to the (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511) and (440) crystal faces of CuFe2O4 (#JCPDS77−0010), respectively. This indicates that the CuFe2O4 prepared by the sol−gel method has generated an obvious spinel structure, which is in agreement with the findings of Selima et al. [14]. According to Scherre formula, when the calcination temperature is 300 °C, the lattice size on the (311) crystal plane is 18.2 nm [15]. There is a phase transformation from cubic CuFe2O4 (c−CuFe2O4) to tetragonal CuFe2O4 (t−CuFe2O4) at temperatures above 300 °C. The arrangement of crystal particles is more complete and denser. The CuFe2O4−600 at 2θ = 18.32°, 34.72°, 35.86°, 41.82°, 53.92°, 62.16° and 63.63°, corresponding to the tetragonal CuFe2O4 at (101), (103), (211), (004), (312), (224) and (400) crystal faces, which are in agreement with the standard card (#JCPDS34−0425). When the calcination temperature is 400–600 °C, there is the appearance of an impurity phase. The characteristic peak of CuO (#JCPDS48−1548) appears at 53.49°, indicating that there is a small amount of CuO. The characteristic peaks of α−Fe2O3 (JCPDS 84−0306) appear at 57.27°, 62.92° and 64.01°, confirming the presence of this phase. The XRD results show that the crystalline formation and particle size of the catalysts are affected by the calcination temperature.
Raman spectroscopy technique is one of the powerful techniques for a direct probe of cation redistribution, structural transformation, and lattice distortion. Figure 3 shows Raman spectra of CuFe2O4 calcined at 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C. The structural transformation from cubic (Fd−3m) to tetragonal (I41/amd) symmetry occurs due to strengthening of the Jahn–Teller distortion. In this study, five Raman characteristic peaks were observed for the CuFe2O4 calcined at 200 °C and 300 °C, which were present near 155 cm−1 (T2g(3)), 280 cm−1 (Eg), 331 cm−1 (T2g(2)), 470 cm−1 (T2g(1)), 574 cm−1 (A1g(2)) and 676 cm−1 (A1g(1)). The Raman activity patterns present in the synthesized copper ferrate match well with the group theory results. These belong to cubic inverse−spinel copper ferrite. With the increase of calcination temperature, the copper ferrite samples gradually transformed into tetragonal phase structure, and new Raman spectral peaks appeared, such as 780 cm−1, 840 cm−1 and 930 cm−1. In the prepared CuFe2O4, the presence of Raman modes the T2g mode and the Eg mode in the lower frequency range demonstrates the stability of the spinel structure [16]. The peak at the T2g(1) mode is due to the asymmetric stretching of the oxygen anion with tetrahedral and octahedral cations. It can be observed that the vibrational frequency of the Raman−activated mode shifts to a lower frequency (red−shift) due to the redistribution of the cations and the relative increase of the particle size. The width of the Raman active modes is also increased. Due to the redistribution of cations between the tetrahedral and octahedral positions, the intensity of the peak the A1g(1) mode decreases with increasing calcination temperature, while the intensity of the remaining peaks increases [17].
Figure 4 shows the FT−IR spectra of CuFe2O4 calcined at 300 °C before and after the degradation reaction. Spinel compounds are characterized by two lattice vibrations that correspond, respectively, to the vibrations of tetrahedral and octahedral metal centers against the O2−− cage. The first one appears in Figure 4 around 570 cm−1 while the other is not complete and is expected to be centered slightly below 400 cm−1. [18]. These two bands confirm the formation of spinel structure and there is no significant change before and after the reaction. The absorption broadband at 3400 cm−1 indicates the stretching mode of the H2O molecule −OH group. The formation of the bands at 2925 cm−1 and 2960 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibrations of CH2 and CH3. Moreover, bands due to C=O stretching vibrations of the citric acid COOH group appear at 1635 cm−1, indicating the binding of citric acid radicals to the magnetite surface. This band may also be the bending vibration of water [19]. The characteristic absorption band located near 1036 cm−1 is attributed to the C−O−C stretching vibration. The CuFe2O4 also exhibits weak characteristic bands at 1380 cm−1 and 878 cm−1, which represent the symmetric stretching vibration of the nitrate ion and the asymmetric stretching, etc. [20] From the FT−IR spectrum, it can be seen that citrate and nitrate impurities are very small. High−purity CuFe2O4 materials can be effectively prepared by the sol−gel method.

3.2. TC Degradation Behavior

3.2.1. A Comparative Study of TC Removal in the Different System

As displayed in Figure 5a, the degradation efficiencies of different reaction systems were investigated. The degradation rate of TC was 0.3% when only PDS was added. This indicates that PDS could not produce free radicals rapidly in the absence of external catalysis [21]. When only CuFe2O4 was used (i.e., without PDS), the TC removal efficiency reached 34.0%, obviously as a result of adsorption but not degradation In summary, the removal of TC by absorption or single PDS degradation is relatively low. In the absence of PDS, the CuFe2O4, UV and CuFe2O4/UV were 34.0%, 7.8% and 50.6%, respectively. The highest degradation rate of TC reached 91.1% after adding PDS, which verified that PDS has a crucial role to play in the system, as the addition of PDS could generate more free radicals [22]. The UV lamp was the activator in the photocatalytic reaction. The degradation rate of TC was 61.5% in the case of activating PDS by UV radiation, which confirmed that PDS can be directly excited by UV light to make its O−O bond break into SO4•− (Equation (1)). At the same time, UV radiation excites electrons from the valence band of CuFe2O4 into the conduction band. These electrons act as a strong reducing agent and result in the formation of SO4•− radicals as shown in Equation (2) [23]. The addition of CuFe2O4 was more effective compared to PDS activation by UV. The degradation of TC reached 91.1% in the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system, indicating the high catalytic efficiency of CuFe2O4 in activating PDS. In addition, CuFe2O4 acts as a photocatalyst, where it can excite more different kinds of radicals in the system [24]. The above discussion shows that CuFe2O4 coupled with UV activated persulfate provides excellent degradation conditions for degrading TC. Firstly, both CuFe2O4 and UV can activate PDS. Secondly, the CuFe2O4 as a photocatalyst, it could excite more different kinds of radicals in the system.
Meanwhile, the mineralization efficiency of TC at various catalytic conditions was evaluated by TOC measurement in the solution after 90 min of reaction. As shown in Figure 5b, the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system had the highest TOC removal rate which was 39.6%, followed by CuFe2O4/PDS. It indicates that the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system can achieve a high level of pollutant degradation.
S 2 O 8 2 UV 2 SO 4
S 2 O 8 2 + e SO 4 +   S O 4 2
In this work, the catalytic performance of calcination at different temperatures (200~600 °C) was compared, and the results are shown in Figure 6a. The degradation rates of TC were 87.4%, 91.1%, 86.2%, 85.7% and 82.6% at different calcination temperatures (200–600 °C), respectively. It shows that TC has high degradation efficiency at low calcination temperature, and the degradation rate of TC decreases with higher calcination temperature. Proper calcination can improve the catalytic performance of CuFe2O4 catalyst. As the calcination temperature increases, the crystal structure, specific surface area and oxygen vacancies of the catalyst will change, thereby affecting its catalytic performance. At an appropriate calcination temperature, the specific surface area and pore structure of the catalyst are optimized, and the catalytic activity and selectivity are improved. Excessive temperature can lead to an increase in particle size and lattice damage, thereby reducing catalytic activity [25]. In addition, as the calcination temperature increases, CuFe2O4 decomposes into separate oxides α−Fe2O3 and CuO. To confirm that Fe2O3 and CuO affect the degradation rate of TC, a comparison test was also conducted in this section (Figure 6b), and under the same conditions, the removal rate by CuO as catalyst was 85.1% and that by Fe2O3 as a catalyst was 39.1%.

3.2.2. The Effect of Initial pH

Since the initial pH usually has an important influence on the generation process of free radicals, the physicochemical properties of the reactants and the oxidation capacity of the free radicals, the findings of the investigation of the initial solution pH are presented in Figure 7. Firstly, under alkaline conditions, the OH− reacts with SO4•− to form •OH, and the oxidation activity is weakened. The •OH reacts with •OH to form water and the free radicals are reduced, which leads to a decrease in the TC degradation rate (Equations (3)–(5)). The findings indicate that the TC removal is affected when the free radicals in the system are reduced [26]. Secondly, the TC degradation is also influenced by the charge of TC and the surface charge of CuFe2O4 [27,28]. The point of zero charge (pHzpc) of CuFe2O4 was 5.95 (Figure 8a). The chemical structure of tetracycline was shown in Figure 8b. The hydroxyl groups are deprotonated at high pH, hence the negative charge, at low pH the amine groups are protonated and hence the positive charge. When pH < 3, the TC solution has a positive charge. When pH = 3–7.7, the TC in the solution exists as amphoteric ions. When pH > 7.7, it exists as monovalent anions or divalent anions. When pH < pHzpc, the positive surface charge of the material will help to adsorb more SO4•− oxidized organic matter [29]. When pH > pHzpc, the material surface is negatively charged and TC exists as monovalent anions, which generate an electrostatic repulsion between TC and the surface of CuFe2O4. At pH = 11, there is no adsorption in the 30 min−period before the reaction. At pH = 9 and pH = 3, the amount adsorbed is much less than at pH = 5 and pH = 7. Under strong acid or alkali conditions, the surface of copper ferrite will suffer serious structural damage and loss of active site, leading to a significant reduction in its adsorption capacity. Under neutral condition, copper ferrite shows better adsorption performance, because its surface structure and active site can maintain good stability at this time. In addition, some experimental studies have also shown that copper ferrite under neutral conditions may undergo hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces and charge transfer interactions with the adsorbent, thereby enhancing its adsorption capacity [30]. It prevents the reaction of TC on the material surface. Showing the high efficiency of CuFe2O4/UV/PDS at neutral pH, the process is suitable for surface water and groundwater treatment.
S O 4 + O H S O 4 2 + O H
S O 4 + H 2 O H S O 4 + O H
O H + O H H 2 O 2

3.2.3. Stability and Recyclability of CuFe2O4

The stability and reusability of CuFe2O4 photocatalysts were confirmed through five consecutive reuse experiments. The CuFe2O4 is easily removed from the solution through magnetic means such as simple magnets [31]. It was separated from the system using a magnet after each degradation reaction and rinsed three times with deionized water. Then, put into a 60 °C oven to dry. Subsequently, the degradation experiment was performed again. As displayed in Figure 9, even after four cycles, the TC degradation rate remained above 84%. From the changes in TC adsorption, it is inferred that the minor decrease in the efficiency of removal may be attributed to limited poisoning of the catalyst surface by reaction intermediates and loss of CuFe2O4 particles during washing [32].

3.3. Degradation Reaction Mechanism

3.3.1. Identification of Active Species

To investigate the activation mechanism of the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system, quenching experiments were performed. Based on the summary of previous studies [33,34,35], it was concluded that SO4•− and •OH may be produced in the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system. Because of the different reaction rates of anhydrous ethanol (EtOH) and tert−butanol (TBA) with SO4•− and •OH, the EtOH capture group and the TBA capture group were selected. The reaction rates of EtOH with SO4•− and •OH are (1.6–7.7) × 107 M−1s−1 and (1.2–2.8) × 109 M−1s−1 [36], respective1y. As presented in Figure 10a, EtOH concentration and the degradation rate of TC were inversely related. When the EtOH concentration increased from 0 mM to 100 mM, the degradation rate of TC decreased by 32.2%. In addition, the reaction rate of TBA with •OH was higher than that of SO4•− (k•OH = (3.8–7.6) × 108 M−1s−1, kSO4•− = (4.0–9.1) × 105 M−1s−1) [37]. The removal rate of TC was 83.4% when the concentration of TBA was 100 mM (Figure 10b). Therefore, according to the difference between the degradation rate of TC under the participation of EtOH and TBA, it can be inferred that SO4•− plays a dominant role compared with •OH. It is worth noting that the addition of ethanol and tert butanol does not completely stop the reaction, indicating that there may be other free radical or non− free radical pathways in the reaction system [38,39].

3.3.2. Mechanism of Degradation

According to the mentioned results and discussions, the possible mechanism for the TC degradation by CuFe2O4/UV/PDS is proposed as shown in Figure 11. In the first step, the energy of some incident photons can destroy the chemical bond of TC molecule, TC molecules will directly self−decompose. In addition, UV radiation can also directly activate PDS, generating sulfate radicals. Furthermore, the presence of photogenerated electrons on the surface of CuFe2O4 can activate PDS to generate SO4•−. Secondly, the effective Fe3+/Fe2+ (Cu2+/Cu3+) conversion enhances the PDS activation and generates SO4•− and •OH for pollutant removal [40,41]. These produce free radicals react with TC, breaking it down into harmless H2O, CO2 and some intermediates.

4. Conclusions

To summarize, the CuFe2O4 exhibits excellent performance in the degradation of tetracycline. In this process, several methods (XRD, Raman spectra spectroscopy, SEM and FT−IR) were carried out to characterize CuFe2O4, demonstrating that magnetic separable CuFe2O4 nanoparticles can be prepared by the sol−gel method. Through the coupling of CuFe2O4/UV/PDS process, the degradation rate of antibiotics was improved. It was confirmed that the coupling of the CuFe2O4/UV has a synergistic effect on the catalytic PDS to produce more active species. Under optimal conditions, the TC degradation rate reached 91.1% within 90 min. Magnetic CuFe2O4 powder can be effectively recycled, and reusability and stability experiments confirmed the excellent stability and cyclicity of the CuFe2O4 catalyst. In addition, through quenching experiments, it was concluded that there is SO4•− and •OH generation in the system. A possible mechanism of degradation was proposed. It confirmed its potential application in degrading antibiotics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L. and Y.C.; Data curation, P.M., Y.S. and J.Z.; Formal analysis, P.M. and Y.S.; Funding acquisition, B.L.; Methodology, J.Z. and W.Z.; Supervision, Y.C. and B.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.S.; Writing–review & editing, P.M. and B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Key Research and Extension Project of Henan Province (222102320291).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Maqbool, F.; Hu, Y. Removal of antibiotics pollutants in wastewater by UV−based advanced oxidation processes: Influence of water matrix components, processes optimization and application: A Review. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 45, 102496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abd, E.M.; Eltaweil, A.S.; Elshishini, H.M. Sustainable adsorptive removal of antibiotic residues by chitosan composites: An insight into current developments and future recommendations. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qi, N.; Wang, P.; Wang, C.; Ao, Y. Effect of a typical antibiotic (tetracycline) on the aggregation of TiO2 nanoparticles in an aquatic environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 341, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, G.; Yu, Y.; Liang, L. Remediation of antibiotic wastewater by coupled photocatalytic and persulfate oxidation system: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cai, J.; Xie, J.; Xing, L. Enhanced mechanism of carbamazepine degradation by electrochemical activation of persulfate in flow−through system. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 301, 122021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zrinyi, N.; Pham, A.L. Oxidation of benzoic acid by heat−activated persulfate: Effect of temperature on transformation pathway and product distribution. Water Res. 2017, 120, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, W.; Su, Y. Removal of dinitrotoluenes in wastewater by sono−activated persulfate. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012, 19, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, Y.; Xiang, Y.; He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Luo, L.; Peng, H.; Dai, C.; Zhu, F.; Tang, L. Applications and factors influencing of the persulfate−based advanced oxidation processes for the remediation of groundwater and soil contaminated with organic compounds. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 359, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Guo, C.; Lu, J.; Hu, Z.; Ge, M. Tetracycline degradation by persulfate activated with magnetic Cu/CuFe2O4 composite: Efficiency, stability, mechanism and degradation pathway. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 373, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, Y.; Ai, J.; Zhang, H. The mechanism of degradation of bisphenol A using the magnetically separable CuFe2O4/peroxymonosulfate heterogeneous oxidation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 309, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jing, P.; Li, J.; Pan, L.; Wang, J.; Sun, X.; Liu, Q. Efficient photocatalytic degradation of acid fuchsin in aqueous solution using separate porous tetragonal− CuFe2O4 nanotubes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 284, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, M.; Ren, X.; Hu, L.; Guo, W.; Zhan, J. Facet−controlled activation of persulfate by goethite for tetracycline degradation in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Lin, C.; Bi, H.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Q. Magnetically separable CuFe2O4/AGBR composite photocatalysts: Preparation, characterization, photocatalytic activity and photocatalytic mechanism under Visible light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Selima, S.S.; Khairy, M.; Mousa, M.A. Comparative studies on the impact of synthesis methods on structural, optical, magnetic and catalytic properties of CuFe2O4. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 6535–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, S.; Mei, S.; Qianqian, R.; Yang, L.; Yang, L.; Lu, Z.; Shuang, W.; Wen, G. Effect of synthesis conditions on the structure and properties of LiFeO2/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites prepared by a sol−gel method. Solid State Commun. 2021, 334, 114379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, Y.; Sherwood, J.; Qin, Y.; Holler, R.A.; Bao, Y. A general approach to the synthesis and detailed characterization of magnetic ferrite nanocubes. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 12641–12649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chatterjee, B.K.; Bhattacharjee, K.; Dey, A.; Ghosh, C.K.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. Influence of spherical assembly of copper ferrite nanoparticles on magnetic properties: Orientation of Magnetic Easy Axis. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 7930–7944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Verma, K.; Kumar, A.; Varshney, D. Effect of Zn and Mg doping on structural, dielectric and magnetic properties of tetragonal CuFe2O4. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soufi, A.; Hajjaoui, H.; Elmoubarki, R. Heterogeneous Fenton−like degradation of tartrazine using CuFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized by sol−gel combustion. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2022, 9, 100251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Huang, G. Construction of ternary CuO/CuFe2O4/g−C3N4 composite and its enhanced photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride with persulfate under simulated sunlight. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 112, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, W.; Cai, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, H.; Zeng, W.; Li, J.; Li, W. Rapid removal of organic pollutants by a novel persulfate/brochantite system: Mechanism and implication. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 585, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, J.; von Gunten, U.; Kim, J.H. Persulfate−based advanced oxidation: Critical assessment of opportunities and roadblocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3064–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, Q.; Nengzi, L.; Zhang, X. Enhanced activation of persulfate by AC@CoFe2O4 nanocomposites for effective removal of lomefloxacin. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 233, 115978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yin, R.; Chen, Y.; Hu, J.; Lu, G.; Zeng, L.; Choi, W.; Zhu, M. Complexes of fe(iii)−organic pollutants that directly activate Fenton−like processes under Visible light. Appl. Catal. B−Environ. 2021, 283, 119663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. María, V.; López, R.; Miguel, A. Effect of calcination temperature of a copper ferrite synthesized by a sol−gel method on its structural characteristics and performance as Fenton catalyst to remove gallic acid from water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 511, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rajabi, S.; Nasiri, A.; Hashemi, M. Enhanced activation of persulfate by CuCoFe2O4@MC/AC as a novel nanomagnetic heterogeneous catalyst with ultrasonic for metronidazole degradation. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qiao, L.; Shi, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, B.; Liu, J. The removal efficiencies and mechanism of aniline degradation by peroxydisulfate activated with magnetic Fe−Mn oxides composite. J. Water Reuse Desalination 2021, 11, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ramu, A.; Salla, S.; Gopi, S.; Silambarasan, P.; Yang, D.; Song, M.; Ali, H.; Salem, M.; Choi, D. Surface−tuned hierarchical γ−Fe2O3–N−RGO nanohydrogel for efficient catalytic removal and electrochemical sensing of toxic nitro compounds. Chemosphere 2021, 268, 128853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tan, C.; Gao, N.; Fu, D. Efficient degradation of paracetamol with nanoscaled magnetic CoFe2O4 and MnFe2O4 as a heterogeneous catalyst of peroxymonosulfate. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 175, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, Y.; Ma, P.; Qiao, L.; Liu, B. Fe–Mn Oxide Composite Activated Peroxydisulfate Processes for Degradation of p−Chloroaniline: The Effectiveness and the Mechanism. Processes 2022, 10, 2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belessiotis, G.V.; Falara, P.P.; Ibrahim, I.; Kontos, A.G. Magnetic Metal Oxide−Based Photocatalysts with Integrated Silver for Water Treatment. Materials 2022, 15, 4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zheng, X.; Chu, Y.; Miao, B.; Fan, J. Ag−doped Bi2WO6/BiOI heterojunction used as photocatalyst for the enhanced degradation of tetracycline under visible−light and biodegradability improvement. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 893, 162382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y. Heterogeneous activation of persulfate for Rhodamine B degradation with 3D flower sphere−like BiOI/Fe3O4 microspheres under visible light irradiation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 192, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pan, J.; Guo, F.; Sun, H.; Li, M.; Zhu, X.; Gao, L.; Shi, W. CdS nanoparticles decorated hexagonal Fe2O3 nanosheets with a Z−scheme photogenerated electron transfer path for improved visible−light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 56, 6663–6675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, H.; Guo, F.; Pan, J.; Huang, W.; Wang, K.; Shi, W. One−pot thermal polymerization route to prepare N−deficient modified G−C3N4 for the degradation of tetracycline by the synergistic effect of photocatalysis and persulfate−based advanced oxidation process. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Nengzi, L. Activation of persulfate by a novel magnetic CuFe2O4/Bi2O3 composite for lomefloxacin degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sarkar, P.; Roy, D.; Bera, B. Efficient photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin using novel dual Z−scheme gCN/CuFe2O4/MoS2 mediated peroxymonosulphate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Elashery, S.E.A.; Ibrahim, I.; Gomaa, H.; El−Bouraie, M.M.; Moneam, I.A.; Fekry, S.S.; Mohamed, G.G. Comparative Study of the Photocatalytic Degradation of Crystal Violet Using Ferromagnetic Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles and MgO−Bentonite Nanocomposite. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ibrahim, I.; Belessiotis, G.V.; Antoniadou, M.; Kaltzoglou, A. Silver decorated TiO2/g−C3N4 bifunctional nanocomposites for photocatalytic elimination of water pollutants under UV and artificial solar light. Results Eng. 2022, 14, 100470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.; Zhu, N.; Wei, X.; Ding, Y.; Ke, Y.; Wu, P.; Liu, Z. Mechanism insight into efficient peroxydisulfate activation by novel Nano Zero−valent iron anchored yCo3O4 (nzvi/yCo3O4) composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dang, V.C.; Tran, D.T.; Phan, A.T.; Pham, N.K.; Nguyen, V.N. Synergistic effect for the degradation of tetracycline by rGO−Co3O4 assisted Persulfate Activation. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 153, 110005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The SEM of CuFe2O4.
Figure 1. The SEM of CuFe2O4.
Processes 11 01638 g001
Figure 2. The XRD patterns of CuFe2O4 at different calcination temperatures.
Figure 2. The XRD patterns of CuFe2O4 at different calcination temperatures.
Processes 11 01638 g002
Figure 3. The Raman spectra of CuFe2O4 at different calcination temperatures.
Figure 3. The Raman spectra of CuFe2O4 at different calcination temperatures.
Processes 11 01638 g003
Figure 4. The FT−IR spectra of CuFe2O4 before and after degradation reaction.
Figure 4. The FT−IR spectra of CuFe2O4 before and after degradation reaction.
Processes 11 01638 g004
Figure 5. (a) TC degradation efficiency of the different systems investigated in this work (The CuFe2O4 was added 30 min before the reaction starts and that PDS is added at t = 0); (b) TOC of different systems. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Figure 5. (a) TC degradation efficiency of the different systems investigated in this work (The CuFe2O4 was added 30 min before the reaction starts and that PDS is added at t = 0); (b) TOC of different systems. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Processes 11 01638 g005
Figure 6. (a) Effect of different calcination temperatures of CuFe2O4 on TC degradation; (b) Effect of different catalysts on TC degradation. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L (CuO dose = 0.2 g/L and Fe2O3 dose = 0.2 g/L).
Figure 6. (a) Effect of different calcination temperatures of CuFe2O4 on TC degradation; (b) Effect of different catalysts on TC degradation. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L (CuO dose = 0.2 g/L and Fe2O3 dose = 0.2 g/L).
Processes 11 01638 g006
Figure 7. The effect of initial pH on TC degradation in CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Figure 7. The effect of initial pH on TC degradation in CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Processes 11 01638 g007
Figure 8. (a) The pHpazc of CuFe2O4, (b)The chemical structure of tetracycline.
Figure 8. (a) The pHpazc of CuFe2O4, (b)The chemical structure of tetracycline.
Processes 11 01638 g008
Figure 9. The stability and reusability of CuFe2O4. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Figure 9. The stability and reusability of CuFe2O4. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Processes 11 01638 g009
Figure 10. The effect of different (a) EtOH and (b) TBA, concentration on degradation of TC in CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Figure 10. The effect of different (a) EtOH and (b) TBA, concentration on degradation of TC in CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system. Experimental conditions: [TC]0 = 20 mg/L, pH = 7, [PDS] = 0.7 mM, UV−light power = 30 W and CuFe2O4 dose = 0.2 g/L.
Processes 11 01638 g010
Figure 11. Schematic representation of the possible degradation mechanism of TC in the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system.
Figure 11. Schematic representation of the possible degradation mechanism of TC in the CuFe2O4/UV/PDS system.
Processes 11 01638 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, P.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Cao, Y.; Liu, B. Catalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Coupled UV−Peroxydisulfate System: Efficiency, Stability and Mechanism. Processes 2023, 11, 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061638

AMA Style

Ma P, Shi Y, Zhang J, Zhang W, Cao Y, Liu B. Catalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Coupled UV−Peroxydisulfate System: Efficiency, Stability and Mechanism. Processes. 2023; 11(6):1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Panfeng, Yu Shi, Jingsen Zhang, Weijia Zhang, Yong Cao, and Bingtao Liu. 2023. "Catalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Coupled UV−Peroxydisulfate System: Efficiency, Stability and Mechanism" Processes 11, no. 6: 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061638

APA Style

Ma, P., Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Cao, Y., & Liu, B. (2023). Catalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Coupled UV−Peroxydisulfate System: Efficiency, Stability and Mechanism. Processes, 11(6), 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop